Breakdown Properties of Cables with Different Inorganic, Insulating Nanomaterials

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The simulation and experimental results presented in the manuscript are promissing. However, the introduction section may be improved for the benefit of the readers. The state of the art may e fine-tuned. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors

There are important fails in your work that cannot be allowed in a scientific publication. You should include citations in the text, a standard practice that you have omitted. This is surprising, since you should know the standard practice for a scientific paper. Besides, the English language must be corrected. Before you perfomr these actions, it is not possible for me to admit this paper.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

To the authors of "Breakdown Properties of Cables with Different Inorganic Nano-insulating Material"

Although the research is interesting, the presentation must be improved.
The main observation is that the proportion of nanoparticles used to obtain nanocomposites is not mentioned.
Then, wherever a solution is mentioned (page 2), its concentration must also be mentioned.
Also, the authors do not mention the procedure after which the surface of the nanoparticles was modified and with what.
All properties change due to the addition of nanoparticles but the authors do not explain why. This part should be resumed a bit and the results collaborated with the ZnO and MMT properties.
I think that in title the affirmation "Nano-insulating Material" must be replaced with insulating nanomaterials.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors

you have improved the manuscript

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper can be accepted in present form.