Risk Assessment of Investments in Projects of Production of Raw Materials for Bioethanol
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- –
- to propose an approach and develop applied software for quantitative assessment of the risk of profit of investors in projects for the production of raw materials for bioethanol;
- –
- on the basis of the developed application software to quantify the risk of profit of investors in projects for the production of raw materials for bioethanol for a given project environment.
2. Theoretical Background
- –
- mathematical expectation of the amount of investments in the project
- –
- frequency of amount of investments in the project
- –
- the number of intervals of amount of investments in the project
- –
- variance of amount of investments in the project
- –
- standard deviation of investment in the project
- –
- coefficient of variation of investments in the project
- –
- mathematical expectation of the market value of raw materials for bioethanol
- –
- dispersion of the market value of raw materials for bioethanol
- –
- standard deviation of the market value of raw materials for bioethanol
- –
- coefficient of variation of the market value of raw materials for bioethanol
3. Materials and Methods
4. Research Results and Discussion
- P(Ds) = 0…0.2—minimal risk of profit R(Ps);
- P(Ds)= 0.21…0.4—allowable risk of profit R(Ps);
- P(Ds)= 0.41…0.6—average risk of profit R(Ps);
- P(Ds)= 0.61…0.8—high risk of profit R(Ps);
- P(Ds)= 0.81…1.0—critical risk of profit R(Ps).
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Clerici, A.; Alimonti, G. World Energy Resources, EPJ Web of Conferences 98, 2015. Available online: https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2015/17/epjconf_eps-sif_01001.pdf (accessed on 9 July 2020).
- Gupta, A.; Verna, J.P. Sustainable bio-ethanol production from agroresidues: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 41, 550–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahajwalla, V. Green processes: Transforming waste into valuable resources. Engineering 2018, 4, 309–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tryhuba, A.; Boyarchuk, V.; Tryhuba, I.; Boyarchuk, O.; Ftoma, O. Evaluation of Risk Value of Investors of Projects for the Creation of Crop Protection of Family Dairy Farms. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendel. Brun. 2019, 67, 1357–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ashokkumar, V.; Salam, Z.; Tiwari, O.N.; Chinnasamy, S.; Mohammed, S.; Ani, F.N. An integrated approach for biodiesel and bioethanol production from Scenedesmus bijugatus cultivated in a vertical tubular photobioreactor. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 101, 778–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Batyuk, B.; Dyndyn, M. Coordination of configurations of complex organizational and technical systems for development of agricultural sector branches. J. Autom. Inf. Sci. 2020, 52, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syrotiuk, V.; Syrotyuk, S.; Ptashnyk, V.; Baranovych, S.; Gielzecki, J.; Jakubowski, T. A hybrid system with intelligent control for the processes of resource and energy supply of a greenhouse complex with application of energy renewable sources. Przegląd Elektrotechniczny 2020, 149–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gródek-Szostak, Z.; Malik, G.; Kajrunajtys, D.; Szeląg-Sikora, A.; Sikora, J.; Kuboń, M.; Niemiec, M.; Kapusta-Duch, J. Modeling the Dependency between Extreme Prices of Selected Agricultural Products on the Derivatives Market Using the Linkage Function. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Szelag-Sikora, A.; Sikora, J.; Niemiec, M.; Gródek-Szostak, Z.; Kapusta-Duch, J.; Kubon, M.; Komorowska, M.; Karcz, J. Impact of Integrated and Conventional Plant Production on Selected Soil Parameters in Carrot Production. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5612. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/20/5612 (accessed on 28 September 2020). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kubon, M.; Kocira, S.; Kocira, A.; Leszczyńska, D. Use of Straw as Energy Source in View of Organic Matter Balance in Family Farms. In Renewable Energy Sources: Engineering, Technology, Innovation; Springer Proceedings in Energy; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kubon, M.; Sikora, J.; Niemiec, M.; Olech, E.; Szeląg-Sikora, A. Energy Islands as a Potential Source of Securing the Energy Supply of Bio-Feedstock for Biogas Plants. In Renewable Energy Sources: Engineering, Technology, Innovation; Springer Proceedings in Energy; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 713–723. Available online: http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/978-3-319-72371-6_70 (accessed on 30 September 2020).
- Tryhuba, A.; Boyarchuk, V.; Tryhuba, I.; Ftoma, O. Forecasting of a Lifecycle of the Projects of Production of Biofuel Raw Materials With Consideration of Risks. Int. Conf. Adv. Trends Inf. Theory 2019, 420–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tryhuba, A.; Boyarchuk, V.; Tryhuba, I.; Ftoma, O.; Padyuka, R.; Rudynets, M. Forecasting the risk of the resource demand for dairy farms basing on machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Modern Machine Learning Technologies and Data Science, MoMLeT+DS 2020, Shatsk, Ukraine, 10 May 2020; Volume I, pp. 327–340. Available online: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2631/paper25.pdf (accessed on 26 September 2020).
- Kozina, T.; Ovcharuk, O.; Trach, I.; Levytska, V.; Ovcharuk, O.; Hutsol, T.; Mudryk, K.; Jewiarz, M.; Wrobel, M.; Dziedzic, K. Spread Mustard and Prospects for Biofuels. In Renewable Energy Sources: Engineering, Technology, Innovation; Mudryk, K., Werle, S., Eds.; Springer Proceedings in Energy; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 791–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boyarchuk, V.; Tryhuba, I.; Ftoma, O.; Francik, S.; Rudynets, M. Method and Software of Planning of the Substantial Risks in the Projects of Production of raw Material for Biofuel. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop IT Project Management (ITPM 2020), Slavsko, Lviv Region, Ukraine, 18–20 February 2020; pp. 116–129. Available online: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2565/ (accessed on 25 September 2020).
- Havrylianchyk, R.; Bilyk, T.; Hutsol, T.; Osadchuk, O.; Mudryk, K.; Jewiarz, M.; Wróbel, M.; Dziedzic, K. Straw of Buckwheat as an Alternative Source of Biofuels. In Renewable Energy Sources: Engineering, Technology, Innovation; Springer Proceedings in Energy; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sikora, J.; Niemiec, M.; Szeląg-Sikora, A.; Gródek-Szostak, Z.; Kubon, M.; Komorowska, M. The Effect of the Addition of a Fat Emulsifier on the Amount and Quality of the Obtained Biogas. Energies 2020, 13, 1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sikora, J.; Niemiec, M.; Szelag-Sikora, A.; Kubon, M.; Olech, E.; Marczuk, A. Biogasification of wastes from industrial processing of carps. Przem. Chem. 2017, 96, 2275–2278. [Google Scholar]
- Tryhuba, A.; Ftoma, O.; Tryhuba, I.; Boyarchuk, O. Method of quantitative evaluation of the risk of benefits for investors of fodder-producing cooperatives. In Proceedings of the 14th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT), Lviv, Ukraine, 17–20 September 2019; Volume 3, pp. 55–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korys, K.A.; Latawiec, A.E.; Grotkiewicz, K.; Kubon, M. The Review of Biomass Potential for Agricultural Biogas Production in Poland. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6515. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6515 (accessed on 30 September 2020). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ratushny, R.; Bashynsky, O.; Ptashnyk, V. Development and Usage of a Computer Model of Evaluating the Scenarios of Projects for the Creation of Fire Fighting Systems of Rural Communities. In Proceedings of the XIth International Scientific and Practical Conference on Electronics and Information Technologies (ELIT-2019), Lviv, Ukraine, 16–18 September 2019; pp. 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratushny, R.; Bashynsky, O.; Shcherbachenko, O. Identification of firefighting system configuration of rural settlements, Fire and Environmental Safety Engineering. MATEC Web Conf. 2018, 247, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rudynets, M.; Pavlikha, N.; Kytsyuk, I.; Korneliuk, O.; Fedorchuk-Moroz, V.; Androshchuk, I.; Skorokhod, I.; Seleznov, D. Establishing patterns of change in the indicators of using milk processing shops at a community territory. East. Eur. J. Enterp. Technol. Control Process. 2019, 6, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hridin, O.; Slavina, N.; Mushenyk, I.; Dobrovolska, E. Managerial decisions in logistic systems of milk provision on variable production conditions. Indep. J. Manag. Prod. 2020, 11, 783–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bashynskyi, O.; Medvediev, Y.; Slobodian, S.; Skorobogatov, D. Justification of models of changing project environment for harvesting grain, oilseed and legume crops. Indep. J. Manag. Prod. 2019, 10, 658–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bochkovskii, A.; Gogunskii, V. Development of the method for the optimal management of occupational risks. East. Eur. J. Enterp. Technol. 2018, 3, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabriel Rullo, P.; Costa-Castelló, R.; Roda, V.; Feroldi, D. Energy management strategy for a bioethanol isolated hybrid system: Simulations and experiments. Energies 2018, 11, 1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kasprzak, K.; Wojtunik-Kulesza, K.; Oniszczuk, T.; Kuboń, M.; Oniszczuk, A. Secondary Metabolites, Dietary Fiber and Conjugated Fatty Acids as Functional Food Ingredients against Overweight and Obesity. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2018, 13, 1073–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bushuiev, S.; Bushuieva, N. Mechanisms of creation of value and performance of project-managerial organizations. East. Eur. J. Enterp. Technol. 2010, 43, 4–9. [Google Scholar]
- Hulida, E.; Pasnak, I.; Koval, O. Determination of the Critical Time of Fire in the Building and Ensure Successful Evacuation of People. Period. Polytech. Civ. Eng. 2019, 63, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sikora, J.; Niemiec, M.; Tabak, M.; Gródek-Szostak, Z.; Szeląg-Sikora, A.; Kuboń, M.; Komorowska, M. Assessment of the Efficiency of Nitrogen Slow-Release Fertilizers in Integrated Production of Carrot Depending on Fertilization Strategy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ahorsu, R.; Medina, F.; Constantí, M. Significance and challenges of biomass as a suitable feedstock for bioenergy and biochemical production: A review. Energies 2018, 11, 3366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Demirbas, A. Bioethanol from cellulosic materials: A renewable motor fuel from biomass. Energy Sources 2005, 27, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Philippidis, G.; Bartelings, H.; Helming, J.; M’barek, R.; Smeets, E.; Van Meijl, H. The good, the bad and the uncertain: Bioenergy use in the European Union. Energies 2018, 11, 2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kubon, M.; Krasnodebski, A. Logistic cost in competitive strategies of enterprises. Agric. Econ. 2010, 56, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bashynsky, O. Coordination of dairy workshops projects on the community territory and their project environment. In Proceedings of the 14th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT), Lviv, Ukraine, 17–20 September 2019; Volume 3, pp. 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kucher, O.; Hutsol, T.; Zavalniuk, K. Marketing strategies and prognoses of development of the Renewable Energy market in Ukraine. In Scientific Achievements in Agricultural Engineering, Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine; Traicon: Krakow, Poland, 2017; pp. 100–121. Available online: http://188.190.33.56:7980/jspui/handle/123456789/905 (accessed on 18 September 2020).
Indicator | Project Implementation Scenario | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
Minimum profit of investor, $/ton. | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 |
Probability of profit of investor | 0.89 | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.53 | 0.44 | 0.34 |
Probability of loss of investor | 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.33 | 0.36 | 0.47 | 0.56 | 0.66 |
The risk of the investor making a profit | admissible | admissible | medium | medium | medium | high | high |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Tryhuba, A.; Hutsol, T.; Tryhuba, I.; Pokotylska, N.; Kovalenko, N.; Tabor, S.; Kwasniewski, D. Risk Assessment of Investments in Projects of Production of Raw Materials for Bioethanol. Processes 2021, 9, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9010012
Tryhuba A, Hutsol T, Tryhuba I, Pokotylska N, Kovalenko N, Tabor S, Kwasniewski D. Risk Assessment of Investments in Projects of Production of Raw Materials for Bioethanol. Processes. 2021; 9(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9010012
Chicago/Turabian StyleTryhuba, Anatoliy, Taras Hutsol, Inna Tryhuba, Nataliia Pokotylska, Nataliia Kovalenko, Sylwester Tabor, and Dariusz Kwasniewski. 2021. "Risk Assessment of Investments in Projects of Production of Raw Materials for Bioethanol" Processes 9, no. 1: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9010012
APA StyleTryhuba, A., Hutsol, T., Tryhuba, I., Pokotylska, N., Kovalenko, N., Tabor, S., & Kwasniewski, D. (2021). Risk Assessment of Investments in Projects of Production of Raw Materials for Bioethanol. Processes, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9010012