Next Article in Journal
Precise Optical Fiber-Based Ammonia Sensor Using CdS Quantum Dots Decorated with ZnO at Heterointerface
Next Article in Special Issue
A Novel Colorimetric Biosensor for the Detection of Catalase-Positive Staphylococcus aureus Based on an Onion-like Carbon Nanozyme
Previous Article in Journal
Portable and Visual Detection of Cytochrome c with Graphene Quantum Dots–Filter Paper Composite
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancement of Ion-Sensitive Field-Effect Transistors through Sol-Gel Processed Lead Zirconate Titanate Ferroelectric Film Integration and Coplanar Gate Sensing Paradigm
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Miniaturized Iridium Oxide Microwire pH Sensor for Biofluid Sensing

1
Electrical and Computer Engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75205, USA
2
Plexon, Dallas, TX 75206, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chemosensors 2024, 12(8), 168; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors12080168
Submission received: 8 July 2024 / Revised: 18 August 2024 / Accepted: 20 August 2024 / Published: 22 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection pH Sensors, Biosensors and Systems)

Abstract

:
pH regulation in human biofluids is a crucial step for disease diagnosis and health monitoring. Traditional pH sensors are limited by their bulky size in wearable systems, and fragile glass tips require frequent calibration, thus limiting their use in continuous monitoring. Flexible sensors, particularly those utilizing microwires and thread-based substrates, present advantages for small sample analysis, including natural breathability and suitability for bandage or textile integration. This study examines iridium oxide and silver–silver chloride coated on thin gold wires, fabricated using sol–gel and dip-coating processes known for their simplicity. The flexible microwires demonstrated promising pH performance from a study of their pH characteristics, sensitivity, hysteresis, and potential drift. Electrodes tested in microwells allowed for small sample volumes and localized pH measurement in a controlled environment. Additional integration into fabrics for sweat sensing in wearables highlighted their potential for continuous, real-time health monitoring applications.

1. Introduction

Human biofluid exhibits numerous biomarkers for disease diagnosis and for tracking health status. Biofluids maintain strict pH regulation, and minor changes can indicate the early onset of diseases. Real-time data collection and analysis can significantly improve patient outcomes through early detection and intervention strategies. An instance is the early detection of sepsis infection, which can be alerted by monitoring pH changes in the blood or bodily fluids [1,2]. Sweat, tears, saliva, and urine are options for the detection of biomarkers for specific diseases [3,4,5,6]. Continuous sweat production can be achieved through iontophoresis and chemical methods [7,8], allowing for real-time skin monitoring within a tiny amount of sweat. Skin pH assessment can indicate the deterioration or healing of the tissues. Typically, healthy skin displays a mildly acidic pH of 5 [9], while wounded skin tends to be more alkaline, nearing a pH of 8 [10]. In clinical environments, portable handheld or table-top pH sensors featuring flat-tip designs are employed for monitoring skin health. However, the fragile glass tip necessitates skilled users to operate and regular calibration, and prevents the continuous monitoring of skin chemistry. The amount of fluid needed by the sensing electrodes is not achievable with the use of iontophoresis. This prohibits tracking the continuous time-variant pH changes that provide critical physiological information.
Flexible sensors offer an excellent solution for real-time health monitoring. Flexible polymeric substrates with electrodes, being created through laser engraving, lithography, and printing techniques, have been demonstrated [11,12,13]. Although planar polymeric substrates have laid the groundwork for flexible pH sensing, they face limitations when it comes to analyzing tiny samples, such as those in cell analysis, and in terms of substrate breathability. Microwire and thread-based pH sensors may offer a great alternative. Multiplexed pH measurements using microwire electrodes were demonstrated for cell growth study in cell culture [14]. Thread electrodes integrated into textile substrates provide natural breathability during skin sensing. The use of thread-based pH sensors allows for sensing on various diagnostic platforms, such as bandages [15], and knitted into textiles [16]. Thread-based pH sensors require an initial step of metallization to create a conductive surface, and then the pH-sensitive material is coated. Metal microwires do not require the metallization step during the fabrication process. The pH-sensitive material can be deposited by sputtering, electrodeposition, or sol–gel processes [17,18,19]. Among these, the sol–gel process stands out for its relative simplicity. Researchers can reproduce high-quality thin films without sophisticated deposition hardware. Additionally, the surface homogeneity and thickness can be controlled during the coating step [20]. This work utilizes the sol–gel process to deposit iridium oxide (IrOx) on a gold bonding wire. The biocompatibility and high sensitivity features of IrOx are crucial for biosensing, thus it has been a preferred coating material for implantable bioelectrodes [21]. Silver–silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) is widely used as a reference electrode material for stability, miniaturization, and fabrication ease [22].
Our group previously reported on IrOx thin films coated on planar polyimide substrates [23]. This work explored IrOx films conformally coated on 25 µm gold microwires. To complete the fabrication of the miniaturized sensing platform, Ag/AgCl films were deposited onto the microwires. The surface geometry of a microwire provided a three-dimensional sensing area beneficial for studying tiny samples. This was demonstrated by testing the electrodes immersed in microwells. Additionally, the microwires were weaved into fabric to illustrate wearable textile applications where sensing was effectively conducted using small sample volumes of solution. pH characteristics such as sensitivities, hysteresis, and drift were analyzed.

2. Materials and Methods

Figure 1 illustrates the device configuration. The preparation of the sol–gel solution, the dip-coating process, and the heat treatment were adapted from previous work [24]. After coating IrCl3 on a gold (Au) microwire, heat treatment at 325 °C facilitated oxide growth. The IrOx layer formed on the wire surface as illustrated in Figure 1a. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) image in Figure 1b shows an electrode diameter of 25 µm with a layer of IrOx. A SEM image in Figure 2a shows the surface detail and successful IrOx growth. Figure 2b shows the elemental peaks for Ir, O, and Au by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) (JEOL IT500HR Field Emission).
A potentiostat (CH Instruments, Bee Cave, TX, USA) was used for open-circuit potential (OCP) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) 1X (Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), with a pH of 7.4 and a salt concentration (0.137 M) close to that of human body fluids, was chosen for its biological relevance [25]. Artificial sweat (Reagents, Charlotte, NC, USA) with an initial pH of 4.7 was adjusted from pH 4 to 9 using hydrochloric acid (HCl) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH). A commercial pH meter (Apera, Columbus, OH, USA) was used to verify the pH levels of the adjusted sweat solutions. A commercial glass rod (Basi, West Lafayette, IN, USA) Ag/AgCl reference electrode was used for tests in buffer pH 4, 7, and 10 solutions (Fisher, Manchester, NH, USA). Due to the large size of the commercial electrode, 50 mL solutions were prepared for verifying their pH values. The Ag/AgCl microwire was prepared by coating gold (Au) bonding wires with commercial ink (CHI., CA, USA). The 25 µm diameter microwires with IrOx and Ag/AgCl enabled sensing in volumes as small as 0.2 mL. To test the microwire in these small volumes, 3-D printed microwells with a diameter of 10 mm and a 0.2 mL capacity were created. To further demonstrate wearable applications, the microwires were assembled in fabrics and tested with small solution volumes of 0.2 mL. Three IrOx-Ag/AgCl microwire pairs were weaved into a fabric pad with a size of 5 × 5 cm2. Each microwire pair was connected to a single input channel of a data acquisition card (NI, Austin, TX, USA). Each channel consists of two ports for the IrOx working electrode and the Ag/AgCl reference electrode. This electrical interface connecting the electrode pairs embedded in the pad allows for three different pH-level solutions of 4, 6, and 9 to be dripped onto the pad and for their local potentials to be simultaneously recorded.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. pH-Sensing Performance by Open-Circuit Potential Measurement

Figure 3a shows the OCP responses and hysteresis study across two test cycles using the IrOx microwire vs. a commercial Ag/AgCl electrode. This was to verify solely the IrOx performance using the commercial Ag/AgCl electrode as a standard reference. Each cycle involved testing in the sequence of pH 4-7-10-7-4. A 50 mL beaker filled with solutions was used for all of the tests. The electrodes underwent cleaning in deionized (DI) water between tests. Previously, hysteresis (dV) was defined and reported for IrOx films on planar substrates [24]. The dV was characterized as the standard deviation between stabilized potentials at identical pH values in the test solutions, as indicated in Figure 3a. The correlation between pH and dV at pH 4, 7, and 10 was utilized to compute the pH fluctuation (dpH). The dV values of ±1.9, ±11, and ±0.3 mV corresponded to pH variations (dpH) of ±0.03, ±0.2, and ±0.06 pH, respectively, as depicted in Figure 3b. The highest dpH of ±0.2 pH occurred at pH 7, in contrast to both acidic and alkaline environments. The “±” sign here indicates the error range from its average output value. The difference in ionic concentrations of pH 10 and pH 7 likely caused high dV while returning from pH 10 to pH 7 during the cyclic testing. Alkaline pH 10 predominantly contains OH ions compared to neutral pH 7, with equal amounts of OH and H+ ions. OH ions attached to the oxide states and tended to be more adherent on the surface even with deionized water cleaning to the electrode. Another study also reported that higher hysteresis in a neutral pH 7 solution in cyclic tests, compared to acidic or alkaline levels, existed in field effect transistor sensors [26]. The correlation between pH and potential was utilized for determining sensitivity. A sensitivity of −54 mV/pH for the IrOx microwire electrode was comparable to the previously demonstrated IrOx planar films at −51 mV/pH [24].
Ag/AgCl microwire was then used to replace the commercial Ag/AgCl electrode. Figure 4a shows the OCP responses from the IrOx vs. Ag/AgCl microwire pair and (b) illustrates a sensitivity of −55 mV/pH. Figure 4b indicates the highest hysteresis (dV) of ±4.3 mV at pH 7, resulting in a pH variation (dpH) of ±0.07. The higher hysteresis for pH 7 was again a similar phenomenon, as mentioned before. From the OCP measurements, the IrOx vs. Ag/AgCl microwires produced a lower pH variation of ±0.07 compared to ±0.2 by the commercial Ag/AgCl electrode. This is probably due to more residues on a larger surface area of the commercial Ag/AgCl electrode than the limited surface of the microwire.

3.2. pH-Sensing Performance by Cyclic Voltammetry

Cyclic voltammetry is a versatile technique widely used to study the oxidative/reductive processes indicated by the peak potentials. To validate the functionality of the small microwires, a sensitivity study from CV was performed. The sensitivities were obtained from the CV profiles using the peak potential and pH relationship. CV was performed in a three-electrode system (CHI., USA) with an IrOx microwire as the working electrode, commercial Ag/AgCl or microwire Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode, and platinum as the counter electrode. The tests were performed in the same buffer solutions in the potential range of −0.4 to +0.8 V at a scan rate of 30 mV/s.
The pH performance was compared between the IrOx microwire vs. the commercial Ag/AgCl and IrOx vs. Ag/AgCl microwires electrode pairs. For the IrOx microwire vs. the commercial Ag/AgCl electrode, Figure 5a shows a sensitivity of −66.7 mV/pH, calculated from the peak potentials in the CV curves and pH values. A similar sensitivity of −63.7 mV/pH for the IrOx vs. Ag/AgCl microwire pair is shown in Figure 5b. The increased sensitivity observed in the CV tests in contrast to the OCP measurements is ascribed to the differences in the oxide states. In CV scans, the oxide composition undergoes alterations owing to redox reactions. Conversely, in OCP measurements, the high input impedance of the instrument prevents substantial changes in the oxide states [27]. Nonetheless, the OCP and CV measurements demonstrated that IrOx microwire performance was comparable between against a commercial reference electrode and the Ag/AgCl microwire made in our lab.

3.3. Potential Drift Study

To study the potential drift behavior, Figure 6a shows an IrOx microwire vs. a commercial Ag/AgCl electrode in 50 mL solution. Figure 6b shows the IrOx vs. Ag/AgCl microwires dipped in microwells filled with 0.2 mL solution in each well. The larger volume of 50 mL was used to accommodate the size of the commercial Ag/AgCl electrode. PBS 1× solution of pH 7.4 and a salt concentration of 0.137 M, close to human body fluid, was used in all stages of the drift studies.
Potential drift (V′) was previously defined as the slow non-random change in the output potential and was measured as the change between the initial and settled potentials [24]. Our group previously demonstrated a reset technique on planar IrOx films that could improve the drifting issue [28]. Figure 6c,d show how the reset method applied to the IrOx microwire vs. a commercial Ag/AgCl electrode, and the IrOx vs. Ag/AgCl microwires, respectively, can improve the drift phenomena. The experimental protocol for both scenarios was the same: after the recording, they continued for 1.5 h with the pairs in solution. The blue-shaded areas show the potential drift ranges. Then, an electrical reset was applied to the electrode pairs, indicated by the yellow lines. The reset was performed by applying an external voltage of 0.2 V across the working and reference electrodes. The 0.2 V reset voltage was chosen because it has been shown to produce a stable OCP with low drifts compared to other reset values, demonstrated in previous work for IrOx [28]. After 2 min, the voltage was turned off and the recording wires were reconnected to the electrode pairs to record the potentials for another 1.5 h. The red-shaded areas show the improved performance of output potentials with less drifting. The drift (V′) improvements after the reset for an IrOx microwire vs. a commercial Ag/AgCl electrode in Figure 6c and the IrOx vs. Ag/AgCl microwire pair in Figure 6d were changed from 11.8 mV to 4.2 mV and from 16.5 mV to 2.2 mV, reducing drifting by 64% and 87%, respectively. The potential drift improvement was accompanied by a faster settling time towards their stable potential values. The change in the output potential after reset can be attributed to the charge exchange processes at the OH-rich (IrOx) surface previously observed for the planar electrode [28]. This study confirmed that the voltage-reset technique applied to planar electrodes can also improve the performance of the microwire electrodes [28].

3.4. Microwires in Small-Volume Sensing

Artificial sweat with an initial pH of 4.7 was used to create new solutions, with their pH levels adjusted to range from 4 to 9 using HCl and NaOH. A pH meter verified the adjusted pH levels. A pipette was used to drop in or draw out solutions or water from the microwells. Deionized water was used to clean the microwells and electrodes between tests to remove residues. A single IrOx vs. Ag/AgCl microwire pair was immersed in the microwell and continuously tested from pH 4 to 9. Figure 7a shows the OCP step responses using the same microwire pair. The sensitivity of −57.4 mV/pH, shown in Figure 7b for the microwire, was comparable with the previous planar film design, which produced a sensitivity of −59 mV/pH, tested in artificial sweat [29].
To demonstrate potential wearable applications, three pairs of IrOx vs. Ag/AgCl microwire pairs were weaved into a 5 × 5 cm2 meshed fabric pad, as illustrated in Figure 8a. The meshed fabric was a stretchable cloth material for breathability that was important for long-term wound dressing. Each pair was connected to the data acquisition (DaQ) card. Each pair utilized a single channel. Solutions with pH 4, 6, and 9 were dripped on the fabric pad simultaneously with pipettes. The zoomed-in drawing in Figure 8a illustrates the pipette dripping a small volume, 0.2 mL, of artificial sweat solution onto the fabric pad containing the microwires. Figure 8b shows that the electrodes produce a sensitivity of −56 mV/pH across the three pH levels tested. These experiments demonstrated small-volume in situ sensing in two different scenarios.

4. Conclusions

This study investigated the development and pH-sensing characteristics of microwire-based pH sensors. Our group previously demonstrated IrOx based pH sensors built on planar surfaces. This manuscript makes a significant advancement by creating a much smaller, wire-shaped 25 µm IrOx pH sensor. To complete the sensor system, a Ag/AgCl reference electrode was built utilizing the microwire. Sol–gel and dip coating processes were utilized to produce IrOx and Ag/AgCl films on gold microwires.
Electroanalytical tests, such as open-circuit potential and cyclic voltammetry, indicated that IrOx and Ag/AgCl microwire pairs exhibited performance comparable to their planar and commercial counterparts. When tested in control solutions, such as commercial buffers and adjusted pH solutions in PBS and artificial sweat, the microwire pairs showed near-Nernstian sensitivity and low hysteresis. Improved drifting was achieved after the voltage reset was applied and was also similar to the planar films. The reset technique enables long-term stability without frequently removing the sensor from the solution for calibration. The small-volume sensing ability was demonstrated using wells and embedding the microwires into 5 × 5 cm2 fabrics.
The flexible microwire with a diameter of 25 µm enables localized pH measurements. The miniaturized configuration offers distinct advantages for both wearable and micro-volume sensing applications. Integrating these sensors into fabrics embedded in a bandage presents an approach for wearable monitoring systems. Their compact size also supports minimally invasive applications for real-time sensing in wound dressing. Moreover, the capacity to operate in low sample volumes is also beneficial for microfluidic systems where sample availability is limited. These attributes collectively position the microwire pH sensor as a promising tool for advancing biomedical research and clinical diagnostics. Future applications involve inserting these microwires into biological cells to interface directly with cellular environments without disrupting normal cellular functions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-C.C. and K.C.; methodology, K.C.; software, K.C.; validation, K.C., S.B. and K.Y.K.; formal analysis, K.C.; investigation, S.B. and K.C.; resources, K.Y.K.; data curation, K.C.; writing—original draft preparation, K.C.; writing—review and editing, J.-C.C. and K.C.; visualization, S.B.; supervision, J.-C.C.; project administration, J.-C.C.; funding acquisition, J.-C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially funded by the School of Engineering at Southern Methodist University, Mary and Richard Templeton Endowment.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

Ki Yong Kwon was employed by the company Plexon. All authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Husabø, G.; Nilsen, R.M.; Flaatten, H.; Solligård, E.; Frich, J.C.; Bondevik, G.T.; Braut, G.S.; Walshe, K.; Harthug, S.; Hovlid, E. Early diagnosis of sepsis in emergency departments, time to treatment, and association with mortality: An observational study. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ganesh, K.; Sharma, R.N.; Varghese, J.; Pillai, M. A profile of metabolic acidosis in patients with sepsis in an Intensive Care Unit setting. Int. J. Crit. Illn. Inj. Sci. 2016, 6, 178–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kaya, T.; Liu, G.; Ho, J.; Yelamarthi, K.; Miller, K.; Edwards, J.; Stannard, A. Wearable sweat sensors: Background and current trends. Electroanalysis 2019, 31, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, X.; Pan, X.; Blyth, J.; Lowe, C.R. Towards the real-time monitoring of glucose in tear fluid: Holographic glucose sensors with reduced interference from lactate and pH. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2008, 23, 899–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zuliani, C.; Matzeu, G.; Diamond, D. A potentiometric disposable sensor strip for measuring pH in saliva. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 132, 292–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Prats-Alfonso, E.; Abad, L.; Casañ-Pastor, N.; Gonzalo-Ruiz, J.; Baldrich, E. Iridium oxide pH sensor for biomedical applications. Case urea–urease in real urine samples. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 39, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bariya, M.; Nyein, H.Y.Y.; Javey, A. Wearable sweat sensors. Nat. Electron. 2018, 1, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Choi, J.; Ghaffari, R.; Baker, L.B.; Rogers, J.A. Skin-interfaced systems for sweat collection and analytics. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaar3921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fluhr, J.W.; Elias, P.M. Stratum corneum pH: Formation and function of the ‘acid mantle’. Exog. Dermatol. 2002, 1, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Percival, S.L.; McCarty, S.; Hunt, J.A.; Woods, E.J. The effects of pH on wound healing, biofilms, and antimicrobial efficacy. Wound Repair Regen. 2014, 22, 174–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, Y.; Song, Y.; Bo, X.; Min, J.; Pak, O.S.; Zhu, L.; Wang, M.; Tu, J.; Kogan, A.; Zhang, H. A laser-engraved wearable sensor for sensitive detection of uric acid and tyrosine in sweat. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ma, D.; Chon, S.; Cho, S.; Lee, Y.; Yoo, M.; Kim, D.; Lee, D.Y.; Lim, J.K. A novel photolithographic method for fabrication of flexible micro-patterned glucose sensors. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 876, 114720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dominiczak, J.; Krzemiński, J.; Wojcieszek, J.; Baraniecki, D.; Budny, F.; Wojciechowska, I.; Walter, P.; Pepłowski, A.; Górski, Ł.; Jakubowska, M. Aerosol-jet-printed potentiometric pH sensor for sweat measurements in smart patches. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 2024, 43, 100636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dabaghi, M.; Saraei, N.; Xu, G.; Chandiramohan, A.; Yeung, J.; Nguyen, J.P.; Vukmirovic, M.; Selvaganapathy, P.R.; Hirota, J.A. PHAIR: A biosensor for pH measurement in air–liquid interface cell culture. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Terse-Thakoor, T.; Punjiya, M.; Matharu, Z.; Lyu, B.; Ahmad, M.; Giles, G.E.; Owyeung, R.; Alaimo, F.; Baghini, M.S.; Brunyé, T.T. Thread-based multiplexed sensor patch for real-time sweat monitoring. npj Flex. Electron. 2020, 4, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jia, J.; Xu, C.; Pan, S.; Xia, S.; Wei, P.; Noh, H.Y.; Zhang, P.; Jiang, X. Conductive thread-based textile sensor for continuous perspiration level monitoring. Sensors 2018, 18, 3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, M.; Yao, S.; Madou, M. A long-term stable iridium oxide pH electrode. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2002, 81, 313–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shahrestani, S.; Ismail, M.C.; Kakooei, S.; Beheshti, M.; Zabihiazadboni, M.; Zavareh, M.A. Iridium Oxide pH Sensor Based on Stainless Steel Wire for pH Mapping on Metal Surface; IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2018; Volume 328, p. 012014. [Google Scholar]
  19. Trovato, V.; Teblum, E.; Kostikov, Y.; Pedrana, A.; Re, V.; Nessim, G.D.; Rosace, G. Sol-gel approach to incorporate millimeter-long carbon nanotubes into fabrics for the development of electrical-conductive textiles. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 240, 122218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Faustini, M.; Louis, B.; Albouy, P.A.; Kuemmel, M.; Grosso, D. Preparation of sol–gel films by dip-coating in extreme conditions. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 7637–7645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, I.; Whang, C.; Choi, K.; Choo, M.; Lee, Y. Characterization of iridium film as a stimulating neural electrode. Biomaterials 2002, 23, 2375–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shinwari, M.W.; Zhitomirsky, D.; Deen, I.A.; Selvaganapathy, P.R.; Deen, M.J.; Landheer, D. Microfabricated reference electrodes and their biosensing applications. Sensors 2010, 10, 1679–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chawang, K.; Bing, S.; Chiao, J. Printable and flexible iridium oxide-based pH sensor by a roll-to-roll process. Chemosensors 2023, 11, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, W.; Cao, H.; Deb, S.; Chiao, M.; Chiao, J.-C. A Flexible pH Sensor Based on the Iridium Oxide Sensing Film. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2011, 169, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hopkins, E.; Sanvictores, T.; Sharma, S. Physiology, Acid Base Balance; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  26. Shin, P.; Ryssel, H. pH Sensing Properties of ISFETs with LPCVD Silicon Nitride Sensitive-Gate. J. Electr. Eng. Inf. Sci. 1997, 2, 82–87. [Google Scholar]
  27. Olthuis, W.; Robben, M.; Bergveld, P.; Bos, M.; Van der Linden, W.E. pH Sensor Properties of Electrochemically Grown Iridium Oxide. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1990, 2, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chawang, K.; Xia, X.; Huang, M.-H.; Bing, S.; Benomar, M.; Doan, G.; Cao, H.; Chiao, J.-C. Improvement on Potential Drifting for Sol–Gel and Electroplated Iridium Oxide-Based pH-Sensing Films. IEEE Sens. Lett. 2023, 7, 2001504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, X.; Chawang, K.; Chiao, J.-C. Wearable Iridium Oxide pH Sensors for Sweat pH Measurements. In Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, 27–30 October 2019. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Iridium oxide (IrOx) film coated on gold microwire. (b) A SEM image showing the 25 µm coated microwire.
Figure 1. (a) Iridium oxide (IrOx) film coated on gold microwire. (b) A SEM image showing the 25 µm coated microwire.
Chemosensors 12 00168 g001
Figure 2. (a) A SEM image shows successful IrOx growth. (b) EDS peaks indicate the elemental composition.
Figure 2. (a) A SEM image shows successful IrOx growth. (b) EDS peaks indicate the elemental composition.
Chemosensors 12 00168 g002
Figure 3. (a) Open-circuit potential (OCP) response of IrOx microwire vs. a commercial Ag/AgCl electrode. The dotted lines indicate hysteresis (dV) at the identical pH level. (b) The sensitivity plot with hysteresis (dV) and corresponding pH variation (dpH) at three pH levels.
Figure 3. (a) Open-circuit potential (OCP) response of IrOx microwire vs. a commercial Ag/AgCl electrode. The dotted lines indicate hysteresis (dV) at the identical pH level. (b) The sensitivity plot with hysteresis (dV) and corresponding pH variation (dpH) at three pH levels.
Chemosensors 12 00168 g003
Figure 4. (a) The OCP and hysteresis (dV) of an IrOx microwire vs. a Ag/AgCl microwire. (b) The sensitivity plot with hysteresis (dV) and corresponding pH variation (dpH) at three pH levels.
Figure 4. (a) The OCP and hysteresis (dV) of an IrOx microwire vs. a Ag/AgCl microwire. (b) The sensitivity plot with hysteresis (dV) and corresponding pH variation (dpH) at three pH levels.
Chemosensors 12 00168 g004
Figure 5. Sensitivities determined from cyclic voltammetry (CV) peak potentials and pH relationship for two different electrode-pair configurations: (a) an IrOx microwire vs. a commercial Ag/AgCl electrode. (b) IrOx vs. Ag/AgCl microwires.
Figure 5. Sensitivities determined from cyclic voltammetry (CV) peak potentials and pH relationship for two different electrode-pair configurations: (a) an IrOx microwire vs. a commercial Ag/AgCl electrode. (b) IrOx vs. Ag/AgCl microwires.
Chemosensors 12 00168 g005
Figure 6. The test setup for the drift study among the two different electrode configurations includes the following: (a) an IrOx microwire vs. a commercial Ag/AgCl electrode in a beaker with 50 mL of solution; (b) IrOx vs. Ag/AgCl microwires in a microwell filled with 0.2 mL of solution. The potential drift (V′) analysis using the voltage reset technique for (a,b) electrode configurations is shown in (c,d), respectively. The yellow bar indicates the reset period of 2 min. The shaded areas of blue and red indicate the maximum drifting ranges.
Figure 6. The test setup for the drift study among the two different electrode configurations includes the following: (a) an IrOx microwire vs. a commercial Ag/AgCl electrode in a beaker with 50 mL of solution; (b) IrOx vs. Ag/AgCl microwires in a microwell filled with 0.2 mL of solution. The potential drift (V′) analysis using the voltage reset technique for (a,b) electrode configurations is shown in (c,d), respectively. The yellow bar indicates the reset period of 2 min. The shaded areas of blue and red indicate the maximum drifting ranges.
Chemosensors 12 00168 g006
Figure 7. (a) OCP step response and (b) sensitivity of an IrOx vs. Ag/AgCl microwire pair tested in microwells filled with 0.2 mL artificial sweat adjusted to pH 4–9.
Figure 7. (a) OCP step response and (b) sensitivity of an IrOx vs. Ag/AgCl microwire pair tested in microwells filled with 0.2 mL artificial sweat adjusted to pH 4–9.
Chemosensors 12 00168 g007
Figure 8. (a) Three IrOx vs. Ag/AgCl microwire pairs weaved into the meshed fabric pad for wearable pH-sensing applications. The detailed drawing shows the application of the artificial sweat solution on the fabric area containing the microwires. (b) The sensitivity from the three pairs tested at pH 4, 6, and 9.
Figure 8. (a) Three IrOx vs. Ag/AgCl microwire pairs weaved into the meshed fabric pad for wearable pH-sensing applications. The detailed drawing shows the application of the artificial sweat solution on the fabric area containing the microwires. (b) The sensitivity from the three pairs tested at pH 4, 6, and 9.
Chemosensors 12 00168 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chawang, K.; Bing, S.; Kwon, K.Y.; Chiao, J.-C. Miniaturized Iridium Oxide Microwire pH Sensor for Biofluid Sensing. Chemosensors 2024, 12, 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors12080168

AMA Style

Chawang K, Bing S, Kwon KY, Chiao J-C. Miniaturized Iridium Oxide Microwire pH Sensor for Biofluid Sensing. Chemosensors. 2024; 12(8):168. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors12080168

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chawang, Khengdauliu, Sen Bing, Ki Yong Kwon, and J.-C. Chiao. 2024. "Miniaturized Iridium Oxide Microwire pH Sensor for Biofluid Sensing" Chemosensors 12, no. 8: 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors12080168

APA Style

Chawang, K., Bing, S., Kwon, K. Y., & Chiao, J. -C. (2024). Miniaturized Iridium Oxide Microwire pH Sensor for Biofluid Sensing. Chemosensors, 12(8), 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors12080168

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop