Integrating the Public Health Services Model into Age-Friendly Pharmacies: A Case Study on the Pharmacies in Taiwan
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Research Design
2.1. Method
2.2. Questionnaires
2.3. Questionaaire Reliability Analysis
2.3.1. Advocacy Activity Questionnaire
2.3.2. Home Care Questionnaire
2.3.3. Community Care Questionnaire
2.3.4. Institutional Medical Care Questionnaire
3. Results
3.1. Age-Friendly Pharmacies
3.2. Home Medical Care Services
3.3. Community Pharmaceutical Services
3.4. Institutional Medical Care Services
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Taiwan National Development Council. Population Projections for the Republic of China (Taiwan): 2018–2065 Report. Available online: https://pop-proj.ndc.gov.tw/download.aspx?uid=70&pid=70 (accessed on 4 August 2021).
- Chen, C.H.; Wang, T.C.; Liou, W.S. 2014. Investigation of Cognition Demand and Satisfaction on Pharmaceutical Care in Residents over 65 y/o and Behavior of Medication Disposal in Taoyuan Country. Master’s Thesis, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy & Science, Tainan, Taiwan, 30 July 2014. Available online: http://ir.cnu.edu.tw/handle/310902800/28988 (accessed on 4 August 2021).
- Castelino, R.L.; Bajorek, B.V.; Chen, T.F. Targeting Suboptimal Prescribing in the Elderly: A Review of the Impact of Pharmacy Services. Ann. Pharmacother. 2009, 43, 1096–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, H.M.; Chang, H.J. Factors Associated with Quality of Life in a Group of Dependent Elders Using Home Helper Services. Taiwan Long-Term Care Mag. 2007, 11, 247–265. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, Y.H.; Lu, F.H. Prescription Principles in the Elderly. Formos. J. Med. 2003, 7, 385–395. [Google Scholar]
- Tarn, Y.H.; Chen, C.L.; Li, H.W.; Tsia, F.H.; Lai, H.Y. The Outcomes of Adherence Counseling Service Provided by Community Pharmacists in Taiwan. Formosa J. Clin. Pharm. 2016, 24, 222–237. [Google Scholar]
- Taiwan Food and Drug Administration. Drug Management Innovations. Taiwan. 2018. Available online: https://www.fda.gov.tw/TC/siteNews.aspx?sid=38&id=78 (accessed on 4 August 2021).
- Taoyuan City Government, Taiwan, Elderly People in Taoyuan City Department of Budget Accounting and Statistics Taoyuan. 2017. Available online: https://dbas.tycg.gov.tw/home.jsp?id=10254&parentpath=0,13,47,10249 (accessed on 2 June 2021).
- Strand, L.M.; Morley, P.C.; Cipolle, R.J.; Ramsey, R.; Lamsam, G.D. Drug-Related Problems: Their Structure and Function. DICP Ann. Pharmacother. 1990, 24, 1093–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Federation of Taiwan Pharmacists Associations. The Standard Operating Procedures for Pharmacist Implements the Home Care Pharmaceutical Services. 2018. Available online: https://hpcare.taiwanpharma.org.tw/1/Downloads/standard/standard_3.pdf (accessed on 6 October 2021).
- Morisky, D.E.; Green, L.W.; Levine, D.M. Concurrent and Predictive Validity of a Self-Reported Measure of Medication Adherence. Med. Care. 1986, 24, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Doucette, W.R.; Kreling, D.H.; Schommer, J.C.; Gaither, C.A.; Mott, D.A.; Pedersen, C.A. Evaluation of Community Pharmacy Service mix: Evidence from the 2004 National Pharmacist Workforce Study. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 2006, 46, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miguel, P. Geographical Accessibility to Community Pharmacies by the Elderly in Metropolitan Lisbon. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2018, 14, 622–653. [Google Scholar]
- Félix, J.; Ferreira, D.; Afonso-Silva, M.; Gomes, M.V.; Ferreira, C.; Vandewalle, B.; Marques, S.; Mota, M.; Costa, S.; Cary, M.; et al. Social and Economic Value of Portuguese Community Pharmacies in Health Care. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2017, 17, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wu, S.C.; Chu, Y.T.; Chu, W.O. Community Pharmaceutical Care and its Promotion: With the Role of Healthcare Members. J. Long-Term Care 2010, 14, 89–97. [Google Scholar]
- Dewsbury, C.; Rodgers, R.M.; Krska, J. Views of English Pharmacists on Providing Public Health Services. Pharmacy 2015, 3, 154–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mark, A.S.; Kaylee, M.D.; Natalie, S. Linking Pharmacists to the Delivery of Public Health Services. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 2017, 57, 742–746. [Google Scholar]
- Turner, K.; Weinberger, M.; Renfro, C.; Ferreri, S.; Trygstad, T.; Trogdon, J.; Shea, C.M. The Role of Network Ties to Support Implementation of a Community Pharmacy Enhanced Services Network. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2019, 15, 1118–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Service | Customers Serviced |
---|---|
Medication guidance, consultation, and instructions | 347,217 |
Blood pressure measurement | 90,149 |
Referral services (for healthcare services related to diabetes care, the second-generation smoking cessation program, and long-term care) | 34,750 |
Provision of reading or magnifying glasses to older adults | 32,648 |
Guidance on discarding expired drugs | 98,501 |
Guidance on operating blood pressure and glucose monitors | 66,489 |
Code * | Content of Communication | No. of Times | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
0 | No medication problem was discovered, but the patient was educated on appropriate medical visit and self-care methods | 181 | 31.1% |
82 | The patient exhibited poor self-care and an unhealthy lifestyle | 73 | 12.5% |
92 | Medication knowledge was incorrect | 42 | 7.2% |
94 | The patient frequently forgot to take medicine | 30 | 5.2% |
93 | The patient did not understand the correct medication timing or dosage | 29 | 5.0% |
81 | Knowledge on diseases and medical visits was incorrect | 25 | 4.3% |
96 | Physiological self-monitoring was required | 21 | 3.6% |
71 | Medicine was not administered | 19 | 3.3% |
01 | (To physicians) No medical treatment was applied, but suggestions were provided on disease control or treatment effectiveness tracking | 16 | 2.7% |
73 | Dosage or administration method was incorrect | 16 | 2.7% |
83 | The patient’s knowledge on over-the-counter drugs, health food, or Chinese medicine was incorrect | 16 | 2.7% |
02 | The patient was referred to personnel in other professional fields | 15 | 2.6% |
98 | The patient did not understand the use of the dosage form | 13 | 2.2% |
22 | Medication was repeated (the same type or pharmacological classification of drugs) | 10 | 1.7% |
97 | Drug storage was improper | 9 | 1.5% |
31 | Dosage form was improper | 8 | 1.4% |
11 | Untreated conditions or diseases were discovered | 7 | 1.2% |
91 | Administration time of several drugs was excessively complex | 6 | 1.0% |
25 | Test data for medicine were lacking | 5 | 0.9% |
32 | Treatment contraindications were identified | 5 | 0.9% |
33 | Drug incompatibility was identified | 5 | 0.9% |
13 | Combined usage with other drugs was required to reinforce the treatment | 4 | 0.7% |
35 | More effective, safer, more convenient, or cheaper drugs were available | 4 | 0.7% |
65 | Unexpected pharmacological reactions were identified under normal dosage | 4 | 0.7% |
38 | This medicine had proven to be ineffective in its previous prescriptions | 3 | 0.5% |
55 | The patient exhibited poor liver and kidney functions | 2 | 0.3% |
64 | The prescription was unsafe for the patient (e.g., the patient had risk factors for diseases, was pregnant, was breastfeeding, was a toddler, or was elderly) | 2 | 0.3% |
74 | Incorrect administration time was given | 2 | 0.3% |
95 | The patient was unable to swallow the medicine | 2 | 0.3% |
12 | Preventive medical treatment was required | 1 | 0.2% |
21 | No indication was discovered from this drug | 1 | 0.2% |
36 | Medication timing was excessively complicated | 1 | 0.2% |
37 | Single-ingredient medicine as recommended over compound medicine | 1 | 0.2% |
51 | Dosage was too high | 1 | 0.2% |
61 | Drug interactions were identified | 1 | 0.2% |
67 | Drug administration was incorrect | 1 | 0.2% |
75 | Drug administration was too fast | 1 | 0.2% |
Variable | No. of Patients | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Inclusion criteria (missing value: n = 4) | ||
Diagnosed with two or more chronic diseases | 359 | 69.3% |
Using five or more types of medicine prescribed by physicians | 78 | 15.1% |
Having two or more continuous prescriptions for chronic diseases | 73 | 14.1% |
Using a special dosage form | 8 | 1.5% |
Sex (missing value: n = 5) | ||
Female | 264 | 51.1% |
Male | 253 | 48.9% |
Male-to-female ratio | 1.04 | |
Age (years; missing value: n = 4) | ||
<40 | 17 | 3.3% |
41–50 | 45 | 8.7% |
51–60 | 107 | 20.7% |
61–70 | 164 | 31.7% |
71–80 | 110 | 21.2% |
81–90 | 63 | 12.2% |
≥91 | 12 | 2.3% |
Mean ± standard deviation (years) | 65.8 ± 13.4 |
Medication Adherence | Adherence Score | Before Intervention | After Intervention | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of Patients | Percentage (%) | No. of Patients | Percentage (%) | ||
Low | 0 | 11 | 1.9% | 0 | 0.0% |
1 | 2 | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0% | |
2 | 38 | 6.7% | 0 | 0.0% | |
3 | 61 | 10.8% | 6 | 1.1% | |
4 | 97 | 17.1% | 8 | 1.4% | |
5 | 110 | 19.4% | 8 | 1.4% | |
6 | 214 | 37.7% | 11 | 1.9% | |
Moderate | 7 | 6 | 1.1% | 42 | 7.4% |
8 | 3 | 0.5% | 53 | 9.3% | |
9 | 2 | 0.4% | 65 | 11.5% | |
10 | 5 | 0.9% | 69 | 12.2% | |
11 | 4 | 0.7% | 71 | 12.5% | |
High | 12 | 14 | 2.4% | 234 | 41.3% |
Missing value | 2 | - | 2 | - |
Service Item | No. of Respondents | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Confirm the appropriateness of drug preparation, storage, and delivery. | 46 | 61.3 |
Confirm the appropriateness of combined administration of prescribed medicine with other types of medicine, such as Chinese medicine and health food. | 54 | 72.0 |
Examine the appropriateness of the medicine prescribed by various medical institutions and departments. | 60 | 80.0 |
Conduct medication evaluation, investigate the appropriateness and safety of medical treatment, and identify, solve, and prevent medication problems. | 62 | 82.7 |
Provide drug information consultation, quality control services, and on-the-job education to patients and medical professionals. | 53 | 70.7 |
Variable | No. of Patients | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Inclusion criteria | ||
Diagnosed with two or more chronic diseases | 18 | 43.9% |
Using five or more types of medicine prescribed by physicians | 6 | 14.6% |
Having two or more continuous prescriptions for chronic diseases | 7 | 17.1% |
Using a special dosage form | 1 | 2.4% |
Referred by a physician | 9 | 22.0% |
Sex | ||
Female | 25 | 61.0% |
Male | 16 | 39.0% |
Male-to-female ratio | 1.6 | |
Age (years) | ||
<40 | 1 | 2.4% |
51–60 | 6 | 14.6% |
61–70 | 17 | 41.5% |
71–80 | 7 | 17.1% |
81–90 | 9 | 22.0% |
91≥ | 1 | 2.4% |
Mean ± standard deviation (years) | 70.2 ± 11.7 |
Content of Communication | No. of Times | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|
Medication was repeated (the same type or pharmacological classification of drugs) | 7 | 17.1% |
(To physicians) No medical treatment was applied, but suggestions were provided on disease control or treatment effectiveness tracking | 6 | 14.6% |
Dosage was too high | 6 | 14.6% |
Dosage form was improper | 4 | 9.8% |
Unexpected pharmacological reactions were identified under normal dosage | 4 | 9.8% |
No indication was discovered from this drug | 3 | 7.3% |
The patient exhibited poor liver and kidney functions | 2 | 4.9% |
Untreated conditions or diseases were discovered | 1 | 2.4% |
Another drug could be administered to prevent the side effect | 1 | 2.4% |
More effective, safer, more convenient, or cheaper drugs were available | 1 | 2.4% |
Single-ingredient medicine was recommended over compound medicine | 1 | 2.4% |
Dosage or serum drug concentration was too low | 1 | 2.4% |
Dosing interval was too long | 1 | 2.4% |
The patient was allergic to this drug | 1 | 2.4% |
The prescription was unsafe for the patient (e.g., the patient had risk factors for diseases, was pregnant, was breastfeeding, was a toddler, or was elderly) | 1 | 2.4% |
Dosage or administration method was incorrect | 1 | 2.4% |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chen, S.-C.; Lee, K.-H.; Horng, D.-J.; Huang, P.-J. Integrating the Public Health Services Model into Age-Friendly Pharmacies: A Case Study on the Pharmacies in Taiwan. Healthcare 2021, 9, 1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111589
Chen S-C, Lee K-H, Horng D-J, Huang P-J. Integrating the Public Health Services Model into Age-Friendly Pharmacies: A Case Study on the Pharmacies in Taiwan. Healthcare. 2021; 9(11):1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111589
Chicago/Turabian StyleChen, Shih-Chang, Kuan-Han Lee, Der-Juinn Horng, and Po-Jui Huang. 2021. "Integrating the Public Health Services Model into Age-Friendly Pharmacies: A Case Study on the Pharmacies in Taiwan" Healthcare 9, no. 11: 1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111589
APA StyleChen, S. -C., Lee, K. -H., Horng, D. -J., & Huang, P. -J. (2021). Integrating the Public Health Services Model into Age-Friendly Pharmacies: A Case Study on the Pharmacies in Taiwan. Healthcare, 9(11), 1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111589