Next Article in Journal
New Insights in Therapy for Food Allergy
Next Article in Special Issue
The New Challenge of Sports Nutrition: Accepting Insect Food as Dietary Supplements in Professional Athletes
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Paper-Based Packaging: A Consumer’s Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Determination of Carbohydrate Composition in Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor L.) Larvae and Characterization of Mealworm Chitin and Chitosan
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 10
Issue 5
10.3390/foods10051036
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Chemical Composition, Nutrient Quality and Acceptability of Edible Insects Are Affected by Species, Developmental Stage, Gender, Diet, and Processing Method

by
Victor Benno Meyer-Rochow
1,2,*,
Ruparao T. Gahukar
3,
Sampat Ghosh
2 and
Chuleui Jung
2,4,*
1
Department of Genetics and Ecology, Oulu University, SF-90140 Oulu, Finland
2
Agriculture Science and Technology Research Institute, Andong National University, Andong 36729, Gyeongsangbuk, Korea
3
103, Niyogi Bhavan, Abhyankar Marg, Dhantoli, Nagpur 4400012, Maharashtra, India
4
Department of Plant Medicals, Andong National University, Andong 36729, Gyeongsangbuk, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2021, 10(5), 1036; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10051036
Submission received: 15 April 2021 / Revised: 6 May 2021 / Accepted: 7 May 2021 / Published: 10 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Edible Insects as Innovative Foods: Nutritional, Functional and Acceptability Assessments II)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Edible insects have been considered as either nutritious food itemsper se, or as wholesome ingredients to various dishes and components of traditional subsistence. Protein, fat, mineral and vitamin contents in insects generally satisfy the requirements of healthy food, although there is considerable variation associated with insect species, collection site, processing method, insect life stage, rearing technology and insect feed. A comparison of available data(based on dry weight) showed that processing can improve the nutrient content, taste, flavour, appearance and palatability of insects, but that there are additional factors, which can impact the content and composition of insect species that have been recommended for consumption by humans. This review focuses on factors that have received little attention in connection with the task to improve acceptability or choice of edible insects and suggests ways to guarantee food security in countries where deficiencies in protein and minerals are an acute and perpetual problem. This review is meant to assist the food industry to select the most suitable species as well as processing methods for insect-based food products.

1. Introduction

Entomophagy (the habit of eating insects) has been practiced since time immemorial by humans [1,2,3] and their primate relatives [4,5]. Although entomophagy was not new to science, it was a paper by Meyer-Rochow [6], which for the first time suggested that edible insect species ought not to be neglected in the quest to safeguard future global food security. At present edible insects are still recognized as a sustainable food item by many residents of sub-Saharan Africa, South and Central America (including Mexico), South-East Asia and the Australia Papua New Guinea region. The consumption of insect species depends upon availability/access, suitability, preference, nutritional value, religious beliefs and social customs [7,8,9,10,11,12].
In North-East India, some highly appreciated species of edible insects are available (mostly seasonally) for sale at the local markets, but their cost is often higher than that of conventional animal meats or food of vertebrate origin [13,14]. This holds true also for Laos [15], Cameroon and many other African countries [16,17]. Nonetheless, the local people prefer the insects because of their taste and for traditional aspects [13,14,18]. However, insect consumption is declining, with one of the reasons being a shortage of the product due to a lack of facilities to efficiently and systematically rear suitable species and another reason in developing countries being an increasing “westernization” in terms of food choices [19]. As a result, sellers experience disruptions and delays in obtaining supplies and potential buyers are frustrated by the fluctuations of the product’s condition and availability.
Insects contain easily digestible quality protein with all the essential amino acids readily identifiable (except for methionine and tryptophan, which are present in low levels). The absence of tryptophan and fractional recovery of methionine and cysteine are attributed to methods of analysis and not necessarily because they are actually absent. For example, based on the data of 5 insects, viz. yellow mealworm Tenebrio molitor L., house cricket Acheta domesticus L., superworm Zophobas morio Fabricius, lesser mealworm Alphitobius diaperinus Panzer and the roach Blaptica dubia Serville, Yi et al. [20] observed that the amount of essential amino acids (EAA) was high and that the content of protein was similar to that of conventional meat products. In China, the pupal powder of the silkworm Antheraea pernyi Guerin-Meneville is appreciated, because of its substantial amount of protein (71.9%), EAA, fat (20.0%) and ash (4.0%) [21]. Information on the composition and content of nutrients in edible insects is readily accessible through journals, special reports and dissertations and has been summarized repeatedly [22,23,24,25,26].
With established techniques such as HPLC (high-performance liquid chromatography) for extraction and quantification of nutrients and bioprospecting of new species of edible insects, studies on the nutritional value of insects are being intensified with an aim to search economic and efficient ways to supply processed insects [27]. Currently, nutritional contents are not yet known for the majority of the surveyed/collected insect species of the various geographical locations and eco-zones that they occur in. Furthermore, knowledge and perception of factors that are encountered during the rearing of domesticated insects or those collected in the wild is limited and available only for a certain number of species. More studies on the chemical compositions of edible insects in relation to factors like geography, climate, processing and preparation methods would facilitate the identification of species most suitable for mass rearing and a potential to ameliorate the state of health in humans in certain parts of the globe [28]. This is especially important in view of the fact that most insects used as food today may not be much better nutritionally than traditional meats and that their ‘value’ is actually more related to environmental issues rather than their nutritional content [29,30].
This review examines and summarises a variety of factors that either are known (or have the potential) to influence an insect’s chemical composition and its nutritive value, such as a species’ taxonomic position or ecotype, thereby enhancing or reducing its acceptability as a food item for humans. The review illuminates in particular the roles that developmental stages, castes, an insect’s habitat and diet (whether natural or laboratory based) play in relation toaninsect’s amino acid and fatty acid content profile and to what extent the amounts of fibre, soluble carbohydrates and minerals depend on environmental factors. We highlight the importance of different processing methods, the risks of contamination and allergies and relate such factors to consumer choice as well as general acceptability of edible insects and insect-containing products as an alternative to conventional food items.

2. Nutrient Contents

2.1. Biological Factors: Insect Species, Developmental Stage, Sex and Caste, Organ and Ecotype or Biological Variants

2.1.1. Insect Species

Edible insects generally belong to eight orders namely Blattodea (cockroaches, termites), Coleoptera (beetles), Diptera (flies), Hemiptera (true bugs), Hymenoptera (ants, bees and wasps), Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), Odonata (dragonflies, damselflies) and Orthoptera (grasshoppers, crickets and locusts). Table 1 represents proximate nutrient composition of selected representative edible insect species and is not a compilation of all edible insect chemical analyses published to date. The results are based on dried insect samples, with the exception of the beetles Oryctes boas and Oryctes rhinoceros, which were not fully dry when analysed. The wide variation in the nutrient content among insect species generally depends on a variety of factors, of which geographic and climatic conditions as well as the insects’ food intake seem to be the most important factors. Although not to a very great extent, chemical content can indeed vary among different species belonging to the same genus (Table 2). The feeding regime, physiology and even ecological factors are more important determinants of the nutrient content than the species’ taxonomic proximity.
Table 3 contains comparative data on the amino acid composition of edible insect species. The results reveal that species belonging to the same genus may possess only somewhat different amino acid contents. To cite an example: various species of Vespa were found to differ with regard to the quantities of their amino acids [31,32]. Similar observations were made in connection with Apis spp. [33,34,35]. Moreover, the differences were attributed to the rearing system, including the insects’ feed and ecological condition. Palm weevils were found to have slightly different protein and amino acid content, depending on where they had been collected from [22]. However, irrespective of the amounts, the relative distribution of the amino acids was found to follow an almost identical trend in all of the individuals.
Overall, glutamic acid was always found to be most abundant, but among the essential amino acids leucine predominated followed by lysine. Although the scope to discuss the nutritional benefits of individual nutrient is limited in the present manuscript, it is worth mentioning that lysine content of edible insects is advantageous as it is often limiting in the cereal-based diet of humans. Species-specific fat and fatty acid content was apparent in edible insects (Table 4). In general, palmitic acid followed by stearic acid was the predominating fatty acids among the saturated kinds (SFA), while oleic acid was the most abundant among the monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA). Species-specific patterns were noticed for mineral content (Table 5). However, the differences in the mineral contents are primarily attributable to geographic and ecological factors as the minerals are not synthesized in the animal body but are obtained from the dietary sources.

2.1.2. Developmental Stage

Table 6 contains comparative data on the proximate nutrient content of different developmental stages of selected edible insect species. As already briefly touched upon, the contents of an insect can vary between adults, larvae, pupae and nymphs with regard to carbohydrates, protein, fat, fiber, ash, and minerals and there are complex reasons for this. In general, the protein content was found to be higher along with the more mature developmental stages. The opposite held true for fat content. Larvae and adults may feed on different foods and pupae usually do not consume any food at all, which would explain the differences in amino and fatty acid content as well as minerals seen in the different developmental stages of, for example, the honey bee [33]. To cite an example, in male bees (known as drones), the compositions of amino acids, protein and minerals all increase with development stage [61]. Saturated fatty acids dominated over monounsaturated fatty acids in the pupae but the reverse was reported for adults [61]. Variations in the nutrient composition of different post-embryonic developmental stages of nymphs and adults of the grasshopper Zonoceros variegatus were studied by Ademolu et al. [62]. Increments in protein but reductions in the amounts of fat from nymphs to adults were observed. Similar results, i.e., higher protein and lower fat content in parallel with the developmental stages hold true for three Blattodea species, namely Blaptica dubia, Blaberus discoidalis and Blatta lateralis [63].
The need to build up muscle tissue can change during developmental stages and is influenced by events of an insect’s life cycle. For example, termite worker adults may have less fat than the more sedentary nymphs and that is presumably because of their more active lifestyles and the greater need to burn fat to meet the energy demands of their leg muscles. The sedentary termite queen, as the only egg producer of the colony, would require much less muscle tissue, but considerably more fat. When reared for 13 weeks, cricket (A. domesticus) nymphs contained 36–60% crude protein and 12–25% fat with maximum amounts of palmitic, oleic, linoleic, linolenic and a small amount of arachidic, EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid) and DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) fatty acids [64]. The concentrations of Mg, Ca and Zn reached their optimum after 9 weeks when they were 1.30–11.30 mg, 1.40–19.70 mg and 0.20–16.60 mg/100 mg, respectively. On that basis, Kipkoech et al. [64] suggested cricket harvesting to occur preferentially between 9–11 weeks, because only at that age the larvae are in their nutritionally best condition for consumption [65].
In this context another issue is related to differences between developmental stages, specifically in relation to their life cycle physiologies: during events like droughts and overwintering periods the conditions of an insect may change. Ghosh et al. [52], for example, demonstrated changes in the bodycomposition of bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) queens during overwintering and summer periods.

2.1.3. Sex and Caste

The powder of male silkworm (B. mori) pupae contained less protein than that of female pupae (reviewed by Mahesh et al. [72]), but there was no difference in the kinds of amino acid present between the two sexes [73,74]. Research by Cai et al. [75] and Kiuchi et al. [76] on male and female silkworm pupae has confirmed the presence of sex-related differences, adding information to the earlier reported differences in the amounts and compositions of the lipids in male and female pupae [77]. For example, more fatty acids were present in male than female pupae, but total lipid content of B. mori male pupae, on a fresh weight basis, was less (4.8%) than that of female pupae (9.0%) [78]. The content of unsaturated fatty acids was nearly the same in both sexes, but unsaturated acids were proportionately higher in female pupae [77]. In the case of A. domesticus, females have been shown to possess more lipids on a dry weight basis (18.3–21.7 g/100 g) than males (12.9–16.1 g/100 g), but less protein (63.1–65.7 g/100 g versus 69.9–71.9 g/100 g for female and male respectively). There was, however, no difference between the sexes with regard to the presence of essential amino acids (EAA) (72.3–77.1%), thrombogenicity (1.22–1.45%) and atherogenicity indices (0.53–0.58) [79].
In the subterranean termite, Reticulitermes sp., the reproductive caste had higher contents of the following nutrients than workers e.g., carbohydrates 2.7% versus 1.3%, protein 87.3% versus 81.7%, and amino acids 6.7% versus 4.7% [80]. Ntukuyoh et al. [81] evaluated the nutrient contents of the soldiers, workers and queens of the termite Macrotermes bellicosus in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Considering the average of the values provided, soldiers had the highest amount of protein (55.6%), lipid (2.7%) and fibre. Workers were especially rich in carbohydrates (65.1%), vitamin C (1.1 mg/kg), Fe (54.3 mg/kg), Mn (22.4 mg/kg) and Ca (58.3 mg/kg) whereas the queen contained higher amounts of vitamin A (7.0 mg/kg), Na (69.1 mg/kg), Mg (47.8 mg/kg) and Zn (25.2 mg/kg). Workers and queen had nearly the same amount of Cu (18.8 and 18.3 mg/kg respectively). In general agreement with this study by Ntukuyoh et al. [81], the same species collected from southwestern Nigeria by Idowu et al. [82] differed somewhat because of its higher content of ash, crude fibre, crude protein and carbohydrates in soldiers and workers rather than the reproductive caste which, on the contrary, had a higher fat content.
The weaver ant (Oecophylla smaragdina) exhibited a higher content of total lipid (average of annual values for larvae: 168.5, pupae: 140.7, and adults: 140.6 mg/g) in the queen while worker castes contained slightly more than half the amount (larvae: 112.0, pupae: 111.6, and adults: 100.8 mg/g) [83]. Lower contents of protein (37.5%) and ash (3.0%), but higher lipid content (36.9%) in the queen than that reported for other castes of weaver ants (presumably worker caste), were reported [84] for weaver ants in Thailand. In honey bees, considerable differences with regard to amino and fatty acids were documented not only for different developmental stages like larvae, pupae and adults, but also for the different sexes of the bees [33,61].

2.1.4. Organs

Dué et al. [85] analyzed oil extracted from the integument and the digestive tract fat content (DFC) of the larvae of the South American palm weevil Rhynchophorus palmarum (L.). Fat content obtained from the integument (=“skin” in that paper) was lower (35.2%) than the DFC oil (49.1%). Oleic acid was highest in both oils (45.6–46.7%) followed by palmitic acid (39.9–40.4%). Saturated fatty acids were 45.1% and 45.0% for skin oil and DFC oil, respectively. Vitamin-A was found only in DFC oil. Regarding quality properties, the oil obtained from the integument was considered superior to that of the DFC oil, judged by their respective indices of iodine of 51.2 versus 48.4, peroxide of 6.9 versus 0.0 and oleic acidity (7.8 versus 0.6). However, data on the nutrient compositionsbased on specific insect organs such as fat body, ovaries, compound eyes, glands, etc.are extremely limited.

2.1.5. Ecotype or Biological Variations

When Rhynchophorus phoenicis larvae were obtained from plantations of the raffia palm (Raphia sp.), yellow larvae contained more fat (27.7%) than white wild (22.2%) or white breeding (17.4%) larvae, more protein (8.8% for yellow wild versus 7.8 and 8.7% for white wild and breeding kinds, respectively), more carotenoids (805.0 versus 391.0 and 276.0 µg/100 g for yellow wild, white wild and breeding respectively), but less polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) (0.5 versus 0.8%) and tocopherol (2.3 versus 4.8 and 4.1 mg/100 g for yellow wild, white wild and breeding kinds, respectively) [86]. In Uganda, no significant differences were recorded for the dry matter and moisture contents between the brown ecotype and the green one of the cone-headed grasshopper, Ruspolia nitidula (Scopoli). High potassium content (5.55 mg/kg) was recorded [87] in brown grasshoppers collected in Kampala during the March–May season but not in the November–December season. These findings provide some information on the likely correlation between colour change (as a result of the ecotype) and chemical composition in grasshoppers influenced by climatic conditions and geographic location.

2.2. Ecosystem and Insect Habitat

Sustainability in insect diversity and year-round (or at least seasonal) availability is important for family livelihood of local communities [17]. Terrestrial insects are more abundant and easier to collect than aquatic species and may therefore be recommended for consumption in preference to the latter [88]. On the other hand, Williams and Williams [89] demonstrated the potential of aquatic insects to contribute to human diet. In a study of nutrient contents in both aquatic and terrestrial insects by using linear models, Fontaneto et al. [88] showed that terrestrial insects contained a significantly lower amount of monounsaturated fatty acids (22.5%) than that reported for aquatic edible insects (33.8%). In contrast, a higher amount (44.2%) of PUFA was found to be generally present in terrestrial insects rather than the aquatic species (27.9), although statistically the difference did not reach significance.
In Uganda, the effects of two swarming seasons (March–May and November–December) on the nutrient contents of R. nitidula were studied. No significant differences were found in the comparative contents of protein (39.7–40.4% in the March–May season and 37.0–39.1% in the November–December season), fat (41.9–42.4% in the March–May season and 41.2–43.0% in the November–December season) and carbohydrates, but carotenoids (2084.8–2273.1 µg/100 g in the March–May season versus 913.7–1389.4 µg/100 g in the November-December season) and fibre (11.3–12.2% in the March–May season versus 13.1–14.3% in the November–December season) differed significantly with the seasons [87]. In an additional study, Ssepuuya et al. [90] reported that the geographical area was highly influential with regard to the insect’s mineral content within a season, whereas the season alone affected significantly the variation in the contents of protein (34.2–45.8%), fat (42.2–54.3%), ash and minerals in R. nitidula. Geographical area or season, however, were not seen to affect the compositions of amino and fatty acids.
Maximum contents of fat in O. smaragdina ant queen larvae (249.2 mg/g), queen pupae (228.9 mg/g), worker larvae (129.9 mg/g), worker pupae (133.1 mg/g) and worker adults (123.2 mg/g) from Assam (India) were recorded in March, whereas maximum fat (207.3 mg/g) in queen adults was found in April and minimal amounts occurred during the November–February months [83]. These data, which were valid for various sites, can be used by collectors to decide the most suitable period to collect preferred insect species and their life stages based on nutrient contents.
In Botswana, Madibela et al. [91] studied contents of Imbrasia belina larvae sampled at three eco-sites (Mauntlala, Moreomabele, Sefophe). At Moreomabele, a high content of acid detergent fibre (ADF) (230.9 g/kg dry matter) and acid detergent insoluble nitrogen (ADIN) (18.0 g/kg DM) was noted, whereas these contents were least (155.5 g/kg for ADF and 11.8 g/kg for ADIN) at Sefophe. At Mauntlala, contents of ADF and ADIN were 175.1 and 12.2 g/kg respectively. In M. bellicosus termites from Nigeria, Idowu et al. [82] reported highest contents of vitamins (A, the B-complex, and C) in reproductive castes collected from farmland, whereas those from an industrial estate had the highest amount of Cu (0.076 mg/L). Lead was detected only in the soldiers. The highest value of Cr in workers was found in termites collected from farmland (0.226 mg/L) and a waste dumping site (0.223 mg/L). The chemical composition between hibernating queen bumblebees, Bombus terrestris (L.), during the winter season differed significantly from summer queens and featured an increased ratio from 3.6 to 4.9 between unsaturated and saturated fatty acids [52]. Thus, differences may be observed in species even if collected from a single site, but at different times of the year.

2.3. Insect Feed

Insects are reared on a synthetic diet (containing only chemical ingredients), semi-synthetic or meridic diet (containing synthetic and plant material). Both categories of food are classified as laboratory diets. The natural diet comes solely from natural sources, i.e., host plants or plant products. More details about these diets can be found in [92].

2.3.1. Plant Material

The nutritional status of the host plants that insects feed on affects the nutrient contents of the edible insects. When vermiwash (water washings of earthworm cocoons) at 10%, 25% or 50% was sprayed on mulberry leaves and fed to fifth instar B. mori larvae, significant increases on a dose-dependent basis were observed with regard to carbohydrates, protein and fat [93]. However, when Ebenebe et al. [94] reared R. phoenicis larvae on four organic substrates, e.g., sugarcane tops, split watermelon, split pineapple and raw papaya, their larvae had (on dry weight basis) normal carbohydrate, protein and fibre, contents that did not vary much and statistical significance was lacking. They concluded that split pineapple can be selected for feeding larvae as a potential source of protein and fluid.
Among 10 African host grasses of the longhorn grasshopper Ruspolia differens Serville, Malinga et al. [95] noted maximum survival of 65% on Chloris guyana, Pennisetum purpureum, Setaaia sphacelata, Brachiaria ruziziensis and Sporoborus pyramicloris. Fresh weight was highest (0.383 g/adult) on P. purpurium and B. ruziziensis. On a mixed diet basis, significantly shorter development time (16 days) from nymph to adult and higher survival (>65%) occurred in diversified diets compared to the use of single grass species. Contents of PUFA and fatty acid composition did not differ significantly among the diets. Therefore, a mixed feed can be recommended for mass rearing of grasshoppers.
Quaye et al. [96] evaluated four diets based on the oil palm yolk (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) alone or mixed with banana and pineapple waste or millet waste. The highest protein (32.0%) and fibre (8.4%) content was found in R. phoenicis larvae fed on oil palm yolk. Practically, year-round non-availabilities of some plant materials and the costs involved to procure them make vegetative substrates often uneconomic for mass production by farmers and tribal communities [94].
Whenever an insect’s natural food is altered, nutrient contents may be affected. For example, adding wheat bran to grass (natural food) to feed the locusts (Locusta migratoria) influence the nutrient composition, the protein content in adults varies from 555 g to 649 g/kg (dry matter) and the fat content varies from 186 g to 296 g/kg [97]. While rearing the Asian palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) on three substrates, Cito et al. [98] recorded total fat of the order of 57.6%, 58.4% and 60.0% for apple juice, pineapple palm (Phoenix canariensis Chaubaud) and cocoa palm [Syagrus romanzoffiana (Cham.) Glassman] respectively. For the three substrates, the content of monounsaturated fatty acids was 43.9%, 41.6% and 44.7% while the unsaturated fatty acids reached 56.1%, 57.2% and 52.8% of the total fatty acids, respectively [98].
Larvae of R. ferrugineus fed on raffia palm [Raphia farinifera (Gaertn.)] were heavier (159 g) than those reared on oil palm, which weighed only 52 g [99]. These findings demonstrated how different substrates can be used and can be practical in relation to weevil rearing. Feeding neonate nymphs of the grasshopper (R. differens) till the imago stage on inflorescences of local grasses (8 species) did not strongly modify fatty acid content or composition or even adult body weight [100]. The ratio of n-6:n-3 fatty acids was generally low, a point of note in connection with the need for a healthy human diet. Significant differences in the composition of rare fatty acids (n-6/n-3, arachidonic acid, alpha-linolenic acid), however, were present in the grass species. In another study, Rutaro et al. [101] used inflorescences of four plants and found a high content (21%) of essential fatty acids in field-collected sixth instar nymphs compared to the low content (12–13%) in connection with less diversified diets. However, total lipid content and weight of grasshoppers did not differ among diets, but it showed that the fatty acid composition can be influenced by an insect’s food uptake.

2.3.2. Laboratory Diets

Laboratory or artificial diets have certain advantages over natural plant material for rearing silkworms, because such diets are semi-synthetic or synthetic and can be used for several insect species. They help to rear insects that vary little between individuals which can then be made available whenever needed for bioassays or other purposes [92,102].
Rutaro et al. [103] formulated artificial diet for R. differens containing rice seed head, finger millet seed head, wheat bran, chicken egg buster, sorghum seed head, germinated finger millet, simsim cake, crushed dog biscuit pellet and shea butter. More diverse diets resulted in increased content of PUFA and linoleic acid. Fatty acid composition differed significantly among the diets. The workers concluded that essential fatty acid content can be increased by feeding grasshoppers on highly diversified diets, particularly when mass rearing is the objective.
Ghaly [104] prepared a diet of dry ingredients (corn flour + whole wheat flour + wheat bran + dried yeast powder mixed in a ratio of 3:3:3:1, by weight) and liquid ingredient (glycerine + honey mixed in 1:1 ratio, by weight). The two ingredients were then mixed in a 1:1 ratio. This diet proved superior to plant material in rearing Gonimbrasia belina and Anthoaera zambezina in Zambia. In Nigeria, the G. belina larvae reared on a semi-synthetic diet (corn starch + vegetable oil + glucose + cellulose + mineral mix + vitamin mix + protein) contained 7.1% carbohydrates, 35.2% protein, 15.2% fat and 7.4% ash [105]. These contents were comparatively low in larvae fed only natural plant biomass [105]. These diets should be tried in connection with other lepidopteran larvae consumed in Africa. Stull et al. [106] successfully reared T. molitor on a diet containing 40% stover (corn by product) by weight. Analyses after 32 days into rearing showed that the larvae contained all the essential amino acids. In another experimental series, the insects completed metamorphosis and all larvae survived on a 100% stover diet for multiple generations. Therefore, this diet can be recommended for the rearing of Tenebrio and possibly some other beetle species in the laboratory.
Indoor rearing can be further improved by fortifying the laboratory diet. For example, De Wit [107] prepared a vitamin D-enriched diet to rear B. mori larvae. There were significant changes in the content of the macro nutrients compared with diets that had not been fortified, e.g., increases in protein (61.2% versus 58.8%) and reduction in fat (37.3% versus 39.5%). The addition of the commercial protein supplement Nutrilite® increased the content of sericin and fibrous protein by 68% and 56%, respectively, with addition of 10% supplement compared to no addition for the late larval instars of B. mori [108]. This finding implies that laboratory diets should be preferred for edible insects if the objective is to obtain a greater amount of nutrients from the insect biomass.

2.3.3. Plant Based by-Products

While assessing 18 diets based on industry by-products (such as, potato protein, barley mash, leftover of turnip-rape and broad beans) for rearing of crickets such as A. domesticus and G. bimaculatus, Sorjonen et al. [109] reported yields of A. domesticus as high as 4.10 g on barley mash and 5.12 g of G. bimaculatus on turnip rape. The average weights of female and male A. domesticus were 0.459 g and 0.342 g, respectively, whereas in the case of G. bimaculatus the corresponding weights were 0.912 and 0.626 g. Thus, these protein-rich products can replace currently-used soybean in mass rearing. Further, Sorjonen et al. [110] added two more diets (mix of broad bean and pea, mix of potato, carrot and apple) for rearing of R. differens. Increasing protein level in the diet up to 17% enhanced growth, development time, and survival. Fatty acid content and composition differed as per diet. For example, high PUFA content was noted in connection with barley mash, barley feed and broad bean diets. Fresh weight was highest (0.507 g/adult) in the Suomalainen diet with vitamins and minerals as supplements [110]. However, the study suggested that the best options were barley feed, barley mash or potato protein.
Lehtovaara et al. [111] recorded nearly 10-fold increased contents of linoleic, alpha-linolenic, eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoicfatty acids in R. differens adults when these acids were present in the artificial diet. Development performance was also improved with n-6/n-3 acid ratio. Lack of protein and fat in the diet prolonged development and resulted in low final weight. Therefore, it is necessary to design nutritional content in artificial diets to obtain heavy, nutritious grasshoppers through mass rearing.

2.4. Insect Processing and Product Quality

Traditionally, insects are consumed raw or processed (dried, crushed, pulverized, ground, pickled, cooked, boiled, fried, roasted/grilled, toasted, smoked or extruded [112]. Besides these techniques, Kewuyemi et al. [113] suggested fermentation to enrich the inherent composition of insect-based products and to induce anti-microbial, nutritional and therapeutic properties. Similarly, defatted T. molitor larvae and oil could be used as food ingredients [114]. Defatted mealworm powder contains sufficient protein, minor amounts of minerals and bioactive compounds and has a savory taste due to plentiful amino acids. Oil is abundant in γ-tocopherol and possesses good shelf life [114].
Before processing, insects are often kept without food for fasting and large specimens are degutted or defatted, because the gut may contain undigested plant material, excreta, microbes etc.; moreover, degutted insects have higher contents of crude fibre protein [91,112]. This practice, being efficient and practical, has been routinely adopted by tribal communities particularly for large lepidopteran larvae. Processed insects can be preserved by freeze-drying or sun-drying and in canned form. Processing methods may differ as per consumer preference, availability and suitability of insect species, social custom, religious rituals, tribal ethics and family tradition [17]. The effects of four different drying temperatures (80, 100, 120, 140 °C) on antioxidant properties of silkworm powder was studied by Anuduang et al. [115] and showed that the lowest drying temperature preserved phenolic compounds and antioxidants best.
In selecting a food item on the basis of “post-ingestive fitness”, the processing method can help to remove anti-nutrients and other unhealthy components as well as increasing the shelf life. Thus, processing is important to maintain the level of nutrient content, to extend the shelf life and to obtain functional and fortified foods [112]. In food processing units, products are enriched with insect chitosan (a polysaccharide derivative of chitin), which is more soluble and therefore preferred over raw chitin in food processing [116]. Local communities frequently know methods to improve insect-based foods with traditional wisdom built on generations of experience [117].
Methods can of course change and be replaced by others, because each method has certain advantages or disadvantages suiting regional needs.For example, roasting, cooking and frying are largely employed in North-East India, because of the better taste of insects compared to boiling and baking [13]. Generally, vitamins are susceptible to heating and heat processing decreases the level of these vital compounds entirely or partially. Storage conditions are important to prevent the deterioration of insects. However, tocopherol content in T. molitor and Zophobas mario L. was not altered under different environments [118], but antioxidant properties in silkworm powder were [115]. Nyangena et al. [119] examined the effects of traditional processing techniques, i.e., boiling, toasting, solar-drying, oven-drying, boiling + oven drying, boiling + solar-drying, toasting + oven-drying, toasting + solar-drying on the proximate composition and microbiological quality of Acheta domesticus, Ruspolia differens, Hermetia illucens and Spodoptera litoralis. They found that traditional processing improved microbial safety but altered the nutritional value. Moreover, species- and treatment patterns clearly existed. A few examples below may demonstrate the different processing techniques used in selected insect species.

2.4.1. Lepidoptera

Maceration of Bombyx mori pupae, being simple, practical and not at all costly, is the most common method employed by indigenous people. For example, Winitchai et al. [120] reported 72–79% of unsaturated fatty acids and 32–44% of alpha-linolenic acid in Soxhlet extractions of fresh pupae whereas respective contents after maceration were 75–80% and 40–46%. Defatting of pupae and turning them into a powder is practiced to retain nutrients as witnessed in comparisons with the powder of non-defatted pupae [121], e.g., crude protein 57.4% versus 48.3%, digestible protein 48.3% versus 40.1%, soluble protein 29.0% versus 16.4% and carbohydrates 15.8% versus 10.2% [74].
In India, fresh pupae of a bivoltine breed of B. mori contained 17.1% protein and 9.2% fat compared with 56.9–75.2% protein and 24.9% fat of dried pupae [122]. Oil extracted from pupae is an important source of unsaturated fatty acids (75%), essential linoleic acid (33%) and alpha-linoleic acid (35%) [121].
Once the silk threads are separated, silkworm pupae (often referred to as chrysalis) become waste matter, but the powder of the empty pupae contains important nutrients [72] as also reported by Rao [123] from India, e.g., 48.7% protein, 30.1% fat, 8.6% ash, and significant amount of minerals and vitamins; however, defatted spent pupae contained higher protein, e.g., 75.2%. In Brazil, Pereira et al. [124] recorded that chrysalis (pupae) toast contained protein (51.1%), fat (34.4%), linolenic (24.4% of total fatty acids), palmitic (24.6% of total fatty acids), stearic (7.6% of total fatty acids), oleic (34.8% of total fatty acids), and linoleic acids (7.0% of total fatty acids), Zn (244.0 µg/g) and K (4.8 mg/g). Because of the high content of major nutrients and essential fatty acids, chrysalis toast was recommended as an alternative dietary supplement in Brazil [124]. These results suggest that as far as possible, larvae should be defatted and de-oiled before processing. The powder is less perishable and can be stored in cool and dry places in a house/hut or refrigerator for a long time and may be consumed whenever needed. Currently, this processing technique remains invalidated although valuable for nutritional security. Furthermore, steamed and freeze-dried mature silkworm powder exhibits different pharmacological effects [125] as calorie restriction mimetics [126], including enhanced mitochondrial functions in the brain [127].
In Africa, when Gonimbrasia (=Imbrasia) belina larvae were degutted, washed and dried, the shelf life could be extended up to one year without any deterioration in quality [128]. Lautenschläger et al. [129] compared three traditional techniques of preparation before consumption, e.g., evisceration, cooking and drying of silk moth, Imbrasia epimethea,(Drury) larvae. No significant differences for protein, fat, amino acids and fatty acid composition were observed among the three treatments. Gut removal reduced carbohydrates originating from the leaves of the host plant and showed negative effects on the nutritional value. No changes in the content of nutrients (except reduction in MUFA) were observed when the larvae were exposed to thermal processing. The study by Medigo et al. [130] showed that processing can also involve adding foods containing high amounts of sugar and saturated fats, although such additions diminished the overall nutrient content of the insect product [130].
In Botswana, Madibela et al. [91] compared nutrient contents in Gonimbrasia (=Imbrasia) belina larvae without any processing and those that were degutted salted or degutted + salted. Degutted samples had a higher content of crude protein (567.5–579.3 g/kg DM) than non-degutted larvae (505.3–537.5 g/kg DM) but had a lower concentration of ash (41.2–39.0 g/kg in degutted versus 58.0–59.2 g/kg in non-degutted larvae). A similar trend was present with regard to acid detergent fibre (ADF) (148.5–173.2 g/kg in non-degutted versus 158.8–268.1g/kg DM in degutted larvae). The addition of salt increased ADF, whereas the degutted + salted samples had a higher ADF than degutted or salted larvae or those without processing. Unprocessed insects diluted the concentration of protein but increased the fiber and tannin contents.
It is possible that the heating results in the formation of new components, and that solvents used for the extraction of protein at industrial level can affect the safety of novel protein products [131]. In two edible insects namely Imbrasia truncate Aurivillius and I. epimethea, appreciated by consumers in the Congo river basin, Fogang Mba et al. [132] reported respective contents (fresh weight) of protein as high as 19.1 and 20.1 g and of fat reaching 6.8 and 6.7 g/100 g in the larvae. Unsaturated fatty acids in I. truncata and I.epimethea were 2.6 and 2.2 g/100 g, of which alpha-linolenic acid amounted to 1.9 and 2.2 g/100 g respectively. Processing procedures are held to be responsible for the ranges and, therefore, need to be well planned in connection with food products that contain insects.

2.4.2. Coleoptera

There was a considerable increase in the content of carbohydrates, protein and fat of sun-dried larvae of O. rhinoceros and R. phoenicis over non-processed ones. Pith of coconut palm for O. rhinoceros [133] and raffia palm pith for R. phoenicis [134] served as natural feed source whereas a laboratory diet comprising of corn starch, vegetable oil, sucrose, glucose, cellulose, mineral mix and vitamin mix for O. rhinoceros, Gonimbrasia (=Imbrasia) belina, M. bellicosus and R. phoenicis [105] was successfully used. A greater increase in dry weight was seen in laboratory-diet fed larvae than those fed only natural plant material.
Wheat flour dough enriched with ground T. molitor larvae at 10% resulted in a softer dough with increased size and weight when baked at 200 °C for 22 min [135]. High moisture extruded meat substitutes can contain the biomass of another species of beetle, e.g., Alphitobias diaperinus (Panzer) 40% mixed with soy dry matter up to 60% [136]. Water content in the product was important for improving its physical properties, i.e., the sensation when biting or chewing it.

2.4.3. Orthoptera

In laboratory experiments, R. differens adults were frozen at about −50 °C for 96 h [137]. Another lot was oven-dried at 60 °C for 24 h. No significant differences in the two methods were present for the content of average crude protein (46.4 for freeze dried and 47.7% for oven fried samples) and fat content (35.6% and 35.5% for freeze and oven dried samples, respectively). The content of chitin, by contrast, varied from 11.3 to 13.4% for freeze and oven dried samples. The mineral contents (in 100 g DM) in oven-fried and freeze-dried grasshoppers were as follows. Na = 54.0 versus 69.1 mg, K = 779.2 versus 816.4 mg, Ca = 895.7 versus 1034.7 mg, Mg = 145.8 versus 161.0 mg, Zn = 14.6 versus 14.2 mg, Fe = 216.6 versus 220.1 mg, P = 652.3 versus 685.9 mg, Cu = 1.7 versus 1.7 mg and Mn = 7.4 versus 8.3 mg [137]. On the contrary, toasting + drying significantly reduced protein digestibility in R. differens (76.4% versus 82.3% in fresh specimens of the grasshopper: [138]). Boiling of grasshoppers resulted in significant increases of protein and elements such as Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn and Ca contents, but decreases in the fat content on dry matter basis. Amino and fatty acid profiles were minimally affected but a significant reduction in ash content was noted. In case of roasting, there was an increase in Ca and trace mineral elements. The colour was uniformly intensified in green and brown polymorphs when roasted together. The aroma of heat-processed grasshoppers was influenced by lipid oxidation [139].
Fresh dried grasshoppers had a maximum fat content of 43.1% compared with only 16.3% in fresh insects. Also, there was a reduction in niacin content when the grasshoppers were toasted, toasted + dried or fresh dried (3.06–3.28 mg/100 g versus 3.61 mg in fresh insects [138]. High protein and fat contents, which contributed to >75% of the dry mass, justify the high reputation of this nutritionally valuable species for human consumption.
Hassan et al. [140] compared two processing methods for the tree locust, Anacridium melanorhodon (Walker) and reported that frying of adults resulted in slightly increased fat absorption (1.3 mL/100 g by frying versus 1.0 mL/100 g by boiling).Boiling, however, resulted in a reduction in tannin content (9 mg/100 g by frying versus 5.8 mg/100 g by boiling) and high protein digestibility (41.1% by frying versus 49.9% by boiling). Better digestibility was associated with water absorption (2.5 mL/100 g in fried versus 2.9mL/100 g in boiled insects). Farina [141] compared the broth prepared by cooking A. domesticus adults after freezing them with those adults that were alive when cooked. There was a significant difference in the pH, overall acceptance and perception of saltiness and umami/savory flavour. These qualities were associated with the breakdown of glycogen and the formation of lactic acid during the killing of the insect. Therefore, a proper processing method needs to be selected in connection with insect-based protein in the presence of sodium chloride.

2.4.4. Blattodea

Kinyuru et al. [138] reported no significant change in protein digestibility (range of 90.1–90.5%) in the winged termite Macrotermes subhyalinus Rambur, but a significant increase in fat content was present due to fresh drying (42.3 g versus 19.8 g/100 g in fresh collection). A significant reduction in retinol content (0.98–1.6 µg/g versus 2.2 µg/g in fresh insect) and riboflavin content (2.8 mg/100 g in toasted termites versus 4.2 mg in fresh stock) was recorded [138].
When the flour of the soldier caste of the termite Syntermes sp. was mixed with honey spread at 8, 16 and 24% and then processed by pan-frying at 80, 90 and 100 °C, the 24% mixture exhibited a significant increase in the content of protein from 5.6 to 15.9 g/100 g, Fe from 3.8 to 8.8 mg/100g and Zn from 1.8 to 4.5 mg/100 g. It also led to improved sensory qualities, especially flavour and taste [142].

3. Insect Quality

3.1. Content of Anti-Nutrients

Table 7 represents anti-nutrient contents of selected edible insects based on currently available information. In comparison to the data on nutrient content of edible insects, data on anti-nutrients are limited and even controversial. By definition anti-nutrients hinder or inhibit the absorption of nutrients, especially minerals, but some may also provide anti-oxidants like polyphenols including tannins. Due to insufficient data, saponins, alkaloids, etc. have not been included in our list.
The available literature shows high variations in the amounts of individual anti-nutrient compounds. Edible insects are mostly herbivorous, feeding on plants and their parts. For self-preservation plants synthesize different types of secondary metabolites and these secondary metabolites are known as allelochemicals and accumulate in the bodies of plant matter-ingesting insects. Their primary action is to inhibit the absorption of necessary nutrients and they are therefore termed anti-nutrients. The wide variation of the insects’ anti-nutrient content is likely to be due to the different chemical compositions of plants on which the insects feed. Primarily, it depends on the environment and the site that a plant is growing. However, a systematic protocol has to be developed in order to quantify the anti-nutrient contents. In this context it is also worth mentioning that the development of rearing techniques of edible insects under controlled conditions can minimize or even avoid the contamination of insects with these allelochemicals.

3.2. Contamination with Chemical Pesticides, Inorganic Products and Infestations with Insect

Chemical pesticides sprayed on host plants of edible insects are often stored in the form of residue in the insect body. That chemical contamination causes a deterioration of, for example, the quality of edible insects such as the locust Locusta sp. in Kuwait (and the water bug, Lethocerus indicus in India was shown [149,150]. Poma et al. [151] reported low concentrations of heavy metals, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) and dioxins in edible insects compared with chicken egg, fish, and animal meat. In China, heavy metals have been found in B. mori larvae fed on mulberry leaves harvested from plants cultivated in soil treated with municipal solid waste compost [152] or grown in soil-polluted fields [153]. The hide beetle, Dermestes maculatus DeGeer, which feeds on dry animal matter, also attacks dry edible insects. In the laboratory, Fasunwon et al. [154] experimented with artificial inoculations by this beetle with larvae of the rhinoceros beetles Oryctes boas (Fabricius) and R. phoenicis. There were significant differences in the nutrient contents when containers were provided with a mixture of salt and pepper (10 g/container). Protected larvae of O. boas contained 56.1–60.6% protein versus 39.3% of the control and R. phoenicis had 34.8–37.3% protein versus 22.7% in the control. A similar trend was present for the fat content with 4.3–7.8% versus 4.5% in the control of O. boas larvae, and 20.1–30.7% versus 13.5% in the control of R. phoenicis larvae. Therefore, storage of well dried edible insects mixed with salt and pepper has been recommended to maintain the nutritional quality [154].

3.3. Microbial Contamination

Contamination with microorganism is a major factor in the deterioration of the quality of insect-based food items. Numerous bacterial species are known to affect insects including Bacillus cereus Frankland andFrankland, Staphylococcus aureus Rosenbach, Escherichia coli, Rickettsiella spp. Some insects also act as carriers of human pathogens of the genera Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shigella [155]. Additionally, grasshoppers serve as intermediate hosts to several avian parasites, horsehair worms and tapeworms [156].
In Ghana, larvae of R. phoenicis fed on raffia palm or oil palm contained bacteria at 1.3 × 107–6.5 × 106colony-forming units (CFU)/g body mass, which was higher than the acceptable level of 5.0 × 106 CFU/g [99].In Nigeria, Braide andNwaoguike [157] assessed the quality of processed larvae of this widely consumed species and reported a load of bacterial and fungal counts of the order of 1.68 × 105 CFU/g and 9.2 × 102 CFU/g, respectively. The major bacteria were Lactobacillus plantarum Bergey, S. aureus Rosenbacch, Bacillus subtilis (Ehrenberg) Cohn, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Schroter) Migula and Proteus vulgaris Hauser.
Major fungal species were Cladosporium sp., Penicillium verrucosum Dierckx, Aspergillus flavus Link and Fusarium poae (Peck) Wollenweber. In Zimbabwe, stink bugs such as Encosternum deregorguei Spinola, stored in dung-smeared wooden baskets, were found contaminated with aflatoxin (a carcinogenic mycotoxin: [158]. Consequences of the contamination were, however, not studied. Braide et al. [159] recorded contamination of bacteria (4.49 × 107 CFU/g) and fungi (9.5 × 106 CFU/g) from collections in the wild of caterpillars of the emperor moth, Bunaea alcinoe (Stoll) in South Africa; caterpillars harbouring bacteria such as, P. aeruginosa and Proteus mirabilis produced undesirable flavours in food products, and S. aureus, B. cereus and E. coli produced toxins [159]. Furthermore, S. aureus was easily introduced during the handling of insects [160].
Processing (by traditional and innovative methods) can eliminate microbes or at least considerably reduce their load [112]. In lactic acid fermentation of a mixture of sorghum flour and T. molitor larvae, the level of spore forming bacteria (B. subtilis, B. megaterium, B. licheniformis) remained stable suggesting the bacteria were unable to germinate; their quantity remained at the acceptable level of <103 CFU/g [161]. Some of the effective and practical safety measures discussed below can be implemented. For example, thorough washing and heating can reduce microbial contamination to some extent [155]. Also, insect boiling before roasting proved effective to keep spore forming bacteria under check and insect dehydration can also reduce microbial contamination because at the lower humidity bacteria grow less.
Modified packaging systems are needed to prevent further contamination and to enhance shelf life of stored edible insects [159]. Regular monitoring and evaluation for bacterial contamination should be undertaken during storage as environmental changes can affect the insect quality. Therefore, refrigeration is employed to prevent contamination compared to outside storage at ambient temperature [162]. Packaging material is another critical aspect for safety. For example, boiled, solar dried and milled house crickets when stored for 2 months at ambient temperature in polypropylene (PP), plastic or polyethylene packages, the PP-packaged insects lasted only 45 days compared to 2 months with the other packaging materials. In all packages, iodine values, contents of SFA, MUFA and PUFA significantly decreased, peroxide, p-anisidine and saponification values increased and incidences of yeast and mould (Aspergillus, Alternaria, Penicillium) were high [162]. Although plastic packages with lids outperformed bags, adding a layer of polypropylene on the inner side can minimize permeability and exposure to both air and water vapour and thus can prolong the shelf life [162].
In food industries in Europe, a recent study has revealed antibiotic resistant genes in A. domesticus. As a preventive measure, Roncolini et al. [163] suggested standardization of the production processes and a prudent use of antimicrobials during the rearing of edible insects. Even though Spiroplasma sp. and Erwinia sp. in T. molitor and Parabacteroides sp. in the tropical house cricket, Gryllodes sigillatus (F. Walker) were the major pathogens during rearing of insects in the laboratory, Van der Weyer et al. [164] recommended that food safety should include also general bacteria like Cronobacter spp. or spoilage bacteria (Pseudomonas spp.) to be considered as potential human pathogens.

3.4. Allergenic Proteins

Allergenic reactions to the ingestion of insects and cross-reactivity with homologous proteins and co-sensitization between insects have been reported [165]. Allergens of edible insects identified as muscle proteins such as myosin, sarcoplasmic-Ca-binding protein, the major being tropomyosin and arginine-kinase (also known as pan-allergens).Persons who are allergic to dust mites and crustaceans could have an allergic reaction to foods containing T. molitor proteins [166]. It is possible that human susceptibility is due to immunoglobulin E-binding cross-reactions. For example, persons allergic to shrimps react with protein extract of T. molitor that shows Ig-E-binding cross-reacting allergens with other phylogenetically related groups of arthropods. Therefore, consumers allergic to shellfish should invariably be notified about the risk of developing an allergy by labelling the insect products accordingly [167].
It was shown that thermal processing and digestion did not eliminate insect protein allergenicity [168]. But the recent technique of high hygrostatic pressure coupled with enzymatic (pepsin) hydrolysis improvedin vitrodigestion of allergenic proteins of T. molitor. This technique can be an alternative strategy to conventional hydrolysis to generate a large quantity of peptide originating from allergenic T. molitor proteins [169].

3.5. Food Fortification

Insects as supplements for the predominant staples like corn, cassava, sorghum, pearl millet, beans and rice are commonly employed by indigenous folk in many developing countries. Insects also form a sustainable ingredient to produce new food items because fortification increases richness in nutrients. Corn being a major staple food crop in sub-Saharan Africa, members of local communities consume this tryptophan- and lysine-deficient product in considerable quantities. But this diet can be supplemented with termites and lysine-rich silkworms to overcome the deficiencies in these amino acids [170]. Similarly, natives of Papua New Guinea consume crop tubers with a low content of lysine and leucine. Vitamin deficiency can be remedied by supplementing the diet with Rhynchophorus spp. larvae, containing high amounts of vitamins and lysine. Tubers enriched with tryptophan and aromatic amino acids can render a diet more balanced and nutritious [170]. Ayensu et al. [171] mixed flour (70%) of R. phoenicis with orange-fleshed sweet potato and wheat flour to prepare biscuits. These biscuits had their energy, fat and protein content increased by fortification with palm weevil larvae powder compared with biscuits containing 100% wheat flour. Contents of Ca, Fe, Zn were also increased. The biscuits were highly appreciated by pregnant women in eastern Africa.
Winged termites such as M. subhyalinus added at 5.0% to cereal-based recipes in the Lake Victoria region of Kenya not only improved the food quality (protein, retinol, riboflavin, iron, zinc content) but made the food also more attractive [172]. In Mexico, corn bread (‘tortilla’) is sometimes supplemented with T. molitor larvae to improve consumer acceptance as well as nutritional content especially essential amino acids [173]. Likewise, Kwiri et al. [128] suggested that edible insect G. belina could be an alternative substitute of the current local plant-based supplements (beans, peanut, cowpea) in Zimbabwe.
Kim et al. [174] recommended up to 10% replacement of lean meat/fat portion with flour of the cricket A. domesticus. When compared with meat to which no cricket flour had been added, this level of mixing increased the content of protein from 14.0% to 20.7%, fat from 9.8% to 10.4%, potassium from 261.0 to 355.2 mg/100 g, phosphorus from 242.9 to 338.0 mg/100 g, magnesium from 20.4 to 33.5 mg/100 g, zinc from 1.7 to 3.8 mg/100 g and sodium from 967.0 to 1053 mg/100 g, but reduced Ca. The improved contents fulfilled the requirement of protein and micronutrients in meat emulsion [174]. In conclusion, lean meat can conveniently be replaced with cricket flour. This innovative step may encourage food industries to follow this mixture in food recipes not only to improve current entomophagy practices adopted by tribal communities but also to popularize mixing in commercial products sold by food companies.

4. Impact of Insect Quality on Consumers’ Preference and Acceptability

For accepting insects as food, nutrient content (protein being a major component), quality of insects (particularly, taste, flavour, appearance, palatability) and external factors (availability, convenient pricing, conducive social environment) are important [12,175]. Forest-dwelling communities not only in developing countries [17] but also in rural places like, for instance, in Japan [176] have easy access to wild areas and prefer wild insects because of their taste. Currently, little is known about the consumers’ reactions to wild insects and their food products, preference, acceptance and consumption of insect-based foods [29]. There are, however, anecdotal reports of preferences and greater acceptance of selected wild species of edible insects in Africa and India over reared species like silkworms or crickets.
In Kenya, Alemu et al. [177] found no significant difference in consumption of whole or powdered termites. At the local market, consumers checked the insect stock for freshness, presence of legs, cleanliness, species type and oil content before purchasing termites, for example, Macrotermes falciger (Ruelle). The majority of the buyers (77.6%) preferred fried adults [178]. Termite soldiers with long bodies were in great demand and highly preferred over alate forms [178]. The grasshopper (R. differens) is a traditional delicacy, a source of nutrients and tasty multipurpose insect in Tanzania, Kenya and Uganda [179]. Consumers preferred grasshoppers which were salted, boiled and smoked or deep fried in cotton seed oil over any other single processing methods (smoking, deep frying, sun-drying, toasting, boiling) [179]. In another survey, R. differens adults boiled with salt, onion and tomato and then dried, were preferred over those only deep-dried with salt and onion. The acceptability ranking was 7.2 and 5.2 for these products respectively (ranking scale of 0–9, with 9 being the maximum acceptance: [137]). In the case of R. nitidula, people in Uganda preferred the boiled and dried grasshoppers with salt, onion and tomatoes over those which were simply boiled and dried without tomatoes. In India whole insects are preferred, with the exception of grasshoppers, whose legs are sometimes removed; larvae, pupae and adult termites are often mixed and sold together by indigenous vendors [13].
Overall, although a greater acceptance was noted for insects without much attention to the species, fear of trying an unknown product, lack of taste experience and a belief of low social acceptance were considered as major constraints in popularizing edible insects [180] even though taste alone in more than 50% of probands tested did not enable them to distinguish insects from cheese or bread [181]. Correct labelling is also an important factor of acceptability. Recently, while assessing the accuracy of insect products in the UK market, Siozios et al. [182] found, by using DNA barcoding, frequent disparities between identity in packages containing mopane caterpillars, winged termites and grasshoppers. This may distract consumers from accepting and consuming insects or insect products.
In selecting an edible species information on entomophagy, prior experience and familiarity with edible insects, appearance, flavour and overall likability of a species are major factors [12]. Therefore, information and knowledge can influence attitudes towards insects as food and food supplemented with edible insects [183]. In fact, Van Thielen et al. [184] reported an increasing positive response in Belgium regarding acceptance, as revealed by a survey undertaken two years after the introduction of edible insects in that country. In a similar survey of Danish consumers revealed the fact that 23% of them were willing to eat insects [185].
Before experiencing the taste of cricket powder, Canadian consumers thought that consumption was undesirable, but their attitude changed after having consumed the powder and they were then willing to buy it [186]. In the USA, Mexico and Spain, replacing wheat flour with 15% and 30% of cricket (A. domesticus) powder in chocolate chip cookies was evaluated [187]. No difference between 15% and 30% was noted by USA consumers whilst Mexican and Spanish consumers liked the 15% sample significantly more than the control and 30% sample. From this survey, it was concluded that 15% powder did not negatively impact acceptability but improved liking and protein content in cookies. In Brazil, female consumers were more reluctant towards entomophagy than male subjects, but in Benin no such gender effect existed [188]. Preference was given to whole insects, although insect flour was liked by 40% of all consumers. Generally, insects were considered safe for consumption by educated consumers familiar with entomophagy [189]. Perception of entomophagy by residents of Korea and Ethiopia assessed through structured questionnaires revealed a positive note [190].
According to Medigo et al. [130], Belgians also have a positive attitude towards consuming insects and they have, moreover, developed a taste for certain species. Therefore, Sun-Waterhouse et al. [28] opined that practical approaches for transforming insect biomass into consumer food products are vital. Based on a survey and experiment in Australia and the Netherlands, Lensvelt and Steenbekkers [8] concluded that providing information on entomophagy and giving people the opportunity to try insects were two important aspects to influence consumers’ attitude towards edible insects.
As another approach, Collins et al. [191] suggested educating school children, extending promotion for acceptance of the insect product to facilitate the adoption of insect food as a mainstream item and, thereby, as an available product through market chains. For example, the number of “burgers” with meal worms consumed by western people depended upon appearance, taste and flavour [192]. These criteria are important especially when mealworm products are considered inferior to the carrier products [193]. Medigo et al. [130] found that the processed mealworms with chocolate were the most popular insects whereas whole and crushed mealworms or boiled or baked crickets were least consumed. Similarly, despite the good nutritional qualities of mealworm larvae, it is uncertain that they would become a safe source of protein for Europeans because of their difficult to control, highly and variable microbial load [194].
Edible insects are not only something for developing countries, but equally important for developed countries (because of the problems of the latter with an increasingly obese populace) where they ought to find perhaps even greater acceptance than in the developing countries. Information about presentation, conservation, preservation of food products and local marketing is to some extent now available [17]. Studies are lacking, however, on likely changes in flavour, taste and texture of mealworm and other insect-containing products during storage; for the industrial production, moreover, information on suitable packaging and presentation of insect products is equally important. Effective advertising of edible insects could undoubtedly do with improvements and using catchy slogans like “Forget about the pork and put a cricket on your fork” or “Mealworms and spaghetti is food that makes you happy” could be expected to help as well [30].

5. Conclusions and Suggestions for Future Research

Insects are being considered as an alternative to conventional protein sources for both developing as well as developed countries. Edible insects have received attention from researchers in recent years because, firstly, the consumption of insects has spread to urban areas and the current concept is oriented towards health-related as well as ecological issues, and secondly, because conventional livestock rearing and certain systems of crop cultivation have proved environmentally disastrous [27,195,196,197]. Bioprospecting is currently limited to a few eco-zones in countries where insects have commonly been consumed. Intensive surveys may yet reveal more species that could be considered for consumption and farming. The shelf life of processed insects could possibly be improved if more research were devoted to this aspect. Factors responsible for nutrient content and quality of edible insects have not been explored sufficiently and to know how the chemical composition, handling and storage methods, contamination with micro-organisms, the insects’ diet, feeding schedules, host plants and the plant’s own nutrient content as well as the seasons affect food insect marketability would be of considerable benefit in selecting the most suitable species [198].
There is a need to develop rearing facility designs to be made available to small mass production units, which can help create a socially acceptable climate for the expansion of entomophagy [199]. Mass collections of aquatic insects by using nets woven by fishermen may be a remunerative venture, but encouraging locals and creating marketing channels as well as obtaining permits to fish for aquatic insects could be major hurdles. Recently, Oppert et al. [200] suggested sequencinggene transcripts from embryos, one-day hatchlings, nymphs and male and female adults of A. domesticus to use genetically modified crickets for improved insect production.
Regulations and legislation along with proper farming procedures, storage and hygiene would benefit consumers by way of healthier insects. Frameworks shared by different countries exist in Europe [201] but are lacking for most developing countries [202]. Proper processing and decontamination methods against micro-organisms during collection and storage, and preference of species should be included in surveys to ensure food safety [22]. A compilation of all information may be used to select a few insect species for mass rearing or augmenting their survival rate in natural habitats and a linkage through regional or international networks among countries/regions where entomophagy is practiced would be a first step. The network could facilitate exchanges and dissemination of information on insects and insect related recipes.
It is essential to conserve wild edible insect populations and to improve the survival of the most popular species [17]. This can be achieved by studying the population dynamics of these insects, identifying their host plants, and controlling their enemies. Other actions can include restrictions on over-harvesting, revoking the decreasing diversity of host plants, boosting the insects’ resilience to adverse weather phenomena and seasonal effects and monitoring insect diseases.
A regulatory legal framework is required to guarantee that manufacturing practices, quality management, hazard analysis and other issues related to content and quality of edible insects are meeting acceptable standards [202]. Furthermore, proper labelling and documentation of the insect product would help to boost the consumers’ knowledge and interest in entomophagy as would some cheeky and witty slogans to promote insect-containing food items [30]. The scientific guidelines explained by the European Food Security Authority [201] are worth studying to prepare a manual for insects consumed in developing countries, either on a regional or national basis to assure food and nutritional security.
In certain regions the people’s diet may lack zinc, but in others there may be a shortage of magnesium, or iron, or calcium. To improve situations such as these, some species of insects could be promoted that are particularly rich in the minerals that are needed. Likewise, there may be reasons to boost certain fatty acids in the diet, acids that could be supplied by specific species of insects. To be able to select the appropriate species, it is of course essential to know precisely the chemical composition of the insect species, which demonstrates how important it is to have a detailed catalogue of the contents of as many species of insects as possible. If one extends this to animal feed, fish culturists may desire in particular protein-rich species, but pigs should perhaps be fed fatty insects and poultry farmers may wish to obtain insects with a high calcium content.
To promote insect-based functional foods as a platform for certain health-related properties is a promising option and is to some extent already taking place, e.g., larvae of the pallid emperor moth Cirina forda for protein solubility, oil absorption capacity and foaming stability [203], T. molitor larvae for their oil, foaming and emulsion capacity [204], black soldier fly for peptides with antimicrobial activity against the stomach ulcer bacterium Helicobacter pylori [205] and male silkworm pupal extract with its Viagra-like effect for erectile dysfunction [206].In fact, Meyer-Rochow [207] reviews hundreds of species that can be used therapeutically, but in many cases also serve as food for humans. This is an aspect certainly worth exploring further.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.T.G., S.G. and V.B.M.-R.; Methodology, not applicable; Software, not applicable; Validation, R.T.G., S.G., C.J. and V.B.M.-R.; Formal analysis, R.T.G., S.G. and V.B.M.-R.; Investigation, R.T.G., S.G., C.J. and V.B.M.-R.; Resources, RTH, S.G., C.J. and V.B.M.-R.; Data curation, R.T.G., S.G., C.J. and V.B.M.-R.; Writing—original draft preparation, R.T.G. and V.B.M.-R.; Writing—review and editing, V.B.M.-R., S.G. and C.J.; Visualization, S.G. and V.B.M.-R.; Supervision, R.T.G. and C.J.; Project administration.All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

To complete this study Sampat Ghosh and Victor Benno Meyer-Rochow received support from Chuleui Jung of Andong National University’s Insect Industry R&D Center via the Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2018R1A6A1A03024862).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to two anonymous reviewers for their critical suggestions on an earlier draft of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bequaert, J. Insects as food: How they have augmented the food supply of mankind in early and recent years. Nat. Hist. J. 1921, 21, 191–200. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergier, E. Peuples Entomophages et Insectes Comestibles: Étude Sur les Moeurs de L’Homme et de L’Insecte; Imprimérie Rullière Frères: Avignon, France, 1941. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bodenheimer, F.S. Insects as human food. In Insects as Human Food: A Chapter of the Ecology of Man; Bodenheimer, F.S., Ed.; W. Junk: Hague, The Netherlands, 1951; pp. 7–38. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bogart, S.L.; Pruetz, J.D. Insectivory of savanna chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) at Fongoli, Senegal. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2011, 145, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McGrew, W.C. The ‘other faunivory’ revisited: Insectivory in human and non-human primates and the evolution of human diet. J. Human Evol. 2014, 71, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Meyer-Rochow, V.B. Can insects help to ease the problem of world food shortage? Search 1975, 6, 261–262. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gahukar, R.T. Entomophagy and human food security. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2011, 31, 129–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Lensvelt, E.J.S.; Steenbekkers, L.P.A. Exploring consumer acceptance of entomophagy: A survey and experiment in Australia and the Netherlands. Ecol. Food Nutr. 2014, 53, 543–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shouteten, J.J.; De Steur, H.; De Pelsmaeker, S.; Lagast, S.; Juvinal, J.G.; De Bourdeaudhuij, L.; Verbeke, W.; Gellynck, X. Functional and sensory profiling of insect-, plant- and meat-based burgers under blind, expected and informed conditions. Food Qual. Prefer. 2016, 52, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Menozzi, D.; Sogari, G.; Veneziani, M.; Simoni, E.; Mora, C. Eating novel foods: An application of the theory of planned behaviour to predict the consumption of an insect-based product. Food Qual. Prefer. 2017, 59, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tan, H.S.G.; House, J. Consumer acceptance of insects as food: Integrating psychological and socio-cultural perspectives. In Edible Insects in Sustainable Food Systems; Halloran, A., Flore, R., Vantomme, P., Roos, N., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2018; pp. 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ghosh, S.; Jung, C.; Meyer-Rochow, V.B. What governs selection and acceptance of edible insect species? In Edible Insects in Sustainable Food Systems; Halloran, A., Flore, R., Vantomme, P., Roos, N., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2018; pp. 331–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chakravorty, J.; Ghosh, S.; Meyer-Rochow, V.B. Practices of entomophagy and entomotherapy by members of the Nyishi and Galo tribes, two ethnic groups of the state of Arunachal Pradesh (North East India). J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2011, 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Chakravorty, J.; Ghosh, S.; Meyer-Rochow, V.B. Comparative survey of entomophagy and entomotherapeutic practices in six tribes of Eastern Arunachal Pradesh (India). J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2013, 9, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Meyer-Rochow, V.B.; Nonaka, K.; Boulidam, S. More feared than revered: Insects and their impact on human societies with some specific data on the importance of entomophagy in a Laotian setting. Entomol. Heute 2008, 20, 25. [Google Scholar]
  16. Muafor, F.J.; Genetegha, A.A.; le Gall, P.; Levang, P. Exploitation, Trade and Farming of Palm Weevil Grubs in Cameroon; Center for International Forestry Research Content: Bogor, Indonesia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gahukar, R.T. Edible insects collected from forests for family livelihood and wellness of rural communities: A review. Glob. Food Secur. 2020, 25, 100348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chakravorty, J.; Ghosh, S.; Meyer-Rochow, V.B. Chemical composition of Aspongopus nepalensis Westwood 1837 (Hemiptera; Pentatomidae), a common food insect of tribal people in Arunachal Pradesh (India). Int. J. Vitam Nutr. Res. 2011, 81, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mueller, A. Insects as food in Laos and Thailand—A case of “Westernization”? Asian J. Soc. Sci. 2019, 47, 204–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yi, L.; Lakemond, C.M.M.; Sagis, L.M.G.; Eisner-Schadler, V.; van Huis, A.; van Boekel, M.J.S. Extraction and characterization of protein fractions from five insect species. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 3341–3348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, J.; Han, D. Proximate, amino acid and mineral composition of pupae of the silkworm, Antheraea pernyl in China. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2006, 19, 850–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rumpold, B.A.; Schlüter, O.K. Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 802–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Van Huis, A.; van Itterbeeck, J.; Klunder, H.; Mertens, E.; Halloran, A.; Muir, G.; Vantomme, P. Edible Insects: Future Prospects for Food and Feed Security; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  24. Nowak, V.; Persijn, D.; Rittenschober, D.; Charrondiere, U.R. Review of food composition data for edible insects. Food Chem. 2016, 193, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Paul, A.; Frederich, M.; Uyttenbroeck, R.; Hatt, S.; Malik, P.; Lebecque, S.; Hamaidia, M.; Miazek, K.; Goffin, D.; Willems, L.; et al. Grasshopper s a food resource? A review. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2016, 20, 337–352. [Google Scholar]
  26. Fogang Mba, A.R.; Kansci, G.; Viau, M.; Hafnaoui, N.; Meynier, A.; Demmano, G.; Genot, C. Lipid and amino acid profiles support the potential of Rhynchophorus phoenicis larvae for human food. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2017, 60, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gahukar, R.T. Edible insects farming: Efficiency and impact on family livelihood, food security and environment compared to livestock and crops. In Insects as Sustainable Food Ingredients: Production, Processing and Food Application; Dossey, A.T., Morales-Ramos, J.A., Rojas, M.G., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 85–111. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sun-Waterhouse, D.; Waterhouse, G.I.N.; You, L.; Zhang, J.; Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Ma, L.; Gao, J.; Dong, Y. Transforming insect biomass into consumer wellness foods: A review. Food Res. Int. 2016, 89, 129–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Payne, C.L.R.; Scarborough, P.; Rayner, P.; Nonaka, K. Are edible insects more or less ‘healthy’ than commonly consumed insects? A comparison using two nutrient profiling models developed to combat over- and under-nutrition. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 70, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Meyer-Rochow, V.B.; Jung, C. Insects used as food and feed: isn’t that what we all need? Foods 2020, 9, 1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ying, F.; Xiaoming, C.; Long, S.; Zhiyong, C. Common edible wasps in Yunnan Province, China and their nutritional value. In Forest Insects as Food: Human Bite Back; Durst, P.B., Johnson, D.V., Leslie, R.N., Shono, K., Eds.; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific: Bangkok, Thailand, 2010; pp. 93–98. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ghosh, S.; Namin, S.M.; Meyer-Rochow, V.B.; Jung, C. Chemical composition and nutritional value of different species of Vespa hornets. Foods 2021, 10, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ghosh, S.; Jung, C.; Meyer-Rochow, V.B. Nutritional value and chemical composition of larvae, pupae and adults of worker honey bee, Apis mellifera ligustica as a sustainable food source. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2016, 19, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ghosh, S.; Chuttong, B.; Burgett, M.; Meyer-Rochow, V.B.; Jung, C. Nutritional value of brood and adult workers of the Asia honeybee species Apis cerana and Apis dorsata. In African Edible Insects as Alternative Source of Food, Oil, Protein and Bioactive Components; Mariod, A.A., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ghosh, S.; Jung, C.; Chuttong, B.; Burgett, M. Nutritional aspects of the dwarf honeybee (Apis florea F.) for human consumption. In The Future Role of Dwarf Honeybees in Natural and Agricultural Systems; Abrol, D.P., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; pp. 137–145. [Google Scholar]
  36. Akullo, J.; Agea, J.G.; Obaa, B.B.; Okwee-Acai, J.; Nokimbugwe, D. Nutritional composition of commonly consumed edible insects in the Lango sub-region of northern Uganda. Int. Food Res. J. 2018, 25, 159–166. [Google Scholar]
  37. Omotoso, O.T. Nutrition composition, mineral analysis and antinutrient factors of Oryctes rhinoceros L. (Scarabaeidae: Coleoptea) and winged termites, Macrotermes nigeriensis Sjostedt (Termitidae: Isoptera). Br. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2015, 8, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chakravorty, J.; Ghosh, S.; Megu, K.; Jung, C.; Meyer-Rochow, V.B. Nutritional and anti-nutritional composition of Oecophylla smaragdina (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Odontotermes sp. (Isoptera: Termitidae): Two preferred edible insects of Arunachal Pradesh, India. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2016, 19, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ghosh, S.; Lee, S.M.; Jung, C.; Meyer-Rochow, V.B. Nutritional composition of five commercial edible insects in South Korea. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2017, 20, 686–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Adámková, A.; Mlček, J.; Kouřimska, L.; Borkovcová, M.; Bušina, T.; Adámek, M.; Bednářová, M.; Krajsa, J. Nutritional potential of selected insect species reared on the Island of Sumatra. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Bbosa, T.; Ndagire, C.T.; Mukisa, I.M.; Fiaboe, K.K.M.; Nakimbugwe, D. Nutritional characteristics of selected insects in Uganda for use as alternative protein sources in food and feed. J. Insect Sci. 2019, 19, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Nyakeri, E.M.; Ogola, H.J.; Ayieko, M.A.; Amimo, F.A. An open system for farming black soldier fly larvae as a source of proteins for small scale poultry and fish production. J. Insects Food Feed 2017, 3, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Anvo, M.P.M.; Toguyeni, A.; Otchoumou, K.; Zoungrana-Kabore, C.Y.; Kouamelan, E.P. Nutritional qualities of edible caterpillars, Cirina butyrospermi in southeastern of Burkina Faso. Int. J. Innov. Appl. Stud. 2016, 18, 639–645. [Google Scholar]
  44. Chakravorty, J.; Ghosh, S.; Jung, C.; Meyer-Rochow, V.B. Nutritional composition of Chondacris rosea and Brachytrupes orientalis: Two common insects used as food by tribes of Arunachal Pradesh, India. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2014, 17, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pérez-Ramírez, R.; Torres-Castillo, J.A.; Barrientos-Lazano, L.; Almaguee-Sierra, P.; Torres-Acosta, R.I. Schistocerca piceifrons piceifrons as a source of compounds of biotechnological and nutritional interest. J. Insect Sci. 2019, 19, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Banjo, A.D.; Lawal, O.A.; Songonuga, E.A. The nutritional value of fourteen species of edible insects in southwestern Nigeria. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 5, 298–301. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kinyuru, J.N.; Konyole, S.O.; Roos, N.; Onyango, C.A.; Owino, V.O.; Owuor, B.O.; Estambale, B.B.; Friis, H.; Aagaard-Hansen, J.; Kenji, G.M. Nutrient composition of four species of winged termites consumed in western Kenya. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2013, 30, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ramos-Elorduy Blásquez, J.; Moreno, J.M.P.; Camacho, V.H.M. Could grasshoppers be a nutritive meal? Food Nutr. Sci. 2012, 3, 164–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Onyeike, E.N.; Ayalogu, E.O.; Okaraonye, C.C. Nutritive value of the larvae of raphia palm beetle (Orytes rhinoceros) and weevil (Rhynchophorus pheonicis). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2005, 85, 1822–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ramos-Elorduy, J.; Moreno, J.M.P.; Correa, S.C. Edible insects of the state of Mexico and determination of their nutritive values. An. Inst. Biol. Univ. Nac. Auton. Mex. Ser. Zool. 1998, 69, 65–104. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ramos-Elorduy, J.; Moreno, J.M.P.; Prado, E.E.; Perez, M.A.; Otero, J.L.; de Guevara, O.L. Nutritional value of edible insects from the State of Oaxaca, Mexico. J. Food Compos. Anal. 1997, 10, 142–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ghosh, S.; Choi, K.C.; Kim, S.; Jung, C. Body compositional changes of fatty acid and amino acid from the queen bumblebee, Bombus terrestris during overwintering. J. Apic. 2017, 32, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Mariod, A.A.; Abdel-Wahab, S.I.; Ain, N.M. Proximate amino acid, fatty acid and mineral composition of two Sudanese edible pentatomid insects. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2011, 31, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ekpo, K.E.; Onigbinde, A.O.; Asia, I.O. Pharmaceutical potentials of the oils of some popular insects consumed in southeast Nigeria. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2009, 3, 51–57. [Google Scholar]
  55. Santos Oliveira, J.F.; Passos de Carvalho, J.; Bruno de Sousa, R.F.X.; Madalena, S.M. The nutritional value of four species of insects consumed in Angola. Ecol. Food Nutr. 1976, 5, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bukkens, S.G.F. The nutritional value of edible insects. Ecol. Food Nutr. 1997, 36, 287–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ukhun, M.E.; Osasona, M.A. Aspects of the nutritional chemistry of Macrotermes bellicosus. Nutr. Rep. Int. 1985, 32, 1121–1130. [Google Scholar]
  58. Igwe, C.U.; Ujowundu, C.O.; Nwaogu, L.A.; Okwu, G.N. Chemical analysis of an edible African termite, Macrotermes nigeriensis, a potential antidote to food security problem. Biochem. Anal. Biochem. 2011, 1, 1000105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Womeni, H.M.; Linder, M.; Tiencheu, B.; Mbiapo, F.T.; Villeneuve, P.; Fanni, J.; Parmentier, M. Oils of Oryctes owariensis and Homorocoryphus nitidulus consumed in Cameroon: Sources of linoleic acid. J. Food Technol. 2009, 7, 54–58. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ashiru, M.O. The food value of the larvae of Anaphe venata Butler (Lepidoptera: Notodontidae). Ecol. Food Nutr. 1989, 22, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ghosh, S.; Sohn, H.-Y.; Pyo, S.-J.; Jensen, A.B.; Meyer-Rochow, V.B.; Jung, C. Nutritional composition of Apis mellifera drones from Korea and Denmark as a potential sustainable alternative food source: Comparison between developmental stages. Foods 2020, 9, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Ademolu, K.O.; Idowu, A.B.; Olatunde, G.O. Nutritional value assessment of variegated grasshopper, Zonocerus variegatus (L.) (Acridoidea: Pyrgomorphidae) during post- embryonic development. Afr. Entomol. 2010, 18, 360–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kulma, M.; Plachý, V.; Kouřimská, L.; Vrabec, V.; Bubová, Y.; Adámková, A.; Hučko, B. Nutritional value of three Blattodea species used as feed for animals. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2016, 25, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kipkoech, C.; Kinyuru, J.N.; Imathiu, S.; Roos, N. Use of house cricket to address food security in Kenya; nutritional and chitin composition of farmed crickets as influenced by age. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2017, 12, 3189–3197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ombeni, B.J.; Munyuli, T.; Fideline, N.; Espoir, I.; Betu, M. Profile in amino acids and fatty acids of Bunaeopsis aurantiaca caterpillars eaten in South Kivu Province, eastern of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Ann. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 19, 566–576. [Google Scholar]
  66. Ramos-Elorduy, J.; Gonazález, E.A.; Hernández, A.R.; Pino, J.M. Use of Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) to recycle organic wastes and as feed for broiler chickens. J. Econ. Entomol. 2002, 95, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Omotoso, O.T.; Adedire, C.O. Nutrient composition, mineral content and the solubility of the proteins of palm weevil, Rhynchophorus phoenicis. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B. 2007, 8, 318–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Opara, M.N.; Sanyigha, F.T.; Ogbuewu, I.P.; Okoli, I.C. Studies on the production trend and quality characteristics of palm grubs in the tropical rainforest zone of Nigeria. Int. J. Agric. Technol. 2012, 8, 851–860. [Google Scholar]
  69. Chinweuba, A.J.; Otuokere, I.E.; Opara, M.O.; Okafor, G.U. Nutritional potentials of Rhynchophorus phoenicis (Rahia palm weevil): Implications for food security. Asian J. Res. Chem. 2011, 4, 452–454. [Google Scholar]
  70. Omotoso, O.T. The nutrient profile of the development stages of palm beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros. Br. J. Environ. Sci. 2018, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  71. Finke, M.D. Complete nutrient composition of commercially raised invertebrates used as food for insectivores. Zoo Biol. 2002, 21, 269–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mahesh, D.S.; Vidharthi, B.S.; Narayanaswamy, T.K.; Subbarayappa, C.T.; Muthuraju, R.; Shruthi, P. Bionutritional science of silkworm pupal residue to mine: New ways for utilization. Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. 2015, 2, 135140. [Google Scholar]
  73. Trivedy, K.; Nirmal Kumar, S.; Mondal, M.; Bhat, A.K. Protein binding pattern and major amino acid component in de-oiled pupal powder of silkworm, Bombyx mori Linn. J. Entomol. 2008, 5, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Trivedy, K.; Nirmal kumar, S.; Quadri, S.M.H. Comparative study of major nutritional component of defatted and normal pupal powder of silkworm, Bombyx mori. Indian J. Seric. 2011, 50, 190–199. [Google Scholar]
  75. Cai, J.R.; Yuan, L.M.; Liu, B.; Sun, L. Non-destructive gender identification of silkworm cocoon using x-ray imaging technology coupled with multivariate data analysis. Anal. Methods 2014, 6, 7224–7233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kiuchi, T.; Koga, H.; Kawamoto, M.; Shoji, K.; Sakai, H.; Arai, Y.; Tshihara, G.; Kawaoka, S.; Sugano, S.; Shimada, T.; et al. A single female-specific piRNA is the primary determiner of sex in the silkworm. Nature 2014, 509, 633666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nakasone, S.; Ito, T. Fatty acid composition of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. J. Insect Physiol. 1967, 13, 1237–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kotake-Nara, E.; Yamamoto, K.; Nozawa, M.; Miyashita, K.; Murakami, T. Lipid profiles and oxidative stability of silkworm pupal oil. J. Oleo Sci. 2002, 51, 681–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Kulma, M.; Kouřimská, L.; Plachý, V.; Božik, M.; Adámková, A.; Vrabec, V. Effect of sex on the nutritional value of house cricket, Acheta domestica L. Food Chem. 2019, 272, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Paul, D.; Dey, S. Nutrient content of sexual and worker forms of the subterranean termite, Reticulitermes sp. Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 2011, 10, 505–507. [Google Scholar]
  81. Ntukuyoh, A.I.; Udiong, D.S.; Ikpe, E.; Akpakpan, A.E. Evaluation of nutritional value of termites (Macrotermes bellicosus), soldiers, workers and queen in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Int. J. Food Nutr. Saf. 2012, 1, 60–65. [Google Scholar]
  82. Idowu, A.B.; Ademolu, K.O.; Bamidele, J.A. Nutrition and heavy metal levels in the mound termite, Macrotermes bellicosus (Smeathman) (Isoptera: Termitidae), at three sites under varying land use in Abeokuta, southwestern Nigeria. Afr. Entomol. 2014, 22, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Borgohain, M.; Borkotoki, A.; Mahanta, R. Total lipid, triglyceride, and cholesterol contents in Oecophylla smaragdina Fabricius consumed in upper Assam of northeast India. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 2014, 4, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  84. Raksakantong, P.; Meeso, N.; Kubola, J.; Sirimornpun, S. Fatty acids and proximate composition of eight Thai edible terricolous insects. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Dué, E.A.; Zabri, H.C.B.L.; Koudio, J.P.E.N.; Kouamé, L.P. Fatty acid compositionand properties of skin and digestive fat content oils from Rhynchophorus palmarum L. larva. Afr. J. Biochem. Res. 2009, 3, 89–94. [Google Scholar]
  86. Mba, A.R.F.; Kansci, G.; Viau, M.; Ribourg, L.; Genot, C. Growing conditions and morphotypes of African palm weevil (Rhynchophorus phoenicis) larvae influence their lipophilic nutrient but not their amino acid composition. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2018, 69, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ssepuuya, G.R.; Mukisa, J.M.; Nakimbugwe, D. Nutritional composition, quality and shelf stability of processed Ruspolia nitidula (edible grasshoppers). Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 5, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Fontaneto, D.; Tommaseo-Ponzetta, M.; Galli, C.; Rise, P.; Glew, R.H.; Paoletti, M.G. Difference in fatty acid composition between aquatic and terrestrial insects used as food in human nutrition. Ecol. Food Nutr. 2011, 50, 351–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Williams, D.D.; Williams, S.S. Aquatic insects and their potential to contribute to the diet of the globally expanding human population. Insects 2017, 8, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Ssepuuya, G.R.; Smets, R.; Nakimbugwe, D.; van der Borght, M.; Claes, J. Nutritional composition of long-horned grasshopper, Ruspolia differens Serville: Effect of swarming season and sourcing geographical area. Food Chem. 2019, 301, 125305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Madibela, O.R.; Mokwena, K.K.; Nsoso, S.J.; Thema, T.F. Chemical composition of mopane worm sampled at three different sites in Botswana subjected to different processing. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2009, 41, 935–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Singh, P. Artificial Diets for Insects, Mites and Spiders; IFI/Plenum Data Company, Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1977; 594p. [Google Scholar]
  93. Purushothaman, S.; Muthuvelu, S.; Balasubramanian, U.; Murugesan, P. Biochemical analysis of mulberry leaves (Morus alba L.) and silkworm, Bombyx mori enriched with vermiwash. J. Entomol. 2012, 9, 289–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Ebenebe, C.I.; Okpoko, V.O.; Ufele, A.N.; Amobi, M.I. Survivability, growth performance and nutrient composition of the African palm weevil (Rhynchophous phoenicis Fabricius) reared on four different substrates. J. Biosci. Biotechnol. Discov. 2017, 2, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Malinga, G.M.; Valtonen, A.; Hiltunen, M.; Lehtovaara, V.J.; Nyeko, P.; Roininen, H. Performance of the African edible bush-cricket, Ruspolia differens on single and mixed diets containing inflorescences of their host plant species. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2020, 168, 12932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Quaye, B.; Atuahene, C.C.; Donkoh, A.; Adjei, B.M.; Opoku, O.; Amankrah, M.A. Nutritional potential and microbial status of African palm weevil (Rhynchophorus phoenicis) larvae raised on alternative feed resources. Am. Sci. Res. J. Eng. Technol. Sci. 2018, 48, 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  97. Oonincx, D.G.A.B.; van der Poel, A.F.B. Effects of diet on the chemical composition of migratory locusts (Locusta migratoria). Zoo Biol. 2011, 30, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Cito, A.; Longo, S.; Mazza, G.; Dreassi, E.; Francardi, V. Chemical evaluation of the Rhynchophorus ferrugineus larvae fed on different substrates as human food source. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2017, 23, 529–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Atuahene, C.C.; Adjei, M.B.; Adu, M.A.; Quaye, B.; Opare, M.B.; Benney, R. Evaluating potential of edible insects (palm weevil, Rhynchophorus phoenicis larvae) as an alternative protein source to humans. Anim. Sci. Adv. 2017, 7, 1897–1900. [Google Scholar]
  100. Rutaro, K.; Malinga, G.M.; Lehtovaara, V.J.; Opoke, R.; Nyeko, P.; Roininen, H.; Valtonen, A. Fatty acid content and composition in edible Ruspolia differens feeding on mixtures of natural food plants. BMC Res. Notes 2018, 11, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Rutaro, K.; Malinga, G.M.; Lehtovaara, V.J.; Opoke, R.; Valtonen, A.; Kwetegyeka, J.; Nyeko, P.; Roininen, H. The fatty acid composition of edible grasshopper, Ruspolia differens (Serville) (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae) feeding on diversifying diets of host plants. Entomol. Res. 2018, 48, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Meyer-Rochow, V.B.; Ghosh, S.; Jung, C. Farming of insects for food and feed in South Korea: Tradition and innovation. Berl. Muenchener Tieraerztliche Wochenschr. 2019, 132, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Rutaro, K.; Malinga, G.M.; Opoke, R.; Lehtovaara, V.J.; Omujal, F.; Nyeko, P.; Valtonen, A. Artificial diets determine fatty acid composition in edible Ruspolia differens (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae). J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2018, 21, 1342–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ghaly, A.E. The use of insects as human food in Zambia. Online J. Biol. Sci. 2009, 9, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ekpo, K.E. Nutritional and biochemical evaluation of the protein quality of four popular insects consumed in southern Nigeria. Arch. Appl. Sci. Res. 2011, 3, 24–40. [Google Scholar]
  106. Stull, V.J.; Kersten, M.; Bergmans, R.S.; Patz, J.A.; Paskewitz, S. Crude protein, amino acid, and iron content of Tribolium molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) reared on an agricultural byproduct from production: An exploratory study. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2019, 112, 533–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. De Wit, L. Rearing of Bombyx mori with Vitamin D-Enriched Diet. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Applied Sciences, Almere, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  108. Rani, A.G.; Premlatha, C.; Raj, R.S.; Ranjit Singh, A.J. Impact of supplementation of Amway protein on the economic characters and energy budget of silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Asian J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 10, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Sorjonen, J.M.; Valtonen, A.; Hirvisalo, E.; Karhapaa, M.; Lindgren, J.; Nilarmila, P.; Mooney, P.; Maki, M.; Sirjander-Rasi, H.; Tapio, M.; et al. The plant-based by-product diets for the mass rearing of Acheta domesticus and Gryllus bimaculatus. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Sorjonen, J.M.; Lehtovaara, V.J.; Immmonen, J.; Karhapää, M.; Valtonen, A.; Roininn, H. Growth performance and food conversion of Ruspolia differens on plant-based by product diets. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2020, 168, 12915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lehtovaara, V.J.; Valtonen, A.; Sorjonen, J.M.; Hiltunen, M.; Rutaro, K.; Malinga, G.M.; Roininen, H. The fatty acid contents of the edible grasshopper, Ruspolia differens can be manipulated using artificial diets. J. Insects Food Feed 2017, 3, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Melghar-Lalanne, G.; Hernandez-Alvarez, A.J.; Salinas-Castro, A. Edible insects processing: Traditional and innovative technologies. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Kewuyemi, Y.; Kesa, H.; Chinna, C.E.; Adebo, O.A. Fermented edible insects for promoting food security in Africa. Insects 2020, 11, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Son, Y.J.; Choi, S.Y.; Hwang, I.K.; Nho, C.W.; Kim, S.H. Could defatted mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) and mealworm oil be used as food ingredients? Foods 2020, 9, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Anuduang, A.; Loo, Y.Y.; Jomduang, S.; Lim, S.J.; Mustapha, W.A.W. Effect of thermal processing on physico-chemical and antioxidant propertie in mulberry silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) powder. Foods 2020, 9, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Williams, J.P.; Williams, J.R.; Kirabo, A.; Chester, D.; Peterson, M. Nutrient content and health benefits of insects. In Insects as Sustainable Food Ingredients: Production, Processing and Food Applications; Dossey, A.T., Morales-Ramos, J.A., Rojas, M.G., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 61–84. [Google Scholar]
  117. Meyer-Rochow, V.B.; Chakravorty, J. Notes on entomophagy and entomotherapy generally and information on the situation in India in particular. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2013, 48, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Sabolová, M.; Adámková, A.; Kouřimská, L.; Chrpová, D.; Pánek, J. Minor lipophilic compounds in edible insects. Potravinarsmt 2016, 10, 400–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Nyangena, D.N.; Mutungi, C.; Imathiu, S.; Kinyuru, J.; Affognon, H.; Ekesi, S.; Nakimbugwe, D.; Fiaboe, K.K.M. Effects of traditional processing techniques on the nutritional and microbiological quality of four edible insect species used for food and feed in East Africa. Foods 2020, 9, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Winitchai, S.; Manoishori, T.; Abe, M.; Boonpisuttinant, K.; Manosroi, A. Free radical scavenging activity, tyrosinase inhibition activity and fatty acids composition of oils from pupae of native Thai silkworm (Bombyx mori L.). Kasetsart J. Nat. Sci. 2011, 45, 404–412. [Google Scholar]
  121. Sangavi, M.; Sarath, S. Byproducts of seri-industry and their applications. Kisan World 2017, 44, 21–23. [Google Scholar]
  122. Chavan, S.; Chinnaswamy, K.P.; Changalerayappa. Influence of mulberry varieties and silkworm breeds on biochemical constituent of oiled and de-oiled pupal powder. In Proceedings of the National Seminar on Tropical Sericulture, Bangalore, India, 28–30 December 1999; p. 57. [Google Scholar]
  123. Rao, P.U. Chemical composition and nutritional evaluation of spent silkworm pupae. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1994, 42, 2201–2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Pereira, N.R.; Ferrarese-Filho, O.; Matsushita, M.; de Souza, N.E. Proximate composition and fatty acid profile of Bombyx mori L. chrysalis toast. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2003, 16, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ji, S.-D.; Nguyen, P.; Yoon, S.-M.; Kim, K.-Y.; Son, J.G.; Kweon, H.-Y.; Koh, Y.H. Comparison of nutrient composition and pharmacological effects of steamed and freeze-dried mature silkworm powders generated by four silkworm varieties. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2017, 20, 1410–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Kim, K.-Y.; Osabutey, A.F.; Nguyen, P.; Kim, S.B.; Jo, Y.-Y.; Kweon, H.Y.; Lee, H.-T.; Ji, S.-D.; Koh, Y.H. The experimental evidences of steamed amd freeze dried mature silkworm powder as the calorie restriction mimetics. Int. J. Indust. Entomol. 2019, 39, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Nguyen, P.; Kim, K.-Y.; Kim, A.-Y.; Choi, B.-H.; Osabutey, A.F.; Park, Y.H.; Lee, H.-T.; Ji, S.D.; Koh, Y.H. Mature silkworm powders ameliorated scopolamine-induced amnesia by enhancing mitochondrial functions in the brains of mice. J. Func. Foods 2020, 67, 103886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Kwiri, R.; Winini, C.; Muredzi, P.; Tongonya, J.; Gwala, W.; Mujuru, F.; Gwala, S.T. Mopane worm (Goniobrasia belina) utilization, a potential source of protein in fortified blended foods in Zimbabwe: A review. Glob. J. Sci. Front. Res. D Agric. Vet. 2014, 14, 55–67. [Google Scholar]
  129. Lautenschläger, T.; Neinhuis, C.; Kikongo, E.; Henle, T.; Förster, A. Impact of different preparations on the nutritional value of the edible caterpillar, Imbrasia epimethea from northern Angola. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2016, 243, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Megido, R.C.; Sablon, L.; Geuens, M.; Brostaux, Y.; Alabi, T.; Blecker, C.; Drugmand, D.; Haubruge, E.; Francis, F. Edible insects’ acceptance by Belgian consumers: Promising attitude for entomophagy development. J. Sens. Stud. 2014, 29, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Van der Spieger, M.; Noordam, M.Y.; van der Fels-Klenx, H.J. Safety of novel protein sources (insects, microalgae, seaweed, duckweed and rapeseed) and legislative aspects for their application in food and feed production. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2013, 12, 662–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Fogang Mba, A.R.; Kansci, G.; Viau, M.; Rougerie, R.; Genot, C. Edible caterpillars of Imbrasia truncata and Imbrasia epimethea contain lipids and proteins of high potential of nutrition. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2019, 79, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Okaraonyre, C.C.; Ikewuchi, J.C. Nutritional potential of Oryctes rhinoceros larva. Pak. J. Nutr. 2009, 8, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Womeni, H.M.; Tiencheu, B.; Linder, B.; Nabayo, E.M.C.; Tenyang, N.; Mbiupo, F.T.; Villeneuve, F.J.; Parmentier, M. Nutritional value and effect of cooking, drying and storage process on some functional properties of Rhynchophorus phoenicis. Int. J. Life Sci. Pharm. Res. 2012, 2, 203–219. [Google Scholar]
  135. Severelini, C.; Azzolini, D.; Albenzio, M.; Deroesi, A. On printability, quality and nutritional properties of 3D printed cereal-based snacks enriched with edible insects. Food Res. Int. 2018, 106, 666–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Smetana, S.; Larki, N.A.; Pernutz, C.; Franke, K.; Bindrich, I.J.; Toepfl, S.; Heinz, V. Structure design of insect-based meat analogs with high-moisture extrusion. J. Food Eng. 2018, 229, 83–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Fombong, F.T.; van der Borght, M.; Broeck, J.V. Influence of freeze-drying and oven-drying post blanching on the nutrient composition of the edible insect, Ruspolia differens. Insects 2017, 8, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Kinyuru, M.; Kenji, G.M.; Njoroge, S.M.; Ayieko, M. Effect of processing methods on the in vitro protein digestibility and vitamin content of edible winged termite (Macrotermes subhylanus) and grasshopper (Ruspolia differens). Food Bioprocess Technol. 2010, 3, 778–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ssepuuya, G.R.; Nakimbugwe, D.; de Winne, A.; Smets, R.; Claes, J.; van dr Borght, M. Effect of heat processing on the nutrient composition, colour, and volatile odour compounds of the long-horned grasshopper, Ruspolia differens Serville. Food Res. Int. 2020, 129, 108831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Haassan, N.M.E.; Hamed, S.Y.; Hassan, A.B.; Mohamed, M.E.; Babiker, E.E. Nutritional evaluation and physiological properties of boiled and fried tree locust. Pak. J. Nutr. 2008, 7, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Farina, M.F. How method of killing crickets impact the sensory qualities and physiochemical properties when prepared in a broth. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2017, 8, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Akullo, J.; Agea, J.G.; Obaa, B.B.; Okwee-Acai, J.; Nokimbugwe, D. Process development, sensory and nutritional evaluation of honey spread enriched with edible insects’ flour. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2017, 11, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Adeduntan, S.A. Nutritional and antinutritional characteristics of some insects foraging in Akure forest reserve Ondo state, Nigeria. J. Food Technol. 2005, 3, 563–567. [Google Scholar]
  144. Ekpo, K.E. Nutrient composition, functional properties and anti-nutrient content of Rhynchophorus phoenicis (F.) larva. Ann. Biol. Res. 2010, 1, 178–190. [Google Scholar]
  145. Ekop, E.A.; Udoh, A.I.; Akpan, P.E. Proximate and anti-nutrient composition of four edible insects in Akwa Ibom state, Nigeria. World J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2010, 2, 224–231. [Google Scholar]
  146. Ganguly, A.; Chakravorty, R.; Das, M.; Gupta, M.; Mandal, D.K.; Haldar, P.; Ramos-Elorduy, J.; Moreno, J.M.P. A preliminary study on the nutrients and antinutrients in Oedaleus abruptus (Thunberg) (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Int. J. Nutr. Metab. 2013, 5, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Shantibala, T.; Lokeshwari, R.K.; Debaraj, H. Nutritional and anti-nutritional composition of the five species of aquatic edible insects consumed in Manipur, India. J. Insect Sci. 2014, 14, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Ghosh, S.; Haldar, P.; Mandal, D.K. Evaluation of nutrient quality of a short-horned grasshopper, Oxya hyla hyla Serville (Orthoptera: Acrididae), in search of new protein source. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2016, 4, 193–197. [Google Scholar]
  149. Saeed, T.; Dagga, F.A.; Saraf, M. Analysis of residual pesticides present in edible insects captured in Kuwait. Arab Gulf J. Sci. Res. 1993, 11, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  150. Samom, S. Edible aquatic insects vanishing from Loktak. The Assam Tribune, 19 May 2016.
  151. Poma, G.; Cuykx, M.; Amato, E.; Calaprice, C.; Focant, J.F.; Covaci, A. Evaluation of hazardous chemicals in edible insects and insect-based food intended for human consumption. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 100, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Zhao, S.; Shang, X.; Duo, L. Accumulation and spatial distribution of Cd, Cr and Pb in mulberry from municipal solid waste compost following application of EDTA and (NH4)2SO4. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2013, 20, 967–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Zhou, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, S.; Han, S.; Liu, J. Lead in the soil—mulberry (Morus alba L.); silkworm (Bombyx mori) food chain: Translocation and detoxification. Chemosphere 2015, 128, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Fasunwon, B.T.; Banjo, A.D.; Jemine, T.A. Effect of Dermetes maculatus on the nutritional qualities of two edible insects (Oryctes boas and Rhynchophorus phoenicis). Afr. J. Food Agric. Nutr. Dev. 2011, 11, 5600–5613. [Google Scholar]
  155. Grabowski, N.T.; Klein, G. Microbiology of processed edible insect products- results of a preliminary survey. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Fink, M. An experimental infection model for Tetrameres americana (Cram, 1927). Parasitol. Res. 2005, 95, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Braide, W.; Nwaoguikpe, R.N. Assessment of microbiological quality and nutritional values of a processed edible weevil caterpillar (Rhynchophorus phoenicis) in Port Harcourt, southern Nigeria. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2011, 5, 410–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Musundire, R.; Osuga, I.M.; Cheseto, M.; Irungu, J.; Torto, B. Aflatoxin contamination detected in nutrient and anti-oxidant rich edible stink bug stored in recycled grain containers. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e014914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Braide, W.; Oranusi, S.; Udegbunam, L.I.; Akobondu, C.; Nwaoguikpe, R.N. Microbiological quality of an edible caterpillar of emperor moth, Bunaea alcinoe. J. Ecol. Nat. Environ. 2011, 3, 176–180. [Google Scholar]
  160. Mutungi, C.; Irungu, F.G.; Nduko, J.; Mutua, F.; Affoghon, H.; Nakjmbugwe, D.; Ekesi, S.; Fiabor, K.K.M. Post-harvest processes of edible insects in Africa. A review of processing methods and the implications for nutrition, safety and new products development. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 276–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Klunder, H.C.; Wolkers-Roojackers, J.; Korpela, J.M.; Nout, M.J.R. Microbiological aspects of processing and storage of edible insects. Food Control 2012, 26, 628–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Kamau, E.; Mutungi, C.; Kinyuru, J.; Imathiu, S.; Tanga, C.; Affognon, H.; Ekesi, S.; Nakimbugwe, D.; Flaboe, K.K.M. Effect of packaging material, storage temperature and duration on the quality of semi-processed adult house cricket meal. J. Food Res. 2018, 7, 21–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Roncolini, A.; Cardinali, F.; Aquilanti, I.; Millanović, V.; Garofalo, C.; Sabbatini, R.; Abaker, M.S.S.; Pandolfi, M.; Pasquini, M.; Tavoletti, S.; et al. Investigating antibiotic resistance genes in marketed ready-to-eat small crickets (Acheta domesticus). J. Food Sci. 2019, 84, 3222–3232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Vandeweyer, D.; Crauwels, S.; Lievens, B.; Van Campenhout, L. Metagenetic analysis of the bacterial communities of edible insects from diverse production cycles at industrial rearing companies. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 261, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Ribeiro, J.C.; Cunha, L.; Sousa-Pinto, B.; Fonseca, J. Allergic risks of consuming edible insects. A systematic review. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Barre, A.; Velazquez, E.; Delpianque, A.; Caze-Subra, S.; Bienvenu, F.; Bienvenu, J.; Maudouit, A.; Simplicien, A.; Gamier, L.; Benoist, H.; et al. Cross-reacting allergens of edible insects. Rev. Fr. d’Allergologie 2016, 56, 522–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Barre, A.; Pichereau, C.; Velazquez, E.; Maudouit, A.; Simplicien, A.; Gamier, L.; Bienvenu, F.; Bienvenu, J.; Buriet-Schultz, O.; Auriol, C.; et al. Insights into the allergenic potential of the edible yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor). Foods 2019, 8, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. De Gier, S.; Verhoeckx, K. Insect food allergy and allergens. Mol. Immunol. 2018, 100, 82–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Boukil, A.; Perreault, B.A.; Chamberland, J.; Mezdour, S.; Poulilot, Y.; Doyen, A. High hygrostatic pressure-assisted enzymatic hydrolysis affects mealworm allergenic proteins. Molecules 2020, 25, 2685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Bukkens, S.G.F. Insects in the human diet: Nutritional aspects. In Ecological Implications of Minilivestock: Potential of Insects, Rodents, Frogs and Snails; Paoletti, M.G., Ed.; Science Publishers: Enfield, NH, USA, 2005; pp. 545–577. [Google Scholar]
  171. Ayensu, J.; Lutterodt, H.; Annan, R.A.; Adusei, A.; Loh, S.P. Nutritional composition and acceptability of biscuits fortified with palm weevil (Rhynchophorus phoenicis Fabricius) and orange-fleshed sweet potato among pregnant women. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 1807–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  172. Kinyuru, M.; Kenji, G.M.; Njoroge, S.M. Process development, nutrition and sensory qualities of wheat buns enriched with edible termites (Macrotermes subhyalinus) from Lake Victoria region, Kenya. Afr. J. Food Agric. Nutr. Dev. 2009, 9, 1739–1750. [Google Scholar]
  173. Aguilar-Miranda, E.D.; Lopez, M.G.; Escamilla-Santana, C.; De La Rosa, P.B. Characteristics of maize flour Tortilla supplemented with ground Tenebrio molitor larvae. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 192–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Kim, H.W.; Setyabrata, D.; Lee, Y.J.; Jones, O.G.; Kim, Y.H.B. Effect of house cricket (Acheta domesticus) flour addition on physicochemical and textural properties of meal emulsion under various formulations. J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 2787–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  175. Van Huis, A. Edible insects: Marketing the impossible? J. Insects Food Feed 2017, 3, 67–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Payne, C.L.R.; Evans, J.D. Nested houses: Domestication dynamics of human-wasp relations in contemporary rural Japan. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2017, 13, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  177. Alemu, M.H.; Olsen, S.B.; Vedel, S.E.; Pambo, K.O.; Owino, V.O. Combining product attributes with recommendation and shopping location attributes to assess consumer preferences for insect-based food products. Food Qual. Prefer. 2017, 55, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Netshifhethe, S.R.; Kunjeku, E.C.; Duncan, F.D. Human uses and indigenous knowledge of edible termites in Chombe district, Limpopo Province, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2018, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Mmari, M.W.; Kinyuru, J.N.; Laswai, O.K.; Okoth, J.K. Traditions, beliefs and Indigenous technologies in connection with the edible longhorn grasshopper, Ruspolia differens (Serville) in Tanzania. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2017, 13, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Schäufele, I.; Albores, E.B.; Hamm, U. The role of species for the acceptance of edible insects: Evidence from a consumer survey. Br. Food J. 2019, 121, 2190–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Meyer-Rochow, V.B.; Hakko, H. Can edible grasshoppers and silkworm pupae be tasted by humans when prevented to see and smell these insects? J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2018, 21, 616–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Siozios, S.; Massa, A.; Parr, C.l.; Verspar, R.L.; Hurst, G.D.D. DNA barcoding reveals incoorect labelling of insects sold as food in the UK. PeerJ 2020, 8, e8496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Barsics, F.; Megido, R.C.; Brostaux, Y.; Barsics, C.; Blecker, C.; Haubruge, E.; Francis, F. Could new information influence attitude to food supplemented with edible insects? Br. Food J. 2017, 119, 2027–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Van Thielen, L.; Vermuyten, S.; Storms, B.; Rumpold, B.; van Campenhout, L. Consumer acceptance of foods containing edible insects in Belgium two years after their introduction to the market. J. Insects Food Feed 2019, 5, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Videback, P.N.; Grunert, K.G. Disgusting or delicious? Examining attitudinal ambivalence towards entomophagy among Danish consumers. Food Qual. Prefer. 2020, 83, 103913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Barton, A.; Richardson, C.D.; McSweeney, M.B. Consumer attitudes toward entomophagy before and after evaluating cricket (Acheta domesticus)-based protein powders. J. Food Sci. 2020, 35, 781–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Delgado, M.C.; Chambers, E.; Carbonell-Barrachina, A.; Artiaga, L.N.; Quintanar, R.V.; Hernadez, A.B. Consumer acceptability in the USA, Mexico, and Spain of chocolate chip cookies made with partial insect powder replacement. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 1621–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Ghosh, S.; Tchibozo, S.; Lammantchion, E.; Meyer-Rochow, V.B.; Jung, C. Observations on how people in two locations of the Plateau Département of Southeast Benin perceive entomophagy: A case study from West Africa. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 637385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Schardong, I.S.; Freiberg, J.A.; Santana, N.A.; dos Santos Richads, N.S.P. Brazilian consumers’ perception of edible insects. Ciência Rural 2019, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Ghosh, S.; Jung, C.; Meyer-Rochow, V.B.; Dekebo, A. Perception of entomophagy by residents of Korea and Ethiopia revealed through structured questionnaire. J. Insects Food Feed 2020, 6, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Collins, C.M.; Vaskou, P.; Kountouris, Y. Insect food products in the western world: Assessing the potential of a new “green market”. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2019, 112, 518–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Megido, R.C.; Gierts, C.; Blecker, C.; Brostaux, Y.; Francis, F. Consumer acceptance of insect-based alternative meat products in western countries. Food Qual. Prefer. 2016, 52, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Tan, H.S.G.; van den Berg, E.; Stieger, M. The influence of product preparation, familiarity and individual traits on the consumer acceptance of insects as food. Food Qual. Prefer. 2016, 52, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Bordiean, A.; Krzyzaniak, M.; Stolarski, M.J.; Czachorowski, S.; Peni, D. Will yellow mealworm become a source of safe proteins for Europe? Agriculture 2020, 10, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Hedenus, F.; Wirsenius, S.; Johansson, D.J.A. The importance of reduced meat and dairy consumption for meeting stringent climate change targets. Clim. Chang. 2014, 124, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  196. Gahukar, R.T. Insects as human food: Are they really tasty and nutritious? J. Agric. Food Inf. 2013, 14, 264–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Rojas-Downing, M.M.; Nejadhashemi, A.P.; Harrigan, T.; Woznicki, S.A. Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation and mitigation. Clim. Risk Manag. 2017, 16, 145–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Belluco, S.; Losasso, C.; Maggioletti, M.; Alonzi, C.C.; Paoletti, M.G.; Ricci, A. Edible insects in a food safety and nutritional perspective: A critical review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2013, 12, 296–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Berggren, A.; Jansson, A.; Low, M. Using current systems to inform rearing facility design in the insects as food industry. J. Insects Food Feed 2018, 4, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Oppert, B.; Perkin, L.C.; Lorenzen, M.; Dossey, A.T. Transcriptome analysis of life stages of the house cricket, Acheta domesticus, to improve insect crop production. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Risk profile related to production and consumption of insects as food and feed. EFSA J. 2015, 13, 4257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Grabowski, N.T.; Tchibozo, S.; Abdulmawjood, A.; Acheuk, F.; Guerfali, M.M.; Sayed, W.A.A.; Plötz, M. Edible insects in Africa in terms of food, wildlife resource, and pest management legislation. Foods 2020, 9, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  203. Omotoso, O.T. Nutritional quality, functional properties and antinutrient composition of the larva of Cirina forda (Westwod) (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2006, 7, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  204. Zielińska, E.; Karaś, M.; Baranaik, R. Comparison of functional properties of edible insects and preparation thereof. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 91, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Alvarez, D.; Wilkinson, K.A.; Treilhou, M.T.; Tene, M.; Castillo, D.; Sauvain, M. Prospecting peptide isolated from black soldier fly (Diptera: Stratiomycidae) with antimicrobial activity against Helicobacter pylori (Campylobacteriales: Helibactericeae). J. Insect Sci. 2019, 19, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Oh, H.G.; Lee, H.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Kang, Y.R.; Moon, D.I.; Seo, M.Y.; Back, H.I.; Kim, S.Y.; Oh, M.R.; Park, S.H.; et al. Effects of male silkworm pupa powder on the erectile dysfunction by chronic ethanol consumption in rats. Lab. Anim. Res. 2012, 28, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  207. Meyer-Rochow, V.B. Therapeutic arthropods and other, largely terrestrial, folk medicinally important invertebrates: A comparative survey and review. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2017, 13, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Proximate nutrient composition (g/100 g dry matter basis) of edible insects.
Table 1. Proximate nutrient composition (g/100 g dry matter basis) of edible insects.
InsectDevelopmental StageProteinFatFibreNFE *AshReference
Blattodea (including infra order Isoptera)
Edible cockroaches and termites 46.331.35.213.74.4[22]
Macrotermes bellicosusA40.744.85.32.25.0[36]
Macrotermes nigeriensisA37.548.05.02.13.2[37]
Odototermes sp.A33.750.96.36.13.0[38]
Syntermes sp. soldierA64.73.123.02.54.2[36]
Coleoptera
Edible beetles 40.733.410.713.25.1[22]
Allomyrina dichotomaL54.220.24.017.73.9[39]
Oryctes rhinocerosL52.010.817.92.011.8[37]
Protaetia brevitarsisL44.215.411.122.56.9[39]
Tenebrio molitorL53.234.56.31.94.0
Tenebrio molitorP51.032.012.0----[40]
Tenebrio molitorL52.031.013.0----
Zophobas morioL46.035.06.0----
Diptera
Edible flies 49.522.813.66.010.3[22]
Caliphora vomitoriaA64.90.716.612.25.6[41]
Hermetia illucensPre P44.331.95.13.48.7
Hermetia illuscensL39.032.612.4--14.6[42]
Hemiptera
Edible bugs 48.330.312.46.15.0[22]
Aspongopus nepalensisA10.638.433.515.32.2[18]
Hymenoptera
Edible ants, bees, wasps 46.525.15.720.33.5[22]
Oecophylla smaragdinaA55.315.019.87.32.6[38]
Lepidoptera
Edible moth 45.427.76.618.84.5[22]
Cirina butyrospermiL62.714.55.012.65.1[43]
Odonata
Edible dragonfly, damselfly 55.219.811.84.68.5[22]
Orthoptera
Edible grasshoppers, crickets, locusts 61.313.49.613.03.9[22]
Acheta domesticusA62.612.28.012.35.0[41]
Brachytrupes sp. A65.411.813.32.54.9[36]
Brachytrupes orientalisA65.76.38.815.24.3[44]
Chondacris roseaA68.97.912.46.74.2
Gryllus assimilisA56.032.07.0----[40]
Gryllus bimaculatusA58.311.99.510.69.7[39]
Ruspolia nitidulaA40.846.35.93.73.3[41]
Schistocerca piceifrons piceifronsA80.36.212.6--3.4[45]
Teleogryllus emmaA55.725.110.40.78.2[39]
L = Larva, P = Pupa, N = Nymph, A = Adult, B = Brood, NFE * = Nitrogen-free extract (indicative of soluble carbohydrates).
Table
Table 2. Comparative account of proximate nutrient content (g/100 g dry matter basis) of different species belonging to same genus.
Table 2. Comparative account of proximate nutrient content (g/100 g dry matter basis) of different species belonging to same genus.
GenusSpeciesDevelopmental StageProteinFatFibreNFE *AshReference
Blattodea
MacrotermesbellicosusA20.428.22.743.32.9[46]
notalensis22.122.52.242.81.9
subhylanus39.344.86.41.97.6[47]
bellicosus39.747.06.22.44.7
PeriplanetaamericanaL,A65.628.23.00.82.5[48]
australasiae62.427.34.52.73.0
PseudacanthotermesmilitarisA33.546.66.68.74.6[47]
spiniger37.547.37.20.77.2
Coleoptera
OryctesboasL26.01.53.438.51.5[46]
rhinoceros42.30.6--27.712.7[49]
Hemiptera
EdessaconspersaN,A36.845.810.04.23.2[50] (cf. [22])
montezumae37.545.910.92.13.7
petersii37.042.018.01.02.0[51]
sp.33.054.011.0--1.0
Hymenoptera
AttamexicanaA46.039.011.00.04.0[51]
cephalotes43.031.010.014.02.0
BrachygastraaztecaB63.022.03.09.03.0
mellifica53.030.03.011.03.0
PolybiaparvulinaB61.021.06.08.04.0
occidentalis nigratella61.028.02.011.03.0
occidentalis bohemani62.019.04.013.03.0
Lepidoptera
AnapheinfractaL20.015.22.466.11.6[46]
recticulata23.010.23.164.62.5
venata25.723.22.355.63.2
sp.18.918.61.746.84.1
Orthoptera
SphenariumpurpurascensA65.210.89.411.63.0[48]
mexicanum62.110.84.122.60.3
purpurascens 56.011.09.021.03.0[51]
histrio 77.04.012.04.02.0
sp. 68.012.011.05.05.0
L = Larva, P = Pupa, N = Nymph, A = Adult, B = Brood, NFE * = Nitrogen-free extract (indicative of soluble carbohydrates).
Table
Table 3. Amino acid composition of different species belonging to the same genus.
Table 3. Amino acid composition of different species belonging to the same genus.
GenusSpeciesAmino Acid Composition (% of Total Amino Acids or Protein)Total Amino Acids or Protein (g/100 g Dry Matter)Reference
ValIleLeuLysTyrThrPheTrpHisMet+CysTotal EAA ††ArgAspSerGluGlyAlaPro
Apis * (P)mellifera5.95.67.87.34.94.60.5ND2.71.040.35.68.64.920.56.17.1ND40.9[33]
cerana6.14.78.65.93.74.34.1ND2.54.744.64.912.34.710.47.29.66.651.2[34]
dorsata5.74.48.55.73.34.43.9ND2.64.943.44.913.44.911.17.58.56.938.9
florea5.94.89.36.54.54.84.8ND2.84.848.25.310.45.114.06.28.17.635.6[35]
Bombus * (A)ignitus7.05.79.36.13.02.32.7ND3.06.145.24.03.84.911.49.111.210.147.3[52]
terrestris6.35.08.17.83.12.33.1ND2.66.344.65.03.96.312.58.110.29.938.3
Brachygastra (B)azteca6.45.18.56.16.54.44.10.72.83.047.64.48.44.516.46.75.86.463.0[51]
mellifica5.44.47.83.67.54.44.00.73.63.845.25.78.64.216.06.76.17.153.0
Polybia (B)occidentalis nigratella5.94.57.87.45.64.03.30.73.05.047.25.78.44.512.97.16.56.361.0
parvulina6.14.77.87.35.94.13.40.73.45.348.75.77.84.413.37.26.46.561.0
Polistes *sagittarius6.65.57.84.45.04.25.0ND3.01.442.94.48.34.417.26.97.28.936.1[31]
sulcatus6.76.28.04.24.94.24.4ND2.42.043.04.07.34.415.38.98.98.045.0
Vespa * (B)velutina6.15.58.76.16.64.24.2ND3.22.447.04.56.34.520.16.35.56.137.9[32]
mandarinia6.35.78.76.37.34.34.3ND3.32.748.92.26.54.321.26.35.45.736.8
basalis5.75.38.56.87.14.34.3ND3.21.446.64.36.44.322.15.75.05.728.1
Vespa * (L)basalis5.95.98.04.35.74.14.3ND2.52.142.83.97.74.317.18.27.78.443.9[31]
mandarinia mandarinia5.04.66.116.54.03.310.5ND2.10.852.93.36.33.413.26.36.57.952.2
velutina auraria6.95.97.62.97.64.34.1ND3.12.945.36.39.26.512.08.07.15.949.0
tropica duealis7.55.48.33.35.44.54.2ND1.41.241.27.110.15.013.48.77.86.642.4
Sphenariumhistrio5.15.38.75.77.34.011.70.61.93.353.66.69.35.15.35.37.67.277.0[51]
purpurascens5.74.28.95.76.33.110.30.72.24.351.46.08.74.810.76.86.46.256.0
L = Larva, P = Pupa, A = Adult, B = Brood; ND = Not determined or not estimated; * Amino acid content (g/100 g dry matter) was obtained from the respective paper and recalculated as g/100 g of total amino acids or protein; †† EAA: Essential amino acids, we include essential amino acids (Val, Ile, Leu, Lys, Thr, Trp, Phe, His, Met) and two conditional essential amino acids (Tyr, Cys).
Table
Table 4. Fatty acid composition of selected edible insects.
Table 4. Fatty acid composition of selected edible insects.
GenusSpeciesDevelopmental StageFatty Acid Composition (% of Total Fatty Acids)Total Fatty Acids or Fat (g/100 g Dry Matter)Reference
C14:0C16:0C18:0SFAC18:1MUFAC18:2PUFA
Apis†ceranaL3.938.28.150.746.948.70.50.76.1[34]
P3.031.410.646.249.852.70.91.16.3
A1.918.212.133.857.763.42.62.84.2
dorsataP3.233.311.849.447.749.80.80.86.2
A1.014.414.431.361.066.52.22.23.1
melliferaL2.437.311.851.847.548.20.00.04.9[33]
P2.935.112.651.147.648.90.00.05.5
A0.614.49.325.245.267.07.87.81.7
floreaP1.835.38.846.647.652.31.01.17.2[35]
A1.530.79.743.249.755.71.11.15.4
AspongopusviduatusA0.331.33.537.945.556.84.95.454.2[53]
nepalensisA0.432.34.837.546.456.16.16.135.9[18]
Bombus *,†ignitusA2.616.11.722.149.175.42.52.59.5[52]
terrestrisA3.815.21.721.551.176.22.22.28.4
ImbrasiabelinaL1.231.94.737.934.236.06.026.123.4[54]
epimetheaL0.623.222.146.18.49.07.042.513.3[22]
truncataL0.224.621.746.57.67.67.644.416.4
ertliL1.022.00.461.42.024.020.031.011.1[55,56]
oyemensisL0.546.07.254.234.634.611.211.225.4[22]
MacrotermesBellicosus **A 2.242.52.949.015.817.924.233.136.1[54]
bellicosusA0.246.5--46.712.814.934.438.346.1[56,57]
nigeriensisA0.631.47.139.452.553.17.67.634.2[58]
subhylanusA1.127.76.335.148.652.810.812.244.8[47]
bellicosusA1.238.49.549.541.744.65.05.947.0
PseudacanthotermesmilitarisA 26.05.932.250.356.111.511.746.6
spinigerA0.828.06.135.849.352.910.511.347.3
OryctesowariensisL2.50.20.23.15.243.645.550.953.8[59]
rhinocerosL3.528.72.134.441.545.914.119.738.1[54]
Vespa†velutinaB6.031.97.848.335.339.75.212.111.6[32]
mandariniaB2.521.35.030.727.729.233.740.120.2
basalisB1.415.85.424.323.925.242.850.522.2
L = Larva, P = Pupa, A = Adult; † Fatty acid content (mg/100 g dry matter) was obtained from the respective paper and recalculated as % of total fatty acids; * Mated queen; ** Oil. SFA = Saturated fatty acids, MUFA = Monounsaturated fatty acids, PUFA = Polyunsaturated fatty acids
Table
Table 5. Minerals content (mg/100 g) of selected edible insects.
Table 5. Minerals content (mg/100 g) of selected edible insects.
GenusSpeciesDevelopmental StageCaMgNaKPFeZnCuMnReference
AnapheinfractaL8.61.0 111.31.8 [46]
reticulateL10.52.6 102.42.2
venataL8.61.6 100.52.0
sp.L7.61.0 122.21.6
venataL40.050.030.01150.0730.010.010.01.040.0[60]
ApisceranaL63.186.637.2823.1715.65.97.31.01.1[34]
P62.9104.344.41153.2931.57.17.71.20.2
A91.1148.877.11538.81283.911.112.91.90.2
dorsataP68.9103.448.61136.6905.05.86.41.10.1
A78.5113.353.91254.3972.37.67.41.20.1
BrachytupesorientalisA76.387.2112.0412.3 18.78.51.55.0[44]
sp.A9.20.1 126.90.7 [22]
ImbrasiaepimetheaL224.7402.275.31258.1666.713.011.11.25.8[22]
ertliL55.0254.02418.01204.0600.02.1 1.53.4
oyemensisL73.0 730.0680.0
MacrotermessubhylanusA58.7 53.38.1 [47]
bellicosusA63.6 116.010.8
PseudacanthotermesmilitarisA48.3 60.312.9
spinigerA42.9 64.87.1
L = Larva, P = Pupa, A = Adult.
Table
Table 6. Comparative account of proximate nutrient content (g/100 g dry matter basis) of different developmental stages of edible insects.
Table 6. Comparative account of proximate nutrient content (g/100 g dry matter basis) of different developmental stages of edible insects.
InsectDevelopmental StageProteinFatFibreNFE *AshReference
Coleoptera
Tebebrio molitorL47.737.75.07.13.0[66]
P53.136.75.11.93.2
A60.220.816.30.012.7
Rhynchophorus phoenicisEarly L9.161.522.14.92.4[67]
Late L10.562.117.27.82.3
A8.452.421.816.01.4
Rhynchophorus phoenicisL23.454.23.45.05.2[68]
Immature P33.142.73.16.77.4
Mature P34.947.12.45.63
A34.144.77.24.05.8
Rhynchophorus phoenicisEarly L9.124.25.813.02.4[69]
Late L10.525.46.012.02.3
Oryctes rhinocerosL70.87.55.47.08.3[70]
P65.320.22.24.33.2
A74.29.63.72.85.3
Hymenoptera
Apis melliferaL42.019.01.035.03.0[51]
P49.020.03.024.04.0
Apis mellifera ligusticaL35.314.5 45.14.1[33]
P45.916.0 34.33.8
A51.06.9 30.511.5
Orthoptera
Acheta domesticus (as is basis)N15.43.35.80.91.1[71]
A20.56.8 10.01.1
Zonoceros variegatusN118.34.30.90.41.9[62]
N214.44.80.90.41.0
N316.82.91.50.90.9
N415.50.70.99.71.6
N514.61.10.99.81.6
N616.10.91.08.81.5
A21.40.91.210.01.4
L = Larva, P = Pupa, N = Nymph, A = Adult; NFE * (nitrogen-free extract) indicates carbohydrate.
Table
Table 7. Anti-nutrient content (mg/100 g) of selected edible insects.
Table 7. Anti-nutrient content (mg/100 g) of selected edible insects.
PhytateTanninOxalateTrypsin InhibitorLectinHydrocyanideReference
Ant †2030.8400.0 [143]
Termite †2482.1948.3
Winged termite †1128.2250.0
Cricket †3159.0900.0
Meal bug2256.41150.0
Grasshopper †1100.11050.0
Anaphe venata†1918.0753.3
Tree hopper 1000.0
Rhynchophorus pheonicis * L1.41.00.10.90.6 [144]
Gymnogryllus lucens† A0.030.031.3 0.2[145]
Heteroligus meles†0.030.042.8 0.3
Rhynchophorus† L0.030.041.8 0.2
Zonocerus variegatus† A0.030.042.6 0.3
Oedaleus abruptus† A 2450.0600.0 [146]
Lethocerus indicus * N,A 372.3 [147]
Laccotrephes maculatus * N,A 350.4
Hydrophilus olivaceous * A 528.7
Cybister tripunctatus * A 301.7
Crocothemes servillia * N 465.3
Macrotermes nigeriensis† A15.20.6103.0 [37]
Oryctes rhinoceros† L16.10.6109.0
Oecophylla smaragdina† A171.0496.7 [38]
Odontotermes sp. † A141.2615.0
Oxya hyla hyla† A 2316.0474.0 [148]
Oryctes rhinoceros† L37.05.61.3 [70]
Oryctes rhinoceros† P39.46.81.3
Oryctes rhinoceros† A41.14.21.2
L = Larva, P = Pupa, N = Nymph, A = Adult; * Anti-nutrient content was estimated on the basis of wet weight; † Anti-nutrient content was estimated on the basis of dry weight.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meyer-Rochow, V.B.; Gahukar, R.T.; Ghosh, S.; Jung, C. Chemical Composition, Nutrient Quality and Acceptability of Edible Insects Are Affected by Species, Developmental Stage, Gender, Diet, and Processing Method. Foods 2021, 10, 1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10051036

AMA Style

Meyer-Rochow VB, Gahukar RT, Ghosh S, Jung C. Chemical Composition, Nutrient Quality and Acceptability of Edible Insects Are Affected by Species, Developmental Stage, Gender, Diet, and Processing Method. Foods. 2021; 10(5):1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10051036

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meyer-Rochow, Victor Benno, Ruparao T. Gahukar, Sampat Ghosh, and Chuleui Jung. 2021. "Chemical Composition, Nutrient Quality and Acceptability of Edible Insects Are Affected by Species, Developmental Stage, Gender, Diet, and Processing Method" Foods 10, no. 5: 1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10051036

APA Style

Meyer-Rochow, V. B., Gahukar, R. T., Ghosh, S., & Jung, C. (2021). Chemical Composition, Nutrient Quality and Acceptability of Edible Insects Are Affected by Species, Developmental Stage, Gender, Diet, and Processing Method. Foods, 10(5), 1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10051036

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop