Exploring Sustainable Development Pathways for Agri-Food Supply Chains Empowered by Cross-Border E-Commerce Platforms: A Hybrid Grounded Theory and DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC Approach
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (1)
- What are the concepts and characteristics of sustainable development in cross-border e-commerce platform-driven agricultural supply chains?
- (2)
- What are the primary promoting factors for the sustainable development of cross-border e-commerce platform-driven agricultural supply chains?
- (3)
- How are the significance, hierarchical relationships, and interaction relationships of the promoting factors for sustainable development in cross-border e-commerce platform-driven agricultural supply chains constructed?
- (4)
- What practical, feasible pathways exist for achieving sustainability in cross-border e-commerce platform-driven agricultural supply chains?
2. Conceptual Definition and Theoretical Foundation
2.1. Conceptual Definition and Characteristics
- Digitally driven platform: In cross-border e-commerce platform-dominated agri-food supply chains, the digital platform serves as a central engine. Advanced technologies, such as big data, blockchain, and cloud computing, are employed to gather supply chain information, facilitate seamless information flow, and promote effective collaboration among supply chain stakeholders. This digital platform reduces information asymmetry, enhances management transparency, and optimizes coordination efficiency, offering robust support for supply chain collaboration and sustainable development [46,47].
- Green and environmental orientation: Sustainability in cross-border e-commerce platform-dominated agri-food supply chains places a significant emphasis on green and environmental considerations. This entails efficient resource utilization, adoption of clean production methods, and promotion of circular economy practices at various supply chain stages [48]. Environmentally friendly and biodegradable packaging materials reduce waste and environmental pollution while positively impacting consumer perception. Additionally, utilizing eco-friendly transportation powered by renewable energy sources reduces carbon emissions and environmental footprint. Introducing environmental management systems and green assessments integrates green principles into supply chain management and decision-making processes, further enhancing the benefits of sustainable development [49].
- Quality control and safety assurance: Ensuring agri-food product quality and safety is a pivotal goal of cross-border agri-food supply chains. Establishing food safety regulations and product traceability systems enables comprehensive monitoring and traceability of agri-food products from production to transportation, ensuring compliance with quality standards and safety requirements. Furthermore, quality traceability and recall mechanisms enhance process control in key segments, thus enhancing the controllability and safety of supply chain quality [50].
- Demand responsiveness and innovation: Cross-border agri-food supply chains necessitate agile responses to constantly evolving market demands, requiring a high degree of responsiveness and innovation. Leveraging technologies such as big data enables accurate insights into market fluctuations, facilitating timely adjustments to production and supply strategies [51]. Establishing flexible supply chain systems to meet diverse and innovative product or service demands enhances supply chain competitiveness [52].
- Multi-party collaboration and win–win mechanisms: Collaboration among multiple stakeholders is paramount in cross-border agri-food supply chains. Establishing strategic partnerships, which integrate resources from various participants, leads to risk sharing and benefit sharing, ultimately enhancing the efficiency and sustainability of the supply chain. Dynamic optimization mechanisms for business and technological innovation [53], coupled with social responsibility, contribute to stable and beneficial cross-border agri-food supply chain ecosystems [54].
2.2. Platform Theory
2.3. Supply Chain Ecosystem Theory
3. Methods
3.1. Programmatic Grounded Theoretical Approach
3.2. DEMATEL–ISM–MICMAC Method
- (1)
- Data collection: Design questionnaires and invite experts to rate the impact of each factor. Rating criteria: 0 for no impact, 1 for minor impact, 2 for moderate impact, 3 for significant impact, and 4 for very high impact [74].
- (2)
- Construct direct impact matrix Z: Process the collected questionnaire data to calculate the average and construct the direct impact matrix Z.
- (3)
- Calculate composite impact matrix T: Standardize the average direct impact matrix Z to obtain the composite impact matrix T. The unit matrix E is used for calculation.
- (4)
- Analyze composite impact matrix T: Calculate the influence, influenced by centrality and causality, using the composite impact matrix T, revealing the relationships among factors [75].
- (5)
- Calculate reachable matrix: Calculate the overall impact matrix H, derive the threshold λ by averaging all values in the composite impact matrix T, and transform the overall impact matrix H into the reachable matrix M.
- (6)
- Calculate reachable and preceding sets: Utilize the reachable matrix M to determine the reachable and preceding sets of elements. The reachable set is the collection of row vector elements, which can be reached in the reachable matrix M, and the preceding set is the collection of column vector elements, which can be reached [74].
- (7)
- Construct ISM model: Based on the elements, which satisfy Formula (10), build a hierarchical structure. In each extraction, remove the used elements and repeat the process until all elements are categorized into different hierarchical levels.
- (8)
- Calculate dependency and driving force values: Sum the rows and columns of the reachable matrix M to obtain the driving force and dependency values of each factor. The driving force indicates the extent to which a factor influences other factors, while dependency indicates the degree to which a factor is influenced by other factors.
- (9)
- Visualize dependency and driving force quadrant: Plot the calculated driving force and dependency values in a quadrant graph, providing a visual representation of the relationships between factors.
4. Index System Construction
4.1. Data Collection and Processing
4.2. Data Coding
4.2.1. Open Coding
4.2.2. Axial Coding
4.2.3. Selective Coding
4.2.4. Theoretical Saturation Test
4.3. Construction of Driver Factor Indicator System
5. Research Process
5.1. Data Collection and Processing
5.2. DEMATEL Model Construction
5.3. ISM Model Construction
5.4. MICMAC Model Construction
6. Discussion
6.1. Theoretical Contribution
6.1.1. Emphasizing the Stakeholder Perspective in Sustainable Agricultural Supply Chains
6.1.2. Refinement and Extension of Research Scope
6.1.3. Innovation in Research Methods
- a.
- Surface factor analysis: These factors directly promote the sustainability of e-commerce platform-led cross-border agricultural product supply chains, directly impacting their stable development, and are subject to both direct and indirect influences from various factors. These factors mainly relate to the environmental system and cross-border agricultural ecosystem, contributing to the stability and reliability of cross-border agricultural product supply in the supply chain ecosystem, driving agricultural consumption upgrades, and enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the supply chain [87,88]. Therefore, taking timely and effective measures regarding these factors can directly promote the sustainability of e-commerce platform-led cross-border agricultural product supply chains.
- b.
- Transition factor analysis: These factors collectively exist as an intermediate layer in the multi-level hierarchical model of sustainability-promoting factors in e-commerce platform-led cross-border agricultural product supply chains. They are influenced not only by deep-seated factors but also by surface factors, serving as bridges connecting deep-seated and surface-level factors. These factors, while driving sustainability, also need to be comprehensively influenced by several other factors to further ensure the stability and sustainability of e-commerce platform-led cross-border agricultural product supply chains.
- c.
- Deep-seated factor analysis: These factors possess the strongest promoting power, influencing other, higher level promoting factors through different paths, constituting the fundamental elements for promoting the sustainability of e-commerce platform-led cross-border agricultural product supply chains. In particular, the role of policy environment optimization (S1) is prominent among deep-seated factors, consistent with the viewpoint mentioned in Ref [25]. Additionally, brand influence expansion (S15) also holds a significant position among deep-seated factors, aligning with the existing research, which suggests that the primary driving forces for sustainable agricultural supply chains come from media to community promotion, global market reputation enhancement [90], reputation management, and more [91]. These deep-seated factors play crucial roles in the influencing system, offering vital support for the sustainable development of e-commerce platform-led cross-border agricultural product supply chains.
6.1.4. Practical Implications
7. Conclusions and Future Outlook
7.1. Conclusions
7.2. Future Outlook
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Guo, H.D. Steps to the digital Silk Road. Nature 2018, 554, 25–27. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, G.; Li, S.; Zhang, Z.; Hou, Y.; Shin, C. A Visual Knowledge Map Analysis of Cross-Border Agri-Food Supply Chain Research Based on CiteSpace. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10763. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Information Center; China International E-commerce Center. Development Report on Cross-Border E-Commerce of Agri-Food Products in China; Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Information Center: Beijing, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- FAO; IFAD; UNICEF; WFP; WHO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2022: Repurposing Food and Agri-Food Policies to Make Healthy Diets More Affordable; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Trollman, H.; Jagtap, S.; Trollman, F. Crowdsourcing food security: Introducing food choice derivatives for sustainability. Food Secur. 2023, 15, 953–965. [Google Scholar]
- Ren, S. Towards a sustainable cross-border e-commerce development. China Commun. 2021, 18, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J.; Lai, K.H. Institutional pressures, dynamic capabilities and environmental management systems: Investigating the ISO 9000-Environmental management system implementation linkage. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 209, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.Q.; Lin, H. The Mechanism and Effect of ‘Internet+’ Empowering Small Farmers to Connect with the Big Market. Mod. Econ. Res. 2020, 110–117. [Google Scholar]
- UN. The Paris Agreement; UN: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- WCED. Our Common Future; World Commission on Environment and Development: New York, NY, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, G.; Zhang, Z.; Li, S.; Shin, C. Research on the Influencing Factors of Sustainable Supply Chain Development of Agri-Food Products Based on Cross-Border Live-Streaming E-Commerce in China. Foods 2023, 12, 3323. [Google Scholar]
- Kahar, A. Performance Evaluation and Improvement Path of Agri-Food Trade Supply Chain between China and Central Asian Countries; Xinjiang Agri-Food University: Ürümqi, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Su, H.M. Research on Risk Identification of Cross-Border Agri-Food Product Supply Chain Based on Immune Theory; Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics: Nanchang, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Sui, B.W.; Zhuang, L.J. Cross border agri-food products supply chain: The cornerstone of the development of China ASEAN agri-food products circulation industry. China Circ. Econ. 2016, 30, 67–74. [Google Scholar]
- Saeed, M.A.; Kersten, W. Drivers of sustainable supply chain management: Identification and classification. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1137. [Google Scholar]
- Guimarães, Y.M.; Eustachio, J.H.P.P.; Leal Filho, W.; Martinez, L.F.; do Valle, M.R.; Caldana, A.C.F. Drivers and barriers in sustainable supply chains: The case of the Brazilian coffee industry. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 34, 42–54. [Google Scholar]
- Ghadge, A.; Kara, E.M.; Mogale, G.D.; Choudhary, S.; Dani, S. Sustainability implementation challenges in food supply chains: A case of UK artisan cheese producers. Prod. Plan. Control 2022, 32, 1191–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bottani, E.; Casella, G.; Nobili, M.; Tebaldi, L. Assessment of the economic and environmental sustainability of a food cold supply chain. IFAC Pap. OnLine 2019, 52, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, S.M.; Moktadir, M.A.; Kabir, G.; Chakma, J.; Rumi, M.J.U.; Islam, M.T. Framework for evaluating risks in food supply chain: Implications in food wastage reduction. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 228, 786–800. [Google Scholar]
- Allaoui, H.; Guo, Y.; Sarkis, J. Decision support for collaboration planning in sustainable supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 229, 761–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, R.; Kamble, S.S.; Gunasekaran, A. Big GIS analytics framework for agriculture supply chains: A literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018, 155, 103–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dania, W.A.P.; Xing, K.; Amer, Y. Collaboration behavioural factors for sustainable agri-food supply chains: A systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 186, 851–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agyemang, M.; Zhu, Q.; Adzanyo, M.; Antarciuc, E.; Zhao, S. Evaluating barriers to green supply chain redesign and implementation of related practices in the West Africa cashew industry. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 136, 209–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chkanikova, O.; Mont, O. Corporate Supply Chain Responsibility: Drivers and Barriers for Sustainable Food Retailing. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2015, 22, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salim, K.H.; Padfield, R.; Lee, T.C.; Syayuti, K.; Papargyropoulou, E.; Tham, M.H. An investigation of the drivers, barriers, and incentives for environmental management systems in the Malaysian food and beverage industry. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2018, 20, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jing, H.; Du, W. Research on the Driving Factors of Sustainable Supply Chain and Its Impact on Environmental Performance. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2015, 25, 129–131. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, P.H. Research on the Driving Factors of Enterprise Sustainable Supply Chain Management: An Analysis Based on the TOE Theoretical Framework. Logist. Technol. 2020, 43, 146–148. [Google Scholar]
- David, A.; Jerome, D.; Cheree, T. Achieving sustainability in food manufacturing operations and their supply chains: Key insights from a systematic literature review. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 28, 1491–1499. [Google Scholar]
- Jia, F.; Zhang, H.; You, J.X.; Wang, Y. Matching Elasticity and Vulnerability of Cross-Border E-Commerce Supply Chain Based on Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods. Supply Chain. Manag. 2020, 1, 33–52. [Google Scholar]
- Geng, W.; Zhu, X.; Ye, X.; Zhen, M. Performance evaluation analysis of cross-border e-commerce supply chain based on ISM model. Natl. Circ. Econ. 2022, 8–11. [Google Scholar]
- Dong, Q.; Chen, F. Research on Factors Affecting the Operation of Cross-Border E-Commerce Supply Chain. Supply Chain. Manag. 2021, 2, 13–25. [Google Scholar]
- Siyavash, M.; Komeyl, B.; Julia, P. Evaluating Barriers and Drivers to Sustainable Food Supply Chains. Math. Probl. Eng. 2022, 2022, 4486132. [Google Scholar]
- Apeji, U.D.; Sunmola, F.T. An Entropy-Based Approach for Assessing Operational Visibility in Sustainable Supply Chain. Procedia Manuf. 2020, 51, 1600–1605. [Google Scholar]
- Gunawan, I.; Vanany, I.; Widodo, E. Typical traceability barriers in the Indonesian vegetable oil industry. Br. Food J. 2020, 123, 1223–1248. [Google Scholar]
- Strauss, A.; Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, S.; Powell, W.; Foth, M.; Natanelov, V.; Miller, T.; Dulleck, U. Strengthening consumer trust in beef supply chain traceability with a blockchain-based human-machine reconcile mechanism. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 180, 105886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serfas, D.; Gray, R.; Slade, P. Congestion and distribution of rents in wheat export sector: A Canada–US cross-border comparison. Can. J. Agri-Food Econ./Rev. Can. D’agroeconomie 2018, 66, 187–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abula, K.; Abula, B.; Hu, Q.; Chen, X.; Wang, D. Research on the High-Quality Development Path of the Cross-Border agri-food Product Supply Chain between China and Central Asia. Agronomy 2022, 10, 2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, C.Y. Research on Several Optimization Issues of Cross-border Supply Chain Networks. Doctoral Dissertation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Plambeck, E.; Lee, H.L.; Yatsko, P. Improving environmental performance in your Chinese supply chain. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2012, 53. [Google Scholar]
- Minnens, F.; Lucas Luijckx, N.; Verbeke, W. Food supply chain stakeholders’ perspectives on sharing information to detect and prevent food integrity issues. Foods 2019, 8, 225. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Tsolakis, N.; Niedenzu, D.; Simonetto, M.; Dora, M.; Kumar, M. Supply network design to address United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: A case study of blockchain implementation in Thai fish industry. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 131, 495–519. [Google Scholar]
- Um, J.; Han, N. Understanding the relationships between global supply chain risk and supply chain resilience: The role of mitigating strategies. Supply Chain. Manag. Int. J. 2021, 26, 240–255. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y. Yi’an County: Rebuilding the Agri-Food Industry Chain with Digitization. China Urban and Rural Finance News, 14 April 2021; B03. [Google Scholar]
- Zhong, R.Y.; Newman, S.T.; Huang, G.Q.; Lan, S. Big data for supply chain management in the service and manufacturing sectors: Challenges, opportunities, and future perspectives. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2016, 101, 572–591. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Y.; Chen, N.; Chen, H. The Digital Platform, Enterprise Digital Transformation, and Enterprise Performance of Cross-Border E-Commerce—From the Perspective of Digital Transformation and Data Elements. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 18, 777–794. [Google Scholar]
- Luthra, S.; Garg, D.; Haleem, A. The impacts of critical success factors for implementing green supply chain management towards sustainability: An empirical investigation of Indian automobile industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 121, 142–158. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.; Yang, J.; Qu, S.; Wang, L.; Shishime, T.; Bao, C. Sustainable production: Practices and determinant factors of green supply chain management of Chinese companies. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2012, 21, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, J.H.; Lu, K.L. Enhancing effects of supply chain resilience: Insights from trajectory and resource-based perspectives. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2017, 22, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, T.M.; Sethi, S. Innovations in supply chain management for information technology. J. Bus. Res. 2010, 63, 472–475. [Google Scholar]
- Dubey, R.; Gunasekaran, A.; Childe, S.J.; Papadopoulos, T.; Blome, C.; Luo, Z. Antecedents of resilient supply chains: An empirical study. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2019, 67, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rauer, J.; Kaufmann, L. Mitigating External Barriers to Implementing Green Supply Chain Management: A Grounded Theory Investigation of Green-Tech Companies’ Rare Earth Metals Supply Chains. J. Supply Chain. Manag. 2015, 51, 65–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maloni, J.M.; Brown, E.M. Corporate Social Responsibility in the Supply Chain: An Application in the Food Industry. J. Bus. Ethics 2006, 68, 35–52. [Google Scholar]
- Gawer, A. Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Res. Policy 2014, 43, 1239–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boudreau, K.J.; Hagiu, A. Platform Rules: Multi-Sided Platforms as Regulators. In Platforms, Markets and Innovation; Edward Edgar Publishing Limited: Cheltenham, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Van Alstyne, M.W.; Parker, G.G.; Choudary, S.P. Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2016, 94, 54–62. [Google Scholar]
- Laudon, K.C.; Traver, C.G. E-Commerce 2019: Business, Technology and Society; Pearson: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Gomez-Herrera, E.; Martens, B.; Turlea, G. The drivers and impediments for cross-border e-commerce in the EU. Inf. Econ. Policy 2014, 28, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kshetri, N. 1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 39, 80–89. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, Y.; Ellinger, A.E.; Chen, H. Third-party logistics provider customer orientation and customer firm logistics improvement in China. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2008, 38, 356–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Cao, Q. Exploring antecedents of supply chain collaboration: Effects of culture and interorganizational system appropriation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018, 195, 146–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rong, K.; Hu, G.; Lin, Y.; Shi, Y.; Guo, L. Understanding business ecosystem using a 6C framework in Internet-of-Things-based sectors. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 159, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, M.; Zhang, Q. Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. J. Oper. Manag. 2010, 29, 163–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soosay, C.A.; Hyland, P.W.; Ferrer, M. Supply chain collaboration: Capabilities for continuous innovation. Supply Chain. Manag. Int. J. 2008, 13, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pathak, S.D.; Day, J.M.; Nair, A.; Sawaya, W.J.; Kristal, M.M. Complexity and adaptivity in supply networks: Building supply network theory using a complex adaptive systems perspective. Decis. Sci. 2007, 38, 547–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lezoche, M.; Hernandez, J.E.; Díaz, M.D.M.E.A.; Panetto, H.; Kacprzyk, J.L. Agri-food 4.0: A survey of the supply chains and technologies for the future agriculture. Comput. Ind. 2020, 117, 103187. [Google Scholar]
- Strauss, A.L. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists: Questions and Answers; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Celsi, R.L.; Rose, R.L.; Leigh, T.W. An exploration of high-risk leisure consumption through skydiving. J. Consum. Res. 1993, 20, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flint, D.J.; Larsson, E.; Gammelgaard, B.; Mentzer, J.T. Logistics innovation: A customer value-oriented scial process. J. Bus. Logist. 2005, 26, 113–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pettit, S.; Beresford, A. Critical success factors in the context of humanitarian aid supply chains. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2009, 39, 450–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabus, A.; Fontela, E. World Problems, an Invitation to Further Thought within the Framework of DEMATEL; Battelle Geneva Research Center: Geneva, Switzerland, 1972; Volume 1, pp. 12–14. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, M.I.; Khan, S.; Khan, U.; Haleem, A. Modeling the Big Data challenges in context of smart cities-an integrated fuzzy ISM-DEMATEL approach. Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt. 2023, 41, 422–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zan, Q.Q.; Zhou, L.P.; Luo, K.M. Research on Influencing Factors of agri-food Land Circulation Based on ISM-MICMAC. J. Shandong Agri-Food Univ. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2022, 24, 8–15+145. [Google Scholar]
- Hirschman, C.E. Humanistic Inquiry in Marketing Research: Philosophy, Method, and Criteria. J. Mark. Res. 1986, 23, 237–249. [Google Scholar]
- Omar, A.; Davis-Sramek, B.; Fugate, B.S.; Mentzer, J.T. Exploring the Complex Social Processes of Organizational Change: Supply Chain Orientation from a Manager’s Perspective. J. Bus. Logist. 2012, 33, 4–19. [Google Scholar]
- Suchman, L.A. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Feng, Q.Q.; Zhang, G.Y.; Dai, H.W. Indicator System and Process Design for Selection of Disruptive Technologies: A Multi-case Study Based on Grounded Theory. Sci. Technol. Manag. Res. 2021, 41, 50–59. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, L.J.; Ye, J.M.; Jia, W.C.; Wang, L. Research on Influencing Factors of Exit Path Selection for Zombie Enterprises: Based on Grounded Theory. Financ. Mon. 2022, 935, 118–124. [Google Scholar]
- Li, S.; Nirei, M.; Yamana, K. Value of data: There’s no such thing as a free lunch in the digital economy. J. Int. Econ. 2019, 103708. [Google Scholar]
- Belk, R.W. Extended Self and Extending Paradigmatic Perspective. J. Consum. Res. 1989, 16, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaufmann, L.; Denk, N. How to demonstrate rigor when presenting grounded theory research in the supply chain management literature. J. Supply Chain. Manag. 2011, 47, 64–72. [Google Scholar]
- Lincoln, Y.S.; Guba, E.G.; Pilotta, J. Naturalistic Inquiry; Sage Publications: Beverly Hills, CA, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, C. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mangla, S.K.; Luthra, S.; Rich, N.; Kumar, D.; Rana, N.P.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Enablers to implement sustainable initiatives in agri-food supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018, 203, 379–393. [Google Scholar]
- Narimissa, O.; Kangarani-Farahani, A.; Molla-Alizadeh-Zavardehi, S. Drivers and barriers for implementation and improvement of Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 28, 247–258. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, D.S. Construction of Collaborative Mechanism of agri-food Logistics Ecosystem under Closed Supply Chain Operation Mode. Commer. Econ. Res. 2022, 836, 109–112. [Google Scholar]
- Zhaoyang, L. Empirical Study on the Factors Influencing the Development of Cross border Agricultural Product E-commerce. Int. Trade Issues 2018, 117–127. [Google Scholar]
- Mehmood, A.; Ahmed, S.; Viza, E.; Bogush, A.; Ayyub, R.M. Drivers and barriers towards circular economy in agri-food supply chain: A review. Bus. Strategy Dev. 2021, 4, 465–481. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, A.; Moktadir, A.; Liman, Z.R.; Gunasekaran, A.; Hegemann, K.; Khan, S.A.R. Evaluating sustainable drivers for social responsibility in the context of ready-made garments supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 248, 119231. [Google Scholar]
- Sajjad, A.; Eweje, G.; Tappin, D. Managerial perspectives on drivers for and barriers to sustainable supply chain management implementation: Evidence from New Zealand. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020, 29, 592–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Z.; Wang, X.Y. Research on the Factors Influencing the Facilitation of China’s Cross border E-commerce Export Trade. Bus. Econ. Res. 2020, 5, 139–143. [Google Scholar]
- Xing, G.Y.; Shi, J.Z.; Lu, C. Policy evolution and development trend of China’s cross-border e-commerce under the the Belt and Road Initiative. J. Xi’an Jiaotong Univ. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2020, 40, 11–19. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.J. Leveraging Digital Empowerment to Play a Good Combination Fist in Intelligent Supply Chain Integration Service Talent Supply. China Storage Transp. 2023, 134–135. [Google Scholar]
- Galdeano-Gómez, E.; Pérez-Mesa, C.J.; Giagnocavo, L.C. Food Exporters and Co-opetition Relationships: An Analysis on the Vegetable Supply Chain. Br. Food J. 2015, 117, 1596–1609. [Google Scholar]
- Autry, W.C.; Bobbitt, M.L. Supply chain security orientation: Conceptual development and a proposed framework. The Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2008, 19, 42–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flint, D.J.; Woodruff, R.B.; Gardial, S.F.F. Exploring the Phenomenon of Customers Desired Value Change in a Business-to-Business Context. J. Mark. 2002, 66, 102–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Francesca, F.; Marco, R.V.; Andrea, S. Supply Chain Resilience in the Pharmaceutical Industry: A Qualitative Analysis from Scholarly and Managerial Perspectives. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2023, 8, 129. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, Q.; Su, Q.X. Mechanism Study on Empowering Small and Medium-sized Enterprises’ Internationalization through Cross-Border E-Commerce Platforms. Int. Trade 2022, 68–76. [Google Scholar]
- John, E. Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environ. Qual. Manag. 2020, 8, 37–51. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, H.; Ke, W.; Wei, K.K.; Gu, J.; Chen, H. The role of institutional pressures and organizational culture in the firm’s intention to adopt internet-enabled supply chain management systems. J. Oper. Manag. 2010, 28, 372–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McHugh, M.L. Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem. Medica 2012, 22, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
The Category of Spindle Code Extraction | The Initial Concept Extracted by Open Coding | |
---|---|---|
Main Category | Initial Category | |
External Environment System | Policy environment optimization | Improve e-commerce and agri-food product regulatory policies; Continuously optimize the regulatory environment |
Simplification of customs clearance process | Simplify customs procedures, speed up customs clearance; Reduce compliance costs | |
Consumption demand forecast | Carry out consumption big data analysis; Scientifically predict consumption trends; Guide production decisions | |
Service Support System | Financial innovation services | Develop supply chain financial products; Provide accurate financing solutions |
Digital empowerment | Use big data, blockchain, and other technologies; Improve the efficiency of supply chain coordination | |
Talent training support | Cultivate compound management and technical talents; Enhance supply chain innovation and operation ability | |
Agri-Food Production System | Quality standard guarantee | Implement the whole process of quality management; Ensure product quality, safety, and controllability |
Regional cluster development | Give play to the advantages of regional resources; Build an industrial cooperation ecosystem; Achieve complementary advantages | |
Strategic cooperation maintenance | Establish a stable strategic cooperative relationship; Improve the stability of supply chain collaboration | |
Logistics Distribution System | Overseas warehousing construction | Lay out overseas warehousing network according to the market; Ensure product supply |
Infrastructure improvement | Plan logistics parks, transportation routes, and other infrastructure; Improve distribution efficiency | |
Smooth information sharing | Share real-time orders, inventory, and other key information; Reduce coordination costs | |
Knowledge innovation linkage | Establish knowledge sharing mechanism; Encourage technological innovation; Provide quality services | |
E-Commerce Trading System | Platform governance optimization | Establish a standardized operation and management mechanism; Improve platform effectiveness |
Brand influence expansion | Deepen marketing channels; Enhance brand awareness and reputation | |
Technology application upgrade | Adopt safe and efficient network, data, and AI technology; Optimize the user experience | |
Supply chain strategic coordination | Promote the strategic cooperation of supply chain enterprises; Achieve resource sharing and complementary advantages | |
Risk prevention and control enhancement | Assess supply chain risk; Establish early warning and response mechanisms; Improve the ability to resist risks |
First-Level Indicators | Second-Level Indicators | Source |
---|---|---|
External Environment System | S1 Policy environment optimization | The construction of procedural grounded theory |
S2 Customs clearance process simplification | The construction of procedural grounded theory | |
S3 Consumer demand forecast | [87,88] | |
Service Support System | S4 Financial innovation service | [55] |
S5 Digital empowerment | [52] | |
S6 Talent training support | The construction of procedural grounded theory | |
Agri-Food Production System | S7 Quality standard guarantee | The construction of procedural grounded theory |
S8 Regional cluster development | [80,81] | |
S9 Strategic cooperation maintenance | [75,82] | |
Logistics Distribution System | S10 Overseas warehouse construction | The construction of procedural grounded theory |
S11 Infrastructure improvement | [21] | |
S12 Smooth information sharing | [83] | |
S13 Knowledge innovation linkage | The construction of procedural grounded theory | |
E-Commerce Trading System | S14 Platform governance optimization | The construction of procedural grounded theory |
S15 Brand influence expansion | [1,15] | |
S16 Technology application upgrade | [19] | |
S17 Supply chain strategic synergy | The construction of procedural grounded theory | |
S18 Risk prevention and control enhancement | The construction of procedural grounded theory |
Classification Project | Classification Criteria | Quantity | Proportion |
---|---|---|---|
Type of Personnel | Top management personnel of cross-border logistics enterprises | 4 | 20% |
Cross-border agri-food product sustainable supply chain scientific research practitioners | 9 | 45% | |
Cross-border e-commerce platform operation and management personnel | 7 | 35% | |
Years of Work | 0–5 years | 1 | 5% |
5–10 years | 10 | 50% | |
More than 10 years | 9 | 45% | |
Level of Education | Junior college | 1 | 5% |
Bachelor | 2 | 10% | |
Master of Science | 10 | 50% | |
Doctor | 7 | 35% | |
Age | 18–28 years old | 2 | 10% |
29–40 years old | 7 | 35% | |
40–60 years old | 10 | 50% | |
Over 60 years old | 1 | 5% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, G.; Hou, Y.; Shin, C. Exploring Sustainable Development Pathways for Agri-Food Supply Chains Empowered by Cross-Border E-Commerce Platforms: A Hybrid Grounded Theory and DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC Approach. Foods 2023, 12, 3916. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12213916
Wang G, Hou Y, Shin C. Exploring Sustainable Development Pathways for Agri-Food Supply Chains Empowered by Cross-Border E-Commerce Platforms: A Hybrid Grounded Theory and DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC Approach. Foods. 2023; 12(21):3916. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12213916
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Gaofeng, Yanning Hou, and Changhoon Shin. 2023. "Exploring Sustainable Development Pathways for Agri-Food Supply Chains Empowered by Cross-Border E-Commerce Platforms: A Hybrid Grounded Theory and DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC Approach" Foods 12, no. 21: 3916. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12213916
APA StyleWang, G., Hou, Y., & Shin, C. (2023). Exploring Sustainable Development Pathways for Agri-Food Supply Chains Empowered by Cross-Border E-Commerce Platforms: A Hybrid Grounded Theory and DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC Approach. Foods, 12(21), 3916. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12213916