Next Article in Journal
Consumption Patterns of Processed Foods in Singapore—A Cross-Sectional Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Research on Fusarium Mycotoxins in Maize—A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Quantum-Dot-Bead-Based Fluorescence-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Sensitive Detection of Cry2A Toxin in Cereals Using Nanobodies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Screening of Mycotoxigenic Fungi in Barley and Barley Malt (Hordeum vulgare L.) Using Real-Time PCR—A Comparison between Molecular Diagnostic and Culture Technique
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Variation in Tocochromanols Level and Mycotoxins Content in Sweet Maize Cultivars after Inoculation with Fusarium verticillioides and F. proliferatum

by
Agnieszka Waśkiewicz
1,*,
Małgorzata Muzolf-Panek
2,
Łukasz Stępień
3,
Elżbieta Czembor
4,
Pascaline Aimee Uwineza
1,
Paweł Górnaś
5 and
Marcin Bryła
6
1
Department of Chemistry, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 75, 60-625 Poznan, Poland
2
Department of Food Quality and Safety Management, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 31, 60-637 Poznan, Poland
3
Department of Pathogen Genetics and Plant Resistance, Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszyńska 34, 60-479 Poznan, Poland
4
Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute—National Research Institute, Radzików, 05-870 Błonie, Poland
5
Institute of Horticulture, Graudu 1, LV-3701 Dobele, Latvia
6
Department of Food Safety and Chemical Analysis, Prof. Waclaw Dabrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology—State Research Institute, 02-532 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(18), 2781; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182781
Submission received: 22 July 2022 / Revised: 28 August 2022 / Accepted: 1 September 2022 / Published: 9 September 2022

Abstract

:
A major problem in maize production is the contamination of the grain with Fusarium spp., mainly F. proliferatum and F. verticillioides and their secondary metabolites—mycotoxins. Under biotic stress conditions, caused by a fungal pathogen, plants initiate a series of defense mechanisms that may cause quantitative and qualitative changes in the composition of phenolic compounds. We analyzed the resistance of four sweet maize cultivars (Syngenta Group: Overland, Sweetstar, GSS 8529, Shinerock) to the infection with Fusarium verticillioides and F. proliferatum isolates, along with fumonisins B1, B2, and B3 grain contamination and the levels of tocopherols and tocotrienols accumulated. Differences in ear rot levels were found between the cultivars and isolates used. The phenotypic evaluation positively correlated with the concentrations of fumonisins. The results obtained also indicate a significant dependence on tocochromanols content in sweet maize cultivars tested on the infection of plants with Fusarium isolates and fumonisin biosynthesis. Further studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms of the plant reaction and the effect of different levels of tocopherols and tocotrienols on Fusarium resistance and grain contamination with mycotoxins.

1. Introduction

Maize (Zea mays L.)—one of the most important cereals—is a monoecious crop of the Poaceae family widely cultivated worldwide [1]. Along with wheat and rice it is the most frequently grown crop across the globe in both temperate and tropical regions with a cultivation area of around 200 million ha [2]. Maize is an essential and staple crop valued for its nutritional properties and used as food and animal feed, as well as raw material for industrial applications, such as biofuel and bioproducts [3].
One of the greatest challenges in maize production is the contamination of grain with Fusarium fungi and mycotoxins [4]. Rapid increase in maize cultivation area, use of inappropriate crop rotation and global warming of the climate have resulted in an increased incidence of diseases, including Fusarium ear rot caused mainly by Fusarium proliferatum and F. verticillioides, with yield reduction of 5–10% [3,5]. In addition, most Fusarium strains are able to produce mycotoxins during vegetation season [1,3,6,7,8]. As a result, mycotoxins reduce grain quality and, when consumed, cause various health problems for both humans and animals [3]. The most important secondary metabolites formed by F. proliferatum and F. verticillioides include group B fumonisins (fumonisin B1, B2, B3) [8,9]. The contamination of commercially available purified products for human consumption (ground maize grain, maize meal, grits, polenta, semolina, cornflakes and sweet maize) with these toxins typically does not exceed 1000 µg/kg, although it can be higher in some countries. The International Agency for Research on Cancer in 2002 classified fumonisin B1 under substances probably carcinogenic to humans (class 2B) [10]. Moreover, in 2007 the Regulation of the EC Commission no. 1126/2007 updated the highest admissible concentrations for the two most important fumonisins B1 and B2 found in maize and its processed products [11].
Breeding cultivars with increased resistance is commonly considered as the most profitable and environmentally friendly method of protection against Fusarium pathogens, since the use of fungicides is frequently not effective and largely dependent on weather conditions.
Constant progress in sweet maize breeding results in a considerable number of new cultivars of high economic importance, differing in vegetation period length, yield, contents of sugars and quality of kernels. Sweet maize is grown mostly for its nutritive and culinary value. The kernels contain all micro- and macroelements, as well as many vitamins: A, C, B1, B2, PP, and in particular large amounts of vitamin E [12]. Tocopherol and tocotrienols, together known as “tocochromanols”, are lipophilic compounds that are classified as tochochromanols [13]. However, according to Azzi (2019), the term ’vitamin E’ should not be generalized, being used interchangeably for different tocols, since only α-T meets the criteria of preventing the human deficiency disease of vitamin E ’Ataxia with Vitamin E Deficiency’ [14]. Tocochromanols are made of a chromanol ring and a polyprenyl side chain, which is saturated in tocopherols and three-fold unsaturated in tocotrienols. Both the tocopherols (Ts) and tocotrienols (T3 s) have four derivatives: alpha (α), beta (β), delta (δ) and gamma (γ), differing in number and location of methyl groups at the chromanol ring [12,15,16,17]. Particularly γ-T and α-T have the largest share of the total tocochromanols in maize [15]. In addition, kernels of sweet maize do not contain gluten, constituting a valuable dietary component in a gluten-free diet. Sweet maize provides fresh products for direct consumption and raw material for the fruit and vegetable processing industry, frozen food and preserves. Furthermore, numerous scientific studies have shown that consistent intake of whole grain maize reduces the risk of developing chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and obesity, and it also improves digestive health [18,19].
Under biotic stress conditions (e.g., caused by a fungal pathogen), plants initiate a series of defense mechanisms [20]. They also change quantitative and qualitative composition of phenolic compounds—plant secondary metabolites—participating in the regulation of pigmentation, growth, reproduction of plants and their resistance to pathogens [21]. Phenolic compounds may be divided into two groups: those synthesized during normal development and growth of plants, and those for which production is triggered by biotic and/or abiotic stress [22,23,24]. This process may cause inhibition or impaired development of the pathogen and/or limited biosynthesis of mycotoxins.
Knowledge about the impact of Fusarium infection on the levels of some secondary metabolites, e.g., tocopherols and tocotrienols in maize kernels, is still limited. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of Fusarium infection on the level of mycotoxins and its correlation with the level of tocochromanols content in four sweet maize cultivars.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Four sweet maize cultivars (Syngenta Group: Overland, Sweetstar, GSS 8529, Shinerock) were used to evaluate the relationship between the levels of their resistance to the infection with two Fusarium verticillioides isolates and two F. proliferatum isolates, fumonisins B1, B2, and B3 grain contamination and the levels of tocochromanols accumulated in their kernels. Sweetstar represents an early genotype with an average of 14–16 kernel rows per cob. GSS 8529, Overland and Shinerock belong to an average 18 rows-per-cob group (as a mid-early or mid-late genotypes). They were included into this study based on the preliminary experiment as the susceptible or moderately resistant to ear rot under field condition.

2.2. Field Experiment and Phenotypic Ear Rot Resistance Assessment

Field experiment was conducted in 2016, in Radzików, Central Poland (52.2192′ N, 20.6315′ E, 87 m above sea level). An RCBD (randomized complete block design) model was used. About 25 plants were grown in one row, three replications (0.75 m between rows and 0.25 m between plants in the row). Four Fusarium sp. isolates were used: two F. verticillioides (KF 3492 and KF 3707) and two F. proliferatum (KF 3654 and KF 925). All isolates came from the KF collection of pathogenic fungi at the Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznań, Poland. Their species identities were confirmed using molecular techniques utilizing translation elongation factor 1α gene (tef-1α) sequence analysis, according to the previous works [7].
To produce inoculum, the isolates were grown on a liquid SNA medium. After 2 weeks, cultures were filtered through cheesecloth and conidial concentrations were adjusted to ~106 spores/mL. Inoculation of individual ears was conducted 10–12 days after silking time using 1.5 mL of spore suspension. Minimum of 24 plants were inoculated for each genotype using a sterile needle (8–9 plants in three replicates). Control plants were inoculated using a sterile water without the pathogen. At maturity, ears from each plot were dehusked and harvested manually, dried to approximately 15% of grain moisture and individually rated for FER symptoms using a seven-point scale: 1 = no visible disease symptoms, 2 = 1–3%, 3 = 4–10%, 4 = 11–25%, 5 = 26–50%, 6 = 51–75%, and 7 = 76–100% of kernels exhibiting visual symptoms of infection, such as brown, pink or reddish discoloration of kernels (white mycelial growth) [25].

2.3. Tocochromanols Content

2.3.1. Extraction of Tocochromanols

Extraction of tocochromanols was performed according to Górnaś et al. (2014) [26]. The amount of 0.1 g powdered maize kernels (5 maize cobs for each repetition) was placed in a 15 mL screw cap tube sequentially supplemented with 2.5 mL of ethanol, 0.05 g of pyrogallol and 0.25 mL of aqueous potassium hydroxide (600 g/L). The tube was immediately closed with a screw cap, vortexed for 10 s at 2500 rpm and incubated in a water bath at 80 °C for 25 min, during which (after 10 min) samples were vortexed for 10 s at 2500 rpm. After incubation samples were cooled immediately in an ice-water bath and 2.5 mL of sodium chloride (10 g/L) was added. The entire volume was vortexed for 5 s at 2500 rpm. Then, tocochromanols were extracted using 2.5 mL of n-hexane:ethyl acetate (9:1; v/v), and vortexed for 15 s at 2500 rpm and centrifuged for 5 min (1000× g, at 4 °C). The organic layer was removed to the round bottom flask and residues were re-extracted with 2.5 mL of n-hexane:ethyl acetate (9:1; v/v) as before. Re-extraction was repeated three times. The combined organic layer fractions were evaporated in a vacuum rotary evaporator at 40 °C to dryness, dissolved in 2 mL ethanol and filtered through a nylon syringe filter (0.22 μm).

2.3.2. Determination of Tocochromanols by RP-HPLC/FLD

Tocochromanols were identified using a previously validated method [27]. The chromatographic separation was carried out on the Shimadzu HPLC system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) consisting of a pump (LC-10ADvp), a degasser (DGU-14A), a low pressure gradient unit (FCV-10ALvp), a system controller (SCL-10Avp), an auto injector (SIL-10AF), a column oven (CTO-10ASvp), a fluorescence detector (RF-10AXL), and Luna PFP column (3 μm, 150 mm × 4.6 mm) with a guard column (4 mm × 3 mm) (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). The analysis was performed under the following conditions: mobile phase methanol: water (93:7; v/v); flow (1.0 mL/min); column oven temperature (40 °C); room temperature (22 ± 1 °C) and runtime (13 min). The identification and quantification were performed using a fluorescence detector at an excitation wavelength of 295 nm and emission wavelength of 330 nm. The limits of detection (LODs) for tocopherols and tocotrienols were as follows: 0.051, 0.018, 0.022, 0.044, 0.061, 0.027, 0.030 and 0.019 mg/L for α-T, β-T, γ-T, δ-T, α-T3, β-T3, γ-T3 and δ-T3, respectively.

2.4. Mycotoxins Analysis

High purity fumonisin B1, B2, and B3 standards (50 µg/mL in acetonitrile: water, 1:1) LC/MS-grade organic solvents, water and other reagents were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Fumonisins were extracted and purified from 10 g of homogenized samples of maize kernels (5 maize cobs for each repetition) according to the detailed procedure described earlier [28]. The eluates were evaporated to dryness at 40 °C under a stream of nitrogen and stored at −20 °C until the chromatographic analyses. The analytical system consisted of the Aquity UPLC chromatograph (Waters, Manchester, MA, USA), coupled with an electrospray ionization triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (TQD) (Waters, Manchester, MA, USA). Chromatographic column—Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 (100 mm × 2.1 mm/ID, with a particle size of 1.8 µm) (Waters, Manchester, MA, USA) was used for mycotoxins separation, with a flow rate of 0.35 mL/min at room temperature. The mobile phase consisted of methanol (A) and water (B) with an addition of 0.1% formic acid, phase B additionally contained 2 mM ammonium formate. The gradient program was used: from 1% to 95% A in 10 min, then 95% A for 2 min, and return to initial conditions in 2 min. The injection volume was 3 µL. Mass spectrometer was operated in the positive electrospray ionization mode (ESI) with ion source/desolvation temperature 150/350 °C, respectively. The compounds were quantitatively analyzed using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). The analytes were identified by comparing the retention times and m/z values obtained by MS and MS2 with the mass spectra (722.4/352.4, 706.4/336.4 and 706.4/170.4 for FB1, FB2 and FB3, respectively) of the corresponding standards tested under the same conditions. Limit of detection for fumonisins was 1 ng/g. All samples were analyzed in triplicate. For data processing EmpowerTM 3 software was used (Waters, Manchester, UK).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 13.1 software (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA). Hypotheses were tested at α = 0.05. The significance of the factors is presented as p value. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. Each combination of factors included 3 repetitions. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed (independent variables: maize species and pathogen isolate). The variance homogeneity was verified using Hartley–Cochran–Bartlett test. The HSD Tukey’s test was used to determine the significant differences between samples. Correlation between visual assesment and fumosisins and tocochromanols was tested using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (R). Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to visualize information and to detect relationship between variables. General discrimination analysis (GDA), the supervised pattern recognition method were used to calculate classification rules for samples discrimination. Cluster analysis (CA) as unsupervised pattern recognition method was also used to visualize data and show some patterns in dataset.

3. Results

Based on the obtained results it was possible to find the relationships between the levels of four sweet maize cultivars’ resistance to the infection with two Fusarium verticillioides and two F. proliferatum isolates, fumonisin B1, B2, and B3 content and the levels of tocochromanols accumulation in maize kernels. Statistically significant effects of both genotype (maize cultivar) and Fusarium isolate on fumonisins (FBs) content was observed based on two-way ANOVA.

3.1. Phenotypic Evaluation

Phenotypic evaluation of the cultivars’ resistance to ear rot caused by Fusarium verticillioides (KF 3492 and KF 3707 isolates) and F. proliferatum (KF 3654 and KF 925 isolates) after inoculation and under natural infection conditions was carried out at the maturity plant stage. Differences between Overland, Sweetstar, GSS 8529 and Shinerock cultivars were significant (F = 5.8843; p = 0.0015). Differences between ear rot levels after inoculation using each isolate or under natural infection were also found (F = 14.8081; p < 0.0001). On average, after inoculation the disease symptoms were scored as follows: 5.3 (KF 925), 5.5 (KF 3492) and 4.9 (both, KF 370 and KF 3654). Under natural infection it was scored as 2.2.
Sweetstar and GSS 8529 are very susceptible to ear rot (Figure 1). The level of resistance of the Sweetstar cultivar, which belongs to the early group with an average 14–16 rows per cob, was scored in the range from 5.7 (after inoculation with KF 925 isolate) to 7.0 (after inoculation with KF 3492 isolate). The GSS 8529 belongs to the mid-early group with an average 18 rows per cob and it was scored in the range from 5.7 (inoculation with KF 925 isolate) to 7.0 (after inoculation with KF 3492 isolate). Overland and Shinerock were described as moderately resistant to most of the isolates used. Both cultivars were described as mid-early and mid-late. Ear rot resistance of the Overland cultivar was scored in the range from 3.7 (after inoculation with KF 3707 isolate) to 5.3 (after inoculation with the most aggressive KF 925 isolate) and Shinerock from 3.7 to 4.7 (after inoculation KF 3492 isolate).

3.2. Mycotoxins Level

All results of mycotoxins concentrations were shown in Table 1. Two-way ANOVA revealed the statistically significant effects of both maize cultivar and Fusarium isolate on fumonisins (FBs) content. The highest values for all fumonisins (FB1, FB2 and FB3) were reported in GSS 8529 cultivar inoculated with F. verticillioides (KF 3707 isolate) and Fusarium proliferatum (KF 3654). Notably, the levels of all fumonisins were elevated in the samples of Overland cultivar inoculated with Fusarium verticillioides (KF 3707 isolate), and the samples of Overland and Sweetstar inoculated with Fusarium proliferatum (KF 3654 isolate).

3.3. Tocopherols and Tocotrienols Content

All results for tocochromanols content were shown in Table 2. Two-way ANOVA revealed the statistically significant effects of both maize cultivar and Fusarium isolate on tocopherols and tocotrienols content. The highest level of δ-T3 was observed in Overland and Sweet Star, γ-T3 in Overland and α-T3 in Shinerock cultivar (Table 2). The lowest levels of all three T3 s were observed for GSS 8529 cultivar, especially the samples inoculated with KF 3707 and KF 3654 Fusarium isolates. For tocopherols, the highest level of δ-T was reported in Sweetstar cultivar, β-T in Sweetstar and Overland, γ-T in Sweet Star and α-T in Sweetstar and Overland cultivars. Similarly, the lowest content of tocopherols was observed in GSS 8529 cultivar, especially in the samples inoculated with KF 3707 and KF 3654 Fusarium isolates. Generally, the maize cultivar could be ordered according to the decreasing content of total tocotrienols and tocopherols as follows: Overland > Sweetstar > Shinerock > GSS 8529. No β-tocotrienol was found in any of the samples analyzed.
The phenotypic evaluation (visual assessment) was positively correlated with the concentration of fumonisins, which was proven by statistically significant R-Spearman’s correlation coefficient, equalled to 0.51, 0.42 and 0.54 for FB1, FB2 and FB3, respectively. Additionally, the results of phenotypic evaluation (visual assessment) were significantly, inverserely correlated with α-T3 (R = 0.61, p = 0.000) and α-T (R = 0.55, p = 0.000) levels.

3.4. Multivariate Analysis

In order to insert more insight into the data matrix and show the relationships between variables as well as variables and scores, PCA (principal component analysis) was performed. It could be stated that three principal components, showing eigenvalues higher than 1, explained around 92.5% of total variability, including the PC1 explaining 57.4% and PC2 explaining 20.1% of total variance. Figure 2 presents results of PCA, namely the distribution of variables (Figure 2a) and scores (Figure 2b) onto the factor plane described by PC1 as x axis and PC2 as y axis.
As shown in Figure 2a PC1 is highly positively correlated with γ-T3 (0.91), γ-T (0.91), β-T (0.82) and δ-T3 (0.78) and negatively correlated with fumonisins FB1 (−0.76), FB2 (−0.77) and FB3 (−0.80). PC2 is highly correlated with δ-T (−0.78). In Figure 2b, the distribution of scores is shown along the PC1 and PC2 axes. The scores were grouped into two distinct clusters. The first cluster included Overland cultivar (mid-late, phenotyped as a moderate resistant to ear rot based on the symptoms of the disease under field condition after inoculation) and Sweetstar cultivar. Both cultivars displayed high levels of tocopherols (δ-T3, δ-T, γ-T3, γ-T and β-T) and low level of the fumonisin content in comparison to the most susceptible GSS 8529 cultivar. The second cluster included GSS 8529 and Shinerock cultivars. Susceptible GSS 8529 accumulated high levels of fumonisins and Shinerock had high levels of alfa-tocopherols (α-T and α-T3). Shinerock was described as a moderately resistant to ear rot based on phenotypic evaluation and accumulated low levels of fumonisins. Moreover, within the susceptible GSS 8529 group the samples were highly scattered along both axes which indicated that GSS 8529 inoculated with various isolates differed significantly in tocopherol content and fumonisin concentration. The lowest differences between Fusarium isolates were noticed for Shinerock cultivar, phenotyped as the most resistant to ear rot based on the symptoms of the disease under field condition after inoculation. The PCA is less sensitive to the differentiation of all samples, thus GDA (general discriminant analysis) was performed to group the samples based on the similarities within clusters. GDA is a supervised pattern recognition technique which enables us to obtain discriminant functions, maximizing the ratio of between-class variance and minimize the ratio of within-class variance. The discriminant function was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The standardized canonical function coefficients are shown in Table 3.
Based on the results shown in Table 3 it could be concluded that the contents of α-T3, γ-T3 and FB3 contributed mostly to the first discriminant function which accounted for 78% of the total variance. The second canonical function explained 20% of total variance and was mainly related to δ-T3 content and FB1 and FB2 levels. Results of GDA discrimination was shown in Figure 3. All samples were discriminated with 97% classification propriety. Only the control samples of GSS 8529 cultivar were misclassified as Shinerock maize samples.
Next, the cluster analysis (CA) was performed to show the similarities between variables and similarities between samples. Results of CA was shown in Figure 4. Visual assessment was related to the fumonisin contents (the lowest 1 − r Pearson values). The highest 1 − r Pearson values were observed between results of visual assessment and α-T3 (1.50) and α-T (1.42) levels.
Figure 4b shows the dendrogram of the sample grouped according to their nearest similarities. At the 100 × Dist/max Dist. = 40 four distinct clusters could be observed. The first cluster included all Shinerock cultivar samples and three control samples of GSS 8529 cultivar, the second cluster consisted of all Overland cultivar samples, the third cluster of all Sweetstar cultivar samples and the fourth cluster included the GSS 8529 cultivar samples inoculated with Fusarium isolates. The results of CA were similar to the results of GDA, as not all GSS 8529 samples were properly grouped.

4. Discussion

The obtained results indicate a significant dependence of tocochromanols content in samples of sweet maize cultivars tested on the infection of plants with Fusarium isolates and mycotoxin biosynthesis.
This relationship can be clearly seen in the case of the susceptible cultivar GSS 8529 (especially after inoculation with KF 3707 and KF 3654 isolates), for which high concentrations of fumonisins (sum of FBs—21.58 and 19.85 µg/g, respectively) were shown. This finding corresponded to a significant decrease in the concentration of both tocopherols (9.14 and 10.35 mg/100 g, respectively) and tocotrienols (2.68 and 3.39 mg/100 g, respectively) compared to a control sample (1.24 µg/g—FBs; 18.13 mg/100 g—T; 6.60 mg/100 g—T3). The opposite situation was observed for the moderately resistant cultivar—Shinerock. Using each of the four isolates, the relation was similar—very low levels of fumonisins were noted (0.98–2.52µg/g for KF 3492 and KF 3654, respectively), which was associated with a significant increase in tocochromanols concentrations (Ts—21.27–23.44 mg/100 g and T3 s—7.72–8.30 mg/100 g) in the inoculated samples compared to the control (FBs—0.00 µg/g, Ts—17.20 mg/100 g; T3 s—4.75 mg/100 g). In the other two cultivars (Overland and Sweetstar), the situation was ambiguous and strictly dependent on the isolate. For the Overland cultivar, high concentrations of fumonisins were noticed only for variants with KF 3707 and KF 3654 isolates (12.15 and 6.84 µg/g, respectively), while the concentrations of tocochromanols remained at similar levels or even slightly higher (35.51 and 42.37 mg/100 g) compared to the control without inoculation (FBs—0.00 µg/g, sum of tocochromanols—35.03 mg/100 g). Other observations were made for the early Sweetstar cultivar, where, probably due to the shorter growing season, the level of fumonisins was low (1.07–1.24 µg/g), except for the variant with KF 3254 inoculation (7.68 µg/g), and the content of tocochromanols was slightly lower (29.25–34.94 mg/100 g) compared to the control (FBs—0.04 µg/g; sum of tocochromanols—37.01 mg/100 g).
There are only a few reports in the available literature, connecting maize fusariosis and mycotoxins biosynthesis with the level of various phenolic compounds. In the studies conducted by Martinez-Fraca et al. (2022) [29] the relationship between ferulic acid (FA) levels, fungal infection, and FB1 production was analyzed for 51 maize genotypes. Moreover, the putative antioxidative activity of ferulic acid—a major component of the seed pericarp—was verified. The authors selected maize cultivars with low and high FA levels and showed that fungal colonization (by F. verticillioides) and FB1 production were significantly lower in genotypes with high levels of FA than in genotypes with low content of FA [29]. Similar studies concerned the involvement of antioxidants (α-tocopherol, lutein, zeaxanthin, β-carotene and ferulic acid) in the resistance of maize cultivars to Fusarium ear rot mycotoxins accumulation [30]. It was shown that among the tested antioxidants, FA and α-tocopherol had the potential to inhibit the activity of Fusarium verticillioides, and their effectiveness depended on the susceptibility of the genotype. Majeed et al. (2017) [31] conducted research with the use of maize varieties with different susceptibility to fusariosis and analyzed the content of aflatoxins and tocopherols in these samples. The results showed that higher level of tocopherol corresponded with lower concentration of aflatoxins [31]. The presence of tocopherols and the aflatoxins content were also studied in another cereal—in different varieties of rice [16]. As in previous studies, the correlation between tocochromanols content and aflatoxins concentration was demonstrated—the higher the level of tocopherols in the samples, the lower the mycotoxin content.
Interesting studies were carried out on rats consuming maize naturally contaminated with mycotoxins, the diet of which was supplemented with selenium and vitamin E [32]. It has been shown that compared to the control group (without supplementation) selenium and vitamin E were able to alleviate oxidative stress and liver function damage due to the consumption of maize naturally contaminated with mycotoxins. In turn, Hoehler et al. (1996) [33] and Baldi et al. (2004) [34] investigated the effect of vitamins A, C and E on the toxicity of ochratoxin A and T-2 toxin in chickens and on cell lines, and showed that supplementation may, to a varying degree, depend on the type of antioxidant, counteracting a short-term mycotoxin toxicity.
Both our results and research conducted by other scientists show that there is still a lot to be explained and confirmed in this area.

5. Conclusions

Our results highlight the role of tocochromanols and their antioxidative activity on maize resistance to Fusarium ear rot and provide the basis of a phenotypic trait that can be deployed for breeding selection. The effect of Fusarium infection on the level of tocochromanols was particularly evident for the susceptible variety, where the high level of mycotoxins corresponded to a significant decrease in the concentration of tocochromanols. The results are interesting and need further studies to investigate the mechanisms of the plant reaction and the effect of different levels of tocochromanols on Fusarium resistance and grain contamination with mycotoxins.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.W.; methodology, P.G., M.M.-P., M.B. and A.W.; validation, P.G., M.M.-P., M.B. and A.W.; investigation, A.W., Ł.S., E.C. and M.B.; resources, E.C. and Ł.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.W. M.B. and P.A.U.; writing—review and editing, A.W., Ł.S., E.C. and M.M.-P.; visualization, M.M.-P.; supervision, A.W.; project administration, A.W.; funding acquisition, A.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Polish National Science Centre, Grant No. 2014/15/B/NZ9/02169.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. García-Díaz, M.; Gil-Serna, J.; Vázquez, C.; Botia, M.N.; Patiño, B. A Comprehensive Study on the Occurrence of Mycotoxins and Their Producing Fungi during the Maize Production Cycle in Spain. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Erenstein, O.; Moti, J.; Sonder, K.; Mottaleb, K.; Prasanna, B.M. Global Maize Production, Consumption and Trade: Trends and R&D Implications. Food Secur. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Edgerton, M.D. Increasing crop productivity to meet global needs for feed, food, and fuel. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ferrigo, D.; Raiola, A.; Causin, R. Fusarium Toxins in Cereals: Occurrence, Legislation, Factors Promoting the Appearance and Their Management. Molecules 2016, 21, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pereira, P.; Nesci, A.; Castillo, C.; Etcheverry, M. Impact of bacterial biological control agents on fumonisin B1 content and Fusarium verticillioides infection of field-grown maize. Biol. Control. 2010, 53, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Waśkiewicz, A.; Beszterda, M.; Goliński, P. Occurrence of Fumonisins in Food—An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Problem. Food Control. 2012, 26, 491–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Waśkiewicz, A.; Stępień, Ł. Mycotoxins Biosynthesized by Plant-Derived Fusarium Isolates. Arch. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 2012, 63, 437–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Waśkiewicz, A.; Stępień, Ł.; Wilman, K.; Kachlicki, P. Diversity of Pea-Associated F. proliferatum and F. verticillioides Populations Revealed by FUM1 Sequence Analysis and Fumonisin Biosynthesis. Toxins 2013, 5, 488–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Perincherry, L.; Lalak-Kańczugowska, J.; Stępień, Ł. Fusarium-Produced Mycotoxins in Plant-Pathogen Interactions. Toxins 2019, 11, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Some Traditional Herbal Medicines, Some Mycotoxins, Naphthalene and Styrene. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2002; Volume 82. [Google Scholar]
  11. European Commission Regulation (EC). Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1126/2007 of 28 September 2007. Off. J. Eur. Union 2007, L255, 14–17. [Google Scholar]
  12. Shahidi, F.; de Camargo, A.C. Tocopherols and Tocotrienols in Common and Emerging Dietary Sources: Occurrence, Applications, and Health Benefits. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Munné-Bosch, S.; Alegre, L. The Function of Tocopherols and Tocotrienols in Plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2002, 21, 31–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Azzi, A. Tocopherols, Tocotrienols and Tocomonoenols: Many Similar Molecules but Only One vitamin E. Redox Biol. 2019, 26, 101259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rocheford, T.R.; Wong, J.C.; Egesel, C.O.; Lambert, R.J. Enhancement of Vitamin E Levels in Corn. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2002, 21 (Suppl. S3), 191S–198S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sheng, S.; Li, T.; Liu, R.H. Corn Phytochemicals and Their Health Benefits. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2018, 7, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Iqbal, S.Z.; Mustafa, H.G.; Asi, M.R.; Jinap, S. Variation in Vitamin E Level and Aflatoxins Contamination in Different Rice Varieties. J. Cereal Sci. 2014, 60, 352–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shah, T.R.; Prasad, K.; Kumar, P. Maize—A Potential Source of Human Nutrition and Health: A Review. Cogent Food Agric. 2016, 2, 1166995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumar, D.; Jhariya, N.A. Nutritional, Medicinal and Economical Importance of Corn: A Mini Review. Res. J. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 2, 7–8. [Google Scholar]
  20. Morkunas, I.; Narożna, D.; Nowak, W.; Samardakiewicz, S.; Remlein-Starosta, D. Cross-Talk Interactions of Sucrose and Fusarium oxysporum in the Phenylpropanoid Pathway and the Accumulation and Localization of Flavonoids in Embryo Axes of Yellow Lupine. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 424–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Lattanzio, V.; Lattanzio, V.M.T.; Cardinali, A. Role of Phenolics in the Resistance Mechanisms of Plants Against Fungal Pathogens and Insects. Phytochem. Adv. Res. 2006, 661, 23–67. [Google Scholar]
  22. Winkel-Shirley, B. Biosynthesis of flavonoids and effects of stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002, 5, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hammerschmidt, R. Phytoalexin Accumulation: Response or Defense. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2003, 62, 125–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Atanasova-Penichon, V.; Barreau, C.; Richard-Forget, F. Antioxidant Secondary Metabolites in Cereals: Potential Involvement in Resistance to Fusarium and Mycotoxin Accumulation. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Reid, L.M.; Nicol, R.W.; Ouellet, T.; Savard, M.; Miller, J.D.; Young, J.C.; Stewart, D.W.; Schaafsma, A.W. Interaction of Fusarium graminearum and F. moniliforme in Maize Ears: Disease Progress, Fungal Biomass, and Mycotoxin Accumulation. Phytopathology 1999, 89, 1028–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Górnaś, P.; Pugajeva, I.; Segliņa, D. Seeds Recovered from By-Products of Selected Fruit Processing as a Rich Source of Tocochromanols: RP-HPLC/FLD and RP-UPLC-ESI/MSn study. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2014, 239, 519–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Górnaś, P.; Siger, A.; Czubinski, J.; Dwiecki, K.; Segliņa, D.; Nogala-Kalucka, M. An Alternative RP-HPLC Method for the Separation and Determination of Tocopherol and Tocotrienol Homologues as Butter Authenticity Markers: A Comparative Study Between two European Countries. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2014, 116, 895–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Waśkiewicz, A.; Irzykowska, L.; Drzewiecka, K.; Bocianowski, J.; Dobosz, B.; Weber, Z.; Karolewski, Z.; Krzyminiewski, R.; Goliński, P. Plant-Pathogen Interactions During Infection Process of Asparagus with Fusarium spp. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 2013, 8, 1065–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Martínez-Fraca, J.; de la Torre-Hernández, M.E.; Meshoulam-Alamilla, M.; Plasencia, J. In Search of Resistance Against Fusarium Ear Rot: Ferulic Acid Contents in Maize Pericarp Are Associated with Antifungal Activity and Inhibition of Fumonisin Production. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 852257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Picot, A.; Atanasova-Pénichon, V.; Pons, S.; Marchegay, G.; Barreau, C.; Pinson-Gadais, L.; Roucolle, J.; Daveau, F.; Caron, D.; Richard-Forget, F. Maize Kernel Antioxidants and Their Potential Involvement in Fusarium Ear Rot Resistance. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 3389–3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Majeed, S.; Iqbal, M.; Asi, M.R.; Iqbal, S.Z.; Selamat, J. Analysis of Nutritional Traits and Aflatoxin Contamination in Selected Maize Varieties from Pakistan. J. Food Prot. 2017, 80, 1993–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yu, J.; Chen, D.; Yu, B. Protective Effects of Selenium and Vitamin E on Rats Consuming Maize Naturally Contaminated with Mycotoxins. Front. Agric. China 2009, 3, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hoehler, D.; Marquardt, R. Influence of Vitamins E and C on the Toxic Effects of Ochratoxin A and T-2 Toxin in Chicks. Poult. Sci. 1996, 75, 1508–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Baldi, A.; Losio, M.N.; Cheli, F.; Rebucci, R.; Sangalli, L.; Fusi, E.; Bertasi, B.; Pavoni, E.; Carli, S.; Politis, I. Evaluation of the Protective Effects of α-Tocopherol and Retinol Against Ochratoxin A Cytotoxicity. Br. J. Nutr. 2004, 91, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Mean values of ear rot resistance of four sweet maize cultivars (Overland, Sweetstar, GSS 8529 and Shinerock) inoculated with Fusarium verticillioides (KF 3492 and KF 3707 isolates) and Fusarium proliferatum (KF 3654 and KF 925 isolates) and under natural infection. Bars represent standard deviation (SD).
Figure 1. Mean values of ear rot resistance of four sweet maize cultivars (Overland, Sweetstar, GSS 8529 and Shinerock) inoculated with Fusarium verticillioides (KF 3492 and KF 3707 isolates) and Fusarium proliferatum (KF 3654 and KF 925 isolates) and under natural infection. Bars represent standard deviation (SD).
Foods 11 02781 g001
Figure 2. Projections of the variables (a) and scores (b) onto the factor plane defined by principal components (PC1 and PC2). Note: FB1, FB2, FB3—fumonisins B1, B2 and B3, respectively; α-T3, δ-T3, γ-T3—tocotrienols alfa, delta and gamma, respectively; α-T, β-T, δ-T, γ-T tocopherols, alfa, beta, delta and gamma, respectively.
Figure 2. Projections of the variables (a) and scores (b) onto the factor plane defined by principal components (PC1 and PC2). Note: FB1, FB2, FB3—fumonisins B1, B2 and B3, respectively; α-T3, δ-T3, γ-T3—tocotrienols alfa, delta and gamma, respectively; α-T, β-T, δ-T, γ-T tocopherols, alfa, beta, delta and gamma, respectively.
Foods 11 02781 g002
Figure 3. GDA classification of the scores (maize cultivars) based on tocopherols/tocotrienols and fumonisins contents.
Figure 3. GDA classification of the scores (maize cultivars) based on tocopherols/tocotrienols and fumonisins contents.
Foods 11 02781 g003
Figure 4. Dendrograms of variables (a) and scores–maize variety (b) of CA (cluster analysis) of similarities.
Figure 4. Dendrograms of variables (a) and scores–maize variety (b) of CA (cluster analysis) of similarities.
Foods 11 02781 g004
Table 1. Mycotoxin content [µg/g] in four maize cultivars inoculated with Fusarium isolates.
Table 1. Mycotoxin content [µg/g] in four maize cultivars inoculated with Fusarium isolates.
Maize CultivarFusarium IsolateFB1FB2FB3
control0.913 ± 0.033 f0.294 ± 0.033 gh0.031 ± 0.003 h
KF 34924.186 ± 0.340 d1.298 ± 0.151 de0.725 ± 0.071 b
GSS 8529KF 370716.061 ± 0.577 a4.553 ± 0.508 a0.969 ± 0.051 a
KF 365416.160 ± 0.286 a3.170 ± 0.303 b0.523 ± 0.050 c
KF 9255.333 ± 0.178 c0.973 ± 0.160 ef0.137 ± 0.036 fg
control0.000 ± 0.000 g0.000 ± 0.000 h0.000 ± 0.000 h
KF 34920.797 ± 0.084 f0.123 ± 0.021 gh0.057 ± 0.009 gh
ShinerockKF 37070.870 ± 0.060 f0.391 ± 0.013 gh0.019 ± 0.003 h
KF 36542.064 ± 0.174 e0.418 ± 0.028 gh0.033 ± 0.004 h
KF 9250.996 ± 0.034 f0.217 ± 0.028 gh0.036 ± 0.008 h
control0.000 ± 0.000 g0.000 ± 0.000 h0.000 ± 0.000 h
KF 34921.716 ± 0.174 e0.308 ± 0.030 gh0.049 ± 0.008 h
OverlandKF 37079.562 ± 0.456 b2.171 ± 0.273 c0.417 ± 0.031 d
KF 36545.338 ± 0.237 c1.307 ± 0.262 de0.198 ± 0.014 ef
KF 9252.229 ± 0.210 e0.576 ± 0.066 fg0.077 ± 0.014 gh
control0.034 ± 0.006 g0.002 ± 0.000 h0.000 ± 0.000 h
KF 34920.863 ± 0.070 f0.152 ± 0.016 gh0.051 ± 0.010 h
SweetstarKF 37071.012 ± 0.096 f0.221 ± 0.004 gh0.007 ± 0.001 h
KF 36545.960 ± 0.174 c1.493 ± 0.051 d0.229 ± 0.028 e
KF 9250.917 ± 0.035 f0.128 ± 0.008 gh0.012 ± 0.004 h
n = 3; KF 3492 and KF 3707—isolates of Fusarium verticillioides, KF 3654 and KF 925—isolates of Fusarium proliferatum; a–h—the same superscript letters in the columns indicate the lack of significant differences between samples (α = 0.05).
Table 2. Tocopherols and tocotrienols content [mg/100 g of sample] in different maize cultivars inoculated with Fusarium isolates.
Table 2. Tocopherols and tocotrienols content [mg/100 g of sample] in different maize cultivars inoculated with Fusarium isolates.
Maize CultivarFusarium Isolateα-Tβ-Tγ-Tδ-Tα -T3γ-T3δ-T3Total TTotal T3
control1.958 ± 0.202 fgh0.062 ± 0.018 cd9.269 ± 0.145 jk0.248 ± 0.044 cde2.011 ± 0.167 de4.209 ± 0.212 f0.377 ± 0.071 b18.133 ± 0.5206.596 ± 0.437
KF 34921.124 ± 0.045 jk0.048 ± 0.013 de8.097 ± 0.342 k0.297 ± 0.022 cde1.207 ± 0.068 hi2.611 ± 0.086 gh0.270 ± 0.042 b13.653 ± 0.5894.087 ± 0.191
GSS 8529KF 37071.668 ± 0.146 ghi0.007 ± 0.002 e4.592 ± 0.106 m0.200 ± 0.027 e0.920 ± 0.039 i1.496 ± 0.057 i0.263 ± 0.030 b9.144 ± 0.2102.678 ± 0.125
KF 36540.898 ± 0.061 k0.006 ± 0.002 e5.845 ± 0.263 l0.210 ± 0.021 e1.137 ± 0.090 hi2.026 ± 0.091 hi0.224 ± 0.051 b10.345 ± 0.5023.386 ± 0.206
KF 9251.479 ± 0.098 ij0.060 ± 0.011 cd11.336 ± 0.239 fghi0.300 ± 0.043 cde1.816 ± 0.091 ef3.239 ± 0.141 g0.229 ± 0.047 b18.458 ± 0.6435.284 ± 0.271
control1.954 ± 0.181 fgh0.062 ± 0.015 cd10.232 ± 0.396 ij0.204 ± 0.026 e1.801 ± 0.119 ef2.682 ± 0.198 gh0.261 ± 0.052 b17.196 ± 0.8324.744 ± 0.365
KF 34922.388 ± 0.128 cde0.050 ± 0.015 de12.246 ± 0.299 defg0.232 ± 0.033 de2.278 ± 0.173 bcd5.070 ± 0.144 e0.368 ± 0.065 b22.631 ± 0.8227.716 ± 0.378
ShinerockKF 37072.138 ± 0.066 def0.053 ± 0.009 de10.662 ± 0.310 hj0.206 ± 0.037 e2.493 ± 0.107 ab5.345 ± 0.163 e0.375 ± 0.017 b21.273 ± 0.7008.213 ± 0.279
KF 36542.518 ± 0.086 cd0.065 ± 0.015 cd12.349 ± 0.365 def0.215 ± 0.029 de2.507 ± 0.181 ab5.413 ± 0.221 e0.373 ± 0.047 b23.441 ± 0.8848.294 ± 0.447
KF 9252.235 ± 0.069 def0.056 ± 0.012 cd11.767 ± 0.223 efgh0.214 ± 0.019 de2.704 ± 0.063 a5.217 ± 0.123 e0.375 ± 0.032 b22.569 ± 0.5048.297 ± 0.204
control3.076 ± 0.091 ab0.144 ± 0.019 ab11.612 ± 0.231 efgh0.247 ± 0.017 cde2.237 ± 0.041 bcd7.139 ± 0.213 b0.600 ± 0.043 a25.057 ± 0.5289.977 ± 0.283
KF 34922.450 ± 0.092 cd0.119 ± 0.017 ab11.145 ± 0.323 ghi0.293 ± 0.018 cde1.810 ± 0.066 ef6.518 ± 0.182 bcd0.632 ± 0.058 a22.967 ± 0.7068.960 ± 0.280
OverlandKF 37072.691 ± 0.171 bc0.132 ± 0.012 ab12.469 ± 0.319 def0.363 ± 0.034 bc2.138 ± 0.051 cd7.070 ± 0.164 b0.722 ± 0.043 a25.584 ± 0.7859.929 ± 0.257
KF 36543.366 ± 0.290 a0.124 ± 0.011 ab16.583 ± 0.549 a0.426 ± 0.025 b2.334 ± 0.108 bc7.879 ± 0.317 a0.724 ± 0.062 a31.435 ± 1.33610.937 ± 0.485
KF 9253.298 ± 0.160 a0.140 ± 0.012 ab13.893 ± 0.435 c0.330 ± 0.024 bcd2.154 ± 0.090 cd7.015 ± 0.302 bc0.697 ± 0.078 a27.526 ± 1.0919.865 ± 0.466
control2.031 ± 0.109 efg0.130 ± 0.017 ab16.748 ± 0.419 a0.655 ± 0.031 a1.733 ± 0.056 ef6.370 ± 0.259 cd0.621 ± 0.044 a28.288 ± 0.9148.724 ± 0.359
KF 34921.315 ± 0.138 ij0.102 ± 0.011 bc12.755 ± 0.700 cde0.685 ± 0.071 a1.400 ± 0.119 gh5.202 ± 0.422 e0.597 ± 0.097 a22.055 ± 1.5347.198 ± 0.637
SweetstarKF 37071.621 ± 0.129 ghi0.153 ± 0.041 a13.200 ± 0.559 cd0.768 ± 0.081 a1.420 ± 0.052 gh5.110 ± 0.171 e0.626 ± 0.050 a22.898 ± 1.0827.156 ± 0.272
KF 36541.568 ± 0.049 hi0.128 ± 0.005 ab12.976 ± 0.408 cd0.759 ± 0.042 a1.590 ± 0.049 fg5.262 ± 0.177 e0.619 ± 0.038 a22.903 ± 0.7647.472 ± 0.262
KF 9251.932 ± 0.107 fgh0.133 ± 0.004 ab15.219 ± 0.559 b0.656 ± 0.046 a1.696 ± 0.075 fg6.113 ± 0.296 d0.688 ± 0.064 a26.438 ± 1.1518.498 ± 0.434
n = 3; control—maize not inoculated with Fusarium; KF 3492 and KF 3707—isolates of Fusarium verticillioides; KF 3654 and KF 925—isolates of Fusarium proliferatum; T—tocopherols; T3—tocotrienols; a–m—the same superscript letters in the columns indicate the lack of significant differences between samples (α = 0.05).
Table 3. Standardized canonical discriminant function coefficients.
Table 3. Standardized canonical discriminant function coefficients.
Root 1Root 2Root 3
δ-T30.19−0.38−0.04
γ-T32.09−0.60.23
α-T3−2.510.55−0.70
δ-T0.560.95−0.31
β-T0.45−0.640.37
γ-T−0.130.100.07
α-T−0.20−0.42−0.26
FB1−0.24−1.570.76
FB20.991.53−0.52
FB3−1.12−0.490.46
discrimination %78202
cumulative %7898100
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Waśkiewicz, A.; Muzolf-Panek, M.; Stępień, Ł.; Czembor, E.; Uwineza, P.A.; Górnaś, P.; Bryła, M. Variation in Tocochromanols Level and Mycotoxins Content in Sweet Maize Cultivars after Inoculation with Fusarium verticillioides and F. proliferatum. Foods 2022, 11, 2781. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182781

AMA Style

Waśkiewicz A, Muzolf-Panek M, Stępień Ł, Czembor E, Uwineza PA, Górnaś P, Bryła M. Variation in Tocochromanols Level and Mycotoxins Content in Sweet Maize Cultivars after Inoculation with Fusarium verticillioides and F. proliferatum. Foods. 2022; 11(18):2781. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182781

Chicago/Turabian Style

Waśkiewicz, Agnieszka, Małgorzata Muzolf-Panek, Łukasz Stępień, Elżbieta Czembor, Pascaline Aimee Uwineza, Paweł Górnaś, and Marcin Bryła. 2022. "Variation in Tocochromanols Level and Mycotoxins Content in Sweet Maize Cultivars after Inoculation with Fusarium verticillioides and F. proliferatum" Foods 11, no. 18: 2781. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182781

APA Style

Waśkiewicz, A., Muzolf-Panek, M., Stępień, Ł., Czembor, E., Uwineza, P. A., Górnaś, P., & Bryła, M. (2022). Variation in Tocochromanols Level and Mycotoxins Content in Sweet Maize Cultivars after Inoculation with Fusarium verticillioides and F. proliferatum. Foods, 11(18), 2781. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182781

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop