Next Article in Journal
Applicability of Transition State Theory to the (Proton-Coupled) Electron Transfer in Photosynthetic Water Oxidation with Emphasis on the Entropy of Activation
Previous Article in Journal
Luminescent Diimine-Pt(IV) Complexes with Axial Phenyl Selenide Ligands
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Inorganics
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/inorganics11100388
inorganics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hybrids Composed of an Fe-Containing Wells–Dawson Polyoxometalate and Carbon Nanomaterials as Promising Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction

by
Hugo C. Novais
1,
Bruno Jarrais
1,
Israël-Martyr Mbomekallé
2,
Anne-Lucie Teillout
2,
Pedro de Oliveira
2,
Cristina Freire
1 and
Diana M. Fernandes
1,*
1
LAQV-REQUIMTE/Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
2
Equipe d’Electrochimie et de Photo-Électrochimie, Institut de Chimie Physique, UMR 8000 CNRS, Faculté des Sciences d’Orsay, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91405 Orsay, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2023, 11(10), 388; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11100388
Submission received: 6 September 2023 / Revised: 25 September 2023 / Accepted: 26 September 2023 / Published: 29 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polyoxometalate Chemistry for Smart Materials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is a key cathodic reaction in energy-converting systems, such as fuel cells (FCs). Thus, it is of utmost importance to develop cost-effective and efficient electrocatalysts (ECs) without noble metals to substitute the Pt-based ones. This study focuses on polyoxometalate (POM)-based ECs for ORR applications. A Wells–Dawson POM salt K7 [P2W17(FeOH2)O61].·20H2O was immobilised onto graphene flakes and multiwalled carbon nanotubes doped with nitrogen, denominated as P2W17Fe@GF_N8 and P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8. The successful preparation of the composites was proved with various characterisation techniques, including FTIR, XPS and SEM. Both materials showed good ORR performance in an alkaline medium with similar potential onset values of ~0.84 V vs. RHE and diffusion-limiting current densities of −3.9 and −3.3 mA cm−2 for P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 and P2W17Fe@GF_N8, respectively. Furthermore, both composites presented low Tafel slopes (48–58 mV dec−1). Chronoamperometric tests revealed that the as-prepared nanocomposites rendered a significant improvement achieving between 90 and 94% of current retention in tolerance to methanol in comparison with Pt/C, and moderate to good long-term electrochemical stability with current retentions comprised between 68 and 88%. This work reinforces the use of POMs as important electroactive species for the preparation of alternative ORR electrocatalysts, exhibiting good activity, stability and selectivity towards the ORR in the presence of methanol.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The population growth has resulted in a steep rise in energy demand, which has raised concerns about the security of our energy supplies in the midterm future. It is, therefore, of the highest urgency to develop sustainable alternative energy sources and conversion devices in order to reduce carbon emissions [1]. Fuel cells (FCs) present themselves as one of the most promising green options and sustainable technologies available. A key feature of these systems is the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) that occurs at the cathode and generally exhibits slow kinetics [2,3,4]. Electrocatalysts (ECs) play a major role in most energy conversion devices, including FCs, because they enhance the selectivity and efficiency of the chemical reactions involved. Thus far, the most effective ECs for ORR, to date, have been derived from noble metals, like platinum and palladium [5]. The latter have several drawbacks, including expensive price, limited availability and a lack of tolerance towards fuel crossover (such as methanol and CO) [5]. Since the discovery of the ORR in fuel cells, researchers have been working to improve the efficiency and stability of the electrocatalysts used in this process. In recent years, there have been significant advances in the development of ORR electrocatalysts, particularly in the use of iron-based catalysts [6]. Additionally, surface science studies have been conducted to understand better the electronic structure, stability and electrocatalytic properties of various catalysts [7,8]. In addition, computational methods have been developed to aid in the design of solid catalysts, which has opened up new possibilities for ORR electrocatalyst research [9]. Over recent years, several studies have been carried out with the objective of designing high-performance ECs based on earth-abundant elements to overcome the referred limitations associated with Pt- and Pd-based electrocatalysts [2,4,10]. The development of efficient and cost-effective catalysts for the ORR is of critical importance for the widespread adoption of fuel cells. Plus, significant progress has been achieved towards the design of ORR catalysts based on earth-abundant elements [11]. However, despite these advances, the search for efficient and stable ORR catalysts remains a topic of active research. One of the first catalysts tested for the ORR was cobalt phthalocyanine (CoPc) [11]. Jasinski’s seminal work published in Nature in 1964 demonstrated that CoPc can catalyse ORR in acidic media. This work laid the foundation for the development of metal–phthalocyanine-based catalysts for fuel cells. Currently, the FCs that have received the most attention are proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) [12]. Although these systems are considered the most technologically advanced, they depend on pricey acid membranes and ionomers [13] and on platinum group metal-based electrocatalysts, which are costly, show limited durability and are scarcely available [14]. In order to enhance the electrocatalytic behaviour of the ORR, Pt and Pd have been incorporated with several transition metals, such as Ru [15], Ni [16], Ag [16] or Co [17,18].
Carbon nanomaterials (CMs), including graphene (GF) and carbon nanotubes (CNT), show great promise as efficient ORR electrocatalysts due to their high stability, conductivity, low cost and large surface area [19]. These materials demonstrate an exceptional high chemical and thermal stability, favourable electrical properties, high porosity and a large surface area [20]. Nanotubes and graphene are among the most widely applied materials in the ORR, employed as metal-free ECs in alkaline media and supporting materials for electrocatalysts in hybrid nanocomposites [21,22]. In addition, doping the material with heteroatoms, such as nitrogen, sulphur and phosphorus, could enhance its electrocatalytic activity [21,22,23,24,25,26]. Regarding nitrogen species, different forms can be incorporated into the graphitic network, including pyridinic, pyrrolic, graphitic (quaternary) and oxidized nitrogen, and these variations can significantly affect the electrocatalytic performance of the material. Artyushkova et al. showed that pyridinic and graphitic (quaternary) nitrogen species can act as highly active sites for the ORR due to their ability to stabilize the adsorption of reaction intermediates [26]. On the other hand, pyrrolic and oxidized nitrogen species have been found to exhibit lower activity for the ORR. Therefore, it is important to carefully consider the type and concentration of nitrogen species when designing doped carbon catalysts for the ORR. Incorporating nitrogen in the sp2 carbon allows for the improvement of the electronic properties of pristine carbons, which gives rise to an enhanced electrocatalytic performance towards the ORR [21,22,27,28,29]. Over the years, several studies have reported progress in the performance of pyrolyzed catalysts for the ORR [30,31]. In 2009, Lefèvre et al. disclosed the utilisation of polymers as carbon–nitrogen sources for the synthesis of ORR catalysts [32]. The sacrificial support method (SSM) has also been shown to be an effective strategy for the preparation of ORR catalysts [33]. In 2011, Zelenay reported on a significant improvement in the durability of ORR catalysts based on nonprecious metals [34].
Furthermore, it has been proposed that creating composite electrocatalysts, which combine the exceptional properties of carbon nanomaterials with the vast stability and abundant redox characteristics of polyoxometalates (POMs), could be a feasible approach to increase the proficiency of various energy-linked reactions [28,35,36,37,38]. The POM used in this work belongs to the Wells–Dawson family ([(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)]7−). The iron-substituted POMs are of particular interest, as they may act either as oxidation or as reduction electrocatalysts [12]. Fe-substituted polyoxometalates (Fe-POMs) have emerged as a promising candidate amidst various catalysts due to their distinctive characteristics. These offer a cost-effective alternative to expensive Pt-based catalysts, making them a potential substitute for the ORR [39]. Moreover, the use of Fe in these catalysts adds to their sustainability. Iron is one of the most abundant elements on Earth, making it a readily available resource. It is also widely recycled, and its extraction and processing require less energy compared to other metals like cobalt [40].
This report details the preparation of composites by incorporating K7 [P2W17(FeOH2)O61].·20H2O, a salt of Wells-Danson POM, onto two distinct nitrogen-doped carbon materials (nitrogen-doped graphene flakes—GF_N8; nitrogen-doped multiwalled carbon nanotubes—MWCNT_N8. The resulting composites were then applied as electrocatalysts for the ORR.

2. Experimental Section

Materials Preparation and Characterisation Methods

The preparation of the composites and ORR studies’ solvents and materials are extensively described in the Supplementary Information (SI). Nitrogen doping of the carbon materials (0.60 g) was achieved with the mechanical ball-milling treatment during 5 h at a constant frequency of 15 vibrations s−1 with Retsch MM200 equipment using melamine (0.26 g) as a precursor. Then, the materials that resulted underwent a thermal treatment under a N2 flow (100 cm3 min−1) at a rate of 10 °C min−1 until reaching the final temperature of 800 °C and kept at these temperature during 1 h; they were then cooled to room temperature under a nitrogen atmosphere and stored in a desiccator [41]. The P2W17Fe@CM composites were then prepared through the immobilization of P2W17Fe onto previously prepared MWCNT_N8 and GF_N8. The immobilization of the POM was achieved as follows: a 5 mL acetate buffer solution (pH = 4.0) containing 50 mg of P2W17Fe was added to a 20 mL acetate buffer solution (pH = 4.0) containing 25 mg of CM. The mixture was dispersed for 15 min in an ultrasonic bath and then left to stir for 2 h at 400 rpm. Then, the resulting composites were filtered, washed and left to dry at 60 °C under vacuum overnight. The composites were labelled as P2W17Fe@GF_N8 and P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8.
Before use in the electrocatalytic studies, the composites prepared were characterized using different techniques: Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The methods and equipment used are detailed in the Supplementary Materials. Electrocatalytic performances towards the ORR were evaluated using a PGSTAT 302N potentiostat (Metrohm Autolab B.V., Utrecht, The Netherlands) controlled with NOVA 2.1 software and using a conventional 3-electrode system. For all details regarding electrodes, electrode conditioning and modification, see the Supplementary Materials.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Materials Characterisation

All the prepared materials were initially characterized with infrared spectroscopy (Figure 1). The FTIR spectra of the nitrogen-doped carbon materials are shown in Figure S1. The MWCNT_N8 spectrum revealed several vibrational bands at 3436, 2928, 2846, 1641, 1383 and 1124 cm−1, but some of these bands appeared quite weak and poorly resolved. This may have arisen from the low loading of the POMs onto the carbon material or their interaction with the graphene and carbon nanotube matrix that hindered their identification. The vibrational bands of the OH groups could be observed at 3436 cm−1, and were due to the O-H stretching and bending modes from the adsorbed residual water and hydroxyl groups [42,43]. The C-N stretching vibration band was shown at 1383 cm−1 [44,45]. The band at 1124 cm−1 was assigned to the phenolic groups’ vibration modes [42,46,47]. Lastly, the two bands at 2928 and 2846 cm−1 corresponded to the C-H stretching modes, possibly caused by defects in the sp2 hybridised domains. The band located at 1641 cm−1 could be attributed to the C=N and C=O stretching modes of carboxylic acid, carbonyl, ketone and quinone groups [42,44,45,46,47]. The vibrational spectra of GF_N8 were similar (Figure S1, black line), showing vibrational bands assigned to O-H stretching and bending modes at ~3410 and 1386 cm−1, respectively [42,43]. The observed vibrations at 1630 cm−1 represented the C=N and C=O stretching modes, while the phenol groups displayed vibrations at 1387 cm−1 and the C-O stretching modes of oxygen groups could be observed at 1142 cm−1 [38,42,43,44,45]. Finally, the band associated with the C-O-C and the C-O stretching modes and the C-O-H bending mode was observed at 1070 cm−1 [42,46,47].
Figure 1 (black) shows the FTIR spectrum of P2W17Fe, where the typical vibrational bands of the POMs could be observed between 1100 and 700 cm−1. The band at 1085 cm−1 was assigned to the splitting of the νasP-O stretching vibration and the three vibration bands at 947, 917 and 793 cm−1 were assigned to the νasW=Ot, νasW-Ob-W and νasW-Oc-W stretching modes (corner and edge sharing W-O-W), respectively [48,49]. The infrared spectra of the composites P2W17Fe@GF_N8 (red) and P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 (blue) showed weaker bands when compared with the spectrum of the POM; still, it was possible to confirm its immobilization onto the carbon materials. Additionally, bands arising from the nitrogen-doped carbon materials were also observed. After the immobilization of P2W17Fe onto the carbon materials, a small shift in the position of the characteristic bands of the POM to shorter wavelengths could be verified. The reported changes were likely due to reflect the weakening (stretching) of the W-O bonds as a result of possible changes in electron densities (or strengthening of repulsive interactions between oxygen atoms), following the adsorption of the POM on the surfaces of the carbon materials [28,50].
The XPS characterisation of the starting nitrogen-doped materials GF_N8 and MWCNT_N8 was already published by Bruno Jarrais et al. [41]. Still, for a proper comparison with the composite materials, the main peaks were recalled here. Both composites were also characterised with XPS to assess their composition. The relative amounts of the different elements were calculated through the peak areas and are presented in Table 1.
As can be seen in Figures S2a and S3a in the Supplementary Materials file, the presence of nitrogen in the heteroatom-doped carbon materials (GF_N8 and MWCNT_N8) was found, which suggested that the doping procedure was successful. The XPS N1s spectra of the nitrogen-doped carbon materials were deconvoluted into three primary peaks, corresponding to pyridinic N at 398.2 eV, pyrrolic N at 399.6 eV and quaternary N at 401.0 eV [51,52]. For MWCNT_N8, a fourth peak at 404.1 eV was found and attributed to nitrogen oxide and/or nitrate species [51,53]. For both N-doped materials, the relative amounts of N functionalities showed the same pattern, increasing in the same order: (quaternary N) < (pyrrolic N) < (pyridinic N). The C1’s high-resolution spectra (Figures S2b and S3b) were fitted with seven peaks: one at 284.6 eV, attributed to the graphitic structure (sp2 and C=C), sp3 hybridized carbon and C-N bonding at 285.2 eV, C-N and C-OH bonding at 285.9 eV, C-O-C groups at 286.9 eV, C=O groups (ketones, quinones and aldehydes) at 288.2 eV, COOH (carboxylic acids and esters) at 289.3 eV and a peak at 291.0 eV, attributed to π–π* transitions [41,54]. The O1’s high-resolution spectra of the GF_N8 (Figure S2c) were fitted with one peak at 531.9 eV, attributed to C=O and COOH. However, MWCNT_N8 (Figure S3c), upon deconvolution, presented two peaks, one at 531.7 eV, assigned to C=O and COOH, and another at 533.1 eV, attributed to HO-C [38,41,55].
The XPS spectra of P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 are presented in Figure 2. The N1’s XPS spectrum of the P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 composite (Figure 2a) had four main peaks at 398.5, 399.8, 401 and 402.2 eV, attributed to pyridinic, pyrrolic, quaternary N and to nitrogen oxide and/or nitrate species, respectively [41,52,56,57]. The XPS fitting of the N1’s spectrum for the composite P2W17Fe@GF_N8 (Figure S2a) was very similar to that of GF_N8, presenting peaks at 398.1, 399.8 and 401.1 eV, corresponding to pyridinic, pyrrolic and quaternary N, respectively.
Figure 2b displayed the C1’s high-resolution XPS spectrum of the P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 composite. It exhibited seven peaks in total, the primary peak at 284.6 eV (sp2 graphitic structure and C=C), a peak at approximately 285.1 eV (sp3 hybridized carbon and C-N bonding), a peak at 285.8 eV (C-N and C-OH bonding), a peak at approximately 286.8 eV (C-O-C groups), a peak at 288.1 eV (C=O groups, such as ketones, quinones and aldehydes), a peak at ~289.2 eV (COOH, such ascarboxylic acids and esters) and a peak at 291.0 eV (π–π* transitions) [41,54]. The fitting of the C1’s XPS spectrum of P2W17Fe@GF_N8 was very similar, as can be seen in Figure S4a of the Supplementary Materials file.
Figure 2c shows the high-resolution O1’s spectrum for P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8, which was deconvoluted into two main peaks: one at 530.7 eV, assigned to oxygen in C=O (ketones, quinones and aldehydes) and COOH (carboxylic acids and esters) groups and oxygen atoms belonging to the POM, and another at 532.6 eV, attributed to O in the HO-C groups (phenols) [38,41,55]. These two peaks were observed for MWCNT_N8 and in the O1’s spectrum of P2W17Fe@GF_N8. It is important to refer that, after the immobilisation of the POM on the carbon materials, there was a significant increase (approximately three-fold) in the percentage of oxygen O1s in the final composites. This was due to a contribution of the POM to the O1’s percentages of the composite.
The P2p high-resolution spectra of P2W17Fe@CM are shown in Figure 2d and Figure S4d. The observed peaks could be resolved as 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 doublets at ~133.4 and ~134.2 eV, respectively [58]. In Figure 2e and Figure S4e, the peaks found in the high-resolution spectra of W4f were attributed to 4f7/2 (~35.6 eV) and 4f5/2 (~37.8 eV) due to spin-orbital coupling [58]. Finally, in Figure 2f and Figure S4f, the Fe2p could be divided into Fe 2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2 with the binding energies of ~711.6 eV and ~724.7 eV associated with Fe3+, respectively [59,60].
Assuming that XPS is a surface technique that scans sample depths down to 10 nm, this may have prevented us from reaching the expected P/W ratio. Still, the experimental value of the P/W ratio of both composites was very close to the theoretical value, thus, confirming the preservation of the polyoxometalate structure.
The morphology of all the materials underwent an assessment through scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Figure 3 demonstrates the SEM images for P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 (a) and P2W17Fe@GF_N8 (b) at a 50,000× magnification. As can be seen, the morphologies of P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 and P2W17Fe@GF_N8 differed significantly. P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 exhibited a needle-like structure characteristic of multiwalled carbon nanotubes, whereas P2W17Fe@GF_N8 showed thin and flat flakes of carbon layers. Both composites were decorated with lighter microsized spots that corresponded to P2W17Fe clusters, which led to this roughened texture. In Figure 3a, the widths of the carbon nanotubes showed clear uniformity with a range of diameters between 8 and 20 nm wide. Figure 3b displays folded graphene sheets and a less rough texture. The SEM images of MWCNT_N8 and GF_N8, exhibiting the same morphological characteristics as described above, are shown in Figure S5.
An EDX analysis was conducted to assess the distribution of P2W17Fe throughout the composites. Figure 4 shows the SEM and EDX elemental mapping images for P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8, while the images of the P2W17Fe @GF_N8 composite can be found in Figure S6. The elemental mapping analysis showed, in general, a homogenous distribution of the POM elements (W, P, Fe and O), suggesting that the POM was uniformly immobilized throughout the carbon material. The lighter shades on the EDX elemental mapping images of the W, P, Fe and O elements refer to the POM clusters.

3.2. Electrochemical Performance towards the ORR

The electrocatalytic activity towards the ORR of both composites was firstly studied with cyclic voltammetry (CV) in N2- and O2-saturated KOH solutions (0.1 mol dm−3). The N-doped carbon materials were also evaluated in identical experimental conditions for comparison. Figure 5 presents the CVs in N2- and O2-saturated solutions for the two nanocomposites prepared, where it could be clearly observed that in the N2-saturated electrolyte, no peak was detected, while in the O2-purged electrolyte, both composites exhibited an irreversible peak corresponding to oxygen reduction at Epc = 0.82 and 0.79 V vs. RHE for P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 and P2W17Fe@GF_N8, respectively. The electrochemical study of the starting nitrogen-doped materials—GF_N8 and MWCNT_N8—was published by Limani et al. [53], but was replicated here for comparison. MWCNT_N8 and GF_N8 underwent an assessment under identical experimental circumstances (refer to Figure S7a,b within the Supplementary Materials), and they exhibited reduction peaks at Epc = 0.74 and 0.80 V vs. RHE, respectively. The performance of Pt/C (20 wt %) was also tested under the same experimental conditions (Figure S7c), exhibiting the ORR peak at Epc = 0.86 V vs. RHE.
To gain a deeper understanding of the electrocatalytic performance of the P2W17Fe@CM nanocomposites towards the ORR, linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) was carried out at 1600 rpm in an O2-saturated KOH solution (0.1 mol dm−3). The LSV curves shown in Figure 6a were obtained by subtracting the blanks (the latter recorded in a N2-saturated KOH solution) from the ones saved in the O2-saturated KOH. Table 2 displays the key ORR parameters acquired—the onset potential (Eonset), the diffusion-limiting current density values (jL, 0.26 V, 1600 rpm), the Tafel slopes (TS) and the number of electrons transferred per oxygen molecule (nO2).
The Eonset values of the P2W17Fe@CM nanocomposites and N-doped carbon materials were very similar, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 V vs. RHE. P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 had the closest Eonset value to the one obtained for Pt/C (0.94 V vs. RHE). Furthermore, all electrocatalysts showed jL values between−4.0 and−3.3 mA cm−2, but did not reach the value obtained for Pt/C (−4.7 mA cm−2). Still, these nanocomposites performed well compared to other similar electrocatalysts, as can be observed in Table S2. It is also important to highlight that the ORR electrocatalytic activity of the pristine carbon materials greatly improved after nitrogen doping, which agreed with various studies that reported an enhancement in the ORR electrocatalytic performance after the N-doping of similar carbon materials [53,61]. After N-doping, the Eonset potential of MWCNT shifted by 14 mV towards positive values, and the value of jL doubled, whereas GF presented a positive shift of 11 mV and a jL 1.3 times higher (in magnitude of jL). As nitrogen atoms have a high electronegativity, there may have contributed to an increased favourable interaction between O2 molecules promoting the ORR mechanism through a rearrangement of the electronic structure of the neighbouring atoms [62].
Based on the XPS results in Table 1, it was not possible to directly link the superior performance of MWCNT_N8 with N%, as both the nitrogen-doped carbon materials had the same total percentage. Therefore, Table S1 presents the relative atomic percentages of nitrogen in the prepared carbon materials. According to the literature, the most active N species for the ORR are the pyridinic and quaternary ones. Pyridinic nitrogen atoms, due to their electron donation to the conjugated p bond of graphene and to the lone pair of electrons, have been identified as electroactive sites for the ORR through their ability to facilitate reductive oxygen adsorption [62,63]. Similarly, quaternary nitrogen is also recognised as an electroactive site for the ORR [63,64]. Even though our previous work [58] showed that the amount of pyridinic nitrogen is positively correlated with the ORR activity in nitrogen-doped carbon materials, here, it seems that quaternary nitrogen was more relevant. If we compare MWCNT_N8 and GF_N8, the best performing electrocatalysts was the former presenting higher quaternary N (16.9%). The same applied for the composite material.
On the other hand, we had the incorporation of POMs, which are known for their excellent ORR activity. POMs have multiple redox-active sites that can facilitate an electron transfer during the ORR. In previous studies, including ours, POMs have been suggested to interact with nitrogen-doped carbon materials to form composite catalysts that exhibit enhanced ORR activity.
Figure 6b depicts the quantity of electrons transferred per oxygen molecule for the N-doped CM and the respective composites. The results obtained with P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 and MWCNT_N8 suggested that the redox processes were very close to being four-electron ones. On the other hand, P2W17Fe@GF_N8 and GF_N8 participated in a mixed redox process involving two and four electrons, as confirmed with the nO2 values. Based on these parameters, the behaviour after POM immobilisation appeared to be very similar to the nitrogen-doped carbon materials. A possible explanation is that the active sites originating from the POM immobilisation did not offset for the eventual loss of N-induced active sites [38,53].
In an alkaline medium, the oxygen reduction reaction can take either an indirect (two-electron) pathway, which involves reducing O2 to HO2− and then reducing the intermediate to H2O/HO−, or a more desirable process, where O2 is directly reduced to H2O/HO− [65]. Thus, for a more complete examination of the ECs, it is of utmost importance to estimate the percentage of HO2−2 produced during the ORR process. The percentage of HO2− produced was calculated using Equation (S4) (Supplementary Materials) to various potential values (Figure 6c). The P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 composite showed the lowest percentage of HO2− produced (33%), which corresponded to the nO2 value (nO2 = 3.4). For the P2W17Fe@GF_N8 composite, the values of HO2− produced (40%) were also in accordance with the nO2 value obtained (3.1). Despite the agreement of the results, care should be taken when a direct comparison between these two methods is attempted, as both present limitations [61,66,67,68]. Firstly, the oxidation process of hydrogen peroxide on the platinum electrocatalyst was not a mass-transfer-limited process. Secondly, as can be seen in the SEM images, these prepared electrocatalysts presented a rough structure of the support material and a heterogeneity of clusters of the immobilised POM. This may have altered the electrode geometry and introduced turbulence in the electrolyte flow, resulting in approximate nO2 measurements that may not accurately portray the true electrocatalytic performance of the ORR [53].
In order to obtain more information about the kinetics of the reaction, we extracted the Tafel plots for the prepared nanocomposites and the Pt/C reference from the LSV curves in O2-saturated KOH at 1600 rpm. These plots are presented in Figure 6d. The nanocomposite P2W17Fe@GF_N8 had a slightly higher Tafel slope value (58 mV dec−1) when compared with P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 (48 mV dec−1), but both nanocomposites showed a lower Tafel slope compared with Pt/C (89 mV dec−1). These results indicated that oxygen molecules were readily adsorbed and activated on the surface of these materials. In general, the ORR process can follow different mechanisms in a high-pH environment. One is the well-known electrocatalytic inner-sphere electron transfer mechanism, where molecular O2 undergoes direct chemisorption on the catalyst site, leading to a direct/series 4e− pathway without the desorption of reaction intermediates (such as peroxide) from the surface [69,70,71]. Normally, metal-containing materials follow a dissociative four-electron pathway, facilitated by their excellent O2 adsorption ability. This process involves the initial adsorption of O2, followed by breakage of the O-O bond, forming adsorbed O* species (O2 + 2*→ 2O*, where * denotes a surface catalytic site). The species then gains two electrons and two protons to produce the final product OH- (2O* + 2e− + 2H2O → 2OH* + 2OH−; 2OH* + 2e− → 2OH− + 2*) [72].
Our Tafel slope values suggested that for P2W17Fe@CM, the global reaction rate was ruled by the conversion of a species MOO− to MOOH (where M denotes an empty site on the electrocatalyst surface) or by the first discharge step [38,53].
The proportional relationship between the double-layer capacitance (Cdl) and the electrochemically active surface areas (ECSAs), as well as the similarity between the electrocatalysts used in this study, allowed for a direct comparison of the obtained Cdl values of the composites [73,74,75,76]. By conducting CV measurements at varying scan rates, it was possible to estimate Cdl values from the slopes of the linear fittings of the CV current densities (measured at the same potential of 1.13 V vs. RHE in a nonfaradaic region), obtained at different scan rates for the composites and their nitrogen-doped carbon materials (see experimental details in Supplementary Materials file Section S1.4 and Figures S13 and S14). Still, the Cdl should be interpreted as an estimation of the number of accessible electrocatalytically active sites for a specific electrocatalyst [77]. Table 3 clearly shows a notable increase in the count of active sites, following the immobilisation of the POM (P2W17Fe) on both nitrogen-doped carbon materials. This increase was higher for the P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 composite, with a composite/carbon support Cdl ratio of 3.98 vs. 1.39 for P2W17Fe@GF_N8.
When evaluating the potential of an electrocatalyst for the ORR, it is of utmost importance to assess its stability. This was carried out with chronoamperometry (CA) at E = 0.46 V vs. RHE for 36,000 s at 1600 rpm in an oxygen-saturated alkaline electrolyte (Figure 7a). The nanocomposite P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 showed superior stability with an 88% current retention, surpassing the results achieved for Pt/C (86%), while P2W17Fe@GF_N8 showed a lower current retention value (68%). The increased current retention observed for P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 could be attributed to the stronger interaction between the POM and its highly ordered nitrogen-doped MWCNT. Still, the good stability of the composites was mainly due to the trapping of the POM particles in the nanonetworks of the carbon materials, avoiding (or at least limiting) their migration, aggregation and leaching towards the electrolyte, not adversely affecting the corresponding support stabilities. In addition, the high degree of graphitisation and/or ordered wall structure of the carbon materials could reduce a possible degradation of the composite, which could be another cause of the increased durability [78,79,80].
Methanol is an excellent hydrogen carrier fuel, and can also be produced from sustainable and green pathways to allow it to be a carrier of low carbon and potentially carbon-neutral hydrogen [81,82]. As such, the study of the methanol tolerance of electrocatalysts in methanol fuel cells is extremely important, since the methanol crossover from the anode to the cathode can lead to a significantly decrease in the cathodic performance, if the electrocatalysts is sensitive to it [83]. The Pt-based materials are handicapped by their high sensitivity to the methanol oxidation reaction, despite their better performance in alkaline medium compared most of the studied electrocatalysts [84]. This situation affected their performance in the ORR, lowering the current density obtained. Thus, the tolerance of methanol was assessed through chronoamperometry in O2-saturated 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH in the presence of methanol (0.5 mol dm−3) for the Pt/C and P2W17Fe@CM composites during 2500 s (Figure 7b). Methanol was added 500 s after the beginning of the CA. The Pt/C electrocatalyst maintained only ~70% of its initial current density, whereas the composites retained between ~90 and 94%, being one of the advantages of using this type of material.

4. Conclusions

In this work, it was possible to successfully immobilise the Wells–Dawson POM [P2W17(FeOH2)O61]7− onto graphene flakes and carbon nanotubes doped with nitrogen (P2W17Fe@GF_N8 and P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8) without the need for linker molecules. It was proven that both composites were successfully synthesised using several characterisation techniques, such as FTIR, XPS and SEM analysis. The prepared composites showed intrinsic electroactivity towards the ORR in an alkaline medium, displaying onset potential values varying between 0.83 and 0.84 V vs. RHE. Furthermore, the nanocomposites demonstrated low Tafel slopes (47–70 mV dec−1) and commendable jL values (−3.3–−4.0 mA cm−2). The analysis of the Koutecky−Levich plots revealed that the ORR process occurred through a mixed electron process for P2W17Fe@GF_N8 and a process involving four electrons for P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8, also confirmed with the results of the %HO2− production. The composite P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 demonstrated a sturdy electrocatalytic performance over 36,000 s, revealing a high retention value of 88%—surpassing the commercial Pt/C, which achieved 86%. Additionally, both composites had an excellent methanol tolerance (90–94%), evincing high selectivity for the OR and, thus, overcoming a significant limitation of the Pt/C electrocatalyst. This study was a significant stride towards creating new, inexpensive and sturdy electrocatalysts that are free of noble metals, with immense potential for energy-related reactions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/inorganics11100388/s1, Figure S1: FTIR spectra in the 4000–500 cm−1 range of the nitrogen-doped carbon materials GF_N8 (black) and MWCNT_N8 (red), Figure S2: XPS deconvoluted spectra of corresponding elements of GF_N8, Figure S3: XPS deconvoluted spectra of corresponding elements of MWCNT_N8, Figure S4: XPS deconvoluted spectra of corresponding elements in the P2W17Fe@GF_N8 composite, Figure S5: SEM images of MWCNT_N8 (a) and GF_N8 (b) at 50,000× magnification, Figure S6: SEM and EDX elemental mapping images of P2W17Fe @GF_N8 at 5000× magnification for the elements C (red), O (green), W (blue), P (yellow) and Fe (purple), Figure S7: CVs of MWCNT_N8 (a), GF_N8 (b) and Pt/C (20 wt. %) (c) modified electrodes in N2-saturated (dash line) and O2-saturated (full line) 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH solution at 0.005 V, Figure S8: ORR LSV polarization curves for Pt/C (20 wt. %) at different rotation rates in O2-saturated 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH solution at 0.005 V s−1 (a), and the corresponding Koutecky–Levich (K-L) plots (b), Figure S9: ORR LSV polarization curves for MWCNT_N8 at different rotation rates in O2-saturated 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH solution at 0.005 V s−1 (a) and the corresponding Koutecky–Levich (K-L) plots (b), Figure S10: ORR polarization curves for GF_N8 at different rotation rates in O2-saturated 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH solution at 0.005 V s−1 (a) and the corresponding Koutecky–Levich (K-L) plots (b), Figure S11: ORR LSV polarization curves for P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 at different rotation rates in O2-saturated 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH solution at 0.005 V s−1 (a) and the corresponding Koutecky–Levich (K-L) plots (b), Figure S12: ORR LSV polarization curves for P2W17Fe@GF_N8 at different rotation rates in O2-saturated 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH solution at 0.005 V s−1 (a) and the corresponding Koutecky–Levich (K-L) plots (b), Figure S13: CVs at different scan rates for GF_N8 (a), MWCNT_N8 (b), P2W17Fe@GF_N8 (c), P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 (d) and Pt/C (e) in N2-saturated KOH (0.1 M), Figure S14: current density-scan rate linear fitting plots for all materials. Numeric values correspond to the double-layer capacitances (Cdl) for each material, Table S1: relative atomic percentages of nitrogen presented in the XPS high-resolution N1s spectra of the prepared carbon materials, Table S2: ORR performance of transition metal carbon hybrid electrocatalysts obtained from the literature. References [38,45,48,53,58,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97] cited in Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.M.F. and P.d.O.; methodology, H.C.N., B.J., I.-M.M. and A.-L.T.; validation, D.M.F.; writing—original draft preparation, H.C.N.; writing—review and editing, D.M.F. and P.d.O.; supervision, D.M.F. and C.F.; funding acquisition, C.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by project UNIRCELL POCI-01-0145-FEDER-16422 and funded by FEEI through Programa operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização-COMPETE2020 and by national funds through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to institutions policies.

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to the PT national funds FCT/MCTES through the projects UIDB/50006/2020 and UIDP/50006/2020, as well as to Campus France—project PHC Pessoa 42341RM (O2@nanoCPOM). Thanks are also due to the FCT project FOAM4ENER PTDC/QUI-ELT/28299/2017. H.C.N. thanks the FCT through the ChemMat program for his PhD grant PD/BD/143095/2018. D.M.F. thanks FCT/MCTES for funding through the Individual Call to Scientific Employment Stimulus (2021.00771.CEECIND/CP1662/CT0007). I.-M M., A.-L.T. and P.d.O. thank the CNRS (namely, its IEA programme) and the Université Paris-Saclay for financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Perera, F. Pollution from Fossil-Fuel Combustion is the Leading Environmental Threat to Global Pediatric Health and Equity: Solutions Exist. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nie, Y.; Li, L.; Wei, Z. Recent advancements in Pt and Pt-free catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2168–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Stacy, J.; Regmi, Y.N.; Leonard, B.; Fan, M. The recent progress and future of oxygen reduction reaction catalysis: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 69, 401–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xia, W.; Mahmood, A.; Liang, Z.; Zou, R.; Guo, S. Earth-Abundant Nanomaterials for Oxygen Reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 2650–2676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kuang, M.; Zheng, G. Nanostructured Bifunctional Redox Electrocatalysts. Small 2016, 12, 5656–5675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Parvez, K.; Yang, S.; Hernandez, Y.; Winter, A.; Turchanin, A.; Feng, X.; Müllen, K. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene and Its Iron-Based Composite As Efficient Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 9541–9550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stamenkovic, V.R.; Mun, B.S.; Mayrhofer, K.J.J.; Ross, P.N.; Markovic, N.M. Effect of Surface Composition on Electronic Structure, Stability, and Electrocatalytic Properties of Pt-Transition Metal Alloys:  Pt-Skin versus Pt-Skeleton Surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8813–8819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marković, N.M.; Ross, P.N. Surface science studies of model fuel cell electrocatalysts. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2002, 45, 117–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nørskov, J.K.; Bligaard, T.; Rossmeisl, J.; Christensen, C.H. Towards the computational design of solid catalysts. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cao, R.; Lee, J.-S.; Liu, M.; Cho, J. Recent Progress in Non-Precious Catalysts for Metal-Air Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 816–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jasinski, R. A New Fuel Cell Cathode Catalyst. Nature 1964, 201, 1212–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kuo, M.-C.; Stanis, R.J.; Ferrell, J.R., III; Turner, J.A.; Herring, A.M. Electrocatalyst materials for fuel cells based on the polyoxometalates—K7 or H7[(P2W17O61)FeIII(H2O)] and Na12 or H12[(P2W15O56)2FeIII4(H2O)2]. Electrochim. Acta 2007, 52, 2051–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Samsudin, A.M.; Bodner, M.; Hacker, V. A Brief Review of Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)-Based Anion Exchange Membranes for Alkaline Fuel Cells. Polymers 2022, 14, 3565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, X.; Li, H.; Yang, J.; Lei, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Tang, Y.; Mao, Z. Recent advances in Pt-based electrocatalysts for PEMFCs. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 13316–13328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yu, E.H.; Scott, K.; Reeve, R.W. Electrochemical Reduction of Oxygen on Carbon Supported Pt and Pt/Ru Fuel Cell Electrodes in Alkaline Solutions. Fuel Cells 2003, 3, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yin, H.; Liu, S.; Zhang, C.; Bao, J.; Zheng, Y.; Han, M.; Dai, Z. Well-Coupled Graphene and Pd-Based Bimetallic Nanocrystals Nanocomposites for Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reduction Reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 2086–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lima, F.H.B.; Ticianelli, E.A. Oxygen electrocatalysis on ultra-thin porous coating rotating ring/disk platinum and platinum–cobalt electrodes in alkaline media. Electrochim. Acta 2004, 49, 4091–4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Todoroki, N.; Wadayama, T. Oxygen Reduction Reaction Activity for Cobalt-Deposited Pt(111) Model Catalyst Surfaces in Alkaline Solution. Denki Kagaku Oyobi Kōgyō Butsuri Kagaku 2018, 86, 243–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wohlgemuth, S.-A.; White, R.J.; Willinger, M.-G.; Titirici, M.-M.; Antonietti, M. A one-pot hydrothermal synthesis of sulfur and nitrogen doped carbon aerogels with enhanced electrocatalytic activity in the oxygen reduction reaction. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 1515–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zheng, Y.; Jiao, Y.; Jaroniec, M.; Jin, Y.; Qiao, S.Z. Nanostructured Metal-Free Electrochemical Catalysts for Highly Efficient Oxygen Reduction. Small 2012, 8, 3550–3566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qu, L.; Liu, Y.; Baek, J.-B.; Dai, L. Nitrogen-Doped Graphene as Efficient Metal-Free Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Reduction in Fuel Cells. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1321–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chen, Z.; Higgins, D.; Chen, Z. Nitrogen doped carbon nanotubes and their impact on the oxygen reduction reaction in fuel cells. Carbon 2010, 48, 3057–3065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Debe, M.K. Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells. Nature 2012, 486, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Steele, B.C.H.; Heinzel, A. Materials for fuel-cell technologies. Nature 2001, 414, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gasteiger, H.A.; Kocha, S.S.; Sompalli, B.; Wagner, F.T. Activity benchmarks and requirements for Pt, Pt-alloy, and non-Pt oxygen reduction catalysts for PEMFCs. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2005, 56, 9–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, H.; Grabstanowicz, L.R.; Barkholtz, H.M.; Rebollar, D.; Kaiser, Z.B.; Zhao, D.; Chen, B.-H.; Liu, D.-J. Impacts of Imidazolate Ligand on Performance of Zeolitic-Imidazolate Framework-Derived Oxygen Reduction Catalysts. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 2500–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, X.; Fan, X.; Lin, H.; Fu, H.; Wang, T.; Zheng, J.; Li, X. An efficient Co–N–C oxygen reduction catalyst with highly dispersed Co sites derived from a ZnCo bimetallic zeolitic imidazolate framework. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 37965–37973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Freire, C.; Fernandes, D.M.; Nunes, M.; Abdelkader, V.K. POM & MOF-based Electrocatalysts for Energy-Related Reactions. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 1703–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vikkisk, M.; Kruusenberg, I.; Ratso, S.; Joost, U.; Shulga, E.; Kink, I.; Rauwel, P.; Tammeveski, K. Enhanced electrocatalytic activity of nitrogen-doped multi-walled carbon nanotubes towards the oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline media. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 59495–59505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jahnke, H.; Schönborn, M.; Zimmermann, G. Organic dyestuffs as catalysts for fuel cells. Top. Curr. Chem. 1976, 61, 133–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gupta, S.; Tryk, D.; Bae, I.; Aldred, W.; Yeager, E. Heat-Treated Polyacrylonitrile-Based Catalysts for Oxygen Electroreduction. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1989, 19, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lefèvre, M.; Proietti, E.; Jaouen, F.; Dodelet, J.P. Iron-based catalysts with improved oxygen reduction activity in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Science 2009, 324, 71–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Pylypenko, S.; Mukherjee, S.; Olson, T.S.; Atanassov, P. Non-platinum oxygen reduction electrocatalysts based on pyrolyzed transition metal macrocycles. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 7875–7883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, G.; More, K.L.; Johnston, C.M.; Zelenay, P. High-performance electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction derived from polyaniline, iron, and cobalt. Science 2011, 332, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lin, H.; Wang, J.-W.; Guo, X.-W.; Yao, S.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Z.-M.; Lu, T.-B. Phosphorized polyoxometalate-etched iron-hydroxide porous nanotubes for efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 24479–24485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, S.; Oms, O.; Hao, L.; Liu, R.; Wang, M.; Zhang, Y.; He, H.-Y.; Dolbecq, A.; Marrot, J.; Keita, B.; et al. High Oxygen Reduction Reaction Performances of Cathode Materials Combining Polyoxometalates, Coordination Complexes, and Carboneous Supports. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 38486–38498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fernandes, D.M.; Araújo, M.P.; Haider, A.; Mougharbel, A.S.; Fernandes, A.J.S.; Kortz, U.; Freire, C. Polyoxometalate-graphene Electrocatalysts for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ChemElectroChem 2018, 5, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fernandes, D.M.; Novais, H.C.; Bacsa, R.; Serp, P.; Bachiller-Baeza, B.; Rodríguez-Ramos, I.; Guerrero-Ruiz, A.; Freire, C. Polyoxotungstate@Carbon Nanocomposites As Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR) Electrocatalysts. Langmuir 2018, 34, 6376–6387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. He, S.; Liu, Q.; Wang, X. Polyoxometalate-based materials: Quasi-homogeneous single-atom catalysts with atomic-precision structures. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 5758–5770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shen, H.; Thomas, T.; Rasaki, S.A.; Saad, A.; Hu, C.; Wang, J.; Yang, M. Oxygen Reduction Reactions of Fe–N–C Catalysts: Current Status and the Way Forward. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2019, 2, 252–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jarrais, B.; Guedes, A.; Freire, C. Heteroatom-Doped Carbon Nanomaterials as Metal-Free Catalysts for the Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 1737–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Navaee, A.; Salimi, A.; Soltanian, S.; Servati, P. Facile one-pot synthesis of platinum nanoparticles decorated nitrogen-graphene with high electrocatalytic performance for oxygen reduction and anodic fuels oxidation. J. Power Sources 2015, 277, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Olalde, B.; Aizpurua, J.M.; García, A.; Bustero, I.; Obieta, I.; Jurado, M.J. Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Functionalized with Poly(l-lactic acid): A Comparative Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 10663–10667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fernandes, D.M.; Freire, C. Carbon Nanomaterial–Phosphomolybdate Composites for Oxidative Electrocatalysis. ChemElectroChem 2015, 2, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Daems, N.; Sheng, X.; Vankelecom, I.F.J.; Pescarmona, P.P. Metal-free doped carbon materials as electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 4085–4110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lee, D.W.; De Los Santos, V.L.; Seo, J.W.; Felix, L.L.; Bustamante, D.A.; Cole, J.M.; Barnes, C.H.W. The Structure of Graphite Oxide: Investigation of Its Surface Chemical Groups. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 5723–5728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kumarasinghe, A.R.; Samaranayake, L.; Bondino, F.; Magnano, E.; Kottegoda, N.; Carlino, E.; Ratnayake, U.N.; de Alwis, A.A.P.; Karunaratne, V.; Amaratunga, G.A.J. Self-Assembled Multilayer Graphene Oxide Membrane and Carbon Nanotubes Synthesized Using a Rare Form of Natural Graphite. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 9507–9519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lyon, D.K.; Miller, W.K.; Novet, T.; Domaille, P.J.; Evitt, E.; Johnson, D.C.; Finke, R.G. Highly oxidation resistant inorganic-porphyrin analog polyoxometalate oxidation catalysts. 1. The synthesis and characterization of aqueous-soluble potassium salts of α2-P2W17O61(Mn+·OH2)(n−10) and organic solvent soluble tetra-n-butylammonium salts of α2-P2W17O61(Mn+·Br)(n−11) (M = Mn3+, Fe3+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7209–7221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Amiri, A.; Saadati-Moshtaghin, H.R.; Zonoz, F.M.; Targhoo, A. Preparation and characterization of magnetic Wells–Dawson heteropoly acid nanoparticles for magnetic solid-phase extraction of aromatic amines in water samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1483, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aricò, A.S.; Bruce, P.; Scrosati, B.; Tarascon, J.-M.; van Schalkwijk, W. Nanostructured materials for advanced energy conversion and storage devices. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 366–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Huang, M.-C.; Teng, H. Nitrogen-containing carbons from phenol–formaldehyde resins and their catalytic activity in NO reduction with NH3. Carbon 2003, 41, 951–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Artyushkova, K.; Serov, A.; Rojas-Carbonell, S.; Atanassov, P. Chemistry of Multitudinous Active Sites for Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Transition Metal–Nitrogen–Carbon Electrocatalysts. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 25917–25928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Limani, N.; Marques, I.S.; Jarrais, B.; Fernandes, A.J.S.; Freire, C.; Fernandes, D.M. Cobalt Phosphotungstate-Based Composites as Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reactions. Catalysts 2022, 12, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Estrade-Szwarckopf, H. XPS photoemission in carbonaceous materials: A “defect” peak beside the graphitic asymmetric peak. Carbon 2004, 42, 1713–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lipińska, M.E.; Rebelo, S.L.H.; Pereira, M.F.R.; Gomes, J.A.N.F.; Freire, C.; Figueiredo, J.L. New insights into the functionalization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes with aniline derivatives. Carbon 2012, 50, 3280–3294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ai, W.; Luo, Z.; Jiang, J.; Zhu, J.; Du, Z.; Fan, Z.; Xie, L.; Zhang, H.; Huang, W.; Yu, T. Nitrogen and Sulfur Codoped Graphene: Multifunctional Electrode Materials for High-Performance Li-Ion Batteries and Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6186–6192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liu, Y.; Qiao, Y.; Wei, G.; Li, S.; Lu, Z.; Wang, X.; Lou, X. Sodium storage mechanism of N, S co-doped nanoporous carbon: Experimental design and theoretical evaluation. Energy Storage Mater. 2018, 11, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Novais, H.C.; Jarrais, B.; Haider, A.; Kortz, U.; Guerrero-Ruiz, A.; Rodríguez-Ramos, I.; Freire, C.; Fernandes, D.M. Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reduction Reaction on 48-Tungsto-8-Phosphate Wheel Anchored on Carbon Nanomaterials. Electrocatalysis 2022, 14, 294–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Imar, S.; Yaqub, M.; Maccato, C.; Dickinson, C.; Laffir, F.; Vagin, M.; McCormac, T. Nitrate and Nitrite Electrocatalytic Reduction at Layer-by-Layer Films Composed of Dawson-Type Heteropolyanions Mono-Substituted with Transitional Metal Ions and Silver Nanoparticles. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 184, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, X.-H.; Chen, W.-L.; He, P.; Wang, T.; Liu, D.; Li, Y.-W.; Li, Y.-G.; Wang, E.-B. Dawson-type polyoxometalate-based vacancies g-C3N4 composite-nanomaterials for efficient photocatalytic nitrogen fixation. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2019, 6, 3315–3326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dai, L.; Xue, Y.; Qu, L.; Choi, H.-J.; Baek, J.-B. Metal-free catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 4823–4892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ni, S.; Li, Z.; Yang, J. Oxygen molecule dissociation on carbon nanostructures with different types of nitrogen doping. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 1184–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Subramanian, N.P.; Li, X.; Nallathambi, V.; Kumaraguru, S.P.; Colon-Mercado, H.; Wu, G.; Lee, J.-W.; Popov, B.N. Nitrogen-modified carbon-based catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2009, 188, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fernandes, D.M.; Mathumba, P.; Fernandes, A.J.S.; Iwuoha, E.I.; Freire, C. Towards efficient oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts through graphene doping. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 319, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kakaei, K.; Esrafili, M.D.; Ehsani, A. (Eds.) Chapter 6—Oxygen Reduction Reaction. In Interface Science and Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Volume 27, pp. 203–252. [Google Scholar]
  66. Zheng, Y.; Jiao, Y.; Ge, L.; Jaroniec, M.; Qiao, S.Z. Two-step boron and nitrogen doping in graphene for enhanced synergistic catalysis. Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 3192–3198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mamlouk, M.; Kumar, S.S.; Gouerec, P.; Scott, K. Electrochemical and fuel cell evaluation of Co based catalyst for oxygen reduction in anion exchange polymer membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 7594–7600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhou, R.; Zheng, Y.; Jaroniec, M.; Qiao, S.-Z. Determination of the electron transfer number for the oxygen reduction reaction: From theory to experiment. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 4720–4728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ramaswamy, N.; Mukerjee, S. Fundamental mechanistic understanding of electrocatalysis of oxygen reduction on Pt and non-Pt surfaces: Acid versus alkaline media. Adv. Phys. Chem. 2012, 2012, 491604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fletcher, S. Tafel slopes from first principles. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2009, 13, 537–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zúñiga, C.; Candia-Onfray, C.; Venegas, R.; Muñoz, K.; Urra, J.; Sánchez-Arenillas, M.; Marco, J.F.; Zagal, J.H.; Recio, F.J. Elucidating the mechanism of the oxygen reduction reaction for pyrolyzed Fe–N–C catalysts in basic media. Electrochem. Commun. 2019, 102, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jiao, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Jaroniec, M.; Qiao, S.Z. Design of electrocatalysts for oxygen- and hydrogen-involving energy conversion reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2060–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Fan, L.-Z. MOF-derived CoSe2 microspheres with hollow interiors as high-performance electrocatalysts for the enhanced oxygen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 15310–15314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Liu, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, S.; Yu, F.; Yu, M.; Chiang, C.Y.; Zhou, W.; Zhao, J.; Qiu, J. Metal–organic-framework-derived hybrid carbon nanocages as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and evolution. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Lach, J.; Wróbel, K.; Wróbel, J.; Podsadni, P.; Czerwiński, A. Applications of carbon in lead-acid batteries: A review. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2019, 23, 693–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Liang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhou, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Regier, T.; Dai, H. Covalent Hybrid of Spinel Manganese–Cobalt Oxide and Graphene as Advanced Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 3517–3523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Araújo, M.P.; Nunes, M.; Rocha, I.M.; Pereira, M.F.R.; Freire, C. Co3O4 Nanoparticles Anchored on Selectively Oxidized Graphene Flakes as Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reactions. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 10064–10076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lei, Z.; Feng, W.; Feng, C.; Zhou, W.; Wei, C.; Wang, X. Nitrified coke wastewater sludge flocs: An attractive precursor for N,S dual-doped graphene-like carbon with ultrahigh capacitance and oxygen reduction performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 2012–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, Z.; Lu, Y.; Yan, Y.; Larissa, T.Y.P.; Zhang, X.; Wuu, D.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Y.; Wang, X. Core-shell carbon materials derived from metal-organic frameworks as an efficient oxygen bifunctional electrocatalyst. Nano Energy 2016, 30, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Xia, S.; Guo, W.; Cai, N.; Sun, L.; Zhou, H.; Lu, W.; Chen, X.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Y.; Yang, H.; et al. Synthesis and application in oxygen reduction reaction of N-doping porous graphitic carbon from biomass waste. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021, 224, 107028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Olah, G.A. Towards Oil Independence Through Renewable Methanol Chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kumar, A.; Daw, P.; Milstein, D. Homogeneous Catalysis for Sustainable Energy: Hydrogen and Methanol Economies, Fuels from Biomass, and Related Topics. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 385–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Lo Vecchio, C.; Sebastián, D.; Lázaro, M.J.; Aricò, A.S.; Baglio, V. Methanol-Tolerant M–N–C Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reactions in Acidic Media and Their Application in Direct Methanol Fuel Cells. Catalysts 2018, 8, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mathumba, P.; Fernandes, D.M.; Matos, R.; Iwuoha, E.I.; Freire, C. Metal Oxide (Co3O4 and Mn3O4) Impregnation into S, N-doped Graphene for Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR). Materials 2020, 13, 1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Hoang, S.; Guo, S.; Hahn, N.T.; Bard, A.J.; Mullins, C.B. Visible Light Driven Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation on Nitrogen-Modified TiO2 Nanowires. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Tuci, G.; Zafferoni, C.; Rossin, A.; Milella, A.; Luconi, L.; Innocenti, M.; Phuoc, L.T.; Duong-Viet, C.; Pham-Huu, C.; Giambastiani, G. Chemically functionalized carbon nanotubes with pyridine groups as easily tunable N-decorated nanomaterials for the oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline medium. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 3460–3470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Muthuswamy, N.; Buan, M.E.M.; Walmsley, J.C.; Rønning, M. Evaluation of ORR active sites in nitrogen-doped carbon nanofibers by KOH post treatment. Catal. Today 2018, 301, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Chen, X.; Zhang, W.; Qu, Y.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Lu, C. Solvent-free synthesis of honeycomb-like N-doped porous carbon derived from biomass pine sawdust as an efficient metal-free electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2022, 926, 116909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ingavale, S.; Patil, I.; Prabakaran, K.; Swami, A. Microwave-assisted synthesis of cobalt-polyoxometalate@ carbon black nanocomposites and their electrocatalytic ability toward oxygen reduction reaction. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 7366–7379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fernandes, D.M.; Mestre, A.S.; Martins, A.; Nunes, N.; Carvalho, A.P.; Freire, C. Biomass-derived nanoporous carbons as electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Catal. Today 2020, 357, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Nunes, M.; Fernandes, D.M.; Rocha, I.M.; Pereira, M.F.; Mbomekalle, I.M.; de Oliveira, P.; Freire, C. Phosphomolybdate@ Carbon-Based Nanocomposites as Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 6257–6266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Su, Y.; Jiang, H.; Zhu, Y.; Yang, X.; Shen, J.; Zou, W.; Chen, J.; Li, C. Enriched graphitic N-doped carbon-supported Fe3O4 nanoparticles as efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 7281–7287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, H.; Li, H.; Wang, H.; He, K.; Wang, S.; Tang, Y.; Chen, J. NiCo2O4/N-doped graphene as an advanced electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. J. Power Sources 2015, 280, 640–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yang, Z.; Wu, J.; Zheng, X.; Wang, Z.; Yang, R. Enhanced catalytic activity for the oxygen reduction reaction with co-doping of phosphorus and iron in carbon. J. Power Sources 2015, 277, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ning, R.; Tian, J.; Asiri, A.M.; Qusti, A.H.; Al-Youbi, A.O.; Sun, X. Spinel CuCo2O4 nanoparticles supported on N-doped reduced graphene oxide: A highly active and stable hybrid electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. Langmuir 2013, 29, 13146–13151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hossen, M.M.; Artyushkova, K.; Atanassov, P.; Serov, A. Synthesis and characterization of high performing Fe-NC catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in Alkaline Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. J. Power Sources 2018, 375, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lu, F.; Fan, K.; Cui, L.; Li, B.; Yang, Y.; Zong, L.; Wang, L. Engineering FeN4 active sites onto nitrogen-rich carbon with tubular channels for enhanced oxygen reduction reaction performance. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2022, 313, 121464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Inorganics 11 00388 g001
Figure 1. FTIR spectra in the 4000–500 cm−1 range of K7 [P2W17(FeOH2)O61] (black) and of the composites P2W17Fe@GF_N8 (red) and P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 (blue).
Figure 1. FTIR spectra in the 4000–500 cm−1 range of K7 [P2W17(FeOH2)O61] (black) and of the composites P2W17Fe@GF_N8 (red) and P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 (blue).
Inorganics 11 00388 g001
Inorganics 11 00388 g002
Figure 2. XPS deconvoluted spectra of corresponding elements in the P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 composite.
Figure 2. XPS deconvoluted spectra of corresponding elements in the P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 composite.
Inorganics 11 00388 g002
Inorganics 11 00388 g003
Figure 3. SEM images of P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 (a) and P2W17Fe@GF_N8 (b) at 50,000× magnification.
Figure 3. SEM images of P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 (a) and P2W17Fe@GF_N8 (b) at 50,000× magnification.
Inorganics 11 00388 g003
Inorganics 11 00388 g004
Figure 4. SEM and EDX elemental mapping images of P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 at 5000× magnification for the elements C (red), O (green), W (blue), P (yellow) and Fe (purple).
Figure 4. SEM and EDX elemental mapping images of P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 at 5000× magnification for the elements C (red), O (green), W (blue), P (yellow) and Fe (purple).
Inorganics 11 00388 g004
Inorganics 11 00388 g005
Figure 5. CVs of P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 (a) and P2W17Fe@GF_N8 (b) modified electrodes in N2-saturated (dash line) and O2-saturated (full line) 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH solution at 0.005 V s−1.
Figure 5. CVs of P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N8 (a) and P2W17Fe@GF_N8 (b) modified electrodes in N2-saturated (dash line) and O2-saturated (full line) 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH solution at 0.005 V s−1.
Inorganics 11 00388 g005
Inorganics 11 00388 g006aInorganics 11 00388 g006b
Figure 6. ORR LSV curves acquired using an RDE in O2-saturated KOH solution (0.1 mol dm−3) at 1600 rpm and 0.005 V s−1 of commercial Pt/C (20 wt %), P2W17Fe@CM nanocomposites and nitrogen-doped carbon materials (a); nO2 at several potential values (b); estimated percentage of HO2− produced with RRDE for P2W17Fe@CM and Pt/C (20 wt %) in O2-saturated 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH solution at 1600 rpm; the disk potential was swept at v = 0.005 V s−1 and the ring potential was kept at E = 0.2 V versus Ag/AgCl (c); ORR Tafel plots for P2W17Fe@CM obtained from LSV data in Figure 6a, where current densities were normalized to the mass of each EC (d).
Figure 6. ORR LSV curves acquired using an RDE in O2-saturated KOH solution (0.1 mol dm−3) at 1600 rpm and 0.005 V s−1 of commercial Pt/C (20 wt %), P2W17Fe@CM nanocomposites and nitrogen-doped carbon materials (a); nO2 at several potential values (b); estimated percentage of HO2− produced with RRDE for P2W17Fe@CM and Pt/C (20 wt %) in O2-saturated 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH solution at 1600 rpm; the disk potential was swept at v = 0.005 V s−1 and the ring potential was kept at E = 0.2 V versus Ag/AgCl (c); ORR Tafel plots for P2W17Fe@CM obtained from LSV data in Figure 6a, where current densities were normalized to the mass of each EC (d).
Inorganics 11 00388 g006aInorganics 11 00388 g006b
Inorganics 11 00388 g007
Figure 7. Chronoamperometric response of the ECs at 1600 rpm in 0.1 mol dm−3 O2-saturated KOH at E = 0.46 V vs. RHE for 36,000 s (a) and E = 0.46 V vs. RHE with the addition of 0.5 mol dm−3 methanol after ≈ 500 s (b).
Figure 7. Chronoamperometric response of the ECs at 1600 rpm in 0.1 mol dm−3 O2-saturated KOH at E = 0.46 V vs. RHE for 36,000 s (a) and E = 0.46 V vs. RHE with the addition of 0.5 mol dm−3 methanol after ≈ 500 s (b).
Inorganics 11 00388 g007
Table 1. XPS surface atomic percentages for the pristine carbon materials, the doped carbon materials and the prepared composites.
Table 1. XPS surface atomic percentages for the pristine carbon materials, the doped carbon materials and the prepared composites.
MaterialXPS Atomic % a
C1sO1sN1sP2pW4fFe 2p
GF96.83.2-----
MWCNT98.91.1----
GF_N897.02.01.0---
MWCNT_N898.01.01.0---
P2W17Fe@GF_N892.66.00.620.100.610.16
P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N895.03.40.680.120.630.12
a Calculated based on the areas of the corresponding bands in the high-resolution XPS spectra.
Table 2. Main ORR parameters obtained from polarisation curves recorded in O2-saturated 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH solution for the different materials tested.
Table 2. Main ORR parameters obtained from polarisation curves recorded in O2-saturated 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH solution for the different materials tested.
SamplesEonset vs. RHE (V)jL (mA cm−2)Tafel Slope (mV dec−1)nO2
Pt/C0.94−4.7894.0
GF0.72−2.0632.4
MWCNT0.69−2.0542.1
GF_N80.83−3.3702.5
MWCNT_N80.83−4.0473.5
P2W17Fe@GF_N80.83−3.3583.1
P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N80.84−3.9483.4
Table 3. Electrocatalytically active surface area (ECSA) values of the carbon supports and their corresponding POM-based composites.
Table 3. Electrocatalytically active surface area (ECSA) values of the carbon supports and their corresponding POM-based composites.
CM SupportCdl (mF cm−2)CompositeCdl (mF cm−2)Composite/Carbon Support Cdl Ratio
GF_N80.0228P2W17Fe@GF_N80.03171.39
MWCNT_N80.0203P2W17Fe@MWCNT_N80.08083.98
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Novais, H.C.; Jarrais, B.; Mbomekallé, I.-M.; Teillout, A.-L.; Oliveira, P.d.; Freire, C.; Fernandes, D.M. Hybrids Composed of an Fe-Containing Wells–Dawson Polyoxometalate and Carbon Nanomaterials as Promising Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Inorganics 2023, 11, 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11100388

AMA Style

Novais HC, Jarrais B, Mbomekallé I-M, Teillout A-L, Oliveira Pd, Freire C, Fernandes DM. Hybrids Composed of an Fe-Containing Wells–Dawson Polyoxometalate and Carbon Nanomaterials as Promising Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Inorganics. 2023; 11(10):388. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11100388

Chicago/Turabian Style

Novais, Hugo C., Bruno Jarrais, Israël-Martyr Mbomekallé, Anne-Lucie Teillout, Pedro de Oliveira, Cristina Freire, and Diana M. Fernandes. 2023. "Hybrids Composed of an Fe-Containing Wells–Dawson Polyoxometalate and Carbon Nanomaterials as Promising Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction" Inorganics 11, no. 10: 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11100388

APA Style

Novais, H. C., Jarrais, B., Mbomekallé, I. -M., Teillout, A. -L., Oliveira, P. d., Freire, C., & Fernandes, D. M. (2023). Hybrids Composed of an Fe-Containing Wells–Dawson Polyoxometalate and Carbon Nanomaterials as Promising Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Inorganics, 11(10), 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11100388

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop