Social Media Improves Students’ Academic Performance: Exploring the Role of Social Media Adoption in the Open Learning Environment among International Medical Students in China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- To explore the factors that influence the use of SM platforms among international medical students throughout their studies.
- To explore the effect of SM-based OL that promotes student AP.
- To explore how medical students use SM to maintain their ENG with peers and their performance.
2. Literature Review
3. Research Model and Hypotheses
3.1. Perceived Usefulness
3.2. Perceived Ease of Use
3.3. Interact with Peers
3.4. Open Learning
3.5. Engagement
3.6. Academic Performance
4. Methodology
4.1. Constructs Development and Pilot Study
4.2. Formal Survey
4.3. Descriptive Analysis
4.4. Common Method Variance
5. Data Analysis
5.1. Measurement Model
5.2. Structural Model
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions
7.1. Implications
7.2. Future Perspective and Limitations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
References
- Avcı, K.; Çelikden, S.G.; Eren, S.; Aydenizöz, D. Assessment of medical students’ attitudes on social media use in medicine: A cross-sectional study. BMC Med. Educ. 2015, 15, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Statista. Number of Social Network Users Worldwide from 2017 to 2025. Available online: https://www.statista.com/markets/424/topic/540/social-media-user-generated-content/#overview (accessed on 12 September 2021).
- Pekkala, K.; van Zoonen, W. Work-related social media use: The mediating role of social media communication self-efficacy. Eur. Manag. J. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutherland, S.; Jalali, A. Social media as an open-learning resource in medical education: Current perspectives. Adv. Med. Educ. Pract. 2017, 8, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fox, S. Peer-to-Peer Healthcare. Pew Internet & American Life Project. 2011. Available online: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/P2PHealthcare.aspx (accessed on 16 September 2021).
- Mansfield, S.J.; Morrison, S.G.; Stephens, H.O.; Bonning, M.A.; Wang, S.; Withers, A.H.J.; Olver, R.C.; Perry, A.W. Social media and the medical profession. Med. J. Aust. 2011, 194, 642–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Q.; Peng, W.; Zhang, F.; Hu, R.; Li, Y.; Yan, W. The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 2016, 18, e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Davis, W.M.; Ho, K.; Last, J. Advancing social media in medical education. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2015, 187, 549–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Leonard, P.M.; Vaast, E. Social media and their affordances for organizing: A review and agenda for research. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2017, 11, 150–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wakefield, J.; Frawley, J.K. How does students’ general academic achievement moderate the implications of social networking on specific levels of learning performance? Comput. Educ. 2020, 144, 103694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Rahmi, W.M.; Yahaya, N.; Alamri, M.M.; Aljarboa, N.A.; Kamin, Y.B.; Saud, M.S.B. How Cyber Stalking and Cyber Bullying Affect Students’ Open Learning. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 20199–20210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bylieva, D.; Bekirogullari, Z.; Kuznetsov, D.; Almazova, N.; Lobatyuk, V.; Rubtsova, A. Online Group Student Peer-Communication as an Element of Open Education. Future Internet 2020, 12, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.N.; Ashraf, M.A.; Seinen, D.; Khan, K.U.; Laar, R.A. Social Media for Knowledge Acquisition and Dissemination: The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Collaborative Learning Driven Social Media Adoption. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 648253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ertmer, P.A.; Newby, T.J.; Liu, W.; Tomory, A.; Yu, J.H.; Lee, Y.M. Students’ confidence and perceived value for participating in cross-cultural wiki-based collaborations. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 2011, 59, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meishar-Tal, H.; Kurtz, G.; Pieterse, E. Facebook groups as LMS: A case study. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 2012, 13, 33–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Al-Maatouk, Q.; Othman, M.S.; Aldraiweesh, A.; Alturki, U.; Al-Rahmi, W.M.; Aljeraiwi, A.A. Task-Technology Fit and Technology Acceptance Model Application to Structure and Evaluate the Adoption of Social Media in Academia. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 78427–78440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, M.; Jiang, J. Teens, social media & technology. Pew Res. Cent. 2018, 31, 1673–1689. [Google Scholar]
- Krasilnikov, A.; Smirnova, A. Online social adaptation of first-year students and their academic performance. Comput. Educ. 2017, 113, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alenazy, W.M.; Al-Rahmi, W.M.; Khan, M.S. Validation of TAM Model on Social Media Use for Collaborative Learning to Enhance Collaborative Authoring. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 71550–71562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryane, I.; El Faddouli, N.-E. A Case Study of Using Edmodo to Enhance Computer Science Learning for Engineering Students. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2020, 15, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Al-Rahmi, W.M.; Yahaya, N.; Alturki, U.; Alrobai, A.; Aldraiweesh, A.A.; Alsayed, A.O.; Kamin, Y.B. Social media—Based collaborative learning: The effect on learning success with the moderating role of cyberstalking and cyberbullying. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2020, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasheed, M.I.; Malik, M.J.; Pitafi, A.H.; Iqbal, J.; Anser, M.K.; Abbas, M. Usage of social media, student engagement, and creativity: The role of knowledge sharing behavior and cyberbullying. Comput. Educ. 2020, 159, 104002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vygotsky, L.S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; London, UK, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Davis, F.D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 1989, 13, 319–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chukwuere, J.E.; Chukwuere, P.C. The Impact of Social Media on Social Lifestyle: A Case Study of University Female Students. Gend. Behav. 2017, 15, 9966–9981. [Google Scholar]
- Terzi, B.; Bulut, S.; Kaya, N. Factors affecting nursing and midwifery students’ attitudes toward social media. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2019, 35, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, T.T.; Karatepe, O.M.; Lee, G.; Demiral, H. Do Gender and Prior Experience Moderate the Factors Influencing Attitude toward Using Social Media for Festival Attendance? Sustainability 2018, 10, 3509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brinkman, C.S.; Gabriel, S.; Paravati, E. Social achievement goals and social media. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2020, 111, 106427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stathopoulou, A.; Siamagka, N.-T.; Christodoulides, G. A multi-stakeholder view of social media as a supporting tool in higher education: An educator–student perspective. Eur. Manag. J. 2019, 37, 421–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tulin, M.; Pollet, T.V.; Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. Perceived group cohesion versus actual social structure: A study using social network analysis of egocentric Facebook networks. Soc. Sci. Res. 2018, 74, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansen, D.T. The Teacher and the World: A Study of Cosmopolitanism as Education; Routledge: Milton Park, UK, 2017; ISBN 1136632972. [Google Scholar]
- Penni, J. The future of online social networks (OSN): A measurement analysis using social media tools and application. Telemat. Inform. 2017, 34, 498–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baccarella, C.V.; Wagner, T.F.; Kietzmann, J.; McCarthy, I.P. Social media? It’s serious! Understanding the dark side of social media. Eur. Manag. J. 2018, 36, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, J.K.; Saunders, C.; Wachira, B.W.; Thoma, B.; Chan, T.M. Social media and the modern scientist: A research primer for low- and middle-income countries. Afr. J. Emerg. Med. 2020, 10, S120–S124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salmeron, L.; García, A.; Vidal-Abarca, E. The development of adolescents’ comprehension-based Internet reading activities. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2018, 61, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berkani, L. A semantic and social-based collaborative recommendation of friends in social networks. Softw. Pract. Exp. 2020, 50, 1498–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuse, A.; Lanham, E.A. Impact of social media and quality life of people who stutter. J. Fluen. Disord. 2016, 50, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tess, P.A. The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)—A literature review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2013, 29, A60–A68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, S.; Ramakrishnan, T.; Ngamassi, L. Impact of social media use on student satisfaction in Higher Education. High. Educ. Q. 2020, 74, 304–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richey, M.; Ravishankar, M. The role of frames and cultural toolkits in establishing new connections for social media innovation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 144, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Berezan, O.; Krishen, A.S.; Agarwal, S.; Kachroo, P. The pursuit of virtual happiness: Exploring the social media experience across generations. J. Bus. Res. 2018, 89, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rozgonjuk, D.; Sindermann, C.; Elhai, J.D.; Montag, C. Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) and social media’s impact on daily-life and productivity at work: Do WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat Use Disorders mediate that association? Addict. Behav. 2020, 110, 106487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wodzicki, K.; Schwämmlein, E.; Moskaliuk, J. “Actually, I Wanted to Learn”: Study-related knowledge exchange on social networking sites. Internet High. Educ. 2012, 15, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenhow, C.; Galvin, S.M.; Willet, K.B.S. What Should Be the Role of Social Media in Education? Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 2019, 6, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vlieghe, J.; Vandermeersche, G.; Soetaert, R. Social media in literacy education: Exploring social reading with pre-service teachers. New Media Soc. 2016, 18, 800–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López-Yáñez, I.; Yanez-Marquez, C.; Camacho-Nieto, O.; Aldape-Pérez, M.; Argüelles-Cruz, A.-J. Collaborative learning in postgraduate level courses. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 51, 938–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alwagait, E.; Shahzad, B.; Alim, S. Impact of social media usage on students academic performance in Saudi Arabia. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 51, 1092–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandra, C.P. The adoption of e-auction in Indonesia: The extended technology acceptance model study. iBuss Manag. 2015, 3, 423–433. [Google Scholar]
- Bruner, J. Acts of Meaning; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Gaytan, J. Integrating social media into the learning environment of the classroom: Following social constructivism principles. J. Appl. Res. Bus. Instr. 2013, 11, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Mishra, R.K. Social Constructivism and Teaching of Social Science. J. Soc. Stud. Educ. Res. 2014, 5, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slavin, R.E. Cooperative learning and intergroup relations. In Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education; Banks, J.A., Banks, C.A.M., Eds.; Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 628–634. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, J.S.; Collins, A.; Duguid, P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ. Res. 1989, 18, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharjee, J. Constructivist approach to learning—An effective approach of teaching learning. Int. Res. J. Interdiscip. Multidiscip. Stud. 2015, 1, 23–28. [Google Scholar]
- Stabile, C.; Ershler, J. (Eds.) Constructivism Reconsidered in the Age of Social Media: New Directions for Teaching and Learning; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Kelm, O.R. Social media: It’s what students do. Bus. Commun. Q. 2011, 74, 505–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Churcher, K. “Friending” Vygotsky: A Social Constructivist Pedagogy of Knowledge Building through Classroom Social Media Use. J. Eff. Teach. 2014, 14, 33–50. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, M.J.W.; McLoughlin, C. Web 2.0-Based E-Learning: Applying Social Informatics for Tertiary Teaching: Applying Social Informatics for Tertiary Teaching; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2010; ISBN 160566295X. [Google Scholar]
- McLoughlin, C.; Lee, M.J.W. Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 2010, 26, 28–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Golub, J. Focus on Collaborative Learning; National Council of Teachers of English: Urbana, IL, USA, 1988; ISBN 0814117538. [Google Scholar]
- Min, G.; Yan, X.; Yuecheng, Y. An Enhanced Technology Acceptance Model for Web-Based Learning. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 2004, 15, 365–374. [Google Scholar]
- Teo, T.; Zhou, M. Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: A structural equation modeling approach. J. Comput. High. Educ. 2014, 26, 124–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, F.; Ward, R.; Ahmed, E. Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 63, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cain, J. Online Social Networking Issues within Academia and Pharmacy Education. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2008, 72, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ansari, J.A.N.; Khan, N.A. Exploring the role of social media in collaborative learning the new domain of learning. Smart Learn. Environ. 2020, 7, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Patera, M.; Draper, S.; Naef, M. ExploringMagic Cottage: A virtual reality environment for stimulating children’s imaginative writing. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2008, 16, 245–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hurt, N.E.; Moss, G.; Bradley, C.; Larson, L.; Lovelace, M.; Prevost, L.; Riley, N.; Domizi, D.; Camus, M. The ‘Facebook’ Effect: College Students’ Perceptions of Online Discussions in the Age of Social Networking. Int. J. Sch. Teach. Learn. 2012, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alamri, M.; Almaiah, M.; Al-Rahmi, W. Social Media Applications Affecting Students’ Academic Performance: A Model Developed for Sustainability in Higher Education. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenhow, C.; Gleason, B. Twitteracy: Tweeting as a New Literacy Practice. Educ. Forum 2012, 76, 464–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dumford, A.D.; Miller, A.L. Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. J. Comput. High. Educ. 2018, 30, 452–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balakrishnan, V.; Gan, C.L. Students’ learning styles and their effects on the use of social media technology for learning. Telemat. Inform. 2016, 33, 808–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasiah, R.R.V. Transformative Higher Education Teaching and Learning: Using Social Media in a Team-based Learning Environment. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 123, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jacobsen, W.C.; Forste, R. The Wired Generation: Academic and Social Outcomes of Electronic Media Use Among University Students. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2011, 14, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Junco, R.; Heiberger, G.; Loken, E. The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 2011, 27, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baird, D.E.; Fisher, M. Neomillennial User Experience Design Strategies: Utilizing Social Networking Media to Support “Always on” Learning Styles. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 2005, 34, 5–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, D.; Sinanan, J.; Wang, X.; McDonald, T.; Haynes, N.; Costa, E.; Spyer, J.; Venkatraman, S.; Nicolescu, R. How the World Changed Social Media; Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Statista. Social Networks in China-Statistics & Facts. Available online: https://www.statista.com/topics/1170/social-networks-in-china (accessed on 16 September 2021).
- Bhattacherjee, A. Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices. In Global Text Project; University of South Florida: Tampa, FL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Dutot, V.; Bhatiasevi, V.; Bellallahom, N. Applying the technology acceptance model in a three-countries study of smartwatch adoption. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 2019, 30, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kavota, J.K.; Kamdjoug, J.R.K.; Wamba, S.F. Social media and disaster management: Case of the north and south Kivu regions in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 52, 102068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Rahmi, W.M.; Alias, N.; Othman, M.S.; Marin, V.I.; Tur, G. A model of factors affecting learning performance through the use of social media in Malaysian higher education. Comput. Educ. 2018, 121, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Podsakoff, N.P. Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2012, 63, 539–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hair, J.; Hollingsworth, C.L.; Randolph, A.B.; Chong, A.Y.L. An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2017, 117, 442–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Sarstedt, M.; Hopkins, L.; Kuppelwieser, V.G. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2014, 26, 106–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Becker, J.-M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M.; Völckner, F. How collinearity affects mixture regression results. Mark. Lett. 2015, 26, 643–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mason, C.H.; Perreault, W.D. Collinearity, Power, and Interpretation of Multiple Regression Analysis. J. Mark. Res. 1991, 28, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.; Sarstedt, M.; Hult, G.T.M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM); Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associate: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 2013; ISBN 08058028395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ringle, C.M.; Wende, S.; Becker, J. SmartPLS 3; SmartPLS: Boenningstedt, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Rauniar, R.; Rawski, G.; Yang, J.; Johnson, B. Technology acceptance model (TAM) and social media usage: An empirical study on Facebook. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2014, 27, 6–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alamri, M.M. Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions toward Social Media Usage and Academic Performance: A Study from Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2019, 14, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Depietro, P. Social media and collaborative learning. Counterpoints 2013, 435, 47–62. [Google Scholar]
- Tarantino, K.; McDonough, J.; Hua, M. Effects of Student Engagement with Social Media on Student Learning: A Review of Literature. J. Technol. Student Aff. 2013, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Hea, A.C.K. Social Media in Technical Communication. Tech. Commun. Q. 2013, 23, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaufer, D.; Gunawardena, A.; Tan, A.; Cheek, A. Bringing Social Media to the Writing Classroom: Classroom Salon. J. Bus. Tech. Commun. 2011, 25, 299–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Longo, B. Using Social Media for Collective Knowledge-Making: Technical Communication Between the Global North and South. Tech. Commun. Q. 2014, 23, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Items | Percentage | |
---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 55.4 |
Female | 44.6 | |
Education | Under Graduate | 69.95 |
Masters | 21.03 | |
Doctoral | 9.01 | |
Social Media Use Frequency for Educational Purposes | 2 h | 10.1 |
Almost 3 h | 15.5 | |
Almost 5 h | 27.9 | |
More than 5 h | 46.5 | |
Pakistan | 38.19 | |
Bangladesh | 16.73 | |
International Medical Student Home Country | India | 24.2 |
Malaysia | 11.58 | |
Afghanistan | 9.3 |
Constructs | PU | PEU | IP | OL | ENG | AP | Cronbach’s a | rho_A | CR | AVE | VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PU | 0.878 | 0.883 | 0.916 | 0.732 | |||||||
PU1 | 0.817 | 1.806 | |||||||||
PU2 | 0.836 | 2.184 | |||||||||
PU3 | 0.867 | 2.491 | |||||||||
PU4 | 0.901 | 2.836 | |||||||||
PEU | 0.833 | 0.865 | 0.892 | 0.680 | |||||||
PEU1 | 0.832 | 1.232 | |||||||||
PEU2 | 0.904 | 3.004 | |||||||||
PEU3 | 0.873 | 2.524 | |||||||||
PEU4 | 0.897 | 3.532 | |||||||||
IP | 0.871 | 0.876 | 0.912 | 0.722 | |||||||
IP1 | 0.848 | 2.096 | |||||||||
IP2 | 0.801 | 1.847 | |||||||||
IP3 | 0.902 | 2.963 | |||||||||
IP4 | 0.847 | 2.184 | |||||||||
OL | 0.896 | 0.896 | 0.928 | 0.762 | |||||||
OL1 | 0.829 | 2.017 | |||||||||
OL2 | 0.881 | 2.810 | |||||||||
OL3 | 0.887 | 2.662 | |||||||||
OL4 | 0.894 | 3.008 | |||||||||
ENG | 0.888 | 0.889 | 0.922 | 0.748 | |||||||
ENG1 | 0.854 | 2.438 | |||||||||
ENG2 | 0.870 | 2.632 | |||||||||
ENG3 | 0.882 | 2.626 | |||||||||
ENG4 | 0.853 | 2.364 | |||||||||
AP | 0.900 | 0.903 | 0.930 | 0.770 | |||||||
AP1 | 0.859 | 2.245 | |||||||||
AP2 | 0.899 | 3.060 | |||||||||
AP3 | 0.878 | 2.796 | |||||||||
AP4 | 0.872 | 2.439 |
Constructs | PU | PEU | IP | OL | ENG | AP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PU | 0.855 | 0.867 | 0.845 | 0.883 | 0.886 | 0.773 |
PEU | 0.433 | 0.824 | 0.857 | 0.853 | 0.841 | 0.826 |
IP | 0.521 | 0.607 | 0.849 | 0.873 | 0.821 | 0.786 |
OL | 0.489 | 0.547 | 0.623 | 0.873 | 0.858 | 0.650 |
ENG | 0.333 | 0.631 | 0.573 | 0.577 | 0.864 | 0.814 |
AP | 0.525 | 0.589 | 0.625 | 0.596 | 0.669 | 0.877 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ashraf, M.A.; Khan, M.N.; Chohan, S.R.; Khan, M.; Rafique, W.; Farid, M.F.; Khan, A.U. Social Media Improves Students’ Academic Performance: Exploring the Role of Social Media Adoption in the Open Learning Environment among International Medical Students in China. Healthcare 2021, 9, 1272. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9101272
Ashraf MA, Khan MN, Chohan SR, Khan M, Rafique W, Farid MF, Khan AU. Social Media Improves Students’ Academic Performance: Exploring the Role of Social Media Adoption in the Open Learning Environment among International Medical Students in China. Healthcare. 2021; 9(10):1272. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9101272
Chicago/Turabian StyleAshraf, Muhammad Azeem, Muhammad Naeem Khan, Sohail Raza Chohan, Maqbool Khan, Wajid Rafique, Muhammad Fahad Farid, and Asad Ullah Khan. 2021. "Social Media Improves Students’ Academic Performance: Exploring the Role of Social Media Adoption in the Open Learning Environment among International Medical Students in China" Healthcare 9, no. 10: 1272. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9101272
APA StyleAshraf, M. A., Khan, M. N., Chohan, S. R., Khan, M., Rafique, W., Farid, M. F., & Khan, A. U. (2021). Social Media Improves Students’ Academic Performance: Exploring the Role of Social Media Adoption in the Open Learning Environment among International Medical Students in China. Healthcare, 9(10), 1272. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9101272