Next Article in Journal
Fabrication of Doxorubicin-Loaded Lipid-Based Nanocarriers by Microfluidic Rapid Mixing
Next Article in Special Issue
Autophagy: Guardian of Skin Barrier
Previous Article in Journal
Pyruvate Dehydrogenase A1 Phosphorylated by Insulin Associates with Pyruvate Kinase M2 and Induces LINC00273 through Histone Acetylation
Previous Article in Special Issue
ER-phagy in the Occurrence and Development of Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Methamphetamine Dysregulates Macrophage Functions and Autophagy to Mediate HIV Neuropathogenesis

1
Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
2
Department of Biochemistry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
3
Department of Developmental and Molecular Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
4
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(6), 1257; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061257
Submission received: 29 March 2022 / Revised: 19 May 2022 / Accepted: 24 May 2022 / Published: 27 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Autophagy in Inflammation-Associated Damage and Diseases)

Abstract

:
HIV-neurocognitive impairment (HIV-NCI) can be a debilitating condition for people with HIV (PWH), despite the success of antiretroviral therapy (ART). Substance use disorder is often a comorbidity with HIV infection. The use of methamphetamine (meth) increases systemic inflammation and CNS damage in PWH. Meth may also increase neuropathogenesis through the functional dysregulation of cells that harbor HIV. Perivascular macrophages are long-lived reservoirs for HIV in the CNS. The impaired clearance of extracellular debris and increased release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by HIV-infected macrophages cause neurotoxicity. Macroautophagy is a vital intracellular pathway that can regulate, in part, these deleterious processes. We found in HIV-infected primary human macrophages that meth inhibits phagocytosis of aggregated amyloid-β, increases total ROS, and dysregulates autophagic processes. Treatment with widely prescribed ART drugs had minimal effects, although there may be an improvement in phagocytosis when co-administered with meth. Pharmacologically inhibited lysosomal degradation, but not induction of autophagy, further increased ROS in response to meth. Using mass spectrometry, we identified the differentially expressed proteins in meth-treated, HIV-infected macrophages that participate in phagocytosis, mitochondrial function, redox metabolism, and autophagy. Significantly altered proteins may be novel targets for interventional strategies that restore functional homeostasis in HIV-infected macrophages to improve neurocognition in people with HIV-NCI using meth.

1. Introduction

Over 38 million people with HIV (PWH) are living worldwide [1]. HIV is treated with antiretroviral therapy (ART), which suppresses viral replication in infected cells but does not eradicate infection [2]. The ongoing presence of HIV in tissue reservoirs causes PWH to experience long-term comorbidities for which the underlying mechanisms are not extensively characterized [3]. One such comorbidity is HIV-neurocognitive impairment (HIV-NCI), in which PWH experience a spectrum of deficits from motor dysfunction to impaired executive function. HIV-NCI greatly diminishes quality of life and increases the overall risks of morbidity and mortality [4,5]. Approximately 15–40% of PWH have HIV-NCI, for which there are no therapies in the ART era [4,6,7].
Substance use disorder (SUD) has been shown to worsen neurocognition in people with HIV-NCI, compared to non-substance users [8,9,10]. One substance that causes long-term neurotoxicity is methamphetamine (meth), a long-acting stimulant that readily crosses the blood–brain barrier (BBB). According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, over 15 million people in the United States reported meth use in their lifetimes and 2.5 million reported use in 2020—over 20% higher than in 2019. People using meth are at an increased risk of acquiring HIV [11]. They are also less likely to adhere to ART regimens [12]. A 2020 study of 351 PWH found that non-adherence to ART was ~18% higher in people who reported meth use. A recent analysis of PWH reporting meth use demonstrated higher serum levels of the inflammatory mediators, IL-6 and sD163, than in people not using meth [13]. This suggests that meth may directly impact immune cells. Thus, additional studies are needed to characterize further the interactions between meth and HIV infection in cells that mediate neurocognitive decline.
HIV enters the CNS within two weeks of peripheral infection, in part, through the transmigration across the BBB of a mature subpopulation of monocytes. These cells can differentiate into long-lived macrophages that remain in perivascular regions of the CNS for years and infect resident phagocytes, microglia, as well as other perivascular macrophages [14]. Ongoing HIV replication localizes to these cell types in post-mortem brain tissue studies of PWH who took ART long-term [15]. The infection of macrophages with HIV disorganizes the actin cytoskeleton [16]. This impairs the phagocytic uptake of extracellular proteins and apoptotic cells [17]. The higher metabolic demands of HIV-infected macrophages cause increased mitochondrial activity, which augments the production and release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [14,18]. ROS damage healthy lipids, proteins, and DNA in other cell types, such as neurons and astrocytes [19]. HIV infection and higher amounts of ROS accelerate the rapid processing of inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β, that injure neurons directly [20,21].
Macroautophagy, hereby called autophagy, is a catabolic process vital to macrophage homeostasis that is also dysregulated during HIV infection [22]. Studies of people whose HIV infection advances much slower, termed elite controllers, indicate that higher levels of autophagy markers in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) contribute to reduced disease progression [23]. Post-mortem brain tissue studies also suggest that higher levels of autophagic activity, flux, protect against HIV-mediated neurodegeneration [24,25]. In macrophages, HIV induces autophagy and inhibits the maturation of autophagosomes (APG) into autolysosomes (AL) to prevent lysosomal degradation of virions [26,27]. This causes a buildup of damaged macromolecules and dysfunctional organelles that may contribute to altered functions [28]. One key protein involved in autophagy is LC3, which is cleaved and lipidated during APG biogenesis into LC3I and LC3II isoforms [29]. LC3II present on the inner and outer membrane of the APG is degraded as maturation progresses, serving as a key marker to monitor autophagic flux [30]. Selective forms of autophagy also exist that degrade specific cargo, ranging from aggregated proteins and lipids to dysfunctional organelles, such as mitochondria and ER [31].
We hypothesized that meth enhances neurotoxicity in PWH and exacerbates HIV-NCI by further dysregulating homeostatic functions of HIV-infected macrophages. Primary human macrophages were cultured from healthy individuals, infected with HIV, treated or not with meth for 24 h, and analyzed for functional changes. We also examined the effects of a commonly prescribed ART cocktail on these functions with and without meth. Meth reduced phagocytosis of amyloid-β, increased total ROS levels regardless of baseline oxidative stress, and did not impact inflammasome-mediated IL-1β release. We found minimal changes with ART alone, and nearly all the meth-mediated changes by functional assays persisted with ART.
To determine the potential mechanisms that mediate these changes and identify the additional impacted pathways, we analyzed the proteomes of HIV-infected macrophages treated or not with meth by mass spectrometry. Meth treatment for 24 h altered the expression of proteins involved in phagocytosis and metabolism, including redox status. Given the connection of these pathways to autophagy, we also determined how meth impacted total and selective autophagic activity. Meth induced autophagy and impaired APG maturation, may reduce autophagic degradation of poly-ubiquitinated proteins, and increased autophagic clearance of mitochondria, termed mitophagy [32]. These data indicate that meth may further damage the CNS in PWH by enhancing the detrimental impact of HIV on macrophages—long-lived viral reservoirs. Differentially expressed proteins identified by mass spectrometry may be therapeutic targets to restore macrophage homeostasis and reduce neurocognitive dysfunction in PWH who use meth.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General Culture Methods, HIV Infection, and Key Reagents

Leukopaks were obtained from healthy donors, and PBMC were isolated using Ficoll gradient centrifugation. For proteomics, Western blotting, and RT-qPCR experiments, PBMCs were cultured directly into macrophages for 6 days in the presence of 10–20 ng/mL of M-CSF in culture media with DMEM, containing 10% FBS, 5% human serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% glutamine, and 1% 1M HEPES on 60 mm dishes, as we described previously [33]. For phagocytosis, ROS, mitophagy, and cytokine experiments, monocytes were negatively isolated from PBMC using the MojoSort Pan Monocyte Isolation Kit (Biolegend Cat. No.: 480060, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. These are commonly used methods to generate primary human MDM with a culture purity of approximately 99% by CD11b positivity [34].
After differentiation into monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM), cells were infected with 20 ng/mL of HIVADA, a macrophage-tropic viral strain derived from a person with HIV (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). After 24 h, the excess virus was washed off and MDM were cultured for an additional 2–3 days prior to treatment with 50 µM of methamphetamine (meth) and/or ART for 24 h. This ART cocktail consists of 16 nM of tenofovir (Cat. No.: 10199), 441 nM of emtricitabine (Cat. No.: 10071), and 43 nM of dolutegravir, all obtained from the NIH AIDS Reagent Program (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). The concentration of meth was calculated to approximate CNS levels based on known plasma concentrations and penetrance across the BBB [35,36]. The ART concentrations tested reflect what is present in the CSF of people taking these drugs [37,38,39]. Meth, tenofovir, and emtricitabine were dissolved in water, and dolutegravir was dissolved in DMSO.

2.2. Measurement of HIV Infection

Supernatants from 60 mm dishes of cultured uninfected or HIV-infected macrophages after treatment with meth and/or ART for 24 h were collected and analyzed for concentrations of HIV by levels of capsid protein, p24, using a sensitive alphaLISA, according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). All samples were processed in duplicate for each experiment and averaged across all the experiments per treatment condition.

2.3. Mass Spectrometry Analysis

HIV-infected macrophages, either untreated or treated with meth for 24 h, were washed 3 times with cold PBS and lysed with a RIPA buffer and protein concentrations were determined. Approximately 20 µL of protein for both treatments were treated with 5 mM of DTT for 30 min and 20 mM of iodoacetamide to remove the detergents present in RIPA. Samples were then loaded in S-Trap microcentrifuge tubes and washed 3 times with a loading buffer of 90% methanol and 10 mM of NH4HCO3 and centrifuged at 500× g for 2 min. Pellets were moved to clean Eppendorf tubes and digested in 20 µL of 0.1 µg/mL trypsin in 50 mM of NH4HCO3 for 1 h at 47 °C. After centrifuging, the digested peptides were eluted with 40 µL of 0.2% formic acid in HPLC grade water and eluted again with 35 µL of 50% acetonitrile with 0.2% formic acid. The eluted peptides were dried for mass spectrometry analysis.
Dried samples were resuspended by a Dionex RSLC Ultimate 300 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) autosampler in 10 µL of 0.1% TFA and loaded onto a 2-column setup for nano-chromatography, coupled online with an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Chromatographic separation was performed with a system consisting of a C-18 trap cartridge (300 µm ID, 5 mm length) and a picofrit analytical column (75 µm ID, 25 cm length), packed in-house with reversed-phase Repro-Sil Pur C18-AQ 3 µm resin. To analyze the proteome, peptides were separated using a 60 min gradient from 4–30% buffer B (buffer A: 0.1% formic acid, buffer B: 80% acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. The mass spectrometer was set to acquire spectra in a data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode. Briefly, the full MS scan was set to 300–1200 m/z in the orbitrap, with a resolution of 120,000 (at 200 m/z) and an AGC target of 5 × 105. MS/MS was performed in the ion trap using the top speed mode (2 s), an AGC target of 1 × 104 and an HCD collision energy of 35. Raw files were searched using Proteome Discoverer software (v2.4, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using the SEQUEST search engine and the SwissProt human database, updated February 2020. The search included the variable modification of N-terminal acetylation, and fixed modification of carbamidomethyl cysteine. Trypsin was specified as the digestive enzyme, with up to 2 missed cleavages allowed. Mass tolerance was set to 10 pm for the precursor ions and 0.2 Da for ion products. The peptide and protein false discovery rate was set to 1%. Following the search, data were processed as previously described [40]. Briefly, the proteins were log2 transformed, normalized by the average value of each sample, and the missing values were imputed using a normal distribution 2 standard deviations lower than the mean [41].
Statistical regulation was assessed by a paired t test. Data distribution was assumed to be normal, but this was not formally tested. Averaging the paired t tests across the protein samples, we determined the differentially expressed proteins in response to meth with a fold change of ≥1.2 and ≤0.8 and significance cutoffs of p < 0.05 and p < 0.1. Using the p < 0.1 set of proteins, we performed KEGG pathway analysis (Kyoto, Japan) and determined the functional interactomes (String Consortium, Lausanne, Switzerland) for the cellular- and disease-related processes that meth impacted in HIV-infected macrophages. The false discovery rate (FDR) cutoffs for the KEGG pathway analysis were <0.01 and FDR < 0.05 for all the other interactome analyses. We also used a database from the laboratory of Dr. Ana Maria Cuervo (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA) that connected our enriched proteins to those involved in autophagy activation, regulation, and lysosomal function.

2.4. Phagocytosis Experiments

Negatively isolated monocytes were seeded in 24-well plates onto glass coverslips at 75,000 cells/well and differentiated into MDM for 6 days, infected with HIV, and treated or not for 24 h with meth and/or ART, as described. Then, 2–4 h prior to phagocytosis, 1 µM of Beta-Amyloid (1–42), HiLyte™ Fluor 488 peptide was aggregated at 37 °C in phenol-red free media (Anaspec Cat# AS-60479-01, Fremont, CA, USA). Amyloid solution was added to untreated (Untx) or treated MDM for 2 h. Coverslips were washed 2–3× with PBS, fixed with 3.7% PFA, washed 3 times with PBS, and mounted on frosted microscope slides with ProLong Diamond Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Invitrogen Cat# P36962, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The slides were dried at room temperature for at least 24 h and then visualized on a Zeiss CLEM by an observer blinded to the treatment condition. Fifty to seventy-five cells per treatment were analyzed in ImageJ for the intensity of green, fluorescent signals per cell. Median fluorescence per treatment in each experiment was averaged across all experiments, converted to a fold change in amyloid accumulation relative to the untreated control (HIV Untx) set to 1.0, and tested for statistical significance. A set of control cells were treated with DMSO or pre-treated with 20 µM of actin polymerization inhibitor, cytochalasin D (CytD), for 20 min with CytD present during amyloid phagocytosis (Tocris Bioscience Cat#1233, Minneapolis, MN, USA) [42]. After fixation and washing, DMSO and CytD-treated MDM were permeabilized for 5 min with 0.1% Triton-×-100 in PBS and incubated for 30 min with Alexa 594-conjugated phalloidin to stain the cytoskeleton (Invitrogen Cat#A12381, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The coverslips were washed 2 times with PBS, mounted, and visualized as described.

2.5. Reactive Oxygen Species Measurement

Monocytes that were negatively selected were cultured on 96-well plates (Corning Cat#3603, Corning, NY, USA) at 100,000 cells per well for 6 days to differentiate into MDM, infected with HIV, and treated with meth and/or ART for 24 h, as described. MDM were then stained for 1 h with 10 µM of CM-H2DCFDA (Invitrogen Cat#C6287, Carlsbad, CA, USA) that fluoresces upon coupling to all the reactive oxygen species (ROS) present in the cell. Post-staining, the cells were washed with PBS or incubated with 30 µM of CCCP (Sigma-Aldrich Cat#C2759, St. Louis, MO, USA), a mitochondrial uncoupler, or 5 mM pf N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC), an ROS neutralizer (Sigma-Aldrich Cat#A725, St. Louis, MO, USA) [43]. The fluorescent signal from the reacted DCF was read with excitation at 495 nm and emission at 520 nm by a SpectraMax M5 microplate fluorometer and analyzed in SoftMax Pro (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). In each experiment, the fluorescent signals from sextuplet wells per treatment were averaged and compared to the untreated control, which was set at 1.0 in each experiment.
For the autophagy manipulation experiments related to ROS, in the last 4 h of treatment, some untreated or meth-treated cells were incubated with 200 µM of leupeptin, which inhibits lysosomal degradation of autophagic cargo (Fisher Scientific Cat#BP2662) [44]. Other untreated or meth-treated MDM were incubated with 500 nM of Torin 2, an inhibitor of mTORC1 that leads to classical autophagy induction, in the last 3 h of treatment (Tocris Bioscience Cat#42-481-0, Minneapolis, MN, USA) [44]. This timing and concentration of Torin 2 was optimized to ensure the induction of autophagy in HIV-infected MDM, increased LC3II flux, and decreased p62 levels. Fluorescence from DCF was read, normalized, and quantified as described.

2.6. Autophagic Flux and p62 Experiments

HIV-infected MDM were exposed to meth and/or ART or not for 24 h. To assess LC3II and p62 flux, lysosomal inhibitors, 20 mM of NH4Cl + 200 μM of leupeptin (N + L), were added to some cells in the last 4 h of exposure. Concentrations of these inhibitors were optimized as described previously [33]. After treatment, the dishes were washed with PBS at 4 °C and cells were lysed with RIPA buffer and 1:100 Halt Protease Inhibitor and Phosphatase Inhibitor (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#78425, Waltham, MA, USA). For RT-qPCR, RNA was isolated by Trizol, according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Lysates were analyzed for protein concentration using Protein Assay Reagent Concentrate (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). A total of 35–50 μg protein/lane supplemented with β-mercaptoethanol was resolved by SDS-PAGE, and the protein was transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes overnight at 4 °C (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). Revert Total Protein Stain (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA) was added to the membranes according to the manufacturer’s protocols to measure the total protein levels using an Odyssey Fc machine (Li-Cor). The signal was visualized in the dynamic range. Total protein was confirmed as a reliable Western blotting loading control in our system of primary human macrophages, as described previously. The optical density of all the signals was quantified in Image Studio v.5.2 software (Li-Cor). The membranes were then blocked in nonfat dry milk 5% in TBS with 0.1% Tween-20, followed by incubation overnight at 4 °C with rabbit antibodies to LC3B (52 ng/mL, 1:1000 Cell Signaling Technology #2775, Danvers, MA, USA) or p62 (0.5 μg/mL, 1:1000 Enzo Life Sciences BML-PW9860, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). HRP-fixed goat anti-rabbit antibody (65.7 ng/mL, 1:1000 Cell Signaling Technology #7074) was then added for 1 h. The signal was developed using Super SignalWest Femto Chemiluminescent Substrate and Luminol/Enhancer according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), quantified, and normalized to total protein.
A total of 2 µg of RNA for each treatment per experiment was reverse transcribed into cDNA by SuperScript Vilo Master Mix (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and stored at −20 °C. Taqman Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) for 18S reference (Cat#Hs99999901_s1, Thermo Fisher Scientific) or SQSTM1 (Cat#Hs01061917_g1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were performed in the Taqman Gene Expression Master Mix on a StepOne Plus Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The relative quantity of SQSTM1 in infected MDM treated with meth (HIV Meth) was measured by 2−ΔΔCt relative to the control (HIV Untx), with 18S as reference. The fold change in cDNA quantity per treatment was calculated relative to the control set to 1.0 in each experiment.
To determine the detailed changes in autophagy in response to meth and ART, LC3II or p62 was analyzed in the following three ways: steady state protein levels, rate of autophagic activity, flux, and amount of autophagic activity, net flux [33]. These parameters were calculated according to previously used methods. Lower steady-state LC3II and low flux would indicate dampened autophagy induction. High steady-state LC3II and high flux suggest induced autophagy, met with appropriately increased maturation. High steady-state LC3II with lower flux would suggest only reduced maturation, and high steady-state LC3II with minimal change in flux would indicate induced autophagy not matched with higher maturation.

2.7. LC3 and TOM20 Immunofluorescence Studies of Mitophagy

HIV-infected MDM were cultured at 75–100,000 cells per well onto glass coverslips in 24-well plates. MDM were treated with meth or not for 24 h, and N + L at the mentioned concentrations were added in the last 4 h of treatment to calculate the mitophagic flux. After treatment, the cells were washed 3× with PBS, fixed with 3.7% PFA, washed, and permeabilized for 2 min with 0.1% Triton-×-100 in PBS. Coverslips were incubated for at least 30 min with a blocking solution and exposed to primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution overnight at 4 °C for LC3B (520 ng/mL, 1:100 Cell Signaling Technology #2775, Danvers, MA, USA) and TOM20 (2 μg/mL, 1:100 Santa Cruz Biotechnology F-10 sc-17764, Dallas, TX, USA) or mouse IgG2a (25 μg/mL, 1:500 Invitrogen Cat# 02-6200, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and rabbit IgG (2 μg/mL, 1:250 Invitrogen Cat# 02-6102, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Coverslips were washed and incubated for 1 h at room temperature in antibodies diluted in the same blocking solution, goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (4 μg/mL, 1:500 Invitrogen #A-11008, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and/or goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 594 (4 μg/mL, 1:500 Invitrogen #A-11005, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells were washed with PBS and mounted onto frosted microscope slides with ProLong Diamond Antifade Mountant with DAPI and dried for at least 24 h at room temperature (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).
The cells were visualized at 40× in Z-series by confocal microscopy (Leica DMI8) by a blinded observer. The images were analyzed in Volocity 64 (Quorum Technologies, Lewes, UK). The number of LC3 puncta, total mitochondrial volume, and colocalization of LC3 with TOM20 were measured in each Z-series. The total red signal and number of puncta were quantified in 40–80 cells per treatment with thresholds for puncta size and intensity, as well as TOM20 signal, determined individually per experiment. LC3 puncta positive for mitochondria, which appear yellow upon overlay, represented the mitophagosomes that were also quantified in response to each treatment. LC3 flux and mitophagic flux were calculated as in Western blotting experiments. The number of puncta in cells with N + L was divided by the number of puncta in cells without N + L per treatment, and this was set to 1.0 for the untreated condition in each experiment. The fold change in mitophagic flux upon meth treatment was then calculated in each experiment and averaged.

2.8. Statistical Analyses for Functional Assays

All the quantitative data were analyzed in Microsoft Excel or Prism software v.9.0.1 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Shapiro–Wilk tests with p = 0.05 as the cutoff were used to test the data for normality. All data were normally distributed when more than two groups were compared. For all the two-group analyses, appropriate unpaired or paired Student’s t tests were used. When more than two groups were analyzed for significance, one-way ANOVA was used. When ANOVA was performed, this was followed by a multiple-comparison Dunnett’s test or a Turkey’s test to determine the differences between specific groups. One-sample t tests and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to test the fold changes for significance depending on normality. The untreated (Untx) control was set to 1.0 for each experiment. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant for all functional assay experiments.

3. Results

3.1. Methamphetamine Alters Protein Expression in HIV-Infected Macrophages

Monocyte-derived perivascular macrophages are resilient reservoirs for HIV in the CNS that perpetuate ongoing neuroinflammation and CNS damage [14]. We tested whether methamphetamine (meth) changes the functions of HIV-infected macrophages that mediate CNS dysfunction. Mass spectrometry was then performed to identify the proteins that meth changes that may mediate functional differences. We cultured primary human macrophages from four individual donors, infected with HIV for 24 h, washed off virus and cultured for an additional 2–3 days, and left them untreated (HIV Untx) or treated with 50 µM of methamphetamine (HIV Meth) for 24 h. Lysates were collected and subjected to mass spectrometry analysis to examine the global changes at the protein level, which were mapped to both the human and HIV proteomes. Raw protein data per experiment were normalized with negligible changes in spread, indicating high quality (Figure 1A,B). Each read was analyzed for statistical significance using paired t tests with identification of 90 differentially expressed proteins, using a p-value cutoff of 0.05, log2(4.32), and fold changes of ≥1.2, log2(0.26), or ≤0.8, log2(−0.32). Of these, 43 proteins were significantly upregulated and 47 were significantly downregulated (Figure 1C).
An important internal control for our proteomic analyses was the detection of HIV viral proteins. Mass spectrometry detected five total reads representing HIV proteins, Gag, Gag-Pol, or gp160, which were found in all four experiments. The levels of these reads were plotted as ranked abundance per protein relative to the 3655 total reads detected in each individual experiment. This enabled the visualization of the variability in protein levels across the primary human samples. We also used a p24 alphaLISA assay on the culture supernatants from these same four experiments to detect levels of HIV in pg/mL. By alphaLISA, there was a trend toward increased HIV levels with meth treatment, although this was not significant statistically. Overall HIV infection was highest in MDM from the experiments, represented by the green and purple dots (Supplementary Figure S1A). Importantly, HIV protein reads were highest in the untreated and meth-treated cells from the same two experiments and lowest in those represented by the black and brown dots. The trends in HIV infection with meth treatment in each experiment also corresponded with the changes in each read detected by mass spectrometry (Supplementary Figure S1A,B). Although there were upward trends for HIV proteins with meth treatment, these were not significant statistically. These data indicate that our proteomic analyses are consistent with an independently performed experiment.

3.2. Meth Inhibits Phagocytosis and Alters Expression of Phagocytic Proteins

Phagocytic clearance by macrophages of neurotoxic proteins and apoptotic cells is essential for maintaining a stable CNS environment [45]. Increased levels of aggregated amyloid-β in the CNS have been associated with neurodegeneration and HIV neuropathogenesis [46,47]. Monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) were cultured from PBMC on glass coverslips, infected with HIV as described, and left untreated (HIV Untx) or treated with 50 µM of meth and/or ART (16 nM of tenofovir, 441 nM of emtricitabine and 43 nM of dolutegravir) for 24 h. We measured the phagocytosis of aggregated, fluorescent 1–42 amyloid-β peptide in untreated HIV-infected MDM and in response to meth and/or ART. An amount of 20 µM of cytochalasin D (CytD), an inhibitor of actin polymerization essential for phagocytic engulfment, was a control (Figure 2A) [42]. Meth alone significantly decreased phagocytosis of aggregated amyloid-β peptide approximately 30% relative to the control. ART alone had no significant effect, yet interestingly, meth + ART appeared to increase phagocytosis relative to meth alone (p = 0.054, Figure 2B). These ART drugs may oppose the mechanisms by which meth inhibits phagocytosis. Reduction in phagocytosis is not likely to be due to drug toxicity, since meth treatment of up to 1 mM has been shown to be non-toxic to primary human monocytes and macrophages [35,38,48].
To determine the potential mechanisms of phagocytic suppression by meth, we identified the differentially expressed proteins related to the actin cytoskeletal arrangements important for substrate engulfment. Significant decreases in three factors that promote actin organization, ARHGEF9, PALLD, and ASAP1, were detected [49,50]. Meth also increased levels of RCC2, which reduces arrangement [51]. There was also a trend toward decreased ELMO1, which is required for actin organization during phagocytic engulfment (Figure 2C) [52]. We found an increase in FCGR3A and trends toward decreased MSR1 and SCARB, the receptors involved in recognizing cargo to internalize (Figure 2C) [53]. Meth may both disorganize the actin rearrangements necessary for substrate engulfment and impact the recognition of substrates at the cell surface.
Phagocytosis is a dynamic, multi-step process regulated by signaling. Meth significantly increased calcium signaling effectors, calmodulin (CALM1/2/3) and CAM2KD, which activate the proteins that contribute to cell motility and contraction, such as PRKCA (Figure 2D) [54,55]. Membrane lipids enriched for PI(3)P anchor proteins that promote trafficking of phagocytic vesicles [50]. Meth significantly decreased PIK3C3, Vps34, a vital kinase that produces PI(3)P lipids [56]. There was also a trend toward decreased levels of PIK3R1, which positively regulates PI3K activity (Figure 2D) [56]. This suggests that meth may inhibit phagocytosis by altering the signaling necessary for phagocytic function.

3.3. Meth Increases ROS and Changes Expression of Proteins Involved in Related Metabolic Processes

We also measured the effects of meth on reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels because released ROS are toxic to other CNS cells. MDM were cultured on 96-well plates, infected with HIV, and treated or not with meth and/or ART for 24 h. Total cellular ROS were stained using a DCF-based fluorescent dye. Either PBS or 30 µM of CCCP in PBS was added 1 h prior to quantifying the fluorescence in sextuplet wells per condition in each experiment. CCCP was added to determine whether an effect on ROS by meth and/or ART could persist with already increased mitochondrial stress, which exists in the CNS of people with HIV-NCI [6]. N-acetylcysteine (NAC), an ROS neutralizer, was the additional control (Figure 3A). Meth with or without ART significantly increased ROS with both PBS alone and CCCP as the baselines (Figure 3A,B). The increase with meth + ART was significantly higher than with ART alone but not higher than meth alone, suggesting that the effect of meth is predominant.
By proteomics, we detected significant increases in electron transport chain (ETC) factors, COX7A2 and UQCRSF, and a decrease in ETC components, COX6A1 and NDUFB7 (Figure 3C) [57]. While not statistically significant, there were also trends toward increased citric acid cycle-related enzymes, IDH1, IDH2, and PDHB (Figure 3C) [58]. A significant increase in L2HGDH may also increase the levels of α-ketoglutarate, a metabolite also produced by isocitrate dehydrogenase (Figure 3D) [59]. This may reflect the changes in aerobic metabolism that mediate increased ROS production, as well as mitochondrial biogenesis and degradation. Meth significantly upregulated NUDT8, an enzyme that detoxifies oxidized guanine nucleosides that present due to increased ROS levels (Figure 3D) [60]. Meth also significantly decreased MARCH5, an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets vital proteins that regulate mitochondrial fusion/fission for degradation [61]. This could decrease the overall mitochondrial content in the cell and increase ROS (Figure 3C).
We examined the impact of meth on overall metabolism. Meth altered the expression of NF-κB regulators and appeared to increase NFKB1 protein (Figure 3D). There was a significant decrease in the negative regulator of NF-κB, NLRP2, and a significant decrease in the positive regulator, IKBKB (Figure 3D) [19]. Meth may increase NF-κB and signaling to enhance cell survival, which occurs in macrophages with higher baseline ROS [62]. There were also trends with meth treatment toward decreased mTOR and Akt1 (Figure 3D). Decreased activity of mTOR/Akt1 also classically induces autophagy [44].

3.4. Meth Increases Protein Pathways Involved in Macrophage Functions and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Given the variability in raw abundance of each protein read across the primary human samples, we also analyzed differentially expressed proteins with p < 0.1, in addition to p < 0.05. By this method, there were 92 significantly upregulated proteins and 92 downregulates ones (Supplementary Table S1). Using these 184 proteins, we performed a KEGG pathway analysis and found significant changes in metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation, and phagocytosis. This confirmed that meth alters these already dysregulated functions in HIV-infected macrophages to potentially increase neuropathogenesis. Interestingly, the processes involved in several neurodegenerative diseases were also significantly enriched with meth, including Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s, and ALS (Figure 4A). Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s pathways were enriched (FDR 0.0056 and 0.0405, respectively) even when analyzing proteins with p < 0.05. By STRING database interactome analysis, meth affects the regulation of viral processes, immune functions, and purine metabolism (Figure 4B). Viral processes and host–virus interactions were statistically enriched when analyzing p < 0.05 proteins, FDR 0.0337 and 0.0369, respectively. This map also highlights that neurodegeneration-related changes in the proteome may relate to changes in both oxidative phosphorylation and calcium signaling.

3.5. Meth Induces Autophagy, Inhibits Its Completion, and May Reduce p62 Degradation

Autophagic activity is a significant regulator of phagocytosis and oxidative metabolism. To measure the changes in autophagy, MDM were cultured from PBMC on 60 mm dishes, infected with HIV, and left untreated (Untx) or treated with meth and/or ART for 24 h. For the Western blotting experiments, 20 mM of NH4Cl + 200 µM of leupeptin (N + L) were added in the last 4 h of treatment to inhibit autophagic degradation or LC3II and p62 to measure flux. Lysates or RNA were isolated followed by Western blotting for LC3 (Figure 5B) and p62 (Figure 5F) and RT-qPCR analysis of SQSTM1 expression (Figure 5J). Meth alone significantly increased LC3II levels only in the absence of lysosomal inhibitors (Figure 5C). This led to an overall trend toward decreased LC3II flux and no change in net flux (Figure 5D,E). There also appeared to be increased LC3II in the meth + ART treated samples, although this was not quite statistically significant. ART alone had no significant impact (Figure 5C,E). Meth appears to induce autophagy, but that induction does not increase autophagosome (APG) maturation. This causes LC3II, and potentially the associated APG cargo, to accumulate undegraded, which may further impair cell homeostasis.
One type of cargo degraded by autophagy includes polyubiquitinated proteins, most often linked to ubiquitin at K63 [63]. These proteins are docked to forming APG through the interaction of the cargo receptor, p62, with LC3II. Similar to LC3II, the autophagic flux of p62 can also be measured by Western blotting [29]. However, this pool of APG is small in comparison to total APG content, and only some donor’s cells have significant p62 flux at baseline. A total of 6 out of 10 LC3II experiments had measurable p62 flux in which significant accumulation was found in response to N + L (Figure 5G). Although meth and/or ART did not significantly change the baseline p62 levels, meth with or without ART did significantly reduce p62 flux and net flux (Figure 5H,I). This may reflect an overall decrease in the degradation of aggregated proteins due to impaired APG maturation. Transcription is also a significant mode of regulating p62 expression; thus, we hypothesized that changes in gene expression may explain why p62 does not accumulate significantly with meth treatment [31]. No statistically significant change in transcription was found after 6 h or 24 h of treatment, but there was a trend toward an increase at 24 h (Figure 5J). These changes could influence the protein levels of p62, and thus, the autophagic flux of polyubiquitinated cargo.
Using mass spectrometry data, we determined whether meth alters the expression of the proteins that regulate autophagy at the level of activation, suppression, and effector function. We also categorized these proteins as either involved in autophagy directly or involved in lysosomal function, with significance cutoffs of p < 0.1 and p < 0.05 (Supplementary Figure S2). Meth significantly decreased DAPK1, a kinase that promotes autophagy by phosphorylating Beclin-1 to dissociate it from BCL-2 (Supplementary Figure S2A,C) [64]. Beclin-1, part of the class III PI3K complex essential for autophagy initiation and maturation, was not altered significantly, but there was a trend toward an increase (Supplementary Figure S2C) [65]. More antagonism by lower DAPK1 may be compensatory to higher Beclin-1. Conversely, meth significantly decreased Vps34 (PIK3C3), another key component of the PI3K complex with Beclin-1 [65]. While not significantly increased, there was a trend toward more ATG5, which is necessary for autophagy initiation (Supplementary Figure S2C) [66]. There was also a trend toward increased levels of MAP1LC3B that agrees with our Western blot data (Figure 5, Supplementary Table S1). However, correlating protein levels of LC3 with autophagic flux requires the specific analysis of the lipidated isoform, LC3II, as mentioned previously [30]. Unlike Western blotting, mass spectrometry cannot distinguish between LC3I and LC3II isoforms, which makes it less reliable for monitoring levels of autophagy.
Lysosomal function is vital for proper APG maturation and degradation of cargo to be recycled as building blocks for de novo organelle synthesis [67]. We analyzed whether meth affects the levels of several lysosomal proteins including enzymes, membrane proteins, acidifying proton pumps, and factors involved in lysosomal biogenesis. Meth statistically increased proton pumps, ATP6V1C1 and ATP6V1E1, but this increase was not above our 1.2-fold change cutoff (Supplementary Figure S2B,D). This slight increase could mediate the effective autophagic degradation of select cargo, including aggregated proteins, lipids, or even organelles, such as mitochondria.

3.6. Meth May Induce Mitophagy to Decrease Total Mitochondrial Content

Mitophagy is a form of selective autophagy induced in response to increased ROS. There are several mechanisms by which depolarized, dysfunctional mitochondria can be degraded by autophagy, with the PINK1/Parkin pathway being the most studied [68]. We hypothesized that the degradation of mitochondria by autophagy, mitophagic flux, would be downregulated similarly to p62-mediated autophagy. By immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy Z-series studies of LC3 and TOM20, a mitochondrial outer membrane protein, we measured how meth impacts total autophagy and mitophagy in HIV-infected MDM (Figure 6A).
Ammonium chloride + L were added in the last 4 h of treatment to calculate flux. Different from LC3II Western blotting, LC3 puncta indicate the number of APG present rather than reflecting the total cellular content of LC3 [29]. By counting LC3 puncta in a Z-series per cell, there were no significant changes with or without N + L in response to meth (Figure 6B). This suggests that some APG may be maturing properly after meth induces autophagy, while other APG subgroups containing specific cargo may not mature appropriately. We observed a trend for decreased LC3 puncta positive for mitochondria, yellow puncta on overlay, representing mitophagosomes (Figure 6D). The trend did not persist with N + L, resulting in increased mitophagic flux (Figure 6E). This suggests that meth may selectively upregulate the autophagic degradation of mitochondria due to either direct or indirect impacts on mitochondrial function. Our quantification of the total TOM20 volume per cell showed that meth decreases the mitochondrial content, which is consistent with higher levels of mitophagy (Figure 6C) [69].

3.7. Drug Inhibited Lysosomal Degradation Increases ROS in Meth-Treated Macrophages

ROS induce total and selective autophagic processes [70]. We examined whether increasing or decreasing total autophagic activity during meth exposure further alters ROS levels. We treated HIV-infected MDM with meth for 24 h. In the last 4 h of treatment, for one set of cells we added leupeptin, which prevents lysosomal degradation of autophagic substrates, as shown in Figure 4. To another set of cells, in the last 3 h of treatment, we added 500 nM of Torin 2, an mTOR inhibitor that induces autophagy [71]. This timing and concentration of Torin 2 induced autophagy as shown by Western blotting, demonstrating higher LC3II flux and decreased p62 (Figure 7C). Torin 2 alone significantly increased ROS, although minimally, while leupeptin alone had no effect. However, meth + leupeptin significantly increased ROS relative to meth alone. Meth + Torin 2 had the same effect as meth alone (Figure 7A,D). However, these effects did not persist with oxidative stress induced by CCCP (Figure 7B,E). These data do not support our initial hypothesis that increasing autophagic activity could ameliorate meth-induced ROS. They also suggest that meth increases ROS through mechanisms independent of autophagic activity and underscore that inhibiting autophagy may enhance oxidative stress and resultant cell toxicity during meth exposure.

4. Discussion

Substance use disorder can worsen NCI [9]. The mechanisms by which HIV-NCI occurs in the era of ART are not fully characterized. Whether regular methamphetamine (meth) use impacts these mechanisms remains important to determine, given the rise in prevalence and incidence of meth use nationally [72]. Mature monocytes are preferentially infected with HIV and primed to cross the blood–brain barrier to reseed the CNS with HIV, even in PWH stably suppressed on ART [73,74]. These monocytes can become CNS-resident perivascular MDM that perpetuate infection and neuroinflammation to injure parenchymal cells [45].
In the CNS of people with HIV-NCI, MDM are heterogeneously infected, with some cells having HIV integrated into their genomes, termed HIV-positive cells, while others do not have integrated HIV but are still exposed to viral proteins, ROS, and inflammatory mediators. These are termed exposed cells [14,73]. In our functional and proteomic assays, we tested the impact of meth on HIV-infected MDM that contain HIV-positive cells and exposed cells. Based on our results and those of prior proteomic studies, we propose that meth impacts some macrophage functions regardless of HIV infection, while other functions meth alters require HIV infection.
We tested whether meth and/or ART change phagocytosis of a neurotoxic protein, aggregated amyloid-β [18]. Meth significantly decreased amyloid-β accumulation in HIV-infected MDM, and ART appeared to minimize the impact of meth on phagocytosis [16]. The levels of infection were similar in ART-treated cells and meth + ART-treated cells. ART may increase phagocytosis independently of HIV infection and in the context of phagocytic suppression by meth. These data indicate that taking a full ART regimen as prescribed could ameliorate the negative impact of meth on phagocytosis of amyloid-β. Meth may also accelerate the intracellular degradation of amyloid-β once internalized, but our proteomic data did not indicate significant increases in lysosomal proteases or proteins involved in phagosome maturation (Supplementary Figure S2).
Phagocytosis requires several classes of molecular factors that recognize substrates, internalize them, and traffic phagosomes [50]. Our mass spectrometry results indicate that meth may impact all these components. The most significantly changed proteins are involved in actin cytoskeleton disorganization [42]. Other groups that performed proteomic analyses of primary human MDM demonstrated that HIV infection can either dampen phagocytosis to promote viral replication or activate infected cells to phagocytize microbes. This occurs by regulating the factors that reorganize the actin cytoskeleton, primarily profilin 1 and cofilin 1 [75,76]. Both proteins were highly expressed by HIV-infected MDM in our study, but were unchanged with meth (Supplementary Table S1). Another study demonstrated that meth inhibits phagocytosis in uninfected dendritic cells [35]. Together, these data suggest that meth reduces phagocytosis independently of HIV infection. Inhibited phagocytosis could be caused by decreased PI(3)P as a result of decreased class III PI3K activity (gene products of PIK3C3 and PIK3R1) and/or decreased recognition of substrates by scavenger receptors, MSR1 and SCARB1 (Figure 2C,D). However, CD16, which recognizes the opsonized substrates to be engulfed, was increased with meth [77,78]. This could increase substrate recognition and impact downstream signaling.
We also measured reactive oxygen species (ROS) [79]. Meth treatment of HIV-infected macrophages significantly increased ROS, even when higher levels of baseline stress were induced by a mitochondrial uncoupler, CCCP. Our ROS experiments in uninfected MDM exposed to meth and/or ART yielded the same results (n = 3, Supplementary Figure S4). This demonstrates that meth causes redox changes, regardless of HIV infection. In our studies, we measured total ROS in the cell, which are reflective of the pathways including cell respiration, phagocyte NADPH oxidase activity, and downstream neutralization of ROS [19]. By proteomics, the levels of proteins involved in the respiratory burst from NADPH oxidase were unchanged, as well as any isoform of superoxide dismutase (Supplementary Table S1). Thus, we hypothesized that meth increases mitochondrial ROS, although this was not specifically measured.
Due to its affinity for protons, we predicted that meth disrupts the proton gradient across the inner mitochondrial membrane to increase ROS [36]. We analyzed mitochondrial membrane potential by a JC-1 assay. Meth did not alter the monomeric or aggregate mitochondrial signal (Supplementary Figure S3A,B). These data indicate that meth may increase ROS through more indirect mechanisms related to changes in signaling, and perhaps, gene expression. However, we did not specifically measure mitochondrial ROS generated from altered ETC function. Future studies will address this. By mass spectrometry, meth changed ETC components and other factors that contribute to altered oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial degradation. There was also an increased expression of the enzymes involved in oxidative metabolism, as well as crucial signaling factors that regulate oxidative status, including higher NF-κB and its regulators, and trends toward lower mTOR and Akt1 [19]. Proteomic studies of the secretome of HIV-infected primary human MDM demonstrated significantly increased superoxide dismutase. This was confirmed by Western blotting [76]. Thus, active neutralization of ROS in infected MDM in response to meth may also contribute to oxidative stress.
ROS cause rapid processing by NLRP3 inflammasomes and secretion of IL-1β, which is increased in the CNS of PWH with cognitive impairment [6,80]. Two types of factors are needed to activate these inflammasomes to convert cytokine pro-forms into active cytokines. The first is a pathogen-associated molecular pattern, such as bacterial LPS, and the second is a danger-associated molecule, such as ATP [81]. We predicted that more long-term treatment with meth could increase the activation of these inflammasomes in response to LPS and ATP and increase IL-1β secretion. LPS + ATP effectively activated inflammasomes (Supplementary Figure S5A). However, daily treatment with meth and with or without ART for 7 days did not significantly change IL-1β (Supplementary Figure S5B). Meth may alter the levels of other inflammatory cytokines implicated in HIV pathogenesis. By proteomics, meth significantly increased CXCL16, a ligand for CXCR6, a coreceptor for the entry of the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) into PBMC, mostly T cells (Supplementary Table S1) [82]. Higher levels of HIV infection in macrophages also increase the elaboration of CXCL16 [82,83]. A proteomic analysis of uninfected primary human MDM also demonstrated that meth increases the secretion of CXCL16 [84]. This indicates that meth increases this cytokine independently of HIV infection. Future studies will address how increased CXCL16 contributes to HIV pathogenesis in MDM exposed to meth.
Changes in ROS and autophagic activity significantly contribute to neurodegeneration [67]. Autophagy negatively regulates the inflammasome-mediated release of IL-1β [22,85]. We measured how meth changes total autophagy by LC3, selective degradation of poly-ubiquitinated proteins by p62, and mitophagy. ART alone had no significant effect on any parameters related to LC3II or p62 according to Western blotting. Therefore, we did not examine its impact on mitophagy. Meth induced autophagy in HIV-infected MDM, but APG maturation did not increase similarly, causing significant accumulation of LC3II. Increased induction of autophagy by meth is consistent across cell culture and animal models, which can contribute to autophagic cell death in certain cell types. Other studies showed that toxicity from meth is reduced when autophagy is attenuated pharmacologically [86,87,88]. The dual impact of meth on autophagy induction and completion in our system is similar to how neuronal autophagy is altered in Alzheimer’s [89]. We performed the same Western blotting experiments in uninfected MDM treated with meth and found no significant changes in autophagy (n = 3, Supplementary Figure S6A,B). This suggests that meth impacts autophagy in an infection-dependent manner.
One type of selective autophagic cargo includes poly-ubiquitinated proteins, which are docked by the receptor, p62 [63]. We found a significant decrease in the rate and amount of p62 being degraded with meth, even with concomitant ART. Our proteomic analyses also did not suggest that p62 was increased with meth (Supplementary Table S1). However, we performed the same Western blotting experiments in uninfected MDM and found an increase in p62 steady state levels and decreased flux, as we found in infected cells (Supplementary Figure S6A,C). Our previous studies demonstrated that HIV infection increases the baseline levels of p62 and decreases flux [33]. This p62 may not accumulate as much in infected MDM in response to meth because steady state levels are high at baseline.
The levels of p62 can be regulated by oxidative stress. Excess cytosolic p62 binds Keap1, which sequesters the transcription factor, Nrf2, and causes translocation to the nucleus to activate the transcription of antioxidant genes [90]. The SQSTM1 gene is itself a target to increase the responses related to autophagy and apoptosis [85]. We found a trend toward increased SQSTM1 transcription with 24 h of meth treatment but not at an earlier time point, 6 h. SQSTM1 transcription may be dampened until around 24 h. Our ROS studies show that at this later time point of meth treatment, there are more ROS, which could activate Nrf2. Analyses of autophagy at time points after 24 h could further characterize how meth impacts these processes to contribute to neurodegeneration.
Our pathway analyses of differentially expressed proteins suggested several metabolic and disease-related processes that meth impacts in HIV-infected macrophages. Viral processes and host-virus interactions were also significantly enriched. Most of the involved proteins mediate the transcriptional and translational regulation of RNA virus expression and restriction (Figure 4B). This suggests that gene expression-related mechanisms may explain the existing in vitro data demonstrating that meth pre-treatment can enhance HIV infection [48,91]. Our data similarly highlight an interaction between meth and HIV in infected macrophage reservoirs that could mediate clinical findings of higher inflammatory markers in meth using PWH [13]. Proteins associated with neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, were significantly enriched. This underscores macrophages as key mediators of CNS damage in multiple disease processes. These specific proteins are involved in oxidative metabolism, proteasomal activity, and signaling through calcium and PI3K (Figure 4B). Therefore, therapies for known neurodegenerative conditions that target these processes may also improve outcomes in PWH using meth with cognitive impairment.
Gene expression analyses of human macrophages treated with meth could determine the transcriptional pathways that meth alters to mediate differential protein expression. In vivo studies of gene expression in SIV-infected macaque brains exposed to meth found an increased proportion of infected macrophages, which is consistent with our mass spectrometry data and prior in vitro studies [92,93]. These analyses demonstrated the differential expression of genes in the complement pathway and electron transport chain function [93]. Both immune and metabolic processes, coined “immunometabolism,” are likely to be key in the changes we measured in our functional assays. Preferences for aerobic metabolism in M2 macrophages or anaerobic metabolism in M1 have been characterized, although inflammatory activity and its relation to M1 and M2 is nuanced [94]. scRNA-seq analyses found that glycolytic and pentose phosphate pathways were enriched in SIV-infected brain macrophages exposed to meth [93]. We also found significant increases in four MHCII proteins, as well as higher ROS, which correspond with the more inflammatory M1 subtype (Supplementary Table S1, Figure 3). Cytokines were mostly not detected by mass spectrometry. There were also no changes in major M2 surface markers, CD206 and CD163, or the M1 marker, CD32 [94,95]. The studies of macrophage cell lines treated with meth similarly demonstrated a more M1-like subtype characterized by increased nitric oxide and IL-12 [96]. Future metabolomic studies involving Seahorse, LC/MS/MS, and stable isotope-labeled carbon flux analyses may determine how meth alters specific metabolic activities to establish a more inflammatory state.
Targeting the signaling changes caused by meth may also provide therapeutic benefits, as suggested by the enrichment of Parkinson’s pathway-related proteins. Meth appears to increase NF-κB activation, but decreases levels of class III PI3K, and perhaps, mTOR and Akt1. Dampened Akt1 is associated with M1 macrophages [97]. Additional studies will determine the mechanisms by which these survival and metabolic factors are changed by meth. These mechanisms may relate to the upregulation of calcium signaling factors, such as calmodulins and calmodulin-dependent kinases (Figure 2D). Altered intracellular calcium is a major output of signaling through the sigma-1 receptor, which is present on the ER [98]. Several studies indicate that meth activates these receptors in microglia [99,100,101]. According to mass spectrometry, meth increased sigma-1 receptor expression in all four experiments, with a mean fold change of 1.172 relative to the control, p = 0.0597 (Supplementary Table S1). The ranked expression of this receptor in HIV-infected macrophages at baseline was high and consistent as well, ranging from 1527 to 1745 out of 3655 total reads. Future studies will examine whether altering sigma-1 receptor activation ameliorates the dysregulation of macrophage functions [102].
Our studies demonstrate that meth dysregulates key functions of HIV-infected macrophages in the CNS, including phagocytosis, total ROS, and autophagy. Based on our mass spectrometry data and others, some of these effects are mediated by meth alone, while others are due to the interaction between meth and HIV infection. These data suggest interventional strategies to reduce neurocognitive deficits in people with HIV-NCI who use meth that target the potential pathways of calcium signaling, PI3K activity, NF-κB, and/or sigma-1 receptor activity.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biomedicines10061257/s1, Table S1: Differential protein expression in meth-treated HIV-infected macrophages plotted by fold change and p-value including enriched pathways; Figure S1: Detected HIV genome proteins correlate with p24 alphaLISA data from culture supernatants; Figure S2: Methamphetamine-induced changes in autophagy/lysosomal components in HIV infected macrophages; Figure S3: Determination of mitochondrial membrane potential by JC-1 dye fluorometric plate reader assay; Figure S4: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels in uninfected MDM; Figure S5: Inflammasome-mediated IL-1β release from HIV-infected macrophages; Figure S6: LC3II and p62 Western blot data in uninfected macrophages.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.M.B., A.M.C. and J.W.B.; methodology, J.M.B., S.S., A.M.C. and J.W.B.; investigation, J.M.B.; formal analyses, J.M.B., S.S., A.M.C. and J.W.B.; original draft preparation, J.M.B. and S.S.; review and editing, J.M.B., A.M.C., S.S. and J.W.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Analytical Imaging Facility (AIF) microscopy work was funded by an NCI Cancer Center support grant, P30CA013330. The Leica DMI8 confocal microscope was purchased under SIG No. S10OD023591-01. The work was also funded by NIH training grants, F30DA053118 and T32GM007288-44 (J.M.B.), NIH NIDA grants, R01DA048609 and R01DA044584 (J.W.B.), NIH NIA grants P30AG038072 (A.M.C.), and P30AI124414 (ERC CFAR, and specifically to BATC). SS was supported by the Leukemia Research Foundation (Hollis Brownstein New Investigator Research Grant), AFAR (Sagol Network GerOmics award), Deerfield (Xseed award), Relay Therapeutics, Merck, and the NIH Office of the Director (1S10OD030286-01).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Jennifer Aguilan and Katarzyna Kulej for their support in processing the mass spectrometry data. We also acknowledge the Analytical Imaging Facility at Albert Einstein College of Medicine for their technical support. Everyone in Berman’s laboratory has had helpful suggestions for interpreting and presenting these data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no financial conflict of interest or other conflict. Funders did not participate in the design of the study, in data collection, analyses, interpretations of the results, in preparation of the manuscript, or in publishing the data.

References

  1. UNAIDS Reference. 2021. Available online: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/JC3032_AIDS_Data_book_2021_En.pdf (accessed on 20 March 2022).
  2. Cheney, L.; Barbaro, J.M.; Berman, J.W. Antiretroviral Drugs Impact Autophagy with Toxic Outcomes. Cells 2021, 10, 909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nasi, M.; De Biasi, S.; Gibellini, L.; Bianchini, E.; Pecorini, S.; Bacca, V.; Guaraldi, G.; Mussini, C.; Pinti, M.; Cossarizza, A. Ageing and inflammation in patients with HIV infection. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2017, 187, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Spooner, R.; Ranasinghe, S.; Urasa, S.; Yoseph, M.; Koipapi, S.; Mukaetova-Ladinska, E.B.; Lewis, T.; Howlett, W.; Dekker, M.; Kisoli, A.; et al. HIV—Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND): The first longitudinal follow up of a cART-treated cohort of older people in sub-Saharan Africa. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2022, 90, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gutierrez-San-Juan, J.; Arrieta-Aldea, I.; Arnau-Barres, I.; Garcia-Escobar, G.; Lerma-Chipirraz, E.; Perez-Garcia, P.; Marcos, A.; Blasco-Hernando, F.; Gonzalez-Mena, A.; Canas, E.; et al. Factors associated to neurocognitive impairment in older adults living with HIV. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2022, 27, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Saylor, D.; Dickens, A.M.; Sacktor, N.; Haughey, N.; Slusher, B.; Pletnikov, M.; Mankowski, J.L.; Brown, A.; Volsky, D.J.; McArthur, J.C. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder—Pathogenesis and prospects for treatment. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2016, 12, 234–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Caruana, G.; Vidili, G.; Serra, P.A.; Bagella, P.; Spanu, A.; Fiore, V.; Calvisi, D.F.; Manetti, R.; Rocchitta, G.; Nuvoli, S.; et al. The burden of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) in post-HAART era: A multidisciplinary review of the literature. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 21, 2290–2301. [Google Scholar]
  8. Byrd, D.A.; Fellows, R.P.; Morgello, S.; Franklin, D.; Heaton, R.K.; Deutsch, R.; Atkinson, J.H.; Clifford, D.B.; Collier, A.C.; Marra, C.M.; et al. Neurocognitive impact of substance use in HIV infection. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2011, 58, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Applebaum, A.J.; Otto, M.W.; Richardson, M.A.; Safren, S.A. Contributors to neuropsychological impairment in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected opiate-dependent patients. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 2010, 32, 579–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Meyer, V.J.; Rubin, L.H.; Martin, E.; Weber, K.M.; Cohen, M.H.; Golub, E.T.; Valcour, V.; Young, M.A.; Crystal, H.; Anastos, K.; et al. HIV and recent illicit drug use interact to affect verbal memory in women. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2013, 63, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Grov, C.; Westmoreland, D.; Morrison, C.; Carrico, A.W.; Nash, D. The Crisis We Are Not Talking About: One-in-Three Annual HIV Seroconversions Among Sexual and Gender Minorities Were Persistent Methamphetamine Users. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2020, 85, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fulcher, J.A.; Javanbakht, M.; Shover, C.L.; Ragsdale, A.; Brookmeyer, R.; Shoptaw, S.; Gorbach, P.M. Comparative impact of methamphetamine and other drug use on viral suppression among sexual minority men on antiretroviral therapy. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021, 221, 108622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Miller, M.; Lee, J.Y.; Fulcher, J.A.; Roach, M.E.; Dilworth, S.E.; Chahine, A.; Pallikkuth, S.; Fuchs, D.; Pahwa, S.; Carrico, A.W. Getting to the point: Methamphetamine injection is associated with biomarkers relevant to HIV pathogenesis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020, 213, 108133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rappaport, J.; Volsky, D.J. Role of the macrophage in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders and other comorbidities in patients on effective antiretroviral treatment. J. Neurovirol. 2015, 21, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ko, A.; Kang, G.; Hattler, J.B.; Galadima, H.I.; Zhang, J.; Li, Q.; Kim, W.K. Macrophages but not Astrocytes Harbor HIV DNA in the Brains of HIV-1-Infected Aviremic Individuals on Suppressive Antiretroviral Therapy. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2018, 14, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Debaisieux, S.; Lachambre, S.; Gross, A.; Mettling, C.; Besteiro, S.; Yezid, H.; Henaff, D.; Chopard, C.; Mesnard, J.M.; Beaumelle, B. HIV-1 Tat inhibits phagocytosis by preventing the recruitment of Cdc42 to the phagocytic cup. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Le-Bury, G.; Niedergang, F. Defective Phagocytic Properties of HIV-Infected Macrophages: How Might They Be Implicated in the Development of Invasive Salmonella Typhimurium? Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hauser, K.F.; Knapp, P.E. Interactions of HIV and drugs of abuse: The importance of glia, neural progenitors, and host genetic factors. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2014, 118, 231–313. [Google Scholar]
  19. Herb, M.; Schramm, M. Functions of ROS in Macrophages and Antimicrobial Immunity. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ko, J.H.; Yoon, S.O.; Lee, H.J.; Oh, J.Y. Rapamycin regulates macrophage activation by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome-p38 MAPK-NFkappaB pathways in autophagy- and p62-dependent manners. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 40817–40831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Takikita, S.; Takano, T.; Narita, T.; Takikita, M.; Ohno, M.; Shimada, M. Neuronal apoptosis mediated by IL-1 beta expression in viral encephalitis caused by a neuroadapted strain of the mumps virus (Kilham Strain) in hamsters. Exp. Neurol. 2001, 172, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Leymarie, O.; Lepont, L.; Berlioz-Torrent, C. Canonical and Non-Canonical Autophagy in HIV-1 Replication Cycle. Viruses 2017, 9, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nardacci, R.; Amendola, A.; Ciccosanti, F.; Corazzari, M.; Esposito, V.; Vlassi, C.; Taibi, C.; Fimia, G.M.; Del Nonno, F.; Ippolito, G.; et al. Autophagy plays an important role in the containment of HIV-1 in nonprogressor-infected patients. Autophagy 2014, 10, 1167–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Dever, S.M.; Rodriguez, M.; Lapierre, J.; Costin, B.N.; El-Hage, N. Differing roles of autophagy in HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment and encephalitis with implications for morphine co-exposure. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhou, D.; Masliah, E.; Spector, S.A. Autophagy is increased in postmortem brains of persons with HIV-1-associated encephalitis. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 203, 1647–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kyei, G.B.; Dinkins, C.; Davis, A.S.; Roberts, E.; Singh, S.B.; Dong, C.; Wu, L.; Kominami, E.; Ueno, T.; Yamamoto, A.; et al. Autophagy pathway intersects with HIV-1 biosynthesis and regulates viral yields in macrophages. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 186, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Campbell, G.R.; Rawat, P.; Bruckman, R.S.; Spector, S.A. Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Nef Inhibits Autophagy through Transcription Factor EB Sequestration. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1005018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Wu, M.Y.; Lu, J.H. Autophagy and Macrophage Functions: Inflammatory Response and Phagocytosis. Cells 2019, 9, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Klionsky, D.J.; Abdel-Aziz, A.K.; Abdelfatah, S.; Abdellatif, M.; Abdoli, A.; Abel, S.; Abeliovich, H.; Abildgaard, M.H.; Abudu, Y.P.; Acevedo-Arozena, A.; et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy. Autophagy 2021, 17, 1–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rubinsztein, D.C.; Cuervo, A.M.; Ravikumar, B.; Sarkar, S.; Korolchuk, V.; Kaushik, S.; Klionsky, D.J. In search of an “autophagomometer”. Autophagy 2009, 5, 585–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Johansen, T.; Lamark, T. Selective autophagy mediated by autophagic adapter proteins. Autophagy 2014, 7, 279–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yoo, S.M.; Jung, Y.K. A Molecular Approach to Mitophagy and Mitochondrial Dynamics. Mol. Cells 2018, 41, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Barbaro, J.M.; Cuervo, A.M.; Berman, J.W. HIV Increases the Inhibitory Impact of Morphine and Antiretrovirals on Autophagy in Primary Human Macrophages: Contributions to Neuropathogenesis. Cells 2021, 10, 2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Heideveld, E.; Horcas-Lopez, M.; Lopez-Yrigoyen, M.; Forrester, L.M.; Cassetta, L.; Pollard, J.W. Methods for macrophage differentiation and in vitro generation of human tumor associated-like macrophages. Methods Enzymol. 2020, 632, 113–131. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Talloczy, Z.; Martinez, J.; Joset, D.; Ray, Y.; Gacser, A.; Toussi, S.; Mizushima, N.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Goldstein, H.; Loike, J.; et al. Methamphetamine inhibits antigen processing, presentation, and phagocytosis. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Schepers, R.J.; Oyler, J.M.; Joseph, R.E., Jr.; Cone, E.J.; Moolchan, E.T.; Huestis, M.A. Methamphetamine and amphetamine pharmacokinetics in oral fluid and plasma after controlled oral methamphetamine administration to human volunteers. Clin. Chem. 2003, 49, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Best, B.M.; Letendre, S.L.; Koopmans, P.; Rossi, S.S.; Clifford, D.B.; Collier, A.C.; Gelman, B.B.; Marra, C.M.; McArthur, J.C.; McCutchan, J.A.; et al. Low cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of the nucleotide HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitor, tenofovir. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2012, 59, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Van Den Hof, M.; Blokhuis, C.; Cohen, S.; Scherpbier, H.J.; Wit, F.; Pistorius, M.C.M.; Kootstra, N.A.; Teunissen, C.E.; Mathot, R.A.A.; Pajkrt, D. CNS penetration of ART in HIV-infected children. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 484–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Letendre, S.L.; Mills, A.M.; Tashima, K.T.; Thomas, D.A.; Min, S.S.; Chen, S.; Song, I.H.; Piscitelli, S.C. ING116070: A study of the pharmacokinetics and antiviral activity of dolutegravir in cerebrospinal fluid in HIV-1-infected, antiretroviral therapy-naive subjects. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 59, 1032–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Sun, Y.; Stransky, S.; Aguilan, J.; Brenowitz, M.; Sidoli, S. DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation analysis using a high throughput and low bias direct injection mass spectrometry platform. MethodsX 2021, 8, 101585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Weiner, A.K.; Sidoli, S.; Diskin, S.J.; Garcia, B.A. Graphical Interpretation and Analysis of Proteins and their Ontologies (GiaPronto): A One-Click Graph Visualization Software for Proteomics Data Sets. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2018, 17, 1426–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Ninkovic, J.; Roy, S. Morphine decreases bacterial phagocytosis by inhibiting actin polymerization through cAMP-, Rac-1-, and p38 MAPK-dependent mechanisms. Am. J. Pathol. 2012, 180, 1068–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Park, Y.S.; Choi, S.E.; Koh, H.C. PGAM5 regulates PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy via DRP1 in CCCP-induced mitochondrial dysfunction. Toxicol. Lett. 2018, 284, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yang, Y.P.; Hu, L.F.; Zheng, H.F.; Mao, C.J.; Hu, W.D.; Xiong, K.P.; Wang, F.; Liu, C.F. Application and interpretation of current autophagy inhibitors and activators. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2013, 34, 625–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Li, Q.; Barres, B.A. Microglia and macrophages in brain homeostasis and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 225–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Andras, I.E.; Toborek, M. Amyloid beta accumulation in HIV-1-infected brain: The role of the blood brain barrier. IUBMB Life 2013, 65, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Achim, C.L.; Adame, A.; Dumaop, W.; Everall, I.P.; Masliah, E. Increased accumulation of intraneuronal amyloid beta in HIV-infected patients. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2009, 4, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Liang, H.; Wang, X.; Chen, H.; Song, L.; Ye, L.; Wang, S.H.; Wang, Y.J.; Zhou, L.; Ho, W.Z. Methamphetamine enhances HIV infection of macrophages. Am. J. Pathol. 2008, 172, 1617–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tanna, C.E.; Goss, L.B.; Ludwig, C.G.; Chen, P.W. Arf GAPs as Regulators of the Actin Cytoskeleton-An Update. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Uribe-Querol, E.; Rosales, C. Phagocytosis: Our Current Understanding of a Universal Biological Process. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, P.; Zhang, W.; Wang, L.; Liang, W.; Cai, A.; Gao, Y.; Chen, L. RCC2 Interacts with Small GTPase RalA and Regulates Cell Proliferation and Motility in Gastric Cancer. Onco. Targets Ther. 2020, 13, 3093–3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Gumienny, T.L.; Brugnera, E.; Tosello-Trampont, A.C.; Kinchen, J.M.; Haney, L.B.; Nishiwaki, K.; Walk, S.F.; Nemergut, M.E.; Macara, I.G.; Francis, R.; et al. CED-12/ELMO, a novel member of the CrkII/Dock180/Rac pathway, is required for phagocytosis and cell migration. Cell 2001, 107, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Bonilla, D.L.; Bhattacharya, A.; Sha, Y.; Xu, Y.; Xiang, Q.; Kan, A.; Jagannath, C.; Komatsu, M.; Eissa, N.T. Autophagy regulates phagocytosis by modulating the expression of scavenger receptors. Immunity 2013, 39, 537–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Tebar, F.; Chavero, A.; Agell, N.; Lu, A.; Rentero, C.; Enrich, C.; Grewal, T. Pleiotropic Roles of Calmodulin in the Regulation of KRas and Rac1 GTPases: Functional Diversity in Health and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Smith, F.D.; Samelson, B.K.; Scott, J.D. Discovery of cellular substrates for protein kinase A using a peptide array screening protocol. Biochem. J. 2011, 438, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Gozzelino, L.; De Santis, M.C.; Gulluni, F.; Hirsch, E.; Martini, M. PI(3,4)P2 Signaling in Cancer and Metabolism. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Guo, R.; Gu, J.; Zong, S.; Wu, M.; Yang, M. Structure and mechanism of mitochondrial electron transport chain. Biomed. J. 2018, 41, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Roosterman, D.; Cottrell, G.S. Rethinking the Citric Acid Cycle: Connecting Pyruvate Carboxylase and Citrate Synthase to the Flow of Energy and Material. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ma, S.; Sun, R.; Jiang, B.; Gao, J.; Deng, W.; Liu, P.; He, R.; Cui, J.; Ji, M.; Yi, W.; et al. L2hgdh Deficiency Accumulates l-2-Hydroxyglutarate with Progressive Leukoencephalopathy and Neurodegeneration. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017, 37, e00492-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Xu, Z.; Huang, J.; Gao, M.; Guo, G.; Zeng, S.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Gong, Z.; Yan, Y. Current perspectives on the clinical implications of oxidative RNA damage in aging research: Challenges and opportunities. Geroscience 2021, 43, 487–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yoo, Y.S.; Park, Y.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Cho, H.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, T.H.; Kim, Y.S.; Lee, Y.; Kim, C.J.; et al. The mitochondrial ubiquitin ligase MARCH5 resolves MAVS aggregates during antiviral signalling. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Gwinn, M.R.; Vallyathan, V. Respiratory burst: Role in signal transduction in alveolar macrophages. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B Crit. Rev. 2006, 9, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Lamark, T.; Svenning, S.; Johansen, T. Regulation of selective autophagy: The p62/SQSTM1 paradigm. Essays Biochem. 2017, 61, 609–624. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Wu, Y.H.; Chou, T.F.; Young, L.; Hsieh, F.Y.; Pan, H.Y.; Mo, S.T.; Brown, S.B.; Chen, R.H.; Kimchi, A.; Lai, M.Z. Tumor suppressor death-associated protein kinase 1 inhibits necroptosis by p38 MAPK activation. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kang, R.; Zeh, H.J.; Lotze, M.T.; Tang, D. The Beclin 1 network regulates autophagy and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2011, 18, 571–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhao, L.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, D.; Chen, M.; Gao, P.; Xiao, W.; Rao, G.; Wang, X.; Jin, H.; Xu, L.; et al. Morphine induces Beclin 1- and ATG5-dependent autophagy in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells and in the rat hippocampus. Autophagy 2014, 6, 386–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Pan, T.; Kondo, S.; Le, W.; Jankovic, J. The role of autophagy-lysosome pathway in neurodegeneration associated with Parkinson’s disease. Brain 2008, 131, 1969–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Schofield, J.H.; Schafer, Z.T. Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species and Mitophagy: A Complex and Nuanced Relationship. Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 2021, 34, 517–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Esteban-Martinez, L.; Sierra-Filardi, E.; McGreal, R.S.; Salazar-Roa, M.; Marino, G.; Seco, E.; Durand, S.; Enot, D.; Grana, O.; Malumbres, M.; et al. Programmed mitophagy is essential for the glycolytic switch during cell differentiation. EMBO J. 2017, 36, 1688–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sun, X.; Chang, R.; Tang, Y.; Luo, S.; Jiang, C.; Jia, H.; Xu, Q.; Dong, Z.; Liang, Y.; Loor, J.J.; et al. Transcription factor EB (TFEB)-mediated autophagy protects bovine mammary epithelial cells against H2O2-induced oxidative damage in vitro. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 12, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Park, S.; Sim, H.; Lee, K. Rapamycin-resistant and torin-sensitive mTOR signaling promotes the survival and proliferation of leukemic cells. BMB Rep. 2016, 49, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Wainwright, J.J.; Mikre, M.; Whitley, P.; Dawson, E.; Huskey, A.; Lukowiak, A.; Giroir, B.P. Analysis of Drug Test Results Before and After the US Declaration of a National Emergency Concerning the COVID-19 Outbreak. JAMA 2020, 324, 1674–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Leon-Rivera, R.; Morsey, B.; Niu, M.; Fox, H.S.; Berman, J.W. Interactions of Monocytes, HIV, and ART Identified by an Innovative scRNAseq Pipeline: Pathways to Reservoirs and HIV-Associated Comorbidities. mBio 2020, 11, e01037-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Leon-Rivera, R.; Veenstra, M.; Donoso, M.; Tell, E.; Eugenin, E.A.; Morgello, S.; Berman, J.W. Central Nervous System (CNS) Viral Seeding by Mature Monocytes and Potential Therapies to Reduce CNS Viral Reservoirs in the cART Era. mBio 2021, 12, e03633-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kadiu, I.; Ricardo-Dukelow, M.; Ciborowski, P.; Gendelman, H.E. Cytoskeletal protein transformation in HIV-1-infected macrophage giant cells. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 6404–6415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Ciborowski, P.; Kadiu, I.; Rozek, W.; Smith, L.; Bernhardt, K.; Fladseth, M.; Ricardo-Dukelow, M.; Gendelman, H.E. Investigating the human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected monocyte-derived macrophage secretome. Virology 2007, 363, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Vural, A.; Kehrl, J.H. Autophagy in macrophages: Impacting inflammation and bacterial infection. Scientifica 2014, 2014, 825463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Tao, H.; Yancey, P.G.; Blakemore, J.L.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, L.; Jerome, W.G.; Brown, J.D.; Vickers, K.C.; Linton, M.F. Macrophage SR-BI modulates autophagy via VPS34 complex and PPARalpha transcription of Tfeb in atherosclerosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 131, e94229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Akay, C.; Cooper, M.; Odeleye, A.; Jensen, B.K.; White, M.G.; Vassoler, F.; Gannon, P.J.; Mankowski, J.; Dorsey, J.L.; Buch, A.M.; et al. Antiretroviral drugs induce oxidative stress and neuronal damage in the central nervous system. J. Neurovirol. 2014, 20, 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Shi, C.S.; Shenderov, K.; Huang, N.N.; Kabat, J.; Abu-Asab, M.; Fitzgerald, K.A.; Sher, A.; Kehrl, J.H. Activation of autophagy by inflammatory signals limits IL-1beta production by targeting ubiquitinated inflammasomes for destruction. Nat. Immunol. 2012, 13, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Nakahira, K.; Haspel, J.A.; Rathinam, V.A.; Lee, S.J.; Dolinay, T.; Lam, H.C.; Englert, J.A.; Rabinovitch, M.; Cernadas, M.; Kim, H.P.; et al. Autophagy proteins regulate innate immune responses by inhibiting the release of mitochondrial DNA mediated by the NALP3 inflammasome. Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Korbecki, J.; Bajdak-Rusinek, K.; Kupnicka, P.; Kapczuk, P.; Siminska, D.; Chlubek, D.; Baranowska-Bosiacka, I. The Role of CXCL16 in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Other Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wetzel, K.S.; Yi, Y.; Elliott, S.T.C.; Romero, D.; Jacquelin, B.; Hahn, B.H.; Muller-Trutwin, M.; Apetrei, C.; Pandrea, I.; Collman, R.G. CXCR6-Mediated Simian Immunodeficiency Virus SIVagmSab Entry into Sabaeus African Green Monkey Lymphocytes Implicates Widespread Use of Non-CCR5 Pathways in Natural Host Infections. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e01626-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Burns, A.; Ciborowski, P. Acute exposure to methamphetamine alters TLR9-mediated cytokine expression in human macrophage. Immunobiology 2016, 221, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Tilija Pun, N.; Park, P.H. Role of p62 in the suppression of inflammatory cytokine production by adiponectin in macrophages: Involvement of autophagy and p21/Nrf2 axis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Foroughi, K.; Khaksari, M.; Rahmati, M.; Bitaraf, F.S.; Shayannia, A. Apelin-13 Protects PC12 Cells Against Methamphetamine-Induced Oxidative Stress, Autophagy and Apoptosis. Neurochem. Res. 2019, 44, 2103–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Foroughi, K.; Jahanbani, S.; Khaksari, M.; Shayannia, A. Obestatin attenuated methamphetamine-induced PC12 cells neurotoxicity via inhibiting autophagy and apoptosis. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2020, 39, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tan, X.H.; Zhang, K.K.; Xu, J.T.; Qu, D.; Chen, L.J.; Li, J.H.; Wang, Q.; Wang, H.J.; Xie, X.L. Luteolin alleviates methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity by suppressing PI3K/Akt pathway-modulated apoptosis and autophagy in rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 137, 111179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Nixon, R.A.; Yang, D.S. Autophagy failure in Alzheimer’s disease—Locating the primary defect. Neurobiol. Dis. 2011, 43, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Komatsu, M.; Kurokawa, H.; Waguri, S.; Taguchi, K.; Kobayashi, A.; Ichimura, Y.; Sou, Y.S.; Ueno, I.; Sakamoto, A.; Tong, K.I.; et al. The selective autophagy substrate p62 activates the stress responsive transcription factor Nrf2 through inactivation of Keap1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chilunda, V.; Calderon, T.M.; Martinez-Aguado, P.; Berman, J.W. The impact of substance abuse on HIV-mediated neuropathogenesis in the current ART era. Brain Res. 2019, 1724, 146426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Liu, Y.; Meng, F.Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, P.; Liu, J.B.; Hu, W.H.; Young, W.B.; Ho, W.Z. Methamphetamine facilitates HIV infection of primary human monocytes through inhibiting cellular viral restriction factors. Cell Biosci. 2021, 11, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Niu, M.; Morsey, B.; Lamberty, B.G.; Emanuel, K.; Yu, F.; Leon-Rivera, R.; Berman, J.W.; Gaskill, P.J.; Matt, S.M.; Ciborowski, P.S.; et al. Methamphetamine Increases the Proportion of SIV-Infected Microglia/Macrophages, Alters Metabolic Pathways, and Elevates Cell Death Pathways: A Single-Cell Analysis. Viruses 2020, 12, 1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Viola, A.; Munari, F.; Sanchez-Rodriguez, R.; Scolaro, T.; Castegna, A. The Metabolic Signature of Macrophage Responses. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Orecchioni, M.; Ghosheh, Y.; Pramod, A.B.; Ley, K. Corrigendum: Macrophage Polarization: Different Gene Signatures in M1(LPS+) vs. Classically and M2(LPS-) vs. Alternatively Activated Macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Li, X.; Wu, F.; Xue, L.; Wang, B.; Li, J.; Chen, Y.; Chen, T. Methamphetamine causes neurotoxicity by promoting polarization of macrophages and inflammatory response. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2018, 37, 486–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Arranz, A.; Doxaki, C.; Vergadi, E.; De La Torre, Y.M.; Vaporidi, K.; Lagoudaki, E.D.; Ieronymaki, E.; Androulidaki, A.; Venihaki, M.; Margioris, A.N.; et al. Akt1 and Akt2 protein kinases differentially contribute to macrophage polarization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 9517–9522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Krutetskaya, Z.I.; Milenina, L.S.; Antonov, V.G.; Nozdrachev, A.D. Sigma-1 Receptor Agonist Amitriptyline Inhibits Store-Dependent Ca(2+) Entry in Macrophages. Dokl. Biochem. Biophys. 2019, 488, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Robson, M.J.; Turner, R.C.; Naser, Z.J.; McCurdy, C.R.; Huber, J.D.; Matsumoto, R.R. SN79, a sigma receptor ligand, blocks methamphetamine-induced microglial activation and cytokine upregulation. Exp. Neurol. 2013, 247, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Shen, K.; Zhang, Y.; Lv, X.; Chen, X.; Zhou, R.; Nguyen, L.K.; Wu, X.; Yao, H. Molecular Mechanisms Involving Sigma-1 Receptor in Cell Apoptosis of BV-2 Microglial Cells Induced by Methamphetamine. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 2016, 15, 857–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Chao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Du, L.; Zhou, R.; Wu, X.; Shen, K.; Yao, H. Author Correction: Molecular mechanisms underlying the involvement of the sigma-1 receptor in methamphetamine-mediated microglial polarization. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Rosen, D.A.; Seki, S.M.; Fernandez-Castaneda, A.; Beiter, R.M.; Eccles, J.D.; Woodfolk, J.A.; Gaultier, A. Modulation of the sigma-1 receptor-IRE1 pathway is beneficial in preclinical models of inflammation and sepsis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, eaau5266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Mass spectrometry proteomics analysis performed on primary human HIV-infected MDM treated with and without methamphetamine (meth, 50 µM) for 24 h from four individuals. (A) Distribution of protein abundances across samples after log2 transformation and (B) after normalizing the dataset by the center of the distribution, i.e., average. The similarity between the two graphs indicates that the samples were injected at very similar amounts, thus, not requiring advanced normalization steps. (C) Volcano plot displaying the log2 fold change (x-axis) and the log paired t-test p-value (y-axis) with indicated upregulated proteins (in red, fold change of >1.2, p < 0.05) and downregulated proteins (in blue, fold change of <0.8, p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Mass spectrometry proteomics analysis performed on primary human HIV-infected MDM treated with and without methamphetamine (meth, 50 µM) for 24 h from four individuals. (A) Distribution of protein abundances across samples after log2 transformation and (B) after normalizing the dataset by the center of the distribution, i.e., average. The similarity between the two graphs indicates that the samples were injected at very similar amounts, thus, not requiring advanced normalization steps. (C) Volcano plot displaying the log2 fold change (x-axis) and the log paired t-test p-value (y-axis) with indicated upregulated proteins (in red, fold change of >1.2, p < 0.05) and downregulated proteins (in blue, fold change of <0.8, p < 0.05).
Biomedicines 10 01257 g001
Figure 2. Phagocytosis of 1–42 amyloid-β by HIV-infected MDM. Macrophages were infected with HIV for 3–4 days, treated with methamphetamine (meth, 50 µM) and/or ART (16 nM of tenofovir, 441 nM of emtricitabine and 43 nM of dolutegravir) for 24 h, and in the last two hours, fluorescent 1–42 β-amyloid (green) was added prior to fixation, mounting, and visualization. Control cells were pre-incubated with 20 µM of cytochalasin D (CytD) for 20 min and was present throughout phagocytosis. (A) Representative images of untreated (HIV Untx), HIV ART, HIV, Meth, and HIV Meth + ART with HIV DMSO and HIV CytD as controls. HIV DMSO and HIV CytD cells were counterstained with Alexa 594 conjugated phalloidin (red). (B) Fold change in median accumulation of amyloid-β per cell during phagocytosis, with HIV Untx set to 1.0 in each experiment. (C,D) Differentially expressed proteins detected by mass spectrometry related to phagocytic substrate recognition, engulfment, and signaling, HIV Untx is in white bars and HIV Meth is in red bars. n = 4–8 with 50–75 cells counted per treatment in each microscopy experiment ** p < 0.01 one-sample t test, # p < 0.05 ## p < 0.01 paired t test. Scale bar is 15 µm. Error bars represent SEM for (B) and SD for (C,D).
Figure 2. Phagocytosis of 1–42 amyloid-β by HIV-infected MDM. Macrophages were infected with HIV for 3–4 days, treated with methamphetamine (meth, 50 µM) and/or ART (16 nM of tenofovir, 441 nM of emtricitabine and 43 nM of dolutegravir) for 24 h, and in the last two hours, fluorescent 1–42 β-amyloid (green) was added prior to fixation, mounting, and visualization. Control cells were pre-incubated with 20 µM of cytochalasin D (CytD) for 20 min and was present throughout phagocytosis. (A) Representative images of untreated (HIV Untx), HIV ART, HIV, Meth, and HIV Meth + ART with HIV DMSO and HIV CytD as controls. HIV DMSO and HIV CytD cells were counterstained with Alexa 594 conjugated phalloidin (red). (B) Fold change in median accumulation of amyloid-β per cell during phagocytosis, with HIV Untx set to 1.0 in each experiment. (C,D) Differentially expressed proteins detected by mass spectrometry related to phagocytic substrate recognition, engulfment, and signaling, HIV Untx is in white bars and HIV Meth is in red bars. n = 4–8 with 50–75 cells counted per treatment in each microscopy experiment ** p < 0.01 one-sample t test, # p < 0.05 ## p < 0.01 paired t test. Scale bar is 15 µm. Error bars represent SEM for (B) and SD for (C,D).
Biomedicines 10 01257 g002
Figure 3. Total reactive oxygen species (ROS) in HIV-infected MDM were detected by a fluorometric plate reader assay. CM-H2DCFDA dye in culture media was added for 1 h followed by incubation in PBS, 30 µM of CCCP, or 5 mM of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) for 1 h, followed by detection of fluorescence by fluorometry. (A) ROS levels at baseline without stimulation with untreated cells (Untx) set to 1.0 in each experiment. (B) ROS levels in cells stimulated with CCCP for 1 h with CCCP alone set to 1.0 in each experiment. (C,D) Differentially expressed proteins detected by mass spectrometry related to mitochondrial function and cellular redox metabolism, HIV Untx in white bars and HIV Meth in red bars. n = 4–8; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001, one-sample t test or Wilcoxon signed rank test. && p < 0.01, &&& p < 0.001 Meth + ART compared to ART alone by one-way ANOVA. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 paired t test. Error bars represent SEM for ROS data and SD for proteomics data.
Figure 3. Total reactive oxygen species (ROS) in HIV-infected MDM were detected by a fluorometric plate reader assay. CM-H2DCFDA dye in culture media was added for 1 h followed by incubation in PBS, 30 µM of CCCP, or 5 mM of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) for 1 h, followed by detection of fluorescence by fluorometry. (A) ROS levels at baseline without stimulation with untreated cells (Untx) set to 1.0 in each experiment. (B) ROS levels in cells stimulated with CCCP for 1 h with CCCP alone set to 1.0 in each experiment. (C,D) Differentially expressed proteins detected by mass spectrometry related to mitochondrial function and cellular redox metabolism, HIV Untx in white bars and HIV Meth in red bars. n = 4–8; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001, one-sample t test or Wilcoxon signed rank test. && p < 0.01, &&& p < 0.001 Meth + ART compared to ART alone by one-way ANOVA. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 paired t test. Error bars represent SEM for ROS data and SD for proteomics data.
Biomedicines 10 01257 g003
Figure 4. Pathway analyses and interactomes by proteomics in meth-treated HIV-infected macrophages. (A) Significantly enriched proteins with fold change of either <0.8 or >0.2 and p < 0.1 were analyzed for pathway analysis using KEGG software. (B) Significantly enriched proteins with fold change of either <0.8 or >0.2 and p < 0.1 were analyzed for protein–protein interactions using the STRING database and highlighted according to matching processes.
Figure 4. Pathway analyses and interactomes by proteomics in meth-treated HIV-infected macrophages. (A) Significantly enriched proteins with fold change of either <0.8 or >0.2 and p < 0.1 were analyzed for pathway analysis using KEGG software. (B) Significantly enriched proteins with fold change of either <0.8 or >0.2 and p < 0.1 were analyzed for protein–protein interactions using the STRING database and highlighted according to matching processes.
Biomedicines 10 01257 g004
Figure 5. Normalized LC3II and p62 levels, LC3II or p62 flux, LC3II or p62 net flux, and SQSTM1 transcription in HIV-infected macrophages. PBMC were cultured into MDM, infected with HIV-ADA as described, and left untreated (HIV Untx) or treated with meth and/or ART for 24 h. NH4Cl and leupeptin (N + L) were added directly to indicated cultures in the last 4 h. (A) HIV p24 values in pg/mL from supernatants in five experiments, including the untreated control (HIV Untx). (B) Representative Western blot for LC3I and LC3II. (C) LC3II levels normalized to total protein content and then to HIV Untx control set to 1.0 in each experiment. (D) LC3II flux calculated using LC3II values with HIV Untx set to 1.0. (E) LC3II net flux calculated using LC3II values with HIV Untx set to 1.0. (F) Representative Western blot for p62. (G) p62 levels normalized to HIV Untx set to 1.0 in each experiment. (H) p62 flux calculated using p62 values with HIV Untx set to 1.0. (I) p62 net flux calculated using p62 values with HIV Untx set to 1.0. (J) RT-qPCR for SQSTM1 in HIV-infected MDM untreated or treated with meth for 6 h or 24 h. n = 3–10; * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001, one-sample t test. Error bars for (A) represent SD, all others represent SEM.
Figure 5. Normalized LC3II and p62 levels, LC3II or p62 flux, LC3II or p62 net flux, and SQSTM1 transcription in HIV-infected macrophages. PBMC were cultured into MDM, infected with HIV-ADA as described, and left untreated (HIV Untx) or treated with meth and/or ART for 24 h. NH4Cl and leupeptin (N + L) were added directly to indicated cultures in the last 4 h. (A) HIV p24 values in pg/mL from supernatants in five experiments, including the untreated control (HIV Untx). (B) Representative Western blot for LC3I and LC3II. (C) LC3II levels normalized to total protein content and then to HIV Untx control set to 1.0 in each experiment. (D) LC3II flux calculated using LC3II values with HIV Untx set to 1.0. (E) LC3II net flux calculated using LC3II values with HIV Untx set to 1.0. (F) Representative Western blot for p62. (G) p62 levels normalized to HIV Untx set to 1.0 in each experiment. (H) p62 flux calculated using p62 values with HIV Untx set to 1.0. (I) p62 net flux calculated using p62 values with HIV Untx set to 1.0. (J) RT-qPCR for SQSTM1 in HIV-infected MDM untreated or treated with meth for 6 h or 24 h. n = 3–10; * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001, one-sample t test. Error bars for (A) represent SD, all others represent SEM.
Biomedicines 10 01257 g005
Figure 6. Confocal immunofluorescence studies of autophagosomes (LC3) and mitochondria (TOM20) in HIV-infected macrophages untreated (HIV Untx) or treated with meth for 24 h and N + L added in the last 4 h of treatment for indicated conditions. (A) Representative images of LC3 puncta (green), mitochondria (TOM20, red), and nuclei (DAPI, blue) and corresponding rabbit and mouse IgG controls. (B) Number of LC3 puncta per cell in a Z-series was quantified in Volocity according to the Section 2. (C) Total amount of TOM20 staining was quantified per cell. (D) Number of LC3 puncta positive for TOM20, mitophagosomes (yellow puncta), per cell were quantified in a Z-series. (E) Number of mitophagosomes in (D) was used to quantify mitophagic flux with and without meth treatment. n = 4 with 50–75 cells analyzed per condition per experiment; * p < 0.05, paired t test. Scale bar is 15 µm. Error bars represent SEM.
Figure 6. Confocal immunofluorescence studies of autophagosomes (LC3) and mitochondria (TOM20) in HIV-infected macrophages untreated (HIV Untx) or treated with meth for 24 h and N + L added in the last 4 h of treatment for indicated conditions. (A) Representative images of LC3 puncta (green), mitochondria (TOM20, red), and nuclei (DAPI, blue) and corresponding rabbit and mouse IgG controls. (B) Number of LC3 puncta per cell in a Z-series was quantified in Volocity according to the Section 2. (C) Total amount of TOM20 staining was quantified per cell. (D) Number of LC3 puncta positive for TOM20, mitophagosomes (yellow puncta), per cell were quantified in a Z-series. (E) Number of mitophagosomes in (D) was used to quantify mitophagic flux with and without meth treatment. n = 4 with 50–75 cells analyzed per condition per experiment; * p < 0.05, paired t test. Scale bar is 15 µm. Error bars represent SEM.
Biomedicines 10 01257 g006
Figure 7. Meth-mediated upregulation of ROS is increased when lysosomal degradation is inhibited but not when autophagy is induced. (A) A total of 200 µM of leupeptin, which inhibits autophagic flux, was added in the last 4 h of 24 h treatment, and ROS were detected by fluorometry as described. (B) Same experiments as in (A) with CCCP alone as the untreated control. (C) Western blotting for LC3 and p62 in HIV-infected MDM treated with 500 nM of Torin 2, an mTOR inhibitor, for 3 h, demonstrating increased LC3II flux and decreased p62 levels. (D) A total of 500 nM of Torin 2, which induces autophagy, was added in the last 3 h of 24 h treatment, and ROS were detected by fluorometry as described. (E) Same experiments as in (D) with CCCP alone as the untreated control. n = 4, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 meth or Torin 2 alone compared to untreated by one-way ANOVA;  p < 0.05 meth compared to meth + leupeptin by one-way ANOVA. Error bars represent SEM.
Figure 7. Meth-mediated upregulation of ROS is increased when lysosomal degradation is inhibited but not when autophagy is induced. (A) A total of 200 µM of leupeptin, which inhibits autophagic flux, was added in the last 4 h of 24 h treatment, and ROS were detected by fluorometry as described. (B) Same experiments as in (A) with CCCP alone as the untreated control. (C) Western blotting for LC3 and p62 in HIV-infected MDM treated with 500 nM of Torin 2, an mTOR inhibitor, for 3 h, demonstrating increased LC3II flux and decreased p62 levels. (D) A total of 500 nM of Torin 2, which induces autophagy, was added in the last 3 h of 24 h treatment, and ROS were detected by fluorometry as described. (E) Same experiments as in (D) with CCCP alone as the untreated control. n = 4, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 meth or Torin 2 alone compared to untreated by one-way ANOVA;  p < 0.05 meth compared to meth + leupeptin by one-way ANOVA. Error bars represent SEM.
Biomedicines 10 01257 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barbaro, J.M.; Sidoli, S.; Cuervo, A.M.; Berman, J.W. Methamphetamine Dysregulates Macrophage Functions and Autophagy to Mediate HIV Neuropathogenesis. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061257

AMA Style

Barbaro JM, Sidoli S, Cuervo AM, Berman JW. Methamphetamine Dysregulates Macrophage Functions and Autophagy to Mediate HIV Neuropathogenesis. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(6):1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061257

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barbaro, John M., Simone Sidoli, Ana Maria Cuervo, and Joan W. Berman. 2022. "Methamphetamine Dysregulates Macrophage Functions and Autophagy to Mediate HIV Neuropathogenesis" Biomedicines 10, no. 6: 1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061257

APA Style

Barbaro, J. M., Sidoli, S., Cuervo, A. M., & Berman, J. W. (2022). Methamphetamine Dysregulates Macrophage Functions and Autophagy to Mediate HIV Neuropathogenesis. Biomedicines, 10(6), 1257. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061257

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop