Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Marinating on Fatty Acid Composition of Sous-Vide Semimembranosus Muscle from Holstein-Friesian Bulls
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Differentiated Relative Humidity of Air on the Quality of Traditional Speciality Guaranteed “Krakowska Sucha Staropolska” Sausage
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamics Changes of Microorganisms Community and Fermentation Quality in Soybean Meal Prepared with Lactic Acid Bacteria and Artemisia argyi through Fermentation and Aerobic Exposure Processes
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Risk of Salt Reduction in Dry-Cured Sausage Assessed by the Influence on Water Activity and the Survival of Salmonella
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/foods11060796
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nitrite-Free Implications on Consumer Acceptance and the Behavior of Pathogens in Cured Pork Loins

by
Luis Patarata
1,*,
Filipa Carvalho
1 and
Maria João Fraqueza
2
1
CECAV, Animal and Veterinary Research Center, Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Sciences (AL4AnimalS), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal
2
CIISA, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Sciences (AL4AnimalS), University of Lisbon, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(6), 796; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11060796
Submission received: 10 December 2021 / Revised: 26 February 2022 / Accepted: 1 March 2022 / Published: 10 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quality and Safety of Meat and Meat Products)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cured pork loins are valued products due to their particular sensory characteristics. These products are usually prepared with nitrite to guarantee adequate color and pathogen control. The use of nitrite in meat products has been criticized due to its potential contribution to carcinogenic N-nitroso-compound formation. The present work aimed to evaluate the effect of eliminating nitrite from the manufacturing of cured loins made with wine- and water-based marinades on the color evaluation of consumers and on the behavior of Clostridium sporogenes, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella. The use of nitrite in processing cured loins resulted in a color considered adequate by more than 50% of the consumers. When nitrite was not used, the color was described mainly as weak. The hedonic evaluation of cured loins did not reflect the color evaluation. The samples with a weak and an adequate color had similar hedonic evaluations. The present work did not allow us to infer the potential interest in injecting S. xylosus into meat to prepare cured loins. The use of nitrite did not affect the survival of Cl. sporogenes, L. monocytogenes, or Salmonella. The reduction in the aw was the primary determinant influencing pathogen survival. The production of nitrite-free cured loins seems possible once the control of pathogens can be achieved. However, the product will have a weaker color. Consumers appreciate sensory aspects other than color, which, combined with the positive impact of the “additive-free” claim, can support the possibility of producing cured loins without nitrite.

1. Introduction

The use of nitrite as a food additive in meat products has been a common practice since the middle of the last century. Its use is justified mainly by its, until now, irreplaceable action on stabilizing the typical color of cured meat products and controlling biological hazards, particularly Clostridium botulinum. It is also an antioxidant and is involved in flavor formation [1]. The regulations on its use have evolved according to scientific knowledge on its benefits and potential health risks. In 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) disclosed a report revealing the trends found in a meta-analysis of the relationship between the consumption of processed meats and the occurrence of colon cancer [2]. That association was found to be clearly demonstrated—that is why processed meats have been classified as Group I risk factors, with a mean odds ratio of 1.18, indicating an increase of 18% in the probability of having colon cancer for processed-meat consumers, when compared with the risk of non-consumers [3]. The N-nitro compounds formed after the reaction of nitrite with amines that eventually become present in the product and the presence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in smoked products are the main hazards linked to the carcinogenic risk of processed meats [4]. Considering the established relationship and the relative risk—which is not exceptionally high—there has been a trend to reduce nitrite in meat products [5,6,7]. This trend is warrantable, since nitrite-cured meat products might be unsafe for consumers’ health due to the presence of potential chemical hazards. However, the opposite is true: the absence of nitrite might also be potentially harmful for different reasons, mainly due to the potential presence of biological hazards, namely Cl. botulinum and L. monocytogenes [8,9].
When reducing or eliminating nitrite from meat products during manufacture, alternative measures should be considered to guarantee the strategy’s efficacy. The effect of nitrite on meat products’ sensory attributes is mainly related to the stabilization of color due to the formation of nitrosylmyoglobin by the bond of nitric oxide with the iron of that hemoprotein. The characteristic color of this pigment is stable during the manufacture and shelf life of the product [10]. Nitrite also contributes to the aroma by its antioxidant action and participation in forming several aromatic compounds [11,12]. The phenomena underlying the curing of nitrite-free meat products have been researched in the last years, and several clues are indicating the importance of the formation of zinc-protoporphyrin in long-cured products, such as cured hams or cured loins, resulting in products with a color similar to that obtained by using nitrite [13,14,15]. Another strategy to obtain cured meat products with an adequate color is to favor the microbial production of nitric oxide by bacteria equipped with NO synthase (NOS), such as several coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS) strains used in meat products. In conventional use, nitrite is reduced to NO, the chemical molecule of interest for the formation of nitrosylmyoglobin and one of the more important for inhibiting pathogens. When CNS with NOS activity is involved, the NO produced can bind the myoglobin to form the cured pigment without adding nitrite to the product [16,17]. The aroma of cured meat products is due to a certain level of lipid oxidation and the microbial catabolism of amino acids [18,19,20]. The aroma is also highly determined by the seasonings used, particularly by smoke, if this operation is used [21,22].
From the safety point of view, it is necessary to consider the time necessary to achieve a safe water activity (aw) that does not allow pathogen growth or toxinogenesis. The minimum aw needed to inhibit the Cl. botulinum toxinogenesis is around 0.95 [23,24]. In cured sausages, particularly those with a smaller caliber, it can be achieved in the first days of drying [25,26]. The inhibition of other pathogens, namely the Gram-negative bacteria, might also be achieved at these levels of drying [6,27,28], and the main concern is mainly associated with the potential growth of Listeria monocytogenes [27,29,30] and the eventual production of enterotoxins by Staphylococcus aureus [31].
Cured loins are meat products included in the vast tradition of dry-cured meat products made in the Mediterranean region and elsewhere. The recipes vary between regions in line with the local gastronomic traditions [5,32,33,34,35]. It is common, in wine-producing regions, to season the meat with wine, both for cooking and dry-cured sausage production [36,37]. In the Portuguese Douro region, with a long wine-making tradition, the preparation of cured loins includes cutting the pork loins transversally to the muscles’ orientation (300–500 g each piece), then seasoning them in a marinade composed of red wine, pure or diluted with water, salt, garlic, and bay leaves. The meat is maintained in the marinade for 2 to 7 days at low temperatures. The meat is filled into pork gut, tied, smoked, and dried for 2 to 4 weeks until it reaches a safe aw [38]. When their industrial production includes nitrite, the meat is salted with a mixture of salt and nitrite for 24 h before the marinade. The practice of marinating in wine to produce dry-cured sausages results in a characteristic winy flavor and a red-burgundy color when the wine is red [39,40]. Additionally, due to its composition of ethanol, organic acids, and phenolic compounds, it is expected that the wine marination procedure will reduce microbial growth on the meat [41,42,43,44]. Whole pieces of meat are usually used, and they can be marinated at low temperatures for several days. This acidic environment might also regulate the microbiota in the cured loins, as it favors the competition of the acidophilic lactic acid bacteria (BAL) while inhibiting several pathogens that may be present [45,46].
The present work aimed to evaluate the effect of eliminating nitrite from the manufacturing of cured loins made with wine-based and water-based marinades on the color and the behavior of Clostridium sporogenes, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design

The experiment comprised two independent parts. In the first part, we prepared cured loins for sensory evaluation. In the second, we prepared a challenge test to independently evaluate the three pathogens’ behavior. Each part of the experiment included three batches prepared with meat from three different suppliers.

2.2. Microorganisms and Culture Conditions

The Staphylococcus xylosus used to test its potential to redden the cured loins was previously isolated and identified from the natural microbiota of nitrite-free cured loins made by small producers in a mountain region [47]. For the microbial challenge test, we used Cl. sporogenes DSM 767, L. monocytogenes ATCC 35152, and Salmonella ATCC 49214. Cl. sporogenes was used as a surrogate for Cl. botulinum [48]. For L. monocytogenes and Salmonella, a mixture was prepared of the collected strain and two wild strains isolated from meat products. Pure cultures of the L. monocytogenes or Salmonella strains were combined for the inoculation. The cultures were prepared according to the process described in the reference [37].

2.3. Sensory Analysis Experiment

2.3.1. Preparation of Cured Loins for Sensory Evaluation

Pork loins were cut transversely into portions of around 350 g each. The meat was divided into three groups: (1) salted with 2% salt, (2) salted with 2% salt and 150 mg/kg of sodium nitrite (included at 5% in salt, Formulab, Portugal), and (3) previously injected with 20 mL of a suspension of an indigenous S. xylosus (around 6 log CFU/mL) and salted with 2% of salt. The meat without S. xylosus was injected with 20 mL of water. The meat rested at 4 °C for 24 h. Each group was further divided into two: one portion to be marinated in a mixture of 50% red wine from the region, 50% water, 1% fresh chopped garlic, and 0.5% dried bay leaf; in the other part, the wine was replaced by water (Table 1). The ratio of meat to the marinade mixture was approximately 1:1 (w/v).
The loin pieces were filled into collagen casing (Fibraco, Poland) and smoked (<35 °C) in a chamber with an electric smoke generator using beechwood chips for 8 h. The drying phase was performed over 30 days in a climatic chamber at 15 ± 2 °C with an initial relative humidity (RH) of 95% and consecutive reduction to maintain the RH at 5% below the aw. Samples were then vacuum-packaged until the sensory analysis, which occurred within 2 weeks.

2.3.2. Sensory Analysis

In-person test with cured loin samples. A consumer test was performed with 104 volunteers recruited from the personal and professional contacts of the authors. The test included a hedonic evaluation, yes/no purchase intentions, and a Just About Right (JAR) scale. The hedonic evaluation was conducted on a 9-point scale (1—strongly dislike, 9—strongly appreciate) to answer the question, “How would you classify the cured loin we tested?” The 5-point JAR scale was used to evaluate the adequacy of the color, ranging across much too weak (−2), weak (−1), ideal (0), strong (+1), and much too strong (+2). The evaluations below and above the ideal were condensed into a single class—weak or strong [49]. The samples from the three batches were combined, and each consumer only tested one sample from each treatment/batch. Each batch was randomly distributed across the consumers (a total of 6 samples per consumer). The consumers were 66% women, aged between 19 and 66 years old, and were usually consumers of cured meat products (81%).
Online test with cured loin images. This test was performed to evaluate the effect of information on the presence of nitrite on the preference for cured loins based on color adequacy. This test was performed only with samples from two experimental conditions, with or without nitrite, made with wine-based marinades. Cured loins were cut transversally and photographed (Figure 1) in standardized condition, as defined in [50].
An online test was made using the web platform GoogleForms. In the first part, two images were presented to the consumer, who asked, “Which of the cured loins has a more characteristic color?” In the second part, the samples were identified with the phrase “Cured Loin 1 has a food additive indicated by the WHO as being carcinogenic; Cured Loin 2 does not have any chemical additives”, and it was asked again which of the two products had a more characteristic color. The respondents (n = 168) of the online test were 74% women, aged between 18 and 62 years old, and were usually consumers of cured meat products (89%).

2.3.3. Instrumental Evaluation of Color

Due to the theoretical instability of the wine pigments, particularly in the presence of nitrite, the instrumental color was measured in cured loins at 8 and 30 days of drying to determine the color’s stability. The L*a*b* color parameters were measured on the surface of the cured loins’ longitudinal section with a Minolta CR 310 chromameter with a standard D65 illuminant. The measuring head of the chromameter (a 50 mm diameter) used a wide area of illumination and a 0° viewing angle. Measurements were taken in triplicate immediately after cutting the samples across the central part of the sample.

2.4. Microbial Challenge Test

2.4.1. Preparation of Cured Loins for the Microbial Challenge Test

For this part of the experiment, the formulations tested were the same as indicated in Table 1, only with some modifications regarding the previous preparation of the meat, as formerly described [33]. After cutting the meat in a safety cabinet with sterile tools, the pieces were exposed to UV light for 15 min on each side and frozen until use. The meat portions were thawed for 48 h at 4 °C. The meat was inoculated with the pathogens in a laminar flow chamber. Each microorganism culture was diluted in 1 L of 0.85% NaCl to obtain a concentration of about 6 log bacteria/mL. The contamination was carried out in three different blocks with the respective microorganisms: Cl. sporogenes, L. monocytogenes, or Salmonella. The meat portions were dipped into the suspension of each microorganism for about 1 min and shaken manually. The pieces of meat were then removed from the suspension and placed on steel net trays with a ~2 cm mesh to drip off the excess suspension. The meat, in polyethylene bags, rested at 4 °C for 18 h and was then rinsed in 0.85% NaCl to withdraw the microorganisms that had not adhered. Preparation of the cured loins was as indicated in Section 2.3.1. Samples were taken for analysis at the filling phase and at 8, 21, and 30 days after smoking. One cured loin was used for each sampling time in each batch for each challenging microorganism.

2.4.2. Activity of Water and pH

Water activity was measured in a Rotronic Hygroscope DT WA-40 (Bassersdorf, Switzerland). The pH was measured directly in the cured loins with a penetration electrode using a pH meter (model MicropH 2002, Crison, Barcelona, Spain).

2.4.3. Microbial Analysis

At the defined sampling times, one cured loin was collected. The casing of the cured loin was aseptically removed, and 10 g of the sample was excised from the outer part of the piece (~0.5 cm from the surface) in different locations of the piece. An initial dilution of 1:10 was prepared in a 0.85% NaCl solution, followed by homogenization for 3 min in a stomacher. When low counts were expected, to increase the detection limit, the initial dilution was prepared at 1:5. Counts of Cl. sporogenes were made after pasteurization (75 °C, 20 min) of the initial dilution. The count was made by incorporating 1 mL in PA3679 medium [51] after 4 days of incubation at 30 °C. L. monocytogenes and Salmonella were counted in CHROMagar media (Paris, France) by spreading 0.1 mL on the surface. When low counts were expected, 0.5 mL was spread in two Petri dishes (0.25 mL each). The first was incubated at 30 °C for 48 h and the second was incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. In the absence of Salmonella growth after 24 h, the dishes were incubated for a further 24 h. Counts of CNS were made in Mannitol Salt Agar (Biokar, France) at 30 °C for 48 h. The results are presented as log CFU/g.

2.5. Data Analysis

The results from the continuous variables—hedonic evaluation and the number of surviving microbes in the microbial challenge test—were compared by ANOVA. The Chi-square test compared the results of consumption intention. The penalty analysis was calculated to evaluate the impact of an evaluation of non-ideal color on the hedonic evaluation. The changes in the evaluation of characteristic color between the anonymous and the identified presentation were tested by the McNemar test. The significance level used was 0.05. Data analysis was conducted using XLStat software (Addinsoft, Paris, France).

3. Results and Discussion

The cured loins presented a mean pH of 5.60 ± 0.20 and an aw of 0.87 ± 0.01. No significant differences (p ≥ 0.05) were observed between the six tested formulations. In non-inoculated cured loins, CNS counts were low: 1.65 ± 1.30 log CFU/g at the filling stage, 0.80 ± 1.20 log CFU/g and 0.82 ± 1.23 log CFU/g after 8 and 21 days of drying, respectively; at 30 days of drying, these bacteria were not detected in non-inoculated samples. In inoculated samples, the counts were 3.93 ± 0.22 log CFU/g at filling and remained between 3.5 and 4.0 log CFU/g until the end of processing. No differences (p = 0.33) were detected between inoculated cured loins marinated in wine-based and water-based marinades (data not shown in the tables or figures).

3.1. Sensory Evaluation

The results of the hedonic evaluation are presented in Table 2. All the samples were classified above the center of the scale (5 in the 9-point scale). The general evaluation between the different formulations was close, with statistical differences found only between the cured loins marinated with water with nitrite, which had the highest score, and the control marinated in water, which had the the lowest. The hedonic evaluations of any other comparisons were similar. The consumption intention followed, as foreseen, the same trend as hedonic evaluation (Table 3).
The JAR results are presented in Figure 2. In the two formulations including nitrite, the color was evaluated as ideal by more than 50% of consumers. The cured loins made with S. xylosus in a water-based marinade were evaluated as having an ideal color by 50% of the consumers. The limit of 50% of consumers evaluating the characteristic as about right is commonly used to determine if a product is ready to be launched in the market, considering that weak or strong characteristics prejudice the hedonic evaluation [52].
As shown in Table 4, the relationship between the JAR evaluation and the hedonic evaluation was established through penalty analysis.
In cured loins made with nitrite and the water-based marinade, there was a penalty associated with weak color of 0.77 units in the nine-point hedonic evaluation. The cured loins made with nitrite and the wine-based marinade had a negative penalty (−0.40) that represented a gain. On average, 26.0% of consumers who evaluated the color as strong gave a hedonic evaluation higher than that found for those considering the color to be about right. The JAR evaluation of color was at or below 50% for all the other formulations. In all of these cases, weak color was the cause of lowering the hedonic evaluation by 0.91 to 1.32 units.
Some results might seem incoherent. For example, for cured loins made with wine-based marinades without nitrite, 56.7% of the consumers considered these products to have a weak color (Figure 2), but the mean hedonic evaluation and the consumption intentions were high. Cured loins made with nitrite and wine-based marinades, despite having a high percentage of consumers (58.9%, Figure 2) considering the color to be adequate, had a low hedonic evaluation and the lowest consumption intentions (53.8%). It is necessary to consider that the penalty analysis compares the mean hedonic scores for the samples classified as having a JAR color and the hedonic scores for the weak and strong groups. It is also necessary to consider that the hedonic evaluation was an open question, allowing the consumer to perform a multifactorial evaluation and not focus only on the color. Ultimately, odor or flavor aspects could have driven the consumers’ evaluation more than the color.
Consumers might be influenced by a perception of the “naturalness” of the food [53]. We asked 164 consumers to indicate, using an online test, between two cured loin images, which one they considered to have a more characteristic color. In the first instance, we presented the images anonymously; in the second moment, they were identified as additive-free or having a carcinogenic chemical additive (Table 5).
A general trend was observed of considering the images of cured loins without nitrite to have a more characteristic color when the cured loins were anonymous (58.5%). This evaluation increased (p < 0.05) to 67.1% when the images were identified. Almost 13% of the consumers changed their evaluation of “more characteristic color” for the nitrite-free cured loin images. The trend observed in this test should not be compared with the results from the hedonic JAR evaluation, as the natural variability among samples and slices in tests made with live consumers did not exist in this online test with images, where the image was always the same. Nonetheless, a potential suggestion effect was observed. Consumers’ choices and general hedonic evaluation depend highly on personal credence cues [54]. Regarding the clean-label issue [55], there have been several studies on trendy aspects of food quality, such as organic and animal welfare [56,57], that have tended to find similar results, which were highly dependent on personal expectations, as the perception is the result of a sensory stimulus and the related cognitive processing [58,59].

3.2. Instrumental Evaluation of Color

The instrumental color of cured loins (Table 6) was influenced by several factors, relating mainly to the nitrite and the stability of wine pigments, and probably by the interaction between both.
The color parameters presented in Table 6 show considerable differences between the tested formulations, after both 8 and 30 d of drying, with different trends in the first and second analysis period. After 8 d of drying, the cured loins made with nitrite had a redder color than any other formulation, both in wine and water-based marinades. These samples also had a more yellow color. Nitrosylmyoglobin has a clear red color, reflected in the a* values [60]. After 30 d of drying, the a* values from cured loins prepared with nitrite in a water-based marinade showed the reddest color (13.05 ± 1.09), but those prepared with wine and nitrite had a lower a* (8.60 ± 0.41). This reduction in a* might be associated with meat pigment modification due to the presence of wine or to the masking effect of wine pigments. In samples with a lower a*, the b* parameter was higher.
Considering the control cured loins and those prepared with nitrite, this suggests that the yellow component of color was driven by the presence of wine, probably derived from the wine pigments [61]. Anthocyanins are the major wine compounds contributing to its characteristic red-purple color, with a minor contribution of tannins [62]. The stability of anthocyanins is highly dependent on pH and the reaction with other phenolic compounds or oxygen, among other factors. When red wine is used to marinate meat, its color might change due to changes in the anthocyanin oxidation status or a reaction with other compounds [61]. The higher pH found in meat and also in the cured loins, compared with the pH of wine, could result in its chemical modification, leading to browner compounds. How nitrite can interact with the wine color is not clear. Anthocyanins are recognized as being able to neutralize reactive radical species by electron or hydrogen atom transference from phenolic groups, resulting in color modification [63,64]. The various reactive species formed during the nitrite reduction, namely peroxynitrite (ONOO−), might also be involved in this complex interaction between nitrite and anthocyanins in cured loins [23,65], resulting in the oxidation of anthocyanins and the associated color change. We believe that these reactions associated with color modification would eventually slow, as the results after 8 d of drying did not suggest these modifications. The use of S. xylosus resulted in slight differences in the color parameters. The a* was similar to that of the control, and the b* had only slight differences. The potential production of nitric oxide by CNS has been tested in culture media and in minced meat [66,67]. The possibility of having microbially produced nitric oxide in a single-piece product such as cured loins does not seem to be effective, mainly because the bacteria fail to grow to high counts, which could reveal its potential.

3.3. Microbial Challenge Tests

The challenge test results for Cl. sporogenes, L. monocytogenes, and Salmonella are presented in Table 7. It was observed that during the 5 days of marination, Clostridium remained at a level similar to that observed after inoculation in the control samples. No effect of using wine in the marinade was observed. Both the presence of nitrite and the competitive S. xylosus resulted in a reduction (p < 0.05) in the microorganism count. The product was smoked and dried for 8 days, which reduced the counts by around two logarithmic units under all the experimental conditions. After 21 days of drying, it was not detected.
The experiments with L. monocytogenes began with a level of contamination of 4.43 ± 0.13 log CFU/g. At the end of 5 days of marination, the counts were nearly 1 log CFU/g lower than after inoculation. The effects of nitrite and wine were not observed at this phase. Only a slight difference (p < 0.05) was detected between the sample with the highest count (the control in the water-based marinade) and the sample inoculated with S. xylosus in the same marinade. Although L. monocytogenes is a psychotropic microorganism [68], it did not multiply during the marination phase, even when the conditions were favorable, such as a lack of nitrite or inoculated competition. This might be due to the initial high salt concentration at the surface until it equilibrated in the product, or a washing effect of the microorganisms might have occurred in the marinade, ultimately due to the ability of these strains, under these conditions, to adhere to the food surface [69]. The effect of smoking and drying on the pathogens’ survival was observed as a reduction in the counts of one to two logarithmic units after 8 days of smoking. In this phase, none of the effects studied was found to affect the survival of L. monocytogenes. The bacteria did not survive during the remaining drying period, as observed by the null counts after 21 days. A residual number of survivals was observed only in one experimental condition: the water-based marinade with S. xylosus.
The trend of Salmonella’s behavior was similar to that observed for L. monocytogenes, with no observable effects of the experimental conditions, but it was strongly influenced by smoking and drying. The counts remained similar to that in the inoculated meat after the marination, confirming the strong attachment ability of Salmonella to meat [70]. After 8 days of drying, the reduction in the counts of Salmonella was two to three logarithmic units. The resilience of Salmonella is patent in its presence after 21 days of drying under certain experimental conditions, but after 30 days of drying, it was not detectable. After 30 days of drying, no counts of any of the challenged microorganisms were observed in any of the experiments.
Cured loins are products made from a whole piece of meat. Once contamination occurs on the pieces’ surface, the preservation barriers are expected to have higher importance on the surface, contrary to cured products made from minced meat [71]. The contact with higher salt content at the beginning of the process, when it had not equilibrated in all the pieces [72], the eventual washing effect produced by the marinade, and the smoke compounds [73] contributed to the low survival of the inoculated microorganisms challenged in the present study. The reduction in aw, which was faster on the surface, also contributed to the lethal effect observed in the present work [25,74].

4. Conclusions

In processing cured loins, nitrite resulted in a color considered to be adequate by more than 50% of the consumers. The use of S. xylosus resulted in a 50% and 48.1% of consumers judging the color to be adequate when water-based or wine-based marinades were used, respectively. In the control samples, the color was considered adequate by less than 40% of the consumers. The hedonic evaluation of cured loins did not reflect the color evaluation, as samples considered to have a weak and an adequate color had similar hedonic evaluations. The results of the present work did not allow us to infer the potential interest in injecting S. xylosus in meat to prepare cured loins. Still, the JAR evaluation had a slightly higher proportion of consumers indicating that its color was adequate. The effect of being labeled as green or additive-free impacted consumers’ perceptions of the cured loins’ color. If consumers were informed about the presence of a potentially harmful additive, they tended to change their evaluation of characteristic color in additive-free products. From the results obtained in the present work, it is possible to infer that nitrite does not affect the survival of Cl. sporogenes (which was used as a surrogate for Cl. botulinum), L. monocytogenes, and Salmonella. The reduction in the aw was the primary determinant of pathogen survival.
The preparation of cured loins without nitrite should consider that the red color will be weaker, and when nitrite and wine are used simultaneously, color modifications can occur. Besides the color, consumers appreciated other sensory aspects. The multifactorial hedonic evaluation, combined with the positive impact of the “additive-free” claim can support the possibility of producing cured loins without nitrite.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.P. and M.J.F.; Data collection and methodology, L.P. and F.C.; Data analysis, L.P. and F.C.; Writing—original draft preparation, L.P.; Writing—review and editing M.J.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Parceria no. 49/Iniciativa no. 77 PDR2020-1.0.1-FEADER-031374 and 031359.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee) of Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (Doc 99-CE-UTAD-2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Acknowledgments

Project UID/CVT/00772/2020 and Project UIDB/CVT/00276/2020 was supported by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT). Maria João Fraqueza is a member of network Red CYTED HEALTHY MEAT (119RT0568). The authors would like to thank Ana Leite for her technical assistance with the laboratory tasks, Mário O. Santos for the photography work, and the consumers who participated in the tests.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fraqueza, M.J.; Laranjo, M.; Elias, M.; Patarata, L. Microbiological hazards associated with salt and nitrite reduction in cured meat products: Control strategies based on antimicrobial effect of natural ingredients and protective microbiota. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 38, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Red Meat and Processed Meat; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 114, ISBN 9789283201809. [Google Scholar]
  3. Molognoni, L.; Daguer, H.; Motta, G.E.; Merlo, T.C.; Lindner, J.D.D. Interactions of preservatives in meat processing: Formation of carcinogenic compounds, analytical methods, and inhibitory agents. Food Res. Int. 2019, 125, 108608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fraqueza, M.J.M.J.; Borges, A.; Patarata, L. Strategies to Reduce the Formation of Carcinogenic Chemicals in Dry Cured Meat Products; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 16, ISBN 9780128114971. [Google Scholar]
  5. Higuero, N.; Moreno, I.; Lavado, G.; Vidal-Aragón, M.C.; Cava, R. Reduction of nitrate and nitrite in Iberian dry cured loins and its effects during drying process. Meat Sci. 2020, 163, 108062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hospital, X.F.; Hierro, E.; Fernández, M. Effect of reducing nitrate and nitrite added to dry fermented sausages on the survival of Salmonella Typhimurium. Food Res. Int. 2014, 62, 410–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Perea-Sanz, L.; López-Díez, J.J.; Belloch, C.; Flores, M. Counteracting the effect of reducing nitrate/nitrite levels on dry fermented sausage aroma by Debaryomyces hansenii inoculation. Meat Sci. 2020, 164, 108103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bernardo, P.; Patarata, L.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Fraqueza, M.J. Nitrate Is Nitrate: The Status Quo of Using Nitrate through Vegetable Extracts in Meat Products. Foods 2021, 10, 3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lebrun, S.; Van Nieuwenhuysen, T.; Crèvecoeur, S.; Vanleyssem, R.; Thimister, J.; Denayer, S.; Jeuge, S.; Daube, G.; Clinquart, A.; Fremaux, B. Influence of reduced levels or suppression of sodium nitrite on the outgrowth and toxinogenesis of psychrotrophic Clostridium botulinum Group II type B in cooked ham. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 334, 108853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Huang, P.; Xu, B.; Shao, X.; Chen, C.; Wang, W.; Li, P. Theoretical basis of nitrosomyoglobin formation in a dry sausage model by coagulase-negative staphylococci: Behavior and expression of nitric oxide synthase. Meat Sci. 2020, 161, 108022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wakamatsu, J.I.; Hayashi, N.; Nishimura, T.; Hattori, A. Nitric oxide inhibits the formation of zinc protoporphyrin IX and protoporphyrin IX. Meat Sci. 2010, 84, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lorenzo, J.M.; González-rodríguez, R.M.; Sánchez, M.; Amado, I.R.; Franco, D. Effects of natural (grape seed and chestnut extract) and synthetic antioxidants (buthylatedhydroxytoluene, BHT) on the physical, chemical, microbiological and sensory characteristics of dry cured sausage “ chorizo”. Food Res. Int. 2013, 54, 611–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Wakamatsu, J.I.; Kawazoe, H.; Ohya, M.; Hayakawa, T.; Kumura, H. Improving the color of meat products without adding nitrite/nitrate using high zinc protoporphyrin IX-forming microorganisms. Meat Sci. 2020, 161, 107989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. De Maere, H.; Chollet, S.; De Brabanter, J.; Michiels, C.; Paelinck, H.; Fraeye, I. Influence of meat source, pH and production time on zinc protoporphyrin IX formation as natural colouring agent in nitrite-free dry fermented sausages. Meat Sci. 2018, 135, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Becker, E.M.; Westermann, S.; Hansson, M.; Skibsted, L.H. Parallel enzymatic and non-enzymatic formation of zinc protoporphyrin IX in pork. Food Chem. 2012, 130, 832–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ras, G.; Leroy, S.; Talon, R. Nitric oxide synthase: What is its potential role in the physiology of staphylococci in meat products? Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 282, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sánchez Mainar, M.; Stavropoulou, D.A.; Leroy, F. Exploring the metabolic heterogeneity of coagulase-negative staphylococci to improve the quality and safety of fermented meats: A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 247, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Viallon, C.; Berdagué, J.L.; Montel, M.C.; Talon, R.; Martin, J.F.; Kondjoyan, N.; Denoyer, C. The effect of stage of ripening and packaging on volatile content and flavour of dry sausage. Food Res. Int. 1996, 29, 667–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Andrade, M.J.; Córdoba, J.J.; Casado, E.M.; Córdoba, M.G.; Rodríguez, M. Effect of selected strains of Debaryomyces hansenii on the volatile compound production of dry fermented sausage “salchichón”. Meat Sci. 2010, 85, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Perea-Sanz, L.; Montero, R.; Belloch, C.; Flores, M. Nitrate reduction in the fermentation process of salt reduced dry sausages: Impact on microbial and physicochemical parameters and aroma profile. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 282, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Šojić, B.; Pavlić, B.; Zeković, Z.; Tomović, V.; Ikonić, P.; Kocić-Tanackov, S.; Džinić, N. The effect of essential oil and extract from sage (Salvia officinalis L.) herbal dust (food industry by-product) on the oxidative and microbiological stability of fresh pork sausages. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 89, 749–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Roseiro, L.C.; Gomes, A.; Patarata, L.; Santos, C. Comparative survey of PAHs incidence in Portuguese traditional meat and blood sausages. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50, 1891–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Majou, D.; Christieans, S. Mechanisms of the bactericidal effects of nitrate and nitrite in cured meats. Meat Sci. 2018, 145, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hospital, X.F.; Hierro, E.; Stringer, S.; Fernández, M. A study on the toxigenesis by Clostridium botulinum in nitrate and nitrite-reduced dry fermented sausages. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 218, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Patarata, L.; Novais, M.; Fraqueza, M.; Silva, J. Influence of Meat Spoilage Microbiota Initial Load on a naturally fermented sausage. Foods 2020, 9, 676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Walz, F.H.; Gibis, M.; Lein, M.; Herrmann, K.; Hinrichs, J.; Weiss, J. Influence of casing material on the formation of efflorescences on dry fermented sausages. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 89, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Christieans, S.; Picgirard, L.; Parafita, E.; Lebert, A.; Gregori, T. Impact of reducing nitrate/nitrite levels on the behavior of Salmonella Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes in French dry fermented sausages. Meat Sci. 2018, 137, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Blanco-Lizarazo, C.M.; Sotelo-Díaz, I.; Arjona-Roman, J.L.; Llorente-Bousquets, A.; Miranda-Ruvalcaba, R. Effect of Starter Culture and Low Concentrations of Sodium Nitrite on Fatty Acids, Color, and Escherichia coli Behavior during Salami Processing. Int. J. Food Sci. 2018, 2018, 5934305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Inguglia, E.S.; Oliveira, M.; Burgess, C.M.; Kerry, J.P.; Tiwari, B.K. Plasma-activated water as an alternative nitrite source for the curing of beef jerky: Influence on quality and inactivation of Listeria innocua. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 59, 102276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Riel, G.; Boulaaba, A.; Popp, J.; Klein, G. Effects of parsley extract powder as an alternative for the direct addition of sodium nitrite in the production of mortadella-type sausages–Impact on microbiological, physicochemical and sensory aspects. Meat Sci. 2017, 131, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jo, K.; Lee, S.; Yong, H.I.; Choi, Y.S.; Jung, S. Nitrite sources for cured meat products. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 129, 109583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Silva, R.; Pereira, J.; Rouxinol, M.; Patarata, L. Sensory Changes and Listeria monocytogenes Behavior in Sliced Cured Pork Loins during Extended Storage. Foods 2020, 9, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Morales-Partera, Á.M.; Cardoso-Toset, F.; Jurado-Martos, F.; Astorga, R.J.; Huerta, B.; Luque, I.; Tarradas, C.; Gómez-Laguna, J. Survival of selected foodborne pathogens on dry cured pork loins. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 258, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Belloch, C.; Neef, A.; Salafia, C.; López-Diez, J.J.; Flores, M. Microbiota and volatilome of dry-cured pork loins manufactured with paprika and reduced concentration of nitrite and nitrate. Food Res. Int. 2021, 149, 110691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kim, T.K.; Yong, H.I.; Jang, H.W.; Lee, H.; Kim, Y.B.; Jeon, K.H.; Choi, Y.S. Quality of Sliced Cured Pork Loin with Spinach: Effect of Incubation Period with Starter Culture. J. Food Qual. 2019, 2019, 6373671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Linares, M.B.; Garrido, M.D.; Martins, C.; Patarata, L. Efficacies of Garlic and L. sakei in Wine-Based Marinades for Controlling Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. in Chouriço de Vinho, a Dry Sausage Made from Wine-Marinated Pork. J. Food Sci. 2013, 78, M719–M724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Patarata, L.; Martins, S.; Silva, J.A.; Fraqueza, M.J. Red Wine and Garlic as a Possible Alternative to Minimize the Use of Nitrite for Controlling Clostridium Sporogenes and Salmonella in a Cured Sausage: Safety and Sensory Implications. Foods 2020, 9, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Colaço-do-Rosário, C.; Patarata, L.; Esteves, A.; Silva, J. Salsicharia Tradicional Transmontana: Caracterização, Monitorização e Experimentação da tecnologia Artesanal. Relatório Final do Projecto PAMAF 3056; UTAD: Vila Real, Portugal, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  39. Istrati, D.; Ciuciu, A.S.; Vizireanu, C.; Ionescu, A.; Carballo, J. Impact of spices and wine-based marinades on tenderness, fragmentation of myofibrillar proteins and color stability in bovine biceps femoris muscle. J. Texture Stud. 2015, 46, 455–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cristino, R.; Costa, E.; Cosme, F.; Jordão, A.M. General phenolic characterisation, individual anthocyanin and antioxidant capacity of matured red wines from two Portuguese Appellations of Origins. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 2486–2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sánchez, M.C.; Ribeiro-Vidal, H.; Esteban-Fernández, A.; Bartolomé, B.; Figuero, E.; Moreno-Arribas, M.V.; Sanz, M.; Herrera, D. Antimicrobial activity of red wine and oenological extracts against periodontal pathogens in a validated oral biofilm model. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 19, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sabel, A.; Bredefeld, S.; Schlander, M.; Claus, H. Wine phenolic compounds: Antimicrobial properties against yeasts, lactic acid and acetic acid bacteria. Beverages 2017, 3, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Olejar, K.J.; Ricci, A.; Swift, S.; Zujovic, Z.; Gordon, K.C.; Fedrizzi, B.; Versari, A.; Kilmartin, P.A. Characterization of an antioxidant and antimicrobial extract from cool climate, white grape marc. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Robles, A.; Fabjanowicz, M.; Chmiel, T.; Płotka-Wasylka, J. Determination and identification of organic acids in wine samples. Problems and challenges. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 120, 115630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fraqueza, M.J.; Patarata, L.; Lauková, A. Protective cultures and bacteriocins in fermented meats. In Fermented Meat Products: Health Aspects; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 228–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Elias, M.; Laranjo, M.; Agulheiro-Santos, A.; Potes, E. The Role of Salt on Food and Human Health. In Salt in the Earth; Cinku, M., Karabulut, S., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020; pp. 19–43. [Google Scholar]
  47. Patarata, L. Caracterização e Avaliação da Aptidão Tecnológica de Bactérias do ácido Láctico e Micrococcaceae em Produtos de Salsicharia. Efeito da sua Utilização em Culturas de Arranque e de Formulação Acidificante no Fabrico de Linguiça Tradicional Transmontana; UTAD: Vila Real, Portugal, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  48. Ghabraie, M.; Vu, K.D.; Tnani, S.; Lacroix, M. Antibacterial effects of 16 formulations and irradiation against Clostridium sporogenes in a sausage model. In Fermented Meat Products; Sankaranarayanan, A., Amaresan, N., Dhanasekaran, D., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; Volume 63, pp. 197–237. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ares, G.; de Andrade, J.C.; Antúnez, L.; Alcaire, F.; Swaney-Stueve, M.; Gordon, S.; Jaeger, S.R. Hedonic product optimisation: CATA questions as alternatives to JAR scales. Food Qual. Prefer. 2017, 55, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Oliveira e Silva, R.; do Carmo Rouxinol, M.I.F.; da Silva Coutinho Patarata, L.A.; Silva, R.; Rouxinol, M.; Patarata, L. The use of photography to perform an online consumer test on the freshness of chicken breast and the extension of shelf life. J. Sens. Stud. 2020, 35, e12565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Grischy, R.; Speck, R.; Adams, D. New Media for Enumeration and Detection of Clostricfium sporogenes (PA3679) Spores. J. Food Sci. 1983, 48, 1466–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rothman, L.; Parker, M.J. Structure and use of Just-Abouit-Right Scales; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2009; ISBN 978-0-8031-7010-0. [Google Scholar]
  53. Pinton, M.B.M.; Santos, B.; Lorenzo, J.J.M.; Cichoski, A.A.J.; Boeira, C.C.P.; Campagnol, P.P.C.B.; dos Santos, B.A.; Lorenzo, J.J.M.; Cichoski, A.A.J.; Boeira, C.C.P.; et al. Green technologies as a strategy to reduce NaCl and phosphate in meat products: An overview. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 40, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fernqvist, F.; Ekelund, L. Credence and the effect on consumer liking of food-A review. Food Qual. Prefer. 2014, 32, 340–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Hung, Y.; de Kok, T.M.; Verbeke, W. Consumer attitude and purchase intention towards processed meat products with natural compounds and a reduced level of nitrite. Meat Sci. 2016, 121, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lusk, J.L. Consumer preferences for and beliefs about slow growth chicken. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 4159–4166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Carlucci, A.; Monteleone, E.; Braghieri, A.; Napolitano, F. Mapping the effect of information about animal welfare on consumer liking and willingness to pay for yogurt. J. Sens. Stud. 2009, 24, 712–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jacoby, J.; Johar, G.V.; Morrin, M. Consumer behavior: A Quadrennium. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1998, 49, 319–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Loken, B. Consumer psychology: Categorization, inferences, affect, and persuasion. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2006, 57, 453–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Pegg, R.B.; Shahidi, F. Unraveling the Chemical Identity of Meat Pigments. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1997, 37, 561–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. García-Marino, M.; Hernández-Hierro, J.M.; Rivas-Gonzalo, J.C.; Escribano-Bailón, M.T. Colour and pigment composition of red wines obtained from co-maceration of Tempranillo and Graciano varieties. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 660, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Brouillard, R.; Chassaing, S.; Fougerousse, A. Why are grape/fresh wine anthocyanins so simple and why is it that red wine color lasts so long? Phytochemistry 2003, 64, 1179–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. He, F.; Liang, N.N.; Mu, L.; Pan, Q.H.; Wang, J.; Reeves, M.J.; Duan, C.Q. Anthocyanins and their variation in red wines II. Anthocyanin derived pigments and their color evolution. Molecules 2012, 17, 1483–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Gago, B.; Lundberg, J.O.; Barbosa, R.M.; Laranjinha, J. Red wine-dependent reduction of nitrite to nitric oxide in the stomach. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2007, 43, 1233–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Enaru, B.; Drețcanu, G.; Pop, T.D.; Stǎnilǎ, A.; Diaconeasa, Z. Anthocyanins: Factors affecting their stability and degradation. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ras, G.; Bailly, X.; Chacornac, J.P.; Zuliani, V.; Derkx, P.; Seibert, T.M.; Talon, R.; Leroy, S. Contribution of nitric oxide synthase from coagulase-negative staphylococci to the development of red myoglobin derivatives. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 266, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ras, G.; Zuliani, V.; Derkx, P.; Seibert, T.M.; Leroy, S.; Talon, R. Evidence for nitric oxide synthase activity in Staphylococcus xylosus mediating nitrosoheme formation. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Serra-Castelló, C.; Jofré, A.; Garriga, M.; Bover-Cid, S. Modeling and designing a Listeria monocytogenes control strategy for dry-cured ham taking advantage of water activity and storage temperature. Meat Sci. 2020, 165, 108131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lee, B.H.; Hébraud, M.; Bernardi, T. Increased adhesion of Listeria monocytogenes strains to abiotic surfaces under cold stress. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Yuan, L.; Sadiq, F.A.; Wang, N.; Yang, Z.; He, G. Recent advances in understanding the control of disinfectant-resistant biofilms by hurdle technology in the food industry. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 61, 3876–3891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Fraqueza, M.; Patarata, L. Fermented Meat Products: From the Technology to the Quality Control. In Fermented Food Products; Sankaranarayanan, A., Amaresan, N., Dhanasekaran, D., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; pp. 197–237. ISBN 978-0-367-22422-6. [Google Scholar]
  72. Laranjo, M.; Gomes, A.; Agulheiro-Santos, A.C.; Potes, M.E.; Cabrita, M.J.; Garcia, R.; Rocha, J.M.; Roseiro, L.C.; Fernandes, M.J.; Fraqueza, M.J.; et al. Impact of salt reduction on biogenic amines, fatty acids, microbiota, texture and sensory profile in traditional blood dry-cured sausages. Food Chem. 2017, 218, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Lingbeck, J.M.; Cordero, P.; O’Bryan, C.A.; Johnson, M.G.; Ricke, S.C.; Crandall, P.G. Functionality of liquid smoke as an all-natural antimicrobial in food preservation. Meat Sci. 2014, 97, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Fraqueza, M.; Laranjo, M.; Alves, S.; Fernandes, M.; Agulheiro-Santos, A.; Fernandes, M.; Potes, M.; Elias, M. Dry-cured meat products according to the smoking regime: Process optimization to control polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Foods 2020, 9, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Foods 11 00796 g001 550
Figure 1. Images of cured loins presented in the online consumer test. Anonymous—no information was provided to the consumer; identified—samples were identified with the information “Cured Loin 1 has a food additive indicated by the WHO as being carcinogenic; Cured Loin 2 does not have any chemical additives”.
Figure 1. Images of cured loins presented in the online consumer test. Anonymous—no information was provided to the consumer; identified—samples were identified with the information “Cured Loin 1 has a food additive indicated by the WHO as being carcinogenic; Cured Loin 2 does not have any chemical additives”.
Foods 11 00796 g001
Foods 11 00796 g002 550
Figure 2. Just About Right evaluation of cured loins.
Figure 2. Just About Right evaluation of cured loins.
Foods 11 00796 g002
Table
Table 1. Formulations tested in the experiment.
Table 1. Formulations tested in the experiment.
Marinades(1) Control(2) Nitrite(3) S. xylosus
Wine-based (50 wine:50 water)
1% fresh garlic
0.5% bay leaves		2% salt 2% salt
150 mg/kg nitrite		2% salt
20 mL cell suspension
Water-based (100 water)
1% fresh garlic
0.5% bay leaves		2% salt 2% salt
150 mg/kg nitrite		2% salt
20 mL cell suspension
Table
Table 2. Hedonic evaluation of cured loins. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Table 2. Hedonic evaluation of cured loins. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
MarinadesControlNitriteS. xylosus
Wine-based6.27 ± 1.38 ab5.81 ± 1.63 ab5.93 ± 1.66 ab
Water-based5.74 ± 1.63 b6.39 ± 1.42 a6.04 ± 1.71 ab
a, b Means followed by different letters are different (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Consumption intention of cured loins. Results are presented as a percentage of consumers and the standardized residuals.
Table 3. Consumption intention of cured loins. Results are presented as a percentage of consumers and the standardized residuals.
MarinadesControlNitriteS. xylosus
Wine-based67.3 (0.82) 153.8 (−2.31)68.3 (1.04)
Water-based49.0 (−3.43)76.0 (2.83)68.3 (1.04)
1 Values in brackets are the standardized residuals.
Table
Table 4. Mean drop (MD) and penalties associated with a non-ideal evaluation of the cured loins’ color.
Table 4. Mean drop (MD) and penalties associated with a non-ideal evaluation of the cured loins’ color.
Marinades ControlNitriteS. xylosus
Level%MDPenalties%MDPenalties%MDPenalties
Wine-basedWeak56.70.94 10.8615.40.54−0.05036.50.910.71
Strong4.80 26.0−0.40 15.40.24
Water-basedWeak59.61.321.3432.70.770.7841.41.221.35
Strong6.71.49 7.70.84 8.71.93
1 Values marked in bold correspond to a mean drop obtained for the evaluation by at least 20% of consumers.
Table
Table 5. Percentage of consumers considering the cured loins’ color to be more characteristic based on an observation of pairs 1 of online images in an anonymous test and after identification as having a carcinogenic additive or not (n = 164 consumers).
Table 5. Percentage of consumers considering the cured loins’ color to be more characteristic based on an observation of pairs 1 of online images in an anonymous test and after identification as having a carcinogenic additive or not (n = 164 consumers).
PresentationCured Loin Images
Without Nitritewith Nitrite
Anonymous58.541.5
Identified67.132.9
Change between Anonymous and Identified
Maintained     82.9
Without → with nitrite4.3
With → without nitrite12.8
z = 2.464, p = 0.013
1 One image was from a cured loin with and the other without nitrite, but both with a wine-based marinade.
Table
Table 6. Color parameters (L*a*b*) of cured loins after 8 and 30 d of drying. Results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.
Table 6. Color parameters (L*a*b*) of cured loins after 8 and 30 d of drying. Results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.
Parameter
Marinades		ControlNitriteS. xylosusControlNitriteS. xylosus
8 d Drying 30 d Drying
L*
Wine-based58.41 ± 1.59 bc55.54 ± 2.19 c63.36 ± 1.28 a50.96 ± 0.38 a45.80 ± 1.09 b50.95 ± 0.42 a
Water-based59.07 ± 1.06 abc58.47 ± 1.83 bc60.28 ± 0.15 ab42.67 ± 1.35 c46.32 ± 1.99 b42.69 ± 0.42 c
a*
Wine-based13.90 ± 1.34 b17.35 ± 0.48 a10.82 ± 0.85 c8.11 ± 0.57 c8.60 ± 0.41 c9.45 ± 0.17 bc
Water-based9.55 ± 0.92 c16.77 ± 0.74 a11.14 ± 0.13 c11.72 ± 1.13 ab13.05 ± 1.09 a9.32 ± 1.08 c
b*
Wine-based5.14 ± 0.59 d8.01 ± 0.49 a5.64 ± 0.21 cd10.94 ± 0.08 ab10.50 ± 0.01 ab8.02 ± 0.50 c
Water-based6.53 ± 0.60 bc8.16 ± 0.50 a6.98 ± 0.22 ab7.60 ± 0.84 c9.37 ± 0.92 bc11.73 ± 1.36 a
a, b, c, d For each drying period, means followed by different letters are different (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 7. Counts of Cl. Sporogenes, L. monocytogenes, and Salmonella in the challenge test made with cured loins. Results are presented as the mean and standard deviation.
Table 7. Counts of Cl. Sporogenes, L. monocytogenes, and Salmonella in the challenge test made with cured loins. Results are presented as the mean and standard deviation.
MarinadesControlNitriteS. xylosus
Cl. sporogenesMeat after inoculation2.73 ± 0.23
Filling
(5 d in the marinade)		Wine-based2.60 ± 0.31 a1.84 ± 0.13 b1.83 ± 0.09 b
Water-based2.97 ± 0.18 a1.80 ± 0.04 b1.64 ± 0.19 b
8 d after smokingWine-based0.07 ± 0.120.08 ± 0.140.03 ± 0.06
Water-basedNDND0.01 ± 0.02
21 d after smokingWine-basedNDNDND
Water-basedNDNDND
L. monocytogenesMeat after inoculation4.43 ± 0.13
Filling
(5 d in the marinade)		Wine-based3.49 ± 0.14 b3.89 ± 0.03 ab3.81 ± 0.17 ab
Water-based3.94 ± 0.06 a3.69 ± 0.01 ab3.50 ± 0.27 b
8 d after smokingWine-based2.18 ± 0.582.75 ± 1.411.98 ± 0.28
Water-based2.06 ± 0.443.06 ± 1.151.55 ± 1.37
21 d after smokingWine-basedNDNDND
Water-basedNDND0.43 ± 0.74
SalmonellaMeat after inoculation4.39 ± 0.03
Filling
(5 d in the marinade)		Wine-based4.41 ± 0.303.97 ± 0.364.24 ± 0.07
Water-based4.52 ± 0.144.05 ± 0.124.20 ± 0.16
8 d after smokingWine-based0.89 ± 0.781.21 ± 1.222.47 ± 0.06
Water-based2.75 ± 0.812.38 ± 0.302.56 ± 0.23
21 d after smokingWine-based1.37 ± 1.19NDND
Water-based1.18 ± 0.310.48 ± 0.830.43 ± 0.37
a, b Means followed by different letters are different (p < 0.05); ND—not detected.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Patarata, L.; Carvalho, F.; Fraqueza, M.J. Nitrite-Free Implications on Consumer Acceptance and the Behavior of Pathogens in Cured Pork Loins. Foods 2022, 11, 796. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11060796

AMA Style

Patarata L, Carvalho F, Fraqueza MJ. Nitrite-Free Implications on Consumer Acceptance and the Behavior of Pathogens in Cured Pork Loins. Foods. 2022; 11(6):796. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11060796

Chicago/Turabian Style

Patarata, Luis, Filipa Carvalho, and Maria João Fraqueza. 2022. "Nitrite-Free Implications on Consumer Acceptance and the Behavior of Pathogens in Cured Pork Loins" Foods 11, no. 6: 796. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11060796

APA Style

Patarata, L., Carvalho, F., & Fraqueza, M. J. (2022). Nitrite-Free Implications on Consumer Acceptance and the Behavior of Pathogens in Cured Pork Loins. Foods, 11(6), 796. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11060796

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop