Can Creativity and Cognitive Reserve Predict Psychological Well-Being in Older Adults? The Role of Divergent Thinking in Healthy Aging
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Psychological Well-Being in Aging
1.2. Correlated Variables
1.2.1. Cognitive Reserve
1.2.2. Divergent Thinking and Its Relationship with Cognitive Reserve
1.3. Aims and Hypotheses
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants, Study Design, and Procedure
2.2. Materials
2.2.1. Psychological Well-Being
2.2.2. Cognitive Reserve
2.2.3. Divergent Thinking
3. Data Analyses
4. Results
4.1. Divergent Thinking and Cognitive Reserve
4.2. Cognitive Reserve and Well-Being
4.3. Divergent Thinking and Well-Being
5. Discussion
5.1. The Effect of Age Progression
5.2. Divergent Thinking and Cognitive Reserve: What Is New?
5.3. Cognitive Reserve and Well-Being
5.4. Divergent Thinking and Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Reserve
5.5. Strengths and Limitations
6. Conclusions
7. Implications and Future Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cantarella, A.; Borella, E.; Marigo, C.; De Beni, R. Benefits of well-being training in healthy older adults. Appl. Psychol. Health Well-Being 2017, 9, 261–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pison, G. Atlas de la Population Mondiale; Autrement: Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, E.S.; Delaney, S.W.; Kubzansky, L.D. Sense of purpose in life and cardiovascular disease: Underlying mechanisms and future directions. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2019, 21, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, E.S.; James, P.; Zevon, E.S.; Trudel-Fitzgerald, C.; Kubzansky, L.D.; Grodstein, F. Optimism and healthy aging in women and men. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2019, 188, 1084–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kubzansky, L.D.; Huffman, J.C.; Boehm, J.K.; Hernandez, R.; Kim, E.S.; Koga, H.K.; Feig, E.; Lloyd-Jones, D.; Seligman, M.E.P.; Labarthe, D. Positive psychological well-being and cardiovascular health promotion. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 72, 1382–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ryff, C.D. Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychother. Psychosom. 2014, 83, 10–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Steptoe, A. Happiness and health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2019, 40, 339–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lara, E.; Martín-María, N.; De la Torre-Luque, A.; Koyanagi, A.; Vancampfort, D.; Izquierdo, A.; Miret, M. Does loneliness contribute to mild cognitive impairment and dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Ageing Res. Rev. 2019, 52, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Union. Analytical report on subjective well-being, 2016. In Understanding Subjective Well-Being. For Good Measure: Advancing Research on Well-Being Metrics beyond GDP; Stone, A.A., Krueger, A.B., Stiglitz, J.E., Fitoussi, J.P., Durand, M., Eds.; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2018; pp. 163–201. [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization. 2014. Available online: www.who.int/features/factfiles/mental_health/e (accessed on 15 November 2023).
- Ryff, C.D.; Keyes, C.L.M. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1995, 69, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001, 52, 141–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahneman, D.; Diener, E.; Schwarz, N. (Eds.) Well-Being: Foundations of Hedonic Psychology; Russell Sage Foundation: St. Manhattan, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Park, D.C. Aging, cognition, and culture: A neuroscientific perspective. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2002, 26, 859–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Opitz, P.C.; Gross, J.J.; Urry, H.L. Selection, optimization, and compensation in the domain of emotion regulation: Applications to adolescence, older age, and major depressive disorder. Soc. Personal. Psichol. Compass 2012, 6, 142–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scheibe, S. Predicting real-world behaviour: Cognition-emotion links across adulthood and everyday functioning at work. Cogn. Emot. 2018, 33, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reed, A.E.; Carstensen, L.L. The theory behind the age-related positivity effect. Front. Psychol. 2012, 3, 30180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tomaszczyk, J.C.; Fernandes, M.A. A positivity effect in older adults’ memorability judgments of pictures. Exp. Aging Res. 2013, 39, 254–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Charles, S.T. Strength and vulnerability integration: A model of emotional well-being across adulthood. Psychol. Bull. 2010, 136, 1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scheibe, S.; Carstensen, L.L. Emotional aging: Recent findings and future trends. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2010, 65B, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steptoe, A.; Deaton, A.; Stone, A.A. Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. Lancet 2015, 385, 640–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fusi, G.; Palmiero, M.; Lavolpe, S.; Colautti, L.; Crepaldi, M.; Antonietti, A.; Di Domenico, A.; Colombo, B.; Di Crosta, A.; La Malva, P.; et al. Aging and Psychological Well-Being: The Possible Role of Inhibition Skills. Healthcare 2022, 10, 1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruini, C.; Ottolini, F.; Rafanelli, C.; Ryff, C.; Fava, G.A. La validazione italiana delle Psychological Well-being Scales (PWB). Riv. Psichiatr. 2003, 38, 117–130. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, E.S.; Tkatch, R.; Martin, D.; MacLeod, S.; Sandy, L.; Yeh, C. Resilient aging: Psychological well-being and social well-being as targets for the promotion of healthy aging. Gerontol. Geriatr. Med. 2021, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Beni, R.; Borella, E.; Carretti, B.; Marigo, C.; Nava, L. BAC. Benessere e Abilità Cognitive nell’età adulta e avanzata; Giunti: Firenze, Italy, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Nyberg, L.; Boraxbekk, C.J.; Sörman, D.E.; Hansson, P.; Herlitz, A.; Kauppi, K.; Ljunberg, J.K.; Lövheim, H.; Anders Lundquist, A.; Annelie Nordin Adolfsson; et al. Biological and environmental predictors of heterogeneity in neurocognitive ageing: Evidence from Betula and other longitudinal studies. Ageing Res. Rev. 2020, 64, 101184. [Google Scholar]
- Fastame, M.C.; Hitchcott, P.K.; Penna, M.P. The impact of leisure on mental health of Sardinian elderly from the ‘blue zone’: Evidence for ageing well. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2018, 30, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Friedman, E.M.; Hayney, M.S.; Love, G.D.; Urry, H.L.; Rosenkranz, M.A.; Davidson, R.J.; Singer, B.H.; Ryff, C.D. Social relationships, sleep quality, and interleukin-6 in aging women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 18757–18762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jebb, A.T.; Morrison, M.; Tay, L.; Diener, E. Subjective well-being around the world: Trends and predictors across the life span. Psychol. Sci. 2020, 31, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelis, D.; Kotsou, I.; Quoidbach, J.; Hansenne, M.; Weytens, F.; Dupuis, P.; Mikolajczak, M. Increasing emotional competence improves psychological and physical well-being, social relationships, and employability. Emotion 2011, 11, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turiano, N.A.; Spiro, A., III; Mroczek, D.K. Openness to experience and mortality in men: Analysis of trait and facets. J. Aging Health 2012, 24, 654–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bar-Tur, L. Fostering well-being in the elderly: Translating theories on positive aging to practical approaches. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 517226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allerhand, M.; Gale, C.R.; Deary, I.J. The dynamic relationship between cognitive function and positive well-being in older people: A prospective study using the English Longitudinal Study of Aging. Psychol. Aging 2014, 29, 306–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alfonso-Benlliure, V.; Mayordomo, T.; Sales, A.; Mélendez, J.C. Divergent Thinking in older adults: Understanding its role in well-being. J. Happiness Stud. 2021, 22, 3285–3298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fastame, M.C.; Brandas, B.; Pau, M. Is Cognitive Reserve a Determinant of Functional and Mental Health in Older People of the Sardinian Blue Zone? A Mediational Approach. Psychiatr. Q. 2023, 94, 617–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyberg, L.; Lövdén, M.; Riklund, K.; Lindenberger, U.; Lars Bäckman, L. Memory aging and brain maintenance. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 16, 292–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nyberg, L.; Pudas, S. Successful Memory Aging. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2019, 70, 219–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stern, Y.; Arenaza-Urquijo, E.M.; Bartrés-Faz, D.; Belleville, S.; Cantilon, M.; Chetelat, G.; Ewers, M.; Franzmeier, N.; Kempermann, G.; Kremen, W.S.; et al. Defining and investigating cognitive reserve, brain reserve, and brain maintenance. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2018, 16, 1305–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stern, Y. What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2002, 8, 448–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tucker, A.M.; Stern, Y. Cognitive reserve in aging. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2011, 8, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nucci, M.; Mapelli, D.; Mondini, S. Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire (CRIq): A new instrument for measuring cognitive reserve. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2012, 24, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Koffer, R.E.; Sprague, B.N.; Charles, S.T.; Ram, N.; Almeida, D.M. Activity diversity and its associations with psychological well-being across adulthood. J. Gerontol. B Psichol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2018, 73, 985–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Musick, M.A.; Wilson, J. Volunteering and depression: The role of psychological and social resources in different age groups. Soc. Sci. Med. 2003, 56, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabeza, R.; Albert, M.; Belleville, S.; Craik, F.I.; Duarte, A.; Grady, C.L.; Lindenberger, U.; Nyberg, L.; Park, D.C.; Reuter-Lorenz, P.A.; et al. Maintenance, reserve and compensation: The cognitive neuroscience of healthy ageing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2018, 19, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Opdebeeck, C.; Martyr, A.; Clare, L. Cognitive reserve and cognitive function in healthy older people: A meta-analysis. Aging, Neuropsychol. Cogn. 2016, 23, 40–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barulli, D.; Stern, Y. Efficiency, capacity, compensation, maintenance, plasticity: Emerging concepts in cognitive reserve. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2013, 17, 502–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toh, W.X.; Yang, H.; Hartanto, A. Executive function and subjective well-being in middle and late adulthood. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2020, 75, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lara, E.; Koyanagi, A.; Caballero, F.; Domènech-Abella, J.; Miret, M.; Olaya, B.; Rico-Uribe, L.; Ayuso-Mateos, J.L.; Haro, J.M. Cognitive reserve is associated with quality of life: A population-based study. Exp. Gerontol. 2017, 87, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pettigrew, C.; Soldan, A. Defining cognitive reserve and implications for cognitive aging. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2019, 19, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Opdebeeck, C.; Nelis, S.M.; Quinn, C.; Clare, L. How does cognitive reserve impact on the relationships between mood, rumination, and cognitive function in later life? Aging Ment. Health 2015, 19, 705–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Opdebeeck, C.; Matthews, F.E.; Wu, Y.T.; Woods, R.T.; Brayne, C.; Clare, L. Cognitive reserve as a moderator of the negative association between mood and cognition: Evidence from a population-representative cohort. Psychol. Med. 2018, 48, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Palmiero, M.; Fusi, G.; Crepaldi, M.; Borsa, V.M.; Rusconi, M.L. Divergent thinking and the core executive functions: A state-of-the-art review. Cogn. Process. 2022, 23, 341–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guilford, J.P. Three faces of intellect. Am. Psychol. 1959, 14, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guilford, J.P. The Nature of Human Intelligence, 1st ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1967. [Google Scholar]
- Runco, M.A.; Acar, S. Divergent Thinking as An Indicator of Creative Potential. Creat. Res. J. 2012, 24, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.H. Meta-analyses of the relationship of creative achievement to both IQ and divergent thinking test scores. J. Creat. Behav. 2018, 42, 106–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fusi, G.; Lavolpe, S.; Crepaldi, M.; Rusconi, M.L. The controversial effect of age on divergent thinking abilities: A systematic review. J. Creat. Behav. 2021, 55, 374–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmiero, M.; Nori, R.; Piccardi, L. Verbal and visual divergent thinking in aging. Exp. Brain Res. 2017, 235, 1021–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colautti, L.; Borsa, V.M.; Fusi, G.; Crepaldi, M.; Palmiero, M.; Garau, F.; Bonfiglio, N.F.; Gianni, J.; Rusconi, M.L.; Penna, M.P.; et al. The Role of Cognition in Divergent Thinking: Implications for Successful Aging. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flood, M.; Phillips, K.D. Creativity in older adults: A plethora of possibilities. Issues Ment. Health Nurse 2007, 28, 389–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Price, K.A.; Tinker, A.M. Creativity in later life. Maturitas 2014, 78, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antonietti, A.; Colombo, B.; Pizzingrilli, P. The WCR model of creativity. From concept to application. Open J. Educ. 2011, 4, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colombo, B.; Antonietti, A.; Daneau, B. The relationships between cognitive reserve and creativity. A study on American aging population. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmiero, M.; Di Giacomo, D.; Passafiume, D. Can creativity predict cognitive reserve? J. Creat. Behav. 2016, 50, 7–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magni, E.; Binetti, G.; Bianchetti, A.; Rozzini, R.; Trabucchi, M. Mini-Mental State Examination: A normative study in Italian elderly population. Eur. Neurol. 1996, 3, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ryff, C.D. Psychological well-being in adult life. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 1984, 4, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sprini, G.; Tomasello, S. Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking; Giunti: Firenze, Italy, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Torrance, E.P. Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-Technical Manual Figural (Streamlined) Forms A and B; Scholastic Testing Service: Bensenville, IL, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- West, S.G.; Finch, J.F.; Curran, P.J. Structural Equation Models with Nonnormal Variables: Problems and Remedies. In Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, 1st ed.; Hoyle, R.H., Ed.; Sage Publications, Inc.: Szeng de Oakes, CA, USA, 1995; pp. 56–75. [Google Scholar]
- Kline, R.B. Methodology in the Social Sciences: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th ed.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Stern, Y. Cognitive reserve. Neuropsychology 2009, 47, 2015–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stern, Y. Cognitive Reserve: Theory and Applications; Taylor & Francis: Oxfordshire, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Amanollahi, M.; Amanollahi, S.; Anjomshoa, A.; Dolatshahi, M. Mitigating the negative impacts of aging on cognitive function; modifiable factors associated with increasing cognitive reserve. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2021, 53, 3109–3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.Y.; Kang, J.M.; Kim, D.J.; Woo, S.K.; Lee, J.Y.; Cho, S.J. Cognitive reserve, leisure activity, and neuropsychological profile in the early stage of cognitive decline. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2020, 12, 590607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ihle, A.; Oris, M.; Sauter, J.; Rimmele, U.; Kliegel, M. Cognitive reserve and social capital accrued in early and midlife moderate the relation of psychological stress to cognitive performance in old age. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 2018, 45, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ihle, A.; Rimmele, U.; Oris, M.; Maurer, J.; Kliegel, M. The longitudinal relationship of perceived stress predicting subsequent decline in executive functioning in old age is attenuated in individuals with greater cognitive reserve. Gerontology 2020, 66, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hui, A.N.; He, M.W.; Wong, W.C. Understanding the Development of Creativity across the Life Span. In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 69–87. [Google Scholar]
- Whalley, L.J.; Deary, I.J.; Appleton, C.L.; Starr, J.M. Cognitive reserve and the neurobiology of cognitive aging. Ageing Res. Rev. 2004, 3, 369–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colangeli, S.; Boccia, M.; Verde, P.; Guariglia, P.; Bianchini, F.; Piccardi, L. Cognitive reserve in healthy aging and Alzheimer’s disease: A meta-analysis of fMRI studies. Am. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. Other Demen 2016, 31, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MacPherson, S.E.; Healy, C.; Allerhand, M.; Spanò, B.; Tudor-Sfetea, C.; White, M.; Smirni, D.; Shallice, T.; Chan, E.; Bozzali, M. Cognitive reserve and cognitive performance of patients with focal frontal lesions. Neuropsychologia 2017, 96, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santangelo, G.; Altieri, M.; Enzinger, C.; Gallo, A.; Trojano, L. Cognitive reserve and neuropsychological performance in multiple sclerosis: A meta-analysis. Neuropsychology 2019, 33, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abraham, A. Creative thinking as orchestrated by semantic processing vs. cognitive control brain networks. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beaty, R.E.; Benedek, M.; Barry Kaufman, S.; Silvia, P.J. Default and executive network coupling supports creative idea production. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beaty, R.E.; Zeitlen, D.C.; Baker, B.S.; Kenett, Y.N. Forward flow and creative thought: Assessing associative cognition and its role in divergent thinking. Think. Ski. Creat. 2021, 41, 100859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benedek, M.; Jauk, E.; Sommer, M.; Arendasy, M.; Neubauer, A.C. Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence 2014, 46, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kenett, Y.N. Investigating creativity from a semantic network perspective. In Exploring Transdisciplinarity in Art and Sciences; Kapoula, Z., Volle, E., Renoult, J., Andreatta, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 49–75. [Google Scholar]
- Zabelina, D.L.; Friedman, N.P.; Andrews-Hanna, J. Unity and diversity of executive functions in creativity. Conscious. Cogn. 2019, 68, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, K.; Zeitlen, D.C.; Beaty, R.E.; Vatansever, D.; Chen, Q.; Qiu, J. Diverse functional interaction driven by control-default network hubs supports creative thinking. Cereb. Cortex 2023, 33, 11206–11224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Zhu, H.; Huang, L.; Chen, H.; Liu, R.; Qin, R.; Shao, P.; Xu, H.; Ma, J.; Cheng, Y. The flexibility of cognitive reserve in regulating the frontoparietal control network and cognitive function in subjects with white matter hyperintensities. Behav. Brain Res. 2022, 425, 113831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varela-López, B.; Cruz-Gómez, Á.J.; Lojo-Seoane, C.; Díaz, F.; Pereiro, A.X.; Zurrón, M.; Lindín, M.; Galdo-Álvarez, S. Cognitive reserve, neurocognitive performance, and high-order resting-state networks in cognitively unimpaired aging. Neurobiol. Aging 2022, 117, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mean | SD | t | p | d | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEN_tot | sample | 112.62 | 15.10 | 0.90 | 0.368 | - |
male | 111.37 | 15.96 | ||||
female | 113.85 | 14.23 | ||||
BEN_PS | sample | 33.73 | 5.85 | 1.08 | 0.284 | - |
male | 33.15 | 5.75 | ||||
female | 34.30 | 5.95 | ||||
BEN_EC | sample | 30.88 | 5.04 | 1.40 | 0.165 | - |
male | 30.23 | 5.45 | ||||
female | 31.51 | 4.55 | ||||
BEN_CS | sample | 26.39 | 4.38 | −0.65 | 0.517 | - |
male | 26.65 | 4.40 | ||||
female | 26.13 | 4.38 | ||||
CRIq_tot | sample | 114.82 | 20.52 | −1.10 | 0.274 | - |
male | 116.88 | 20.66 | ||||
female | 112.79 | 20.33 | ||||
CRIq_S | sample | 108.99 | 14.81 | −2.19 | 0.031 * | −0.40 |
male | 111.92 | 14.23 | ||||
female | 106.11 | 14.92 | ||||
CRIq_W | sample | 104.33 | 20.66 | −2.15 | 0.034 * | −0.39 |
male | 108.33 | 19.37 | ||||
female | 100.39 | 21.28 | ||||
CRIq_LA | sample | 120.53 | 24.69 | 0.80 | 0.425 | - |
male | 118.72 | 24.90 | ||||
female | 122.31 | 24.55 | ||||
Lines_Flu | sample | 9.72 | 5.66 | −1.25 | 0.213 | - |
male | 10.37 | 5.59 | ||||
female | 9.08 | 5.70 | ||||
Lines_Flex | sample | 7.17 | 3.95 | −0.97 | 0.334 | - |
male | 7.52 | 3.90 | ||||
female | 6.82 | 3.99 | ||||
Lines_Orig | sample | 12.63 | 8.98 | −0.67 | 0.502 | - |
male | 13.18 | 9.05 | ||||
female | 12.08 | 8.96 | ||||
AUT_Flu | sample | 6.98 | 3.61 | −0.45 | 0.651 | - |
male | 7.13 | 3.75 | ||||
female | 6.83 | 3.50 | ||||
AUT_Flex | sample | 5.05 | 2.56 | −0.92 | 0.357 | - |
male | 5.27 | 2.85 | ||||
female | 4.84 | 2.24 | ||||
AUT_Orig | sample | 4.18 | 3.20 | −0.34 | 0.731 | - |
male | 4.28 | 3.44 | ||||
female | 4.08 | 2.97 | ||||
Lines_M | sample | 0 | 0.97 | −1.00 | 0.321 | - |
male | 0.09 | −0.09 | ||||
female | −0.09 | −0.25 | ||||
AUT_M | sample | 0.01 | 0.92 | −0.53 | 0.596 | - |
male | 0.05 | −0.04 | ||||
female | −0.04 | −0.04 |
Age | ||
---|---|---|
Lines_Flu | r | −0.36 *** |
p-value | <0.001 | |
Lines_Flex | r | −0.33 *** |
p-value | <0.001 | |
Lines_Orig | r | −0.30 *** |
p-value | <0.001 | |
Lines_M | r | −0.34 *** |
p-value | <0.001 | |
AUT_Flu | r | −0.15 |
p-value | 0.098 | |
AUT_Flex | r | −0.17 |
p-value | 0.067 | |
AUT_Orig | r | −0.22 * |
p-value | 0.017 | |
AUT_M | r | −0.18 * |
p-value | 0.044 | |
CRIq_S | r | −0.16 |
p-value | 0.081 | |
CRIq_W | r | −0.39 *** |
p-value | <0.001 | |
CRIq_LA | r | −0.22 * |
p-value | 0.018 | |
CRIq_tot | r | −0.34 *** |
p-value | <0.001 | |
BEN_PS | r | 0.04 |
p-value | 0.625 | |
BEN_EC | r | −0.23 ** |
p-value | 0.010 | |
BEN_CS | r | −0.20 * |
p-value | 0.027 | |
BEN_tot | r | −0.13 |
p-value | 0.145 |
BEN_tot | BEN_PS | BEN_EC | BEN_CS | CRIq_S | CRIq_W | CRIq_LA | CRIq_tot | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRIq_S | r | 0.02 | −0.12 | 0.16 | 0.00 | — | |||
p | 0.797 | 0.206 | 0.081 | 0.978 | — | ||||
CRIq_W | r | 0.26 ** | 0.12 | 0.29 ** | 0.27 ** | 0.41 *** | — | ||
p | 0.005 | 0.195 | 0.001 | 0.003 | <0.001 | — | |||
CRIq_LA | r | 0.13 | −0.00 | 0.28 ** | 0.06 | 0.54 *** | 0.25 ** | — | |
p | 0.150 | 0.967 | 0.002 | 0.525 | <0.001 | 0.006 | — | ||
CRIq_tot | r | 0.20 * | 0.02 | 0.34 *** | 0.16 | 0.78 *** | 0.70 *** | 0.82 *** | — |
p | 0.025 | 0.808 | <0.001 | 0.082 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | — | |
Lines_Flu | r | 0.11 | −0.02 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.28 ** | 0.32 *** | 0.30 *** | 0.40 *** |
p | 0.239 | 0.854 | 0.075 | 0.545 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
Lines_Flex | r | 0.11 | −0.03 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.25 ** | 0.35 *** | 0.26 ** | 0.38 *** |
p | 0.232 | 0.773 | 0.072 | 0.632 | 0.006 | <0.001 | 0.004 | <0.001 | |
Lines_Orig | r | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.18 * | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.28 ** | 0.20 * | 0.27 ** |
p | 0.190 | 0.960 | 0.046 | 0.622 | 0.194 | 0.002 | 0.029 | 0.002 | |
Lines_M | r | 0.12 | −0.01 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.23 * | 0.33 *** | 0.26 ** | 0.36 *** |
p | 0.205 | 0.884 | 0.055 | 0.587 | 0.013 | <0.001 | 0.004 | <0.001 | |
AUT_Flu | r | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.09 | −0.04 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.28 ** | 0.23 * |
p | 0.540 | 0.662 | 0.339 | 0.626 | 0.463 | 0.290 | 0.002 | 0.013 | |
AUT_Flex | r | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.05 | −0.04 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.20 * | 0.17 |
p | 0.349 | 0.265 | 0.589 | 0.648 | 0.603 | 0.391 | 0.031 | 0.061 | |
AUT_Orig | r | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.11 | −0.01 | −0.00 | 0.08 | 0.21 * | 0.16 |
p | 0.287 | 0.242 | 0.211 | 0.899 | 0.959 | 0.356 | 0.021 | 0.081 | |
AUT_M | r | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.09 | −0.05 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.25 ** | 0.20 * |
p | 0.387 | 0.370 | 0.317 | 0.595 | 0.611 | 0.376 | 0.005 | 0.029 | |
DT_tot | r | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.25 ** | 0.31 *** | 0.34 *** |
p | 0.203 | 0.673 | 0.080 | 0.987 | 0.070 | 0.006 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
DV = BEN_tot | |||||
Model | R | R2 | Adjusted R2 | F | p |
1 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 2.15 | 0.145 |
2 | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 2.88 | 0.026 * |
Model comparison | R2 change | F change | p | ||
1–2 | 0.07 | 3.08 | 0.030 * | ||
Model coefficients | |||||
Model | Variables | β | t | p | |
1 | age | −0.13 | −1.47 | 0.145 | |
2 | age | −0.02 | −0.19 | 0.850 | |
CRIq_S | −0.18 | −1.57 | 0.119 | ||
CRIq_W | 0.28 | 2.71 | 0.008 ** | ||
CRIq_LA | 0.15 | 1.43 | 0.157 | ||
DV = BEN_PS | |||||
Model | R | R2 | adjusted R2 | F | p |
1 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.625 |
2 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 1.93 | 0.111 |
Model comparison | R2 change | F change | p | ||
1–2 | 0.06 | 2.48 | 0.064 | ||
Model coefficients | |||||
Model | Variables | β | t | p | |
1 | age | 0.04 | 0.49 | 0.625 | |
2 | age | 1.12 | 1,22 | 0.224 | |
CRIq_S | −0.25 | −2.16 | 0.033 * | ||
CRIq_W | 0.24 | 2.30 | 0.023 * | ||
CRIq_LA | 0.09 | 0.86 | 0.389 | ||
DV= BEN_EC | |||||
Model | R | R2 | adjusted R2 | F | p |
1 | 0.23 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 6.93 | 0.010 * |
2 | 0.38 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 4.76 | 0.001 ** |
Model comparison | R2 change | F change | p | ||
1–2 | 0.09 | 3.87 | 0.011 | ||
Model coefficients | |||||
Model | Variables | β | t | p | |
1 | age | −0.23 | −2.63 | 0.010 * | |
2 | age | −0.11 | −1.18 | 0.240 | |
CRIq_S | −0.07 | −0.67 | 0.506 | ||
CRIq_W | 0.21 | 2.11 | 0.037 * | ||
CRIq_LA | 0.24 | 2.30 | 0.023 * | ||
DV = BEN_CS | |||||
Model | R | R2 | adjusted R2 | F | p |
1 | 0.20 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 5.03 | 0.027 * |
2 | 0.31 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 3.18 | 0.016 * |
Model comparison | R2 change | F change | p | ||
1–2 | 0.06 | 2.49 | 0.063 | ||
Model coefficients | |||||
Model | Variables | β | t | p | |
1 | age | −0.20 | −2.24 | 0.027 * | |
2 | age | −0.11 | −1.10 | 0.273 | |
CRIq_S | −0.15 | −1.38 | 0.169 | ||
CRIq_W | 0.28 | 2.68 | 0.008 ** | ||
CRIq_LA | 0.05 | 0.46 | 0.647 |
Effect | Estimate | SE | 95% C.I. (a) | β | z | Significance (p-Value) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||||||
Indirect | DT_tot ⇒ CRIq_tot ⇒ BEN_EC | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.045 | 0.07 | 2.16 | 0.031 * |
age ⇒ CRIq_tot ⇒ BEN_EC | −0.06 | 0.03 | −0.11 | −0.00 | −0.07 | −2.08 | 0.038 * | |
Component | age ⇒ CRIq_tot | −0.80 | 0.27 | −1.32 | −0.26 | −0.26 | −2.97 | <0.001 *** |
CRIq_tot ⇒ BEN_EC | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.29 | 3.14 | 0.002 ** | |
DT_tot ⇒ CRIq_tot | 3.31 | 0.98 | 1.40 | 5.25 | 0.25 | 3.37 | <0.001 *** | |
Direct | age ⇒ BEN_EC | −0.10 | 0.07 | −0.24 | 0.04 | −0.13 | −1.41 | 0.158 |
DT_tot ⇒ BEN_EC | 0.07 | 0.32 | −0.57 | 0.70 | 0.02 | 0.21 | 0.831 | |
Total | age ⇒ BEN_EC | −0.16 | 0.08 | −0.31 | −0.01 | −0.21 | −2.04 | 0.041 * |
DT_tot ⇒ BEN_EC | 0.30 | 0.31 | −0.30 | 0.92 | 0.10 | 0.97 | 0.331 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Fusi, G.; Giannì, J.; Borsa, V.M.; Colautti, L.; Crepaldi, M.; Palmiero, M.; Garau, F.; Bonfiglio, S.N.; Cao, Y.; Antonietti, A.; et al. Can Creativity and Cognitive Reserve Predict Psychological Well-Being in Older Adults? The Role of Divergent Thinking in Healthy Aging. Healthcare 2024, 12, 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12030303
Fusi G, Giannì J, Borsa VM, Colautti L, Crepaldi M, Palmiero M, Garau F, Bonfiglio SN, Cao Y, Antonietti A, et al. Can Creativity and Cognitive Reserve Predict Psychological Well-Being in Older Adults? The Role of Divergent Thinking in Healthy Aging. Healthcare. 2024; 12(3):303. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12030303
Chicago/Turabian StyleFusi, Giulia, Jessica Giannì, Virginia Maria Borsa, Laura Colautti, Maura Crepaldi, Massimiliano Palmiero, Francesca Garau, Salvatore Natale Bonfiglio, Ylenia Cao, Alessandro Antonietti, and et al. 2024. "Can Creativity and Cognitive Reserve Predict Psychological Well-Being in Older Adults? The Role of Divergent Thinking in Healthy Aging" Healthcare 12, no. 3: 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12030303
APA StyleFusi, G., Giannì, J., Borsa, V. M., Colautti, L., Crepaldi, M., Palmiero, M., Garau, F., Bonfiglio, S. N., Cao, Y., Antonietti, A., Penna, M. P., Rozzini, L., & Rusconi, M. L. (2024). Can Creativity and Cognitive Reserve Predict Psychological Well-Being in Older Adults? The Role of Divergent Thinking in Healthy Aging. Healthcare, 12(3), 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12030303