Lapnurse—A Blended Learning Course for Nursing Education in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Design and Experts’ Preliminary Validation of Its Online Theoretical Module
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Detail how the course has been designed and developed based on the training needs demanded by nurses; and
- Preliminary assess by experts in a pilot study the functionality, content, and usability of the e-learning environment that provides the theoretical module of Lapnurse.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Course Design
- Student: They will be the main receiver of didactic contents in an active knowledge search. For aspects of formal and non-formal learning, the student acts as a consumer of content, e.g., accessing didactic content and courses, but without permission to create new content or edit existing ones. For aspects of informal learning, the student is considered an active participant within the professional network of the environment. They will participate in forums and discussions, and will interact with other users in the community.
- Teacher: A MIS surgeon with broad experience in teaching. As such, the main role of the teacher will be as a content provider for formal learning, creating and editing didactic contents, and loading them into the environment. For informal learning, they will be considered an active participant within the professional network of the environment. They will be able to upload multimedia content, participate as a tutor solving doubts in forums and debates, and interact with other users in the community.
- Administrator: The administrator will normally be an expert in computer systems, responsible for all management and technical aspects of the environment. Among their tasks are user management, system monitoring, and technical assistance.
2.2. Didactic Surgical Videos
2.3. Interactive 3D Designs
2.4. Preliminary Validation by Experts of the Online Theoretical Module
3. Results
4. Discussion
4.1. Study Limitations
4.2. Comparison with Prior Work
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
- Access management requirements: user registration, login, logout, password recovery, and password change.
- Requirements of user profile and interactions: consultation and editing of personal data, user search, and language selection.
- Environmental maintenance requirements: user administration, monitoring, maintenance and updating of the environment, detection and notification of errors, and contingency response.
- Requirements for formal learning: creation, editing, and elimination of new courses, search for courses, request for subscription to courses, consultation of courses enrolled, accept/reject the subscription to a course, evaluation of skills acquired and progress evaluation.
- Requirements for informal learning: comment or raise questions in the forum, create new topics in the forum, and establish communication between users in the chat.
Appendix B
Questionnaire for Content Validation
- Q1: Contents have good technical quality
- Q2: The amount of content is appropriate
- Q3: The content distribution is appropriate
- Q4: Multimedia contents (images, videos, and 3D designs) are of quality, provide added value and useful information
- Q5: The questionnaire is adequate in terms of number of questions and difficulty
- Q6: The contents are unique, that is, the different types of content are not offered by similar e-learning environments
- Q7: The e-learning environment provides innovative content
- Q8: The e-learning environment uses professional language and appropriate content for users
- Q9: The content is whole and complete
- Q10: The e-learning environment uses multimedia content correctly applied for educational purposes
- Q11: Contents are updated
- Q12: Contents are easily understood
- Q13: 3D designs are interactive
- Q14: 3D designs are realistic and have good quality
- Q15: Contents are realistic and relevant to professional practice
- Q16: Surgical videos have good image quality
- Q17: The e-learning environment provides adequate means (questionnaires) to assess users’ knowledge on the learned topics
- Q18: The discussion forum of the e-learning environment is suitable and useful for users
- Q19: The e-learning environment provides a useful chat for communication between users
- Q20: Contents satisfactorily cover the theoretical aspects of a nursing laparoscopy course
- Q21: The glossary of 3D designs is useful and complete
- Q22: Indicate which lessons you consider more and less important
- Q23: Indicate which resources (glossary, chat, discussion forum, multimedia didactic content, lessons, questionnaires) you consider more and less important
Appendix C
Questionnaire for Usability Validation
- Q24: The text-background color contrast is appropriate
- Q25: The font type and size facilitates reading
- Q26: Navigation labels are clear and concise
- Q27: The e-learning environment is attractive
- Q28: Appropriate number of buttons/links
- Q29: The e-learning environment uses colors properly
- Q30: The e-learning environment is organized
- Q31: The overall design of the e-learning environment is consistent (consistency and uniformity in style, structures and colors on all pages)
- Q32: Web pages within the e-learning environment are not long
- Q33: Navigation through the e-learning environment is intuitive
- Q34: Correct use is made of the visual space of the e-learning environment
- Q35: Information overload is avoided
- Q36: I like the graphic aspect and the general layout of the e-learning environment
- Q37: The e-learning environment is easy to use
References
- Leone, C.; Conceição, C.; Dussault, G. Trends of cross-border mobility of physicians and nurses between Portugal and Spain. Hum. Resour. Health 2013, 11, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sánchez-Peralta, L.F.; Sánchez-Fernández, J.; Pagador, J.B.; Sánchez-Margallo, F.M. New technologies in minimally invasive surgery training: What do surgeons demand? Cir. Cir. 2013, 81, 412–419. [Google Scholar]
- Graue, M.; Bjarkøy, R.Ø.; Iversen, M.M.; Haugstvedt, A.; Harris, J. Integrating evidence-based practice into the diabetes nurse curriculum in Bergen. Eur. Diabetes Nurs. 2010, 7, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.K. Development of a web-based education program for nurses working in nursing homes on human rights of older adults. J. Korean Acad. Nurs. 2010, 40, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Öztürk, D.; Dinç, L. Effect of web-based education on nursing students’ urinary catheterization knowledge and skills. Nurse Educ. Today 2014, 34, 802–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McVeigh, H. Factors influencing the utilisation of e-learning in post-registration nursing students. Nurse Educ. Today 2009, 29, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ward, J.A.; Beaton, R.D.; Bruck, A.M.; de Castro, A.B. Promoting occupational health nursing training: An educational outreach with a blended model of distance and traditional learning approaches. AAOHN J. 2011, 59, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sowan, A.K.; Jenkins, L.S. Designing, delivering and evaluating a distance learning nursing course responsive to students needs. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2013, 82, 553–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lahti, M.; Kontio, R.; Pitkänen, A.; Välimäki, M. Knowledge transfer from an e-learning course to clinical practice. Nurse Educ. Today 2014, 34, 842–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smyth, S.; Houghton, C.; Cooney, A.; Casey, D. Students’ experiences of blended learning across a range of postgraduate programmes. Nurse Educ. Today 2012, 32, 464–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- MOODLE. Available online: https://moodle.org/ (accessed on 15 June 2021).
- Fernández-Alemán, J.L.; López-González, L.; González-Sequeros, O.; Jayne, C.; López-Jiménez, J.J.; Toval, A. The evaluation of i-SIDRA–a tool for intelligent feedback–in a course on the anatomy of the locomotor system. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2016, 94, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rapp, A.K.; Healy, M.G.; Charlton, M.E.; Keith, J.N.; Rosenbaum, M.E.; Kapadia, M.R. YouTube is the most frequently used educational video source for surgical preparation. J. Surg. Educ. 2016, 73, 1072–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sowan, A.K.; Idhail, J.A. Evaluation of an interactive web-based nursing course with streaming videos for medication administration skills. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2014, 83, 592–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wallace, T.; Birch, D.W. A needs-assessment study for continuing professional development in advances minimally invasive surgery. Am. J. Surg. 2007, 193, 593–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Callisen, L. Why Micro Learning Is the Future of Training in the Workplace. eLearning Industry. Available online: http://elearningindustry.com/micro-learning-future-of-training-workplace (accessed on 15 June 2021).
- Ortega-Morán, J.F.; Pagador, J.B.; Sánchez-Peralta, L.F.; Sánchez-González, P.; Noguera, J.; Burgos, D.; Gómez, E.J.; Sánchez-Margallo, F.M. Validation of the three web quality dimensions of a minimally invasive surgery e-learning platform. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2017, 107, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- De Góes Fdos, S.; Fonseca, L.M.; de Camargo, R.A.; de Oliveira, G.F.; Felipe, H.R. Educational technology “Anatomy and Vital Signs”: Evaluation study of content, appearance and usability. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2015, 84, 982–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Davids, M.R.; Chikte, U.; Grimmer-Somers, K.; Halperin, M.L. Usability testing of a multimedia e-learning resource for electrolyte and acid-base disorders. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2014, 45, 367–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerrero-Martínez, I.M.; Portero-Prados, F.J.; Romero-González, R.C.; Romero-Castillo, R.; Pabón-Carrasco, M.; Ponce-Blandón, J.A. Nursing Students’ Perception on the Effectiveness of Emergency Competence Learning through Simulation. Healthcare 2020, 8, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.V.; Chi, Y.; Selvam, U.P.; Devi, M.K.; Wang, W.; Chan, Y.S.; Wee, F.C.; Zhao, S.; Sehgal, V.; Ang, N.K.E. A Clinical Teaching Blended Learning Program to Enhance Registered Nurse Preceptors’ Teaching Competencies: Pretest and Posttest Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e18604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Musharyanti, L.; Haryanti, F.; Claramita, M. Improving Nursing Students’ Medication Safety Knowledge and Skills on Using the 4C/ID Learning Model. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 2021, 14, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galbany-Estragués, P.; Nelson, S. Factors in the drop in the migration of Spanish-trained nurses: 1999–2007. J. Nurs. Manag. 2018, 26, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fries-Tersch, E.; Tugran, T.; Bradley, H. 2017 Annual Report on Intra-EULabour Mobility. European Commission. 2018. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/2017_report_on_intra-eu_labour_mobility.pdf (accessed on 15 June 2021).
- Ali, M.; Han, S.C.; Bilal, H.S.M.; Lee, S.; Kang, M.J.Y.; Kang, B.H.; Razzaq, M.A.; Amin, M.B. iCBLS: An interactive case-based learning system for medical education. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2018, 109, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Swartz, L.B.; Cole, M.T.; Shelley, D.J. Instructor satisfaction with teaching business law: Online vs. onground. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ. (IJICTE) 2010, 6, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Margalina, V.M.; De-Pablos-Heredero, C.; Botella, J.L.M. Achieving Job Satisfaction for Instructors in E-Learning: The Relational Coordination Role. In Social Issues in the Workplace: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2018; pp. 521–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yengin, I.; Karahoca, A.; Karahoca, D. E-learning success model for instructors’ satisfactions in perspective of interaction and usability outcomes. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2011, 3, 1396–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Almarashdeh, I. Sharing instructors experience of learning management system: A technology perspective of user satisfaction in distance learning course. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 63, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, C.; Alvelos, H.; Teixeira, L. The Use of Moodle e-learning Platform: A Study in a Portuguese University. Procedia Technol. 2012, 5, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Amandu, G.M.; Muliira, J.K.; Fronda, D.C. Using Moodle E-learning Platform to Foster Student Self-directed Learning: Experiences with Utilization of the Software in Undergraduate Nursing Courses in a Middle Eastern University. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 93, 677–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Paragina, F.; Paragina, S.; Jipa, A.; Savu, T.; Dumitrescu, A. The benefits of using MOODLE in teacher training in Romania. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2011, 15, 1135–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escobar-Rodriguez, T.; Monge-Lozano, P. The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students. Comput. Educ. 2012, 58, 1085–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butzke, M.A.; Alberton, A. Estilos de aprendizagem e jogos de empresa: A percepção discente sobre estratégia de ensino e ambiente de aprendizagem. REGE-Rev. Gestão 2017, 24, 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tarhini, A.; Hone, K.; Liu, X.; Tarhini, T. Examining the moderating effect of individual-level cultural values on users’ acceptance of e-learning in developing countries: A structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2017, 25, 306–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cidral, W.A.; Oliveira, T.; Di Felice, M.; Aparicio, M. E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Comput. Educ. 2018, 122, 273–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aparicio, M.; Bacao, F.; Oliveira, T. Grit in the path to e-learning success. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 66, 388–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Back, D.A.; Behringer, F.; Haberstroh, N.; Ehlers, J.P.; Sostmann, K.; Peters, H. Learning management system and e-learning tools: An experience of medical students’ usage and expectations. Int. J. Med. Educ. 2016, 7, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rasheed, K.; Noman, M.; Imran, M.; Iqbal, M.; Khan, Z.M.; Abid, M.M. Performance comparison among local and foreign universities websites using seo tools. ICTACT J. Soft Comput. 2018, 8. Available online: http://ictactjournals.in/paper/IJSC_Vol_8_Iss_2_Paper_3_1597_1610.pdf (accessed on 15 June 2021).
- Liaw, S.Y.; Wong, L.F.; Chan, S.W.; Ho, J.T.; Mordiffi, S.Z.; Ang, S.B.; Goh, P.S.; Ang, E.N. Designing and evaluating an interactive multimedia Web-based simulation for developing nurses’ competencies in acute nursing care: Randomized controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2015, 17, e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bloomfield, J.G.; Jones, A. Using e-learning to support clinical skills acquisition: Exploring the experiences and perceptions of graduate first-year pre-registration nursing students—A mixed method study. Nurse Educ. Today 2013, 33, 1605–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hammond, J.; Cherrett, T.; Waterson, B. Making in-class skills training more effective: The scope for interactive videos to complement the delivery of practical pedestrian training. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2015, 46, 1344–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mai, N.; Heykyung, P.; Min-Jae, L.; Jian-Yuan, S.; Ji-Young, O. Technology Acceptance of Healthcare E-Learning Modules: A Study of Korean and Malaysian Students’ Perceptions. TOJET Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 2015, 14, 181–194. [Google Scholar]
- Pimmer, C.; Brysiewicz, P.; Linxen, S.; Walters, F.; Chipps, J.; Gröhbiel, U. Informal mobile learning in nurse education and practice in remote areas—A case study from rural South Africa. Nurse Educ. Today 2014, 34, 1398–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bralić, A.; Divjak, B. Integrating MOOCs in traditionally taught courses: Achieving learning outcomes with blended learning. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2018, 15, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gonçalves, B.; Osório, A. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) to improve teachers’ professional development. D-Rev. Educ. Distância Elearning 2018, 1, 52–63. [Google Scholar]
Question | Lesson 1 | Lesson 2 | Lesson 3 | Lesson 4 | Lesson 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
Q1 | 4.75 ± 0.50 | 4.75 ± 0.50 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 5.00 ± 0.00 |
Q2 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 4.75 ± 0.50 | 4.75 ± 0.50 |
Q3 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 4.75 ± 0.50 | 4.50 ± 0.58 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 4.50 ± 0.58 |
Q4 | 4.75 ± 0.50 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 5.00 ± 0.00 |
Q5 | 4.25 ± 0.50 | 4.75 ± 0.50 | 4.00 ± 1.41 | 4.75 ± 0.50 | 4.75 ± 0.50 |
Question | Lesson 6 | Lesson 7 | Lesson 8 | Lesson 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
Q1 | 4.75 ± 0.50 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 5.00 ± 0.00 |
Q2 | 4.75 ± 0.50 | 4.75 ± 0.50 | 4.50 ± 0.58 | 5.00 ± 0.00 |
Q3 | 4.25 ± 0.50 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 4.75 ± 0.50 |
Q4 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 5.00 ± 0.00 |
Q5 | 4.75 ± 0.50 | 4.75 ± 0.50 | 4.75 ± 0.50 | 4.75 ± 0.50 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ortega-Morán, J.F.; Pagador, B.; Maestre-Antequera, J.; Sánchez-Fernández, J.; Arco, A.; Monteiro, F.; Sánchez-Margallo, F.M. Lapnurse—A Blended Learning Course for Nursing Education in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Design and Experts’ Preliminary Validation of Its Online Theoretical Module. Healthcare 2021, 9, 951. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9080951
Ortega-Morán JF, Pagador B, Maestre-Antequera J, Sánchez-Fernández J, Arco A, Monteiro F, Sánchez-Margallo FM. Lapnurse—A Blended Learning Course for Nursing Education in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Design and Experts’ Preliminary Validation of Its Online Theoretical Module. Healthcare. 2021; 9(8):951. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9080951
Chicago/Turabian StyleOrtega-Morán, Juan Francisco, Blas Pagador, Juan Maestre-Antequera, Javier Sánchez-Fernández, Antonio Arco, Francisco Monteiro, and Francisco M. Sánchez-Margallo. 2021. "Lapnurse—A Blended Learning Course for Nursing Education in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Design and Experts’ Preliminary Validation of Its Online Theoretical Module" Healthcare 9, no. 8: 951. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9080951
APA StyleOrtega-Morán, J. F., Pagador, B., Maestre-Antequera, J., Sánchez-Fernández, J., Arco, A., Monteiro, F., & Sánchez-Margallo, F. M. (2021). Lapnurse—A Blended Learning Course for Nursing Education in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Design and Experts’ Preliminary Validation of Its Online Theoretical Module. Healthcare, 9(8), 951. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9080951