Next Article in Journal
Effect of Bacteria Content in Wheat Flour on Storage Stability of Fresh Wet Noodles
Next Article in Special Issue
The Characterization of a Novel D-allulose 3-Epimerase from Blautia produca and Its Application in D-allulose Production
Previous Article in Journal
Behavioural Nudges, Physico-Chemical Solutions, and Sensory Strategies to Reduce People’s Salt Consumption
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Extracellular Production and Characterization of Sucrose Isomerase in Bacillus subtilis with Optimized Signal Peptides
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Purification, Characterization, and Immobilization of a Novel Protease-Resistant α-Galactosidase from Oudemansiella radicata and Its Application in Degradation of Raffinose Family Oligosaccharides from Soymilk

1
College of Food Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030800, China
2
Shanxi Key Laboratory of Edible Fungi for Loess Plateau, Taigu 030800, China
3
Shanxi Engineering Research Center of Edible Fungi, Taigu 030800, China
4
Inner Mongolia Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Fishery and Biology Experiment Research Centre, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Foods 2022, 11(19), 3091; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11193091
Submission received: 29 August 2022 / Revised: 21 September 2022 / Accepted: 1 October 2022 / Published: 5 October 2022

Abstract

:
α-galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.22) are glycosidases that catalyze the hydrolysis of α-1,6-linked D-galactosyl residues of different substrates, which has been widely applied in the food industry. Oudemansiella radicata is a kind of precious edible medicinal mushroom, which is a healthy, green, and safe food-derived enzyme source. In this study, a novel acidic α-galactosidase was purified from the dry fruiting bodies of O. radicata by ion-exchange chromatography and gel filtration, and designated as ORG (O. radicata α-galactosidase). ORG was further immobilized to obtain iORG by the sodium alginate–chitosan co-immobilization method. Then, the characterization of free and immobilized enzymes and their potential application in the removal of the RFOs from soymilk were investigated. The results showed that ORG might be a 74 kDa heterodimer, and it exhibited maximum activity at 50 °C and pH 3.0, whereas iORG showed maximum activity at 50 °C and pH 5.5. In addition, iORG exhibited higher thermal stability, pH stability, storage stability, and a better degradation effect on raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFOs) in soymilk than ORG, and iORG completely hydrolyzed RFOs in soymilk at 50 °C within 3 h. Therefore, iORG might be a promising candidate in the food industry due to its excellent stability, high removal efficiency of RFOs from soymilk, and great reusability.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

α-galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.22) is an exoglycosidase that specifically catalyzes the hydrolysis of α-1,6-linked D-galactosyl residues of α-galactooligosaccharides and galactomannans [1]. α-galactosidase has been widely applied in clinical medicine, food processing, animal feed, and pulp and paper industries [2,3,4,5,6]. Raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFOs) have been identified as antinutritional factors in soybean because they cannot be decomposed in humans or other monogastric animals and are prone to induce flatulence and gastrointestinal disturbance [7]. The enzymatic processing of soybean products by α-galactosidases has been reported to be one of the most effective techniques to reduce RFOs levels in soybean products, thus increasing their nutritional values [4,8]. At present, the yield, activity, and heat resistance of α-galactosidase are increased mainly by genetic engineering bacteria construction and amino acid mutation, but these two methods may not guarantee the safety of the enzyme. Therefore, it is particularly urgent to develop natural and safe food-derived α-galactosidase. Plants, animals, and microorganisms are known sources of α-galactosidase. The edible fungi are preferred enzyme sources in food industries because of their high nutritional value and unique characteristics. Moreover, the enzymes isolated from edible fungi were mild, safe, green, and environmentally friendly. Some α-galactosidases have been confirmed to possess the potential to hydrolyze RFOs, and they are derived from edible fungi such as Irpex lacteus [7], Pleurotus citrinopileatus [9], Leucopaxillus tricolor [10], Coriolus versicolor [11], Tremella aurantialba [12], Termitomyces eurrhizus [13], Hericium erinaceus [14], Tricholoma matsutake [15], Pleurotus djamor [16], and Agaricus bisporus [17]. Oudemansiella radicata (belonging to the Oudemansiella genus, Physalacriaceae family, Agaricomycetes class) is a kind of precious edible medicinal mushroom farmed in China, and it is known as “Edible Queen” for its high nutritious and economic value [18]. O. radicata is rich in polysaccharides, enzymes, amino acids, vitamins, triterpenes, ergosterols, and other nutrients, and it is a healthy, green, and safe food-derived enzyme source [19]. Recently, the isolation and characterization of some active enzymes from O. radicata, such as ribonuclease, metalloprotease, laccases, and cellulase, have attracted researchers’ attention [19,20,21]. However, to our knowledge, there is little research on the characterization of α-galactosidase from O. radicata.
Nowadays, the increasing harsh conditions of industrial processes and the need to reduce costs have made immobilized enzymes very attractive for researchers. Not only can the enzyme immobilization technique improve the stability of the enzyme and prolong the reaction time, but it can also simplify the downstream processing and improve the operation stability. Although there are many newly developed immobilization carriers, sodium alginate (Na-alginate) is still widely used owing to its excellent biocompatibility, low cost, non-toxicity, high stability, and good spheroidization [22]. Chitosan, a rare alkaline polysaccharide with a positive charge in nature, is incorporated as a dopant into alginate gels [23]. In this study, the sodium alginate–chitosan co-immobilization method was adopted to immobilize α-galactosidase from O. radicata. This method can not only solve the problems with the Na-alginate embedding method, such as high leakage of biomolecules, low mechanical strength, and large pore size, but also retain the enzyme activity to the maximum extent, and, thus, it exhibits great application potential and development prospects [24]. Moreover, the carboxylate part of Na-alginate could ionically interact with the protonated amino group of its chitosan counterpart to form a physically cross-linked hydrogel, thus effectively avoiding enzyme molecule leakage [25]. Meanwhile, chitosan outside the Na-alginate can also be cross-linked with glutaraldehyde to form schiff base in the immobilization process.
In this study, a novel α-galactosidase (ORG) was first purified and characterized from O. radicata by using ion-exchange chromatography and gel filtration. Then, the purified enzyme was immobilized by the sodium alginate–chitosan co-immobilization method. The characterization of free and immobilized enzymes and their potential application in the removal of the RFOs from soymilk were investigated. The stability of temperature, pH, and storage were evaluated and compared between free and immobilized enzymes. In addition, the reusability of the immobilized enzyme was examined. This study laid a foundation for the application of O. radicata-derived α-galactosidase in the food industry, and provided a new perspective for the intensive processing of functional substances in edible fungi.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The dry fruiting bodies of O. radicata were purchased from Yunnan Hanlu Fungus Industry Co., Ltd. (Yunnan, China). DEAE-Sepharose, CM-Sepharose, and Q-Sepharose were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd. (Saint Louis, MO, USA). Superdex75 10/300 GL and AKTA purifier were purchased from GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA. The protein molecular weight standards (Blue Plus Protein Marker) were supplied by Beijing TransGen Biotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). All the substrates (such as 4-nitrophenyl-α-D-galactopyranoside (pNPG)) and proteases were purchased from Beijing Solarbio Life Sciences Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The commercial glucose oxidase (GOD) kit was purchased from Beijing Solarbio Life Sciences Co., Ltd. The reagents (sodium hydroxide, glacial acetic acid, calcium chloride, pentanediol, citric acid, dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS), and sodium acetate (NaAc)) were obtained from Tianjin Kaitong Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China), and they were analytically pure.

2.2. Enzyme Activity Standard Assay and Protein Content Determination

α-galactosidase activity was determined with pNPG as a substrate. As previously reported [26], the 40 μL diluted enzyme solution was mixed evenly with 40 μL NaAc-HAc buffer (100 mM, pH 4.6) containing 10 mM pNPG and reacted for 10 min at 40 °C. Then, the reaction was terminated by adding 320 μL Na2CO3 solution (500 mM), and the absorbance was determined at 405 nm. The 0.1 g immobilized enzyme was mixed evenly with 0.1 mL NaAc-HAc buffer (100 mM, pH 4.6) containing 10 mM pNPG and reacted for 10 min at 40 °C. Then, the reaction was terminated by adding 0.8 mL Na2CO3 solution (500 mM), and the absorbance was determined at 405 nm. The amount of enzyme that released 1 μmol p-nitrophenol from pNPG per min at 40 °C was defined as one unit (U) of enzyme. Protein content was measured by the Bradford method with bovine serum albumin as the standard protein [27]. Specific enzyme activity was expressed as U/mg protein.

2.3. Purification of α-Galactosidase

The dry fruiting bodies of O. radicata were mixed with normal saline at the ratio of 1:10 (w/v), homogenized using a wall-breaking machine, and extracted at 4 °C for 4 h. The extract was centrifuged at 6500 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was dialyzed overnight (3500 Da molecular interception) to obtain the crude enzyme solution. The crude enzyme solution was subjected to anion exchange chromatography on DEAE-Sepharose column (5 cm × 20 cm) pre-equilibrated with 10 mM NaAc-HAc buffer (pH 4.4) at a flow rate of 10 mL/min. After removal of unabsorbed proteins, adsorbed proteins were eluted with NaAc-HAc buffer (pH 4.4) containing 50 mM, 150 mM, and 1 M NaCl, respectively. After the dialysis with distilled water, the active fraction with high α-galactosidase activity was chromatographed on cation exchange CM-Sepharose column (2.5 × 30 cm) pre-equilibrated with 10 mM NaAc-HAc buffer (pH 4.0) at a flow rate of 4 mL/min. After removal of unadsorbed proteins, adsorbed proteins were obtained by elution with NaAc-HAc buffer (pH 4.0) containing 50 mM, 150 mM, and 1 M NaCl. After dialysis, the fractions with the high α-galactosidase activity were pooled and then loaded onto Q-Sepharose column (1.5 cm × 10 cm) which was equilibrated with 10 mM NaAc-HAc buffer (pH 4.0) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min in advance. After removal of unadsorbed protein, adsorbed proteins were eluted with NaAc-HAc buffer (pH 4.0) containing a linear gradient NaCl (0~1 M). The fractions with the high α-galactosidase activity were pooled, dialyzed, and freeze-dried. Subsequently, Superdex75 10/300 gel filtration column (25.6 mL) was pre-equilibrated with 10 mM NaAc-HAc buffer (pH 4.0) containing 100 mM NaCl. The dry protein powder was homogenized in 200 μL deionized water and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. After being loaded onto the gel filtration column, the supernatant was subjected to fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) using an AKTA Purifier at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. The active fractions were pooled, concentrated by ultrafiltration with Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filter devices (50,000 MWCO), and loaded onto Superdex75 10/300 gel filtration column again, followed by FPLC. The active fractions were pooled, concentrated by ultrafiltration (50,000 MWCO), and freeze-dried for further analysis. The obtained enzyme powder was named ORG.

2.4. Determination of Molecular Mass

The molecular mass of the ORG was detected using gel filtration in combination with SDS-PAGE. A standard curve based on elution volume and molecular mass standards (GE Healthcare) was obtained, and then the native molecular mass of the α-galactosidase was calculated based on the elution volume. Blue Plus Protein Marker was used as the molecular mass standard with the range of 14 kDa~100 kDa. In SDS-PAGE, a 12% resolving gel and a 5% stacking gel were used following the standard procedure.

2.5. Analysis of Amino Acid Sequence

The purified ORG band was excised, digested, and then dissolved in 0.1% formic acid and 2% acetonitrile for liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) analysis. The inner amino acid sequences of ORG were compared with those of α-galactosidases from other sources by Mascot. Sequence homologues were obtained from NCBI database.

2.6. Immobilization of ORG

The ORG was immobilized using a previously reported method with minor modification [24]. The ORG was dissolved in 10 mM NaAc-HAc solution (pH 4.6). The dissolved enzyme solution and 0.04 g/mL. Na-alginate solution was mixed evenly at the ratio of 3:1. The chitosan was dissolved in 2% acetic acid to prepare 10 mL 5% chitosan–acetic acid transparent solution, and then the transparent solution was mixed with 4% CaCl2 solution at the ratio of 1:1. The mixture was stirred evenly by a magnetic stirrer, adjusted to pH 5.0, and stood. The Na-alginate solution of embedded enzyme was dropped evenly into chitosan–CaCl2 mixture solution though a 5 mL syringe to generate the immobilized beads with a diameter of about 0.15 cm, and then the resultant beads were cooled on ice. The immobilized enzyme was stood at room temperature (20~25 °C) for 1 h, cleaned, and put into 2% glutaraldehyde for cross-linking reaction at 4 °C for 2 h. After cross-linking and cleaning, the final obtained enzyme was the immobilized α-galactosidase from O. radicata, and it was named iORG. The enzyme activity and protein content of iORG were measured. The enzyme immobilization efficiency (also called immobilization yield) was defined as the difference between the activity of the free enzyme and the residual activity in the supernatant at the end of the immobilization period, multiplied by 100 and divided by the activity of the free enzyme [24]. The activity recovery (also called recovered activity or expressed activity) of the immobilized α-galactosidase is the percentage of enzyme activity that is maintained in the immobilized enzyme compared to the offered enzyme activity [28]. The specific activity yield (%) was defined as the specific activity of immobilized enzyme, multiplied by 100 and divided by the specific activity of the free enzyme [22].

2.7. Biochemical Characterization

2.7.1. Effects of Temperature and pH on Activity of ORG and iORG

The optimal pH of ORG and iORG was determined within the pH range of 2.2~8.0 with 100 mM Na2HPO4-citric acid buffer. ORG or iORG solution was mixed with pH buffers (2.2~8.0) and incubated at 4 °C for 2 h. Afterwards, the pH stability was detected by the residual enzyme activities. The optimal temperature of ORG and iORG was determined over the temperature range (4~90 °C). The thermostability of ORG and iORG was measured by the residual activities after 2 h incubation at each temperature (4, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 °C). In order to determine the effects of the incubation time on thermostability of ORG and iORG, these two enzymes were incubated separately at 50 °C and 60 °C each for 180 min. At 30 min interval, the enzymes were withdrawn, cooled immediately, and tested for residual enzyme activities by standard assay.

2.7.2. Effects of Metal Ions, Chemical Reagents, and Side Modification Reagents on ORG

Various metal ions (2.5, 5, 10, and 20 mM), chemical reagents (2, 20, and 200 mM), or side modification reagents (0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, and 2.0 mM) were mixed with ORG at the ratio of 1:1 and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h to investigate their influences on ORG. After incubation, the relative activity of ORG was detected by standard assay.

2.7.3. Effects of Proteases on Activity of ORG

The ORG was incubated at 37 °C with 2, 10, or 20 mg/mL seven proteases, separately at the ratio of 1:1 for 1 h (including pepsin, pH 4.0; acid protease, pH 4.0; alkaline protease, pH 8.0; neutral protease, pH 7.0; trypsin, pH 7.0; α-chymotrypsin, pH 7.0; or papain, pH 7.0). ORG incubated under the same conditions without proteases was used as control. After incubation, the residual activity of ORG was measured by standard assay.

2.7.4. Substrate Specificity Determination

The specificity of ORG towards 4 synthetic substrates (pNPG, oNPG, 4-nitrophenyl β-D-glucuronide, and 4-nitrophenyl α-D-glucopyranoside) was measured by standard assay. The activity of the ORG towards natural substrates including oligosaccharides (such as raffinose and stachyose) and polysaccharides (locust bean gum and guar gum) was determined using the DNS method [29] with minor modifications. Enzyme solution was mixed with natural substrates at the ratio of 1:1. After 30 min incubation at 50 °C, the reducing sugar content was determined. The amount of enzyme that released 1 µmol of reducing sugar from natural substrates per min at 50 °C was defined as one unit (U) of α-galactosidase activity. The activity of the ORG towards melibiose and maltose substrates was determined by using a glucose oxidase (GOD) kit.

2.7.5. Inhibitors Kinetics

The inhibition mode of ORG by galactose and melibiose was determined by the Lineweaver–Burk plot, respectively. The pNPG concentrations were 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 mM. The concentrations of the inhibitor melibiose were 0, 1, 3, 5, and 10 mM, and the inhibitor galactose concentrations were 0, 1, 5, 10, and 20 mM. The inhibition constant Ki was determined from Dixon plot, and enzymatic reactions were performed by standard assay with pNPG (1.5~3 mM) as substrate and with galactose or galactose as an inhibitor.

2.7.6. Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Raffinose and Stachyose

The reaction system NaAc-HAc buffer (1 M, pH 4.6) contained 1 mL ORG (2 U/mL), 0.5 mL raffinose (50 mM), and 0.5 mL stachyose (50 mM). The mixture was incubated at 40 °C. Aliquots of the reaction mixtures were withdrawn at various time intervals and boiled for 5 min to stop the reaction. The release amount of reducing sugar was determined by the DNS method. The hydrolysis products were analyzed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC).

2.7.7. Kinetic Constants of ORG and iORG

The Michaelis–Menten plot was drawn in OriginPro 2021 software, and based on it, the kinetic constants (Km and Vmax) of substrate hydrolysis were computed. The enzyme activity was determined by standard assay with pNPG (0.5~4 mM) as substrate and by DNS method mentioned in 2.7.4 with raffinose (2~40 mM) and stachyose (2~40 mM) as substrates. The catalytic efficiency constant (Kcat/Km) was calculated based on Km and Vmax.

2.7.8. Storage Stability and Reusability

ORG and iORG were stored for 10 days at 4 °C and room temperature (20~25 °C). Enzyme activity was determined by standard assay every 2 days. The enzyme activity determined on the first day was used as control (100%), based on which enzyme activity at other time points was measured. The enzyme activity was determined by standard assay with pNPG as substrate and by DNS method mentioned in 2.7.4 with raffinose as substrate to investigate the reusability of iORG. After the reaction was completed, iORG was washed with deionized water and NaAc-HAc buffer (10 mM, pH 4.6) successively and used again in a new reaction system. The above experiments were repeated 6 times. The activity of iORG in the first reaction was used as control (100%) for calculating the relative activity of iORG after each use.

2.8. Elimination of RFOs from Soymilk by ORG and iORG

The soymilk was prepared using soybeans purchased from the local market according to the method described previously [30]. Soymilk (5 mL) was added with (0.2~1.2 U/mL) ORG or iORG and incubated at 50 °C for 5 h in a shaking water bath at 100 rpm to determine the optimal enzyme dosage. After incubation, the samples were boiled for 5 min and centrifuged (10,000 rpm, 10 min). After degradation of soymilk samples, the released reducing sugar content was determined by DNS method [29]. In addition, soymilk (5 mL) was incubated with ORG or iORG (1 U/mL) at 50 °C for 7 h in a shaking water bath at 100 rpm. The soymilk treated with distilled water instead of the enzyme solution by the same method that was used as a blank control. Aliquots of the reaction mixtures were withdrawn every hour and boiled for 5 min to terminate the reaction. The reducing sugar content released from the withdrawn aliquots at different incubated times was determined by DNS method to determine the optimal incubated time. When soymilk was incubated with iORG, aliquots of the reaction mixtures were withdrawn every hour, and the hydrolysates of reaction mixtures were detected by the TLC method. The reaction mixtures were spotted onto a silica gel 60 plate (Merck, Germany), and developed using solution with the n-butanol/methanol/water ratio of 6:4:3 (v/v/v). The sugar spots were visualized by heating the plate at 95 °C for 10~15 min after being sprayed with the chromogenic reagent (consisting of 1 g diphenylamine, 1 mL aniline, 50 mL acetone, and 5 mL85% phosphoric acid).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

OriginPro 2021 software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA) was used for plotting. All experiments were performed in triplicate. The data were expressed as mean ± standard deviations (SD). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using SPSS 20.0 software (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Purification of ORG

The α-galactosidase from O. radicata was purified by homogenate extraction, successive ion exchange chromatography on DEAE-Sepharose, CM-Sepharose, and Q-Sepharose columns, and the final gel filtration on Superdex 75 10/300. After the crude enzyme solution was subjected to DEAE Sepharose anion exchange chromatography, four elution peaks (D1, D2, D3, and D4) were obtained (Figure 1a). The further ion exchange chromatography of fraction D3 was performed on the CM-Sepharose column, due to its high enzyme activity and the low impurity protein content. Subsequently, the fraction C1 with high α-galactosidase activity was pooled (Figure 1b), and then fraction C1 was further loaded to a column of Q-Sepharose to obtain two elution peaks (Q1 and Q2). Fraction Q2 with the high enzyme activity was collected (Figure 1c). Two gel filtration chromatographies were performed on Superdex 75 10/300 column to obtain final active fraction F1-1 (Figure 1d). The active fraction F1-1 was a single symmetrical peak, and, thus, F1-1 was preliminarily determined as a single component. The purification efficiency of each step was presented in Table 1. The specific activity of the ORG was estimated as 170.47 U/mg, which was higher than that of most α-galactosidases [7,14,26,31,32]. The purification fold of ORG was up to 1894.11.

3.2. Molecular Mass and Amino Acid Sequence

The gel filtration chromatography results showed that the size of ORG was 74 kDa (Figure 1d), which was similar to other α-galactosidases purified from T. eurrhizus (72 kDa) [13] and from Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (74 kDa) [33]. In this study, the molecular mass of the ORG was identified further by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. Two single bands were observed, and the molecular mass corresponding to these two bands was 24 kDa and 50 kDa, respectively (Figure 2, lane 1). Since ORG was obtained by ultrafiltration concentration (50,000 MWCO), it can be inferred that the 24 kDa band might not be an impurity protein, and that ORG might be a heterodimer. Purified enzyme was used for subsequent analysis.
All the 15 peptide sequences were identified from the deduced amino acid sequences by LC–MS/MS, and 14 peptide fragments showed both 100% query coverage and 100% identity with α-galactosidase (Table 2), confirming that ORG was α-galactosidase. BLASTP search against the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) database revealed that ORG showed high identity with α-galactosidases from different fungi belonging to the glycoside hydrolase (GH) family 27, such as Fistulina hepatica (accession number: KIY47914.1, 100%), Crucibulum laeve (accession number: TFK41875.1, 100%), Hypholoma sublateritium (accession number: KJA21426.1, 100%), and Moniliophthora roreri (accession number: ESK96753.1, 100%). Based on this, it could be concluded that ORG might be a novel member of the GH family 27.

3.3. α-Galactosidase Immobilization

The sodium alginate–chitosan co-immobilization method combines embedding and cross-linking, and thus it can immobilize the enzyme more effectively [24]. In this study, the immobilization efficiency of the free enzyme was 60.08 ± 0.11%. The activity recovery of the immobilized α-galactosidase is 72.19 ± 0.08%. The specific activity of immobilized ORG was 118.35 U/mg, which was 0.69 times as low as that of the free enzyme. Glutaraldehyde is both a cross-linking agent and an enzyme denaturant [34]. It can denature and inactivate the enzyme during the cross-linking process, which is an important reason for the loss of enzyme activity.

3.4. Biochemical Characterization

3.4.1. Effects of Temperature and pH on Activity of ORG and iORG

In this study, the optimal pH value of ORG was determined to be 3.0, while the optimal pH value of iORG was determined to be 5.5 (Figure 3a). The iORG could still maintain 58.40 ± 0.81% enzyme activity at pH 8.0, suggesting that enzyme immobilization extended the practical reaction pH range. Moreover, the activity of ORG was stable within an acidic pH range of 2.2~5.0, and its activity remained above 50% after 2 h incubation (Figure 3b), which was in agreement with previously reported α-galactosidase activities [10,11,12,26,35]. In addition, iORG demonstrated significantly higher pH stability than ORG within the pH range of 4.5~8.0, which was conducive to industrial application of iORG.
The optimal temperature for both ORG and iORG was 50 °C. iORG showed >55% relative activity at 30~60 °C, which was much higher than ORG (Figure 3c). The thermostability assay results showed that ORG maintained >65% activity after 2 h incubation below 40 °C (Figure 3d). In contrast, iORG exhibited the same activity level at a wider temperature range (4~60 °C). The thermal stability of iORG was much higher than that of ORG at 50 °C and 60 °C throughout the entire 180 min incubation (Figure 3e,f). iORG maintained 63.48 ± 1.31% and 46.50 ± 2.36% enzyme activity after 180 min incubation at 50 °C and 60 °C, whereas ORG only retained initial activities of 33.47 ± 1.68% and 7.91 ± 0.13% under the same conditions. These results indicated that the sodium alginate–chitosan co-immobilization method adopted by this study could effectively improve the thermal stability of ORG.

3.4.2. Effects of Various Metal Ions on ORG

Ag+ and Hg2+ have been reported to significantly inhibit the α-galactosidases from A. squamosa seeds [35], Bacillus megaterium [36], H. erinaceus [14], and Lentinula edodes [32]. Consistent with the above previous reports, ORG activity was drastically suppressed (>97%) by Ag+ and Hg2+ in this study (Table 3). The activity of ORG was increased by 8~15% under the stimulation of high concentration of Ca2+, Mg2+, Al3+, and K+ (10 mM), while it was inhibited by Mn2+, Fe3+, and Pb2+ in a dose-dependent manner. The strong inhibitory effect of Ag+ on ORG might be due to the presence of histidine or amino acids containing carboxyl groups in the active center of ORG [32]. Previous reports have shown that Hg2+ ions interacted with the cysteine residue present around the active center of ORG to interfere with the substrate binding, thus leading to dramatic inhibitory effect on ORG [10,12,37].

3.4.3. Effects of Various Chemical Reagents on ORG

The results showed that NaCl (113.04~118.00%) and glucose (110.36~118.67%) promoted ORG activity, while maltose (74.15~82.46%) inhibited ORG activity (Table 4). ORG exhibited good tolerance to sucrose, lactose, and xylose, and thus it could be used to treat waste molasses and improve the precipitation rate of sucrose in sugar production. The low concentration (1 mM) of melibiose, galactose, and SDS had no effect on ORG, whereas high concentrations (10 mM and 100 mM) of these three chemical reagents significantly inhibited ORG activity. When their concentrations reached 100 mM, the residual enzyme activity of ORG was 44.40 ± 2.38% under melibiose treatment, 32.74 ± 3.94% under galactose treatment, and 53.67 ± 1.47% under SDS treatment, respectively. SDS strongly inhibited the activity of ORG, which is similar to most other α-galactosidases [9,14,16,17]. In addition, melibiose and galactose inhibited ORG activity in a dose-dependent manner, and their inhibition types were further analyzed in subsequent tests. ORG activity was not decreased in the presence of EDTA-Na2, implying that ORG was not a metal enzyme, or it required no divalent cations for maintaining its activity.

3.4.4. Effects of Side Modification Reagents on ORG

Different concentrations of NBS and DIC dramatically decreased the activity of ORG (to 5.90~19.75% and 24.66~40.61%, respectively) (Figure 4), suggesting that the tryptophan residue and the arginine residue played a key role in the activity center of ORG, whereas 0.2~0.8 mM PMSF and 0.4~1 mM DEPC slightly increased ORG activity (to 106.63~114.61% and 106.49~115.59%, respectively), implying that serine and histidine residues were not in the active center of ORG. Furthermore, DTT had no effect on the activity of ORG, suggesting that the thiol group might be not be necessary for maintaining the activity of ORG. Some α-galactosidases purified from edible fungi such as P. citrinopileatus [9], T. matsutake [15], and T. aurantialba [12] have been reported to be significantly inhibited by NBS, indicating that the active center of these enzymes all contained tryptophan residues. Unlike our findings regarding the thiol group, Xu et al. (2019) found that DTT dramatically increased the activity of LEGI, demonstrating that the catalytic activity of LEGI was dependent on the thiol group [32].

3.4.5. Resistance to Proteases of ORG

ORG activity was hardly lost after incubating with acid protease, pepsin, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, or papain at 37 °C for 1 h, indicating that ORG was strongly resistant to these proteases (Figure 5). However, alkaline protease (1, 5, and 10 mg/mL, pH 8.0) significantly decreased the activity of ORG after 1 h incubation at 37 °C with a residual ORG activity of 73.92~87.70%. Some α-galactosidases in the GH family 27 have been reported to have broad protease resistance, such as LEGI from Lentinula edodes [32], HEG from H. erinaceus [14], rILgalA from I. lacteus [7], and PCGI from P. citrinopileatus [9]. Moreover, acid protease (1, 5, and 10 mg/mL) slightly increased the activity of ORG (106.50~116.01%). Similar results have been reported in α-galactosidases from P. citrinopileatus (139%) [9], H. erinaceus (159%) [14], and P. djamor (115%) [16]. In summary, ORG exhibited good resistance to multiple proteases under the acidic and neutral conditions.

3.4.6. Substrate Specificity of ORG

ORG exhibited the highest activity on pNPG (100%) and negligible activity on other synthetic substrates such as oNPG (0.51%), 4-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucuronide (0.48%), and 4-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucuronide (0.46%) (Table 5), demonstrating that ORG was highly specific to the synthetic substrate pNPG. Among natural substrates tested, ORG showed 25.08%, 20.33%, and 17.53% relative activity on maltose, raffinose, and stachyose, respectively. ORG had little effect on guar gum and locust bean gum, which might be ascribed to the access restriction on polymeric substrate by the enzyme active site [35]. Similar to most GH 27 α-galactosidases, ORG can degrade intact galactomannan polymers to release galactose, but can hardly hydrolyze polymeric galactomannans [10,17,31]. ORG can degrade maltose, raffinose, and other RFOs and, thus, it exhibits a great potential to be applied in the food industry.

3.4.7. Effects of Inhibitors on ORG

The Lineweaver–Burk plots showed that with the increasing concentrations of inhibitors melibiose (0~10 mM) and galactose (0~20 mM), Km exhibited a dose-dependent increase, and Vmax displayed a dose-dependent decrease, respectively (Figure 6a,b), suggesting that both melibiose and galactose acted on ORG as mixed-type (competitive and non-competitive) inhibitors. This was also confirmed in the Dixon plots (Figure 6c,d), where all the lines were intersected in the second quadrant. Additionally, the Dixon plot showed that the inhibition constant Ki of melibiose and galactose was 1.86 mM and 5.94 mM, respectively, implying that melibiose had stronger inhibitory effects than galactose.
The mixed inhibition type of galactose on ORG was similar to that of galactose on α-galactosidases from H. erinaceus [14], Penicillium purpurogenum [38], and A. squamosa seeds [35], but different from the competitive inhibition type of galactose on many other counterparts [9,17,37,39]. Furthermore, galactose showed a noncompetitive inhibition effect on the activity of α-galactosidase from Lenzites elegans [40]. Inhibition constant Ki value (5.94 mM) of galactose on ORG was higher than that of galactose on α-galactosidases from P. citrinopileatus (0.92 mM) [9], Talaromyces emersonii (2.77 mM) [41], H. erinaceus (5.27 mM) [14], and maize (Zea mays) flour (1.33 mM) [39], indicating that ORG was more tolerant to galactose than these α-galactosidases. Compared with galactose, fewer reports on the inhibition of melibiose on α-galactosidases are available [9,14,17,42,43]. Similar to α-galactosidase from H. erinaceus [14], ORG was inhibited by melibiose in mixed mode, which was inconsistent with some previous reports that α-galactosidases were inhibited by melibiose in competitive mode [9,17,43].

3.4.8. Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Raffinose and Stachyose by ORG

The reducing sugar content was increased gradually with the extended ORG treatment time, with its content reaching the maximum at 8 h (Figure 7a). However, a slight decrease in reducing sugar content was observed at 24 h, which might be attributed to the decrease in ORG activity and the precipitation of galactose. The results of stachyose and raffinose degradation by ORG were consistent with those by α-galactosidases from T. aurantialba [12], H. erinaceus [14], P. djamor [16], and B. megaterium [36]. In this study, TLC analysis showed that stachyose and raffinose were degraded completely by ORG at 6 h and 8 h, respectively (Figure 7b), which was in line with the subsequent observation that ORG displayed good catalytic efficiency for raffinose and stachyose. Notably, raffinose content was increased at 6 h, which might be attributed to the hydrolysis of stachyose by ORG. This result indicated that raffinose and stachyose could be effectively hydrolyzed by ORG to produce reducing sugar. Moreover, the time required by complete hydrolysis of raffinose and stachyose by ORG (8 h) was similar to that by α-galactosidase from Rhizomucor mieheii (8 h) [44], which was much less than that by α-galactosidases from T. aurantialba (12 h) [12] and P. citrinopileatus [9] (18 h). These results indicated that ORG exhibited great ability to hydrolyze stachyose and raffinose.

3.4.9. Kinetic Constants of ORG and iORG

The Km value of ORG for pNPG, raffinose, and stachyose was 0.58, 16.52, and 19.03 mM, respectively, whereas the Km value of iORG for these 3 substrates was 1.13, 18.16, and 20.03 mM, respectively. Both ORG and iORG showed the lowest Km for pNPG, indicating their highest affinity to pNPG. Furthermore, ORG showed higher affinity (lower Km value) towards pNPG than other characterized α-galactosidases [7,10,16,32,33,40]. The catalytic efficiency (Kcat/Km, mM−1s−1) analysis results showed that both ORG and iORG hydrolyzed pNPG most efficiently (60.62, 35.13), followed by raffinose (7.78, 7.83) and stachyose (6.42, 6.88) (Table 6). The results in this study were in accordance with the previous reports on the α-galactosidases from H. erinaceus [14], Lentinula edodes [32], and P. djamor [16]. Moreover, the Km value of iORG for these three substrates was higher than that of ORG, indicating that the affinity of ORG to the substrates was decreased after immobilization. It is worth noting that the Kcat/Km value of both ORG and iORG on raffinose and stachyose was higher than that of α-galactosidases reported in previous studies [14,32,33,36,45] on them. The above findings provide a theoretical basis for the application of ORG and iORG in food processing.

3.4.10. Storage Stability and Reusability

As storage time increased, iORG exhibited better stability than ORG (Figure 8a,b), which can be attributed to the more stable structure of iORG. Enzyme activity decreased relatively faster at room temperature (20~25 °C) than at 4 °C. At room temperature, ORG and iORG only maintained 47.31 ± 2.25% and 69.50 ± 1.28% of their initial activity on day 10 post-storage (Figure 8b). The results showed that the immobilization of ORG could effectively improve its adaptability to environmental temperature change, reduce its enzyme activity loss, and extend the storage time.
After six cycles of reuses, iORG retained 59.37 ± 1.46% and 51.43 ± 1.05% of its initial activity towards pNPG and raffinose, respectively (Figure 8c). The loss of immobilized enzyme carrier in recycling is an important reason for the decrease in enzyme activity. The results indicated that iORG exhibited good reusability, which was conductive to its industrial application. In addition to iORG, some immobilized enzyme obtained by other methods also displayed good reusability. One previous study revealed that cross-linked α-galactosidase aggregates (CLEAs) retained 48% activity towards pNPG after nine repeated uses and 22% activity towards raffinose after six repeated uses [39]. Singh and Kayastha (2012) reported that the chitosan- and amberlite-immobilized α-galactosidases retained 52% and 22% activity towards pNPG after 12 reuses, respectively [23].

3.5. Elimination of RFOs from Soymilk by ORG and iORG

Since ORG can degrade raffinose and stachyose, which are the main compounds of RFOs, the potential of ORG and iORG to remove RFOs in soymilk was further examined. Compared with the blank control (2.47 ± 0.07 mg/mL), the reducing sugar content released from soymilk was gradually increased with the increasing ORG and iORG dosages, and then reached a maximum of 6.60 ± 0.08 mg/mL and 7.41 ± 0.15 mg/mL at enzyme dosages of 1 U/mL, respectively (Figure 9a), suggesting the optimum enzyme dosage was 1 U/mL. The results indicated that ORG and iORG could degrade RFOs in soymilk and produce reducing sugar. Moreover, iORG exhibited a better degradation effect of RFOs in soymilk than ORG at the same enzyme dosage. The reducing sugar content released from soymilk at different incubation timepoints was determined when soymilk was incubated with ORG or iORG (Figure 9b). At 5 h post-soymilk incubation with ORG, the reducing sugar content reached the maximum (6.57 ± 0.03 mg/mL), which was 1.66 times as high as that in the control group. However, at 3 h post-soymilk incubation with iORG, the reducing sugar content reached the maximum (7.39 ± 0.03 mg/mL), which was 2.28 times as high as that in the control group, suggesting that ORG immobilization could shorten the degradation time of RFOs and increase the degradation efficiency of RFOs in soymilk. TLC analysis results indicated that under iORG treatment, stachyose in soymilk was degraded completely at 2 h, and raffinose was degraded completely at 3 h (Figure 9c), which was consistent with determination results of reducing sugar content.

4. Discussion

ORG, as the native purified enzyme, might be a heterodimer, and its molecular mass is 74 kDa. It has been reported that α-galactosidases from A. squamosa seeds [35] and P. citrinopileatus [9] are also heterodimer, whereas those from L. elegans [40] and Thielavia terrestris [43] are homodimer. The α-galactosidases exist in both monomeric and multimeric forms, exhibiting structural diversity [7,36,45,47]. Based on sequence similarity, the α-galactosidases are divided into glycoside hydrolase (GH) family 4, 27, 36, 57, 97, and 110 [7,17,33,40]. Most reported fungal α-galactosidases belonged to GH family 27 and 36. ORG shared considerably high sequence similarity to the reported GH family 27 α-galactosidases, suggesting that ORG should be a new α-galactosidase member of the GH family 27.
Similar to α-galactosidases from C. versicolor [11], A. bisporus [17], and A. squamosa seeds [35], ORG is an acidic α-galactosidase. The optimal temperature at which ORG exhibited the maximum activity was 50 °C, and this optimal temperature of ORG was the same with that of α-galactosidases from P. citrinopileatus [9], L. tricolor [10], and Aspergillus oryzae YZ1 [47], and it was higher than that of other α-galactosidases reported in previous studies [36,39] (Table 7). Although ORG displayed higher thermostability than some natural mushroom α-galactosidases [10,15,17], its thermostability was lower than some recombinant α-galactosidases from thermophilic fungi [43,45] and other sources [7,36], which would limit its industrial application to some extent. Nowadays, various methods have been developed to improve the thermostability and pH stability of α-galactosidases [8,23,33]. In the present study, the sodium alginate–chitosan co-immobilized method was adopted to increase the thermostability and pH stablity of ORG. The pH profiles illustrated that the immobilization increased the pH stablity of ORG and shifted the optimal pH of ORG to the alkaline side (Figure 3a,b). Previous literature showed that the alteration of enzyme microenvironment due to immobilization or support is the main reason for the change of optimum pH value [48]. The carboxylate part of Na-alginate could ionically interact with the protonated amino group of the chitosan counterpart to form a net anionic charge. The concentration of [H+] within the microenvironment of immobilized enzyme is higher than that in the bulk of the medium, which causes the pH-activity curve to shift to the alkaline. The thermostability assay results showed that iORG demonstrated significantly higher thermostability than ORG within the temperature range of 4~70 °C (Figure 3d–f). This might be due to the immobilization of the enzyme to the support, providing stability and resulting in formation of the enzyme–substrate complex without any hindrance for the access of substrates to the active site [39,49]. Besides, the calcium alginate–chitosan matrix absorbs a large amount of heat and preserves the enzyme against denaturation, which is an important reason for the improved thermal stability of the immobilized enzyme [25]. It is worth noting that iORG exhibited higher catalytic efficiency towards stachyose (6.88 mM−1·s−1) and raffinose (7.83 mM−1·s−1) than some reported α-galactosidases [14,32,33,36,45] (Table 6).
RFOs are anti-nutritional factors in soybean and other legumes, and they can cause flatulence. So far, many α-galactosidases have been reported to remove RFOs from soymilk [31,33,37,45,46,50]. However, some α-galactosidases exhibited defects such as low enzymatic activity and poor RFO removal capacity, reflected by slow and incomplete hydrolysis of RFOs, which might be due to their low catalytic efficiencies or low stability. For example, after soymilk was treated with α-galactosidase from Aspergillus terreus for 12 h, the RFOs were incompletely hydrolyzed [50]. Chen et al. (2015) reported that after soymilk was treated with 10 U/mL α-galactosidase from R. miehei for 8 h, the RFOs were completely hydrolyzed [44]. In this study, iORG completely hydrolyzed soybean milk in only 3 h, which could be attributed to its high catalytic efficiency and high stability. The degradation effect of iORG (within 3 h) on soymilk RFOs has been reported to be better than that of α-galactosidases from B. megaterium [36], B. thetaiotaomicron [33] and A. oryzae YZ1 [46], which is consistent with the results of catalytic efficiency. Among the reported enzymes, α-galactosidase from I. lacteus showed the rapidest removal of RFOs from soymilk and complete hydrolysis towards stachyose and raffinose within 30 min [7], which might be ascribed to a high-level expression of recombinant enzyme.
Furthermore, previous reports showed that the RFO degradation effects in soybean products (soymilk, soybean meal, etc.) were closely related to the enzyme dosage [37,45,46]. One previous study reported that it took 6, 4, and 2 h for RFOs in soybean meal to be completely (>95%) hydrolyzed at the doses of 1, 2, and 5 U/mL of α-galactosidase from Paecilomyces thermophila, respectively [45]. Another study demonstrated that after soymilk was treated for 3 h at the doses of 5, 10, and 15 U/mL of α-galactosidases from A. oryzae YZ1, 87.1%, 88.0%, and 97.8% of RFOs were hydrolyzed, respectively [46]. These findings confirmed that RFO degradation was enzyme dosage-dependent. This study determined the optimal enzyme dosage as 1 U/mL. Consistent with the reports by Baffa et al. [8], Çelem et al. [22], and Bayraktar et al. [39], this study showed that immobilization can improve the stability of the enzyme and its degradation ability towards RFOs. In addition, iORG retained 51.43 ± 1.05% relative enzyme activity towards raffinose after being reused six times. In conclusion, iORG exhibited excellent stability, high ability to remove RFOs from soymilk, and great reusability and, thus, it has a great potential to be used to eliminate RFOs from soymilk as well as other soybean products.

5. Conclusions

A novel α-galactosidase (ORG) was purified from O. radicata by using ion-exchange chromatography and gel filtration. The ORG might be a 74 kDa heterodimer with an optimal temperature of 50 °C and an optimal pH of 3.0. The tryptophan residue and the arginine residue played a key role in the active center of ORG. Melibiose (Ki 1.86 mM), galactose (Ki 5.94 mM), and SDS significantly inhibited enzyme activity at the concentration of >1 mM. The ORG displayed remarkable resistance to multiple proteases and sugars. The immobilized enzyme (iORG) showed maximum activity at 50 °C and pH 5.5. Although iORG had low substrate affinity, it displayed higher thermostability, pH stability, and storage stability. In practice, the iORG was used to hydrolyze RFOs in soymilk, with a 100% hydrolysis rate within 3 h at 1 U/mL enzyme dosage. These favorable properties of iORG make it a suitable candidate for the removal of flatulence-causing oligosaccharides in soymilk, and can be applied to improve the nutritional values of legume-derived food.

Author Contributions

X.G.: supervision and writing—review and editing; J.L.: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, and writing—original draft; T.B.: methodology and investigation; D.G.: software and visualization; M.C.: conceptualization and methodology; C.F.: project administration; L.X.: resources; Y.C. and N.Z.: formal analysis and visualization; J.M.: resources and data curation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Doctoral Science Foundation of Shanxi Agricultural University (2017YJ33), Key Project of Coal-based Science and Technology of Shanxi Province (FT2014-03-01), and Key Team of Scientific and Technological Innovation of Edible Fungi of Shanxi Province (201805D131009).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank each teacher of Shanxi Key Laboratory of Edible Fungi for Loess Plateau for their contribution to this article. Great gratitude goes to Ping Liu from Huazhong Agriculture University, Wuhan, China for her work at English editing and language polishing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, W.; Xu, X.; Chen, R.; Meng, Q.; Yuan, J.; Yang, P.; Yao, B. Production of a Highly Protease-Resistant Fungal alpha-Galactosidase in Transgenic Maize Seeds for Simplified Feed Processing. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0129294. [Google Scholar]
  2. Clarke, J.H.; Davidson, K.; Rixon, J.E.; Halstead, J.R.; Fransen, M.P.; Gilbert, H.J.; Hazlewood, G.P. A comparison of enzyme-aided bleaching of softwood paper pulp using combinations of xylanase, mannanase and alpha-galactosidase. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 53, 661–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Garman, S.C.; Garboczi, D.N. The molecular defect leading to Fabry disease: Structure of human alpha-galactosidase. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 337, 319–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lu-Kwang, J.; Abdullah, A.L.; SM, M.I. α-Galactosidase and Its Applications in Food Processing. Encycl. Food Chem. 2019, 337, 124–128. [Google Scholar]
  5. Llamas-Moya, S.; Higgins, N.F.; Adhikari, R.; Lawlor, P.G.; Lacey, S. Effect of multicarbohydrase enzymes containing α-galactosidase on the growth and apparent metabolizable energy digestibility of broiler chickens: A meta-analysis. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 2021, 277, 114949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Anisha, G.S. Microbial α-galactosidases: Efficient biocatalysts for bioprocess technology. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 344, 126293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jang, J.M.; Yang, Y.; Wang, R.; Bao, H.; Yuan, H.; Yang, J. Characterization of a high performance alpha-galactosidase from Irpex lacteus and its usage in removal of raffinose family oligosaccharides from soymilk. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 131, 1138–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Baffa Júnior, J.C.; Viana, P.A.; de Rezende, S.T.; Soares, N.D.F.F.; Guimarães, V.M. Immobilization of an alpha-galactosidase from Debaryomyces hansenni UFV-1 in cellulose film and its application in oligosaccharides hydrolysis. Food Bioprod. Process. 2018, 111, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hu, Y.; Tian, G.; Geng, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, L.; Wang, H.; Ng, T.B. A protease-resistant α-galactosidase from Pleurotus citrinopileatus with broad substrate specificity and good hydrolytic activity on raffinose family oligosaccharides. Process Biochem. 2016, 51, 491–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Geng, X.; Fan, J.; Xu, L.; Wang, H.; Ng, T.B. Hydrolysis of oligosaccharides by a fungal alpha-galactosidase from fruiting bodies of a wild mushroom Leucopaxillus tricolor. J. Basic Microbiol. 2018, 58, 1043–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Du, F.; Liu, Q.; Wang, H.; Ng, T. Purification an alpha-galactosidase from Coriolus versicolor with acid-resistant and good degradation ability on raffinose family oligosaccharides. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 30, 1261–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Geng, X.; Yang, D.; Zhang, Q.; Chang, M.; Xu, L.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, H.; Meng, J. Good hydrolysis activity on raffinose family oligosaccharides by a novel alpha-galactosidase from Tremella aurantialba. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 150, 1249–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, W.; Du, F.; Wang, L.; Zhao, L.; Wang, H.; Ng, T.B. Hydrolysis of Oligosaccharides by a Thermostable alpha-Galactosidase from Termitomyces eurrhizus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 29226–29235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Ye, F.; Geng, X.R.; Xu, L.J.; Chang, M.C.; Feng, C.P.; Meng, J.L. Purification and characterization of a novel protease-resistant GH27 alpha-galactosidase from Hericium erinaceus. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 120, 2165–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Geng, X.; Tian, G.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, L.; Wang, H.; Ng, T.B. A Fungal alpha-Galactosidase from Tricholoma matsutake with Broad Substrate Specificity and Good Hydrolytic Activity on Raffinose Family Oligosaccharides. Molecules 2015, 20, 13550–13562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Hu, Y.J.; Tian, G.T.; Zhao, L.Y.; Wang, H.; Ng, T.B. A protease-resistant alpha-galactosidase from Pleurotus djamor with broad pH stability and good hydrolytic activity toward raffinose family oligosaccharides. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 94, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, Y.; Zhu, M.; Tian, G.; Zhao, L.; Wang, H.; Ng, T.B. Isolation of a protease-resistant and pH-stable alpha-galactosidase displaying hydrolytic efficacy toward raffinose family oligosaccharides from the button mushroom Agaricus bisporus. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 104, 576–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; Jia, J.; Ren, X.; Li, B.; Zhang, Q. Extraction, preliminary characterization and in vitro antioxidant activity of polysaccharides from Oudemansiella radicata mushroom. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 120, 1760–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Geng, X.; Te, R.; Tian, G.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, L.; Wang, H.; Ng, T.B. Purification and characterization of a novel metalloprotease from fruiting bodies of Oudemansiella radicata. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2017, 64, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Balaraju, K.; Park, K.; Jahagirdar, S.; Kaviyarasan, V. Production of cellulase and laccase enzymes by Oudemansiella radicata using agro wastes under solid-state and submerged conditions. Res. Biotechnol. 2010, 1, 21–28. [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu, Q.; Chen, H.; Wang, H.; Ng, T.B. Isolation and Characterization of a Ubiquitin-Like Ribonuclease from the Cultured Deep Root Mushroom, Oudemansiella radicata (Higher Basidiomycetes). Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2015, 17, 1037–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Çelem, E.B.; Önal, S. Sepabeads EC-EP immobilized α-galactosidase: Immobilization, characterization and application in the degradation of raffinose-type oligosaccharides. Process Biochem. 2022, 116, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Singh, N.; Kayastha, A.M. Cicer alpha-galactosidase immobilization onto chitosan and Amberlite MB-150: Optimization, characterization, and its applications. Carbohydr. Res. 2012, 358, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cao, W.J.; Yuan, H.S. Immobilization and dye degradation of laccase from Lenzites betulina. Mycosystema 2016, 35, 343–354. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhou, Z.D.; Li, G.Y.; Li, Y.J. Immobilization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae alcohol dehydrogenase on hybrid alginate-chitosan beads. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2010, 47, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Du, F.; Zhu, M.; Wang, H.; Ng, T. Purification and characterization of an alpha-galactosidase from Phaseolus coccineus seeds showing degrading capability on raffinose family oligosaccharides. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 69, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hammond, J.B.W.; Kruger, N.J. The Bradford Method for Protein Quantitation. In New Protein Techniques; Walker, J.M., Ed.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 1988; pp. 25–32. [Google Scholar]
  28. Boudrant, J.; Woodley, J.M.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Parameters necessary to define an immobilized enzyme preparation. Process Biochem. 2020, 90, 66–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Miller, G.L. Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugar. Anal. Chem. 1959, 31, 426–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Thippeswamy, S.; Mulimani, V.H. Enzymic degradation of raffinose family oligosaccharides in soymilk by immobilized α-galactosidase from Gibberella fujikuroi. Process Biochem. 2002, 38, 635–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, H.; Shi, P.; Luo, H.; Huang, H.; Yang, P.; Yao, B. A thermophilic alpha-galactosidase from Neosartorya fischeri P1 with high specific activity, broad substrate specificity and significant hydrolysis ability of soymilk. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 153, 361–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xu, L.; Chen, B.; Geng, X.; Feng, C.; Meng, J.; Chang, M. A protease-resistant alpha-galactosidase characterized by relatively acid pH tolerance from the Shitake Mushroom Lentinula edodes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 128, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shin, Y.J.; Woo, S.H.; Jeong, H.M.; Kim, J.S.; Ko, D.S.; Jeong, D.W.; Lee, J.H.; Shim, J.H. Characterization of novel alpha-galactosidase in glycohydrolase family 97 from Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and its immobilization for industrial application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 152, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bayraktar, H.; Serilmez, M.; Karkas, T.; Celem, E.B.; Onal, S. Immobilization and stabilization of alpha-galactosidase on Sepabeads EC-EA and EC-HA. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 49, 855–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sakharayapatna Ranganatha, K.; Venugopal, A.; Chinthapalli, D.K.; Subramanyam, R.; Nadimpalli, S.K. Purification, biochemical and biophysical characterization of an acidic alpha-galactosidase from the seeds of Annona squamosa (custard apple). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 175, 558–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Huang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Ben, P.; Duan, Y.; Lu, M.; Li, Z.; Cui, Z. Characterization of a novel GH36 alpha-galactosidase from Bacillus megaterium and its application in degradation of raffinose family oligosaccharides. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 108, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Mutra, R.; Joseph, J.E.; Panwar, D.; Kaira, G.S.; Kapoor, M. Low molecular weight alpha-galactosidase from black gram (Vigna mungo): Purification and insights towards biochemical and biophysical properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 119, 770–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Morales-Quintana, L.; Faundez, C.; Herrera, R.; Zavaleta, V.; Ravanal, M.C.; Eyzaguirre, J.; Moya-Leon, M.A. Biochemical and structural characterization of Penicillium purpurogenum alpha-D galactosidase: Binding of galactose to an alternative pocket may explain enzyme inhibition. Carbohydr. Res. 2017, 448, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bayraktar, H.; Onal, S. Cross-linked alpha-galactosidase aggregates: Optimization, characterization and application in the hydrolysis of raffinose-type oligosaccharides in soymilk. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 4748–4760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sampietro, D.; Quiroga, E.; Sgariglia, M.; Soberón, J.; Vattuone, M.A. A thermostable α-galactosidase from Lenzites elegans (Spreng.) ex Pat. MB445947: Purification and properties. Anton. Leeuw. 2012, 102, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Similä, J.; Gernig, A.; Murray, P.; Fernandes, S.; Tuohy, M.G. Cloning and expression of a thermostable α-galactosidase from the thermophilic fungus Talaromyces emersonii in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 20, 1653–1663. [Google Scholar]
  42. Fialho Lda, S.; Guimaraes, V.M.; Callegari, C.M.; Reis, A.P.; Barbosa, D.S.; Borges, E.E.; Moreira, M.A.; de Rezende, S.T. Characterization and biotechnological application of an acid alpha-galactosidase from Tachigali multijuga Benth. seeds. Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 2579–2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Y.; Yang, S.; Yan, Q.; Liu, J.; Jiang, Z. High-level expression of a novel protease-resistant α-galactosidase from Thielavia terrestris. Process Biochem. 2018, 71, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, Z.; Yan, Q.; Jiang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y. High-level expression of a novel α-galactosidase gene from Rhizomucor miehei in Pichia pastoris and characterization of the recombinant enyzme. Protein Expres. Purifi. 2015, 110, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, Y.; Yan, Q.; Guan, L.; Jiang, Z.; Yang, S. Biochemical characterization of a novel protease-resistant α-galactosidase from Paecilomyces thermophila suitable for raffinose family oligosaccharides degradation. Process Biochem. 2020, 94, 370–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, J.; Yang, X.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Piao, X.; Cao, Y. Characterization of a protease-resistant alpha-galactosidase from Aspergillus oryzae YZ1 and its application in hydrolysis of raffinose family oligosaccharides from soymilk. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 158, 708–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sripuan, T.; Aoki, K.; Yamamoto, K.; Tongkao, D.; Kumagai, H. Purification and characterization of thermostable α-galactosidase from Ganoderma lucidum. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2003, 67, 1485–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Su, R.; Shi, P.; Zhu, M.; Hong, F.; Li, D. Studies on the properties of graphene oxide-alkaline protease bio-composites. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 115, 136–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ortega, N.; Perez-Mateos, M.; Pilar, M.C.; Busto, M.D. Neutrase Immobilization on Alginate−Glutaraldehyde Beads by Covalent Attachment. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ferreira, J.G.; Reis, A.P.; Guimarães, V.M.; Falkoski, D.L.; da Silva Fialho, L.; de Rezende, S.T. Purification and Characterization of Aspergillus terreus α-Galactosidases and Their Use for Hydrolysis of Soymilk Oligosaccharides. Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 2011, 164, 1111–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Elution profile of ORG on a (a) DEAE-Sepharose column, (b) CM-Sepharose column, (c) Q-Sepharose column, and (d) Superdex75 10/300 GL column. ORG represents purified Oudemansiella radicata α-galactosidase.
Figure 1. Elution profile of ORG on a (a) DEAE-Sepharose column, (b) CM-Sepharose column, (c) Q-Sepharose column, and (d) Superdex75 10/300 GL column. ORG represents purified Oudemansiella radicata α-galactosidase.
Foods 11 03091 g001
Figure 2. The ORG as visualized by SDS-PAGE. Protein concentrations were approximately 1 mg/mL. ORG represents purified Oudemansiella radicata α-galactosidase.
Figure 2. The ORG as visualized by SDS-PAGE. Protein concentrations were approximately 1 mg/mL. ORG represents purified Oudemansiella radicata α-galactosidase.
Foods 11 03091 g002
Figure 3. Relative activity of ORG (■) and iORG (●) with respect to pH and temperature. (a): Effects of pH on ORG and iORG; (b): pH stability of ORG and iORG; (c): effects of temperature on ORG and iORG; (d): thermal stability of ORG and iORG; (e): time-dependent thermal stability at 50 °C; (f): time-dependent thermal stability at 60 °C. The results represent the mean ± SD (n = 3). iORG represents the immobilized enzyme obtained by immobilizing α-galactosidase isolated and purified from Oudemansiella radicata.
Figure 3. Relative activity of ORG (■) and iORG (●) with respect to pH and temperature. (a): Effects of pH on ORG and iORG; (b): pH stability of ORG and iORG; (c): effects of temperature on ORG and iORG; (d): thermal stability of ORG and iORG; (e): time-dependent thermal stability at 50 °C; (f): time-dependent thermal stability at 60 °C. The results represent the mean ± SD (n = 3). iORG represents the immobilized enzyme obtained by immobilizing α-galactosidase isolated and purified from Oudemansiella radicata.
Foods 11 03091 g003
Figure 4. Effect of side modification reagents on the activity of ORG: (a) DTT, (b) NBS, (c) PMSF, (d) DIC, (e) DEPC. In each figure, “0 mM” indicates control. “*” represents significant difference in activity in comparison to control (p < 0.05, Student’s t-test).
Figure 4. Effect of side modification reagents on the activity of ORG: (a) DTT, (b) NBS, (c) PMSF, (d) DIC, (e) DEPC. In each figure, “0 mM” indicates control. “*” represents significant difference in activity in comparison to control (p < 0.05, Student’s t-test).
Foods 11 03091 g004
Figure 5. The resistance of ORG to various proteases. Result represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance is indicated by different letters in columns as assessed by two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j) indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. The resistance of ORG to various proteases. Result represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance is indicated by different letters in columns as assessed by two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j) indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Foods 11 03091 g005
Figure 6. Inhibition kinetics assays of ORG. Lineweaver–Burk plot for determining the inhibition mode of (a) melibiose (0–10 mM) and (b) galactose (0–20 mM); Dixon plot for determination of inhibition constant Ki of melibiose (c) and galactose (d) at different pNPG concentrations (1.5–3 mM).
Figure 6. Inhibition kinetics assays of ORG. Lineweaver–Burk plot for determining the inhibition mode of (a) melibiose (0–10 mM) and (b) galactose (0–20 mM); Dixon plot for determination of inhibition constant Ki of melibiose (c) and galactose (d) at different pNPG concentrations (1.5–3 mM).
Foods 11 03091 g006
Figure 7. (a): The released reducing sugar content from RFOs after treatment with ORG; (b): TLC analysis of hydrolysis products of raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFOs) after treatment with ORG. Lane S, a mixture of galactose, raffinose and stachyose. Control (0 h) indicates without ORG treatment.
Figure 7. (a): The released reducing sugar content from RFOs after treatment with ORG; (b): TLC analysis of hydrolysis products of raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFOs) after treatment with ORG. Lane S, a mixture of galactose, raffinose and stachyose. Control (0 h) indicates without ORG treatment.
Foods 11 03091 g007
Figure 8. Storage stability of ORG and iORG at 4 °C (a) and room temperature (b); reusability of iORG (c).
Figure 8. Storage stability of ORG and iORG at 4 °C (a) and room temperature (b); reusability of iORG (c).
Foods 11 03091 g008
Figure 9. (a): The released reducing sugar content from soymilk by varied enzyme dosage of ORG and iORG after 5 h of incubation at 50 °C; (b): the released reducing sugar content from soymilk at different incubation times after treatment with ORG or iORG; (c): TLC analysis of hydrolysis products from soymilk after treatment with iORG. Lane S, a mixture of galactose, raffinose, and stachyose. Control (0 h) indicates without ORG or iORG treatment.
Figure 9. (a): The released reducing sugar content from soymilk by varied enzyme dosage of ORG and iORG after 5 h of incubation at 50 °C; (b): the released reducing sugar content from soymilk at different incubation times after treatment with ORG or iORG; (c): TLC analysis of hydrolysis products from soymilk after treatment with iORG. Lane S, a mixture of galactose, raffinose, and stachyose. Control (0 h) indicates without ORG or iORG treatment.
Foods 11 03091 g009
Table 1. The purification efficiency of α-galactosidase from Oudemansiella radicata.
Table 1. The purification efficiency of α-galactosidase from Oudemansiella radicata.
Purification StepProtein (mg)Total Activity (U)Specific Activity (U/mg)Recovery a (%)Purification Fold
Crude enzyme19,868.33 ± 50.111788.15 ± 2.000.09 ± 0.00100 ± 0.201 ± 0.00
D3194.31 ± 1.24409.99 ± 2.372.11 ± 0.0222.9 ± 0.3023.44 ± 0.35
C17.36 ± 0.75219.29 ± 1.7629.8 ± 0.4512.26 ± 0.11331.12 ± 2.13
Q23.59 ± 0.05147.6 ± 1.4041.15 ± 0.850.08 ± 0.00457.22 ± 15.93
F12.41 ± 0.02123. 38 ± 1.0655.06 ± 1.260.07 ± 0.00611.78 ± 14.01
F1-10.27 ± 0.0168.44 ± 1.10170.47 ± 1.810.04 ± 0.001894.11 ± 20.12
a Recovery is the ratio of the total activity of the enzyme after a purification step to the total activity before the purification step. D3, C1, Q2, F1, and F1-1 indicate the active fragment in the DEAE-, CM-, Q-Sepharose, Superdex75 columns, and Superdex75 columns, respectively.
Table 2. Sequence alignment of ORG with other α-galactosidases.
Table 2. Sequence alignment of ORG with other α-galactosidases.
NumberDescriptionProtein SequenceIdentityAccession
1α-galactosidase [Fistulina hepatica ATCC 64428] GH27265 SPLLIGTDLSR 275100%KIY47914.1
2α-galactosidase [Crucibulum laeve] GH27333 DQKHTAVMYLNFNER 347100%TFK41875.1
3α-galactosidase [Cylindrobasidium torrendii FP15055 ss-10] GH27227 MSNAIKDLAK 236 100%KIY65758.1
4α-galactosidase [Hypholoma sublateritium FD-334 SS-4] GH27165 EGEVGRYQR 173100%KJA21426.1
5α-galactosidase [Moniliophthora roreri MCA 2997] GH27164 IHQLGLK 170100%ESK96753.1
6α-galactosidase [Hebeloma cylindrosporum h7] GH27316 NDLDMLEIGHSKLTYDEQK 334100%KIM37201.1
7α-galactosidase [Dendrothele bispora (strain CBS 962.96)] GH27434 DLWTHTDNGTAVR 446100%THU90266.1
8α-galactosidase [Amanita muscaria Koide BX008] GH27155 YDNCAIPFDDVIR 167100%KIL60293.1
9α-galactosidase [Armillaria solidipes] GH2799 QRNSDGNIVENAK 111100%PBK67780.1
10α-galactosidase [Pleurotus ostreatus PC15] GH27363 QYAMRDLWTHTDNGTAVR 380100%KDQ32138.1
11alpha-galactosidase [Laccaria bicolor (strain S238N-H82/ATCC MYA-4686)] GH2796 QTFPSGMNSLTNK 108100%XP_001881346.1
12α-galactosidase [Armillaria gallica] GH27102 FPSGMRSLTDHIHGLR 117100%PBL00348.1
13α-galactosidase A [Schizophyllum commune (strain H4-8/FGSC 9210)] GH2716 EKEVAYGSSTPR 27100%XP_003038638.1
14α-galactosidase [Gymnopus androsaceus JB14] GH27252 NGGFTFDESK 261100%KAE9385869.1
15putative alpha-galactosidase B [Termitomyces sp.]149 YDNCAVPFDSIIK 161100%KNZ77552.1
Table 3. The effects of metal ions on ORG.
Table 3. The effects of metal ions on ORG.
Metal IonRelative Activity (%) (mean ± SD, n = 3)
1.25 mM2.5 mM5 mM10 mM
Ca2+93.7 ± 1.39 bcd97.4 ± 2.62 abc103.8 ± 3.81 ab109.1 ± 3.99 bc
Mg2+85.5 ± 5.56 d90.8 ± 4.41 bcde101.9 ± 1.47 cd108.8 ± 4.58 bc
Cu2+70.1 ± 5.06 e65.6 ± 2.83 h68.1 ± 3.41 g74.2 ± 5.36 e
Zn2+71.1 ± 0.57 e81.2 ± 3.31 fg89.2 ± 1.01 ef92.7 ± 1.31 d
Cr2+109 ± 3.2 a88.8 ± 5.84 cdef78.7 ± 1.3 d72.3 ± 3.06 e
Fe2+76.4 ± 8.01 e84.6 ± 4.20 fgh94.7 ± 2.31 de95.8 ± 1.60 d
Mn2+88.8 ± 3.71 cd69.2 ± 3.22 h64.5 ± 3.23 g29.3 ± 1.58 g
K+72.7 ± 7.91 e89.3 ± 2.44 cdef101.9 ± 3.61 cd113.0 ± 0.76 ab
Ba2+97.1 ± 5.11 bc95.7 ± 4.00 abcd94.0 ± 0.46 bc94.8 ± 5.27 d
Pb2+89.7 ± 7.54 cd84.8 ± 1.84 fg77.3 ± 4.62 de62.3 ± 1.35 f
Cd2+99.8 ± 4.85 b77.8 ± 6.25 g74.9 ± 3.40 f74.1 ± 1.99 e
Hg2+2.53 ± 0.83f1.2 ± 0.71 j1.8 ± 1.4 i2.76 ± 0.08 h
Fe3+77.6 ± 6.15 e42.7 ± 4.73 i34.8 ± 1.78 h27.6 ± 1.78 g
Ag+1.02 ± 1.45 f1.53 ± 0.31 j1.02 ± 0.54 i2.48 ± 1.57 h
Al3+99.6 ± 3.39 b102.9 ± 0.62 a100.2 ± 2.31 a115.7 ± 1.00 a
Li+101.7 ± 1.38 ab87.4 ± 4.14 efg79.3 ± 3.16 de76.3 ± 1.68 e
Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j) indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Effects of chemical reagents on the activity of ORG.
Table 4. Effects of chemical reagents on the activity of ORG.
Chemical ReagentsRelative Activity (%) (Mean ± SD, n = 3)
100 mM10 mM1 mM
Melibiose44.40 ± 2.38 h79.23 ± 3.12 f102.16 ± 1.44 cd
Sucrose96.87 ± 3.44 d103.22 ± 2.14 d106.84 ± 2.20 bc
Lactose94.60 ± 1.21 d105.84 ± 1.24 cd99.12 ± 1.56 d
Glucose118.67 ± 2.77 a110.92 ± 1.26 bc110.36 ± 1.82 ab
Galactose32.74 ± 3.94 i89.85 ± 1.31 e103.00 ± 2.99 cd
Xylose96.78 ± 1.65 d112.65 ± 2.09 bc110.80 ± 0.52 ab
Maltose82.46 ± 3.86 e77.21 ± 1.38 f74.15 ± 2.73 e
NaCl116.31 ± 2.89 a118.00 ± 1.23 a113.04 ± 3.45 a
(NH4)2SO4106.16 ± 1.53 b109.14 ± 3.00 c106.12 ± 4.10 bc
NaAc76.49 ± 1.09 f106.82 ± 1.51 cd103.48 ± 3.79 cd
EDTA101.94 ± 2.42 c114.30 ± 1.00 b99.16 ± 1.91 d
SDS53.67 ± 1.47 g89.57 ± 0.98 e106.32 ± 2.46 bc
Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i) indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Substrate specificity of ORG.
Table 5. Substrate specificity of ORG.
SubstrateConcentrationRelative Activity (%)
4-Nitrophenyl α-D-galactopyranoside (pNPG)10 mM100.00 ± 0.00 a
4-Nitrophenyl β-D-galactopyranoside (oNPG)10 mM0.51 ± 0.01 gh
4-Nitrophenyl α-D-glucuronide10 mM0.48 ± 0.03 gh
4-Nitrophenyl β-D-glucuronide10 mM0.46 ± 0.01 gh
Sucrose
Lactose
100 mM0.20 ± 0.01 h
Lactose100 mM1.10 ± 0.15 ef
Melibiose100 mM0.80 ± 0.02 efg
Maltose100 mM25.08 ± 0.46 b
Raffinose100 mM20.33 ± 0.75 c
Stachyose100 mM17.53 ± 0.43 d
Guar gum1%1.27 ± 0.10 e
Locust bean gum1%0.68 ± 0.04 fgh
Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h) indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Table 6. Comparison of the kinetic constants, and soymilk RFOs degradation effect of different sources’ α-galactosidase.
Table 6. Comparison of the kinetic constants, and soymilk RFOs degradation effect of different sources’ α-galactosidase.
EnzymeSourcepNPGRaffinoseStachyoseDegradation Effect of RFOs in Soymilk
Km (mM)Kcat/Km (mM−1s−1)Km (mM)Kcat/Km (mM−1s−1)Km (mM)Kcat/Km (mM−1s−1)
ORG aOudemansiella radicata0.5860.6216.527.7819.036.42completely hydrolyzed at 50 °C within 5 h
iORG aOudemansiella radicata1.1335.1318.167.8320.036.88completely hydrolyzed at 50 °C within 3 h
rILgalA [7]Irpex lacteus1.219005.31304.1180completely hydrolyzed at 60 °C in 30 min (2.7 U/mL)
HEG [14]Hericium erinaceus0.3691.3940.073.154.712.15NF
LEGI [32]Lentinula edodes1.0813.4917.241.2313.83.18NF
Bt_3294 [33]Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron2.212.832.20.626.90.0298.9% hydrolyzed at 40 °C for 10 h
AgaB [36]Bacillus megaterium0.4261016.971.6925.430.67completely hydrolyzed at 37 °C for 4 h
VM-αGal [37]black gram seeds0.990.41317.230.0026NFNFstachyose and raffinose were hydrolyzed by 26.5% and 18.45% at 40 °C for 2 h, respectively
PtGal36A [45]Paecilomyces thermophila0.461.8710.813.868.060.07completely (>95%) degraded for 6, 4, and 2 h by 1, 2, and 5 U/mL enzyme dose (soybean meal)
PCGI [9]Pleurotus citrinopileatus0.21140.31 b18.9122.99 b16.719.25 bNF
GalC [46]Aspergillus oryzae YZ12.16112.5b4.6312.45 b8.545.28 bDegradation rates (5, 10, and 15 U/mL) were 87.1%, 88.0%, and 97.8% for 3 h
a indicates that it is the research object of this paper; b The data indicates to use Vmax/Km (min−1) to describe the catalytic efficiency.
Table 7. Comparison of the enzymatic properties of ORG and other fungi sources’ α-galactosidases.
Table 7. Comparison of the enzymatic properties of ORG and other fungi sources’ α-galactosidases.
α-GalactosidasesFungiOptimal pHOptimum Temperature (°C)pH StabilityHeat Stability (°C)Molecular Weight (kDa)GH FamilyReference
Some natural mushroom sources of α-galactosidasesOudemansiella radicata3502.0–4.057.75%, 60 °C for 1 h74NFthis study
Pleurotus citrinopileatus4.4504.0–7.0Stable at 40 °C or below60GH 27[9]
Leucopaxillus tricolor5503.0–5.0Completely loss, 60 °C for 1 h60NF[10]
Coriolus versicolor3602.0–5.080%, 50 °C for 30 min40NF[11]
Tremella aurantialba5542.0–5.030.8%, 70 °C for 1 h88NF[12]
Termitomyces eurrhizus5602.0–6.0Stable at 50 °C and 60 °C 72NF[13]
Hericium erinaceus6602.2–7.0Over 50%, 50 °C for 2 h57GH 27[14]
Tricholoma matsutake4.555NFCompletely loss, 50 °C for 30 min47GH 27[15]
Pleurotus djamor553.53.0–10.0Over 68%, 50 °C for 1 h60NF[16]
Agaricus bisporus4602.0–9.010%, 50 °C for 40 min45GH 27[17]
Lentinula edodes5604.0–6.0Stable at 40 °C or below64GH 27[32]
Lenzites elegans4.570~803–7.5Retained 94% activity after 2 h at 60 °C158GH 36[40]
Ganoderma Lucidum6705.0–7.0Stable at 70 °C or below249NF[47]
Some recombinant α-galactosidasesIrpex lacteus4.8703.0–11.090% after 10 h at 60 °C64GH 27[7]
Penicillium Purpurogenum4.5554.0–6.0Stable below 40 °C67GH27[38]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Geng, X.; Lei, J.; Bau, T.; Guo, D.; Chang, M.; Feng, C.; Xu, L.; Cheng, Y.; Zuo, N.; Meng, J. Purification, Characterization, and Immobilization of a Novel Protease-Resistant α-Galactosidase from Oudemansiella radicata and Its Application in Degradation of Raffinose Family Oligosaccharides from Soymilk. Foods 2022, 11, 3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11193091

AMA Style

Geng X, Lei J, Bau T, Guo D, Chang M, Feng C, Xu L, Cheng Y, Zuo N, Meng J. Purification, Characterization, and Immobilization of a Novel Protease-Resistant α-Galactosidase from Oudemansiella radicata and Its Application in Degradation of Raffinose Family Oligosaccharides from Soymilk. Foods. 2022; 11(19):3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11193091

Chicago/Turabian Style

Geng, Xueran, Jiayu Lei, Tergun Bau, Dongdong Guo, Mingchang Chang, Cuiping Feng, Lijing Xu, Yanfen Cheng, Ningke Zuo, and Junlong Meng. 2022. "Purification, Characterization, and Immobilization of a Novel Protease-Resistant α-Galactosidase from Oudemansiella radicata and Its Application in Degradation of Raffinose Family Oligosaccharides from Soymilk" Foods 11, no. 19: 3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11193091

APA Style

Geng, X., Lei, J., Bau, T., Guo, D., Chang, M., Feng, C., Xu, L., Cheng, Y., Zuo, N., & Meng, J. (2022). Purification, Characterization, and Immobilization of a Novel Protease-Resistant α-Galactosidase from Oudemansiella radicata and Its Application in Degradation of Raffinose Family Oligosaccharides from Soymilk. Foods, 11(19), 3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11193091

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop