Next Article in Journal
Environmental Hazards of Nanobiomaterials (Hydroxyapatite-Based NMs)—A Case Study with Folsomia candida—Effects from Long Term Exposure
Next Article in Special Issue
Insight into the Burden of Malignant Respiratory Tumors and their Relationship with Smoking Rates and Lead Contamination in Mexico
Previous Article in Journal
Surface Water Processes Influencing Alterations in Pharmaceutical Chemical Composition following Wastewater Discharge into a Freshwater Estuary
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dynamic Adsorption Characteristics of Cr(VI) in Red-Mud Leachate onto a Red Clay Anti-Seepage Layer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adsorption Characteristics of Dimethylated Arsenicals on Iron Oxide–Modified Rice Husk Biochar

1
Department of Environment Safety System Engineering, Semyung University, Jecheon 27136, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Ocean Integrated Science, Chonnam National University, Yeosu 59626, Republic of Korea
3
Korea Basic Science Institute, 145 Anam-ro, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2022, 10(11), 703; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10110703
Submission received: 29 September 2022 / Revised: 11 November 2022 / Accepted: 12 November 2022 / Published: 17 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heavy Metal Contamination in Soil and Health Risks)

Abstract

:
In this study, the adsorption characteristics of dimethylated arsenicals to rice husk biochar (BC) and Fe/biochar composite (FeBC) were assessed through isothermal adsorption experiments and X-ray absorption spectroscopy analysis. The maximal adsorption capacities (qm) of inorganic arsenate, calculated using the Langmuir isotherm equation, were 1.28 and 6.32 mg/g for BC and FeBC, respectively. Moreover, dimethylated arsenicals did not adsorb to BC at all, and in the case of FeBC, qm values of dimethylarsinic acid (DMA(V)), dimethylmonothioarsinic acid (DMMTA(V)), and dimethyldithioarsinic acid (DMDTA(V)) were calculated to be 7.08, 0.43, and 0.28 mg/g, respectively. This was due to the formation of iron oxide (i.e., two-line ferrihydrite) on the surface of BC. Linear combination fitting using As K-edge X-ray absorption near edge structure spectra confirmed that all chemical forms of dimethylated arsenicals adsorbed on the two-line ferrihydrite were DMA(V). Thus, FeBC could retain highly mobile and toxic arsenicals such as DMMTA(V) and DMDTA(V)) in the environment, and transform them into DMA(V) with relatively low toxicity.

1. Introduction

Arsenic (As) is found in the environment (water, soil, and air) as a result of both natural and anthropogenic factors, and is considered a health risk factor worldwide due to its high toxicity and carcinogenicity not only to animals but also to humans [1,2,3,4]. The toxicity and mobility of As in the environment are greatly affected by the species [5,6,7,8], which can generally be classified into inorganic arsenicals (e.g., arsenate [As(V)] and arsenite [As(III)]) and organoarsenicals (e.g., dimethylarsinic acid [DMA(V)], dimethylmonothioarsinic acid [DMMTA(V)], and dimethyldithioarsinic acid [DMDTA(V)]). Organoarsenicals can be formed via the methylation of inorganic arsenicals, a process known as the detoxification [9]. Although the toxicities of inorganic arsenicals are greater than those of organoarsenicals [2,10], interest in dimethylated arsenicals (particularly DMMTA(V) and DMDTA(V)) has grown; this is because recent studies have demonstrated that the half maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of As(V), DMA(V), and DMMTA(V) against human epidermoid carcinoma A431 cells were 571, 843, and 10.7 μM, respectively [11]. Another study reported that the 48 h acute toxicities (IC50) of As(V), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V) against Daphnia magna were 9.5, <30, 1.7, and 6.5 mg/L, respectively [12]. Dimethylated arsenicals are potential human and ecological risks, as they have been detected in various environments such as geothermal waters, paddy pore waters, landfill leachate, and peatlands [13,14,15,16,17], as well as in foods such as seafood, rice grains, and other rice products [18,19,20].
Biochar is produced via pyrolysis of various biomass, such as agricultural waste and sewage sludge. It has the ability to remove heavy metals and organic contaminants from soil and water due to its high surface area and abundant surface functional groups [4,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. However, oxygen-containing functional groups, such as carboxylic (-COOH), carbonyl (-COH), and hydroxyl (-OH) groups, render the surface charge of biochar negative [28,29,30,31]. As a result, electrostatic repulsion can negatively affect the adsorption of anionic contaminants. To overcome this drawback, several previous studies have used biochar modified with iron (Fe) oxides, and subsequently observed significant increases in the adsorption capacity for anionic contaminants [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Fe oxides exist ubiquitously throughout the environment and also exhibit a high binding affinity for anionic contaminants such as As [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. Kim et al. [48] assessed the adsorption capacity of As(III) by modifying Miscanthus biochar with Fe. The results of their study showed that the adsorption proportion of As(III) for unmodified biochar and biochar modified with Fe were <10.4% and >72.3%, respectively, confirming that the adsorption capacity increased approximately 7-fold after modification with Fe. Furthermore, Wang et al. [32] analyzed the As(V) adsorption capacity of Pinus taeda biochar modified with hematite, which was increased by approximately 1.6-fold after Fe modification. The maximum As(V) adsorption of biochar before and after modification was 265.2 and 428.7 mg/kg, respectively, confirming that the As(V) adsorption capacity after Fe modification increased by about 1.6 folds. In addition, a notable disadvantage of unmodified biochar was that it was difficult to separate and reuse [49]; whereas when modified with Fe oxides, biochar could be separated using magnetization (i.e., ease of recovery). Phosphate recovery efficiency was recorded as 70.4% even after five cycles of reuse, indicating that it could be used as a more efficient adsorbent compared to other phosphate adsorbent materials [50]. Consequently, interest in biochar modified with such Fe oxides has continued to increase [51,52].
Here, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of rice husk biochar (BC) as a tool for reducing the mobility and toxicity of dimethylated arsenicals in the environment. In particular, the change in adsorption capacity was observed by modifying BC with two-line ferrihydrite, and the chemical forms of adsorbed dimethylated arsenicals were subsequently assessed by using X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). As there have been few studies on the adsorption of dimethylated arsenicals from using Fe oxides and BC compared to those on inorganic arsenicals, this study aimed to improve the understanding of the adsorption characteristics of Fe/biochar composite (FeBC) for dimethylated arsenicals. Furthermore, the findings of this study can provide justification for the inclusion of the use of FeBC as part of risk mitigation measures for water and/or soil contaminated with dimethylated arsenicals.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. BC

The BC used in this study was prepared by thermally decomposing rice husk at 500 °C and was provided by the Water Quality Laboratory of Seoul National University (South Korea). The physicochemical characteristics of BC were analyzed in a previous study [53], which revealed a mean pore size of 221 nm, a specific surface area of 24.34 m2/g, an intra-particle porosity of 41.71%, and a skeletal density of 1.69 g/cm3. The respective concentrations of C and O were 47.82% and 8.98%, whilst the O/C ratio was 0.14. The provided BC was finely ground by using a pestle and subsequently stored in a desiccator. The particle size of the ground BC was analyzed by using a particle-size analyzer (Partica mini LA 350, Horiba, Japan).

2.2. Synthesis of FeBC

The synthesis of FeBC was performed according to a partially modified two-line ferrihydrite synthesis method that has been previously reported [54]. Briefly, 15 g of BC was added to 150 mL of 0.1 M iron(III) nitrate nonahydrate solution (Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, ≥99%, Daejung, Siheung-si, Republic of Korea); 1 M NaOH was then added to adjust the pH to 7.5. Distilled water was added to increase the volume of the solution to 200 mL. This prepared solution was then reacted for 24 h at room temperature, with intermittent stirring, and then solid–liquid separation was performed by using a vacuum filter (JS-2D, JEIL, Seoul, Republic of Korea). The recovered solid was washed several times using distilled water, dried at room temperature, and then stored in a desiccator. Elemental mapping was performed by using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) (SU8220, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) to analyze Fe on the surface of the synthesized FeBC. The particle size of FeBC was analyzed by using the particle size analyzer, and the total Fe concentration of FeBC was measured via digestion with aqua regia. FeBC (1 g) was placed in a 15 mL polypropylene tube, and 10 mL of aqua regia (7.5 mL of HCl and 2.5 mL of HNO3) was added, followed by reaction at room temperature for 24 h, and finally filtering through a 0.45 μm GHP filter (Pall Corporation, Port Washington, NY, USA). Fe content analysis in this filtered solution was performed at 248.3 nm, using an atomic absorption spectrometer (AAS) (AAS-6200, Simadzu, Japan).

2.3. Equilibrium Adsorption Isotherm Experiments

Initial concentrations were prepared as follows; 10, 100, 200, 500, 1000, and 2000 mg/L for As(V) (Na2HAsO4·7H2O, ≥99%, Wako, Japan); 10, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 2000, and 5000 mg/L for DMA(V) (C2H7AsO7, ≥99%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA); 0.5, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 mg/L for DMMTA(V) (C2H7AsOS, 95%, Toronto Research Chemicals, Toronto, Canada); and 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 20, and 50 mg/L for DMDTA(V) (C2H7AsNaS2;, 97%, Toronto Research Chemicals, Toronto, Canada). Adsorption isotherm experiments were conducted after adjusting the pH to 7.0, using 0.1 M HCl and 1 M NaOH. A solution containing 0.1 g of BC or FeBC and each As species (10 mL) was placed in a 50 mL polypropylene tube, stirred at 120 rpm for 24 h, and then filtered by using a 0.45-μm GHP filter. Thereafter, the concentration of As in the solution was analyzed at 196.696 nm, using an inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometer (ICP–OES) (Ultima 2C, Horiba Jobin Yvon, Vénissieux, France).
To obtain the parameters that could explain adsorption characteristics, including maximum adsorption capacity (qm), for each As species, three different adsorption isotherm models (i.e., Langmuir isotherm, Freundlich isotherm, and Temkin isotherm) were applied here. In our preliminary results (Supplementary Table S1), the Langmuir isotherm (Equation (1)) showed the highest R2 values for dimethylated arsenicals, and therefore, its parameters were derived and used for the assessment of adsorption characteristics here.
q e = q m bC e 1 + bC e
where qe is the concentration of As adsorbed to the solid at equilibrium (mg/g), b is the Langmuir constant (L/mg), and Ce is the concentration of As remaining in the liquid at equilibrium (mg/L).

2.4. XAS

As K-edge XAS data were collected at the 10C wide XAFS beamline in the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory, Korea, in fluorescence mode. To investigate the adsorption characteristics of each As species (As(V), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V)) on FeBC (i.e., to confirm the chemical form of each As species adsorbed onto the two-line ferrihydrite formed on the BC surface), raw spectra data were pretreated by using the Athena software 0.2.96, which involved the normalization of edge-step and background removal. This was followed by linear combination fitting (LCF), using four kinds of As reference compounds (As(V), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V)). In addition, the suitability of LCF fitting was evaluated by using the R-factor value [55,56].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characteristics of FeBC

Figure 1 shows the FE-SEM images and elemental mapping results for the surfaces of BC and synthesized FeBC. The Fe compositions of BC and FeBC surfaces, detected via elemental mapping, were measured to be 0.2% (wt.%) and 17.6% (wt.%), respectively (Figure 1c,f and Table 1). In addition, the result of aqua regia digestion showed that the total Fe concentrations in BC and FeBC were 527 and 47,155 mg/kg, respectively (Table 1). The difference in the Fe composition of BC and FeBC surfaces confirmed via elemental mapping (88 folds; 0.2% and 17.6%, respectively) and that confirmed via aqua regia digestion (89.5 folds; 527 and 47,155 mg/kg, respectively) were similar, thus suggesting that Fe oxides’ precipitates were well dispersed across the FeBC surface (Figure 1b,e). The median particle size of FeBC was approximately 56 μm.

3.2. Comparison of Adsorption Characteristics of Arsenicals on BC and FeBC

The qm of As(V), which was obtained via Langmuir isotherm fitting, was calculated as 1.28 mg/g on BC and 6.32 mg/g on FeBC (Figure 2). The qm of As(V) on FeBC was significantly increased compared to that on BC, which indicated that Fe oxides formed on the surface of BC could serve as adsorption sites with a high efficiency for As(V) [32]. Most BC surfaces are negatively charged due to the presence of oxygen-containing functional groups such as -COO; therefore, it is difficult for them to adsorb anionic contaminants such as As due to electrostatic repulsion [35,36,57,58,59]. However, BC modified with Fe can increase the adsorption capacity for anionic contaminants, such as As, by neutralizing the surface charge of BC, and thereby providing a positive adsorption site on the BC surface [33]. Feng et al. [33] conducted adsorption isotherm experiments for reactive red 120 (RR120), an anionic contaminant, at pH 3.5 and 7.5, using the Hickory chip (HC) and Fe-loaded Hickory chip (FeHC). As a result, it was confirmed that the qm of RR120 for FeHC increased to 32.0 mg/g at pH 3.5 (2.90 mg/g for HC) and to 79.4 mg/g at pH 7.5 (2.39 mg/g for HC). It was concluded that the increase in the surface charge of HC after Fe loading (i.e., the point of zero charges (pzc) increased from about 2 to 9.19) accelerated the electrostatic interaction between RR120 and the adsorbent, thereby increasing the adsorption capacity. Additionally, Fan et al. [34] performed adsorption isotherm experiments on As(V) at pH 3.0, using corn straw (CS) and Fe-infused CS (CS-Fe). They subsequently found that the qm of As(V) for CS-Fe increased to 14.77 mg/g, compared to 2.86 mg/g for CS, which was considered to be a result of the increase in adsorbent surface charge due to the increase in the pzc (from 2.75 to 6.93). He et al. [60] also performed adsorption isotherm experiments on As(V), using corn straw biochar (CSB) and Fe-infused CSB (FeCSB), and reported that the qm values of As(V) for CSB and FeCSB at pH 7.0 ± 0.2 were 0.017 and 6.80 mg/g, respectively, suggesting an estimated 400-fold improvement resulting from an increase in pzc from 4.5 to 7.4. Table 2 summarizes the change in the anionic contaminant adsorption capacity before and after dropping Fe into BC.
It was expected that the pzc values of BC prepared by pyrolysis at 500 °C ranged from 5.6 to 7.0 [61,62]. In addition, as the pzc of general two-line ferrihydrite was 8.0 to 8.4 [63], the formation of two-line ferrihydrite on the BC surface caused a change in the electrostatic interaction, with an increase in the pzc of BC simultaneously, which in turn increased the adsorption capacity for As(V). Through processes such as post-synthetic modification, it is possible to produce materials (i.e., adsorbents) that have the characteristics of both organic and inorganic materials and compensate for each other’s disadvantages [64]. Adsorption capacity can be improved not only by electrostatic interaction but also by van der Waals interaction [65,66].
BC with a high porosity, high specific surface area, and abundant surface functional groups has been widely used to adsorb organic pollutants [67,68]. However, our observations revealed that dimethylated arsenicals (DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V)) were not adsorbed to BC (Figure 2). We presumed this was caused by the aforementioned electrostatic repulsion (DMA(V), pKa = 6.2; DMMTA(V), pKa = 4.3, 6–7; and DMDTA(V), pKa = 2.25) [69], as well as the effect of steric hindrance; however, further in-depth studies are required to clarify these aspects. In contrast, the qm values of DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V) to FeBC were calculated as 7.08, 0.43, and 0.28 mg/g, respectively (Figure 2). Consequently, Fe oxides (two-line ferrihydrite) formed on the FeBC surface were presumed to have been the main factor in the adsorption of DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V). According to the results of adsorption isotherm experiments presented by Yoon et al. [12], using As(V), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V) with amorphous Fe oxide two-line ferrihydrite at different pH conditions, the qm values of As(V), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V) at pH 7.0 were 61.6, 43.6, 14.0, and 2.5 mg/g, respectively. This indicated that the qm of each As species to two-line ferrihydrite decreased as the methyl and thiol group content increased (DMMTA(V) has one thiol group, and DMDTA(V) has two thiol groups). Therefore, adsorption capacity was inhibited due to the presence of methyl and thiol groups. Similarly, the present study confirmed that the qm for FeBC decreased as the thiol content in organoarsenic species increased.
Yoon et al. [12] studied the species transformation potential of DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V) over 24 h, after adding 0.1 g of two-line ferrihydrite to solutions of DMMTA(V) and DMDTA(V) at pH of 4.0, 7.0, and 10.0. Their results showed that no species transformation occurred for DMMTA(V), and that DMDTA(V) was slightly oxidized to DMMTA(V) (approximately 4.2%) at pH 7.0. In the present study, as the Fe content of FeBC was approximately 12-fold lower than that of the two-line ferrihydrite used by Yoon et al. [12] (i.e., Fe content for 0.1 g of two-line ferrihydrite [5Fe2O3∙9H2O] was 58 mg [70], whilst Fe content for 0.1 g of FeBC was 4.72 mg), it was considered that no significant species transformation of DMMTA(V) and DMDTA(V) had occurred.

3.3. Chemical Forms of Adsorbed Dimethylated Arsenicals on Two-Line Ferrihydrite

An X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) analysis was performed to evaluate the chemical forms of dimethylated arsenicals adsorbed onto FeBC. As the main cause of the adsorption of dimethylated arsenicals onto FeBC was presumed to be the two-line ferrihydrite formed on the FeBC surface, the adsorption characteristics of dimethylated arsenicals on FeBC were studied by using the As K-edge XANES spectra of two-line ferrihydrite samples adsorbed with DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V). Figure 3 shows the reference spectra of As(V), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V), as well as the K-edge XANES spectra of dimethylated arsenicals adsorbed on two-line ferrihydrite. The reference spectra of As(V), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V) showed absorption energies (white-line energy position) of 11,875.3, 11,873.8, 11,873.4, and 11,872.6 eV, respectively (Figure 3). It was confirmed that absorption energy decreased as the methyl and thiol group content increased. A similar decrease in absorption energy according to the increase of methyl and thiol group content has been reported previously (Table 3).
In contrast, except for the two-line ferrihydrite adsorbed with As(V), the absorption energy of all samples adsorbed with DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V) were the same as that of the reference compound (11,873.8 eV). Figure 4 shows the results of LCF for the As K-edge XANES spectra of each As species adsorbed on two-line ferrihydrite. The LCF results of the samples, in which each dimethylated arsenical was adsorbed on two-line ferrihydrite, indicated that the adsorbed As forms were all DMA(V) (Figure 4). Kim et al. [75] reported that ferric iron was able to serve as a catalyst to induce the oxidation of DMDTA(V) to DMMTA(V) and DMA(V), whilst Kerl et al. [76] noted that an estimated 50% of DMDTA(V) was converted to DMMTA(V) in an Fe-containing nutrient solution. Based on the findings of these studies, the results of the present study seemed to suggest that the partial oxidation of DMMTA(V) and DMDTA(V) may have occurred on the surface of FeBC, and that DMA(V) formed via oxidation was immediately adsorbed on two-line ferrihydrite formed on the surface of FeBC. As a result, the adsorbed dimethylated arsenicals appeared in the form of DMA(V) (Figure 5).

3.4. Environmental Implication

DMMTA(V) has been shown to exhibit high human- and eco-toxicity compared to DMA(V) and DMDTA(V). Cytotoxicity levels (IC50) of As(III), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V) in bladder cancer EJ-1 cells was reported to be 75 μM, ≥1 mM, 17 μM, and ≥1 mM, respectively [77], whilst the 48 h acute toxicities (IC50) of As(V), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V) against Daphnia magna was reported to be 9.5, <30, 1.7, and 6.5 mg/L, respectively [12]. In this study, it was confirmed that unmodified BC did not adsorb these highly toxic dimethylated arsenicals and that the adsorption capacity of BC for dimethylated arsenicals could be improved through surface modification with Fe oxides. Meanwhile, the coexistence of Fe oxides, such as two-line ferrihydrite and dimethylated arsenicals, induced transformation into DMA(V), which is less toxic in comparison to DMMTA(V) or DMDTA(V).

4. Conclusions

In this study, the adsorption characteristics of As(V) and dimethylated arsenicals (DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V)) on BC and FeBC were assessed. As BC was modified with two-line ferrihydrite, the maximum adsorption capacity of As(V) increased approximately 5-fold, from 1.28 to 6.32 mg/g. This may have been due to the Fe oxide modification, thereby increasing adsorption sites on the FeBC surface and decreasing the electrostatic repulsion. Dimethylated arsenicals did not adsorb onto BC, whereas on FeBC, DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V) showed maximum adsorption capacities at 7.08, 0.43, and 0.28 mg/g, respectively. As such, dimethylated arsenicals were adsorbed through the reaction with two-line ferrihydrite presented on the surface of FeBC. Similar to observations in previous studies, adsorption inhibition was observed with an increase in thiol-group content. The XANES-LCF analysis confirmed that the main form of dimethylated arsenicals adsorbed to two-line ferrihydrite was DMA(V). This indicated that FeBC could be utilized to lower the mobility of dimethylated arsenicals in the environment and to transform them into less hazardous forms.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxics10110703/s1, Table S1: Parameters obtained through Langmuir model, Freundlich model, and Temkin model after isothermal adsorption experiments for each As species on FeBC.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.A.; methodology, S.-G.Y. and J.A.; software, S.-G.Y.; formal analysis, S.-G.Y.; investigation, S.-G.Y.; data curation, S.-G.Y.; writing–original draft preparation, S.-G.Y. and J.A.; writing—review and editing, I.-S.K. and H.-O.Y.; visualization, S.-G.Y.; supervision, J.A.; project administration, J.A.; funding acquisition, I.-S.K. and H.-O.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute through the Aquatic Ecosystem Conservation Research Program, funded by the Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2021003050001); the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant, funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. 2019R1A2C2007092); and the MOE as Waste to Energy-Recycling Human Resource Development Project.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mohammed Abdul, K.S.; Jayasinghe, S.S.; Chandana, E.P.S.; Jayasumana, C.; De Silva, P.M. Arsenic and human health effects: A Review. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015, 40, 828–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hughes, M.F. Arsenic toxicity and potential mechanisms of action. Toxicol. Lett. 2002, 133, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Bondada, B.R.; Tu, S.; Ma, L.Q. Absorption of foliar-applied arsenic by the arsenic hyperaccumulating fern (Pteris vittata L.). Sci. Total Environ. 2004, 332, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vithanage, M.; Herath, I.; Joseph, S.; Bundschuh, J.; Bolan, N.; Ok, Y.S.; Kirkham, M.B.; Rinklebe, J. Interaction of arsenic with biochar in soil and water: A critical review. Carbon 2017, 113, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Parsons, C.T.; Couture, R.-M.; Omoregie, E.O.; Bardelli, F.; Greneche, J.-M.; Roman-Ross, G.; Charlet, L. The impact of oscillating redox conditions: Arsenic immobilisation in contaminated calcareous floodplain soils. Environ. Pollut. 2013, 178, 254–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Park, S.; Kim, S.H.; Chung, H.; An, J.; Nam, K. Effect of organic substrate and FE oxides transformation on the mobility of arsenic by biotic reductive dissolution under repetitive redox conditions. Chemosphere 2022, 305, 135431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Garcia-Manyes, S. Arsenic speciation in contaminated soils. Talanta 2002, 58, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Han, Y.-S.; Park, J.-H.; Kim, S.-J.; Jeong, H.Y.; Ahn, J.S. Redox transformation of soil minerals and arsenic in arsenic-contaminated soil under cycling redox conditions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 378, 120745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Thomas, D.J. Arsenic methylation—Lessons from three decades of research. Toxicology 2021, 457, 152800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Katsoyiannis, I.; Zouboulis, A. Removal of arsenic from contaminated water sources by sorption onto iron-oxide-coated polymeric materials. Water Res. 2002, 36, 5141–5155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Naranmandura, H.; Ibata, K.; Suzuki, K.T. Toxicity of dimethylmonothioarsinic acid toward human epidermoid carcinoma A431 cells. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2007, 20, 1120–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yoon, S.-G.; Kim, Y.-E.; Chae, C.; An, J.; Yoon, H.-O. Dimethylmonothioarsinic acid and dimethyldithioarsinic acid in the environment: Sorption characteristics on 2-line ferrihydrite and acute toxicity to daphnia magna. Environ. Geochem. Health 2021, 44, 925–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Planer-Friedrich, B.; London, J.; McCleskey, R.B.; Nordstrom, D.K.; Wallschläger, D. Thioarsenates in geothermal waters of Yellowstone National Park:  Determination, preservation, and geochemical importance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 5245–5251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hug, K.; Maher, W.A.; Stott, M.B.; Krikowa, F.; Foster, S.; Moreau, J.W. Microbial contributions to coupled arsenic and sulfur cycling in the acid-sulfide hot spring champagne pool, New Zealand. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, J.; Kerl, C.F.; Hu, P.; Martin, M.; Mu, T.; Brüggenwirth, L.; Wu, G.; Said-Pullicino, D.; Romani, M.; Wu, L.; et al. Thiolated arsenic species observed in rice paddy pore waters. Nat. Geosci. 2020, 13, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Y.; Low, G.K.-C.; Scott, J.A.; Amal, R. Microbial transformation of arsenic species in municipal landfill leachate. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 188, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zaccone, C.; Lobianco, D.; Raber, G.; D’Orazio, V.; Shotyk, W.; Miano, T.M.; Francesconi, K. Methylated arsenic species throughout a 4-m deep core from a free-floating peat island. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 621, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dai, J.; Chen, C.; Gao, A.-X.; Tang, Z.; Kopittke, P.M.; Zhao, F.-J.; Wang, P. Dynamics of dimethylated monothioarsenate (DMMTA) in paddy soils and its accumulation in rice grains. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 8665–8674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Colina Blanco, A.E.; Kerl, C.F.; Planer-Friedrich, B. Detection of thioarsenates in rice grains and rice products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 2287–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Luvonga, C.; Rimmer, C.A.; Yu, L.L.; Lee, S.B. Organoarsenicals in seafood: Occurrence, dietary exposure, toxicity, and risk assessment considerations—A Review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 943–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, M.; Gao, B.; Varnoosfaderani, S.; Hebard, A.; Yao, Y.; Inyang, M. Preparation and characterization of a novel magnetic biochar for arsenic removal. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 130, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Weber, K.; Quicker, P. Properties of biochar. Fuel 2018, 217, 240–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, J.; Wang, S. Preparation, modification and environmental application of biochar: A Review. J. Clean. Product. 2019, 227, 1002–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Qian, K.; Kumar, A.; Zhang, H.; Bellmer, D.; Huhnke, R. Recent advances in utilization of biochar. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 42, 1055–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tan, X.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, G.; Wang, X.; Hu, X.; Gu, Y.; Yang, Z. Application of biochar for the removal of pollutants from aqueous solutions. Chemosphere 2015, 125, 70–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alka, S.; Shahir, S.; Ibrahim, N.; Ndejiko, M.J.; Vo, D.-V.N.; Manan, F.A. Arsenic removal technologies and future trends: A mini review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 278, 123805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Montaño-Medina, C.U.; Lopéz-Martínez, L.M.; Ochoa-Terán, A.; López-Maldonado, E.A.; Salazar-Gastelum, M.I.; Trujillo-Navarrete, B.; Pérez-Sicairos, S.; Cornejo-Bravoc, J.M. New pyridyl and aniline-functionalized carbamoylcarboxylic acids for removal of metal ions from water by coagulation-flocculation process. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 451, 138396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhou, Z.; Liu, Y.-G.; Liu, S.-B.; Liu, H.-Y.; Zeng, G.-M.; Tan, X.-F.; Yang, C.-P.; Ding, Y.; Yan, Z.-L.; Cai, X.-X. Sorption performance and mechanisms of arsenic(v) removal by magnetic gelatin-modified biochar. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 314, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, W.-H.; Hoang, A.T.; Nižetić, S.; Pandey, A.; Cheng, C.K.; Luque, R.; Ong, H.C.; Thomas, S.; Nguyen, X.P. Biomass-derived biochar: From production to application in removing heavy metal-contaminated water. Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 2022, 160, 704–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yaashikaa, P.R.; Senthil Kumar, P.; Varjani, S.J.; Saravanan, A. Advances in production and application of biochar from lignocellulosic feedstocks for remediation of environmental pollutants. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 292, 122030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. López-Maldonadoa, E.A.; Hernández-García, H.; Zamudio-Aguilar, M.A.M.; Oropeza-Guzmánc, M.T.; Ochoa-Teránc, A.; López-Martínezd, L.M.; Martinez-Quiroze, M.; Valdez, R.; Olivas, A. Chemical issues of coffee and Tule lignins as ecofriendly materials for the effective removal of hazardous metal ions contained in metal finishing wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 397, 125384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, S.; Gao, B.; Zimmerman, A.R.; Li, Y.; Ma, L.; Harris, W.G.; Migliaccio, K.W. Removal of arsenic by magnetic biochar prepared from Pinewood and natural hematite. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 175, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Feng, K.; Xu, Z.; Gao, B.; Xu, X.; Zhao, L.; Qiu, H.; Cao, X. Mesoporous ball-milling iron-loaded biochar for enhanced sorption of Reactive Red: Performance and mechanisms. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 290, 117992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fan, J.; Xu, X.; Ni, Q.; Lin, Q.; Fang, J.; Chen, Q.; Shen, X.; Lou, L. Enhanced As (v) removal from aqueous solution by biochar prepared from iron-impregnated Corn Straw. J. Chem. 2018, 2018, 5137694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Lin, L.; Qiu, W.; Wang, D.; Huang, Q.; Song, Z.; Chau, H.W. Arsenic removal in aqueous solution by a novel Fe-Mn modified biochar composite: Characterization and mechanism. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 144, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yao, S.; Liu, Z.; Shi, Z. Arsenic removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto iron oxide/activated carbon magnetic composite. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2014, 12, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Samsuri, A.W.; Sadegh-Zadeh, F.; Seh-Bardan, B.J. Adsorption of As(iii) and As(v) by Fe coated biochars and biochars produced from empty fruit bunch and rice husk. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2013, 1, 981–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tuna, A.Ö.; Özdemir, E.; Şimşek, E.B.; Beker, U. Removal of As(v) from aqueous solution by activated carbon-based hybrid adsorbents: Impact of experimental conditions. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 223, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, C.; Huang, L.; Xue, S.-G.; Huang, Y.-Y.; Hartley, W.; Cui, M.-Q.; Wong, M.-H. Arsenic sorption by red mud-modified biochar produced from rice straw. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 18168–18178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pedersen, H.D.; Postma, D.; Jakobsen, R. Release of arsenic associated with the reduction and transformation of iron oxides. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2006, 70, 4116–4129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jeong, Y.; Fan, M.; Singh, S.; Chuang, C.-L.; Saha, B.; Hans van Leeuwen, J. Evaluation of iron oxide and aluminum oxide as potential arsenic(v) adsorbents. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2007, 46, 1030–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mamindy-Pajany, Y.; Hurel, C.; Marmier, N.; Roméo, M. Arsenic adsorption onto hematite and goethite. Comptes Rendus Chim. 2009, 12, 876–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Song, K.; Kim, W.; Suh, C.-Y.; Shin, D.; Ko, K.-S.; Ha, K. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles prepared by electrical wire explosion for arsenic removal. Powder Technol. 2013, 246, 572–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Luther, S.; Borgfeld, N.; Kim, J.; Parsons, J.G. Removal of arsenic from aqueous solution: A study of the effects of ph and interfering ions using iron oxide nanomaterials. Microchem. J. 2012, 101, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jeong, S.; Yang, K.; Jho, E.H.; Nam, K. Importance of chemical binding type between As and iron-oxide on bioaccessibility in soil: Test with synthesized two line ferrihydrite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 330, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Su, B.; Lin, J.; Owens, G.; Chen, Z. Impact of green synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles on the distribution and transformation of as species in contaminated soil. Environ. Poll. 2020, 258, 113668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tuutijärvi, T.; Lu, J.; Sillanpää, M.; Chen, G. As(v) adsorption on maghemite nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 166, 1415–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kim, J.; Song, J.; Lee, S.-M.; Jung, J. Application of iron-modified biochar for arsenite removal and toxicity reduction. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 80, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, X.; Qin, Y.; Jia, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Pan, Y.; Sun, J. Preparation and application of Fe/biochar (Fe-BC) catalysts in wastewater treatment: A review. Chemosphere 2021, 274, 129766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, H.; Shan, J.; Chen, Z.; Lichtfouse, E. Efficient recovery of phosphate from simulated urine by Mg/Fe bimetallic oxide modified biochar as a potential resource. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 784, 147546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yi, Y.; Tu, G.; Zhao, D.; Tsang, P.E.; Fang, Z. Biomass waste components significantly influence the removal of Cr(VI) using magnetic biochar derived from four types of feedstocks and steel pickling waste liquor. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 360, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Reguyal, F.; Sarmah, A.K.; Gao, W. Synthesis of magnetic biochar from pine sawdust via oxidative hydrolysis of FeCl2 for the removal sulfamethoxazole from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 321, 868–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kang, S.; Kim, G.; Choe, J.K.; Choi, Y. Effect of using powdered biochar and surfactant on desorption and biodegradability of phenanthrene sorbed to biochar. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 371, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Schwertmann, U.; Cornell, R.M. Iron Oxides in the Laboratory Preparation and Characterization; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  55. An, J.; Jeong, B.; Nam, K. Evaluation of the effectiveness of in situ stabilization in the field aged arsenic-contaminated soil: Chemical extractability and biological response. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 367, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Park, J.; Chung, H.; Kim, S.H.; An, J.; Nam, K. Effect of neutralizing agents on the type of as co-precipitates formed by in situ Fe oxides synthesis and its impact on the bioaccessibility of as in Soil. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 743, 140686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xu, X.; Zheng, Y.; Gao, B.; Cao, X. N-doped biochar synthesized by a facile ball-milling method for enhanced sorption of CO2 and reactive red. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 368, 564–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yao, Y.; Gao, B.; Zhang, M.; Inyang, M.; Zimmerman, A.R. Effect of biochar amendment on sorption and leaching of nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate in a sandy soil. Chemosphere 2012, 89, 1467–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mukherjee, A.; Zimmerman, A.R.; Harris, W. Surface Chemistry variations among a series of laboratory-produced biochars. Geoderma 2011, 163, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. He, R.; Peng, Z.; Lyu, H.; Huang, H.; Nan, Q.; Tang, J. Synthesis and characterization of an iron-impregnated biochar for aqueous arsenic removal. Sci. Total. Environ. 2018, 612, 1177–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pham, T.H.; Chu, T.T.H.; Nguyen, D.K.; Le, T.K.O.; Obaid, S.A.; Alharbi, S.A.; Kim, J.; Nguyen, M.V. Alginate-modified biochar derived from rice husk waste for improvement uptake performance of lead in wastewater. Chemosphere 2022, 307, 135956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ahmad, A.; Khan, N.; Giri, B.S.; Chowdhary, P.; Chaturvedi, P. Removal of methylene blue dye using rice husk, cow dung and sludge biochar: Characterization, application, and kinetic studies. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 306, 123202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cismasu, A.C.; Michel, F.M.; Tcaciuc, A.P.; Tyliszczak, T.; Brown, G.E., Jr. Composition and structural aspects of naturally occurring ferrihydrite. C. R. Geosci. 2011, 343, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. López-Maldonadoa, E.A.; Oropeza-Guzmán, M.T. Nejayote biopolyelectrolytes multifunctionality (glucurono ferulauted arabinoxylans) in the separation of hazardous metal ions from industrial wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 423, 130210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kuppler, R.J.; Timmons, D.J.; Fang, Q.-R.; Li, J.-R.; Makal, T.A.; Young, M.D.; Yuan, D.; Zhao, D.; Zhuang, W.; Zhou, H.-C. Potential applications of metal-organic frameworks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2009, 253, 3042–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rivadeneira-Mendoza, B.F.; Filho, O.A.E.; Fernández-Andrade, K.J.; Curbelo, F.; Silva, F.F.D.; Luque, R.; Rodríguez-Díazhi, J.M. MOF@biomass hybrids: Trends on advanced functional materials for adsorption. Environ. Res. 2023, 216, 114424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dai, Y.; Zhang, N.; Xing, C.; Cui, Q.; Sun, Q. The adsorption, regeneration and engineering applications of biochar for removal organic pollutants: A review. Chemosphere 2019, 223, 12–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rosales, E.; Meijide, J.; Pazos, M.; Sanromán, M.A. Challenges and recent advances in biochar as low-cost biosorbent: From batch assays to continuous-flow systems. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 246, 176–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jeong, S.; Kang, J.; Cho, M.; An, J.; Yoon, H.-O. New insights into surface behavior of dimethylated arsenicals on montmorillonite using X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 852, 158531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Das, S.; Hendry, M.J.; Essilfie-Dughan, J. Transformation of two-line ferrihydrite to goethite and hematite as a function of pH and temperature. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 45, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Smith, P.G.; Koch, I.; Gordon, R.A.; Mandoli, D.F.; Chapman, B.D.; Reimer, K.J. X-ray absorption near-edge structure analysis of arsenic species for application to biological environmental samples. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 39, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jing, C.; Meng, X.; Liu, S.; Baidas, S.; Patraju, R.; Christodoulatos, C.; Korfiatis, G.P. Surface complexation of organic arsenic on nanocrystalline titanium oxide. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 290, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Maher, W.; Foster, S.; Krikowa, F.; Donner, E.; Lombi, E. Measurement of inorganic arsenic species in rice after nitric acid extraction by HPLC-ICPMS: Verification using Xanes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 5821–5827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Suess, E.; Scheinost, A.C.; Bostick, B.C.; Merkel, B.J.; Wallschlaeger, D.; Planer-Friedrich, B. Discrimination of thioarsenites and thioarsenates by X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 8318–8326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kim, Y.-T.; Lee, H.; Yoon, H.-O.; Woo, N.C. Kinetics of dimethylated thioarsenicals and the formation of highly toxic dimethylmonothioarsinic acid in environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 11637–11645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kerl, C.F.; Schindele, R.A.; Brüggenwirth, L.; Colina Blanco, A.E.; Rafferty, C.; Clemens, S.; Planer-Friedrich, B. Methylated thioarsenates and monothioarsenate differ in uptake, transformation, and contribution to total arsenic translocation in rice plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 5787–5796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Naranmandura, H.; Carew, M.W.; Xu, S.; Lee, J.; Leslie, E.M.; Weinfeld, M.; Le, X.C. Comparative toxicity of arsenic metabolites in human bladder cancer EJ-1 cells. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2011, 24, 1586–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FE-SEM images and EDS elemental mapping results of BC and FeBC: (a) FE-SEM image of BC, (b,c) elemental mapping results of BC, (d) Fe-SEM image of FeBC, and (e,f) elemental mapping results of FeBC.
Figure 1. FE-SEM images and EDS elemental mapping results of BC and FeBC: (a) FE-SEM image of BC, (b,c) elemental mapping results of BC, (d) Fe-SEM image of FeBC, and (e,f) elemental mapping results of FeBC.
Toxics 10 00703 g001
Figure 2. Results of adsorption isotherm experiments for each As species (As(V), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V)) for BC and FeBC. The maximal adsorption capacity (qm [mg/g]) and coefficient of determination (R2) of As(V) for BC were 1.28 and 0.2821, respectively. DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V) were not adsorbed onto BC. For FeBC, the qm (mg/g) values of As(V), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V) were 6.32, 7.08, 0.43, and 0.28, respectively, whilst R2 values were 0.6837, 0.7920, 0.5075, and 0.7724, respectively.
Figure 2. Results of adsorption isotherm experiments for each As species (As(V), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V)) for BC and FeBC. The maximal adsorption capacity (qm [mg/g]) and coefficient of determination (R2) of As(V) for BC were 1.28 and 0.2821, respectively. DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V) were not adsorbed onto BC. For FeBC, the qm (mg/g) values of As(V), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V) were 6.32, 7.08, 0.43, and 0.28, respectively, whilst R2 values were 0.6837, 0.7920, 0.5075, and 0.7724, respectively.
Toxics 10 00703 g002
Figure 3. As reference compounds (As(V), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V)) and K-edge XANES spectra for two-line ferrihydrite, to which each As species was adsorbed. The dashed line represents the absorption energy of 11,873.8 eV.
Figure 3. As reference compounds (As(V), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V)) and K-edge XANES spectra for two-line ferrihydrite, to which each As species was adsorbed. The dashed line represents the absorption energy of 11,873.8 eV.
Toxics 10 00703 g003
Figure 4. (a) LCF results of each As species adsorbed on two-line ferrihydrite (2LF) (open circles), against the As K-edge XANES spectra (solid lines). The R-factors for each analysis were 0.0105, 0.0014, 0.0027, and 0.0014 for the 2LF with adsorbed As(V), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V), respectively. (b) The stacked vertical bar indicates the ratio of As reference compounds (As(V), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V)) to compose the spectrum most similar to the spectrum of each sample, i.e., the proportion of As adsorbed to 2LF.
Figure 4. (a) LCF results of each As species adsorbed on two-line ferrihydrite (2LF) (open circles), against the As K-edge XANES spectra (solid lines). The R-factors for each analysis were 0.0105, 0.0014, 0.0027, and 0.0014 for the 2LF with adsorbed As(V), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V), respectively. (b) The stacked vertical bar indicates the ratio of As reference compounds (As(V), DMA(V), DMMTA(V), and DMDTA(V)) to compose the spectrum most similar to the spectrum of each sample, i.e., the proportion of As adsorbed to 2LF.
Toxics 10 00703 g004
Figure 5. Proposed adsorption mechanisms of dimethylated arsenicals on FeBC.
Figure 5. Proposed adsorption mechanisms of dimethylated arsenicals on FeBC.
Toxics 10 00703 g005
Table 1. Elemental mapping results (% surface Fe composition) for BC and FeBC, and total Fe concentration analyzed via aqua regia digestion.
Table 1. Elemental mapping results (% surface Fe composition) for BC and FeBC, and total Fe concentration analyzed via aqua regia digestion.
SampleSurface Fe Distribution (%) Determined Using EDS Elemental MappingFe Concentration (mg/kg) Determined Using Aqua Regia Digestion and AAS Analysis
BC0.2527
FeBC17.647,155
BC, biochar; FeBC, Fe/biochar composite; EDS, energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer; AAS, atomic absorption spectrometer.
Table 2. Changes in adsorption capacity for anionic contaminants before and after Fe modification for various biomass-based adsorbents.
Table 2. Changes in adsorption capacity for anionic contaminants before and after Fe modification for various biomass-based adsorbents.
Biomass UsedContaminantMaximum Adsorption Capacity (mg/g)Reference
BiocharFe/Biochar Composite
Hickory chipsAnionic dye (reactive red 120)2.9032.0Feng et al. [33]
2.3979.4
Corn stemAs(III)2.898.25 (Fe-Mn modified biochar)Lin et al. [35]
Pine woodAs(V)0.2650.429Wang et al. [32]
Corn strawAs(V)2.8614.77Fan et al. [34]
Activated carbonAs(V)17.8620.24Yao et al. [36]
Empty fruit bunchAs(V)5.515.2Samsuri et al. [37]
As(III)18.931.4
Rice huskAs(V)19.330.7
As(III)7.116.9
Activated carbonAs(V)0.004.663Tuna et al. [38]
Rice strawAs(V)0.5525.923Wu et al. [39]
BC, biochar; FeBC, Fe/biochar composite.
Table 3. Absorption energy (white-line energy position) (eV) of As species.
Table 3. Absorption energy (white-line energy position) (eV) of As species.
As SpeciesAbsorption Energy (eV)Reference
As(V)11,875.3Smith et al. [71]
As(V)11,873.5Jing et al. [72]
DMA(V)11,873
As(V)11,875Maher et al. [73]
DMA(V)11,873
Monothioarsenate11,871.3Suess et al. [74]
Dithioarsenate11,870.3
Tetrathioarsenate11,869.8
As(V)11,873Jeong et al. [69]
DMA(V)11,872
DMMTA(V)11,871
DMDTA(V)11,870
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yoon, S.-G.; Kwak, I.-S.; Yoon, H.-O.; An, J. Adsorption Characteristics of Dimethylated Arsenicals on Iron Oxide–Modified Rice Husk Biochar. Toxics 2022, 10, 703. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10110703

AMA Style

Yoon S-G, Kwak I-S, Yoon H-O, An J. Adsorption Characteristics of Dimethylated Arsenicals on Iron Oxide–Modified Rice Husk Biochar. Toxics. 2022; 10(11):703. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10110703

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yoon, Sang-Gyu, Ihn-Sil Kwak, Hye-On Yoon, and Jinsung An. 2022. "Adsorption Characteristics of Dimethylated Arsenicals on Iron Oxide–Modified Rice Husk Biochar" Toxics 10, no. 11: 703. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10110703

APA Style

Yoon, S. -G., Kwak, I. -S., Yoon, H. -O., & An, J. (2022). Adsorption Characteristics of Dimethylated Arsenicals on Iron Oxide–Modified Rice Husk Biochar. Toxics, 10(11), 703. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10110703

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop