To Work or Not to Work, That Is the Question: The Psychological Impact of the First COVID-19 Lockdown on the Elderly, Healthcare Workers, and Virtual Workers
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- The three categories of people (healthcare workers, virtual workers, and the elderly) used different emotional regulation strategies, with different post-traumatic development skills and different narrative processes.
- Emotional regulation is affected by the methods of coping with the traumatic experience of lockdown and with the symbolization processes.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants
2.2. Procedure
2.3. Measures
- The Italian Weighted Referential Activity Dictionary (IWRAD) is a dictionary consisting of 9596 words and represents the computerized measure of RA. It features a scale ranging from 0 to 1. High scores represent a high level of referential activity. The most frequent words with low IWRAD weights scores are associated with a subjective focus rather than pointing to external objects and describing situations, in the present rather than the past tense. For a deeper discussion, see [33].
- The Italian Reflection Dictionary (IREF) is a dictionary composed of 908 abstract words concerning how people think and communicate their thoughts. It includes basic logic words and cognitive or logical words.
- The Italian Sensory Somatic Dictionary (ISensD) is a dictionary composed of 1926 words related to the body and bodily activities. The number of ISensD words in a speech sample is a measure of the sub-symbolic activation.
- The Italian Sum Affect Dictionary (ISAffD) is a dictionary consisting of 1786 words concerning how people feel and how they communicate their feelings. It indicates an emotional response, positive or negative. The ISAffD is composed of three sub-dictionaries: positive affect (IAffP); negative affect (IAffN); and neutral affect without a specific valence (IAffZ).
- The Italian Weighted Reflection and Reorganization List (IWRRL) refers to the reorganization and reflection function, where a speaker attempts to recognize and understand the emotional value of an event or set of events. It contains a list of 1633 Italian words and high scores on this measure represent high reflection/reorganization. It concerns a person’s reasoning related to an experience that has been vividly experienced.
- The Italian DisFluency Dictionary (IDFD) is a small set of words, as well as repeated words, incomplete words, and filled pauses, that people tend to use when struggling to communicate. High scores typically characterize the arousal phase in which emotional schemas are activated.
- Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) [35]. The DERS is a 36 item self-report on a 5 point Likert scale (from 5, “Almost always”, to 1, “Almost never”) that measures emotional regulation. The self-report questionnaire provides a total score (DERS TOTAL), indicating the general level of difficulty in emotional regulation (total score range = 36–180) and six scores corresponding to several facets of emotion dysregulation capacities. The six subscales of emotional regulation are:
- The Non-Acceptance scale, which concerns the non-acceptance of the emotional response. It is made up of six items that reflect the tendency to experience negative secondary emotions in response to one’s own primary negative emotion, as well as the subject’s difficulties in accepting the negative emotion or discomfort that this causes.
- The Goals scale, which indicates the difficulty in engaging in a behavior directed towards a goal and is represented by five items that reflect the difficulty in completing one’s work or concentrating when experiencing negative emotions.
- The Strategies scale, which concerns limited access to one’s own regulation strategies. The eight items reflect the level of confidence the person has in his or her ability to manage and modulate negative emotions and the belief that little can be done to regulate emotions effectively once an individual is upset.
- The Impulse scale, which expresses the difficulty in controlling behaviors and includes six items that reflect the difficulty in maintaining control over one’s behavior when experiencing negative emotions.
- The Clarity scale, which concerns the difficulties in recognizing the emotion experienced and its five items reflect the degree to which a person recognizes the emotion they are experiencing.
- The Awareness scale, which expresses reduced emotional self-awareness and is expressed by six items that reflect emotional awareness, i.e. the degree of attention paid to one’s emotional state.
- The Relationships With Others subscale, which concerns the development of a greater sense of compassion for or closeness with others, changes in behavior on an interpersonal level, the construction of new relationships, and the strengthening of previous relationships.
- The New Possibilities subscale, which evaluates the presence of changes in life goals, openness to new experiences, approaches to facing choices more consciously, and the new possibilities that are experienced when people develop a new life path that would not be possible if they had not experienced a crisis.
- The Personal Strength subscale, which evaluates a greater sense of self-confidence in facing the obstacles of life, a better acceptance of even unfavorable circumstances, and changes in the subject’s perception of their own identity.
- The Changes in Spirituality subscale, which measures personal growth associated with a better awareness of spiritual issues and an increase in sharing spiritual moments with others.
- The Appreciation of Life subscale, which concerns the individual’s re-evaluation of the value of daily life, changes in priorities, and the birth of new life values.
- The Italian version of the PTGI used for this study [39], shows excellent total internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.93), and an acceptable-to-high internal reliability for the five factors (alpha interval Cronbach’s from 0.74 to 0.86).
Semi-Structured Interview
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Descriptive Analysis
3.2. Comparison among Groups: HWs, Elderly, and VWs
3.3. Regression Analysis
4. Discussion
4.1. Peculiarities among Healthcare Workers, Virtual Workers, and the Elderly
4.2. Work Setting as a Protective Factor
4.3. A New Way to Explore Emotional Dysregulation
5. Conclusions
6. Limitations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Torales, J.; O’Higgins, M.; Castaldelli-Maia, J.M.; Ventriglio, A. The Outbreak of COVID-19 Coronavirus and Its Impact on Global Mental Health. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 2020, 66, 317–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Castellini, G.; Rossi, E.; Cassioli, E.; Sanfilippo, G.; Innocenti, M.; Gironi, V.; Silvestri, C.; Voller, F.; Ricca, V. A Longitudinal Observation of General Psychopathology before the COVID-19 Outbreak and during Lockdown in Italy. J. Psychosom. Res. 2021, 141, 110328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richter, D.; Riedel-Heller, S.; Zürcher, S.J. Mental Health Problems in the General Population during and after the First Lockdown Phase Due to the SARS-Cov-2 Pandemic: Rapid Review of Multi-Wave Studies. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci. 2021, 30, e27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rossi, R.; Socci, V.; Talevi, D.; Mensi, S.; Niolu, C.; Pacitti, F.; Di Marco, A.; Rossi, A.; Siracusano, A.; Di Lorenzo, G. COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown Measures Impact on Mental Health Among the General Population in Italy. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tull, M.T.; Edmonds, K.A.; Scamaldo, K.M.; Richmond, J.R.; Rose, J.P.; Gratz, K.L. Psychological Outcomes Associated with Stay-at-Home Orders and the Perceived Impact of COVID-19 on Daily Life. Psychiatry Res. 2020, 289, 113098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giorgi, G.; Lecca, L.I.; Alessio, F.; Finstad, G.L.; Bondanini, G.; Lulli, L.G.; Arcangeli, G.; Mucci, N. COVID-19-Related Mental Health Effects in the Workplace: A Narrative Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2020, 17, 7857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Monte, C.; Monaco, S.; Mariani, R.; Di Trani, M. From Resilience to Burnout: Psychological Features of Italian General Practitioners During COVID-19 Emergency. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 567201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cawcutt, K.A.; Starlin, R.; Rupp, M.E. Fighting Fear in Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 2020, 41, 1192–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barello, S.; Plamenchi, L.; Graffigna, G. Burnout and somatic symptoms among frontline healthcare professionals at the peak of the Italian COVID-19 pan-demic. Psychiatry Res. 2020, 290, 113129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, H.; Zhou, X.; Jia, X.; Song, C.; Luo, X.; Zhang, H.; Wu, H.; Ye, J. Emotional exhaustion in front-line healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan, China: The effects of time pressure, social sharing and cognitive appraisal. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Söğütlü, Y.; Söğütlü, L.; Göktaş, S.Ş. Relationship of COVID-19 Pandemic with Anxiety, Anger, Sleep and Emotion Regulation in Healthcare Professionals. J. Contemp. Med. 2021, 11, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Z.; Wang, X.; Bi, H.; Li, Y.; Yue, S.; Gu, S.; Xiang, G. Factors That Influence Perceived Organizational Support for Emotional Labor of Chinese Medical Personnel in Hubei. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 684830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Di Trani, M.; Mariani, R.; Ferri, R.; De Berardinis, D.; Frigo, M.G. From Resilience to Burnout in Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Emergency: The Role of the Ability to Tolerate Uncertainty. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 646435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Finstad, G.L.; Giorgi, G.; Lulli, L.G.; Pandolfi, C.; Foti, G.; León-Perez, J.M.; Can-tero-Sánchez, F.J.; Mucci, N. Resilience, Coping Strategies and Posttraumatic Growth in the Workplace Following COVID-19: A Narrative Review on the Positive Aspects of Trauma. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matli, W. The Changing Work Landscape as a Result of the Covid-19 Pandemic: Insights from Remote Workers Life Situations in South Africa. Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy 2020, 40, 1237–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fauville, G.; Luo, M.; Queiroz, A.C.M.; Bailenson, J.N.; Hancock, J. Zoom Exhaustion & Fatigue Scale. SSRN Electron. J. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bailenson, J.N. Nonverbal Overload: A Theoretical Argument for the Causes of Zoom Fatigue. Technol. Mind Behav. 2021, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boccia, S.; Ricciardi, W.; Ioannidis, J.P.A. What Other Countries Can Learn From Italy During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020, 180, 927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Valenzuela, P.L.; Santos-Lozano, A.; Lista, S.; Serra-Rexach, J.A.; Emanuele, E.; Lucia, A. Coronavirus Lockdown: Forced Inactivity for the Oldest Old? J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2020, 21, 988–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sayin Kasar, K.; Karaman, E. Life in Lockdown: Social Isolation, Loneliness and Quality of Life in the Elderly during the COVİD-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review. Geriatr. Nur. (Lond.) 2021, 42, 1222–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brown, L.; Mossabir, R.; Harrison, N.; Brundle, C.; Smith, J.; Clegg, A. Life in Lockdown: A Telephone Survey to Investigate the Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown Measures on the Lives of Older People (≥75 Years). Age Ageing 2021, 50, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- García-Fernández, L.; Romero-Ferreiro, V.; López-Roldán, P.D.; Padilla, S.; Rodriguez-Jimenez, R. Mental Health in Elderly Spanish People in Times of COVID-19 Outbreak. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2020, 28, 1040–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knepple Carney, A.; Graf, A.S.; Hudson, G.; Wilson, E. Age Moderates Perceived COVID-19 Disruption on Well-Being. The Gerontologist 2021, 61, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bucci, W. Overview of the Referential Process: The Operation of Language Within and Between People. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 2021, 50, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mariani, R.; De Coro, A. Study of a Short-Term Treatment by Referential Activity Linguistic Measures. Res. Psychother. Psychopathol. Process. Outcome 2013, 16, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bucci, W. Symptoms and Symbols: A Multiple Code Theory of Somatization. Psychoanal. Inq. 1997, 17, 151–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bucci, W. Dissociation from the Perspective of Multiple Code Theory—Part II: The Spectrum of Dissociative Processes in the Psychoanalytic Relationship. Contemp. Psychoanal. 2007, 43, 305–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Trani, M.; Mariani, R.; Renzi, A.; Greenman, P.S.; Solano, L. Alexithymia According to Bucci’s Multiple Code Theory: A Preliminary Investigation with Healthy and Hypertensive Individuals. Psychol. Psychother. Theory Res. Pract. 2018, 91, 232–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mariani, R.; Di Trani, M.; Negri, A.; Tambelli, R. Linguistic Analysis of Autobiographical Narratives in Unipolar and Bipolar Mood Disorders in Light of Multiple Code Theory. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 273, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mariani, R.; Monaco, S.; Christian, C.; Di Trani, M. Dreaming in quarantine: Linguistic analysis of referential process of dreams during COVID-19 pandemic lock-down. Res. Psychother. Psychopathol. Process. Outcome 2021, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mariani, R.; Gennaro, A.; Monaco, S.; Di Trani, M.; Salvatore, S. Narratives of Dreams and Waking Thoughts: Emotional Processing in Relation to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 745081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mariani, R.; Monaco, S.; Di Trani, M. Putting into Words the COVID-19 Lockdown Experience: Psychological Symptoms and the Referential Process. Healthcare 2021, 9, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maskit, B. Overview of Computer Measures of the Referential Process. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 2021, 50, 29–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mariani, R.; Maskit, B.; Bucci, W.; De Coro, A. Linguistic Measures of the Referential Process in Psychodynamic Treatment: The English and Italian Versions. Psychother. Res. 2013, 23, 430–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gratz, K.L.; Roemer, L. Multidimensional Assessment of Emotion Regulation and Dysregulation: Development, Factor Structure, and Initial Validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 2004, 26, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giromini, L.; Ales, F.; de Campora, G.; Zennaro, A.; Pignolo, C. Developing Age and Gender Adjusted Normative Reference Values for the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 2017, 39, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Giromini, L.; Velotti, P.; de Campora, G.; Bonalume, L.; Cesare Zavattini, G. Cultural Adaptation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: Reliability and Validity of an Italian Version: Reliability and Validity of the Ders in Italy. J. Clin. Psychol. 2012, 68, 989–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tedeschi, R.G.; Calhoun, L.G. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Measuring the Positive Legacy of Trauma. J. Trauma. Stress 1996, 9, 455–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prati, G.; Pietrantoni, L. Italian Adaptation and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Full and the Short Form of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. J. Loss Trauma 2014, 19, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trougakos, J.P.; Chawla, N.; McCarthy, J.M. Working in a Pandemic: Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 Health Anxiety on Work, Family, and Health Outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 2020, 105, 1234–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hormes, J.M.; Kearns, B.; Timko, C.A. Craving Facebook? Behavioral Addiction to Online Social Networking and Its Association with Emotion Regulation Deficits: Online Social Networking Addiction. Addiction 2014, 109, 2079–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Negri, A.; Andreoli, G.; Mariani, R.; De Bei, F.; Rocco, D.; Greco, A.; Bucci, W. First Validation of the Referential Process Post-Session Scale-Therapist Version (RPPS-T). Clin. Neuropsychiatry 2020, 17, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Murphy, S.; Maskit, B.; Bucci, W. Putting Feelings into Words: Cross-Linguistic Markers of the Referential Process. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality, Denver, CO, USA, 5 June 2015; Association for Computational Linguistics: Denver, CO, USA, 2015; pp. 80–88. [Google Scholar]
HWSs | Elderly | VWSs | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | ||||||
N = 104 | N = 62 | N = 91 | ||||||
Questions | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | F | p |
Time Dedicated to Social Media | 1.95 | 0.81 | 2.40 | 1.65 | 2.15 | 1.65 | 3.24 | 0.041 * |
Cohabitant During Lockdown | 1.62 | 1.32 | 1.48 | 1.30 | 1.66 | 1.09 | 0.39 | 0.680 |
Fear of Being Infected | 4.54 | 1.60 | 4.48 | 5.24 | 3.05 | 1.11 | 7.60 | 0.001 ** |
Months of Pre-Lockdown Cohabitation | 10.75 | 9.41 | 41.05 | 10.80 | 9.07 | 9.35 | 163.20 | 0.000 ** |
DERS | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | F | p |
Nonacceptance | 11.89 | 5.06 | 13.89 | 6.56 | 11.60 | 5.27 | 3.536 | 0.031 * |
Goals | 10.63 | 3.56 | 11.90 | 4.59 | 12.01 | 4.10 | 3.335 | 0.037 * |
Impulse | 10.01 | 3.63 | 10.68 | 4.69 | 11.67 | 5.05 | 3.292 | 0.039 * |
Awareness | 14.47 | 4.36 | 15.69 | 4.32 | 15.11 | 4.55 | 1.493 | 0.227 |
Strategies | 14.20 | 5.48 | 16.11 | 6.20 | 14.90 | 5.84 | 2.075 | 0.128 |
Clarity | 10.52 | 3.96 | 10.98 | 4.53 | 11.32 | 4.49 | 0.840 | 0.433 |
DERSTOTAL | 71.72 | 18.02 | 79.34 | 22.36 | 76.24 | 20.03 | 2.986 | 0.052 |
PTGI | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | F | p |
Relationship With Others | 18.06 | 8.05 | 17.34 | 8.49 | 15.70 | 7.89 | 2.065 | 0.129 |
New Possibilities | 13.25 | 5.36 | 11.42 | 5.61 | 13.16 | 5.75 | 2.426 | 0.091 |
Personal Strength | 12.22 | 5.24 | 10.32 | 5.51 | 9.90 | 4.95 | 5.245 | 0.006 ** |
Changes In Spirituality | 3.12 | 1.97 | 4.16 | 3.17 | 2.92 | 1.91 | 5.849 | 0.003 ** |
Appreciation For Life | 10.18 | 3.67 | 9.85 | 3.82 | 8.90 | 3.88 | 2.854 | 0.060 |
PTGITOTAL | 56.84 | 20.29 | 53.10 | 23.07 | 50.02 | 21.05 | 2.445 | 0.089 |
RP Linguistic Measures 1 | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | F | p |
Words | 2716.66 | 1476.58 | 2173.03 | 1494.19 | 2027.18 | 973.49 | 7.229 | 0.001 ** |
MDF | 0.094 | 0.042 | 0.096 | 0.046 | 0.109 | 0.040 | 3.616 | 0.028 * |
IAffN | 0.0131 | 0.0037 | 0.0150 | 0.0051 | 0.0110 | 0.0035 | 18.422 | 0.000 ** |
IAffP | 0.0108 | 0.0032 | 0.0126 | 0.0044 | 0.0108 | 0.0033 | 5.512 | 0.005 ** |
IAffS | 0.0277 | 0.0061 | 0.0310 | 0.0070 | 0.0251 | 0.0055 | 17.315 | 0.000 ** |
IAffZ | 0.0038 | 0.0022 | 0.0035 | 0.0021 | 0.0033 | 0.0017 | 1.496 | 0.226 |
IRef | 0.0246 | 0.0061 | 0.0228 | 0.0071 | 0.0260 | 0.0071 | 4.131 | 0.017 * |
ISenS | 0.0425 | 0.0072 | 0.0398 | 0.0099 | 0.0353 | 0.0070 | 20.592 | 0.000 ** |
IWRAD | 0.5007 | 0.0030 | 0.5009 | 0.0039 | 0.4978 | 0.0029 | 25.626 | 0.000 ** |
IWRRL | 0.5431 | 0.0027 | 0.5431 | 0.0029 | 0.5419 | 0.0032 | 4.699 | 0.010 * |
Beta | t | Sign. | |
---|---|---|---|
PTGI TOTAL | 0.29 | 3.15 | 0.002 |
Time Dedicated to Social Media | 0.17 | 2.62 | 0.009 |
Fear of Being Infected | 0.31 | 3.55 | 0.001 |
MDF | 0.16 | 2.47 | 0.009 |
IAffN | 0.057 | 0.92 | 0.357 |
IWRAD | 0.043 | 0.68 | 0.499 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Andreassi, S.; Monaco, S.; Salvatore, S.; Sciabica, G.M.; De Felice, G.; Petrovska, E.; Mariani, R. To Work or Not to Work, That Is the Question: The Psychological Impact of the First COVID-19 Lockdown on the Elderly, Healthcare Workers, and Virtual Workers. Healthcare 2021, 9, 1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121754
Andreassi S, Monaco S, Salvatore S, Sciabica GM, De Felice G, Petrovska E, Mariani R. To Work or Not to Work, That Is the Question: The Psychological Impact of the First COVID-19 Lockdown on the Elderly, Healthcare Workers, and Virtual Workers. Healthcare. 2021; 9(12):1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121754
Chicago/Turabian StyleAndreassi, Silvia, Silvia Monaco, Sergio Salvatore, Gaetano Maria Sciabica, Giulio De Felice, Elena Petrovska, and Rachele Mariani. 2021. "To Work or Not to Work, That Is the Question: The Psychological Impact of the First COVID-19 Lockdown on the Elderly, Healthcare Workers, and Virtual Workers" Healthcare 9, no. 12: 1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121754
APA StyleAndreassi, S., Monaco, S., Salvatore, S., Sciabica, G. M., De Felice, G., Petrovska, E., & Mariani, R. (2021). To Work or Not to Work, That Is the Question: The Psychological Impact of the First COVID-19 Lockdown on the Elderly, Healthcare Workers, and Virtual Workers. Healthcare, 9(12), 1754. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121754