Next Article in Journal
Challenges of Pharyngeal Cancer Screening in Lower-Income Countries during Economic and Social Transitions: A Population-Based Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Fear of COVID-19, Perceived Stress, and PTSD: The Serial Mediating Role of Sense of Coherence
Previous Article in Journal
Wanna Bet? Investigating the Factors Related to Adolescent and Young Adult Gambling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Psychological Predictors of COVID-19-Related Anxiety in Vulnerable Groups
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
EJIHPE
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/ejihpe13100156
ejihpe-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Meaning in Life and Loneliness as Mediators between COVID-19 Anxiety and Life Satisfaction in the Post-Pandemic among the General Population in Turkey: A Serial Mediation Model

by
Zafer Güney Çağış
1,2,
Gülçin Güler Öztekin
2,
Izaddin Ahmad Aziz
3,4,
Francesco Chirico
5,6,
Amelia Rizzo
7,* and
Murat Yıldırım
2,8,*
1
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Letters, Mersin University, 33110 Mersin, Turkey
2
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Letters, Agri Ibrahim Cecen University, Fırat Mahallesi Yeni Üniversite Caddesi No: 2 AE/1, 04100 Merkez/Ağrı, Turkey
3
Special Education Department, College of Education, Salahaddin University-Erbil, Erbil 44002, Iraq
4
English Department, College of Education, Bayan University, Erbil 44002, Iraq
5
Post-Graduate School of Occupational Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
6
Health Service Department, Italian State Police, Ministry of the Interior, 00184 Milan, Italy
7
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
8
Graduate Studies and Research, Lebanese American University, Beirut 13-5053, Lebanon
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2023, 13(10), 2214-2225; https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13100156
Submission received: 23 August 2023 / Revised: 28 September 2023 / Accepted: 4 October 2023 / Published: 9 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mental Health during COVID-19 Pandemic: What Do We Know So Far?)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted global society, leading to negative well-being and mental health outcomes. However, little is known about how COVID-19-related anxiety affects life satisfaction through psychological factors. This study examined the mediating roles of meaning in life and loneliness in the relationship between COVID-19 anxiety and life satisfaction in 333 Turkish general population (59.2% females; Mage = 33.9 ± 7.8). Participants completed measures of COVID-19 anxiety, life satisfaction, meaning in life, and loneliness. The results showed that COVID-19 anxiety predicted meaning in life, loneliness, and life satisfaction. Meaning in life predicted loneliness and life satisfaction, while loneliness predicted life satisfaction. Serial mediation analysis revealed that COVID-19 anxiety predicts life satisfaction through meaning in life and loneliness, even after controlling for age and gender. These findings contribute to our understanding of the underlying mechanisms between COVID-19 anxiety and life satisfaction, with implications for future research and practice.

1. Introduction

The rapidly spreading contagious COVID-19 disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) adversely affects well-being and mental health outcomes [1,2]. Studies conducted in Turkey found that 19.0% of the participants exhibited high anxiety levels [3]. A recent systematic review also highlighted that approximately one-fourth of the participants reported experiencing mild to moderate anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, it was revealed that one in ten individuals dealing with anxiety may have a severe or even extreme anxiety disorder [4]. Recognizing the significance of providing support to individuals facing challenging circumstances, it is essential to note that higher satisfaction levels have been linked to lower anxiety levels [5]. Research showed that stay-at-home orders as a measure of the pandemic were associated with financial anxiety, greater health anxiety, and loneliness [6].
Furthermore, higher coronavirus anxiety was associated with more rumination and loneliness and lower subjective vitality [7]. Previous literature showed that the COVID-19 pandemic seriously threatened mental health, such as depression, anxiety, and fear [8,9]. In addition, recent studies have shown that the COVID-19 pandemic may have lasting effects on people’s well-being and mental health, and the risk of psychological health problems may increase over time [9,10,11]. However, psychological resources and strengths (e.g., meaning in life, hope, resilience, and optimism) were found to significantly contribute to individuals’ positive mental health and well-being in the face of adversity [1,12,13,14].
Life satisfaction, which is one of the pillars of subjective well-being, refers to the cognitive and judgmental process of one’s life in general, and this process is based on comparing how satisfied people are with their current situation according to individually selected criteria that are not imposed from outside [15]. The expanding literature has provided evidence showing a close link between life satisfaction and social support [16], self-compassion [17], mindfulness, self-esteem, and resilience [18], and negative relationships with mental health problems such as depression and anxiety [19]. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, life satisfaction was significantly negatively related to COVID-19-related fear and anxiety through psychological distress [20]. Similarly, a longitudinal study reported that COVID-19 was associated with deterioration in mental health by increasing symptoms of psychological distress, depression, and anxiety, as well as reducing life satisfaction [21].
The disturbing feeling that comes with the perception that one’s social needs are not met by the quantity or quality of social relationships is loneliness [22]. Loneliness leads people to negative consequences such as social isolation, coronavirus-related anxiety [23], poor sleep quality [24], psychological maltreatment [25], low life satisfaction, low quality of life [26,27], and poor well-being [28]. In the relevant literature, researchers have also revealed the mediating effect of loneliness on well-being and mental health outcomes. For example, loneliness exacerbates the association between coronavirus anxiety and rumination [29], COVID-19 peritraumatic distress, anxiety, and depression symptoms [30], perceived social support, depression, and anxiety [31], and rejection sensitivity and social anxiety [32]. On the other hand, a crucial predictor of loneliness is reduced meaning in life [33]. In other words, meaning in life allows people to regulate loneliness under challenging situations [34]. This emphasizes the importance of meaning in life, reducing loneliness, and supporting coping with adverse situations that may lead to serious mental health problems.
Frankl, one of the forerunners of Existential Theory, argues that people are characterized by an innate drive to find meaning in their lives. Life bestows a sense of purpose and significance to each individual; however, this sense of meaning can significantly vary from person to person and evolve [35]. Frankl’s perspective in logotherapy emphasizes not a universal, overarching meaning of life but rather the unique, moment-specific significance of an individual’s existence, often described as ‘healing through meaning’ [36]. According to Frankl [35], individuals can discover meaning in their lives through three avenues: creative values, experiential values, and attitudinal values. Attitudinal values entail the capacity to unearth meaning by adapting one’s attitude to inevitable adversity. People with a sense of meaning and purpose tend to persevere amidst challenges, demonstrating their resilience and survival [37].
Furthermore, it is important to note that a sense of meaning in life has positive implications for mental health, physical well-being, and overall wellness [37]. Therefore, it can be assumed that bolstering the perception of life’s significance among individuals experiencing COVID-19-induced anxiety could potentially mitigate feelings of loneliness and heighten satisfaction with life. This premise gives support for the foundation of our proposed mediation model in this study.
More importantly, Frankl notes in his autobiography that he increasingly realizes that life is immensely meaningful and that there must still be meaning even in suffering and failure. With this expression, Frankl emphasizes that stressful situations can be overcome by accepting life and developing a sense of meaning. In addition, meaning in life contributes positively to maintaining or improving mental health. Studies have provided evidence that meaning in life is positively associated with life satisfaction, better mental health, physical health, and well-being [38], and reduces stress, anxiety, and depression that emerge during adverse life circumstances [39]. Accordingly, meaning in life serves as a protective factor in improving well-being and mental health, as it mitigates adversity [13]. Kim et al. [40] found that the effect of depression was mediated by meaning in life, which provides a better quality of life. Some studies supported the mediating effect of meaning in life in the relationships between perceived stress and avoidant coping [41] and stressors and life satisfaction [42,43] by serving as a buffering effect against the negative consequences of stressful situations. The findings show that meaning in life provides a basis for assessing one’s chances of coping with life’s challenges. In light of previous studies, we can conclude that despite stress factors such as anxiety, depression, and stress that emerge over time and in different situations, people can function positively by returning to their essence of finding meaning in life, leading to well-being and life satisfaction.
The expanding literature mentioned above has provided evidence of an inverse relationship between anxiety and well-being due to unexpected situations such as the pandemic. It is essential to identify protective factors for better mental health. Thus, in this study with the Turkish general population, we suggest that high meaning in life and low loneliness may mitigate the negative impact of challenging situations on individuals’ well-being.

Present Study

Although the roles of loneliness and meaning in life have been independently studied for COVID-19 anxiety and life satisfaction in some earlier studies, the simultaneous effect of these two variables concerning mental health and well-being outcomes has not been studied yet. Therefore, it is important to better understand the link between these variables to assist mental health professionals during the post COVID-19 pandemic. Based on the theoretical framework and empirical evidence documented above, this study aimed to examine meaning in life and loneliness as serial mediators in the relationship between COVID-19 anxiety and life satisfaction. To facilitate this aim, the following hypotheses were generated. The proposed serial mediation model is depicted in Figure 1.
H1: 
COVID-19 anxiety would be negatively associated with life satisfaction.
H2: 
Loneliness would mediate the relationship between COVID-19 anxiety and life satisfaction.
H3: 
Meaning in life would mediate the relationship between COVID-19 anxiety and life satisfaction.
H4: 
Meaning in life and loneliness serially mediate the effects of COVID-19 anxiety on life satisfaction.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

Determining the adequacy of the sample size is important in research. It is commonly known that to detect an indirect effect among the variables of interest, a sample size ranging from 115 to 285 participants is typically required for 0.80 power to detect an effect [44]. In our study, a total of 333 Turkish young adults were recruited, which falls within this recommended range. This indicates that the sample size chosen for our study ensures sufficient statistical power to detect the desired effect. Table 1 presents the characteristics of the sample. Participants ranged in age between 18–63 years (M = 33.92, SD = 7.81), including 197 (59.2%) females. In total, 179 (53.8%) of the participants were married, 141 (42.3%) were single, and 13 (3.9%) were divorced/widowed. The majority of the participants were undergraduates (59.2%), followed by postgraduates (26.7%), and high school graduates (14.1). By percentage, 6.9% of the participants had low income, 81.4% had middle income, and 11.7% had high income.

2.2. Measures

The COVID-19 Anxiety Scale (CAS) was developed to assess physiological reactions of anxiety related to COVID-19 disease [8]. The CAS consists of 5 items (e.g., “I had trouble falling or staying asleep because I was thinking about the coronavirus”) rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = not at all to 4 = nearly every day over the last 2 weeks. A higher score on the CAS represents greater symptoms of coronavirus anxiety. The scale has excellent internal consistency reliability and a one-dimensional structure. Biçer et al. [45] adapted the CAS into Turkish. The internal reliability coefficient for the current study was 0.87.
The Meaningful Living Measure [46] is a self-report scale including 6 items (e.g., “I have meaningful social and close relationships”). All items are scored using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree. A higher score on the MLM suggests a greater level of meaning in life. It has strong internal consistency reliability. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.86 for the current study.
The UCLA8 Loneliness Scale [47] was used to assess participants’ feelings of loneliness. The scale is an 8-item self-reported scale answered on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (never) to 4 (often). An example statement is, “I am unhappy being so withdrawn”. The validity and reliability scale can be applied to Turkish culture [48]. The internal reliability coefficient for the current study was 0.78.
The Satisfaction with Life Scale [15] is a common measurement tool to assess the general life satisfaction of individuals. The SWLS is a one-dimensional scale consisting of 5 items (e.g., “In most ways, my life is close to my ideal”). All items are rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree. Higher scores on the scale reflect greater satisfaction with life. The scale was adapted into Turkish by Durak et al. [49]. The Cronbach’s alpha for the present study was 0.85.

2.3. Procedure

After obtaining the approval of the university’s ethics committee, data were collected through an online survey and a convenience sampling method. Data were collected from the general population in Turkey. Consent was obtained from all participants before being involved in this study. A secure Google form link was generated and shared with participants to ensure data security. Participants were invited to this study through various communication tools (e.g., WhatsApp and Facebook). Participants were assured of anonymity and confidentiality about the responses and personal information. This survey took approximately 10 min to complete.

2.4. Data Analysis

The normality was assessed using skewness and kurtosis values, whereas Levene’s test was run to examine the homoscedasticity of variance. Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis was performed to examine the relationship between variables. The mediating roles of meaning in life and loneliness in the relationship between COVID-19 anxiety and life satisfaction were examined using a serial mediation model tested using the PROCESS macro for the SPSS (Model 6). By controlling for age and gender as covariates in the analysis, 5000 bootstrap samples were used to estimate a 95% confidence interval. Confidence intervals that do not include zero indicate that the indirect effect is statistically significant [50]. All analyses were performed using the SPSS 20 and PROCESS macro for SPSS version 4.0.

3. Results

3.1. Preliminary Analyses

Descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s alphas, and correlation coefficients of the variables are presented in Table 2. All variables of this study were normally distributed. The skewness values were between ±3, and the kurtosis values were between ±10 [51]. Correlation analysis revealed that COVID-19 anxiety had a negative relationship with meaning in life (r = −0.20, p < 0.01) and life satisfaction (r = −0.13, p < 0.05), while it had a positive relationship with loneliness (r = 0.38, p < 0.01). On the other hand, meaning in life negatively correlated with loneliness (r = −0.36, p < 0.01) and positively correlated with life satisfaction (r = 0.58, p < 0.01), while loneliness was negatively correlated with life satisfaction (r = –0.34, p < 0.01). In addition, age was correlated only with life satisfaction (r = 0.15, p < 0.01), while gender was correlated with COVID-19 anxiety (r = 0.15, p < 0.01), meaning in life (r = −0.19, p < 0.01), loneliness (r = 0.14, p < 0.01), and life satisfaction (r = −0.23, p < 0.01).

3.2. Serial Mediation Analysis

Bootstrap sampling analysis presented significant serial mediation. We assessed COVID-19 anxiety as the independent variable (X), meaning in life as the first mediator (M1), loneliness as the second mediator (M2), and life satisfaction as the dependent variable (Y). Figure 1 displays the results of the mediation model that explores the role of meaning in life and loneliness in the relationship between COVID-19 anxiety and life satisfaction while controlling for age and gender.
As seen in Table 3 and Figure 1, the results of the analysis revealed that COVID-19 anxiety significantly predicted meaning in life (B = −0.312, SE = 0.10, t = −3.186, p < 0.01) and loneliness (B = 0.309, SE = 0.05, t = 6.446, p < 0.001). Similarly, meaning in life significantly predicted loneliness (B = −0.150, SE = 0.03, t = −5.651, p < 0.001). In addition, both meaning in life (B = 0.449, SE = 0.04, t = 10.559, p < 0.001) and loneliness (B = −0.267, SE = 0.08, t = −3.173, p < 0.01) were significant predictors of life satisfaction. Moreover, COVID-19 anxiety directly predicted life satisfaction (total effect; B = −0.235; SE = 0.06; 95% CI [−0.343, −0.120]. More importantly, after including mediators of meaning in life and loneliness in the analysis, the coefficient was insignificant (direct effect; B = 0.082; SE = 0.08; 95% CI [−0.070, 0.236]).
The analyses revealed that the indirect effect of COVID-19 anxiety on life satisfaction via meaning in life (X → M1 → Y) was significant (B = 0.014; SE = 0.05; 95% CI [−0.24, −0.04]). Similarly, the indirect effect of COVID-19 anxiety on life satisfaction through loneliness (X → M2 → Y) was also found to be significant (B = −0.08; SE = 0.03; 95% CI [−0.14, −0.03]). As a result of the serial mediating effect, the indirect effect of COVID-19 anxiety on life satisfaction through both meaning in life and loneliness (X → M1 → M2 → Y) was significant (B = −0.01; SE = 0.01; 95% CI [−0.03, 0.01]) (see Table 4).

4. Discussion

The current study used a relatively large Turkish sample to examine the association between COVID-19 anxiety and life satisfaction. We also examined the mediation effects of meaning in life and loneliness underlying the association. Consistent with our hypotheses, participants with higher levels of COVID-19 anxiety would experience decreased life satisfaction, with loneliness acting as a mediator. Furthermore, the serial mediation model (COVID-19 anxiety → meaning in life → loneliness → life satisfaction) produced a significant result, suggesting that individuals who experience more COVID-19 anxiety would report less meaning in life and experience more loneliness, thus leading them to experience poor life satisfaction. The findings are discussed in detail below.
Firstly, the findings showed that COVID-19 anxiety was negatively related to life satisfaction, supporting the first hypothesis of this study. Participants with COVID-19 anxiety reported low life satisfaction. These results were consistent with the findings of many previous studies [21,52]. A recent study with similar results found that life satisfaction negatively correlated with depression, anxiety, and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic [53]. In a study with university students in Turkey, participants reported symptomatic symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress, and post-traumatic stress disorder, which correlated in turn with poor psychological and physical health-related quality of life [54]. Surprisingly, some studies found a positive relationship between anxiety and life satisfaction during the pandemic [55]. One study, which was contrary to our results, found that COVID-19 fear and anxiety were positively associated with life satisfaction and assumed that this association was because while experiencing strict pandemic rules, those with high degrees of COVID-19 fear and anxiety were able to recognize the real values of life, such as being satisfied with their lives [20]. However, it should be further addressed in future studies to better understand the relationship between the two variables in stressful situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Secondly, the results showed that loneliness partially mediated the association between COVID-19 anxiety and life satisfaction, providing evidence for the second hypothesis of this study. We determined that COVID-19 anxiety was positively associated with loneliness, which in turn was negatively associated with life satisfaction. Similarly, previous studies showed that loneliness mediated the effect of mental health and quality of life. For example, loneliness mediated the relationship between the negative impact of COVID-19 and quality of life [56]. Likewise, studies showed that those who perceived themselves as at risk of contracting COVID-19 had higher loneliness scores [57], and those who felt lonely faced significant threats to their well-being [58]. In a longitudinal study, after 12 months of follow-up, anxiety symptoms continued at high levels, depressive symptoms and loneliness increased, and life satisfaction decreased [59]. These results have provided evidence that situations beyond people’s control may have led to psychological consequences such as loneliness and low well-being.
Thirdly, the current findings yielded that meaning in life mediated the association between COVID-19 anxiety and life satisfaction, supporting this study’s third hypothesis. The current study provided evidence indicating that participants with COVID-19 anxiety reported lower meaning in life and life satisfaction. Also, meaning in life, which mitigated the negative effects of COVID-19 anxiety on life satisfaction, was a significant predictor of life satisfaction. Previous literature supported that individuals with positive feelings and a high sense of meaning in life were more likely to cope with negative life events and have better psychological health [7,12,60]. A study with Turkish people indicated the longitudinal predictive effect of meaning in life on young adults’ resilience and mental well-being during difficult times [61]. Moreover, past research showed that high meaning in life as a mediator was positively associated with various indicators of well-being and mental health [29,62]. For example, a study revealed that people who experienced COVID-19 stress were more likely to develop meaning crisis, which was associated with higher mental distress [63]. In addition to the studies in the literature, the results of our study show once again that meaning in life acts as a buffer between pandemic stressors and subjective well-being.
Finally, this study showed that meaning in life and loneliness serially mediated the effects of COVID-19 anxiety on life satisfaction, verifying the fourth hypothesis of the present study. In other words, individuals with high COVID-19 anxiety tended to have a lessor sense of meaning in life and a higher sense of loneliness, reducing their life satisfaction in Turkey. Previous findings are consistent with the results of this study regarding the relationship between COVID-19 anxiety, meaning in life, loneliness, and life satisfaction. For example, meaning in life and depression sequentially mediated the effects of family function on life satisfaction [64]. Another study indicated that increased meaning in life and life satisfaction resulted in lower anxiety and COVID-19 stress [43]. These findings have proven that meaning in life and life satisfaction allow people to regulate psychological factors on mental health and protect people’s mental health. Therefore, psychological resources and strengths support coping with adverse life situations such as pandemics that have the potential to cause serious mental health consequences and reduce anxiety, stress, depression, and loneliness.
The current study results indicate that in Turkish society, as in other countries, the COVID-19 pandemic has negative consequences on the well-being of individuals even in the post-pandemic period [65]. More importantly, we determine that high meaning in life and low loneliness mitigate this association under challenging times. Thus, we suggest that intervention programs based on these variables may be used preventively and therapeutically.

4.1. Contributions

The findings of this study with a Turkish sample contribute to the expanding literature and offer important implications for professionals dealing with COVID-19 anxiety, meaning in life, loneliness, and life satisfaction. When coping with COVID-19 anxiety, meaning in life acts as a factor that increases the level of life satisfaction and mitigates the level of loneliness. In contrast, loneliness serves as a factor that reduces the level of life satisfaction. In difficult times, our results provide evidence that individuals with anxiety may benefit from meaning in life. This is because anxiety negatively affects well-being by increasing the risk of psychological disorders and mental health problems [66,67,68,69], such as stress, depression, fear, loneliness, and post-traumatic disorders. Therefore, meaning in life is critical for fostering individuals’ mental health and might serve as a buffer for adverse consequences. In this regard, mental health professionals and psychological counsellors can help individuals reduce anxiety in stressful situations by reinforcing meaning in life and increasing life satisfaction, facilitating experiencing less loneliness in such situations. In addition, to promote well-being, mental health providers could consider the role of meaning in life and develop meaning-based interventions to prevent psychological stressors. As the findings of our study indicate that unexpected events such as the COVID-19 pandemic have psychological outcomes, it is of urgent importance that mental health professionals engage in practices that increase the preparedness and resilience of the general population.

4.2. Limitations

Although the present study offers important results, it nevertheless has some limitations. One significant limitation of this study pertains to the sample characteristics. The age range of the participants varied from 18 to 63 years old, with a mean age of 33.92 (SD = 7.81). The fairly even distribution of participants within this age range indicates a potential underrepresentation of individuals from the broader population. As such, this limitation restricts the extent to which this study’s findings can be generalized. To address this limitation, future research could consider exploring the study variables within distinct target groups, such as adolescents, young adults, and older adults. Alternatively, researchers may consider a more balanced representation of age groups within the sample. Additionally, replication of this study in diverse countries and cultural contexts would be valuable for better investigating the associations between the variables reported in this study. In addition, this study’s data were collected through an online survey via various communication tools, which leads to another limitation as this study has only encompassed internet users. Furthermore, despite the adequacy of the sample size (n = 333) for the analysis, it would be beneficial to consider replicating the current study utilizing a larger sample randomly selected from the target population. This will increase the generalizability of the findings, allowing for a broader application and enhanced external validity of the research outcomes.

5. Conclusions

In the post-pandemic period, people may hope that deterioration in mental health will decrease thanks to vaccines and measures. However, with the increase in the transmission of new variants, we are probably far from returning to the pre-pandemic situation [66,67,68,69]. Indeed, the available data showed that COVID-19 anxiety was linked to reduced meaning in life, leading to higher loneliness and lower life satisfaction as an indicator of the post-pandemic situation [70,71,72]. This result might reflect that life satisfaction further mitigates when COVID-19 anxiety leads to decreased meaning in life and increased loneliness. The current study also indicates the role of meaning in life and loneliness in improving life satisfaction. It suggests that focusing on the changes in life satisfaction is essential in difficult situations [73]. Mental health professionals can improve a sense of meaning in life by decreasing anxiety and loneliness, finally improving life satisfaction.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, Z.G.Ç., G.G.Ö. and M.Y.; software, validation, and formal analysis, Z.G.Ç., G.G.Ö., I.A.A. and M.Y.; investigation, I.A.A., Z.G.Ç. and G.G.Ö.; resources, I.A.A., F.C. and A.R.; data curation, I.A.A., F.C. and A.R.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.G.Ç. and G.G.Ö.; writing—review and editing, G.G.Ö., I.A.A. and A.R.; visualization, all the authors; supervision and project administration, F.C. and M.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Agri Ibrahim Cecen University Ethics Committee (protocol code 313 and date of approval: 28 December 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were by the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank all participants who voluntarily contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yıldırım, M.; Çağış, Z.G.; Crescenzo, P.; Ferrari, G.; Dhimal, M.; Nucera, G.; Szarpak, L.; Chirico, F. Vulnerability and self-efficacy predict loneliness among the Turkish public during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Health Soc. Sci. 2022, 7, 410–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yıldırım, M.; Şanlı, M.E. Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the COVID-19 Impact Scale in university students. J. Sch. Educ. Psychol. 2023, 3, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Erdoğan, S.; Can, A.A.; Abiç, A.; Yilmaz, D.V. Examination of individuals’ depression, anxiety, and stress levels during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 2022, 41, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Delpino, F.M.; da Silva, C.N.; Jerônimo, J.S.; Mulling, E.S.; da Cunha, L.L.; Weymar, M.K.; Alt, R.; Caputo, E.L.; Feter, N. Prevalence of anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 2 million people. J. Affect. Disord. 2022, 318, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Costa, S.; Canale, N.; Mioni, G.; Cellini, N. Maintaining social support while social distancing: The longitudinal benefit of basic psychological needs for symptoms of anxiety during the COVID-19 outbreak. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2022, 52, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tull, M.T.; Edmonds, K.A.; Scamaldo, K.M.; Richmond, J.R.; Rose, J.P.; Gratz, K.L. Psychological outcomes associated with stay-at-home orders and the perceived impact of COVID-19 on daily life. Psychiatry Res. 2020, 289, 113098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Arslan, G.; Yıldırım, M.; Aytaç, M. Subjective vitality and loneliness explain how coronavirus anxiety increases rumination among college students. Death Stud. 2022, 46, 1042–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, S.A. Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: A brief mental health screener for COVID-19 related anxiety. Death Stud. 2020, 44, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xiao, P.; Chen, L.; Dong, X.; Zhao, Z.; Yu, J.; Wang, D.; Li, W. Anxiety, depression, and satisfaction with life among college students in China: Nine months after initiation of the outbreak of COVID-19. Front. Psychiatry 2022, 12, 2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gan, Y.; Ma, J.; Wu, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, H.; Hall, B.J. Immediate and delayed psychological effects of province-wide lockdown and personal quarantine during the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Psychol. Med. 2022, 52, 1321–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rizzo, A.; Yıldırım, M.; Öztekin, G.G.; De Carlo, A.; Nucera, G.; Szarpak, Ł.; Zaffina, S.; Chirico, F. Nurse burnout before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic comparative review. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1225431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Arslan, G.; Yıldırım, M.; Karataş, Z.; Kabasakal, Z.; Kılınç, M. Meaningful living to promote complete mental health among university students in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2020, 20, 930–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Arslan, G.; Yıldırım, M. Coronavirus stress, meaningful living, optimism, and depressive symptoms: A study of moderated mediation model. Aust. J. Psychol. 2021, 73, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yıldırım, M.; Arslan, G. Exploring the associations between resilience, dispositional hope, preventive behaviours, subjective well-being, and psychological health among adults during early stage of COVID-19. Curr. Psychol. 2020, 41, 5712–5722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Diener, E.D.; Emmons, R.A.; Larsen, R.J.; Griffin, S. The satisfaction with life scale. J. Personal. Assess. 1985, 49, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fisher, M.H.; Sung, C.; Kammes, R.R.; Okyere, C.; Park, J. Social support as a mediator of stress and life satisfaction for people with intellectual or developmental disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Appl. Res. Intellect. Disabil. 2022, 35, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tran, M.A.Q.; Khoury, B.; Chau, N.N.T.; Van Pham, M.; Dang, A.T.N.; Ngo, T.V.; Ngo, T.T.; Truong, T.M.; Le Dao, A.K. The Role of Self-Compassion on Psychological Well-Being and Life Satisfaction of Vietnamese Undergraduate Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Hope as a Mediator. J. Ration.-Emotive Cogn.-Behav. Ther. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, K.; Kong, F. Linking trait mindfulness to life satisfaction in adolescents: The mediating role of resilience and self-esteem. Child. Indic. Res. 2020, 13, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mei, S.; Qin, Z.; Yang, Y.; Gao, T.; Ren, H.; Hu, Y.; Cao, R.; Liang, L.; Li, C.; Tong, Q. Influence of life satisfaction on quality of life: Mediating roles of depression and anxiety among cardiovascular disease patients. Clin. Nurs. Res. 2021, 30, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Duong, C.D. The impact of fear and anxiety of COVID-19 on life satisfaction: Psychological distress and sleep disturbance as mediators. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2021, 178, 110869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Thompson, E.J.; Stafford, J.; Moltrecht, B.; Huggins, C.F.; Kwong, A.S.; Shaw, R.J.; Zaninotto, P.; Patel, K.; Silverwood, R.J.; McElroy, E.; et al. Psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and life satisfaction following COVID-19 infection: Evidence from 11 UK longitudinal population studies. Lancet Psychiatry 2022, 9, 894–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Peplau, L.A.; Perlman, D. Perspectives on loneliness in Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research, and Therapy; Peplau, L.A., Perlman, D., Eds.; Wiley: London, UK, 1982; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gaeta, L.; Brydges, C.R. Coronavirus-related anxiety, social isolation, and loneliness in older adults in Northern California during the stay-at-home order. J. Aging Soc. Policy 2021, 33, 320–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Deng, M.; Qian, M.; Lv, J.; Guo, C.; Yu, M. The association between loneliness and sleep quality among older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Geriatr. Nurs. 2023, 49, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Arslan, G.; Yıldırım, M. Psychological maltreatment and loneliness in adolescents: Social ostracism and affective experiences. Psychol. Rep. 2022, 125, 3028–3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Onal, O.; Evcil, F.Y.; Dogan, E.; Develi, M.; Uskun, E.; Kisioglu, A.N. The effect of loneliness and perceived social support among older adults on their life satisfaction and quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educ. Gerontol. 2022, 48, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tu, Y.; Zhang, S. Loneliness and subjective well-being among Chinese undergraduates: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Soc. Soc. Indic. Res. 2015, 124, 963–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Landmann, H.; Rohmann, A. When loneliness dimensions drift apart: Emotional, social and physical loneliness during the COVID-19 lockdown and its associations with age, personality, stress and well-being. Int. J. Psychol. 2022, 57, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Arslan, G.; Allen, K.A. Exploring the association between coronavirus stress, meaning in life, psychological flexibility, and subjective well-being. Psychol. Health Med. 2022, 27, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Keller, F.M.; Derksen, C.; Kötting, L.; Dahmen, A.; Lippke, S. Distress, loneliness, and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Test of the extension of the Evolutionary Theory of Loneliness. Appl. Psychol. Health Well-Being 2022, 15, 24–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Harrison, V.; Moulds, M.L.; Jones, K. Perceived social support and prenatal well-being; The mediating effects of loneliness and repetitive negative thinking on anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. Women Birth 2022, 35, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lin, Y.; Fan, Z. The relationship between rejection sensitivity and social anxiety among Chinese college students: The mediating roles of loneliness and self-esteem. Curr. Psychol. 2022, 42, 12439–12448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Macià, D.; Cattaneo, G.; Solana, J.; Tormos, J.M.; Pascual-Leone, A.; Bartrés-Faz, D. Meaning in life: A major predictive factor for loneliness comparable to health status and social connectedness. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 627547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yıldırım, M. Loneliness and Psychological Distress: A Mediating Role of Meaning in Life during COVID-19 Pandemic. In Anxiety, Uncertainty, and Resilience during the Pandemic Period-Anthropological and Psychological Perspectives; Gabrielli, F., Irtelli, F., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Frankl, V.E. Man’s Search for Meaning: An Introduction to Logotherapy; Washington Square Press: New York, NY, USA, 1963. [Google Scholar]
  36. Costello, S.J. The spirit of logotherapy. Religions 2015, 7, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wong, P.T.P. Existential Humanistic Theories. In Comprehensive Handbook of Personality and Psychopathology; Hersen, M., Thomas, J.C., Segal, D.L., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  38. Yıldırım, M.; Arslan, G. A moderated mediation effect of stress-related growth and meaning in life in the association between coronavirus suffering and satisfaction with life: Development of the stress-related growth measure. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 648236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, Q.; Wang, X.Q.; He, X.X.; Ji, L.J.; Liu, M.F.; Ye, B.J. The relationship between search for meaning in life and symptoms of depression and anxiety: Key roles of the presence of meaning in life and life events among Chinese adolescents. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 282, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kim, J.Y.; Lee, Y.W.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, E.H. The mediating and moderating effects of meaning in life on the relationship between depression and quality of life in patients with dysphagia. J. Clin. Nurs. 2019, 28, 2782–2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Halama, P.; Bakosova, K. Meaning in life as a moderator of the relationship between perceived stress and coping. Stud. Psychol. 2009, 51, 143–148. [Google Scholar]
  42. Pan, J.Y.; Wong DF, K.; Joubert, L.; Chan CL, W. The protective function of meaning of life on life satisfaction among Chinese students in Australia and Hong Kong: A cross-cultural comparative study. J. Am. Coll. Health 2008, 57, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Trzebiński, J.; Cabański, M.; Czarnecka, J.Z. Reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic: The influence of meaning in life, life satisfaction, and assumptions on world orderliness and positivity. J. Loss Trauma 2020, 25, 544–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fritz, M.S.; MacKinnon, D.P. Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychol. Sci. 2007, 18, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Biçer, İ.; Çakmak, C.; Demir, H.; Kurt, M.E. Koronavirüs anksiyete ölçeği kısa formu: Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Anatol. Clin. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 25, 216–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Arslan, G. Anlamlı yaşam ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Anlamlı yaşama ilişkin kısa ve etkili bir ölçme aracı. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Derg. 2020, 56, 227–242. [Google Scholar]
  47. Russell, D.; Peplau, L.A.; Cutrona, C.E. The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J. Personal. Soc. Soc. Psychol. 1980, 39, 472–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Doğan, T.; Çötok, N.A.; Tekin, E.G. Reliability and validity of the Turkish Version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS-8) among university students. Procedia-Soc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2011, 15, 2058–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Durak, M.; Senol-Durak, E.; Gencoz, T. Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale among Turkish university students, correctional officers, and elderly adults. Soc. Soc. Indic. Res. 2010, 99, 413–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hayes, A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  51. Brown, T.A. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research; Guildford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  52. Rogowska, A.M.; Kuśnierz, C.; Bokszczanin, A. Examining anxiety, life satisfaction, general health, stress and coping styles during COVID-19 pandemic in Polish sample of university students. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2020, 2020, 797–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tamarit, A.; De la Barrera, U.; Schoeps, K.; Castro-Calvo, J.; Montoya-Castilla, I. Analyzing the role of resilience and life satisfaction as mediators of the impact of COVID-19 worries on mental health. J. Community Psychol. 2023, 51, 234–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cam, H.H.; Ustuner Top, F.; Kuzlu Ayyildiz, T. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and health-related quality of life among university students in Turkey. Curr. Psychol. 2022, 41, 1033–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mamani-Benito, O.; Esteban RF, C.; Castillo-Blanco, R.; Caycho-Rodriguez, T.; Tito-Betancur, M.; Farfán-Solís, R. Anxiety and depression as predictors of life satisfaction during pre-professional health internships in COVID-19 times: The mediating role of psychological well-being. Heliyon 2022, 8, e11025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Altay, M.; Arisoy, A. Fear of COVID-19 and quality of life: The mediating role of loneliness among older Turkish adults. Ageing Soc. 2022, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Padmanabhanunni, A.; Pretorius, T. The role of fortitude, loneliness, and depression in the association between risk perception of contracting COVID-19 and life satisfaction: Serial mediation analysis. S. Afr. J. Psychol. 2022, 52, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hall, J.A.; Dominguez, J.; Mihailova, T. Interpersonal media and face-to-face communication: Relationship with life satisfaction and loneliness. J. Happiness Stud. 2022, 24, 331–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Benke, C.; Autenrieth, L.K.; Asselmann, E.; Pané-Farré, C.A. One year after the COVID-19 outbreak in Germany: Long-term changes in depression, anxiety, loneliness, distress and life satisfaction. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2022, 273, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Yıldırım, M.; Arslan, G.; Wong, P.T. Meaningful living, resilience, affective balance, and psychological health problems among Turkish young adults during coronavirus pandemic. Curr. Psychol. 2021, 41, 7812–7823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Arslan, G.; Yıldırım, M. A longitudinal examination of the association between meaning in life, resilience, and mental well-being in times of coronavirus pandemic. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 645597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Howell, A.J.; Passmore, H.A.; Buro, K. Meaning in nature: Meaning in life as a mediator of the relationship between nature connectedness and well-being. J. Happiness Stud. 2013, 14, 1681–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Schnell, T.; Krampe, H. Meaning in life and self-control buffer stress in times of COVID-19: Moderating and mediating effects with regard to mental distress. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 582352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Huang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Xu, L.; Wang, T.; Tang, Y.; Li, Y.; Guo, M.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, W.; et al. Family function and life satisfaction of postgraduate medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of meaning in life and depression. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Jamshaid, S.; Bahadar, N.; Jamshed, K.; Rashid, M.; Imran Afzal, M.; Tian, L.; Umar, M.; Feng, X.; Khan, I.; Zong, M. Pre-and Post-Pandemic (COVID-19) Mental Health of International Students: Data from a Longitudinal Study. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2023, 16, 431–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ranieri, J.; Guerra, F.; Cilli, E.; Caiazza, I.; Gentili, N.; Ripani, B.; Canzio, M.; Coletti, E.; Quassoni, A.; Niutta, S.; et al. Buffering effect of e-learning on Generation Z undergraduate students: A cross-sectional study during the second COVID-19 lockdown in Italy. Mediterr. J. Clin. Psychol. 2021, 9, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Manivannan, M.; Jogalekar, M.P.; Kavitha, M.S.; Maran BA, V.; Gangadaran, P. A mini-review on the effects of COVID-19 on younger individuals. Exp. Biol. Med. 2021, 246, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Commodari, E.; La Rosa, V.L. Adolescents in Quarantine during COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy: Perceived Health Risk, Beliefs, Psychological Experiences and Expectations for the Future. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 559951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. La Rosa, V.L.; Commodari, E. University Experience during the First Two Waves of COVID-19: Students’ Experiences and Psychological Wellbeing. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2023, 13, 1477–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Yıldırım, M.; Turan, M.E.; Albeladi, N.S.; Crescenzo, P.; Rizzo, A.; Nucera, G.; Ferrari, G.; Navolokina, A.; Szarpak, L.; Chirico, F. Resilience and perceived social support as predictors of emotional well-being. J. Health Soc. Sci. 2023, 8, 59–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Torbenko, I.; Doan, S.; Kholodnytska, H.; Vertepna, A.; Navolokina, A. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on older people. J. Health Soc. Soc. Sci. 2023, 8, 93–94. [Google Scholar]
  72. Chirico, F.; Teixeira da Silva, J.A. What should happen after the COVID-19 pandemic ends? A global plan is needed to address “endemic” COVID-19 and prevent future pandemics. J. Health Soc. Sci. 2023, 8, 9–12. [Google Scholar]
  73. Yıldırım, M.; Çiçek, İ.; Öztekin, G.G.; Aziz, I.A.; Hu, J. Associations Between Problematic Social Media Use and Psychological Adjustment in Turkish Adolescents: Mediating Roles of Family Relationships. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2023, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ejihpe 13 00156 g001
Figure 1. Serial mediation model with unstandardized coefficients. a1, direct effect of COVID-19 anxiety on meaning in life; a2, direct effect of COVID-19 anxiety on loneliness; a3, direct effect of meaning in life on loneliness; b1, direct effect of meaning in life on life satisfaction; b2, direct effect of loneliness on life satisfaction; c, total effect of COVID-19 anxiety on life satisfaction; c’, direct effect of COVID-19 anxiety on life satisfaction. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1. Serial mediation model with unstandardized coefficients. a1, direct effect of COVID-19 anxiety on meaning in life; a2, direct effect of COVID-19 anxiety on loneliness; a3, direct effect of meaning in life on loneliness; b1, direct effect of meaning in life on life satisfaction; b2, direct effect of loneliness on life satisfaction; c, total effect of COVID-19 anxiety on life satisfaction; c’, direct effect of COVID-19 anxiety on life satisfaction. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Ejihpe 13 00156 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of the sample (n = 333).
Table 1. Characteristics of the sample (n = 333).
Groupn%
GenderFemale19759.2
Male13640.8
Marital statusMarried17953.8
Single14142.3
Widowed/divorced133.9
Education levelHigh school graduate4714.1
Undergraduate19759.2
Postgraduate8926.7
Perceived socioeconomic levelLow236.9
Middle27181.4
High3911.7
Table 2. Descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s alphas, and correlation coefficients of the study variables.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s alphas, and correlation coefficients of the study variables.
VariableMSDα123456
1. Age33.920.49--0.11 *−0.020.07−0.070.15 **
2. Gender--- -0.15 **−0.19 **0.14 *−0.23 **
3. COVID-19 anxiety1.340.580.87 -−0.20 **0.38 **−0.13 *
4. Meaning in life5.540.760.86 -−0.36 **0.58 **
5. Loneliness1.741.570.78 -−0.34 **
6. Life satisfaction3.131.500.85 -
Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; α = Cronbach alpha; M = mean; SD = standard deviation.
Table 3. Unstandardized direct estimates.
Table 3. Unstandardized direct estimates.
PredictorOutcomeCoeffSEtp
COVID-19 anxietyMeaning in life−0.310.10−3.186<0.01
COVID-19 anxietyLoneliness0.310.056.446<0.001
Meaning in lifeLoneliness−0.150.03−5.651<0.001
Meaning in lifeLife satisfaction0.450.0410.559<0.001
LonelinessLife satisfaction−0.270.08−3.173<0.01
COVID-19 anxietyLife satisfaction0.080.081.071>0.05
Note. SE: standard error; Coeff: Unstandardized coefficient.
Table 4. Unstandardized indirect estimates.
Table 4. Unstandardized indirect estimates.
95%
Model PathwayMediatorOutcomeCoeffSELLCIULCI
COVID-19 anxiety →Meaning in life  →Life satisfaction−0.140.05−0.24−0.04
COVID-19 anxiety → Loneliness  →Life satisfaction−0.080.03−0.14−0.03
COVID-19 anxiety →Meaning in life → Loneliness →Life satisfaction−0.130.01−0.03−0.01
Note. SE: standard error; Coeff: Unstandardized coefficient; CI: Confidence interval; LL: Lower limit; UL: Upper limit.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Çağış, Z.G.; Öztekin, G.G.; Aziz, I.A.; Chirico, F.; Rizzo, A.; Yıldırım, M. Meaning in Life and Loneliness as Mediators between COVID-19 Anxiety and Life Satisfaction in the Post-Pandemic among the General Population in Turkey: A Serial Mediation Model. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2023, 13, 2214-2225. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13100156

AMA Style

Çağış ZG, Öztekin GG, Aziz IA, Chirico F, Rizzo A, Yıldırım M. Meaning in Life and Loneliness as Mediators between COVID-19 Anxiety and Life Satisfaction in the Post-Pandemic among the General Population in Turkey: A Serial Mediation Model. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education. 2023; 13(10):2214-2225. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13100156

Chicago/Turabian Style

Çağış, Zafer Güney, Gülçin Güler Öztekin, Izaddin Ahmad Aziz, Francesco Chirico, Amelia Rizzo, and Murat Yıldırım. 2023. "Meaning in Life and Loneliness as Mediators between COVID-19 Anxiety and Life Satisfaction in the Post-Pandemic among the General Population in Turkey: A Serial Mediation Model" European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education 13, no. 10: 2214-2225. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13100156

APA Style

Çağış, Z. G., Öztekin, G. G., Aziz, I. A., Chirico, F., Rizzo, A., & Yıldırım, M. (2023). Meaning in Life and Loneliness as Mediators between COVID-19 Anxiety and Life Satisfaction in the Post-Pandemic among the General Population in Turkey: A Serial Mediation Model. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(10), 2214-2225. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13100156

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop