Next Article in Journal
Factors Influencing the Consumption of Seaweed amongst Young Adults
Next Article in Special Issue
Glycaemic Index of Gluten-Free Biscuits with Resistant Starch and Sucrose Replacers: An In Vivo and In Vitro Comparative Study
Previous Article in Journal
Study of Lactic Acid Bacteria Biodiversity in Fermented Cobrançosa Table Olives to Determine Their Probiotic Potential
Previous Article in Special Issue
Shelf-Life Prediction and Thermodynamic Properties of No Added Sugar Chocolate Spread Fortified with Multiple Micronutrients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of Antimicrobial Cellulose Nanofiber-Based Films Activated with Nisin for Food Packaging Applications

by
Diamante Maresca
and
Gianluigi Mauriello
*
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(19), 3051; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11193051
Submission received: 29 August 2022 / Revised: 26 September 2022 / Accepted: 28 September 2022 / Published: 1 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Bioactive Compounds in Food Systems)

Abstract

:
The cellulose nanofiber (CNF) is characterized by the nano-sized (fibers with a diameter between 5 and 20 nm and a length between 2 and 10 μm), flexible and cross-linked structure that confer enhanced mechanical and gas barrier properties to cellulosic fiber-based packaging materials. The purpose of this work was to develop an antimicrobial packaging film by direct mixing nisin with CNF, followed by coating it onto polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and polylactic acid (PLA) films. The antimicrobial effectiveness of CNF-Nis+PE, CNF-Nis+PP, and CNF-Nis+PLA was investigated both in vitro end in ex vivo tests. In the latter case, challenge test experiments were carried out to investigate the antimicrobial activity of the coupled films of CNF-Nisin+PLA to inhibit the growth of Listeria innocua 1770 during the storage of a meat product. The films were active against the indicator microorganisms Brochothrix thermosphacta and Listeria innocua in in vitro test. Moreover, a reduction in the Listeria population of about 1.3 log cycles was observed immediately after the contact (T0) of the active films with hamburgers. Moreover, when the hamburgers were stored in active films, a further reduction of the Listeria population of about 1.4 log cycles was registered after 2 days of storage. After this time, even though an increase in Listeria load was observed, the trend of the Listeria population in hamburgers packed with active films was maintained significantly lower than the meat samples packed with control films during the whole storage period.

1. Introduction

Food packaging does not only provide a containment function but also plays a key role in food protection and preservation, convenience, and customer communication strategy [1,2]. Over the last few years, the increase in consumers’ food quality and safety demands has led to a need to develop innovative concepts in the packaging field. In fact, modern packaging systems have been designed to protect packed food, to providing quality and health safety assurance, and to making easier food storage and distribution. In this scenario, the field of active packaging systems is becoming increasingly significant in food technology. Active packaging can be defined as an intelligent or smart system that involves interaction between package or package components and food or internal gas atmosphere and satisfies the consumer demands for minimally processed, high quality, and safe foods [3,4]. Within of subset of active packaging, antimicrobial packaging has received considerable scientific interest leading to extensive research on it. The primary purpose of food antimicrobial packaging is to reduce, inhibit or delay the growth of spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms and thus extend the shelf-life, improve safety, and preserve the quality of packaged products [5]. In the last years, many scientific papers have been published in this field, describing both the antimicrobial compounds and the type of packaging material involved [6,7]. With regard to antimicrobial compounds, organic and phenolic acids, essential oils, anthocyanins, enzymes, bacteriocins, and fungicides are the main substances used to confer antimicrobial properties to food packaging [8]. Among them, bacteriocins, particularly nisin, have been subjected to extensive research in antimicrobial packaging solutions for food biopreservation [9,10]. Nisin, produced by some Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis strains, is an antimicrobial peptide recognized as safe by FAO/WHO and Expert Committee on Food Additives, and it was given a generally regarded as safe (GRAS) status for use in meat, dairy products, vegetables, and processed cheese [11]. Nisin was used to activate packaging materials by direct incorporation into the packaging compounds, by coating onto the surface of the packaging, or by film forming using antimicrobial polymers [12,13]. Low-density polyethylene (LWPE), polypropylene (PP), polylactic acid (PLA), sodium caseinate, alginate, chitosan, corn zein, and soy protein were the main plastic and bioplastic materials used to develop antimicrobial packaging films with nisin [14,15,16,17]. However, due to the increasing demand for bio-based packaging materials derived from renewable sources, industry and academic research has been extensively conducted to develop environmentally friendly materials as a sustainable alternative to non-degradable plastics [18,19]. Advances in the nanotechnology field have focused the research attention on nanomaterials derived from cellulose for their common feature characteristics as biodegradability, biocompatibility, non-toxicity, and chemical stability [20,21]. In particular, the cellulose nanofiber (CNF) is characterized by the nano-sized (fibers with a diameter between 5 and 20 nm and a length between 2 and 10 μm), flexible and cross-linked structure that confers enhanced mechanical and gas barrier properties to cellulosic fiber-based packaging materials [5]. Due to these promising characteristics, several studies have reported the use of nano-cellulose-based materials as a coating layer to confer good barrier function towards oxygen and fat [7,22] or as a filler to improve the mechanical and barrier properties as well as the thermal stability of the nanocomposites for potential food packaging applications [5,22,23,24,25]. Moreover, many authors have investigated the antimicrobial efficacy of cellulose-based films when they incorporated the most studied bioactive compounds such as bacteriocins [13,18,26,27,28,29], essential oils [30,31,32], probiotics [33,34], anthocyanins [35,36], and chitosan [19,37,38] for sustainable antimicrobial packaging systems development. However, few investigations have been carried out on cellulose-based materials activation with nisin. In particular, nisin was added to cellulose-based film by (i) incorporation into hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and nanocrystalline cellulose [26,27,39,40]; (ii) coating onto modified-nanocellulose film surface [18,41,42]; (iii) chemical immobilization [28]. Yang et al. [13] developed a bio-based antimicrobial packaging film using nisin and sugarcane bagasse nanocellulose without additional chemical modification. Thus, the purpose of this work was to develop an antimicrobial packaging film by direct mixing nisin with CNF water suspension, followed by coating onto polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and polylactic acid (PLA) films. In addition, the antimicrobial effectiveness of CNF-Nisin+PE, CNF-Nisin+PP, and CNF-Nisin+PLA was investigated both in vitro and in ex vivo tests. In the latter case, challenge test experiments were carried out to investigate the antimicrobial activity of the coupled films of CNF-Nisin+PLA to inhibit the growth of Listeria innocua 1770 throughout the storage time of a meat product.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

Brochothrix thermosphacta 7R1 and Listeria innocua 1770 were used as indicator strains in the nisin bioactivity assay. They have been provided by Department of Agricultural Sciences, Division of Microbiology, University of Naples Federico II, and were previously identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing [43,44,45]. B. thermosphacta 7R1 and L. innocua 1770 were routinely cultured in Tryptone Soya Broth (TSB, Oxoid, Milan, Italy) supplemented with 5 g/L Yeast Extract Powder (Oxoid S.p.A., Milan, Italy) at 20 °C and 30 °C, respectively.

2.2. Preparation of Nisin Solution (Nis)

The nisin solution (Nis) was obtained and tested as described by Maresca et al. [46] with some modifications. Briefly, 0.5 g of Nisin (Sigma, 2.5% of nisin) were dissolved in 10 mL of 0.02 mol/L HCl (Merck, Vimodrone, Italy) and centrifuged at 6500× g for 15 min. Pellet was treated in the someway twice, and all supernatants from each centrifugation process were mixed in a single solution representing the Nis. It was routinely stored at 4 °C for further experiments. Its antimicrobial activity was tested against B. thermosphacta 7R1 and L. innocua 1770 by agar diffusion and critical dilution assay as described by Villani et al. [47]. Briefly, serial two-fold dilutions of bacteriocin in 0.02 mol/L HCl were prepared, and 10 μL of each dilution were spotted onto TSA soft agar (TSB with the addition of 7.5 g/L agar and 5 g/L Yeast Extract Powder) seeded with 25 μL/mL of an overnight culture of each indicator strain. After overnight incubation at 20 °C for B. thermosphacta and 30 °C for L. innocua, the arbitrary units per ml (AU/mL) of Nis were calculated as the reciprocal value of the highest dilution that showed clear growth inhibition of the indicator strain.

2.3. Preparation of CNF-Based Films

Different quantities of CNF were dissolved in a Nis water solution to reach a CNF concentration of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0% (w/v) and an antimicrobial activity of 640 AU/mL and 1280 AU/mL against B. thermosphacta and L. innocua, respectively. Control mixtures were prepared at the same CNF concentrations in water without nisin. The mixtures were stirred at 300 rpm for 15 min to favor the homogeneous CNF distribution and the CNF-nisin blend formation. Afterward, 50 mL of each mixture was poured into 90 mm diameter glass Petri dishes, previously loaded on the bottom with circle sheets of 90 mm in diameter of polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), or polylactic acid (PLA). Dishes were incubated at 60 °C for 16 h for water evaporation and the CNF-based films formation.

2.4. Antimicrobial Activity Test

Only the films obtained by using 2.5% and 3.0% CNF mixtures were tested here. Coupled films with nisin were labeled CNF-Nis+PE, CNF-Nis+PP, and CNF-Nis+PLA, according to the plastic material used. Control coupled films were labeled CNF/PE, CNF/PP, and CNF/PLA. The antimicrobial activity was evaluated immediately post films manufacturing (T0) and after storage for 7 days (T7) at 4 °C. Briefly, pieces of active and control films, as well as of plastic material alone, were placed onto the surface of TSA soft agar plate seeded with 2.5% of an overnight culture of each indicator strain. After plates incubation (20 °C for B. thermosphacta and 30 °C for L. innocua), the antimicrobial activity was evaluated by observing a growth inhibition zone underneath and around the active film samples [14].

2.5. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis

The surface morphology of films was examined using an FEI Quanta 200 FEG scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) in high vacuum mode. Before observations, samples were mounted onto stubs by means of carbon adhesive discs (Agar Scientific Ltd, Stansted Mountfitchet, UK) and sputter coated with a 5–10 nm thick Au-Pd layer. All samples were analyzed at 10 kV acceleration voltage using a secondary electron detector. SEM images were recorded at magnifications of 5000×, 10000×, and 25000×.

2.6. Challenge Test

Challenge test experiments have been carried out to validate the CNF-Nis+PLA film for functioning in food packaging applications. Fresh minced meat (provided from local market and immediately transferred to the laboratory in refrigerated conditions) was artificially contaminated with 80 mL of an L. innocua 1770 suspension (2.0 × 106 CFU/mL) to obtain food contamination of about 8.0 × 104 CFU/g. After manual homogenization of the meet, hamburgers were formed (approximately 70 g each) and covered on both sides with the CNF-Nis+PLA film at 2.5% of CNF. Hamburgers covered with CNF/PLA film were included in the analysis as control. All samples were stored at 4 °C for a week. Bacterial loads of L. innocua 1770 were monitored by viable plate count technique immediately after meat contamination (unpacked meat) (T00), immediately after setting hamburgers packaging (T0), and after 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 8 storage days. At each sampling time, aliquots (20 g) were taken and homogenized in 180 mL (w/v) of quarter strength Ringer’s solution (Oxoid, Milan, Italy). Subsequently, ten-fold serial dilutions were carried out, and L. innocua 1770 was enumerated on Listeria Chromogenic Agar Base according to Ottaviani and Agosti (ALOA, Biolife, Milan, Italy). Furthermore, aliquots of 0.1 mL of the appropriate dilutions were also spread onto PCA (Plate Count Agar, Oxoid) plates for the enumeration of total mesophilic aerobic bacteria. All plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24–48 h. The experiments were performed in triplicate, and the results were expressed as Log CFU/g of product.

2.7. Data Analysis

Analyses were carried out in triplicate, and all data were reported as mean ± standard deviation. Two-way ANOVA tests and t-test analyses (Microsoft Excel for Mac version 11.5, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) were performed to evaluate significant differences (p < 0.05) between means.

3. Results

3.1. CNF-Based Films Manufacturing

All the films produced with a 2.5% and 3% mixture of CNF were found to be easily peeled off to petri dish, and they showed a uniform interfacial adhesion between PE, PP, PLA layer, and the CNF (control) or CNF-Nis (active) layer. On the contrary, films containing 1, 1.5, and 2% of CNF showed poor adhesion to the plastic layer and a non-continuous surface with crack zones. Based on visual observations, both active and control coupled films obtained with 2.5% and 3.0% of CNF and on all different polymers were not transparent, and they showed completely different surface morphology.
In Figure 1 is represented, as an example, the coupled activated film obtained by using a 2.5% CNF mixture and PLA. The surface of the control film (Figure 1, panel A) appeared smooth and continuous layer without cracks zones, while the surface of the activated film (Figure 1, panel B) appeared wrinkled with marked ice-crystal-like features.

3.2. Antimicrobial Efficacy of CNF-Based Films in Agar Inhibition Assay

The antimicrobial activity of all films with nisin at T0 and T7 was highlighted by a clear growth inhibition zone of the test microorganism B. thermosphacta 7R1 and L. innocua 1770, beyond the perimeter of the samples and underneath, after removing the film from the agar. The films at 2.5 and 3.0% CNF did not show significant differences in antimicrobial activity according to the dimension, homogeneity, and clearness of the growth inhibition areas (data not shown). In Figure 2 is depicted, as an example, the result of the antimicrobial activity test of the films prepared by using 2.5% CNF after their preparation (T0) against B. thermosphacta TR1. On the left side are represented the Petri dishes before removing the film from the agar, and the growth inhibition area is clear beyond the films with nisin (sections A, D, and G). No other film led to the inhibition of the growth (all other sections). On the right side are represented the Petri dishes after removing the film, and the growth inhibition zones are very clear underneath the film samples with nisin (sections A1, D1, and G1). On the contrary, a lack of antimicrobial activity was confirmed for the control coupled films and polymers alone (all other sections).

3.3. Surface Characterization of CNF-Based Films

In Figure 3 are depicted the SEM images at different magnifications of the surface morphology of the CNF/PLA control film (Figure 3 panels A, B, and C) and CNF-Nis+PLA active film (Figure 3 panels A1, B1, and C1), both at 2.5% of CNF. The surface of CNF/PLA film is characterized by a continuous network of cellulose nanofibers with few crack zones between fibers forming a compact coating matrix. As shown in Figure 2 (panels A1, B1, and C1), the surface of the CNF-Nis+PLA active film appears to have a different internal structure compared to the control film. In particular, the CNFs network appears less homogeneous with pores formation in some areas.

3.4. Antibacterial Effect of CNF-PLA Films in a Food System

Results of the viable counts of L. innocua in hamburgers packed with active (CNF-Nis+PLA) and control (CNF/PLA) coupled films along 8 days of storage at 4 °C are reported in Figure 4. A reduction in Listeria population, of about 1.3 log cycles, was observed immediately after the contact (T0) between hamburgers and the active films compared with the control. Moreover, when the hamburgers were stored in active films, a further reduction of Listeria population, of about 1.4 log, was registered after 2 days (T2) of storage. After this time, even though an increased Listeria load was observed, the trend of the Listeria population in hamburgers packed with active films was maintained significantly lower than the meat samples packed with control films during the whole storage period (Figure 4). In Figure 5 are shown the results of total viable mesophilic counts in hamburgers packed and stored in the same conditions. As can be seen, in hamburgers packed with control films, the number of total bacteria increased from 5.5 to 6.6 log CFU/g after 8 days of storage. On the contrary, the total bacteria count of the hamburgers packed with the active film was significantly lower along 8 days of storage compared to the control.

4. Discussion

In this work, we attempted to combine the functionalization of the CNF with nisin and the casting of a CNF-nisin solution onto PP, PE, and PLA films to develop coupled antimicrobial CNF-based films for food packaging applications. The novelty of this study lies in the solution cast method used to obtain active coupled films without any chemical or enzymatic pre-treatment to CNF as well as to plastic or bio-plastic films. Our results suggested that the coupled film formation depended greatly on CNF concentration in the mixtures. In fact, the best results were obtained only using the higher CNF content of 2.5% and 3.0%. In particular, these films (both active and control) exhibited a compact and homogeneous surface structure without crack zones as well as a uniform adhesion between PE, PP, and PLA layers and the CNF alone (control) or CNF-Nis layer (treated). Firstly, this result suggested that a minimum of CNF content is probably necessary to promote the interactions among nanofibers and the formation of a continuous fibrillar network, which led to no collapse onto film surfaces during the drying. Notably, no previous research investigated the effect of different CNF concentrations in combination with nisin on surface film morphology. However, some authors have provided some information that could support the relationship between the different CNF concentrations, the surface structure of the films, and the physico-mechanical properties of CNF films. Azeredo et al. [48] observed that the mechanical properties of the mango puree-CNF edible films were improved at higher CNF concentrations. Pizzaro et al. [49] reported that the increase in the CNF concentration (from 1 to 5% w/w) resulted in a decrease in the water vapor permeability of edible films. Finally, Lapuz et al. [50] proved that as the concentration of CNF increased from 0.2% to 1.0%, the surface of the edible film appeared smoother without breaking zones. Additionally, the same authors observed an improved tensile strength of the films when the CNF concentration was increased. Thus, the surface integrity and physico-mechanical properties of CNF films can be dependent on the CNF content. In fact, all mentioned authors suggested that a high CNF content can lead to establishing a close fiber-to-fiber contact by hydrogen bond formation to form a rigid CNF network structure with very interesting resistance behavior. Therefore, the non-continuous surface with several crack zones observed at low CNF concentration can be explained by the bonds weakening or even debonding resulting in less integrity of CNF structure. In our study, the addition of nisin into the CNF solution remarkably changed the surface appearance of the active films developed. Compared to control, the surface of the active coupled films appeared highly rough with ice-crystal-like features. These characteristic surface structures have never been reported in previous studies. Saini et al. [18] noticed only an apparent change in surface color, from white to brown, after nisin grafting on the CNF films. Similar findings were obtained by Yang et al. [13]. These authors noticed a uniform and smooth surface of sugarcane bagasse-CNF-nisin hybrid films and an apparent change in surface color compared to pure CNF films. Moreover, studies based on microscopic investigation of hybrid CNF-nisin films by scanning electron microscope (SEM) observed a smooth and homogeneous surface [27] or a rough and porous surface [40] compared to CNF films without nisin. However, similar crystallized structures were observed on the surface topography of nisin-polyethylene films when they were characterized by the atomic force microscopy technique [51]. According to the authors, these crystallized structures could be attributed to agglomerates formed by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) added as a chelating agent to the nisin solution. In our case, the nisin solution was added to FFSs without EDTA. Based on our observation, we assumed that the ice-crystal-like structures could be due to salt crystals (sodium chloride salt present in Nisin powder formulation) formation during the drying process. The salt crystal growth phenomena during evaporation of a NaCl aqueous solution have been suggested before [52,53]. In these studies, dendrite structures of NaCl similar to snowflakes were generated on a glass surface by a simple drying of a NaCl solution. However, despite the biological similarity with our results, the surface structures of active coupled CNF-based films are to be further investigated. Microscopic investigation of CNF/PLA control film by SEM analysis confirmed the close contact between CNFs, resulting in a homogeneous structure. On the other hand, the continuous and non-porous surface structures of the CNFs-based films have been demonstrated by SEM analysis in previous research [7,27,54,55]. On the contrary, to the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to analyze the surface morphology of coupled CNF-Nis+PLA active film where the CNF matrix was used as a carrier for the bacteriocin. Moreover, in our study, coupled CNF-based films obtained by using the greatest CNF content also showed a perfect adhesion between plastic (PP, PE) or bio-plastic (PLA) films and CNF-based layers (with or without nisin). To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to develop active coupled films by casting and drying CNF-nisin solutions directly onto PP and PLA films. Similarly, Yang et al. [13] developed a CNFs/nisin film used as a liner of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) plastic packaging for ready-to-eat ham. Grower et al. [41] prepared nisin-methylcellulose (MC) and nisin-hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) solutions coated onto low-density polyethylene (LDPE) films. However, despite the different nature of the cellulose matrix (MC and HPMC), antimicrobial cellulose-based film manufacturing is needed for plasticizer use (glycol 400). Salmieri et al. [42] primarily developed a PLA-CNF nanocomposite film and then functionalized it with nisin by the adsorption coating method. In literature, it is well known the use of CNF as reinforcement in various polymers, including PP, PE, and PLA, to develop composites or bio-composites [56,57,58,59,60,61]. However, in these studies, the CNF polymer composites manufacturing needed specific techniques (extrusion, solution casting, compression molding, and melt spinning) and processing conditions (coupling agents or surfactants utilized, chemical modifications onto CNF surface) to facilitate the uniform distribution of CNF in polymer or bio-polymer matrix [62,63]. As a matter of fact, the key challenge is to obtain compatibility between the hydrophobic polymer matrices and hydrophilic CNF. In our study, we found the perfect adhesion between polymer films and the CNF layer.
Antimicrobial activity of developed CNF-Nis+PE, CNF-Nis+PP, and CNF-Nis+PLA coupled films was observed by agar inhibition assay against both indicator strains, B. thermosphacta, and L. innocua. These bacteria are actually the main used microbial targets to study the antimicrobial effectiveness of film packaging containing nisin. The uniform and confined inhibition zones suggested a homogeneous dispersion of Nis in the CNF matrix such that it did not diffuse irregularly into the agar media. The compatibility between nisin and CNF has been demonstrated in several investigations. In particular, the chemical interactions between the compounds in the CNF-nisin films have been investigated by SEM, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis [13,18,27,39,42]. The surface of the CNF network has a large amount of negatively charged carboxyl groups, while nisin is positively charged at a pH below its isoelectric point [64]. Therefore, when nisin is dispersed through the CNF matrix, electrostatic interactions can occur between positively charged nisin and negatively charged CNFs such that nisin is embedded in the nanofiber network through the formation of hydrogen bondings. According to Lu et al. [64], the close fiber-to-fiber sites are replaced with fiber-nisin-fiber sites through electrostatic interactions. Moreover, all active coupled films showed to preserve the antimicrobial activity for 8 days under refrigerated storage conditions. It is well known that nisin shows its antimicrobial activity against B. thermosphacta and L. innocua. However, to the best of our knowledge, the present study gives the first experimental evidence of the long-term antimicrobial effectiveness of coupled CNF-based films containing the bacteriocin towards the mentioned indicator strains. In research conducted by Sebti et al. [39], the cross-linked HPMC-nisin films were completely inactive against Micrococcus luteus in an agar inhibition assay. This result was due to possible nisin retention via chemical bonds with HPMC or other film components during the film forming process. Instead, Imran et al. [26] developed an HPMC-nisin film that showed antimicrobial activity against different strains belonging to Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtilis, and Enterococcus facium species. Finally, the nisin-distarch phosphate-nanocrystalline cellulose films, manufactured by Sun et al. [40], proved in vitro to be effective in inhibiting the growth of S. aureus and E. coli. In order to validate an antimicrobial film for food packaging application, the antimicrobial properties of active coupled films were also quantitatively investigated by challenge test experiments. During the application study on hamburgers, chosen as a real food system, the CNF-Nis+PLA coupled films showed their effectiveness in inhibiting and controlling the growth of both L. innocua and total mesophilic aerobic bacteria compared to control films. The contact between the meet sample and active coupled films caused an immediate reduction in L. innocua population. Moreover, viable counts of L. innocua were lower by 1.4 log CFU/g at 2 days of storage. After this time, although an increased Listeria load was registered, the Nis+CNF/PLA satisfactorily assured the control of the Listeria population until the end of the storage compared to control films. The overall trend in Listeria viable counts may depend on nisin release and action mechanisms in food matrix. During the first 48 h of storage, the significant decrease in bacterial population could suggest a fast nisin release allowing an immediate bacteriocin action towards the indicator strain. After this time, the gradual Listeria growth could be explained by (i) a decreased bacteriocin concentration on the film surface, (ii) a slower nisin release in the food system, and/or (iii) a bacteriocin inactivation by food components (i.e., proteins and lipids) resulting in its reduced availability to act against the target microorganism. Our results do not agree with the data provided by Yang et al. [13]. In this study, the CNFs/nisin hybrid films used as a liner of an LDPE plastic package for ready-to-eat ham showed total inhibition of L. monocytogenes during 7 days of storage at 4 °C. Similarly, in Salmieri et al. [42] experiments, PLA-cellulose nanocrystal films containing nisin showed a significant reduction of L. monocytogenes in ham from day 1 and a total inhibition from day 3. Instead, when frankfurters were packed with bacterial cellulose films containing nisin, the L. monocytogenes population significantly decreased after 2 days of storage and then remained constant until the end of the experiment [65]. However, Hassan et al. [27] carried out experiments based on nisin release from nanofibrillated cellulose films and proved evidence than can support our results. The authors observed a fast diffusion of nisin during the first 6 h resulting in complete inhibition of S. aureus over this time. Subsequently, a gradual recovery of bacterial survivors was observed till 72 h due to the slower diffusion and nisin inactivation during this second period. In our study, the antimicrobial effect of Nis+CNF/PLA on the total mesophilic aerobic bacteria population in hamburgers was also evaluated. The initial total bacteria load was approximately 5.5 log CFU/g, and a continuous increase up to 6.6 log CFU/g was observed after 8 days of storage in control coupled films. On the contrary, the total bacteria count of the hamburgers packed with the active coupled film was significantly lower along 8 days of storage compared to the control. Our findings suggested that CNF-Nis+PLA films possessed the potential for controlling the growth of autochthonous spoilage microbiota of the meat product; therefore, they could be promising and innovative antimicrobial packaging systems to enhance the safety and extend the shelf life of the food.

5. Conclusions

CNF showed to be a promising material to enhance the functional properties of food packaging. Indeed, it showed the ability to capture the nisin and make it available to work as an antimicrobial agent when in contact with pathogen and spoilage microorganisms, both in vitro and in ex vivo challenge tests. Moreover, our findings showed that natural autochthonous meat microbiota was negatively affected as well by the contact of food packaging obtained by using a nisin-activated CNF layer. Remarkably, the CNF layer (with or without nisin) showed to be compatible with polyolefin plastics, such as PE and PP, and bioplastics, such as PLA, to obtain multilayer packaging for the food industry application.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.M.; methodology, G.M. and D.M.; investigation, D.M.; data curation, D.M.; writing—original draft preparation, D.M.; writing—review and editing, G.M.; supervision, G.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Gennaro Gentile of IPCB-CNR (Pozzuoli, Italy) for the kind support in the SEM analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chang, D.F.; Berk, A. Making cross-racial therapy work: A phenomenological study of clients’ experiences of cross-racial therapy. J. Coun. Psychol. 2009, 56, 521–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Salgado, P.; Di Giorgio, L.; Musso, Y.S.; Mauri, A. Recent Developments in smart food packaging focused on biobased and biodegradable polymers. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 630393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Labuza, T.P.; Breene, W.M. Applications of “active packaging” for improvement of shelf-life and nutritional quality of fresh and extended shelf-life foods. J. Food Process. Preserv. 1989, 13, 1–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mauriello, G.; Villani, F. Bacteriocins in plastics. In Antimicrobial Polymers; Lagaro, J.M., Ocio, M.J., López-Rubio, A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2012; Volume 6, pp. 117–147. [Google Scholar]
  5. Silva, F.A.G.; Dourado, F.; Gama, M.; Poças, F. Nanocellulose bio-based composites for food packaging. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhong, Y.; Godwin, P.; Jin, G.; Xiao, H. Biodegradable polymers and green-based antimicrobial packaging materials: A mini-review. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2020, 3, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ezati, P.; Rhim, G.W.; Molaei, R.; Priyadarshi, R.; Han, S. Cellulose nanofiber-based coating film integrated with nitrogen-functionalized carbon dots for active packaging applications of fresh fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2022, 186, 111845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Al-Tayyara, N.A.; Youssefb, A.M.; Al-Hindia, R. Antimicrobial food packaging based on sustainable bio-based materials for reducing foodborne pathogens: A review. Food Chem. 2020, 310, 125915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sánchez, L.A.; El-Haddad, E.; Mahmoud, D.; Miller, M.J.; Karam, L. Invited review: Advances in nisin use for preservation of dairy products. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 2041–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yildirim, S.; Rocker, B.; Pettersen, M.; Nygaard, J.; Ayhan, A.; Rutkaite, R.; Radusin, T.; Marcos, B.; Coma, V. Active packaging applications for food. CRFSFS 2018, 17, 165–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. European Food Safety Authority. Opinion of the scientific panel on food additives, flavourings, processing aids and materials in contact with food on a request from the commission related to the use of nisin (E 234) as a food additive. EFSA J. 2006, 314, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  12. Santosa, R.C.S.; Otonia, C.G.; Moraesa, A.R.F.; Souzac, V.; Medeirosa, E.; Espitiad, P.; Piresa, A.; Coimbra, J.; Soares, N.F.F. Nisin and other antimicrobial peptides: Production, mechanisms of action, and application in active food packaging. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2018, 48, 179–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, Y.; Liu, H.; Wu, M.; Ma, J.; Lu, P. Bio-based antimicrobial packaging from sugarcane bagasse nanocellulose/nisin hybrid films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 161, 627–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mauriello, G.; De Luca, E.; La Storia, A.; Villani, F.; Ercolini, D. Antimicrobial activity of a nisin-activated plastic film for food packaging. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 41, 464–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, B.; Kennedy, J.F.; Peng, J.L.; Yie, X.; Xie, B.J. Preparation and performance evalua-tion of glucomannan-chitosan-nisin ternary antimicrobial blend film. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 65, 488–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jin, T.; Zhang, H. Biodegradable polylactic acid polymer with nisin for use in antimicrobial food packaging. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lopresti, F.; Botta, L.; La Carrubba, V.; Di Pasquale, L.; Settanni, L.; Gaglio, R. Combining carvacrol and nisin in biodegradable films for antibacterial packaging applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 193, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Saini, S.; Sillard, C.; Naceur, M.; Bras, G. Nisin anchored cellulose nanofibers for long term antimicrobial active food packaging. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 12422–12430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abral, H.; Pratama, H.; Handayani, D.; Mahardika, M.; Aminah, I.; Sandrawati, N.; Sugiarti, E.; Muslimin, A.N.; Ilyas, R.A. Antimicrobial edible film prepared from bacterial cellulose nanofibers/starch/chitosan for a food packaging alternative. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2021, 2021, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lamm, M.E.; Li, K.; Qian, J.; Wang, H.; Lavoine, N.; Newman, R.; Gardner, D.J.; Li, T.; Hu, L.; Arthur, J.; et al. Recent advances in functional materials through cellulose nanofiber templating. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2005538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pandey, A. Pharmaceutical and biomedical applications of cellulose nanofbers: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 2043–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhua, Z.; Fua, S.; Lavoineb, N.; Luciab, L.A. Structural reconstruction strategies for the design of cellulose nanomaterials and aligned wood cellulose-based functional materials—A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 247, 116722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Haoa, W.; Wanga, M.; Zhoua, F.; Luoa, H.; Xied, X.; Luoe, F.; Chab, R. A review on nanocellulose as a lightweight filler of polyolefin composites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 243, 116466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Omran, A.A.B.; Mohammed, A.A.B.A.; Sapuan, S.M.; Ilyas, R.A.; Asyraf, M.R.M.; Rahimian Koloor, S.S.; Petru, M. Micro and nanocellulose in polymer composite materials: A review. Polymers 2021, 13, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ali, M.A.S.S.; Jimat, D.N.; Nawawi, W.M.F.W.; Sulaiman, S. Antibacterial, mechanical and thermal properties of PVA/starch composite film reinforced with cellulose nanofiber of sugarcane bagasse. Int. J. Sci. Eng. 2022, 47, 5747–5754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Imran, M.; Soumaya, E.; Junelles, A.M.R.; Desobry, S. Cellulose derivative based active coatings: Effects of nisin and plasticizer on physico-chemical and antimicrobial properties of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 81, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hassan, A.E.; Shaimaa, M.F.; Hassan, M.L. Influence of TEMPO-oxidized NFC on the mechanical, barrier properties and nisin release of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose bioactive films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 113, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wu, H.; Teng, W.; Liu, B.; Tian, H.; Wang, J. Characterization and long term antimicrobial activity of the nisin anchored cellulose films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 113, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mapelli, C.; Musatti, A.; Barbiroli, A.; Saini, S.; Beas, J.; Cavicchiolic, D.; Rollinia, M. Cellulose nanofiber (CNF)–sakacin-A active material: Production, characterization and application in storage trials of smoked salmon. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 4731–4738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Chen, S.; Wu, M.; Lu, P.; Gao, L.; Yana, S.; Wang, S. Development of pH indicator and antimicrobial cellulose nanofibre packaging film based on purple sweet potato anthocyanin and oregano essential oil. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 149, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Soofi, M.; Alizadeh, A.; Hamishehkar, H.; Almasi, H.; Roufegarinejad, L. Preparation of nanobiocomposite film based on lemon waste containing cellulose nanofiber and savory essential oil: A new biodegradable active packaging system. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 169, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kalajahi, S.E.M.; Alizadeh, A.; Hamishehkar, H.; Almasi, H.; Asef, H. Orange juice processing waste as a biopolymer base for biodegradable film formation reinforced with cellulose nanofber and activated with nettle essential oil. J. Polym. Environ. 2022, 30, 258–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Karimia, N.; Alizadeha, A.; Almasib, H.; Hanifiana, S. Preparation and characterization of whey protein isolate/polydextrosebased nanocomposite film incorporated with cellulose nanofiber and L. plantarum: A new probiotic active packaging system. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 121, 108978. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zabihollahi, N.; Alizadeh, A.; Almasi, H.; Hanifian, S.; Hamishekar, H. Development and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulose based probiotic nanocomposite film containing cellulose nanofiber and inulin for chicken fillet shelf life extension. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 160, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Roy, S.; Kim, H.C.; Panicker, P.S.; Rhim, J.W.; Kim, J. Cellulose nanofiber-based nanocomposite films reinforced with zinc oxide nanorods and grapefruit seed extract. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sani, M.A.; Khezerloub, A.; Ehsanic, A. Fabrication and characterization of the bionanocomposite film based on whey protein biopolymer loaded with TiO2 nanoparticles, cellulose nanofibers and rosemary essential oil. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 124, 300–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gopi, S.; Amalraj, A.; Judea, S.; Thomas, S.; Guoc, Q. Bionanocomposite films based on potato, tapioca starch and chitosan reinforced with cellulose nanofiber isolated from turmeric spent. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem Eng. 2019, 96, 664–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sadati, S.M.M.; Ghahfarrokhi, N.S.; Shahrousvand, E.; Rovshandeh, J.M.; Shahrousvand, M. Edible chitosan/cellulose nanofiber nanocomposite films for potential use as food packaging. Mater. Technol. 2021, 37, 1276–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sebti, H.; Broughton, J.D.; Coma, V. Physicochemical properties and bioactivity of nisin-containing cross-linked hydroxy propyl methylcellulose films. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 6468–6474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sun, H.; Shao, X.; Zhang, M.; Wang, Z.; Dong, J.; Yu, D. Mechanical, barrier and antimicrobial properties of corn distarch phosphate/nanocrystalline cellulose films incorporated with nisin and ε-polylysine. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 136, 839–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Grower, J.L.; Cooksey, K.; Getty, K. Release of nisin from Methylcellulose-Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose film formed on low-density polyethylene film. J. Food Sci. 2004, 69, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Salmieri, S.; Islam, F.; Khan, R.A.; Hossain, F.M.; Ibrahim, H.M.M.; Lacroix, M. Antimicrobial nanocomposite films made of poly (lactic acid)-cellulose nanocrystals (PLA-CNC) in food applications: Effect of nisin release on the inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes in ham. Cellulose 2014, 21, 1837–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Russo, F.; Ercolini, D.; Mauriello, G.; Villani, F. Behaviour of Brochothrix thermosphacta in presence of other meat spoilage microbial groups. Food Microbiol. 2006, 23, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ercolini, D.; Russo, F.; Nasi, A.; Ferranti, P.; Villani, F. Mesophilic and psychrotrophic bacteria from meat and their spoilage potential in vitro and in beef. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 1990–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. La Storia, A.; Ercolini, D.; Marinello, F.; Di Pasqua, R.; Villani, F.; Mauriello, G. Atomic force microscopy analysis shows surface structure changes in carvacrol-treated bacterial cells. Res. Microbiol. 2011, 162, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Maresca, D.; De Prisco, A.; La Storia, A.; Cirillo, T.; Esposito, F.; Mauriello, G. Microencapsulation of nisin in alginate beads by vibrating technology: Preliminary investigation. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 66, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Villani, F.; Pepe, O.; Mauriello, G.; Salzano, G.; Moschetti, G.; Coppola, S. Antimicrobial activity of Staphilococcus xylosus from Italian sausage against Listeria monocytogenes. Appl. Microbiol. 1994, 18, 159–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Azeredo, H.M.C.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Wood, D.; Williams, T.G.; Bustilloa, R.A.; Mchugh, T.H. Nanocomposite Edible Films from Mango Puree Reinforced with Cellulose Nanofibers. J. Food Sci. 2009, 74, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Pizzaro, A.; David, R.; Oliver, S.; Fernando, O.L. Effect of cellulose nanofibers concentration on mechanical, optical, and barrier properties of gelatin-based edible films. DYNA 2015, 82, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lapuz, A.R.; Tsuchikawa, S.; Inagaki, T.; Migo, V. Production of nanocellulose film from abaca fibers. Crystals 2022, 12, 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. La Storia, A.; Ercolini, D.; Mauriello, G. Characterization of bacteriocin-coated antimicrobial polyethylene films by atomic force microscopy. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Salim, H.; Kolpakov, P.; Bonn, D.; Shahidzadeh, N. Self-Lifting NaCl Crystals. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 7388–7393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Suematsu, N.J.; Iwamoto, J.; Ishii, Y.; Yamamoto, A. Dendrite pattern formation of sodium chloride crystal. Materials 2021, 14, 4434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Carvalho, R.A.; Santos, T.A.; Azevedo, V.M.; Felix, P.H.C.; Dias, M.V.; Borges, S.V. Bio-nanocomposites for food packaging applications: Effect of cellulose nanofibers on morphological, mechanical, optical and barrier properties. Polym. Int. 2018, 67, 386–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Silveira, M.P.; Silva, H.C.; Pimentel, I.; Poitevin, C.G.; Stuart, A.K.; Carpiné, D.; Jorge, L.M.; Jorge, R.M.M. Development of active cassava starch cellulose nanofiber-basedfilmsincorporated with natural antimicrobial tea tree essential oil. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 48726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Norrrahim, M.N.F.; Ariffif, H.; Anuar, T.A.T.; Hassan, M.A.; Tsukegi, T. One-pot nanofibrillation of cellulose and nanocomposite production in a twin-screw extruder. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 368, 012034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Peng, Y.; Nair, S.; Chen, H.; Yan, N.; Cao, J. Effects of lignin content on mechanical and thermal properties of polypropylene composites reinforced with micro particles of spray dried cellulose nanofibrils. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 11078–11108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Anuar, T.A.T.Y.; Ariffin, H.; Norrrahim, M.N.F.; Hassan, M.A.; Tsukeg, T.; Nishida, H. Sustainable one-pot process for the production of cellulose nanofiber and polyethylene/cellulose nanofiber composites. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 207, 590–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gitari, B.; Chang, B.P.; Misra, M.; Navabi, A.; Mohanty, A.K. A comparative study on the mechanical, thermal and water barrier properties of PLA nanocomposite films prepared with bacterial nanocellulose and cellulose nanofibrils. Biol. Resour. 2019, 14, 1867–1889. [Google Scholar]
  60. Wang, Q.; Sun, J.; Zhu, Q.; Liu, J. Structure and properties of polylactic acid biocomposite films reinforced with cellulose nanofibrils. Molecules 2020, 25, 3306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Norrrahim, M.N.F.; Ariffif, H.; Anuar, T.A.T.; Hassan, M.A.; Ibrahim, N.A.; Nishida, H. Performance evaluation of cellulose nanofiber with residual hemicellulose as a nanofiller in polypropylene-based nanocomposite. Polymers 2021, 13, 1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chanda, S.; Bajwa, D. A review of current physical techniques for dispersion of cellulose nanomaterials in polymer matrices. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2021, 60, 325–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fernandez, M.E.L.; Miskolczi, N. Production of cellulose nano-fibers and its application in poly-lactic-acid: Property improvement by new types of coupling agents. Polymers 2022, 14, 1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lu, P.; Zhao, H.; Zheng, L.; Duan, Y.; Wu, M.; Yu, X.; Yang, Y. Nanocellulose/nisin hydrogel microparticles as sustained antimicrobial coatings for paper packaging. Appl. Polym. Mater. 2022, 4, 2664–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Nguyen, V.T.; Gidleyb, M.J.; Dykesc, G.A. Potential of a nisin-containing bacterial cellulose film to inhibit Listeria monocytogenes on processed meats. Food Microbiol. 2008, 25, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Films obtained by using 2.5% CNF mixture and PLA. Control film (panel A); nisin-activated film (panel B).
Figure 1. Films obtained by using 2.5% CNF mixture and PLA. Control film (panel A); nisin-activated film (panel B).
Foods 11 03051 g001
Figure 2. Coupled films and polymers alone in inhibition agar test against Brochothrix thermosphacta 7R1 before (left side) and after (right side) removing the samples from the agar. Segments A and A1, CNF-Nis+PE; segments B and B1, CNF/PE; segments C and C1, PE; segments D and D1, CNF-Nis+PP; segments E and E1, CNF/PP; segments F and F1, PP; segments G and G1, CNF-Nis+PLA; segments H and H1, CNF/PLA; segments I and I1, PLA.
Figure 2. Coupled films and polymers alone in inhibition agar test against Brochothrix thermosphacta 7R1 before (left side) and after (right side) removing the samples from the agar. Segments A and A1, CNF-Nis+PE; segments B and B1, CNF/PE; segments C and C1, PE; segments D and D1, CNF-Nis+PP; segments E and E1, CNF/PP; segments F and F1, PP; segments G and G1, CNF-Nis+PLA; segments H and H1, CNF/PLA; segments I and I1, PLA.
Foods 11 03051 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of CNF/PLA (left side) and CNF-Nis+PLA (right side) film at 2.5% CNF. (AC): CNF/PLA at 500×, 1000×, and 25000× magnifications, respectively; (A1C1): CNF-Nis+PLA at 500×, 1000×, and 25000× magnifications, respectively.
Figure 3. SEM images of CNF/PLA (left side) and CNF-Nis+PLA (right side) film at 2.5% CNF. (AC): CNF/PLA at 500×, 1000×, and 25000× magnifications, respectively; (A1C1): CNF-Nis+PLA at 500×, 1000×, and 25000× magnifications, respectively.
Foods 11 03051 g003
Figure 4. Viable counts of L. innocua population during the storage at 4 °C of hamburgers packed with CNF-Nis+PLA active films (treated) and CNF/PLA control films (control).
Figure 4. Viable counts of L. innocua population during the storage at 4 °C of hamburgers packed with CNF-Nis+PLA active films (treated) and CNF/PLA control films (control).
Foods 11 03051 g004
Figure 5. Total viable counts of mesophilic aerobic bacteria during the storage at 4 °C of hamburgers packed with CNF-Nis+PLA active films (treated) and CNF/PLA control films (control).
Figure 5. Total viable counts of mesophilic aerobic bacteria during the storage at 4 °C of hamburgers packed with CNF-Nis+PLA active films (treated) and CNF/PLA control films (control).
Foods 11 03051 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maresca, D.; Mauriello, G. Development of Antimicrobial Cellulose Nanofiber-Based Films Activated with Nisin for Food Packaging Applications. Foods 2022, 11, 3051. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11193051

AMA Style

Maresca D, Mauriello G. Development of Antimicrobial Cellulose Nanofiber-Based Films Activated with Nisin for Food Packaging Applications. Foods. 2022; 11(19):3051. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11193051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maresca, Diamante, and Gianluigi Mauriello. 2022. "Development of Antimicrobial Cellulose Nanofiber-Based Films Activated with Nisin for Food Packaging Applications" Foods 11, no. 19: 3051. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11193051

APA Style

Maresca, D., & Mauriello, G. (2022). Development of Antimicrobial Cellulose Nanofiber-Based Films Activated with Nisin for Food Packaging Applications. Foods, 11(19), 3051. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11193051

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop