Next Article in Journal
Bioprotection Efficiency of Metschnikowia Strains in Synthetic Must: Comparative Study and Metabolomic Investigation of the Mechanisms Involved
Next Article in Special Issue
Prevalence of Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., and Listeria monocytogenes, and Population Levels of Food Safety Indicator Microorganisms in Retail Raw Chicken Meat and Ready-To-Eat Fresh Leafy Greens Salads Sold in Greece
Previous Article in Journal
Enhance Wine Production Potential by Using Fresh and Dried Red Grape and Blueberry Mixtures with Different Yeast Strains for Fermentation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effectiveness of Bacteriophages against Biofilm-Forming Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli In Vitro and on Food-Contact Surfaces
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 12
Issue 21
10.3390/foods12213926
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bongkrekic Acid and Burkholderia gladioli pathovar cocovenenans: Formidable Foe and Ascending Threat to Food Safety

by
Dong Han
1,
Jian Chen
2,
Wei Chen
1 and
Yanbo Wang
1,*
1
Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Engineering and Technology Research Center of Food Additives, School of Food and Health, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
2
Food Safety Key Laboratory of Zhejiang Province, School of Food Science and Biotechnology, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(21), 3926; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12213926
Submission received: 6 September 2023 / Revised: 10 October 2023 / Accepted: 24 October 2023 / Published: 26 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Foodborne Pathogenic Bacteria: Prevalence and Control—Volume II)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bongkrekic acid (BKA) poisoning, induced by the contamination of Burkholderia gladioli pathovar cocovenenans, has a long-standing history of causing severe outbreaks of foodborne illness. In recent years, it has emerged as a lethal food safety concern, presenting significant challenges to public health. This review article highlights the recent incidents of BKA poisoning and current research discoveries on the pathogenicity of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans and underlying biochemical mechanisms for BKA synthesis. Moreover, the characterization of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans and the identification of the bon gene cluster provide a crucial foundation for developing targeted interventions to prevent BKA accumulation in food matrices. The prevalence of the bon gene cluster, which is the determining factor distinguishing B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans from non-pathogenic B. gladioli strains, has been identified in 15% of documented B. gladioli genomes worldwide. This finding suggests that BKA poisoning has the potential to evolve into a more prevalent threat. Although limited, previous research has proved that B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans is capable of producing BKA in diverse environments, emphasizing the possible food safety hazards associated with BKA poisoning. Also, advancements in detection methods of both BKA and B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans hold great promise for mitigating the impact of this foodborne disease. Future studies focusing on reducing the threat raised by this vicious foe is of paramount importance to public health.

1. Introduction

Foodborne diseases have been posing enduring societal and economic challenges worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), foodborne diseases are estimated to cause 600 million illnesses and 420,000 deaths every year, making them a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally [1,2]. These illnesses and deaths have a substantial impact on individuals, families, communities, broader society, as well as the global economy. In addition to the human distress caused by these diseases, they also have impactful influences on the food supply chain [2]. Therefore, effective prevention, control, and management of foodborne diseases remain a critical public health priority. Bongkrekic acid (BKA) is a potent respiratory toxin, which could significantly impair mitochondrial ATP/ADP exchange and has been implicated in numerous outbreaks of fatal food poisoning. It is classified as a flavorless, odorless, colorless, thermally stable, and highly unsaturated methoxy tricarboxylic acid [3]. Previous research has demonstrated that BKA is produced by Burkholderia gladioli pv. cocovenenans in natural conditions seeing that the BKA biosynthesis gene cluster (bon) exists in the gene repertoire of this bacterium [4,5,6]. Although the biosynthesis and pathogenesis of BKA are unique in many ways, the bacterium of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans is prevalently distributed globally as it has been extensively isolated and identified in various food and environmental samples, such as water and soil, from all five most populated continents [7,8]. Results also indicated that many cultivated food ingredients, such as Tremella fuciformis (white wood ear mushroom), can be contaminated with B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans [9,10]. Since 1975, more than 3000 cases of BKA toxication have been officially documented with a remarkably high case-fatality rate (40–60%). Although a significant amount of previous BKA outbreaks occurred in Java, Indonesia, reports indicated that recent cases widely spread around in Africa, China, and Southeast Asia [3,6,11] (Table 1). A recent outbreak in Northeast China caused nine deaths, which has a case-fatality rate of 100% [12]. The toxicity of BKA relies on its occupation of a substrate binding site of mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier to inhibit the activity of the carrier [13]. Considering the structural conservativity of mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier in eukaryotic organisms, the toxicity of BKA is most likely universal across human and mammalian species. Previous research showed that BKA-contaminated diet can lead to the death of mice, dogs, and rhesus monkeys within 35 h [14,15]. Studies on oral administration have indicated LD50 value ranges of 1–3.16 mg/kg for human and 0.68–6.84 mg/kg for mice, respectively, while another study revealed that rats were able to survive an oral dose of 10 mg/kg of BKA, whereas a dose of 20 mg/kg was proved to be lethal [3,16].
Since the first report of a BKA outbreak in 1895, B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans contamination and BKA poisoning have been associated with a broad range of food products [23]. These food products include rice noodle [20], fermented beverages [7], fermented coconut (tempe bongkrèk) [24], rehydrated wood ear mushrooms (Tremella spp. and Auricularia heimuer) [9], fermented corn flour [12], fermented grains (glutinous rice, japonica rice, and corn), and sweet potato flour [3,23,25] (Table 1). It is understandable that the production and accumulation of BKA in B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans requires appropriate conditions for bacterial population proliferation, functional gene expression, and metabolite enzymatic biosynthesis [26,27]. The desired conditions for BKA production have been detected as near-neutral pH (6.5–8.0), mild temperature (22–30 °C), low NaCl concentration (lower than 2%), and suitable fatty acid composition (oleic acid rich), and these requirements can be accommodated by some fermented and rehydrated food matrices [9,14,28,29]. Any food-related microbiological studies are built upon pure-culture and co-culture experiments between microbes and food matrices. Nevertheless, most of such culture studies on B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans fermentation and BKA production were conducted decades ago [9,29,30].
The current detection method for BKA relies on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-based instrumental analysis, whereas real-time PCR techniques are primarily employed to detect the presence of the bon gene cluster, which is employed to verify the existence of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans [4,31,32,33]. While these analyses have no problem generating scientific results and unveiling underlying mechanisms, it is important to consider their suitability for in situ and routine food production inspections, owing to the high cost and technical requirements associated with these assays. One conventional method of preventing BKA is to have a better manufacturing practice and quality control of these high-risk foods. However, to further enhance the effectiveness of these measures, additional efforts may be required [7]. Furthermore, emerging challenges such as climate change and the acceleration of antibiotic resistance pose significant threats to the food industry. These challenges can substantially increase the uncertainty of foodborne pathogens and diseases, making it even more crucial to implement effective preventive measures to safeguard consumer safety [34,35]. As a threat that is largely unnoticed by the general public while repeatedly proven to be lethal and difficult to detect, B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans contamination and BKA poisoning pose a legitimate hazard to consumers and could demolish their confidence in certain aspects of food consumption [36]. This review delves into the multifaceted research topic of BKA and B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans, aiming to provide valuable insights and a comprehensive blueprint to combat this persistent yet rising threat to public health.

2. A Dual Biography of Burkholderia gladioli pathovar cocovenenans and Bongkrekic Acid

At the beginning, B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans was referred to by the name of Pseudomonas cocovenenans [37]. In memory of American plant pathologist and microbiologist Walter H. Burkholder, the genus name of Burkholderia was assigned to seven bacterial species that were previously classified within the genus of Pseudomonas [38] (Figure 1). After then, this pathogenic bacterium was recognized as Burkholderia cocovenenans, according to genomic comparison study [39]. Later, phylogenetic analyses proved that B. cocovenenans is in fact a junior synonym to B. gladioli; therefore, its current nomenclature was conferred [40]. While the outbreaks of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans frequently occurred in coconut-related food consumptions and particularly tempe bongkrèk, a traditional Indonesian fermented coconut food from which BKA derives its name, beforehand, the scientific understanding of this disease remained elusive until the 1930s [24,41]. Two scientists, van Veen and Mertens, carried out a series of studies on samples from central Java to explore the cause of the then-mysterious deadly food poisoning [42,43,44,45,46]. There were two poisonous substances discovered from B. gladioli pv. Cocovenenans-contaminated food matrices. Firstly, the researchers identified a yellowish bacterial pigment and named it toxoflavin(e) [44]. Toxoflavin is a type of pyrimidotriazine compound that can be produced by multiple Burkholderia spp. (Figure 2A). It has manifested antibiotic, fungicidal, and virulence enhancement functionalities and also exerts certain level toxicities toward eukaryotic cells [47,48,49]. Shortly after, bongkrek(ic) acid was purified and categorized. Although their molecular structures were investigated and proposed after their discovery, the structure of both toxoflavin and BKA was not conclusively determined until the late 1950s [37,50] (Figure 2B). In contrast to the relatively mild toxicity observed with toxoflavin, BKA exhibits a high level of toxicity in monkeys, with a fatal dose estimated to be approximately 0.5 mg per subject when administered orally to monkeys weighing 1–5 kg [46]. Despite evidence that proved that both toxoflavin and BKA were poisonous to human, BKA and its extreme respiratory toxicity have been broadly recognized as the singular cause for the life-threating symptoms given the fact that the toxicity of BKA overwhelmingly outweighs that of toxoflavin in nearly all measurable ways [3,11]. This inference gains further support from the fact that only B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans, along with BKA, has been associated with lethal outbreaks, whereas toxoflavin can be produced by numerous other bacterial strains that have not been linked to fatal food poisoning incidents [20,51]. It is worth noticing that the initial understanding of BKA and B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans was only derived from studies on Indonesian pathogenic strains, whereas the cause of outbreaks in China was verified to be the same afterwards [10].

3. Pathogenesis of Bongkrekic Acid

BKA has been verified to be extremely toxic toward every animal species investigated, such as monkeys, pigeons, rabbit, and rats, even when BKA is administered in non-pure form (fermented coconut cakes) [43]. The symptoms observed in animal BKA studies include initial hyperglycemia, subsequent hypoglycemia, and dramatic blood lactic acid content increases (2–3 times of the normal level), and these symptoms were later demonstrated to be associated with impaired mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation [16]. Through respective experimental designs, researchers were able to conclusively determine that BKA could bind to adenine nucleotide translocator (ANT) which located on the mitochondrial inner membrane [24,52,53,54].
ANT, also known as ADP/ATP translocase or ADP/ATP carrier, is an important mitochondrial carrier that is responsible for transporting ADP into and ATP out of mitochondria [53,55]. ANT carriers out its role by cycling between two states: cytoplasmic open state (c-state) and matrix open state (m-state). At normal circumstances, free ADP from mitochondrial intermembrane space (from cell cytoplasm) can specifically bind to c-state ANT, whereas free ADP in mitochondrial matrix can bind to m-state ANT. These binds will lead to conversion cycles between c-state and m-state of ANT and allow the ADP/ATP exchange to be carried out (Figure 3A). When consumed by animals, owing to its apparent lipophilicity, BKA can firstly penetrate the inner mitochondrial membrane and then bind to m-state ANT to form a BKA-inhibited ANT structure (Figure 3B) [13]. The formation of this structure will prevent the eversion of m-state ANT into c-state and thus terminate respective ADP/ATP exchanges. In view of the efficient inhibitory activity of BKA (one BKA molecule bind to one ANT), robust stability of BKA-inhibited ANT, crucial role of ANT in eucaryotic metabolism, and conservativity of mitochondrial ANT, there are currently no effective medical or pharmaceutical treatments available to reverse the symptoms caused by BKA poisoning, although the invention and development of such treatments would undoubtedly be invaluable [3]. Therefore, current strategies for managing the risk of BKA and B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans outbreaks are primarily focused on preventive measures instead of medical treatments.

4. Genomic Characteristics of Burkholderia gladioli pathovar cocovenenans

4.1. Genomic Diversity and Prevalence

The previous generation of phylogenetic studies on pathogens relies on independent comparisons of live microorganisms or fixed genetic materials, such as cell protein gel electrophoresis, DNA–DNA binding, and detailed biochemical profiling, which was once the only viable method but was deemed as insufficient for both disease control and research purposes [40,56]. Not long ago, high-throughput sequencing and nucleic-tide-level genome documentation revolutionized this research field swiftly [57,58]. In silico genomic comparisons among online databases empowered researchers and medical professionals to conduct coherent and efficient genomic epidemiological analyses that were unimaginable previously [59]. Genomic assemblies confirmed that B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans incorporates two circular chromosomes with the bon gene cluster located at chromosome 1. It can be concluded from the genome of B. gladioli BSR3 and Co14 that the pathogenic strains also possess one clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) array sequence at chromosome 1 and a total of five copies of rRNA from the two total chromosomes (Figure 4). A group of researchers [8] conducted species-wide genomic comparative analysis on B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans with the focus on the bon gene cluster (Figure 4). This study offered a comprehensive perspective on global distribution and prevalence of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans. The authors conducted analyses of genomic diversity and phylogenetic relationships using a dataset consisting of self-sequenced B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans Co14 genome and 238 published B. gladioli genomes available in the NCBI database. This study revealed that out of 239 B. gladioli genomes, 36 contained the bon gene cluster. The 15.06% occurrence of bon inserts it as a shell gene (15–95%) in pan-genome methodologies employed in this study, which conveys that the bon gene cluster with corelated BKA biosynthesis is not a species-wide bioactivity and acquirement of this gene cluster could be a recent event. The results also showcased average nucleotide identity (ANI) values between 97.29% and 100.00% among B. gladioli genomes, while these ANI values among genomes of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans strains are in between 97.45% and 100.00%.
Alongside other Burkholderia spp. (both pathogenic and non-pathogenic), a pan-genome analysis was carried out on eight self-assembled genomes of B. gladioli pathovar cocovenenans by another recent research study [5]. The study demonstrated that B. gladioli pv. Cocovenenans exhibits an intricate population structure. Their results also indicated that the ancestor of the pathogenic B. gladioli gained the bon gene cluster (and respective pathogenesis) from horizontal gene transfer. Furthermore, a genome recombination event might cause the deletion of the bon gene cluster from the genome of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans. This discovery suggested that the ancient B. gladioli may have obtained the bon gene cluster and related regulators from other species, and as they evolved, significant genetic divergence was observed among them. It can be referred from these results that the conventional ribosomal RNA-based identification method may not yield satisfactory discrimination efficacies for pathogen screening since limited core-gene differences exist between B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans and non-pathogenic B. gladioli. Accordingly, techniques targeting the bon gene cluster, such as PCR amplification and BKA production detection, could serve as practical identification methods.

4.2. The Bon Gene Cluster and Bongkrekic Acid Biosynthesis

Another study [4] employed the Lambda Red homologous recombination technique to establish a bonA-silenced mutant and confirmed that the biosynthesis of BKA is carried out by the bon polyketide synthase (PKS) gene cluster. Using bioinformatic tools, this study then comprehensively depicted the assemble processes and corresponding gene functions in BKA biosynthesis. The center of bon in strain B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans DSMZ 11318 comprises 3 open reading frames (ORFs), bonA, bonB, and bonD (equivalent to 4 ORFs—bonA, bonB, bonC, and bonD—in most other B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans strains) that encode modular type I PKS modules (Figure 3C,D). These PKS modules are essential to BKA biosynthesis since cycles of polyketide chain elongation take place at these modules. The bon gene cluster also comprises nine discrete gene loci, each encoding a free-standing protein to facilitate the biosynthesis of BKA. Specifically, since bon PKS lacks cognate acyltransferase, the loading of an extender unit to acyl carrier protein relies on free-standing cognate acyltransferase BonJ and BonK (Figure 5A) [60,61]. Similarly, enoyl reductase is absent from the modules in bonA-D, implying that enoyl reductions are carried out by another free-standing protein—BonE (Figure 5B). Researchers also noticed that BKA is rather uncommonly branched compared to many other bacterial PKS products; they deduced that β-branching occurs during the BKA assembly to introduce alkyl branches at the C-21 and C-3 positions in BKA. During the β-branching of BKA, BonF, BonG, and the duo of BonH and BonI most likely function as ketosynthase, 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase, and enoyl-CoA hydratase, respectively (Figure 5C) [62]. After a typical PKS elongation process, the hydroxyl group at C-17 is methylated by BonM, an O-methyltransferase. Eventually, a novel cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (BonL) was inferred to be responsible for the introduction of a carboxyl group at C-22 (Figure 5D) [4].

5. Characteristics of Burkholderia gladioli pathovar cocovenenans

To date, studies on the microbial characteristics of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans, including growth, metabolism, survival, stress resistance, gene expression, and BKA production, remain scarce. The lack of information can create challenges in preventive measures and interventions against this disease, and it can also result in unnecessary resource investments and increased risks to public health. Therefore, it is essential to increase current knowledge on its behavior and identify effective strategies to control its growth and spread. It is pivotal to elucidate the biosynthesis properties of the bon gene cluster and the metabolic characteristics of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans in both defined culture conditions as well as in pertinent food matrices to profoundly address the rising risk caused by BKA and B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans [60,63].

5.1. Bongkrekic Acid Production in Culture Media

Researchers have conducted a series of investigations into the culture growth and BKA production characteristics of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans, which have generated valuable insights into the various factors that influence the growth of this bacterium and production of BKA [29,64] (Table 2). Their studies have focused on identifying compounds with potential toxin-preventive capabilities to better understand how to control the spread of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans and reduce the risk of BKA contamination. The study’s significant discovery is that the absence of either coconut oil or glycerol from the culture media completely halts BKA production, without affecting the growth of bacterial populations. This result highlighted the critical role of both coconut oil and glycerol in BKA synthesis and suggested that the fat composition and concentration present in the substrate significantly impacts BKA production. This finding was consistent with the results of another study, which demonstrated that the addition of oleic oil at a concentration of 3.31 mmol per gram of defatted rich coconut medium is a significantly favored substrate for BKA production [9]. The observation indicated that oleic oil, a type of monounsaturated fat that is commonly found in olive oil, might be readily metabolized by B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans for BKA synthesis, resulting in a high level of BKA production. This suggests that specific lipid formation can significantly impact BKA production, with oleic oil being particularly effective. The significant influence of coconut oil and fat content, likely leading to increased Bongkrekic acid (BKA) production, may explain earlier BKA poisoning cases in coconut-related foods. Conversely, more recent BKA outbreaks, predominantly linked to corn- and rice-based foods with lower fat concentration, may be attributed to factors such as pathogen transmission across regions, prolonged fermentation periods, and varying nutrient compositions in these respective foods. This observation underscores the importance of unraveling the complexities of BKA-related incidents in diverse food contexts. The results of previous studies [29,64] also demonstrated that supplementing culture medium with either 2% NaCl or acetic acid (adjusted to pH 4.5) was effective in reducing the formation of BKA (Table 2). However, neither of these supplementations was able to completely inhibit the BKA production alone. Interestingly, the combination of 2% NaCl and acetic acid (adjusted to pH 4.5) was found to have a sufficient inhibitory effect on BKA production by inhibiting the bacterial growth, reducing the concentration of BKA to below the limit of detection (10 μg/g) using HPLC. This observation was consistent across all three investigated B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans strains, which initially had bacterial populations ranging from 5.78 log CFU/mL to 7.04 log CFU/mL. The findings of this study suggest that a combination of NaCl and acetic acid has a robust inhibitory effect on BKA production, and respective hurdle strategies could be viable options for reducing the risk of BKA contamination.

5.2. Effect of Food Ingredients on the Production of Bongkrekic Acid

In the same study [29,64], the authors also evaluated the anti-BKA production activities of four natural spices: garlic powder, onion power, capsicum power, and turmeric power. The study found that adding 0.6% garlic powder, 0.6% onion powder, 0.8% capsicum powder, and 0.6% turmeric powder to coconut culture medium could inhibit the formation of BKA when the initial populations of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans were low (between 3.64 and 5.27 log CFU/mL). However, when the initial populations of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans were high (above 7.32 log CFU/mL), adding up to 2% of any these spice supplements did not completely inhibit the BKA production. Additionally, the study revealed that the most effective way to utilize these spices is when the population of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans is at minimum level. The results suggested that natural spices can be effectively used in applicable food products to inhibit the growth of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans and prevent BKA accumulation when utilized properly. The study’s findings are of great importance as they have the potential to aid in disease prevention efforts in both food manufacturing and consumption. Although there has been more recent experimental research on B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans and BKA that heavily focused on toxin and microbe detections, the significance of culture studies on food matrices lies in their unique approach to the problem. The scarcity of similar studies in the current research landscape highlights the need for additional research in this area. Such research can help in developing novel and effective strategies for BKA poisoning prevention.

5.3. Bongkrekic Acid Production under Co-Culture Conditions

Beneficial and non-pathogenic microorganisms play a vital role in preventing the development of foodborne pathogens and safeguarding food safety [65]. For instance, by occupying the same ecological niches with harmful microorganisms, lactic acid bacteria, such as Lactobacillus spp. and Pediococcus spp., can compete for nutrients and produce antimicrobial substances that inhibit the growth and activity of foodborne pathogens [66]. Although present naturally in a diverse range of food commodities, these microbes can also be deliberately introduced or promoted under preferable culture conditions to achieve their dominance in respective food matrices. Moreover, the growth kinetics and antagonistic effects between these microbes and foodborne pathogens, e.g., Salmonella spp., Campylobacter jejuni, Yersinia enterocolitica, pathogenic Escherichia coli, Shigella spp., Vibrio spp., and others, have been previously depicted by employing co-culture experiments [67]. However, co-culture studies regarding B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans and BKA production have been rare, considering that the overwhelming majority of BKA outbreaks that occurred in food matrices consist of complex microbial communities. In addition to examining other common factors, the previous study also investigated the impact of Rhizopus oligosporus, the fungus traditionally used for fermenting tempe bongkrèk, on the growth of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans and the production of BKA under co-culture conditions [29]. In agreement with earlier research, the results demonstrated that although R. oligosporus possesses certain inhibition effects against the growth of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans, the BKA synthesis reduction activities require a substantially higher initial population of R. oligosporus compared with that of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans [14,68]. One intriguing finding in these studies was that the presence of organic acid with a pH of 4.5 was one of the most effective inhibitors of BKA production, resulting in complete inhibition under almost all culture conditions. It is noteworthy that during the fermentation of high-protein foods, R. oligosporus may result in pH increases instead of decreases. For instance, a particular study demonstrated a significant rise in pH value from 6.30 to 7.18 in soybean fermented with R. oligosporus after 72 h of fermentation [64,69]. This observation may offer a partial explanation for the frequent outbreaks of BKA in tempe bongkrèk.
Despite undergoing clear acidification during fermentation, standing in contrast to tempe bongkrèk’s near-neutral pH values, many acidic foods have been linked to BKA outbreaks [7,12,70]. Although the exact cause of this phenomenon is not completely understood, we hypothesize that it could be caused by differences in microbial characteristics involved in the fermentation process, variations in initial microbial load, fluctuations of fermentation conditions, or other unknown factors. Future research efforts could focus on characterizing the microbial composition and dynamics of different fermentative environments, investigating the impact of fermentation conditions (e.g., temperature, pH, salt concentration, and water activity), and identifying potential techniques that may reduce or inhibit BKA production. Additionally, these studies offer insights for developing intervention strategies, such as adjusting starter cultures or standardizing fermentation conditions, to reduce the risk of BKA contamination in food.

6. Detection and Analytical Advancements

The dependability of detection methods plays a pivotal role in establishing the credibility of any epidemiologic or academic research. In the context of foodborne illnesses like BKA and B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans, binary detection, microbial analysis on the pathogen or chemical analysis on BKA, appears to be an appropriate and viable approach, given the nature of the research subject.

6.1. Detections of Bongkrekic Acid

From the very beginning, the identification and validation of BKA was conducted using paper chromatography methods, which can accurately detect a relatively pure form of BKA at levels as low as 0.05 μg [37,50,71]. Later, with technological advancements, more advanced analytical methods such as HPLC and mass spectrometry (MS) have become available (Table 3). These instrumental techniques offer enhanced accuracy and sensitivity when compared to paper chromatography, allowing for more efficient and dependable analysis of BKA in both pure formation and in food matrices [33,72]. The use of the respective methods has facilitated the detection of trace amounts of BKA in complex food matrices, enabling the conduction of highly sophisticated scientific research and reliable epidemiological analyses. With the help of these studies, researchers have acquired a better understanding of BKA in food products [3]. Despite their advantages, it is worth noting that equipment installation and maintenance for these analyses can be costly, requiring specialized technical expertise and corresponding sample preparation procedures. These characteristics make them time-consuming and challenging to conduct in situ application and routine food safety testing.
To address the limitations posed by instrumental methods, researchers have turned to alternative techniques that offer greater simplicity, are user-friendly, and are more compatible for in situ food analysis. One major category of these methods is immunoassays, which can quantify BKA based on developed antibodies in theory. The respective immunoassays, such as colloidal gold-based immunochromato-graphic assay (GICA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), have been developed and validated by few Chinese institutions for rapid BKA detection in food products and other types of samples [6,73]. These methods rely on the robustness of the antibody–antigen reaction to enable efficient and reliable detection of BKA, thus providing a valuable tool for food safety monitoring and quality control. Future studies can explore the applicability of these methods in a broader range of samples and in different settings. Additionally, studies can be conducted to evaluate the feasibility of integrating these methods into existing food safety monitoring systems, as well as the cost-effectiveness of implementing them on an expanded scale.

6.2. Detections of Burkholderia gladioli pathovar cocovenenans and Gene

Culture-based analytical methods are crucial for ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the microbial research findings since the culturability of microbes is important to both scientific discovery and prolonged laboratory microbial preservation. Therefore, conventional microbiological analytical approaches, including non-selective medium enrichment, subculturing on differential media, colony observation, microscopic morphology, biochemical tests, gram staining, and toxicity evaluation, have been broadly adopted by research on B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans [6]. The respective analytical protocols were both documented by scientific studies and standardized by government authorities, such as the National Standard of the People’s Republic of China (GB 4789.29–2020) [6,74]. It Is a justifiable inference that these protocols are labor-intensive, and improvements in these assays could result in substantial benefits in respective studies and regulatory tests.
Considering the challenges involved in using traditional culture-based assays, exploring alternative approaches for detecting the presence of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans could be advantageous. The utilization of novel nucleic-acid-based techniques presents a promising alternative, as they are capable of providing enhanced accuracy and sensitivity in comparison with conventional methods. Therefore, these techniques could be considered as a viable option to identify the presence of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans [75,76]. Previous studies have primarily focused on the use of qPCR or novel recombinase polymerase amplification techniques to detect B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans targeting the 16S–23S rRNA-encoding regions [74,77,78]. These methods have shown a high sensitivity in detecting B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans with a detection limit as low as 100 CFU/mL, which can be attributed to the advancements in molecular biology technologies [77]. It should be noticed that the identification efficacy validations of these assays were carried out in between B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans and other genera of bacteria, rather than non-pathogenic B. gladioli strains and other Burkholderia spp. strains. In addition to its current application for distinguishing between bacterial species, 16S–23S rRNA genes can potentially serve as a valuable tool for species-level identification [79,80]. Future studies could be conducted to explore the utilization of 16S–23S rRNA genes for more precise species-level identification, which holds promise for enhancing the accuracy and comprehensiveness of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans and other bacterial identifications. Given the presence of the BKA synthetic bon gene cluster and its 15.06% occurrence in recorded B. gladioli genomic assemblies [8], the bon gene cluster stands as one of the limited distinguishable genetic disparities between B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans and other B. gladioli strains, and we propose that nucleic acid-based tests targeting specific fragments of bon could offer highly reliable and accurate approaches for identifying B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans. Such tests have the potential to be highly specific and sensitive in the detection and diagnosis of this pathogen.
Table 3. Detection method for BKA or B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans in foods.
Table 3. Detection method for BKA or B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans in foods.
Food MatrixTargetAnalytical MethodLimit of DetectionReference
Glutinous rice flour, corn flour, tremella (white wood ear mushrooms)BKAMixed-mode weak anion exchange solid-phase extraction combined with HPLC and diode array detection30 μg/kg[81]
Formula rice powderLiquid chromatography–electrospray ionization quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry2 μg/kg[82]
Liquor fermentation cultureUPLC–MS/MS0.4 μg/kg[83]
Rice noodleHPLC-Orbitrap High-Resolution MS with a Fe3O4/Halloysite nanotubes procedure0.3 μg/kg[33]
Auricularia heimuer (black wood ear mushroom)HPLC–MS/MS with novel sample preparation technique1.0 μg/kg[84]
Rice, corn flour, and fermented corn noodleUPLC-MS/MS0.12 μg/kg[72]
tremellaVisual detection using cysteamine modified gold nanoparticles3.43 nM[85]
Auricularia heimuer, tremella, and rice noodleColloidal gold immunochromatography assay1.2 μg/k[73]
tremellaB. gladioli pv. cocovenenansLoop-mediated isothermal amplification technology on 16S–23S rRNA-encoding region76 CFU/mL[78]
Glutinous rice soupQuantitative PCR on 16S–23S rRNA-encoding region361 CFU/mL[74]
Rice noodle, fresh white noodle, and glutinous rice flour Pathogenic and non-pathogenic B. gladioliRecombinant enzyme polymerase amplification with CRISPR/Cas12a system10–100 CFU/mL[77]
HPLC: High-performance liquid chromatography; UPLC: Ultra-performance liquid chromatography; MS: mass spectrometer; CRISPR: clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats.

7. Conclusions

In summary, the contamination of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans, leading to the development of bongkrekic acid (BKA) poisoning, has emerged as a critical and lethal food safety concern with dire consequences, posing significant challenges to public health. The incidence of BKA poisoning in recent years has ignited a pursuit for a more profound comprehension of the pathogenicity of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans and the underlying biochemical mechanisms for BKA synthesis. Specifically, characterization of B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans and the identification of the bon gene cluster have provided an essential foundation for developing targeted interventions to prevent and control BKA accumulation, while high-throughput sequencing and in silico genomic comparisons have unveiled the origin and global prevalence of this pathogen, highlighting this foodborne disease as a significant and ascending threat. Although limited, previous research based on culturing techniques has provided evidence that B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans is capable of producing BKA in different environments, which highlights the possible food safety hazards associated with BKA poisoning. Due to the scarcity of information regarding the impact of culture conditions such as pH, salt content, antimicrobial agents, and coexisting microorganisms on BKA reduction, it is crucial to enhance our understanding of inhibiting BKA production and promote respective applications to ensure food safety. Advancements in the detection methods of both BKA and B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans hold promise for mitigating the impact of this foodborne disease. Overall, it is imperative to undertake future research initiatives on BKA and B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans. Such research endeavors hold significant potential in controlling the threat posed by this formidable adversary to public health.

Author Contributions

D.H., J.C. and W.C.: investigation; D.H.: software, and original draft; J.C., W.C. and Y.W.: review and editing; Y.W.: supervision, project administration and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32001666) and the Research Foundation for Youth Scholars of Beijing Technology and Business University (No. QNJJ2022-11).

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study can be made available by the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO. WHO Estimates of the Global Burden of Foodborne Diseases: Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group 2007–2015; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pires, S.M.; Desta, B.N.; Mughini-Gras, L.; Mmbaga, B.T.; Fayemi, O.E.; Salvador, E.M.; Gobena, T.; Majowicz, S.E.; Hald, T.; Hoejskov, P.S. Burden of foodborne diseases: Think global, act local. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 39, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Anwar, M.; Kasper, A.; Steck, A.R.; Schier, J.G. Bongkrekic acid—A review of a lesser-known mitochondrial toxin. J. Med. Toxicol. 2017, 13, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Moebius, N.; Ross, C.; Scherlach, K.; Rohm, B.; Roth, M.; Hertweck, C. Biosynthesis of the respiratory toxin bongkrekic acid in the pathogenic bacterium Burkholderia gladioli. Chem. Biol. 2012, 19, 1164–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gong, H.; Huang, X.; Zhu, W.; Chen, J.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Weng, J.; Che, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, X. Pan-genome analysis of the Burkholderia gladioli pv. cocovenenans reveal the extent of variation in the toxigenic gene cluster. Food Microbiol. 2023, 113, 104249. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yuan, M.; Han, R.; Bai, L.; Dong, Y.; Xi, Q.; Du, Q.; Yang, Y.; Forghani, F.; Yang, Q.; Ahn, J. Recent Advances in the Characterization of Burkholderia gladioli pv. cocovenenans and Its Toxin Production. Food Rev. Int. 2023, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Falconer, T.M.; Kern, S.E.; Brzezinski, J.L.; Turner, J.A.; Boyd, B.L.; Litzau, J.J. Identification of the potent toxin bongkrekic acid in a traditional African beverage linked to a fatal outbreak. Forensic Sci. Int. 2017, 270, e5–e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peng, Z.; Dottorini, T.; Hu, Y.; Li, M.; Yan, S.; Fanning, S.; Baker, M.; Xu, J.; Li, F. Comparative genomic analysis of the foodborne pathogen Burkholderia gladioli pv. cocovenenans harboring a bongkrekic acid biosynthesis gene cluster. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 628538. [Google Scholar]
  9. Garcia, R.A. The effect of lipids on bongkrekic (Bongkrek) acid toxin production by Burkholderia cocovenenans in coconut media. Food Addit. Contam. 1999, 16, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, N.; Ma, M.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, D. Comparative description of Pseudomonas cocovenenans (van Damme, Johannes, Cox, and Berends 1960) NCIB 9450T and strains isolated from cases of food poisoning caused by consumption of fermented corn flour in China. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1990, 40, 452–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lynch, K.; Dennis, J. Burkholderia; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yuan, Y.; Gao, R.; Liang, Q.; Song, L.; Huang, J.; Lang, N.; Zhou, J. A Foodborne Bongkrekic Acid Poisoning Incident—Heilongjiang Province, 2020. China CDC Wkly. 2020, 2, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ruprecht, J.J.; King, M.S.; Zögg, T.; Aleksandrova, A.A.; Pardon, E.; Crichton, P.G.; Steyaert, J.; Kunji, E.R. The molecular mechanism of transport by the mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier. Cell 2019, 176, 435–447.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ko, S. Growth and toxin production of Pseudomonas cocovenenans, the so-called ‘bongkrek bacteria’. ASEAN Food J. 1985, 1, 78. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cox, J.; Embit, K.; Buckle, K. Burkholderia cocovenenans. In Foodborne Microorganisms of Public Health Significance; Australian Institute of Food Science and Technology: Waterloo, Australia, 2003; pp. 605–614. [Google Scholar]
  16. Welling, W.; Cohen, J.; Berends, W. Disturbance of oxidative phosphorylation by an antibioticum produced by Pseudomonas cocovenenans. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1960, 3, 122–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. ProMED-Mail. Burkholderia cocovenenans Foodborne Illness—Indonesia (Central Java). Available online: https://promedmail.org/promed-post/?id=20265 (accessed on 15 July 2023).
  18. ProMED-Mail. Burkholderia cocovenenans Foodborne Illness—China: (YN). Available online: https://promedmail.org/promed-post/?id=2587303 (accessed on 15 July 2023).
  19. Gudo, E.S.; Cook, K.; Kasper, A.M.; Vergara, A.; Salomão, C.; Oliveira, F.; Ismael, H.; Saeze, C.; Mosse, C.; Fernandes, Q. Description of a mass poisoning in a rural district in Mozambique: The first documented bongkrekic acid poisoning in Africa. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 66, 1400–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Li, J.; Zhou, L.; Long, C.; Fang, L.; Chen, Q.; Chen, Q.; Liang, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Chen, Z. An investigation of Bongkrekic acid poisoning caused by consumption of a nonfermented rice noodle product without noticeable signs of spoilage. J. Food Prot. 2019, 82, 1650–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shi, R.; Long, C.; Dai, Y.; Huang, Q.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, N.; Chen, Y.; Liu, S.; Ma, Q.; Quan, L. Bongkrekic acid poisoning: Severe liver function damage combined with multiple organ failure caused by eating spoiled food. Leg. Med. 2019, 41, 101622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chhetri, V.; Pokhrel, H.P.; Dorji, T. A review on foodborne disease outbreaks in Bhutan. WHO South-East Asia. J. Public Health 2021, 10, 101–104. [Google Scholar]
  23. Van Veen, A. The Bongkrek Toxins; MIT Press: Cambridge, UK, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  24. Henderson, P.J.; Lardy, H.A. Bongkrekic acid: An inhibitor of the adenine nucleotide translocase of mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 1970, 245, 1319–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, H.; Guo, Y.; Chen, L.; Liu, Z.; Liang, J.; Shi, M.; Gao, F.; Song, Y.; Chen, J.; Fu, P. Epidemiology of foodborne bongkrekic acid poisoning outbreaks in China, 2010 to 2020. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0279957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nout, M. Fermented foods and food safety. Food Res. Int. 1994, 27, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Anal, A.K.; Perpetuini, G.; Petchkongkaew, A.; Tan, R.; Avallone, S.; Tofalo, R.; Van Nguyen, H.; Chu-Ky, S.; Ho, P.H.; Phan, T.T. Food safety risks in traditional fermented food from South-East Asia. Food Control 2020, 109, 106922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tamang, J.P.; Cotter, P.D.; Endo, A.; Han, N.S.; Kort, R.; Liu, S.Q.; Mayo, B.; Westerik, N.; Hutkins, R. Fermented foods in a global age: East meets West. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 184–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Buckle, K.; Kartadarma, E. Inhibition of bongkrek acid and toxoflavin production in tempe bongkrek containing Pseudomonas cocovenenans. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1990, 68, 571–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Šubík, J.; Behúň, M. Effect of bongkrekic acid on growth and metabolism of filamentous fungi. Arch. Microbiol. 1974, 97, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Voragen, A.; De Kok, H.; Kelholt, A.; Schols, H.; Djien, K.S. Determination of bongkrek acid and toxoflavin by high pressure liquid chromatography. Food Chem. 1982, 9, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Somprasong, N.; McMillan, I.; Karkhoff-Schweizer, R.R.; Mongkolsuk, S.; Schweizer, H.P. Methods for genetic manipulation of Burkholderia gladioli pathovar cocovenenans. BMC Res. Notes 2010, 3, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liang, M.; Chen, R.; Xian, Y.; Hu, J.; Hou, X.; Wang, B.; Wu, Y.; Wang, L. Determination of bongkrekic acid and isobongkrekic acid in rice noodles by HPLC-Orbitrap HRMS technology using magnetic halloysite nanotubes. Food Chem. 2021, 344, 128682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cissé, G. Food-borne and water-borne diseases under climate change in low-and middle-income countries: Further efforts needed for reducing environmental health exposure risks. Acta Trop. 2019, 194, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Caniça, M.; Manageiro, V.; Abriouel, H.; Moran-Gilad, J.; Franz, C.M. Antibiotic resistance in foodborne bacteria. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 84, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Skowron, K.; Budzyńska, A.; Grudlewska-Buda, K.; Wiktorczyk-Kapischke, N.; Andrzejewska, M.; Wałecka-Zacharska, E.; Gospodarek-Komkowska, E. Two Faces of Fermented Foods—The Benefits and Threats of Its Consumption. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nugteren, D.; Berends, W. Investigations on bongkrekic acid, the toxine from Pseudomonas cocovenenans. Recl. Trav. Chim. PaysBas 1957, 76, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yabuuchi, E.; Kosako, Y.; Oyaizu, H.; Yano, I.; Hotta, H.; Hashimoto, Y.; Ezaki, T.; Arakawa, M. Proposal of Burkholderia gen. nov. and transfer of seven species of the genus Pseudomonas homology group II to the new genus, with the type species Burkholderia cepacia (Palleroni and Holmes 1981) comb. nov. Microbiol. Immunol. 1992, 36, 1251–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhao, N.; Qu, C.; Wang, E.; Chen, W. Phylogenetic Evidence for the Transfer of Pseudomonas cocovenenans (van Damme et al. 1960) to the Genus Burkholderia as Burkholderia cocovenenans (van Damme et al. 1960) comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1995, 45, 600–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Coenye, T.; Holmes, B.; Kersters, K.; Govan, J.; Vandamme, P. Burkholderia cocovenenans and Burkholderia vandii are junior synonyms of Burkholderia gladioli (Severini 1913) and Burkholderia plantarii, respectively. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1999, 49, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Helfrich, E.J.; Piel, J. Biosynthesis of polyketides by trans-AT polyketide synthases. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2016, 33, 231–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mertens, W.; van Veen, A. A Fréquent Cause of Poisoning in Javanese. Bull. Société Pathol. Exot. 1934, 27. Available online: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19342901639 (accessed on 15 July 2023).
  43. Van Veen, A.; Mertens, W. On the isolation of a toxic bacterial pigment (provisional communication). Proc. Konink. Akad. Wetensch. Amsterdam 1933, 36, 666–670. [Google Scholar]
  44. Van Veen, A.; Mertens, W. Toxoflavine, the yellow pigment of bongkrek. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas Belg. 1934, 53, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Van Veen, A.; Mertens, W. Bongkrek acid, a blood sugar lowering substance. Preliminary communication. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas Belg. 1935, 54, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Van Veen, A.; Mertens, W. The effect of the acid from bongkrek on carbohydrate metabolism. Geneeskd. Tijdschr. Voor Ned. Indie 1935, 75, 1059–1127. [Google Scholar]
  47. Jeong, Y.; Kim, J.; Kim, S.; Kang, Y.; Nagamatsu, T.; Hwang, I. Toxoflavin produced by Burkholderia glumae causing rice grain rot is responsible for inducing bacterial wilt in many field crops. Plant Dis. 2003, 87, 890–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, J.; Park, J.; Kim, S.; Park, I.; Seo, Y.S. Differential regulation of toxoflavin production and its role in the enhanced virulence of Burkholderia gladioli. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016, 17, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Li, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, R.; Wang, Q.; Lu, L. Toxoflavin produced by Burkholderia gladioli from Lycoris aurea is a new broad-spectrum fungicide. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e00106-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Van Damme, P.; Johannes, A.; Cox, H.; Berends, W. On toxoflavin, the yellow poison of Pseudomonas cocovenenans. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays Bas 1960, 79, 255–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Philmus, B.; Shaffer, B.T.; Kidarsa, T.A.; Yan, Q.; Raaijmakers, J.M.; Begley, T.P.; Loper, J.E. Investigations into the biosynthesis, regulation, and self-resistance of toxoflavin in Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5. ChemBioChem 2015, 16, 1782–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Erdelt, H.; Weidemann, M.J.; Buchholz, M.; Klingenberg, M. Some principle effects of bongkrekic acid on the binding of adenine nucleotides to mitochondrial membranes. Eur. J. Biochem. 1972, 30, 107–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Klingenberg, M.; Appel, M.; Babel, W.; Aquila, H. The binding of bongkrekate to mitochondria. Eur. J. Biochem. 1983, 131, 647–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Scherer, B.; Klingenberg, M. Demonstration of the relation between the adenine nucleotide carrier and the structural changes of mitochondria as induced by adenosine 5′-diphosphate. Biochemistry 1974, 13, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kunji, E.R.; Aleksandrova, A.; King, M.S.; Majd, H.; Ashton, V.L.; Cerson, E.; Springett, R.; Kibalchenko, M.; Tavoulari, S.; Crichton, P.G. The transport mechanism of the mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Cell Res. 2016, 1863, 2379–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Behl, A.; Nair, A.; Mohagaonkar, S.; Yadav, P.; Gambhir, K.; Tyagi, N.; Sharma, R.K.; Butola, B.S.; Sharma, N. Threat, challenges, and preparedness for future pandemics: A descriptive review of phylogenetic analysis based predictions. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2022, 98, 105217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Baker, S.; Hanage, W.P.; Holt, K.E. Navigating the future of bacterial molecular epidemiology. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2010, 13, 640–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tang, P.; Croxen, M.A.; Hasan, M.R.; Hsiao, W.W.; Hoang, L.M. Infection control in the new age of genomic epidemiology. Am. J. Infect. Control 2017, 45, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Pallen, M.J.; Loman, N.J.; Penn, C.W. High-throughput sequencing and clinical microbiology: Progress, opportunities and challenges. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2010, 13, 625–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, H.; Du, L. Iterative polyketide biosynthesis by modular polyketide synthases in bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 541–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Cheng, Y.Q.; Coughlin, J.M.; Lim, S.K.; Shen, B. Type I polyketide synthases that require discrete acyltransferases. Meth. Enzymol. 2009, 459, 165–186. [Google Scholar]
  62. Walker, P.; Weir, A.; Willis, C.; Crump, M. Polyketide β-branching: Diversity, mechanism and selectivity. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2021, 38, 723–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rohm, B.; Scherlach, K.; Hertweck, C. Biosynthesis of the mitochondrial adenine nucleotide translocase (ATPase) inhibitor bongkrekic acid in Burkholderia gladioli. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 1520–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kartadarma, E. Growth of Pseudomonas cocovenenans and Toxin Production in Tempe Bongkrek; University of New South Wales: Sydney, Australia, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  65. Fidan, H.; Esatbeyoglu, T.; Simat, V.; Trif, M.; Tabanelli, G.; Kostka, T.; Montanari, C.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Özogul, F. Recent developments of lactic acid bacteria and their metabolites on foodborne pathogens and spoilage bacteria: Facts and gaps. Food Biosci. 2022, 47, 101741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gao, Z.; Daliri, E.B.-M.; Wang, J.; Liu, D.; Chen, S.; Ye, X.; Ding, T. Inhibitory effect of lactic acid bacteria on foodborne pathogens: A review. J. Food Prot. 2019, 82, 441–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Adams, M.R.; Nicolaides, L. Review of the sensitivity of different foodborne pathogens to fermentation. Food Control 1997, 8, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ko, S.; Kelholt, A.J. The inhibitive effect of Rhizapus oligosparus on toxin production by Pseudomonas cocovenenans in “tempe” bongkrek. Ann. Bogor. 1981, 7, 97–106. [Google Scholar]
  69. Handoyo, T.; Morita, N. Structural and functional properties of fermented soybean (tempeh) by using Rhizopus oligosporus. Int. J. Food Prop. 2006, 9, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hachmeister, K.A.; Fung, D.Y. Tempeh: A mold-modified indigenous fermented food made from soybeans and/or cereal grains. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 1993, 19, 137–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lumbach, G.; Cox, H.; Berends, W. Elucidation of the chemical structure of bongkrekic acid—I: Isolation, purification and properties of bongkrekic acid. Tetrahedron 1970, 26, 5993–5999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hu, J.; Liang, M.; Xian, Y.; Chen, R.; Wang, L.; Hou, X.; Wu, Y. Development and validation of a multianalyte method for quantification of aflatoxins and bongkrekic acid in rice and noodle products using PRiME-UHPLC-MS/MS method. Food Chem. 2022, 395, 133598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Cao, X.; Xu, Z.; Su, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lei, H.; Xiao, J. The rapid detection of bongkrekic acid in foods using colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay. J. Chin. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 23, 309–318. [Google Scholar]
  74. Li, H.-J.; Dong, L.-H.; Chen, G.-F.; Liu, S.-Y.; Yang, J.-Y.; Yang, J.-Y. Establishment of Droplet Digital PCR Assay for Quantitative Detection of Pseudomonas cocovenenans in Foods. Biotechnol. Bull. 2023, 39, 127. [Google Scholar]
  75. Mothershed, E.A.; Whitney, A.M. Nucleic acid-based methods for the detection of bacterial pathogens: Present and future considerations for the clinical laboratory. Clin. Chim. Acta 2006, 363, 206–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Huo, B.; Hu, Y.; Gao, Z.; Li, G. Recent advances on functional nucleic acid-based biosensors for detection of food contaminants. Talanta 2021, 222, 121565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zheng, J.; Liu, L.; Li, X.; Xu, Z.; Gai, Z.; Zhang, X.; Lei, H.; Shen, X. Rapid and Simple Detection of Burkholderia gladioli in Food Matrices Using RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a Method. Foods 2023, 12, 1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ma, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhang, W. Rapid detection of Pseudomonas cocovenenans by loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2013, 34, 321–324. [Google Scholar]
  79. Sabat, A.J.; van Zanten, E.; Akkerboom, V.; Wisselink, G.; van Slochteren, K.; de Boer, R.F.; Hendrix, R.; Friedrich, A.W.; Rossen, J.W.; Kooistra-Smid, A.M. Targeted next-generation sequencing of the 16S-23S rRNA region for culture-independent bacterial identification-increased discrimination of closely related species. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chang, H.C.; Wei, Y.F.; Dijkshoorn, L.; Vaneechoutte, M.; Tang, C.T.; Chang, T.C. Species-level identification of isolates of the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii complex by sequence analysis of the 16S-23S rRNA gene spacer region. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 1632–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Li, H.; Jin, Y.; Huang, H.; Weng, C.; Hu, Y. Fast determination of bongkrekic acid in foods using mixed-mode weak anion exchange solid phase extraction coupled with high performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection (HPLC-DAD). Food Sci. 2016, 37, 247–251. [Google Scholar]
  82. Li, H.; Yuan, F.; Zhang, C. The research of detection bongkrekic acid (BA) by LC-ESI-TOF technology. Food Ind. 2018, 39, 319–323. [Google Scholar]
  83. Junhu, W.; Yongsheng, Q.; Jian, W.; Yuan, Z. Rapid determination of bongkrekic acid in Liushenqu by ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Chin. J. Chromatogr. 2019, 37, 963. [Google Scholar]
  84. Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Ma, Q.; Zhang, X.; Su, Y.; Zhang, R. Determination of Bongkrekic Acid in Agaric by HPLC-MS/MS. Henan J. Prev. Med. 2021, 32, 496–499. [Google Scholar]
  85. Zhang, Y.; Hou, S.; Song, H.; Luo, X.; Wu, D.; Zheng, F.; Liu, W.; Ji, S. The dual-mode platform based on cysteamine-stabilized gold nanoparticles for the high throughput and on-site detection of bongkrekic acid. Food Control 2022, 136, 108887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Foods 12 03926 g001
Figure 1. Chronological list of significant research findings in BKA and B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans. The presented years are literature publication years.
Figure 1. Chronological list of significant research findings in BKA and B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans. The presented years are literature publication years.
Foods 12 03926 g001
Foods 12 03926 g002
Figure 2. Illustration of related molecular structures and gene clusters. (A) Structure of toxoflavin; (B) Structure of bongkrekic acid; (C) Bongkrekic acid synthesis gene cluster in B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans DSMZ 11318; (D) Bongkrekic acid synthesis gene cluster in B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans BSR3. The presented length of a gene is directly proportional to the quantity of its base pairs.
Figure 2. Illustration of related molecular structures and gene clusters. (A) Structure of toxoflavin; (B) Structure of bongkrekic acid; (C) Bongkrekic acid synthesis gene cluster in B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans DSMZ 11318; (D) Bongkrekic acid synthesis gene cluster in B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans BSR3. The presented length of a gene is directly proportional to the quantity of its base pairs.
Foods 12 03926 g002
Foods 12 03926 g003
Figure 3. Pathogenic mechanism of BKA. (A) Unimpaired physiological function of mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier. (B) Function of mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier impaired by BKA.
Figure 3. Pathogenic mechanism of BKA. (A) Unimpaired physiological function of mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier. (B) Function of mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier impaired by BKA.
Foods 12 03926 g003
Foods 12 03926 g004
Figure 4. Circular genome diagrams of (A) B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans BSR3 and (B) B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans Co14. Genes of the top 20 abundant clusters of orthologous groups (COGs) are color-labeled according to their COG categories at the respective gene loci. The rRNA gene loci, CRISPR array locus, and bon gene locus are labeled at the inner circle.
Figure 4. Circular genome diagrams of (A) B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans BSR3 and (B) B. gladioli pv. cocovenenans Co14. Genes of the top 20 abundant clusters of orthologous groups (COGs) are color-labeled according to their COG categories at the respective gene loci. The rRNA gene loci, CRISPR array locus, and bon gene locus are labeled at the inner circle.
Foods 12 03926 g004
Foods 12 03926 g005
Figure 5. Depiction of essential free-standing gene functions in the biosynthesis of BKA. (A) The loading of the chain-extending unit to acyl carrier protein via cognate acyltransferase BonJ and BonK. (B) Enoyl reductions carried out by enoyl reductase BonE. (C) β-branching carried out by ketosynthase BonF, 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase BonG, and enoyl-CoA hydratase BonH and BonI. (D) The terminal synthetic reactions are executed by the catalytic activity of O-methyltransferase BonM and P450 monooxygenase BonL.
Figure 5. Depiction of essential free-standing gene functions in the biosynthesis of BKA. (A) The loading of the chain-extending unit to acyl carrier protein via cognate acyltransferase BonJ and BonK. (B) Enoyl reductions carried out by enoyl reductase BonE. (C) β-branching carried out by ketosynthase BonF, 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase BonG, and enoyl-CoA hydratase BonH and BonI. (D) The terminal synthetic reactions are executed by the catalytic activity of O-methyltransferase BonM and P450 monooxygenase BonL.
Foods 12 03926 g005
Table 1. Documented bongkrekic acid poisoning cases.
Table 1. Documented bongkrekic acid poisoning cases.
Region (Country)Year aFood MatrixCase-Fatality Rate (Deaths vs. Number of Illnesses)Reference
Central Java (Indonesia)2007Fermented soybean pulp33.3% (10:30)[17]
Yunnan Province (Southern China)2014Fermented corn flour snacks22.7% (5:22)[18]
Southern Africa (Mozambique)2015Brewed corn flour alcoholic beverage32% (75:234)[19]
Guangdong Province (Southern China)2018Rice noodle (not fermented or spoiled)50% (2:4)[20]
Guangdong Province (Southern China)2019 (Publication year)Rice noodle (expired)60% (3:5)
(5 separated cases)		[21]
Heilongjiang Province (Northern China)2020Fermented corn flour100% (9:9)[12]
Dagana District (Bhutan)2020Brewed corn alcohol (suspected)66.7% (4:6)[22]
a Refer to the year in which the outbreak occurred unless stated otherwise.
Table 2. Substrate concentrations that resulted in substantial BKA production in culture media.
Table 2. Substrate concentrations that resulted in substantial BKA production in culture media.
Substrate Concentration aMedium Type bCulture Medium FormulationInitial Bacterial Population (Log CFU/g or Log CFU/mL)Bacterial Growth When the Substrate Exceeds the Concentration Range cReference
Between 0 and 10% glycerolWetCoconut culture medium: prepared from water-pressed desiccated coconut with a final pH 6.95.96+[64]
Lower than 4% glucose4.54+
Lower than 0.8% garlic powder 4.64Unknown
Lower than 0.6% onion power5.27Unknown
Lower than 0.8% capsicum power3.64Unknown
Lower than 0.6% turmeric power5.27Unknown
Lower than 2% NaCl and pH value higher than 4.5 (adjusted using acetic acid)5.78 to 7.04 −[29]
Higher than 10% coconut fatDryDefatted rich coconut medium: prepared from water-blended fresh coconut meat with lipid content extracted8.95+[9]
3.31 mmol/g oleic acidWet+
Higher than 40% lauric acidDry+
a: The concentration of a certain substrate at which substantial bongkrekic acid production was detected; b: The type of medium (wet or dry) used for calculating the substrate concentration; c +: apparent bacterial growth was observed, −: no apparent bacterial growth, Unknown: the bacterial growth was not measured or mentioned in the culture media.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, D.; Chen, J.; Chen, W.; Wang, Y. Bongkrekic Acid and Burkholderia gladioli pathovar cocovenenans: Formidable Foe and Ascending Threat to Food Safety. Foods 2023, 12, 3926. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12213926

AMA Style

Han D, Chen J, Chen W, Wang Y. Bongkrekic Acid and Burkholderia gladioli pathovar cocovenenans: Formidable Foe and Ascending Threat to Food Safety. Foods. 2023; 12(21):3926. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12213926

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Dong, Jian Chen, Wei Chen, and Yanbo Wang. 2023. "Bongkrekic Acid and Burkholderia gladioli pathovar cocovenenans: Formidable Foe and Ascending Threat to Food Safety" Foods 12, no. 21: 3926. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12213926

APA Style

Han, D., Chen, J., Chen, W., & Wang, Y. (2023). Bongkrekic Acid and Burkholderia gladioli pathovar cocovenenans: Formidable Foe and Ascending Threat to Food Safety. Foods, 12(21), 3926. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12213926

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop