Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Solar Drying of Brewer’s Spent Grains: A Comparison with Conventional Electric Convective Drying
Next Article in Special Issue
Weibull Reliability and Mechanical Properties of Chemical Strengthening Lightweight Glass Containers Using Spray Coating
Previous Article in Journal
A Review on Data-Driven Process Monitoring Methods: Characterization and Mining of Industrial Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thermal Behavior of Ceramic Bodies Based on Estonian Clay from the Arumetsa Deposit with Oil Shale Ash and Clinker Dust Additives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Reduction of Potential-Induced-Degradation of p-Type PERC Solar Cell Modules by an Ion-Diffusion Barrier Layer Underneath the Front Glass

1
Department of Advanced Materials Engineering, Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Korea
2
New & Renewable Energy Research Center, Korea Electronics Technology Institute, Seongnam 13509, Korea
3
PV Module Development Team, Hyundai Energy Solution, Chungcheongbuk-do 27711, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2022, 10(2), 334; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10020334
Submission received: 14 January 2022 / Revised: 25 January 2022 / Accepted: 7 February 2022 / Published: 10 February 2022

Abstract

:
With the maturation of silicon-based technologies, silicon solar cells have achieved a high conversion efficiency that approaches the theoretical limit. Currently, great efforts are being made to enhance the reliability of silicon solar cells. When the silicon solar cells are made into modules, potential-induced-degradation (PID) occurs during operation because of the high voltage applied between the frame and the cells, which reduces the efficiency and output power. The diffusion of Na+ ions from the front glass and the increased leakage current along the migration path are the major causes of PID. In this work, atomic layer deposition (ALD)-grown amorphous thin Al2O3 layers are introduced underneath the front glass to prevent the diffusion of Na+ ions and the resulting PID. Accelerated PID tests showed that an ALD-grown Al2O3 layer of 30 nm could effectively suppress PID seriously affecting the conversion efficiency or light transmittance. The introduction of an ion-diffusion barrier underneath the front glass is expected to contribute to securing the long-term reliability of silicon-based electricity generation, together with the introduction of barrier layers inside the solar cells.

1. Introduction

As the demand for energy continues to increase worldwide, interest in eco-friendly renewable energy has accelerated because of the increasingly serious environmental pollution and global warming, which is recognized as the main culprit of climate change. Solar energy conversion devices, especially photovoltaic cells, have been regarded as most promising among the various types of renewable energy because of their unlimited reserves and high energy conversion efficiency [1,2]. Among the photovoltaic devices, crystalline silicon solar cells have developed most rapidly, because of their high conversion efficiency and a mature silicon-based industry; as a result, they account for more than 80% of the global solar cell market [3,4,5,6]. According to the Best Research-Cell Efficiency chart reported by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, the highest cell efficiency for a single-crystalline silicon solar cell is 26.1%, achieved by the Institute for Solar Energy Research, Germany [7].
Most solar cell modules provided in the market guarantee operation for longer than 25 years. As the conversion efficiency approaches the theoretical limit of 29%, the interest is shifting from efficiency to long-term stability.
When silicon solar cell modules are connected in series to produce a high voltage of 600–1000 V, the same high voltage is applied between the grounded module frame and the solar cell, which causes a large leakage current and loss of power output during the production of electricity. This is referred to as potential-induced-degradation (PID), which deteriorates the photovoltaic performance of crystalline silicon solar cell modules over a long period of time [8,9,10,11,12].
PID is known to occur as a result of the diffusion of Na+ ions present in the soda-lime front glass that is generally used for silicon solar cell modules and contains 12% Na2O. When a high voltage is applied, Na+ ions inside the front glass diffuse into the cells across the encapsulant and anti-reflection coatings. The diffused Na+ ions accumulate at the interface between the anti-reflection coatings and the cells or at the stacking faults inside the silicon, which forms a conduction path, leading to a large leakage current [13,14,15,16,17], which gradually degrades the conversion efficiency and maximum power output of the modules.
The PID can be reduced by adjusting the refractive index of the anti-reflection coatings formed on top of the cells. As the refractive index of silicon nitride (SiNx), which is typically used for the anti-reflection coating of silicon solar cells, increases, the conductivity also increases, resulting in a reduction in the migration of positively charged ions to SiNx. This effectively enhances the resistance to PID. However, if the refractive index becomes higher than 2.14, light with a short wavelength cannot be absorbed by silicon, causing a decrease in the cell efficiency as a result of the reduction in the photocurrent [16,17,18].
An alternative way to prevent PID is to insert a layer that can block the penetration of ions from the glass [19,20]. This layer can be located between the front glass and the front encapsulant or between the anti-reflection coating and the cell. These blocking layers are known to effectively suppress the diffusion of Na+ ions inside the glass and the shunting path and consequently reduce PID. Possible candidates for this blocking layer include Al2O3, TiO2, and SiO2 [21,22,23]. Previous work done by Jung et al. shows that an ultrathin layer of SiOx formed between the cell and the anti-reflection coating effectively reduces PID [24].
Herein, we explored the effect of Al2O3 thin layers, which are known to have high light transmittance with outstanding barrier performance against ion diffusion, on the reduction of PID in silicon solar cell modules. As the thickness of Al2O3 increased, the PID was remarkably reduced, and a 30 nm layer of Al2O3 could suppress PID effectively.

2. Materials and Methods

Ions can diffuse through the grain boundaries in crystalline Al2O3 layers, and an amorphous phase of Al2O3 is required for suitable performance as a diffusion barrier. For this purpose, thermal atomic layer deposition (ALD) was utilized for the growth of the Al2O3 ion diffusion barrier layers. Soda-lime glass and quartz were cut to a size of 5 cm × 5 cm. These substrates were first ultrasonically cleaned with acetone, methanol, and isopropyl alcohol sequentially for 15 min each and finally rinsed with deionized water. The cleaned glass substrates were then dried in a thermal ALD chamber at 150 °C for 30 min. Thermal ALD of Al2O3 was performed at the same temperature with trimethylaluminum (TMA, Al(CH3)3) and H2O as the precursor and reactant, respectively. During each cycle, the substrate was exposed to the precursor for 0.2 s, followed by purging with 80 sccm of Ar for 20 s.
Structural characterization was performed using X-ray diffraction (Empyrean, Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK) and scanning electron microscopy (JSM-7610F Plus, Jeol, Tokyo, Japan). The light transmittance was measured using UV-vis spectroscopy (Optizen POP, K LAB, Daejeon, Korea) for 10 to 30 nm Al2O3 films deposited on quartz substrates.
To characterize the PID, an acceleration test was performed using IEC62804-1, an internationally recognized standard-based solar cell test device [25]. For silicon solar cells, passivated emitter and rear contact (PERC) cells, which represent the largest portion of the market, were used. As shown in Figure 1, p-type PERC solar cells, encapsulants, and Al2O3-grown sola-lime glass were placed on an aluminum chuck heated to 60 °C on a hot plate [26]. Then, a 2-kg weight was loaded on top of the glass and +1000 V was applied to the bottom aluminum chuck for 96 h. Light I-V curves and electroluminescence (EL) images were obtained to evaluate the effect of the blocking layers on PID. To ensure testing uniformity, four module-like layer stacks underwent an accelerated test at the same time. Note that PERC solar cells without oxidation layers inserted between the anti-reflection coating and the cell were examined because these oxidation layers inside the cells are known to prevent PID as well.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of the ALD-Grown Al2O3 for Si-Solar Cell Usage

3.1.1. Uniform Growth of Al2O3 with Amorphous Structure

Figure 2 shows the SEM plan view and cross-section view images of the ALD-grown Al2O3 thin films on Si wafer (a) and glass (b), (c). For both Al2O3 films, the calibrated growth rate was 1.3 Å/cycle. SEM plan view images of the Al2O3 films, as shown in Figure 2a,b, allow reasonable doubt regarding the polycrystalline microstructure. However, all the ALD-grown Al2O3 thin films investigated in this work exhibited an amorphous structure, which is confirmed by the absence of a pronounced XRD peak (not shown), as is generally expected for films grown by ALD.

3.1.2. Optical Transmittance and Passivation Properties of Al2O3 Thin Films

Prior to the accelerated PID test, the light transmittance of Al2O3-coated quartz substrates with various Al2O3 thicknesses was characterized, as shown in Figure 3a,b. Note that light transmittance through the glass and light absorption by silicon decreased with a thick Al2O3 layer. As presented in Figure 3a, the light transmittance in the wavelength range of 200–300 nm was slightly reduced with increasing thickness of Al2O3. However, the average transmittance for the 200–1000 nm range was greater than 94% and independent of the Al2O3 thickness, although the transmittance for 30 nm was slightly smaller than the others.
To further confirm the validity of the ALD process used in this work for Al2O3 thin film growth, we examined the surface passivation properties using capacitance-voltage measurements. For 10 nm-thick Al2O3 films grown on p-type single-crystalline Si wafers, the capacitance-voltage profile shifted to a positive bias after annealing, as shown in Figure 3I, which is indicative of negatively charged Al2O3 thin films with the appropriate passivation properties of well-grown Al2O3 thin films.

3.2. Accelerated PID Test with Light I-V and Electroluminescent Measurement

The results of the accelerated PID tests are shown in Figure 4. As mentioned in the Materials and Methods section, the current and voltage with and without light were measured before and after loading a 2 kg weight for 96 h. Note that the reference sample is the initial module before the accelerated PID test. The rest of the samples correspond to the measurement results after the accelerated PID test with respect to the designated Al2O3 layer thickness. Before the PID test, all the modules showed similar I-V characteristics; therefore, only the module without the Al2O3 layer was used as the reference.
As shown in Figure 4a, the Al2O3 layer deposited underneath the front glass can effectively prevent PID. Without the Al2O3 diffusion barrier, Voc was remarkably reduced, from 0.658 V to 0.572 V. However, a 10 nm-thick layer of Al2O3 recovers Voc to that of the reference module. Jsc does not change significantly, which can be inferred from the similar light absorption properties presented in Figure 3. All the modules exhibited similar series resistance, which can be obtained from the slope that crosses the voltage axis, regardless of the presence of the Al2O3 diffusion barrier layer. However, slopes that cross the current axis showed different behavior; the module without the Al2O3 layer showed a quite stiff slope, whereas the slopes of the modules with the Al2O3 layer recovered close to that of the reference. This is predictable because the leakage current that causes PID is related to the shunt resistance and not to the series resistance.
Although the Voc and Jsc of the cells with Al2O3 layers were almost the same, regardless of the thickness of Al2O3, the change in the fill factor and the solar conversion efficiency of each module were remarkably reduced in cells with an Al2O3 layer, as shown in Figure 4b. The fill factor decreased from 75.3% to 72.4% without the Al2O3 layer, while it recovered to its initial value when employing an Al2O3 layer of only 10 nm. Without the Al2O3 layer, the conversion efficiency deteriorated significantly; it dropped by approximately 18.8% after the PID test. However, as the thickness of Al2O3 increased, the efficiency drop tended to decrease, even though there was some fluctuation. Even with only 10 nm of Al2O3, the efficiency after the PID test for 96 h was 19.92%, which indicates that the efficiency decreased by approximately 2.54%. When the thickness of Al2O3 was 30 nm, the efficiency loss was only 0.98% after the PID test.
PID causes the formation of defects inside the cell, which can be analyzed by EL. As presented in Figure 4c–f, lots of defects were generated, possibly due to the diffusion of Na+ ions, after the PID test when no Al2O3 layer was inserted. Although 10 nm-thick Al2O3 demonstrated a quite reduced PID as shown in light I-V measurement results, EL images of 10 nm indicated that there were still non-negligible number of defects. It could be confirmed that the defects caused by the diffusion of Na+ ions disappeared only when the thickness was 30 nm.
From the light I-V measurement and EL results, it can be concluded that the optimum thickness of Al2O3, the diffusion barrier of Na+ ions from the front glass, is 30 nm. All the changes of the photovoltaic parameters with various Al2O3 thicknesses after the accelerated PID test were summarized in Table 1.
According to V. Naumann et al., an accumulation of alkali metals should be found at the interface of the front side coatings of the solar cell, which can be demonstrated by lock-in thermography (LIT), and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy (ToF-SIMS), when PID occurs [27]. Further investigation using these analysis techniques would manifest the correlation between the occurrence of PID and the diffusion of Na+ ions.

4. Conclusions

The improvement in solar cell efficiency has received much recent attention, and intensive research to achieve higher efficiency has been conducted. However, with the widespread use of solar cells, long-term reliability has become another important aspect. PID is regarded as a major source of deterioration that occurs during operation when silicon-based solar cells are made into modules. The diffusion of Na+ ions into the cells and the resulting increase in leakage current are one of the main causes of PID. When ALD-grown amorphous Al2O3 thin layers of 30 nm are introduced underneath the front glass of the module, PID is effectively prevented without a serious decrease in the Voc, Jsc, or solar conversion efficiency. This method is expected to have a greater effect when this Na+ ion-diffusion barrier is combined with the insertion of another barrier layer between the anti-reflection coatings and solar cells.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.J., K.-s.O. and S.R.; methodology, E.J.; experimental design, sample fabrication, data curation, E.J. and K.-s.O.; writing, E.J.; review and editing, S.R.; supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, S.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20183010014320). This work was also supported by Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) grant funded by the Korea Government (MOTIE) (P0017012, Human Resource Development Program for Industrial Innovation). Also, this work was supported by Kyonggi University’s Graduate Research Assistantship 2020.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Soo Min Kim at the Gumi Electronics & Information Technology Research Institute regarding the formation of module-like layer structures and the accelerated PID test.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Saga, T. Advances in crystalline silicon solar cell technology for industrial mass production. NPG Asia Mater. 2010, 2, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Tsoutsos, T.; Frantzeskaki, N.; Gekas, V. Environmental impacts from the solar energy technologies. Energy Policy 2005, 33, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gul, M.; Kotak, Y.; Muneer, T. Review on recent trend of solar photovoltaic technology. Energy Explor. Exploit. 2016, 34, 485–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Battaglia, C.; Cuevas, A.; Wolf, S.D. High-efficiency crystalline silicon solar cells: Status and perspectives. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1552–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Wilson, G.M.; Al-Jassim, M.; Metzger, W.K.; Glunz, S.W.; Verlinden, P.; Xiong, G.; Mansfield, L.M.; Stanbery, B.J.; Zhu, K.; Yan, Y.; et al. The 2020 photovoltaic technologies roadmap. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2020, 53, 493001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chaar, L.E.; Iamont, L.A.; Zein, N.E. Review of photovoltaic technologies. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 2165–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yoshikawa, K.; Kawasaki, H.; Yoshida, W.; Irie, T.; Konishi, K.; Nakano, K.; Uto, T.; Adachi, D.; Kanematsu, M.; Uzu, H.; et al. Silicon heterojunction solar cell with interdigitated back contacts for a photoconversion efficiency over 26%. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nagel, H.; Metz, A.; Wangemann, K. Crystalline Si solar cells and modules featuring excellent stability against potential-induced degradation. In Proceedings of the 26th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, Hamburg, Germany, 5–9 September 2011. [Google Scholar]
  9. Harvey, S.P.; Aguiar, J.A.; Hacke, P.; Guthrey, H.; Johnston, S.; Al-Jassim, M. Sodium Accumulation at Potential-Induced Degradation Shunted Areas in Polycrystalline Silicon Modules. IEEE J. Photovoltaics 2016, 6, 1440–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lausch, D.; Naumann, V.; Graff, A.; Hähnel, A.; Breitenstein, O.; Hagendorf, C.; Bagdahn, J. Sodium Outdiffusion from Stacking Faults as Root Cause for the Recovery Process of Potential-induced degradation (PID). Energy Procedia 2014, 55, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jaeckel, B.; Cosic, M.; Arp, J. PID Effect of c-Si Modules: Study of Degradation and Recovery to More Closely Mimic Field Behavior. Isr. J. Chem. 2015, 55, 1091–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bora, B.; Mondal, S.; Prasad, B.; Sastry, O.S.; Bangar, M.; Tripathi, A.K.; Banerjee, C. Accelerated stress testing of potential induced degradation susceptibility of PV modules under different climatic conditions. Sol. Energy 2021, 223, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xiao, C.; Jiang, C.S.; Harvey, S.P.; Sulas, D.; Chen, X.; Liu, J.; Pan, J.; Moutinho, H.; Norman, A.; Hacke, P.; et al. Large-Area Material and junction Damage in c-Si solar Cells by Potential-Induced Degradation. Sol. RRL 2019, 3, 1800303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Naumann, V.; Brzuska, C.; Werner, M.; Großer, S.; Hagendorf, C. Investigations on the formation of stacking fault-like PID-shunts. Energy Procedia 2016, 92, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Luo, W.; Khoo, Y.S.; Hacke, P.; Naumann, V.; Lausch, D.; Harvey, S.P.; Singh, J.P.; Chai, J.; Wang, Y.; Aberle, A.G.; et al. Potential-induced degradation in photovoltaic modules: A critical review. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 43–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Pingel, S.; Frank, O.; Winkler, M.; Daryan, S.; Geipel, T.; Hoehne, H.; Berghold, J. Potential Induced Degradation of solar cells and panels. In Proceedings of the 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA, 20–25 June 2010. [Google Scholar]
  17. Naumann, V.; Lausch, D.; Hähnel, A.; Bauer, J.; Breitenstein, O.; Graff, A.; Werner, M.; Swatek, S.; Großer, S.; Bagdahn, J.; et al. Explanation of potential-induced degradation of the shunting type by Na decoration of stacking faults in Si solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2014, 120, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bae, S.H.; Oh, W.W.; Kim, S.M.; Kim, Y.D.; Park, S.G.; Kang, Y.M.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, D.W. Potential Induced Degradation (PID) of Crystalline Silicon Solar Modules. Korean J. Mater. Res. 2014, 24, 326–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Oh, J.; Dauksher, B.; Bowden, S.; Tamizhmani, G.; Hacke, P.; D’Amico, J. Further studies on the Effect of SiNx Refractive Index and Emitter Sheet Resistance on Potential-Induced Degradation. IEEE J. Photovoltaics 2017, 7, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gou, X.; Li, X.; Zhou, S.; Wang, S.; Fan, W.; Huang, Q. PID Testing Method Suitable for Process Control of Solar Cells Mass Production. Int. J. Photoenergy 2015, 2015, 863248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lu, L.; Shen, H.; Jiang, F.; Yang, C.; Lin, L. The enhanced conductivity of AZO thin films on soda lime glass with an ultrathin Al2O3 buffer layer. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2010, 405, 3320–3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hara, K.; Ichinose, H.; Murakami, T.N.; Masuda, A. Crystalline Si photovoltaic modules based on TiO2-coated cover glass against potential-induced degradation. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 44291–44295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kapur, J.; Stika, K.M.; Westphal, C.S.; Norwood, J.L.; Hamzavytehrany, B. Prevention of potential-induced degradation with thin ionomer film. IEEE J. Photovoltaics 2014, 5, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jung, D.W.; Oh, K.S.; Jang, E.J.; Chan, S.I.; Ryu, S.W. Thickness Effect of SiOx Layer Inserted between Anti-Reflection Coating and p-n Junction on Potential-Induced Degradation (PID) of PERC Solar Cells. J. Microelectron. Packag. Soc. 2019, 26, 75–80. [Google Scholar]
  25. Park, H.; Jeong, J.; Shin, E.; Kim, S.; Yi, J. A reliability study of silicon heterojunction photovoltaic modules exposed to damp heat testing. Microelectron. Eng. 2019, 216, 111081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yamaguchi, S.; Ohdaira, K. Degradation behavior of crystalline silicon solar cells in a cell-level potential-induced degradation test. Sol. Energy 2017, 155, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Naumann, V.; Hagendorf, C.; Grosser, S.; Werner, M.; Bagdahn, J. Micro Structural Root Cause Analysis of Potential Induced Degradation in c-Si Solar Cells. Energy Procedia 2012, 27, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of the accelerated PID test. A 2 kg weight made of aluminum was used. Four module-like stack samples were tested at the same time. After 96 h, each stack was disassembled, and I-V measurements were performed.
Figure 1. Schematic of the accelerated PID test. A 2 kg weight made of aluminum was used. Four module-like stack samples were tested at the same time. After 96 h, each stack was disassembled, and I-V measurements were performed.
Processes 10 00334 g001
Figure 2. SEM plan view images of the ALD-grown Al2O3 thin films on (a) single crystalline Si wafer, (b) glass. (c) SEM cross-section view image of the ALD-grown Al2O3 thin films on a glass.
Figure 2. SEM plan view images of the ALD-grown Al2O3 thin films on (a) single crystalline Si wafer, (b) glass. (c) SEM cross-section view image of the ALD-grown Al2O3 thin films on a glass.
Processes 10 00334 g002
Figure 3. (a) Light transmittance for 200 to 1000 nm range of ALD-grown Al2O3 thin films with various thicknesses. (b) Average light transmittance with respect to the thickness of the Al2O3 layer. (c) Capacitance-voltage profile of a p-type single-crystalline silicon wafer passivated by the ALD-grown 10 nm Al2O3 thin layers.
Figure 3. (a) Light transmittance for 200 to 1000 nm range of ALD-grown Al2O3 thin films with various thicknesses. (b) Average light transmittance with respect to the thickness of the Al2O3 layer. (c) Capacitance-voltage profile of a p-type single-crystalline silicon wafer passivated by the ALD-grown 10 nm Al2O3 thin layers.
Processes 10 00334 g003
Figure 4. Characterization results of PERC cells after the accelerated PID test. (a) Light I–V, (b) efficiency changes, electroluminescent images obtained after the PID test; (c) ref—before the PID test, (d) without the Al2O3 layer, (e) 10 nm Al2O3, and (f) 30 nm Al2O3.
Figure 4. Characterization results of PERC cells after the accelerated PID test. (a) Light I–V, (b) efficiency changes, electroluminescent images obtained after the PID test; (c) ref—before the PID test, (d) without the Al2O3 layer, (e) 10 nm Al2O3, and (f) 30 nm Al2O3.
Processes 10 00334 g004
Table 1. Photovoltaic parameters with various Al2O3 thicknesses after the accelerated PID test. The changes with respect to the values of reference sample are shown together in the parentheses.
Table 1. Photovoltaic parameters with various Al2O3 thicknesses after the accelerated PID test. The changes with respect to the values of reference sample are shown together in the parentheses.
SampleVOC
(V)
JSC
(mA/cm2)
FF
(%)
Efficiency
(%)
Reference0.65841.2475.320.44
0 nm Al2O30.572
(−13.07%)
40.08
(−2.81%)
72.4
(−3.85%)
16.6
(−18.79%)
10 nm Al2O30.658
(0%)
40.32
(−2.23%)
75.1
(−0.27%)
19.92
(−2.54%)
20 nm Al2O30.655
(−0.46%)
40.48
(−1.84%)
70.9
(−5.84%)
18.8
(−8.02%)
30 nm Al2O30.658
(0%)
40.28
(−2.32%)
76.4
(1.46%)
20.24
(−0.98%)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jang, E.; Oh, K.-s.; Ryu, S. Reduction of Potential-Induced-Degradation of p-Type PERC Solar Cell Modules by an Ion-Diffusion Barrier Layer Underneath the Front Glass. Processes 2022, 10, 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10020334

AMA Style

Jang E, Oh K-s, Ryu S. Reduction of Potential-Induced-Degradation of p-Type PERC Solar Cell Modules by an Ion-Diffusion Barrier Layer Underneath the Front Glass. Processes. 2022; 10(2):334. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10020334

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jang, Eunjin, Kyoung-suk Oh, and Sangwoo Ryu. 2022. "Reduction of Potential-Induced-Degradation of p-Type PERC Solar Cell Modules by an Ion-Diffusion Barrier Layer Underneath the Front Glass" Processes 10, no. 2: 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10020334

APA Style

Jang, E., Oh, K. -s., & Ryu, S. (2022). Reduction of Potential-Induced-Degradation of p-Type PERC Solar Cell Modules by an Ion-Diffusion Barrier Layer Underneath the Front Glass. Processes, 10(2), 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10020334

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop