Next Article in Journal
Applications of Natural Products in Food
Next Article in Special Issue
Down-Regulation of FAD2-1 Gene Expression Alters Lysophospholipid Composition in the Endosperm of Rice Grain and Influences Starch Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Validation of an Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method to Determine Maduramicin in Crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) and Evaluate Food Safety
Previous Article in Special Issue
Green Processing, Germinating and Wet Milling Brown Rice (Oryza sativa) for Beverages: Physicochemical Effects
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/foods10020302
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Risk of Bacillus cereus in Relation to Rice and Derivatives

by
Dolores Rodrigo
*,
Cristina M. Rosell
and
Antonio Martinez
Instituto de Agroquimica y Tecnología de Alimentos (IATA-CSIC), Paterna, 46980 Valencia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2021, 10(2), 302; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020302
Submission received: 23 December 2020 / Revised: 19 January 2021 / Accepted: 26 January 2021 / Published: 2 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rice: From Staple Food to Innovative, Safe, Authentic and Healthy Foods)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Rice is a very popular food throughout the world and the basis of the diet of the citizens of many countries. It is used as a raw material for the preparation of many complex dishes in which different ingredients are involved. Rice, as a consequence of their cultivation, harvesting, and handling, is often contaminated with spores of Bacillus cereus, a ubiquitous microorganism found mainly in the soil. B. cereus can multiply under temperature conditions as low as 4 °C in foods that contain rice and have been cooked or subjected to treatments that do not produce commercial sterility. B. cereus produces diarrhoeal or emetic foodborne toxin when the consumer eats food in which a sufficient number of cells have grown. These circumstances mean that every year many outbreaks of intoxication or intestinal problems related to this microorganism are reported. This work is a review from the perspective of risk assessment of the risk posed by B. cereus to the health of consumers and of some control measures that can be used to mitigate such a risk.

1. Introduction

Bacillus cereus is present in many foods due to its ubiquitous nature and has become one of the top ten responsible for many cases of food and waterborne outbreaks in humans. The demands of consumers for complex and mildly processed foods with a limited refrigerated shelf-life are driving this increase on the B. cereus outbreaks all over the world as has been recognized by the European Food Safety Authority EFSA and Center for Disease Control (CDC) report [1]. In 2018, B. cereus was involved in a total of 98 reported outbreaks among members’ states of the European Union [1]. The impact of those numbers is clearer by saying that those represented the 1.9% of total outbreaks in the European Union, with 1539 people affected with 111 hospitalizations and 1 death [1]. Moreover, recent outbreaks in other countries have been also associated with this pathogen, e.g., 45 cases identified in an outbreak at a restaurant in Canberra (Australia) [2] and 200 students affected in an outbreak at a school in China [3]. Two types of food disease can be produced by B. cereus: diarrhoeal and emetic syndromes. Diarrhoeal illness is produced when enough B. cereus cells are consumed and the microorganism is implanted and grows in the small intestine producing the toxin, whereas the emetic syndrome appears when a food containing pre-formed cereulide toxin produced during B. cereus growth is consumed [4,5].
Generally, B. cereus has been associated with complex foodstuffs that include rice as ingredient; nevertheless, other rice-based products and farinaceous foods, such as pasta and noodles, can be also a vehicle for contamination and being involved in B. cereus intoxication [5]. This fact has promoted research on rice and carbohydrate-rich products and on improving decontamination and processing technologies that may reduce the risk of B. cereus poisoning. Outbreaks caused by B. cereus are due, in a large number of occasions, to the consumption of rice contaminated with spores or vegetative cells [6,7] (about 95% of cases of emetic disease are related to the consumption of rice [8]). Specifically, this etiological agent produced gastrointestinal diseases caused by the consumption of Chinese fried rice [9,10]. This is due to the way in which it is cooked; it is boiled in large quantities, kept unrefrigerated for several hours, depending on consumer’s demand, before being further processed (fried or heated). During this unrefrigerated storage the microorganism can grow and/or produce the emetic toxin that will not be destroyed or inactivated by a subsequent processing step [6]. These culinary practices are coherent from the logistical point of view; however, rice should be stored below 7 °C or above 63 °C, which are the limit temperatures for the germination of heat-resistant spores [11]. Those authors found that in 40 samples of local and imported rice, all of them contained B. cereus concentrations larger than 1100 CFU/g. Other authors [12] found that 94 out of 178 raw rice samples were contaminated with B. cereus in the United States. Therefore, reported results confirm how ubiquitous this microorganism, especially in rice-based foods, is. Nevertheless, the microbial loads are different depending on the rice form, being the presence of high concentrations of microorganisms more common in brown rice than in white rice, due to the processing that the cereal receives in each case. In fact, a study carried out with samples of white and husked rice reported concentrations of the pathogen around 2.5 × 101 CFU/g in husked rice and 2.5 × 103 CFU/g in brown rice [13].
Rice is the grain of herbaceous plants of the genus Oryza cultivated for more than 8000 years and of which about 750 million tons are produced annually mainly for human food, although the lower quality crops are destined to animal feeding [14]. It is a staple food for more than half of the world population and especially in underdeveloped countries. This cereal is presented to the consumer in different ways: whole, husked, or white depending on the treatment to which the grain was subjected. It also accepts many forms of industrial cooking and processing, steaming, parboiling, instant, ground (rice flour, pasta, and cookies) [15]. Each of them represents a different risk for the consumer depending on the subsequent treatment that consumer applies prior to consumption.
Rice, with a pH close to 7, consisting of 79% of carbohydrates, 7% protein, and 2% fat, plus vitamins and minerals, can act as an excellent growth medium for B. cereus once it has been cooked because it is in that moment when the humidity of the substrate reaches water activity values suitable for the growth of the microorganism. Even if the vegetative cells of B. cereus do not grow, they can survive 48 weeks on fresh and dry storage without loss of viability. Nevertheless, the viability of the pathogens is reduced after 16 weeks, if the storage occurs at temperatures above 45 °C with water activity around 0.78 [8].
The main problem posed by contamination with B. cereus of foods is the presence of heat-resistant spores that survive normal cooking temperatures for rice, or other raw materials or processed products, which is usually boiling water close to 100 °C [16]. Studies show that during normal cooking, around 20 min depending on the variety of rice, there are 2–3 decimal reductions on the initial spore load so the risk in the final product depends largely on the initial concentration of microorganisms and hygienic measures during handling, cooking, or processing [9,17]. After cooking, the remaining spores are capable of growing up to 107–109 CFU/g after 24 h at 26 or 32 °C respectively [10,11,18,19]. Spores germinate and grow depending on storage temperature; optimum growth temperatures in rice are 30–36 °C. After 10 days of storage at 8 °C, a growth of 104 CFU/g to 108 CFU/g was observed [20].
This review paper addresses the problem of B. cereus in rice and its derivatives under a microbiological risk assessment perspective, summarizing some control measures and improving processing technologies that could be considered to reduce the risk of the presence of the microorganism in these products and B. cereus toxin.

2. Hazard Description and Growth in Rice

B. cereus is a rod shaped spore-forming bacterium that belongs to the Bacillus genus. It is Gram-positive and motille due to flagels. B. anthracis, B. cereus, B. mycoides, B. thuringiensis, B. pseudomycoides, and B. weihenstephanensis are representative species of the 18 identified belonging to this genus [21]. Data of the genoma have shown that B. anthracis, B. cereus, and B. thuringiensis are very closely related; B. thuringiensis is an insect pathogen used in biocontrol and B. anthracis bacterium is responsible for anthrax [22,23]. These species show phenotypic properties and a high level of similarity in their DNA, making biochemical identification quite difficult [22]. Different species had traditionally been differentiated by their phenotypic characteristics (e.g., shape, optimal growth temperature, resistance to acidity) but currently, other more powerful methods are being used such as digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) and/or average nucleotide identity (ANI) values [24], signature sequences (e.g., in the 16 S rRNA and cspA genes) or the presence of specific virulence factors (e.g., cytK-1 or anthrax toxin genes), and MALDI-TOF MS analysis [25] or real time PCR [26]. A recent study for Carroll [27] describes the first whole genome sequencing (WGS) characterization of isolates linked to an outbreak caused by members of the B. cereus group.
B. cereus is a habitual saprophyte, which is resistant to low humidity, high temperatures, dehydration, radiation, and acidity; spores are ubiquitous in the environment, inhabitant of soil, water, vegetables, and air and can be found in the soil at concentrations in the order of 106 CFU/g [28]. This microorganism is of interest in public health as it is considered an opportunistic pathogen that produces food toxins [16,29].
Within the Bacillus genus, B. cereus is the species most frequently associated with food outbreaks [30]. B. cereus is a facultative aerobic bacillus that can grow in highly variable conditions, a broad pH range between 4.5 to 9.5, at a minimum water activity for growth of 0.93, and in a broad range of temperatures from 4 °C (psychrotrophic strains) to 48 °C and at a NaCl concentrations up to 7% [31]. Although, as mentioned before, B. cereus tolerates a wide range of pH, the presence of 0.1% acetic acid is sufficient to inhibit the growth of the microorganism [29]. The optimum pH range from 6 to 7 and its tolerance to stress conditions due to pH, improves under anaerobically conditions [32]. Some strains of B. cereus are motile thanks to peritric flagella, although non-motile strains have also been described [13,33].
Although B. cereus have been considered as pathogenic microorganisms, researches described that some strains of this microorganism can be considered as beneficial and they have been used as animal probiotics in some formulations [34] and as growth promoters in plants [35].
The optimal growth temperature of B. cereus ranges between 30 and 40 °C although some strains can grow at 55 °C. Nevertheless, there are studies that have described that the strains responsible for emetic syndrome have a minimal growth temperature of 15 °C [31]. Even some strains show tolerance to lower temperatures, 4 °C, being considered psychrotrophic or psychrotolerant. Particularly, a study has suggested that B. cereus isolates from dairy products have adapted to those environmental conditions [36].
Vegetative cells die immediately below pH 4.3 in relation to previous exposure to acids in the environment before being ingested, despite the fact that some strains show great tolerance to gastric acids [37]. That could be the reason why the most frequent disease produced by the consumption of rice at neutral pH is the emetic syndrome, because at that pH, the microorganism lacks the necessary resistance against gastric acids to pass the intestinal tract and grows in the intestine producing toxins for emetic syndrome. By contrast, the spores have great tolerance to pH, being their viability from pH 1 to 9 [37]. In those conditions, when spores are ingested with the food, they can germinate in the small intestine and produce the diarrhoeal toxin.
Growth of B. cereus is optimal in the presence of oxygen, although the microorganism can grow anaerobically, but toxin production is undetectable in this environment [31]. Regarding the water activity (aw), for vegetative cells, it should be in the range of 0.912 to 0.950 for growth [38].
Rice derivatives (boiled, fried), due to its composition and chemical characteristics, represent an excellent growth medium for bacteria and can support the growth of B. cereus at different temperature conditions. B. cereus spores can survive perfectly in the dehydrated rice, without loss of viability for at least 48 weeks of storage. However, some loss of viability has been observed if it is stored at 45 °C and water activity of 0.78 [39].
B. cereus spores have the ability to survive the cooking treatments commonly given to rice. There is high heterogeneity in the thermal resistance of the spores. Some authors [40] indicated decimal reduction (D) values between 0.94 and 11 min at 95 °C and 0.22 and 2.5 min at 100 °C in double-distilled water. Another study reported a D value of approximately 3.5 min for spores in rice at 97.8 °C [41]. With those data, and considering a standard cooking process for rice, for example 100 °C for 20 min, it is clear that there will be some level of reduction in the number of spores in the food, but it will not be enough to ensure the food safety of the food for this microorganism.
The spores that remain alive after a long-term storage of cooked rice, even at low temperatures, germinate and some degree of growth of B. cereus will take place. Ultee et al. [42] indicated that B. cereus reached levels of 104 to 108 in ten days when the product was stored at 8 °C.

3. B. cereus Characterization Included Dose-Response Relationship

B. cereus produces two types of illness, the emetic and diarrhoeal, depending on the context at which it grows. The diarrheal syndrome is produced as a consequence of the ingestion of a large number of vegetative cells or spores that pass the stomach barrier, during their growth in the small intestine [43]. The emetic toxin “cereulide” is a cyclic peptide, produced during the growth of B. cereus in the food itself, when the conditions of pH, water activity, and temperature are suitable [44]. It has a strongly hydrophobic character, therefore, to cause food poisoning, it must be attached to the target cells attached or dissolved in vehicles found in food [44]. This type of food intoxication is most often associated with the ingestion of cereal products, especially rice [45,46].
Agata et al. [47] studied the growth and emetic toxin production of B. cereus in cooked rice. They stored the cooked rice at different temperatures, and results indicated that the higher the temperature, the faster the growth of the microorganism and the sooner the toxin was produced. The production of cereulide was strongly correlated with the growth of bacteria in boiled rice. The growth and toxin levels at 30 °C for 24 h were similar for boiled and fried rice. In the past, studies carried out with human volunteers [48,49,50] found a weak significance for symptoms when B. cereus cells were ingested.
A human dose response relationship has not been described for either the emetic or diarrhoeal toxin produced by B. cereus. Epidemiological evidence suggests that the majority of outbreaks worldwide due to B. cereus have been associated with concentrations higher than 105 CFU/g in implicated foods [51,52,53].

3.1. Diarrhoeal Illness

The diarrhoeal syndrome is an example of a toxic infection. It is produced by enterotoxins. In the literature, the value quoted for the minimum infective dose for the diarrheal illness caused by B. cereus is generally higher than 105 cells per gram [51,52,53]. Kramer and Gilbert [6] stated that the levels of B. cereus recovered from foods implicated in outbreaks of the diarrhoeal-type illness have always been within the range 5 × 105 to 9.5 × 108 CFU/g. The symptoms of B. cereus diarrheal type food intoxication include abdominal pain, watery diarrheal, rectal tenesmus, moderate nausea that may accompany diarrheal, seldom vomiting, and no fever [43]. Symptoms develop within 6–15 h and can persist for 24 h. This syndrome is rather mild and tends to mimic the symptoms of Clostridium perfringens food poisoning [54].

3.2. Emetic Illness

The emetic illness, where toxin is pre-formed in the food, requires a high cell concentration (105 to 108 CFU/g) to produce clinically significant amounts of toxin [54]. Heating foods before consumption might remove vegetative cells of B. cereus but it will not destroy the heat-stable emetic toxin. Infective dose, in the case of emetic illness, is not relevant, since the disease is intoxication dependent on the amount of toxin ingested. In an outbreak in Finland, a concentration of 1.6 μg/g of emetic toxin was found in the food, assuming that 300 g of food was consumed; the toxic dose could be as high as 450 μg/g [30]. In another outbreak in the Netherlands, concentrations of 0.03–13.3 μg/g of food were found [54]. The signs of B. cereus emetic type food poisoning include nausea, vomiting, and headaches, abdominal cramps, and/or diarrheal. The incubation period was estimated on 1 to 5 h after the consumption of food containing cereulide-heat-and gastric acid-resistant peptide. The symptoms of this illness mimic those of Staphylococcus aureus food poisoning [54].

4. Evaluation of Exposition to B. cereus in Rice

In general, foods are contaminated with B. cereus spores by soil. The number of cells in soil can range from 103 to 105 spores of B. cereus per gram [36,55]. Spores of B. cereus can develop biofilms due to its adhesive properties; in consequence, foods can be contaminated during processing when circulating by pipes, surfaces, or belts [56]. This microorganism frequently appears as a spore in ready-to-eat foods since the vegetative cells usually are destroyed by the thermal processes (cooking or frying). Storage of processed products without refrigeration or under temperature abuse, or the use of raw materials in complex foods allowing B. cereus spores to germinate and grow can represent a risk for consumers [34].
As for the development of new preservation technologies including combined processing (hurdle technologies) such as high hydrostatic pressures, pulsed electric fields, cooked chilled foods, among others, B. cereus has become an emerging risk, since these processes do not eliminate the spores and, in some circumstances, produce damaged vegetative cells that can grow at temperatures of the order of 10 °C or even lower.
Restaurants or catering facilities are the most frequent places where intoxication occurred. The main responsible for B. cereus proliferation in foods prepared in those facilities leading to poisoning were attributed, in many cases, to inaccurate refrigeration temperature and/or the delay before preparation and consumption of dishes [34].
Studies carried out on raw rice indicate that B. cereus spores are frequently isolated from this food, due to its ubiquity in nature. In fact, a prevalence of 100% was observed in 2010 in Argentina [57]. Likewise, in Colombia 244 samples of foods containing rice were analysed in different regions of the country and results showed that 11.92% of those foods have concentrations higher than 104 CFU/g, concentrations that are considered of high risk [58].
Meals containing rice can also be a source of B. cereus. Studies carried out in restaurants of the United States and United Kingdom, where rice dishes were prepared, revealed that contamination can also occur after cooking, particularly through cross-contamination with spatulas used to mix rice during the cooking process [59]. In the UK, studies indicate that small restaurants pose a higher risk than large chain restaurants, owing to the poor training in hygienic practices, as well as the preparation of rice too early before being served [60].
Therefore, it is inevitable that, B. cereus due to its ubiquity, will be present in many raw materials. The contamination of the food during processing also requires the application of good hygienic practices and appropriate hygienic design of equipment as additional measures to control the contamination of products.

5. Control Measures

Control of B. cereus in rice and derivatives can be carried out at three different levels. First, there are the hygienic measures; second, the preservation processes in the production chain that would have the mission of destroying the microorganism and its spores; and third, control measures to slow down or inhibit the growth [61]. Table 1 summarizes the most important control measures described in literature.
The cleaning of equipment or machines where rice circulates in the industry is the first barrier to be applied to prevent the growth of the microorganism in surfaces or pipelines and the contamination of the rice by B. cereus. Its spores have the ability to adhere to stainless steel surfaces of industrial equipment; this favours the growth of the microorganism on these surfaces. The use of sodium hypochlorite and weak acids is recommended on pipes and other surfaces [34]. A hygienic design of the equipment is important to avoid dead areas where the microorganism’s spores can adhere and germinate.
The second barrier relies on the use of preservation procedures in the rice production chain that are capable of destroying vegetative cells and, where appropriate, bacterial spores. Heat treatment is the most common process for destroying spores and vegetative cells of microorganisms. However, B. cereus has a highly variable thermal resistance; in consequence, it is difficult to establish consistent pasteurization or cooking conditions. Fernandez et al. [40] reported for bacterial spores D-values at 90 °C between 3.99 min and 45 min for two strains of B. cereus isolated from vegetables. This difficulty is increased considering the great difference in thermal resistance between vegetative cells and spores. Byrne et al. [62] indicated that the D-values of B. cereus suggest that a mild cook of 70 °C for 12 s would achieve a 6 log reduction of B. cereus vegetative cells, while the equivalent reduction of B. cereus spores would be achieved after heating for 36 s at 105 °C in pork luncheon meat. Spores isolated from vegetables showed a D105 °C value of 0.63 min in reference substrate (pH 7) [40]. This means that a F105 °C value of 3.8 min is necessary to achieve a reduction of around 6 log; it should be taken into account that the normal cooking process of rice is carried out between 80 and 90 °C. Considering heat resistance data for very high heat resistant spores [40], heating food above 105 °C will be enough to kill B. cereus and protect the food from spoilage; nevertheless, only commercial sterilization ensures complete inactivation of B. cereus spores. Cooking, mild heat treatments, or regular pasteurization do not inactivate all B. cereus spores [36]. Mild heating processed such as indicated above can instead activate spores for germination and subsequent vegetative cell growth.
Several non-thermal technologies have been used to inactivate B. cereus spores, but their effect was variable. At ambient temperature, a pressure higher than 1000 MPa is required for inactivation bacterial spores [63]; in consequence, no B. cereus spores present in a rice dish can be inactivated at the lower ordinary industrial pressure treatments (600 MPa or less). Combined treatments can help in destroying the bacterial spores. Van Opstal et al. [64] studied the inactivation of B. cereus spores in milk by mild pressure and heat treatments. Results indicated that all strains were reduced more than 6 logs by the two-step treatment consisting on 30 min at 200 MPa/45 °C and 10 min of cooking at 60 °C. Pina-Perez et al. [65] reported that high hydrostatic pressure and natural antimicrobials were synergic against B. cereus vegetative cells in a mixture of liquid whole egg and skim milk.
Marco et al. [66] studied the joint effect of the antimicrobial olive powder and high hydrostatic pressure against B. cereus spores in a control substrate. The authors concluded that olive powder had an additive effect to the high hydrostatic pressure processing with storage temperature and could act as an additional control measure preventing the growth of microorganisms on products pasteurised by high hydrostatic pressure technologies or reducing the potential growth in the case of cold-chain break during the shelf life. Another non-thermal technology regarded as an effective decontamination method for rice raw material after the crop harvesting is the Cold Plasma [67]. Baia et al. [68] have studied the plasma technology to inactivate B. cereus spores; they achieved between 1.62–2.96 log CFU/mL reductions. Liao et al. (2020) [69] studied the application of plasma-activated water combined with mild heat for the decontamination of B. cereus spores in rice. The treatments achieved 1.54 and 2.12 log CFU/g reductions of B. cereus spores in rice after 60 min exposure.
The third control measure for B. cereus relies on avoiding or diminishing bacterial growth. The incidence of the B. cereus disease is linked to the food storage temperatures and the storage time before it is finally served. Freezing or cold storage of rice-based meals (temperature lower than 4 °C) is an important strategy to control B. cereus [61]. Growth of B. cereus can be reduced by increasing the generation time, increasing doubling times or the lag phase under refrigeration storage [70,71]. According to those studies, it appears that the main control measure avoiding growth of B. cereus in foods is the refrigeration at temperatures below 4 °C. Refrigeration can be combined with other methods to prevent microorganism’s growth. Modified atmosphere package, a carbon dioxide concentration higher than 40%, can prevent growth of B. cereus stored at a temperature lower than 8 °C [72,73]. At the same time, according to Andersson et al. [77], when the storage temperature was raised from 6 °C to 8 °C, growth of B. cereus was apparent, but after slight pH or water activity reductions, the growth of B. cereus was controlled at refrigeration temperatures higher than 4 °C [78]. Some food additives can be used alone or combined with other control measures against B. cereus in rice derivatives. Some bacteriocins such as nisin can inactivate B. cereus vegetative cells while essential oils-based antimicrobials such as carvacrol showed a limited effect [74,79,80]. Grande et al. [5] used enterocin AS-48 to inhibit toxicogenic B. cereus in rice-based foods. Inactivation of endospores was achieved by heating for 1 min at 90 °C in boiled rice or at 95 °C in rice-based gruel. Fernandes et al. [75] studied the antibacterial effects of chitosan on B. cereus. The use of chito-oligosaccharides alone against B. cereus spores was not enough to destroy a large number of cells. Ferrer et al. [76] concluded that olive powder could be used as an additional control measure in the case of cold chain break due to its effects on the lag phase of B. cereus vegetative cells.
In consequence, for full control of B. cereus concentration, it is essential to have a low initial concentration of B. cereus in raw materials and an adequate design of processing equipment. That should be followed by an effect preservation method and by effective cooling procedures to fast cool heat-treated foods, and storing the product below 4 °C. Those procedures will control the concentration of B. cereus up to acceptable levels for food safety.

6. Conclusions

B. cereus will grow in most foods under favourable pH (4.5 to 9.5), water activities (>0.93), and temperatures from 4 to 48 °C. Due to its ubiquity, its spores contaminate practically all categories of foods, rice and pasta meals being the most important source of B. cereus spores causing intoxication. Those spores have the ability to survive the treatments commonly given to rice and other carbohydrate-rich products. Rice cooking, the mild heat applications on rice refrigerated processed foods, or regular pasteurization, as well as many non-thermal technologies, do not inactivate all B. cereus spores. Only the commercial sterilization can assure the complete inactivation of spores. However, it is not always possible to provide a sterilization process to such foods, since in restaurants or in collective food preparation, sterilization is not used in the production of meals. Moreover, it is also necessary to consider the detrimental effect on the nutritional or sensory properties of sterilized foods.
The B. cereus concentration that consumers will face will depend on raw material contamination and preservation or processing technology, but is the multiplication of B. cereus in foods stored under abuse refrigeration temperature that is the main contributor to the risk for human health. Rapid cooling and subsequent refrigeration storage of heat treated foods is critical and should be carefully controlled to avoid the growth of vegetative cells during the cooling phase. Moreover, to complement refrigeration with slight reductions in pH or water activity of high-carbohydrate meals will prevent multiplication of B. cereus at refrigeration temperatures between 4 to 8 °C.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: A.M. and D.R.; methodology, A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.; review and editing, C.M.R. and D.R.; supervision, A.M.; funding acquisition, C.M.R., D.R. and A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by EU PRIMA program through the project “Tracing rice and valorizing side streams along mediterranean blockchain (TRACE-RICE) and through the Spanish Ministry of Science through project AGL2017-86840-C2-2-R, and to FEDER funds from EU.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank TRACE-RICE project, Reference number AMD-1934-1 the support for this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. EFSA; ECDC. The European Union One Health 2018 Zoonoses Report. Available online: https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5926 (accessed on 29 January 2021).
  2. Thirkell, C.E.; Sloan-Gardner, T.S.; Kaczmarek, M.C.; Polkinghorne, B.G. An outbreak of Bacillus cereus toxin-mediated emetic and diarrhoeal syndromes at a restaurant in Canberra, Australia 2018. Commun. Dis. Intell. 2019, 43, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chen, D.; Li, Y.; Lv, J.; Liu, X.; Gao, P.; Zhen, G.; Zhang, W.; Wu, D.; Jing, H.; Li, Y.; et al. A foodborne outbreak of gastroenteritis caused by Norovirus and Bacillus cereus at a university in the Shunyi District of Beijing, China 2018: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Martin, D.W.; Gary, C.B.; Kaarin, E.G.; Michael, W.P. Risk presented to minimally processed chilled foods by psychrotrophic Bacillus cereus. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 93, 94–105. [Google Scholar]
  5. Grande, M.J.; Lucas, R.; Abriouel, H.; Valdivia, E.; Ben Omar, N.; Maqueda, M.; Martínez-Bueno, M.; Martínez-Cañamero, M.; Galvez, A. Inhibition of toxicogenic Bacillus cereus in rice-based foods by enterocin AS-48. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 106, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kramer, J.M.; Gilbert, R.J. Bacillus cereus and other Bacillus species. In Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens; Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  7. Navaneethan, Y.; Effarizah, M.E. Prevalence, toxigenic profiles, multidrug resistance, and biofilm formation of Bacillus cereus isolated from ready-to eat cooked rice in Penang, Malaysia. Food Control 2021, 121, 107553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hocking, A.D.; Ailsa, D. Bacillus Cereus and Other Bacillus Species. In Foodborne Microorganisms of Public Health Significance, 6th ed.; Hocking, A.D., Ed.; Australian Institute of Food Science and Technology Inc.: North Ryde, Australia, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  9. Little, C.L.; Barnes, J.; Mitchell, R.T. Microbiological quality of take-away cooked rice and chicken sandwiches: Effectiveness of food hygiene training of the management. Commun. Dissease Public Health 2002, 5, 289–298. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lake, R.; Hudson, A.; Cressey, P. Risk profile of Bacillus spp. in rice. N. Z. Food Saf. Auth. 2004. Available online: https://www.mpi.govt.nz/dmsdocument/26138/direct (accessed on 29 January 2021).
  11. Maurice, B.L.; Tahar, A.S.; Shze, T.P.; Valarie, S.; Jamie, F.A.; Hashim, H.F.; Apun, K.; Radu, S. Enumeration and molecular detection of Bacillus cereus in local indigenous and imported rice grains. Agric. Food Secur. 2016, 5, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ankolekar, C.; Rahmati, T.; Labbé, R.G. Detection of toxigenic Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis spores in U.S. rice. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 128, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sarrías, J.A.; Valero, M.; Salmerón, M.C. Elimination of Bacillus cereus contamination in raw rice by electron beam irradiation. Food Microbiol. 2003, 20, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Muthayya, S.; Sugimoto, J.D.; Montgomery, S.; Maberly, G.F. An overview of global rice production, supply, trade, and consumption. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2014, 1324, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Luh, B.S. Rice production. In Cereals Processing Technology; Owens, G., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2001; pp. 79–107. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gilbert, R.J.; Stringer, M.F.; Peace, T.C. The survival and growth of Bacillus cereus in boiled and fried rice in relation to outbreaks of food poisoning. J. Hyg. Camb. 1974, 73, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Shelef, L.A.; Liang, P. Antibacterial Effects of Butylated Hydroxyanisole (BHA) against Bacillus species. J. Food Sci. 1982, 47, 796–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu, S.; Yu, P.; Wang, J.; Li, C.; Guo, H.; Liu, C.; Kong, L.; Yu, L.; Wu, S.; Lei, T.; et al. A Study on Prevalence and Characterization of Bacillus cereus in Ready-to-Eat Foods in China. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 30–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Jessim, A.I.; Fakhry, S.S.; Alwash, S.J. Detection and Determination of Bacillus cereus in Cooked Rice and Some Types of Spices with Ribosomal 16SrRNA gene Selected from Iraqi Public Restaurants. Int. J. Bio-Resour. Stress Manag. 2017, 8, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Messelhäußer, U.; Ehling-Schulz, M. Bacillus cereus—a Multifaceted Opportunistic Pathogen. Curr. Clin. Microbiol. Rep. 2018, 5, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Rajkowski, K.T.; Bennett, R.W. Bacillus cereus. In International Handbook of Foodborne Pathogens; Miliotis, M.D., Bier, J.W., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2003; Chapter 3; pp. 27–39. [Google Scholar]
  22. Martinez, J.; Sanchez, G.; Garay, E.; Aznar, R. valuation of phenotypic and PCR-based approaches for routine analysis of Bacillus cereus group foodborne isolates. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 2011, 99, 697–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vilas-Boas, G.; Peruca, A. Biology and taxonomy of Bacillus cereus, Bacillus antrhracis and Bacillus thuringiensis. Can. J. Microbiol. 2007, 53, 673–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, Y.; Du, J.; Lai, Q.L.; Zeng, R.Y.; Ye, D.Z.; Xu, J.; Zongze, S. Proposal of nine novel species of the Bacillus cereus group. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol, 2017, 67, 2499–2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Takahashi, N.; Nagai, S.; Fujita, A.; Ido, Y.; Kato, K.; Saito, A.; Moriya, Y.; Tomimatsu, Y.; Kaneta, N.; Tsujimoto, Y.; et al. Discrimination of psychrotolerant Bacillus cereus group based on MALDI-TOF MS analysis of ribosomal subunit proteins. Food Microbiol. 2020, 91, 103542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Frentzel, H.; Kelner-Burgos, Y.; Deneke, C. Evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for the differentiation of Bacillus cereus group species. Food Control. 2021, 120, 107530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Carroll, L.M.; Wiedmann, M.; Mukherjee, M.; Nicholas, D.C.; Mingle, L.A.; Dumas, N.B.; Cole, J.A.; Kovac, J. Characterization of Emetic and Diarrheal Bacillus cereus Strains From a 2016 Foodborne Outbreak Using Whole-Genome Sequencing: Addressing the Microbiological, Epidemiological, and Bioinformatic Challenges. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Hendriksen, N.B.; Hansen, B.M.; Johansen, J.E. Occurrence and pathogenic potential of Bacillus cereus group bacteria in a sandy loam. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 2006, 89, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sánchez, J.; Correa, M.; Castañeda-Sandoval, L.M. Bacillus cereus an important pathogen the microbiological control of food. Rev. Fac. Nac. Salud Publica 2016, 34, 230–242. [Google Scholar]
  30. Pirhonen, T.; Anderson, M.; Jääskeläinen, E.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.; Honkanen, T.; Johansson, T.M. Biochemical an toxinc diversity of Bacillus cereus in a pasta and meat dish associated with a food-poisoning case. Food Microbiol. 2005, 22, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bottone, E. Bacillus cereus, a volatile human pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 23, 382–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Gil-Turnes, C.; Freitas dos Santos, A.; Weykamp da Cruz, F. Properties of the Bacillus cereus strain used in probiotic CenBiot. Rev. Microbiol. 1999, 30, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Finlay, W.J.; Logan, N.A.; Sutherland, A.D. Bacillus cereus emetic toxin production in cooked rice. Food Microbiol. 2002, 19, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. EFSA. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards on Bacillus cereus and other Bacillus spp. in foodstuffs. EFSA J. 2005, 175, 1–48. [Google Scholar]
  35. Halverson, L.; Handelsman, J. Enhancement of Soybean Nodulation by Bacillus cereus UW85 in the field and in growth chamber. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991, 57, 2767–2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kotiranta, A.; Lounatmaa, K.; Haapasalo, M. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of Bacillus cereus infections. Microb. Infect. 2000, 2, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Clavel, T.; Carlin, F.; Lairon, D.; Nguyen-The, C.; Schmitt, P. Survival of Bacillus cereus spores and vegetative cells in acid media simulating human stomach. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 97, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mols, M.; Pier, I.; Zwietering, M.H.; Abee, T. The impact of oxygen availability on stress survival and radical formation of Bacillus cereus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 135, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Jaquette, C.B.; Beuchat, L.R. Survival and growth of psychrotrophic Bacillus cereus in dry and reconstituted infant rice cereal. J. Food Prot. 1998, 61, 1629–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Fernandez, A.; Ocio, M.J.; Fernandez, P.S.; Rodrigo, M.; Martinez, A. Application of non-linear regression analysis to the estimation of kinetic parameters for two enterotoxigenic strains of Bacillus cereus spores. Food Microbiol. 1999, 16, 607–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Penna, T.C.V.; Moraes, D.A. The influence of nisin on the thermal resistance of Bacillus cereus. J. Food Prot. 2002, 65, 415–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ultee, A.; Slump, R.A.; Steging, G.; Smid; E. J. Antimicrobial activity of carvacrol toward Bacillus cereus on rice. J. Food Prot. 2000, 63, 620–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Granum, P.E.; Lund, T. Bacillus cereus and its food poisoning toxins. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1997, 157, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Agata, N.; Ohta, M.; Mori, M.; Isobe, M. A novel dodecadepsipeptide, cerulide, is an emetic toxin of Bacillus cereus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1995, 129, 17–20. [Google Scholar]
  45. Berthold-Pluta, A.; Pluta, A.; Garbowska, M. The efect of selected factors on the survival of Bacillus cereus in the human gastrointestinal tract. Microb. Pathog. 2015, 82, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ehling-Schulz, M.; Frenzel, E.; Gohar, M. Food-bacteria interplay: Pathometabolism of emetic Bacillus cereus. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Agata, N.; Ohta, M.; Yokoyama. K. Production of Bacillus cereus emetic toxin (cereulide) in various foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002, 73, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hauge, S. Food poisoning caused by aerobic spore forming bacilli. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1955, 18, 591–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dack, G.M.; Sugiyama, H.; Owens, O.J.; Kirsner, J.B. Failure to produce illness in human volunteers fed Bacillus cereus and Clostridium Perfringens. J. Infect. Dis. 1954, 94, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Langeveld, L.P.M.; van Sponsen, W.A.; van Beresteijn, E.C.H.; Notermans, S. Consumption by healthy adults of pasteurised milk with a high concentration of Bacillus cereus: A double-blind study. J. Food Prot. 1996, 59, 723–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Schoeni, J.L.; Lee Wong, A.C. Bacillus cereus food poisoning and its toxins. J. Food Prot. 2005, 68, 636–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Notermans, S.; Dufrenne, J.; Teunis, P.; Beumer, R.; te Giffel, M.; Peeters Weem, P. A risk assessment study of Bacillus cereus present in pasterurized milk. Food Microbiol. 1997, 14, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Granum, P.E.; Baird-Parker, T.C. Bacillus species. In The Microbiological Safety of Quality of Food; Lund, B.M., Baird-Parker, T.C., Gould, G.W., Eds.; Aspen: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000; Volume 2, pp. 1029–1039. [Google Scholar]
  54. Tajkarimi, M. Bacillus cereus. PHR 250. Materials from Maha Hajmeer; 2007; 6p. Available online: https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/ahfss/Animal_Health/PHR250/2007/25007BcerMH__2_.pdf (accessed on 29 January 2021).
  55. Guinebretiere, M.; Girardin, H.; Dargaingnaratz, C.; Carlin, F.; Nguyen-The, C. Contamination flows for B. cereus and spore-forming aerobic bacteria in a cooked, pasteurized and chilled zucchini purée processing line. Int. J. Food Proct. 2003, 82, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jullien, C.; Benezech, T.; Carpertier, B.; Lebret, V.; Faille, C. Identification of surface characteristics relevant to the hygienic status of stainless steel for the food industry. J. Food Eng. 2003, 56, 77–87. [Google Scholar]
  57. Fangio, M.; Roura, S.; Fritz, R. Isolation and Identification of Bacillus spp. and Related Genera from different Starchy Foods. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75, M218–M221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. UERIA Perfil de Riesgo Bacillus cereus en Alimentos Listos Para su Consumo no Industrializados; Ministerio de la Protección Social Unidad de Evaluación de Riesgos para la Inocuidad de los Alimentos UERIA Instituto Nacional de Salud INS. 2011. Available online: https://docplayer.es/14657995-Perfil-de-riesgo-bacillus-cereus-en-alimentos-listos-para-consumo-no-industrializados.html (accessed on 29 January 2021).
  59. Bryan, F.L.; Bartleson, C., A.; Cristopherson, N. Hazard analysis in reference to Bacillus cereus of boiled and fried rice in Cantonese style restaurants. J. Food Proct. 1981, 44, 500–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nichols, G.L.; Little, C.L.; Mithani, V.; de Louvois, K. The microbiological quality of cooked rice from restaurants and take away premises in the Unided Kigdom. J. Food Proct. 1999, 62, 877–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tessi, M.A.; Arìngoli, E.E.; Pirovani, M.E.; Vincenzini, A.Z.; Sabbag, N.G.; Costa, S.C.; Garcia, C.C.; Zannier, M.S.; Silva, E.R.; Moguilevsky, M.A. Microbiological Quality and Safety of Ready-to-Eat Cooked foods from a centralized School Kitchen in Argentina. J. Food Proct. 2002, 65, 636–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Byrne, B.; Dunne, G.; Bolton, D.J. Thermal inactivation of Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens vegetative cells and spores in pork luncheon roll. Food Microbiol. 2006, 23, 803–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Smelt, J.P.P.M.; Hellemons, J.C.; Wouters, P.C.; Van Gerwen, S.J.C. Physiological and mathematical aspects in setting criteria for decontamination of foods by physical means. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002, 78, 57–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Van Opstal, I.; Bagamboula, C.F.; Vanmuysen, S.C.M.; Wuytack, E.Y.; Michiels, C.W. Inactivation of Bacillus cereus spores in milk by mild pressure and heat treatments. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 92, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Pina-Perez, M.C.; Silva-Angulo, A.B.; Muguerza-Marquınez, B.; Rodrigo, D.; Martınez Lopez, A. Synergistic Effect of High Hydrostatic Pressure and Natural Antimicrobials on Inactivation Kinetics of Bacillus cereus in a Liquid Whole Egg and Skim Milk Mixed Beverage. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2009, 6, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Marco, A.; Ferrer, C.; Velasco, L.M.; Rodrigo, D.; Muguerza, B.; Martınez, A. Effect of olive powder and high hydrostatic pressure on the inactivation of Bacillus cereus spores in a reference medium. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2011, 8, 681–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liao, X.Y.; Muhammad, A.I.; Chen, S.G.; Hu, Y.Q.; Ye, X.Q.; Liu, D.H.; Ding, T. Bacterial spore inactivation induced by cold plasma. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 2562–2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Baia, Y.; Muhammada, A.I.; Hua, Y.; Kosekic, S.; Liaoa, X.; Chena, S.; Yea, X.; Liua, D.; Dinga, T. Inactivation kinetics of Bacillus cereus spores by Plasma activated water (PAW). Food Res. Int. 2020, 131, 109041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liao, X.Y.; Bai, Y.; Muhammad, A.I.; Liu, D.H.; Hu, Y.Q.; Ding, T. The application of plasma-activated water combined with mild heat for the decontamination of Bacillus cereus spores in rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2020, 53, 064003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Choma, C.; Guinebretiere, M.H.; Carlin, F.; Schmitt, P.; Velge, P.; Granum, P.E.; Nguyen-The, C. Prevalence, characterization and growth of Bacillus cereus in commercial cooked chilled foods containing vegetables. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 88, 617–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Valero, M.; Leontidis, S.; Fernández, P.; Martínez, A.; Salmerón, C. Growth of Bacillus cereus in natural and acidified carrot substrates over the temperature range 5–30 °C. Food Microbiol. 2000, 17, 605–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Benniket, M.H.J.; Smid, E.J.; Rombouts, F.M.; Gorris, L.G.M. Growth of psychrotrophic foodborne pathogens in a solid surface model system under the influence of carbon dioxide and oxygen. Food Microbiol. 1995, 12, 509–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Samapundo, S.; Everaert, H.; Wandutu, J.N.; Rajkovic, A.; Uyttendaele, M.; Devlieghere, F. The influence of headspace and dissolved oxygen level on growth and haemolytic BL enterotoxin production of a psychrotolerant Bacillus weihenstephanensis isolate on potato based ready-to-eat food products. Food Microbiol. 2011, 28, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Ray, B. Nisin of Lactococus lactis ssp lactus as a food biop’reservative. In Food Biopreservatives of Natural Origen; Ray, B., Daeschel, M.A., Eds.; CRC Presss: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1992; pp. 207–264. [Google Scholar]
  75. Fernandes, J.C.; Eaton, P.; Gomes, A.M.; Pintado, M.E.; Malcata, F.X. Study of the antibacterial effects of chitosans on Bacillus cereus (and its spores) by atomic force microscopy imaging and nanoindentation. Ultramicroscopy 2009, 109, 854–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ferrer, C.; Ramón, D.; Muguerza, B.; Marco, A.; Martínez, A. Effect of Olive Powder on the Growth and Inhibition of Bacillus cereus. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2009, 6, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Andersson, A.; Ronner, U.; Granum, P.E. What problems does the food industry have with the spore-forming pathogens Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens? Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1995, 28, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Benedict, R.C.; Partridge, T.; Wells, D.; Buchanan, R.L. Bacillus cereus, aerobic growth kinetics. J. Food Prot. 1993, 56, 211–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pol, I.; Smid, E.J. Combined action of nisin and carvacrol on Bacillus cereus and Listeria monocytogenes. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1999, 29, 166–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Periago, P.M.; Moezelaar, P. The combined effect of nisin and carvacol at different pH and temperature levels on the viability of different strains of Bacillus cereus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001, 68, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Some control measures for Bacillus cereus spores or vegetative cells.
Table 1. Some control measures for Bacillus cereus spores or vegetative cells.
Control MeasureProcedureTreatment/Effect on B. cereusReference
Control initial microbial loadUse of sodium hypochlorite and weak acids on equipment100 ppm sodium hypochlorite
Weak acids at 30–40 °C for 20–30 min		[34]
InactivationHeat treatmentD-value (90 °C) 3.99–45 min
70 °C for 12 s, 6 log reduction (vegetative cells)
105 °C 36 s, 6 log reduction (spores)		[40,62]
High Hydrostatic Pressure (HPP)More than 1000 MPa[63]
Combined treatmentsMild heat and High Hydrostatic Pressure, between 100 and 600 MPa at 30 and 60 °C, 6 log inactivation[64,65]
Olive powder 2.5% and High Hydrostatic Pressure 500 MPa had additive effect[66]
Cold Plasma (CAP)1.62–2.96 log CFU/mL reductions
Plasma-activated water combined with mild heat, 1.5–2.12 log CFU/g reductions		[67,68,69]
Growth limitation or inhibitionCold storageBelow 4 °C[65,70,71]
Carbon dioxide concentration higher than 40% can prevent growth of B. cereus stored at temperature lower than 8 °C[72,73]
AntimicrobialsNisin, 500 IU/g[74]
Enterocin AS-48, 20–35 µg/ml[5]
Chitosan, 2.5% (w/v)[75]
Olive powder, 2.5% (w/v)[76]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rodrigo, D.; Rosell, C.M.; Martinez, A. Risk of Bacillus cereus in Relation to Rice and Derivatives. Foods 2021, 10, 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020302

AMA Style

Rodrigo D, Rosell CM, Martinez A. Risk of Bacillus cereus in Relation to Rice and Derivatives. Foods. 2021; 10(2):302. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020302

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rodrigo, Dolores, Cristina M. Rosell, and Antonio Martinez. 2021. "Risk of Bacillus cereus in Relation to Rice and Derivatives" Foods 10, no. 2: 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020302

APA Style

Rodrigo, D., Rosell, C. M., & Martinez, A. (2021). Risk of Bacillus cereus in Relation to Rice and Derivatives. Foods, 10(2), 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020302

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop