Nurturing Sustainability in Toddlerhood: Investigating Preschool Teachers’ Views and Daily Practices in a Swedish Preschool
Abstract
:1. Introduction
Teachers Working with Toddlers
- What are the views of preschool teachers on ECEfS in relation to a toddler group at the Swedish preschool?
- What are the daily practices used to foster sustainability concepts in toddlers at the Swedish preschool?
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Ethical Considerations
2.2. Research Setting and Participants
2.3. Data Collection Techniques
2.3.1. Interviews
2.3.2. Observations
2.3.3. Document Analysis
2.4. Data Analysis
Data Preparation and Coding Process
3. Findings
3.1. Preschool Teachers’ Views
3.1.1. Preschool Teachers’ Views of EfS in Toddler Groups
3.1.2. Views of Toddlers’ Capacity to Engage in EfS
3.2. Teachers’ Daily Practices
3.2.1. The Social and Cultural Dimension of Sustainability
Representations in Books, Pictures, Toys, Etc.
“In the toddler group, we consciously choose books, images, and materials that challenge cultural and social stereotypes. We aim to foster an inclusive and respectful environment where children can learn about different cultures, traditions, and lifestyles from a young age”.
Social and Cultural Diversity
“The preschool is a social and cultural meeting place that should promote children’s understanding of the value of diversity. Awareness of different living conditions and cultures can help to develop an ability to understand and empathise with other people’s conditions and values”.[33] (p. 6)
Equality and Equity
“We sometimes open all the doors at our department. Children can freely visit all the rooms and play whatever they want. We organise our learning environment based on their interests and convenience. For example, we had a bird project. We built a nest and started to observe it in the classroom. We realised some children had difficulty seeing the birds entering the nest. Therefore, we decided to move all the tables near the windows. So, all can observe during breakfast or lunchtime. We also put a platform on the wall to make it visible outdoors to shorter children”.
Overall Integration of the Social and Cultural Dimension
3.2.2. The Economic Dimension of Sustainability
Consumption
“It is alarming that children nowadays use diapers much longer than before, which is not good for them and not sustainable for our environment. As preschool teachers, our goal is to help children become nappy-free earlier. We collaborate with families and encourage children by introducing a potty early on in our group, creating an awareness about sustainability”.
Reuse and Sorting
“The children have demonstrated the ability to learn which items belong in which bins and have clearly understood how to differentiate between them. Incorporating characters, stories, songs, and role-playing in Education for Sustainability is an effective way to make the concept more tangible and engaging for younger children”.
Co-Use, Sharing, and Redistribution of Materials and Resources
“This practice is an excellent way to promote reading and sharing educational resources. It is a great example for our toddlers to understand the meaning of sharing. When we all share, we always have more”.
Overall Integration of the Economic Dimension
3.2.3. The Ecological/Environmental Dimension of Sustainability
About Nature
“During the project, the children listened to various bird voices and learned to identify different species based on their unique sounds. We also involved them in role-playing activities about birds, where they wore different masks and hats to represent different species. This helped them understand the characteristics and behaviours of different birds. To make the learning experience more interactive, we created a big bird nest from cardboard for the children to enter and role-play as birds. The classroom was also arranged to optimise the view of the birds and their nests. The children could observe how birds build their nests and care for their young. Overall, the bird project was an excellent way for the children to learn about nature and the importance of preserving different species. I believe the children developed an appreciation for birds and their unique characteristics, which will stay with them for years”.
Protecting and Caring for Nature
“Today, the children found a worm and said, ‘Oh, look! It’s tiny. We need to take care of it. We can put it in our planting area because it can live there.’ And they carefully moved the worm. They know there’s air and food for it in the planting area. We don’t just do activities about this; we also talk about it during their play, mealtime, whenever we find an opportunity. Then, a child found a snail while playing and said, ‘We have to put the snail here,’ he did. We started singing the song ‘Little snail, watch out, watch out’ They understand that they are big, but snails are small, so we need to take care of them and protect them”.
“Taking care of nature is crucial. We should pay attention to the smallest creatures, such as a lonely spider, and interact with them respectfully. It’s important to recycle and not litter. We must be careful not to harm tiny creatures like ants and avoid stepping on them. When we encounter animals like spiders or ants in our room, we should handle them carefully and release them outdoors unharmed. We must take care of animals since they’re essential to nature. Animals in their natural habitat should be welcomed, not feared. It’s crucial to understand the significance of nature and animals and treat them with care and respect”.
“When the children start picking up trash from the ground, their parents also become interested in doing the same. One parent shared an incident with me about their forest walk where their child spotted water bottles on the ground and suggested that they collect them and give them to the teacher for recycling”.
Preschool and Nature
“Even though they are very young, we always dare to walk in the forest. It can be challenging to move around with such young children, but we see how happy they are in the forest, how much they enjoy smelling the flowers, how they wonder where the flowers are in the winter, and how surprised they are when the flowers bloom in the spring”.
“Recently, we also went to the same area to gather flowers. We visited the same place during winter when Lion shouted, -What happened to the swamps? They’re gone, and the flowers are here.-. We are always mindful of how nature changes based on the weather and observe and discuss it with each other. For instance, we might say, -See that tree? It’s brown now, but it’ll be greener in the spring. Can you smell the flowers?- We always try to be observant and appreciate the beauty of nature around us”.
Overall Integration of the Ecological/Environmental Dimension
4. Discussion
4.1. Toddlers Learn Habits That Are Important for Sustainability
4.2. Experiences as the Foundation for Sustainability Knowledge in Early Years
4.3. The Teacher’s Role Is Central—In What Ways?
5. Limitations and Future Directions
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lee, H.; Calvin, K.; Dasgupta, D.; Krinner, G.; Mukherji, A.; Thorne, P.; Park, Y. IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report, Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Core Writing Team, Lee, H., Romero, J., Eds.; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- UNESCO-2021. Berlin Declaration on Education for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381228 (accessed on 19 November 2024).
- Easterly, W. The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good; Penguin Press: London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Collier, P. The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done About It; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- UNESCO-2002. Education for Sustainability: From Rio to Johannesburg: Lessons Learnt from a Decade of Commitment. 2002. Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000127100 (accessed on 5 June 2020).
- Assadourian, E. The Role of Education in Shaping a Sustainable Future. In Sustainability and Education; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- UNESCO-2014. Roadmap for Implementing the Global Action Programme on Education for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000230514 (accessed on 5 June 2020).
- Davis, J.; Elliott, S. (Eds.) Young Children and the Environment: Early Education for Sustainability, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- UNESCO-2017. Early Childhood Care and Education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 2017. Available online: http://en.unesco.org/themes/early-childhood-care-and-education (accessed on 5 June 2020).
- Pramling Samuelsson, I.; Kaga, Y. (Eds.) The Contribution of Early Childhood Education to a Sustainable Society; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2008; pp. 1–136. [Google Scholar]
- Engdahl, I. Early Childhood Education for Sustainability: The OMEP World Project. Int. J. Early Child. 2015, 47, 347–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ärlemalm-Hagsér, E.; Boyd, D.; McLeod, D.; Assunção Folque, M.; Kahriman-Pamuk, D. Building Knowledge and Competence to Promote Sustainability in Early Childhood Education—Four European Case Studies. In Young Children and Environment: Early Learning for Sustainability, 3rd ed.; Davis, J., Elliott, S., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2023; pp. 318–338. [Google Scholar]
- Piaget, J. The Origins of Intelligence in Children; International Universities Press: Madison, CT, USA, 1952. [Google Scholar]
- Heft, H.; Chawla, L. Children as agents in sustainable development: The ecology of competence. In Children and Their Environments: Learning, Using and Designing Spaces; Spencer, C., Blades, M., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006; pp. 199–216. [Google Scholar]
- Kahriman-Pamuk, D.; Borg, F. Sustainability, play and children’ s agency: A comparative study of the Swedish and Turkish preschool curricula. Eur. Early Child. Educ. Res. J. 2024, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Willockx, D.; Dom, L. Childcare 2030: On Using SDGs as a Framework for Implementing Sustainability in Two Day-Care Centres in Flanders. Int. J. Early Child. 2022, 54, 75–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Augustyn, M.; Frank, D.A.; Zuckerman, B.S. Infancy and Toddler Years. In Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics, 4th ed.; Elsevier Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2009; pp. 24–38. [Google Scholar]
- Sikder, S.; Fleer, M. Small Science: Infants and Toddlers Experiencing Science in Everyday Family Life. Res. Sci. Educ. 2015, 45, 445–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bussey, K.; Hill, D. Care as Curriculum: Investigating Teachers’ Views on the Learning in Care. Early Child Dev. Care 2017, 187, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burton, C. Jumping in Sidewalk Puddles: Eco-Pedagogical Practices in the Urban Environment for Early Childhood Practitioners. Int. J. Sustain. Econ. Soc. Cult. Context 2020, 16, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son, W.K.; Jeon, J.Y. Toddlers’ Experience World through Play in the Nature-Friendly Outdoor Environment. Korean J. Childcare Educ. 2011, 7, 143–164. [Google Scholar]
- Forman, G.; Hall, E.; Berglund, K. The Power of Ordinary Moments. Child Care Inf. Exch. 2001, 9, 52–55. Available online: https://exchangepress.com/library/5014152.pdf (accessed on 19 November 2024).
- Pramling Samuelsson, I.; Park, E. How to Educate Children for Sustainable Learning and for a Sustainable World. Int. J. Early Child. 2017, 49, 273–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindahl, M. Inlärning och Erfarande—Ettåringars Möte med Förskolans Värld [Learning and Experience—One-Year-Olds’ Encounters with the Preschool World]; Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis: Göteborg, Sweden, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Dyment, J.E.; Davis, J.M.; Nailon, D.; Emery, S.; Getenet, S.; McCrea, N.; Hill, A. The Impact of Professional Development on Early Childhood Educators’ Confidence, Understanding and Knowledge of Education for Sustainability. Environ. Educ. Res. 2014, 20, 660–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panatsa, I.; Malandrakis, G. Preschool Teachers’ Attitudes and Views on Education for Sustainability. Early Child. Educ. J. 2018, 46, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
- Inoue, M.; O’Gorman, L.; Davis, J. Investigating Early Childhood Teachers’ Understandings of and Practices in Education for Sustainability in Queensland: A Japan–Australia Research Collaboration. Aust. J. Environ. Educ. 2016, 32, 174–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahriman-Öztürk, D.; Olgan, R. Analysis of Preschool Teachers’ Views on the Importance of Education for Sustainable Development by Means of Location and Household Type in Childhood. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ. 2016, 11, 6303–6313. [Google Scholar]
- Višnjić-Jevtić, A.; Lepičnik Vodopivec, J.; Pribišev Beleslin, T.; Šindić, A. Unmasking Sustainability in Early Childhood Education: Teachers’ Voices from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, and Slovenia. Int. J. Early Child. 2022, 54, 119–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Güler Yıldız, T.; Öztürk, N.; İlhan İyi, T.; Aşkar, N.; Banko Bal, Ç.; Karabekmez, S.; Höl, Ş. Education for Sustainability in Early Childhood Education: A Systematic Review. Environ. Educ. Res. 2021, 27, 796–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greve, A.; Hansen, O.H. Toddlers in Nordic Early Childhood Education and Care. In International Handbook of Early Childhood Education; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 907–927. [Google Scholar]
- Swedish Research Council. Good Research Practice; Swedish Research Council: Stockholm, Sweden, 2017; Available online: https://www.vr.se/download/18.5639980c162791bbfe697882/1529480529472/Good-Research-Practice_VR_2017.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2020).
- Skolverket (The Swedish National Agency for Education). Curriculum for the Preschool Lpfö18; Skolverket: Stockholm, Sweden, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Creswell, J.W. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative, 5th ed.; Pearson Education: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Merriam, S.B.; Tisdell, E.J. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, 4th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harms, T. Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale; Teachers College Press: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Siraj-Blatchford, J.; Mogharreban, C.; Park, E. International Research on Education for Sustainable Development in Early Childhood; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Kahriman-Pamuk, D.; Uzun, N.B.; Yıldız, T.G.; Haktanır, G. Reliability of indicators measuring early childhood education for sustainability: A study in Turkey using generalizability theory. Int. J. Early Child. 2019, 51, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pribišev Beleslin, T.; Travar, M. The importance of the OMEP ESD rating scale for building future preschool teachers’ professional competencies in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Int. J. Early Child. 2022, 54, 139–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fermín-González, M.; Echenique-Arginzones, A. Early childhood education for sustainability: An assessment of the ERS-SDEC Scale (OMEP) in a comparative study of Chile–Venezuela. Int. J. Early Child. 2022, 54, 93–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larsson, J.; Samuelsson, I.P. Collective resources as a precursor for educating children toward a sustainable global world. ECNU Rev. Educ. 2019, 2, 396–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kultti, A.; Larsson, J.; Ärlemalm-Hagsér, E.; Pramling-Samuelsson, I. Early Childhood Education for Sustainable Development in Sweden. In International Research on Education for Sustainable Development in Early Childhood; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 123–137. [Google Scholar]
- Patton, M.Q. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 3rd ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Linder, N.; Giusti, M.; Samuelsson, K.; Barthel, S. Pro-Environmental Habits: An Underexplored Research Agenda in Sustainability Science. Ambio 2022, 51, 546–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chauhan, S.; Rama Das, S.; Haigh, M.; Rita, N. Awareness vs Intentionality: Exploring Education for Sustainable Development in a British Hindu Community. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 20, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buil, P.; Roger-Loppacher, O.; Tintoré, M. Creating the Habit of Recycling in Early Childhood: A Sustainable Practice in Spain. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Davis, J.M. Educating for Sustainability in the Early Years: Creating Cultural Change in a Child Care Setting. Aust. J. Environ. Educ. 2005, 21, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jickling, B.; Wals, A.E. Globalization and Environmental Education: Looking Beyond Sustainable Development. J. Curric. Stud. 2008, 40, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boutte, G.S. Beyond the Illusion of Diversity: How Early Childhood Teachers Can Promote Social Justice. Soc. Stud. 2008, 99, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conteh, J.; Brock, A. ‘Safe Spaces’? Sites of Bilingualism for Young Learners in Home, School, and Community. Int. J. Biling. Educ. Biling. 2011, 14, 347–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siraj-Blatchford, I. Conceptualising Progression in the Pedagogy of Play and Sustained Shared Thinking in Early Childhood Education: A Vygotskian Perspective. Educ. Child Psychol. 2009, 26, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lundy, L. ‘Voice’ Is Not Enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Br. Educ. Res. J. 2007, 33, 927–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Vandenbroeck, M.; Roets, G.; Snoeck, A. Immigrant Mothers Crossing Borders: Nomadic Identities and Multiple Belongings in Early Childhood Education. Eur. Early Child. Educ. Res. J. 2009, 17, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siraj-Blatchford, I. Learning in the Home and at School: How Working Class Children Succeed Against the Odds. Br. Educ. Res. J. 2010, 36, 463–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cummins, J. Negotiating Identities: Education for Empowerment in a Diverse Society; California Association for Bilingual Education: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Engdahl, I.; Pramling Samuelsson, I.; Ärlemalm-Hagser, E. Swedish Teachers in the Process of Implementing Education for Sustainability in Early Childhood Education. New Ideas Child Educ. Psychol. 2021, 1, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Participants | Gender | Age | The Educational Level | Years of Teaching |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | F | 47 | University | 16 |
T2 | F | 53 | University | 13 |
T3 | F | 53 | Collage | 3.5 |
Research Questions | Data Collection Techniques | Data Analyses |
---|---|---|
What are the views of preschool teachers on ECEfS in a toddler group at a Swedish preschool? | Interviews Document analysis | Thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-phase process [36]. |
Employing open coding to identify expressions relevant to recurring patterns or themes. | ||
Grouping codes into potential themes and collating relevant data. | ||
Using MAXQDA software for word frequency checks to refine codes. | ||
Aligning codes with the relevant literature. | ||
What are the daily practices employed to foster sustainability among toddlers at a Swedish preschool? | Interviews Observation Document analysis | Thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-phase process [36]. |
Employing open coding to identify expressions relevant to recurring patterns or themes. | ||
Grouping codes into potential themes and collating relevant data. | ||
Using MAXQDA software for word frequency checks to refine codes. | ||
Aligning codes with the OMEP ESD Rating Scale (ERS-SDEC). |
Materials/Activities | Description | Observed Impact |
---|---|---|
Picture books featuring women in STEM roles | Books portraying women as scientists, engineers, and astronauts | Challenged gender stereotypes; engaged children’s interest |
Diverse toy sets | Toys representing various skin colours, disabilities, and backgrounds | Promoted inclusion; allowed children to identify with diversity |
Multilingual books and labels | Books and labels in different languages present in the classroom | Encouraged use of mother tongue; valued linguistic diversity |
Practice | Description | Observed Impact |
---|---|---|
Multilingual activities | Counting numbers in different languages during circle time | Showed the value of linguistic diversity; boosted children’s confidence in using their mother tongues |
Learning essential words | Teachers learning words in the children’s mother tongues | Improved communication; strengthened teacher–child relationships |
Inclusive support for children with special needs | Accommodating children with special needs | Fostered an inclusive environment; helped promote respect for individual differences |
Cultural awareness activities | Highlighting different living conditions and traditions | Enhanced empathy; broadened children’s understanding of diverse cultures |
Practice | Description | Observed Impact |
---|---|---|
Visual displays of children’s rights | Posters and materials related to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child | Raised awareness of rights; fostered discussions |
Adaptive learning environment | Adjusting classroom setup to meet children’s needs (e.g., bird project) | Ensured equal access; addressed individual needs |
Participation in decision-making process | Children choosing meals and activities | Empowered children; promoted autonomy and responsibility |
Celebrating children’s rights day | Teaching the toddlers songs and activities about children’s rights | Reinforced understanding of rights; engaged children in meaningful learning |
Practice | Description | Observed Impact |
---|---|---|
Water conservation experiment | Comparing water usage between fully opened and partially opened taps | Children became more mindful of water usage and gained visual understanding of conservation |
Food waste measurement | Weighing leftover food and discussing results with children | Reduction in food waste: children were more conscious about taking appropriate portions |
Diaper use reduction initiative | Encouraging earlier potty training in collaboration with families | Decreased diaper usage; cost savings; environmental benefits |
Practice | Description | Observed Impact |
---|---|---|
Waste-sorting activities | Asking children to sort recyclables into designated bins | Increased understanding of recycling; active participation in waste management |
Composting | Disposing of food scraps in compost bins after meals | Awareness of organic waste recycling; contribution to garden compost |
Sopsamlarmonster integration | Using animated characters to teach about recycling | Enhanced engagement in learning about sorting; improved retention of recycling concepts |
Reuse of materials | Collecting reusable items for art activities; repurposing old furniture | Promotion of creativity; enhanced understanding of reusing materials instead of discarding |
Rainwater storage usage | Collecting rainwater for watering plants | Comprehension of water conservation; practical application of resource reuse |
Practice | Description | Observed Impact |
---|---|---|
Clothing exchange cabinet | Communal cabinet where clothing and shoes are shared among children, teachers, and parents | Ensured all children had necessary clothing; promoted reuse and sharing values |
Book exchange at library | Regular visits to the library to exchange books | Encouraged literacy; taught the value of sharing educational resources |
Sharing-economy examples | Teachers sharing personal experiences of bartering and swapping resources | Inspired families to adopt sharing practices; reinforced community values |
Practice | Description | Observed Impact |
---|---|---|
Classroom nature materials | Inclusion of natural items (pinecones, leaves) in the classroom | Enhanced connection with nature; sensory engagement |
Planting project | Planting seeds and observing growth over time | Understanding of plant life cycles; responsibility in caring for plants |
Bird project | Observing actual bird nests and role-playing as birds | Awareness of bird species; appreciation for wildlife |
Rearranging classroom layout | Adjusting the classroom to provide unobstructed outdoor views | Increased observation of nature; integration of indoor and outdoor learning |
Practice | Description | Observed Impact |
---|---|---|
Cardboard-recycling initiative | The children found and decided to recycle a piece of cardboard | Understanding of recycling; problem-solving skills |
Caring for small creatures | Respectful interactions with worms, snails, spiders, ants | Development of empathy; appreciation for all living things |
Trash collection during forest visits | Children collected trash found in nature and recycled it | Environmental responsibility: proactive care for the environment |
Family influence | Children’s actions inspiring sustainable practices at home | Extended impact beyond preschool; family engagement in sustainability |
Practice | Description | Observed Impact |
---|---|---|
Forest walks | Regular visits to the forest and natural areas | Joy and happiness in nature; development of observational skills |
Waterfall visits | Listening to water sounds; discussing aquatic life | Fascination with natural phenomena; learning about ecosystems |
Observing seasonal changes | Noticing differences in nature across seasons | Understanding of environmental cycles; enhanced appreciation |
Flower gathering | Collecting flowers; sensory exploration | Sensory engagement: fostering curiosity and wonder |
Main Theme | Subtheme | Key Findings |
---|---|---|
Preschool Teachers’ Views | Views of EfS in Toddler Groups | Views on ECEfS as an environmental and ecological dimension |
Views of Toddlers’ Capacity to Engage in EfS | Confidence in toddlers’ abilities to grasp ECEfS | |
Importance of starting with the youngest for long-term sustainable behaviours | ||
Preschool Teachers’ Daily Practices—Social and Cultural Dimension of Sustainability | Representations in Books, Pictures, and Toys | Inclusion of diverse materials |
Promoting diversity and inclusion | ||
Social and Cultural Diversity | Emphasis on cultural diversity | |
Support for multilingualism | ||
Equality and Equity | Adaptive learning environment | |
Child participation in decision-making | ||
Preschool Teachers’ Daily Practices—Economic Dimension of Sustainability | Consumption | Active engagement in con-versation projects and mindful use of resources in daily life |
Support for early potty training | ||
Reuse and Sorting | Integration of reuse, sorting, and composting activities in daily life | |
Collaboration with a third-party educational initiative provides a benefit | ||
Co-use, Sharing, and Redistribution | Encouragement of sharing and redistribution of re-sources like clothes, books, and toys. | |
Preschool Teachers’ Daily Practices—The Ecological/Environmental Dimension of Sustainability | About Nature | Hands-on nature projects like planting seeds and observing bird nests |
Incorporation of natural elements (pinecones, leaves) and educational materials about nature into the classroom | ||
Protecting and Caring for Nature | Encouraging children to recognize the impact of human actions on nature | |
Extending the impact beyond the preschool by influencing families with actions like picking up trash | ||
Fostering empathy towards nature by caring for small creatures | ||
Preschool and Nature | Observation of natural changes during regular vis-its | |
Fostering a connection with nature |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kahriman-Pamuk, D.; Pramling Samuelsson, I. Nurturing Sustainability in Toddlerhood: Investigating Preschool Teachers’ Views and Daily Practices in a Swedish Preschool. Children 2024, 11, 1412. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121412
Kahriman-Pamuk D, Pramling Samuelsson I. Nurturing Sustainability in Toddlerhood: Investigating Preschool Teachers’ Views and Daily Practices in a Swedish Preschool. Children. 2024; 11(12):1412. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121412
Chicago/Turabian StyleKahriman-Pamuk, Deniz, and Ingrid Pramling Samuelsson. 2024. "Nurturing Sustainability in Toddlerhood: Investigating Preschool Teachers’ Views and Daily Practices in a Swedish Preschool" Children 11, no. 12: 1412. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121412
APA StyleKahriman-Pamuk, D., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2024). Nurturing Sustainability in Toddlerhood: Investigating Preschool Teachers’ Views and Daily Practices in a Swedish Preschool. Children, 11(12), 1412. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121412