Next Article in Journal
Property Changes of Low-Permeability Oil Reservoirs Under Long-Term Water Flooding
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrospun Fibers of Ecovio® Polymer Blends with Antimicrobial Tea Tree Essential Oil: Enhanced Chemical and Biological Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Study of CO2 Hydrate Formation in Marine Oil–Gas Based on Additive Effect
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Antileishmanial, Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Potential of Cecropia concolor Willd (Urticaceae), an Amazonian Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Green Medicine: Advancing Antimicrobial Solutions with Diverse Terrestrial and Marine Plant-Derived Compounds

1
National Marine Biodiversity of Korea (MABIK), Seochun 33662, Republic of Korea
2
Marine Integrated Biomedical Technology Center, The National Key Research Institutes in Universities, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea
3
Research Center for Marine Integrated Bionics Technology, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Food Science and Technology, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea
5
Smart Food Manufacturing Project Group, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea
6
Ocean and Fisheries Development International Cooperation Institute, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea
7
International Graduate Program of Fisheries Science, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2024, 12(11), 2316; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112316
Submission received: 13 September 2024 / Revised: 12 October 2024 / Accepted: 21 October 2024 / Published: 22 October 2024

Abstract

:
Infectious diseases continue to cause global morbidity and mortality. The rise of drug-resistant pathogens is a major challenge to modern medicine. Plant-based antimicrobials may solve this issue; hence, this review discussed in detail plant-sourced antimicrobial drugs as an alternative toward bacterial, fungal, and viral pathogens. Plant-derived chemicals from various sources such as marine, medicinal, and non-medicinal sources have diverse antimicrobial properties. Complex chemical profiles from these sources allow these molecules to interact with several targets in the microbial pathogens. Due to their multi-component composition, these compounds are more effective and less likely to acquire resistance than single-target antibiotics. Medicinal herbs have long been used for their antimicrobial properties; however, non-medicinal plants have also been identified for their antimicrobial properties. Other interesting new pathways for the identification of antimicrobials include marine plants, which contain a wide variety of metabolites that are both distinct and varied. We have conducted a thorough literature search for the medicinal, non-medicinal, and marine plant-derived molecules with antimicrobial roles from databases which include Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. The review also discussed the synergistic potential of combining these plant-derived compounds with traditional antimicrobial drugs to attenuate the microbial pathogenesis. Based on the existing research and advancements, the review article emphasizes the importance of continuing research into plant-based antimicrobials from these many sources and integrating them with existing therapies to combat the rising threat of drug-resistant infections.

1. Introduction

The infectious diseases that are caused by pathogenic microorganisms continue to be the largest cause of sickness and death throughout the globe, posing a continuing challenge to the health systems that are in place across the world [1]. Since the discovery of antibiotics, the treatment of bacterial infections has undergone a revolutionary change, which has resulted in a large reduction in the mortality and morbidity rates associated with these diseases [2]. On the other hand, the development and proliferation of multi-drug-resistant (MDR) infections have significantly reduced the effectiveness of standard antimicrobial treatments [3]. The presence of these resistant strains undermines the treatment procedures that are now in place, which results in longer illnesses, greater healthcare expenses, and increased fatality rates. The development of antibiotic resistance may be attributed to a number of different processes, one of which is variations in the permeability of the cell membrane. This can occur either by decreasing the drug’s capacity to penetrate the cell or by increasing the efflux pumps’ ability to eliminate the drug. Also, bacteria can deactivate antibiotics or change their targets, as well as other resistance mechanisms, as documented in the literature and shown in Figure 1 [4]. A similar pattern may be seen in fungal and viral infections, where the mechanisms of resistance provide an increasing challenge to the traditional treatments that are now available [5]. In fungi, resistance often develops due to the alteration of drug targets, the overexpression of efflux pumps, or the production of biofilm, all of which make it difficult for antifungal drugs to enter and work efficiently [6]. On the other hand, viruses can acquire resistance to antiviral treatments mostly due to genetic changes that modify the structure of viral proteins. This allows viruses to avoid the effects of antiviral drugs [7]. Because of this, one of the most important problems in modern medicine is the pressing need for novel antimicrobial treatments [8,9]. There is a renaissance in the exploration of alternate sources for new antimicrobial drugs [10], which is occurring in the context of the rising challenge of infection resistance. Compounds originating from plants, which include both terrestrial and marine flora, represent a potential new frontier among these possibilities. Traditional single-target antibiotics have a strategic disadvantage in comparison to these plant-based medicines because of their various chemical profiles, which offer a large reservoir of bioactive compounds and provide a strategic advantage [11,12]. Complex interactions with various microbial targets are made easier by the multidimensional character of plant-derived antimicrobials, which often include numerous active components. This complexity helps to circumvent or postpone the development of resistance, which is a key constraint associated with traditional drugs [13].
Over the course of many centuries, medicinal plants have been an essential component of traditional medical practices in various cultures. Their antimicrobial characteristics have been well researched and recorded, and a significant number of them have been exploited in the creation of therapeutic drugs that are now in practice [14]. It has been known for a long time that some plants, such as garlic (Allium sativum), neem (Azadirachta indica), and turmeric (Curcuma longa), have the capacity to suppress the growth of microorganisms via a variety of different methods [15,16,17]. Recent developments in phytochemistry and pharmacology have rekindled interest in these ancient treatments, with current research verifying and increasing their medicinal potential. In addition to well-known medicinal plants, non-medicinal plants—those not typically employed in medical contexts—are emerging as important sources of new antimicrobial agents [18]. These previously neglected plants have shown promising antimicrobial activity due to their distinct and frequently undiscovered chemical compositions [19]. Research into non-medicinal plants broadens the range of possible antimicrobial agents, perhaps leading to the identification of new compounds with novel modes of action. Marine plants, which include seaweeds and seagrasses, are another underexplored source of bioactive compounds [20]. The marine environment, with its extreme conditions and distinct biological niches, promotes the generation of varied and new metabolites with strong antimicrobial properties [21]. Marine plants such as red algae (e.g., Gracilaria and Gelidium species) and seagrasses have shown the potential to provide new classes of antimicrobial agents that may offer novel mechanisms of action against resistant pathogens [22,23,24]. The combination of plant-derived chemicals with conventional antibacterial medicines is a strategic approach to improving treatment results. Combining these chemicals has the potential to synergize with current therapies, increasing effectiveness while decreasing the chance of resistance development [25,26]. Furthermore, the use of plant-derived metabolites as scaffolds in the synthesis and semi-synthesis of new pharmaceuticals opens up a promising avenue for drug innovation, possibly leading to the creation of innovative therapeutic agents that address the limits of present therapies.
While commercially available plant-based antimicrobials such as tea tree oil (Melaleuca alternifolia), neem oil (A. indica), and cranberry extract (proanthocyanidins) are well known for their antimicrobial properties and are widely used in healthcare, agriculture, and cosmetics, the primary focus of this review is to investigate novel and less explored plant-derived compounds. These commercial drugs have been extensively researched and evaluated in the current literature, and they have well-established applications for treating infections and other health conditions [26,27]. However, many of these commercially accessible compounds have drawbacks such as chemical variability, a limited antimicrobial spectrum, and bioavailability difficulties [28]. While tea tree oil is often used for its antimicrobial properties, its efficiency varies depending on the source and technique of extraction, and some users report skin sensitivity in greater quantities [29]. These limitations underscore the need for more research into novel plant-based antimicrobials that may have greater therapeutic promise. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the potential of medicinal, non-medicinal, and marine plant-based antimicrobials in combating antimicrobial-resistant microbial pathogens. These well-studied and understudied plants have a wide reservoir of chemicals that may display broader antimicrobial action, increased effectiveness, and improved safety profiles, possibly presenting novel methods for combating multi-drug-resistant pathogens. By investigating compounds from these plants, the review emphasizes their varied antimicrobial capabilities and discusses their possible integration with traditional medicinal products. The review will support current research results, underlining the need to continue investigating these various sources and their relevance in establishing effective ways to fight resistant microbial pathogens.

2. Plant-Based Antimicrobials

Plant-based antimicrobials represent a diverse and potent group of compounds derived from medicinal, non-medicinal, and marine plants, offering novel solutions to combat microbial infections [30]. These compounds, developed as part of plants’ natural defense mechanisms, exhibit various activities against bacteria, fungi, and viruses [31]. As illustrated in Figure 2, examples of these bioactive compounds include rhein and luteolin from medicinal plants, berberine and abietic acid from non-medicinal plants, and fucoxanthin and pheophytin from marine plants. These compounds showcase the diversity of plant-derived antimicrobials and their varying structures across different plant sources. With the increasing threat of antimicrobial resistance, exploring plant-derived bioactive substances has gained momentum, providing alternative and complementary strategies to conventional antibiotics. Plant-based antimicrobials hold immense potential for advancing infection management in healthcare and agricultural settings by targeting multiple microbial pathways and showing synergistic effects with existing drugs [32,33].

2.1. Medicinal Plants

Medicinal plants have been a cornerstone of traditional remedies across cultures and civilizations for centuries. The antimicrobial properties of plants were harnessed to treat infections long before modern antibiotics were discovered [34]. Some of the earliest records of plant use come from ancient civilizations like the Egyptians, Greeks, and Chinese, who used herbs like Echinacea purpurea (coneflower) and Curcuma longa (turmeric) to treat wounds and infections [35]. These plants, often referred to as “green medicine”, were passed down through generations, each culture contributing to the vast repository of knowledge on natural therapies [36]. Today, many of these medicinal plants have become the subject of rigorous scientific research, confirming their efficacy and uncovering the mechanisms by which they exert antimicrobial activity (Table 1). Lantana camara, a plant widely recognized for its medicinal value in tropical regions, is a source of lectins, a class of proteins with carbohydrate-binding abilities [37]. Lectins have been found to disrupt bacterial cell membranes, preventing the growth of microbial pathogens. Studies have demonstrated that lectins from L. camara are effective at a concentration of 10 µg/disk against a spectrum of bacterial strains, including Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli. These pathogens are often associated with serious infections, particularly in healthcare settings, where antibiotic resistance is rampant. In addition to its antimicrobial properties, the lectin from L. camara has shown the ability to inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells, such as HT29 colon cancer cells. This dual activity—both antimicrobial and anticancer—suggests that lectins from this plant could have broad therapeutic applications, particularly in addressing multi-drug resistant (MDR) infections and potentially cancer.
Figure 2. The substances of plant-based antimicrobials.
Figure 2. The substances of plant-based antimicrobials.
Processes 12 02316 g002
Also, Desmodium styracifolium, a plant used in traditional Chinese medicine, is a rich source of flavonoids, including 5,7-dihydroxy-2′,3′,4′-trimethoxyflavone [38]. This compound has been shown to inhibit the growth of Acidovorax avenae subsp. cattleyae, a bacterial pathogen that affects crops. At a concentration of 125 µg/mL, this flavonoid effectively suppressed bacterial growth, making it a promising bioactive agent for plant disease control. Moreover, its ability to inhibit Magnaporthe oryzae, a fungal pathogen responsible for rice blast, in both in vitro and in vivo studies further underscores its versatility. The dual antimicrobial activity of this compound against both bacterial and fungal pathogens presents exciting possibilities for its use in integrated pest management and medical antimicrobial strategies. Resveratrol, a well-known polyphenolic molecule, has been shown in many studies to have strong antibacterial and antifungal action. For example, in in vivo experiments, resveratrol was tested against Staphylococcus aureus, P. aeruginosa, and Candida albicans, and it was discovered to reduce an acute antigen-dependent reaction by regulating the immune response, favoring the Th2 response over the Th1-type response [39]. A similar pattern has been seen with Zataria multiflora, which has shown significant antibacterial activity, notably against Acinetobacter baumannii. Treatment with Z. multiflora extract resulted in no identifiable colonies in lung tissue cultures of pneumonic mice that were infected with clinical isolates of A. baumannii [40]. This demonstrates the potential of Z. multiflora as a natural antibacterial agent. Research conducted in clinical settings has shown that the bioactive molecule known as rhodmyrtone has antibacterial properties. Because it has been shown to be both effective and safe in treating inflammatory acne lesions, rhodomyrtone has emerged as a potentially useful natural alternative to synthetic antibiotics, especially in dermatological applications [41].
Research has shown that medicinal plant bioactive compounds, such as flavonoids, terpenoids, alkaloids, and polyphenols, can interfere with microbial processes in multiple ways [42]. They can inhibit bacterial cell wall synthesis, disrupt membrane integrity, interfere with DNA replication, and prevent biofilm formation—one of the key challenges in combating antibiotic resistance [43]. In addition, these compounds often have multiple targets within the microbial cell, making it more difficult for resistance to develop [44]. Medicinal plants offer not only an alternative but also an adjunct to conventional antibiotics [45]. Studies have demonstrated the synergistic effects of plant compounds when used in combination with standard antibiotics, enhancing their effectiveness and reducing the required dosage [46,47]. This holds significant potential in treating infections caused by multi-drug-resistant pathogens [48]. Also, the evidence supporting their effectiveness in both in vitro and in vivo studies, as well as in clinical trials, underscores the importance of further research and the development of these plant-based compounds.
Table 1. Active compounds derived from medicinal, non-medicinal, and seaweeds with antimicrobial roles toward diverse microbial pathogens.
Table 1. Active compounds derived from medicinal, non-medicinal, and seaweeds with antimicrobial roles toward diverse microbial pathogens.
Name of CompoundsName of PlantStructureActive ConcentrationMicrobial PathogensBiological RoleReferences
Medicinal plant
LectinLantana camara-10 μg/diskKlebsiella pnuemoniae,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
Escherichia coli
-
Growth inhibitory effects on HT29 cells
-
Antibacterial and antifungal activity
[37]
Lantic acid Processes 12 02316 i0017.81 mg/mL
0.97 mg/mL
E. coli,
Staphylococcus aureus
-
Antibacterial activity
[49]
RheinCassia alata L.Processes 12 02316 i002IC50 of 2.5 μg/mLAcidovorax avenae subsp. cattlvae
-
Effectively controlled rice blast, tomato late blight, wheat leaf rot, and red pepper anthracnose in vivo
-
Antibacterial effect
[50]
EmodinProcesses 12 02316 i00332 μg/mL
64 μg/mL
Candida albicans,
C. parapsilosis
-
Antifungal activity
-
Quorum sensing inhibitory acitivty
-
Significant inhibitory effect on violacin production
-
Biofilm inhibition and eradication activities
[51]
KaempferolProcesses 12 02316 i00413.0 μg/mLMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
-
Antibacterial activity
[52]
Waltherione GWaltheria indica (Malvaceae)Processes 12 02316 i005100 μg/mLStaphylococcus epidermidis
-
Antibacterial activity
[53]
DalpanitinDerris scandensProcesses 12 02316 i00623 μg/mL
94 μg/mL
94 μg/mL
S. aureus,
E. coli,
P. aeruginosa
-
Antibacterial activity
[54]
5,7-dihydroxy-2′,3′,4′-trimethoxyisoflavanoneDesmodium styracifoliumProcesses 12 02316 i007125 μg/mLAcidovorax avenae subsp.cattleyae.
-
Antibacterial activity
[38]
LuteolinEuphorbia humifusaProcesses 12 02316 i00832 μg/mLS. aureus
-
Inhibition of biofilm formation
-
Synergy with quercetin
[55]
3-[3-(3-pyridinyl)-1,2,4-
oxadiazol-5-yl] benzonitrile
Tropaeolum tuberosumProcesses 12 02316 i009100 μg/mL
100 μg/mL
150 μg/mL
Bacillus cereus,
S. aureus,
P. aeruginosa
-
Antibacterial activity
[56]
HyperinCanarium patentinerviumProcesses 12 02316 i01050 μg/mLS. aureus
-
Antibacterial activity
[57]
3-phenylpropionic acidZygophyllum mandavilleiProcesses 12 02316 i01115.62 μg/mL
7.81 μg/mL
7.81 μg/mL
3.90 μg./mL
Xanthomonas oryzae,
Pseudomonas syringae,
Aspergillus flavus,
Fusarium solani
-
Antibacterial and antifungal activity
[58]
3,3′-di-O-methyl ellagic acidAfzelia africanaProcesses 12 02316 i0122.5 μg/mL
2.5 μg/mL
1.25 μg/mL
Streptococcus mutans,
S. aureus,
Bacillus subtilis
-
Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities
[59]
Galangin 3-methyl etherLychnophora markgraviiProcesses 12 02316 i013>0.5 μg/mL
0.05 μg/mL
0.5 μg/mL
0.055 μg/mL
Kocuria rhizophila,
S. aureus,
S. epidermidis,
S. mutans
-
Antibacterial and antifungal activity
[60]
AllicinAllium sativumProcesses 12 02316 i014128 μg/mL
64 μg/mL
64 μg/mL
K. penumonia,
P. aeruginosa,
S. agalactiae
-
Antibacterial activity
[61]
ResveratrolPicea abiesProcesses 12 02316 i015-S. aureus,
P. aeruginosa,
C. albicans
-
Antibacterial activity
-
Antifungal activity
-
Suppressing acute antigen-dependent Th1 reaction for Th2 response
[39]
ExtractZataria multiflora Boiss--Acinetobacter baumannii
-
Antibacterial activity
-
No colony was found in pneumonic mice infected with standard or clinical isolate lung tissue culture
[40]
ExtractCasearia sylvestris--Helicobacter pylori
-
Antibacterial activity
-
Antibiofilm activity
-
Decreased ulcerative lesion size (in vivo)
[62]
RhodomyrtoneRhodomyrtus tomentosaProcesses 12 02316 i016-Propionibacterium acnes
-
Effective and safe in treating inflammatory acne lesions
[41]
ExtractNigella sativa--P. acnes
-
Significant reductions in number of comedones, papules, and pustules (clinical trial)
[63]
Rhodomyrtosone BRhodomyrtus tomentosaProcesses 12 02316 i0171.25 µg/mL
0.62 µg/mL
0.62 µg/mL
S. aureus,
MRSA,
B. cereus
-
Antibacterial activity
-
Single injection of 40 µg RDSB per animal significantly reduced production of skin ulcers in murine model of MRSA infection
[64]
ExtractDaphne genkwa-35,000 mg/mLMRSA
-
Antibacterial activity
-
PBP2a and PBP4 inhibition
[65]
Thymohydroquinone dimethyl etherAyapana triplinervisProcesses 12 02316 i018IC50 45 µg/mLZika Virus
-
Antiviral activity
-
Inhibit ZIKV infection in human cells
[66]
Methyl gallatePolygonum chinense LinnProcesses 12 02316 i019-Influenza virus
-
Antiviral activity
[67]
Non-medicinal
LectinPortulaca elatior-0.185 μg/mL
1.48 μg/mL
1.48 μg/mL
1.48 μg/mL
Pectobacterium sp.,
C. albicans,
Candida tropicalis,
Candida krusei
-
Antibacterial activity
[68]
8.1 μg/mL
32.5 μg/mL
4.06 μg/mL
16 μg/mL
E. faeclis,
P. aeruginosa,
S. aureus,
C. albcans
-
Antibacterial activity
-
Antifungal activity
[69]
Asiatic acidPunica granatum L.Processes 12 02316 i02064 μg/mL
16 μg/mL
Mycobacterium smegmatis,
S. aureus
-
Antibacterial activity
[70]
Punicalagin Processes 12 02316 i0211.2 μg/mL
0.6 μg/mL
0.6 μg/mL
C. albicans,
P. aeruginosa,
S. epidermidis
-
Antifungal activity
-
Antibacterial activity
[71]
Ellagic acid Processes 12 02316 i02231.62 μg/mLMRSA
-
Antibacterial activity
[72]
1,4-naphthalenedione-5-hydroxy-2-methylDiospyros maritimaProcesses 12 02316 i0235 μg/mL
0.625 μg/mL
Aeromonas hydrophila,
S. aureus
-
Antibacterial activity
[73]
1,2,4,6-tetra-O-galloyl-β-glucoseSedum takesimenseProcesses 12 02316 i02432 μg/mL
128 μg/mL
128 μg/mL
32 μg/mL
128 μg/mL
16 μg/mL
E. coli,
P. aeruginosa,
Salmonella tyrphimurium,
B. cereus,
Listeria monocytogenes,
S. aureus
-
Antibacterial activity and synergy effect with conventional antibiotics
[74]
3″,4′,4′″,5,5″,7,7″-heptahydoxy-3-8″-biflavoneGarcinia kolaProcesses 12 02316 i02564 μg/mL
64 μg/mL
64 μg/mL
S. mutans,
Streptococcus mitis,
Streptococcus downei
-
Antibacterial activity
-
Inhibited water-insoluble glucan synthesis by glucosyltransferases
[75]
(8E)-4-
geranyl-3,5-dihydroxybenzophenone
Processes 12 02316 i026162.5 μg/mL
15.6 μg/mL
Prophyromonas gingivalis,
Streptococcus sobrinus
-
Antimicrobial activity
[76]
(E)-3-(1-oxobut-2-en-2-yl)glutaric acidOlea europaeaProcesses 12 02316 i02718 mg/mLP. syringae
-
Cytoprotective and antimicrobial properties
[77]
OleuropeinProcesses 12 02316 i028625 μg/mL
625 μg/mL
625 μg/mL
S. mutans,
P. gingivalism,
Fusobacterium nucleatum
-
Antibacterial activity
[78]
BerberineBerberis hispanicaProcesses 12 02316 i0295 μg/mLS. aureus
-
Antibacterial activity
[79]
2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinonePlumbago zeylanicaProcesses 12 02316 i030100 μg/mLE. coli
-
Synergy effect with kanamycin
-
Not toxic to mammalian cells
-
Curing of plasmid
[80]
Heneicosane Processes 12 02316 i03110 μg/mLS. pneumoniae,
A. fumigatus
-
Antibacterial activity
-
Antifungal activity
[81]
Abietic acidPinus merkusiiProcesses 12 02316 i0329.36 μg/mLS. mutans
-
Antibacterial activity
[82]
3-(2′,4′,6′,6′-tetramethylcyclohexa-1′,4′-dienyl)acrylic acidViola odorataProcesses 12 02316 i03364 μg/mL
128 μg/mL
32 μg/mL
S. aureus,
P. aeruginosa,
S. pyogenes
-
Antibacterial activity
[83]
Aromadendrin-4′-methyl etherVentilago madraspatanaProcesses 12 02316 i03478 μg/mL
312 μg/mL
S. aureus,
C. albicans
-
Antimicrobial and antioxidant activity
[84]
MangiferinMangifera indicaProcesses 12 02316 i0357.81 μg/mL
1.95 μg/mL
1.95 μg/mL
E.coli,
S.aureus,
C. albicans
-
Antioxidant efficacy
-
Antibacterial action and anticandidal action
-
Negligible cytotoxicity against normal cells
[85]
Myricetin-3-
O-rhamnoside
Prosopis africanaProcesses 12 02316 i0368 μg/mL
8 μg/mL
16 μg/mL
16 μg/mL
32 μg/mL
S. aureus,
Enterococcus faeclais,
P. aeruginosa,
E. coli,
K. pneumoniae
-
Antibacterial and antioxidant activity
[86]
ExtractArachis hypogaea L.NAIC50 1.3 μg/mLHuman influenza viruses
-
Inhibited replication of influenza virus A/WSN/33
[87]
ExtractPrunus dulcisNA0.2 mg/mLHerpes simplex virus 1
-
Antiviral activity
-
No cytotoxicity
[88]
Seaweeds
DigalactosyldiacylglycerolFucus vesiculosusProcesses 12 02316 i037IC50 87 μg/mLS. aureus
-
Antibacterial activity
[89]
Fucoidan-3.13 mg/mL
0.2 mg/mL
E. coli,
S. typhimurium
-
Antibacterial activity
-
Antirotaviral activity
[90]
Hydroxyphenophytin BChlorella vulgarisProcesses 12 02316 i0380.3 mg/mL
1.2 mg/mL
A. ochraceus,
A. carbonarus
-
Antifungal activity
[91]
Fucofuroeckol-AEisenia bicyclisProcesses 12 02316 i03916~32 μg/mLL. monocytogenes
-
Antibacterial activity
-
Synergy effect with streptomycin
[92]
Pheophytin aSyringodium isoetifoliumProcesses 12 02316 i0406.2 μg/mL
12.5 μg/mL
12.5 μg/mL
Salmonella typhi,
E. coli,
P. aeruginosa
-
Antibacterial activity
[93]
β-caroteneHalopteris scopariaProcesses 12 02316 i0410.225 μg/mL
0.1125 μg/mL
0.225 μg/mL
L. monocytogenes,
S. aureus,
S. enterica
-
Inhibition of α-amylase and trypsin
-
Antibacterial activity
[94]
FucoxanthinHimanthalia elongataProcesses 12 02316 i0426.2 μg/mL
12.5 μg/mL
Salmonella typhi,
E. coli,
P. aeruginosa
-
Antibacterial activity
[95]
Ascophyllan HSAscophyllum nodosum-167 mg/10 mL/kgS. penumoniae
-
Therapeutic impact on S. pneumoniae infection by stimulating host’s defensive mechanisms
-
Bacterial burdens in lungs were significantly reduced
[96]
FucoidanUndaria pinnatifida-3.52 mg/dayInfluenza A (H1N1, PR8)
-
Gross lung pathology (consolidation) was significantly reduced
[97]
FucoidanSargassum swartzii-1.56 μg/mLHIV-1 p24
-
Antiviral activity
-
No cytotoxic effect
[98]

2.2. Non-Medicinal Plants

The term “non-medicinal plants” refers to plants that have not been historically used in medicinal practices in contrast to the medicinal plants, which have been employed for therapeutic reasons over the course of history. The potential health advantages of these plants have been overlooked throughout history since they are often grown for decorative, agricultural, or industrial uses. When referring to plants that were not first recognized for their therapeutic characteristics in traditional or contemporary medicine, the word “non-medicinal” is used to characterize them [99]. On the other hand, recent research has shown that these plants have hidden potential, since they contain many bioactive chemicals with strong antibacterial characteristics (Table 1).
For example, evidence suggests that the plant Portulaca elatior, more generally referred to as purslane, which has historically been grown for its decorative and culinary qualities, has strong antimicrobial properties [68]. In a similar vein, the Punica granatum (pomegranate), which is largely cultivated for its fruit in agricultural settings, has been shown to have considerable antimicrobial components such as asiatic acid, which are effective against bacterial infections, notably against S. aureus [70].
A lesser known compound, (E)-3-(1-oxobut-2-en-2-yl), has been identified in olives and is shown to have important antimicrobial and cytoprotective properties [77]. With an active concentration of 18 mg/mL, this compound inhibited the growth of Pseudomonas syringae, a bacterium that causes diseases in a variety of plants. In addition to its antimicrobial activity, this compound also exhibits significant cytoprotective effects, which may be useful in developing treatments that combine antimicrobial and protective effects on human cells. Its dual action makes it a potential candidate for use in both agricultural and medical applications. In addition, aromadendrin-4′-methyl is a flavonoid found in Ventilago madraspatana that has demonstrated strong antimicrobial and antioxidant activities [84]. It effectively inhibits the growth of both S. aureus and C. albicans at concentrations of 78 µg/mL and 312 µg/mL, respectively. This compound was also found to be highly active in antioxidant efficacy. The compound’s dual action properties further enhance its therapeutic potential, as it could help reduce oxidative stress in infected tissues while simultaneously eliminating pathogens.
These findings highlight the potential of non-medicinal plants as a source of novel antimicrobial agents. The discovery of antimicrobial compounds in non-medicinal plants also has opportunities for their application in industries beyond healthcare. The food industry could benefit from natural plant-based preservatives that inhibit the growth of food pathogens, reducing the need for synthetic additives. Similarly, eco-friendly plant-based disinfectants could offer a sustainable alternative to chemical agents, minimizing the environmental impact. However, despite the fact that non-medicinal plants have the potential to be a source of antimicrobial agents, there is a significant lack of studies addressing the bioactive chemicals that they contain, especially in the context of in vivo and clinical trials. Although in vitro studies have shown that various plant-derived chemicals effectively reduce the development of microorganisms, our knowledge of their genuine therapeutic potential and safety in practical applications is limited due to the absence of substantial in vivo and clinical tests. To fully exploit the antimicrobial capabilities of plants not used for therapeutic purposes, it is necessary to carry out thorough in vivo studies that investigate the efficiency of these plants inside biological systems. Researchers have the ability to unleash the full potential of these bioactive chemicals and establish non-medicinal plants as viable sources of natural antimicrobial drugs if they extend their investigations into the in vivo and clinical domains.

2.3. Marine Plants

While terrestrial plants have been the focus of much of the research on plant-based antimicrobials, marine plants offer an equally rich and largely unexplored source of bioactive compounds. Marine ecosystems, particularly those in extreme environments, have evolved unique secondary metabolites that exhibit potent antimicrobial activity. Seaweeds, algae, and other marine plants have adapted to survive in conditions of high salinity, temperature variation, and microbial competition, producing diverse chemicals with powerful defensive properties (Table 1) [100,101].
For instance, carotenoids are well known for their antioxidant properties, but β-carotene, isolated from the brown alga Halopteris scoparia, has also shown antimicrobial potential [94]. At concentrations as low as 0.225 µg/mL, β-carotene effectively inhibited the growth of Listeria monocytogenes, S. aureus, and Salmonella enterica. Fucoxanthin, another carotenoid derived from the brown seaweed Halomonas elongata, has exhibited both antimicrobial and antioxidant properties [95]. Fucoxanthin was particularly effective against L. monocytogenes, showing a zone of inhibition of 10.72 mm at a concentration of 25 µg per disk. This compound’s ability to inhibit the growth of a major foodborne pathogen, combined with its antioxidant activity, underscores its potential for use in both pharmaceutical and food industries. Its dual action as an antimicrobial and antioxidant makes fucoxanthin an attractive candidate for developing natural preservatives and health supplements aimed at preventing bacterial infections while promoting overall health. In addition to these compounds, ascophyllan HS, a bioactive polysaccharide derived from the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum, has shown therapeutic effects against Streptococcus pneumoniae infection. At a dosage of 167 mg/10 mL/kg, ascophyllan HS significantly reduced bacterial burdens in the lungs of infected subjects by activating host defense systems [96]. Also, one of the most exciting discoveries in marine plant research is the antimicrobial activity of fucoidans, sulfated polysaccharides found in brown algae [102]. Fucoidans have demonstrated strong antiviral properties, particularly against viruses like influenza and herpes simplex [103]. Additionally, they have shown potential in combating biofilm-associated infections, which are notoriously difficult to treat with conventional antibiotics [104]. The chemical diversity of marine plants offers a unique advantage in the search for new antimicrobials. This chemical novelty is particularly valuable in the control against antibiotic-resistant pathogens, as it opens up new avenues for drug development [105].

3. Mechanisms of Action

The antimicrobial activity of plant-derived compounds is underpinned by complex mechanisms of action that often differentiate them from conventional antibiotics [106]. Unlike many synthetic drugs, which target a single bacterial process, plant-based compounds frequently exhibit multi-target interactions and synergistic effects. These characteristics enhance their antimicrobial efficacy and offer solutions to the growing issue of antibiotic resistance [13,107]. In this section, we delve into the primary mechanisms of action of plant-derived antimicrobials, emphasizing their ability to interact with multiple biological targets and to synergize with conventional antibiotics.

3.1. Multi-Target Interactions

A significant advantage of plant-based antimicrobial compounds is their ability to simultaneously affect multiple microbial pathways. Traditional antibiotics often focus on a specific bacterial function, such as cell wall synthesis, protein production, or DNA replication [108]. While these drugs can be highly effective, their singular mode of action increases the likelihood that bacteria will evolve resistance through mutations or the acquisition of resistance genes [109]. In contrast, many plant-derived compounds exert their antimicrobial effects by interacting with several targets within the microbial cell, making it more difficult for pathogens to develop resistance [110,111].
Plant secondary metabolites, including flavonoids, alkaloids, terpenoids, and phenolic compounds, often demonstrate this multi-target behavior. These compounds exert their antibacterial activities using a variety of mechanisms (Figure 3) [112]. For example, flavonoids, a diverse class of plant compounds, are known to interfere with microbial processes in several ways [113]. They can disrupt bacterial cell membranes, inhibit key enzymes involved in energy production, and interfere with the synthesis of nucleic acids. Similarly, alkaloids and terpenoids can cause membrane damage, increase permeability, and ultimately lead to cell death by affecting cellular respiration and ATP synthesis. This multi-pronged attack ensures the rapid eradication of pathogens and reduces the probability that any one mutation will confer resistance. A well-known flavonoid, quercetin, found in various fruits and vegetables, has been shown to interfere with bacterial cell membrane integrity and inhibit nucleic acid synthesis [114]. Similarly, another flavonoid, catechin, can block essential microbial enzymes and reduce oxidative stress, further contributing to its antimicrobial properties [115]. Alkaloids also demonstrate this multi-target interaction. One such compound, berberine, derived from Berberis species, exhibits broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity by inhibiting DNA replication and damaging bacterial cell membranes [116]. Morphine, although primarily known for its analgesic properties, has shown antimicrobial effects by disrupting cellular respiration in some pathogens, highlighting the versatility of alkaloids [117]. Terpenoids, another class of plant secondary metabolites, offer potent antimicrobial actions. Thymol, extracted from thyme, effectively disrupts bacterial cell membranes and inhibits the activity of key enzymes necessary for microbial survival [118]. Lastly, phenolic compounds such as gallic acid, commonly found in various fruits, inhibit microbial growth by disrupting essential microbial enzymes and interfering with nucleic acid processes [119]. Ellagic acid, another phenolic compound, has shown significant antimicrobial effects, particularly against Gram-positive bacteria, by inhibiting enzymes critical for microbial metabolism [120].
An example of this multi-target behavior is seen with diallylthiosulfinate (allicin), a compound extracted from garlic (A. sativum), which has demonstrated antibacterial activity against K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and Streptococcus agalactiae (Table 1) [61]. Allicin exerts its antimicrobial effects by inhibiting both protein and DNA synthesis, contributing to its broad-spectrum antibacterial activity. Additionally, tomatidin, a compound derived from Berberis vulgaris, has been shown to inhibit ATP synthase, leading to antibacterial activity against Listeria, Bacillus, and Staphylococcus species through this mechanism [121]. These examples underscore the potential of plant-based compounds to disrupt multiple microbial processes, enhancing their efficacy and reducing the likelihood of resistance development.

3.2. Synergistic Interactions

Another notable aspect of plant-based antimicrobial compounds is their synergistic ability with conventional antibiotics. Synergistic interactions occur when two or more agents are combined to produce an effect greater than the sum of their individual effects. In the context of antimicrobial therapy, plant extracts can enhance the efficacy of synthetic antibiotics, often allowing for reduced dosages and minimizing potential side effects [122,123]. This combination of treatments can be precious in addressing infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria [124].
However, despite the fact that non-medicinal plants have the potential to be a source of antimicrobial agents, there is a significant lack of studies addressing the bioactive chemicals that they contain, especially in the context of in vivo and clinical trials. Although in vitro studies have shown that a variety of plant-derived chemicals are effective in reducing the development of microorganisms, our knowledge of their genuine therapeutic potential and safety in practical applications is limited due to the absence of substantial in vivo and clinical tests. For the purpose of fully exploiting the antibacterial capabilities of plants that are not used for therapeutic purposes, it is necessary to carry out thorough in vivo studies that investigate the efficiency of these plants inside biological systems. Researchers have the ability to unleash the full potential of these bioactive chemicals and establish non-medicinal plants as viable sources of natural antimicrobial drugs if they extend their investigations into the in vivo and clinical domains (Figure 4) [125].
Building on this idea, specific examples illustrate the significant potential of plant-derived compounds to act synergistically with conventional antibiotics (Table 2). For instance, fucofuroeckol-A, a phlorotannin isolated from the brown seaweed Eisenia bicyclis, has demonstrated potent antibacterial activity, particularly against L. monocytogenes at concentrations of 16–32 µg/mL [92]. More importantly, when combined with streptomycin, fucofuroeckol-A exhibited significant synergistic effects, enhancing the antibiotic’s ability to combat bacterial infections. Another powerful example is 1,2,4,6-tetra-O- galloyl-β-D-glucose, derived from Sedum takesimense [74]. This compound has shown antibacterial activity against a broad spectrum of pathogens, including E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, B. cereus, L. monocytogenes, and S. aureus. Additionally, 2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone, a compound isolated from Plumbago zeylanica, has been found to enhance the activity of kanamycin against E. coli at a concentration of 100 µg/mL [80]. This compound demonstrated a notable synergy with kanamycin. Moreover, this compound has the potential to assist in the curing of plasmids, further weakening bacterial resistance mechanisms and ensuring the effectiveness of the antibiotic treatment.
Other examples include ellagic acid, which exhibits synergy with moxifloxacin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [72], and chrysoeriol, derived from Artemisia rupestris, which has shown synergistic effects with ciprofloxacin against MRSA [130]. Phlorofucofuroeckol-A, another compound from E. bicyclis, has demonstrated synergistic activity with erythromycin and lincomycin against Propionibacterium acnes, making it a promising compound for dermatological applications [132]. These studies show the potential of plant-based compounds to enhance the efficacy of conventional antimicrobial therapies. By leveraging the natural bioactivity of these compounds in synergy with antibiotics, we can develop more effective treatment strategies for managing antibiotic-resistant infections.

4. Development and Applications

The utilization of plant metabolites in drug development has become a focal point in the search for novel antimicrobial agents [133]. Plant metabolites, the secondary compounds produced by plants as part of their defense mechanisms, offer a rich source of chemical diversity. These compounds have long served as the foundation for the development of various therapeutic agents, particularly in antimicrobial therapies [134]. Recent advancements in biotechnology and chemical synthesis have further enhanced the potential of plant metabolites to serve as scaffolds for new drug design [135]. This section explores how plant-derived compounds are being used in drug development and highlights innovations in the synthesis and semi-synthesis of new antimicrobial agents.

Drug Development from Plant Metabolites

Plant metabolites, such as alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and phenolics, possess complex and unique chemical structures that can serve as ideal scaffolds for drug development [136]. These compounds have evolved over millions of years to protect plants from microbial infections, pests, and environmental stressors, making them well suited to being starting points for designing antimicrobial drugs. One of the key advantages of using plant metabolites as scaffolds is their structural complexity, which often includes multiple functional groups that can interact with different biological targets. These metabolites are not only biologically active but also provide the chemical backbone needed for the development of synthetic derivatives [137,138]. By modifying the core structure of these metabolites, researchers can enhance their pharmacological properties, such as improving solubility, increasing potency, or reducing toxicity [139,140]. The process for this is shown in Figure 5 [141].
In addition to their potential for therapeutic applications, it is crucial to determine the toxicity and appropriate dosage of plant-derived compounds through rigorous in vitro and in vivo assays before they can be developed into safe and effective drugs [142]. Assays to determine toxicity and dosage play a key role in evaluating the safety profile of these compounds, as some plant metabolites can exhibit cytotoxic effects at certain concentrations. Understanding their toxicity and therapeutic windows is critical for their application in clinical settings [30]. Without these assessments, even promising compounds may pose risks or fail to achieve the desired therapeutic outcomes.
For instance, the alkaloid quinine, originally derived from the bark of the Cinchona tree, has been used as the scaffold for developing antimalarial drugs [143]. Similarly, artemisinin, a compound isolated from Artemisia annua, is the foundation for semi-synthetic derivatives used in modern malaria treatments [144]. These examples demonstrate how plant metabolites can be chemically modified to create more effective and targeted therapies. Furthermore, semi-synthetic flavonoids, such as diosmin, a derivative of hesperidin, have been used for the treatment of venous diseases, while hydroxyethylrutosides (HRs), derived from rutin, are employed for treating capillary fragility and venous insufficiency [145]. These modifications enhance the natural activity of flavonoids, making them more effective in clinical settings [146]. Another semi-synthetic flavonoid, 7-O-galloyl quercetin, is an example of how modifications to the core structure of natural flavonoids can result in enhanced antimicrobial activity [147]. On the other hand, the development of synthetic flavonoid derivatives like flavopiridol highlights the potential of completely synthesized compounds [148].
While natural plant metabolites are valuable in their own right, innovations in chemical synthesis and semi-synthesis have allowed scientists to expand their potential by creating novel derivatives that may not exist in nature. Semi-synthesis involves the chemical modification of a natural product to create a new compound with improved pharmacokinetics, enhanced antimicrobial activity, or reduced side effects [149].
One area of innovation lies in the semi-synthesis of plant-derived compounds, where the core structure of a plant metabolite is retained but functional groups are modified to optimize drug properties. In the context of antimicrobial drug development, similar approaches have been applied [150,151]. For example, flavonoids such as quercetin and catechin have been chemically modified to create derivatives with enhanced antibacterial properties [152,153]. These semi-synthetic flavonoids show improved activity against resistant bacterial strains, making them promising candidates for future drug development [154].
Moreover, advancements in synthetic biology have enabled the full chemical synthesis of complex plant metabolites, further expanding the possibilities for drug discovery. By synthesizing plant-derived compounds in the laboratory, researchers can improve production yields and introduce modifications that may improve the compound’s stability, efficacy, and delivery in the human body. These innovations in synthetic chemistry are paving the way for a new generation of antimicrobial agents that combine the best attributes of natural products with the precision of modern drug design [155,156,157].

5. Data Collection

Utilizing several databases, including Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, we searched for the literature that was related to the proposed objective of the review paper. A number of different keywords were used in the search, some of which were as follows: “antimicrobial from medicinal plants”, antifungal from medicinal plants, antivirals from medicinal plants, “antibacterial agents from plants”, antifungals from marine seaweeds, “antimicrobial from plant-derived compounds”, “medicinal compounds”, “antimicrobial compounds from seaweeds”, “antimicrobial from non-medicinal plants”, and synergistic effects of plant-derived compounds.

6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

A wide variety of compounds with significant therapeutic potential have been discovered via the investigation of plant-based antimicrobials. These antimicrobials include those that are produced from medicinal, non-medicinal, and marine plants. There is a solid basis for current antimicrobial research that is provided by traditional medicinal plants, notably in the fight against infections that are resistant to several treatments. Furthermore, new discoveries on non-medicinal and marine plants have brought to light their unrealized potential, particularly in creating natural preservatives and antimicrobial substances that are benign to the environment. The capacity of plant-derived antimicrobials to target numerous microbial activities and to synergize with conventional antibiotics/antifungals is a defining characteristic of their modes of action. The use of this multi-target method not only improves their efficiency but also offers significant solutions for the fight against antibiotic resistance. The use of plant metabolites as scaffolds for the creation of novel antimicrobial drugs is becoming more possible as a result of developments in drug research. Through advancements in chemical synthesis and semi-synthesis, it is now possible to produce unique derivatives that have qualities that have been improved. The complexity and variety of plant metabolites are being used by researchers in order to produce medicines that are more successful and are more specifically targeted. However, despite the fact that they hold a great deal of potential, plant-based antimicrobials have some drawbacks. Inconsistent effectiveness may be caused by variations in chemical composition, which can be influenced by variables such as the origin of the plant and the extraction procedures used. This presents difficulties for the process of standardization pertaining to therapeutic use. The limited bioavailability of plant-derived chemicals is another cause for concern. This is because many of these compounds have low solubility, which reduces their usefulness in treating systemic diseases. In addition, some substances, when present in larger quantities, have the potential to produce toxicity and adverse consequences. For instance, tea tree oil and neem oil are known to cause irritation to the skin. If these substances are used in an incorrect manner or for an extended length of time, there is still a possibility that resistance may develop. Finally, the wide-scale manufacturing of plant-based antimicrobials may give rise to issues about the environment and sustainability. Furthermore, the overharvesting of these plants may pose a danger to the world’s biodiversity.
To broaden our knowledge of the mechanisms and therapeutic potential of plant-derived products in the fight against microbial infections, the following research should be carried out in the future:
  • Continuous research and innovation are very necessary in order to address newly developing health risks and to enhance the efficacy of therapies that are already available. This involves broadening the scope of investigations to include a greater variety of plant species, especially those not used for medical purposes and marine plants, to discover new chemicals that possess distinctive characteristics.
  • A dynamic approach to the development of antimicrobial solutions that are both sustainable and effective is presented by the integration of traditional knowledge with new scientific breakthroughs.
  • In order to tackle antibiotic resistance, it will be helpful to conduct in-depth research on the multi-target mechanisms of plant-derived antimicrobials and the synergistic effects that these antimicrobials have with conventional antibiotics.
  • The enhancement of the pharmacological characteristics of plant metabolites should be the primary focus of developments in semi-synthesis and chemical modification. This will allow for the development of medicines that are more effective and more precisely targeted.
  • The development of natural alternatives to synthetic chemicals requires more investigation into plant-based antimicrobials for applications in agriculture, food preservation, and environmental management. This is crucial for the development of natural alternatives.
  • In order to advance the study and translate laboratory discoveries into practical applications that can be used in the real world, it will be essential to collaborate across several disciplines, including medicine, chemistry, pharmacology, and botany.

Author Contributions

D.-M.J.: conceptualization, the literature search, writing—original draft preparation, and editing. N.T. and D.K.O.: investigation and the literature search. S.-C.K., K.W.K., D.Y., J.-Y.K., G.-W.O., G.C., D.-S.L. and S.-K.P.: investigation, methodology, and funding acquisition. Y.-M.K.: supervision and writing—review and editing. F.K.: conceptualization, supervision, the literature search, and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was granted funding by the National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK) Research Program 2024M00500.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Janik, E.; Ceremuga, M.; Niemcewicz, M.; Bijak, M. Dangerous pathogens as a potential problem for public health. Medicina 2020, 56, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Muteeb, G.; Rehman, M.T.; Shahwan, M.; Aatif, M. Origin of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance, and their impacts on drug development: A narrative review. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Catalano, A.; Iacopetta, D.; Ceramella, J.; Scumaci, D.; Giuzio, F.; Saturnino, C.; Aquaro, S.; Rosano, C.; Sinicropi, M.S. Multidrug resistance (MDR): A widespread phenomenon in pharmacological therapies. Molecules 2022, 27, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Breijyeh, Z.; Karaman, R. Antibacterial activity of medicinal plants and their role in wound healing. Future J. Pharm. Sci. 2024, 10, 68. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nami, S.; Aghebati-Maleki, A.; Morovati, H.; Aghebati-Maleki, L. Current antifungal drugs and immunotherapeutic approaches as promising strategies to treatment of fungal diseases. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 110, 857–868. [Google Scholar]
  6. Perlin, D.S. Mechanisms of resistance to antifungal agents. Man. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 5, 2236–2254. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ma, Y.; Frutos-Beltrán, E.; Kang, D.; Pannecouque, C.; De Clercq, E.; Menéndez-Arias, L.; Liu, X.; Zhan, P. Medicinal chemistry strategies for discovering antivirals effective against drug-resistant viruses. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 4514–4540. [Google Scholar]
  8. Terreni, M.; Taccani, M.; Pregnolato, M. New antibiotics for multidrug-resistant bacterial strains: Latest research developments and future perspectives. Molecules 2021, 26, 2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chinemerem Nwobodo, D.; Ugwu, M.C.; Oliseloke Anie, C.; Al-Ouqaili, M.T.; Chinedu Ikem, J.; Victor Chigozie, U.; Saki, M. Antibiotic resistance: The challenges and some emerging strategies for tackling a global menace. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2022, 36, e24655. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ahmed, S.K.; Hussein, S.; Qurbani, K.; Ibrahim, R.H.; Fareeq, A.; Mahmood, K.A.; Mohamed, M.G. Antimicrobial resistance: Impacts, challenges, and future prospects. J. Med. Surg. Public Health 2024, 2, 100081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Porras, G.; Chassagne, F.; Lyles, J.T.; Marquez, L.; Dettweiler, M.; Salam, A.M.; Samarakoon, T.; Shabih, S.; Farrokhi, D.R.; Quave, C.L. Ethnobotany and the role of plant natural products in antibiotic drug discovery. Chem. Rev. 2020, 121, 3495–3560. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Khan, R.A. Natural products chemistry: The emerging trends and prospective goals. Saudi Pharm. J. 2018, 26, 739–753. [Google Scholar]
  13. Shin, J.; Prabhakaran, V.-S.; Kim, K.-S. The multi-faceted potential of plant-derived metabolites as antimicrobial agents against multidrug-resistant pathogens. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 116, 209–214. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sharma, P.; Manchanda, R.; Goswami, R.; Chawla, S. Biodiversity and therapeutic potential of medicinal plants. In Environmental Concerns and Sustainable Development: Volume 2: Biodiversity, Soil and Waste Management; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 27–44. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wylie, M.R.; Merrell, D.S. The antimicrobial potential of the neem tree Azadirachta indica. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 891535. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ajanaku, C.O.; Ademosun, O.T.; Atohengbe, P.O.; Ajayi, S.O.; Obafemi, Y.D.; Owolabi, O.A.; Akinduti, P.A.; Ajanaku, K.O. Functional bioactive compounds in ginger, turmeric, and garlic. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 1012023. [Google Scholar]
  17. Prajapati, S.K.; Mishra, G.; Malaiya, A.; Jain, A.; Mody, N.; Raichur, A.M. Antimicrobial application potential of phytoconstituents from turmeric and garlic. In Bioactive Natural Products for Pharmaceutical Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 409–435. [Google Scholar]
  18. Anand, U.; Jacobo-Herrera, N.; Altemimi, A.; Lakhssassi, N. A comprehensive review on medicinal plants as antimicrobial therapeutics: Potential avenues of biocompatible drug discovery. Metabolites 2019, 9, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Vaou, N.; Stavropoulou, E.; Voidarou, C.; Tsigalou, C.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Towards advances in medicinal plant antimicrobial activity: A review study on challenges and future perspectives. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mapelli-Brahm, P.; Gómez-Villegas, P.; Gonda, M.L.; León-Vaz, A.; León, R.; Mildenberger, J.; Rebours, C.; Saravia, V.; Vero, S.; Vila, E. Microalgae, seaweeds and aquatic bacteria, archaea, and yeasts: Sources of carotenoids with potential antioxidant and anti-inflammatory health-promoting actions in the sustainability era. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Banday, A.H.; ul Azha, N.; Farooq, R.; Sheikh, S.A.; Ganie, M.A.; Parray, M.N.; Mushtaq, H.; Hameed, I.; Lone, M.A. Exploring the potential of marine natural products in drug development: A comprehensive review. Phytochem. Lett. 2024, 59, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sudhakar, M.; Dharani, G.; Paramasivam, A. Evaluation of antimicrobial, antioxidant and cytotoxicity potential of R-phycoerythrin extracted from Gracilaria corticata seaweed. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2023, 6, 100352. [Google Scholar]
  23. Maleki, N.; Roomiani, L.; Tadayoni, M. Microwave-assisted extraction optimization, antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of carrageenan from red algae (Gracilaria acerosa). J. Food Meas. Charact. 2023, 17, 1156–1166. [Google Scholar]
  24. Matias, M.; Pinteus, S.; Martins, A.; Silva, J.; Alves, C.; Mouga, T.; Gaspar, H.; Pedrosa, R. Gelidiales are not just agar—Revealing the antimicrobial potential of Gelidium corneum for skin disorders. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Angelini, P. Plant-Derived Antimicrobials and Their Crucial Role in Combating Antimicrobial Resistance. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. AlSheikh, H.M.A.; Sultan, I.; Kumar, V.; Rather, I.A.; Al-Sheikh, H.; Tasleem Jan, A.; Haq, Q.M.R. Plant-based phytochemicals as possible alternative to antibiotics in combating bacterial drug resistance. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mosaddad, S.A.; Hussain, A.; Tebyaniyan, H. Green alternatives as antimicrobial agents in mitigating periodontal diseases: A narrative review. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Berida, T.I.; Adekunle, Y.A.; Dada-Adegbola, H.; Kdimy, A.; Roy, S.; Sarker, S.D. Plant antibacterials: The challenges and opportunities. Heliyon 2024, 10, e31145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nascimento, T.; Gomes, D.; Simões, R.; da Graça Miguel, M. Tea tree oil: Properties and the therapeutic approach to acne—A review. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chaachouay, N.; Zidane, L. Plant-derived natural products: A source for drug discovery and development. Drugs Drug Candidates 2024, 3, 184–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Liu, Z. A review of plant antipathogenic constituents: Source, activity and mechanism. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2022, 188, 105225. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sankar, P.; Vijayakaran, K.; Ramya, K. Phytomolecules as an Alternative Medicine to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance. In Handbook on Antimicrobial Resistance: Current Status, Trends in Detection and Mitigation Measures; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tiwari, P.; Bajpai, M.; Sharma, A. Antimicrobials from medicinal plants: Key examples, success stories and prospects in tackling antibiotic resistance. Lett. Drug Des. Discov. 2023, 20, 420–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rizvi, S.A.; Einstein, G.P.; Tulp, O.L.; Sainvil, F.; Branly, R. Introduction to traditional medicine and their role in prevention and treatment of emerging and re-emerging diseases. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jacob, D.E.; Izah, S.C.; Nelson, I.U.; Daniel, K.S. Indigenous Knowledge and Phytochemistry: Deciphering the Healing Power of Herbal Medicine. In Herbal Medicine Phytochemistry: Applications and Trends; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024; pp. 1953–2005. [Google Scholar]
  36. Paine, M.F.; Roe, A.L. “Green medicine”: The past, present, and future of botanicals. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 104, 410–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hiremath, K.Y.; Jagadeesh, N.; Belur, S.; Kulkarni, S.S.; Inamdar, S.R. A lectin with anti-microbial and anti proliferative activities from Lantana camara, a medicinal plant. Protein Expr. Purif. 2020, 170, 105574. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Le Dang, Q.; Do, H.T.T.; Choi, G.J.; Van Nguyen, M.; Vu, H.D.; Pham, G.V.; Ho, C.T.; Nguyen, X.C.; Tran, T.D.; Nghiem, D.T. In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activities of extracts and constituents derived from Desmodium styracifolium (Osb.) Merr. against various phytopathogenic fungi and bacteria. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 188, 115521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shevelev, A.B.; La Porta, N.; Isakova, E.P.; Martens, S.; Biryukova, Y.K.; Belous, A.S.; Sivokhin, D.A.; Trubnikova, E.V.; Zylkova, M.V.; Belyakova, A.V. In vivo antimicrobial and wound-healing activity of resveratrol, dihydroquercetin, and dihydromyricetin against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans. Pathogens 2020, 9, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hassannejad, N.; Bahador, A.; Rudbari, N.H.; Modarressi, M.H.; Parivar, K. In vivo antibacterial activity of Zataria multiflora Boiss extract and its components, carvacrol, and thymol, against colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a pneumonic BALB/c mouse model. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019, 120, 18640–18649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wunnoo, S.; Bilhman, S.; Amnuaikit, T.; Ontong, J.C.; Singh, S.; Auepemkiate, S.; Voravuthikunchai, S.P. Rhodomyrtone as a new natural antibiotic isolated from Rhodomyrtus tomentosa leaf extract: A clinical application in the management of acne vulgaris. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mickymaray, S. Efficacy and mechanism of traditional medicinal plants and bioactive compounds against clinically important pathogens. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Arip, M.; Selvaraja, M.; Tan, L.F.; Leong, M.Y.; Tan, P.L.; Yap, V.L.; Chinnapan, S.; Tat, N.C.; Abdullah, M.; K, D. Review on plant-based management in combating antimicrobial resistance-mechanistic perspective. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 879495. [Google Scholar]
  44. Maran, S.; Yeo, W.W.Y.; Lim, S.-H.E.; Lai, K.-S. Plant secondary metabolites for tackling antimicrobial resistance: A pharmacological perspective. In Antimicrobial Resistance: Underlying Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 153–173. [Google Scholar]
  45. Deb Adhikari, M.; Saha, T.; Tiwary, B.K. Quest for Alternatives to Antibiotics: An Urgent Need of the Twenty-First Century. In Alternatives to Antibiotics: Recent Trends and Future Prospects; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 3–32. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ayaz, M.; Ullah, F.; Sadiq, A.; Ullah, F.; Ovais, M.; Ahmed, J.; Devkota, H.P. Synergistic interactions of phytochemicals with antimicrobial agents: Potential strategy to counteract drug resistance. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2019, 308, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sharma, K.; Guleria, S.; Razdan, V.K.; Babu, V. Synergistic antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of essential oils of some selected medicinal plants in combination and with synthetic compounds. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 154, 112569. [Google Scholar]
  48. Coimbra, A.; Miguel, S.; Ribeiro, M.; Coutinho, P.; Silva, L.; Duarte, A.P.; Ferreira, S. Thymus zygis essential oil: Phytochemical characterization, bioactivity evaluation and synergistic effect with antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Djappa, C.E.T.; Arfao, A.T.; Metsopkeng, C.S.; Alex, M.M.A.; Laurent, S.; Henoumont, C.; Fouotsa, H.; Mkounga, P.; Nkengfack, E.A. Cultivability of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus in the presence of hydroethanolic extracts of Lantana camara stems and leaves: Importance of bioactive compounds in the cellular inhibition process. Sci. Afr. 2024, 26, e02373. [Google Scholar]
  50. Pham, D.Q.; Pham, H.T.; Han, J.W.; Nguyen, T.H.; Nguyen, H.T.; Nguyen, T.D.; Nguyen, T.T.T.; Ho, C.T.; Pham, H.M.; Vu, H.D. Extracts and metabolites derived from the leaves of Cassia alata L. exhibit in vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activities against fungal and bacterial plant pathogens. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 166, 113465. [Google Scholar]
  51. Dzoyem, J.P.; Fotso, S.C.; Wansi, J.D.; Tabenkoueng, B.; Tsopgni, W.D.T.; Toze, F.A.A.; McGaw, L.J. Anti-biofilm and anti-quorum sensing activities of extract, fractions and compounds from the leaves of Cassia alata L. against yeast pathogens. Phytomed. Plus 2024, 4, 100621. [Google Scholar]
  52. Yon, J.-A.-L.; Lee, S.-K.; Keng, J.-W.; Chow, S.-C.; Liew, K.-B.; Teo, S.-S.; Shaik Mossadeq, W.M.; Marriott, P.J.; Akowuah, G.A.; Ming, L.C. Cassia alata (Linnaeus) roxburgh for skin: Natural remedies for atopic dermatitis in Asia and their pharmacological activities. Cosmetics 2022, 10, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Silva, R.M.; Domingos, L.T.; de Castro, G.M.; Laport, M.S.; Ferreira-Pereira, A.; Lima, M.M.; Cotinguiba, F. Leishmanicidal and antimicrobial activities of 4-quinolone alkaloids from stems of the medicinal plant Waltheria indica (Malvaceae) and their chemotaxonomic significance. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2022, 33, 1291–1298. [Google Scholar]
  54. Mohotti, S.; Rajendran, S.; Muhammad, T.; Strömstedt, A.A.; Adhikari, A.; Burman, R.; De Silva, E.; Göransson, U.; Hettiarachchi, C.; Gunasekera, S. Screening for bioactive secondary metabolites in Sri Lankan medicinal plants by microfractionation and targeted isolation of antimicrobial flavonoids from Derris scandens. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 246, 112158. [Google Scholar]
  55. Wu, X.; Ma, G.-L.; Chen, H.-W.; Zhao, Z.-Y.; Zhu, Z.-P.; Xiong, J.; Yang, G.-X.; Hu, J.-F. Antibacterial and antibiofilm efficacy of the preferred fractions and compounds from Euphorbia humifusa (herba euphorbiae humifusae) against Staphylococcus aureus. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2023, 306, 116177. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ticona, L.A.; Sánchez, Á.R.; Gonzáles, Ó.O.; Doménech, M.O. Antimicrobial compounds isolated from Tropaeolum tuberosum. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 35, 4698–4702. [Google Scholar]
  57. Mogana, R.; Adhikari, A.; Tzar, M.; Ramliza, R.; Wiart, C. Antibacterial activities of the extracts, fractions and isolated compounds from Canarium patentinervium Miq. against bacterial clinical isolates. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2020, 20, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Yehia, R.S.; Osman, G.H.; Assaggaf, H.; Salem, R.; Mohamed, M.S. Isolation of potential antimicrobial metabolites from endophytic fungus Cladosporium cladosporioides from endemic plant Zygophyllum mandavillei. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 134, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Vigbedor, B.Y.; Akoto, C.O.; Neglo, D. Isolation and characterization of 3, 3′-di-O-methyl ellagic acid from the root bark of Afzelia africana and its antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. Sci. Afr. 2022, 17, e01332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hernández Tasco, A.J.; Ramírez Rueda, R.Y.; Alvarez, C.J.; Sartori, F.T.; Sacilotto, A.C.B.; Ito, I.Y.; Vichnewski, W.; Salvador, M.J. Antibacterial and antifungal properties of crude extracts and isolated compounds from Lychnophora markgravii. Nat. Prod. Res. 2020, 34, 863–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Reiter, J.; Levina, N.; Van der Linden, M.; Gruhlke, M.; Martin, C.; Slusarenko, A.J. Diallylthiosulfinate (Allicin), a volatile antimicrobial from garlic (Allium sativum), kills human lung pathogenic bacteria, including MDR strains, as a vapor. Molecules 2017, 22, 1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Spósito, L.; Oda, F.B.; Vieira, J.H.; Carvalho, F.A.; dos Santos Ramos, M.A.; de Castro, R.C.; Crevelin, E.J.; Crotti, A.E.M.; Santos, A.G.; da Silva, P.B. In vitro and in vivo anti-Helicobacter pylori activity of Casearia sylvestris leaf derivatives. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 233, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Soleymani, S.; Zargaran, A.; Farzaei, M.H.; Iranpanah, A.; Heydarpour, F.; Najafi, F.; Rahimi, R. The effect of a hydrogel made by Nigella sativa L. on acne vulgaris: A randomized double-blind clinical trial. Phytother. Res. 2020, 34, 3052–3062. [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhao, L.-Y.; Liu, H.-X.; Wang, L.; Xu, Z.-F.; Tan, H.-B.; Qiu, S.-X. Rhodomyrtosone B, a membrane-targeting anti-MRSA natural acylgphloroglucinol from Rhodomyrtus tomentosa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 228, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kuok, C.-F.; Hoi, S.-O.; Hoi, C.-F.; Chan, C.-H.; Fong, I.-H.; Ngok, C.-K.; Meng, L.-R.; Fong, P. Synergistic antibacterial effects of herbal extracts and antibiotics on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A computational and experimental study. Exp. Biol. Med. 2017, 242, 731–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Haddad, J.G.; Picard, M.; Bénard, S.; Desvignes, C.; Desprès, P.; Diotel, N.; El Kalamouni, C. Ayapana triplinervis essential oil and its main component thymohydroquinone dimethyl ether inhibit Zika virus at doses devoid of toxicity in zebrafish. Molecules 2019, 24, 3447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tran, T.T.; Kim, M.; Jang, Y.; Lee, H.W.; Nguyen, H.T.; Nguyen, T.N.; Park, H.W.; Le Dang, Q.; Kim, J.-C. Characterization and mechanisms of anti-influenza virus metabolites isolated from the Vietnamese medicinal plant Polygonum chinense. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 17, 162. [Google Scholar]
  68. da Silva, S.P.; da Silva, J.D.F.; da Costa, C.B.L.; da Silva, P.M.; de Freitas, A.F.S.; da Silva, C.E.S.; da Silva, A.R.; de Oliveira, A.M.; Sá, R.A.; Peixoto, A.R. Purification, characterization, and assessment of antimicrobial activity and toxicity of Portulaca elatior leaf lectin (PeLL). Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2023, 15, 287–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. da Silva, J.D.F.; da Silva, S.P.; da Silva, P.M.; Vieira, A.M.; de Araújo, L.C.C.; de Albuquerque Lima, T.; de Oliveira, A.P.S.; do Nascimento Carvalho, L.V.; da Rocha Pitta, M.G.; de Melo Rêgo, M.J.B. Portulaca elatior root contains a trehalose-binding lectin with antibacterial and antifungal activities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 126, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sun, S.; Huang, S.; Shi, Y.; Shao, Y.; Qiu, J.; Sedjoah, R.-C.A.-A.; Yan, Z.; Ding, L.; Zou, D.; Xin, Z. Extraction, isolation, characterization and antimicrobial activities of non-extractable polyphenols from pomegranate peel. Food Chem. 2021, 351, 129232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gosset-Erard, C.; Zhao, M.; Lordel-Madeleine, S.; Ennahar, S. Identification of punicalagin as the bioactive compound behind the antimicrobial activity of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peels. Food Chem. 2021, 352, 129396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dahash, S.L.; Al-Windy, S.B.; Al-Kuraishi, A.H.; Hussien, N.R.; Al-Niemi, M.S.; Al-Kuraishy, H.M. Ellagic acid-rich Pomegranate extracts synergizes moxifloxacin against methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2021, 71, S88–S92. [Google Scholar]
  73. Isnansetyo, A.; Handayani, D.P.; Istiqomah, I.; Arif, A.; Kaneko, T. An antibacterial compound purified from a tropical coastal plant, Diospyros maritima. Biodiversitas J. Biol. Divers. 2022, 23, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jeong, E.-T.; Park, S.-K.; Jo, D.-M.; Khan, F.; Choi, T.H.; Yoon, T.-M.; Kim, Y.-M. Synergistic antibacterial activity of an active compound derived from sedum takesimense against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its clinical isolates. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 31, 1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Xu, H.-X.; Mughal, S.; Taiwo, O.; Lee, S.F. Isolation and characterization of an antibacterial biflavonoid from an African chewing stick Garcinia kola Heckel (Clusiaceae). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 147, 497–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hioki, Y.; Onwona-Agyeman, S.; Kakumu, Y.; Hattori, H.; Yamauchi, K.; Mitsunaga, T. Garcinoic acids and a benzophenone derivative from the seeds of Garcinia kola and their antibacterial activities against oral bacterial pathogenic organisms. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 2087–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Rubio-Senent, F.; Martos, S.; Garcia, A.; Fernandez-Bolanos, J.G.; Rodriguez-Gutierrez, G.; Fernandez-Bolanos, J. Isolation and characterization of a secoiridoid derivative from two-phase olive waste (alperujo). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 1151–1159. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  78. Karygianni, L.; Cecere, M.; Argyropoulou, A.; Hellwig, E.; Skaltsounis, A.L.; Wittmer, A.; Tchorz, J.P.; Al-Ahmad, A. Compounds from Olea europaea and Pistacia lentiscus inhibit oral microbial growth. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 19, 51. [Google Scholar]
  79. Aribi, I.; Chemat, S.; Hamdi-Pacha, Y.; Luyten, W. Isolation of berberine tannate using a chromatography activity-guided fractionation from root bark of Berberis hispanica Boiss. & Reut. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2017, 40, 894–899. [Google Scholar]
  80. Patwardhan, R.B.; Dhakephalkar, P.K.; Chopade, B.A.; Dhavale, D.D.; Bhonde, R.R. Purification and characterization of an active principle, lawsone, responsible for the plasmid curing activity of Plumbago zeylanica root extracts. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2618. [Google Scholar]
  81. Vanitha, V.; Vijayakumar, S.; Nilavukkarasi, M.; Punitha, V.; Vidhya, E.; Praseetha, P. Heneicosane—A novel microbicidal bioactive alkane identified from Plumbago zeylanica L. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 154, 112748. [Google Scholar]
  82. Sakunpak, A.; Sueree, L. Thin-Layer Chromatography—Contact Bioautography as a Tool for Bioassay-Guided Isolation of Anti-Streptococcus mutans Compounds from Pinus merkusii Heartwood. JPC–J. Planar Chromatogr. Mod. TLC 2018, 31, 355–359. [Google Scholar]
  83. Gautam, S.S.; Bithel, N.; Kumar, S.; Painuly, D.; Singh, J. A new derivative of ionone from aerial parts of Viola odorata Linn. and its antibacterial role against respiratory pathogens. Clin. Phytosci. 2017, 2, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Rajesh, P.; Samaga, P.V.; Ravishankar Rai, V.; Lokanatha Rai, K. In vitro biological activity of aromadendrin-4′-methyl ether isolated from root extract of Ventilago madraspatana Gaertn with relevance to anticandidal activity. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 1042–1045. [Google Scholar]
  85. Yehia, R.S.; Altwaim, S.A. An insight into in vitro antioxidant, antimicrobial, cytotoxic, and apoptosis induction potential of mangiferin, a bioactive compound derived from Mangifera indica. Plants 2023, 12, 1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Matsuete-Takongmo, G.; Meffo-Dongmo, S.C.; Lannang, A.M.; Sewald, N. Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activities of Isolated Compounds from Prosopis africana Leaves. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2022, 2022, 4205823. [Google Scholar]
  87. Makau, J.N.; Watanabe, K.; Mohammed, M.M.; Nishida, N. Antiviral activity of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) skin extract against human influenza viruses. J. Med. Food 2018, 21, 777–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Bisignano, C.; Mandalari, G.; Smeriglio, A.; Trombetta, D.; Musarra Pizzo, M.; Pennisi, R.; Sciortino, M.T. Almond skin extracts abrogate HSV-1 replication by blocking virus binding to the cell. Viruses 2017, 9, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Buedenbender, L.; Astone, F.A.; Tasdemir, D. Bioactive molecular networking for mapping the antimicrobial constituents of the baltic brown alga Fucus vesiculosus. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Graikini, D.; Soro, A.B.; Sivagnanam, S.P.; Tiwari, B.K.; Sánchez, L. Bioactivity of Fucoidan-Rich Extracts from Fucus vesiculosus against Rotavirus and Foodborne Pathogens. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sultan, Y.Y.; Marrez, D.A. Isolation and purification of antifungal compounds from the green microalga Chlorella vulgaris. J. Appl. Biotechnol. Rep. 2022, 9, 603–613. [Google Scholar]
  92. Kim, H.-J.; Dasagrandhi, C.; Kim, S.-H.; Kim, B.-G.; Eom, S.-H.; Kim, Y.-M. In vitro antibacterial activity of phlorotannins from edible brown algae, Eisenia bicyclis against streptomycin-resistant Listeria monocytogenes. Indian J. Microbiol. 2018, 58, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sathyanathan, C.; Jyothirmayi, B.; Sundaram, L.; Abhinand, P.; Eswaramoorthy, R.; Gnanambal, K. Pheophytin a isolated from the seagrass Syringodium isoetifolium plausibly blocks umuC proteins of select bacterial pathogens, in silico. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 121, 1592–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Hadjkacem, F.; Elleuch, J.; Pierre, G.; Fendri, I.; Michaud, P.; Abdelkafi, S. Production and purification of fucoxanthins and β-carotenes from Halopteris scoparia and their effects on digestive enzymes and harmful bacteria. Environ. Technol. 2024, 45, 2923–2934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Rajauria, G.; Abu-Ghannam, N. Isolation and partial characterization of bioactive fucoxanthin from Himanthalia elongata brown seaweed: A TLC-based approach. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2013, 2013, 802573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Okimura, T.; Jiang, Z.; Komatsubara, H.; Hirasaka, K.; Oda, T. Therapeutic effects of an orally administered edible seaweed-derived polysaccharide preparation, ascophyllan HS, on a Streptococcus pneumoniae infection mouse model. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 154, 1116–1122. [Google Scholar]
  97. Richards, C.; Williams, N.A.; Fitton, J.H.; Stringer, D.N.; Karpiniec, S.S.; Park, A.Y. Oral fucoidan attenuates lung pathology and clinical signs in a severe influenza a mouse model. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Dinesh, S.; Menon, T.; Hanna, L.E.; Suresh, V.; Sathuvan, M.; Manikannan, M. In vitro anti-HIV-1 activity of fucoidan from Sargassum swartzii. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 82, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  99. Fierascu, R.C.; Fierascu, I.; Baroi, A.M.; Ortan, A. Selected aspects related to medicinal and aromatic plants as alternative sources of bioactive compounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Park, E.; Yu, H.; Lim, J.-H.; Choi, J.H.; Park, K.-J.; Lee, J. Seaweed metabolomics: A review on its nutrients, bioactive compounds and changes in climate change. Food Res. Int. 2023, 163, 112221. [Google Scholar]
  101. Xu, P.; Tan, H.; Jin, W.; Li, Y.; Santhoshkumar, C.; Li, P.; Liu, W. Antioxidative and antimicrobial activities of intertidal seaweeds and possible effects of abiotic factors on these bioactivities. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2018, 36, 2243–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ayrapetyan, O.N.; Obluchinskaya, E.D.; Zhurishkina, E.V.; Skorik, Y.A.; Lebedev, D.V.; Kulminskaya, A.A.; Lapina, I.M. Antibacterial properties of fucoidans from the brown algae Fucus vesiculosus L. of the Barents Sea. Biology 2021, 10, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Pradhan, B.; Nayak, R.; Patra, S.; Bhuyan, P.P.; Behera, P.K.; Mandal, A.K.; Behera, C.; Ki, J.-S.; Adhikary, S.P.; MubarakAli, D. A state-of-the-art review on fucoidan as an antiviral agent to combat viral infections. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 291, 119551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Jeong, G.-J.; Khan, F.; Tabassum, N.; Cho, K.-J.; Kim, Y.-M. Marine-derived bioactive materials as antibiofilm and antivirulence agents. Trends Biotechnol. 2024, 42, 1288–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Noorjahan, A.; Mahesh, S.; Anantharaman, P.; Aiyamperumal, B. Antimicrobial potential of seaweeds: Critical review. In Sustainable Global Resources of Seaweeds Volume 1: Bioresources, Cultivation, Trade and Multifarious Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 399–420. [Google Scholar]
  106. Aribisala, J.O.; Aruwa, C.E.; Sabiu, S. Progressive approach of phenolic acids toward the advancement of antimicrobial drugs. In Advancement of Phenolic Acids in Drug Discovery; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; pp. 177–210. [Google Scholar]
  107. Martelli, G.; Giacomini, D. Antibacterial and antioxidant activities for natural and synthetic dual-active compounds. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 158, 91–105. [Google Scholar]
  108. Uddin, T.M.; Chakraborty, A.J.; Khusro, A.; Zidan, B.R.M.; Mitra, S.; Emran, T.B.; Dhama, K.; Ripon, M.K.H.; Gajdács, M.; Sahibzada, M.U.K. Antibiotic resistance in microbes: History, mechanisms, therapeutic strategies and future prospects. J. Infect. Public Health 2021, 14, 1750–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zhang, F.; Cheng, W. The mechanism of bacterial resistance and potential bacteriostatic strategies. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Yang, S.K.; Low, L.Y.; Yap, P.S.X.; Yusoff, K.; Mai, C.W.; Lai, K.S.; Lim, S.H.E. Plant-derived antimicrobials: Insights into mitigation of antimicrobial resistance. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2018, 12, 295–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Jubair, N.; Rajagopal, M.; Chinnappan, S.; Abdullah, N.B.; Fatima, A. Review on the antibacterial mechanism of plant-derived compounds against multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDR). Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2021, 2021, 3663315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Khameneh, B.; Eskin, N.M.; Iranshahy, M.; Fazly Bazzaz, B.S. Phytochemicals: A promising weapon in the arsenal against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Górniak, I.; Bartoszewski, R.; Króliczewski, J. Comprehensive review of antimicrobial activities of plant flavonoids. Phytochem. Rev. 2019, 18, 241–272. [Google Scholar]
  114. Nguyen, T.L.A.; Bhattacharya, D. Antimicrobial activity of quercetin: An approach to its mechanistic principle. Molecules 2022, 27, 2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Renzetti, A.; Betts, J.W.; Fukumoto, K.; Rutherford, R.N. Antibacterial green tea catechins from a molecular perspective: Mechanisms of action and structure–activity relationships. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 9370–9396. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  116. Feng, R.; Qu, J.; Zhou, W.; Wei, Q.; Yin, Z.; Du, Y.; Yan, K.; Wu, Z.; Jia, R.; Li, L. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of berberine on avian Pasteurella multocida. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2016, 9, 22886–22892. [Google Scholar]
  117. Bhambhani, S.; Kondhare, K.R.; Giri, A.P. Diversity in chemical structures and biological properties of plant alkaloids. Molecules 2021, 26, 3374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kowalczyk, A.; Przychodna, M.; Sopata, S.; Bodalska, A.; Fecka, I. Thymol and thyme essential oil—New insights into selected therapeutic applications. Molecules 2020, 25, 4125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Keyvani-Ghamsari, S.; Rahimi, M.; Khorsandi, K. An update on the potential mechanism of gallic acid as an antibacterial and anticancer agent. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 5856–5872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Álvarez-Martínez, F.J.; Barrajón-Catalán, E.; Encinar, J.A.; Rodríguez-Díaz, J.C.; Micol, V. Antimicrobial capacity of plant polyphenols against gram-positive bacteria: A comprehensive review. Curr. Med. Chem. 2020, 27, 2576–2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Guay, I.; Boulanger, S.; Isabelle, C.; Brouillette, E.; Chagnon, F.; Bouarab, K.; Marsault, E.; Malouin, F. Tomatidine and analog FC04–100 possess bactericidal activities against Listeria, Bacillus and Staphylococcus spp. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2018, 19, 7. [Google Scholar]
  122. Castañeda, A.M.; Meléndez, C.M.; Uribe, D.; Pedroza-Díaz, J. Synergistic effects of natural compounds and conventional chemotherapeutic agents: Recent insights for the development of cancer treatment strategies. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Atta, S.; Waseem, D.; Fatima, H.; Naz, I.; Rasheed, F.; Kanwal, N. Antibacterial potential and synergistic interaction between natural polyphenolic extracts and synthetic antibiotic on clinical isolates. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2023, 30, 103576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. MacNair, C.R.; Rutherford, S.T.; Tan, M.-W. Alternative therapeutic strategies to treat antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2024, 22, 262–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Dassanayake, M.K.; Khoo, T.-J.; An, J. Antibiotic resistance modifying ability of phytoextracts in anthrax biological agent Bacillus anthracis and emerging superbugs: A review of synergistic mechanisms. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2021, 20, 79. [Google Scholar]
  126. Kim, K.-H.; Yu, D.; Eom, S.-H.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, D.-H.; Song, H.-S.; Kim, D.-M.; Kim, Y.-M. Fucofuroeckol-A from edible marine alga Eisenia bicyclis to restore antifungal activity of fluconazole against fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans. J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 30, 605–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Arora, S.; Saquib, S.A.; Algarni, Y.A.; Kader, M.A.; Ahmad, I.; Alshahrani, M.Y.; Saluja, P.; Baba, S.M.; Abdulla, A.M.; Bavabeedu, S.S. Synergistic effect of plant extracts on endodontic pathogens isolated from teeth with root canal treatment failure: An in vitro study. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Demgne, O.M.F.; Damen, F.; Fankam, A.G.; Guefack, M.-G.F.; Wamba, B.E.; Nayim, P.; Mbaveng, A.T.; Bitchagno, G.T.; Tapondjou, L.A.; Penlap, V.B. Botanicals and phytochemicals from the bark of Hypericum roeperianum (Hypericaceae) had strong antibacterial activity and showed synergistic effects with antibiotics against multidrug-resistant bacteria expressing active efflux pumps. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 277, 114257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Nafis, A.; Kasrati, A.; Jamali, C.A.; Custódio, L.; Vitalini, S.; Iriti, M.; Hassani, L. A comparative study of the in vitro antimicrobial and synergistic effect of essential oils from Laurus nobilis L. and Prunus armeniaca L. from Morocco with antimicrobial drugs: New approach for health promoting products. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Lan, J.-E.; Li, X.-J.; Zhu, X.-F.; Sun, Z.-L.; He, J.-M.; Zloh, M.; Gibbons, S.; Mu, Q. Flavonoids from Artemisia rupestris and their synergistic antibacterial effects on drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 35, 1881–1886. [Google Scholar]
  131. Eom, S.H.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, S.H.; Yoon, N.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, T.H.; Chung, Y.H.; Kim, S.B.; Kim, Y.M.; Kim, H.W. In vitro antibacterial activity and synergistic antibiotic effects of phlorotannins isolated from Eisenia bicyclis against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Phytother. Res. 2013, 27, 1260–1264. [Google Scholar]
  132. Lee, J.-H.; Eom, S.-H.; Lee, E.-H.; Jung, Y.-J.; Kim, H.-J.; Jo, M.-R.; Son, K.-T.; Lee, H.-J.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, M.-S. In vitro antibacterial and synergistic effect of phlorotannins isolated from edible brown seaweed Eisenia bicyclis against acne-related bacteria. Algae 2014, 29, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Mantravadi, P.K.; Kalesh, K.A.; Dobson, R.C.; Hudson, A.O.; Parthasarathy, A. The quest for novel antimicrobial compounds: Emerging trends in research, development, and technologies. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Elshafie, H.S.; Camele, I.; Mohamed, A.A. A comprehensive review on the biological, agricultural and pharmaceutical properties of secondary metabolites based-plant origin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Anwar, N.; Teo, Y.K.; Tan, J.B.L. The role of plant metabolites in drug discovery: Current challenges and future perspectives. In Natural Bio-Active Compounds: Volume 2: Chemistry, Pharmacology and Health Care Practices; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 25–51. [Google Scholar]
  136. Sharma, A.; Sharma, S.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, V.; Sharma, A.K. Plant secondary metabolites: An introduction of their chemistry and biological significance with physicochemical aspect. In Plant Secondary Metabolites: Physico-Chemical Properties and Therapeutic Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 1–45. [Google Scholar]
  137. Lautié, E.; Russo, O.; Ducrot, P.; Boutin, J.A. Unraveling plant natural chemical diversity for drug discovery purposes. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 397. [Google Scholar]
  138. Böttger, A.; Vothknecht, U.; Bolle, C.; Wolf, A.; Böttger, A.; Vothknecht, U.; Bolle, C.; Wolf, A. Plant secondary metabolites and their general function in plants. In Lessons on Caffeine, Cannabis & Co: Plant-Derived Drugs and Their Interaction with Human Receptors; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 3–17. [Google Scholar]
  139. Das, B.; Baidya, A.T.; Mathew, A.T.; Yadav, A.K.; Kumar, R. Structural modification aimed for improving solubility of lead compounds in early phase drug discovery. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2022, 56, 116614. [Google Scholar]
  140. Chopra, B.; Dhingra, A.K. Natural products: A lead for drug discovery and development. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 4660–4702. [Google Scholar]
  141. Najmi, A.; Javed, S.A.; Al Bratty, M.; Alhazmi, H.A. Modern approaches in the discovery and development of plant-based natural products and their analogues as potential therapeutic agents. Molecules 2022, 27, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Aware, C.B.; Patil, D.N.; Suryawanshi, S.S.; Mali, P.R.; Rane, M.R.; Gurav, R.G.; Jadhav, J.P. Natural bioactive products as promising therapeutics: A review of natural product-based drug development. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 151, 512–528. [Google Scholar]
  143. Mohammadi, S.; Jafari, B.; Asgharian, P.; Martorell, M.; Sharifi-Rad, J. Medicinal plants used in the treatment of Malaria: A key emphasis to Artemisia, Cinchona, Cryptolepis, and Tabebuia genera. Phytother. Res. 2020, 34, 1556–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Pinheiro, L.; Feitosa, L.M.; SILVEIRA, F.F.; Boechat, N. Current antimalarial therapies and advances in the development of semi-synthetic artemisinin derivatives. An. Acad. Bras. Ciências 2018, 90, 1251–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Bakhshi, G.D.; Rangwala, Z.S.; Chauhan, A.R. Systemic enzyme therapy in chronic venous disease: A review. Int. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2021, 9, 2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Uivarosi, V.; Munteanu, A.-C.; Nițulescu, G.M. An overview of synthetic and semisynthetic flavonoid derivatives and analogues: Perspectives in drug discovery. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 2019, 60, 29–84. [Google Scholar]
  147. Hricovíniová, Z.; Mascaretti, Š.; Hricovíniová, J.; Čížek, A.; Jampílek, J. New unnatural Gallotannins: A way toward green antioxidants, antimicrobials and antibiofilm agents. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Xu, K.; Ren, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Fu, X.-J.; Zhang, P.-C. Clinical development and informatics analysis of natural and semi-synthetic flavonoid drugs: A critical review. J. Adv. Res. 2023, 63, 269–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Majhi, S.; Das, D. Chemical derivatization of natural products: Semisynthesis and pharmacological aspects-A decade update. Tetrahedron 2021, 78, 131801. [Google Scholar]
  150. Stojković, D.; Petrović, J.; Carević, T.; Soković, M.; Liaras, K. Synthetic and Semisynthetic Compounds as Antibacterials Targeting Virulence Traits in Resistant Strains: A Narrative Updated Review. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Goel, B.; Sahu, B.; Jain, S.K. Plant-derived drug discovery: Introduction to recent approaches. In Botanical Leads for Drug Discovery; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  152. Alizadeh, S.R.; Ebrahimzadeh, M.A. Quercetin derivatives: Drug design, development, and biological activities, a review. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 229, 114068. [Google Scholar]
  153. Musial, C.; Kuban-Jankowska, A.; Gorska-Ponikowska, M. Beneficial properties of green tea catechins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Li, C.; Dai, T.; Chen, J.; Chen, M.; Liang, R.; Liu, C.; Du, L.; McClements, D.J. Modification of flavonoids: Methods and influences on biological activities. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 10637–10658. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  155. Li, C.-Q.; Lei, H.-M.; Hu, Q.-Y.; Li, G.-H.; Zhao, P.-J. Recent advances in the synthetic biology of natural drugs. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 691152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Wang, J.; Nielsen, J.; Liu, Z. Synthetic biology advanced natural product discovery. Metabolites 2021, 11, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Atanasov, A.G.; Zotchev, S.B.; Dirsch, V.M.; Supuran, C.T. Natural products in drug discovery: Advances and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 20, 200–216. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The structural component of bacteria cells shows multiple antibacterial resistance mechanisms. (a) Gram-positive bacteria and (b) Gram-negative bacteria. Reprinted from [4]. Copyright @ 2024, Springer Open.
Figure 1. The structural component of bacteria cells shows multiple antibacterial resistance mechanisms. (a) Gram-positive bacteria and (b) Gram-negative bacteria. Reprinted from [4]. Copyright @ 2024, Springer Open.
Processes 12 02316 g001
Figure 3. Multiple mechanisms of action of plant-derived pure compounds toward bacterial pathogens. Reprinted from [112]. Copyright © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Figure 3. Multiple mechanisms of action of plant-derived pure compounds toward bacterial pathogens. Reprinted from [112]. Copyright © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Processes 12 02316 g003
Figure 4. The multiple mechanisms by which phytochemical synergists reverse antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens. The mechanism of inhibition by plant-derived compounds includes the interaction with binding sites and receptors, inhibiting antibiotic-degrading enzymes, enhancing the cell membrane permeability, and disrupting the efflux pump system. The key abbreviations include ABC, ATP-binding cassette superfamily; SMR, small multi-drug resistance superfamily; MFS, major facilitator superfamily; MATE, multi-drug and toxic compound extrusion superfamily; RND, resistance–nodulation–division superfamily; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; H⁺, hydrogen ion; EGCG, epigallocatechin gallate; and PBP2a, penicillin-binding protein 2a. Reprinted from [125]. Copyright © 2021 by the author(s) and part of Springer Open.
Figure 4. The multiple mechanisms by which phytochemical synergists reverse antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens. The mechanism of inhibition by plant-derived compounds includes the interaction with binding sites and receptors, inhibiting antibiotic-degrading enzymes, enhancing the cell membrane permeability, and disrupting the efflux pump system. The key abbreviations include ABC, ATP-binding cassette superfamily; SMR, small multi-drug resistance superfamily; MFS, major facilitator superfamily; MATE, multi-drug and toxic compound extrusion superfamily; RND, resistance–nodulation–division superfamily; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; H⁺, hydrogen ion; EGCG, epigallocatechin gallate; and PBP2a, penicillin-binding protein 2a. Reprinted from [125]. Copyright © 2021 by the author(s) and part of Springer Open.
Processes 12 02316 g004
Figure 5. Key processes in the discovery and development of natural products from botanical sources. The figure has been redesigned based on the previous literature [141].
Figure 5. Key processes in the discovery and development of natural products from botanical sources. The figure has been redesigned based on the previous literature [141].
Processes 12 02316 g005
Table 2. Synergistic interactions between plant-derived compounds and conventional antibiotics/antifungals against resistant pathogens.
Table 2. Synergistic interactions between plant-derived compounds and conventional antibiotics/antifungals against resistant pathogens.
CompoundPlantActivityBacteriaSynergistic EffectsReference
ExtractDaphne genkwa35,000 mg/mLMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
-
Synergistic effect with oxacillin
[65]
Ellagic acid -31.62 μg/mLMRSA
-
Synergistic effect with moxifloxacin
[72]
1,2,4,6-tetra-O-galloyl-β-glucoseSedum takesimense32 μg/mL
128 μg/mL
128 μg/mL
32 μg/mL
128 μg/mL
16 μg/mL
Escherichia coli
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Salmonella tyrphimurium
Bacillus cereus
Listeria monocytogenes
Staphylococcus aureus
-
Synergistic effect with conventional antibiotics
[74]
2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinonePlumbago zeylanica100 μg/mLE. coli
-
Synergistic effect with kanamycin
[80]
Fucofuroeckol-AEisenia bicyclis16–32 μg/mLL. monocytogenes
-
Synergistic effect with streptomycin
[92]
512 μg/mLFluconazole-resistant Candida albicans
-
Synergistic effect with fluconazole
[126]
ExtractCommiphora molmol3.12 mg/mLC. albicans
-
Synergistic effect with fluconazole (FICI = 0.45)
[127]
8,8-bis(dihydroconiferyl) diferulateHypericum roeperianum4 μg/mL
128 μg/mL
32 μg/mL
E. coli
Enterobacter aerogenes
Klebsiella pneumoniae
-
Synergistic activity of cloxacillin, doxycycline, and tetracycline
[128]
Extract-Laurus nobilis L.0.25 μg/mL
0.25 μg/mL
0.25 μg/mL
C. albicans
C. glabrata
C. krusei
-
Synergistic activity with fluconazole
[129]
ChrysoeriolArtemisiarupestris32 μg/mLMRSA
-
Synergistic activity with ciprofloxacin
[130]
Phlorofucofuroeckol-AEisenia bicyclis32 μg/mLMRSA
-
Synergistic effect with ampicillin, penicillin, and oxacillin
[131]
32 μg/mLPropionibacterium acnes
-
Synergistic effect with erythromycin and lincomycin
[132]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jo, D.-M.; Tabassum, N.; Oh, D.K.; Ko, S.-C.; Kim, K.W.; Yang, D.; Kim, J.-Y.; Oh, G.-W.; Choi, G.; Lee, D.-S.; et al. Green Medicine: Advancing Antimicrobial Solutions with Diverse Terrestrial and Marine Plant-Derived Compounds. Processes 2024, 12, 2316. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112316

AMA Style

Jo D-M, Tabassum N, Oh DK, Ko S-C, Kim KW, Yang D, Kim J-Y, Oh G-W, Choi G, Lee D-S, et al. Green Medicine: Advancing Antimicrobial Solutions with Diverse Terrestrial and Marine Plant-Derived Compounds. Processes. 2024; 12(11):2316. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112316

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jo, Du-Min, Nazia Tabassum, Do Kyung Oh, Seok-Chun Ko, Kyung Woo Kim, Dongwoo Yang, Ji-Yul Kim, Gun-Woo Oh, Grace Choi, Dae-Sung Lee, and et al. 2024. "Green Medicine: Advancing Antimicrobial Solutions with Diverse Terrestrial and Marine Plant-Derived Compounds" Processes 12, no. 11: 2316. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112316

APA Style

Jo, D. -M., Tabassum, N., Oh, D. K., Ko, S. -C., Kim, K. W., Yang, D., Kim, J. -Y., Oh, G. -W., Choi, G., Lee, D. -S., Park, S. -K., Kim, Y. -M., & Khan, F. (2024). Green Medicine: Advancing Antimicrobial Solutions with Diverse Terrestrial and Marine Plant-Derived Compounds. Processes, 12(11), 2316. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112316

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop