Next Article in Journal
Risk of Dementia after Exposure to Contrast Media: A Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Cellular Mechanisms of Coronary Artery Spasm
Previous Article in Journal
TMT-Based Proteomic Analysis of Human Spermatozoa from Unexplained Recurrent Miscarriage Patients before and after Oral Antioxidant Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pathophysiology of Cardiovascular Diseases: New Insights into Molecular Mechanisms of Atherosclerosis, Arterial Hypertension, and Coronary Artery Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Suppression of Cardiogenic Edema with Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Mechanisms and Insights from Pre-Clinical Studies

Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine–Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(8), 2016; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10082016
Submission received: 4 August 2022 / Revised: 16 August 2022 / Accepted: 17 August 2022 / Published: 19 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cellular Mechanisms of Cardiovascular Disease)

Abstract

:
In heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), cardiogenic edema develops from impaired cardiac function, pathological remodeling, chronic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, neurohormonal activation, and altered nitric oxide-related pathways. Pre-clinical HFrEF studies have shown that treatment with sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) stimulates natriuretic and osmotic/diuretic effects, improves overall cardiac function, attenuates maladaptive cardiac remodeling, and reduces chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction. Here, we review the mechanisms and effects of SGLT-2i therapy on cardiogenic edema in various models of HFrEF. Overall, the data presented suggest a high translational importance of these studies, and pre-clinical studies show that SGLT-2i therapy has a marked effect on suppressing the progression of HFrEF through multiple mechanisms, including those that affect the development of cardiogenic edema.

1. Introduction

Heart failure (HF) affects about 64.3 million people worldwide [1], including an estimated 6.2 million in the United States [2]. The prevalence of symptomatic HF is expected to increase 46% by 2030, in comparison to 2012 [3]. HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is characterized by progressive heart enlargement and declining contraction that leads to clinical symptoms (breathlessness, fatigue, swelling, etc.) from pathological fluid and sodium retention (edema) [4,5]. Sodium retention and the dysregulation of neurohumoral systems, including the sympathetic nervous system, renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), and the natriuretic peptide (NP) system, lead to excessive extracellular fluid accumulation in the interstitial space or edema (pulmonary, pleural effusion, ascites and/or gross/systemic peripheral fluid retention), which are hallmarks of symptomatic HF [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Symptomatic HF adversely impacts quality of life, is the primary cause of patient hospitalization, and is associated with premature mortality [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. The prognostic role of edema is confirmed by clinical trials and post hoc analysis [13,19,21,22,23]. Maintaining physiologically relative fluid homeostasis is one of the primary goals of HF management [17,24].
During the last decade, significant progress has been made in the management of HFrEF with clearly defined, guideline-directed therapies [5,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Pharmaco-therapeutic interventions for HFrEF include modulating the neurohumoral response by targeting RAAS with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor blockers; the sympathetic nervous system with beta-blockers; the mineralocorticoid system with mineralocorticoid receptor blockers (MRBs); and both RAAS and NP systems with combined Ang II receptor–neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI). However, better pharmacological interventions for reversing or preventing cardiogenic edema are needed. Early treatment at the pre-clinical stages may prevent HF progression to symptomatic stages with or without decompensation and improve outcomes. Most recently, the US Food and Drug Administration approved a new class of drug for the management of HF with reduced, mid-range or preserved ejection fraction called sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i, originally developed as glucose-lowering agents), including canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and ertugliflozin [32,33]. In patients with HFrEF, SGLT-2i-based therapies enhance natriuresis/diuresis, modulate neurohumoral activation, improve cardiac and renal functions, functional status, duration, and quality of life [34]. These agents reduce HF-related hospitalization rates that are due to the aggravation of HF signs and symptoms caused by edema, independent from the reduction in glycemic level and the co-administration of guideline-directed HF therapy [34].
In HF, the retention of sodium and water by the kidneys leads to an expansion of free fluid in the interstitial compartments or edema. The expansion of the interstitial fluid volume is aggravated by vascular leakage caused by inflammation and endothelial dysfunction [35,36] and is associated with impaired extra fluid removal from the interstitial to intravascular space, which is in part caused by pathological alteration in the capillary dynamics and lymphatic system [24,37,38,39]. Fluid accumulation in the lungs manifests as cardiogenic pulmonary edema, while peripheral interstitial fluid overload manifests as soft tissue or third space edema. In contrast to classical diuretics, which affect blood plasma volume, SGLT-2i efficiently lowers edema by reducing pathological HF-related sodium retention and intestinal fluid volume [34,40,41,42,43]. Treatment with SGLT-2i also reduces the plasma level of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) as an indicator of HF-associated reduced edema [44]. SGLT-2i receptor SGLT-2 is not expressed by cardiac tissue [45], excluding direct action of this class of drug on the heart. Therefore, the molecular and pathophysiological mechanisms of action of SGLT-2i in HFrEF remain inconclusive, although many intriguing hypotheses and mechanisms of action have been proposed [46,47,48,49].
This review aims to summarize the current evidence from pre-clinical translational studies, providing mechanistic experimental support for SGLT-2i action targeting the normalization of sodium–water homeostasis and the attenuation or prevention of edema signs and symptoms in HFrEF.

2. Contribution of Neurohumoral Activation, Cardiorenal Dysfunction and Cardiac Remodeling to Edema in HFrEF

Regardless of the etiology causing ventricular dysfunction, the ensuing compensatory mechanisms that occur in response to decreased cardiac output will be the same. Decreased cardiac output leads to a reduction in the intra-arterial effective circulating volume [24]. Subsequent sympathetic nervous system activation leads to an increase in heart rate and peripheral vasoconstriction. Concurrent RAAS activation and decreased renal perfusion lead to a reduction in sodium and water excretion from the kidneys [26,50]. Increased adrenergic tone and (Ang II)-induced vasoconstriction cause cardiac pressure overload. Increased intra-cardiac filling pressure leads to a backup of fluid in the pulmonary vasculature and the development of pulmonary congestion symptoms [9]. Increased water and sodium retention leads to intravascular blood volume expansion as well as interstitial fluid accumulation (extracellular water). Increased blood volume leads to increased central filling pressures and contributes to the development of peripheral congestion symptoms [9,24]. Edema directly increases pre-load as a feedback mechanism, contributing to left ventricular wall stress, cardiac remodeling and overall further decline in cardiac function [17].
During the asymptomatic stage of ventricular dysfunction (at risk for HF or at pre-HF stage [5]), the effects of elevated intra-cardiac filling pressures are mitigated by structural ventricular remodeling and the compensatory interdependent activation of neurohumoral systems. Thus, the early activation of the sympathetic nervous system and RAAS initially may help to maintain cardiac output and systemic perfusion. This compensatory response prevents the development of clinically evident signs or symptoms associated with the dysregulation of sodium–water homeostasis. As systolic dysfunction progresses, increased volume within the ventricles leads to an alteration in ventricular architecture, including myocyte hypertrophy/dilation, myocyte apoptosis, myofibroblast proliferation, and interstitial fibrosis [51]. Decreased forward flow as a result of decreased contractility leads to pathological neurohumoral activation, and the increased production of pro-atrial (ANP) and pro-B-type (BNP) natriuretic peptides by atria and ventricles as a compensatory mechanism. However, as HFrEF progresses, the NP system becomes impaired [52,53,54] and unbalanced persistent neurohumoral activation eventually becomes maladaptive and contributes to extracellular fluid retention or edema via vascular exchange to the interstitial space [26,41,50,55,56,57].

3. Evidence Supporting Edema Attenuation by SGLT-2i in Pre-Clinical HF Models

SGLT-2i inhibits renal sodium reabsorption and increases the urinary excretion of sodium, which may attenuate symptomatic HFrEF by reducing pulmonary and systemic edema and/or preventing edema formation [34]. Pre-clinical studies in animal models of HFrEF have shown that, in addition to natriuretic and osmotic/diuretic effects, treatment with SGLT-2i positively modulates edema-related plasma biomarkers and physiological outcomes contributing to edema modulation. Thus, SGLT-2i improves cardiac output and attenuates maladaptive cardiac remodeling, chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction (ED) by restoring the activity of nitric oxide (NO) within the vascular endothelium. The ability of SGLT-2i to attenuate inflammation and ED strongly suggests that SGLT-2i may help prevent fluid leakage from the vascular compartment to the interstitial space and prevent edema development. Despite the fact that the direct action of SGLT-2i on cardiac tissue is unlikely since SGLT-2 protein is not expressed in the heart, the combined impact of anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative stress, and anti-ED effects of SGLT-2i may improve ventricular and global cardiac output, reduce fibrosis, suppress edema, and overall, attenuate HF progression.

3.1. Impact of SGLT-2i on Neurohumoral Activation toward Edema Restraining in HFrEF

SGLT-2i might retard HF-associated chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system and RAAS, which stimulates salt and water retention by the kidneys and crucially contributes to pulmonary and systemic edema formation [26,58,59].
Experimental data related to the association between SGLT-2i treatment and RAAS modulation are limited to translational models of type 2 diabetes mellitus [60]. Overstimulation of the sympathetic nervous system in HFrEF is associated with elevated levels of norepinephrine in circulation [59]. Neurohormonal activation was attenuated in a group of non-diabetic pigs with post-MI HFrEF treated with empagliflozin, as demonstrated by reduced plasma levels of norepinephrine catabolites in comparison with the control experimental group [61]. Persistent sympathetic activation causes tachycardia [62]. In contrast to diuretics that elevate resting heart rate, SGLT-2i treatment is not associated with heart rate elevation [49] and may even reduce it [63], therefore suppressing pathologically elevated sympathetic activity. A trial in patients with HFrEF is warranted to align this mechanism with SGLT-2i outcomes in the clinic.

3.2. SGLT-2i Positively Affect Natriuretic Peptide System, Diuresis/Natriuresis, HF Signs, and Edema-Associated HF Plasma Biomarkers

The natriuretic peptide system plays a central role in natriuresis, diuresis, and vasodilatation, and balances the outcomes of the sympathetic nervous system and RAAS; however, in symptomatic HFrEF, its physiologic activity is impaired [52,54,64,65]. The associations between plasma BNP/NT-pro-BNP levels and edema were incorporated into the Universal Definition of Heart Failure [5]. In pre-clinical models of HFrEF, elevated plasma and cardiac pro-BNP/BNP (and pro-ANP/NT-pro-ANP) levels were strongly associated with extracellular fluid accumulation and clinically relevant edema manifestation as pleural effusion and pulmonary edema [53,56,66,67,68,69].
In a spontaneous hypertensive rat (SHR) HF model, treatment with empagliflozin reduced expression levels of ANP/BNP and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) in the ventricular tissue that were upregulated by HF [70]. In a zebrafish model of HF (induced by aristolochic acid), treatment with empagliflozin (0.1%, 10 µg) dampened the expression of ANP/BNP and downregulated related signaling pathways [66]. In an obese rat model of spontaneous hypertensive HF, empagliflozin treatment (925 mg/kg body weight by oral gavage for 6 months) decreased hepatic congestion [71]. In a post-myocardial infarction (MI) rat model of HFrEF, empagliflozin treatment increased urinary sodium excretion associated with a substantial reduction in body weight [72]. Utilizing a TAC-induced mouse HFrEF model, the beneficial effects of empagliflozin treatment on cardiac function were not dependent on natriuresis since the diuretic effect of SGLT-2i was not associated with any significant changes in electrolyte balance (blood or urine Na+ and K+ concentrations). ANP/BNP levels were not provided in this study [73].

3.3. SGLT-2i May Depress Edema by Improving Cardiac Function

Left ventricular function is an important indicator of HFrEF progression [1]. Reduced cardiac output stimulates chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system and RAAS and promotes edema. The impact of SGLT-2i on systolic and diastolic function has been evaluated in rat, mouse and pig translational models of HFrEF. Several studies have investigated cardiac function outcomes in post-MI HFrEF models of left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery ligation. In an ischemic reperfusion (IR) model of pre-diabetic obese insulin-resistant Wistar rats on a high-fat diet, dapagliflozin improved LVEF [74]. In a post-MI HFrEF model: (1) empagliflozin treatment increased LVEF [72], improved contractility, stroke volume, and end-systolic blood pressure despite diuresis, and improved diastolic function (reduction in LV end-diastolic pressure) [75]; canagliflozin IR model treatment alleviated left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic dysfunction, which may be explained by the increased phosphorylation of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase, eNOS, and subsequent vasodilation [76]; (2) in non-diabetic mice, dapagliflozin treatment improved LV systolic function and LV mass [77]. In an MI porcine model, empagliflozin treatment improved LV systolic function [61] and ameliorated diastolic dysfunction [78]. In a model of cardiomyopathy induced by Ang II infusion in diabetic mice, dapagliflozin treatment increased LV fractional shortening [79]. In a genetic rat model of HFrEF (inducible diabetes and hypertensive HF), treatment with empagliflozin increased EF [80]. In a mouse model of doxorubicin (DOX)-induced cardiomyopathy, treatment with empagliflozin ameliorated LV dysfunction [81]. In a mouse model of cardiac pressure overload (by transverse aortic constriction (TAC)), the treatment of empagliflozin attenuated LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction, perhaps by increasing glucose and fatty acid oxidation [82]. Treatment with empagliflozin blunted the decline in cardiac function in a mouse model of TAC-induced HFrEF [73]. In a hypertensive HF model (spontaneous hypertensive rats fed a high fat diet for 32 weeks), treatment with empagliflozin normalized end-systolic and end-diastolic volume, but LV ejection fraction was not significantly improved [70]. Through the various species and models presented, SGLT-2i—at a minimum—maintains, but in most cases shows an overwhelming objective improvement in, cardiac function. Overall outcomes of SGLT-2i in translational models of HFrEF are summarized in Table 1.

3.4. SGLT-2i May Block Edema by Reducing Cardiac Remodeling

Pathological cardiac remodeling contributes to the development of edema and the progression of HF [5,51]. Beneficial effects of SGLT-2i treatment were demonstrated on inducible rat and mouse models of HFrEF (Table 1). In a hypertensive HF model (spontaneous hypertensive rats on a high-fat diet for 32 weeks), the treatment of empagliflozin significantly attenuated cardiac fibrosis in atrial and ventricular tissues [70]. Empagliflozin treatment attenuated adverse LV remodeling in post-MI HFrEF in pigs [61] and reduced interstitial cardiac fibrosis in pigs HFrEF induced by 2 h balloon occlusion of the proximal left anterior descending artery [78], which was associated with reduced extracellular volume [78]. In a rat post-MI model of HFrEF, empagliflozin treatment attenuated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and fibrosis [72], but did not show any improvement in interstitial fibrosis or cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in another study [75]. In a mouse post-MI HFrEF model: empagliflozin treatment improved cardiac remodeling by the inhibition of apoptosis, alleviated oxidative stress, restored mitochondrial membrane potential, and activated AMPK signaling [83]; dapagliflozin treatment inhibited cardiac apoptosis and reduced LV mass, the expression of cardiac collagen 1/3, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) transcripts of cardiac fibrosis histological staining [77]. Treatment with empagliflozin (10 mg/kg/day) administered 3 weeks before MI improved cardiac remodeling and ameliorated fibrosis and hypertrophy post-MI in both diabetic and non-diabetic rats. This is possibly due to the increase in the myocardial expression of cardiac guanosine-5′-triphosphate enzyme cyclohydrase 1 (cGCH1), which activates neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and inhibits inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) [84]. In a mouse model of DOX-induced cardiomyopathy, treatment with empagliflozin (dosage not provided) lowered myocardial fibrosis [81]. In a rat model of cardiomyopathy (salt-sensitive hypertensive rats fed a high-salt/high-fat diet) treatment with tofogliflozin (0.005% for 9 weeks) reduced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, perivascular fibrosis and associated fibrosis genes (ANP, BNP and interleukin 6) [87]. In an Ang II-induced model of cardiomyopathy in diabetic mice, dapagliflozin treatment attenuated fibrosis [70]. Overall, SGLT-2i reduce cardiac remodeling pathology, help to maintain a healthy cardiac tissue architecture, and prevent diastolic dysfunction, thus preventing HF progression and edema development.

3.5. Impact of SGLT-2i on Cardiorenal Function Leading to Edema Suppression

Cardiac and renal function are highly interdependent and modulate sodium and water retention. Increased sodium retention by the kidneys leads to intravascular blood volume expansion, as well as interstitial fluid accumulation (extracellular water). SGLT-2i may restrict excessive sodium and water retention in the interstitial space of the kidney parenchyma and reduce edema formation in HFrEF [88]. In a rat chronic kidney disease model caused by 5/6 subtotal nephrectomy and DOX-induced dilated cardiomyopathy, empagliflozin treatment (20 mg/kg/day for 60 days) was associated with a lower kidney injury score, decreased myocardial fibrosis, inhibited LV remodeling, and decreased BNP protein level in LV (an indicator of HF/pressure overload). This may be explained by empagliflozin treatment causing downregulated autophagy, apoptosis, reduced markers of oxidative stress (NADPH oxidase, NOX-1, NOX-2) in renal tubular cells, decreased markers of DNA damage (phosphorylated histone H2AX) and mitochondrial damage (cytosolic cytochrome C), and increasing indicators of mitochondrial integrity (mitochondrial cytochrome C) [89].

3.6. SGLT-2i Block Activation of Sodium–Hydrogen Exchangers in the Heart and Kidneys That Contribute to the Clinical Progression of HFrEF Associated with Edema

SGLT-2i may slow edema development and HF progression by blocking the activity of sodium–hydrogen exchangers (NHE) expressed in the myocardium (NHE-1 isoform) and in the proximal convoluted tubule of kidneys (NHE-3 isoform) [90], as well as the activity of the late component of the cardiac sodium channel current in cardiomyocytes [91]. NHE-1 regulates cardiomyocyte pH and volume. NHE-3 is responsible for the reabsorption of approximately 70% of filtered sodium [90]. In HFrEF, chronic neurohumoral activation stimulates the activation of cardiac NHE-1 and renal NHE-3, leading to enhanced sodium retention that contributes to the physiological and clinical progression of HFrEF associated with fluid retention (edema) and increased sodium influx and intracellular calcium linked to cardiac hypertrophy, cell injury and fibrosis [90,92,93].
Excess intracellular calcium within cardiac myocytes also increases arrhythmogenicity due to increased cytosolic calcium during the relaxation phase of the cardiac cycle. The inhibition of NHE-1 activity with cariporide in animal models of HF adequately restored sodium and calcium handling, caused the regression of ventricular hypertrophy, and improved several markers of electrophysiological remodeling such as reduced QT and QRS intervals [94]. SGLT-2i antagonizes the effects of NHE in the heart and kidneys. An in silico analysis of the mechanism of action of empagliflozin showed that it binds to and inhibits the downstream signaling effects of NHE activation. The NHE blockade prevents cardiomyocyte death by increasing the expression of apoptotic inhibitors in cardiomyocytes. These findings were validated by an in vivo HF rat model, which showed that treatment with empagliflozin led to an increased expression of anti-apoptotic proteins and slowed HF progression [95]. However, several studies do not support empagliflozin as a potent inhibitor of NHE-1 in the healthy heart [96,97].

3.7. SGLT-2i May Restrain Edema by Suppressing Chronic Inflammation and ROS

Chronic inflammation and oxidative stress promote maladaptive systolic dysfunction, cardiac remodeling, and pulmonary/systemic edema, and therefore are hallmarks of HFrEF pathophysiology [36,98,99,100]. Treatment with SGLT-2i decreased inflammation and/or the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in inducible and genetic rat/mouse models of HFrEF. Empagliflozin treatment attenuated oxidative stress [72], and dapagliflozin treatment lowered cardiac transcripts of inflammatory cytokines (TNFα, TGF-β1, Vcam-1, MCP-1, Icam-1, IL-6) [77] in mouse/rat MI models. Incardiac dysfunction mouse models induced by administering lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 5 mg/kg) co-administration of empagliflozin preserved cardiac function possibly by improved AMPK phosphorylation and ATP/ADP, as well as reduced cardiac iNOS, plasma TNFα, and creatine kinase MB (isoenzyme, found mostly in cardiac and some skeletal muscles) levels [86]. In a model of cardiomyopathy by Ang II infusion in diabetic mice, dapagliflozin decreased inflammation and ROS production [70]. In a genetic rat model of HFrEF (inducible diabetes and hypertensive HF), treatment with empagliflozin decreased the infiltration of macrophages [80]. In a mouse TAC-induced model of HFrEF, empagliflozin decreased the expression of markers of sterile cardiac inflammation, possibly by attenuating the activity of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome; this occurred in the absence of changes to ketone bodies or cardiac ATP use [73]. SGLT-2i therapy clearly attenuates cardiac inflammation and ROS associated with HFrEF.

3.8. SGLT-2i May Prevent Vascular Leakage and Edema by Improvement of Endothelial Dysfunction

The endothelium is a semi-permeable barrier that plays a crucial role in tissue fluid hemostasis by the tight control of fluid exchange from the vascular compartment to the interstitial space [101]. The proper function of the vascular endothelium is vital for preventing the inadvertent extravasation of fluid into surrounding tissues or edema. Clinical and translational HF is associated with a significant impairment of endothelium-dependent vasodilation (endothelial dysfunction (ED)), which is mediated almost entirely by the excess formation of superoxide radicals and other oxidant species that interfere with the activation of nitric oxide (NO) and the bioavailability of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) [35,69,102]. Thus, in chronic HF, increased oxidative stress and the dysregulation of NO pathways lead to coronary/peripheral arteries and/or lung ED, which contribute to HF decompensation (NYHA class IV, pulmonary edema) and are associated with hospitalization and heart transplantation [103,104,105].
In HFrEF, treatment with SGLT-2i may prevent vascular leakage leading to edema by the prevention or improvement of ED. The impact of SGLT-2i on attenuating ED by restoring the activity of NO within the vascular endothelium in pre-clinical and clinical studies has been comprehensively overviewed [106,107,108,109]. Several pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that one of the off-target effects of SGLT-2i may involve a reduction in ED [106,107]. These pre-clinical studies were predominantly conducted on models of diabetes, since ED is known to be a major mediator of diabetic vascular disease. In a porcine model of HFrEF induced by 2 h balloon occlusion of proximal LAD artery, treatment with empagliflozin increased the activity of eNOS and NO production and the bioavailability associated with the activation of the cGMP–PKG axis [78]. Ex vivo studies have demonstrated that SGTL-2i may directly induce vasodilation by several mechanisms, including the modulation of cell adhesion molecules, the attenuation of inflammation, and reduced oxidative stress [106]. Treatment with empagliflozin was associated with a significant improvement in endothelial-dependent vasodilation in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) rat models [107]. Empagliflozin has been found to improve the enzymatic activity of eNOS, a key enzyme in the production of the one of the most important mediators of vasodilation, NO, in STZ-induced diabetic rats [107]. Thus, SGLT-2i may exert its vasodilatory effects by restoring the activity of NO within the vascular endothelium. Another possible mechanism by which SGLT-2i carriy out their vasorelaxant effect is by inhibiting glucose-mediated membrane depolarization [110]. One study found that canagliflozin and phlorizin induced membrane hyperpolarization in pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. This finding was attributed to the activation of potassium channels in the plasma membrane of these cells by NO [110]. Empagliflozin restored the beneficial effect of cardiac microvascular endothelial cells on cardiomyocyte function in a co-culture system of human cardiac microvascular endothelial cells with adult rat ventricular cardiomyocytes by reducing mitochondrial oxidative damage and, ROS accumulation, and increasing the bioavailability of endothelial NO [109]. Still, an investigation of SGLT-2i treatment outcomes on pre-clinical model(s) of DCM-HFrEF characterized by impaired NO-cGMP bioavailability and cardiac eNOS production [69] is warranted.

3.9. Alteration of Cardiac Metabolism and Energy Utilization by SGLT-2i Improves Cardiac Structure and Function, Which May Contribute to Edema Reduction

As noted in earlier sections, the effects of SGLT-2i on cardiac tissue are largely indirect. However, cardiac metabolism is directly altered with the inclusion of SGTL-2i therapy. The failing heart is characterized by altered cardiac muscle contraction, increased oxygen demand, and high cellular turnover, resulting in an increased metabolic demand to support the pathologic condition which can manifest symptomatically as cardiac cachexia and sarcopenia [56,111]. By lowering circulating glucose levels, SGLT-2i shifts the cardiac metabolism to function under a fasting-like state (catabolic), with energy provided by gluconeogenesis and ketogenesis [112]. The energy-deficient state increases cardiac autophagy (cellular cleanup) by activating the SIRT1/PGC-1α/FGF21 pathway, thus reducing local inflammation, lowering oxidative stress, and removing dysfunctional cells that may otherwise contribute to myocardial remodeling as a consequence of cellular necrosis [112]. Ketone utilization produces more ATP than glucose or other metabolites [113], thus improving the energy supply for HFrEF. The increased availability of cardiac energetics with SGLT-2i therapy has been shown to improve cardiac structure and function in mice with and without T2DM [114,115]. These improvements should reduce cardiogenic-associated edema in HFrEF models treated with SGLT-2i therapy, though additional studies are needed to specifically investigate this correlation.

4. Limitations

Pathological RAAS overactivation and the impairment of the NP system significantly contributes to sodium retention and fluid accumulation in the interstitial space leading to edema. However, pre-clinical studies targeting the impact of SGLT-2i on these systems and overall neurohumoral activation are currently lacking. In HFrEF clinical and pre-clinical studies, treatment with SGLT-2i leads to an overall improvement of left ventricular function and the attenuation of cardiac remodeling, which are essential promoters and indicators of edema development and HF progression. Still, the direct mechanisms responsible for such beneficial action of SGLT-2i remain unclear, since cardiac tissue lacks the SGLT-2i receptor SGLT-2.
One major issue surrounding clinical and pre-clinical cardiogenic edema is the ability to detect early changes in excess fluid during the transition from the pre-symptomatic to the symptomatic phase of HF. Current diagnostic imaging modalities include echocardiography, MRI, CT, and thoracic radiography, though they often require specialized training for image collection and analysis. Quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) has been introduced as an objective and longitudinal method for diagnosing and monitoring systemic cardiogenic edema in animal models [56,67,69,116,117], which may offer a refined method for monitoring edema therapeutic response throughout all phases of HF.
The locomotive and anatomical differences between human and animal models (mice, rats, pigs) used should also be considered. Upright (bipedal) versus horizontal (quadrupedal) orientation may have translational differences for the effects of edema development, manifestation, and clearance. Known differences include: pedal edema (humans), which is less commonly observed in the forelimbs of animals exhibiting HF due to changes in subcutaneous space [118]; the alteration of fluid lines and pulmonary patterns in thorax imaging due to gravity-dependence [119]; and evolutionary changes in baroreceptor sites and function throughout mammalian species [120]. Additional considerations for managing hospitalized HF patient positioning (horizontal recumbent, supine) when undergoing treatment and care for cardiogenic edema should be examined, as unanesthetized HF animal models rarely adopt this orientation. Newer studies suggest proning edema patients, and thus placing them in a more animal-like posture [119,121] to improve outcomes.
SGLT-2i is recommended in the outpatient setting for all patients with stable HFrEF conditions [122]. As with most pharmacological treatments, side effects and limitations for use have been reported from clinical trials and medical practice with SGLT-2i [123,124,125]. The most common clinical side effects might include fatigue, nausea, increased drinking, sudden urge to urinate, dry mouth, female urinary tract infections, hypotension, changes in blood pH, and, more rarely, acute renal pathology, bone fractures, and lower limb amputations. As a result of study design and inability to communicate directly with the patient, unfortunately, most pre-clinical studies are not able to account for all potential side effects prior to advancing to human administration.

5. Conclusions

Effective edema prevention and treatment are the primary goals of HF management and an unmet need to improve quality of life, reduce HF-related hospitalization rate, and prolong life. HFrEF pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that SGLT-2i treatment may attenuate edema formation through the stimulation of natriuretic and osmotic/diuretic effects, improvement in overall cardiac function, and the suppression of maladaptive cardiac remodeling, chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction (Figure 1). By repressing inflammation and endothelial dysfunction, SGLT-2i may prevent vascular leakage and edema development associated with extensive fluid accumulation in the interstitial space. In addition to its anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative stress, and anti-fibrotic effects, SGLT-2i improves ventricular and global cardiac output, suppresses edema, and slows the rate of HF progression, locally in terms of cardiac function, and systemically at the kidneys, which appear to be the primary site of action.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, I.P.G.; validation: R.D.S. and G.L.R.; investigation: R.D.S., M.E.M., M.H. and I.P.G.; writing—original draft preparation, R.D.S., M.E.M. and I.P.G.; writing—review and editing, R.D.S., G.L.R. and I.P.G.; formatting for publication, R.D.S.; supervision, I.P.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Supported by research funds from the University of Arizona, College of Medicine—Phoenix.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Groenewegen, A.; Rutten, F.H.; Mosterd, A.; Hoes, A.W. Epidemiology of Heart Failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2020, 22, 1342–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Virani, S.S.; Alonso, A.; Aparicio, H.J.; Benjamin, E.J.; Bittencourt, M.S.; Callaway, C.W.; Carson, A.P.; Chamberlain, A.M.; Cheng, S.; Delling, F.N.; et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2021, 143, e254–e743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Benjamin, E.J.; Muntner, P.; Alonso, A.; Bittencourt, M.S.; Callaway, C.W.; Carson, A.P.; Chamberlain, A.M.; Chang, A.R.; Cheng, S.; Das, S.R.; et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2019, 139, e56–e528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rosenbaum, A.N.; Agre, K.E.; Pereira, N.L. Genetics of Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Practical Implications for Heart Failure Management. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020, 17, 286–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bozkurt, B.; Coats, A.J.S.; Tsutsui, H.; Abdelhamid, C.M.; Adamopoulos, S.; Albert, N.; Anker, S.D.; Atherton, J.; Bohm, M.; Butler, J.; et al. Universal Definition and Classification of Heart Failure: A Report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure: Endorsed by the Canadian Heart Failure Society, Heart Failure Association of India, Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand, and Chinese Heart Failure Association. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2021, 23, 352–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dzau, V.J.; Colucci, W.S.; Hollenberg, N.K.; Williams, G.H. Relation of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System to Clinical State in Congestive Heart Failure. Circulation 1981, 63, 645–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Clark, A.L.; Cleland, J.G. Causes and Treatment of Oedema in Patients with Heart Failure. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2013, 10, 156–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yancy, C.W.; Jessup, M.; Bozkurt, B.; Butler, J.; Casey, D.E., Jr.; Drazner, M.H.; Fonarow, G.C.; Geraci, S.A.; Horwich, T.; Januzzi, J.L.; et al. 2013 Accf/Aha Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2013, 128, e240–e327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Parrinello, G.; Greene, S.J.; Torres, D.; Alderman, M.; Bonventre, J.V.; Di Pasquale, P.; Gargani, L.; Nohria, A.; Fonarow, G.C.; Vaduganathan, M.; et al. Water and Sodium in Heart Failure: A Spotlight on Congestion. Heart Fail. Rev. 2015, 20, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pellicori, P.; Kaur, K.; Clark, A.L. Fluid Management in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. Card. Fail. Rev. 2015, 1, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Melenovsky, V.; Andersen, M.J.; Andress, K.; Reddy, Y.N.; Borlaug, B.A. Lung Congestion in Chronic Heart Failure: Haemodynamic, Clinical, and Prognostic Implications. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2015, 17, 1161–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mentz, R.J.; Stevens, S.R.; DeVore, A.D.; Lala, A.; Vader, J.M.; AbouEzzeddine, O.F.; Khazanie, P.; Redfield, M.M.; Stevenson, L.W.; O’Connor, C.M.; et al. Decongestion Strategies and Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Activation in Acute Heart Failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2015, 3, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Metra, M.; O’Connor, C.M.; Davison, B.A.; Cleland, J.G.; Ponikowski, P.; Teerlink, J.R.; Voors, A.A.; Givertz, M.M.; Mansoor, G.A.; Bloomfield, D.M.; et al. Early Dyspnoea Relief in Acute Heart Failure: Prevalence, Association with Mortality, and Effect of Rolofylline in the Protect Study. Eur. Heart J. 2011, 32, 1519–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Aimo, A.; Vergaro, G.; Giannoni, A.; Emdin, M. Wet Is Bad: Residual Congestion Predicts Worse Prognosis in Acute Heart Failure. Int. J. Cardiol. 2018, 258, 201–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rubio-Gracia, J.; Demissei, B.G.; Ter Maaten, J.M.; Cleland, J.G.; O’Connor, C.M.; Metra, M.; Ponikowski, P.; Teerlink, J.R.; Cotter, G.; Davison, B.A.; et al. Prevalence, Predictors and Clinical Outcome of Residual Congestion in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure. Int. J. Cardiol. 2018, 258, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Palazzuoli, A.; Evangelista, I.; Nuti, R. Congestion Occurrence and Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure Scenario: Time to Reconsider Different Pathways of Volume Overload. Heart Fail. Rev. 2020, 25, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lombardi, C.M.; Cimino, G.; Pellicori, P.; Bonelli, A.; Inciardi, R.M.; Pagnesi, M.; Tomasoni, D.; Ravera, A.; Adamo, M.; Carubelli, V.; et al. Congestion in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure: Assessment and Treatment. Heart Fail. Clin. 2021, 17, 575–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Greene, S.J.; Fonarow, G.C.; Butler, J. Risk Profiles in Heart Failure: Baseline, Residual, Worsening, and Advanced Heart Failure Risk. Circ. Heart Fail. 2020, 13, e007132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ambrosy, A.P.; Vaduganathan, M.; Huffman, M.D.; Khan, S.; Kwasny, M.J.; Fought, A.J.; Maggioni, A.P.; Swedberg, K.; Konstam, M.A.; Zannad, F.; et al. Clinical Course and Predictive Value of Liver Function Tests in Patients Hospitalized for Worsening Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Analysis of the Everest Trial. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2012, 14, 302–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Boorsma, E.M.; Ter Maaten, J.M.; Damman, K.; Dinh, W.; Gustafsson, F.; Goldsmith, S.; Burkhoff, D.; Zannad, F.; Udelson, J.E.; Voors, A.A. Congestion in Heart Failure: A Contemporary Look at Physiology, Diagnosis and Treatment. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020, 17, 641–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gheorghiade, M.; Gattis, W.A.; O’Connor, C.M.; Adams, K.F., Jr.; Elkayam, U.; Barbagelata, A.; Ghali, J.K.; Benza, R.L.; McGrew, F.A.; Klapholz, M.; et al. Acute Chronic Therapeutic Impact of a Vasopressin Antagonist in Congestive Heart Failure, I. Effects of Tolvaptan, a Vasopressin Antagonist, in Patients Hospitalized with Worsening Heart Failure: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA 2004, 291, 1963–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lala, A.; McNulty, S.E.; Mentz, R.J.; Dunlay, S.M.; Vader, J.M.; AbouEzzeddine, O.F.; DeVore, A.D.; Khazanie, P.; Redfield, M.M.; Goldsmith, S.R.; et al. Relief and Recurrence of Congestion During and after Hospitalization for Acute Heart Failure: Insights from Diuretic Optimization Strategy Evaluation in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (Dose-Ahf) and Cardiorenal Rescue Study in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (Caress-Hf). Circ. Heart Fail. 2015, 8, 741–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Selvaraj, S.; Claggett, B.; Pozzi, A.; McMurray, J.J.V.; Jhund, P.S.; Packer, M.; Desai, A.S.; Lewis, E.F.; Vaduganathan, M.; Lefkowitz, M.P.; et al. Prognostic Implications of Congestion on Physical Examination among Contemporary Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: Paradigm-Hf. Circulation 2019, 140, 1369–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Miller, W.L. Fluid Volume Overload and Congestion in Heart Failure: Time to Reconsider Pathophysiology and How Volume Is Assessed. Circ. Heart Fail. 2016, 9, e002922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rossignol, P.; Hernandez, A.F.; Solomon, S.D.; Zannad, F. Heart Failure Drug Treatment. Lancet 2019, 393, 1034–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sullivan, R.D.; Mehta, R.M.; Tripathi, R.; Reed, G.L.; Gladysheva, I.P. Renin Activity in Heart Failure with Reduced Systolic Function-New Insights. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Murphy, S.P.; Ibrahim, N.E.; Januzzi, J.L., Jr. Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Review. JAMA 2020, 324, 488–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pellicori, P.; Khan, M.J.I.; Graham, F.J.; Cleland, J.G.F. New Perspectives and Future Directions in the Treatment of Heart Failure. Heart Fail. Rev. 2020, 25, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. McDonagh, T.A.; Metra, M.; Adamo, M.; Gardner, R.S.; Baumbach, A.; Bohm, M.; Burri, H.; Butler, J.; Celutkiene, J.; Chioncel, O.; et al. 2021 Esc Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 3599–3726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Espinoza, C.; Alkhateeb, H.; Siddiqui, T. Updates in Pharmacotherapy of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction. Ann. Transl. Med. 2021, 9, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Patel, N.H.; Bindra, A.S. Transitioning Hfref Patients on Ace Inhibitors to Modern Medical Therapy: What Is the Next Step? JACC Heart Fail. 2021, 9, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gupta, M.; Rao, S.; Manek, G.; Fonarow, G.C.; Ghosh, R.K. The Role of Dapagliflozin in the Management of Heart Failure: An Update on the Emerging Evidence. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2021, 17, 823–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Spertus, J.A.; Birmingham, M.C.; Nassif, M.; Damaraju, C.V.; Abbate, A.; Butler, J.; Lanfear, D.E.; Lingvay, I.; Kosiborod, M.N.; Januzzi, J.L. The Sglt2 Inhibitor Canagliflozin in Heart Failure: The Chief-Hf Remote, Patient-Centered Randomized Trial. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 809–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hernandez, M.; Sullivan, R.D.; McCune, M.E.; Reed, G.L.; Gladysheva, I.P. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Improve Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Outcomes by Reducing Edema and Congestion. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zuchi, C.; Tritto, I.; Carluccio, E.; Mattei, C.; Cattadori, G.; Ambrosio, G. Role of Endothelial Dysfunction in Heart Failure. Heart Fail. Rev. 2020, 25, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Murphy, S.P.; Kakkar, R.; McCarthy, C.P.; Januzzi, J.L., Jr. Inflammation in Heart Failure: Jacc State-of-the-Art Review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 75, 1324–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Guyton, A.C.; Granger, H.J.; Taylor, A.E. Interstitial Fluid Pressure. Physiol. Rev. 1971, 51, 527–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Itkin, M.; Rockson, S.G.; Burkhoff, D. Pathophysiology of the Lymphatic System in Patients with Heart Failure: Jacc State-of-the-Art Review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2021, 78, 278–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Aronson, D. The Interstitial Comartment as a Therapeutic Target in Heart Failure. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 933384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hallow, K.M.; Helmlinger, G.; Greasley, P.J.; McMurray, J.J.V.; Boulton, D.W. Why Do Sglt2 Inhibitors Reduce Heart Failure Hospitalization? A Differential Volume Regulation Hypothesis. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2018, 20, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yu, H.; Basu, S.; Hallow, K.M. Cardiac and Renal Function Interactions in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Mathematical Modeling Analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2020, 16, e1008074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Fujiki, S.; Tanaka, A.; Imai, T.; Shimabukuro, M.; Uehara, H.; Nakamura, I.; Matsunaga, K.; Suzuki, M.; Kashimura, T.; Minamino, T.; et al. Body Fluid Regulation Via Chronic Inhibition of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 in Patients with Heart Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Candle Trial. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2022; online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tanaka, A.; Shimabukuro, M.; Teragawa, H.; Okada, Y.; Takamura, T.; Taguchi, I.; Toyoda, S.; Tomiyama, H.; Ueda, S.; Higashi, Y.; et al. Reduction of Estimated Fluid Volumes Following Initiation of Empagliflozin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: A Secondary Analysis of the Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Emblem Trial. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2021, 20, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rasalam, R.; Atherton, J.J.; Deed, G.; Molloy-Bland, M.; Cohen, N.; Sindone, A. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Effects on Heart Failure Hospitalization and Cardiac Function: Systematic Review. ESC Heart Fail. 2021, 8, 4093–4118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ghezzi, C.; Loo, D.D.F.; Wright, E.M. Physiology of Renal Glucose Handling Via Sglt1, Sglt2 and Glut2. Diabetologia 2018, 61, 2087–2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bell, R.M.; Yellon, D.M. Sglt2 Inhibitors: Hypotheses on the Mechanism of Cardiovascular Protection. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018, 6, 435–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wojcik, C.; Warden, B.A. Mechanisms and Evidence for Heart Failure Benefits from Sglt2 Inhibitors. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2019, 21, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Nightingale, B. A Review of the Proposed Mechanistic Actions of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Heart Failure. Cardiol. Res. 2021, 12, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fathi, A.; Vickneson, K.; Singh, J.S. Sglt2-Inhibitors. More Than Just Glycosuria and Diuresis. Heart Fail. Rev. 2021, 26, 623–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sayer, G.; Bhat, G. The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System and Heart Failure. Cardiol. Clin. 2014, 32, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Konstam, M.A.; Kramer, D.G.; Patel, A.R.; Maron, M.S.; Udelson, J.E. Left Ventricular Remodeling in Heart Failure: Current Concepts in Clinical Significance and Assessment. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2011, 4, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ibebuogu, U.N.; Gladysheva, I.P.; Houng, A.K.; Reed, G.L. Decompensated Heart Failure Is Associated with Reduced Corin Levels and Decreased Cleavage of Pro-Atrial Natriuretic Peptide. Circ. Heart Fail. 2011, 4, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tripathi, R.; Wang, D.; Sullivan, R.; Fan, T.H.; Gladysheva, I.P.; Reed, G.L. Depressed Corin Levels Indicate Early Systolic Dysfunction before Increases of Atrial Natriuretic Peptide/B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and Heart Failure Development. Hypertension 2016, 67, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zaidi, S.S.; Ward, R.D.; Ramanathan, K.; Yu, X.; Gladysheva, I.P.; Reed, G.L. Possible Enzymatic Downregulation of the Natriuretic Peptide System in Patients with Reduced Systolic Function and Heart Failure: A Pilot Study. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 7279036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Schrier, R.W.; Abraham, W.T. Hormones and Hemodynamics in Heart Failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999, 341, 577–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sullivan, R.D.; Mehta, R.M.; Tripathi, R.; Gladysheva, I.P.; Reed, G.L. Normalizing Plasma Renin Activity in Experimental Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Effects on Edema, Cachexia, and Survival. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chiorescu, R.M.; Lazar, R.-D.; Buksa, S.-B.; Mocan, M.; Blendea, D. Biomarkers of Volume Overload and Edema in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 910100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Adams, K.F., Jr. Pathophysiologic Role of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone and Sympathetic Nervous Systems in Heart Failure. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 2004, 61, S4–S13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hartupee, J.; Mann, D.L. Neurohormonal Activation in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2017, 14, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ansary, T.M.; Nakano, D.; Nishiyama, A. Diuretic Effects of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Their Influence on the Renin-Angiotensin System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Santos-Gallego, C.G.; Requena-Ibanez, J.A.; San Antonio, R.; Ishikawa, K.; Watanabe, S.; Picatoste, B.; Flores, E.; Garcia-Ropero, A.; Sanz, J.; Hajjar, R.J.; et al. Empagliflozin Ameliorates Adverse Left Ventricular Remodeling in Nondiabetic Heart Failure by Enhancing Myocardial Energetics. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 73, 1931–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Borovac, J.A.; D’Amario, D.; Bozic, J.; Glavas, D. Sympathetic Nervous System Activation and Heart Failure: Current State of Evidence and the Pathophysiology in the Light of Novel Biomarkers. World J. Cardiol. 2020, 12, 373–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shimizu, W.; Kubota, Y.; Hoshika, Y.; Mozawa, K.; Tara, S.; Tokita, Y.; Yodogawa, K.; Iwasaki, Y.K.; Yamamoto, T.; Takano, H.; et al. Effects of Empagliflozin Versus Placebo on Cardiac Sympathetic Activity in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Embody Trial. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2020, 19, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wei, C.M.; Heublein, D.M.; Perrella, M.A.; Lerman, A.; Rodeheffer, R.J.; McGregor, C.G.; Edwards, W.D.; Schaff, H.V.; Burnett, J.C., Jr. Natriuretic Peptide System in Human Heart Failure. Circulation 1993, 88, 1004–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gidlof, O. Toward a New Paradigm for Targeted Natriuretic Peptide Enhancement in Heart Failure. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 650124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shi, X.; Verma, S.; Yun, J.; Brand-Arzamendi, K.; Singh, K.K.; Liu, X.; Garg, A.; Quan, A.; Wen, X.Y. Effect of Empagliflozin on Cardiac Biomarkers in a Zebrafish Model of Heart Failure: Clues to the Empa-Reg Outcome Trial? Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2017, 433, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tripathi, R.; Sullivan, R.D.; Fan, T.M.; Houng, A.K.; Mehta, R.M.; Reed, G.L.; Gladysheva, I.P. Cardiac-Specific Overexpression of Catalytically Inactive Corin Reduces Edema, Contractile Dysfunction, and Death in Mice with Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ma, X.; Tannu, S.; Allocco, J.; Pan, J.; Dipiero, J.; Wong, P. A Mouse Model of Heart Failure Exhibiting Pulmonary Edema and Pleural Effusion: Useful for Testing New Drugs. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 2019, 96, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tripathi, R.; Sullivan, R.D.; Fan, T.M.; Mehta, R.M.; Gladysheva, I.P.; Reed, G.L. A Low-Sodium Diet Boosts Ang (1-7) Production and No-Cgmp Bioavailability to Reduce Edema and Enhance Survival in Experimental Heart Failure. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lee, H.C.; Shiou, Y.L.; Jhuo, S.J.; Chang, C.Y.; Liu, P.L.; Jhuang, W.J.; Dai, Z.K.; Chen, W.Y.; Chen, Y.F.; Lee, A.S. The Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin Attenuates Cardiac Fibrosis and Improves Ventricular Hemodynamics in Hypertensive Heart Failure Rats. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2019, 18, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Abdurrachim, D.; Teo, X.Q.; Woo, C.C.; Chan, W.X.; Lalic, J.; Lam, C.S.P.; Lee, P.T.H. Empagliflozin Reduces Myocardial Ketone Utilization While Preserving Glucose Utilization in Diabetic Hypertensive Heart Disease: A Hyperpolarized (13) C Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2019, 21, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yurista, S.R.; Sillje, H.H.W.; Oberdorf-Maass, S.U.; Schouten, E.M.; Pavez Giani, M.G.; Hillebrands, J.L.; van Goor, H.; van Veldhuisen, D.J.; de Boer, R.A.; Westenbrink, B.D. Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibition with Empagliflozin Improves Cardiac Function in Non-Diabetic Rats with Left Ventricular Dysfunction after Myocardial Infarction. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2019, 21, 862–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Byrne, N.J.; Matsumura, N.; Maayah, Z.H.; Ferdaoussi, M.; Takahara, S.; Darwesh, A.M.; Levasseur, J.L.; Jahng, J.W.S.; Vos, D.; Parajuli, N.; et al. Empagliflozin Blunts Worsening Cardiac Dysfunction Associated with Reduced Nlrp3 (Nucleotide-Binding Domain-Like Receptor Protein 3) Inflammasome Activation in Heart Failure. Circ. Heart Fail. 2020, 13, e006277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Tanajak, P.; Sa-Nguanmoo, P.; Sivasinprasasn, S.; Thummasorn, S.; Siri-Angkul, N.; Chattipakorn, S.C.; Chattipakorn, N. Cardioprotection of Dapagliflozin and Vildagliptin in Rats with Cardiac Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. J Endocrinol 2018, 236, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Connelly, K.A.; Zhang, Y.; Desjardins, J.F.; Nghiem, L.; Visram, A.; Batchu, S.N.; Yerra, V.G.; Kabir, G.; Thai, K.; Advani, A.; et al. Load-Independent Effects of Empagliflozin Contribute to Improved Cardiac Function in Experimental Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2020, 19, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sayour, A.A.; Korkmaz-Icoz, S.; Loganathan, S.; Ruppert, M.; Sayour, V.N.; Olah, A.; Benke, K.; Brune, M.; Benko, R.; Horvath, E.M.; et al. Acute Canagliflozin Treatment Protects against in Vivo Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Non-Diabetic Male Rats and Enhances Endothelium-Dependent Vasorelaxation. J. Transl. Med. 2019, 17, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wang, K.; Li, Z.; Sun, Y.; Liu, X.; Ma, W.; Ding, Y.; Hong, J.; Qian, L.; Xu, D. Dapagliflozin Improves Cardiac Function, Remodeling, Myocardial Apoptosis, and Inflammatory Cytokines in Mice with Myocardial Infarction. J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 2021; (online ahead of print). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Santos-Gallego, C.G.; Requena-Ibanez, J.A.; San Antonio, R.; Garcia-Ropero, A.; Ishikawa, K.; Watanabe, S.; Picatoste, B.; Vargas-Delgado, A.P.; Flores-Umanzor, E.J.; Sanz, J.; et al. Empagliflozin Ameliorates Diastolic Dysfunction and Left Ventricular Fibrosis/Stiffness in Nondiabetic Heart Failure: A Multimodality Study. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021, 14, 393–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Arow, M.; Waldman, M.; Yadin, D.; Nudelman, V.; Shainberg, A.; Abraham, N.G.; Freimark, D.; Kornowski, R.; Aravot, D.; Hochhauser, E.; et al. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Dapagliflozin Attenuates Diabetic Cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2020, 19, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kraker, K.; Herse, F.; Golic, M.; Reichhart, N.; Crespo-Garcia, S.; Strauss, O.; Grune, J.; Kintscher, U.; Ebrahim, M.; Bader, M.; et al. Effects of Empagliflozin and Target-Organ Damage in a Novel Rodent Model of Heart Failure Induced by Combined Hypertension and Diabetes. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sabatino, J.; De Rosa, S.; Tamme, L.; Iaconetti, C.; Sorrentino, S.; Polimeni, A.; Mignogna, C.; Amorosi, A.; Spaccarotella, C.; Yasuda, M.; et al. Empagliflozin Prevents Doxorubicin-Induced Myocardial Dysfunction. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2020, 19, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, X.; Lu, Q.; Qiu, Y.; do Carmo, J.M.; Wang, Z.; da Silva, A.A.; Mouton, A.; Omoto, A.C.M.; Hall, M.E.; Li, J.; et al. Direct Cardiac Actions of the Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin Improve Myocardial Oxidative Phosphorylation and Attenuate Pressure-Overload Heart Failure. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e018298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Liu, Y.; Wu, M.; Xu, J.; Xu, B.; Kang, L. Empagliflozin Prevents from Early Cardiac Injury Post Myocardial Infarction in Non-Diabetic Mice. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 161, 105788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Asensio Lopez, M.D.C.; Lax, A.; Hernandez Vicente, A.; Saura Guillen, E.; Hernandez-Martinez, A.; Fernandez Del Palacio, M.J.; Bayes-Genis, A.; Pascual Figal, D.A. Empagliflozin Improves Post-Infarction Cardiac Remodeling through Gtp Enzyme Cyclohydrolase 1 and Irrespective of Diabetes Status. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Mizuno, M.; Kuno, A.; Yano, T.; Miki, T.; Oshima, H.; Sato, T.; Nakata, K.; Kimura, Y.; Tanno, M.; Miura, T. Empagliflozin Normalizes the Size and Number of Mitochondria and Prevents Reduction in Mitochondrial Size after Myocardial Infarction in Diabetic Hearts. Physiol. Rep. 2018, 6, e13741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Koyani, C.N.; Plastira, I.; Sourij, H.; Hallstrom, S.; Schmidt, A.; Rainer, P.P.; Bugger, H.; Frank, S.; Malle, E.; von Lewinski, D. Empagliflozin Protects Heart from Inflammation and Energy Depletion Via Ampk Activation. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 158, 104870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Kimura, T.; Nakamura, K.; Miyoshi, T.; Yoshida, M.; Akazawa, K.; Saito, Y.; Akagi, S.; Ohno, Y.; Kondo, M.; Miura, D.; et al. Inhibitory Effects of Tofogliflozin on Cardiac Hypertrophy in Dahl Salt-Sensitive and Salt-Resistant Rats Fed a High-Fat Diet. Int. Heart J. 2019, 60, 728–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kuriyama, S. A Potential Mechanism of Cardio-Renal Protection with Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors: Amelioration of Renal Congestion. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2019, 44, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yang, C.C.; Chen, Y.T.; Wallace, C.G.; Chen, K.H.; Cheng, B.C.; Sung, P.H.; Li, Y.C.; Ko, S.F.; Chang, H.W.; Yip, H.K. Early Administration of Empagliflozin Preserved Heart Function in Cardiorenal Syndrome in Rat. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 109, 658–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Packer, M. Activation and Inhibition of Sodium-Hydrogen Exchanger Is a Mechanism That Links the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus with That of Heart Failure. Circulation 2017, 136, 1548–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Philippaert, K.; Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Fatehi, M.; Long, W.; Soni, S.; Byrne, N.J.; Barr, A.; Singh, J.; Wong, J.; Palechuk, T.; et al. Cardiac Late Sodium Channel Current Is a Molecular Target for the Sodium/Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin. Circulation 2021, 143, 2188–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Morris, K. Targeting the Myocardial Sodium-Hydrogen Exchange for Treatment of Heart Failure. Expert. Opin. Ther. Targets 2002, 6, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zuurbier, C.J.; Baartscheer, A.; Schumacher, C.A.; Fiolet, J.W.T.; Coronel, R. Sglt2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin Inhibits the Cardiac Na+/H+ Exchanger 1: Persistent Inhibition under Various Experimental Conditions. Cardiovasc. Res. 2021, 117, 2699–2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Baartscheer, A.; Hardziyenka, M.; Schumacher, C.A.; Belterman, C.N.; van Borren, M.M.; Verkerk, A.O.; Coronel, R.; Fiolet, J.W. Chronic Inhibition of the Na+/H+—Exchanger Causes Regression of Hypertrophy, Heart Failure, and Ionic and Electrophysiological Remodelling. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 154, 1266–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Iborra-Egea, O.; Santiago-Vacas, E.; Yurista, S.R.; Lupon, J.; Packer, M.; Heymans, S.; Zannad, F.; Butler, J.; Pascual-Figal, D.; Lax, A.; et al. Unraveling the Molecular Mechanism of Action of Empagliflozin in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction with or without Diabetes. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2019, 4, 831–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Chung, Y.J.; Park, K.C.; Tokar, S.; Eykyn, T.R.; Fuller, W.; Pavlovic, D.; Swietach, P.; Shattock, M.J. Off-Target Effects of Sglt2 Blockers: Empagliflozin Does Not Inhibit Na+/H+ Exchanger-1 or Lower [Na+]i in the Heart. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020, 117, 2794–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Chung, Y.J.; Park, K.C.; Tokar, S.; Eykyn, T.R.; Fuller, W.; Pavlovic, D.; Swietach, P.; Shattock, M.J. Sglt2 Inhibitors and the Cardiac Na+/H+ Exchanger-1: The Plot Thickens. Cardiovasc. Res. 2021, 117, 2702–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Wiig, H. Pathophysiology of Tissue Fluid Accumulation in Inflammation. J Physiol 2011, 589, 2945–2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Van Linthout, S.; Tschope, C. Inflammation—Cause or Consequence of Heart Failure or Both? Curr. Heart Fail. Rep. 2017, 14, 251–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Aimo, A.; Castiglione, V.; Borrelli, C.; Saccaro, L.F.; Franzini, M.; Masi, S.; Emdin, M.; Giannoni, A. Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in the Evolution of Heart Failure: From Pathophysiology to Therapeutic Strategies. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2020, 27, 494–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mehta, D.; Malik, A.B. Signaling Mechanisms Regulating Endothelial Permeability. Physiol. Rev. 2006, 86, 279–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Emdin, M.; Aimo, A.; Castiglione, V.; Vergaro, G.; Georgiopoulos, G.; Saccaro, L.F.; Lombardi, C.M.; Passino, C.; Cerbai, E.; Metra, M.; et al. Targeting Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate to Treat Heart Failure: Jacc Review Topic of the Week. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 76, 1795–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Fischer, D.; Rossa, S.; Landmesser, U.; Spiekermann, S.; Engberding, N.; Hornig, B.; Drexler, H. Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure Is Independently Associated with Increased Incidence of Hospitalization, Cardiac Transplantation, or Death. Eur. Heart J. 2005, 26, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Kerem, A.; Yin, J.; Kaestle, S.M.; Hoffmann, J.; Schoene, A.M.; Singh, B.; Kuppe, H.; Borst, M.M.; Kuebler, W.M. Lung Endothelial Dysfunction in Congestive Heart Failure: Role of Impaired Ca2+ Signaling and Cytoskeletal Reorganization. Circ. Res. 2010, 106, 1103–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Giannitsi, S.; Bougiakli, M.; Bechlioulis, A.; Naka, K. Endothelial Dysfunction and Heart Failure: A Review of the Existing Bibliography with Emphasis on Flow Mediated Dilation. JRSM Cardiovasc. Dis. 2019, 8, 2048004019843047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Alshnbari, A.S.; Millar, S.A.; O’Sullivan, S.E.; Idris, I. Effect of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors on Endothelial Function: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Studies. Diabetes Ther. 2020, 11, 1947–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ugusman, A.; Kumar, J.; Aminuddin, A. Endothelial Function and Dysfunction: Impact of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021, 224, 107832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Dou, L.; Burtey, S. Reversing Endothelial Dysfunction with Empagliflozin to Improve Cardiomyocyte Function in Cardiorenal Syndrome. Kidney Int. 2021, 99, 1062–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Juni, R.P.; Al-Shama, R.; Kuster, D.W.D.; van der Velden, J.; Hamer, H.M.; Vervloet, M.G.; Eringa, E.C.; Koolwijk, P.; van Hinsbergh, V.W.M. Empagliflozin Restores Chronic Kidney Disease-Induced Impairment of Endothelial Regulation of Cardiomyocyte Relaxation and Contraction. Kidney Int. 2021, 99, 1088–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Han, Y.; Cho, Y.E.; Ayon, R.; Guo, R.; Youssef, K.D.; Pan, M.; Dai, A.; Yuan, J.X.; Makino, A. Sglt Inhibitors Attenuate No-Dependent Vascular Relaxation in the Pulmonary Artery but Not in the Coronary Artery. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2015, 309, L1027–L1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Sala, V.; Gatti, S.; Gallo, S.; Medico, E.; Cantarella, D.; Cimino, J.; Ponzetto, A.; Crepaldi, T. A New Transgenic Mouse Model of Heart Failure and Cardiac Cachexia Raised by Sustained Activation of Met Tyrosine Kinase in the Heart. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 9549036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Packer, M. Cardioprotective Effects of Sirtuin-1 and Its Downstream Effectors: Potential Role in Mediating the Heart Failure Benefits of Sglt2 (Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2) Inhibitors. Circ. Heart Fail. 2020, 13, e007197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Mudaliar, S.; Alloju, S.; Henry, R.R. Can a Shift in Fuel Energetics Explain the Beneficial Cardiorenal Outcomes in the Empa-Reg Outcome Study? A Unifying Hypothesis. Diabetes Care 2016, 39, 1115–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Croteau, D.; Luptak, I.; Chambers, J.M.; Hobai, I.; Panagia, M.; Pimentel, D.R.; Siwik, D.A.; Qin, F.; Colucci, W.S. Effects of Sodium-Glucose Linked Transporter 2 Inhibition with Ertugliflozin on Mitochondrial Function, Energetics, and Metabolic Gene Expression in the Presence and Absence of Diabetes Mellitus in Mice. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e019995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Xie, B.; Ramirez, W.; Mills, A.M.; Huckestein, B.R.; Anderson, M.; Pangburn, M.M.; Lang, E.Y.; Mullet, S.J.; Chuan, B.W.; Guo, L.; et al. Empagliflozin Restores Cardiac Metabolic Flexibility in Diet-Induced Obese C57bl6/J Mice. Curr. Res. Physiol. 2022, 5, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Sullivan, R.D.; Houng, A.K.; Gladysheva, I.P.; Fan, T.M.; Tripathi, R.; Reed, G.L.; Wang, D. Corin Overexpression Reduces Myocardial Infarct Size and Modulates Cardiomyocyte Apoptotic Cell Death. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Reed, G.L.; Gladysheva, I.P.; Sullivan, R.D.; Mehta, R.M. Method of Personalized Treatment for Cardiomyopathy and Heart Failure and Associated Diseases by Measuring Edema and Cachexia/Sarcopenia. United States Patent Application Serial Number 17/313,904, 20210263120, 26 August 2021. [Google Scholar]
  118. Weech, A.A.; Goettsch, E.; Reeves, E.B. Nutritional Edema in the Dog: I. Development of Hypoproteinemia on a Diet Deficient in Protein. J. Exp. Med. 1935, 61, 299–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kizhakke Puliyakote, A.S.; Holverda, S.; Sa, R.C.; Arai, T.J.; Theilmann, R.J.; Botros, L.; Bogaard, H.J.; Prisk, G.K.; Hopkins, S.R. Prone Positioning Redistributes Gravitational Stress in the Lung in Normal Conditions and in Simulations of Oedema. Exp. Physiol. 2022, 107, 771–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Bagshaw, R.J. Evolution of Cardiovascular Baroreceptor Control. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1985, 60, 121–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Nakos, G.; Batistatou, A.; Galiatsou, E.; Konstanti, E.; Koulouras, V.; Kanavaros, P.; Doulis, A.; Kitsakos, A.; Karachaliou, A.; Lekka, M.E.; et al. Lung and ‘End Organ’ Injury Due to Mechanical Ventilation in Animals: Comparison between the Prone and Supine Positions. Crit. Care 2006, 10, R38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Di Fusco, S.A.; Gronda, E.; Mocini, E.; Luca, F.; Bisceglia, I.; De Luca, L.; Caldarola, P.; Cipriani, M.; Corda, M.; De Nardo, A.; et al. Anmco Statement on the Use of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Patients with Heart Failure: A Practical Guide for a Streamlined Implementation. Eur. Heart J. Suppl. 2022, 24, C272–C277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Pittampalli, S.; Upadyayula, S.; Mekala, H.M.; Lippmann, S. Risks Vs Benefits for Sglt2 Inhibitor Medications. Fed. Pract. 2018, 35, 45–48. [Google Scholar]
  124. Butler, J.; Usman, M.S.; Khan, M.S.; Greene, S.J.; Friede, T.; Vaduganathan, M.; Filippatos, G.; Coats, A.J.S.; Anker, S.D. Efficacy and Safety of Sglt2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. ESC Heart Fail. 2020, 7, 3298–3309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Pelletier, R.; Ng, K.; Alkabbani, W.; Labib, Y.; Mourad, N.; Gamble, J.M. Adverse Events Associated with Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors: An Overview of Quantitative Systematic Reviews. Ther. Adv. Drug Saf. 2021, 12, 2042098621989134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Mechanism by which sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) reduce pulmonary and systemic edema in HFrEF. Ejection fraction (EF); cardiac output (CO); reactive oxygen species (ROS). Created with BioRender.com on 18 July 2022.
Figure 1. Mechanism by which sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) reduce pulmonary and systemic edema in HFrEF. Ejection fraction (EF); cardiac output (CO); reactive oxygen species (ROS). Created with BioRender.com on 18 July 2022.
Biomedicines 10 02016 g001
Table 1. Cardiac outcomes of treatments with SGLT-2i in pre-clinical models of HFrEF.
Table 1. Cardiac outcomes of treatments with SGLT-2i in pre-clinical models of HFrEF.
Preclinical
Models
(species)
Drug
Dosage
Duration
Cardiac FunctionCardiac
Remodeling
Inflammation, ROS, ED
Hypertensive HF model
(rat)
Empagliflozin
20 mg/kg/day
12 weeks
[70]
  • Normalized end diastolic, end systolic volume.
  • LVEF not significantly improved [70]
  • Reduced cardiac fibrosis [70]
Genetic HFrEF model
(rat)
Empagliflozin
10 mg/kg/day
4 weeks
  • Increased cardiac function and LVEF [80]
  • Decreased infiltration by macrophages [80]
Post-MI
HFrEF model
(rat; mouse, pig)
Empagliflozin
10mg orally
2 months [61]
  • Increased LV systolic volume [61]
  • Attenuated remodeling post-MI (lower LV, dilation, sphericity) [61]
20 mg/kg/day
6 weeks [75]
  • Improved contractility, stroke work, end-systolic blood pressure diastolic function [75]
  • No improvement in interstitial fibrosis or cardiomyocyte hypertrophy [75]
30 mg/kg/day
2 weeks [72]
  • Improved LVEF [72]
  • Attenuated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, fibrosis [72]
  • Decreased inflammation alleviated oxidative stress [72,83, 84, 85];
10 mg/day
2 months [78]
  • Improved diastolic function [78]
  • Ameliorated diastolic dysfunction [78]
  • Reduced extracellular volume [78]
  • Increased eNOS activity and NO production and bioavailability associated with cGMP-PKG axis [78]
10 mg/kg/day
2 weeks [81]
  • Improved cardiac remodeling [81]
Dapagliflozin
1 mg/kg/day
28 days [72, 74]
  • Improved LVEF [72, 74]
1.5 mg/kg/day
4 weeks [77]
  • Systolic function [77]
  • Inhibited cardiac apoptosis and reduced LV mass, cardiac collagen 1/3, ANP/BNP, TGF-β1 transcripts, cardiac fibrosis [77]
  • Lowered levels of inflammatory cytokines [77]
Canagliflozin
3 µg/kg
5 mins [76, 82]
  • Alleviated LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction [76, 82]
Ang II-induced cardiomyopathy (mouse)Dapagliflozin
1.5 mg/kg/day 30 days [79]
  • Increased LV fractional shortening [79]
  • Decreased inflammation and ROS production [79]
DOX-induced
cardiomyopathy (mouse)
Empagliflozin
(not provided) [81]
  • Ameliorated LV function [81]
  • Lowered myocardial fibrosis [81]
LPS-induced
cardiomyopathy (mouse)
Empagliflozin
5 mg/kg [86]
  • Preserved cardiac function [86]
  • Reduced cardiac iNOS, plasma TNFα and creatine kinase MB [86]
TAC-induced HFrEF
(mouse)
Empagliflozin
10 mg/kg/day
2 weeks
post-surgery
[73, 82]
  • Attenuated the decline in cardiac function [73, 82]
  • Attenuated LV remodeling [82]
  • Decreased expression of markers of cardiac inflammation [73]
Heart failure (HF); Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); Left ventricular (LV); Angiotensin II (Ang II); Reactive oxygen species (ROS); Endothelial dysfunction (ED); Doxorubicin (DOX); lipopolysaccharides (LPS); Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS); Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα); Transverse aortic constriction (TAC).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sullivan, R.D.; McCune, M.E.; Hernandez, M.; Reed, G.L.; Gladysheva, I.P. Suppression of Cardiogenic Edema with Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Mechanisms and Insights from Pre-Clinical Studies. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10082016

AMA Style

Sullivan RD, McCune ME, Hernandez M, Reed GL, Gladysheva IP. Suppression of Cardiogenic Edema with Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Mechanisms and Insights from Pre-Clinical Studies. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(8):2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10082016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sullivan, Ryan D., Mariana E. McCune, Michelle Hernandez, Guy L. Reed, and Inna P. Gladysheva. 2022. "Suppression of Cardiogenic Edema with Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Mechanisms and Insights from Pre-Clinical Studies" Biomedicines 10, no. 8: 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10082016

APA Style

Sullivan, R. D., McCune, M. E., Hernandez, M., Reed, G. L., & Gladysheva, I. P. (2022). Suppression of Cardiogenic Edema with Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Mechanisms and Insights from Pre-Clinical Studies. Biomedicines, 10(8), 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10082016

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop