Next Article in Journal
Effect of Phosphorylation on the Structure and Emulsification Properties of Different Fish Scale Gelatins
Next Article in Special Issue
Cascade-Enhanced Lateral Flow Immunoassay for Sensitive Detection of Okadaic Acid in Seawater, Fish, and Seafood
Previous Article in Journal
SARS-CoV-2 Survival in Common Non-Alcoholic and Alcoholic Beverages
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Current Advances in Immunoassays for the Detection of β2-Agonists

1
CAS Key Laboratory of Nutrition, Metabolism and Food Safety, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
2
Key Laboratory of Food Safety Risk Assessment, Ministry of Health, Beijing 100021, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Foods 2022, 11(6), 803; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11060803
Submission received: 1 February 2022 / Revised: 3 March 2022 / Accepted: 4 March 2022 / Published: 11 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Immunoassay Technology in Food Inspection)

Abstract

:
β2-agonists are a group of synthetic phenylethanolamine compounds which are traditionally used for treating bronchospasm. These compounds can also increase skeletal muscle mass and decrease body fat. The illegal use of β2-agonists in food-producing animals results in residue of β2-agonists in edible tissues and causes adverse health effects in humans. Thus, the detection of β2-agonists at trace level in complex sample matrices is of great importance for monitoring the abuse of β2-agonists. Many methods have been developed to detect β2-agonists. Among them, a variety of antigen–antibody interaction-based techniques have been established to detect β2-agonists in various samples, including animal feed, urine, serum, milk, tissues and hair. In this review, we summarized current achievement in the extraction of β2-agonists from testing samples and detection of β2-agonists using immunological techniques. Future perspectives were briefly discussed.

1. Introduction

β2-agonists are a group of synthetic compounds with phenylethylamine structures, which are commonly used to treat asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [1]. They relax the smooth muscle of respiratory tract by combining to β2 adrenoreceptor. β2-agonists are also powerful anabolic agents which can promote protein synthesis, increase muscle mass and decrease fat tissue [2]. They are illegally used in food-producing animals as the growth promoters and nutrient repartitioning agents to escalate lean muscle gain, increase growth rate and feed efficiency [3,4,5,6]. Most countries around the world ban the use of all β2-agonistsin livestock feed and have established strict surveillance programs to ensure the food and feed safety. However, the illegal use of β2-agonists in livestock still happens, and the poisoning incidents caused by consumption of edible tissues from livestock bred with β2-agonistsare reported from time to time in countries around the world [7,8,9,10,11,12].
In order to monitor the illegal use of β2-agonists, various techniques have been developed to detect β2-agonists in animal samples (tissues, milk, urine, hair, etc.), including chromatography, spectrometry and related techniques [13,14], immunoassays [13,14], biosensors [14,15] and β2 adrenoreceptor-based assays [16,17]. Immunoassays are widely used in the purification and measurement of β2-agonists. The antibodies against β2-agonist can be prepared with β2-agonist hapten composed of β2-agonist and a carrier protein, such as serum albumin from bovine, human and rabbit, ovalbumin, keyhole limpet hemocyanin and bovine thyroglobulin. In this review, we summarize antigen–antibody interaction-based methods to purify and determine β2-agonists, including extraction of β2-agonists from samples through immunoaffinity chromatography, immunofiltration and immunomagnetic separation, and detection of β2-agonists by radioimmunoassay, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), chemiluminescence immunoassay, lateral flow immunoassay, immunosensors and other types of immunoassays.

2. β2-Agonist Antibody-Based Sample Extraction/Cleanup

Extraction and cleanup are important steps for the detection of β2-agonists in complex biological samples. Various techniques have been developed to extract and cleanup β-agonists, such as liquid–liquid extraction, solid phase extraction, matrix solid-phase dispersion, dialysis, supercritical fluid extraction [13,14,18]; and antibody-based immunoaffinity chromatography [18,19,20,21,22], immunofiltration [23,24,25] and immunomagnetic separation [26,27,28,29]. Antibody-based techniques provide better cleanup of the samples and higher selectivity than aforementioned other techniques and were summarized herein.

2.1. Immunoaffinity Chromatography

Immunoaffinity chromatography (IAC) is a technique that relies on antigen–antibody interactions to extract the analyte(s) of interest. Analyte from the sample is retained on the column containing immobilized antibody and eluted using minimal amounts of organic solvent. IAC has been accepted as an extractionpreconcentration procedure for detecting β2-agonists in biological samples owing to its high specificity and sample cleanup efficiency. IAC has been applied to extract clenbuterol, salbutamol, ractopamine and its metabolites from urine and tissue samples, respectively. Then, the target compound was detected using different techniques, including high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), electrochemical detection and capillary liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [19,20,21]. Lin et al. [22] developed a method to simultaneously detect clenbuterol, salbutamol, ractopamine and terbutaline in beef by IAC extraction and ultra-high-performance LC-MS/MS detection of these compounds. The immunoaffinity column was made by simultaneously covalent coupling of monoclonal antibodies against clenbuterol, salbutamol and ractopamine, respectively. As the antibodies are not specific for terbutaline, the limit of detection (LOD) of terbutaline is higher than that of the other three β2-agonists.

2.2. Immunofiltration

Immunofiltration has been applied for sample cleanup for detecting β2-agonists. The antibodies against β2-agonist are mixed with the samples and incubated in an ultra-filtration device. After centrifugation, the filter is washed with buffer, and the antibody bound β2-agonist is freed from the antibody by acetic acid. Immunofiltration was used to pretreat urine samples for detection of clenbuterol with a biosensor immunoassay [23] or ELISA [24]. Haasnoot et al. [25] reported that the anti-salbutamol polyclonal antibodies (pAb) recognized several β-agonists, and the combination of immunofiltration of β2-agonists with the ELISA could detect at least ten β2-agonists in urine with comparable LODs.

2.3. Immunomagnetic Separation

Immunomagnetic separation involves the coupling of biological macromolecules, such as antibodies and streptavidin, to superparamagnetic particles. When added to a heterogeneous target suspension, the magnetic particles bind to the desired target and form a complex which can be removed from the suspension by using a magnet. Immunomagnetic separation has been used as a sample pretreatment technology for purification and enrichment of β2-agonists from samples. Chen et al. [26,27] prepared immunomagnetic beads using monoclonal antibodies against clenbuterol and salbutamol, respectively, purified these compounds from animal urine samples and detected them by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Peng et al. [28] separated clenbuterol from swine urine samples using immunomagnetic particles which was prepared by immobilizing biotinylated clenbuterol monoclonal antibody (mAb) on the streptavidin magnetic nanoparticles through biotin–streptavidin interaction. Huang et al. [29] modified the fluorescent magnetic nanobeads with anti-clenbuterol mAb to specifically recognize and capture clenbuterol in swine urine. The fluorescent magnetic nanobeads not only served as a carrier for immunomagnetic separation of clenbuterol but also as a fluorescent probe for fluorescent lateral flow immunoassay of clenbuterol.
The advantages and disadvantages of the methods for extracting β2-agonists from samples using antibodies are summarized in Table 1.

3. Immunological Techniques for Detecting β2-Agonists

Many immunological methods based on an antigen–antibody interaction have been developed for qualitative/quantitative analysis of β2-agonists in biological samples, including radioimmunoassay, ELISA, chemiluminescence immunoassay, lateral flow immunoassay, immunosensors and other types of immunoassays.

3.1. Radioimmunoassay

The classical radioimmunoassay (RIA) is based on the principle of competitive binding. The unlabeled antigens and a fixed amount of radiolabeled antigens compete for a limited amount of antibody to form an antigen–antibody complex. The amount of labeled antigen–antibody complex formed is inversely related to the concentration of the unlabeled antigen. RIA has been applied to detect β2-agonists, such as salbutamol, fenoterol and clenbuterol in various samples, including plasma/serum, urine, feces and liver tissue [30,31,32,33,34]. If the pAb against one β-agonist has cross-reactivity with other β-agonists, the RIA can be applied as a qualitative method to detect the presence of one or more β-agonists [33,34], then a confirmatory analysis would be performed to determine the concentration of the analyte(s). The use of RIAs in detecting β2-agonists has been largely replaced by nonisotopic immunoassays because of concerns over the safe handling and disposal of radioactive reagents and waste.

3.2. ELISA

ELISA, also referred to as enzyme immunoassay, is a plated-based solid-phase enzyme immunoassay commonly used to identify the presence and concentration of antibodies or antigens in liquid samples. Detection of antigens is accomplished by binding enzyme–antibody conjugates to the antigen in the sample and assessing the enzyme activity via incubation with a substrate to produce a measurable end product. A number of enzymes are used in ELISA, including horseradish peroxidase (HRP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and β-galactosidase. ELISA can be classified into direct, indirect, sandwich and competitive ELISA. The competitive ELISA is very useful for determining the concentration of small-molecule antigens in complex sample mixtures. Direct and indirect competitive ELISAs have been developed to detect β2-agonist in various samples.

3.2.1. Direct Competitive ELISA

Clenbuterol [35,36], salbutamol [37] and phenylethanolamine A [38] in various samples (animal urine, blood, hair and tissues) have been measured using direct competitive ELISA. The mAb or pAb against β2-agonist is coated onto the microtiter plate, the β-agonist in sample and β2-agonist labeled with HRP or ALP competes for binding with the mobilized antibody. Addition of the substrate of the enzyme yields a signal that is inversely proportional to β-agonist concentration within the sample. Huang et al. [39] developed a direct competitive ELISA using bacteria-Au-antibody/HRP composite as a probe to detect clenbuterol. The clenbuterol in the sample competed with clenbuterol immobilized on a plate for binding to the limited probe. The use of bacteria as a carrier and Au nanoparticles as cross-linking agents enriched HRP and reduced the antibody applied, which resulted in the amplification of signal in detection. The liner range and limit of detection (LOD) of clenbuterol were 0.02–1.0 ng/mL and 0.03 ng/mL, respectively.

3.2.2. Indirect Competitive ELISA

Indirect competitive ELISAs have been developed to detect β2-agonists, including phenylethanolamine A [40], ractopamine [41], zilpaterol [42], clenbuterol [43,44] and salbutamol [45,46] in various types of samples. In these assays, the β2-agonist coated on the microtiter plate competes with β2-agonist in samples for binding to the primary anti-β2-agonist antibody. Probe labeled secondary antibody against the primary antibody was added successively. The signal produced by the secondary antibody is inversely proportional to β2-agonist concentration within the sample. Most of the above indirect competitive ELISAs used HRP to label the secondary antibody. Fang et al. [46] used Eu3+-labeled secondary antibody in the ELISA to detect salbutamol. Han et al. [41] developed a gold nanoparticle-based indirect competitive ELISA to detect ractopamine by using a secondary antibody labeled with catalase through biotin–streptavidin interaction. In the presence of ractopamine in the sample, gold(III) ions are oxidized by H2O2 to form red AuNPs. In the absence of ractopamine, the AuNPs in the solution are purple or blue due to aggregation. The LOD for ractopamine in urine was 0.35 ng/mL. In general, the primary antibody specifically against one β2-agonist was used in the development of the indirect competitive ELISA. Wang et al. [44,45] developed indirect competitive ELISAs using polyclonal R-(-)-salbutamol antibody which could recognize 31 β-agonists and analogues, and clenbuterol monoclonal antibody which could recognize 23 β-agonists and analogues, respectively. Holographic and three-dimensional quantitative structure–activity relationship models were developed for predicting the epitopes on β-agonist hapten affecting antibody specificity, which will contribute to the rational design and control of the immunoassay specificity of β2-agonist.

3.3. Chemiluminescence Immunoassay

Chemiluminescence describes the emission of light that occurs as a result of unique chemical reactions. In a chemiluminescence reaction, energy is released in the form of photons when electronically excited molecules, produced as a result of the reaction, relax to a stable ground state. Chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) combines chemiluminescence technique with immunochemical reactions using luminescent chemical which could generate light emission. In CLIA, the luminescent chemical is used to label antigen, antibody or used as substrate of enzymes. HRP and ALP are the most widely used enzymes. Luminol and AMPPD are common chemiluminescent substrates used for HRP and AP, respectively.
CLIAs have been developed based on competitive immunoassay to detect salbutamol and brombuterol, respectively. HRP-labeled secondary antibodies were introduced into CLIAs [47,48]. The chemiluminescence intensity was linearly related to the concentration of salbutamol in the range of 0.5–100 ng/mL with a LOD of 0.15 ng/mL [47]. The LOD of brombuterol was 0.33 pg/mL [48]. Wang et al. [49] developed a competitive chemiluminescence immunosensor based on a microfluidic chip to detect ractopamine in swine urine samples using HRP-labeled secondary antibody. The immunosensor could provide a liner range of 0.5–40 ng/mL with a LOD of 0.97 ng/mL for ractopamine detection.

3.4. Lateral Flow Immunoassay

Lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), also known as immunochromatographic assay, is a combination of chromatography and immunoassay using a nitrocellulose membrane as a support to detect labeled antigen–antibody complexes in liquid samples. The signal produced on the membrane can be evaluated by the naked eye or with the aid of portable devices. Direct assay (sandwich assay) and competitive assay are two standard formats of LFIA, which are used to detect large and small molecules, respectively. Competitive tests have been used to detect β2-agonists. A variety of tracers that cause color or optical changes following antigen–antibody interactions have been used in LFIA to detect β2- agonists, such as nanoparticles, fluorescent nanomaterials and upconverted phosphorus nanoparticles. Compared with traditional detection methods, LFIA possesses significant advantages, including simple fabrication, low cost, fast and simple analytical procedure.

3.4.1. Colorimetric LFIA

Nanoparticles with specific structures can produce color by assemblies and aggregations. Various nanoparticles with specific properties have been used as tracers for LFIA to detect β2-agonists in samples.

Gold Nanoparticles as Tracers

Colloidal gold or gold nanoparticle is the most widely used label in LFIA for detecting β2-agonists in samples. It has an intense color and no development process is needed for visualization. Colloidal gold has been used by multiple laboratories to label an antibody against β2-agonist and develop LFIA for detecting target β2-agonist in biological samples, such as clenbuterol in urine and pork muscle [50,51], salbutamol in urine, meat and milk [52,53], phenylethanolamine A in urine and pork [40,54] and ractopamine in animal urine, meat, liver and feed [50,55,56,57,58]. Huang et al. [59] used bacteria as a carrier of gold nanoparticles to construct bacteria-Au-antibody probe in LFIA to detect clenbuterol. Much fewer antibodies are needed in the probe to produce a clearly visible color. The visual detection limit (VDL) for clenbuterol is 0.1 ng/mL in urine, 0.5 ng/mL in milk and 0.2 ng/g in swine feed. Wang et al. [60] developed silver–gold nanoparticles (Au-Ag NPs) probe-based LFIA to detect clenbuterol. The quantitative detection limit of optimized hollow Ag-Au NPs labeled lateral-flow immunochromatographic test strip approaches to 2 ppb. Compared with Au NPs and Ag NPs-labeled test strips, Ag-Au hollow NPs-labeled test strips exhibited much higher sensitivity for qualitatively detecting clenbuterol. Chen et al. [61] established an integrated LFIA to detect clenbuterol using anti-clenbuterol antibody labeled with colloidal gold and fluorescent nanobeads, respectively. The integrated test strip could qualitatively and quantitatively detect clenbuterol with VDL of 0.5 ng/mL and LOD of 0.04 ng/mL.

Other Nanoparticles as Tracers

Colored silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) have been used as a visible label for LFIA to detect β2-agonists. Zhu et al. [62] developed LFIA to detect clenbuterol using purple SiNPs labeled anti-clenbuterol antibody. The VDL for clenbuterol were 6 ng/mL and 5 ng/mL in urine and pork, respectively. Yu et al. [63] developed colored SiNP-based LFIA to detect clenbuterol and ractopamine simultaneously by using anti-clenbuterol antibody and anti-ractopamine antibody labeled with red and blue SiNPs, respectively. The visible limit of detections for clenbuterol and ractopamine were 3 ng/mL and 2 ng/mL, respectively. Wang et al. [64,65] used selenium nanoparticles to label antibodies against clenbuterol, ractopamine and salbutamol, respectively, and developed LFIAs to detect these compounds in swine urine. Zhao et al. [66] developed LFIA for clenbuterol detection using Prussian blue nanoparticles-labeled antibody against clenbuterol. The VLDs for clenbuterol were 3.0 ng/mL in pork, 5 ng/g in both swine kidney and bacon samples. Liu et al. [67] used ultramarine blue nanoparticles as visible labels in LFIAs to detect ractopamine. The visual limit of detection for ractopamine is 2.0 ng/mL, and 1.0 ng/mL in feed and pork samples, respectively.

3.4.2. Luminescent LFIA

Luminescent materials, such as fluorescent nanomaterials and up-converting phosphorus nanoparticles, have been used as reporter to develop sensitive LFIA for detecting β2-agonists.
Various kinds of fluorescent nanoparticles have been used as probes to develop LFIA for detecting β2-agonists. Song et al. [68] used fluorescent nanosilica conjugated mAb against clenbuterol as a signal probe to build a LFIA for detecting clenbuterol. The VLD for qualitative detection was 0.1ng/mL and the LOD for quantitative detection was 0.037 ng/mL, which was much better than the colloidal gold-based strip. Huang et al. [29] developed an LFIA to detect clenbuterol using fluorescent magnetic nanobeads (FMNBs) to label anti-clenbuterol mAb. The FMNBs-Ab probe worked as a carrier for immunomagnetic separation of clenbuterol from sample and as a fluorescent label for the LFIA. The LOD of clenbuterol in swine urine is 0.22 ng/mL. Wang et al. [69] developed fluorescent beads-based LFIA to simultaneously detect 3 β2-agonists. Fluorescent beads were conjugated with mAb specific for clenbuterol, ractopamine and salbuterol, respectively, and put on the conjugated pad. There were three test lines in the analytical pad, which contained immobilized clenbuterol, ractopamine and salbuterol, respectively. The LODs for clenbuterol, ractopamine and salbuterol were 0.10, 0.10 and 0.09 ng/mL, respectively, which were better than that of the colloidal gold-based strip. The same lab developed an LFIA to detect clenbuterol and its structural analogues in pork, using fluorescent nanoparticle-conjugated anti-clenbuterol antibody which had cross-reactivity with mabuterol, brombuterol, cimaterol, cimbuterol, bromchlorbuterol and banbuterol [70]. The established LFIA could screen these seven β2-agonists in a single run. The LODs for these compounds in pork were <50 pg/g. Hu et al. [71] compared time-resolved fluorescent nanobeads, fluorescent submicrospheres, quantum dots and colloidal gold-based LFIA (TRFN-LFIA, FM-LFIA, QD-LFIA, and CG-LFIA) for detection of ractopamine in swine urine. TRFN-LFIA showed the highest sensitivity (LOD 7.2 pg/mL) and a wide linear range of detection (5–2500 pg/mL). In addition, TRFN-LFIA exhibited the shortest detection time compared with the other LFIAs. Shi et al. [72] developed a fluorescence quenching-based LFIA for detecting ractopamine. The antibody against ractopamine was labeled with gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and loaded on the conjugate pad. The test line was coated with Rac and fluorescent polymer dots (FPDs). The control line was coated with FPD. Adding a negative sample resulted in the binding of Ab-AuNPs to ractopamine immobilized on T-Line, which in turn caused fluorescence resonance energy transfer between the FPDs and AuNPs and quenches fluorescence. Adding a positive sample caused a reaction between the ractopamine analyte and Ab-AuNPs and visible fluorescence at the test line. The intensity of fluorescence at the test line positively reflected the amount of ractopamine in the sample. The LOD was 0.16 ng/mL.
Wang et al. [73] developed an LFIA based on upconversion phosphor (UCP) for detection of clenbuterol. The mAb against clenbuterol was labeled with UCP beads which can emit higher energy light under excitation of lower energy light. After reaction, luminescence from clenbuterol-mAb-UCPs can be detected by a scanning photometer or naked eyes. The visual limit of detection for clenbuterol was 0.1 ng/mL. An LFIA based on a time-resolved chemiluminescence was established to detect ractopamine and clenbuterol simultaneously [74]. Antibodies against ractopamine and clenbuterol were conjugated with HRP and ALP, respectively. As the reaction kinetics of HRP and ALP chemiluminescent reaction systems were different, ractopamine and clenbuterol could be sequentially detected in different time windows. The LODs for ractopamine and clenbuterol were 0.17 ng/mL and 0.067 ng/mL, respectively.

3.4.3. Other Types of LFIA

Zhang et al. [75] developed a competitive LFIA to detect clenbuterol in milk, swine liver and tenderloin using Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB)-stained anti-clenbuterol antibody. The CBB-antibody was used as both a recognition reagent and a chromogenic probe, enabling the simple but sensitive detection of clenbuterol with LOD of 2 ng/mL.
Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)-based LFIA has been developed for the detection of β2-agonists, such as phenylethanolamine A [76], clenbuterol [77] and brombuterol [78]. The principle of this method is similar to the LFIA based on colloidal gold particles, but the anti-β2-agonist antibody was labeled with Au@Ag core–shell nanoparticles sandwiched with a Raman reporter (4-mercaptobenzoic acid, MBA) [76,77], or with flower-like gold–silver core–shell bimetallic nanoparticles carrying the MBA [78]. The LOD values for detection of phenylethanolamine A, clenbuterol and brombuterol were 0.32, 0.24 and 0.5 pg/mL, respectively [76,77,78].

3.5. Immunosensors

Immunosensors use antibodies as the recognition element and a transducer that converts the antigen–antibody binding event to a measurable physical signal. Surface plasmon resonance, surface-enhanced Raman scattering, electrochemiluminescence and electrochemical immunosensor are types of immunosensors developed for detecting β2-agonists.

3.5.1. Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is a phenomenon occurring at metal surfaces when plane-polarized light hits a metal film under total internal reflection conditions. SPR signal is directly dependent on the refractive index of the medium on the metal film. The binding of biomolecules on the metal surface results in changes in the refractive index. As SPR allows real-time, label-free detection of biomolecular interactions, it has been used as a powerful tool to study interactions between biomolecules, such as the interaction of antibody and antigen, ligand and receptor, enzyme and substrate [79].
A number of investigators developed competitive immunoassays to detect β2-agonists using SPR sensors. A known concentration of β2-agonist antibody was mixed with the sample and injected over the surface of the sensor chip. The β2-agonist in the sample bound to the antibody and inhibited it from binding to the β2-agonist mobilized on the sensor chip surface and consequently induced an increase in the refractive index at the SPR sensor surface. SPR sensor has been built to detect salbutamol in swine urine with LOD of 5 ng/mL [80]. Suherman et al. [81] fabricated SPR sensors with covalently immobilized β-albuterolvistion on Au chips for detection of ractopamine and salbutamol, respectively. The LODs for ractopamine and salbutamol were 10 pg/mL and 5 pg/mL, respectively. The sensor surface could be regenerated and reused more than 100 times. Wang et al. [82] developed a SPR to detect ractopamine in swine urine through indirect competitive assay, with an LOD of 0.09 ng/mL. Kabiraz et al. [83,84] built SPRs sensors to detect clenbuterol using Au nanoparticles to label the primary antibody against clenbuterol or the secondary antibody. The LODs were 0.05 pg/mL and 100 fg/mL, respectively, which were lower than that of unlabeled Ab.

3.5.2. Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering-Based Immunosensor

Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) is a powerful spectroscopy technology that can provide a nondestructive and ultra-sensitive characterization down to single molecular level. Competitive SERS immunoassay has been applied to detect β2-agonists, based on the competition between free β2-agonists in samples and β2-agonists immobilized on the solid substrate for binding to antibodies on SERS nanoprobes. The intensity of SERS signal is conversely correlated with the concentration of β2-agonist in sample. The SERS nanoprobe is prepared by labeling Au nanoparticles (AuNPs) with Raman reporter and anti-β2-agonist antibody. 4,40-dipyridyl and 2,20-dipyridyland 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (MBA) have been used as Raman reporters to prepare SERS nanoprobes for detecting clenbuterol and ractopamine, respectively [85,86]. Gu et al. [87] developed a SERS-based competitive immunoassay for detecting salbutamol and brombuterol in swine meat, liver and human urine. The SERS probe was prepared by immobilizing antibody against salbutamol (or brombuterol) and SERS reporter nile blue (or 3,3′,5,5′ -tetramethylbenzidine)-labeled DNA concatemers on gold nanoparticles. The introduction of long DNA concatemers in SERS probe and stain of the immune complex with Ag nanoparticles after competitive immunoreaction greatly enhanced Raman signals. The LODs for salbutamol and brombuterol were 2.0 pg/mL and 1.0 pg/mL, respectively. Wei et al. [88] developed a SERS-based liquid magnetic competitive immunoassay to detect clenbuterol. The SERS probe was prepared by labeling AuNPs with Raman reporter MBA and clenbuterol antibody. Fe3O4@Au nanoparticles were labeled with clenbuterol. After competitive reaction, the immunocomplex of SERS probe and Fe3O4@Au-clenbuterol were enriched by an external magnetic field and the SERS signal was collected. The LOD for clenbuterol was 0.22 fg/mL. Yao et al. [89] developed a SERS/resonance Rayleigh scattering (RRS) dual-spectroscopic immunosensor to detect clenbuterol based on nitrogen/silver-codoped carbon dots (CDN/Ag) catalytic amplification. CDN/Ag can strongly catalyze trisodium citrate-HAuC4 reaction to generate red nanogold that exhibits a strong RRS signal. After adding Victoria blue B (VBB), the system also exhibits a strong Raman signal. Electrostatic coupling between CDN/Ag and Ab inhibits the catalytic activity of CDN/Ag and reduces the Raman signal. In the presence of clenbuterol, the binding of Ab with clenbuterol reduces the interaction of Ab with CDN/Ag and restore the catalytic activity of CDN/Ag, which enhances the Raman signal through increasing gold nanoparticles production. The SERS/RRS immunosensor detected clenbuterol with an LOD of 0.68 pg/mL.

3.5.3. Electrochemiluminescence Immunosensor

Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) is the process whereby species generated at the electrode undergo a high-energy electron transfer reaction to form excited states that emit light. ECL immunosensor combines immunoreaction and ECL, which can be used to quantitatively measure an antigen or antibody based on the change in ECL signal before and after immunoreaction. The ECL luminophore is one of the most significant components during the light generation processes. Various ECL luminophores have been reported, including organic, metal complexes, nanomaterials, metal oxides and near-infrared ECL luminophores [90]. Nanomaterials, such as quantum dots (QDs), have been adopted as final emission species either after direct oxidation reactions or after chemiluminescence resonance energy transfer.
Cadmium selenide (CdSe) QDs are one of the most popular ECL emitters due to their intrinsic properties, such as unique luminescent properties and relatively low cost. CdSe QDs have been used in ECL immunosensor to detect β2-agonists. CdSe QDs immobilized on an electrode surface could react with H2O2 to produce a high ECL emission. In the presence of HRP substrate, the consumption of H2O2 in the HRP-catalyzed oxidation process leads to quenching of ECL emission. HRP is conjugated to anti-β2-agonist Ab or the secondary Ab. In the competitive ECL immunoassay, β2-agonist in the sample competes with β2-agonist immobilized on the electrode for the primary Ab and reduces the amount of HRP-containing immunocomplex on the electrode, which alleviates the quenching of the ECL emission by reducing the consumption of H2O2 by HRP. Thus, the ECL intensity was proportional to the amount of β2-agonist in sample. ECL immunosensors based on CdSe QDs and HRP-labeled secondary Ab have been constructed to detect salbutamol in pork and liver, with an LOD of 8.4 pg/mL [91]. ECL immunosensors based on CdSe QDs and anti-salbutamol or anti-ractopamine Ab-conjugated AuNPs-HRP have been constructed to detect these compounds in pork, liver and feed. AuNPs provided a matrix to anchor a large amount of HRP which greatly enhanced the electrochemical quenching. LODs for salbutamol and ractopamine were 17 pg/mL and 1.7 pg/mL, respectively [92,93].
To construct ECL immunosensors to detect β2-agonist, many researchers used QDs as probe to label the anti-β2-agonist antibody and used AuNPs as substrates and electron transport accelerators. By competitive immunoassay, the β2-agonist in the sample competes with the β2-agonist immobilized on the electrode for binding to QDs labeled β2-agonist Ab, which results in the reduction in the β2-agonist-Ab-QDs complex on electrode and ECL signal. Dong et al. [94] used CdSe@SiO2 nanoparticles to label antibody against salbutamol to construct an ECL immunosensor to detect salbutamol in pork. The detection range was 0.001–1000 pg/mL with an LOD of 0.17 pg/mL. To amplify the ECL signal, various chemicals which can carry more QDs have been used to prepare the antibody probe for detecting β2-agonists. Dong at al. [95] used polyamidoamine dendrimers (PAMAM) and silver-cysteine hybrid nanoribbon (SNR) to prepare CdSe QDS-PAMAM-SNR-Ab for detecting brombuterol in pork and feed. Zhu et al. used CdTeQDs-PAMAM-GO-labeled antibody composite to detect brombuterol [96] and used CdSe QDs/PDDA-GN/AuNPs-labeled antibody composite to detect ractopamine in pork [97]. The amplification of the ECL signal increased the sensitivity of these ECL immunosensors and decreased the LOD for β2-agonist to lower pg/mL level.
Li et al. [98] developed an ECL resonance energy transfer (RET) immunosensor to detect brombuterol residues in pork and swine feed based on competitive immunoassay. The electrode was modified with graphitic-phase carbon nitride (g-C3N4) which worked as the ECL emitter. The antibody against brombuterol was labeled with Au-Ag alloy nanoparticles which were energy acceptors. When there is no brombuterol in the sample, the Au-Ag antibody binds with brombuterol immobilized on g-C3N4-coated electrode. Resonance energy transfer occurs and the ECL emission was quenched. On the contrary, brombuterol in the sample competed with brombuterol immobilized on g-C3N4 to bind Au-Ag antibody, g-C3N4 releases a strong ECL signal. The ECL-RET immunosensor for brombuterol detection exhibited high sensitivity with an LOD of 0.31 pg/mL.

3.5.4. Electrochemical Immunosensor

Electrochemical immunosensors combine highly sensitive electrochemical sensing technology with highly specific immunological techniques. In electrochemical immunosensor, the antibody and antigen interaction results in the change in electrical signal, such as current, voltage, resistivity and impedance, that correlates with the concentration of analyte.

Label-Free Electrochemical Immunosensor

Highly sensitive label-free electrochemical immunosensors have been constructed by immobilizing anti-β2-agonist antibody on various types of electrodes which carry a gold nanostructure and other modifiers for detecting β2-agonist, such as salbutamol [99], ractopamine [100] and clenbuterol [101].The LOD was at pg/mL or fg/mL level. Cui et al. [102] constructed a sandwich-type electrochemical immunosensor for detecting salbutamol. The primary salbutamol antibody was immobilized onto sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate-functionalized graphene sheets (SDBS-GS) and coated on the electrode. The secondary salbutamol antibody was conjugated to Pd@SBA-15/BMIM·Br nanoparticles. The electrochemical immunosensor exhibited a wide working range from 0.02 to 15.0 ng/mL with an LOD of 7 pg/mL. Wang et al. [103] constructed a multiplexed electrochemical biosensor to simultaneously detect ractopamine (RAC), salbutamol (SAL) and clenbuterol (CLB) through a competitive immunoassay. Artificial antigens of RAC, SAL and CLB were, respectively, immobilized onto three working electrodes by binding to reduced graphene oxide. The antibody against RAC, SAL or CLB was conjugated with silver-palladium alloy nanoparticles (AgPd NPs). β2-agonists in the sample competed with RAC, SAL and CLB on the electrodes for binding antibodies on AgPd NPs. This immunosensor can simultaneously detect RAC, SAL and CLB ranging from 0.01 to100 ng/mL with LOD of 1.52, 1.44 and 1.38 pg/mL, respectively. Gu et al. [104] developed three electrochemical immunosensors. Each can detect six β2-agonists through a competitive immunoassay. β2-agonists in the sample competed with ractopamine (RAC), clenbuterol (CL) or salbutamol (SAL) immobilized on graphene-coated glassy carbon electrode (GCE/GNP) to bind with pAb against BSA-RAC-CL-SAL antigen. As the antibody had cross-reactivity with terbutaline, mabuterol and tulobuterol, each immunosensor could detect six β2-agonists. All three immunosensors could detect CL with LODs of 0.1 ng/mL. The GCE/GNP/RAC immunosensor detected the other five β2-agonists with LOD of 0.1 ng/mL, which was lower than those of the other two immunosensors.

Enzyme-Labeled Electrochemical Immunosensors

Enzymatic-labeled electrochemical immunosensors have been constructed to detect β2-agonist based on competitive immunoassay, using electrode coated with β2-agonist or primary β2-agonist antibody/secondary antibody, and enzyme-labeled β2-agonist antibody or β2-agonist. The most commonly used enzymes are HRP and ALP. To enhance the electroactivity, the electrodes are usually modified with various materials, such as gold nanoparticles, polyaniline/poly(acrylic acid), colloidal Prussian blue and multiwall carbon nanotubes. Various nanomaterials are used as carriers of enzyme-conjugated β2-agonist/antibody to amplify the signal for β2-agonist detection.
Electrochemical immunosensors were developed to detect salbutamol by immobilizing salbutamol on the electrode modified with gold nanoparticles or other materials, and conjugating the HRP antibody to graphene, Au hybrid graphene nanocomposite or multiwall carbon nanotubes [105,106,107]. The LODs were between 0.03 ng/mL and 0.06 ng/mL, respectively. Electrochemical immunosensors have been fabricated to detect clenbuterol by immobilizing a primary or secondary antibody against clenbuterol on the electrode with various modifications, and labeling clenbuterol with HRP, ALP or glucose oxidase [108,109,110,111]. The LOD of clenbuterol is between 0.008 and 0.25 ng/mL.

3.6. Other Types of Immunoassays

In addition to the aforementioned immunological techniques, other methods based on the antigen–antibody interaction were also established for detecting β2-agonists, such as immune-PCR, gel-based immunoassay, fluorescence polarization immunoassay and integrated microfluidic immunoassay.
Immuno-PCR is a technique to detect antigens and antibodies through a combination of an immunoassay and a PCR. In 1992, Sano et al. [112] developed an immuno-PCR technique based on the direct ELISA, in which the detection enzyme in ELISA was replaced with a biotinylated reporter DNA bound to the antigen–antibody complex through a streptavidin-protein A fusion protein. It combined the antigen detection with ultrasensitive PCR signal amplification, which greatly increases the sensitivity of detection. In recent years, immuno-PCR techniques have been developed by combining versatile DNA-antibody linking methods with real-time PCR (qPCR) to detect β2-agonists. Lei et al. [113] established a direct competitive immuno-PCR assay to detect salbutamol in human urine. Each PCR tube was coated with salbutamol antibody, to which salbutamol labeled with double-stranded DNA and free salbutamol in the sample are competitively bound. The bound DNA in tubes was amplified and quantified by qPCR. Under the optimized conditions, the assay showed a linear range over seven orders of magnitude, whereas the LOD of salbutamol in the human urine sample was 28 fg/mL. Zhao et al. [114] developed a complete antigen-bridged DNA strand displacement amplification immuno-PCR assay for detecting salbutamol. Salbutamol antibodies were immobilized on the immunomagnetic beads. Salbutamol-BSA was linked to DNA probe 1 or 2 which each contained a split DNA barcode and a recognition site for cleavage endonuclease and subsequent quantification by qPCR. Upon binding with salbutamol antibodies on the immunomagnetic beads, the salbutamol probe 1 and probe 2 were closed and form a full-length DNA amplicon after the addition of a complementary bridging DNA and ligase. The full-length DNA amplicons were separated by magnetic separation and amplified by strand displacement amplification (SDA) and qPCR. To detect salbutamol, the salbutamol in the sample competes with salbutamol probes for binding salbutamol antibody, resulting in the reduction in full-length DNA amplicons necessary to SDA and qPCR. The developed immuno-PCR assay specifically detected salbutamol with LOD of 0.65 fg/mL. It was successfully applied to the detection of salbutamol in water and urine samples.
Li et al. [115] developed a gel-based immunoassay for detecting salbutamol and ractopamine residues in pork. The anti-salbutamol antibody and anti-ractopamine antibody were immobilized onto the Sepharose 4B gel, respectively. The anti-salbutamol gel and anti-ractopamine gel were loaded into 1 mL Bond Elut cartridges as the test layers, separated by a layer of air. The target analytes in the samples would compete with HRP-analyte conjugates to combine with the antibody in the test layer. After adding the chromogenic substrate, the negative samples presented a blue color on the respective test layers, while the positive samples presented no or negligible color. The color of the test layers was visually evaluated or photographed for color density-based quantitative analysis. The LODs were 0.5 μg/kg for salbutamol and ractopamine by visual detection. The quantitative LODs of salbutamol and ractopamine in spiked pork samples were 0.051 μg/kg and 0.02 μg/kg, respectively.
Fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) is based on measuring the polarization of light caused by changes in molecular size as a result of antigen–antibody reactions. FPIA use a fluorescein-labeled antigen to compete with the unlabeled antigen for an antibody. If the fluorescein-labeled antigen combines with the antibody, emitted light remains polarized when the incoming light is polarized. As the concentrations of antigen in the sample increase, free fluorescein-labeled antigen molecules also increase in number. Since the unbound fluorescein-labeled antigen molecule rotates freely, the polarized light emitted is reduced. FPIA has been widely applied to small molecule analysis. Zvereva et al. [116] detected ractopamine through FPIA, using ractopamine-aminomethyl fluorescein conjugate and mAb against ractopamine. The FPIA demonstrated an LOD of 1 ng/mL, range of detectable concentrations 2.3–50 ng/mL, and high specificity. It can be effectively used to test meat products. Dong et al. [117] developed FPIA for the detection of RAC in pork by synthesizing 10 fluorescein-labeled ractopamine derivatives (tracers) and paring with two pAbs against ractopamine. After careful selection and comparison, a highly sensitive and specific FPIA was developed with an LOD of 0.56 μg/kg for ractopamine in pork.
Zuo et al. [118] developed a method to simultaneously detect clenbuterol (CLB), ractopamine (RAC) and salbutamol (SAL) by hapten microarray-based indirect competitive immunoassay. The BSA conjugates of CLB, RAC and SAL were immobilized on slides precoated with agarose. The corresponding mAbs against these β-agonists, and the standards or samples were introduced for indirect competitive immunoassay. The antigen–antibody binding on the slide was detected using Cy3 dye-labeled secondary antibody. The LODs of CLB, RAC and SAL were 0.09, 0.50 and 0.01 μg/L, respectively. The hapten microarray system can perform high throughput and parallel analysis with high sensitivity and selectivity.
Kong et al. [119] established an integrated microfluidic immunoassay system for high throughput detection of clenbuterol. The 3-layer microchip had eight analysis units in which sample injection, washing, immunoreaction and enzyme catalysis were performed automatically. The competitive immunoassay for clenbuterol was performed. The free clenbuterol in the sample competed with HRP-clenbuterol to bind with the anti-clenbuterol antibody coated on analysis channel. After adding the enzyme substrate, the fluorescence signal was detected by a linear confocal laser-induced fluorescence scanner. The linear range and LOD of clenbuterol were 0–5.0 ng/mL and 0.088 ng/mL, respectively.

4. Conclusions and Perspectives

In the past few decades, the illegal use of β2-agonists in livestock has received continuous attention worldwide due to its potential threat to public health. In this review, we summarized antibody-based techniques to extract β2-agonists from samples, and focused on the development and application of immunological methods in detecting β2-agonists (Table 2). Most of the methods can measure β2-agonists with high specificity and sensitivity. RIA is replaced largely by nonisotopic immunoassays, due to the difficulties associated with the handling and storage of radioactive reagents and disposal of radioactive waste. ELISA can be used for high-throughput detection of β2-agonists, but the sensitivity is moderate and the assay requires a relatively long time. Introduction of nanomaterials in ELISA as enzyme carriers, enzyme mimics and signal reporters may improve the sensitivity, stability and measurement time of the assay. Combination of ELISA with other methods, such as SERS, can also improve the sensitivity of detection. LFIA is fast, easy to perform, not dependent on special equipment and can be carried out on-site to qualitatively or semiquantitatively detect β2-agonists. The use of fluorescent nanomaterials, quantum dots and the upconverting phosphors as probes in LFIA can improve the sensitivity of detection. SERS-based LFIA further increase the sensitivity for detecting β2-agonists, but instrumentation is required. Chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and immunosensors, such as SPR-, SERS-, ECL- and electrochemistry-based immunosensors, can detect β2-agonists in a short time with high sensitivity, but SPR- and SERS-based immunoassays require special instruments. Current CLIAs for detecting the β2-agonist use enzymes to label the secondary Ab and luminescent chemical as substrate to generate light emission. The introduction of luminescent nanoparticles as hemiluminescence probe, such as Au nanoparticles, QDs and magnetic materials, may enhance the sensitivity of the assay. The conventional SPR immunosensors for detecting β2-agonists are simple and rapid, but the sensitivity is not adequate. The introduction of Au nanomaterials as labels for Ab and as the amplification tags immobilized on the sensor surface enhances the SPR signal. Continued research should be pursued to explore novel nanomaterials to improve the performance, to generate the SPR chips for recyclable use and exploit miniaturized SPR devices to reduce cost. SERS immunosensors based on nanoprobes detect β2-agonists with high sensitivity. However, their stability and reproducibility need to be further improved. Current ECL immunosensors for β2-agonist detection mainly use QDs as probes. Synthesis of new ECL probes, development of new biointerface construction and new signal amplification strategies will improve the performance of sensors. In electrochemical biosensors to detect β2-agonists, nanomaterials, such as gold nanoparticles and graphene, have been used to modify the electrodes or label antibodies to increase conductivity, electron transfer and signal generation. The performance of the immunosensors may be improved by the construction of labels with a high loading of signal species, introduction of interfacial reaction initiated by functionalized nanomaterials and building a synergistic connection between labels and substrate. More research is needed to develop stable, selective, sensitive, rapid and portable devices for detecting β2-agonists.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.O., S.Y. and Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.O. and S.Y.; writing—review and editing, Y.L.; funding acquisition, Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant number 2017YFC1601702).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Billington, C.K.; Penn, R.B.; Hall, I.P. β2 agonists. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2017, 237, 23–40. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Sillence, M.N. Technologies for the control of fat and lean deposition in livestock. Vet. J. 2004, 167, 242–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mazzanti, G.; Daniele, C.; Boatto, G.; Manca, G.; Brambilla, G.; Loizzo, A. New beta-adrenergic agonists used illicitly as growth promoters in animal breeding: Chemical and pharmacodynamic studies. Toxicology 2003, 187, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Prezelj, A.; Obreza, A.; Pecar, S. Abuse of clenbuterol and its detection. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ramos, F.; Baeta, M.L.; Reis, J.; Silveira, M.I. Evaluation of the illegal use of clenbuterol in Portuguese cattle farms from drinking water, urine, hair and feed samples. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2009, 26, 814–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sakai, N.; Sakai, M.; Mohamad Haron, D.E.; Yoneda, M.; Ali Mohd, M. Beta-agonist residues in cattle, chicken and swine livers at the wet market and the environmental impacts of waste water from livestock farms in Selangor State, Malaysia. Chemosphere 2016, 165, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Martínez-Navarro, J.F. Food poisoning related to consumption of illicit beta-agonist in liver. Lancet 1990, 336, 1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brambilla, G.; Loizzo, A.; Fontana, L.; Strozzi, M.; Guarino, A.; Soprano, V. Food poisoning following consumption of clenbuterol-treated veal in Italy. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1997, 278, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sporano, V.; Grasso, L.; Esposito, M.; Oliviero, G.; Brambilla, G.; Loizzo, A. Clenbuterol residues in non-liver containing meat as a cause of collective food poisoning. Vet. Hum. Toxicol. 1998, 40, 141–143. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Brambilla, G.; Cenci, T.; Franconi, F.; Galarini, R.; Macrì, A.; Rondoni, F.; Strozzi, M.; Loizzo, A. Clinical and pharmacological profile in a clenbuterol epidemic poisoning of contaminated beef meat in Italy. Toxicol. Lett. 2000, 114, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, M.L.; Deng, J.F.; Chen, Y.; Chu, W.L.; Hung, D.Z.; Yang, C.C. Late diagnosis of an outbreak of leanness-enhancing agent-related food poisoning. J. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2013, 31, 1501–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Baynes, R.E.; Dedonder, K.; Kissell, L.; Mzyk, D.; Marmulak, T.; Smith, G.; Tell, L.; Gehring, R.; Davis, J.; Riviere, J.E. Health concerns and management of select veterinary drug residues. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2016, 88, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Boyd, D.; O’Keeffe, M.; Smyth, M.R. Methods for the determination of beta-agonists in biological matrices. Rev. Anal. 1996, 121, 1R–10R. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, W.; Wang, P.; Su, X. Current advancement in analysis of β-agonists. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 85, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, G.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, F.; Liu, J.; Wu, D. Emerging nanosensing technologies for the detection of β-agonists. Food Chem. 2020, 332, 127431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Danyi, S.; Degand, G.; Duez, C.; Granier, B.; Maghuin-Rogister, G.; Scippo, M.L. Solubilisation and binding characteristics of a recombinant beta2-adrenergic receptor expressed in the membrane of Escherichia coli for the multianalyte detection of beta-agonists and antagonists residues in food-producing animals. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 589, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cheng, G.; Li, F.; Peng, D.; Huang, L.; Hao, H.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, Z. Development of an enzyme-linked-receptor assay based on Syrian hamster β2-adrenergic receptor for detection of β-agonists. Anal. Biochem. 2014, 459, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. dos Ramos, F.J. Beta2-agonist extraction procedures for chromatographic analysis. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 880, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Haasnoot, W.; Ploum, M.E.; Paulussen, R.J.; Schilt, R.; Huf, F.A. Rapid determination of clenbuterol residues in urine by high-performance liquid chromatography with on-line automated sample processing using immunoaffinity chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1990, 519, 323–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cai, J.; Henion, J. Quantitative multi-residue determination of beta-agonists in bovine urine using on-line immunoaffinity extraction-coupled column packed capillary liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 1997, 691, 357–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shelver, W.L.; Smith, D.J. Immunoaffinity column as sample cleanup method for determination of the beta-adrenergic agonist ractopamine and its metabolites. J. AOAC Int. 2002, 85, 1302–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Lin, Q.B.; Zhao, X.T.; Song, H.; Pan, Y.L. Immunoaffinity chromatography purification and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry determination of four β-agonists in beef. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2012, 29, 935–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hellenäs, K.-E.; Johansson, M.A.; Elliott, C.T.; Sternesjö, A.; Stenberg, E. EuroResidue IV-Proceedings of the Conference on Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Food; van Ginkel, L.A., Ruiter, A., Eds.; RIVM, Laboratory for Residue Analysis: Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 542–545. [Google Scholar]
  24. Haasnoot, W.; Kemmers-Voncken, A.; van Rhijn, H.; Schilt, R. Immunofiltration as al ternative for immunoaffinity chromatography. In EuroResidue IV-Proceedings of the Conference on Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Food; van Ginkel, L.A., Ruiter, A., Eds.; RIVM, Laboratory for Residue Analysis: Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 496–500. [Google Scholar]
  25. Haasnoot, W.; Kemmers-Voncken, A.; Samson, D. Immunofiltration as sample cleanup for the immunochemical detection of beta-agonists in urine. Analyst 2002, 127, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cheng, J.; Su, X.O.; Wang, S.; Zhao, Y. Highly Sensitive detection of clenbuterol in animal urine using immunomagnetic bead treatment and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Cheng, J.; Su, X.O.; Han, C.; Wang, S.; Wang, P.; Zhang, S.; Xie, J. Ultrasensitive detection of salbutamol in animal urine by immunomagnetic bead treatment coupling with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 255, 2329–2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Peng, T.; Wang, J.; Zhao, S.; Xie, S.; Yao, K.; Zheng, P.; Wang, S.; Ke, Y.; Jiang, H. A fluorometric clenbuterol immunoassay based on the use of organic/inorganic hybrid nanoflowers modified with gold nanoclusters and artificial antigen. Mikrochim. Acta 2018, 185, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huang, Z.; Xiong, Z.; Chen, Y.; Hu, S.; Lai, W. Sensitive and matrix-tolerant lateral flow immunoassay based on fluorescent magnetic nanobeads for the detection of clenbuterol in swine urine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 3028–3036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Loo, J.C.; Beaulieu, N.; Jordan, N.; Brien, R.; McGilveray, I.J. A specific radio-immunoassay (RIA) for salbutamol (albuterol) in human plasma. Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 1987, 55, 283–286. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Rominger, K.L.; Mentrup, A.; Stiasni, M. Radioimmunological determination of fenoterol. Part II: Antiserum and tracer for the determination of fenoterol. Arzneimittelforsch 1990, 40, 887–895. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Adam, A.; Ong, H.; Sondag, D.; Rapaille, A.; Marleau, S.; Bellemare, M.; Raymond, P.; Giroux, D.; Loo, J.K.; Beaulieu, N. Radioimmunoassay for albuterol using a monoclonal antibody: Application for direct quantification in horse urine. J. Immunoass. 1990, 11, 329–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Delahaut, P.; Dubois, M.; Pri-Bar, I.; Buchman, O.; Degand, G.; Ectors, F. Development of a specific radioimmunoassay for the detection of clenbuterol residues in treated cattle. Food Addit. Contam. 1991, 8, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Granja, R.H.; Montes, N.A.M.; Rabone, F.; Montes Niño, R.E.; Cannavan, A.; Salerno, A.G. Validation of radioimmunoassay screening methods for beta-agonists in bovine liver according to Commission Decision 2002/657/EC. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2008, 25, 1475–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bui, Q.A.; Vu, T.H.; Ngo, V.K.; Kennedy, I.R.; Lee, N.A.; Allan, R. Development of an ELISA to detect clenbuterol in swine products using a new approach for hapten design. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 6045–6052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Talib, N.A.A.; Salam, F.; Sulaiman, Y. Development of polyclonal antibody against clenbuterol for immunoassay application. Molecules 2018, 23, 789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Lei, Y.C.; Tsai, Y.F.; Tai, Y.T.; Lin, C.Y.; Hsieh, K.H.; Chang, T.H.; Sheu, S.Y.; Kuo, T.F. Development and fast screening of salbutamol residues in swine serum by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in Taiwan. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 5494–5499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bai, Y.; Liu, Z.; Bi, Y.; Wang, X.; Jin, Y.; Sun, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, C.; Xu, S. Preparation of polyclonal antibodies and development of a direct competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect residues of phenylethanolamine A in urine samples. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 11618–11624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Huang, Q.; Zhao, B.; Bold, S.E.; Bu, T.; Yan, L.; Dou, L.; Yang, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, D. Immunoassay of clenbuterol with bacteria as natural signal carriers for signal amplification. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 288, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, X.; Wang, W.; Wang, L.; Wang, Q.; Pei, X.; Jiang, H. Rapid determination of phenylethanolamine A in biological samples by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and lateral-flow immunoassay. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 7615–7624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Han, S.; Zhou, T.; Yin, B.; He, P. Gold nanoparticle-based colorimetric ELISA for quantification of ractopamine. Mikrochim. Acta 2018, 185, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shelver, W.L.; Smith, D.J. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay development for the beta-adrenergic agonist zilpaterol. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 2159–2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lu, Q.; Hou, Y.Y.; Liu, X.X.; Wang, H.; Hou, J.J.; Wei, J.L.; Zhou, S.S.; Liu, X.Y. Construction, expression and functional analysis of anti-clenbuterol codon-optimized scFv recombinant antibody. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 135, 110973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, A.; Huang, X.A.; Lei, H. Two binding epitopes modulating specificity of immunoassay for β-agonist detection: Quantitative structure-activity relationship. Food Chem. 2022, 371, 131071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, L.; Jiang, W.; Shen, X.; Li, X.; Huang, X.A.; Xu, Z.; Sun, Y.; Chan, S.W.; Zeng, L.; Eremin, S.A.; et al. Four hapten spacer sites modulating class specificity: Nondirectional multianalyte immunoassay for 31 β-agonists and analogues. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 2716–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Qiu, J.; Liu, Z.; Kong, F. Development of a highly sensitive time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay for the determination of trace salbutamol in environmental samples. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 679, 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Xu, M.; Qian, X.; Zhao, K.; Deng, A.; Li, J. Flow injection chemiluminescent competitive immunoassay for the β-adrenergic agonist salbutamol using carboxylic resin beads and enzymatic amplification. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2015, 215, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhou, X.; Li, Y.; Shi, J.; Zhao, K.; Deng, A.; Li, J. A flow injection chemiluminescent immunosensor for ultrasensitive detection of brombuterol based on resin beads and enzymatic amplification. Food Anal. Methods 2019, 12, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, S.; Chen, Q.; Wei, X.; Wu, J.; Wang, C.; Liu, J.; Zhang, L.; Dong, Y. A competitive luminol chemiluminescence immunosensor based on a microfluidic chip for the determination of ractopamine. Electrophoresis 2017, 38, 368–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, M.Z.; Wang, M.Z.; Chen, Z.L.; Fang, J.H.; Fang, M.M.; Liu, J.; Yu, X.P. Development of a colloidal gold-based lateral-flow immunoassay for the rapid simultaneous detection of clenbuterol and ractopamine in swine urine. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 395, 2591–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wu, K.; Guo, L.; Xu, W.; Xu, H.; Aguilar, Z.P.; Xu, G.; Lai, W.; Xiong, Y.; Wan, Y. Sulfonated polystyrene magnetic nanobeads coupled with immunochromatographic strip for clenbuterol determination in pork muscle. Talanta 2014, 129, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xie, C.H.; Chen, F.J.; Yang, T.B. A high-affinity anti-salbutamol monoclonal antibody: Key to a robust lateral-flow immunochromatographic assay. Anal. Biochem. 2012, 426, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zvereva, E.A.; Zherdev, A.V.; Xu, C.; Dzantiev, B.B. Highly sensitive immunochromatographic assay for qualitative and quantitative control of beta-agonist salbutamol and its structural analogs in foods. Food Control 2018, 86, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, J.H.; Li, C.S.; Wu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, X.F.; Cheng, H.; Yan, J.H. Development of an ultrasensitive immunochromatographic assay (ICA) strip for the rapid detection of phenylethanolamine A in urine and pork samples. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, 894–899. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ren, M.L.; Chen, X.L.; Li, C.H.; Xu, B.; Liu, W.J.; Xu, H.Y.; Xiong, Y.H. Lateral flow immunoassay for quantitative detection of ractopamine in swine urine. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2014, 27, 134–137. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Gu, H.Y.; Liu, L.P.; Song, S.S.; Kuang, H.; Xu, C.L. Development of an immunochromatographic strip assay for ractopamine detection using an ultrasensitive monoclonal antibody. Food Agric. Immunol. 2016, 27, 471–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zvereva, E.A.; Shpakova, N.A.; Zherdev, A.V.; Xu, C.; Dzantiev, B.B. Highly sensitive immunochromatographic assay for qualitative and quantitative control of beta-agonist ractopamine in Foods. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2018, 54, 436–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Preechakasedkit, P.; Ngamrojanavanich, N.; Khongchareonporn, N.; Chailapakul, O. Novel ractopamine-protein carrier conjugation and its application to the lateral flow strip test for ractopamine detection in animal feed. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2019, 20, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Huang, Q.; Bu, T.; Zhang, W.; Yan, L.; Zhang, M.; Yang, Q.; Huang, L.; Yang, B.; Hu, N.; Suo, Y.; et al. An improved clenbuterol detection by immunochromatographic assay with bacteria@Au composite as signal amplifier. Food Chem. 2018, 262, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; Huang, Y.; Dandapat, A.; Dai, L.; Zhang, G.; Lu, X.; Zhang, J.; Lai, W.; Chen, T. Hollow Au-Ag nanoparticles labeled immunochromatography strip for highly snsitive detection of clenbuterol. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Chen, Y.; Huang, Z.; Hu, S.; Zhang, G.; Peng, J.; Xia, J.; Lai, W. Integrated immunochromatographic assay for qualitative and quantitative detection of clenbuterol. Anal. Biochem. 2019, 577, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhu, C.J.; Zhao, G.Y.; Dou, W.C. Immunochromatographic assay using brightly colored silica nanoparticles as visible label for point-of-care detection of clenbuterol. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 266, 392–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yu, Q.; Liu, J.; Zhao, G.; Dou, W. A silica nanoparticle based 2-colorimmunochromatographic assay for simultaneous determination of clenbuterol and ractopamine. Mikrochim. Acta 2019, 186, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wang, Z.Z.; Jing, J.; Ren, Y.G.; Guo, Y.F.; Tao, N.Y.; Zhou, Q.W.; Zhang, H.L.; Ma, Y.F.; Wang, Y.H. Preparation and application of selenium nanoparticles in a lateral flow immunoassay for clenbuterol detection. Mater. Lett. 2019, 234, 212–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, Z.; Zhou, Q.; Guo, Y.; Hu, H.; Zheng, Z.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Y. Rapid detection of ractopamine and salbutamol in swine urine by immunochromatography based on selenium nanoparticles. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021, 16, 2059–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhao, B.X.; Huang, Q.; Dou, L.N.; Bu, T.; Chen, K.; Yang, Q.F.; Yan, L.Z.; Wang, J.L.; Zhang, D.H. Prussian blue nanoparticles based lateral flow assay for high sensitive determination of clenbuterol. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 275, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liu, J.; Yu, Q.; Zhao, G.; Dou, W. Ultramarine blue nanoparticles as a label for immunochromatographic on-site determination of ractopamine. Mikrochim. Acta 2020, 187, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Song, C.; Zhi, A.; Liu, Q.; Yang, J.; Jia, G.; Shervin, J.; Tang, L.; Hu, X.; Deng, R.; Xu, C.; et al. Rapid and sensitive detection of β-agonists using a portable fluorescence biosensor based on fluorescent nanosilica and a lateral flow test strip. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 50, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, P.; Wang, Z.; Su, X. A sensitive and quantitative fluorescent multi-component immuno-chromatographic sensor for β-agonist residues. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 64, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, R.; Zhang, W.; Wang, P.; Su, X. A paper-based competitive lateral flow immunoassay for multi β-agonist residues by using a single monoclonal antibody labelled with red fluorescent nanoparticles. Mikrochim. Acta 2018, 185, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Hu, L.M.; Luo, K.; Xia, J.; Xu, G.M.; Wu, C.H.; Han, J.J.; Zhang, G.G.; Liu, M.; Lai, W.H. Advantages of time-resolved fluorescent nanobeads compared with fluorescent submicrospheres, quantum dots, and colloidal gold as label in lateral flow assays for detection of ractopamine. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 91, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Shi, C.Y.; Deng, N.; Liang, J.J.; Zhou, K.N.; Fu, Q.Q.; Tang, Y. A fluorescent polymer dots positive readout fluorescent quenching lateral flow sensor for ractopamine rapid detection. Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 854, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, P.; Wang, R.; Zhang, W.; Su, X.; Luo, H. Novel fabrication of immunochromatographic assay based on up conversion phosphors for sensitive detection of clenbuterol. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 77, 866–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wang, W.; Su, X.; Ouyang, H.; Wang, L.; Fu, Z. A novel immunochromatographic assay based on a time-resolved chemiluminescence strategy for the multiplexed detection of ractopamine and clenbuterol. Anal. Chim. Acta 2016, 917, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zhang, H.; Wang, L.; Yao, X.; Wang, Z.; Dou, L.; Su, L.; Zhao, M.; Sun, J.; Zhang, D.; Wang, J. Developing a simple immunochromatography assay for clenbuterol with sensitivity by one-step staining. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 15509–15515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Li, M.; Yang, H.; Li, S.; Zhao, K.; Li, J.; Jiang, D.; Sun, L.; Deng, A. Ultrasensitive and quantitative detection of a new β-agonist phenylethanolamine A by a novel immunochromatographic assay based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 10896–10902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Xie, Y.; Chang, H.F.; Zhao, K.; Li, J.G.; Yang, H.; Mei, L.Y.; Xu, S.M.; Deng, A.P. A novel immunochromatographic assay (ICA) based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering for the sensitive and quantitative determination of clenbuterol. Anal. Methods 2015, 7, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Fu, H.Q.; Chu, Y.X.; Zhao, K.; Li, J.G.; Deng, A.P. Ultrasensitive detection of the β-adrenergic agonist brombuterol by a SERS-based lateral flow immunochromatographic assay using flower-like gold-silver core-shell nanoparticles. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 1711–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Nguyen, H.H.; Park, J.; Kang, S.; Kim, M. Surface plasmon resonance: A versatile technique for biosensor applications. Sensors 2015, 15, 10481–10510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Li, W.; Wang, C.; Li, H.; Chen, Z.; Yan, M. Strategy of Dimercaptothiol as self-assembled monolayers enhance the sensitivity of SPR immunosensor for detection of salbutamol. Anal. Sci. 2021, 37, 1289–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Suherman, M.K.; Kawaguchi, T. Highly selective and sensitive detection of β-agonists using a surface plasmon resonance sensor based on an alkanethiol monolayer functionalized on a Au surface. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 67, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wang, S.; Zhao, S.; Wei, X.; Zhang, S.; Liu, J.; Dong, Y. An improved label-free indirect competitive SPR immunosensor and its comparison with conventional ELISA for ractopamine detection in swine urine. Sensors 2017, 17, 604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Kabiraz, D.C.; Morita, K.; Sakamoto, K.; Kawaguchi, T. Mechanism of surface plasmon resonance sensing by indirect competitive inhibition immunoassay using Au nanoparticle labeled antibody. Talanta 2017, 172, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Kabiraz, D.C.; Morita, K.; Sakamoto, K.; Takahashi, M.; Kawaguchi, T. Highly sensitive detection of clenbuterol in urine sample by using surface plasmon resonance immunosensor. Talanta 2018, 186, 521–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Zhu, G.C.; Hu, Y.J.; Gao, J.; Zhong, L. Highly sensitive detection of clenbuterol using competitive surface-enhanced Raman scattering immunoassay. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 697, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Yu, M.; Hu, Y.J.; Liu, J.Z. Simultaneous detection of clenbuterol and ractopamine based on multiplexed competitive surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) immunoassay. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 10407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gu, X.F.; Tian, S.; Chen, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.X.; Gu, D.D.; Guo, E.H.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.G.; Deng, A.P. A SERS-based competitive immunoassay using highly ordered gold cavity arrays as the substrate for simultaneous detection of β-adrenergic agonists. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 345, 130230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wei, C.; Zhang, C.J.; Xu, M.M.; Yuan, Y.X.; Yao, J.L. Liquid magnetic competitive immunoassay ofclenbuterol based on surface-enhancedRaman spectroscopy. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2017, 48, 1307–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yao, D.; Li, C.; Wen, G.; Liang, A.; Jiang, Z. A highly sensitive and accurate SERS/RRS dual-spectroscopic immunosensor for clenbuterol based on nitrogen/silver-codoped carbon dots catalytic amplification. Talanta 2020, 209, 120529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Abdussalam, A.; Xu, G. Recent advances in electrochemiluminescence luminophores. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2022, 414, 131–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Dong, T.T.; Tang, Q.H.; Chen, M.; Deng, A.P.; Li, J.G. Ultrasensitive Electrochemiluminescent competitive immunoassay for β-Adrenergic agonist salbutamol based on quantum dots and enzymatic amplification. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Cai, F.; Wang, N.; Dong, T.; Deng, A.; Li, J. Dual-signal amplified electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for salbutamol based on quantum dots and gold nanoparticle-labeled horseradish peroxidase. Analyst 2015, 140, 5885–5890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Yan, Q.N.; Cai, F.D.; Zhao, K.; Wu, K.; Deng, A.P.; Li, J.G. Dual-signal amplified electrochemiluminescent immunosensor for detecting ractopamine using quantum dots and gold nanoparticles-labeled horseradish peroxidase. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2017, 6, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Dong, T.T.; Tang, Q.H.; Zhao, K.; Deng, A.P.; Li, J.G. Ultrasensitive electrochemiluminescent salbutamol immunoassay with dual-signal amplification using CdSe@SiO2 as label and gold nanoparticles as substrate. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 961–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Dong, T.; Hu, L.; Zhao, K.; Deng, A.; Li, J. Multiple signal amplified electrochemiluminescent immunoassay for brombuterol detection using gold nanoparticles and polyamidoamine dendrimers-silver nanoribbon. Anal. Chim. Acta 2016, 945, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Zhu, Q.; Cai, F.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, K.; Deng, A.; Li, J. Highly sensitive electrochemiluminescent immunosensor based on gold nanoparticles-functionalized zinc oxide nanorod and poly(amidoamine)-graphene for detecting brombuterol. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 86, 899–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Zhu, Q.; Liu, H.X.; Zhang, J.; Wu, K.; Deng, A.P.; Li, J.G. Ultrasensitive QDs based electrochemiluminescent immunosensor for detecting ractopamine using AuNPs and Au nanoparticles@PDDA-graphene as amplifier. Sens. Actuators B 2017, 243, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Li, P.; Ma, G.; Wu, K.; Deng, A.; Li, J. An electrochemiluminescence energy resonance transfer system for highly sensitive detection of brombuterol. Talanta 2021, 223, 121687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lin, C.H.; Lin, M.J.; Huang, J.D.; Chuang, Y.S.; Kuo, Y.F.; Chen, J.C.; Wu, C.C. Label-free impedimetric immunosensors modulated by protein A/bovine serum albumin layer for ultrasensitive detection of salbutamol. Sensors 2020, 20, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. He, L.H.; Guo, C.P.; Song, Y.P.; Zhang, S.; Wang, M.H.; Peng, D.L.; Fang, S.M.; Zhang, Z.H.; Liu, C.S. Chitosan stabilized gold nanoparticle based electrochemical ractopamine immunoassay. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 2919–2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhan, B.L.; Zhang, Y.T.; Zhao, X. High sensitive sol-gel based electrochemical immunosensor for Clenbuterol Determination. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2021, 16, 211124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Cui, Z.T.; Cai, Y.Y.; Wu, D.; Yu, H.Q.; Li, Y.; Mao, K.X.; Wang, H.; Fan, H.X.; Wei, Q.; Du, B. An ultrasensitive electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of salbutamol based on Pd@SBA-15 and ionic liquid. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 69, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Du, B.; Ma, H.; Wu, D.; Wei, Q. A silver-palladium alloy nanoparticle-based electrochemical biosensor for simultaneous detection of ractopamine, clenbuterol and salbutamol. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 49, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Gu, C.; Ren, P.; Zhang, F.; Zhao, G.; Shen, J.; Zhao, B. Detection of six β-agonists by three multiresidue immunosensors based on an anti-bovine serum albumin-ractopamine-clenbuterol-salbutamol antibody. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 5548–5555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Huang, J.D.; Lin, Q.; Zhang, X.M.; He, X.R.; Xing, X.R.; Lian, W.J.; Zuo, M.M.; Zhang, Q.Q. Electrochemical immunosensor based on polyaniline/poly (acrylic acid) and Au-hybrid graphene nanocomposite for sensitivity enhanced detection of salbutamol. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 92–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Liu, S.; Lin, Q.; Zhang, X.M.; He, X.R.; Xing, X.R.; Lian, W.J.; Huang, J.D. Electrochemical immunosensor for salbutamol detection based onCS-Fe3O4-PAMAM-GNPs nanocomposites and HRP-MWCNTs-Ab bioconjugates for signal amplification. Sens. Actuators B 2011, 156, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Han, X. Development of electrochemical immunosensor for detecting sSalbutamol by competitive immune strategy. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2020, 15, 7337–7346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Regiart, M.; Fernández-Baldo, M.A.; Spotorno, V.G.; Bertolino, F.A.; Raba, J. Ultra sensitive microfluidic immunosensor for determination of clenbuterol in bovine hair samples using electrodeposited gold nanoparticles and magnetic micro particles as bio-affinity platform. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 41, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Talib, N.A.A.; Salam, F.; Sulaiman, Y. Development of Highly sensitive immunosensor for clenbuterol detection by using poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/graphene oxide modified screen-printed carbon electrode. Sensors 2018, 18, 4324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Lai, Y.; Bai, J.; Shi, X.; Zeng, Y.; Xian, Y.; Hou, J.; Jin, L. Graphene oxide as nanocarrier for sensitive electrochemical immunoassay of clenbuterol based on labeling amplification strategy. Talanta 2013, 107, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Dou, Y.Z.; Jiang, Z.N.; Deng, W.P.; Su, J.; Chen, S.X.; Song, H.Y.; Aldalbahi, A.; Zuo, X.L.; Song, X.P.; Shi, J.Y.; et al. Portable detection of clenbuterol using a smartphone-based electrochemical biosensor with electric field-driven acceleration. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016, 781, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Sano, T.; Smith, C.L.; Cantor, C.R. Immuno-PCR: Very sensitive antigen detection by means of specific antibody-DNA conjugates. Science 1992, 258, 120–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Lei, Y.; Li, X.; Akash, M.S.; Zhou, L.; Tang, X.; Shi, W.; Liu, Z.; Chen, S. Development of analytical method for ultrasensitive detection of salbutamol utilizing DNA labeled-immunoprobe. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2015, 107, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Zhao, L.; Zhou, H.; Sun, T.; Liu, W.; He, H.; Ning, B.; Li, S.; Peng, Y.; Han, D.; Zhao, Z.; et al. Complete antigen-bridged DNA strand displacement amplification immuno-PCR assay for ultrasensitive detection of salbutamol. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 748, 142330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Li, C.; Li, J.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, S.; Shen, J.; Wen, K.; Wang, Z. Development and application of a gel-based immunoassay for the rapid screening of salbutamol and ractopamine residues in pork. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 10556–10561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Zvereva, E.A.; Shpakova, N.A.; Zherdev, A.V.; Kiu, L.; Xu, C.; Eremin, S.A.; Dzantiev, B.B. Fluorescence polarization immunoassay of ractopamine. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2016, 52, 673–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Dong, B.; Zhao, S.; Li, H.; Wen, K.; Ke, Y.; Shen, J.; Zhang, S.; Shi, W.; Wang, Z. Design, synthesis and characterization of tracers and development of a fluorescence polarization immunoassay for the rapid detection of ractopamine in pork. Food Chem. 2019, 271, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zuo, P.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Ye, B.C. Determination of beta-adrenergic agonists by hapten microarray. Talanta 2010, 82, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kong, J.; Jiang, L.; Su, X.; Qin, J.; Du, Y.; Lin, B. Integrated microfluidic immunoassay for the rapid determination of clenbuterol. Lab Chip. 2009, 9, 1541–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of antibody-based methods for extracting β2-agonists from samples.
Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of antibody-based methods for extracting β2-agonists from samples.
MethodsAdvantagesDisadvantages
Immunoaffinity chromatographySimple, fast; high separation efficiency and reproducibilityProteases from animal sample may digest protein A or antibody on the immunoaffinity column. The high-affinity binding of antibodies and
antigens may complicate the elution of the
antigen.
ImmunofiltrationSimple, fast, low costFilters are easily clogged by large particles in samples. Contaminating proteins that adhered to the filter will elute with the antigens.
Immunomagnetic separationSimple, fast, easy to perform; high separation efficiency and reproducibilityCommercial immunomagnetic particles for
β2-agonists extraction are not available.
Table 2. Immunoassays for the detection of β2-agonists.
Table 2. Immunoassays for the detection of β2-agonists.
Analytical TechnologiesSamplesAnalyteLimit of DetectionReferences
1. Radioimmunoassayhuman plasmasalbutamol0.5 ng/mL[30]
plasma, urinefenoterol10–20 pg/mL[31]
horse urine albuterol 28.8 fmol/tube[32]
cattle plasma, urine, fecesclenbuterol7.8 pg/tube[33]
bovine liverclenbuterol, mabuterol, etc. 0.1 μg/kg[34]
brombuterol, cimbuterol, etc.0.3 μg/kg
2. ELISA
2.1. Direct competitive ELISAporkclenbuterol0.09 ng/g[35]
milkclenbuterol0.045 ng/mL[36]
feed, milk, swine urine,clenbuterol0.03 ng/mL[39]
swine serumsalbutamol0.25 ng/mL[37]
swine urinephenylethanolamine A0.5 μg/L[38]
2.2 Indirect competitive ELISAswine urine, porkphenylethanolamine Aurine: 0.13 ng/mL, pork: 0.39 ng/g[40]
sheep urineractopamine0.35 ng/mL[41]
swine and bovine urinezilpaterolIC50 3.94 ± 0.48 ng/mL[42]
clenbuterol solutionclenbuterol0.50 ng/mL[43]
clenbuterol solutionclenbuterol0.3 pg/mL[44]
salbutamol solution, urinesalbutamol0.04 ng/mL[45]
livestock wastewatersalbutamol0.66 ng/L[46]
3. Chemiluminescence immunoassay pork, liversalbutamol0.15 ng/mL[47]
swine meat, feed brombuterol 0.33 pg/mL [48]
swine urine ractopamine 0.97 ng/mL [49]
4. Lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA)
4.1. Colorimetric LFIA
4.1.1. Gold nanoparticle as tracerswine urineclenbuterol, ractopamine0.1 ± 0.01 ng/mL[50]
pork muscleclenbuterol0.10 ng/g[51]
swine urinesalbutamol1.0 ng/mL[52]
swine and turkey meat, cow milksalbutamolmeat: 3.0 ng/g; milk: 4.0 ng/g[53]
swine urine, porkphenylethanolamine A5 ng/mL(g)[40]
urine, porkphenylethanolamine A0.1 ng/mL[54]
swine urineractopamine0.13 ng/mL[55]
swine urineractopamine2 ng/mL[56]
turkey meat, beef liverractopamine0.5 ng/mL[57]
swine feedractopamine0.1 ng/g[58]
swine urine and feed, milkclenbuterolurine: 0.1 ng/mL; feed: 0.2 ng/g; milk: 0.5 ng/mL[59]
clenbuterol solutionclenbuterol2 ppb[60]
porkclenbuterol0.04 ng/mL[61]
4.1.2. Other nanoparticles as tracersswine urine, porkclenbuterolurine: 6 ng/mL; pork: 5 ng/mL[62]
clenbuterol, ractopamine solutionclenbuterol, ractopamineclenbuterol: 3 ng/mL; ractopamine: 2 ng/mL[63]
swine urineclenbuterol3 ng/mL[64]
swine urineractopamine, salbutamolractopamine: 1.0 ng/mL; salbutamol: 3.0 ng/mL[65]
pork, swine kidney and baconclenbuterolpork: 3 ng/g; kidney and bacon: 5 ng/g[66]
swine feed, porkractopaminefeed: 2.0 ng/mL; pork: 1.0 ng/mL[67]
4.2. Luminescent LFIAswine urineclenbuterol0.037 ng/mL[68]
swine urineclenbuterol0.22 ng/mL[29]
swine urine, feed, porkclenbuterol, ractopamine, salbuterolclenbuterol: 0.10 ng/mL; ractopamine: 0.10 ng/mL;
salbuterol: 0.09 ng/mL
[69]
swine urineractopamine7.2 pg/mL[71]
swine urine, muscleractopamine0.16 ng/mL[72]
pork tissue, urine, feedclenbuterol0.01 ng/mL[73]
swine urineractopamine, clenbuterol ractopamine: 0.17 ng/mL; clenbuterol: 0.067 ng/mL [74]
4.3. Other types of LFIAmilk, swine liver, tenderloinclenbuterol2 ng/mL[75]
swine urine phenylethanolamine A 0.32 pg/mL[76]
swine urineclenbuterol0.24 pg/mL[77]
swine meat, urinebrombuterol0.5 pg/mL[78]
5. Immunosensors
5.1. Surface plasmon resonance sensorssalbutamol solutionsalbutamol5 ng/mL[80]
ractopamine and salbutamol solution ractopamine, salbutamol ractopamine: 10 pg/mL, salbutamol: 5 pg/mL [81]
swine urineractopamine0.09 ng/mL[82]
clenbuterol solutionclenbuterol0.05 pg/mL[83]
bovine urineclenbuterol100 fg/mL[84]
5.2. SERS-based immunosensorswine urineclenbuterol0.1 pg/mL[85]
clenbuterol and ractopamine solutionclenbuterol, ractopamine1.0 pg/mL[86]
swine meat and liver, human urinesalbutamol, brombuterolsalbutamol 2.0 pg/mL; brombuterol 1.0.pg/mL[87]
clenbuterol solutionclenbuterol0.22 fg/mL[88]
clenbuterol solutionclenbuterol0.68 pg/mL[89]
5.3. Electrochemiluminescence immunosensorpork and liversalbutamol8.4 pg/mL[91]
pork and liversalbutamol17 pg/mL[92]
pork and feedractopamine1.7 pg/mL[93]
porksalbutamol0.17 pg/mL[94]
pork and feedbrombuterol 1.5 pg/mL[95]
porkbrombuterol 0.3 pg/mL[96]
porkractopamine2.6 pg/mL[97]
pork and swine feed extractbrombuterol 0.31 pg/mL[98]
5.4. Electrochemical immunosensorporcine serumsalbutamol0.2 fg/mL[99]
serumsalbutamol7 pg/mL[102]
swine urineractopamine2.3 pg/mL[100]
clenbuterol solutionclenbuterol0.12 ng/mL[101]
porksalbutamol, ractopamine, clenbuterolsalbutamol: 1.44 pg/mL, clenbuterol: 1.38 pg/mL, ractopamine: 1.52 pg/mL[103]
pork, feedsalbutamol0.04 ng/mL[105]
salbutamol solutionsalbutamol0.06 ng/mL[106]
salbutamol solutionsalbutamol0.03 ng/mL[107]
bovine hairclenbuterol0.008 ng/mL[108]
milkclenbuterol0.196 ng/mL[109]
clenbuterol solutionclenbuterol0.076 ng/mL[111]
swine feedclenbuterol0.25 ng/mL[110]
6. Other types of immunoassayshuman urinesalbutamol28 fg/mL[113]
water, urinesalbutamol0.65 fmol/ML[114]
porksalbutamol, ractopaminesabutamol: 0.051 μg/kg, ractopamine: 0.02 μg/kg[115]
turkey meatractopamine1 ng/mL[116]
porkractopamine0.56 μg/kg[117]
clenbuterol, ractopamine and salbutamol solutionclenbuterol, ractopamine, salbutamolclenbuterol: 0.09 μg/L; ractopamine: 0.50 μg/L; salbutamol: 0.01 μg/L[118]
swine urineclenbuterol0.088 ng/mL[119]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ouyang, S.; Yu, S.; Le, Y. Current Advances in Immunoassays for the Detection of β2-Agonists. Foods 2022, 11, 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11060803

AMA Style

Ouyang S, Yu S, Le Y. Current Advances in Immunoassays for the Detection of β2-Agonists. Foods. 2022; 11(6):803. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11060803

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ouyang, Shuyu, Shuting Yu, and Yingying Le. 2022. "Current Advances in Immunoassays for the Detection of β2-Agonists" Foods 11, no. 6: 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11060803

APA Style

Ouyang, S., Yu, S., & Le, Y. (2022). Current Advances in Immunoassays for the Detection of β2-Agonists. Foods, 11(6), 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11060803

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop