Performance Improvement of Micro-Abrasive Jet Blasting Process for Al 6061
1
Department of Aircraft Parts Engineering, International University of Korea, Jinju-si 52833, Korea
2
Department of Aeronautical & Mechanical Engineering, Changshin University, Changwon-si 51352, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2022, 10(11), 2247; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112247
Submission received: 15 September 2022
/
Revised: 5 October 2022
/
Accepted: 7 October 2022
/
Published: 1 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Functional Materials Manufacturing and Processing)
Abstract
:Aluminum 6061 is a precipitation-hardened alloy, containing magnesium and silicon as its major alloying element, and it is widely used in industries due to its remarkable mechanical properties and weld ability. Several types of machining manners are researched for aluminum 6061 alloys, and micro-abrasive jet blasting (μ-AJM) is one of the most developed processes for improving surface roughness. When operating μ-AJM on aluminum alloys, sufficient consideration of environmental variables such as particle types, nozzle diameter, pressure, standoff distance, and injection time is a prerequisite for the appropriate degree of roughness. To find the optimal conditions, a statistical method of analysis of variables was used to investigate the maximum value for depth, diameter, width, etc., of the blasting surface. According to experimental results, multiple factors have a great influence on the condition of surface roughness. The blasting processes were conducted as square and cylindrical experiments, and the parameters for optimal conditions have been derived from a surface roughness measurement system.
1. Introduction
There are several fields in precision machining methods, such as basic cutting methods, discharge and micro-thermal processing methods using lasers and water jets, and surface micromachining methods [1,2,3]. Micromachining is a widely used and developed method in the field of semiconductor manufacturing [4]. Based on micro-fluidics [5,6] technology, a variety of complex experiments have been performed by flowing fluid through a micro-channel. There is an urgent need for the production of fine structures such as high-tech ultra-precision devices, and particularly the fine processing of brittle materials such as ceramic is drawing attention. Recently, micro-abrasive jet blasting (μ-AJM) [7,8,9,10] has become one of the most attractive methods due to the shape processing condition using mechanical corrosion of brittle materials.
Particularly, the spray processing method using microparticles has been used for rust, painting, deburring and surface treatment and researched in the field of microfabrication and semiconductor manufacturing [11]. Moreover, microparticle spraying has an advantage for mask fabrication using ceramic materials with low cost, reduced processing time, and less undercutting compared with chemical methods [12,13,14,15]. Many studies have been conducted using simple two-dimensional geometric shapes as the plane base material [16,17] and, in terms of aluminum alloy [18,19], materials for fine particle spraying.
In the industrial field, performance improvement through surface modification by coating metal or implanting metal elements with ions is required. In the case of aluminum thin-plate bonding, microparticles are first sprayed at high speed to provide adequate surface roughness throughout the plate, remove foreign substances and dust and apply a bonding agent, which is different from the existing chemical treatment method. It is possible to improve the working environment by preventing the occurrence of water pollution and fundamentally preventing water pollution caused by water treatment.
In this paper, an investigation of the optimal conditions for micro-abrasive jet blasting has been derived for the appropriate degree of roughness, considering variable parameters such as fine particle alumina, silicon carbide, nozzle diameter, pressure, injection height, and injection time with the dispersion analysis method used in the experimental design. Moreover, to improve the adhesion strength of aluminum materials, a measurement system has been used for surface roughness, with the maximum depth, diameter, and width evaluated.
2. Materials and Methods
The process of μ-AJM is a particle spraying process that mechanically removes material by controlled erosion, including drilling, grooving, or part milling. The method is strong enough to cut a hole in a ceramic substrate and is sufficient to cut a slot in a fragile silicon and glass wafer. It has no impact without generating heat or vibration. The processed particles are accelerated toward the specimen by compressed air or gas at high pressure, and fine particles of several µm to several tens of µm are supplied by the accelerated air or gas and a vibrating feeder, which is a constant-amount supply device, and are mixed in the nozzle. The particles are then sprayed at high speed through the nozzle. The sprayed particles are subjected to micromachining while hitting the specimen at a speed of 80 to 200 m/s, which is basically a method of mechanical etching. Figure 1 shows the basic processing principle of particle spraying, and the workpiece is processed by front and rear or left and right scanning of the nozzle.
3. Experiments
The statistical approach to designing and analyzing experiments consists of a measurement system for data acquisition, and the select analysis method is a prerequisite. The orthogonal arrangement table was applied to the experiments’ designs due to the large number of factors. The method detects the effect of the interaction between two factors that are expected to be effective in terms of main effects and technical aspects and reduces the number of experiments at the expense of information between two factors that do not occur.
3.1. Micro-Abrasive Jet Blaster
The equipment used to process the fine particles is shown in Figure 2. A dual tank micro blaster (MB1006, COMCO INC, Burbank, CA, USA) manufactured by COMCO was used, and a dust absorber was attached to remove dust generated during the processing experiment. An air dryer was used to remove moisture from the fine microparticles and keep the system dry. The spray nozzle is a device for spraying particles onto a specimen. The difference in the diameter of the spray nozzle was expected to be a major factor in the change in surface properties. Therefore, the diameters of the spray nozzles were selected in sizes of 0.46, 0.7, 1.16, and 1.5 mm, respectively, and the experiment was conducted.
3.2. Blasting Movement System
In the case of a square specimen, a jig for fixing the specimen was prepared and tested by fixing it on the floor using a magnetic block. To fix and spray the square specimen, the center of the injection nozzle and the spray surface of the specimen were precisely matched vertically, and a guide for fixing the specimen and fixing the injection nozzle was separately manufactured and tested for adjustment of the injection distance.
Nevertheless, for cylindrical specimen experiments, a jig for spray processing was directly manufactured and used to fix the specimen and the spray nozzle, to adjust the accuracy of the spray distance, to adjust the spray height of the spray nozzle, and to control the speed of transport and rotation of the specimen.
Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of the operating system (a) and a precision particle spray processing system (b). This device enables precise fixation of the specimen and constant adjustment of the spraying distance for fine particle injection processing, and when rotating and testing a cylindrical specimen on a rotating shaft using two DC motors, the rotational speed of the specimen and the front-rear feed rate. A motor-driven stage was manufactured and used so that it could be variably adjusted.
The spraying method was to connect the hoses to the two spraying particle reservoirs to spray the spraying particles used in the experiment, respectively, when the dried air came out of the air drier. In this case, the injection particles used were SiC and Al2O3, and the injection material valve was injected in a predetermined amount through sequence control. The cylindrical specimen rotation conveying device has the function to precisely rotate and linearly feed the material using two motors and the microcontroller ATmega128. The experimental apparatus is largely composed of a mechanism that oversees rotation and linear transportation of the material and a control unit that controls the motor.
The control unit includes a potentiometer capable of inputting a continuous value, a button, and an LCD device capable of grasping the operation state of the experimental device so that the experimenter can operate intuitively. For the efficient operation of the experimental device, it displays the operating state of the device itself, so it does not need an external separate measuring instrument to understand the state, and the power supply has a built-in power conversion device, so only 220 V general power is required, and a separate external power supply is not required.
4. Experimental Results
The experiment was performed by applying the main factors and the spraying conditions obtained from the pre-tested rectangular specimen to the cylindrical specimen. The effect of the main factors on the cylindrical specimen is examined through the experiment results. Based on the conditions shown in Table 1, the depth of the injection and the width of the injection were determined through a contact-type three-dimensional shape measuring device. Moreover, as experimental factors, A as spray particle, B as nozzle diameter, and C as pressure are specified as three variable values, and D as spray height and E as spray time are designated as fixed values.
The surface roughness Ra value of the specimen subjected to the spiral surface spraying was measured through a surface roughness tester, and the result values are graphically displayed. The graph is summarized for each spray particle, and the graph is displayed based on the nozzle diameter and injection pressure. Figure 4 shows the experimental results of surface roughness Ra for SiC as the spray particle. The results show that as the size of the nozzle diameter increases, the surface roughness Ra value increases slightly, and Ra decreased when the nozzle diameter was 1.16 mm and the pressure was 100.
The results of surface roughness Ra with Al2O3 used as the spray particles are shown in Figure 5. The value for Ra slightly decreases at a nozzle diameter of 1.5 mm and at 25 kPa. The Ra value increases as the nozzle diameter increases. According to the results, the surface roughness Ra values of 0.7 mm, 1.16 mm and 1.5 mm were measured without a significant difference at 25 kPa, and the difference was due to the increase in the surface roughness as the injection pressure increased. In addition, in the graph, the surface roughness increases as the injection pressure increases. As shown in the graph of the spray particle SiC, the surface roughness Ra value increases as the nozzle diameter and injection pressure increase.
Figure 6 shows the increased surface roughness according to increasing injection pressure using the SEM (scanning electron microscope) on the nozzle diameter measuring 1.5 mm, with the working pressure increased from 25 to 100 kPa at 25 kPa increments. Nevertheless, the result shows a tendency for roughness extension and a considerably appropriate amount of roughness for each machining process.
Table 2 shows that the P value for the injected particles is 0, the P value for the nozzle diameter is 0.000, and the P value for the injection pressure is 0.000. In case of the P value being less than 0.05, the result is determined as significant. Moreover, for the contributions of factors affecting the surface roughness Ra, the contribution from the spray particles was 7.14%, the nozzle diameter was 29.55% and the injection pressure was 56.53%. When comparing the influences on the surface roughness Ra through contributions, it is judged that the influences are high and in the order of injection pressure, nozzle diameter, and injection particles.
5. Conclusions
In this study, an investigation of the main parameters of processing, such as fine particle alumina, silicon carbide, nozzle diameter, pressure, injection height, and injection time, has been researched through the dispersion analysis method in the experimental design. According to the experiments’ results, the main factors influencing each item were found to determine the contribution. The injection depth was 16.74% for the spray particles, 18.52% for the nozzle diameter, and 31.78% for the spray pressure. The spray diameter was 21.05% for the spray particles, 29.36% for the nozzle diameter, and 40.50% for the spray pressure. In addition, the surface roughness Ra was 21.05% for the spray particles, 29.36% for the nozzle diameter, and 40.50% for the spray pressure.
According to the main contributions for the cylindrical surface micro-blasting experiment, the influences on the injection depth, the injection diameter, and the surface roughness (Ra) were determined to be high and in the order of the injection pressure, the nozzle diameter, and the spray particles. As a result of the analysis, it was found that the impact level was high when the injection particle level was one SiC, the nozzle diameter was three and four (1.16 and 1.5 mm), and the injection pressure was at level four (100 kPa).
In conclusion, the method for generating the required roughness on an aluminum surface using these research results can improve environmental pollution and the working environment, unlike the conventional chemical treatment method for improving product reliability and reducing manufacturing costs. (KR. Patent No. 10-1533555).
Author Contributions
D.-K.K. built up the research project, designed the experiments and performed investigation; J.-H.L. contributed to the search process, formal analysis and wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by Changshin University Research Fund of 2022-085.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Han, B.S. (For Ultra-Precise) Application of Fine-Grained Engineering; Seon Hak Publishing Company: Incheon, Korea, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Kwon, D.G.; Wang, D.H. Optimal Blasting Conditions for Surface Profile when Micro Particle Blasting by Statistical Analysis of Orthogonal Arrays. J. Korean Soc. Manuf. Process Eng. 2016, 15, 148–154. [Google Scholar]
- Jang, H.S.; Kim, H.S.; Shin, K.H. A Study on Performance Improvement of Electrical Discharge Machining for Producing Micro-holes Using a Shot Blasting Surface Treatment. J. Korean Soc. Plast. Sci. 2012, 21, 312–318. [Google Scholar]
- Madou, M. Fundamentals of Micro Fabrication; CRC Press Inc.: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Hong, S.H.; Lee, J.E.; Cho, M.H.; Lee, S.H. Numerical Investigation on Hydrodynamic Lubrication Characteristics of Micro Dimple Textured Surfaces. J. Korean Soc. Comput. Fluids Eng. 2009, 14, 56–61. [Google Scholar]
- Park, K.H.; Min, J.K.; Kim, J.K.; Kang, S.H.; Kim, S.J.; Park, S.H. A Numerical Study on the Effect of a Microfin with a Flexible Up-down Movement on Heat Transfer using a Fluid-structure Interaction (FSI) Method. J. Korean Soc. Precis. Eng. 2011, 28, 975–983. [Google Scholar]
- Yun, J.D.; Wang, D.H.; Ahn, Y.C.; Go, C.H. Electrical Discharge Machining of Alumina Ceramic Matrix Composites Containing Electro-Conductive Titanium Carbide as a Second Phase. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 1997, 34, 1095–1098. [Google Scholar]
- Wensink, H.; Berenschot, J.W.; Jansen, H.V.; Elwenspoek, M.C. High resolution powder blast micro machining. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Micro Electro Mechanical System, Miyazaki, Japan, 23–27 January 2000; pp. 769–774. [Google Scholar]
- Wakuda, M.; Yamauchi, Y.; Kansaki, S. Effect of work piece properties on machinability in abrasive jet machining of ceramic materials. Precis. Eng. 2002, 26, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slikkerveer, P.J.; Bouten, P.C.P.; de Haas, F.C.M. High quality mechanical etching of brittle materials by powder blasting. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2000, 85, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petersen, K.E. Silicon as a Mechanical Material. Proc. IEEE 1982, 70, 420–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.C.; Lee, I.H.; Ko, T.J. Mask Modeling of a 3D Non-planar Parent Material for Micro-abrasive Jet Machining. J. Korean Soc. Precis. Eng. 2010, 27, 97. [Google Scholar]
- Ko, T.J.; Park, D.J.; Kim, H.S. Characteristics of SU-8 Mask for Abrasive Jet Machining. J. Korean Soc. Precis. Eng. 2007, 24, 71–78. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S.P.; Lee, I.H.; Ko, T.J.; Kang, H.W.; Cho, D.W. Development of Rapid Mask Fabrication Technology for Micro-abrasive Jet Machining. J. Korean Soc. Precis. Eng. 2008, 25, 2190–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wensink, H.; Jansen, H.V.; Berenschot, J.W.; Elwenspoek, M.C. Mask materials for powder blasting. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2000, 10, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Choi, Z.S.; Park, K.H.; Park, D.S. Micro Grooving of Glass Using Micro Abrasive Jet Machining. J. Korean Soc. Precis. Eng. 2001, 18, 178–183. [Google Scholar]
- Saragih, A.S.; Ko, T.J.; Kim, H.S.; Park, Y.W.; Lee, I.H. Precision assessment of micro abrasive jet machining result on glass by using thick SU-8 as a mask. Conf. Proc. Korean Soc. Precis. Eng. 2006, 2006, 493–494. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S.K.; Ryu, C.W. Characteristics of Surface Roughness in the Wire-Cut Electric Discharge Cutting Conditions of Aluminium Alloy 2024. J. Korean Soc. Manuf. Process Eng. 2012, 11, 39–45. [Google Scholar]
- Ryu, M.R.; Lee, D.H.; Lee, S.B.; Park, J.J.; Shim, J.H. Study on Performance Experiment and Analysis of Aluminum Disc Brake. J. Korean Soc. Manuf. Process Eng. 2013, 12, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Schematic diagram of micro-abrasive jet blasting.
Figure 2.
Micro-abrasive jet blaster.
Figure 3.
Schematic diagram of (a) blasting movement system, (b) rotating and straight motion jig.
Figure 4.
Experimental results of surface roughness for SiC, (a) nozzle diameter, (b) working pressure.
Figure 4.
Experimental results of surface roughness for SiC, (a) nozzle diameter, (b) working pressure.
Figure 5.
Experimental result of surface roughness for Al2O3, (a) nozzle diameter, (b) working pressure.
Figure 5.
Experimental result of surface roughness for Al2O3, (a) nozzle diameter, (b) working pressure.
Figure 6.
SEM micrographs of surface roughness increasing according to pressure increasing, (a) 25 kPa, (b) 50 kPa, (c) 75 kPa, (d) 100 kPa (magnification ×2000).
Figure 6.
SEM micrographs of surface roughness increasing according to pressure increasing, (a) 25 kPa, (b) 50 kPa, (c) 75 kPa, (d) 100 kPa (magnification ×2000).
Table 1.
The pre-tested results for main factors and conditions.
| Division | Main Factor | Experimental Condition | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Particle | SiC, Al2O3 | ||
| B | Nozzle diameter | MB1520-24(∅0.46mm), MB1520-29(∅0.7mm), MB1520-29(∅1.16mm), MB1520-29(∅1.5mm) | ||
| C | Pressure | 25 kPa, 50 kPa, 75 kPa, 100 kPa | ||
| D | Injection height | 30 mm | ||
| E | Injection time | 20 s | ||
| F | Rotating speed | 30 rpm | ||
Table 2.
The pre-tested results for main factors and conditions.
| Source | DF | Seq SS | Adj MS | F | P | Contribution (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Particle | 1 | 0.6772 | 0.67716 | 55.58 | 0.000 | 21.05 |
| Nozzle diameter | 3 | 0.9442 | 0.31475 | 22.83 | 0.000 | 29.36 |
| Pressure | 3 | 1.3026 | 0.43420 | 35.64 | 0.000 | 40.50 |
| Error | 24 | 0.2924 | 0.01218 | 9.09 | ||
| Total | 31 | 100.00 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Kwon, D.-K.; Lee, J.-H. Performance Improvement of Micro-Abrasive Jet Blasting Process for Al 6061. Processes 2022, 10, 2247. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112247
AMA Style
Kwon D-K, Lee J-H. Performance Improvement of Micro-Abrasive Jet Blasting Process for Al 6061. Processes. 2022; 10(11):2247. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112247
Chicago/Turabian StyleKwon, Dae-Kyu, and Jae-Hak Lee. 2022. "Performance Improvement of Micro-Abrasive Jet Blasting Process for Al 6061" Processes 10, no. 11: 2247. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112247
APA StyleKwon, D. -K., & Lee, J. -H. (2022). Performance Improvement of Micro-Abrasive Jet Blasting Process for Al 6061. Processes, 10(11), 2247. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112247
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
