Next Article in Journal
Well-Defined Conjugated Macromolecules Based on Oligo(Arylene Ethynylene)s in Sensing
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterizations of Biomasses for Subsequent Thermochemical Conversion: A Comparative Study of Pine Sawdust and Acacia Tortilis
Previous Article in Journal
Implementation Criteria for Intelligent Systems in Motor Production Line Process Management
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modeling the Municipal Waste Collection Using Genetic Algorithms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Utilization of Steel-Making Dust in Drilling Fluids Formulations

by
Musaab I. Magzoub
1,2,
Mohamed H. Ibrahim
1,
Mustafa S. Nasser
1,
Muftah H. El-Naas
1,* and
Mahmood Amani
3
1
Gas Processing Center, College of Engineering, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713 Doha, Qatar
2
Well Construction Technology Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73069, USA
3
Petroleum Engineering, Texas A&M University at Qatar, P.O. Box 23874 Doha, Qatar
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2020, 8(5), 538; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8050538
Submission received: 27 March 2020 / Revised: 26 April 2020 / Accepted: 30 April 2020 / Published: 3 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gas, Water and Solid Waste Treatment Technology)

Abstract

:
Steelmaking is an energy-intensive process that generates considerable amounts of by-products and wastes, which often pose major environmental and economic challenges to the steel-making industry. One of these by-products is steel dust that is produced during the separation of impurities in the smelting and refining of metals in steel-making furnaces. In this study, electric arc furnace (EAF) dust has been evaluated as a potential, low-cost additive to increase the viscosity and weight of drilling muds. Currently, the cost of drilling operations typically accounts for 50 to 80% of the exploration costs and about 30 to 80% of the subsequent field development costs. Utilization of steelmaking waste in drilling fluids formulations is aimed to produce new and optimized water-based drilling formulations, which is expected to reduce the amount of bentonite and other viscosifier additives used in the drilling formulations. The results showed that in a typical water-based drilling fluid of 8.6 ppg (1030.51 kg/m3), the amount of standard drilling grade bentonite could be reduced by 30 wt.% with the addition of the proposed new additive to complete the required mud weight. The mixture proved to be stable with no phase separation.

1. Introduction

The steel-making process produces large amounts of steel dust, which are reported to be as high as 2–4 tons for each ton of steel produced [1]. Consequently, waste management and processing of these by-products is becoming a major environmental issue [2]. The steel dust solid material is formed as a result of interactions between impurities such as silica and lime at various stages of steel production [3], and during the separation of flux and impurities in the smelting and refining of metals processes in steel-making furnaces [4]. Most of the produced steel dust is used for land filling [5,6] and many civil engineering applications including cement production [7,8,9,10,11]. It is also used as an asphalt mixture additive in the surface layer of roads or airport pavements [12,13,14,15]. Bentonite clays and steel dust share similar chemical composition. Both contain aluminum silicates and various combinations of oxides, in addition to sodium, calcium and magnesium ions [16,17]. As shown in the general formula below [18], bentonite clays consist of aluminum silicates with the presence of other ions, such as Na+, Ca+2, and Mg+2, alongside other elements like iron oxide (FeO), manganese oxide (MnO), and magnesium oxide (MgO) [19]. Some compounds such as CaO, Fe2O3, SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2 and MgO also exist in the steel-making by-products with little variations in mass ratios [20,21].
Therefore, many studies propose using steel dust in applications where clays are similarly used. They are used as adsorbents to remove toxic and heavy metals from water [22,23,24,25,26,27,28], as catalyst [29,30,31], and for CO2 sequestration [32,33]. In addition, steel dust was also reported to have been used for drill cuttings disposal [34,35]. The drilled cuttings were disposed through solidification by combining the drill cuttings with water and blast furnace slag to form highly concentrated drilled cutting wastes. The blast furnace slag was compatible with both oil and water-based drilling muds. The drill cutting wastes solidified by blast furnace slag were hard and unreachable [35].
Bentonite clays are also widely used in many industries, such as cosmetics and medical products, paints, water treatment [36,37,38,39], pharmaceuticals [40], dyes [41,42], and papermaking [43,44,45]. In drilling fluids formulation, bentonite mostly makes 80 wt.% of the drilling fluids. Circulation of viscous heavy fluids, such drilling fluids (drilling mud) is essential for successful drilling operation [46,47]. The favorable chemical composition and physical properties of bentonite increases mud viscosity and reduces filtration loss that occur due to differences in pressure between the column of drilling fluids and the formation pore pressure [48]. The fluid is injected through a hollow drill-string, and then flushed out of the well lifting the drilled cutting through annulus space between the drilling string and the wall of the well [49]. The mud circulation serves as hole cleaner by lifting rock cuttings, providing a reasonable hydrostatic pressure to suppress the overburden pressure of the formation and preventing formation fluids from flowing into the well while drilling [46,50]. This mud shares about 50% of the drilling cost, in addition to the overall field development cost due to mud related problems [51]. The proposed formula with the utilization of steel-making waste in drilling fluids is expected to reduce the amount of bentonite and other costly additives used in the drilling formulations.
Worldwide, the total production of steel increased recently to hundreds of million metric tons according to world steel association reports [52]. A typical integrated steel plant produces about 90 to 100 kg of steel slag per ton of steel during the refining of hot metal from the blast furnace. This generates alkaline solid residues about 10 wt.% to 15 wt.% of the produced steel, depending on the characteristics of the manufacturing process. The dust is extensively available and can be supplied as raw material from many steel industries [53]. Composition of the dust varies depending on the type of steel being manufactured, raw materials, cooling and crash methods. Various slag types are produced as by-products in metallurgical processes or as residues in incineration processes in large amounts, which can be classified into three categories according to its origins and the characteristics: ferrous slag, non-ferrous slag, and incineration slag [54]. The main types of steel dust produced at steelmaking process are Ladle Furnace (LF) slag, Bag house dust (BHD) and Cyclone silo dust. The bag house dust (BHD) is the type evaluated in this study and proposed as a drilling fluids additive [51].
Waste management focuses on managing and monitoring of waste and by-product materials, mainly collection, transportation, processing or disposal [55,56]. Steelmaking by-products, such as steel dust is being processed and utilized in many applications. However, to the best knowledge of the author, steel dust has never been evaluated as drilling fluid additives or used in drilling fluids formulations. In this study, the steelmaking by-products have been evaluated to make up to 30 wt.% of the drilling fluid base formulation.

2. Materials

Two types of steel by-products: Ladle Furnace (LF) slag and Bag house dust (BHD) were selected for the study. The samples were collected from the open-to-the atmosphere yard at a local steel factory. The samples were sieved through 200 mesh sieves (75 µm) to remove any coarse parts. Commercial bentonite was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd., Germany. The chemical compositions for the two types of steel dust and the commercial bentonite are shown in Figure 1, highlighting the major elements content in mass percentage.

3. Methodology

The physical and chemical properties of the steel dust were investigated according to API recommendation, considering the chemical composition, dispersion stability, rheological properties and the standard drilling fluid testing.

3.1. Screening and Characterization

Dispersion stability was evaluated for screening and selecting the best steel dust type by measuring the turbidity of 150 mg/L suspension in Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) at various pH values, using a Hach 2100N turbidity meter. Moreover, the stability of the suspension was assessed by measuring the electrokinetic potential (commonly known as Zeta Potential (ζ), that quantifies the magnitude of surface electric charges of the suspended particles) using Zetasizer ZEN3600 (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, UK). Analysis of particle size distribution was conducted using a laser diffraction particle size analyzer (Mastersizer 3000, Malvern Instruments Ltd., UK).

3.2. Sample Preparation and Drilling Fluid Testing

For viscosity and yield point measurements, a speed dial viscometer (Fann Model 35 Viscometer) was employed. The samples were prepared at room temperature by adding bentonite and steel dust in different ratios into 350 mL of distilled water while stirring in a mud mixer for 2 min to form dispersions, then the samples were stirred for another 20 min. Any powder at the wall of the container is scraped using spatula every 5 min to make sure that all powder is suspended in the mixture. Bentonite and steel dust mixture was then aged for 16 h at room temperature. Subsequently, the samples were stirred for 5 min to condition before testing. Dial readings at 600, 300, 200, 100, 6, 3 rpm were recorded when the reading was stabilized at each rotational speed. The low pressure/low temperature API filtration was used to evaluate water control efficiency of the drilling fluid under 100 psi differential pressure. The conductivity of the mud cake and filtrates were recorded, and a mud balance (Fann Model 140) was used to check the drilling fluid density. The commercial standard drilling grade bentonite was used as a reference for comparison.

3.3. Rheological Measurement

A flow sweep test at 25 °C was carried out using a controlled stress and strain instrument (Anton Paar rheometer, MCR302).Co-centric cylinder geometry was used with a cup radius of 15 mm, configured with DIN rotor of a 14 mm radius and a height of 42 mm. The shear viscosity for drilling fluids samples of 6 wt.% solid in water, at different steel dust to bentonite ratios, was determined from the readings of shear stress over a wide range of shear rates (1 e s−1 to 1000 s−1). In addition, dynamic sweep test was conducted for the formulated samples of drilling fluid to obtain information about the structure and elastic properties of the mixture. The test was carried out at room temperature over a range of oscillation frequencies (0.1 to 100 rad/s) at constant oscillation amplitude. An equilibrium time of 5 min was given for the sample before applying any stress. For each experiment, three repeated runs were carried out and the results were reproducible with an average experimental error of less than 5%.

4. Results & Discussion

4.1. Dispersion Stability and Suspension Properties

Stability of the drilling fluids formula is an essential parameter to maintain the original properties of the injected drilling fluid and provide the main functions of the mud circulation throughout the drilling of oil and gas wells. Conducting zeta potential analyses provides evidence on the quality of suspension properties. In drilling fluids, high negative ZP values (more than −20 mV) represent high suspension stability [18,57]. Turbidity measurements also reflect the quantity of suspended particles at a given pH and concentration. Based on this, the results illustrated in Figure 2 and Figure 3 show that bag house dust (BHD) seems to be a good candidate for consideration as drilling fluid additive. Although Ladle Furnace (LF) slag type seems to have a high silica and low iron content (see Figure 1), its suspension in water exhibited poor stability evident from turbidity and zeta potential measurements. The LF slag produced low zeta potential (≈ −15 mV) and low turbidity values over all pH ranges (Figure 2). On the other hand, the bag house dust (BHD) dispersions exhibited high negative zeta potential (≈ −35 mV) and high turbidity values, especially at higher pH values (the typical drilling fluid condition), displaying high dispersion stability (Figure 3).
Particle size and distribution (PSD) greatly influences dispersion stability and water filtration control. Drilling grade bentonite should have a narrow range of PSD with 96% of particles less than 75 µm [58]. In order to have a uniform PSD for the steel dust and bentonite mixture, the steel dust samples were sieved through 200 mesh (75 µm) to remove course particles. This makes all particles less than 75 µm, with 90% of particles (d.90) less than 59.8 µm and gives an average particle size (d.50) of 19.6 µm for steel dust compared to 7.9 µm of bentonite. The particle dispersity index of 1.7 for steel dust and 1.5 for bentonite was obtained. The full profiles of particle size distribution (PSD) are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5.

4.2. Rheological Measurement

Rheological characteristics of drilling fluids are of high importance during drilling operations as the column of the drilling fluids inside the well may be subjected to different forces and stress [59,60]. High-speed mixers are used at well sites to prepare drilling fluids, where high shear rates are applied to formulate the mud prior to being pumped into the well. Inside the well, drilling fluids are also subjected to high shear resulting from rotation of the drilling string, in addition to the shear applied by circulation speeds and pressures. Viscosity of the fluids depends on the rate of shear that it endures. Results of viscosity at shear rates ranging from 1 s−1 to 1000 s−1 are shown in Figure 6. While keeping the total solid content in the drilling fluid fixed at 6 wt.%, the addition of steel dust (BHD) increased the viscosity of the drilling fluid up to 30 wt.% of BHD in bentonite, following which the viscosity began to decrease. This indicates that a maximum of 30 wt.% steel dust can be used in a mixture with bentonite. Figure 7 shows the changes in shear viscosity with the addition of steel dust. The effect is more obvious under high shear, where the viscosity increases from 43.6 mPa.s to 87.3 mPa.s and almost steadies up to 30 wt.% of BHD in bentonite.
Structure, elasticity and gel strength have great influence on the calculation of circulation hydraulics and hole cleaning efficiency. Efficient rheological properties maintain whole cleaning by insuring cutting removal and prevent cutting from settling or packing the well during downtime, tripping or pulling out of the hole (POOH). The results of dynamic flow test showed that the storage and loss modulus of bentonite suspensions increased in orders of magnitude with replacement of steel dust (BHD) in ratio of 30 wt.% to bentonite. Figure 8 shows that both elastic and viscous moduli increased. Large storage modulus reflects that the addition of steel dust to drilling fluids renders the dispersion to exhibit more solid-like behavior with increased elasticity, resulting in an enhanced cutting suspension property of the mud and improved hole cleaning.

4.3. Drilling Fluid Testing

Measuring flow parameters of the drilling mud, such as apparent viscosity, plastic viscosity, and yield point is important for controlling frictional pressure drop and solids-bearing capacity. The results of 20 wt.% and 30 wt.% compared to 100% bentonite are shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10. The viscometer readings increased with steel dust addition at 20 wt.% and then decreased at 30wt%. Subsequently, the apparent viscosity increased from 24.5 cP to 44 cP and then decreased to 38 cP at 30 wt.%. The structure of the mixture seems to be enforced by the presence of steel dust (BHD). The apparent viscosity was successfully maintained at 38 cP despite using less bentonite (70% of the initial mass), indicated by higher apparent viscosity and higher yield point. The plastic viscosity was maintained between 16 to 21 cP.
Low pressure/low temperature API filtration test is also used to evaluate the drilling fluid quality. Filtrates volume and mud cake thickness are shown in Figure 11. The mixture of bentonite and steel dust exhibited higher filtration rates. However, the mud cake formed on the filter paper thickness did not increase and remained around 3 mm, suitable for preventing drill pipe stuck due to tight spots inside the borehole. If a high swelling formation is being drilled, the high filtrations rates may cause damage to the formation as well as pipe blockage. This may limit the amounts of steel dust to 20 wt.% to be used as drilling fluid additive to formulate the water-based drilling fluid and reduces the amount of bentonite needed to 80%. Since the filtration control is affected by the viscosity as well as the particle size, it is highly recommended to use additional additives to maintain the viscosity of the mud such as Xanthan gum, before increasing the amount of bag house dust in the formula. In addition, the steel dust can be used in some non-conventional drilling practices, where control of water filtration to formation is not required, such as underbalanced drilling (UBD). In this type of drilling, “the hydrostatic head of a drilling fluid is intentionally designed to be lower than the pressure of the formation being drilled”, and the formation fluids are allowed to flow into the wellbore up to the surface [61].
The steel dust could also be used to formulate killing fluids in case of influx from formation fluids (Oil/Gas) into the wellbore, to prevent a blowout. Kill procedures typically involve pumping of higher density mud into the wellbore. In the case of an induced kick, steel dust of high specific gravity can provide mud density that is sufficient to kill the well [61]. Another possible utilization of steel dust is in the case of loss circulation (partial or total loss). In such cases, a very large amount of expensive fluids are lost into the formation due to highly permeable or fractured zones [62]. Steel dust is a low-cost material abundantly available that can be potentially used with lost circulation materials (LCM) to regain control of the well.

5. Conclusions

Steel dust powders were evaluated in this study and found to have a high potential for utilization as drilling fluid additives. Characterization and analysis of the steel dust showed that processing and pretreatment of the dust by cleaning, grinding, and sieving is recommended. The pretreatment is needed to homogenize the particle size distribution and enhance water filtration control in addition to improving dispersion stability. Evaluation of the proposed formula helped to conclude that the amount of standard drilling grade bentonite can be reduced by 30 wt.% to produce stable drilling fluids with sufficient density and rheological properties that compete well with standard formulations. The apparent viscosity and plastic viscosity increased from 24.5 cP to 38 cP and from 16 cP to 21 cP respectively. Moreover, the elastic properties were significantly improved as the storage modulus G’ increased from 8.93 Pa to 132 Pa, which is expected to improve cutting lifting and hole cleaning efficiency. The mud cake resulted from API filtration test was 2 to 3 mm, which is less than the maximum allowable thickness of 4 mm. This guarantees the absence of tight spots through the drilled sections and prevents drill pipes from getting mechanically stuck. However, the water filtration was higher (22 to 32 mL). Therefore, to avoid formation damage, the new additive is recommended to be used for drilling the main hole (usually more than 90% of the total depth of the well) from the surface to the depth before the hydrocarbon zone. Special cases such as underbalanced drilling can also be a good application for steel dust drilling fluids. They can also be used in case of partial or total loss circulation in fractured zones, where a massive amount of expensive drilling fluids is lost.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.I.M., M.S.N. and M.H.E.-N. Methodology, M.I.M.; Formal analysis, M.I.M., M.H.I. and M.A.; Investigation, M.I.M., M.S.N., M.A. and M.H.E.-N.; Writing—original draft preparation, M.I.M.; Writing—review and editing, M.I.M., M.H.I., M.S.N. and M.H.E.-N.; supervision, M.S.N. and M.H.E.-N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Das, B.; Prakash, S.; Reddy, P.; Misra, V. An overview of utilization of slag and sludge from steel industries. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2007, 50, 40–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yusuf, M.; Chuah, L.; Khan, M.A.; Choong, T.S.Y. Adsorption of Nickel on Electric Arc Furnace Slag: Batch and Column Studies. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2014, 49, 388–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Teir, S.; Eloneva, S.; Fogelholm, C.-J.; Zevenhoven, R. Dissolution of steelmaking slags in acetic acid for precipitated calcium carbonate production. Energy 2007, 32, 528–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bölükbaşı, Ö.; Tufan, B. Steelmaking slag beneficiation by magnetic separator and impacts on sinter quality. Sci. Sinter. 2014, 46, 331–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Teir, S.; Kuusik, R.; Fogelholm, C.-J.; Zevenhoven, R. Production of magnesium carbonates from serpentinite for long-term storage of CO2. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2007, 85, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Teir, S.; Revitzer, H.; Eloneva, S.; Fogelholm, C.-J.; Zevenhoven, R. Dissolution of natural serpentinite in mineral and organic acids. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2007, 83, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abdel-Ghani, N.T.; El-Sayed, H.A.; El-Habak, A.A. Utilization of by-pass cement kiln dust and air-cooled blast-furnace steel slag in the production of some “green” cement products. HBRC J. 2018, 14, 408–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Machado, A.; Valenzuela-Diaz, F.; De Souza, C.; de Andrade Lima, L. Structural ceramics made with clay and steel dust pollutants. Appl. Clay Sci. 2011, 51, 503–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Colorado, H.A.; Garcia, E.; Buchely, M. White Ordinary Portland Cement blended with superfine steel dust with high zinc oxide contents. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 112, 816–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rosales, J.; Cabrera, M.; Agrela, F. Effect of stainless steel slag waste as a replacement for cement in mortars. Mechanical and statistical study. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 142, 444–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jiang, Y.; Ling, T.-C.; Shi, C.; Pan, S.-Y. Characteristics of steel slags and their use in cement and concrete—A review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 136, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sayadi, M.; Hesami, S. Performance evaluation of using electric arc furnace dust in asphalt binder. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 1260–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alsheyab, M.A.; Khedaywi, T.S. Dynamic creep analysis of Electric Arc Furnace Dust (EAFD)–Modified asphalt. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 146, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Loaiza, A.; Colorado, H.A. Marshall stability and flow tests for asphalt concrete containing electric arc furnace dust waste with high ZnO contents from the steel making process. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 166, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, J.; Guo, M.; Tan, Y. Study on application of cement substituting mineral fillers in asphalt mixture. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 2018, 7, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Murray, H.H. Structure and composition of the clay minerals and their physical and chemical properties. Dev. Clay Sci. 2006, 2, 7–31. [Google Scholar]
  17. Saboori, R.; Sabbaghi, S.; Kalantariasl, A. Improvement of rheological, filtration and thermal conductivity of bentonite drilling fluid using copper oxide/polyacrylamide nanocomposite. Powder Technol. 2019, 353, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Magzoub, M.I.; Nasser, M.S.; Hussein, I.A.; Benamor, A.; Onaizi, S.A.; Sultan, A.; Mahmoud, M. Effects of sodium carbonate addition, heat and agitation on swelling and rheological behavior of Ca-bentonite colloidal dispersions. Appl. Clay Sci. 2017, 147, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Temraz, M.G.; Hassanien, I. Mineralogy and rheological properties of some Egyptian bentonite for drilling fluids. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2016, 31, 791–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hameedi, S.M. Carbon Dioxide Capture by Steel-Making Residues in a Fluidized Bed Reactor. Master’s Thesis, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sadeghalvaad, M.; Sabbaghi, S. The effect of the TiO2/polyacrylamide nanocomposite on water-based drilling fluid properties. Powder Technol. 2015, 272, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ma, A.; Zheng, X.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, S. Zinc recovery from metallurgical slag and dust by coordination leaching in NH3–CH3COONH4–H2O system. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2018, 5, 180660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Omran, M.; Fabritius, T. Utilization of blast furnace sludge for the removal of zinc from steelmaking dusts using microwave heating. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 210, 867–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, G. Removal of zinc from basic oxygen steelmaking filter cake by selective leaching with butyric acid. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 209, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Blahova, L.; Mucha, M.; Navratilova, Z.; Budzyń, S.; Tora, B. Industrial Wastes as Potentional Sorbents of Heavy Metals. Inżynieria Miner. 2018, 19, 61–66. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pająk, M.; Dzieniszewska, A.; Kyzioł-Komosińska, J.; Chrobok, M. Use of Metallurgical Dust for Removal Chromium Ions from Aqueous Solutions. In E3S Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2018; p. 01029. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bouabidi, Z.B.; El-Naas, M.H.; Cortes, D.; McKay, G. Steel-Making dust as a potential adsorbent for the removal of lead (II) from an aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 837–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sun, L.; Chen, D.; Wan, S.; Yu, Z. Performance, kinetics, and equilibrium of methylene blue adsorption on biochar derived from eucalyptus saw dust modified with citric, tartaric, and acetic acids. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 198, 300–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, J.-M.; Kim, J.-H.; Chang, Y.-Y.; Chang, Y.-S. Steel dust catalysis for Fenton-like oxidation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 163, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shan, R.; Lu, L.; Shi, Y.; Yuan, H.; Shi, J. Catalysts from renewable resources for biodiesel production. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 178, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Borisov, V.; Nedosekov, A.; Sigayeva, S.; Suprunov, G.; Vershinin, V.; Tsyrulnikov, P. Deep Oxidation of Methane on Palladic Catalysts on Suppliers ZrO2, CeO2, ZrO2-CeO2, CeO2-CuO on Stainless Steel Prepared with the Method of Plasma Drawing. Procedia Eng. 2015, 113, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Dreillard, M.; Broutin, P.; Briot, P.; Huard, T.; Lettat, A. Application of the DMXTM CO2 Capture Process in Steel Industry. Energy Procedia 2017, 114, 2573–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. El-Naas, M.H.; El Gamal, M.; Hameedi, S.; Mohamed, A.-M.O. CO2 sequestration using accelerated gas-solid carbonation of pre-treated EAF steel-making bag house dust. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 156, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hale, A.H. Well Drilling Cuttings Disposal. U.S. Patent No. 5,341,882, 30 August 1994. [Google Scholar]
  35. Nahm, J.J. Well Drilling Cuttings Disposal. U.S. Patent No. 5,277,519, 11 January 1994. [Google Scholar]
  36. de Figueirêdo, J.; Araújo, J.; da Silva, I.A.; Cartaxo, J.M.; Neves, G.A.; Ferreira, H.C. Purified smectite clays organofilized with ionic surfactant for use in oil-based drilling fluids. Mater. Sci. Forum 2014, 798, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhuang, G.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, J.; Liao, L.; Zhao, J. A new ball milling method to produce organo-montmorillonite from anionic and nonionic surfactants. Appl. Clay Sci. 2015, 104, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vipulanandan, C.; Mohammed, A. Hyperbolic rheological model with shear stress limit for acrylamide polymer modified bentonite drilling muds. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2014, 122, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, L.-Y.; Cai, S.-Y.; Mo, J.-H.; Wei, G.-T.; Li, Z.-M.; Ye, R.-C.; Xie, X.-M. Study on the Preparation of H3PW12O40–TiO2/Bentonite Composite Material. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2015, 30, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cara, S.; Carcangiu, G.; Padalino, G.; Palomba, M.; Tamanini, M. The bentonites in pelotherapy: Chemical, mineralogical and technological properties of materials from Sardinia deposits (Italy). Appl. Clay Sci. 2000, 16, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Al-Hussaini, A.; Eldars, W. Non-conventional synthesis and antibacterial activity of poly (aniline-co-o-phenylenediamine)/bentonite nanocomposites. Des. Monomers Polym. 2014, 17, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bergaya, F.; Lagaly, G. General introduction: Clays, clay minerals, and clay science. In Developments in Clay Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; Volume 5, pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  43. Li, Y.; Yue, Q.; Li, W.; Gao, B.; Li, J.; Du, J. Properties improvement of paper mill sludge-based granular activated carbon fillers for fluidized-bed bioreactor by bentonite (Na) added and acid washing. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 197, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yoon, D.H.; Jang, J.W.; Seo, S.S.; Jeong, S.H.; Cheong, I.W. Preparation of cationic poly (acrylamide)/bentonite nanocomposites from in situ inverse emulsion copolymerization and their performance in papermaking. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2013, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shih, P.-H.; Wu, Z.-Z.; Chiang, H.-L. Characteristics of bricks made from waste steel slag. Waste Manag. 2004, 24, 1043–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bourgoyne, A.T., Jr.; Chenevert, M.E.; Millheim, K.K.; Young, F., Jr. Applied Drilling Engineering, second printing. Textb. Ser. Sperichardsontexas 1991, 2, 502. [Google Scholar]
  47. Afolabi, R.O.; Paseda, P.; Hunjenukon, S.; Oyeniyi, E.A. Model prediction of the impact of zinc oxide nanoparticles on the fluid loss of water-based drilling mud. Cogent Eng. 2018, 5, 1514575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nasser, M.; Onaizi, S.A.; Hussein, I.; Saad, M.; Al-Marri, M.; Benamor, A. Intercalation of ionic liquids into bentonite: Swelling and rheological behaviors. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 507, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. González, J.; Quintero, F.; Arellano, J.; Márquez, R.; Sánchez, C.; Pernía, D. Effects of interactions between solids and surfactants on the tribological properties of water-based drilling fluids. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2011, 391, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Song, K.; Wu, Q.; Li, M.; Ren, S.; Dong, L.; Zhang, X.; Lei, T.; Kojima, Y. Water-based bentonite drilling fluids modified by novel biopolymer for minimizing fluid loss and formation damage. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 507, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Gahan, C.S.; Cunha, M.L.; Sandström, Å. Comparative study on different steel slags as neutralising agent in bioleaching. Hydrometallurgy 2009, 95, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Charles, J. Past, Present and Future of Duplex Stainless Steels; Duplex Conference: Grado, Italy, 2007; pp. 18–20. [Google Scholar]
  53. Morone, M.; Costa, G.; Polettini, A.; Pomi, R.; Baciocchi, R. Valorization of steel slag by a combined carbonation and granulation treatment. Miner. Eng. 2014, 59, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Shen, H.; Forssberg, E. An overview of recovery of metals from slags. Waste Manag. 2003, 23, 933–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Oluwasola, E.A.; Hainin, M.R.; Aziz, M.M.A.; Yaacob, H.; Warid, M.N.M. Potentials of steel slag and copper mine tailings as construction materials. Mater. Res. Innov. 2014, 18 (Suppl. 6), 250–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ennaciri, Y.; Bettach, M. Procedure to convert phosphogypsum waste into valuable products. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2018, 33, 1727–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tunç, S.; Duman, O. The effect of different molecular weight of poly (ethylene glycol) on the electrokinetic and rheological properties of Na-bentonite suspensions. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2008, 317, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. API. API-13A Specification for Drilling Fluid Materials, 5th ed.; API: Washington, DC, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  59. Raheem, A.M.; Vipulanandan, C. Salt contamination and temperature impacts on the rheological and electrical resistivity behaviors of water based drilling mud. Energy Sources Part A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff. 2019, 42, 344–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Afolabi, R.O.; Orodu, O.D.; Efeovbokhan, V.E.; Rotimi, O.J. Optimizing the rheological properties of silica nano-modified bentonite mud using overlaid contour plot and estimation of maximum or upper shear stress limit. Cogent Eng. 2017, 4, 1287248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bennion, D.B.; Thomas, F.B.; Bietz, R.F.; Bennion, D.W. Underbalanced Drilling, Praises and Perils. In Proceedings of the Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference, Midland, TX, USA, 27–29 March 1996; Society of Petroleum Engineers: Richardson, TX, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  62. Gockel, J. Lost Circulation Drilling Fluid. U.S. Patent No. 4,498,995, 12 February 1985. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Chemical composition of bentonite and Ladle Furnace (LF) slag, Bag house dust (BHD) and Cyclone.
Figure 1. Chemical composition of bentonite and Ladle Furnace (LF) slag, Bag house dust (BHD) and Cyclone.
Processes 08 00538 g001
Figure 2. Zeta potential of steel dust LF and BHD in distilled water.
Figure 2. Zeta potential of steel dust LF and BHD in distilled water.
Processes 08 00538 g002
Figure 3. Turbidity of steel dust LF and BHD in distilled water.
Figure 3. Turbidity of steel dust LF and BHD in distilled water.
Processes 08 00538 g003
Figure 4. Particle size distribution of steel dust (BHD) compared to bentonite.
Figure 4. Particle size distribution of steel dust (BHD) compared to bentonite.
Processes 08 00538 g004
Figure 5. Mass percent of size distribution for steel dust (BHD) compared to bentonite.
Figure 5. Mass percent of size distribution for steel dust (BHD) compared to bentonite.
Processes 08 00538 g005
Figure 6. Flow sweep test, viscosity for different steel dust (BHD) ratios.
Figure 6. Flow sweep test, viscosity for different steel dust (BHD) ratios.
Processes 08 00538 g006
Figure 7. Effect of steel dust addition on viscosity at 1 s−1 & 100 s−1.
Figure 7. Effect of steel dust addition on viscosity at 1 s−1 & 100 s−1.
Processes 08 00538 g007
Figure 8. Dynamic flow test.
Figure 8. Dynamic flow test.
Processes 08 00538 g008
Figure 9. Viscometer readings.
Figure 9. Viscometer readings.
Processes 08 00538 g009
Figure 10. Apparent and plastic viscosities and yield point of bentonite and steel dust mixture (BHD).
Figure 10. Apparent and plastic viscosities and yield point of bentonite and steel dust mixture (BHD).
Processes 08 00538 g010
Figure 11. API filtration test for different ratios of steel dust (BHD) and bentonite.
Figure 11. API filtration test for different ratios of steel dust (BHD) and bentonite.
Processes 08 00538 g011

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Magzoub, M.I.; Ibrahim, M.H.; Nasser, M.S.; El-Naas, M.H.; Amani, M. Utilization of Steel-Making Dust in Drilling Fluids Formulations. Processes 2020, 8, 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8050538

AMA Style

Magzoub MI, Ibrahim MH, Nasser MS, El-Naas MH, Amani M. Utilization of Steel-Making Dust in Drilling Fluids Formulations. Processes. 2020; 8(5):538. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8050538

Chicago/Turabian Style

Magzoub, Musaab I., Mohamed H. Ibrahim, Mustafa S. Nasser, Muftah H. El-Naas, and Mahmood Amani. 2020. "Utilization of Steel-Making Dust in Drilling Fluids Formulations" Processes 8, no. 5: 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8050538

APA Style

Magzoub, M. I., Ibrahim, M. H., Nasser, M. S., El-Naas, M. H., & Amani, M. (2020). Utilization of Steel-Making Dust in Drilling Fluids Formulations. Processes, 8(5), 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8050538

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop