Next Article in Journal
PD1+CD8+ Cells Are an Independent Prognostic Marker in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Tuberculosis Severity Predictive Model Using Mtb Variants and Serum Biomarkers in a Colombian Cohort of APTB Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Theragnostic Radionuclide Pairs for Prostate Cancer Management: 64Cu/67Cu, Can Be a Budding Hot Duo
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Dynamic Change of Immune Checkpoints and CD14+ Monocytes in Latent Tuberculosis Infection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/biomedicines10112793
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

MmpL3 Inhibition as a Promising Approach to Develop Novel Therapies against Tuberculosis: A Spotlight on SQ109, Clinical Studies, and Patents Literature

by
Mohd. Imran
1,*,
Mandeep Kumar Arora
2,
Anurag Chaudhary
3,
Shah Alam Khan
4,
Mehnaz Kamal
5,
Manal Mutlaq Alshammari
6,
Raghad Mohammad Alharbi
7,
Nuha Abdullah Althomali
8,
Ibrahim Mohammed Alzimam
9,
Abdullah Ayed Alshammari
10,
Bashair Hamed Alharbi
11,
Amer Alshengeti
12,13,
Abdulmonem A. Alsaleh
14,
Shayea A. Alqahtani
15 and
Ali A. Rabaan
16,17,18
1
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Northern Border University, Rafha 91911, Saudi Arabia
2
School of Pharmaceutical and Population Health Informatics, DIT University, Dehradun 248009, India
3
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Meerut Institute of Engineering and Technology, Meerut 250005, India
4
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, National University of Science and Technology, Muscat 130, Oman
5
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
6
Pharmacy Department, Hotat Bani Tamim General Hospital, Hotat Bani Tamim 16631, Saudi Arabia
7
Department of Pharmacy, Umm-Alqura University, Makkah 24225, Saudi Arabia
8
Department of Community Pharmacy, Kol Alosra, Taif 26512, Saudi Arabia
9
Faculty of Pharmacy, Northern Border University, Rafha 91911, Saudi Arabia
10
Nahdi Medical Company, Riyadh 12211, Saudi Arabia
11
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Umm-Alqura University, Jeddah 21921, Saudi Arabia
12
Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Al-Madinah 41491, Saudi Arabia
13
Department of Infection Prevention and Control, Prince Mohammad Bin Abdulaziz Hospital, National Guard Health Affairs, Al-Madinah 41491, Saudi Arabia
14
Clinical Laboratory Science Department, Mohammed Al-Mana College for Medical Sciences, Dammam 34222, Saudi Arabia
15
Medical Laboratory Department, Erhadh Hospital, Dammam 32434, Saudi Arabia
16
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia
17
College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
18
Department of Public Health and Nutrition, The University of Haripur, Haripur 22610, Pakistan
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(11), 2793; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112793
Submission received: 11 October 2022 / Revised: 24 October 2022 / Accepted: 26 October 2022 / Published: 3 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tuberculosis and Latent Tuberculosis Infection: Molecular Basis and Translational Research)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tuberculosis (TB) is accountable for considerable global morbidity and mortality. Effective TB therapy with multiple drugs completes in about six months. The longer duration of TB therapy challenges patient compliance and contributes to treatment collapse and drug resistance (DR) progress. Therefore, new medications with an innovative mechanism of action are desperately required to shorten the TB therapy’s duration and effective TB control. The mycobacterial membrane protein Large 3 (MmpL3) is a novel, mycobacteria-conserved and recognized promiscuous drug target used in the development of better treatments for multi-drug resistance TB (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB). This article spotlights MmpL3, the clinical studies of its inhibitor (SQ109), and the patent literature. The literature on MmpL3 inhibitors was searched on PubMed and freely available patent databases (Espacenet, USPTO, and PatentScope). SQ109, an analog of ethambutol (EMB), is an established MmpL3 inhibitor and has completed Phase 2b-3 clinical trials. Infectex and Sequella are developing orally active SQ109 in partnership to treat MDR pulmonary TB. SQ109 has demonstrated activity against drug-sensitive (DS) and drug-resistant (DR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and a synergistic effect with isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), clofazimine (CFZ), and bedaquiline (BNQ). The combination of SQ109, clofazimine, bedaquiline, and pyrazinamide (PZA) has been patented due to its excellent anti-TB activity against MDR-TB, XDR-TB, and latent-TB. The combinations of SQ109 with other anti-TB drugs (chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, and sutezolid) have also been claimed in the patent literature. SQ109 is more potent than EMB and could substitute EMB in the intensive stage of TB treatment with the three- or four-drug combination. Developing MmpL3 inhibitors is a promising approach to fighting the challenges associated with DS-TB and DR-TB. The authors foresee MmpL3 inhibitors such as SQ109 as future drugs for TB treatment.

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is a contagious bacterial illness known to humankind since ancient times. The causal microorganism of TB is Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). Lung or pulmonary TB is the most common form, but Mtb also affects other body parts [1]. TB does not spare any age group and is omnipresent worldwide [1]. Most TB patients remain asymptomatic (latent TB) and non-contagious. However, approximately 10% of latent TB cases may advance to active TB (active or symptomatic TB) [2]. Some usual symptoms of active TB comprise continuing chronic cough, hemoptysis, night sweating, and weight loss [1,2,3]. Active TB is associated with a high mortality rate if left untreated [1,2,3]. The 2021 TB report of the World Health Organization (WHO) states that TB is one of the top 10 reasons for global deaths, about one-quarter of the global population is affected by Mtb, and the global burden of TB is expected to increase due to the COVID-19 pandemic [4].
Pulmonary active TB, unlike latent TB, is highly contagious and spreads through the air by the coughing, spitting, speaking, or sneezing of active TB patients. Extrapulmonary TB infections, such as skeletal TB, brain (meningitis) TB, joint TB, gastrointestinal TB, liver TB, genitourinary TB, cutaneous TB, etc., show a wide range of symptoms [5,6]. Heavy smokers, and HIV/AIDS and other immune-compromised patients are more prone to acquire an active infection [5]. Active TB infections are diagnosed using chest x-rays and the microscopic examination of the body fluid. In contrast, blood and tuberculin skin tests (TST) are employed to diagnose latent TB [6]. BCG vaccination, screening of populations at high risk, and early diagnosis and treatment are some ways to prevent and combat TB [7]. Conventional anti-TB drugs are classified into first-line, e.g., isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), ethambutol (EMB), pyrazinamide (PZA) and second-line regimens such as aminoglycosides (streptomycin), fluoroquinolones (moxifloxacin), clofazimine (CFZ), linezolid, ethionamide, and prothionamide [4,8,9,10]. Anti-TB drugs are frequently used in combination (multiple drugs) over a long period (6–9 months), but the duration of therapy varies according to the type of TB [4,8,9,10]. Irrational use of anti-TB drugs has resulted in developing resistance to anti-TB drugs. In multi-drug resistant TB (MDR-TB), resistance develops to the two most commonly used first-line drugs (INH and RIF). In extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB), in addition to RIF and INH, resistance develops to two or more antibiotics belonging to fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides [4,10,11]. Recently total drug-resistant TB (TDR-TB) has also emerged [12].
The longer therapy with anti-TB medications leads to unavoidable adverse effects. For example, the first-line drugs (INH, RIF, EMB, and PZA), bedaquiline and pretomanid can cause hepatotoxicity [12,13]. The longer duration of TB therapy challenges patient compliance and contributes to therapy failure and the progress of drug-resistant (MDR, XDR, and TDR) strains of Mtb. These strains are particularly dangerous for immunocompromised people. The irrational use of anti-TB drugs also promotes the development of MDR-TB, XDR-TB, and TDR-TB [4,10,11,12,13]. Therefore, new treatments with an inventive mechanism of action are desperately desired to shorten the TB therapy’s duration and effective TB control. Accordingly, scientists have identified novel drug targets (DprE1, QcrB, MmpL3, etc.) for anti-TB drug development [12,13]. The mycobacterial membrane protein Large 3 (MmpL3) is a novel, mycobacteria-conserved, and promiscuous drug target developed to provide better therapy for TB. This article spotlights MmpL3, the clinical studies of its inhibitor, and the patent literature.

2. Mycobacterial Membrane Protein Large 3 (MmpL3)

MmpL is a transport protein (trehalose monomycolate flippase) in Mtb. There are about 13 MmpLs, but only MmpL3 is essential in Mtb [14]. The physiological role, structure, and properties of MmpL3 are well described in the literature [14,15,16,17,18,19]. Mycolic acid (MA) is an essential component of the MA-based hydrophobic outer cell wall of Mtb [14,15,16,17,18,19]. MA is produced in the cytoplasm of the Mtb cell. In the cytoplasm of the Mtb, the type I polyketide synthase 13 (Pks13) drives the interaction of MA and trehalose to produce trehalose monomycolate (TMM). MmpL3 is located at the plasma membrane of the Mtb. MmpL3 is responsible for transporting TMM from the cytoplasm to the inner membrane of the Mtb. In the inner membrane, Ag85 mediates the conversion of TMM to trehalose dimycolate (TDM) and trehalose. The trehalose returns to the cytoplasm via the SugABC-Lpqy transporter to restart this cycle. The TDM makes the covalent bond with the arabinogalactan polysaccharides to synthesize a packed and MA-based hydrophobic outer cell wall of Mtb (Figure 1).
The MA-based hydrophobic outer cell wall of Mtb is impermeable to many chemical compounds, including antibiotics, and protects and contributes to the pathogenic success of Mtb [14,16]. Therefore, the expression of MmpL3 is essential for Mtb’s survival and pathogenicity [14,15,16,17,18,19]. The inhibitors of MmpL3 (SQ109) cause the diminution of MmpL3, which leads to the cessation of cell wall synthesis, cell division, and thevrapid death of Mtb [14,15,16,17,18,19].

3. Literature on MmpL3 Inhibitors

The literature on MmpL3 inhibitors was searched on the PubMed database using “MmpL3” as a keyword on 1 October 2022. This search provided 146 articles, including 21 review articles. The summary of 12 relevant and recent review articles is mentioned in Table 1. The authors did not find an MmpL3 inhibitor-based review article discussing clinical studies on MmpL3 inhibitors (SQ109), the development of SQ109, or the patent literature of MmpL3. This aspect provides novelty to the current review article over the previously published reviews on MmpL3 inhibitors.

4. Clinical Studies on MmpL3 Inhibitors

Studies [14,16,19,20,23,24,25,26,27,28,29] have disclosed the chemistry of some important inhibitors of MmpL3 (SQ109, NITD-304, NITD-349, AU1235, CRS400393, BM212, THPP, spiropiperidine, TBL-140, ICA38, HC2091, BM533, BM635, rimonabant, C215, and PIPD1). The clinical studies on MmpL3 inhibitors were searched on 1 October 2022, on the clinicaltrial.gov database [30] utilizing different keywords (SQ109 = 7 studies; No anti-TB study found for NITD-304, NITD-349, AU1235, CRS400393, BM212, THPP, spiropiperidine, TBL-140, ICA38, HC2091, BM533, BM635, rimonabant, C215, or PIPD1). A general search on PubMed was also conducted with the earlier mentioned keywords in the clinical trial and randomized controlled trial section of PubMed. Three studies were identified for the “SQ109” keyword [31,32,33], while other keywords did not produce clinical studies related to TB. The summary of clinical studies on SQ109 is provided in the SQ109 section of this study.

5. SQ109

SQ109 (Synonym: NSC722041; Molecular Formula: C22H38N2; Molecular Weight: 330.55; CAS registry number: 502487-67-4; ChemSpider ID: 4438718; PubChem substance ID: 175426955; PubChem CID: 5274428; Figure 2) is a 1,2-ethylenediamine-based analog of EMB (Figure 2) [34,35]. The 1,2-ethylenediamine linker is essential for the anti-TB activity of SQ109 and EMB [36].
Infectex and Sequella are developing SQ109 in partnership to treat MDR pulmonary TB [37,38]. SQ109 was developed by focusing on EMB, but they share an uncommon chemical skeleton (Figure 2) and mechanism of action. The chemical structure, synthesis, anti-TB activity, oral bioavailability, and acid stability of SQ109 were first disclosed in 2003 [34,39]. The development timeline of SQ109 is presented in Figure 3.

5.1. Mechanism of Action

SQ109 demonstrates its anti-TB activity through three different mechanisms comprising inhibition of MmpL3 (Figure 1), biosynthesis of quinones (MenG and MenA), and a reduction in ATP synthesis in Mtb [37,38,39,40].

5.2. Preclinical Studies

The preclinical studies have established the efficacy of SQ109 against all forms of TB, including DS-TB, DR-TB, and the slow vegetative form of Mtb (latent-TB) [38,39] (Table 2). SQ109 has also shown activity against Aspergillus fumigatus, Candida spp., Helicobacter pylori, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae [38]. SQ109 presented low oral bioavailability but achieved 45-fold higher concentrations in TB murine target organs (lung and spleen) than in plasma, reduced TB-treatment time by about 25–30% in in vivo models, and exhibited synergistic effects with INH, RIF, CFZ, and BDQ [37,38,39] (Table 2).

5.3. Clinical Studies on SQ109

The clinical studies on SQ109 were searched on the clinicaltrial.gov database [30] and PubMed. The summary of clinical studies on SQ109 is provided in Table 3.
Among the seven clinical studies on SQ109 (Table 3), the results of NCT01218217 [31] and NCT01785186 [32] have been published. The NCT01218217 study was conducted between December 2010 and August 2011. It was observed that SQ109 (75, 150, and 300 mg) alone or in combination with RIF was safe and tolerable. The NCT01785186 was conducted between May 2013 and March 2014. However, the recruitment for the SQ109 group was halted because of the unmet pre-specified efficacy threshold. Accordingly, this study is silent about the data of the SQ109 monotherapy. However, the 2b study advocated enhanced activity of SQ109 when added to the MDR regimen [22]. In another published study [33], TB patients were treated with SQ109, RIF, and a combination of RIF and SQ109 for 14 days. The sputum of the treated patients was collected daily and analyzed for the colony-forming units (CFU). It was observed that RIF significantly reduced the CFU more than SQ109. The adverse effects associated with SQ109 are mentioned in one clinical study [31] and the literature [37,38,39]. The common side effects of SQ109 included dose-dependent mild gastrointestinal discomfort, nausea, and vomiting, which did not require any clinical intervention. These studies did not reveal any relevant impact on QT prolongation, neurological parameters, vital signs, blood chemistry, or ophthalmological data [31,37,38,39].

6. Patent Searching and Analysis

The patent searching was done on 1 October 2022, by the freely available patent databases (Espacenet, United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and PatentScope) [41,42,43,44] utilizing different keywords (SQ109 and MmpL3). The patent literature search provided many hits on the Espacenet database (SQ109: 218 hits; MmpL3: 119 hits), USPTO database (SQ109: 115 hits; MmpL3: 39 hits), and PatentScope database (SQ109: 199 hits; MmpL3: 140 hits). The duplicate patents/patent applications were removed and segregated based on their patent family. The patents/applications explicitly stating the application of MmpL3 inhibitors or SQ109 to prevent/treat TB were identified and analyzed.
WO2003096989A2 (Assignee: National Institute of Health) disclosed 1,2-ethylenediamine-based analogs of EMB to provide new molecules for drug-resistant TB and shorten the treatment of TB [45]. WO2003096989A2 is the first patent application disclosing SQ109 and SQ109 dihydrochloride [45]. The compositions of SQ109 to treat Mtb infections are also specifically patented in US8268894B2 [46] and US7842729B2 [47], which are family members of WO2003096989A2 [45].
US7456222B2 (Assignee: Sequella; Status: Patented case) claims a method of treating TB utilizing a therapeutically effective amount of SQ109 (1 to 1000 mg), optionally with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier [48]. This patent disclosed the synthesis, structure elucidation data (NMR and mass spectrum), the anti-TB activity of SQ109 in a mice model of TB, the efficacy of combinations of SQ109 with other anti-TB drugs (INH and RIF), and MIC values of SQ109 for different bacteria (Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative), anaerobes, fungi, and Mtb. This patent states that the dihydrochloride salt of SQ109 was used in most of the experiments; the maximum tolerated dose of SQ109 is 600 mg/kg, whereas an 800 mg/kg dose is fatal; SQ109 has low oral bioavailability (3.8%); SQ109 primarily distributes into the lungs and spleen; plasma protein binding of SQ109 is concentration-dependent (non-linear) due to saturation of the protein binding sites and fluctuates from 15% (20 ng/mL) to 74% (200 ng/mL) to 48% (2000 ng/mL); a low concentration of SQ109 (1–10 mg/kg) shows activity equal to that of EMB at 100 mg/kg; the combination of SQ109 with INH or RIF showed synergistic effects over INH or RIF alone; SQ-109 is equally active against DS and DR strains of Mtb, and SQ109 could substitute EMB in the serious stage of TB treatment comprising combination therapy. It further states that SQ-109 revealed decent activity against Candida albicans (MIC = 4–8 ug/mL) [48]. US8202910B2 [49] is a family member of US7456222B2 [48] with an analogous specification. US8202910B2 claims a composition comprising SQ109 and other therapeutic agents like INH, RIF, and antiparasitic, and antiviral drugs. It also relates to treating fungal diseases using SQ109 or its combinations [49].
US10576079B2 (Assignee: University of California; Status: Patented case) relates to a pharmaceutical composition for treating TB (MD-TB, XDR-TB, and latent-TB) using a combination of CFZ, BDQ, PZA, and SQ109. The in vitro intramacrophage Mtb-iGFP model showed a 98.2% inhibition for the combination of CFZ (0.104 μg/mL), BDQ (0.0085 μg/mL), PZA (15 μg/mL), and SQ109 (0.25 μg/mL) [50].
The patent search also exposed some patents/patent applications claiming SQ109 inventions. However, these documents provide little information about the experimental facts of the claimed SQ109 inventions (Table 4).
Table
Table 4. Patents/patent applications of SQ109 without experimental details of the claimed SQ109 inventions.
Table 4. Patents/patent applications of SQ109 without experimental details of the claimed SQ109 inventions.
S. No.Patent/Patent Application Number
(Assignee; Status)		Summary of the Claimed Invention
1WO2021090283A1
(Foundation for Neglected Disease Research; No national phase entry)		A method of reducing the duration of TB treatment in patients suffering from DS-TB or DR-TB utilizing a combination of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine and an anti-TB agent (SQ109, BNQ, macozinone, CFZ, etc.). The use of the claimed combination to reduce the relapse of TB in patients co-infected with HIV-1 is also claimed [51].
2WO2018191628A1
(University of California; No national phase entry)		An anti-TB pharmaceutical composition of CFZ, BZQ, and PZA that may optionally contain a therapeutically effective amount of SQ109 [52].
3WO2017191444A1
(UCL Business PLC; No national phase entry)		The polymersome (vesicles formed from amphiphilic block copolymers) composition of anti-TB drugs (INH, RIF, SQ109, etc.) with improved in vivo anti-TB activity over the free drug [53].
4US20170189474A1
(Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Abandoned)		A method of treating Hirschsprung-associated fungal enterocolitis with an antifungal agent (SQ109, posaconazole, itraconazole, etc.) [54].
5US2017136102A1
(GangaGen Inc.; Abandoned)		A method of treating Mtb infection with a combination of an outer membrane acting biologic and an anti-TB drug (SQ109, INH, RIF, EMB, PZA, etc.), wherein the outer membrane acting biologic increases the permeability of the mycobacteria outer membrane for the anti-TB drug [55].
6EP2340022B1
(Pfizer; Invalid due to non-payment of fee)		A combination of sutezolid with at least two anti-TB drugs selected from the groups consisting of INH, RIF, PZA, CFZ, SQ109 etc., to treat TB [56].
7US2021069156A1
(Cornell University; Non-final action mailed)		A method of treating inflammatory disease (inflammatory bowel disease) in a subject diagnosed with one or more loss-or-function mutations in the CX3CR1 gene using a therapeutically effective amount of an anti-fungal agent (SQ109, voriconazole, fluconazole, etc.) [57].
8US10624893B2
(GlaxoSmithKline; Patented case)		A method for the treatment of TB using a therapeutically effective amount of GSK2556286 optionally in combination with other drugs (SQ109, INH, RIF, and PZA) [58].
9US9572809B2
(Spero Trinem; Patented case)		A method of controlling, treating, or reducing the advancement, severity or effects of a mycobacterium disease (TB) using a combination of VXc-486 and another antibiotic (SQ109, CFZ, sutezolid, PZA, and INH) [59].
Our search also revealed patents/patent applications claiming MmpL3 inhibitors of diverse chemical classes, including indole derivatives [60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68], indazoles [69], adamantane derivatives [70,71,72], ethylene diamines [73], trehalose analogs [74], and benzothiazole amide [75] for preventing/treating TB. The compounds claimed in these patents/applications have not been clinically tested. Therefore, the authors have not summarized them. However, these patent documents would be worthy of review for those interested in discovering MmpL3 inhibitors.

7. Discussion

Despite innovative development in the diagnosis and healthcare system, the emerging cases of MDR-TB (long treatment of up to two years) and XRD-TB (long and costly treatment due to limited treatment options) are posing questions about the current TB-therapy regimen and making TB an unmet medical need [14,16,22]. Moreover the COVID-19 pandemic has reversed the progress of global TB-control programs [4,16]. These concerns warrant developing potent anti-TB treatments with an inventive mechanism of action, high chemical stability, lower toxicity profile, and shorter treatment duration [14,24]. Accordingly, scientists have identified and validated novel drug targets (MmpL3, DprE1, QcrB, etc.) for anti-TB drug development [12,13].
MmpL3 inhibition weakens Mtb’s cell wall and steers cell death [14,16,20,21,60]. MmpL3 is highly conserved in mycobacteria as well as in corynebacterial but is absent in humans. This motivating feature of MmpL3 suggests the absence of a mechanism of action-based side effects in humans [14,51]. The MmpL3 inhibitors are also active against non-tubercular mycobacteria (NTM), including M. abscessus and M. leprae [14,23,61]. The treatment options for NTM infections are limited and poor, with higher chances of adverse effects and relapse [23]. This also encourages the development of MmpL3 inhibitors. The inhibitors of MmpL3 have demonstrated synergistic effects with many anti-TB drugs (INH, RIF, CFZ, and BDQ) [21,23]. The synergist effect permits the use of lower doses of drugs and reduces the possibility of drug resistance. This attribute also makes MmpL3 an attractive therapeutic target against Mtb infections. The MmpL3 inhibitors do not disclose a common pharmacophore. Many chemical classes (ethylenediamine derivatives, carboxamide derivatives, benzothiazole amides, adamantyl ureas, pyrroles and pyrazoles, benzimidazoles, spiropiperidines, and piperidinol) of MmpL3 are reported [14,16,19,20,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Consequently, MmpL3 is recognized as a promiscuous drug target [16,21]. Being a promiscuous target, repurposing studies on USFDA-approved molecules are foreseeable to identify MmpL3 inhibitors. The drug-repurposing studies will also help identify non-toxic nutraceuticals that can be administered with current regimens of TB therapy [14]. The MmpL3 belongs to the resistance, nodulation, and cell division (RND) transporter family, which depends on proton motive force (PMF) to transfer substrates from the cytoplasm to the inner membrane of the Mtb [24,68]. Accordingly, the activity of MmpL3 is driven by the electron transport chain (ETC) and the PMF in the Mtb [16]. The additional PMF-disrupting effects of some MmpL3 inhibitors (SQ109) potentiate their anti-TB activity against replication and non-replicating Mtb [23]. Therefore, the authors trust that combining QcrB inhibitors and MmpL3 inhibitors may provide highly synergistic effects. The development of MmpL3 inhibitors faces some challenges. Only a few in vitro and whole cell-based assays allowing the recognition of MmpL3 inhibitors are available. The absence of simple and relatively high-throughput assays to quickly screen potential MmpL3 inhibitors currently denotes a hindrance to further development [60]. The conformational changes or alterations in the transporter structure of MmpL3 are possibly causing mutation in MmpL3, which may cause drug resistance [16,63,68]. This aspect needs to be considered while developing MmpL3 inhibitors. Chemically, the most important MmpL3 inhibitors contain lipophilic groups (cycloalkyl, adamantyl, etc.). This aspect improves penetration into the Mtb’s cell wall [24]. However, this property may also cause problems of low aqueous solubility, increased protein binding, and toxicity. These issues may hinder the development of suitable dosage forms of these MmpL3 inhibitors. Long-term TB therapy is needed to avoid relapse of TB due to genetically DR bacteria or phenotypic drug tolerance (PDT). The PDT develops due to the induction of efflux pumps in Mtb. Accordingly, studying phenotypic drug tolerance concerning MmpL3 inhibitors is also warranted to develop better MmpL3 inhibitors [51].
SQ109 (a 1,2-ethylene diamine compound) is the most advanced and promising oral MmpL3 inhibitor under clinical development (phase II-3b trial completed). SQ109 possesses an appreciable tolerability, safety, and efficacy profile against all forms of TB, including pulmonary TB, MDR-TB, XDR-TB, genitourinary-TB, nervous system TB, osseous-articular system TB, and TB of the lymph glands [14,60]. Based on the clinical studies data (Table 3), the authors believe that tablet formulation of dihydrochloride salt of SQ109 may be the marketed dosage in the future. A low dose of SQ109 demonstrated remarkable synergy with first-line drugs (INH and RIF) and bedaquiline. These combinations also shortened the treatment duration by 25–30% [37]. The replacement of EMB with SQ109 in TB therapy has also exhibited improved efficacy and shorter treatment duration. This characteristic makes SQ109 a unique drug to become an excellent component of the combination of TB therapy [37]. SQ109 is also reported to interfere with the ETC (menaquinone inhibitor) and ATP synthesis in Mtb. These additional mechanisms make SQ109 an excellent anti-TB drug [14]. We believe combining QcrB inhibitors like telacebec with SQ109 may be synergistic and advantageous. A recent study has disclosed six metabolites of SQ109, including a hydroxy adamantyl analog of SQ109 and N′-adamantylethylenediamine. None of these metabolites showed anti-TB activity against Mtb, suggesting that the metabolites of SQ109 do not contribute to the anti-TB activity of SQ109 [76]. The spontaneous resistance to SQ109 has not yet been reported in Mtb. However, modest cross-resistance to SQ109 species containing MmpL3 has been reported [71]. The bacterial mutation rate for SQ109 is quite low. Therefore, the chances of Mtb’s resistance development to SQ109 are thin [37,38]. SQ109 has also demonstrated appreciable activity against H. pylori and C. albicans. SQ109 exhibited the killing of 99.99% of H. pylori with concentrations easily achievable in stomach contents and tissues [37,38]. These microorganisms do not have MmpL3 genes. This suggests the activity of SQ109 against H. pylori and C. albicans involves a different mechanism [71]. These findings suggest the incorporation of SQ109 in H. pylori combination therapy and using SQ109 as an antifungal agent.
A company files patent applications to protect and get the commercial benefits of its inventions [42,43,77]. Sequella has also protected SQ109-based inventions related to the pharmaceutical compositions/combinations and methods of treating Mtb infections utilizing SQ109 [45,46,47,48] (Figure 4). Sequella’s patents/patent applications provide experimental details of the claimed SQ109 inventions. However, many patents/patent applications do not provide experimental details of the claimed compositions of SQ109 with other drugs [51,54,56,57,58]. Therefore, the authors recommend carrying out the experiments using the claimed combinations of SQ109 with other drugs provided in such patent applications [51,54,56,57,58] (Figure 4). This will help to identify more SQ109-based anti-TB combinations. The HIV-patients are prone to developing TB. SQ109 has demonstrated good activity against H. pylori and fungi. Therefore, the combinations comprising SQ109 and other drugs (anti-HIV and antifungal) may also be tested (Figure 4). The study of drug interaction helps to avoid pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic-related issues of a drug [42,43]. Accordingly, an assessment of the SQ109-based drug interaction studies is also necessary (Figure 4). A company can file different types of patents for a drug [12,77]. Therefore, the writers foresee the advance and patent filings of further SQ109-based inventions comprising new combinations of SQ109 with other drugs (anti-HIV, antifungal, and different antibiotics/antivirals), new dosage forms of SQ109 (capsule, injection, suspension, etc.), polymorphs of SQ109 (new crystalline or co-crystal forms), and new indications of SQ109.

8. Conclusions

MmpL3 is a validated and mycobacteria-conserved promiscuous drug target in the development of drugs against MDR-TB, XDR-TB, and NTM. SQ109 is the most advanced orally active EMB-based MmpL3 inhibitor in clinical trials. SQ109 is more potent than EMB and demonstrated synergistic effects with first-line anti-TB drugs (INH and RIF), in addtion to a shorter treatment duration. SQ109 is a potential candidate to replace EMB from the currently approved anti-TB regimens. The development of SQ109-based treatments for H. pylori and fungal infections is also predictable. The patent literature discloses some good inventions of SQ109 with some antimicrobial agents. The authors trust the potential of the MmpL3 inhibitor (SQ109) to improve anti-TB drug regimens and foresee tremendous scope for developing SQ109-based antimicrobial regimens.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.I. and S.A.K.; methodology, M.I., S.A.K., M.K.A. and A.C.; software, M.K.; investigation, M.M.A., R.M.A., N.A.A., I.M.A., A.A.A. (Abdullah Ayed Alshammari) and B.H.A.; resources, A.A.R., A.A., A.A.A. (Abdulmonem A. Alsaleh) and S.A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K., M.M.A., R.M.A., N.A.A., I.M.A., A.A.A. (Abdullah Ayed Alshammari) and B.H.A.; writing—review and editing, M.I., S.A.K., M.K.A. and A.C.; visualization, A.A.R., A.A., A.A.A. (Abdulmonem A. Alsaleh) and S.A.A.; supervision, M.I.; project administration, M.I.; funding acquisition, A.A.R., A.A., A.A.A. (Abdulmonem A. Alsaleh) and S.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

All the authors are thankful to their respective institutions for providing support for this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Miggiano, R.; Rizzi, M.; Ferraris, D.M. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Pathogenesis, Infection Prevention and Treatment. Pathogens 2020, 9, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Blumberg, H.M.; Ernst, J.D. The Challenge of Latent TB Infection. JAMA 2016, 316, 931–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Marais, B.J.; Gie, R.P.; Obihara, C.C.; Hesseling, A.C.; Schaaf, H.S.; Beyers, N. Well defined symptoms are of value in the diagnosis of childhood pulmonary tuberculosis. Arch. Dis. Child. 2005, 90, 1162–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Global Tuberculosis Report 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240037021 (accessed on 1 October 2022).
  5. Feske, M.L.; Teeter, L.D.; Musser, J.M.; Graviss, E.A. Giving TB wheels: Public transportation as a risk factor for tuberculosis transmission. Tuberculosis 2011, 91 (Suppl. 1), S16–S23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Oommen, S.; Banaji, N. Laboratory Diagnosis of Tuberculosis: Advances in Technology and Drug Susceptibility Testing. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2017, 35, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hawn, T.R.; Day, T.A.; Scriba, T.J.; Hatherill, M.; Hanekom, W.A.; Evans, T.G.; Churchyard, G.; Kublin, J.G.; Bekker, L.-G.; Self, S.G. Tuberculosis Vaccines and Prevention of Infection. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2014, 78, 650–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Leibert, E.; Rom, W. New drugs and regimens for treatment of TB. Expert Rev. Anti-Infective Ther. 2010, 8, 801–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rendon, A.; Tiberi, S.; Scardigli, A.; D’Ambrosio, L.; Centis, R.; Caminero, J.A.; Migliori, G.B. Classification of drugs to treat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB): Evidence and perspectives. J. Thorac. Dis. 2016, 8, 2666–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. WHO Consolidated Guidelines on Tuberculosis: Module 4: Treatment: Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240007048 (accessed on 1 October 2022).
  11. Prasad, R. Multidrug and extensively drug-resistant TB (M/XDR-TB): Problems and solutions. Indian J. Tuberc. 2010, 57, 180–191. [Google Scholar]
  12. Imran, M.; Alshrari, A.S.; Thabet, H.K.; Abida; Bakht, A. Synthetic molecules as DprE1 inhibitors: A patent review. Expert Opin. Ther. Patents 2021, 31, 759–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Imran, M.; Alam Khan, S.; Asdaq, S.M.B.; Almehmadi, M.; Abdulaziz, O.; Kamal, M.; Alshammari, M.K.; Alsubaihi, L.I.; Hussain, K.H.; Alharbi, A.S.; et al. An insight into the discovery, clinical studies, compositions, and patents of macozinone: A drug targeting the DprE1 enzyme of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Infect. Public Health 2022, 15, 1097–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bolla, J.R. Targeting MmpL3 for anti-tuberculosis drug development. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2020, 48, 1463–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Su, C.-C.; Klenotic, P.A.; Bolla, J.R.; Purdy, G.E.; Robinson, C.V.; Yu, E.W. MmpL3 is a lipid transporter that binds trehalose monomycolate and phosphatidylethanolamine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 11241–11246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Umare, M.D.; Khedekar, P.B.; Chikhale, R.V. Mycobacterial Membrane Protein Large 3 (MmpL3) Inhibitors: A Promising Approach to Combat Tuberculosis. Chem. Med. Chem. 2021, 16, 3136–3148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Belardinelli, J.M.; Yazidi, A.; Yang, L.; Fabre, L.; Li, W.; Jacques, B.; Angala, S.K.; Rouiller, I.; Zgurskaya, H.I.; Sygusch, J.; et al. Structure-function profile of MmpL3, the essential mycolic acid transporter from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. ACS Infect. Dis. 2016, 2, 702–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Su, C.-C.; Klenotic, P.A.; Cui, M.; Lyu, M.; Morgan, C.E.; Yu, E.W. Structures of the mycobacterial membrane protein MmpL3 reveal its mechanism of lipid transport. PLoS Biol. 2021, 19, e3001370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xu, Z.; Meshcheryakov, V.A.; Poce, G.; Chng, S.-S. MmpL3 is the flippase for mycolic acids in mycobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 7993–7998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bajad, N.G.; Singh, S.K.; Singh, S.K.; Singh, T.D.; Singh, M. Indole: A promising scaffold for the discovery and development of potential anti-tubercular agents. Curr. Res. Pharmacol. Drug Discov. 2022, 3, 100119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Addison, W.; Frederickson, M.; Coyne, A.G.; Abell, C. Potential therapeutic targets from Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab): Recently reported efforts towards the discovery of novel antibacterial agents to treat Mab infections. RSC Med. Chem. 2022, 13, 392–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Black, T.A.; Buchwald, U.K. The pipeline of new molecules and regimens against drug-resistant tuberculosis. J. Clin. Tuberc. Other Mycobact. Dis. 2021, 25, 100285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sethiya, J.P.; Sowards, M.A.; Jackson, M.; North, E.J. MmpL3 Inhibition: A New Approach to Treat Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infections. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shao, M.; McNeil, M.; Cook, G.M.; Lu, X. MmpL3 inhibitors as antituberculosis drugs. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 200, 112390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dey, R.; Nandi, S.; Samadder, A.; Saxena, A.; Saxena, A.K. Exploring the potential inhibition of candidate drug molecules for clinical investigation based on their docking or crystallographic analyses against M. tuberculosis enzyme targets. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2020, 20, 2662–2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Goldman, R.C. Target Discovery for New Antitubercular Drugs Using a Large Dataset of Growth Inhibitors from PubChem. Infect. Disord. Drug Targets 2020, 20, 352–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Saxena, A.K.; Singh, A. Mycobacterial tuberculosis Enzyme Targets and their Inhibitors. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2019, 19, 337–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Campaniço, A.; Moreira, R.; Lopes, F. Drug discovery in tuberculosis. New drug targets and antimycobacterial agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 150, 525–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rayasam, G.V. MmpL3 a potential new target for development of novel anti-tuberculosis drugs. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2014, 18, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. NIH. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (accessed on 1 October 2022).
  31. Heinrich, N.; Dawson, R.; du Bois, J.; Narunsky, K.; Horwith, G.; Phipps, A.J.; Nacy, C.A.; Aarnoutse, R.E.; Boeree, M.J.; Gil-lespie, S.H.; et al. Pan African Consortium for the Evaluation of Antituberculosis Antibiotics (PanACEA); Pan African Consortium for the Evaluation of Antituberculosis Antibiotics PanACEA. Early phase evaluation of SQ109 alone and in combination with rifampicin in pulmonary TB patients. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 1558–1566. [Google Scholar]
  32. Boeree, M.J.; Heinrich, N.; Aarnoutse, R.; Diacon, A.H.; Dawson, R.; Rehal, S.; Kibiki, G.S.; Churchyard, G.; Sanne, I.; E Ntinginya, N.; et al. High-dose rifampicin, moxifloxacin, and SQ109 for treating tuberculosis: A multi-arm, multi-stage randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 17, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Kayigire, X.A.; Friedrich, S.O.; van der Merwe, L.; Donald, P.R.; Diacon, A.H. Simultaneous staining of sputum smears for acid-fast and lipid-containing Myobacterium tuberculosis can enhance the clinical evaluation of antituberculosis treatments. Tuberculosis 2015, 95, 770–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lee, R.E.; Protopopova, M.; Crooks, E.; Slayden, R.A.; Terrot, M.; Barry, C.E., 3rd. Combinatorial Lead Optimization of [1,2]-Diamines Based on Ethambutol as Potential Antituberculosis Preclinical Candidates. J. Comb. Chem. 2003, 5, 172–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Protopopova, M.; Hanrahan, C.; Nikonenko, B.; Samala, R.; Chen, P.; Gearhart, J.; Einck, L.; Nacy, C.A. Identification of a new antitubercular drug candidate, SQ109, from a combinatorial library of 1,2-ethylenediamines. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005, 56, 968–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bahuguna, A.; Rawat, D.S. An overview of new antitubercular drugs, drug candidates, and their targets. Med. Res. Rev. 2020, 40, 263–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. SQ109. Available online: https://infectex.ru/en/products/sq-109/ (accessed on 1 October 2022).
  38. Sacksteder, K.A.; Protopopova, M.; Barry, C.E., 3rd; Andries, K.; Nacy, C.A. Discovery and development of SQ109: A new an-titubercular drug with a novel mechanism of action. Future Microbiol. 2012, 7, 823–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. SQ109. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2008, 88, 159–161. [CrossRef]
  40. Iqbal, I.; Bajeli, S.; Akela, A.; Kumar, A. Bioenergetics of Mycobacterium: An Emerging Landscape for Drug Discovery. Pathogens 2018, 7, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Imran, M.; Alam Khan, S.; Alshammari, M.K.; Alreshidi, M.A.; Alreshidi, A.A.; Alghonaim, R.S.; Alanazi, F.A.; Alshehri, S.; Ghoneim, M.M.; Shakeel, F. Discovery, Development, Inventions, and Patent Trends on Mobocertinib Succinate: The First-in-Class Oral Treatment for NSCLC with EGFR Exon 20 Insertions. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Imran, M.; Thabet, H.K.; Alaqel, S.I.; Alzahrani, A.R.; Abida, A.; Alshammari, M.K.; Kamal, M.; Diwan, A.; Asdaq, S.M.B.; Alshehri, S. The Therapeutic and Prophylactic Potential of Quercetin against COVID-19: An Outlook on the Clinical Studies, Inventive Compositions, and Patent Literature. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Imran, M.; Fatima, W.; Alzahrani, A.K.; Suhail, N.; Alshammari, M.K.; Alghitran, A.A.; Alshammari, F.N.; Ghoneim, M.M.; Alshehri, S.; Shakeel, F. Development of Therapeutic and Prophylactic Zinc Compositions for Use against COVID-19: A Glimpse of the Trends, Inventions, and Patents. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Imran, M.; Khan, S.A.; Abida; Alshrari, A.S.; Eltahir Mudawi, M.M.; Alshammari, M.K.; Harshan, A.A.; Alshammari, N.A. Small molecules as kinetoplastid specific proteasome inhibitors for leishmaniasis: A patent review from 1998 to 2021. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2022, 32, 591–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Protopopova, M.N.; Lee, R.E.; Slayden, R.A.; Barry, C.E., 3rd; Einck, L. Anti-Tubercular Drug: Compositions and Methods. WO Patent Application No. 200,309,698,9A2, 27 November 2003. [Google Scholar]
  46. Protopopova, M.N.; Bogatcheva, E.; Einck, L.; Lee, R.E.; Slayden, R.A.; Barry, C.E., 3rd. Compositions and Methods for the Treatment of Infectious Diseases. U.S. Patent Application No. 826,889,4B2, 18 September 2012. [Google Scholar]
  47. Protopopova, M.N.; Lee, R.E.; Slayden, R.A.; Barry, C.E., 3rd; Bogatcheva, E.; Einck, L. Anti-Tubercular Drug: Compositions and Methods. U.S. Patent Application No. 784,272,9B2, 30 November 2010. [Google Scholar]
  48. Protopopova, M.N.; Lee, R.E.; Slayden, R.A.; Barry, C.E., 3rd; Bogatcheva, E.; Einck, L. Anti-Tubercular Drug: Compositions and Methods. U.S. Patent Application No. 745,622,2B2, 25 November 2008. [Google Scholar]
  49. Protopopova, M.N.; Einck, L.; Nikonenko, B.; Chen, P. Compositions and Methods for Treatment of Infectious Disease. U.S. Patent Application No. 820,291,0B2, 19 June 2012. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ho, C.M.; Clemens, D.L.; Clemens, B.Y.L.; Horwitz, M.A.; Vite, A.M.S.; Kee, T.; Ding, X. Multi-Drug Therapies for Tuberculosis Treatment. U.S. Patent Application No. 105,760,79B2, 3 March 2020. [Google Scholar]
  51. Singh, A.; Mishra, R.; Shandil, R.K.; Narayanan, S. Shortening Tuberculosis Therapy and Reducing Relapse by Co-Administering Chloroquine in TB and HIV-TB Co-Infected Conditions. WO Patent Application No. 202,109,028,3A1, 14 May 2021. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ho, C.M.; Horwitz, M.A.; Vite, A.M.S.; Ding, X.; Clemens, D.L.; Clemens, B.Y.L. Multi-Drug Therapies for Tuberculosis Treatment. WO Patent Application No. 201,819,162,8A1, 18 October 2018. [Google Scholar]
  53. Battaglia, G.; Rizzello, L.; Cecchin, D. Anti-Tuberculous Polymersomes. WO Patent Application No. 201,719,144,4A1, 9 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
  54. Frykman, P.K. Antifungal Therapy for the Treatment of Hirschsprung-Associated Enterocolitis. U.S. Patent Application No. 201,701,894,74A1, 6 July 2017. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sharma, U.K. Phage-Derived Compositions for Improved Mycobacterial Therapy. U.S. Patent Application No. 201,713,610,2A1, 18 May 2017. [Google Scholar]
  56. Brickner, S.J.; Nuermberger, E.; Stover, C.K. Combination Therapy for Tuberculosis. EP Patent Application No. 234,002,2B1, 20 November 2013. [Google Scholar]
  57. Iliev, I.; Leonardi, I. Theranostic Test for Antifungal Treatment of Inflammatory Diseases. U.S. Patent Application No. 202,106,915,6A1, 11 March 2021. [Google Scholar]
  58. Pages, L.B.; Aguirre, D.B.; Bates, R.H.; Pichel, J.C.; Provencio, J.E.; Pethe, K. Antituberculosis Agent. U.S. Patent Application No. 106,248,93B2, 21 April 2020. [Google Scholar]
  59. Locher, C.P.; Bennani, Y.L.; Grillot, A.L.; O’Dowd, H.; Perola, E.; Tiran, A.L.; Charifson, P.S. Combination Therapy to Treat Mycobacterium Diseases. U.S. Patent Application No. 957,280,9B2, 21 February 2017. [Google Scholar]
  60. North, J.; Pandya, A.N.; Jackson, M.; Li, W.; Juarrero, M.G. Chemical Probes to Identify Anti-Mycobacterial MmpL3 Inhibitors. U.S. Patent Application No. 202,033,189,7A1, 22 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
  61. Jiricek, J.; Kondreddi, R.R.; Smith, P.W. Indole Carboxamide Derivatives and Uses Thereof. U.S. Patent Application No. 944,703,9B2, 20 September 2016. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kaneko, T.; Fotouhi, N. Indole Carboxamide Compounds and Use Thereof for the Treatment of Mycobacterial Infections. WO Patent Application No. 202,106,231,9A1, 1 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
  63. North, J.; Jackson, M.C. Indole-Based Therapeutics. U.S. Patent Application No. 103,838,48B2, 20 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
  64. Reddy, D.S.; Chopra, S.; Shingare, R.D.; Ramana, S.R.; Dasgupta, A. Indole Compounds, Process for the Preparation and Use Thereof. WO Patent Application No. 201,922,046,1A1, 21 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
  65. Freundlich, J.S.; Alland, D.; Neiditch, M.B.; Inoyama, D.; Capodagli, G.; Kumar, P. Therapeutic Indoles. WO Patent Application No. 201,904,646,5A2, 7 March 2019. [Google Scholar]
  66. Liu, D.; Kuang, G.; Zhou, Y. 4-iodo-indole Compound and Preparation Method Thereof. CN Patent Application No. 112,028,811B, 22 March 2022. [Google Scholar]
  67. Liu, D.; Kuang, G.; Zhou, Y. 4-Bromoindole Compound and Preparation Method Thereof. CN Patent Application No. 112,028,812B, 22 March 2022. [Google Scholar]
  68. Bishai, W.R.; Lun, S.; Guo, H. Inhibitors of Drug-Resistant Mycobacterium Tuberculosis. WO Patent Application No. 201,516,448,2A1, 2 October 2015. [Google Scholar]
  69. Freundlich, J.S.; Alland, D.; Neiditch, M.B.; Kumar, P.; Capodagli, G.; Awasthi, D.; Ekins, S. Therapeutic Indazoles. U.S. Patent Application No. 111,865,49B2, 30 November 2021. [Google Scholar]
  70. Rao, Z.; Li, J.; Zhang, B.; Yang, H. Mmpl3 Inhibitors, Compositions and Uses Thereof. WO Patent Application No. 202,010,385,6A1, 28 May 2020. [Google Scholar]
  71. Oldfield, E.; Li, K. Anti-Microbial Compounds and Compositions. WO Patent Application No. 201,503,523,4A2, 12 March 2015. [Google Scholar]
  72. Liu, S.; Hickey, B.M.E.; Blivtao, J.R.; Xu, Y.; Huang, W.; Guo, X.; Wang, J. Application of Compound, Antibacterial Composition and Application of Antibacterial Composition. CN Patent Application No. 113,768,909A, 10 December 2021. [Google Scholar]
  73. Zhong, W.; Li, S.; Xiao, H.; Zhou, M. Ethylenediamine Compound and Use Thereof. U.S. Patent Application No. 202,208,952,1A1, 24 March 2022. [Google Scholar]
  74. Swarts, B.M. Trehalose Analogues. U.S. Patent Application No. 107,598,21B2, 1 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
  75. Joshua, D.; James, G.; Thale, J.; Mcfaddin, E.; Urs, O.; Xicheng, S.; Weng, C. Novel Anti-Mycobacterial Heterocyclic Amides. CN Patent Application No. 112,423,746A, 26 February 2021. [Google Scholar]
  76. Malwal, S.R.; Zimmerman, M.D.; Alvarez, N.; Sarathy, J.P.; Dartois, V.; Nacy, C.A.; Oldfield, E. Structure, In Vivo Detection, and Antibacterial Activity of Metabolites of SQ109, an Anti-Infective Drug Candidate. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021, 7, 2492–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Imran, M.; Asdaq, S.M.B.; Alam Khan, S.; Meenakshi, D.U.; Alamri, A.S.; Alsanie, W.F.; Alhomrani, M.; Mohzari, Y.; Alrashed, A.; AlMotairi, M.; et al. Innovations and Patent Trends in the Development of USFDA Approved Protein Kinase Inhibitors in the Last Two Decades. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomedicines 10 02793 g001 550
Figure 1. Mechanism of action of MmpL3 inhibitor (SQ109).
Figure 1. Mechanism of action of MmpL3 inhibitor (SQ109).
Biomedicines 10 02793 g001
Biomedicines 10 02793 g002 550
Figure 2. Chemical structures of SQ109 and ethambutol.
Figure 2. Chemical structures of SQ109 and ethambutol.
Biomedicines 10 02793 g002
Biomedicines 10 02793 g003 550
Figure 3. The development timeline of SQ109.
Figure 3. The development timeline of SQ109.
Biomedicines 10 02793 g003
Biomedicines 10 02793 g004 550
Figure 4. Summary and suggestions for the SQ109 -based work.
Figure 4. Summary and suggestions for the SQ109 -based work.
Biomedicines 10 02793 g004
Table
Table 1. Summary of relevant and recent review articles on MmpL3.
Table 1. Summary of relevant and recent review articles on MmpL3.
Ref. No.YearSummary of the Review Article
[14]2020Reviews MmpL3 (physiological role, structure, and properties) and ligands/inhibitors of MmpL3 (AU1235, ICA38, SQ109, rimonabant, SPIRO, and NITD-349).
[16]2021Describes MmpL3 as a drug target, different chemical classes of MmpL3 inhibitors (derivatives of indole carboxamide, pyrrole/pyrazole, quinoline/quinolone, adamantane, benzimidazole, acetamide, and spiro-compound) and different ligands of MmpL3 like ICA38 (PDB ID: 6AJJ), rimonabant (PDB ID: 6AJI), SQ109 (PDB ID: 6AJG), and U1235 (PDB ID: 6AJH).
[20]2022Reviews indole derivatives as MmpL3 inhibitors (NITD-349, indolamide, adamantanol analogs, and indole-2-carboxamides) and inhibitors of other anti-TB drug targets (InhA, DprE1, KasA, chorismate mutase, DNA replication, DNA gyrase, dihydrofolate reductase).
[21]2022Describes MmpL3 as a promiscuous drug target and also spotlights the MmpL3 inhibitors of different chemical classes (adamantyl derivatives, piperidinol derivatives, and benzimidazole derivatives). It also highlights other anti-TB drug targets (TrmD, Ag85C, GyrB, and ClpC1).
[22]2021Briefly explains clinical study data (NCT01785186) of SQ109 (an MmpL3 inhibitor) and comments on the improved anti-TB activity of SQ109 with MDR regimens.
[23]2020Talks about MmpL3, the preclinical/clinical development of MmpL3 inhibitors (BM212, THPP, SQ109, Spiro, NITD-349, NITD-304, AU1235, C215, and HC2091), and different chemical classes of MmpL3 inhibitors (derivatives of indole, benzimidazole, benzothiazole, piperidine, 4-Thiophen-2-yloxane-4-carboxamide, benzofuran, quinoline/quinolone, naphthalene, acetamide, and pyrrole).
[24]2020Explores the current development of MmpL3 inhibitors (ethylenediamine derivatives, carboxamide derivatives, benzothiazole amides, adamantyl ureas, pyrroles and pyrazoles, benzimidazoles, spiropiperidines, and piperidinol), along with their structure-activity relationship (SAR) and challenges in developing them. It also provides the chemical structure of many MmpL3 inhibitors (AU1235, CRS400393, BM212, THPP, spiropiperidine, TBL-140, ICA38, HC2091, BM533, BM635, rimonabant, C215, PIPD1, NITD-349, NITD-304, and SQ109,).
[25]2020Surveys the new targets for TB, including MmpL3 and the chemistry of MmpL3 inhibitors (design and structural features) in clinical/preclinical trials.
[26]2020Identified lead compounds from PubChem database targeting MmpL3 and other anti-TB drug targets by high-throughput screening.
[27]2019Underlines the chemical structures and designs of MmpL3 inhibitors.
[28]2018Highlights the target validation, discovery, hit-optimization, and SAR of MmpL3 inhibitors of different chemical classes (ethylenediamine, adamantyl ureas, phenyl pyrroles, benzimidazoles, indole carboxamides, and spiropiperidines).
[29]2014Discloses MmpL3 as a validated target for developing anti-TB medications. It also discloses SQ109 and BM212 as MmpL3 inhibitors.
Table
Table 2. The anti-TB activity of SQ109 and its combinations against Mtb.
Table 2. The anti-TB activity of SQ109 and its combinations against Mtb.
The Anti-TB Activity of SQ109The Anti-TB Activity of SQ109 Combinations in Mice
Susceptibility ProfileAssayMIC (μg/mL)Drug RegimenLog10 CFU in LungLog Decrease
H37Rv (pan-susceptible)BACTEC≤0.2Two weeks
H37Rv (pan-susceptible)Alamar≤0.39Untreated6.16 ± 0.02-
Erdman (pan-susceptible)Alamar≤0.39INH + RIF + EMB4.64 ± 0.231.52
EMB-resistantAlamar0.78INH + RIF + SQ1094.46 ± 0.121.70
INH-resistantAlamar0.78Four weeks
RIF-resistantAlamar≤0.39Untreated6.42 ± 0.76-
XDR plus EMB-resistantMicrobroth0.20INH + RIF + EMB3.86 ± 0.142.56
INH + RIF + SQ1093.26 ± 0.123.16
Table
Table 3. Summary of clinical studies on SQ109.
Table 3. Summary of clinical studies on SQ109.
Title (Allocation; Intervention Model; Masking; Purpose)Intervention and Active Comparator (AC)NCT Number
(Status; Phase; Number Enrolled; Results; Outcome Measures)		Sponsor/Collaborator (Location; Study Start Date (SSD); Study Completion Date (SCD); Last Update Date (LUD))
Pharmacokinetics and early bactericidal activity (EBA) of SQ109 in adult subjects with pulmonary TB
(Randomized; Parallel assignment; None (Open-label);
Treatment of TB)		SQ109 monotherapy (75 mg, 150 mg, and 300 mg tablet daily) or a combination of RIF with SQ109 (RIF standard dose + 150 mg or 300 mg of SQ109) for 14 days; AC: RIF capsule (150 mg)NCT01218217
(Completed; 2; 90; Not available; EBA of SQ109 monotherapy and combination therapy of SQ109 with RIF)		Michael Hoelscher and Sequella, Inc.
(South Africa; November 2010: May 2012; 14 January 2013)
Evaluation of SQ109 plus PPI in urea breath test-positive volunteers
(Not mentioned; Single group assignment; None (Open-label); Treatment of H. pylori infection)		SQ109 (300 mg) daily for two weeks; AC: Not mentionedNCT01252108
(Withdrawn due to lack of funding: 2: 0: Not available; safety and efficacy of SQ109 against H. pylori infection in adult patients)		Sequella, Inc.
(Not mentioned; March 2012; August 2015; 17 November 2015)
Evaluation of SQ109, high-dose RIF, and moxifloxacin in adults with smear-positive pulmonary TB in a MAMS design
(Randomized:
Single group assignment: None (Open-label): Treatment of TB)		Combinations of SQ109 (300 mg) with RIF (10 to 35 mg/kg), INH (75 mg), PZA
(400 mg) and pyridoxine (25 mg); AC: Combination of INH, RIF, PZA, and EMB		NCT01785186
(Completed: 2: 365; Available; Two negative sputum cultures utilizing liquid media)		Michael Hoelscher and Sequella, Inc.
(South Africa; April 2013; March 2015; 20 September 2017)
Escalating single-dose safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of SQ109 in healthy volunteers
(Randomized; Single group assignment; Quadruple (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor); Treatment of TB)		A single oral dose of SQ109 (10 mg, 20 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg, and the combination of fatty food with 300 mg of SQ109); AC: Placebo NCT01585636
(Completed; 1; 62; Not available; Safety and pharmacokinetics of single dose of SQ109 for seven days)		Sequella, Inc. and Quintiles, Inc.
(United States; September 2006; February 2007; 19 August 2013)
Dose escalation study of SQ109 in healthy adult volunteers
(Randomized; Parallel assignment; Double (participant, investigator); Treatment of MDR-TB) 		SQ109 (75 mg and 150 mg) daily for 14 days and SQ109 (150 mg) daily on days 1–5, 9, and 14; AC: PlaceboNCT00866190
(Completed; 1; 10; Not available; Safety and tolerability evaluation of SQ109)		National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
(United States; April 2009; November 2009; 6 November 2011)
Phase IC study of safety and PK of SQ109 300 mg daily
(Randomized; Parallel assignment; Triple (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor); Treatment of TB)		A single dose of SQ109 (300 mg) daily for two weeks; AC: PlaceboNCT01358162
(Completed: 1: 10: Not available: Safety and tolerability evaluation of SQ109)		NIAID
(United States; November 2010; April 2011; 14 May 2013)
Effects of SQ109 on QTc interval in healthy subjects
(Randomized; Crossover assignment; None (Open-label); Treatment of TB)		Oral SQ109 (300 mg or 450 mg daily) for seven days; AC: PlaceboNCT01874314
(Withdrawn due to undisclosed reason; 1; 0; Not available; Effect of SQ109 on QTc interval)		NIAID
(United States;
Not available; December 2015; 24 March 2014)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Imran, M.; Arora, M.K.; Chaudhary, A.; Khan, S.A.; Kamal, M.; Alshammari, M.M.; Alharbi, R.M.; Althomali, N.A.; Alzimam, I.M.; Alshammari, A.A.; et al. MmpL3 Inhibition as a Promising Approach to Develop Novel Therapies against Tuberculosis: A Spotlight on SQ109, Clinical Studies, and Patents Literature. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2793. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112793

AMA Style

Imran M, Arora MK, Chaudhary A, Khan SA, Kamal M, Alshammari MM, Alharbi RM, Althomali NA, Alzimam IM, Alshammari AA, et al. MmpL3 Inhibition as a Promising Approach to Develop Novel Therapies against Tuberculosis: A Spotlight on SQ109, Clinical Studies, and Patents Literature. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(11):2793. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112793

Chicago/Turabian Style

Imran, Mohd., Mandeep Kumar Arora, Anurag Chaudhary, Shah Alam Khan, Mehnaz Kamal, Manal Mutlaq Alshammari, Raghad Mohammad Alharbi, Nuha Abdullah Althomali, Ibrahim Mohammed Alzimam, Abdullah Ayed Alshammari, and et al. 2022. "MmpL3 Inhibition as a Promising Approach to Develop Novel Therapies against Tuberculosis: A Spotlight on SQ109, Clinical Studies, and Patents Literature" Biomedicines 10, no. 11: 2793. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112793

APA Style

Imran, M., Arora, M. K., Chaudhary, A., Khan, S. A., Kamal, M., Alshammari, M. M., Alharbi, R. M., Althomali, N. A., Alzimam, I. M., Alshammari, A. A., Alharbi, B. H., Alshengeti, A., Alsaleh, A. A., Alqahtani, S. A., & Rabaan, A. A. (2022). MmpL3 Inhibition as a Promising Approach to Develop Novel Therapies against Tuberculosis: A Spotlight on SQ109, Clinical Studies, and Patents Literature. Biomedicines, 10(11), 2793. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112793

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop