Next Article in Journal
Lateral Flow Immunochromatography Assay for Detection of Furosemide in Slimming Health Foods
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of Multifunctional Pullulan/Chitosan-Based Composite Films Reinforced with ZnO Nanoparticles and Propolis for Meat Packaging Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Plant-Based Meat Alternatives on the Gut Microbiota of Consumers: A Real-World Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Domestic Use Simulation and Secondary Shelf Life Assessment of Industrial Pesto alla genovese
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/foods10092039
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Gaseous Ozone on Microbiological Quality of Andean Blackberries (Rubus glaucus Benth)

by
Sandra Horvitz
1,*,
Mirari Arancibia
2,
Cristina Arroqui
1,
Erika Chonata
2 and
Paloma Vírseda
1
1
Research Institute for Innovation & Sustainable Development in Food Chain, Campus Arrosadía, Public University of Navarre, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
2
Food Science and Engineering Faculty, Technical University of Ambato, Av. Los Chasquis y Rio Payamino, Ambato 180206, Ecuador
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2021, 10(9), 2039; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10092039
Submission received: 27 July 2021 / Revised: 23 August 2021 / Accepted: 25 August 2021 / Published: 30 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Strategies to Preserve Quality and Extend Shelf Life of Foods)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Andean blackberries are highly perishable due to their susceptibility to water loss, softening, mechanical injuries, and postharvest diseases. In this study, the antimicrobial efficacy of gaseous ozone against spoilage (mesophiles, psychrotrophs, and yeasts and molds) and pathogenic (E. coli, S. enterica, and B. cinerea) microorganisms was evaluated during 10 days of storage at 6 ± 1 °C. Respiration rate and mass loss were also determined. Ozone was applied prior to storage at 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 ppm, for 3 min. The best results were observed with the higher ozone dose, with initial maximum reductions of ~0.5, 1.09, and 0.46 log units for E. coli, S. enterica, and B. cinerea, respectively. For the native microflora, maximum reductions of 1.85, 1.89, and 2.24 log units were achieved on day 1 for the mesophiles, psychrotrophs, and yeasts and molds, respectively, and this effect was maintained throughout storage. In addition, the lower respiration rate and mass loss of the blackberries ozonated at 0.7 ppm indicate that this treatment did not induce physiological damage to the fruit. Gaseous O3 could be effective in maintaining the postharvest quality of blackberries throughout refrigerated storage but higher doses could be advisable to enhance its antimicrobial activity.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Andean blackberries (Rubus glaucus Benth) are mostly cultivated in temperate and cold climates in South America and are usually consumed processed as pulp, jams, juices, and desserts [1]. Nonetheless, the interest in blackberries as fresh fruit has increased in the last years driven by the consumer’s interest in berries as sources of bioactive compounds and health benefits [2].
As non-climacteric fruit, blackberries must be harvested at full maturity when they have the best organoleptic and nutritional quality. At this stage, they are also more susceptible to mechanical injuries and microbial attacks, which impair their commercial quality and shorten the postharvest shelf-life [3,4]. One of the main postharvest diseases affecting blackberries is gray mold, caused by Botrytis cinerea Pers.: Fr. The contamination with this mold may occur in the field or during the harvest, postharvest, and storage period, even under refrigeration conditions, leading to important economic losses of this crop [5]. In addition, the contamination of berries with pathogens can result in foodborne illness outbreaks and thus, microorganisms such as Escherichia coli or Salmonella are of great concern for fruit growers and processors.
The most extended methods used to control postharvest decay and guarantee fresh produce safety are the application of synthetic fungicides, washing with chlorine-based sanitizers, and storage at low temperature. Yet, the risk of appearance of pesticide-resistant strains of pathogens and of environmental pollution caused by the residues, together with consumers’ demands to minimize chemical use, led to increased restrictions by marketing chains and regulatory agencies on agrochemical use, especially for postharvest applications [6,7].
Likewise, washing before retail is not recommended for delicate fruit such as berries, as their skin may be damaged easily [8]. Furthermore, it is now known that under commercial conditions, postharvest washing can present limited efficacy in fresh produce decontamination, or it can even lead to cross-contamination events between batches [9]. Finally, rapid cooling after harvest and constant cold storage are key factors in delaying microbial growth and extending the postharvest shelf-life of berries [10]. However, cold storage may be insufficient to prevent growth of mold, particularly on berries coming from fields with a high pathogen inoculum [3]. Therefore, the development of alternative sanitizing methods to prolong the storage life of blackberries after harvest is needed.
Conventional thermal treatments are effective in killing foodborne microorganisms, but they can negatively affect the quality of fresh produce. Thus, different individual or combined, physical (hot water, irradiation, UV-light, ozone, cold plasma), chemical (salts, organic acids, natural compounds), and biological treatments have been studied for decay control in fresh fruit and vegetables.
One of these alternatives could be the use of gaseous O3, which has a high oxidant capacity and can be used for the inactivation of a wide range of microorganisms and for the degradation of chemical contaminants and off-odors in storage rooms [11]. There are several advantages related to the use of O3 as a sanitizer: it is produced on site and does not require storage, and its precursors are abundant and economically advantageous. In addition, it decomposes almost immediately to oxygen, presenting no safety concerns regarding the consumption of chemical residues [12]. In 2001, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) declared ozone to be a generally recognized as safe (GRAS) substance for the commercial use as a disinfectant and sanitizer in food handling [13]. Due to these circumstances, its application in food processing is considered an environmental-friendly technology and it is allowed by organic certification [14].
Due to the lack of a protective skin and berries’ surface roughness and sensitivity, gaseous treatments are preferred for these fruit [15]. Moreover, it is a common practice to pick berries straight into the punnets and prepare them in the field for retail. Thus, only gaseous ozone is applicable to them before the punnets are sealed and dispatched [16]. The antimicrobial activity of gaseous ozone against spoilage bacteria and fungi, and pathogens such as E. coli and Salmonella spp., has been studied in different berries including, among others, strawberries, table grapes, blueberries, blackberries, and raspberries.
Gaseous ozone contributed to reduce sour rot [17], the germination of Botrytis cinerea conidia, and the incidence and severity of gray mold during cold storage of table grapes [18]. Similarly, ozone proved efficacy in lowering decay in strawberries [19,20], raspberries [21,22], mulberries [23], blueberries [20,24], and blackberries [25]. On the contrary, after an initial microbial reduction, the exposure to gaseous ozone resulted ineffective in preventing decay after cold storage of strawberries [26], mulberries [27], and blueberries [28,29].
Even though the highest ozone doses often resulted in the highest antimicrobial activity, low concentrations of ozone are preferred in order to minimize exposure of workers to potentially hazardous concentrations of the gas and to reduce the risk of physiological damage to the treated produce [30]. In effect, as different fruit vary in their sensitivity to ozone, an optimal treatment should be established for each particular product. Previous research indicated that storage under continuous ozone prevented fungal decay and extended the shelf-life of blackberries [25]. However, to the best of our knowledge, to date, there are no previous reports dealing with the control of native microflora and inoculated pathogens on Andean blackberries by means of pre-storage treatments with gaseous ozone at low concentrations.
Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effect of low gaseous ozone doses (0.4–0.7 ppm for 3 min) on the growth of native microflora (total aerobic mesophilic bacteria, psychrophiles, and yeast–mold) and inoculated pathogens (E. coli, S. enterica, and B. cinerea) on Andean blackberries during refrigerated storage. The respiration rate and mass loss of the fruit were also determined as indicators of possible physiological damage.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

The plant material used for this study was Andean blackberries (Rubus glaucus Benth), hand-harvested in Tungurahua Province, Ecuador at maturity stage 4 (dark red), according to external color of the fruit and following the color chart of the Ecuadorian Quality Standard for fresh blackberries [31]. Immediately after harvest, 30 kg of fruit were transported to the Technical University of Ambato for analyses. Fruit that were uniform in size and color, sound, and free from blemishes and injuries were selected for the study.

2.2. Microbial Strains

The strains of Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and Salmonella enterica (ATCC 9842) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and Botrytis cinerea was kindly provided by BioSeb Organics Ltd. (Ambato, Ecuador).

2.3. Preparation of Inoculum

A loopful of each stock bacterial culture was individually transferred into 30 mL of brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) and incubated at 37 ± 2 °C for 24 h prior to experimentation. Cells were used when a concentration of 109 CFU mL−1 was reached. Microbial concentration was determined according to the McFarland scale at 600 nm (OD600) [32]. An isolate of B. cinerea was cultured in a Petri dish on potato dextrose agar (PDA, Difco, Detroit, MI, USA). Streptomycin (1.0 mg mL−1) was added to the media to inhibit bacterial growth and the plate was incubated at 25 ± 1 °C for 7 days. The fungi spores were scraped with a sterile loop and diluted with sterile distilled water. Conidia were counted using a hemocytometer and the suspension was adjusted to 107 CFU mL−1.

2.4. Inoculation of Andean Blackberries

The blackberries were distributed in transparent polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic containers with perforated lids. The fruit was placed in a single layer, with each box containing 100 ± 5 g of fruit. The blackberries of each box were inoculated to reach 104 conidia g−1 of Botrytis cinerea and 104 CFU g−1 of E. coli and S. enterica by placing the inoculum on the surface of the fruit with a calibrated micropipette. Three containers/pathogen were prepared for each treatment and evaluation date.
In order to avoid the growth of native fungi and guarantee the growth only of the inoculated microorganism, before the inoculation with B. cinerea, the fruit were disinfected with an ethanol solution (70%, v/v) for 10 s, washed with sterile distilled water, and dried at room temperature. Inoculated blackberries were air dried for 1 h at room temperature (20 ± 2 °C) in a biosafety cabinet to allow the attachment of the microorganisms to the fruit surfaces. Thereafter, the fruit was stored under refrigeration (6 ± 1 °C) for 24 h until ozone treatment.

2.5. Ozone Treatment

Ozone was generated in situ utilizing a surface discharge ozone generator (COM-SD-30, Anseros GmbH, Tübingen, Germany) and synthetic air as the feeding gas (Figure 1). A fan installed inside the treatment chamber (Precision, Pompano Beach, FL, USA) facilitated an even distribution of the gas. Ozone production was of 30 mg h−1 and ozone concentration was continuously monitored and controlled by circulating air from the chamber through an ultraviolet absorption ozone analyzer (Anseros MP; Anseros GmbH, Tübingen, Germany), calibrated in the range of 0–2000 ppm connected to a computer. The software integrated the concentration and time data and when the appropriate dose (concentration × time) was reached, the ozone generator was stopped.
Two independent ozonation processes were performed, one for the inoculated fruit and the second for the non-inoculated blackberries. In both cases, the fruit was divided in five groups: untreated berries represented the control sample, whereas the remaining four groups were subjected to gaseous ozone at 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 ppm, for 3 min.

2.5.1. Inoculated Blackberries

The inoculated fruit was ozonized one day after the inoculation. For this purpose, the containers with the fruit were placed in the treatment chamber, with previous retirement of the lids. For each pathogen, three samples/evaluation date were treated with each of the ozone doses studied.

2.5.2. Non-Inoculated Blackberries

The effect of ozonation on the native microflora of the blackberries was evaluated on non-inoculated samples. Around 2 kg of blackberries were placed on stainless steel mesh trays and taken inside the chamber for the treatment with each O3 dose.

2.6. Packing and Storage

After the O3 treatments, the fruit for the native microflora (aerobic mesophiles, psychrotrophs, and molds and yeasts) studies were packaged in the same transparent polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic containers (100 ± 5 g) as those used for the inoculated fruit. All the samples were stored at 6 ± 1 °C.

2.7. Respiration Rate

The respiration rate of the blackberries was measured using the closed system method [33]. Samples of 100 ± 10 g of blackberries were placed into glass jars with a hermetic closure and stored open at 6 ± 1 °C. On each evaluation date, the jars were closed and the internal O2 and CO2 were determined after 8 h with the use of an O2/CO2 gas analyzer (MAPY 4.0 LE SP, WITT-Gasetechnik, Germany). The results were expressed as mg of CO2 produced per kilogram per hour (mg kg−1 h−1).

2.8. Mass Loss

For mass loss, three trays were randomly selected and individually weighed at the beginning of the experiment, and every two days during the storage period. Results were expressed as percentage of mass loss relative to the initial mass.

2.9. Microbiological Analyses

Microbiological analyses were performed on days 1, 4, 7, and 10 of storage, considering day 1 as the day of ozonation. In addition, the containers were visually controlled daily in order to detect symptoms of microbial development. At each evaluation date, 3 samples/treatment were analyzed.

2.9.1. Inoculated Microorganisms

For the analyses, 5 g of fruit inoculated with each of the pathogens under study was aseptically transferred to an individual filter stomacher bag and homogenized in 45 mL sterile buffered peptone water (Difco, USA) for 120 s at 200 rpm, using a Stomacher 400 circulator (Seward, AK, USA). Serial decimal dilutions of each homogenized sample were made in peptone water. From each dilution, 0.1 mL aliquots were aseptically surface-plated on the following media: Sabouraud dextrose agar plus chloramphenicol, Eosin Methylene Blue (EMB) Agar Levine, and Salmonella Shigella (SS) Agar, for B. cinerea, E. coli, and S. enterica, respectively. All the culture media were from Acumedia (Lansing, MI, USA). Culture conditions were as follows: 37 ± 2 °C for 48 h for E. coli and S. enterica and 25 ± 1 °C for 5 days in the case of B. cinerea.

2.9.2. Native Microflora: Total Aerobic Mesophiles, Psychrotrophs, and Yeasts and Molds

Serial dilutions for these microbial groups were prepared as described above. From each dilution, 1 mL aliquots were aseptically pour-plated for mesophiles and psychrothrophs and 0.1 mL was surface-plated for molds and yeasts analyses. The following media and culture conditions were used: (1) plate count agar (PCA, Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) incubated at 35 ± 2 °C for 48 h and at 7 °C for 7 days, for total mesophilic and psychrotrophic microorganisms, respectively, and (2) Sabouraud dextrose agar plus chloramphenicol media (Acumedia, Lansing, MI, USA) incubated at 25 °C ± 2 for 5 days for yeasts and molds. All the samples were analyzed in duplicate, and microbial counts were expressed as log10 (cfu g−1) of fruit.

2.10. Statistical Analyses

The analyses were conducted in triplicate, considering each container as the experimental unit. Data were subjected to a one-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05) using the IBM SPSS Statistics Version 27 software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). When significant differences were observed, mean treatments were compared using Tukey’s test.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Respiration Rate

Respiration rate (RR) is an indicator of the metabolic activity of fruit and vegetables and thus, an indicator of postharvest shelf-life. The RR of the control and the O3-treated blackberries is shown in Figure 2.
Initially, the respiration rate of the blackberries ranged between 11.30 ± 0.26 (0.4 ppm O3-treated blackberries) and 11.98 ± 0.51 (control) mg CO2 kg−1 h−1, with no significant differences among treatments (p > 0.05). Similar results were observed in cantaloupes [34], mulberries [23], and strawberries [35] treated with low doses of ozone. On the contrary, Forney et al. [36] reported an increase in the CO2 production of broccoli treated with high doses of this gas (7 ppm), which was attributed to physiological damage caused to the florets. During the storage period, the RR of all the fruit increased continuously. However, the highest CO2 production occurred in the control and those blackberries treated with 0.4 ppm O3. In effect, after 10 days, the RR of these fruit was significantly higher than in the blackberries ozonized with the highest doses. Chen et al. [34] and Han et al. [23] found similar inhibitory effects of ozone on respiration rate during storage of melons and mulberries, respectively. The elevated CO2 production observed in the present study, which represented an increase of around 55% and 75%, in the control and the 0.4 ppm O3-treated fruit, respectively, could be related to the highest microbial growth observed in these treatments by the end of the storage period.

3.2. Mass Loss

During the postharvest period, mass loss is caused mainly by the respiration and transpiration of the fruit [37]. In the case of blackberries, their high respiration rates together with the lack of a protective peel make these fruit very susceptible to moisture loss. In effect, regardless of the treatment, mass loss increased constantly during storage, with maximum values of around 8% after 10 days of refrigerated storage (Figure 3). This value is above the maximum mass loss acceptable for commercialization of blackberries, reported as 6% [38]. Nevertheless, in all the evaluation dates, the exposure of blackberries to the highest O3 dose resulted in lower mass loss, indicating that no physiological damage occurred due to ozonation. The lower mass loss in the fruit treated with the highest O3 concentrations could be associated with the lower respiration rates and microbial counts observed in these blackberries. Similar results were reported for strawberries [39] and winter jujubes [40] washed with aqueous ozone and in table grapes [41], red peppers [42], and blueberries [28] exposed to gaseous ozone. According to Contigiani et al. [6], a thicker and reinforced cuticle in the O3-treated fruit, which contributes to keeping cell integrity and offers a protective effect against moisture loss, can explain the positive effect of ozone in hindering mass loss.

3.3. Microbiological Analyses

3.3.1. E. coli and S. enterica

The counts for E. coli and S. enterica in the blackberries as affected by the exposure to gaseous O3 and storage time at 6 °C are presented in Table 1.
Immediately after exposure to ozone, the counts of E. coli and S. enterica were significantly reduced in all the ozone-treated blackberries, with the greatest reductions observed with the highest O3 dose: 0.48 and 1.09 log units for E. coli and Salmonella, respectively. Ozone’s antimicrobial activity is based on its oxidant potential, which provokes injuries to the cell walls and a progressive oxidation of the microorganisms’ cellular components [43]. However, it has limited penetration and thus, can be ineffective against latent infections, microbial growth occurring in wounds, and bacteria attached to uneven surfaces of fresh produce, all of which restrict the contact of ozone with the target microorganisms [44]. In this sense, the low microbial reductions observed in this study could be explained by the roughness and irregularities of the blackberries’ surface where the inoculated bacteria can remain protected from ozone action and the relatively low O3 doses used. Similar findings were reported for ground pepper [45], raspberries and strawberries [46], and mushrooms [47] treated with gaseous ozone and demonstrate that surface area is critical regarding the efficiency of O3 treatments. Under these circumstances, higher O3 concentrations and/or longer exposures to the gas were necessary to achieve the pathogens’ inactivation.
During the storage period, the counts for both pathogens progressively decreased in all the treatments. The final counts of E. coli ranged from 2.96 ± 0.11 (0.7 ppm O3) to 3.49 ± 0.06 log units in the control samples, whilst Salmonella was not detected on day 10 in the blackberries exposed to 0.6 and 0.7 ppm O3. Daş et al. [48] reported similar findings in O3-treated cherry tomatoes inoculated with Salmonella after 6 days of cold storage. Both blackberries and tomatoes are acidic fruit and Salmonella is very susceptible to acid environments. On the contrary, some strains of E. coli remained viable even at pH 2.5 [49]. In this study, and in addition to ozone activity, the low pH (3–3.9) of the blackberries could contribute to limit the growth of this pathogen [50].

3.3.2. Botrytis cinerea

The counts of Botrytis on non-ozonated blackberry samples or O3-treated fruit (0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 ppm gaseous O3/3 min) are shown in Figure 4. On day 1, Botrytis counts for the control reached 3.84 ± 0.05 log units and the maximum reduction (0.46 log units) was observed in the blackberries treated with the highest O3 dose. In effect, only this treatment significantly reduced Botrytis counts initially and following the storage period (Figure 4). On the contrary, the treatment with 0.4 ppm O3 was not effective against this pathogen, with higher counts than the control. During the cold storage period, the growth of Botrytis progressively increased, and mycelium could be visually detected in the samples from all the treatments.
The results found in the literature regarding O3 efficacy to control B. cinerea are somehow contradictory. Vlassi et al. [51] found that, regardless of inoculation technique (injection or immersion), treating table grapes with gaseous ozone (15 ppm/60 min) on a daily basis was an effective means of controlling Botrytis cinerea during 40 days of cold storage. On the contrary, Sharpe et al. [29] reported that low doses of ozone (450 ppb applied for 48 h before storage) reduced decay incidence in apples and grapes but were ineffective in blueberries, probably due to the inability of ozone to penetrate the fruit tissue to kill latent infections occurring early in the growing season. In the same way, gray mold was controlled by ozone in table grapes but not in citrus or stone fruit [52]. These authors attributed the differences to the fact that in the former, the inoculum was on the surface of the fruit, whilst in the latter, the pathogen was inoculated into wounds, hindering the access of the ozone to the inoculum. Finally, in naturally infected fruit, the treatment with 0.15 (grapes) and 0.7 (strawberries) ppm gaseous ozone, applied continuously in the storage room completely inhibited Botrytis development [30]. These apparent discrepancies among studies can be explained by differences in the type of commodity, cultivars, the inoculum level, and the presence of wounds, as well as experimental conditions, such as gas concentration and time of exposure; factors that can influence the antimicrobial efficacy of ozone treatments [15].

3.3.3. Native Microflora: Total Aerobic Mesophiles, Psychrotrophs, and Molds and Yeasts

The microbial counts for the native microflora of the control and the O3-treated blackberries are shown in Table 2. On the initial day, the control samples presented 2.93 ± 0.03 (aerobic mesophiles), 4.44 ± 0.15 (psychrotrophs), and 5.25 ± 0.09 (molds and yeasts) log unit counts.
In all the O3-treated fruit, the counts for the three microbial groups studied were significantly lower (p < 0.05) when compared with the control. Furthermore, the extent of the reductions increased with increasing O3 dose, ranging from 0.27 to 1.85, 0.49 to 1.89, and 0.37 to 2.24 log units for the mesophiles, psychrotrophs, and molds and yeasts, respectively. During the cold storage period, the microbial populations gradually increased regardless of the treatment. Yet, in all the ozone-treated blackberries, the reductions achieved were maintained throughout the storage period. Among the O3 treatments, the best results were observed when the blackberries were exposed to 0.7 ppm O3 with counts on day 10 for total aerobic mesophiles and psychrotrophs even lower than the initial counts of the control samples.
Gaseous ozone can be applied either as a pre-storage treatment or continuously or intermittently during the storage period. Similar to our results, the application of gaseous ozone at doses of 130 g m−3/30 min and 0.5 to 2 mg L−1/60 min reduced the total mesophile counts in juniper berries [53] and greenhouse tomatoes [54], with the inhibitory effects being maintained during storage. In the same way, Alves et al. [55] found that 18 and 14 mg L−1 gaseous ozone applied to strawberries for 30 min were effective in controlling aerobic mesophiles and molds and yeasts, respectively, during 4 days of storage. In studies involving the application of ozone during storage, the exposure of sweet cherries to 2 ppm gaseous ozone for 30 min every 6 days delayed decay development and lowered decay incidence on the fruit for up to 18 days [56]. As well, treating raspberries with 8–10 ppm O3 in cycles of 30 min once every 12 h reduced the aerobic mesophilic bacteria and fungi counts on this fruit during 3 days of storage at room temperature [22]. On the contrary, both intermittent (0.1 ppm applied every 30 min) and continuous (0.35 ppm, 3 days) O3 applications were only partially effective in preventing fungal growth on table grapes and strawberries, respectively [26,57].
These variable and somehow contradictory results could be explained by differences in the type of product, differences in the ozone application methods and in the doses used (time and concentration), the microbial type and microbial load, as well as variations in environmental conditions (temperature, relative humidity), all of which can affect the efficacy of ozone as a sanitizer [58].

4. Conclusions

The application of low doses of gaseous ozone prior to storage was studied as an environmental-friendly alternative to guarantee Andean blackberries’ quality and safety. The best results were obtained after the exposure of the fruit to 0.7 ppm gaseous O3 for 3 min. This treatment slowed down the respiration and mass loss rates, indicating that no physiological damage occurred in the treated fruit. Moreover, it was proven effective in reducing both the native microflora and the inoculated pathogens on the fruit throughout the storage period. Therefore, gaseous ozone could be considered a promising processing technology for prolonging the postharvest life of fresh Andean blackberries during refrigerated storage. However, as the log reduction in microbial populations observed in this study may not be enough to ensure the safety of the product, further studies would be necessary to determine the optimal treatment conditions for this fruit. As well, the effects of the treatment on the bioactive compounds and the physicochemical and sensory quality of the blackberries would be assessed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H. and M.A.; Data curation, C.A. and E.C.; Formal analysis, C.A. and E.C.; Funding acquisition, S.H. and P.V.; Investigation, S.H., M.A., C.A., E.C. and P.V.; Methodology, S.H., M.A. and P.V.; Project administration, S.H. and M.A.; Resources, M.A., C.A. and P.V.; Supervision, S.H., M.A., C.A. and P.V.; Writing—original draft, E.C. and P.V.; Writing—review and editing, S.H., M.A., C.A. and P.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Research and Development Department (DIDE) of the Technical University of Ambato through the project “Development of new technologies for berries postharvest conditioning”, grant 1302-CU-P-2015.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Martínez, A.; Beltrán, O.; Velastegui, G.; Ayala, G.; Jácome, R.; Yánez, M.; Luciano, E. Manual del Cultivo de la Mora de Castilla; INIAP: Quito, Ecuador, 2007; pp. 9–16. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark, J.R.; Finn, C.E. Blackberry cultivation in the world. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 2014, 36, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Gabioud Rebeaud, S.; Varone, V.; Vuong, L.; Cotter, P.Y.; Ançay, A.; Christen, D. Postharvest ozone treatment on raspberries. Acta Hortic. 2020, 1277, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Horvitz, S.; Chanaguano, D. Microbial and sensory quality of an Andean blackberry (Rubus glaucus Benth) cultivar. Acta Hortic. 2020, 1275, 121–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Junqueira-Gonçalves, M.P.; Alarcón, E.; Niranjan, K. The efficacy of potassium sorbate-coated packaging to control postharvest gray mold in raspberries, blackberries and blueberries. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 11, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Contigiani, E.V.; Jaramillo-Sánchez, G.; Castro, M.A.; Gómez, P.L.; Alzamora, S.M. Postharvest Quality of Strawberry Fruit (Fragaria × Ananassa Duch cv. Albion) as Affected by Ozone Washing: Fungal Spoilage, Mechanical Properties, and Structure. Food Bioproc. Tech. 2018, 11, 1639–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Romanazzi, G.; Smilanick, J.L.; Feliziani, E.; Droby, S. Integrated management of postharvest gray mold on fruit crops. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 113, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vardar, C.; Ilhan, K.; Karabulut, O.A. The application of various disinfectants by fogging for decreasing postharvest diseases of strawberry. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2012, 66, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Murray, K.; Wu, F.; Shi, J.; Jun Xue, S.; Warriner, K. Challenges in the microbiological food safety of fresh produce: Limitations of post-harvest washing and the need for alternative interventions. Food Qual. Saf. 2017, 1, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Horvitz, S.; Chanaguano, D.; Arozarena, I. Andean blackberries (Rubus glaucus Benth) quality as affected by harvest maturity and storage conditions. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 226, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Torlak, E. Use of gaseous ozone for reduction of ochratoxin A and fungal populations on sultanas. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2019, 25, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Pandiselvam, R.; Sunoj, S.; Manikantan, M.R.; Kothakota, A.; Hebbar, K.B. Application and Kinetics of Ozone in Food Preservation. Ozone Sci Eng. 2017, 39, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. United States Food and Drug Administration. Rules and Regulations. Part 173-Secondary Direct Food Additives Permitted in Food for Human Consumption (21 CFR Part 173 Authority: 21 USC. 321, 342, 348); Federal Register; United States Food and Drug Administration: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2001; Volume 66, p. 123. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zainuri, J.; Sauqi, A.; Sjah, T.; Desiana, R.Y. Combination of ozone and packaging treatments maintained the quality and improved the shelf life of tomato fruit. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 102, 012027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tzortzakis, N.; Chrysargyris, A. Postharvest ozone application for the preservation of fruits and vegetables. Food Rev Int. 2017, 33, 270–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Glowacz, M.; Rees, D. The practicality of using ozone with fruit and vegetables. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 4637–4643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pinto, L.; Caputo, L.; Quintieri, L.; de Candia, S.; Baruzzi, F. Efficacy of gaseous ozone to counteract postharvest table grape sour rot. Food Microbiol. 2017, 66, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ozkan, R.; Smilanick, J.L.; Karabulut, O.A. Toxicity of ozone gas to conidia of Penicillium digitatum, Penicillium italicum, and Botrytis cinerea and control of gray mold on table grapes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2011, 60, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lopes-Morais, M.; Alvinhäo, J.E.O.; Vilela-Franco, D.; Silva, E.d.B.; Dessimoni-Pinto, N.A.V. Application of ozone aiming to keep the quality of strawberries using a low cost reactor. Rev Bras Frutic. 2015, 37, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Pinto, L.; Palma, A.; Cefola, M.; Pace, B.; D’Aquino, S.; Carboni, C.; Baruzzi, F. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) and gaseous ozone pre-packaging treatment on the physico-chemical, microbiological and sensory quality of small berry fruit. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 26, 100573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Onopiuk, A.; Półtorak, A.; Moczkowska, M.; Szpicer, A.; Wierzbicka, A. The impact of ozone on health-promoting, microbiological, and colour properties of Rubus ideaus raspberries. CyTA-J. Food 2017, 15, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Piechowiak, T.; Antos, P.; Kosowski, P.; Skrobacz, K.; Józefczyk, R.; Balawejder, M. Impact of ozonation process on the microbiological and antioxidant status of raspberries (Rubus ideaeus L.) during storage at room temperature. Agric Food Sci. 2019, 28, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Han, Q.; Gao, H.; Chen, H.; Fang, X.; Wu, W. Precooling and ozone treatments affects postharvest quality of black mulberry (Morus nigra) fruits. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 1947–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Piechowiak, T.; Antos, P.; Józefczyk, R.; Kosowski, P.; Skrobacz, K.; Balawejder, M. Impact of Ozonation Process on the Microbiological Contamination and Antioxidant Capacity of Highbush Blueberry (Vaccinum corymbosum L.) Fruit during Cold Storage. Ozone Sci. Eng. 2019, 41, 376–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Barth, M.M.; Zhou, C.; Mercier, J.; Payne, F.A. Ozone storage effects on anthocyanin content and fungal growth in blackberries. J. Food Sci. 1995, 60, 1286–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pérez, A.G.; Sanz, C.; Ríos, J.J.; Olías, R.; Olías, J.M. Effects of ozone treatment on postharvest strawberry quality. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 1652–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tabakoglu, N.; Karaca, H. Effects of ozone-enriched storage atmosphere on postharvest quality of black mulberry fruits (Morus nigra L.). LWT 2018, 92, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Concha-Meyer, A.; Eifert, J.D.; Williams, R.C.; Marcy, J.E.; Welbaum, G.E. Shelf Life Determination of Fresh Blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum) Stored under Controlled Atmosphere and Ozone. Int. J. Food Sci. 2015, 2015, 164143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Sharpe, D.; Fan, L.; McRae, K.; Walker, B.; MaCKay, R.; Doucette, C. Effects of ozone treatment on Botrytis cinerea and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in relation to horticultural product quality. J. Food Sci. 2009, 74, M250–M257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chilosi, G.; Tagliavento, V.; Simonelli, R. Application of ozone gas at low doses in the cold storage of fruit and vegetables. Acta Hortic. 2015, 1071, 681–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Instituto Ecuatoriano de Normalización. INEN 2427:2010: Frutas Frescas. Mora. Requisitos; Instituto Ecuatoriano de Normalización: Quito, Ecuador, 2010. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  32. Brodowska, A.J.; Nowak, A.; Kondratiuk-Janyska, A.; Piątkowski, M.; Śmigielski, K. Modelling the Ozone-Based Treatments for Inactivation of Microorganisms. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Pérez-Gallardo, A.; García-Almendárez, B.; Barbosa-Cánovas, G.; Pimentel-González, D.; Reyes-González, L.R.; Regalado, C. Effect of starch-beeswax coatings on quality parameters of blackberries (Rubus spp.). J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 5601–5610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Chen, C.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Dong, C.; Xue, W.; Xu, W. The effect of different doses of ozone treatments on the postharvest quality and biodiversity of cantaloupes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2020, 163, 111124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Allende, A.; Marín, A.; Buendía, B.; Tomás-Barberán, F.; Gil, M.I. Impact of combined postharvest treatments (UV-C light, gaseous O3, superatmospheric O2 and high CO2) on health promoting compounds and shelf-life of strawberries. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2007, 46, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Forney, C.F.; Song, J.; Fan, L.; Hildebrand, P.D.; Jordan, M.A. Ozone and 1-MCP alter the postharvest quality of broccoli. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 2003, 128, 403–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kumar, P.; Sethi, S.; Sharma, R.R.; Srivastav, M.; Varghese, E. Effect of chitosan coating on postharvest life and quality of plum during storage at low temperature. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 226, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Joo, M.; Lewandowski, N.; Auras, R.; Harte, J.; Almenar, E. Comparative shelf life study of blackberry fruit in bio-based and petroleum-based containers under retail storage conditions. Food Chem. 2011, 126, 1734–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nayak, S.L.; Sethi, S.; Sharma, R.R.; Sharma, R.M.; Singh, S.; Singh, D. Aqueous ozone controls decay and maintains quality attributes of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, H.; Xiong, Z.; Gui, D.; Li, X. Effect of aqueous ozone on quality and shelf life of Chinese winter jujube. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2019, 43, e14244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wieczynska, J.; Lovino, R.; Lamaj, F.; De Cillis, M.F.; Baser, N.; Ismaili, K.; Verrastro, V.; Tarricone, L.; Simeone, V. Effect of O3 and high CO2 application during cold storage on quality of organic table grape (Vitis vinifera L. ‘Italia’). Acta Hortic. 2015, 1071, 575–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Horvitz, S.; Cantalejo, M.J. The Effects of Gaseous Ozone and Chlorine on Quality and Shelf-life of Minimally Processed Red Pepper. Acta Hortic. 2010, 877, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Niveditha, A.; Pandiselvam, R.; Prasath, V.A.; Singh, S.K.; Gul, K.; Kothakota, A. Application of cold plasma and ozone technology for decontamination of Escherichia coli in foods—A review. Food Control 2021, 130, 108338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ali, A.; Yeoh, W.K.; Forney, C.; Siddiqui, M.W. Advances in postharvest technologies to extend the storage life of minimally processed fruits and vegetables. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 2632–2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Emer, Z.; Akbas, M.Y.; Ozdemir, M. Bactericidal activity of ozone against E. coli in whole and ground black peppers. J. Food Prot. 2008, 71, 914–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bialka, K.L.; Demirci, A. Utilization of gaseous ozone for the decontamination of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella on raspberries and strawberries. J. Food Prot. 2007, 70, 1093–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Akata, I.; Torlak, E.; Erci, F. Efficacy of gaseous ozone for reducing microflora and foodborne pathogens on button mushroom. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2015, 109, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Daş, E.; Candan-Gürakan, G.; Bayındırlı, A. Effect of controlled atmosphere storage, modified atmosphere packaging and gaseous ozone treatment on the survival of Salmonella enteritidis on cherry tomatoes. Food Microbiol. 2006, 23, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gibson, K.E.; Almeida, G.; Jones, S.L.; Wright, K.; Lee, J.A. Inactivation of bacteria on fresh produce by batch wash ozone sanitation. Food Control 2019, 106, 106747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jacques, A.C.; Zambiazi, R.C.; Ávila-Gandra, E.; Krumreich, F.; Rickies da Luz, S.; Ribeiro Galvão Machado, M. Sanitization by Chlorine compounds and Ozone: Effect on Bioactive Compounds in Blackberry (Rubus fruticosus) cv. Tupy. Rev. Ceres 2015, 62, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Vlassi, E.; Vlachos, P.; Kornaros, M. Effect of ozonation on table grapes preservation in cold storage. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 2031–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Smilanick, J.L.; Margosan, D.M.; Mlikota, F. Impact of ozonated water on the quality and shelf-life of fresh citrus fruit, stone fruit and table grapes. Ozone Sci. Eng. 2002, 24, 343–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Brodowska, A.J.; Śmigielski, K.; Nowak, A.; Czyżowska, A.; Otlewska, A. The Impact of Ozone Treatment in Dynamic Bed Parameters on Changes in Biologically Active Substances of Juniper Berries. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Karakosta, E.S.; Karabagias, I.K.; Riganakos, K.A. Shelf Life Extension of Greenhouse Tomatoes Using Ozonation in Combination with Packaging under Refrigeration. Ozone Sci. Eng. 2019, 41, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Alves, H.; Alencar, E.R.; Ferreira, W.F.S.; Silva, C.R.; Ribeiro, J.L. Microbiological and physical-chemical aspects of strawberry exposed to ozone gas at different concentrations during storage. Braz. J. Food Technol. 2019, 22, e2018002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, Z.; Li, W.; Zhai, X.; Li, X. Combination of precooling with ozone fumigation or low fluctuation of temperature for the quality modifications of postharvest sweet cherries. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Artés-Hernández, F.; Aguayo, E.; Artés, F. Alternative atmosphere treatments for keeping quality of ‘Autumn seedless’ table grapes during long-term cold storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2004, 31, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Horvitz, S.; Cantalejo, M.J. Application of ozone for the postharvest treatment of fruits and vegetables. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 54, 312–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Foods 10 02039 g001 550
Figure 1. Diagram of gaseous ozone treatment system.
Figure 1. Diagram of gaseous ozone treatment system.
Foods 10 02039 g001
Foods 10 02039 g002 550
Figure 2. Respiration rate (mg CO2 kg−1 h−1) of control (no ozone treatment) and ozonated (0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 ppm gaseous ozone/3 min) blackberries during 10 days of cold storage (6 ± 1 °C). Values are the mean of 3 independent samples and error bars represent the confidence interval (95%) for the mean.
Figure 2. Respiration rate (mg CO2 kg−1 h−1) of control (no ozone treatment) and ozonated (0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 ppm gaseous ozone/3 min) blackberries during 10 days of cold storage (6 ± 1 °C). Values are the mean of 3 independent samples and error bars represent the confidence interval (95%) for the mean.
Foods 10 02039 g002
Foods 10 02039 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of 3 min exposure to ozone (0, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 ppm) on mass loss of Andean blackberries during 10 days of cold storage. Values are the mean of 3 independent samples and error bars represent the confidence interval (95%) for the mean. For each evaluation date, different capital letters indicate significant differences among O3 doses (p < 0.05). For each O3 dose, different lower-case letters indicate significant differences among evaluation dates (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effect of 3 min exposure to ozone (0, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 ppm) on mass loss of Andean blackberries during 10 days of cold storage. Values are the mean of 3 independent samples and error bars represent the confidence interval (95%) for the mean. For each evaluation date, different capital letters indicate significant differences among O3 doses (p < 0.05). For each O3 dose, different lower-case letters indicate significant differences among evaluation dates (p < 0.05).
Foods 10 02039 g003
Foods 10 02039 g004 550
Figure 4. Effect of 3 min exposure to ozone (0, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 ppm) on Botrytis cinerea counts (log (cfu g−1)) on inoculated blackberries during 10 days of cold storage. Values are the mean of 3 independent samples and error bars represent the confidence interval (95%) for the mean. For each evaluation date, different capital letters indicate significant differences among O3 doses (p < 0.05). For each O3 dose, different lower-case letters indicate significant differences among evaluation dates (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Effect of 3 min exposure to ozone (0, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 ppm) on Botrytis cinerea counts (log (cfu g−1)) on inoculated blackberries during 10 days of cold storage. Values are the mean of 3 independent samples and error bars represent the confidence interval (95%) for the mean. For each evaluation date, different capital letters indicate significant differences among O3 doses (p < 0.05). For each O3 dose, different lower-case letters indicate significant differences among evaluation dates (p < 0.05).
Foods 10 02039 g004
Table
Table 1. E. coli and S. enterica counts (log cfu g−1) of control (no O3 treatment) and ozonated (0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 ppm gaseous ozone/3 min) blackberries during 10 days of cold storage (6 ± 1 °C).
Table 1. E. coli and S. enterica counts (log cfu g−1) of control (no O3 treatment) and ozonated (0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 ppm gaseous ozone/3 min) blackberries during 10 days of cold storage (6 ± 1 °C).
Microorganism DayO3 Concentration (ppm)
0.00.40.50.60.7
E. coli14.71 ± 0.02 Dd4.45 ± 0.02 Cd4.36 ± 0.05 BCd4.27 ± 0.06 ABc4.23 ± 0.13 Ac
44.39 ± 0.05 Cc4.30 ± 0.02 Bc4.20 ± 0.08 BAc4.19 ± 0.04 BAc4.29 ± 0.04 Bc
74.00 ± 0.02 Bb3.99 ± 0.01 Bb3.95 ± 0.03 BBb3.92 ± 0.06 BBb3.65 ± 0.09 Ab
103.49 ± 0.06 Ba3.39 ± 0.08 Ba3.51 ± 0.08 BBa3.05 ± 0.09 BAa2.96 ± 0.11 Aa
S. enterica14.47 ± 0.03 Ed4.29 ± 0.09 Dd3.96 ± 0.08 BCd3.75 ± 0.10 BBd3.38 ± 0.02 Ad
44.00 ± 0.08 Cc3.90 ± 0.03 Bc3.87 ± 0.03 BBc2.97 ± 0.10 BAc2.98 ± 0.01 Ac
73.25 ± 0.05 Eb2.99 ± 0.19 Db2.15 ± 0.05 BCb1.04 ± 0.07 BBb0.80 ± 0.06 Ab
101.58 ± 0.14 Da0.95 ± 0.16 Ca0.50 ± 0.00 BBa0.00 ± 0.00 BAa0.00 ± 0.00 Aa
Values are the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). For each microorganism and evaluation date, different capital letters indicate significant differences among O3 doses (p < 0.05). For each microorganism and O3 dose, different lower-case letters indicate significant differences among evaluation dates (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Aerobic mesophiles, psychrotrophs, and molds and yeasts counts (log cfu g−1) of control (no O3 treatment) and ozonated (0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 ppm gaseous ozone/3 min) blackberries during 10 days of cold storage (6 ± 1 °C).
Table 2. Aerobic mesophiles, psychrotrophs, and molds and yeasts counts (log cfu g−1) of control (no O3 treatment) and ozonated (0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 ppm gaseous ozone/3 min) blackberries during 10 days of cold storage (6 ± 1 °C).
Microbial GroupDayO3 Concentration (ppm)
0.00.40.50.60.7
Aerobic mesophiles12.93 ± 0.03 Ea2.66 ± 0.10 Da2.25 ± 0.06 Ca1.30 ± 0.19 Ba1.08 ± 0.12 Aa
43.23 ± 0.10 Cb2.75 ± 0.16 Ba2.54 ± 0.21 Bb2.18 ± 0.03 Ab2.08 ± 0.08 Ab
74.00 ± 0.06 Dc3.17 ± 0.02 Cb2.58 ± 0.11 Bb2.26 ± 0.12 Ab2.29 ± 0.06 Ac
104.00 ± 0.10 Ec3.88 ± 0.02 Dc3.66 ± 0.04 Cc3.15 ± 0.07 Bc2.73 ± 0.02 Ad
Psychrotrophs14.44 ± 0.15 Ca3.95 ± 0.12 Ba2.70 ± 0.01 Aa2.58 ± 0.02 Aa2.55 ± 0.04 Aa
44.54 ± 0.06 Da4.07 ± 0.04 Cb3.72 ± 0.02 Bb4.15 ± 0.12 Cb3.46 ± 0.25 Ab
75.10 ± 0.03 Db4.84 ± 0.00 Cc4.29 ± 0.01 Bc4.32 ± 0.23 Bb4.01 ± 0.01 Ac
106.18 ± 0.05 Ec5.32 ± 0.07 Dd4.89 ± 0.05 Cd4.78 ± 0.03 Bc4.11 ± 0.03 Ac
Molds and yeasts15.25 ± 0.09 Ea4.88 ± 0.05 Da4.21 ± 0.03 Ca3.22 ± 0.08 Ba3.01 ± 0.17 Aa
46.18 ± 0.12 Eb5.30 ± 0.02 Db5.04 ± 0.02 Cb4.61 ± 0.03 Bb4.36 ± 0.03 Ab
76.81 ± 0.10 Ec6.16 ± 0.01 Dc5.60 ± 0.04 Cc5.43 ± 0.02 Bc5.31 ± 0.01 Ac
107.07 ± 0.04 Dd6.22 ± 0.00 Cd6.20 ± 0.03 Cd6.13 ± 0.02 Bd5.79 ± 0.02 Ad
Values are the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). For each microorganism and evaluation date, different capital letters indicate significant differences among O3 doses (p < 0.05). For each microorganism and O3 dose, different lower-case letters indicate significant differences among evaluation dates (p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Horvitz, S.; Arancibia, M.; Arroqui, C.; Chonata, E.; Vírseda, P. Effects of Gaseous Ozone on Microbiological Quality of Andean Blackberries (Rubus glaucus Benth). Foods 2021, 10, 2039. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10092039

AMA Style

Horvitz S, Arancibia M, Arroqui C, Chonata E, Vírseda P. Effects of Gaseous Ozone on Microbiological Quality of Andean Blackberries (Rubus glaucus Benth). Foods. 2021; 10(9):2039. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10092039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Horvitz, Sandra, Mirari Arancibia, Cristina Arroqui, Erika Chonata, and Paloma Vírseda. 2021. "Effects of Gaseous Ozone on Microbiological Quality of Andean Blackberries (Rubus glaucus Benth)" Foods 10, no. 9: 2039. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10092039

APA Style

Horvitz, S., Arancibia, M., Arroqui, C., Chonata, E., & Vírseda, P. (2021). Effects of Gaseous Ozone on Microbiological Quality of Andean Blackberries (Rubus glaucus Benth). Foods, 10(9), 2039. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10092039

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop