Next Article in Journal
The Effects of Mindfulness-Based Mandala Coloring, Made in Nature, on Chronic Widespread Musculoskeletal Pain: Randomized Trial
Next Article in Special Issue
What Is the Value of Ultrasound in Individuals ‘At-Risk’ of Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Do Not Have Clinical Synovitis?
Previous Article in Journal
Scheduling of Anaesthesia Operations in Operating Rooms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Healthcare
Volume 9
Issue 6
10.3390/healthcare9060641
healthcare-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Challenges and Opportunities of Targeted Behavioral Interventions for Groups at Risk for Developing Rheumatoid Arthritis

by
Alessandra Zaccardelli
1 and
Jeffrey A. Sparks
1,2,*
1
Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, Boston, MA 02115, USA
2
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 20115, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2021, 9(6), 641; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060641
Submission received: 8 April 2021 / Revised: 21 May 2021 / Accepted: 25 May 2021 / Published: 28 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention and Control)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a serious autoimmune disease which causes painful, swollen joints and can impact quality of life and increase morbidity and mortality. There are several preclinical stages of RA that correspond to at-risk groups that include: genetic risk, risk from behaviors, elevation of RA-related autoantibodies, and early clinical disease manifestations such as undifferentiated arthritis. Early interventions are crucial to slowing progression to and potentially preventing RA onset. Modification of behaviors among at-risk individuals may decrease RA risk. There are several challenges and opportunities in implementing preventative behavioral interventions, which may vary within different at-risk groups. Methods: We performed a narrative review of the literature, including meta-analyses focused on RA risk-related behaviors as well as publications investigating the potential efficacy of behavioral modifications on RA risk. Results: There are multiple behavioral risk factors associated with RA, including smoking, obesity, low physical activity, low quality diet, and poor dental hygiene, which may contribute to progression to clinical RA. Meta-analyses have been performed for smoking, excess body weight, and physical activity. Likelihood of adopting behavioral modifications may increase as RA risk increases. Conclusions: Clinicians may be able to tailor preventative approaches to various RA at-risk groups to help reduce RA risk, but further research is needed. A better understanding of the relationship of behaviors with RA risk and optimized approaches to implementing behavioral changes may allow for clinicians to tailor their preventative approaches for at-risk individuals.

1. Introduction

There are several phases of development of RA prior to full clinical onset. Groups within these risk phases may have different likelihood of RA onset. Individuals in certain risk groups may be targets of preventative approaches for RA. These RA at-risk groups include: genetic risk, behavioral risk, systemic autoimmunity (presence of RA-related biomarkers), and presence of clinical RA-related disease manifestations. Though the risk of RA in the general population is low, presence of these independent risk factors increases disease risk, which compounds when combined with other risk factors. Early behavioral modifications and preventative measures, even before systemic autoimmunity and joint involvement [1], are crucial to prevent rheumatoid arthritis progression. Understanding of risk, perceptions about the disease, and preferences regarding preventative measures may influence decisions regarding uptake and adherence of particular lifestyle changes. By evaluating each RA at-risk group and the potential promotors and barriers for preventative changes, clinicians can better understand how to tailor efficient targeted preventative therapeutic approaches.

2. Methods

For this narrative review, we conducted a literature review by searching PubMed for English-language research articles, meta-analyses, and review papers using various combinations of the following keywords: rheumatoid arthritis, risk, lifestyle, behavior, prevention, perspectives. We also searched for meta-analyses investigating established behavioral risk factors for RA including: smoking, obesity, high BMI, low physical activity, diet (alcohol, fish, omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, red meat, caffeinated beverages, and sugar), and poor dental hygiene. We searched the bibliographies of all identified research articles, meta-analyses, and review papers. We also searched the American College of Rheumatology Abstract Archives to identify recent research studies.

3. Findings

3.1. RA At-Risk Group 1: Behaviors

Though the absolute risk of developing RA in the general population is low, with an incidence of RA in the general population of below 0.5/1000 per year [2], certain individuals may be at higher risk for developing RA due to behavioral patterns. Case-control studies in the general population have found that behavioral risk factors include cigarette smoking [3], inhalant-related occupations [4], obesity [5,6,7,8], low physical activity [9], low-quality diet [10], poor dental hygiene [11], maintenance of an abnormal microbiome [12,13], and lack of treatment for psychologic conditions like PTSD [14] and depression [15], habits which confer varying degrees of RA risk [16] (Table 1). These behaviors may also interact with other RA risk factors, such as genetics, to increase overall RA risk [16].
Smoking is the best-established risk factor for RA and may contribute to disease progression through gene-environment interactions by inducing localized mucosal inflammation in the airways and other anatomic sites, protein citrullination (a post-translational modification from arginine to citrulline), and downstream formation of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies leading to RA autoimmunity [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Ever and current smoking strongly increase the risk for RA compared to never smoking in both men and women [26,27,28,29] and anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive and -negative RA [27]. There is an established dose-response for smoking and RA risk; while 1–10-pack years confer moderate risk, smoking above a threshold of 20-pack years strongly increases RA risk [3,26]. Other noxious inhalants like air pollution, silica, and pesticides may also contribute to pulmonary mucosal inflammation and RA development, indicating that lifestyle factors such as inhalant-related occupations may also contribute to RA risk [4].
Excess weight has also been shown to increase RA risk, though the mechanism of risk induction remains less clear. Excess weight increases RA risk overall [5,6,7,8,28,29], but when stratified by sex the association seems to be strongest among women [5,7]. Several studies have also found that increased adiposity confers an increase in RA risk per every 5 kg/m2 body mass index (BMI) increase, particularly in women [30].
High physical activity may reduce RA risk by reducing production of inflammatory biomarkers including C-reactive protein [31] and via an overall anti-inflammatory effect [31,32]. A meta-analysis of physical activity demonstrated that high levels of physical activity reduce RA risk compared to low levels, and that physical activity decreases RA risk compared to inactivity/occasional physical activity [32].
There is extensive literature on poor diet and RA risk, showing that intake levels of individual items such as high levels of red meat [33,34], low quantities of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids [35,36,37,38] and fish [10,38], high caffeine intake [39,40], and low intake of fruit, vegetables, and vitamin C [41], as well as overall low-quality diet [42] increase the risk for RA.
Poor dental hygiene may confer additional RA risk as a consequence of periodontal disease and specifically, Porphyromonas gingivalis, the pathogen responsible. P. gingivalis expresses the peptidylarginine deiminase (PAD) enzyme, which is involved in protein citrullination that may lead to a loss of immune tolerance and RA [11].
Fostering an atypical oral and gut microbiome with high levels of Prevotella copri may increase RA risk [12,13]. Findings of sequence homology between Prevotella epitopes and RA-related autoantigens suggest that molecular mimicry may play a role in RA induction, but the mechanism remains unclear [12].
High levels of PTSD and depression symptoms may lead to chronic dysregulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis and increased levels of systemic inflammatory markers, including interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein, which may be elevated prior to RA onset [14,15]. Therefore, behavioral patterns like lack of treatment for mental health conditions may increase RA risk.
There is also a risk of multiple lifestyle factors and RA development. For instance, while smoking, low alcohol intake, and increased BMI each moderately increase RA risk (population attributable risks of 15%, 12%, and 9%, respectively), individuals with all modifiable risk factors have a 41% risk of developing RA [43]. In addition, overweight individuals with a history of smoking have a 60% risk of developing RA [29]. At the same time, individuals with seropositive arthralgias adhering to 4 or 5 components (compared to none) of a healthy living index score consisting of never smoking, moderate alcohol use, normal BMI (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), regular exercise, and healthy diet showed a significant decrease (35%) in overall RA risk, indicating potential avenues for behavioral modifications to prevent RA [44].
Several observational studies have investigated the effect of behavior modifications on RA risk. Smoking cessation is the best studied behavioral modification to attenuate RA risk [1,45,46,47] (Table 2). For instance, compared to current smokers, former smokers who quit less than five years ago showed moderately diminished RA risk, and this was greatly reduced in those who quit 30 or more years ago [46]. Smoking cessation is also associated with a 20 year latency period of RA development [48]. Other behavioral modifications have also been studied. For instance, previous studies evaluating weight change and RA risk found that maintaining weight may reduce RA risk in comparison to weight loss or gain [49], but this may be due to the early rheumatoid manifestation of cachexia in individuals with undiagnosed RA. However, bariatric surgery was not associated with a reduced RA risk, so more work is needed to establish the role of weight loss in RA risk [50].
Dietary improvements may also reduce RA risk. Increased intake of individual substances such as alcohol may protect against RA [51]. Similarly, increased dietary beta-cryptoxanthin through consumption of items such as orange juice may protect against inflammatory disorders like RA [52]. In addition, meeting a healthy eating threshold composed of factors like increased consumption of vegetables, fruits, whole grains, nuts, legumes, long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, and polyunsaturated fatty acids as well as decreased consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, red meats, processed meats, and trans fats, can reduce RA risk [53].
In addition, higher levels of physical activity have been shown to be associated with lower RA risk, with a 33% lower RA risk for >7 h of recreational activity per week compared to <1 h of physical activity per week [9]. It is also possible that behaviors like tooth brushing and flossing, which may decrease P. gingivalis as well as promote a healthy oral and gut microbiome, may reduce RA risk, but this has not been studied.
Thus, lifestyle modifications may decrease the likelihood of developing RA in the behavioral risk group. However, given the perception of RA in the general population, it may be challenging to encourage these types of behavioral modifications for RA prevention. Understanding RA perceptions within the general population can help advance potential interventions and public health initiatives to reduce RA risk conferred from behavior alone (Table 3). A previous study assessing disease literacy within the general population conducted interviews among individuals with no personal connection to RA and demonstrated an overall lack of RA knowledge [53]. Though some participants identified it as a disease affecting the joints, most were unsure about the cause of RA, incorrectly considering RA as a degenerative process [53]. Meanwhile, others speculated about a potential genetic component and some even believed that diet may contribute to RA progression, indicating that a subset may understand behavioral risk factors. Overall, interviewed individuals expressed a need for more public information about RA [53].
These findings especially reported limited knowledge about RA, ambivalence surrounding lifestyle changes to curb RA progression, and hesitancy to seek early clinical care, presenting challenges in initiating preventative behavioral changes. Other challenges include the development, implementation, and sustainability of behavior-modifying interventions.
At the same time, there are opportunities to educate the general public on RA risk factors and outcomes (Figure 1). Targeted interventions like smoking cessation, weight loss, dietary supplementation, increasing physical activity, and good dental hygiene have already been conducted or proposed. Though adherence and willingness are unclear, there may be opportunities including educational initiatives and personalized risk assessments to help individuals in the general population to better understand RA risk so that they can make behavioral adjustments.
There exists a myriad of opportunities in encouraging behavioral changes, including personalized risk assessment and education tools to provide individuals with a better understanding of their risk, educate them on impacts of specific behavioral changes, and alleviate concerns surrounding predictive assessments (Table 3). These could be tailored to meet the needs of various risk groups. Our group conducted a randomized controlled trial called the PRE-RA Family Study, which incorporated a web-based Personalized Risk Estimator for RA (PRE-RA) tool [54,55,56,57] to provide a RA risk score based on individuals’ genetics, autoantibodies, demographics, and risk behaviors such as height, weight, physical activity, diet including fish and fish oil supplements, dental health, and smoking [54]. RA risk is presented in an interactive webpage displaying a thermometer with non-modifiable risk factors and modifiable risk factors that participants could adjust to see a visual representation of how the change would impact their risk based on the strength of the association and the direction of the modification [54]. The tool also includes personalized tips, text, and websites as well as a graphical representation of personalized relative risk of RA, and a percentage of lifetime risk for developing RA [54]. This format is likely easier to understand in comparison to traditional risk communications which many at-risk individuals find difficult to interpret [58].
The randomized controlled study compared standard-of-care RA education consisting of non-personalized risk education, the PRE-RA tool, and the PRE-RA tool plus motivational interviewing (PRE-RA Plus) to investigate the association between various educational interventions and RA knowledge [54]. Randomization to the PRE-RA and PRE-RA plus arms was associated with higher RA knowledge scores immediately after intervention, which was maintained during follow-up compared to standard of care. Educational intervention with the PRE-RA and PRE-RA Plus tools was associated with an increased ability to identify these RA risk factors which persisted throughout follow-up in comparison to the standard of care [54]. Perhaps more importantly, the PRE-RA tool increased motivation to improve RA-risk-related behaviors [55]. Subjects who received PRE-RA were more likely to increase ladder scores (RR 1.23 [1.01–1.51]) than those who received standard of care. In addition, PRE-RA subjects reported increased fish intake, tooth brushing, flossing, and smoking cessation compared to those who received standard of care [55]. This demonstrates that personalized medicine may improve likelihood of making behavioral modifications. Though some interviewed individuals expressed anxiety about learning their genetic risk, which may prevent them from pursuing preventative testing [59], personalized education via the PRE-RA tool was shown to decrease anxiety and concern for RA development [57], perhaps making them more likely to seek the preventative help they need. The trial investigating the PRE-RA tool may have had limited generalizability as the majority of subjects were highly educated. This also indicates that it may be difficult to recruit at-risk groups for educational interventions.
Given the potential hesitancy to make preventative RA-related lifestyle changes in low risk groups, other opportunities include public health initiatives, which can impact a large portion of the population; for instance, the regulation of smoking through taxes and age restrictions, or banning menthol cigarettes which were previously aggressively marketed to underprivileged communities. Public health initiatives could also discourage low-quality dietary items while encouraging healthier food groups. Other options include encouragement of physical activity via alternative transportation initiatives like increasing urban access to bicycles or city planning with more bike lanes. Many of these behaviors are already considered healthy for reasons besides RA, so there could be positive benefits for RA risk reduction even if not enacted for this reason. These would target the population at large under the pretext of broad health improvement brought on by healthy life choices and as a byproduct could reduce RA risk.
Behavioral modifications can be broken down into primordial and primary interventions, which can work to prevent RA-related behaviors and disease progression, respectively. Primordial interventions may be especially useful among the general population.

3.2. RA At-Risk Group 2: Genetics

For individuals with a genetic predisposition, there is an increased risk for RA which may be exacerbated by behavioral risk factors. Genetic risk includes a family history of RA, especially having a first-degree relative (FDR; parent, sibling, or child) with RA, which confers a 2- to 3-fold increased likelihood of developing RA compared to the general population. FDRs also express increased levels of rheumatic regional pain syndromes and RA-related autoantibodies such as ACPA and rheumatoid factor (RF) in comparison to the general population, which may be indicative of even further progression to clinical RA [60]. Other genetic risk factors include presence of the HLA-DRB1 “shared epitope”, which is the strongest genetic risk factor for RA, particularly when combined with smoking and other environmental factors. Specifically, aberrantly formed citrullinated proteins are presented to T cells via the HLA-DRβ1 protein, which may have the downstream effect of antibody production by B cells [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Amino acid haplotypes at positions 11, 71, and 74 of the HLA-DRβ1 protein greatly increase RA risk and this risk is exacerbated by smoking [27,61]. FDRs who have the shared epitope are even more likely to express RA-related autoantibodies than FDRs without additional genetic predisposition. Other genes such as PTPN22 (protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 22) also likely have causal roles in RA risk, and the mechanisms are being investigated [62]. Furthermore, 98 genes at 101 risk loci have been identified and demonstrated to increase RA risk [63]. Interestingly, studies finding RA monozygotic twin concordance at 15% suggest that genetics alone confer a limited risk for RA development [64].
Genetically predisposed individuals, especially those with pre-clinical RA manifestations, may be more amenable to preventative behavioral changes. In addition to smoking cessation, weight loss, increased physical activity, and dietary modifications, individuals with a family history of RA may benefit from other lifestyle decisions, such as consumer genetic testing for the shared epitope. When interviewed, many FDRs agreed that heredity is related to RA risk however most did not recognize behaviors like poor dental health or smoking as risk factors, and there was a low knowledge of personal behaviors, obesity, or poor diet and RA risk [54,55,56,57]. Individuals in several studies indicated that they would prefer behavioral to pharmaceutical interventions [59,65,66,67,68], expressing that they would be more likely to take preventative measures if they were at a substantially increased risk for RA (above 30% in the next five years), and if the prevention methods had high efficacy [68,69].
There may be educational opportunities which will have a significant impact in the population of FDRs to patients with RA, who may be more receptive to educational materials, especially considering the promising results of the PRE-RA study [54,55,56,57]. Tools like the PRE-clinical Evaluation of Novel Targets in RA website (www.preventra.net) may also help FDRs to assess and better understand their risk for RA. Since interviewed individuals expressed a preference for lifestyle modifications over medications as well as a desire to learn more about their disease [58], FDRs may be amenable to receiving RA risk assessments. This may be beneficial in providing at-risk individuals with more information to make decisions about their behaviors and lifestyle.
In terms of perceptions regarding behavioral changes, interviewed FDRs demonstrated similar beliefs as those in the general population. Many were unsure about the extent of their RA risk [58], expressed a lack of knowledge when making decisions about RA and RA risk, and were unwilling to make lifestyle changes without more information [59]. Many also mentioned that negative perceptions of RA may decrease the likelihood of seeking predictive help. Furthermore, they were specifically concerned about genetic testing, expressing concerns about accuracy and reliability of genetic testing [59] as well as fear of anxiety provoked by results of genetic tests [58,59]. Many also expressed the desire for a more personalized risk assessment to help them make informed decisions [59], or additional support to better understand risk and cope with psychological impact of receiving risk information [58].
Additional challenges surrounding genetic risk include communicating genetic risk information in a way that promotes disease understanding without causing anxiety [69]. For instance, it may be beneficial to provide genetic risk communications via trained geneticists using a streamlined/abridged protocol in a face-to-face or phone setting, rather than via mail or email only. It may also be useful to present genetic information graphically. There may be additional risks when using direct-to-consumer genetic testing services which may increase concern and anxiety [70]. Educational initiatives like the PRE-RA tool may be an important step in letting at-risk individuals know their likelihood of developing RA and encouraging relevant behavior changes (Figure 1).

3.3. RA At-Risk Group 3: Elevated Autoantibodies

Individuals who test positive for RA biomarkers including ACPA, RF, and research biomarkers such as T-cell clones [71], anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) and anti-peptidyl-arginine deiminase type-3 (anti-PAD3) antibodies [72], may also be at increased risk for RA or exacerbated disease activity and joint damage. The association between ACPA and RF positivity and RA is well established [73]. There is a dose-response between increased ACPA levels and likelihood for developing RA. ACPA positivity is more prevalent among FDRs (3–6%) than in the general population (1%), and among smokers, women, and individuals between 45 and 55 years old [74]. Recent research investigating T cell profiles among genetically at-risk individuals, specifically FDRs, demonstrated that T cell clones were present prior to clinical onset of RA and increased from asymptomatic FDRs to symptomatic FDRs to RA disease patients. Thus, T cells increase over time throughout the pre-clinical RA period, especially in stages closer to RA onset [71]. Anti-CarP and anti-PAD3 levels were measured among RA patients and were associated with higher disease activity, particularly in association with other RA risk factors such as RF and ACPA. This indicates that Anti-CarP and anti-PAD3 may play a role in RA development and contribute to disease progression. Elevation of biomarkers like ACPA alone can increase risk of RA to about 5% and this association is even stronger when combined with other risk factors, especially family history of RA, increasing risk to 69% [2]. Antibody positivity is an important indicator of who may progress to RA and the level of association of lifestyle choices and RA risk as many risk factors are associated with autoantibody-positive RA. Prevention among this group may help to slow disease progression as well as attenuate disease manifestations if clinical RA occurs.
As these individuals have been seen by researchers or clinicians and likely been informed of their results, they may be more amenable to preventative behavioral modifications. Understanding their level of disease knowledge, satisfaction with disease education and risk communication, and desire to prevent clinical RA could help to develop targeted lifestyle interventions (Table 3). Interviewed individuals expressed low knowledge about RA and dissatisfaction with the lack of information on the efficacy of behavioral changes and RA risk, indicating that the current standard of care is inadequate in preparing high-risk individuals to understand and manage their RA risk [67]. Further, many expressed a specific anxiety about genetic testing, a potential barrier to this form of behavioral modification. Compared to asymptomatic individuals, symptomatic biomarker-positive individuals were more likely to express interest in behavioral changes, which is a challenge, as early prevention is thought to be essential to stopping disease progression. Similar to the genetic risk group, biomarker-positive individuals exhibited a preference for lifestyle modifications and a desire to learn more about personalized risk factors. At the same time, they expressed a desire to gain more information, assurance, and confirmation. Opportunities include a more robust educational tool to help these individuals better understand their risk and make decisions regarding their behaviors (Figure 1).

3.4. RA At-Risk Group 4: Clinical RA Features

Individuals in the clinical at-risk group include those who present with clinically suspect arthralgias, palindromic rheumatism, undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis, and extra articular inflammatory manifestations such as interstitial lung disease but without classifiable RA. Progression from systemic autoimmunity to clinical pre-RA manifestations such as inflammation and tissue damage may be due to mechanical stress and stimulation of mesenchymal cells, leading to chemokine release and monocyte attraction, as well as osteoclast activation, producing the classical articular presentation [75]. Individuals with pre-RA disease manifestations are at very elevated risk for developing classifiable RA. Some of these individuals may be appropriately treated by clinicians for RA, even if research classification criteria are not entirely fulfilled. Thus, the interpretation of whether these individuals are at risk for RA or already have it may be highly individualized related to the patients’ and providers’ shared goals and decision making.
Interviews conducted among individuals with clinically suspect arthralgias provide insight into perceptions surrounding RA development [76]. Though none of the interviewed individuals identified themselves as patients, they did mention social and physical consequences as a result of their pain and arthralgias. These individuals often express increased disease anxiety related to their symptoms. Many participants expressed concern regarding RA progression and uncertainty about the consequences of their prognosis. However, many participants adopted preventative behavioral changes after learning of their disease risk, specifically, dietary changes, haptonomy, yoga, tai chi, meditation, and mindfulness. These lifestyle changes promote health and reduce pain, highlighting that individuals with RA symptoms may be more likely to adopt behavioral changes to prevent classifiable RA [76]. Thus, it is possible that symptomatic individuals are more likely to make behavioral preventative changes than asymptomatic RA at-risk groups (Table 3). In this group, prognostic models may be essential to accurately provide risk estimations.
Thus, an opportunity among the clinical at-risk group may be encouraging predictive testing to forecast RA or inflammatory arthritis (IA) progression (Figure 1). For instance, ultrasound may be a useful predictor for individuals with ACPA-positivity and non-specific musculoskeletal symptoms, clinically suspect arthralgia, and palindromic rheumatism, but less accurate among others sub-groups [77]. Similarly, a model was developed to combine the severity, number, and locations of subclinical inflammation to determine different risk scores, with increasing RA risk based on increasing presence of inflammation [78]. Another model found that MRI-detected tenosynovitis was associated with IA and RA development, but that foot MRI scans did not increase predictive accuracy [79].
Predictive models may help to better understand the compounding risk from multiple risk factors leading to the production of personalized risk evaluations to more accurately predict RA risk. Individuals with combined risk factors may be at increased risk for disease. Similarly, individuals with a positive family history, high genetic susceptibility, smoking, and increased BMI had a 22-fold increased risk for ACPA-positive RA [80]. Additional predictive models have been developed for individuals in later phases of RA progression. For instance, a tool subclassifying individuals’ ACPA positivity and non-specific musculoskeletal symptoms and IA progression based on RA-related variables found that many individuals presented with non-specific musculoskeletal symptoms and no individuals with a low-risk score progressed to IA, while 31% of those with a moderate risk developed IA and 62% of individuals with a high risk progressed to IA [81]. Meanwhile, a prediction rule for RA development in seropositive (ACPA and/or IgM RF-positive) arthralgia patients categorized patients into 3 risk groups based on risk variables including FDR status, alcohol non-use, duration of symptoms < 12 months, presence of intermittent symptoms, and antibody status. with 82% accuracy [82]. Individuals in the intermediate risk group may have a 4.52-fold increased risk for RA, while those in the high-risk group have a 14.86-fold increased RA risk [82]. At the same time, genetic risk and pre-clinical risk factors may be combined to more accurately assess which clinically suspect arthralgia patients will progress to IA. A study evaluating clinically suspect arthralgia patients determined that IL-7R and IGF-1 were differentially expressed among individuals who did and did not progress to IA [83].

4. Conclusions

There are several behavioral factors which are associated with increased likelihood of developing RA, and which can be modified to reduce risk. As individuals’ RA risk increases from behavioral risk only to genetic, autoantibody, and pre-clinical RA risk, it may be possible to tailor strategies to encourage RA education and prevention. As risk increases, individuals may be more likely to make preventative behavioral modifications. However, early measures are more likely to effectively attenuate risk. In the general population, large-scale public health initiatives may be necessary to promote healthier lifestyle, with the byproduct of decreasing RA risk. In the genetic, autoantibody, and pre-clinical RA at-risk groups, personalized risk scores and education may be beneficial in helping individuals cope with their RA risk and make appropriate decisions regarding preventative care. More research is needed to determine the efficacy of specific behavioral modifications and likelihood of recruitment and long-term adherence to these lifestyle changes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.Z. and J.A.S.; Methodology, A.Z. and J.A.S.; resources, A.Z. and J.A.S.; data curation A.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, A.Z.; writing—review and editing, J.A.S.; visualization, A.Z.; supervision, J.A.S.; project administration, J.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

Sparks has performed consultancy for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, and Pfizer unrelated to the current work and is supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (grant numbers K23 AR069688, R03 AR075886, L30 AR066953, P30 AR070253, and P30 AR072577), the Rheumatology Research Foundation (R Bridge Award), and the Bruce, R. and Joan, M. Mickey Research Scholar Fund. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of Harvard University, its affiliated academic health care centers, or the NIH.

References

  1. Alpizar-Rodriguez, D.; Finckh, A. Is the prevention of rheumatoid arthritis possible? Clin. Rheumatol. 2020, 39, 1383–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Finckh, A.; Escher, M.; Liang, M.H.; Bansback, N. Preventive Treatments for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Issues Regarding Patient Preferences. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2016, 18, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Di Giuseppe, D.; Discacciati, A.; Orsini, N.; Wolk, A. Cigarette smoking and risk of rheumatoid arthritis: A dose-response meta-analysis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2014, 16, R61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Prisco, L.C.; Martin, L.W.; Sparks, J.A. Inhalants other than personal cigarette smoking and risk for developing rheumatoid arthritis. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2020, 32, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Feng, J.; Chen, Q.; Yu, F.; Wang, Z.; Chen, S.; Jin, Z.; Cai, Q.; Liu, Y.; He, J. Body Mass Index and Risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Medicine 2016, 95, e2859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Qin, B.; Yang, M.; Fu, H.; Ma, N.; Wei, T.; Tang, Q.; Hu, Z.; Liang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Zhong, R. Body mass index and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2015, 17, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Zhou, Y.; Sun, M. A meta-analysis of the relationship between body mass index and risk of rheumatoid arthritis. EXCLI J. 2018, 17, 1079–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Feng, X.; Xu, X.; Shi, Y.; Liu, X.; Liu, H.; Hou, H.; Ji, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; et al. Body Mass Index and the Risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Updated Dose-Response Meta-Analysis. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 3579081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Liu, X.; Tedeschi, S.K.; Lu, B.; Zaccardelli, A.; Speyer, C.B.; Costenbader, K.H.; Karlson, E.W.; Sparks, J.A. Long-Term Physical Activity and Subsequent Risk for Rheumatoid Arthritis Among Women: A Prospective Cohort Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019, 71, 1460–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Di Giuseppe, D.; Crippa, A.; Orsini, N.; Wolk, A. Fish consumption and risk of rheumatoid arthritis: A dose-response meta-analysis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2014, 16, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. de Oliveira Ferreira, R.; de Brito Silva, R.; Magno, M.B.; Carvalho Almeida, A.; Fagundes, N.C.F.; Maia, L.C.; Lima, R.R. Does periodontitis represent a risk factor for rheumatoid arthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2019, 11, 1759720X19858514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Alpizar-Rodriguez, D.; Lesker, T.R.; Gronow, A.; Gilbert, B.; Raemy, E.; Lamacchia, C.; Gabay, C.; Finckh, A.; Strowig, T. Prevotella copri in individuals at risk for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2019, 78, 590–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Scher, J.U.; Sczesnak, A.; Longman, R.S.; Segata, N.; Ubeda, C.; Bielski, C.; Rostron, T.; Cerundolo, V.; Pamer, E.G.; Abramson, S.B.; et al. Expansion of intestinal Prevotella copri correlates with enhanced susceptibility to arthritis. Elife 2013, 2, e01202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, Y.C.; Agnew-Blais, J.; Malspeis, S.; Keyes, K.; Costenbader, K.; Kubzansky, L.D.; Roberts, A.L.; Koenen, K.C.; Karlson, E.W. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Risk for Incident Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2016, 68, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Sparks, J.A.; Malspeis, S.; Hahn, J.; Wang, J.; Roberts, A.L.; Kubzansky, L.D.; Costenbader, K.H. Depression and Subsequent Risk for Incident Rheumatoid Arthritis Among Women. Arthritis Care Res. 2021, 73, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zaccardelli, A.; Friedlander, H.M.; Ford, J.A.; Sparks, J.A. Potential of Lifestyle Changes for Reducing the Risk of Developing Rheumatoid Arthritis: Is an Ounce of Prevention Worth a Pound of Cure? Clin. Ther. 2019, 41, 1323–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zaccardelli, A.; Liu, X.; Ford, J.A.; Cui, J.; Lu, B.; Chu, S.H.; Schur, P.H.; Speyer, C.B.; Costenbader, K.H.; Robinson, W.H.; et al. Asthma and elevation of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies prior to the onset of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2019, 21, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zaccardelli, A.; Liu, X.; Ford, J.A.; Cui, J.; Lu, B.; Chu, S.H.; Schur, P.H.; Speyer, C.B.; Costenbader, K.H.; Robinson, W.H.; et al. Elevated anti-citrullinated protein antibodies prior to rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis and risks for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma. Arthritis Care Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sparks, J.A.; Karlson, E.W. The Roles of Cigarette Smoking and the Lung in the Transitions Between Phases of Preclinical Rheumatoid Arthritis. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2016, 18, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Klareskog, L.; Stolt, P.; Lundberg, K.; Kallberg, H.; Bengtsson, C.; Grunewald, J.; Ronnelid, J.; Harris, H.E.; Ulfgren, A.K.; Rantapaa-Dahlqvist, S.; et al. A new model for an etiology of rheumatoid arthritis: Smoking may trigger HLA-DR (shared epitope)-restricted immune reactions to autoantigens modified by citrullination. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Karlson, E.W.; Chang, S.C.; Cui, J.; Chibnik, L.B.; Fraser, P.A.; De Vivo, I.; Costenbader, K.H. Gene-environment interaction between HLA-DRB1 shared epitope and heavy cigarette smoking in predicting incident rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2010, 69, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Too, C.L.; Yahya, A.; Murad, S.; Dhaliwal, J.S.; Larsson, P.T.; Muhamad, N.A.; Abdullah, N.A.; Mustafa, A.N.; Klareskog, L.; Alfredsson, L.; et al. Smoking interacts with HLA-DRB1 shared epitope in the development of anti-citrullinated protein antibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis: Results from the Malaysian Epidemiological Investigation of Rheumatoid Arthritis (MyEIRA). Arthritis Res. Ther. 2012, 14, R89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Padyukov, L.; Silva, C.; Stolt, P.; Alfredsson, L.; Klareskog, L. A gene-environment interaction between smoking and shared epitope genes in HLA-DR provides a high risk of seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004, 50, 3085–3092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lee, H.S.; Irigoyen, P.; Kern, M.; Lee, A.; Batliwalla, F.; Khalili, H.; Wolfe, F.; Lum, R.F.; Massarotti, E.; Weisman, M.; et al. Interaction between smoking, the shared epitope, and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide: A mixed picture in three large North American rheumatoid arthritis cohorts. Arthritis Rheum. 2007, 56, 1745–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Linn-Rasker, S.P.; van der Helm-van Mil, A.H.; van Gaalen, F.A.; Kloppenburg, M.; de Vries, R.R.; le Cessie, S.; Breedveld, F.C.; Toes, R.E.; Huizinga, T.W. Smoking is a risk factor for anti-CCP antibodies only in rheumatoid arthritis patients who carry HLA-DRB1 shared epitope alleles. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2006, 65, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Sugiyama, D.; Nishimura, K.; Tamaki, K.; Tsuji, G.; Nakazawa, T.; Morinobu, A.; Kumagai, S. Impact of smoking as a risk factor for developing rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2010, 69, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kallberg, H.; Ding, B.; Padyukov, L.; Bengtsson, C.; Ronnelid, J.; Klareskog, L.; Alfredsson, L.; Group, E.S. Smoking is a major preventable risk factor for rheumatoid arthritis: Estimations of risks after various exposures to cigarette smoke. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2011, 70, 508–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Symmons, D.P.; Bankhead, C.R.; Harrison, B.J.; Brennan, P.; Barrett, E.M.; Scott, D.G.; Silman, A.J. Blood transfusion, smoking, and obesity as risk factors for the development of rheumatoid arthritis: Results from a primary care-based incident case-control study in Norfolk, England. Arthritis Rheum. 1997, 40, 1955–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. de Hair, M.J.; Landewe, R.B.; van de Sande, M.G.; van Schaardenburg, D.; van Baarsen, L.G.; Gerlag, D.M.; Tak, P.P. Smoking and overweight determine the likelihood of developing rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013, 72, 1654–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ohno, T.; Aune, D.; Heath, A.K. Adiposity and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mora, S.; Cook, N.; Buring, J.E.; Ridker, P.M.; Lee, I.M. Physical activity and reduced risk of cardiovascular events: Potential mediating mechanisms. Circulation 2007, 116, 2110–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Sun, L.; Zhu, J.; Ling, Y.; Mi, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, T.; Li, Y. Physical activity and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis: Evidence from meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pattison, D.J.; Symmons, D.P.; Lunt, M.; Welch, A.; Luben, R.; Bingham, S.A.; Khaw, K.T.; Day, N.E.; Silman, A.J. Dietary risk factors for the development of inflammatory polyarthritis: Evidence for a role of high level of red meat consumption. Arthritis Rheum. 2004, 50, 3804–3812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Benito-Garcia, E.; Feskanich, D.; Hu, F.B.; Mandl, L.A.; Karlson, E.W. Protein, iron, and meat consumption and risk for rheumatoid arthritis: A prospective cohort study. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2007, 9, R16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Linos, A.; Kaklamani, V.G.; Kaklamani, E.; Koumantaki, Y.; Giziaki, E.; Papazoglou, S.; Mantzoros, C.S. Dietary factors in relation to rheumatoid arthritis: A role for olive oil and cooked vegetables? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999, 70, 1077–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Rosell, M.; Wesley, A.M.; Rydin, K.; Klareskog, L.; Alfredsson, L. Dietary fish and fish oil and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis. Epidemiology 2009, 20, 896–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Di Giuseppe, D.; Wallin, A.; Bottai, M.; Askling, J.; Wolk, A. Long-term intake of dietary long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of rheumatoid arthritis: A prospective cohort study of women. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014, 73, 1949–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Shapiro, J.A.; Koepsell, T.D.; Voigt, L.F.; Dugowson, C.E.; Kestin, M.; Nelson, J.L. Diet and rheumatoid arthritis in women: A possible protective effect of fish consumption. Epidemiology 1996, 7, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mikuls, T.R.; Cerhan, J.R.; Criswell, L.A.; Merlino, L.; Mudano, A.S.; Burma, M.; Folsom, A.R.; Saag, K.G. Coffee, tea, and caffeine consumption and risk of rheumatoid arthritis: Results from the Iowa Women’s Health Study. Arthritis Rheum. 2002, 46, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Heliovaara, M.; Aho, K.; Knekt, P.; Impivaara, O.; Reunanen, A.; Aromaa, A. Coffee consumption, rheumatoid factor, and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2000, 59, 631–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Pattison, D.; Silman, A.; Goodson, N.; Lunt, M.; Bunn, D.; Luben, R.; Welch, A.; Bingham, S.; Khaw, K.; Day, N. Vitamin C and the risk of developing inflammatory polyarthritis: Prospective nested case-control study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2004, 63, 843–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Hu, Y.; Sparks, J.A.; Malspeis, S.; Costenbader, K.H.; Hu, F.B.; Karlson, E.W.; Lu, B. Long-term dietary quality and risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis in women. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 1357–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sparks, J.A.; Chen, C.Y.; Hiraki, L.T.; Malspeis, S.; Costenbader, K.H.; Karlson, E.W. Contributions of familial rheumatoid arthritis or lupus and environmental factors to risk of rheumatoid arthritis in women: A prospective cohort study. Arthritis Care Res. 2014, 66, 1438–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Hahn, J.; Choi, M.; Malspeis, S.; Stevens, E.; Karlson, E.W.; Yoshida, K.; Kubzansky, L.; Sparks, J.A.; Costenbader, K.H. Healthy Lifestyle and Risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Women: A Prospective Cohort Study. In Proceedings of the ACR Convergence, Online, 8 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
  45. Liu, X.; Tedeschi, S.K.; Barbhaiya, M.; Leatherwood, C.L.; Speyer, C.B.; Lu, B.; Costenbader, K.H.; Karlson, E.W.; Sparks, J.A. Impact and Timing of Smoking Cessation on Reducing Risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis Among Women in the Nurses’ Health Studies. Arthritis Care Res. 2019, 71, 914–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Di Giuseppe, D.; Orsini, N.; Alfredsson, L.; Askling, J.; Wolk, A. Cigarette smoking and smoking cessation in relation to risk of rheumatoid arthritis in women. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2013, 15, R56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Costenbader, K.H.; Feskanich, D.; Mandl, L.A.; Karlson, E.W. Smoking intensity, duration, and cessation, and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis in women. Am. J. Med. 2006, 119, 503.e1–503.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Marchand, N.; Sparks, J.A.; Yoshida, K.; Malspeis, S.; Xuehong, Z.; Costenbader, K.H.; Karlson, E.W.; Lu, B. Long-term Weight Changes and Risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis Among Women in a Prospective Cohort: A Marginal Structural Model Approach. In Proceedings of the ACR Convergence, Online, 8 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
  49. Maglio, C.; Zhang, Y.; Peltonen, M.; Andersson-Assarsson, J.; Svensson, P.A.; Herder, C.; Rudin, A.; Carlsson, L. Bariatric surgery and the incidence of rheumatoid arthritis—A Swedish Obese Subjects study. Rheumatology 2020, 59, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Van de Stadt, L.A.; van Schaardenburg, D. Alcohol consumption protects against arthritis development in seropositive arthralgia patients. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2012, 71, 1431–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pattison, D.J.; Symmons, D.P.; Lunt, M.; Welch, A.; Bingham, S.A.; Day, N.E.; Silman, A.J. Dietary β-cryptoxanthin and inflammatory polyarthritis: Results from a population-based prospective study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 82, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Marchand, N.; Chiu, Y.; Yoshida, K.; Malspeis, S.; Sparks, J.A.; Costenbader, K.H.; Karlson, E.W.; Lu, B. Threshold Level for Long-term Healthy Diet Adherence to Reduce the Risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis Among Women in a Prospective Cohort Using a Marginal Structural Model Approach. In Proceedings of the ACR Convergence, Online, 8 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
  53. Simons, G.; Mason, A.; Falahee, M.; Kumar, K.; Mallen, C.D.; Raza, K.; Stack, R.J. Qualitative Exploration of Illness Perceptions of Rheumatoid Arthritis in the General Public. Musculoskelet. Care 2017, 15, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Prado, M.G.; Iversen, M.D.; Yu, Z.; Miller Kroouze, R.; Triedman, N.A.; Kalia, S.S.; Lu, B.; Green, R.C.; Karlson, E.W.; Sparks, J.A. Effectiveness of a Web-Based Personalized Rheumatoid Arthritis Risk Tool with or Without a Health Educator for Knowledge of Rheumatoid Arthritis Risk Factors. Arthritis Care Res. 2018, 70, 1421–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Sparks, J.A.; Iversen, M.D.; Yu, Z.; Triedman, N.A.; Prado, M.G.; Miller Kroouze, R.; Kalia, S.S.; Atkinson, M.L.; Mody, E.A.; Helfgott, S.M.; et al. Disclosure of Personalized Rheumatoid Arthritis Risk Using Genetics, Biomarkers, and Lifestyle Factors to Motivate Health Behavior Improvements: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthritis Care Res. 2018, 70, 823–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sparks, J.A.; Iversen, M.D.; Miller Kroouze, R.; Mahmoud, T.G.; Triedman, N.A.; Kalia, S.S.; Atkinson, M.L.; Lu, B.; Deane, K.D.; Costenbader, K.H.; et al. Personalized Risk Estimator for Rheumatoid Arthritis (PRE-RA) Family Study: Rationale and design for a randomized controlled trial evaluating rheumatoid arthritis risk education to first-degree relatives. Contemp. Clin. Trials 2014, 39, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Marshall, A.A.; Zaccardelli, A.; Yu, Z.; Prado, M.G.; Liu, X.; Miller Kroouze, R.; Kalia, S.S.; Green, R.C.; Triedman, N.A.; Lu, B.; et al. Effect of communicating personalized rheumatoid arthritis risk on concern for developing RA: A randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ. Couns. 2019, 102, 976–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Stack, R.J.; Stoffer, M.; Englbrecht, M.; Mosor, E.; Falahee, M.; Simons, G.; Smolen, J.; Schett, G.; Buckley, C.D.; Kumar, K.; et al. Perceptions of risk and predictive testing held by the first-degree relatives of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in England, Austria and Germany: A qualitative study. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e010555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Simons, G.; Stack, R.J.; Stoffer-Marx, M.; Englbrecht, M.; Mosor, E.; Buckley, C.D.; Kumar, K.; Hansson, M.; Hueber, A.; Stamm, T.; et al. Perceptions of first-degree relatives of patients with rheumatoid arthritis about lifestyle modifications and pharmacological interventions to reduce the risk of rheumatoid arthritis development: A qualitative interview study. BMC Rheumatol. 2018, 2, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Perez-Barbosa, L.; Garza-Elizondo, M.A.; Vega-Morales, D.; Esquivel-Valerio, J.A.; Pelaez-Ballestas, I.; Vazquez-Fuentes, B.R.; Galarza-Delgado, D.A. High frequency of rheumatic regional pain syndromes in first-degree relatives of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Rheumatol. 2020, 39, 3303–3307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Raychaudhuri, S.; Sandor, C.; Stahl, E.A.; Freudenberg, J.; Lee, H.S.; Jia, X.; Alfredsson, L.; Padyukov, L.; Klareskog, L.; Worthington, J.; et al. Five amino acids in three HLA proteins explain most of the association between MHC and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Schulz, S.; Zimmer, P.; Putz, N.; Jurianz, E.; Schaller, H.G.; Reichert, S. rs2476601 in PTPN22 gene in rheumatoid arthritis and periodontitis-a possible interface? J. Transl. Med. 2020, 18, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Okada, Y.; Wu, D.; Trynka, G.; Raj, T.; Terao, C.; Ikari, K.; Kochi, Y.; Ohmura, K.; Suzuki, A.; Yoshida, S.; et al. Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis contributes to biology and drug discovery. Nature 2014, 506, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Silman, A.J.; MacGregor, A.J.; Thomson, W.; Holligan, S.; Carthy, D.; Farhan, A.; Ollier, W.E. Twin concordance rates for rheumatoid arthritis: Results from a nationwide study. Br. J. Rheumatol. 1993, 32, 903–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Munro, S.; Spooner, L.; Milbers, K.; Hudson, M.; Koehn, C.; Harrison, M. Perspectives of patients, first-degree relatives and rheumatologists on preventive treatments for rheumatoid arthritis: A qualitative analysis. BMC Rheumatol. 2018, 2, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Falahee, M.; Simons, G.; Buckley, C.D.; Hansson, M.; Stack, R.J.; Raza, K. Patients’ Perceptions of Their Relatives’ Risk of Developing Rheumatoid Arthritis and of the Potential for Risk Communication, Prediction, and Modulation. Arthritis Care Res. 2017, 69, 1558–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mosor, E.; Stoffer-Marx, M.; Steiner, G.; Raza, K.; Stack, R.J.; Simons, G.; Falahee, M.; Skingle, D.; Dobrin, M.; Schett, G.; et al. I Would Never Take Preventive Medication! Perspectives and Information Needs of People Who Underwent Predictive Tests for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2020, 72, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Novotny, F.; Haeny, S.; Hudelson, P.; Escher, M.; Finckh, A. Primary prevention of rheumatoid arthritis: A qualitative study in a high-risk population. Jt. Bone Spine 2013, 80, 673–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Falahee, M.; Finckh, A.; Raza, K.; Harrison, M. Preferences of Patients and At-risk Individuals for Preventive Approaches to Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin. Ther. 2019, 41, 1346–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lautenbach, D.M.; Christensen, K.D.; Sparks, J.A.; Green, R.C. Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2013, 14, 491–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Lamacchia, C.; Calderin Sollet, Z.; Courvoisier, D.; Mongin, D.; Palmer, G.; Studer, O.; Gabay, C.; Villard, J.; Buhler, S.; Finckh, A. Detection of circulating highly expanded T-cell clones in at-risk individuals for rheumatoid arthritis before the clinical onset of the disease. Rheumatology 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lamacchia, C.; Courvoisier, D.S.; Jarlborg, M.; Bas, S.; Roux-Lombard, P.; Moller, B.; Ciurea, A.; Finckh, A.; Bentow, C.; Martinez-Prat, L.; et al. Predictive value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD3 antibodies alone or in combination with RF and ACPA on the severity of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. van Zanten, A.; Arends, S.; Roozendaal, C.; Limburg, P.C.; Maas, F.; Trouw, L.A.; Toes, R.E.M.; Huizinga, T.W.J.; Bootsma, H.; Brouwer, E. Presence of anticitrullinated protein antibodies in a large population-based cohort from the Netherlands. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 1184–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Alpizar-Rodriguez, D.; Brulhart, L.; Mueller, R.B.; Moller, B.; Dudler, J.; Ciurea, A.; Walker, U.A.; Von Muhlenen, I.; Kyburz, D.; Zufferey, P.; et al. The prevalence of anticitrullinated protein antibodies increases with age in healthy individuals at risk for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Rheumatol. 2017, 36, 677–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Cambre, I.; Gaublomme, D.; Burssens, A.; Jacques, P.; Schryvers, N.; De Muynck, A.; Meuris, L.; Lambrecht, S.; Carter, S.; de Bleser, P.; et al. Mechanical strain determines the site-specific localization of inflammation and tissue damage in arthritis. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Newsum, E.C.; van der Helm-van Mil, A.H.; Kaptein, A.A. Views on clinically suspect arthralgia: A focus group study. Clin. Rheumatol. 2016, 35, 1347–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Duquenne, L.; Chowdhury, R.; Mankia, K.; Emery, P. The Role of Ultrasound Across the Inflammatory Arthritis Continuum: Focus on “At-Risk” Individuals. Front. Med. 2020, 7, 587827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Matthijssen, X.M.E.; Wouters, F.; Boeters, D.M.; Boer, A.C.; Dakkak, Y.J.; Niemantsverdriet, E.; van der Helm-van Mil, A.H.M. A search to the target tissue in which RA-specific inflammation starts: A detailed MRI study to improve identification of RA-specific features in the phase of clinically suspect arthralgia. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2019, 21, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Boer, A.C.; Wouters, F.; Dakkak, Y.J.; Niemantsverdriet, E.; van der Helm-van Mil, A.H.M. Improving the feasibility of MRI in clinically suspect arthralgia for prediction of rheumatoid arthritis by omitting scanning of the feet. Rheumatology 2020, 59, 1247–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Sparks, J.A.; Chen, C.Y.; Jiang, X.; Askling, J.; Hiraki, L.T.; Malspeis, S.; Klareskog, L.; Alfredsson, L.; Costenbader, K.H.; Karlson, E.W. Improved performance of epidemiologic and genetic risk models for rheumatoid arthritis serologic phenotypes using family history. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2015, 74, 1522–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Rakieh, C.; Nam, J.L.; Hunt, L.; Hensor, E.M.; Das, S.; Bissell, L.A.; Villeneuve, E.; McGonagle, D.; Hodgson, R.; Grainger, A.; et al. Predicting the development of clinical arthritis in anti-CCP positive individuals with non-specific musculoskeletal symptoms: A prospective observational cohort study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2015, 74, 1659–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. van de Stadt, L.A.; Witte, B.I.; Bos, W.H.; van Schaardenburg, D. A prediction rule for the development of arthritis in seropositive arthralgia patients. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013, 72, 1920–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Niemantsverdriet, E.; van den Akker, E.B.; Boeters, D.M.; van den Eeden, S.J.F.; Geluk, A.; van der Helm-van Mil, A.H.M. Gene expression identifies patients who develop inflammatory arthritis in a clinically suspect arthralgia cohort. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2020, 22, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Healthcare 09 00641 g001 550
Figure 1. Primordial and primary prevention behavioral opportunities related to rheumatoid arthritis.
Figure 1. Primordial and primary prevention behavioral opportunities related to rheumatoid arthritis.
Healthcare 09 00641 g001
Table
Table 1. Meta-analyses of behavioral risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis.
Table 1. Meta-analyses of behavioral risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis.
Behavioral Risk Factor and ComparisonsSexDirection of AssociationRR or OR for RA (95% CI)Author (Year) of Reference
Smoking
1–10 pack-years/>20 pack-years/>40 pack-years vs. never smokerAll↑RR 1.26 (1.14–1.39)
RR 1.95 (1.65–2.27)
RR 2.07 (1.15–3.73)		Di Giuseppe (2014) [3]
High (>40 pack-years) vs. low (never smoker)All *↑RR 2.47 (2.02–3.02)Di Giuseppe (2014) [3]
Ever vs. neverMen↑OR 1.89 (1.56–2.28)Sugiyama (2010) [26]
RR 1.47 (1.29–1.68)Ding (2021)
Current vs. neverMen↑OR 1.87 (1.49–2.34)Sugiyama (2010) [26]
RR 1.27 (1.09–1.48)Ding (2021)
Past vs. neverMen↑OR 1.76 (1.33–2.31)Sugiyama (2010) [26]
Ever vs. neverMen *↑↑ *OR 3.02 (2.35–3.88) *Sugiyama (2010) [26]
Current vs. neverMen *↑↑ *OR 3.91 (2.78–5.50) *Sugiyama (2010) [26]
Past vs. neverMen *↑↑ *OR 2.46 (1.74–3.47) *Sugiyama (2010) [26]
Ever vs. neverWomen↑OR 1.27 (1.12–1.44)Sugiyama (2010) [26]
Current vs. neverWomen↑OR 1.31 (1.12–1.54)Sugiyama (2010) [26]
Past vs. neverWomen↑OR 1.22 (1.06–1.40)Sugiyama (2010) [26]
Ever vs. neverWomen *↑ *OR 1.34 (0.99–1.80) *Sugiyama (2010) [26]
Current vs. neverWomen *↑ *OR 1.29 (0.94–1.77) *Sugiyama (2010) [26]
Past vs. neverWomen *↑OR 1.21 (0.83–1.77)Sugiyama (2010) [26]
>20 pack-years vs. never smokerMen↑OR 2.31 (1.55–3.41)Sugiyama (2010) [26]
>20 pack-years vs. never smokerWomen↑OR 1.75 (1.52–2.02)Sugiyama (2010) [26]
Excess weight
Obese/overweight vs. normalAll↑RR 1.31 (1.12–1.53)
RR 1.15 (1.03–1.29)
RR 1.21 (1.02–1.44)
RR 1.05 (0.97–1.13)
RR 1.32 (1.11–1.54)
RR 1.08 (1.00–1.15)
RR 1.23 (1.09–1.39)
RR 1.12 (1.04–1.20)		Qin (2015) [6]

Feng (2016) [5]

Zhou (2018) [7]

Feng (2019) [8]
Obese vs. normalWomen↑RR 1.26 (1.12–1.40)Feng (2016) [5]
RR 1.40 (1.24–1.57)Zhou (2018) [7]
Obese vs. normalMenNSRR 0.83 (0.65–1.05)Feng (2016) [5]
RR 0.89 (0.01–1.77)Zhou (2018) [7]
Obese vs. normalAll **↑ **RR 1.47 (1.11–1.96) **Feng (2016) [5]
Per 5 kg/m2 BMI increaseAll↑RR 1.11 (1.05–1.18)Ohno (2020)
RR 1.09 (1.04–1.15)Ding (2021)
Per 5 kg/m2 BMI increaseWomen↑RR 1.15 (1.08–1.21)Ohno (2020) [30]
Per 5 kg/m2 BMI increaseMenNSRR 0.89 (0.73–1.09)Ohno (2020) [30]
Physical Activity
Highest vs. lowestMen and women↓RR 0.79 (0.72–0.87)Sun (2021) [32]
Physically active vs. inactive/occasional activeMen and women↓RR 0.85 (0.79–0.92)Sun (2021) [32]
Dietary intake
Fish: 1 to 3 servings per week vs. neverMen and women↓RR 0.76 (0.57–1.02)Di Giuseppe (2014) [10]
Periodontitis
Periodontal disease (disease vs. no disease)Men and women↑OR 1.97 (1.68–2.31)Railson de Oliveira Ferreira (2019) [11]
BMI, body mass index; NS, non-significant; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; RR, relative risk; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; * Rheumatoid factor-positive RA; ** Seronegative RA.
Table
Table 2. Studies investigating behavior modifications to reduce RA risk.
Table 2. Studies investigating behavior modifications to reduce RA risk.
Behavior ModificationSexDirection of AssociationHR or RR for RA (95% CI)Author (Year) of Reference
Smoking cessation
Quit ≥ 30 years vs. quit < 5 yearsWomen↓HR 0.63 (0.44–0.90)Liu (2019) [45]
Quit > 15 years, quit > 1 year, current smokerWomen and men↓RR 0.70 (0.24–2.02)Di Giuseppe (2013) [46]
Bariatric surgery
Bariatric surgery vs. no bariatric surgeryWomen and menNSHR 0.86 (0.54–1.38)Maglio (2020) [49]
Alternative Healthy Eating Index score * adherence
≥75 points vs. <75 pointsWomen↓RR 0.43 (0.27–0.67)Marchand (2020) [52]
≥75 points vs. <75 pointsWomen **↓ **RR 0.41 (0.22–0.74)Marchand (2020) [52]
≥75 points vs. <75 pointsWomen ***↓ **RR 0.47 (0.25–0.91)Marchand (2020) [52]
BMI, body mass index; NS, non-significant; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; HR, hazard ratio, RR, relative risk; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. * Alternative Healthy Eating Index is composed of 11 food/beverage/nutrient groups and provides a score that ranges from 0 (least healthy) to 110 (most healthy) points. ** Seropositive RA *** Seronegative RA.
Table
Table 3. Challenges and opportunities for behavioral modifications among rheumatoid arthritis risk groups.
Table 3. Challenges and opportunities for behavioral modifications among rheumatoid arthritis risk groups.
At-Risk GroupChallengesOpportunities
General populationLow general understanding or motivation related to RA
Potential unwillingness to change behaviors
Low absolute risk for RA		Education about RA, risk factors, early symptoms, and prevention strategies
Targeted behavioral interventions
Public health initiatives for other reasons may impact RA risk (legislations against smoking, legislation to promote healthy eating, etc.)
Genetic risk (e.g., HLA-DRB1 shared epitope)Unclear cost-benefit of testing for genetics
Interpretation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing
Risk of anxiety about genetic results		Education about genetic risks
Personalized risk assessments
Increased genetic testing and precautions when delivering genetic results
Family history (FDR without RA)Perceptions of RA decrease likelihood of seeking predictive help
Lack of information when making decisions about risk
Potential unwillingness to make and sustain lifestyle changes
Concerns about accuracy of predictive testing
Concerns about anxiety of predictive test		Education about risk factors, early symptoms, and prevention strategies
Personalized risk assessments
Increased genetic testing and precautions when delivering genetic results
Biomarker risk (CCP+, RF, anti-CarP, anti-PAD3)Lack of understanding of RA risk
Need more information on RA and risk
Anxiety about test results		Improve self-efficacy and health literacy
Build on existing willingness to make lifestyle changes
Build on expressed interest in gaining information, assurance, confirmation of meaning of clinical test
Clinical pre-RA risk (e.g., palindromic rheumatism, arthralgias, undifferentiated IA)Some do not view themselves as patients or already feel they have RA
Difficulty in understanding statistical risk of progression to RA
Fear of pain, uncertainty of pain progression, developing functional limitations and prognosis		Education about early symptoms and risks
Personalized risk assessments
Present information in a way that makes sense to patients
Learning risk group made risk groups more likely to adopt healthier habits changes, haptonomy, yoga and mindfulness.
RA, rheumatoid arthritis, FDR, first-degree relative.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zaccardelli, A.; Sparks, J.A. Challenges and Opportunities of Targeted Behavioral Interventions for Groups at Risk for Developing Rheumatoid Arthritis. Healthcare 2021, 9, 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060641

AMA Style

Zaccardelli A, Sparks JA. Challenges and Opportunities of Targeted Behavioral Interventions for Groups at Risk for Developing Rheumatoid Arthritis. Healthcare. 2021; 9(6):641. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060641

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zaccardelli, Alessandra, and Jeffrey A. Sparks. 2021. "Challenges and Opportunities of Targeted Behavioral Interventions for Groups at Risk for Developing Rheumatoid Arthritis" Healthcare 9, no. 6: 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060641

APA Style

Zaccardelli, A., & Sparks, J. A. (2021). Challenges and Opportunities of Targeted Behavioral Interventions for Groups at Risk for Developing Rheumatoid Arthritis. Healthcare, 9(6), 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060641

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop