Algal Biosensors for Detection of Potentially Toxic Pollutants and Validation by Advanced Methods: A Brief Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Possibilities for Metal Ions and Pesticides Determination: Advantages and Limitation
3. Algae-Based Biosensors
3.1. Pollutants Capture Properties of Algae
3.2. Features of Algae-Based Biosensor
3.3. Optical Biosensor Using Algal Fluorescence
3.4. Electrochemical Biosensor by Algae Oxygen Production
4. Challenges and Perspectives in the Development and Implementation of Biosensors
5. Conclusions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ali, H.; Khan, E.; Ilahi, I. Environmental chemistry and ecotoxicology of hazardous heavy metals: Environmental persistence, toxicity, and bioaccumulation. J. Chem. 2019, 2019, 6730305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Briffa, J.; Sinagra, E.; Blundell, R. Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans. Heliyon 2020, 6, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tyohemba, R.L.; Pillay, L.; Humphries, M.S. Bioaccumulation of current-use herbicides in fish from a global biodiversity hotspot: Lake St Lucia, South Africa. Chemosphere 2021, 284, 131407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Curran, W.S. Persistence of herbicides in soil. Crops Soils 2016, 49, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velusamy, K.; Periyasamy, S.; Kumar, P.S.; Rangasamy, G.; Pauline, J.M.N.; Ramaraju, P.; Mohanasundaram, S.; Vo, D.-V.N. Biosensor for heavy metals detection in wastewater: A review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 168, 113307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, N.; Kaur, G. Trends on biosensing systems for heavy metal detection. In Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; Volume 74, pp. 33–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malik, L.A.; Bashir, A.; Qureashi, A.; Pandith, A.H. Detection and removal of heavy metal ions: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 1495–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.; Shah, S.S.; Sharma, C.; Gupta, V.; Sundramoorthy, A.K.; Kumar, P.; Arya, S. An approach towards different techniques for detection of heavy metal ions and their removal from wastewater. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 113032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilschefski, S.C.; Baxter, M.R. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: Introduction to analytical aspects. Clin. Biochem. Rev. 2019, 40, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maciel, E.V.S.; Soares, E.V.; de Toffoli, A.L.; da Silva, J.A.F.; Neto, E.S.; Nazario, C.E.D.; Lanças, F.M. New Materials in Sample Preparation: Recent Advances and Future Trends. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 119, 115633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muller, A.; Pozebon, D.; Dressler, V.L. Advances of nitrogen microwave plasma for optical emission spectrometry and applications in elemental analysis: A review. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2020, 35, 2113–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, N.; Singh, M. Biosensors for heavy metals. Biometals 2005, 18, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zaib, M.; Saeed, A.; Hussain, I.; Athar, M.M.; Iqbal, M. Voltammetric detection of As(III) with Porphyridium cruentum based modified carbon paste electrode biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 62, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Antonacci, A.; Scognamiglio, V. Biotechnological Advances in the Design of Algae-Based Biosensors. Trends Biotechnol. 2019, 38, 334–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Singh, U.B.; Ahluwalia, A.S. Microalgae: A promising tool for carbon sequestration. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2013, 18, 73–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galal El-Din Thabet Shams El-Din, N.; Rashedy, S.H. Biodiversity of Seaweeds in the Red Sea. In Biodiversity of Seaweeds in the Egyptian Marine Waters: The Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea and Suez Canal; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 105–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamed, S.M.; Okla, M.K.; Al-Saadi, L.S.; Hozzein, W.N.; Mohamed, H.S.; Selim, S.; AbdElgawad, H. Evaluation of the phycoremediation potential of microalgae for captan removal: Comprehensive analysis on toxicity, detoxification and antioxidants modulation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 427, 128177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, X.; Li, W.; Jin, M.; Zhang, L.; Qin, L.; Geng, W. Responses and tolerance mechanisms of microalgae to heavy metal stress: A review. Mar. Environ. Res. 2023, 183, 105805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathi, S.; Poluri, K.M. Heavy metal detoxification mechanisms by microalgae: Insights from transcriptomics analysis. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 285, 117443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, L.S.; Judge, S.K.; Voon, B.W.N.; Tee, L.J.; Tan, K.Y.; Murti, M.; Chai, M.K. Bioluminescent Microalgae-Based Biosensor for Metal Detection in Water. IEEE Sens. J. 2018, 18, 2091–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chouler, J.; Monti, M.D.; Morgan, W.J.; Cameron, P.J.; Di Lorenzo, M. A photosynthetic toxicity biosensor for water. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 309, 392–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, C.W.; Lin, C.; Nguyen, M.K.; Hussain, A.; Bui, X.T.; Ngo, H.H. A review of biosensor for environmental monitoring: Principle, application, and corresponding achievement of sustainable development goals. Bioengineered 2023, 14, 58–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taimni, I.K.; Srivastava, M.N. Separations involving sulphides: Separation of selenium, arsenic, antimony and mercury from barium. Anal. Chim. Acta 1956, 15, 517–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beamish, F.E. A critical review of titrimetric methods for determination of the noble metals—II. Talanta 1966, 13, 1053–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ellis, C.M.; Vogel, A.I. Studies on hypovanadous salts as analytical reagents. Analyst 1956, 81, 693–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beamish, F.E.; Westland, A.D. Inorganic gravimetric and volumetric analysis. Anal. Chem. 1958, 30, 805–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beamish, F.E. A critical review of gravimetric methods for determination of the noble metals—II. Talanta 1966, 13, 773–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smichowski, P.; Londonio, A. The role of analytical techniques in the determination of metals and metalloids in dietary supplements: A review. Microchem. J. 2018, 136, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, I. ICP-OES: An advance tool in biological research. Open J. Environ. Biol. 2020, 5, 027–033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Z.; Meliana, C.; Munawaroh, H.S.H.; Karaman, C.; Karimi-Maleh, H.; Low, S.S.; Show, P.L. Recent advances in the analytical strategies of microbial biosensor for detection of pollutants. Chemosphere 2022, 306, 135515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nodeh, H.R.; Ibrahim, W.A.W.; Kamboh, M.A.; Sanagi, M.M. New magnetic graphene-based inorganic–organic sol-gel hybrid nanocomposite for simultaneous analysis of polar and non-polar organophosphorus pesticides from water samples using solid-phase extraction. Chemosphere 2017, 166, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tadeo, J.L.; Sánchez-Brunete, C.; Albero, B.; García-Valcárcel, A.I. Application of ultrasound-assisted extraction to the determination of contaminants in food and soil samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217, 2415–2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-Hernández, L.; Hernández-Domínguez, D.; Bernal, J.; Neusüß, C.; Martín, M.T.; Bernal, J.L. Capillary electrophoresis–mass spectrometry as a new approach to analyze neonicotinoid insecticides. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1359, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, J.; Lu, J.; Qiao, X.; Xu, Z. A study on biomimetic immunoassay-capillary electrophoresis method based on molecularly imprinted polymer for determination of trace trichlorfon residue in vegetables. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 1285–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chui, M.Q.; Thang, L.Y.; See, H.H. Integration of the free liquid membrane into electrokinetic supercharging–capillary electrophoresis for the determination of cationic herbicides in environmental water samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1481, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moawed, E.A.; Radwan, A.M. Application of acid modified polyurethane foam surface for detection and removing of organochlorine pesticides from wastewater. J. Chromatogr. B 2017, 1044, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Welz, B.; Sperling, M. Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Douvris, C.; Trey, V.; Bussan, D.; Bartzas, G.; Thomas, R. How ICP-OES changed the face of trace element analysis: Review of the global application landscape. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 905, 167242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smirnova, S.V.; Ilin, D.V.; Pletnev, I.V. Extraction and ICP-OES determination of heavy metals using tetrabutylammonium bromide aqueous biphasic system and oleophilic collector. Talanta 2021, 221, 121485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Y.; Li, Y. New insight into the negative difference effect in aluminium corrosion using in-situ electrochemical ICP-OES. Corros. Sci. 2020, 168, 108568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yüksel, B.; Ustaoğlu, F.; Arıca, E. Impacts of a garbage disposal facility on the water quality of çavuşlu stream in Giresun, Turkey: A health risk assessment study by a validated ICP-MS assay. Aquat. Sci. Eng. 2021, 36, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soodan, R.K.; Pakade, Y.B.; Nagpal, A.; Katnoria, J.K. Analytical techniques for estimation of heavy metals in soil ecosystem: A tabulated review. Talanta 2014, 125, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tobolkina, E.; Rudaz, S. Capillary Electrophoresis Instruments for Medical Applications and Falsified Drug Analysis/Quality Control in Developing Countries. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 8107–8115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyder, A.; Buledi, J.A.; Nawaz, M.; Rajpar, D.B.; Shah, Z.-U.; Orooji, Y.; Yola, M.L.; Karimi-Maleh, H.; Lin, H.; Solangi, A.R. Identification of heavy metal ions from aqueous environment through gold, silver, and copper nanoparticles: An excellent colorimetric approach. Environ. Res. 2022, 205, 112475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jofre, F.C.; Savio, M. Infrared Radiation: A Sustainable and Promising Sample Preparation Alternative for Inorganic Analysis. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2024, 170, 117469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rathnayake, I.V.N.; Munagamage, T.; Pathirathne, A.; Megharaj, M. Whole cell microalgal-cyanobacterial array biosensor for monitoring Cd, Cr and Zn in aquatic systems. Water Sci. Technol. 2021, 84, 1579–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rosa, M.D.H.; Alves, C.J.; dos Santos, F.N.; de Souza, A.O.; Zavareze, E.D.R.; Pinto, E.; de Pereira, C.M.P. Macroalgae and microalgae biomass as feedstock for products applied to bioenergy and food industry: A brief review. Energies 2023, 16, 1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bourgougnon, N.; Burlot, A.-S.; Jacquin, A.-G. Algae for global sustainability? In Advances in Botanical Research; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; Volume 100, pp. 145–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perricone, V.; Mutalipassi, M.; Mele, A.; Buono, M.; Vicinanza, D.; Contestabile, P. Nature-based and bioinspired solutions for coastal protection: An overview among key ecosystems and a promising pathway for new functional and sustainable designs. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2023, 80, 1218–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ariede, M.B.; Candido, T.M.; Jacome, A.L.M.; Velasco, M.V.R.; Carvalho, J.C.M.; Baby, A.R. Cosmetic attributes of algae—A review. Algal Res. 2017, 25, 483–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chojnacka, K.; Wieczorek, P.P.; Schroeder, G.; Michalak, I. Algae Biomass: Characteristics and Applications: Towards Algae-Based Products; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 8, p. 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iravani, S.; Ahmadzadeh, H.; Sajjadizadeh, H.S.; Rounaghi, G. Scenedesmus sp. MN738556 as a whole cell biosensor for sub-part per billion detections of Cd2+ cations in freshwater sources. Microchem. J. 2024, 197, 109836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prudkin-Silva, C.; Lanzarotti, E.; Álvarez, L.; Vallerga, M.B.; Factorovich, M.; Morzan, U.N.; Urdampilleta, C.M. A cost-effective algae-based biosensor for water quality analysis: Development and testing in collaboration with peasant communities. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 22, 101479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scognamiglio, V.; Antonacci, A.; Arduini, F.; Moscone, D.; Campos, E.V.R.; Fraceto, L.F.; Palleschi, G. An eco-designed paper-based algal biosensor for nanoformulated herbicide optical detection. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 373, 483–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rathnayake, I.V.N.; Megharaj, M.; Naidu, R. Sol–gel immobilized optical microalgal biosensor for monitoring Cd, Cu and Zn bioavailability in freshwater. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2023, 110, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayramoglu, G.; Yalçın, E.; Arica, M.Y. Preparation of effective green sorbents using O. Princeps alga biomass with different compositions of amine groups: Comparison to adsorption performances for removal of a model acid dye. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 347, 118375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spain, O.; Plöhn, M.; Funk, C. The cell wall of green microalgae and its role in heavy metal removal. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 173, 526–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nie, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Kumar, M.; Usman, M.; Li, J.; Tsang, D.C. Bioremediation of water containing pesticides by microalgae: Mechanisms, methods, and prospects for future research. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 707, 136080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Doshi, H.; Ray, A.; Kothari, I.L. Biosorption of cadmium by live and dead Spirulina: IR spectroscopic, kinetics, and SEM studies. Curr. Microbiol. 2007, 54, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotrba, P.; Mackova, M.; Macek, T. Microbial biosorption of metals. In Microbial Biosorption of Metals; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pradhan, D.; Sukla, L.B.; Mishra, B.B.; Devi, N. Biosorption for removal of hexavalent chromium using microalgae Scenedesmus sp. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 209, 617–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sedlakova-Kadukova, J.; Kopcakova, A.; Gresakova, L.; Godany, A.; Pristas, P. Bioaccumulation and biosorption of zinc by a novel Streptomyces K11 strain isolated from highly alkaline aluminium brown mud disposal site. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 167, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zabed, H.M.; Akter, S.; Yun, J.; Zhang, G.; Awad, F.N.; Qi, X.; Sahu, J.N. Recent advances in biological pretreatment of microalgae and lignocellulosic biomass for biofuel production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 105, 105–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sibi, G. Factors influencing heavy metal removal by microalgae—A review. J. Crit. Rev 2019, 6, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, D.V.; Singh, R.P. Algal consortia based metal detoxification of municipal wastewater: Implication on photosynthetic performance, lipid production, and defense responses. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 814, 151928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thenarasu, A.; Chai, M.K.; Tan, Y.H.; Wong, L.S.; Rajamani, R.; Djearamane, S. Study of Chlorella vulgaris from Different Growth Phases as Biosensor for Detection of Titanium and Silver Nanoparticles in Water. Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol. 2024, 23, 959–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ata, A.; Nalcaci, O.O.; Ovez, B. Macro algae Gracilaria verrucosa as a biosorbent: A study of sorption mechanisms. Algal Res. 2012, 1, 194–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hammed, A.M.; Prajapati, S.K.; Simsek, S.; Simsek, H.; Hammed, A.M.; Prajapati, S.K.; Simsek, H. Growth regime and environmental remediation of microalgae. Algae 2016, 31, 189–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, Y.W.; Zeng, E.Y.; Qiu, H.; Yu, K.; Cai, S. Bioconcentration of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and organochlorine pesticides in algae is an important contaminant route to higher trophic levels. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 1885–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rath, B. Microalgal bioremediation: Current practices and perspectives. J. Biochem. Technol. 2012, 3, 299–304. [Google Scholar]
- Moro, L.; Pezzotti, G.; Turemis, M.; Sanchís, J.; Farré, M.; Denaro, R.; Giardi, M.T. Fast pesticide pre-screening in marine environment using a green microalgae-based optical bioassay. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 129, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malhotra, B.D.; Ali, M.A. Nanomaterials in biosensors: Fundamentals and applications. In Nanomaterials for Biosensors; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 1, pp. 1–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chadha, U.; Bhardwaj, P.; Agarwal, R.; Rawat, P.; Agarwal, R.; Gupta, I.; Panjwani, M.; Singh, S.; Ahuja, C.; Selvaraj, S.K.; et al. Recent progress and growth in biosensors technology: A critical review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2022, 109, 21–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazin, I.; Tria, S.A.; Hayat, A.; Marty, J.-L. New biorecognition molecules in biosensors for the detection of toxins. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 87, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purohit, B.; Vernekar, P.R.; Shetti, N.P.; Chandra, P. Biosensor nanoengineering: Design, operation, and implementation for biomolecular analysis. Sens. Int. 2020, 1, 100040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Ying, Y. Microbial biosensors for environmental monitoring and food analysis. Food Rev. Int. 2011, 27, 300–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, C.; Zhang, D.; Mo, Q.; Yuan, J. Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae-based biosensors for copper detection. Microb. Biotechnol. 2022, 15, 2854–2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pescheck, M.; Schweizer, A.; Bláha, L. Innovative electrochemical biosensor for toxicological investigations on algae and cyanobacteria. Bioelectrochemistry 2021, 143, 107926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Q.; Wu, H.; Chen, J.; Guo, B.; Zhao, X.; Lin, H.; Huang, C. Adsorption mechanism of trace heavy metals on microplastics and simulating their effect on microalgae in river. Environ. Res. 2022, 214, 113777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Antonacci, A.; Frisulli, V.; Carvalho, L.B.; Fraceto, L.F.; Miranda, B.; De Stefano, L.; Scognamiglio, V. An all-green photo-electrochemical biosensor using microalgae immobilized on eco-designed lignin-based screen-printed electrodes to detect sustainable nanoherbicides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gosset, A.; Oestreicher, V.; Perullini, M.; Bilmes, S.A.; Jobbágy, M.; Dulhoste, S.; Bayard, R.; Durrieu, C. Optimization of sensors based on encapsulated algae for pesticide detection in water. Anal. Methods 2019, 11, 6193–6203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsopela, A.; Lale, A.; Vanhove, E.; Reynes, O.; Séguy, I.; Temple-Boyer, P.; Launay, J. Integrated electrochemical biosensor based on algal metabolism for water toxicity analysis. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 61, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Allouzi, M.M.A.; Allouzi, S.; Al-Salaheen, B.; Khoo, K.S.; Rajendran, S.; Sankaran, R.; Show, P.L. Current advances and future trend of nanotechnology as microalgae-based biosensor. Biochem. Eng. J. 2022, 187, 108653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roxby, D.N.; Rivy, H.; Gong, C.; Gong, X.; Yuan, Z.; Chang, G.-E.; Chen, Y.-C. Microalgae living sensor for metal ion detection with nanocavity-enhanced photoelectrochemistry. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 165, 112420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boron, I.; Juarez, A.; Battaglini, F. Portable microalgal biosensor for herbicide monitoring. ChemElectroChem 2020, 7, 1623–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durrieu, C.; Ferro, Y.; Perullini, M.; Gosset, A.; Jobbágy, M.; Bilmes, S.A. Feasibility of using a translucid inorganic hydrogel to build a biosensor using immobilized algal cells. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podola, B.; Melkonian, M. Selective real-time herbicide monitoring by an array chip biosensor employing diverse microalgae. J. Appl. Phycol. 2005, 17, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altamirano, M.; Garcia-Villada, L.; Agrelo, M.; Sanchez-Martin, L.; Martin-Otero, L.; Flores-Moya, A.; Rico, M.; Lopez-Rodas, V.; Costas, E. A novel approach to improve specificity of algal biosensors using wild-type and resistant mutants: An application to detect TNT. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2004, 19, 1319–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, S.Y.; Show, P.L.; Lau, B.F.; Chang, J.-S.; Ling, T.C. New prospects for modified algae in heavy metal adsorption. Trends Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 1255–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haigh-Flórez, D.; de la Hera, C.; Costas, E.; Orellana, G. Microalgae dual-head biosensors for selective detection of herbicides with fiber-optic luminescent O2 transduction. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 54, 484–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mandal, R.; Dutta, G. From photosynthesis to biosensing: Chlorophyll proves to be a versatile molecule. Sens. Int. 2020, 1, 100058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buonasera, K.; Lambreva, M.; Rea, G.; Touloupakis, E.; Giardi, M.T. Technological applications of chlorophyll a fluorescence for the assessment of environmental pollutants. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011, 401, 1139–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilal, M.; Rasheed, T.; Sosa-Hernández, J.E.; Raza, A.; Nabeel, F.; Iqbal, H.M. Biosorption: An interplay between marine algae and potentially toxic elements—A review. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danouche, M.; El Ghachtouli, N.; El Arroussi, H. Phycoremediation mechanisms of heavy metals using living green microalgae: Physicochemical and molecular approaches for enhancing selectivity and removal capacity. Heliyon 2021, 7, e07609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajamani, S.; Torres, M.; Falcao, V.; Ewalt Gray, J.; Coury, D.A.; Colepicolo, P.; Sayre, R. Noninvasive evaluation of heavy metal uptake and storage in micoralgae using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based heavy metal biosensor. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 1059–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Chen, L.; Yu, L.; Yang, C.; Zhu, J.; Wang, J.; Zheng, J.; Wang, F.; He, G.; Jiang, F.; et al. Confinement-enhanced microalgal individuals biosensing for digital atrazine assay. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 241, 115647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buyukharman, M.; Gover, T.; Gumus, A.; Gumus, S.; Yildiz, H.B. Design of a Novel Green Algae-Based Biological Photovoltaic Cell with High Photocurrent and a Photoelectrochemical Biosensing Approach Utilizing the BPV for Pesticide Analysis in Water. ChemistrySelect 2024, 9, e202304943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Zheng, S.; Qin, W. Electrochemical biochemical oxygen demand biosensors and their applications in aquatic environmental monitoring. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 2024, 44, 100642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassani, S.; Akmal, M.R.; Maghsoudi, A.S.; Rahmani, S.; Vakhshiteh, F.; Norouzi, P.; Ganjali, M.R.; Abdollahi, M. High-performance voltammetric aptasensing platform for ultrasensitive detection of bisphenol A as an environmental pollutant. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1134601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Modak, N.; Friebe, V.M. Amperometric biosensors: Harnessing photosynthetic reaction centers for herbicide detection. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2023, 42, 101414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ameen, F.; Hamidian, Y.; Mostafazadeh, R.; Darabi, R.; Erk, N.; Islam, M.A.; Orfali, R. A novel atropine electrochemical sensor based on silver nano particle-coated Spirulina platensis multicellular blue-green microalga. Chemosphere 2023, 324, 138180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Labro, J.; Craig, T.; Wood, S.A.; Packer, M.A. Demonstration of the use of a photosynthetic microbial fuel cell as an environmental biosensor. Int. J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 14, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilge, S.; Bakirhan, N.K.; Donar, Y.O.; Sinag, A.; Ozkan, S.A.; Okudan, E.S. Green synthesis of carbon based biosensor materials from algal biomass for the sensitive detection of vardenafil. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 871, 114286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Algae | Objective | Algae Preparation | Detection Method | Main Results | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii | To use biosensor as an indicator of the presence of pesticides. | Dense algal solutions | Detection of O2, H2O2, and H3O+/OH ions, species taking part in metabolic activities of algae. | Diuron herbicide detection was achieved with a sufficiently low limit of detection—0.2 mmol L−1; | [82] |
Porphyridium cruentum | To develop biosensor based on carbon paste electrode modified with Porphyridium cruentum biomass for the determination of As3+ in contaminated water. | The microalgal biomass was well-dispersed in appropriate quantities of graphite powder and mineral oil using pestle and mortar to obtain a homogenized paste. Biomass quantity of Porphyridium cruentum varied from 0.5% to 7.5% optimizing maximum As biosorption. | Differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetric technique | Suitable result was obtained at pH 6.0 with 0.1 mol L−1 HNO3 solution as a stripping medium, allo wing biosorption–accumulation time of 8 min using 5% Porphyridium cruentum biomass in graphite–mineral oil paste. Linear range for As3+ detection with the modified electrode–biosensor was observed between 2.5 mg L−1 and 20 mg L−1; Efficiency of the biosensor in the presence of different interference metal ions (Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+) ions was also evaluated; The application of Porphyridium cruentum modified biosensor was successfully used for the detection of As3+ in the binary metal (Fe3+, Mn2+, Cd2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+) contaminated system; The accuracy of application of biosorption-based biosensors for the detection of As3+ is as low as 2.5 mg L−1. | [13] |
Chlorella vulgaris, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii | Evaluation of fluorescence of immobilized microalgae on the detection of chemicals in urban rainwaters. | Immobilized microalgae by encapsulation in a hybrid alginate/silica translucid hydrogel. | Fluorescence emission detected by a fluorometer, of chlorophyll. | Immobilized algae exhibited lower sensitivity than free algae in suspension (limit of detection 0.001 µmol L−1 and <0.001 µmol L−1) at atrazine (pesticide), but higher fluorescence. | [84] |
Paulschulzia pseudovolvox and species of cyanobacteria in the order Chroococcales | Investigation of the photosynthetic metabolism to be used to integrate and sense environmental signals and the effect of toxic compounds detected by the disruption of the reliable light-dependent electrogenic effect. | The algae were grown in a chamber for four weeks prior to experiments. The chamber was then converted into a Photosynthetic Microbial fuel cell by the addition of an assembly containing the cathode. | The light-dependent electrogenic activity was monitored using a potentiostat. | Initial results suggest Paulschulzia pseudovolvox to be more resistant to effects of the toxicants tested in Chroococcales, demonstrating the importance of using multiple species as they will present a different level of sensitivity to different analytes (copper, thallium, zinc, and glyphosate). | [102] |
Chlorella vulgaris | To use biosensor to detect the presence of metal ions (Cu, Pb, Cd, Na, Al, and Li) in water. | Immobilization of microalgae in agarose solution | Bioluminescence of microalgae was used as an indication parameter (λ = 350–650 nm). | pH tolerance (pH 6–pH 8), and able to produce signals at different cell densities (1 × 106 cells mL−1 to 9 × 106 cells mL−1) and culture ages (day 1 to day 5); The biosensor showed high sensitivity to metal ions (Cu, Pb, Cd, Na, Al, and Li); The presence of these metal ions with concentrations of 0.001 mg L−1 to 10.000 mg L−1 could be detected rapidly within 15 min of exposure. | [20] |
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii | Develop an algae biosensor for the optical detection of nano-encapsulated-atrazine in agriculture. | Algae were immobilized on a paper substrate soaked with an agar thin film and placed in a glass optical measurement cell. | Detected by following the variable fluorescence | Nanoencapsulated atrazine was detected by fluorescence, with an inverse and proportional decrease to the herbicide concentrations ranging from 0.5 nmol L−1 to 200 nmol L−1 with a limit of detection of 16 h; There was slight interference in the presence of 2 mg L−1 for Cu and 10 µg L−1 for As at safe limits, a slight matrix effect, and a recovery value of 96 ± 5% for 75 nmol L−1 nanoencapsulated atrazine in tap water; The suitability of the proposed paper-based optical biosensor as valid support in agriculture. | [54] |
A mixed culture of microalgae that predominantly contains the strains (Scenedesmus obliquus and Chlorella luteoviridisI) | Develop an innovative single-chamber air system microbial fuel cell (MFC) photosynthetic cathode and analyze electrochemical performance of the device using formaldehyde as a response meter—toxic model. Use this technology to monitor water quality. | To initiate biofilm growth, green microalgae was injected into photo MFC and allowed seating and attachment to the anode under static conditions. Two hours an open circuit potential was allowed to develop, and then the photo MFC was connected to a 1000 U resistor to trigger the development of an electroactive biofilm. | Electrochemical analysis using two-electrode mode, with the anode as the working electrode and the cathode as the counter electrode. | The photo MFC demonstrated promising proof-of-concept capability for detecting formaldehyde between 0.001% and 0.02%. Through the measurement of the electrogenic activity of micro-algae in the photo MFC, detection of these contaminants could be rapid and cost-effective compared to biological assays (given the relationship below low cost and simple treatment of materials used in manufacturing) and onsite (due to the device’s small size and portability). | [21] |
Cystoseira algae | Prepare new types of electrode materials for electrochemical sensing of vardenafil as an active substance. | Cystoseira algae dried were dispersed in 400 mL of distilled water and transferred to autoclave. Carbon electrode material was prepared by two-step cycled hydrothermal carbonization of Cystoseira algae at temperatures of 180 °C and 250 °C for 8 h in the autoclave. | Cyclic voltammetry, differential pulse voltammograms, and square wave voltammetry techniques. | Material exhibited high sensitivity with the limits of detection of 96.3 pmol L−1 at pH 1.0 H2SO4 solution; The proposed sensor was successfully applied in tablet formulation, human serum, and human urine samples. | [103] |
Scenedesmus acutus and Monoraphidium contortum strains | The construction of a portable system based on reversible photosynthesis inhibition was used as an indication parameter (λ = 350–650 nm). Produced by herbicides on microalgae, using atrazine as a model compound. | The immobilization of microalgae in a polyelectrolyte-surfactant-carbon nanotube self-assembled material cast on a screen-printed graphite electrode. | Electrochemical experiments were carried out with a purpose-built potentiostat. Oxygen production was followed by chronoamperometry. Cyclic voltammetry was carried out using the same three-electrode system. | Monoraphidium contortum can perform as an efficient recognition element for the construction of biosensors sensitive to atrazine; The system presents a limit of detection of 0.11 μmol L−1, showing an excellent performance in river samples. The sensor maintains its integrity after five months immersed in a freshwater algae medium at room temperature. | [85] |
Chlorella sp. | Developed a living sensor for metal ion detection with nanocavity-enhanced photoelectrochemistry | Mix of Chlorella sp. with copper nanoparticles solution. | Photoelectrochemical measurements in chronoamperometry mode. | Microalgae sensor was exploited to detect potentially toxic metal ions, Cd, Cr, Fe, and Mn with a breakthrough limit of detection of 50 nmol L−1. | [86] |
Mesotaenium sp. and a strain of Synechococcus sp. | Developed an optical microalgal-cyanobacterial array biosensor using microalgae, to detect Cd2+, Cr6+, and Zn2+ in aquatic systems. | Sol-gel immobilization mixture prepared by sodium silicate and colloidal silica | Optimum operational conditions for the biosensor array such as exposure time, storage stability, pH, and multiple metal ions effects. | 10 min exposure time yielded optimum fluorescence values; Metal ions toxicity increased with decreasing pH, resulting in low relative fluorescence (%), and decreased with increasing pH, resulting in higher relative fluorescence (%); The optimum storage time for biosensor strains was 4 weeks for microalgal cultures and 8 weeks for cyanobacterial culture, at 4 °C storage temperature; The metal ion mixtures showed less effect on the inhibition of relative fluorescence (%) of microalgal/cyanobacterial cultures, displaying an antagonistic behavior among the metal ions tested. | [46] |
Microcystis aeruginosa, Synechococcus elongatus, and strains Desmodesmus quadricauda, and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata | Develop an alternative to using this electrochemical biosensor equipped with algae and cyanobacteria for toxicological investigations based on selected test chemicals. | Algae/cyanobacteria solution was centrifuged, and the pellets were diluted with 30 mL culture medium. | Potentiostatic measurement | The evaluation of the sensor signal is based on the current–time curves of a potentiostatic measurement produced by the detection of microbially reduced mediator molecules immobilized in a gel structure; The mediator molecules are reduced during the measurement process and produce a current signal, which rapidly provides information about the vigor and vitality of living bacteria, yeasts, fungi, or cells. | [78] |
Scenedesmus acutus and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata | The developed sensor was based on green microalgae immobilized in an alginate matrix. | Immobilization in encapsulation (alginate beads) | Na Visual observation, and absorbance and fluorescence measurements. | After incubation with different pollutants for five days, naked-eye analysis by several observers proved to be a successful method for surveying algae’s growth and establishing the limits of detection; Suitable limits of detection were 10 mg L−1 for technical-grade acid glyphosate, 15 mg L−1 for glyphosate-based formulation, 50 µg L−1 for atrazine formulation, 7.5 mg L−1 for Cu, and 250 µg L−1 for Cr; The use of the biosensor on the local samples also proved to be successful: strong intensity of green color in those samples from clean water sources. | [53] |
Scenedesmus subspicatus | Develop a novel whole-cell biosensor using chlorophyll a fluorescence from a single species of microalga, Scenedesmus subspicatus, immobilized in an inorganic silica matrix, for detecting bio-availability of multi-metal ions in freshwater. | Immobilization in inorganic silica hydrogels using the sol-gel technique | Effective pH range, cell density, exposure time, and storage stability. | The optimum response for the biosensor was dependent on the pH of the matrix, cell concentration, and exposure time derived; The biosensor was operational for four weeks; The limit of detection for the algal biosensor was determined as 0.9, 0.91, and 0.88 mg L−1 for Cd, Cu, and Zn, respectively. | [55] |
Scenedesmus sp. | Develop an electrochemical biosensor with microalgae to evaluate the biotoxicity of Cd2+ ions in freshwater. | This electrochemical biosensor was constructed by immobilization of microalgae–bovine serum albumin and crosslinked with glutaraldehyde in film on a glassy carbon electrode surface. | The chronoamperometric currents generated by alkaline phosphatase activity. The feasibility was evaluated, and the application of the biosensor was optimized for parameters such as pH and cell density. | Scenedesmus sp. biosensor is highly sensitive with a good selectivity at a 1:1 ratio for measuring the concentration of Cd2+ cations except in the presence of Hg2+; This biosensor could respond with only one drop of an analyte (50 μL of 1000 µg L−1 Cd2+), resulting in suitability for simple and on-site water toxicity testing. | [52] |
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii | Use a biosensor with transgenic microalgae for metal ion detection and quantification. | Suspension of cells in the exponential growth phase | Detection by fluorescence measurements using a spectrofluorometer. | Detection of various metal ions at low limits of detection—0.93 nmol L−1; Algae have substantial buffering capacity for free potential metal ions in their cytosol, even at high external metal ions concentrations. | [95] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Amaral, D.S.d.; Tholozan, L.V.; Bonemann, D.H.; Jansen-Alves, C.; Boschetti, W.; Novo, D.L.R.; Carreno, N.L.V.; Pereira, C.M.P.d. Algal Biosensors for Detection of Potentially Toxic Pollutants and Validation by Advanced Methods: A Brief Review. Chemosensors 2024, 12, 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors12110235
Amaral DSd, Tholozan LV, Bonemann DH, Jansen-Alves C, Boschetti W, Novo DLR, Carreno NLV, Pereira CMPd. Algal Biosensors for Detection of Potentially Toxic Pollutants and Validation by Advanced Methods: A Brief Review. Chemosensors. 2024; 12(11):235. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors12110235
Chicago/Turabian StyleAmaral, Diego Serrasol do, Luana Vaz Tholozan, Daisa Hakbart Bonemann, Cristina Jansen-Alves, Wiliam Boschetti, Diogo La Rosa Novo, Neftali Lenin Villarreal Carreno, and Claudio Martin Pereira de Pereira. 2024. "Algal Biosensors for Detection of Potentially Toxic Pollutants and Validation by Advanced Methods: A Brief Review" Chemosensors 12, no. 11: 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors12110235
APA StyleAmaral, D. S. d., Tholozan, L. V., Bonemann, D. H., Jansen-Alves, C., Boschetti, W., Novo, D. L. R., Carreno, N. L. V., & Pereira, C. M. P. d. (2024). Algal Biosensors for Detection of Potentially Toxic Pollutants and Validation by Advanced Methods: A Brief Review. Chemosensors, 12(11), 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors12110235