Next Article in Journal
The Ascorbic Acid-Modified Fenton System for the Degradation of Bisphenol A: Kinetics, Parameters, and Mechanism
Previous Article in Journal
A Modified Control Strategy for Three-Phase Four-Switch Active Power Filters Based on Fundamental Positive Sequence Extraction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental and Statistical Analysis of Concrete Eco-Cobble Using Organic and Synthetic Fibers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Heteropolyacid-Catalyzed Conversion of Biomass Saccharides into High-Added-Value Products and Biofuels

by
Márcio Jose da Silva
* and
Pedro Henrique da Silva Andrade
Chemistry Department, Federal University of Vicosa, Vicosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2024, 12(11), 2587; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112587
Submission received: 24 September 2024 / Revised: 29 October 2024 / Accepted: 1 November 2024 / Published: 18 November 2024

Abstract

:
The industrial processes used to produce paper and cellulose generate many lignocellulosic residues. These residues are usually burned to produce heat to supply the energy demands of other processes, increasing greenhouse gas emissions and resulting in a high environmental impact. Instead of burning these lignocellulosic residues, they can be converted into saccharides, which are feedstock for high-value products and biofuels. Keggin heteropolyacids are efficient catalysts for obtaining saccharides from cellulose and hemicellulose and converting them into bioproducts or biofuel. Furfural, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, levulinic acid, and alkyl levulinates are important platform molecules obtained from saccharides and raw materials in the biorefinery processes used to produce fine chemicals and biofuels. This review discusses the significant progress achieved in the development of the processes based on heteropolyacid-catalyzed reactions to convert biomass and their residues into furfural, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, levulinic acid, and alkyl levulinates in homogeneous and heterogeneous reaction conditions. The different modifications that can be performed to a Keggin HPA structure, such as the replacement of the central atom (P or Si) with B or Al, the doping of the heteropolyanion with metal cations, and a proton exchange with metal or organic cations, as well as their impact on the catalytic activity of HPAs, are detailed and discussed herein.

1. Introduction

The development of strategies to reduce dependence on fossil resources has become important in today’s world due to energy, environmental, and economic reasons. In this context, exploring biomass as a source of chemicals and alternative energy has emerged as an attractive option [1,2]. Lignocellulosic biomass is a sustainable feedstock because of its renewable nature, abundance, and wide availability [3,4,5]. Among the various types of natural raw materials, lignocellulosic biomass has been converted to energy and biofuels through thermochemical processes, including combustion, liquefaction, gasification, pyrolysis, hydrothermal processing, and biochemical routes [4,5,6].
Lignocellulosic biomass is a rich and renewable source of carbon for biorefinery processes. It consists of lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose fractions, as shown in Figure 1 [3]. Lignin is primarily made up of aromatic alcohols and phenols, while hemicellulose and cellulose fractions mainly consist of saccharides. This type of biomass can provide feedstocks with varying contents of lignin, cellulose, and pentosan (hemicellulose). Figure 2 displays some examples of various types of biomass with their respective compositions [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16].
The proportions of these components depend on the type of biomass and local agronomic conditions [17]. Cellulose and hemicellulose are the most valuable fractions of lignocellulosic biomass because they contain important saccharides such as fructose, xylose, and glucose, which are platform molecules in the production of biofuels and industrial chemicals [16,17,18]. These saccharides are essential for the production of biofuels and industrial chemicals. However, separating them from lignocellulosic biomass is challenging due to the presence of recalcitrant lignin, which is bonded to these fractions through cross-linkages [18]. Lignin is primarily made up of the alcohols aromatic coniferyl, p-coumaryl, and sinapyl, which form hydrogen bonds with cellulose and hemicellulose fractions (see Figure 3) [19].
To convert cellulosic biomass into glucose and fructose, the lignin should first be removed due to its strong interactions with the cellulose and hemicellulose fractions. This can be achieved through various processes, such as acid hydrolysis. The hemicellulose fraction consists of a linear chain of xylans, which provides high stability and does not need to be isolated like cellulose. However, its hydrolysis produces saccharides such as mannose, galactose, xylose, and arabinose [20] (Figure 4).
The food and forest-derived industries produce a significant amount of waste and cellulose residues. Usually, these residues are burned to generate heat and electricity. However, when chemically processed, these biomass sources can produce platform molecules that are useful for making fine chemicals or biofuels [21]. This also helps in reducing the emission of greenhouse gases [22]. This review focuses on demonstrating the effectiveness of Keggin heteropolyacids and their salts as catalysts in converting cellulose and hemicellulose into saccharide monomers, as well as converting these saccharides into platform molecules.
The structure of lignocellulosic biomass comprises polymers of pentoses and hexoses that have fructose and glucose as the main monomers. The hydrolysis of these polymers in an acidic medium generates xylose and glucose, which can be converted into valuable derivatives of platform molecules. Figure 5 and Figure 6 illustrate the conversion routes and the main intermediates involved.
When biomass is broken down to produce xylose as the main sugar, it yields five-carbon chain products such as furfural, 5-HMF, and levulinic acid (see Figure 6). On the other hand, if the breakdown of lignocellulosic biomass produces hexose sugars like glucose, they can be converted to levoglucosan or isomerized into fructose, which, in turn, yield levulinic acid and 5-HMF.
Figure 7 describes a reaction pathway where the initial biomass contains a high amount of polymeric cellulose. In this scenario, the first acid hydrolysis produces a cellobiose disaccharide, which is then hydrolyzed to glucose. Glucose can also be obtained from another disaccharide, sucrose. Following isomerization in an acidic medium, fructose is obtained and converted to 5-HMF [23].

2. Compounds Obtained from the Hydrolysis of Biomass Waste

2.1. Main Platform Molecules Obtained from Lignocellulose

2.1.1. 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) and Derivatives

5-hydroxymethyl furfural is one of the top ten platform molecules used in biorefinery processes. It is used to produce valuable commercial chemicals such as ethers, carboxylic acids, or amine furfural-derived compounds like 5-EMF (ethoxy), 2,5-DMF (dimethyl), 2,5 dicarboxylic acid (FDCA; a polyester precursor), and 5-HMFA (amine). The latter two compounds are particularly important chemicals [24]. 5-EMF and 2,5-DMF are considered potential bio additives for fuels, specifically diesel and gasoline, respectively [25].
Figure 8 illustrates the reaction pathway for the oxidation of 5-HMF to 2,5 dicarboxylic furan acid and the main intermediates involved. Noble metals such as Pt, Rh, or Pd are used as catalysts in the hydrogenation steps [26]. Additionally, the reductive transformation of 5-HMF can also result in the formation of products of interest, mainly the potential precursors for sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) (see Figure 9).
The conversion of biomass to 5-HMF and levulinic acid involves various steps, including biomass pre-treatment, which makes cellulose a lignin-free polymer. Afterward, the saccharides obtained are hydrolyzed, isomerized, and dehydrated in successive steps that are normally promoted by the Lewis or Brønsted acid catalysts (Figure 10) [27].
The Keggin heteropolyacid salts containing metal are bifunctional catalysts that can promote various reactions. The main challenge lies in controlling the selectivity when the acid medium favors the formation of humins due to the polymerization of furan compounds.

2.1.2. Furfural: Production and Derivatives

Furfural is utilized in the production of lubricant oils, biofuels, plastics, resins, fine chemicals (such as agrochemicals and drugs), and flavoring agents. Figure 11 illustrates the most commonly used production routes, which normally use sulfuric acid or phosphoric acid as catalysts [28]. Furfural has been used in lubricant oils and biofuels to fabricate plastics, resins, fine chemicals such as agrochemicals and drugs, and flavoring agents, among several other processes [29]. In this review, the intention is to show that HPA catalysts can replace the mineral acids in such reactions.
The industrial processes are conducted under pressure in a homogeneous phase, resulting in waste products and effluents that need to be neutralized. Moreover, these processes are energy-intensive and involve sulfuric acid as catalysts, reaching commonly low yields [30]. Therefore, it is crucial to find reusable and more efficient catalysts to enable the conversion of biomass to furfural under more environmentally friendly and sustainable conditions [31].
Furfural is considered one of the top thirteen platform molecules due to its wide range of applications as a feedstock in various industrial processes (Figure 12).
Figure 13 shows some examples of valuable alcohols and nitrogen compounds obtained from furfural. For example, pyrrole can be used as pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and veterinary products, in addition to being precursors in the synthesis of important natural products. Proline has pharmaceutical and biological applications [32].
The hydrogenation and/or dehydration of these compounds provides furan derivatives that are potentially useful as precursors of jet biofuels (Figure 14) [32].
The furfural oxidation with molecular oxygen takes place through two different ways, without or with an opening ring, as shown in Figure 15.
The first one gives lactones such as furanone, furan 2,5-dione, and/or furoic acid. The second one preferentially gives carboxylic acids such as maleic, fumaric, and succinic acids, which are highly valuable to the food and pharmaceutical industries [27].

2.1.3. Levulinic Acid Production and Their Derivatives

Similar to 5-HMF and furfural, obtaining levulinic acid from cellulose requires a series of tandem acid-catalyzed reactions such as hydrolysis, dehydration, and isomerization. Most of the time, 5-HMF and furfural are primarily obtained and then converted to levulinic acid (Figure 16).
The processes are usually carried out under homogeneous catalysis conditions, which can cause corrosion in the reactors and make it difficult to purify and separate the products. Additionally, a large amount of effluent and neutralization residues are produced during these steps.
In the following sections, we will explore the evaluation of heterogeneous catalysts in such processes. Metal oxides, zeolites, and sulfonic resins are some examples of alternative solid catalysts that have been considered for converting cellulose to levulinic acid [34]. However, the main challenge in developing efficient heterogeneous catalysts is that they have little contact with insoluble cellulose, which remains stable due to the hydrogen bonds network [35].
Levulinic acid can also be produced from furanoses, which contain six-membered carbon chains; nonetheless, in this case, the combination of hydrogen pressure and a noble metal catalyst is required, resulting in furfuryl alcohol that has its ring cleaved and hydrated to give levulinic acid (Figure 17) [36].
In addition to furfural, since the 1990s, the “Biofine Process” has produced industrial levulinic acid from lignocellulosic biomass [37]. Levulinic acid has been used as an ingredient to produce resins, plasticizers, antifreeze agents, and various other products [38]. Because it is a functionalized substrate with carbonyl and carboxylic groups, it can be employed in various organic transformations, such as redox, esterification, and polymerization reactions (Figure 18) [38].
However, before its use as a high-added-value chemical (Figure 18), it should be upgraded, hampering its commercialization at competitive costs compared to other biomass derivatives [36]. Alternatively, products such as alkyl levulinates can be easily obtained from the esterification of levulinic acid in acid-catalyzed reactions, generating alkyl esters at competitive prices [39] (Figure 19).

3. Heteropolyacid Catalysts

Keggin heteropolyacids (HPAs) belong to the class of polyoxometalates that are metal–oxygen clusters, constituted of oxygen atoms coordinated octahedrally to a metal cation with a high oxidation number (Mo6+, W6+). These metal–oxygen octahedrals are tetrahedrally arranged around central heteroatoms such as P, B, or Si [40,41,42]. Figure 20 shows a typical Keggin anion.
Keggin HPAs are strong Brønsted acid catalysts, whose protons, like di-hydronium cation [H5O2+], are bonded to the oxygen atoms placed in the terminal position of the octahedral present in the Keggin anion. This is a key aspect that can make them efficient catalysts in reactions with biomass-containing saccharides (Figure 21).
Keggin HPAs are acid solids with a low surface area, hampering their use as heterogeneous catalysts. This drawback can be overcome by exchanging their protons with cations with a large ionic radius or supporting the HPAs over a matrix with a high surface area, such as silica, zeolites, and molecular sieves as well [43,44,45,46,47].
In this review, we aim to demonstrate how Keggin HPA catalysts (H3PW12O40, H3PMo12O40, and H4SiW12O40) can act as homogeneous or heterogeneous catalysts after being converted to metal salts or supported on solid matrixes. Keggin HPAs and their salts have been highly efficient catalysts in biomass conversion in homogeneous, heterogeneous, or biphasic systems or in anchored ionic liquids.

4. Results

4.1. Soluble Keggin Heteropolyacid Catalysts

4.1.1. Heteropolyacid-Catalyzed Reactions to Produce Monosaccharides in the Homogeneous Phase

Keggin heteropolyacids are soluble in the polar solvents commonly used in biomass conversion processes and have acted as homogeneous catalysts in different reactions. For instance, Zhang et al. assessed the catalytic efficiency of tungsten heteropolyacids in converting cellulose to glucose (see Figure 22) in a 10:1 MIBK/water biphasic system [48].
The authors found that the cellulose hydrolysis reactions achieved high conversion, regardless of the tungsten catalyst. Among them, the phosphotungstic acid-catalyzed reaction reached the highest glucose yield. These authors determined the total number of acid sites of the catalysts—H4SiW12O40 (2.32 mmol/g), H3PW12O40 (1.78 mmol/g), and H5BW12O40 (2.17 mmol/g)—as well as their strength of acidity—H4SiW12O40 (699 mV), H3PW12O40 (516 mV), and H5BW12O40 (588 mV). These measurements were performed using potentiometric titration. When the initial electrode potential of the solution is higher than 100 mV, the catalyst has strong acid sites.
In another study, Zhang et al. synthesized a series of Lewis metal-substituted phosphotungstic acids with the general formula Hn+xPW11Lx+O39, where Mx+ = Cu2+, Sn4+, Cr3+, Zn2+, Fe3+, Ti4+, and Zr4+, and tested their activity in the reactions to convert cellulose to glucose [49]. The goal was to evaluate the catalytic activity of these salts in water/MIBK (methyl isobutyl ketone) biphasic systems (Figure 23).
Zhang et al. found that the total acid sites of catalysts influenced the reaction conversions in reactions catalyzed by heteropolyacids [49]. The catalyst with the highest acid site content (H5PW11TiO39) was the most active. However, the glucose yield was lower in the presence of two catalysts with a higher number of acid sites (H5PW11TiO39 and H5PW11CuO39) [49]. Mizuno et al. studied the catalytic activity of Keggin heteropolyacids containing different heteroatoms as the central atoms in the saccharification of crystalline cellulose [50]. In this process, crystalline cellulose was immersed in the HPA solution at room temperature for 24 h and then heated to 333 K for 48 h. The yield was based on the glucose unit used in cellulose. Figure 24 provides a summary of the main results.
These authors concluded that Keggin anions with a higher negative charge achieved a higher glucose yield: the lowest yield was in the presence of H3PW12O40 and the highest yield was reached by the H5BW12O40 catalyst. All these Keggin HPAs were more efficient than mineral acids (HCl and H2SO4) [51].

4.1.2. Comparison of Heteropolyacid-Catalyzed Reactions to Produce Monosaccharides with Other Soluble Catalysts

Table 1 shows the glucose yields obtained in reactions in the presence of different soluble catalysts [51,52]. It is important to note that all of the acids were used at the same proton concentration. However, time and reaction temperatures also impacted the catalyst activity (Table 1).
These results can also be compared to those described in Figure 22, Figure 23 and Figure 24 (see Section 4.1.1). This comparison shows that HPA catalysts are more active than mineral acid catalysts.

4.1.3. Comparison of Solid Heteropolyacid-Catalyzed Reactions to Produce Monosaccharides with Other Solid Catalysts

The performance of solid catalysts and HPAs can be evaluated in Table 2. A direct comparison of the activity of solid catalysts is sometimes not easy. For this reason, solid-supported catalysts are not included in Table 2. Only acidic solids are mentioned. Time and reaction temperatures also impact the catalyst activity (Table 2).

4.1.4. Homogeneous Heteropolyacid-Catalyzed Reactions to Produce Levulinic Acid and Alkyl Levulinates

The Keggin heteropolyacids can undergo various transformations, resulting in the formation of soluble or insoluble heteropolyacids. Different salts can be synthesized by either fully or partially replacing the protons of the original heteropolyacid with organic or metal cations. Additionally, the anions of the Keggin can have their heteroatoms replaced, or tungsten and molybdenum atoms can be substituted with other metals. To better understand the catalysts, we will initially only discuss those containing protons (pristine heteropolyacids or those derived from partial exchange). The catalytic properties of heteropolyacids are influenced by the composition of the Keggin anion, particularly the addenda atoms (Mo or W) and the central atoms (P, Si, B, and Al), which can affect their activity. However, all heteropolyacids will remain soluble. Figure 24 illustrates the results of the conversion of cellulose to levulinic acid (LA) in the aqueous phase (Figure 25) [49,52].
The excellent catalytic performance of soluble Keggin HPAs can be explained by comparing the composition of the heteropolyanion and the nature of the cation, which affect the Lewis and Brønsted acidity of these compounds. Figure 24 illustrates the LA yield achieved in reactions using Keggin HPAs with different heteroatoms and Brønsted Lewis molar ratios. The reactions with catalysts exhibiting a higher Lewis acidity resulted in a higher LA yield, with ChH4AlW12O40 being the most active catalyst (Figure 24). Zhang et al. synthesized metal-substituted phosphotungstic acids with Lewis acidity properties and assessed their performance in converting cellulose to levulinic acid (Figure 26) [49].
When one unit of MO (M = W6+) is removed from the Keggin anion of phosphotungstic acid, the PW12O403− anion becomes a lacunar anion PW11O397−. The resulting vacancy can be filled with metal cations, and the acid’s electroneutrality will be achieved with a number of protons that depend on the positive charge of the substituent metal. Among the acids evaluated, only those containing Fe3+ or Cr3+ cations had four protons and, therefore, had anions with the lowest negative charge. These acids achieved the lowest LA yield with very similar results. The other catalysts with five protons achieved superior performance; however, the LA yields were different. Zhang et al. attributed this behavior to the higher strength of the Lewis acidity of the doping metals of the heteropolyanion [50].
Metal-exchanged heteropolyacid salts were also effective catalysts in the conversion of cellulose to alkyl levulinates. Tao et al. synthesized the salts of chromium, aluminum, and tin from the reaction of precursor metal chloride salts and phosphotungstic acid [54]. Figure 27 shows the ethyl levulinate yields obtained from cellulose using metal-exchanged salts as catalysts. For comparison, the reactions with synthesis precursors are also included.
The metal chloride salts are also Lewis acid catalysts, but they were not as effective in esterifying LA with ethyl alcohol as the heteropoly salts. Even though H3PW12O40 yielded slightly higher, it was only marginally better than these salts. On the other hand, when the protons were partially exchanged with metal cations, the resulting salts were significantly more active, such as the Al1/3H2PW12O40 and Sn1/4H2PW12O40 salts. Tao et al. also evaluated the activity of silicotungstic acid and its metal-exchanged salts [55]. The main results are shown in Figure 28.
The efficiency of H4SiW12O40 (Figure 28) was higher than H3PW12O40 (Figure 27). These authors assigned this result to the higher negative charge of the silicotungstic anion compared to the phosphotungstic, which favors its interaction with the substrate (cellulose).
Among the three different metal silicotungstate salts, the Al1/3H3SiW12O40 was the most effective (Figure 28). For that reason, Tao et al. chose aluminum salts to evaluate the impact of the level of exchange of protons on their catalytic efficiency. The exchanged salt Al4/3SiW12O40 presented the lowest efficiency, while the partially exchanged Al2/3H2SiW12O40 was the most effective. This suggests that both Lewis and Brønsted acid sites are important in this reaction.
These authors evaluated the efficiency of an aluminum silicotungstate catalyst in the conversion of various kinds of biomass to ethyl levulinate (Figure 29) [55].
These different ethyl levulinate yields can be a consequence of the varied composition of the lignocellulosic biomass present in these feedstocks. Tao et al. also assessed the efficiency of aluminum silicotungstate in reactions with different alcohols using cellulose as the raw material.
An increase in the carbon chain size of alcohol resulted in a lower alkyl levulinate yield. The same occurred when alcohols having hydroxyl groups with a higher steric hindrance were used, such as sec-propyl or sec-butyl (Figure 30) [55].

4.1.5. Homogeneous Heteropolyacid-Catalyzed Reactions to Produce 5-HMF

Soluble Keggin HPAs have been also used as catalysts in reactions to convert cellulose to 5-HMF. Figure 31 shows the results obtained by Zhang et al. [49].
Among the Keggin heteropolyacids, the H4SiW12O40 catalyst presented the highest molar ratio of Brønsted to Lewis acid sites (B/L) and achieved the highest 5-HMF yield (Figure 31). In the same work, these authors evaluated the activity of metal-substituted phosphotungstic acid salts in the conversion of cellulose to 5-HMF (Figure 32) [49].
As was verified in the reactions of the conversion of cellulose to levulinic acid (Figure 26), the catalysts with anions having a lower negative charge (H4PW11FeO39 and H4PW11CrO39) were those that achieved the highest 5-HMF yields.

4.1.6. Ionic Liquid Heteropolyacid-Catalyzed Reactions to Produce Levulinic Acid, Furfural, and 5-HMF

In addition to the exchange with metal cations, another strategy used to improve the catalytic activity of Keggin HPAs in the reaction for LA production is the partial exchange of their protons with organic cations. This modification becomes even more attractive if the organic cations can be used as ionic liquids.
Heteropolyacid ionic liquids (ILs-POMs) have advantages compared to both homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts. The most important is that, due to their structure, their solubility in polar solvents can be changed with temperature. This means that, although they are insoluble at room temperature in polar solvents, they can be solubilized if the temperature is suitably increased [56]. Moreover, ionic liquids are environmentally friendly compared to fossil origin solvents and present acidity that can be useful in the reactions of biomass conversion [54]. Zhang et al. synthesized a series of phosphotungstic acids with the protons totally or partially exchanged with choline cations (Ch+) (H3-n(Ch)nPW12O40), which were used as catalysts in the polysaccharide conversion to monosaccharides. These catalysts were used to convert cellulose to 5-HMF in a biphasic system (water/MIBK) (Table 3) [48].
Although the yields reached in the reactions with the H3PW12O40 or Ch1H2PW12O40 catalysts were almost the same, the latter had the great advantage of remaining insoluble in the reaction, having been easily recovered and reused without loss of activity [48].
Previous works demonstrated that water/polar organic solvents biphasic systems can positively impact cellulose conversion, not only helping in its degradation but also extracting the products, enhancing the reaction selectivity [53,56]. Thus, these authors also verified the effect of the composition of the biphasic system in the cellulose conversion and the 5-HMF yield on the reactions catalyzed by choline phosphotungstate (Figure 33).
Among the biphasic systems tested, the MIBK/water was the most efficient due to the higher affinity between the product and the organic solvent. The literature describes that, while the hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose and its conversion to 5-HMF preferably happens in the aqueous phase, the possible conversion of 5-HMF to LA occurs in the organic phases [53,56].
Sun et al. demonstrated that the heteropolyacid ionic liquid [C4H6N2(CH2)3SO3H](3−n)HnPW12O40 ([MIMPSH](n)H(3−n)PW12O40, n = 1, 2, 3] directly catalyzed the preparation of LA from starch in a biphasic system (water/MIBK), achieving a 48.7% yield [53]. In this sense, Figure 34 presents some results of reactions carried out in different solvents (water and MIBK) with ionic liquid cations-exchanged tungsten heteropolyacids and a titanium-doped choline phosphotungstate salt.
Several research groups have synthesized partially exchanged HPAs, which are efficient catalysts at high temperatures and more active than the precursor heteropolyacids [49,52,53]. Zhang et al. first evaluated choline-exchanged phosphotungstic acids [48]. Posteriorly, they synthesized a series of metal-substituted phosphotungstic acid salts that were soluble in the reaction medium [49]. Among these salts, titanium-substituted tungstic acid was the most effective. They then solidified this acid by exchanging its protons with choline cations. As shown in Figure 34, even at lower temperatures, this salt was the most efficient catalyst [49]. Zhang et al. also assessed the activity of phosphotungstic acid in the conversion of cellulose to furfural in the presence of 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ionic liquid [BMIN]Cl (Figure 35). These authors verified that high yields of furfural were achieved within a short reaction time at moderate temperatures. Swatloski et al. were the first to describe that 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ionic liquid could dissolve cellulose [56].
Although synthesized by different research groups, all of these partially exchanged heteropolyacids are catalysts at a responsible temperature and are more active than precursor heteropolyacids [49,52,53].
It is noteworthy that, firstly, Zhang et al. evaluated choline-exchanged phosphotungstic acids [48]. In a second work, these authors synthesized a series of metal-substituted phosphotungstic acid salts, which were soluble in the reaction medium [49]. Among those salts, titanium-substituted tungstic acid was the most effective. Afterward, they chose this acid to be solidified, exchanging its protons with choline cation. Figure 34 shows that, even at lower temperatures, this salt was the most efficient catalyst [49].
The 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ionic liquid was used as a solvent in reactions catalyzed by phosphotungstic acid or its silver salt to convert cellulose to 5-HMF (Figure 36).
Figure 36 shows the 5-HMF yields achieved in different solvents and catalysts: Ag3PW12O40/MIBK, H3PW12O40/BIMMCl, H3PW12O40 + B(OH)3/BIMMCl, and (CH16)H4PW11TiO39. Among them, the latter reached the highest conversion and 5-HMF yield, operating at the lowest temperature and shortest reaction time [57,58,59]. This result can be assigned to the large organic cation (hexadecyltrimethylammonium) in the heteropoly salt and to the biphasic system that contributed to the cellulose hydrolysis and 5-HMF extraction.

4.2. Solid-Supported Keggin Heteropolyacid Catalysts: Production of Levulinic Acid, Alkyl Levulinates, 5-HMF, and Furfural

In addition to converting Keggin HPAs to insoluble salts, supporting them over a high surface area solid is also a strategy frequently used in reactions of biorefinery to obtain platform molecules from saccharides [60]. Saghandali et al. synthesized halloysite-supported Keggin HPAs and investigated their activity in the dehydration of fructose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (Figure 37) [61].
The efficiency of the solid-supported heteropolyacid catalysts was the following: H4SiW12O40/halloysite > H3PMo12O40/halloysite > H3PW12O40/halloysite. These authors attributed this result to the higher strength of the acid of the supported silicotungstic acid. This catalyst was also evaluated in the dehydration of different monosaccharides (Figure 38) [61].
The dehydration of disaccharides containing hexoses (cellulose) to fructose was not very efficient, and only a 2% yield was reached. For disaccharides containing hexose + pentose (sucrose), the catalyst was a little bit more efficient achieving a 12% yield. The catalyst was more efficient when monosaccharides were the substrates: glucose (64%) and fructose (99%). These authors attributed the lower yield obtained from glucose to the required isomerization to provide fructose and consequently the five-membered product (5-HMF) [61].
The H4SiW12O40/halloysite-catalyzed reaction was compared to the other supported HPAs (Figure 39).
Wu et al. supported phosphotungstic acid on the graphitic carbon nitride and compared the performance of the precursors, support, and solid-supported catalysts (Table 4) [65].
In the absence of an acid catalyst, no reaction progress was observed. When the H3PW12O40 soluble catalyst was present, the conversion was 89%, and 5-MF was the main reaction product formed. An increase in the dopant load on the support led to an increase in the conversion and 5-HMF yield (Table 4) [65].
Wu et al. studied the effect of temperature and reaction time on the LA and 5-HMF yields (Figure 40A,B, respectively).
The reactions carried out at 313 K provided the highest product yields. Regardless of the time or reaction temperatures, the 5-HMF yields were always higher than the LA yields. Temperatures greater than 413 K led to the degradation of both products, diminishing their yields. Lv et al. assessed the activity of silica-supported silicotungstic acid in reactions performed in a DMSO/water biphasic system to convert cellulose to 5-HMF [62].
Soluble phosphotungstic acid achieved a 5-HMF yield similar to that obtained in the reaction over the H3PW12O40/SiO2 solid-supported catalyst. Nonetheless, when the silica was treated with ATS (aminopropyltrimethoxysilane), the yield jumped to 78.31% [66]. This yield was superior to those achieved with the H4SiW12O40/SiO2 (Figure 41) or H3PW12O40/g-C3N4 catalysts (Figure 40), both in an MIBK/water biphasic system.
In comparison to the halloysite-supported catalyst, this was a superior result, although herein the reaction was longer (Figure 42). Huang et al. investigated the ATS (aminopropyltrimethoxysilane)-silica solid-supported phosphotungstic acid catalyst activity on the glucose conversion to 5-HMF in an acetone/water biphasic system [66].
The highest conversion of glucose to furfural, as well as the highest furfural yield, was achieved in the DMSO solution containing dissolved phosphotungstic acid. When using DMSO with the silica-supported acid catalyst, the conversion was significantly lower and the furfural yield was only 10% lower. The biphasic system of water and toluene was less efficient, probably due to the lower interaction between the substrate and catalyst and the more difficult product extraction [67,68]. The same group evaluated the efficiency of the toluene/water system in the conversion of glucose to furfural using (MCM-41) mesoporous silica-supported cesium phosphotungstate salt at different temperatures (Figure 43) [69].
Dias et al. studied the effect of the silica support porosity, and the solvent system strongly impacted the conversion of xylose dehydration reactions and furfural yield. Comparing the performance of MP or LP silica-supported cesium phosphotungstate salts, the highest conversions were achieved with MP silica-supported catalysts, regardless of the solvent (Figure 44) [69].
Similarly, independently of the silica porosity, the greatest results were obtained in reactions carried out in the DMSO solvent [69]. This can be attributed to the higher extractive efficiency of the DMSO solvent and the higher interaction of the substrate with the MP silica support.
The reaction carried out at the highest temperature (423 K) provided the greatest levulinate ethyl yield (Figure 45) [70]. When the reactions were at temperatures near 350 K, the performance of the phosphotungstic acid/ZrO2-Si-Ph-Si catalyst was much superior to the other catalysts [70,71,72,73].
Figure 46 shows that the esterification of levulinic acid with short- or long-carbon chain size alcohols can achieve high ester yields, since the temperature and time reactions can be optimized, regardless of the catalyst or support used [71,72].
The support played a key role in the esterification reaction of levulinic acid with methyl alcohol (Figure 47). The reaction over the H3PW12O40/ZrO2-Si-Ph-Si catalyst achieved the highest ester yield (99%) within the shortest reaction time. The greater surface area of the support can explain this result [73].
Replacing the protons of Keggin HPAs with large cations such as Cs can also allow the use of these salts as heterogeneous catalysts. Guo et al. synthesized the bimetallic salts of 12-tungstophosphoric acid with different Sn/Cs molar ratios using ultrasound-assisted coprecipitation and tested their activity on the xylose dehydration (Figure 48) [74].
The authors verified that the partial exchange of Cs+ with Sn4+ did not modify its Keggin structure but increased the particle sizes, improving its catalytic performance in D-xylose dehydration [74].
The protons of Keggin HPAs can also be exchanged with organic cations. Figure 49 displays the 5-HMF yields obtained from glucose dehydration carried out over the heterogeneous catalysts derived from phosphotungstic acid.
The phosphotungstate salt exchanged with the organic cation with the sulfonic group was the most effective catalyst, with ([MIM-PS]3PW12O40 achieving the highest 5-HMF yield. Possibly, the sec-butyl alcohol was also the best solvent to interact with the product [77]. The use of Ag3PW12O40 as the catalyst in an aqueous medium also gave a high 5-HMF yield (85.7%) [78]. Two different research groups also assessed the activity of silver silicotungstate or phosphotungstate salts; nonetheless, the reactions were performed in a water/MIBK biphasic system (Figure 50) [79,80].
Although the reaction over Ag4SiW12O40 achieved the highest yield (86%), the catalyst load was two and a half times higher and the reaction time two times longer; therefore, it suggests that the Ag3PW12O40 salt was the most efficient catalyst (Figure 50).
Likewise, observed in reactions of cellulose conversion to 5-HMF, the combination of titanium-doped phosphotungstate salt with an efficient solvent system (water/MIBK) provided the highest yield [49]. This biphasic system was also very efficient on the conversion of fructose to 5-HMF (Figure 51), achieving a 94% yield [80,81].

5. Conclusions

In this review, we discussed the processes involved in synthesizing furfural, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, levulinic acid, and alkyl levulinates from saccharides like fructose, glucose, and xylose. We focused on the use of Keggin heteropolyacids in both homogeneous and heterogeneous reaction conditions. We began with a brief discussion about the components of lignocellulosic biomass (lignin, hemicellulose, and cellulose) and then explored the main pathways for converting cellulose and hemicellulose into high-value products. Next, we addressed the applications and production methods of biorefinery platform molecules such as 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, furfural, levulinic acid, and alkyl levulinates. Subsequently, we delved into the use of Keggin heteropolyacids in biorefinery reactions, describing their main properties and discussing their use as homogeneous catalysts, focusing on acids like H3PW12O40, H3PMo12O40, and H4SiW12O40.
The focus was on demonstrating the use of heteropolyacids in the production of saccharides or their conversion into biorefinery platform molecules. The discussion also covered the performance of these heteropolyacids after modifications such as the partial or complete exchange of protons with metal cations or the replacement of Si and P heteroatoms with Al, B, and Ti, specifically in biorefinery reactions. Keggin heteropolyacids can be transformed into heterogeneous catalysts by replacing their protons with large organic or metal cations (such as choline, cesium, and imidazolium). The use of these salts in the conversion of saccharides to platform molecules was explored. Additionally, it was noted that Keggin heteropolyanions containing W can be substituted with metal cations to create efficient catalysts. The use of these salts in biorefinery reactions was also discussed. Special attention was given to the use of solid-supported heteropolyacids or heteropoly salts. Furthermore, the use of ionic liquids as solvents in heteropolyacid-catalyzed reactions or as a source of organic cations was also discussed. A comparison and discussion of a series of heterogeneous processes using solid-supported heteropolyacid catalysts or heteropolyacid salts was provided. The effects of the critical factors affecting the conversion and product yields, such as solvent, temperature, time, concentration, and type of heteropolyacid catalyst, were also discussed. The primary goal was to describe the recent advances in the development of heteropolyacid catalysts and their application in reactions to convert saccharides into biorefinery platform molecules.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.J.d.S.; methodology, M.J.d.S. and P.H.d.S.A.; software, M.J.d.S. and P.H.d.S.A.; investigation, M.J.d.S. and P.H.d.S.A.; resources, M.J.d.S. and P.H.d.S.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.J.d.S. and P.H.d.S.A.; writing—review and editing, M.J.d.S.; and supervision, M.J.d.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES—Finance Code 001).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Brazilian research agencies CAPES, FAPEMIG, and CNPq for the financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Menon, V.; Rao, M. Trends in bioconversion of lignocellulose: Biofuels, platform chemicals, and biorefinery concept. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2012, 38, 522–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hoogwijk, M.; Faaij, A.; Eickhout, B.; de Vries, B.; Turkenburg, W. Potential of biomass energy out to 2100, for four IPCC SRES land-use scenarios. Biomass Bioenerg. 2005, 29, 225–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Loow, Y.L.; Wu, T.Y.; Tan, K.A.; Lim, Y.S.; Siow, L.F.; Jahim, J.M.; Mohammad, A.W.; Teoh, W.H. Recent advances in the application of inorganic salt pretreatment for transforming lignocellulosic biomass into reducing sugars. J. Agric Food Chem. 2015, 63, 8349–8363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gebre, H.; Fisha, K.; Kindeya, T.; Gebremichal, T. Synthesis of furfural from bagasse. Int. Lett. Chem. Phys. Astron. 2015, 57, 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pointner, M.; Kuttner, P.; Obrlik, T.; Jäger, A.; Kahr, H. Composition of corncobs as a substrate for fermentation of biofuels. Agron. Res. 2014, 12, 391–396. Available online: https://agronomy.emu.ee/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/2014_2_10_b5.pdf (accessed on 23 September 2024).
  6. Cardona, C.A.; Quintero, J.A.; Paz, I.C. Production of bioethanol from sugarcane bagasse: Status and perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 4754–4766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. O’Brien, P. Furfural Chemicals and Biofuels from Agriculture; Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation: Wagga Wagga, Australia, 2006; 39p. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheșcă, A.M.; Tofănică, B.M.; Puiţel, A.C.; Nicu, R.; Gavrilescu, D. Environmentally friendly cellulosic fibers from corn stalks. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2018, 17, 1765–1771. Available online: https://eemj.eu/index.php/EEMJ/article/view/3639 (accessed on 23 September 2024).
  9. Paloheimo, L.; Vainio, K.A.; Kero, M.L. Analyses of plant products in greater detail. Agric. Food Sci. 1961, 33, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, J.X.; Xu, F.; Sun, X.F.; Xiao, B.; Sun, R.C. Physico-chemical and thermal characterization of cellulose from barley straw. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 88, 521–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Hao, J.; Wang, W. Study of almond shell characteristics. Materials 2018, 11, 1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rodríguez, M.; Nolasco, S.; Izquierdo, N.; Mascheroni, R.; Madrigal, M.S.; Flores, D.C.; Ramos, A.Q. Microwave-assisted extraction of antioxidant compounds from sunflower hulls. Heat Mass Transf. 2019, 55, 3017–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Demirkaya, E.; Dal, O.; Yüksel, A. Liquefaction of waste hazelnut shell by using sub-and supercritical solvents as a reaction medium. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2019, 150, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kalita, E.; Nath, B.K.; Deb, P.; Agan, F.; Islam, M.R.; Saikia, K. High quality fluorescent cellulose nanofibers from endemic rice husk: Isolation and characterization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 122, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lachowicz, H.; Wróblewska, H.; Sajdak, M.; Komorowicz, M.; Wojtan, R. The chemical composition of silver birch (Betula pendula Roth.) wood in Poland depending on forest stand location and forest habitat type. Cellulose 2019, 26, 3047–3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lee, C.B.T.L.; Wu, T.Y.; Ting, C.H.; Tan, J.K.; Siow, L.F.; Cheng, C.K.; Jahim, J.M.; Mohammad, A.W. One-pot furfural production using choline chloride-dicarboxylic acid based deep eutectic solvents under mild conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 278, 486–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kenney, K.L.; Smith, W.A.; Gresham, G.L.; Westover, T.L. Understanding biomass feedstock variability. Biofuels 2014, 4, 111–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kumar, D.; Singh, B.; Korstad, J. Utilization of lignocellulosic biomass by oleaginous yeast and bacteria for production of biodiesel and renewable diesel. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 73, 654–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alonso, D.M.; Bond, J.; Dumesic, J. Catalytic conversion of biomass to biofuels. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 1493–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ye, L.; Han, Y.; Wang, X.; Lu, X.; Qi, X.; Yu, H. Recent progress in furfural production from hemicellulose and its derivatives: Conversion mechanism, catalytic system, solvent selection. Mol. Catal. 2021, 515, 111899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Canos, A.C.; Iborra, S.; Velty, A. Chemical routes for the transformation of biomass into chemicals. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2411–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gan, J. Supply of biomass, bioenergy, and carbon mitigation: Method and application. Energy Policy 2007, 35, 6003–6009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Raspolli Galletti, A.M.; Antonetti, C.; Fulignati, S.; Licursi, D. Direct alcoholysis of carbohydrate precursors and real cellulosic biomasses to alkyl levulinates: A critical review. Catalysts 2020, 10, 1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ma, Y.; Qing, S.; Wang, L.; Islam, N.; Guan, S.; Gao, Z.; Mamat, X.; Li, H.; Eli, W.; Wang, T. Production of 50hydroxymethylfurfrual from fructose by a termo-regulated and recyclable Bronsted acid ionic liquid catalyst. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 47377–47383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Delbecq, F.; Wang, Y.; Len, C. Various carbohydrate precursors dehydration to 5-HMF in an acidic biphasic system under microwave irradiation in dimethyl sulfoxide-ionic liquid mixtures. Mol. Catal. 2017, 434, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Delidovich, I.; Hausoul, P.J.C.; Deng, L.; Pfützenreuter, R.; Rose, M.; Palkovits, R. Alternative Monomers Based on Lignocellulose and Their Use for Polymer Production. Chem. Ver. 2016, 116, 1540–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, Z.; Xia, S.; Wang, X.; Fan, Y.; Zhao, K.; Wang, S.; Zheng, A. Catalytic production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from lignocellulosic biomass: Recent advances, challenges and opportunities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 196, 114332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cousin, E.; Namhaed, K.; Pérès, Y.; Cognet, P.; Delmas, M.; Hermansyah, H.; Aroua, M.K. Towards efficient and greener processes for furfural production from biomass: A review of the recent trends. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 847, 157599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yong, K.J.; Wu, T.Y.; Lee, C.B.T.L.; Lee, Z.J.; Liu, Q.; Jahim, J.M.; Zhang, L. Furfural production from biomass residues: Current technologies, challenges and future prospects. Biomass Bioenergy 2022, 161, 106458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Peleteiro, S.; Santos, V.; Garrote, G.; Parajó, J.C. Furfural production from Eucalyptus wood using an acidic ionic liquid. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 146, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Azlan, N.S.M.; Yap, C.L.; Gan, S.; Rahman, M.B.A. Recent advances in the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass and its degraded products to levulinic acid: A synergy of Brønsted-Lowry acid and Lewis acid. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 181, 114778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jorqueira, D.S.S.; de Lima, L.F.; Moya, S.F.; Vilcocq, L.; Richard, D.; Fraga, M.A.; Suppino, R.S. Critical review of furfural and furfuryl alcohol production: Past, present, and future on heterogeneous catalysis. Appl. Catal. A 2023, 665, 119360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qiu, B.; Shi, J.; Hu, W.; Gao, J.; Li, S.; Chu, H. Construction of hydrothermal liquefaction system for efficient production of biomass-derived furfural: Solvents, catalysts and mechanisms. Fuel 2023, 354, 129278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Hou, T.; Han, L.; Xiao, W. Catalysis performance comparison of a Brønsted acid H2SO4 and a Lewis acid Al2(SO4)3 in methyl levulinate production from biomass carbohydrates. J. Energy Chem. 2018, 27, 552–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Alonso, D.M.; Gallo, J.M.R.; Mellmer, M.A.; Wettstein, S.G.; Dumesic, J.A. Direct conversion of cellulose to levulinic acid and gamma-valerolactone using solid acid catalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 927–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, H.; Zhang, P.; Ye, J.; Wu, Y.; Liu, J.; Fang, W.; Zeng, G. Comparison of various pretreatments for ethanol production enhancement from solid residue after rumen fluid digestion of rice straw. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 247, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xu, W.P.; Chen, X.F.; Guo, H.J.; Li, H.L.; Zhang, H.R.; Xiong, L.; Chen, X.D. Conversion of levulinic acid to valuable chemicals: A review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2021, 96, 3009–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Signoretto, M.; Taghavi, S.; Ghedini, E.; Menegazzo, F. Catalytic production of levulinic acid (LA) from actual biomass. Molecules 2019, 24, 2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Morone, A.; Apte, M.; Pandey, R.A. Levulinic acid production from renewable waste resources: Bottlenecks, potential remedies, advancements and applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 51, 548–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Badgujar, K.C.; Badgujar, V.C.; Bhanage, B.M. A review on catalytic synthesis of energy rich fuel additive levulinate compounds from biomass derived levulinic acid. Fuel Process. Technol. 2019, 197, 106213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, S.S.; Yang, G.Y. Recent advances in polyoxometalate-catalyzed reactions. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 4893–4962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Da Silva, M.J.; Liberto, N.A. Soluble and solid supported Keggin heteropolyacids as catalysts in reactions for biodiesel production: Challenges and recent advances. Curr. Org. Chem. 2016, 20, 1263–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Narkhede, N.; Patel, A. Sustainable valorisation of glycerol via acetalization as well as carboxylation reactions over silicotungstates anchored to zeolite Hβ. Appl. Catal. A 2016, 515, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Coronel, N.C.; Da Silva, M.J. Lacunar Keggin heteropolyacid salts: Soluble, solid, and solid-supported catalysts. J. Clust. Sci. 2018, 29, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ferreira, P.; Fonseca, I.M.; Ramos, A.M.; Vital, J.; Castanheiro, J.E. Valorisation of glycerol by condensation with acetone over silica-included heteropolyacids. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2010, 98, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Srikanth, A.; Viswanadham, B.; Kumar, V.P.; Anipindi, N.R.; Chary, K.V. Synthesis and characterization of Cs-exchanged heteropolyacid catalysts functionalized with Sn for carbonolysis of glycerol to glycerol carbonate. Appl. Petrochem. Res. 2016, 6, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Srinivas, M.; Raveendra, G.; Parameswaram, G.; Prasad, P.S.; Lingaiah, N. Cesium exchanged tungstophosphoric acid supported on tin oxide: An efficient solid acid catalyst for etherification of glycerol with tert-butanol to synthesize biofuel additives. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2016, 413, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, X.; Zhang, D.; Sun, Z.; Xue, L.; Wang, X.; Jiang, Z. Highly efficient preparation of HMF from cellulose using temperature-responsive heteropolyacid catalysts in cascade reaction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 196, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Sun, N.; Wang, S.; Wang, X.; Jiang, Z. High production of levulinic acid from cellulosic feedstocks being catalyzed by temperature-responsive transition metal substituted heteropolyacids. Renew. Energy 2019, 141, 802–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ogasawara, Y.; Itagaki, S.; Yamaguchi, K.; Mizuno, N. Saccharification of natural lignocellulose biomass and polysaccharides by highly negatively charged heteropolyacids in concentrated aqueous solution. ChemSusChem 2011, 4, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, Q.; Liu, H.; Gao, D.-M. Establishing a kinetic model of biomass-derived disaccharide hydrolysis over solid acid: A case study on hierarchically porous niobium phosphate. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 132756–132766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tian, J.; Wang, J.; Zhao, S.; Jiang, C.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X. Hydrolysis of cellulose by the heteropoly acid H3PW12O40. Cellulose 2010, 17, 587–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Huang, Y.B.; Fu, Y. Hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose by solid acid catalysts. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 1095–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hua, L.; Linc, L.; Wua, Z.; Zhou, S.; Liu, S. Chemocatalytic hydrolysis of cellulose into glucose over solid acid catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 174–175, 225–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tao, C.; Peng, L.; Zhang, J.; He, L. Al-modified heteropolyacid facilitates alkyl levulinate production from cellulose and lignocellulosic biomass: Kinetics and mechanism studies. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021, 213, 106709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sun, Z.; Xue, L.; Wang, S.; Wang, X.; Shi, J. Single-step conversion of cellulose to levulinic acid using temperature-responsive dodeca-aluminotungstic acid catalysts. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 742–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chang, K.L.; Huynh, Q.T.; Zhong, C.T.; Chen, W.R.; Wang, H.Y.; Phitsuwan, P.; Yang, G.C. Production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from glucose by recyclable heteropolyacid catalyst in ionic liquid. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 28, 102844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dou, Y.; Zhou, S.; Oldani, C.; Fang, W.; Cao, Q. 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural production from dehydration of fructose catalyzed by Aquivion@ silica solid acid. Fuel 2018, 214, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, L.; Xi, G.; Chen, Z.; Qi, Z.; Wang, X. Enhanced formation of 5-HMF from glucose using a highly selective and stable SAPO-34 catalyst. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 307, 877–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, L.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y. Research of desulfurization of dibenzothiophene with SO3H-functionalized morpholine heteropolyacid ionic liquid catalyst. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1220, 128779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chidambaram, M.; Bell, A.T. A two-step approach for the catalytic conversion of glucose to 2,5-dimethylfuran in ionic liquids. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 1253–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hu, L.; Sun, Y.; Lin, L.; Liu, S. 12-Tungstophosphoric acid/boric acid as synergetic catalysts for the conversion of glucose into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in ionic liquid. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 47, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lu, Y.; Sun, Z.; Huo, M. Fabrication of a micellar heteropolyacid with Lewis–Brønsted acid sites and application for the production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from saccharides in water. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 30869–30876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pileidis, F.D.; Titirici, M.M. Levulinic acid biorefineries: New challenges for efficient utilization of biomass. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 562–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Saghandali, F.; Kazemeini, M.; Sadjadi, S. Halloysite-supported silicotungstic acid as an efficient catalyst for dehydration of fructose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2024, 184, 111697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lv, G.; Deng, L.; Lu, B.; Li, J.; Hou, X.; Yang, Y. Efficient dehydration of fructose into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in aqueous medium over silica-included heteropolyacids. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 2244–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Patil, C.R.; Rode, C.V. Synthesis of diesel additives from fructose over PWA/SBA-15 catalyst. Fuel 2018, 217, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gomes, F.N.; Mendes, F.M.; Souza, M.M. Synthesis of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from fructose catalyzed by phosphotungstic acid. Catal. Today 2017, 279, 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wu, J.; Wang, X.; Song, J.; Wang, Q.; Shi, L.; Wang, X.; Huo, M. Synthesis of heteropolyacid (HPA) functionalized graphitic carbon nitride as effective catalysts for converting polysaccharides into high-value chemicals. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 185, 106473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Huang, F.; Su, Y.; Tao, Y.; Sun, W.; Wang, W. Preparation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from glucose catalyzed by silica-supported phosphotungstic acid heterogeneous catalyst. Fuel 2018, 226, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dias, A.S.; Lima, S.; Pillinger, M.; Valente, A.A. Dehydration of xylose into furfural over micro-mesoporous sulfonic acid catalysts. J. Catal. 2005, 229, 414–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dias, A.S.; Lima, S.; Pillinger, M.; Valente, A.A. Mesoporous silica-supported 12-tungstophosphoric acid catalysts for the liquid phase dehydration of D-xylose. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2006, 94, 214–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Dias, A.S.; Lima, S.; Pillinger, M.; Valente, A.A. Acidic cesium salts of 12-tungstophosphoric acid as catalysts for dehydration of xylose into furfural. Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341, 2946–2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sivasubramaniam, D.; Amin, N.S. Synthesis of ethyl levulinate from levulinic acid over solid super acid catalyst. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2015, 45, 907–912. [Google Scholar]
  75. Melero, J.A.; Morales, G.; Iglesias, J.; Paniagua, M.; Hernández, B.; Penedo, S. Efficient conversion of levulinic acid into alkyl levulinates catalyzed by sulfonic mesostructured silicas. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2013, 466, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Su, F.; Ma, L.; Song, D.; Zhang, X.; Guo, Y. Design of a highly ordered mesoporous H3PW12O40/ZrO2–Si (Ph) Si hybrid catalyst for methyl levulinate synthesis. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 885–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. An, S.; Song, D.; Sun, Y.; Guo, Y.; Shang, Q. Design of highly ordered mesoporous Nb2O5-based hybrid catalysts bifunctionalized by the Keggin-type heteropoly acid and phenyl-bridged organosilica moieties for the synthesis of methyl levulinate. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016, 226, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Guo, X.; Guo, F.; Li, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Xing, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Liu, T.; Zhang, X.; Jin, Y. Dehydration of D-xylose into furfural over bimetallic salts of heteropolyacid in DMSO/ H2O, mixture. Appl. Catal. A 2018, 558, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zheng, H.; Sun, Z.; Yi, X.; Wang, S.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Jiang, Z. A water-tolerant C16H3PW11CrO39 catalyst for the efficient conversion of monosaccharides into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in a micellar system. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 23051–23056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, L.; Zhang, L.; Li, H.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, R. High selective production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from fructose by sulfonic acid functionalized SBA-15 catalyst. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 156, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Qu, Y.; Huang, C.; Zhang, J.; Chen, B. Efficient dehydration of fructose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural catalyzed by a recyclable sulfonated organic heteropolyacid salt. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 106, 170–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Basic units of lignocellulosic structure.
Figure 1. Basic units of lignocellulosic structure.
Processes 12 02587 g001
Figure 2. Main cellulose residues and their composition. a [4]; b [5]; c [6]; d [7]; e [8]; f [9]; g [10]; h [11]; i [12]; j [14]; k [15].
Figure 2. Main cellulose residues and their composition. a [4]; b [5]; c [6]; d [7]; e [8]; f [9]; g [10]; h [11]; i [12]; j [14]; k [15].
Processes 12 02587 g002
Figure 3. Main phenols in lignin structure.
Figure 3. Main phenols in lignin structure.
Processes 12 02587 g003
Figure 4. Monosaccharides obtained from hemicellulose hydrolysis [6].
Figure 4. Monosaccharides obtained from hemicellulose hydrolysis [6].
Processes 12 02587 g004
Figure 5. Lewis acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of five-membered ring of lignocellulosic biomass [22].
Figure 5. Lewis acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of five-membered ring of lignocellulosic biomass [22].
Processes 12 02587 g005
Figure 6. Lewis acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of six-membered ring of lignocellulosic biomass [22].
Figure 6. Lewis acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of six-membered ring of lignocellulosic biomass [22].
Processes 12 02587 g006
Figure 7. Various routes to the production of 5-HMF from cellulose [23].
Figure 7. Various routes to the production of 5-HMF from cellulose [23].
Processes 12 02587 g007
Figure 8. Intermediate oxidation products of 5-HMF to 2,5 dicarboxylic furan acid [26]: 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF); 5-hydromethylfuran-2-carboxylic acid (HFMCA); 2,5-diformylfuran (DFF); and 5-formylmethylfuran-2-carboxylic acid (FFCA).
Figure 8. Intermediate oxidation products of 5-HMF to 2,5 dicarboxylic furan acid [26]: 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF); 5-hydromethylfuran-2-carboxylic acid (HFMCA); 2,5-diformylfuran (DFF); and 5-formylmethylfuran-2-carboxylic acid (FFCA).
Processes 12 02587 g008
Figure 9. Reduction products of 5-HMF [26]: Bis-hydroxymethyl furan (BHMF); and Bis-hydroxymethyl tetrahydrofuran (BHMTHF).
Figure 9. Reduction products of 5-HMF [26]: Bis-hydroxymethyl furan (BHMF); and Bis-hydroxymethyl tetrahydrofuran (BHMTHF).
Processes 12 02587 g009
Figure 10. Production of 5-HMF and levulinic acid from lignocellulosic biomass [27].
Figure 10. Production of 5-HMF and levulinic acid from lignocellulosic biomass [27].
Processes 12 02587 g010
Figure 11. Main furfural production technologies [29]. Sulfuric acid-catalyzed processes (yellow arrows), phosphoric acid-catalyzed processes (blue arrows), and an autocatalyzed process (black arrow).
Figure 11. Main furfural production technologies [29]. Sulfuric acid-catalyzed processes (yellow arrows), phosphoric acid-catalyzed processes (blue arrows), and an autocatalyzed process (black arrow).
Processes 12 02587 g011
Figure 12. Conversion of furfural into biofuels and more added value products [20].
Figure 12. Conversion of furfural into biofuels and more added value products [20].
Processes 12 02587 g012
Figure 13. Alcohols and nitrogen compounds are obtained from furfural [32].
Figure 13. Alcohols and nitrogen compounds are obtained from furfural [32].
Processes 12 02587 g013
Figure 14. Main furfural furan-derived potential precursors of jet biofuel [32].
Figure 14. Main furfural furan-derived potential precursors of jet biofuel [32].
Processes 12 02587 g014
Figure 15. Main furfural oxidation products [27].
Figure 15. Main furfural oxidation products [27].
Processes 12 02587 g015
Figure 16. Conversion of cellulose to levulinic acid [33].
Figure 16. Conversion of cellulose to levulinic acid [33].
Processes 12 02587 g016
Figure 17. Production of levulinic acid from furanose using a hydrogen/noble metal combination [36].
Figure 17. Production of levulinic acid from furanose using a hydrogen/noble metal combination [36].
Processes 12 02587 g017
Figure 18. Production of valuable chemicals from levulinic acid [36].
Figure 18. Production of valuable chemicals from levulinic acid [36].
Processes 12 02587 g018
Figure 19. Production of alkyl levulinates from saccharides [39].
Figure 19. Production of alkyl levulinates from saccharides [39].
Processes 12 02587 g019
Figure 20. Typical structure of Keggin heteropolyanion.
Figure 20. Typical structure of Keggin heteropolyanion.
Processes 12 02587 g020
Figure 21. Di-hydronium cation.
Figure 21. Di-hydronium cation.
Processes 12 02587 g021
Figure 22. The different performances of various HPAs in the hydrolysis of cellulose. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.1 g; catalyst, 0.08 mmol; water, 0.5 mL; MIBK, 5.0 mL; temperature, 403 K; and time, 3 h.
Figure 22. The different performances of various HPAs in the hydrolysis of cellulose. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.1 g; catalyst, 0.08 mmol; water, 0.5 mL; MIBK, 5.0 mL; temperature, 403 K; and time, 3 h.
Processes 12 02587 g022
Figure 23. The different performances of various HPA salts in the hydrolysis of cellulose [49]. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.1 g; catalyst, 0.08 mmol; water, 5.5 mL; temperature, 403 K; and time, 3 h.
Figure 23. The different performances of various HPA salts in the hydrolysis of cellulose [49]. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.1 g; catalyst, 0.08 mmol; water, 5.5 mL; temperature, 403 K; and time, 3 h.
Processes 12 02587 g023
Figure 24. Conversion of crystalline cellulose to mono- and disaccharides in aqueous solutions containing Keggin heteropolyacids (glucose and cellobiose) [50]. The reaction conditions were as follows: crystalline cellulose, 0.1 g; HPA aqueous solution, 2 mL; and temperature, 333 K.
Figure 24. Conversion of crystalline cellulose to mono- and disaccharides in aqueous solutions containing Keggin heteropolyacids (glucose and cellobiose) [50]. The reaction conditions were as follows: crystalline cellulose, 0.1 g; HPA aqueous solution, 2 mL; and temperature, 333 K.
Processes 12 02587 g024
Figure 25. The different performances of various tungsten HPAs with different heteroatoms in the hydrolysis of cellulose. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.1 g; catalyst, 0.08 mmol; water, 5.5 mL; and time, 3 h. Ch = choline.a [49]; b [52].
Figure 25. The different performances of various tungsten HPAs with different heteroatoms in the hydrolysis of cellulose. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.1 g; catalyst, 0.08 mmol; water, 5.5 mL; and time, 3 h. Ch = choline.a [49]; b [52].
Processes 12 02587 g025
Figure 26. The different performances of various metal-substituted heteropolyacids in the conversion of cellulose to levulinic acid [49]. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.1 g; catalyst, 0.08 mmol; water, 5.5 mL; temperature, 403 K; and time, 3 h.
Figure 26. The different performances of various metal-substituted heteropolyacids in the conversion of cellulose to levulinic acid [49]. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.1 g; catalyst, 0.08 mmol; water, 5.5 mL; temperature, 403 K; and time, 3 h.
Processes 12 02587 g026
Figure 27. Metal chloride-, phosphotungstic acid-, and metal-exchanged phosphotungstic acid salt-catalyzed reactions to convert cellulose to ethyl levulinate [54]. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.2 g; catalyst, 0.07 mmol; ethyl alcohol, 10 mL; temperature, 453 K; and reaction time, 4 h.
Figure 27. Metal chloride-, phosphotungstic acid-, and metal-exchanged phosphotungstic acid salt-catalyzed reactions to convert cellulose to ethyl levulinate [54]. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.2 g; catalyst, 0.07 mmol; ethyl alcohol, 10 mL; temperature, 453 K; and reaction time, 4 h.
Processes 12 02587 g027
Figure 28. Effect of content and metal nature on the phosphotungstic acid salt-catalyzed reactions to convert cellulose to ethyl levulinate [55]. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.2 g; catalyst, 0.07 mmol; ethyl alcohol, 10 mL; temperature, 453 K; and reaction time, 4 h.
Figure 28. Effect of content and metal nature on the phosphotungstic acid salt-catalyzed reactions to convert cellulose to ethyl levulinate [55]. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.2 g; catalyst, 0.07 mmol; ethyl alcohol, 10 mL; temperature, 453 K; and reaction time, 4 h.
Processes 12 02587 g028
Figure 29. Aluminum-exchanged silicotungstic acid salt-catalyzed conversion of various biomass to ethyl levulinate [55]. The reaction conditions were as follows: raw material, 0.2 g; AlHSiW12O40, 0.07 mmol; ethyl alcohol, 10 mL; temperature, 453 K; and reaction time, 4 h.
Figure 29. Aluminum-exchanged silicotungstic acid salt-catalyzed conversion of various biomass to ethyl levulinate [55]. The reaction conditions were as follows: raw material, 0.2 g; AlHSiW12O40, 0.07 mmol; ethyl alcohol, 10 mL; temperature, 453 K; and reaction time, 4 h.
Processes 12 02587 g029
Figure 30. Metal-exchanged phosphotungstic acid salt-catalyzed reactions of cellulose conversion to alkyl levulinate [55]. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.2 g; AlHSiW12O40, 0.07 mmol; alkyl alcohol, 10 mL; temperature, 453 K; and reaction time, 4 h.
Figure 30. Metal-exchanged phosphotungstic acid salt-catalyzed reactions of cellulose conversion to alkyl levulinate [55]. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.2 g; AlHSiW12O40, 0.07 mmol; alkyl alcohol, 10 mL; temperature, 453 K; and reaction time, 4 h.
Processes 12 02587 g030
Figure 31. Performances of tungsten HPAs in the conversion of cellulose to 5-HMF [50]. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.1 g; catalyst, 0.08 mmol; water, 5.5 mL; temperature, 403 K; and time, 3 h. aA.L = load of acid catalyst.
Figure 31. Performances of tungsten HPAs in the conversion of cellulose to 5-HMF [50]. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.1 g; catalyst, 0.08 mmol; water, 5.5 mL; temperature, 403 K; and time, 3 h. aA.L = load of acid catalyst.
Processes 12 02587 g031
Figure 32. Performances of metal-substituted phosphotungstic acids in the conversion of cellulose to 5-HMF [49]. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.1 g; catalyst, 0.08 mmol; water, 5.5 mL; temperature, 403 K; and time, 3 h.
Figure 32. Performances of metal-substituted phosphotungstic acids in the conversion of cellulose to 5-HMF [49]. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.1 g; catalyst, 0.08 mmol; water, 5.5 mL; temperature, 403 K; and time, 3 h.
Processes 12 02587 g032
Figure 33. Effect of the biphasic system on the cellulose conversion and 5-HMF yield [48]. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.1 g; ChH2PW12O40, 0.11 mmol; volume, 5.5 mL; water/organic solvent mixture, 10% water; temperature, 413 K; and time, 8 h.
Figure 33. Effect of the biphasic system on the cellulose conversion and 5-HMF yield [48]. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.1 g; ChH2PW12O40, 0.11 mmol; volume, 5.5 mL; water/organic solvent mixture, 10% water; temperature, 413 K; and time, 8 h.
Processes 12 02587 g033
Figure 34. Conversion of cellulose to LA in the presence of ionic liquid cations partially exchanged Keggin heteropolyacids. a [49]; b [52]; c [53]. MIBK = methyl isobutyl ketone; and BMIMPSH = C4H6N2(CH2)3SO3H.
Figure 34. Conversion of cellulose to LA in the presence of ionic liquid cations partially exchanged Keggin heteropolyacids. a [49]; b [52]; c [53]. MIBK = methyl isobutyl ketone; and BMIMPSH = C4H6N2(CH2)3SO3H.
Processes 12 02587 g034
Figure 35. Conversion of cellulose to furfural in the presence of phosphotungstic acid solved in ionic liquid [56]. [BMIM]Cl = 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ionic liquid ionic.
Figure 35. Conversion of cellulose to furfural in the presence of phosphotungstic acid solved in ionic liquid [56]. [BMIM]Cl = 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ionic liquid ionic.
Processes 12 02587 g035
Figure 36. 5-HMF yields obtained from cellulose using different solvents in the reactions catalyzed by phosphotungstic catalysts. a BMIMCl: butylmethylimidazolium methyl chloride; and C16: (C16H33N(CH3)3+, hexadecyltrimethylammonium. References: [57,58,59].
Figure 36. 5-HMF yields obtained from cellulose using different solvents in the reactions catalyzed by phosphotungstic catalysts. a BMIMCl: butylmethylimidazolium methyl chloride; and C16: (C16H33N(CH3)3+, hexadecyltrimethylammonium. References: [57,58,59].
Processes 12 02587 g036
Figure 37. Conversion of fructose into 5-HMF over Keggin heteropolyacids impregnated on halloysite [61]. The reaction conditions were as follows: 10 wt.% of the catalyst at 388 K for 40 min.
Figure 37. Conversion of fructose into 5-HMF over Keggin heteropolyacids impregnated on halloysite [61]. The reaction conditions were as follows: 10 wt.% of the catalyst at 388 K for 40 min.
Processes 12 02587 g037
Figure 38. 5-HMF yields achieved in the conversion of saccharides to 5-HMF over H4SiW12O40/halloysite (0.18 mmol)/ halloysite catalyst [61]. The reaction conditions were as follows: catalyst loading 11 wt.% of carbohydrate at 398 K for 43 min.
Figure 38. 5-HMF yields achieved in the conversion of saccharides to 5-HMF over H4SiW12O40/halloysite (0.18 mmol)/ halloysite catalyst [61]. The reaction conditions were as follows: catalyst loading 11 wt.% of carbohydrate at 398 K for 43 min.
Processes 12 02587 g038
Figure 39. 5-HMF yields achieved in hydrolysis of cellulose over solid-supported HPAs a [61]; b [62]; c [63]; d [64].
Figure 39. 5-HMF yields achieved in hydrolysis of cellulose over solid-supported HPAs a [61]; b [62]; c [63]; d [64].
Processes 12 02587 g039
Figure 40. Impact of temperature and reaction time on the (A) LA and (B) 5-HMF yields obtained in the H3PW12O40/g-C3N4-catalyzed cellulose hydrolysis reaction [65]. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.1 g; H3PW12O40/g-C3N4 (30 wt.%) catalyst, 0.2 g; water, 0.5 mL; and MIBK, 5 mL.
Figure 40. Impact of temperature and reaction time on the (A) LA and (B) 5-HMF yields obtained in the H3PW12O40/g-C3N4-catalyzed cellulose hydrolysis reaction [65]. The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.1 g; H3PW12O40/g-C3N4 (30 wt.%) catalyst, 0.2 g; water, 0.5 mL; and MIBK, 5 mL.
Processes 12 02587 g040
Figure 41. Conversion of glucose to 5-HMF over silica-supported silicotungstic acid in biphasic system [62].
Figure 41. Conversion of glucose to 5-HMF over silica-supported silicotungstic acid in biphasic system [62].
Processes 12 02587 g041
Figure 42. HMF yields obtained from glucose in phosphotungstic acid-catalyzed reactions [66]. The reaction conditions were as follows: temperature, 433 K; reaction time, 140 min; catalysts (0.2 g of SiO2-ATS-H3PW12O40; 0.0857 g of H3PW12O40; 0.1143 g of SiO2-ATS; and 0.0857 g of SiO2); 500 rpm of stirring; and solvent (acetone (1 mL)/water (5 mL)). ATS = aminopropyltrimethoxysilane.
Figure 42. HMF yields obtained from glucose in phosphotungstic acid-catalyzed reactions [66]. The reaction conditions were as follows: temperature, 433 K; reaction time, 140 min; catalysts (0.2 g of SiO2-ATS-H3PW12O40; 0.0857 g of H3PW12O40; 0.1143 g of SiO2-ATS; and 0.0857 g of SiO2); 500 rpm of stirring; and solvent (acetone (1 mL)/water (5 mL)). ATS = aminopropyltrimethoxysilane.
Processes 12 02587 g042
Figure 43. Conversion of glucose to furfural over cesium tungstate/MCM-41 catalysts.
Figure 43. Conversion of glucose to furfural over cesium tungstate/MCM-41 catalysts.
Processes 12 02587 g043
Figure 44. Impact of solvent and silica porosity on the xylose dehydration to furfural over silica-supported cesium phosphotungstate salts [69]. MP = mesoporous silica; and LP = large pore silica.
Figure 44. Impact of solvent and silica porosity on the xylose dehydration to furfural over silica-supported cesium phosphotungstate salts [69]. MP = mesoporous silica; and LP = large pore silica.
Processes 12 02587 g044
Figure 45. Impact of reaction temperature and support on levulinic acid esterification with ethyl alcohol over solid-supported phosphotungstic acid. a [70]; b [71]; c [72]; d [73].
Figure 45. Impact of reaction temperature and support on levulinic acid esterification with ethyl alcohol over solid-supported phosphotungstic acid. a [70]; b [71]; c [72]; d [73].
Processes 12 02587 g045
Figure 46. Impact of alcohol and support on levulinic acid esterification with solid-supported phosphotungstic acid. a [71]; b [72].
Figure 46. Impact of alcohol and support on levulinic acid esterification with solid-supported phosphotungstic acid. a [71]; b [72].
Processes 12 02587 g046
Figure 47. Effect of support on levulinic acid esterification with methyl alcohol over solid-supported phosphotungstic acid catalysts. a [71]; b [72]; c [73].
Figure 47. Effect of support on levulinic acid esterification with methyl alcohol over solid-supported phosphotungstic acid catalysts. a [71]; b [72]; c [73].
Processes 12 02587 g047
Figure 48. Effect of superficial content of Sn4+ and Cs+ in the bimetallic phosphotungstate salts on furfural yield obtained from D-xylose [74]. The reaction condition was as follows: D-xylose, 0.2 g; solvent, 20 mL; temperature, 473 K; and time, 3.5 h.
Figure 48. Effect of superficial content of Sn4+ and Cs+ in the bimetallic phosphotungstate salts on furfural yield obtained from D-xylose [74]. The reaction condition was as follows: D-xylose, 0.2 g; solvent, 20 mL; temperature, 473 K; and time, 3.5 h.
Processes 12 02587 g048
Figure 49. Dehydration of glucose carried out over Keggin heteropoly salts exchanged with organic or metal cations. a [75]; b [76]; c [77]; d [78]. C16 = hexadecyltrimethylammonium; and [MIM-PS]n = [C4H6N2(CH2)3SO3H]n.
Figure 49. Dehydration of glucose carried out over Keggin heteropoly salts exchanged with organic or metal cations. a [75]; b [76]; c [77]; d [78]. C16 = hexadecyltrimethylammonium; and [MIM-PS]n = [C4H6N2(CH2)3SO3H]n.
Processes 12 02587 g049
Figure 50. Conversion of glucose to 5-HMF over silver tungstate catalysts in a biphasic system. a [79]; b [80].
Figure 50. Conversion of glucose to 5-HMF over silver tungstate catalysts in a biphasic system. a [79]; b [80].
Processes 12 02587 g050
Figure 51. Fructose dehydration Cs2.5H0.5PW12O40-catalyzed reactions to 5-HMF in water/MIBK biphasic system [80,81].
Figure 51. Fructose dehydration Cs2.5H0.5PW12O40-catalyzed reactions to 5-HMF in water/MIBK biphasic system [80,81].
Processes 12 02587 g051
Table 1. Glucose synthesis in homogenous conditions in the presence of soluble catalysts. a [51]; b [52].
Table 1. Glucose synthesis in homogenous conditions in the presence of soluble catalysts. a [51]; b [52].
EntrySubstrateCatalystTemperature
(K)
Time
(h)
Glucose Yield
(%)
1 aCellobioseHClO43932442
2 aCellobioseH2SO43932429
3 aCellobioseH3PO43932413
4 aCellobioseH3PW12O403934851
5 aCellobioseH4SiW12O403934852
6 aCelluloseH3PW12O403334818
7 aCelluloseH4SiW12O403334861
8 aCelluloseHCl33348<1
9 aCelluloseH2SO4333484
10 bCelluloseHCl453214
11 bCelluloseH3PW12O40453242
Table 2. Glucose synthesis in heterogeneous conditions in the presence of solid catalysts. a [53]; b [54].
Table 2. Glucose synthesis in heterogeneous conditions in the presence of solid catalysts. a [53]; b [54].
EntrySubstrateCatalystTime (h)T (K)Glucose Yield/%
1 aCelluloseHY845337
2 aCelluloseHZSM-5a9.545335.2
3 aCelluloseHZSM-5b9.545333.7
4 aCelluloseH beta8.545329.6
6 aCelluloseFe3O4-SBA-SO3H342325
7 aCelluloseACSO3H342322
8 aCelluloseAmberlyst342314
9 aCelluloseAl2O334233
10 aCelluloseFe3O4-SBA34233
11CelluloseHZSM34232
12 bCelluloseCsH2PW12O40645339
13 bCelluloseCs2.2H0.8PW12O40844336
14 bCellulose[MIMPSH]3PW12O40542330
Table 3. Yields of 5-HMF obtained from cellulose hydrolysis [48].
Table 3. Yields of 5-HMF obtained from cellulose hydrolysis [48].
CatalystConversion5-HMF Yield
No catalyst2-
ChCl42
HCl412
H3PW12O408850
Ch1H2PW12O408778
Ch2HPW12O404830
Ch3PW12O404917
The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.1 g; MIBK, 5.0 mL; water, 0.5 mL; catalyst, 0.11 mmol; temperature, 413 K; and time, 8 h.
Table 4. Load effects of H3PW12O40/g-C3N4 (g-C3N4 = graphitic carbon nitride; n wt.%) catalyst on cellulose hydrolysis conversion and product yields [65].
Table 4. Load effects of H3PW12O40/g-C3N4 (g-C3N4 = graphitic carbon nitride; n wt.%) catalyst on cellulose hydrolysis conversion and product yields [65].
CatalystAcid Loading
mmol/g−1
Conversion
(%)
Levulinic Acid
Yield (%)
HMF
Yield (%)
No catalyst0000
a g-C3N40800
H3PW12O401.780892042
H3PW12O40/
g-C3N4(20 wt. %)
0.750731138
H3PW12O40/
g-C3N4(25 wt. %)
1.090831343
H3PW12O40/
g-C3N4(30 wt. %)
1.3601002158
H3PW12O40/
g-C3N4(35 wt. %)
1.4701002547
a The reaction conditions were as follows: cellulose, 0.1 g; H3PW12O40/g-C3N4 (n wt%), 0.2 g; water, 0.5 mL; MIBK, 5 mL; temperature, 413 K; and time, 10 h.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Silva, M.J.d.; da Silva Andrade, P.H. The Heteropolyacid-Catalyzed Conversion of Biomass Saccharides into High-Added-Value Products and Biofuels. Processes 2024, 12, 2587. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112587

AMA Style

Silva MJd, da Silva Andrade PH. The Heteropolyacid-Catalyzed Conversion of Biomass Saccharides into High-Added-Value Products and Biofuels. Processes. 2024; 12(11):2587. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112587

Chicago/Turabian Style

Silva, Márcio Jose da, and Pedro Henrique da Silva Andrade. 2024. "The Heteropolyacid-Catalyzed Conversion of Biomass Saccharides into High-Added-Value Products and Biofuels" Processes 12, no. 11: 2587. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112587

APA Style

Silva, M. J. d., & da Silva Andrade, P. H. (2024). The Heteropolyacid-Catalyzed Conversion of Biomass Saccharides into High-Added-Value Products and Biofuels. Processes, 12(11), 2587. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112587

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop