Next Article in Journal
Consumption of Farmed Fish, Fed with an Olive-Pomace Enriched Diet, and Its Effect on the Inflammatory, Redox, and Platelet-Activating Factor Enzyme Profile of Apparently Healthy Adults: A Double-Blind Randomized Crossover Trial
Next Article in Special Issue
Value-Added Utilization of Citrus Peels in Improving Functional Properties and Probiotic Viability of Acidophilus-bifidus-thermophilus (ABT)-Type Synbiotic Yoghurt during Cold Storage
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Different Natural Plant Extracts on the Formation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Roast Duck
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of Micro- and Nano-Bubbles as a Tool to Improve the Rheological and Microstructural Properties of Formulated Greek-Style Yogurts
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 11
Issue 14
10.3390/foods11142103
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Whey Protein Hydrolysates of Sheep/Goat Origin Produced by the Action of Trypsin without pH Control: Degree of Hydrolysis, Antihypertensive Potential and Antioxidant Activities

by
Lambros Sakkas
,
Eleni Lekaki
and
Golfo Moatsou
*
Laboratory of Dairy Research, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(14), 2103; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142103
Submission received: 24 May 2022 / Revised: 6 July 2022 / Accepted: 12 July 2022 / Published: 15 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Technologies for Improving Properties, Shelf Life and Analysis of Dairy Products)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tryptic WPHs with considerable residual whey protein content intact were developed from two sheep/goat WPCs (65% and 80% protein) without pH control. Pasteurization was used to avoid denaturation. Changes in non-protein nitrogen (DH_TCASN), free amino groups (DH_TNBS), and major whey proteins were used to investigate the degree and extent of hydrolysis. Antihypertensive potential (ACE-IA), radical scavenging (DPPH-RSA), and iron chelation (Fe-CA) were assessed. No statistically significant changes in pH (5.84–6.29) were observed during hydrolysis and storage. At the start of hydrolysis, DH_TCASN was ≅11% for both substrates whereas DH_TNBS was >10% and >5% for WP65 and WP80, respectively. After one-hour hydrolysis, DH_TCASN was ≅17% for both substrates and DH_TNBS was ≅15% and ≅11% for WP65 and WP80, respectively. The β-lactoglobulin, α-lactalbumin, and caseinomacropeptide of WP65 were hydrolyzed by 14 ± 1.3%, 73.9 ± 2.6% and 37 ± 2.6%. The respective values for WP80 were 14.9 ± 1.7%, 79.9 ± 1%, and 32.7 ± 4.8%. ACE-IA of the hydrolysates of both substrates was much higher (>80%) than that of controls (<10%). Hydrolysis, substrate type, and storage did not affect the DPPH-RSA (45–54%). Fe-CA of the WP65 and WP80 hydrolysates were ≅40% and ≅20%, respectively; a similar outcome was found in the respective controls. Refrigerated storage for 17 h did not affect the degree of hydrolysis and biofunctional activities.

1. Introduction

Whey proteins (WP) exhibit an array of valuable technological and nutritional properties, which are transferred to a variable extent into different types of whey powders and fractions. WP have convenient gelation and emulsification behaviors, interact with other macromolecules, exhibit foaming and thickening properties, water holding capacity, and are both biocompatible and biodegradable. Moreover, edible films, coatings, hydrogels, and nanoparticles encapsulating active food and drug components can be manufactured from the whey fraction of milk [1,2]. Functionality refers to the behavior of WP under heat treatments, the ability to stabilize emulsions and foams acting as interfacial films, the formation of edible films, and the ability to produce elastic gel networks [3]. Whey protein concentrate (WPC) and whey protein isolate (WPI) powders are the result of the selective fractionation of whey by removing fat and a significant amount of lactose, minerals, and non-protein nitrogen compounds; therefore, they contain a high amount of the major whey proteins of milk mostly found in the native form. There are numerous applications for this category of products, such as in different food systems, infant and nutraceutical formulae, biomedical products, biodiesel, bioplastics, and textiles [4]. Several studies have shown the health effects of WP and their peptides, i.e., antioxidant, immunomodulatory and anticancer potential, regulation of diabetes and factors of cardiovascular disease, and treatment of liver disease and sarcopenia [2].
Various types of modifications and treatments either used alone or in combination are applied for the improvement of the physicochemical, functional, nutritional, and biological properties of whey and WP products, i.e., heat treatments to induce controlled polymerization, ultrasound, high-pressure, pulsed-electric field or membrane processing, radiation treatment, chemical modifications—mainly the formation of glycol-conjugates via Maillard reaction—and enzymatic treatments such as cross-linking by transglutaminase or hydrolysis by proteases of animal or microbial origin. Treatment with proteases results in the production of whey protein hydrolysates (WPH) that refer to both experimental and commercial products [3,5,6].
The outcome of hydrolysis is related to the enzyme type, enzyme to substrate (E/S) ratio, temperature, pH, and time. The structure of WP, the mechanism and kinetics of the enzymatic hydrolysis, the enzymes utilized for hydrolysis, the peptides derived therefrom, and the effect of the pre-treatment of substrates have been reviewed by Cheison and Kulozik [5]. Conditions of proteolysis that are adequate for the production of whey-derived biofunctional peptides, as well as their purification and characteristics, have been presented by Dullius et al. [7]. In contrast to the numerus reports on the WPH of cow milk origin, the publications on the properties of WPH originating from small ruminants’ milk are very limited and concern the hydrolysis of non-fractionated whey or individual WP. Indicatively, in-vitro inhibitory activity of human platelet aggregation of tryptic hydrolysates of sheep and goat caseinomacropeptide (CMP) was studied [8,9]. The angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitory activity (ACE-IA) of tryptic [10] or other types of hydrolysates [11] of sheep and goat β-lactoglobulin (β-LG) has been assessed. The antioxidant and ACE-IA of sheep cheese whey hydrolyzed by bacterial protease has been presented [12]. Commercial goat milk was hydrolyzed by subtilisin and trypsin to optimize the conditions resulting in the maximum degree of hydrolysis and ACE-IA [13]; later, the same hydrolysis scheme was used to develop artificial neuronal networks for modelling hydrolysis [14]. Recently, the suitability of various proteases for the production of goat milk WPHs regarding their emulsifying ability and hypoglycemic potential has been investigated [15].
WPCs manufactured from sheep/goat Feta cheese whey are differentiated from that of cow counterparts due to high β-LG content [16]. The usual ratio of sheep to goat milk in Feta cheese milk is 70:30. WPHs from this type of WPC have been used for the supplementation of yoghurt-type gels [17,18]. Tryptic WPHs using these types of WPC as substrate were the objective of the present study. The aim of these experiments was the development of WPHs with high residual intact native protein content. For this purpose, hydrolysis by trypsin was performed under non-controlled pH conditions to avoid the dilution of the hydrolysate and the increase in ash content-. Moreover, low pasteurization was applied to stop the hydrolysis and avoid the denaturation of intact major whey proteins. The assessment of the hydrolysis outcome was carried out by the degree of proteolysis and the investigation of the biofunctional potential.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Substrates, Hydrolysis and Sampling

Two types of whey protein concentrates powders (WPCs) with approximately 65% (WP65) and 80% (WP80) total protein content of sheep/goat origin manufactured from Feta cheese whey were used as substrates. The WPC powders were reconstituted in distilled water at a concentration of 5%, w/w. After stirring for 60 min, the WPC solutions were stored at 4–6 °C overnight for proper hydration. Each solution was divided in two parts: the first was used as hydrolysis substrate while the other was a non-hydrolyzed control that was treated similarly in terms of heating and storage.
Hydrolysis was performed by means of bovine trypsin (TPCK treated, T1426, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at a 0.25% enzyme to protein ratio. Incubation was carried out for one hour at 50 °C without pH adjustment at pH 6.1–6.3 that was the pH of WPC dilutions. The reaction was stopped by heat treatment at 68 °C for 10 min, i.e., typical milk low-pasteurization conditions, to avoid denaturation of whey proteins. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Samples of the hydrolysates and their respective controls were taken just after the addition of trypsin, at 0.05 h (t0.05), after one h of hydrolysis and subsequent heat inactivation (t1) and after 17 h stay of t1 samples at refrigerated storage (t18). Control samples for each experiment were the respective WPC dilutions without enzyme addition treated under the same conditions. Sample codes are presented in Table 1.

2.2. Analyses

2.2.1. Protein Composition of the Substrates

Total nitrogen (TN), nitrogen soluble at pH 4.6 (SN), and nitrogen soluble at 12% trichloroacetic acid (TCASN) of the WPC powders (substrates) were determined by the Kjeldahl method. Total protein (TP) was estimated as total nitrogen (TN) × 6.38. Nitrogen fractions were prepared as follows: the pH of substate solutions was adjusted at pH 4.6 using 1 M HCl; after centrifugation at 3000× g for 30 min, the supernatants were filtrated using a Whatman No 41 filter paper and the filtrate was the SN fraction; equal quantities of SN and 24% (w/w) trichloroacetic acid (TCA) were mixed and remained at room temperature for two hours; the precipitate was removed using Whatman No 40 filter paper and the filtrate was the TCASN fraction; the concentration of the major native whey proteins of the substrates was estimated by reversed-phase HPLC (RP-HPLC) using a Vydac C4 214 TP 515 column [14]; the major whey proteins of the profiles were the caseinomacropeptide (CMP), α-lactalbumin (α-LA), and β-lactoglobulin (β-LG).

2.2.2. Degree and Extent of Hydrolysis

The degree of hydrolysis (DH) was assessed by:
i.
The quantitative changes of nitrogen soluble at pH 4.6 (SN) and nitrogen soluble at 12% trichloroacetic acid (TCASN), as described in Section 2.2.1. The degree of hydrolysis (DH) based on SN changes was estimated according to DH_SN (%) = 100 × (SN_HYD-SN_CON)/(TN_CON-TCASN_CON), where HYD is a hydrolysate and CON is the respective control. The expression TN_CON-TCASN_CON corresponds to protein N content. The DH based on TCASN changes (DH_TCASN) was estimated accordingly.
ii.
Changes of free amino groups was determined by the TNBS (picrylsulfonic acid solution, P2297, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) method of Adler-Nissen [19], with some modifications. One hundred μL hydrolysate was diluted with 900 μL of 1% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate); 250 μL of this dilution were diluted further with 2 mL 0.21 M phosphate buffer, pH 8.0. After the addition of 2 mL 0.05%, w/w TNBS, the mixture was incubated in the dark at 50 °C for 60 min. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 4 mL 0.1 M HCl. After cooling down for 30 min, the absorbance at 340 nm was determined. Glycine was used for the construction of the standard curve. The estimation of the DH was according to Spellman et al. [20]: DH_TNBS (%) = 100 × [(AN2-AN1)/123.3]. AN1 is the amino acid nitrogen content of the control WPC solution without trypsin (CON) expressed as mg/g protein and was estimated using the reference curve. Accordingly, AN2 is the content of the respective hydrolysate (HYD). The value 123.3 mg/g is the nitrogen content of the peptide bonds of the whey proteins in the substrate.
The extent of hydrolysis (EH) was assessed by the reduction of the concentration of major native whey proteins, β-LG, α-LA, and CMP, using the RP-HPLC method (Section 2.2.1). The control solution or hydrolysate was diluted with 0.1% trifluoracetic acid in ultrapure water at 1:3 ratio, centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min, and the supernatant was clarified with a PVDF 0.45 μm syringe filter before injection.

2.2.3. Biofunctionality Assays

The antihypertensive and antioxidant potential of the hydrolysates were assessed as previously described [21] with some modifications.
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitory activity (ACE-IA) was determined by the RP-HPLC method [19]. The hydrolysates after one hour of hydrolysis and after refrigerated storage and the respective controls were diluted in ultrapure water at a ratio 1:2. The dilution was centrifuged at 3000× g for 15 min and filtered with a PVDF 0.45 μm syringe filter before injection.
For the antioxidant potential, assays for DPPH radical scavenging activity (DPPH-RSA) and Fe2+ chelating activity (Fe-CA) after 30 and 60 min of reaction were performed [19]. The DPPH-RSA reaction mixture consisted of 200 μL hydrolysate or control, 720 μL methanol, and 80 μL of 1 mM DPPH solution in methanol. For the Fe-CA assay, the hydrolysates or controls were diluted with ultrapure water at a 1:50 ratio and the dilution was centrifuged at 9500× g for 10 min. The supernatant was assayed after filtration.

2.2.4. Statistical Analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to study the effect of hydrolysis time and storage of the substrate on hydrolysis indices, as well as the results of biofunctionality assays. Differences were investigated by means of least significant difference test (LSD, p < 0.05).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Degree and Extent of Hydrolysis

The protein profile and the nitrogenous fractions of the WPC powders used as substrates are shown in Table 2. The contribution of SN fraction to the TN of WP80 was lower compared to WP65, which indicates that processing conditions applied to increase the degree of concentration induced partial denaturation of whey proteins. The high level of protein concentration of the former induced partial denaturation or structural changes of whey proteins that made them insoluble at pH 4.6.
The release of H+ from the hydrolysis of peptide bonds decreases the pH of the hydrolysates [19]. The changes of pH during hydrolysis and storage presented in Table 3 were not statistically significant. As reported in the literature, the lack of pH control in hydrolyses performed using papain or a microbial alternative [22], alcalase [23], or commercial enzyme preparations [24] did not affect the degree of hydrolysis.
Figure 1 presents the evolution of the concentration of pH 4.6 soluble nitrogen (SN), 12% TCA soluble nitrogen (TCASN), and the free amino groups estimated by the TNBS method (mM Gly). The control samples (CON) and the respective hydrolysates (HYD) were analyzed at the start (t0.05) and end of hydrolysis (t1) and after refrigerated storage (t18). The concentration of major individual native WP under the same conditions is presented in Figure 2.
From both Figure 1 and Figure 2, it is evident that the nitrogen and protein profiles of control (CON) solutions of WPCs without enzyme were not affected by time and storage under refrigeration. As expected, insignificant changes of the soluble nitrogen (SN) of WP65 substrate after hydrolysis took place due to lack of casein in this category of powders. However, an increase in SN was observed in the hydrolysate of WP80, which could be assigned to the trypsin action on the non-native whey proteins of the pH 4.6-insoluble fraction of WP80 that produced soluble peptides. (Table 2). Hydrolysis changed the composition of the SN fraction of both substrates by increasing the medium- and small-sized peptides that remain soluble at 12% TCA (TCASN); the same is true for the free amino groups (mM Gly). The specificity of trypsin on lysine bonds could explain the strong absorbance of the hydrolysates in the TNBS method. Lysine at the end of the produced peptides reacts intensively with TNBS due to the existence of two primary amino groups [18].
Table 4 presents different expressions utilized to assess the outcome of hydrolysis in relation to non-hydrolyzed controls (Section 2.2.2). The degree of hydrolysis (DH) was estimated by the quantitative changes of soluble nitrogen fractions (DH_SN and DH_TCASN) and of free amino groups (DH_TNBS). The extent of hydrolysis (EH) was calculated using the changes of the major residual native whey proteins (EH_β-LG, EH_α-LA and EH_CMP). In accordance with Figure 1, time did not cause any statistically significant change of the DH_SN (p > 0.05) of both substrates. It was very limited for WP65 substrate ranging on average within 0.8% and 1.1% opposite of the 13.7–15.3% estimated for WP80. In general, hydrolysis indices of Table 4 exhibited substantial changes within the first minutes of hydrolysis.
Some of the hydrolysis indices estimated in the present study (Section 2.2.2 and Table 4) were differentiated between the WP65 and WP80. DH_SN and EH_α-LA of WP80 hydrolysates were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of WP65 counterparts. The opposite was true for DH_TNBS. In particular, DH_TCASN was approximately 11% for both substrates, whereas the DH_TNBS was more than 10% and 5% for WP65 and WP80, respectively. The main part of the increase in DH within the first minutes was due to the reduction of native α-LA by 57.6% and of CMP by 19.9%. The linear correlation coefficients between the hydrolysis indices shown in Table 5 were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Strong correlation coefficients were observed between DH_TCASN and EH_α-LA and EH_CMP while the DH_TCASN and DH_TNBS were moderately correlated.
According to the present results (Table 4), the extent of hydrolysis of CMP in WP65 and WP80 was similar: one-hour hydrolysis caused a statistically significant decrease (p < 0.05) in the intact CMP. CMP is the 106–169 N-terminal hydrophilic part of κ-casein. Lys111–Lys112, Lys112–Asn113, and Lys116–Thr117 are the trypsin susceptible bonds of cow CMP. Enzyme and substrate concentration and hydrolysis mode—batch or continuous—control whether all three bonds are hydrolyzed [25]. These particular bonds exist in sheep and goat CMPs [26,27]. Reported peptides corresponding to susceptible bonds in the tryptic digest of sheep CMP are f106–112, 112–116, 112–123, and 117–123; among them, the CMP f112–116 exhibits a high platelet aggregation inhibition [8]. These peptides have been also found in the tryptic digests of both sheep and goat CMPs [9].
At the end of one-hour hydrolysis, there was a statistically significant (p < 0.05) further increase in DH_TCASN and decrease in α-LA and CMP concentrations following the significant increase in DH_TNBS (Table 4). In the majority of studies, β-LG is hydrolyzed more intensively than α-LA by trypsin under experimental conditions close to optima pH 8 and 37 °C [28,29]. An exception is the study of Ferreira et al. [30], which was performed in 5% WPC80 solution at constant pH 8.0 and 37 °C and reports a high residual concentration of non-hydrolyzed β-LG. After 15, 30, and 60 min approximately 87%, 65%, and 42% of the initial remained intact, as opposed to the almost complete hydrolysis of α-LA. Similar to our findings, enhancement of α-LA hydrolysis by trypsin has been observed under non-controlled pH “free-fall pH” conditions [31]. Moreover, trypsin preferably hydrolyzed α-LA further than β-LG during the keeping of a WPI hydrolysate under pH 5.5–6.5 [32].
Trypsin exhibits narrow specificity for the N-terminal side of Arg and Lys residues in the protein [5]. The trypsin cleavage sites of β-LG of small ruminants’ milk do not differ from that of cow milk [33], which is the most studied kind of milk. The characteristics of WPHs—apart from the enzyme—are affected by several factors, such as: pH, temperature and time of hydrolysis, enzyme to substrate ratio, and total solids [5,34]. The high concentration of intact β-LG contrast to a high extent of cleavage α-LA can be attributed to the conditions of hydrolysis at non-controlled pH close to pH 6.0 at 50 °C and to the particular protein composition of the substrate. The pH conditions affect both the activity of the enzyme and the structure and solubility of major whey proteins. At milk pH 6.6, β-LG is present as a dimer—depending on temperature—below 5.5 and tends to form octamers while at pH > 7.5 occurs as a monomer [35,36]. The main part of relevant studies have been performed under the optimum temperature 37 °C and pH 7.8 for trypsin, where β-LG occurs as a monomer that facilitates the action of trypsin. Temperature and pH of hydrolysis affect the stability and solubility of both the enzyme and whey proteins. At 55 °C, trypsin activity is quickly decreased and, between pH 6 and pH 4.25, the enzyme is slowly denatured losing its activity at pH < 4.25 [5]. The isoelectric point of β-LG is close to pH 5.2 and that of α-LA ranges within pH 4.2–4.5 [36]. Therefore, reduced solubility of β-LG under the pH conditions of the present experiments (Table 3) could prevent the access of the enzyme in contrast to α-LA. The decrease in pH slows down and orders the hydrolysis of β-LG due to a resistance of the core domain to trypsin without affecting the release of N- and C-terminal fragments [37]. At pH 6.0, fewer fragments are detected compared to pH 7.0 because of the effect of pH on trypsin stability and activity [37]. Taking the aforementioned points into account, the more intense hydrolysis of α-LA compared to β-LG found in the present study can be explained.
A large part of the changes in indices in Table 4 were observed soon after the addition of trypsin (t0.05) and remained steady after 17 h of refrigerated storage (t18). The fast hydrolysis can be assigned to the high hydrolysis temperature [37,38]. At pH 7.5 at 50 °C and after 10 min, the degree of hydrolysis of β-LG by trypsin with E/S ratio of 0.05 has been found similar to that at 35 °C at 20 min. The acceleration of hydrolysis is assigned to a higher initial activity at temperatures higher than the optimum 37 °C; however, at 50 °C, fewer peptides were produced compared to the hydrolysates incubated at 30–45 °C [38]. Moreover, a temperature of 50 °C at pH 7 has been suggested as a second optimum for short reaction times producing a less controlled hydrolysis pattern since both the α-LA and β-LG are similarly attacked [28]. Cheison and Kulozik [5] concluded that the first few minutes are critical for the outcome of hydrolysis.
The higher β-LG concentration compared to α-LA of the WPCs of the present study could also contribute to the deviation of hydrolysis pattern from that of other reports. The variation of substrate concentration under a constant E/S ratio affects the outcome of hydrolysis and suggests that the formed peptides can inhibit the enzyme [39]. In addition, the processing conditions used in WPC production could limit the access of trypsin to cleavage sites on β-LG. According to a previous study [16], pasteurization of whey, ultrafiltration, evaporation, and spray-drying decrease the percentage of native on the total protein content in these types of WPCs. Heat induced modifications such as oxidation and glycation of proteins, formation of lysine-alanine crosslinks, pH, the exposure of cleavage sites due to protein unfolding, and the structure of aggregates affect the hydrolysis and digestibility of whey proteins [40]. The modified lysine residues of β-LG lactosylated under mild heat treatments has been found resistant to trypsin [41]. Accordingly, glycated β-LG is reported to be resistant to trypsin/chymotrypsin digestion in contrast to its unglycated counterpart [42]. When non-native β-LG monomers were used as substrate, the accessibility of trypsin to cleavage sites was substantially reduced but the release of functional peptides was enhanced [43]. However, the structural changes of β-LG induced by mild or moderate heating are affected by the environment of WPC that contains other whey proteins and variable quantities of lactose and minerals [44].

3.2. Biofunctional Potential

3.2.1. Peptidyl Dipeptide Hydrolase-Inhibitory Activity (ACE-IA)

Under the conditions of our experiments, one hour of hydrolysis of both substrates resulted in hydrolysates with high ACE-IA—more than 80%—that remained steady during refrigerated storage (Figure 3). The type of substrate—WP65 or WP80—did not influence the outcome. Under the same conditions, the non-hydrolyzed substrates exhibited an ACE-IA lower than 10%.
A high ACE inhibition index has been estimated for the tryptic hydrolysates of cow α-LA, β-LG, and WPC80 [45]. ACE-IA is related to the existence of hydrophobic amino acid residues at the C-terminal end and a molecular mass less than 3000; further degradation of tryptic peptides may strengthen or reduce their ACE-inhibitory potential [5,45]. The most common features of ACE inhibiting antihypertensive peptides derived from β-LG and α-LA, i.e., lactokinins, have been concisely reviewed [7]. They consist of 2–12 amino acids, have a molecular mass lower than 1000 Da, and aromatic AA at the C-end, while Leu, Ile, Val, Lys, and Arg are important for ACE inhibition. No relationship between ACE and DH obtained by different enzymes is reported because the specificity of the enzymes determines the production of ACE inhibitory peptides [46,47]. Trypsin produces hydrolysates from WP with high ACE-IA, such as cow β-LG (f22–25, 32–40, 81–83) and of cow α-LA (f104–108, 99–108) [48]. ACE inhibitory peptides have been also isolated from the tryptic hydrolysates of whey proteins of small ruminants’ milk, e.g., β-LG (f1–8, 142–148) [10] and CMP (f106–111, 106–112) [49]. The release of ACE inhibitory peptides in the tryptic hydrolysates of β-LG is affected by heat-denaturation of the substrate and the pH conditions [43]. Production of peptides from the N-terminal region is reduced, especially at pH 5.1, because the conformational changes occurring in this part of the protein are involved in the association of denatured WP. At pH 5.1, the production of ACE-inhibitory peptides from the C-terminal region of the denatured molecule is inhibited but the opposite is true for pH 6.8 and 8.0 [43].

3.2.2. Antioxidant Activities

Antioxidant potential is related to different types of activities and their combinations, i.e., radical scavenging, inhibition of lipid peroxidation, or chelation of metal ions [12].
DPPH radical scavenging activity (DPPH-RSA) of the hydrolysates and of the respective controls is shown in Table 6, in comparison to that of the referenced antioxidant, Trolox. No statistically significant changes were observed between the controls and their hydrolysates, during the storage of hydrolysates and between the WP65 and WP80 hydrolysates.
The % Fe2+ chelating activity (Fe-CA) of the hydrolysates and their respective controls is presented in Figure 4. No statistically significant changes were observed between controls and their hydrolysates, during the storage. However, the hydrolysates of WP80 exhibited significantly lower (p < 0.05) Fe-CA compared to WP65 counterparts.
Among the antioxidative proteins of the whey fraction of milk that could tolerate the conditions of WPC manufacture are the lactoferrin, which can bind considerable amounts of the pro-oxidative iron ions, and the enzyme superoxide dismutase [50]. Radical absorbance capacity is related to the scavenging of free radicals by sulfur containing amino acids [51] to some peptides derived from whey proteins, mainly from α-LA and β-LG [52], and to the secondary structure of the peptides [53]. Fe-CA in milk and dairy products is attributed mainly to casein and casein-derived peptides and especially phosphopeptides, which can interact with metals via the polar side chains of some amino acids [52,53]. The antioxidant activity of peptides is affected by the methods used for the isolation of proteins-substrates, the DH, the type of enzyme, the peptide concentration, and the peptide structure, i.e., composition, configuration, and hydrophobicity [54]. Aromatic residues in the amino acids can exhibit radical scavenging properties by donating protons to electron deficient radicals. The imidazole group in histidine-containing peptides exhibit metal ion-chelating ability and the SH group of cysteine is a direct radical scavenger. Hydrophobic amino acids facilitate the accessibility to hydrophobic radicals and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Carboxyl and amino groups in the side chains can act as chelators of metal ions [54].
In contrast to our findings, an increase in DPPH-RSA has been reported in WPH produced by the hydrolysis of a 15% cow WPC solution with trypsin at a DH close to 10% [55]. On the other hand, fractions of commercial WPHs with low scavenging activity containing mostly large peptides at low concentrations exhibited strong binding of iron, whereas cysteine from α-LA and β- LG seemed to be oxidized after hydrolysis [56]. The action of proteases used for the production of WPHs could modify or reduce the antioxidant potential of intact whey proteins. Moreover, whey proteins can be oxidized during processing at particular residues involved in the protein unfolding [57]. The results shown in Figure 4 coincide with these findings. The WP80 with more pH 4.6 insoluble whey protein (Table 2) exhibited lower Fe-CA activity than the less concentrated WP65 counterpart.
The comparison with the literature data for the antioxidant properties of WPHs produced and assayed under different conditions is inadequate. As previously discussed, the non-controlled pH conditions of hydrolysis resulted in a different peptide profile of the tryptic WPH. Cow WPC hydrolysis by commercial food enzyme preparation without pH control resulted in WPH with statistically significantly lower in vitro and cellular antioxidant activities compared to pH-controlled counterparts [24]. Moreover, lower oxygen radical absorbance capacity was estimated in non pH-controlled WP hydrolysates produced by papain compared to those produced under pH controlled conditions [22].

4. Conclusions

The conditions of hydrolysis of the present study—without pH control, incubation at 50 °C, duration of one hour, and stopping by pasteurization—that were rather marginal for trypsin action resulted in a limited degree of hydrolysis and a considerable amount of intact native whey proteins. Hydrolysis increased the ACE inhibitory activity of the WPCs dramatically, to more than 80%, without downgrading their radical scavenging and iron chelating ability. Moreover, the hydrolysis and biofunctionality indices of the hydrolysates remained steady during overnight refrigerated storage, which is a finding that facilitates their further processing. We suggest that the short reaction time, mild heat treatment, absence of additives, and substrate originating from small ruminants’ cheese whey is an emerging approach for the generation of WPHs. Future research work can be designed based on the present findings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.M.; methodology, L.S. and G.M.; validation, G.M. and L.S.; formal analysis, L.S. and G.M.; investigation, L.S. and E.L.; data curation, G.M. and L.S.; writing—review and editing, G.M.; visualization, L.S. and E.L.; supervision, G.M.; project administration, G.M.; funding acquisition, G.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Greek General Secretariat for Research and Technology, grant number 11SYN_2_1265.

Data Availability Statement

Data is presented in the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank Epirus Protein SA, Ioannina, Greece for providing Feta cheese whey WPCs utilized as substrates in the present study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Castro, R.J.S.d.; Domingues, M.A.F.; Ohara, A.; Okuro, P.K.; Santos, J.G.d.; Brexo, R.P.; Sato, H.H. Whey protein as a key component in food systems: Physicochemical properties, production technologies and applications. Food Struct. 2017, 14, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, C.; Chen, N.; Ashaolu, T.J. Whey proteins and peptides in health-promoting functions—A review. Intern. Dairy J. 2022, 126, 105269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Foegeding, E.A.; Davis, J.P.; Doucet, D.; McGuffey, M.K. Advances in modifying and understanding whey protein functionality. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2002, 13, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pires, A.F.; Marnotes, N.G.; Rubio, O.D.; Garcia, A.C.; Pereira, C.D. Dairy by-products: A review on the valorization of whey and second cheese whey. Foods 2021, 10, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cheison, S.C.; Kulozik, U. Impact of the environmental conditions and substrate pre-treatment on whey protein hydrolysis: A review. Critical Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 418–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guo, M.; Shen, X. Modifications of whey protein. In Whey Protein Production, Chemistry, Functionality, and Applications, 1st ed.; Guo, M., Ed.; Wiley: West Sussex, UK, 2019; pp. 205–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dullius, A.; Goettert, M.I.; de Souza, C.F.V. Whey protein hydrolysates as a source of bioactive peptides for functional foods—Biotechnological facilitation of industrial scale-up. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 42, 58–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Qian, Z.Y.; Jollès, P.; Migliore-Samour, D.; Schoentgen, F.; Fiat, A.M. Sheep kappa-casein peptides inhibit platelet aggregation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1995, 1244, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Manso, M.A.; Escudero, C.; Alijo, M.; Lopez-Fandino, R. Platelet aggregation inhibitory activity of bovine, ovine, and caprine k -casein macropeptides and their tryptic hydrolysates. J. Food Prot. 2002, 65, 1992–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chobert, J.M.; El-Zahar, K.; Sitohy, M.; Dalgalarrondo, M.; Metro, F.; Choiset, Y.; Haertlé, T. Angiotensin I-converting-enzyme (ACE)-inhibitory activity of tryptic peptides of ovine b-lactoglobulin and of milk yoghurts obtained by using different starters. Lait 2005, 85, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hernandez-Ledesma, B.; Recio, I.; Ramos, M.; Amigo, L. Preparation of ovine and caprine β-lactoglobulin hydrolysates with ACE-inhibitory activity. Identification of active peptides from caprine β-lactoglobulin hydrolyzed with thermolysin. Int. Dairy J. 2002, 12, 805–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Correa, A.P.F.; Daroit, D.J.; Fontoura, R.; Meira, S.M.M.; Segalin, J.; Brandelli, A. Hydrolysates of sheep cheese whey as a source of bioactive peptides with antioxidant and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory activities. Peptides 2014, 61, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Espejo-Carpio, F.; Pérez-Gálvez, R.; Guadix, E.; Guadix, A. Optimisation of the hydrolysis of goat milk protein for the production of ACE-inhibitory peptides. J. Dairy Res. 2013, 80, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Espejo-Carpio, F.; Pérez-Gálvez, R.; Guadix, A.; Guadix, E. Artificial Neuronal Networks (ANN) to model the hydrolysis of goat milk protein by subtilisin and trypsin. J. Dairy Res. 2018, 85, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Du, X.; Jing, H.; Wang, L.; Huang, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, H. Characterization of structure, physicochemical properties, and hypoglycemic activity of goat milk whey protein hydrolysate processed with different proteases. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 159, 113257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Moatsou, G.; Hatzinaki, A.; Kandarakis, I.; Anifantakis, E. Nitrogenous fractions during the manufacture of whey protein concentrates from Feta cheese whey. Food Chem. 2003, 81, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Roumanas, D.; Moatsou, G.; Zoidou, E.; Sakkas, L.; Moschopoulou, E. Effect of enrichment of bovine milk with whey proteins on biofunctional and rheological properties of low fat yoghurt-type products. Curr. Res. Nutr. Food Sci. 2016, 4, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sakkas, L.; Tzevdou, M.; Zoidou, E.; Gkotzia, E.; Karvounis, A.; Samara, A.; Taoukis, P.; Moatsou, G. Yoghurt-type gels from skim sheep milk base enriched with whey protein concentrate hydrolysates and processed by heating or high hydrostatic pressure. Foods 2019, 8, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Adler-Nissen, J. Determination of the degree of hydrolysis of food protein hydrolysates by trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1979, 27, 1256–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Spellman, D.; McEvoy, E.; O’Cuinn, G.; FitzGerald, R.J. Proteinase and exopeptidase hydrolysis of whey protein: Comparison of the TNBS, OPA and pH stat methods for quantification of degree of hydrolysis. Int. Dairy J. 2003, 13, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Moschopoulou, E.; Sakkas, L.; Zoidou, E.; Theodorou, G.; Sgouridou, E.; Kalathaki, C.; Liarakou, A.; Chatzigeorgiou, A.; Politis, I.; Moatsou, G. Effect of milk kind and storage on the biochemical, textural and biofunctional characteristics of set-type yoghurt. Intern. Dairy J. 2018, 77, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Le Maux, S.; Nongonierma, A.B.; Barre, C.; FitzGerald, R.J. Enzymatic generation of whey protein hydrolysates under pH-controlled and non pH-controlled conditions: Impact on physicochemical and bioactive properties. Food Chem. 2016, 199, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. De Carvalho, N.C.; Pessato, T.B.; Fernandes, L.G.R.; De Lima Zollner, R.; Netto, F.M. Physicochemical characteristics and antigenicity of whey protein hydrolysates obtained with and without pH control. Int. Dairy J. 2017, 71, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kleekayai, T.; Le Gouic, A.V.; Deracinois, B.; Cudennec, B.; FitzGerald, R.J. In vitro characterisation of the antioxidative properties of whey protein hydrolysates generated under pH- and non pH-controlled conditions. Foods 2020, 9, 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Martin-Orue, C.; Henry, G.; Bouhallab, S. Tryptic hydrolysis of κ-caseinomacropeptide: Control of the enzymic reaction in a continuous membrane reactor. Enzyme Microbial Technol. 1999, 24, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Furet, J.P.; Mercier, J.C.; Gaye, P.; Huedelahaie, D.; Vilotte, J.L. Nucleotide sequence of ovine κ-casein cDNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18, 5286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Coll, A.; Folch, J.M.; Sànchez, A. Nucleotide sequence of the goat kappa-casein cDNA. J. Anim Sci. 1993, 71, 2833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Cheison, S.C.; Leeb, E.; Toro-Siera, J.; Kulozik, U. Influence of hydrolysis temperature and pH on the selective hydrolysis of whey proteins by trypsin and potential recovery of native alpha-lactalbumin. Intern. Dairy J. 2011, 21, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hinnenkamp, C.; Ismail, B.P.A. Proteomics approach to characterizing limited hydrolysis of whey protein concentrate. Food Chem. 2021, 350, 129235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O.; Pinho, O.; Mota, M.V.; Tavares, P.; Pereira, A.; Gonçalves, M.P.; Torres, D.; Rocha, C.; Teixeira, J.A. Preparation of ingredients containing an ACE-inhibitory peptide by tryptic hydrolysis of whey protein concentrates. Intern. Dairy J. 2007, 17, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Fernández, A.; Kelly, P. pH-stat vs. free-fall pH techniques in the enzymatic hydrolysis of whey proteins. Food Chem. 2016, 199, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sáez, L.; Murphy, E.; FitzGerald, R.J.; Kelly, P. Exploring the use of a modified high-temperature, short-time continuous heat exchanger with extended holding time (HTST-EHT) for thermal inactivation of trypsin following selective enzymatic hydrolysis of the β-lactoglobulin fraction in whey protein isolate. Foods 2019, 8, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Hernández-Ledesma, B.; Ramos, M.; Gómez-Ruiz, J.A. Bioactive components of ovine and caprine cheese whey. Small Rumin. Res. 2011, 101, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Gruppi, A.; Dermiki, M.; Spigno, G.; FitzGerald, R.J. Impact of enzymatic hydrolysis and heat inactivation on the physicochemical properties of milk protein hydrolysates. Foods 2022, 11, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Walstra, P.; Wouters, J.T.M.; Geurts, T.J. Serum proteins. In Dairy Science and Technology, 2nd ed.; CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 76–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guo, M.; Wang, C. Chemistry of whey proteins. In Whey Protein Production, Chemistry, Functionality, and Applications, 1st ed.; Guo, M., Ed.; Wiley: West Sussex, UK, 2019; pp. 39–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cheison, S.C.; Lai, M.-Y.; Leeb, E.; Kulozik, U. Hydrolysis of b-lactoglobulin by trypsin under acidic pH and analysis of the hydrolysates with MALDI–TOF– MS/MS. Food Chem. 2011, 125, 1241–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cheison, S.C.; Schmitt, M.; Leeb, E.; Letzel, T.; Kulozik, U. Influence of the temperature and the degree of hydrolysis on the peptide composition of trypsin hydrolysates of b-lactoglobulin: Analysis by LC-ESI-TOF/MS. Food Chem. 2010, 121, 457–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Deng, Y.; Butre, C.I.; Wierenga, P.A. Influence of substrate concentration on the extent of protein enzymatic hydrolysis. Intern. Dairy J. 2018, 86, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, L.; Zhou, R.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, P. Heat-induced denaturation and bioactivity changes of whey proteins. Intern. Dairy J. 2021, 123, 105175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Morgan, F.; Léonil, J.; Mollé, D.; Bouhallab, S. Nonenzymatic lactosylation of bovine β-lactoglobulin under mild heat treatment leads to structural heterogeneity of the glycoforms. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997, 236, 413–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Corzo-Martínez, M.; Soria, A.C.; Belloque, J.; Villamiel, M.; Moreno, F.J. Effect of glycation on the gastrointestinal digestibility and immunoreactivity of bovine β-lactoglobulin. Intern. Dairy J. 2010, 20, 742–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Leeb, E.; Götz, A.; Letzel, T.; Cheison, S.C.; Kulozik, U. Influence of denaturation and aggregation of β-lactoglobulin on its tryptic hydrolysis and the release of functional peptides. Food Chem. 2015, 187, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Petit, J.; Moreau, A.; Ronse, G.; Debreyne, P.; Bouvier, L.; Blanpain-Avet, P.; Jeantet, R.; Delaplace, G. Role of whey components in the kinetics and thermodynamics of β-lactoglobulin unfolding and aggregation. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2016, 9, 1367–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Madureira, A.R.; Tavares, T.; Gomes, A.M.P.; Pintado, M.E.; Malcata, F.X. Invited review: Physiological properties of bioactive peptides obtained from whey proteins. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 437–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Shu, G.; Huang, J.; Bao, C.; Meng, J.; Chen, H.; Cao, J. Effect of different proteases on the degree of hydrolysis and angiotensin I-converting enzyme-inhibitory activity in goat and cow milk. Biomolecules 2018, 8, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Mullally, M.M.; Meisel, H.; FitzGerald, R.J. Angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitory activities of gastric and pancreatic proteinase digests of whey proteins. Int. Dairy J. 1997, 7, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pihlanto-Leppala, A.; Koskinen, P.; Piilola, K.; Tupasela, T.; Korhonen, H. Angiotensin-I converting enzyme inhibitory properties of whey protein digests: Concentration and characterization of active peptides. J. Dairy Res. 2000, 67, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Manso, M.A.; López-Fandiño, R. Angiotensin I converting enzyme—Inhibitory activity of bovine, ovine, and caprine κ-casein macropeptides and their tryptic hydrolysates. J. Food Prot. 2003, 66, 1686–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lindmark-Mansson, H.; Akesson, B. Antioxidative factors in milk. British J. Nutr. 2000, 84, S103–S110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Khan, I.T.; Nadeem, M.; Imran, M.; Ullah, R.; Ajmal, M.; Jaspal, M.H. Antioxidant properties of milk and dairy products: A comprehensive review of the current knowledge. Lipids Health Dis. 2019, 18, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Conway, V.; Gauthier, S.F.; Pouliot, Y. Antioxidant activities of buttermilk proteins, whey proteins, and their enzymatic hydrolysates. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cichosz, G.; Czeczot, H.; Ambroziak, A.; Bielecka, M.M. Natural antioxidants in milk and dairy products. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2017, 70, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sarmadi, B.H.; Ismail, A. Antioxidative peptides from food proteins: A review. Peptides 2010, 31, 1949–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Krunic, T.Z.; Rakin, M.B. Enriching alginate matrix used for probiotic encapsulation with whey protein concentrate or its trypsin-derived hydrolysate: Impact on antioxidant capacity and stability of fermented whey-based beverages. Food Chem. 2022, 370, 130931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Vavrusova, M.; Pindstrup, H.; Johansen, L.B.; Andersen, M.L.; Andersen, H.J.; Skibsted, L.H. Characterisation of a whey protein hydrolysate as antioxidant. Intern. Dairy J. 2015, 47, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Giblin, L.; Yalçın, A.S.; Biçim, G.; Krämer, A.C.; Chen, Z.; Callanan, M.J.; Arranz, E.; Davies, M.J. Whey proteins: Targets of oxidation, or mediators of redox protection. Free Radic. Res. 2019, 53, 1136–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Foods 11 02103 g001 550
Figure 1. Proteolysis indices of tryptic hydrolysates of 5% (w/w) solutions of WPC powders of sheep/goat origin manufactured from Feta cheese whey in comparison to non-treated control counterparts. Abbreviations are explained in Table 1 and Section 2.2.1. Means and standard deviations of three experiments.
Figure 1. Proteolysis indices of tryptic hydrolysates of 5% (w/w) solutions of WPC powders of sheep/goat origin manufactured from Feta cheese whey in comparison to non-treated control counterparts. Abbreviations are explained in Table 1 and Section 2.2.1. Means and standard deviations of three experiments.
Foods 11 02103 g001
Foods 11 02103 g002 550
Figure 2. Concentration of the major intact whey proteins in the tryptic hydrolysates of 5% (w/w) solutions of WPC powders of sheep/goat origin manufactured from Feta cheese whey in comparison to non-treated control counterparts. Abbreviations are explained in Table 1 and Section 2.2.1. Means and standard deviations of three experiments.
Figure 2. Concentration of the major intact whey proteins in the tryptic hydrolysates of 5% (w/w) solutions of WPC powders of sheep/goat origin manufactured from Feta cheese whey in comparison to non-treated control counterparts. Abbreviations are explained in Table 1 and Section 2.2.1. Means and standard deviations of three experiments.
Foods 11 02103 g002
Foods 11 02103 g003 550
Figure 3. ACE-IA (%) of the tryptic hydrolysates of 5% (w/w) solutions of WPC powders of sheep/goat origin manufactured from Feta cheese whey in comparison to non-treated counterparts. Abbreviations explained in Table 1 and Section 2.2.3. Means and standard deviations of three experiments.
Figure 3. ACE-IA (%) of the tryptic hydrolysates of 5% (w/w) solutions of WPC powders of sheep/goat origin manufactured from Feta cheese whey in comparison to non-treated counterparts. Abbreviations explained in Table 1 and Section 2.2.3. Means and standard deviations of three experiments.
Foods 11 02103 g003
Foods 11 02103 g004 550
Figure 4. % Fe2+ chelating activity (Fe-CA) after a 30 min reaction of the tryptic hydrolysates of 5% (w/w) solutions of WPC powders of sheep/goat origin manufactured from Feta cheese whey in comparison to non-treated counterparts. 1 Abbreviations explained in Table 1 and Section 2.2.3. Means and standard deviations of three experiments. * Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between WP80 and WP65 counterparts.
Figure 4. % Fe2+ chelating activity (Fe-CA) after a 30 min reaction of the tryptic hydrolysates of 5% (w/w) solutions of WPC powders of sheep/goat origin manufactured from Feta cheese whey in comparison to non-treated counterparts. 1 Abbreviations explained in Table 1 and Section 2.2.3. Means and standard deviations of three experiments. * Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between WP80 and WP65 counterparts.
Foods 11 02103 g004
Table
Table 1. Coding of samples taken from the tryptic hydrolysates (HYD) of whey protein concentrates (WPC) of sheep/goat origin manufactured from Feta cheese whey and of the respective controls (CON). WP65, WPC with 65% protein content; WP80, WPC with 80% protein content 1.
Table 1. Coding of samples taken from the tryptic hydrolysates (HYD) of whey protein concentrates (WPC) of sheep/goat origin manufactured from Feta cheese whey and of the respective controls (CON). WP65, WPC with 65% protein content; WP80, WPC with 80% protein content 1.
Sample Code 2Trypsin (0.25% on Protein)Time (h) 3Heating (68 °C for 10 min) 4Storage (h) 5
WP(65 or 80)_CON_t0.05-0.05+-
WP(65 or 80)_CON_t1-1+-
WP(65 or 80)_CON_t18-1+17
WP(65 or 80)_HYD_t0.05+0.05+-
WP(65 or 80)_HYD_t1+1+-
WP(65 or 80)_HYD_t18+1+17
1 At a concentration of 5%, w/w; 2 in total 36 samples were taken from three repetitive hydrolyses for each substrate; 3 hydrolysis time at 50 °C in hours; 4 low-pasteurization for enzyme inactivation after one-hour hydrolysis; 5 storage time after heating under refrigeration.
Table
Table 2. Protein composition of substrates WPC powders of sheep/goat origin manufactured from Feta cheese whey. Codes and abbreviations are explained in Section 2.1 and Section 2.2.1 Means and standard deviations of three experiments.
Table 2. Protein composition of substrates WPC powders of sheep/goat origin manufactured from Feta cheese whey. Codes and abbreviations are explained in Section 2.1 and Section 2.2.1 Means and standard deviations of three experiments.
WPCTP g/100 gSN/TN %TCASN/TN %CMP g/100 gα-LA 1 g/100 gβ-LG 1 g/100 g
WP6561.25 ± 1.9891.2 ± 2.6212.9 ± 1.7310.1 ± 0.3210.4 ± 0.4533.0 ± 3.35
WP8073.27 ± 2.1876.5 ± 2.7410.6 ± 1.9010.3 ± 0.586.7 ± 0.3336.64 ± 1.04
1 in the native form.
Table
Table 3. pH changes during hydrolysis and storage of tryptic hydrolysates of 5% (w/w) solutions of WPC powders of sheep/goat origin manufactured from Feta cheese whey. Codes are explained in Section 2.1.
Table 3. pH changes during hydrolysis and storage of tryptic hydrolysates of 5% (w/w) solutions of WPC powders of sheep/goat origin manufactured from Feta cheese whey. Codes are explained in Section 2.1.
Time (h)WP65 WP80
Control+TrypsinControl+Trypsin
0.05 16.28 ± 0.036.28 ± 0.036.11 ± 0.106.11 ± 0.09
0.5 15.92 ± 0.085.85 ± 0.075.75 ± 0.075.65 ± 0.07
1 1,26.07 ± 0.195.95 ± 0.195.88 ± 0.185.84 ± 0.24
18 36.35 ± 0.076.29 ± 0.126.19 ± 0.106.17 ± 0.12
1 50 °C; 2 stopping of the reaction; 3 storage under refrigeration after stopping of the reaction.
Table
Table 4. Degree of hydrolysis (DH) and extent of hydrolysis (EH) estimated as described in Section 2.2.2. Abbreviations explained in Section 2.2.4 and Table 1. Means and standard deviations of three experiments.
Table 4. Degree of hydrolysis (DH) and extent of hydrolysis (EH) estimated as described in Section 2.2.2. Abbreviations explained in Section 2.2.4 and Table 1. Means and standard deviations of three experiments.
Hydrolysis StageDH_TCASNDH_TNBSEH_β-lgEH_α-LAEH_CMP
WP65_HYD_t0.0511 ± 2.4 a10.6 ± 1.8 a,*11.6 ± 2.357.6 ± 4.6 a19.9 ± 2.9 a
WP65_HYD_t117.1 ± 0.3 b13.7 ± 1.5 b,*14 ± 1.373.9 ± 2.6 b37 ± 2.6 b
WP65_HYD_t1817± 1.2 b14.8 ± 0.3 b,*14.6 ± 3.775.4 ± 3.3 b37.8 ± 0.9 b
WP80_HYD_t0.0510.9 ± 1.2 a5.9 ± 0.9 a8.6 ± 2.9 a51.9 ± 6.7 a21.9 ± 3.7 a
WP80_HYD_t116.7 ± 1 b10.3 ± 1.1 b14.9 ± 1.7 b79.9 ± 1 b,*32.7 ± 4.8 b
WP80_HYD_t1817.4 ± 0.5 b11.3 ± 2 b16.9 ± 1.4 b82 ± 1.3 b,*33.6 ± 0.3 b
Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (LSD, p < 0.05) within each group of samples; * indicates statically significant differences between respective hydrolysates of WP65 and WP80.
Table
Table 5. Correlation coefficients between the hydrolysis indices of Table 4. as Abbreviations explained in Section 2.2.2 and Table 4.
Table 5. Correlation coefficients between the hydrolysis indices of Table 4. as Abbreviations explained in Section 2.2.2 and Table 4.
DH_TCASNDH_TNBSED_β-LGED_α-LAED_CMP
DH_TCASN 0.660.720.910.89
DH_TNBS0.66 0.580.610.73
ED_β-LG0.720.58 0.830.64
ED_α-LA0.910.610.83 0.81
ED_CMP0.890.730.640.81
Table
Table 6. % DPPH-RSA estimated as described in Section 2.2.3. Abbreviations explained in Table 1 and Section 2.2.3; s Means and standard deviations (sd) of three experiments.
Table 6. % DPPH-RSA estimated as described in Section 2.2.3. Abbreviations explained in Table 1 and Section 2.2.3; s Means and standard deviations (sd) of three experiments.
WP65_CON
_t0.05		WP65_CON
_t1		WP65_CON
_t18		WP65_HYD
_t0.05		WP65_HYD
_t1		WP65_HYD
_t18		Trolox
mean50.7748.9246.0149.6747.2145.2194.92
sd7.054.403.485.265.444.642.25
WP80_CON
_t0.05		WP80_CON
_t1		WP80_CON
_t18		WP80_HYD
_t0.05		WP80_HYD
_t1		WP80_HYD
_t18		Trolox
mean49.1351.1254.0549.6851.5551.3996.51
sd5.638.772.367.226.753.660.57
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sakkas, L.; Lekaki, E.; Moatsou, G. Whey Protein Hydrolysates of Sheep/Goat Origin Produced by the Action of Trypsin without pH Control: Degree of Hydrolysis, Antihypertensive Potential and Antioxidant Activities. Foods 2022, 11, 2103. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142103

AMA Style

Sakkas L, Lekaki E, Moatsou G. Whey Protein Hydrolysates of Sheep/Goat Origin Produced by the Action of Trypsin without pH Control: Degree of Hydrolysis, Antihypertensive Potential and Antioxidant Activities. Foods. 2022; 11(14):2103. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142103

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sakkas, Lambros, Eleni Lekaki, and Golfo Moatsou. 2022. "Whey Protein Hydrolysates of Sheep/Goat Origin Produced by the Action of Trypsin without pH Control: Degree of Hydrolysis, Antihypertensive Potential and Antioxidant Activities" Foods 11, no. 14: 2103. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142103

APA Style

Sakkas, L., Lekaki, E., & Moatsou, G. (2022). Whey Protein Hydrolysates of Sheep/Goat Origin Produced by the Action of Trypsin without pH Control: Degree of Hydrolysis, Antihypertensive Potential and Antioxidant Activities. Foods, 11(14), 2103. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11142103

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop