Next Article in Journal
E-Liquids from Seven European Countries–Warnings Analysis and Freebase Nicotine Content
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Zebrafish DNA Integrity after Individual and Combined Exposure to TiO2 Nanoparticles and Lincomycin
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles on Model Systems of the Intestinal Barrier
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Co-Exposure of Nanoparticles and Metals on Different Organisms: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nanoparticles: Excellent Materials Yet Dangerous When They Become Airborne

Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Epigenetics, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Toxics 2022, 10(2), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10020050
Submission received: 8 November 2021 / Revised: 5 January 2022 / Accepted: 7 January 2022 / Published: 22 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Knowledge of Nanomaterial Ecotoxicology)

Abstract

:
Since the rise and rapid development of nanoscale science and technology in the late 1980s, nanomaterials have been widely used in many areas including medicine, electronic products, crafts, textiles, and cosmetics, which have provided a lot of convenience to people’s life. However, while nanomaterials have been fully utilized, their negative effects, also known as nano pollution, have become increasingly apparent. The adverse effects of nanomaterials on the environment and organisms are mainly based on the unique size and physicochemical properties of nanoparticles (NPs). NPs, as the basic unit of nanomaterials, generally refer to the ultrafine particles whose spatial scale are defined in the range of 1–100 nm. In this review, we mainly introduce the basic status of the types and applications of NPs, airborne NP pollution, and the relationship between airborne NP pollution and human diseases. There are many sources of airborne NP pollutants, including engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) and non-engineered nanoparticles (NENPs). The NENPs can be further divided into those generated from natural activities and those produced by human activities. A growing number of studies have found that exposure to airborne NP pollutants can cause a variety of illnesses, such as respiratory diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and neurological disorders. To deal with the ever increasing numbers and types of NPs being unleashed to the air, we believe that extensive research is needed to provide a comprehensive understanding of NP pollution hazards and their impact mechanisms. Only in this way can we find the best solution and truly protect the safety and quality of life of human beings.

1. Introduction

The development of nanotechnology can be traced back to the 4th century AD, and the most iconic example is the Lycurgus cup made of dichroic glass by the Romans. The colloidal gold and silver in the glass give the Lycurgus cup an opaque green color in reflected light, but a translucent red color in transmitted light [1,2]. The US National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) defines nanotechnology as “the understanding and control of matter at the nanometer scale (1–100 nm), whose unique phenomena provide new possibilities for a wide range of fields including physics, chemistry, biology, medicine, engineering, and electronics” [2]. There is no doubt that nanotechnology is one of the most promising technologies of the 21st century.
Nanoparticles (NPs), as the basic unit of nanotechnology products, generally refer to the ultrafine particles with a size less than 100 nm in at least one spatial dimension [3,4]. So what does a size less than 100 nm mean? For comparison, we can recognize that the width of a human hair is about 80,000 nm, the diameter of hemoglobin is about 5.5 nm, and the radius of the DNA double helix is only about 1 nm [2,5,6]. Compared with traditional bulk materials, the decisive feature of nanoscale size makes the properties of nanomaterials in terms of strength, toughness, specific heat, catalytic capacity, conductivity, diffusion, magnetic susceptibility, optics, and electromagnetic wave absorption have fundamentally changed, thus showing many unique nano effects (quantum size effect and surface effect, volume effect, macroscopically tunneling effect, etc.). As a result, nanomaterials can be widely used in many fields such as medicine, electronic products, crafts, textiles, and cosmetics.
While people are intoxicated with the many novel functions of nanomaterials and the wonderful application prospects they will bring to our life, their potential safety problems are also increasingly emerging. Due to the extremely small size of NPs, there is a high possibility of inhalation during the development, production, use, and recycling of nano products. It is also a reminder that we need to reassess and understand how they are absorbed and what biological effects they can cause. In addition to the previously mentioned NPs produced by artificially controlled engineering processes, namely as engineered NPs (ENPs), inhalable NP pollutants also include NPs produced by gradual degradation of physical, chemical and biological processes in the environment, which are generally referred to as non-engineered NPs (NENPs). A number of studies have found that airborne NPs are able to penetrate deep into the alveoli through the respiratory tract following inspiratory action, and then distribute along the circulatory system to various tissues and organs, including the liver, spleen, kidneys, heart, and brain, where they may be deposited [7,8,9,10,11]. The small size, large surface area/mass ratio, ability to produce reactive oxygen species, high retention rate, and other characteristics of NPs can induce cytotoxicity and inflammation [12,13,14]. As a result, not only does the respiratory system suffer damage from airborne NP pollutants, but other tissues and organs of the human body are also at risk.
This review will elaborate on the basic status of the types and applications of NPs, airborne NP pollution, and the relationship between airborne NP pollution and human diseases.

2. The Types of ENPs and Their Applications

As mentioned earlier, the common feature of all ENPs is that at least one spatial scale is in the 1–100 nm range [3,4]. According to their composition and structure, ENPs can be roughly divided into two types: inorganic NPs and organic NPs. In this section, we will introduce different types of ENPs in detail from different perspectives such as shape, size, and applications (Table 1).

2.1. Inorganic NPs

The main component of the inorganic NPs family is inorganic matter. Because of their abundant constituent elements and various kinds, they have diversified excellent performance. Here we will only focus on some of the classical ENPs, such as carbon-based NPs, metal-based NPs and oxide NPs.

2.1.1. Carbon-Based NPs

The carbon-based NP family is a family mainly composed of carbon elements, and their morphologies have been in constant change and development. According to the division of spatial dimension, carbon-based NPs generally include the following categories: zero-dimensional (dot or spherical form, such as carbon dots (C-dots) and fullerenes), one-dimensional (tubular or filamentous form, such as single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)), two-dimensional (flake form, such as graphene and its derivatives), and three-dimensional (mainly composed of one- and two-dimensional structural materials, such as graphite) (Figure 1). In this section, C-dots, fullerenes, SWCNTs, MWCNTs, and graphene are mainly introduced.
C-dots, also known as carbon quantum dots or carbon nanodots, are typically zero-dimensional nanoscale carbon nanomaterials, whose morphology is a grape-like aggregate composed of highly fused spherical carbon particles, with a very small size (below 10 nm). Its history can be traced back to 2004, when Xu et al., from the University of South Carolina in the United States, first discovered C-dots that can emit bright fluorescence during the electrophoretic purification of products in the preparation of SWCNTs [15]. C-dots have many excellent properties such as high photoluminescence, strong electron transfer ability, and good biocompatibility, so they have a very broad application in bioimaging, biosensing, and disease treatment. For example, in 2013, Hsu et al. obtained C-dots by calcining green tea, which could be adsorbed on the surface of MCF-7 cells (human breast cancer cells) and thus emit light under ultraviolet irradiation [16]. In 2020, Chaudhary et al. performed fluorescence imaging on MDA-MB468 cells (human breast cancer cells) using C-dots synthesized by pyrolysis of waste plastic residues, and the fluorescence intensity observed in the cells was stable for up to 1 h [17]. In 2021, Kundu et al. used a sensor constructed from C-dots to detect vitamin B2 in aqueous solutions [18]. As for the treatment of diseases, C-dots can play a role as delivery carriers for drugs or genetic drugs [19,20].
Fullerenes, discovered in 1985 by Harold Kroto of the University of Sussex in collaboration with James Health of Rice University in soot residue from the gasification of carbon in helium gas flows, are another zero-dimensional carbon-based NP material [87,88]. Throughout the fullerenes family, C60) is one of the most widely known. It is a perfectly symmetrical caged icosahedron about 1 nm in size, made up of 60 carbon atoms with 12 pentagonal rings and 20 hexagonal rings [89]. It is also known as soccerene because of its resemblance to the soccer ball [88]. At present, the application research of C60 mainly focuses on its catalytic performance, superconductivity, biocompatibility and oxidation resistance. For example, Li and Xu used C60 as catalyst to catalyze the hydrogenation of nitrobenzene to aniline, in which the catalytic hydrogenation efficiency was as high as 100% [29]. This opens up a new way for C60 as a catalyst with excellent performance. In addition, the discovery of doping C60 superconductor is another major achievement in the field of superconductivity. Tanigaki et al. obtained superconductors with good performance and a critical temperature only second to that of oxide ceramic superconductor by doping C60 in metal potassium and rubidium [32]. Therefore, this type of superconductor is expected to be widely used in such fields as electronic shielding in superconducting computers, superconducting magnetic separation technology, long-distance power transmission, magnetic levitation trains, and superconducting supercolliders. Krusic et al. also vividly called C60 “free radical sponge” because of its role in scavenging reactive oxygen radicals, activating skin cells and preventing aging [21]. Therefore, C60 is also used in cosmetics and skin care products and other related industries [22,23]. Other studies have mentioned the application of C60 in the disease treatments, such as anti-inflammatory, antiviral, or antibacterial agents [24,25,26,27], as drug and gene delivery carriers [30,31], as well as diagnostic and medical imaging [28].
CNTs are hollow cylindrical nanomaterials formed by the graphene sheets composed of carbon six membered rings curling in one direction. Therefore, according to the number of graphene sheets, they can be roughly divided into two categories: SWCNTs formed by a single graphene sheet and MWCNTs formed by several concentrically nested graphene sheets. The nanoscale of these two types of CNTs is reflected in the radial dimension. The diameter of SWCNTs is extremely short, some only about 1 nm, while the diameter of MWCNTs generally varies from a few nanometers to tens of nanometers [90]. Their lengths are typically on the micron scale, and even half-meter-long nanotubes have been produced, exhibiting very high aspect ratios of up to 103–108 [90,91]. Since Iijima reported the method of preparing CNTs in 1991, they have been widely used in many fields [92]. For example, CNTs are designed for use in a variety of drug delivery systems, such as anticancer drugs [36,37,38], genetic drugs [33,37,39], antigen-immune drugs [40], and even vaccines [93,94] to treat a variety of diseases. Due to their good mechanical properties and biocompatibilities, CNTs also have unique advantages in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine [41,42,43]. In this regard, cells are encased in suitable CNTs to develop new tissue. As because of the special properties of near-infrared absorption (NIR), CNTs are very suitable for the selective detection of cell surface receptors and cell imaging [33,34]. In addition, CNTs can be used as biosensors. Shumeiko et al. used peptide-encapsulated SWCNTs for protease detection [35].
Graphene is actually an atomic layer of graphite, that is, a two-dimensional monolayer formed by SP2 hybrid carbon atoms covalently bonded in a hexagonal lattice. As early as 1895, Brodie discovered the presence of highly layered structures in thermally reduced graphite oxide [95]. In 1948, Ruess and Vogt published the first transmission electron microscope image of graphene with few layers (between 3 and 10 layers) using a penetrating electron microscope [96]. It was not until 1962 that scientists saw graphene in a single layer under an electron microscope [97]. Graphene has been tested as the thinnest and strongest material ever made [98]. It is less than 10 nm thick, but 100 times harder than solid steel, with an inherent tensile strength of 130 GPa [98]. Therefore, graphene is also a very good choice for tissue engineering scaffolds [46,47,48,49]. Like other carbon-based nanomaterials, it has potential applications in biosensing, bioimaging, drug delivery, and photothermal therapy [44,45,46].

2.1.2. Metal-Based NPs

Metal-based NPs are another important part of inorganic NPs family. In fact, in terms of composition, Metal-based NPs are exactly the same as ordinary metal materials; the key difference is that the particles or thickness of nano metal are on the nanoscale, so that nano-sized metal particles have nano properties that traditional metals do not! Common metal-based NPs include gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), copper nanoparticles (CuNPs), and platinum nanoparticles (PtNPs). It is worth mentioning firstly that metal-based NPs and oxide NPs to be mentioned later are different from the carbon-based NPs. Each type of NPs comes in a variety of shapes and sizes [69,72,99,100,101], as shown in Table 1. In addition, some schematic diagrams of these NPs are given in Figure 2.
Compared to bulks of gold, AuNPs and their applications may be considered to be the product of modern science. However, as previously mentioned, AuNPs and AgNPs were used to color the Lycurgus cup, made by the Romans in the 4th century AD, making it a rare color-changing glass, that appears opaque green in reflected light while translucent red in transmitted light [1,2]. It was not until the 16th century, when Paracelsus, the founder of modern Chemistry in Europe, prepared “drinking gold” for the treatment of mental diseases, that AuNPs began to formally enter the scientific arena and play an increasingly important role in such fields as medical imaging and disease treatment. Due to its unique optical properties, AuNPs themselves can be used as an active near-infrared absorption (NIR) imaging probe for cancer detection [58]. In terms of disease treatment, AuNPs can play a role in anti-giogenesis by inhibiting the activity of heparin-binding proteins (such as vascular endothelial growth factor isoform 165 (VEGF165) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) [50,51] and promoting cell apoptosis [52]; or by encapsulating drugs/genes that can be delivered in a targeted way to treat the disease [53,54,55,56]. In addition, the properties of AuNPs that absorb photons and convert them into heat energy are also used in photothermal therapy [59,60,61]. This kind of treatment can be highly targeted to the cancer because more NPs accumulate in the tumor than in normal tissue, thus selectively irradiating the tumor. AuNPs are also found in many products we use in our daily life, such as toothpaste, anti-aging creams, facial masks, and even food preservatives [57].
AgNPs as bacteriostatic agent is a major feature of their applications. In fact, silver itself has a certain antibacterial effect. However, the antibacterial activity of silver particles at nanometer size is much stronger than that of silver. A small amount of AgNPs can produce a powerful bactericidal effect. This bactericidal effect has a broad spectrum and can inhibit and kill including Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pyogenes, Candida albicans, and other hundred kinds of bacteria [62]. Even better, it does not develop resistance. Therefore, AgNPs have a wide range of applications in daily necessities, food packaging, textiles and clothing, cosmetics, air conditioners, washing machines, and so on, erecting a solid protective wall between human and bacteria [66,67,68]. AgNPs also have antiviral effects. Lara et al. demonstrated that polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) coated AgNPs can prevent transmission of cell- associated and cell-free HIV-1 isolates in their study on the mechanism of anti-HIV activity in early viral replication [63]. In addition, AgNPs can inhibit cancer by inducing cell apoptosis [64]; or by using AgNPs as targeted drug delivery carriers, chemotherapy agents and as enhancers for radiation and photodynamic therapy to achieve the purpose of treatment [65].
Compared with AuNPs and AgNPs, CuNPs and PtNPs seem to have better catalytic applications. The high surface area of NPs enables them to provide better dispersion of the active site and easy diffusion of the reactants. CuNPs and PtNPs not only have good catalytic performance in their own reactions, but also their catalytic performance can be significantly improved when they are combined to form bimetallic catalytic materials [70,71]. In addition, CuNPs and PtNPs also play important roles in antimicrobial, anticancer, targeted drug delivery, bioimaging, and biosensing [69,72].

2.1.3. Oxide NPs

In addition to carbon-based NPs and metal-based NPs, oxide NPs are also an important part of inorganic NPs family. There are many types of oxide NPs, including titanium oxide (TiO2) NPs, silica (SiO2) NPs, zinc oxide (ZnO) NPs, iron oxide (Fe2O3) NPs, and alumina (Al2O3) NPs. As mentioned earlier, oxide NPs, like metal-based NPs, have a variety of structural forms, including spherical, rod, cube, and so on [102] (Figure 2). In terms of size, Elsabahy and Wooley suggested that medium size (20–100 nm) NPs have more potential for in vivo applications, so the size of oxide NPs is also mostly distributed in this range [103]. On a mass basis, TiO2 NPs, SiO2 NPs, and ZnO NPs are the three most produced nanomaterials worldwide. TiO2 NPs are widely used in solar cells, paints and coatings due to their photolysis properties. In addition, TiO2 and ZnO NPs not only absorb ultraviolet light, but also reflect and scatter ultraviolet light, so they are used in cosmetics such as sunscreen [73,78]. As because of their superior properties, SiO2 NPs are widely used in cosmetics, food, automotive industry, coatings, and even biomedical fields [74,75,76,77]. The magnetism of Fe2O3 NPs makes them suitable for use in magnetic separation of biological products and cells, diagnosis and guidelines for site-specific administration [79]. Due to their strong heat resistance, excellent hardness, and high stability, Al2O3 NPs are widely used in strengthening and toughening plastics, rubber, ceramics, refractories, and other products [80,81,82,83].

2.2. Organic NPs

Organic NPs are mainly composed of liposomes, micelles, and organic polymers (Figure 3). Compared with inorganic NPs, organic NPs have the advantages of adjustable chemical structure, good biocompatibility, low toxicity, and easy to be metabolized in biological system, so they are more suitable for clinical application [104].
Liposomes are artificial membranes. The simplest form of liposome is the phospholipid bilayer formed with hydrophilic heads and hydrophobic tails [84]. Micelles are composed of amphiphilic compound molecules, the lipophilic tails of the molecules are concentrated inside the micelles and the hydrophilic heads are exposed outside [85]. Organic polymers are organic polymer compound components in the form of nanospheres (solid spheres) or nanocapsules (hollow spheres with a gap in the center) composed of natural polymers (i.e., chitosan, hyaluronic acid, cellulose, and corn starch) or synthetic polymers (i.e., polyvinyl alcohol, polyethylene glycol, and polylactic-glycolic acid) [105]. Liposomes, micelles, and organic polymers are generally spherical structures with particle sizes ranging from tens of nanometers to hundreds of nanometers, which can meet the needs of drug encapsulation and targeted drug delivery according to specific conditions [84,85,86].

3. Air Pollution Caused by NPs

Air pollution is one of the important factors that threaten human life and health. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), about 7 million people worldwide die from air pollution each year [106]. Particulate matter (PM), as one of the most important components of air pollution mixture, is also the most harmful pollutant to human life and health. According to the aerodynamic equivalent diameter of particles, inhalable particles generally can be divided into three categories: particles with aerodynamic diameter less than 10 microns (PM10, coarse particles), particles with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5, fine particles), and particles less than 100 nanometers (PM0.1, ultrafine particles or NPs). In fact, the health effects of the first two types of particulate pollutants are better understood. However, with the wide application of ENPs, they began to be accumulated in the environment, which gradually aroused people’s strong attention on their role in human health and environmental pollution. In this section, the main sources of airborne NPs are described in detail (Figure 4).
At present, airborne NP pollutants can be divided into two categories according to their sources: ENPs and NENPs. ENPs are made by artificially controlled engineering processes. As a result, exposure to ENPs can occur in a range of activities from the manufacture of nano products (including laboratory development and industrial production), product installation and use, and product disposal and recycling. For example, Han et al. detected airborne dust containing CNTs at levels up to 400 μg/m3 in a CNT production laboratory [107]. Lee et al. detected airborne AgNPs levels of 5–289 μg/m3 in an injection chamber at a AgNPs manufacturing facility [108], which overlaps with the threshold limit of 100 μg/m3 for AgNPs inhalation recommended by the American Conference of Industrial Hygienists [109]. Exposure to ENP pollutants during use is much more complex. As mentioned in the previous section, ENPs have applications in many fields, including medicine, electronic products, crafts, textiles, and cosmetics. Therefore, when people contact and use these products, they are inevitably exposed to ENPs.
NENPs are particles produced by gradual degradation in the environment through physical, chemical, and biological processes. While there are many differences in the physicochemical composition of ENPs and NENPs, one common feature is their very small size (nanoscale), which gives these particles unique properties that may cause harmful effects on human health. Generally, NENPs can be also divided into two categories: naturally occurring NENPs and artificially produced NENPs. Due to natural phenomena such as dust storms, volcanic eruptions, and forest fires, NENPs are already abundant in nature, which could have a serious impact on air quality. As Taylor reported in 2002, naturally occurring aerosols account for 90% of the total, while human activity generates only about 10% of the total. Dust storms appear to be the biggest source of naturally occurring NENPs [110]. According to a report, the particles produced during the dust storms range from tens of nanometers to several microns in diameter, and the concentration of particles between 100 and 200 nm can reach 1500 particles/m3 [111]. Before deposition, the particles can be lifted into the atmosphere by strong winds, where they can be transported long distances. NENPs produced by volcanic eruptions and forest fires have one thing in common: they are produced under high temperature and burning conditions. Following a series of major eruptions of Eyjafjallajökull volcano in Iceland began on 14 April 2010, Schäfer et al. conducted observations of peak NENPs concentrations in southern Germany using different remote sensing systems from the ground and space [112]. Concentrations of particles in the 10–100 nm range are estimated to be as high as 16,000 particles/cm3 compared to lower background values (<4000 particles/cm3). In addition, Guyon et al. sampled within the boundary layer of 69 samples from biomass combustion in the Amazonia and estimated NENPs diameters of 110 ± 15 nm with emission factors ranging from 2.3 × 1014 to 5.4 × 1015 particles emitted per kg dry matter burned [113].
Artificially produced NENPs are also mainly produced through high temperature and combustion, and their sources include industrial emissions, transportation emissions, waste incineration, human routine activities, and smoking. The concentration and size of NENPs emitted by industry are determined by the raw material, processing manners and emission treatment. Leoni et al. measured NENP concentrations in residential areas 1.5 km away from a large steel plant [114]. They estimated that peak NENP concentrations are as high as 3.2 × 105 particles/cm3, and that most NENPs are aggregates of small spheres 30–50 nm in diameter. In addition, Kim et al. and Graczyk et al. tested NENP concentrations in a rubber factory and welding plant respectively and found that the NENP concentrations in the environment were very high, posing a very high risk of occupational exposure [115,116]. They measured NENP concentrations of 5.45 × 105 particles/cm3 in the rubber factory and 1.69 × 106 particles/cm3 in the welding plant, with average diameters of 26 nm and 45 nm, respectively. NENPs generated in transportation are mainly caused by incomplete combustion of diesel or gasoline. The diameter of NENPs produced by diesel engines is mainly in the 20–130 nm range [117], while the diameter of NENPs produced by gasoline engines is in the 20–60 nm range [118]. Wearings that occurred at the road-tire interfaces can also lead to the generations of NENPs. Dahl et al. found that, when the NENP size is between 15 and 700 nm, the NENP emission coefficient will increase with increasing vehicle speed and vary between 3.7 × 1011 and 3.2 × 1012 particles/vehicle/km at speeds of 50 and 70 km/h [119]. In addition, human beings produce a lot of solid wastes in the process of daily life and production, and incineration is one of the main ways to deal with these wastes. Buonanno et al. conducted a measurement of NENPs at the incineration plant in San Vittore del Lazio (Italy) [120]. They found that the incineration process did produce NENPs, with the maximum concentration of 2.7 × 107 particles/cm3 before and 2.0 × 103 particles/cm3 after the filtration treatment. The average diameter of the pre-filtered NENPs was about 150 nm, while the average diameter of the filtered NENPs was smaller, around 90 nm. This shows that the fabric filter does have a strong purification effect on the waste gas, but the open burning of household garbage still exists and causes great harm to the environment, suggesting that we still need to deal with garbage more properly. As a combustion product of smoking, tobacco smoke is also one of the manufactured air pollutants containing NENPs. It has been reported that, under poor ventilation, smoking can significantly increase the concentration of airborne particles in rooms and buildings [121,122]. Based on an assessment of fine particle levels in 110 Scottish homes, Semple et al. found that median PM2.5 concentrations from 93 smoking homes were 31 μg/m3 and 3 μg/m3 for the 17 non-smoking homes, suggesting that members of smoking homes were at higher risk of fine particle exposure [122]. There are some studies that focus on NENPs produced by tobacco burning. For example, Wu et al. conducted a study on the characteristics of tobacco smoke in a laboratory setting. They tested five brands of cigarettes and found that the average emission rate of NENPs was 3.36 ± 0.24 × 1011 particles/min, and the median diameters of particles were 102–113 nm [123]. Similar studies have also been carried out on electronic cigarettes, also known as “e-cigarettes”. Compared to the NENPs contained in tobacco smoke, NENPs produced by e-cigarettes have higher concentrations and larger particle sizes [124]. Fuoco et al. measured that the concentration of NENPs contained in aerosol streams of e-cigarettes was 4.39 ± 0.42 × 109 particles/cm3, and the particle size was in the 120–165 nm range [125]. In addition to the sources mentioned above, NENPs can also be produced in everyday life, such as cooking, cleaning, printing, and burning (candle, mosquito coil, incense, etc.) [126,127,128].

4. NPs and Diseases

Indeed, the recent advances in nanotechnology mentioned above have led to a significant progress in biomedicine. However, many research results show that both ENPs and NENPs will cause certain harm to human life and health (Table 2). After inhalation, coarse particulate matter (PM10) entering with air mainly stays in the nasal cavity and upper respiratory tract, while fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nano particulate matter (PM0.1) with small particle size may penetrate deeper into the alveoli [7]. The PM0.1 may also penetrate different tissue compartments of the lung, eventually reaching capillaries and circulating cells. These particles then travel through circulation to other organs, including the liver, spleen, kidneys, heart, and brain, where deposition may occur. As a result, not only does the respiratory system suffer damage from airborne NP pollutants, but other tissues and organs of the human body are also at risk (Figure 5).

4.1. Respiratory Diseases

As is known to all, the respiratory system, which performs the function of gaseous exchange with the outside world, is the most frequent system in contact with the external environment among various systems of the human body. Therefore, when the air is polluted, the burden on the human respiratory system will be increased. A growing body of research evidence suggests that exposure to airborne NP pollutants can trigger and increase the risk of diseases such as inflammation, asthma, and pulmonary fibrosis.
In fact, inflammatory response is a defense mechanism activated by organisms in the face of “exogenous” foreign bodies. As a non-specific response, it can resist any kind of attack, whether biological, chemical or physical. In general, inflammation is a beneficial adaptive response that helps to maintain the body’s integrity. However, when the foreign body cannot be removed, a transition to chronic inflammation may occur, resulting in different degrees of pathological changes. There is no doubt that NPs, once in the body, are also recognized by the organism as foreign bodies that must be eliminated by inflammatory response, thus causing inflammation. For example, Poulsen et al. found that both small, curled (CNTSmall, 0.8 ± 0.1 μm in length) and large, thick MWCNT (CNTLarge, 4 ± 0.4 μm in length) induced strong acute phase and inflammatory responses after a single intratracheal instillation in C57BL/6 mice, respectively [129]. Features include increased intracellular flow in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, interstitial pneumonia, and altered expression of inflammatory genes such as chemokine (C-C motif) ligands (CCLs) and chemokine (C-X-C motif) chemokine ligands (CXCLs). Nishi et al. treated male Wistar rats with a tracheal infusion of nickel oxide (NiO) NPs (26 nm in average diameter) [130]. In addition to the changes in the expression of three neutrophil chemokines (cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant-1 (CINC-1), CINC-2αβ, and CINC-3) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, they also observed infiltration of neutrophils and alveolar macrophages in the alveoli. In addition, smaller particles have been shown to be more toxic than larger particles of the same composition and crystal structure, and they produce a consistently higher inflammatory response in the lungs [141].
Lavigne et al. conducted a population-based cohort study in Toronto, Canada, to assess the association between exposure to NENPs during pregnancy and early postpartum and the incidence of childhood asthma [131]. In models adjusted for PM2.5 and NO2, exposure to NENPs during the second trimester remained positively associated with the incidence of childhood asthma, meaning that environmental NENPs were independently associated with the incidence of childhood asthma. Kim et al. found that the levels of substance P, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) were significantly increased in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in asthmatic mouse models exposed to TiO2 NPs [132]. At the same time, bradykinin, ATP, and CGRP are also increased in a dose-dependent manner in human normal bronchial epithelial (HNBE) cells exposed to TiO2 NPs. These results suggest that TiO2 NPs can promote the development of neuroinflammation, and the enhanced neuroinflammation may be involved in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma, leading to the release of neurotransmitters, thus aggravating asthma.
In addition, as previously mentioned, CNTs have extremely high aspect ratio properties similar to those of asbestos fibers. There are concerns that inhaling CNTs may also cause damage similar to asbestos fibers, such as pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. When Shvedova et al. treated C57BL/6 mice with pharyngeal aspiration of SWCNTs (1–4 nm in diameter), they found some abnormal responses in the mice’s lungs, which combined robust but acute inflammation with early onset yet progressive fibrosis and granulomas [133].

4.2. Cardiovascular Diseases

Unlike respiratory diseases, the association between environmental particulate exposure and cardiovascular diseases was not accepted until the mid-1990s, when it was observed that hospital admissions for cardiovascular diseases increased on days with higher particulate concentrations [142]. Since then, the link between air pollution and cardiovascular diseases has received increasing attention. Based on the understanding of the relationship between PM10/PM2.5 and cardiovascular diseases, it is natural to think that the airborne NP pollution also plays a role in the process of atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, and other diseases.
Miller et al. used AuNPs to evaluate particle translocations when exploring the relationship between NPs and cardiovascular diseases [143]. In mice exposed to large diameter ranges of AuNPs (2–200 nm initial diameter), translocations of particles smaller than 10 nm were significantly increased and particles were preferentially accumulated in inflammation-rich vascular lesions of fat-fed apolipoprotein E-deficient mice, suggesting that the inhaled NPs were significantly clustered at sites of vascular diseases. Kang et al. found that long-term exposure to inhaled nickel hydroxide (Ni(OH)2) NPs (5 nm in diameter) would cause oxidative stress and inflammation in the lungs and cardiovascular system, and such stress would eventually exacerbate the progression of atherosclerosis in the apoproteinE-deficient (ApoE−/−) mice, a sensitive animal model [134]. The results showed that the plaques in the Ni(OH)2 NPs exposed mice were significantly larger than those in the control group (1.8 times), and the transcript levels of several genes involved in atherosclerosis, CCL-2, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), and cluster of differentiation 68 (CD68) were also increased.
Later, studies found that exposure to NPs also had a certain aggravation of the symptoms of myocardial infarction. After treating myocardial infarction mice with ZnNPs, Song et al. observed that ZnNPs exposure increased the size of myocardial infarction cells and disordered cell arrangement [144]. Thompson et al. found that Sprague–Dawley rats showed significant vasoconstriction and impaired diastole after exposure to C60, leading to exacerbation of myocardial infarction [135].

4.3. Neurological Disorders and Other Diseases

In addition to the above diseases, the nervous system can also be affected by exposure to airborne NP pollutants. The earliest evidence comes from a study by Kilburn, who found that workers exposed to diesel had deteriorated visual performance, impaired cognitive performance, and balance problems, suggesting they had chemical brain damage [136]. Later, Chen et al. found a strong association between living near a major urban road (less than 50 m) and the incidence of dementia [137]. You et al. observed mood disorders and cognitive dysfunction in male C57BL/6N mice after intranasal infusion of SiO2 NPs [138]. A number of recent studies have focused on the effects of airborne NP pollutants on life during pregnancy, and have found that exposure to NP pollutants during pregnancy is associated with low birth weight and neurodevelopmental deficits in offspring [145,146]. Amereh et al. also found that exposure to polystyrene nano plastics (average size 38.92 nm) resulted in endocrine disturbance in male rats, accompanied by decreased serum testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and follicle stimulating hormone levels [139]. Furthermore, Visani et al. found that environmental NPs were significantly hyper-accumulated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases compared to healthy controls [140].

5. Conclusions

As mentioned above, NP materials do have a huge impact on people’s lives in many ways. While these materials are being developed and applied in large numbers, NPs are also beginning to make their way into the environment. NPs come from a wide variety of sources, whether unintentional or intentionally created, and if they are not managed and controlled, the situation of airborne NP pollutants will only be worsening. People’s exposure to airborne NP pollutants increases as these pollutants accumulate more in the air. Airborne NP pollutants enter the human body through the respiratory system, and then distribute to various tissues and organs along with the circulatory system. Accumulated day after day, their toxic effects will cause certain damage to the human body, such as the diseases mentioned above. Although many recent studies have focused on the adverse effects of airborne NP pollution, serious knowledge gaps remain in definitively identifying the human health effects of exposure to these nanoscale pollutants and the mechanisms of action involved. At present, the solutions to NP pollution are mainly reflected in the following aspects: technological innovation, policy formulation, and enhancing civic awareness. Technological innovation mainly depends on scientists’ exploration and research. There are also some possible directions. For example, we hope to find safer and more environmentally friendly NPs to replace those that are harmful to humans and the environment, or introduce some special enzymes, bacteria, and fungi to treat nano-waste. Policy formulation is mainly aimed at the control of the production process of NPs. In addition, raising citizens’ awareness of NP pollution is also a meaningful initiative. In conclusion, until the issue of NP contamination is identified and addressed, it is necessary to strengthen safety management of NP sources in order to reduce exposure and protect human health.

Author Contributions

Writing—Original Draft Preparation, X.-H.Y., Y.-M.X., and A.T.Y.L.; Writing—Review and Editing, X.-H.Y., Y.-M.X., and A.T.Y.L.; Supervision, A.T.Y.L. and Y.-M.X.; Funding Acquisition, A.T.Y.L. and Y.-M.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31771582 and 31271445), the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 2017A030313131), the “Thousand, Hundred, and Ten” Project of the Department of Education of Guangdong Province of China, the Basic and Applied Research Major Projects of Guangdong Province of China (2017KZDXM035 and 2018KZDXM036), the “Yang Fan” Project of Guangdong Province of China (Andy T. Y. Lau-2016; Yan-Ming Xu-2015), and the Shantou Medical Health Science and Technology Plan (200624165260857).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank members of the Lau and Xu laboratory for critical reading of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. The British Museum. Available online: www.britishmuseum.org (accessed on 18 February 2021).
  2. National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI). Available online: www.nano.gov (accessed on 18 February 2021).
  3. Oberdörster, G.; Oberdörster, E.; Oberdörster, J. Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 823–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. ASTM International. Available online: https://www.astm.org/Standards/E2456.htm (accessed on 19 February 2021).
  5. Gnach, A.; Lipinski, T.; Bednarkiewicz, A.; Rybka, J.; Capobianco, J.A. Upconverting nanoparticles: Assessing the toxicity. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 1561–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Whitesides, G.M. The ‘right’ size in nanobiotechnology. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 1161–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Brown, J.S.; Zeman, K.L.; Bennett, W.D. Ultrafine particle deposition and clearance in the healthy and obstructed lung. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002, 166, 1240–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Sadeghi, L.; Yousefi Babadi, V.; Espanani, H.R. Toxic effects of the Fe2O3 nanoparticles on the liver and lung tissue. Bratisl. Lek. Listy 2015, 116, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lee, I.C.; Ko, J.W.; Park, S.H.; Lim, J.O.; Shin, I.S.; Moon, C.; Kim, S.H.; Heo, J.D.; Kim, J.C. Comparative toxicity and biodistribution of copper nanoparticles and cupric ions in rats. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016, 11, 2883–2900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Elder, A.; Gelein, R.; Silva, V.; Feikert, T.; Opanashuk, L.; Carter, J.; Potter, R.; Maynard, A.; Ito, Y.; Finkelstein, J.; et al. Translocation of inhaled ultrafine manganese oxide particles to the central nervous system. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 1172–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Mills, N.L.; Amin, N.; Robinson, S.D.; Anand, A.; Davies, J.; Patel, D.; de la Fuente, J.M.; Cassee, F.R.; Boon, N.A.; Macnee, W.; et al. Do inhaled carbon nanoparticles translocate directly into the circulation in humans? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 173, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lewinski, N.; Colvin, V.; Drezek, R. Cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. Small 2008, 4, 26–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, N.; Georas, S.; Alexis, N.; Fritz, P.; Xia, T.; Williams, M.A.; Horner, E.; Nel, A. A work group report on ultrafine particles (American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology): Why ambient ultrafine and engineered nanoparticles should receive special attention for possible adverse health outcomes in human subjects. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 138, 386–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Egbuna, C.; Parmar, V.K.; Jeevanandam, J.; Ezzat, S.M.; Patrick-Iwuanyanwu, K.C.; Adetunji, C.O.; Khan, J.; Onyeike, E.N.; Uche, C.Z.; Akram, M.; et al. Toxicity of Nanoparticles in Biomedical Application: Nanotoxicology. J. Toxicol. 2021, 2021, 9954443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, X.; Ray, R.; Gu, Y.; Ploehn, H.J.; Gearheart, L.; Raker, K.; Scrivens, W.A. Electrophoretic analysis and purification of fluorescent single-walled carbon nanotube fragments. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12736–12737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hsu, P.C.; Chen, P.C.; Ou, C.M.; Chang, H.Y.; Chang, H.T. Extremely high inhibition activity of photoluminescent carbon nanodots toward cancer cells. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 1774–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chaudhary, S.; Kumari, M.; Chauhan, P.; Ram Chaudhary, G. Upcycling of plastic waste into fluorescent carbon dots: An environmentally viable transformation to biocompatible C-dots with potential prospective in analytical applications. Waste Manag. 2021, 120, 675–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kundu, S.; Ghosh, M.; Sarkar, N. State of the Art and Perspectives on the Biofunctionalization of Fluorescent Metal Nanoclusters and Carbon Quantum Dots for Targeted Imaging and Drug Delivery. Langmuir 2021, 37, 9281–9301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mewada, A.; Pandey, S.; Thakur, M.; Jadhav, D.; Sharon, M. Swarming carbon dots for folic acid mediated delivery of doxorubicin and biological imaging. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 698–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. He, X.; Chen, P.; Zhang, J.; Luo, T.Y.; Wang, H.J.; Liu, Y.H.; Yu, X.Q. Cationic polymer-derived carbon dots for enhanced gene delivery and cell imaging. Biomater. Sci. 2019, 7, 1940–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Krusic, P.J.; Wasserman, E.; Keizer, P.N.; Morton, J.R.; Preston, K.F. Radical reactions of c60. Science 1991, 254, 1183–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Benn, T.M.; Westerhoff, P.; Herckes, P. Detection of fullerenes (C60 and C70) in commercial cosmetics. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 1334–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Mousavi, S.Z.; Nafisi, S.; Maibach, H.I. Fullerene nanoparticle in dermatological and cosmetic applications. Nanomedicine 2017, 13, 1071–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shershakova, N.; Baraboshkina, E.; Andreev, S.; Purgina, D.; Struchkova, I.; Kamyshnikov, O.; Nikonova, A.; Khaitov, M. Anti-inflammatory effect of fullerene C60 in a mice model of atopic dermatitis. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2016, 14, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Sun, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zhong, Z.; Shi, J.; Fan, C.; Huang, Q. Conjugation of dexamethasone to C60 for the design of an anti-inflammatory nanomedicine with reduced cellular apoptosis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 5291–5297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Skariyachan, S.; Parveen, A.; Garka, S. Nanoparticle Fullerene (C60) demonstrated stable binding with antibacterial potential towards probable targets of drug resistant Salmonella typhi—A computational perspective and in vitro investigation. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2017, 35, 3449–3468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Al Garalleh, H.; Thamwattana, N.; Cox, B.J.; Hill, J.M. Modeling interactions between C₆₀ antiviral compounds and HIV protease. Bull. Math. Biol. 2015, 77, 184–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Barnes, C.A.; Brison, J.; Robinson, M.; Graham, D.J.; Castner, D.G.; Ratner, B.D. Identifying individual cell types in heterogeneous cultures using secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging with C60 etching and multivariate analysis. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 893–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Li, B.; Xu, Z. A nonmetal catalyst for molecular hydrogen activation with comparable catalytic hydrogenation capability to noble metal catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 16380–16382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kumar, M.; Raza, K. C60-fullerenes as Drug Delivery Carriers for Anticancer Agents: Promises and Hurdles. Pharm. Nanotechnol. 2017, 5, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Montellano, A.; Da Ros, T.; Bianco, A.; Prato, M. Fullerene C₆₀ as a multifunctional system for drug and gene delivery. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 4035–4041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tanigaki, K.; Kosaka, M.; Manako, T.; Kubo, Y.; Hirosawa, I.; Uchida, K.; Prassides, K. Alkali effects on the electronic states of K3C60 and Rb3C60. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 240, 627–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hasan, M.T.; Campbell, E.; Sizova, O.; Lyle, V.; Akkaraju, G.; Kirkpatrick, D.L.; Naumov, A.V. Multi-Drug/Gene NASH Therapy Delivery and Selective Hyperspectral NIR Imaging Using Chirality-Sorted Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Cancers 2019, 11, 1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Welsher, K.; Liu, Z.; Daranciang, D.; Dai, H. Selective probing and imaging of cells with single walled carbon nanotubes as near-infrared fluorescent molecules. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 586–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Shumeiko, V.; Paltiel, Y.; Bisker, G.; Hayouka, Z.; Shoseyov, O. A Paper-Based Near-Infrared Optical Biosensor for Quantitative Detection of Protease Activity Using Peptide-Encapsulated SWCNTs. Sensors 2020, 20, 5247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ghasemvand, F.; Biazar, E.; Tavakolifard, S.; Khaledian, M.; Rahmanzadeh, S.; Momenzadeh, D.; Afroosheh, R.; Zarkalami, F.; Shabannezhad, M.; Hesami Tackallou, S.; et al. Synthesis and evaluation of multi-wall carbon nanotube-paclitaxel complex as an anti-cancer agent. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench 2016, 9, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Yin, W.; Qian, S.M. CD44v6-O-MWNTS-Loaded Gemcitabine and CXCR4 siRNA Improves the Anti-tumor Effectiveness of Ovarian Cancer. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 687322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Eskandari, S.; Barzegar, A.; Mahnam, K. Absorption of daunorubicin and etoposide drugs by hydroxylated and carboxylated carbon nanotube for drug delivery: Theoretical and experimental studies. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, L.; Zheng, W.; Tang, R.; Wang, N.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, X. Gene regulation with carbon-based siRNA conjugates for cancer therapy. Biomaterials 2016, 104, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Yang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Sun, L.; Han, D.; Li, H.; Wang, C. Pharmacological and toxicological target organelles and safe use of single-walled carbon nanotubes as drug carriers in treating Alzheimer disease. Nanomedicine 2010, 6, 427–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, L.; Yang, B.; Wang, L.Q.; Huang, J.P.; Chen, W.Y.; Ban, Q.; Zhang, Y.; You, R.; Yin, L.; Guan, Y.Q. Biomimetic bone tissue engineering hydrogel scaffolds constructed using ordered CNTs and HA induce the proliferation and differentiation of BMSCs. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 558–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ravanbakhsh, H.; Bao, G.; Mongeau, L. Carbon nanotubes promote cell migration in hydrogels. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Patel, K.D.; Kim, T.H.; Mandakhbayar, N.; Singh, R.K.; Jang, J.H.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, H.W. Coating biopolymer nanofibers with carbon nanotubes accelerates tissue healing and bone regeneration through orchestrated cell- and tissue-regulatory responses. Acta Biomater. 2020, 108, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhu, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, P.; Nie, Z.; Li, J. Applications of graphene and its derivatives in intracellular biosensing and bioimaging. Analyst 2016, 141, 4541–4553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, L.H.; Sui, L.; Zhao, P.H.; Ma, H.D.; Liu, J.Y.; Wei, Z.; Zhan, Z.J.; Wang, Y.L. A composite of graphene oxide and iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery of temozolomide. Pharmazie 2020, 75, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Palmieri, V.; Spirito, M.; Papi, M. Graphene-based scaffolds for tissue engineering and photothermal therapy. Nanomedicine 2020, 15, 1411–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Jo, S.B.; Erdenebileg, U.; Dashnyam, K.; Jin, G.Z.; Cha, J.R.; El-Fiqi, A.; Knowles, J.C.; Patel, K.D.; Lee, H.H.; Lee, J.H.; et al. Nano-graphene oxide/polyurethane nanofibers: Mechanically flexible and myogenic stimulating matrix for skeletal tissue engineering. J. Tissue Eng. 2020, 11, 2041731419900424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Hitscherich, P.; Aphale, A.; Gordan, R.; Whitaker, R.; Singh, P.; Xie, L.H.; Patra, P.; Lee, E.J. Electroactive graphene composite scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2018, 106, 2923–2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Tahriri, M.; Del Monico, M.; Moghanian, A.; Tavakkoli Yaraki, M.; Torres, R.; Yadegari, A.; Tayebi, L. Graphene and its derivatives: Opportunities and challenges in dentistry. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 102, 171–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Arvizo, R.R.; Rana, S.; Miranda, O.R.; Bhattacharya, R.; Rotello, V.M.; Mukherjee, P. Mechanism of anti-angiogenic property of gold nanoparticles: Role of nanoparticle size and surface charge. Nanomedicine 2011, 7, 580–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Mukherjee, P.; Bhattacharya, R.; Wang, P.; Wang, L.; Basu, S.; Nagy, J.A.; Atala, A.; Mukhopadhyay, D.; Soker, S. Antiangiogenic Properties of Gold Nanoparticles. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 3530–3534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Mukherjee, P.; Bhattacharya, R.; Bone, N.; Lee, Y.K.; Patra, C.R.; Wang, S.; Lu, L.; Secreto, C.; Banerjee, P.C.; Yaszemski, M.J.; et al. Potential therapeutic application of gold nanoparticles in B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (BCLL): Enhancing apoptosis. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2007, 5, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Sulaiman, G.M.; Waheeb, H.M.; Jabir, M.S.; Khazaal, S.H.; Dewir, Y.H.; Naidoo, Y. Hesperidin Loaded on Gold Nanoparticles as a Drug Delivery System for a Successful Biocompatible, Anti-Cancer, Anti-Inflammatory and Phagocytosis Inducer Model. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yücel, O.; Şengelen, A.; Emik, S.; Önay-Uçar, E.; Arda, N.; Gürdağ, G. Folic acid-modified methotrexate-conjugated gold nanoparticles as nano-sized trojans for drug delivery to folate receptor-positive cancer cells. Nanotechnology 2020, 31, 355101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rahme, K.; Guo, J.; Holmes, J.D. Bioconjugated Gold Nanoparticles Enhance siRNA Delivery in Prostate Cancer Cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1974, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, W.; Meng, J.; Ji, Y.; Li, X.; Kong, H.; Wu, X.; Xu, H. Inhibiting metastasis of breast cancer cells in vitro using gold nanorod-siRNA delivery system. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 3923–3932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Vance, M.E.; Kuiken, T.; Vejerano, E.P.; McGinnis, S.P.; Hochella, M.F., Jr.; Rejeski, D.; Hull, M.S. Nanotechnology in the real world: Redeveloping the nanomaterial consumer products inventory. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 1769–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Sokolov, K.; Follen, M.; Aaron, J.; Pavlova, I.; Malpica, A.; Lotan, R.; Richards-Kortum, R. Real-time vital optical imaging of precancer using anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies conjugated to gold nanoparticles. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 1999–2004. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  59. Liu, Z.; Shi, J.; Zhu, B.; Xu, Q. Development of a multifunctional gold nanoplatform for combined chemo-photothermal therapy against oral cancer. Nanomedicine 2020, 15, 661–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Chen, H.; Wang, X.; Sutrisno, L.; Zeng, T.; Kawazoe, N.; Yang, Y.; Chen, G. Folic Acid-Functionalized Composite Scaffolds of Gelatin and Gold Nanoparticles for Photothermal Ablation of Breast Cancer Cells. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 589905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, N.; Mao, C.; Yang, M. Protein-Induced Gold Nanoparticle Assembly for Improving the Photothermal Effect in Cancer Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 11136–11143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Lara, H.H.; Garza-Treviño, E.N.; Ixtepan-Turrent, L.; Singh, D.K. Silver nanoparticles are broad-spectrum bactericidal and virucidal compounds. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2011, 9, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Lara, H.H.; Ixtepan-Turrent, L.; Garza-Treviño, E.N.; Rodriguez-Padilla, C. PVP-coated silver nanoparticles block the transmission of cell-free and cell-associated HIV-1 in human cervical culture. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2010, 8, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Ebrahimzadeh, M.A.; Tafazoli, A.; Akhtari, J.; Biparva, P.; Eslami, S. Engineered Silver Nanoparticles, A New Nanoweapon Against Cancer. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2018, 18, 1962–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, X.F.; Liu, Z.G.; Shen, W.; Gurunathan, S. Silver Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization, Properties, Applications, and Therapeutic Approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bumbudsanpharoke, N.; Choi, J.; Ko, S. Applications of Nanomaterials in Food Packaging. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015, 15, 6357–6372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ballottin, D.; Fulaz, S.; Cabrini, F.; Tsukamoto, J.; Durán, N.; Alves, O.L.; Tasic, L. Antimicrobial textiles: Biogenic silver nanoparticles against Candida and Xanthomonas. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2017, 75, 582–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kokura, S.; Handa, O.; Takagi, T.; Ishikawa, T.; Naito, Y.; Yoshikawa, T. Silver nanoparticles as a safe preservative for use in cosmetics. Nanomedicine 2010, 6, 570–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Din, M.I.; Arshad, F.; Hussain, Z.; Mukhtar, M. Green Adeptness in the Synthesis and Stabilization of Copper Nanoparticles: Catalytic, Antibacterial, Cytotoxicity, and Antioxidant Activities. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Traipop, S.; Yakoh, A.; Jampasa, S.; Chaiyo, S.; Boonyongmaneerat, Y.; Panpranot, J.; Praserthdam, P.; Chailapakul, O. Sequential electrodeposition of Cu-Pt bimetallic nanocatalysts on boron-doped diamond electrodes for the simple and rapid detection of methanol. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 14354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Shahvaranfard, F.; Ghigna, P.; Minguzzi, A.; Wierzbicka, E.; Schmuki, P.; Altomare, M. Dewetting of PtCu Nanoalloys on TiO(2) Nanocavities Provides a Synergistic Photocatalytic Enhancement for Efficient H(2) Evolution. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 38211–38221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jeyaraj, M.; Gurunathan, S.; Qasim, M.; Kang, M.H.; Kim, J.H. A Comprehensive Review on the Synthesis, Characterization, and Biomedical Application of Platinum Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Dréno, B.; Alexis, A.; Chuberre, B.; Marinovich, M. Safety of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in cosmetics. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2019, 33 (Suppl. 7), 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Mebert, A.M.; Baglole, C.J.; Desimone, M.F.; Maysinger, D. Nanoengineered silica: Properties, applications and toxicity. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 109, 753–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Khot, L.R.; Sankaran, S.; Maja, J.M.; Ehsani, R.; Schuster, E.W. Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production and crop protection: A review. Crop Protect. 2012, 35, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Han, N.; Bai, L.; Li, J.; Liu, J.; Che, E.; Hu, L.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, T.; et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in drug delivery and biomedical applications. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2015, 11, 313–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Croissant, J.G.; Butler, K.S.; Zink, J.I.; Brinker, C.J. Synthetic amorphous silica nanoparticles: Toxicity, biomedical and environmental implications. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 886–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Vujovic, M.; Kostic, E. Titanium Dioxide and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles in Sunscreens: A Review of Toxicological Data. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2019, 70, 223–234. [Google Scholar]
  79. Estelrich, J.; Escribano, E.; Queralt, J.; Busquets, M.A. Iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetically-guided and magnetically-responsive drug delivery. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 8070–8101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Duan, Z.; He, H.; Liang, W.; Wang, Z.; He, L.; Zhang, X. Tensile, Quasistatic and Dynamic Fracture Properties of Nano-Al₂O₃-Modified Epoxy Resin. Materials 2018, 11, 905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Fu, J.F.; Yu, W.Q.; Dong, X.; Chen, L.Y.; Jia, H.S.; Shi, L.Y.; Zhong, Q.D.; Deng, W. Mechanical and tribological properties of natural rubber reinforced with carbon blacks and Al2O3 nanoparticles. Mater. Design 2013, 49, 336–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bartolomé, J.F.; Smirnov, A.; Kurland, H.D.; Grabow, J.; Müller, F.A. New ZrO2/Al2O3 Nanocomposite Fabricated from Hybrid Nanoparticles Prepared by CO2 Laser Co-Vaporization. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gómez-Rodríguez, C.; Castillo-Rodríguez, G.A.; Rodríguez-Castellanos, E.A.; Vázquez-Rodríguez, F.J.; López-Perales, J.F.; Aguilar-Martínez, J.A.; Fernández-González, D.; García-Quiñonez, L.V.; Das-Roy, T.K.; Verdeja, L.F. Development of an Ultra-Low Carbon MgO Refractory Doped with α-Al(2)O(3) Nanoparticles for the Steelmaking Industry: A Microstructural and Thermo-Mechanical Study. Materials 2020, 13, 715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Akbarzadeh, A.; Rezaei-Sadabady, R.; Davaran, S.; Joo, S.W.; Zarghami, N.; Hanifehpour, Y.; Samiei, M.; Kouhi, M.; Nejati-Koshki, K. Liposome: Classification, preparation, and Applications. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Husseini, G.A.; Pitt, W.G. Micelles and nanoparticles for ultrasonic drug and gene delivery. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 2008, 60, 1137–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Mir, M.; Ahmed, N.; Rehman, A.U. Recent applications of PLGA based nanostructures in drug delivery. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2017, 159, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kroto, H. The 2009 Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting: Sir Harold Kroto, Chemistry 1996. J. Vis. Exp. 2010, 1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Kroto, H.W.; Heath, J.R.; O’Brien, S.C.; Curl, R.F.; Smalley, R.E. C60: Buckminsterfullerene. Nature 1985, 318, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bhattacharya, K.; Mukherjee, S.P.; Gallud, A.; Burkert, S.C.; Bistarelli, S.; Bellucci, S.; Bottini, M.; Star, A.; Fadeel, B. Biological interactions of carbon-based nanomaterials: From coronation to degradation. Nanomedicine 2016, 12, 333–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Zhang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Xie, H.; Qian, W.; Wei, F. Growth of half-meter long carbon nanotubes based on Schulz-Flory distribution. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 6156–6161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Wang, X.; Li, Q.; Xie, J.; Jin, Z.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Jiang, K.; Fan, S. Fabrication of Ultralong and Electrically Uniform Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes on Clean Substrates. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3137–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Iijima, S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 1991, 354, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hu, F.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q.; Wang, G.; Zhu, B.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, W.; Yin, J.; Liu, C.; Bergmann, S.M.; et al. Carbon nanotube-based DNA vaccine against koi herpesvirus given by intramuscular injection. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 98, 810–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Hassan, H.A.; Smyth, L.; Rubio, N.; Ratnasothy, K.; Wang, J.T.; Bansal, S.S.; Summers, H.D.; Diebold, S.S.; Lombardi, G.; Al-Jamal, K.T. Carbon nanotubes’ surface chemistry determines their potency as vaccine nanocarriers in vitro and in vivo. J. Control. Release 2016, 225, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Brodie, B.C. On the Atomic Weight of Graphite. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1859, 149, 249–259. [Google Scholar]
  96. Ruess, G.; Vogt, F. Höchstlamellarer Kohlenstoff aus Graphitoxyhydroxyd. Monatsh. Chem. 1948, 78, 222–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Boehm, H.P.; Clauss, A.; Fischer, G.O.; Hofmann, U. Surface properties of extremely thin graphite lamellae. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Carbon; Pergamon Press: New York, NY, USA, 1962. [Google Scholar]
  98. Lee, C.; Wei, X.; Kysar, J.W.; Hone, J. Measurement of the Elastic Properties and Intrinsic Strength of Monolayer Graphene. Science 2008, 321, 385–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Dreaden, E.C.; Alkilany, A.M.; Huang, X.; Murphy, C.J.; El-Sayed, M.A. The golden age: Gold nanoparticles for biomedicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2740–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Sani, A.; Cao, C.; Cui, D. Toxicity of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs): A review. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2021, 26, 100991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Lee, S.H.; Jun, B.H. Silver Nanoparticles: Synthesis and Application for Nanomedicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Nikolova, M.P.; Chavali, M.S. Metal Oxide Nanoparticles as Biomedical Materials. Biomimetics 2020, 5, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Elsabahy, M.; Wooley, K.L. Design of Polymeric Nanoparticles for Biomedical Delivery Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2545–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Wei, Q.Y.; Xu, Y.M.; Lau, A.T.Y. Recent Progress of Nanocarrier-Based Therapy for Solid Malignancies. Cancers 2020, 12, 2783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Duncan, R.; Vicent, M.J. Polymer therapeutics-prospects for 21st century: The end of the beginning. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 2013, 65, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. World Health Organization (WHO). Available online: https://www.who.int/ (accessed on 6 June 2021).
  107. Han, J.H.; Lee, E.J.; Lee, J.H.; So, K.P.; Lee, Y.H.; Bae, G.N.; Lee, S.B.; Ji, J.H.; Cho, M.H.; Yu, I.J. Monitoring multiwalled carbon nanotube exposure in carbon nanotube research facility. Inhal. Toxicol. 2008, 20, 741–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Lee, J.H.; Ahn, K.; Kim, S.M.; Jeon, K.S.; Lee, J.S.; Yu, I.J. Continuous 3-day exposure assessment of workplace manufacturing silver nanoparticles. J. Nanopart. Res. 2012, 14, 1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. American Conference of Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Available online: https://www.acgih.org/ (accessed on 10 June 2021).
  110. Taylor, D.A. Dust in the wind Environ. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110, A80–A87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. D’Almeida, G.A.; Schütz, L. Number, Mass and Volume Distributions of Mineral Aerosol and Soils of the Sahara. J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol. 1983, 22, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Schäfer, K.; Thomas, W.; Peters, A.; Ries, L.; Obleitner, F.; Schnelle-Kreis, J.; Birmili, W.; Diemer, J.; Fricke, W.; Junkermann, W.; et al. Influences of the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull volcanic plume on air quality in the northern Alpine region. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11, 8555–8575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Guyon, P.; Frank, G.P.; Welling, M.; Chand, D.; Artaxo, P.; Rizzo, L.; Nishioka, G.; Kolle, O.; Fritsch, H.; Dias, M.A.F.S.; et al. Airborne measurements of trace gas and aerosol particle emissions from biomass burning in Amazonia. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2005, 5, 2989–3002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Leoni, C.; Hovorka, J.; Docekalova, V.; Cajthaml, T.; Marvanova, S. Source Impact Determination using Airborne and Ground Measurements of Industrial Plumes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 9881–9888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kim, B.; Lee, J.S.; Choi, B.S.; Park, S.Y.; Yoon, J.H.; Kim, H. Ultrafine particle characteristics in a rubber manufacturing factory. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2013, 57, 728–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Graczyk, H.; Lewinski, N.; Zhao, J.; Concha-Lozano, N.; Riediker, M. Characterization of Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG) Welding Fume Generated by Apprentice Welders. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2016, 60, 205–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Morawska, L.; Bofinger, N.D.; Kocis, L.; Nwankwoala, A. Submicrometer and Supermicrometer Particles from Diesel Vehicle Emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 2033–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ristovski, Z.; Morawska, L.; DBofinger, N.; Hitchins, J. Submicrometer and Supermicrometer Particulate Emission From Spark Ignition Vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 3845–3852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Dahl, A.; Gharibi, A.; Swietlicki, E.; Gudmundsson, A.; Bohgard, M.; Ljungman, A.; Blomqvist, G.; Gustafsson, M. Traffic-generated emissions of ultrafine particles from pavement–tire interface. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 1314–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Buonanno, G.; Stabile, L.; Avino, P.; Belluso, E. Chemical, dimensional and morphological ultrafine particle characterization from a waste-to-energy plant. Waste Manag. 2011, 31, 2253–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Hyland, A.; Travers, M.J.; Dresler, C.; Higbee, C.; Cummings, K.M. A 32-country comparison of tobacco smoke derived particle levels in indoor public places. Tob. Control 2008, 17, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Semple, S.; Apsley, A.; Azmina Ibrahim, T.; Turner, S.W.; Cherrie, J.W. Fine particulate matter concentrations in smoking households: Just how much secondhand smoke do you breathe in if you live with a smoker who smokes indoors? Tob. Control 2015, 24, e205–e211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Wu, C.L.; Chao, C.Y.H.; Sze-To, G.N.; Wan, M.P.; Chan, T.C. Ultrafine Particle Emissions from Cigarette Smouldering, Incense Burning, Vacuum Cleaner Motor Operation and Cooking. Indoor Built Environ. 2011, 21, 782–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Schripp, T.; Markewitz, D.; Uhde, E.; Salthammer, T. Does e-cigarette consumption cause passive vaping? Indoor Air 2013, 23, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Fuoco, F.C.; Buonanno, G.; Stabile, L.; Vigo, P. Influential parameters on particle concentration and size distribution in the mainstream of e-cigarettes. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 184, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Löfroth, G.; Stensman, C.; Brandhorst-Satzkorn, M. Indoor sources of mutagenic aerosol particulate matter: Smoking, cooking and incense burning. Mutat. Res. 1991, 261, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Sarwar, G.; Olson, D.A.; Corsi, R.L.; Weschler, C.J. Indoor fine particles: The role of terpene emissions from consumer products. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2004, 54, 367–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Liu, J.; Fung, D.; Jiang, J.; Zhu, Y. Ultrafine particle emissions from essential-oil-based mosquito repellent products. Indoor Air 2014, 24, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Poulsen, S.S.; Saber, A.T.; Williams, A.; Andersen, O.; Kobler, C.; Atluri, R.; Pozzebon, M.E.; Mucelli, S.P.; Simion, M.; Rickerby, D.; et al. MWCNTs of different physicochemical properties cause similar inflammatory responses, but differences in transcriptional and histological markers of fibrosis in mouse lungs. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2015, 284, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Nishi, K.; Morimoto, Y.; Ogami, A.; Murakami, M.; Myojo, T.; Oyabu, T.; Kadoya, C.; Yamamoto, M.; Todoroki, M.; Hirohashi, M.; et al. Expression of cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant in rat lungs by intratracheal instillation of nickel oxide nanoparticles. Inhal. Toxicol. 2009, 21, 1030–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Lavigne, E.; Donelle, J.; Hatzopoulou, M.; Van Ryswyk, K.; van Donkelaar, A.; Martin, R.V.; Chen, H.; Stieb, D.M.; Gasparrini, A.; Crighton, E.; et al. Spatiotemporal Variations in Ambient Ultrafine Particles and the Incidence of Childhood Asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 199, 1487–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Kim, B.G.; Park, M.K.; Lee, P.H.; Lee, S.H.; Hong, J.; Aung, M.M.M.; Moe, K.T.; Han, N.Y.; Jang, A.S. Effects of nanoparticles on neuroinflammation in a mouse model of asthma. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2020, 271, 103292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Shvedova, A.A.; Kisin, E.R.; Mercer, R.; Murray, A.R.; Johnson, V.J.; Potapovich, A.I.; Tyurina, Y.Y.; Gorelik, O.; Arepalli, S.; Schwegler-Berry, D.; et al. Unusual inflammatory and fibrogenic pulmonary responses to single-walled carbon nanotubes in mice. Am. J. Physiol.-Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2005, 289, L698–L708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Kang, G.S.; Gillespie, P.A.; Gunnison, A.; Moreira, A.L.; Tchou-Wong, K.M.; Chen, L.C. Long-term inhalation exposure to nickel nanoparticles exacerbated atherosclerosis in a susceptible mouse model. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Thompson, L.C.; Urankar, R.N.; Holland, N.A.; Vidanapathirana, A.K.; Pitzer, J.E.; Han, L.; Sumner, S.J.; Lewin, A.H.; Fennell, T.R.; Lust, R.M.; et al. C₆₀ exposure augments cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury and coronary artery contraction in Sprague Dawley rats. Toxicol. Sci. 2014, 138, 365–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Kilburn, K.H. Effects of diesel exhaust on neurobehavioral and pulmonary functions. Arch. Environ. Health 2000, 55, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Chen, H.; Kwong, J.C.; Copes, R.; Tu, K.; Villeneuve, P.J.; Donkelaar, A.v.; Hystad, P.; Martin, R.V.; Murray, B.J.; Jessiman, B.; et al. Living near major roads and the incidence of dementia, Parkinson’s disease, and multiple sclerosis: A population-based cohort study. Lancet 2017, 389, 718–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. You, R.; Ho, Y.S.; Hung, C.H.; Liu, Y.; Huang, C.X.; Chan, H.N.; Ho, S.L.; Lui, S.Y.; Li, H.W.; Chang, R.C. Silica nanoparticles induce neurodegeneration-like changes in behavior, neuropathology, and affect synapse through MAPK activation. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2018, 15, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Amereh, F.; Babaei, M.; Eslami, A.; Fazelipour, S.; Rafiee, M. The emerging risk of exposure to nano(micro)plastics on endocrine disturbance and reproductive toxicity: From a hypothetical scenario to a global public health challenge. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 261, 114158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Visani, G.; Manti, A.; Valentini, L.; Canonico, B.; Loscocco, F.; Isidori, A.; Gabucci, E.; Gobbi, P.; Montanari, S.; Rocchi, M.; et al. Environmental nanoparticles are significantly over-expressed in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk. Res. 2016, 50, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Houdy, P.; Lahmani, M.; Marano, F. Nanoethics and Nanotoxicology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  142. Schwartz, J.; Morris, R. Air pollution and hospital admissions for cardiovascular disease in Detroit, Michigan. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1995, 142, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Miller, M.R.; Raftis, J.B.; Langrish, J.P.; McLean, S.G.; Samutrtai, P.; Connell, S.P.; Wilson, S.; Vesey, A.T.; Fokkens, P.H.B.; Boere, A.J.F.; et al. Inhaled Nanoparticles Accumulate at Sites of Vascular Disease. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 4542–4552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Song, Y.; Wu, L.; Cao, J.; Song, B. Preparation of Nano Zinc Particles and Evaluation of Its Application in Mouse Myocardial Infarction Model. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2021, 21, 1196–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Fleischer, N.L.; Merialdi, M.; van Donkelaar, A.; Vadillo-Ortega, F.; Martin, R.V.; Betran, A.P.; Souza, J.P. Outdoor air pollution, preterm birth, and low birth weight: Analysis of the world health organization global survey on maternal and perinatal health. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Allen, J.L.; Oberdorster, G.; Morris-Schaffer, K.; Wong, C.; Klocke, C.; Sobolewski, M.; Conrad, K.; Mayer-Proschel, M.; Cory-Slechta, D.A. Developmental neurotoxicity of inhaled ambient ultrafine particle air pollution: Parallels with neuropathological and behavioral features of autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. Neurotoxicology 2017, 59, 140–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Carbon-based NPs in different dimensions. Zero-dimensional carbon-based NPs: C-dot and fullerene. One-dimensional carbon-based NPs: SWCNT and MWCNT. Two-dimensional carbon-based NPs: graphene. Three-dimensional carbon-based NPs: graphite.
Figure 1. Carbon-based NPs in different dimensions. Zero-dimensional carbon-based NPs: C-dot and fullerene. One-dimensional carbon-based NPs: SWCNT and MWCNT. Two-dimensional carbon-based NPs: graphene. Three-dimensional carbon-based NPs: graphite.
Toxics 10 00050 g001
Figure 2. A summary of the various forms of metal-based NPs and oxide NPs. Metal-based NPs and oxide NPs have very rich forms. In addition to surface chemistry and optical properties, the morphology of ENPs also has an impact on their function. Therefore, people usually adjust the corresponding reaction conditions in the process of nanomaterials synthesis to produce various forms of ENPs, such as nanosphere, nanoshell, nanorod, triangle, hexagon, octagon, nanopyramid, nanocube, highly branched, nanocage, flower-shaped, etc., so as to meet their actual needs.
Figure 2. A summary of the various forms of metal-based NPs and oxide NPs. Metal-based NPs and oxide NPs have very rich forms. In addition to surface chemistry and optical properties, the morphology of ENPs also has an impact on their function. Therefore, people usually adjust the corresponding reaction conditions in the process of nanomaterials synthesis to produce various forms of ENPs, such as nanosphere, nanoshell, nanorod, triangle, hexagon, octagon, nanopyramid, nanocube, highly branched, nanocage, flower-shaped, etc., so as to meet their actual needs.
Toxics 10 00050 g002
Figure 3. Structural sketches of liposome, micelle, and organic polymer.
Figure 3. Structural sketches of liposome, micelle, and organic polymer.
Toxics 10 00050 g003
Figure 4. A summary of the main sources of airborne NPs. The sources of airborne NPs can be broadly divided into two categories: ENPs and NENPs. ENPs are made by artificially controlled engineering processes (i.e., laboratory development, industrial production, product installation and use, product disposal, and recycling). NENPs are the by-products of some natural activities (i.e., dust storms, volcanic eruptions, and forest fires) or human activities (i.e., industrial emissions, transportation emissions, waste incineration, smoking, and human routine activities).
Figure 4. A summary of the main sources of airborne NPs. The sources of airborne NPs can be broadly divided into two categories: ENPs and NENPs. ENPs are made by artificially controlled engineering processes (i.e., laboratory development, industrial production, product installation and use, product disposal, and recycling). NENPs are the by-products of some natural activities (i.e., dust storms, volcanic eruptions, and forest fires) or human activities (i.e., industrial emissions, transportation emissions, waste incineration, smoking, and human routine activities).
Toxics 10 00050 g004
Figure 5. Human health hazards caused by inhaled NPs.
Figure 5. Human health hazards caused by inhaled NPs.
Toxics 10 00050 g005
Table 1. Type, shape, size, and main applications of ENPs.
Table 1. Type, shape, size, and main applications of ENPs.
TypeENPsShapeSizeApplicationsRef.
Carbon-based NPsC-dotsDot<10 nmBiological imaging
Biological sensing
Drug delivery carriers
[15,16,17]
[18]
[19,20]
Fullerenes
(C60)
Spherical~1 nmAntioxidant
Anti-inflammatory
Antimicrobial
Antiviral
Biological imaging
Catalyst
Drug delivery carriers
Superconductor
[21,22,23]
[24,25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30,31]
[32]
CNTsTubularDiameter:
a few nanometers to
tens of nanometers
Length:
micron scale
Biological imaging
Biological sensing
Drug delivery carriers
Tissue engineering
[33,34]
[35]
[33,36,37,38,39,40]
[41,42,43]
GrapheneFlakeThickness:
<10 nm
Biological imaging
Biological sensing
Drug delivery
Photothermal therapy
Tissue engineering
[44]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[46,47,48,49]
Metal-based
NPs
AuNPsR, SH, SP,
CA, etc. 1
2–100 nmAnticancer
Drug delivery carriers
Daiy necessities
Medical imaging
Photothermal therapy
[50,51,52]
[53,54,55,56]
[57]
[58]
[59,60,61]
AgNPsB, F, H, O, P,
R, SP, T, etc. 1
20–50 nmAntimicrobial
Antiviral
Anticancer
Chemotherapy agents
Daily necessities
Drug delivery carriers
[62]
[63]
[64]
[65]
[66,67,68]
[65]
Enhancers for radiation
and photodynamic therapy
[65]
CuNPsCU, R, SP, etc. 1<100 nmAntimicrobial
Anticancer
Biological imaging
Biological sensing
Catalyst
Drug delivery carriers
[69]
[69]
[69]
[69]
[70,71]
[69]
PtNPsCU, R, SP, etc. 1<100 nmAntimicrobial
Anticancer
Biological imaging
Biological sensing
Catalyst
Drug delivery carriers
[72]
[72]
[72]
[72]
[70,71]
[72]
Oxide NPsTiO2 NPsCU, R, SP, etc. 120–100 nmCosmetics[73]
SiO2 NPsCU, R, SP, etc. 120–100 nmAutomotive industry
Biomedical fields
Coatings
Cosmetics
Food
[74,75,76,77]
ZnO NPsCU, R, SP, etc. 120–100 nmCosmetics[78]
Fe2O3 NPsCU, R, SP, etc. 120–100 nmDiagnosis
Guidelines for drug delivery
Magnetic separation
[79]
Al2O3 NPsCU, R, SP, etc. 120–100 nmIncrease the strength and toughness of the material[80,81,82,83]
Organic NPsLiposomesSphericaltens of nanometers
to hundreds of nanometers
Drug delivery carriers[84]
MicellesSphericaltens of nanometers
to hundreds of nanometers
Drug delivery carriers[85]
PolymersSphericaltens of nanometers
to hundreds of nanometers
Drug delivery carriers[86]
1 B: highly branched; CA: nanocage; CU: nanocube; F: flower-shaped; H: hexagon; O: octagon; P: nanopyramid; R: nanorod; SH: nanoshell; SP: nanosphere; T: triangle.
Table 2. Studies on diseases caused by NPs.
Table 2. Studies on diseases caused by NPs.
DiseasesNPsSizeSystemMain FindingsRef.
Inflammation
of respiratory system
MWCNTsCNTSmall:
11 ± 4.5 nm
in diameter
0.8 ± 0.1 μm
in length
CNTLarge:
67 ± 26.2 nm
in diameter
4 ± 0.4 μm
in length
  • Model: C57BL/6 mice
  • Dose: 0, 18, 54 or 162 μg/mouse
  • Exposure time: 24 h, 3 days and 28 days
  • Intracellular flow was increased in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
  • Interstitial pneumonia
  • The mRNA levels of chemokines CCLs and CXCLs were changed
[129]
NiO NPs26 nm
  • Model: Wistar rats
  • Dose: 0.33 or 0.66 mg/kg
  • Exposure time: 3 days, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months
  • The concentrations of CINC-1 and CINC-2αβ were increased
  • The concentration of CINC-3 was decreased
  • Alveolar infiltration by neutrophils and alveolar macrophages occurred
[130]
AsthmaNENPs<100 nm
  • Model: Population-based cohort study
  • Dose: Not mentioned
  • Exposure time: Not mentioned
  • NENPs was independently associated with the incidence of childhood asthma
[131]
TiO2 NPsNot mentioned
  • Model: HNBE cells
  • Dose: 1, 5, or 10 μM/well (six-well plates)
  • Exposure time: 8 and 24 h
  • Model: BALB/c mice
  • Dose: 200 μg/m3 1 h a day for 3 days
  • Exposure time: 21–23 days
  • Bradykinin, ATP and CGRP were increased in a dose dependent manner in HNBE cells
  • Substance P, ATP and CGRP were significantly increased in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
[132]
Pulmonary
fibrosis
SWCNTs1–4 nm
  • Model: C57BL/6 mice
  • Dose: 0,10,20 or 40 μg/mouse
  • Exposure time: 1, 3, 7, 28, and 60 days
  • Robust but acute inflammation occurred
  • Early onset yet progressive fibrosis and granulomas occurred
[133]
AtherosclerosisNi(OH)2 NPs~5 nm
  • Model: ApoE−/− mice
  • Dose: 0 or 79 μg Ni/m3
  • Exposure time: 5 h/day,
  • 5 days/week, for either
  • 1 week or 5 months
  • Oxidative stress and inflammation occurred
  • Atherosclerosis was intensified
  • The transcript levels of several genes involved in atherosclerosis (CCL-2, VCAM-1 and CD68) were also increased
[134]
Myocardial
infarction
C6050–200 nm
  • Model: Sprague Dawley rats
  • Dose: 28 μg/mouse
  • Exposure time: 24 h
  • Vasoconstriction was increased
  • Vasodilation was impaired
[135]
Neurological
disorders
NENPsNot mentioned
  • Model: Population-based cohort study
  • Dose: Not mentioned
  • Exposure time: Not mentioned
  • Visual performance deteriorated
  • Cognitive performance was impaired
  • Balance was impaired
[136]
NENPsNot mentioned
  • Model: Population-based cohort study
  • Dose: Not mentioned
  • Exposure time: Not mentioned
  • There was a strong association between living near a major urban road (less than 50 m) and dementia risk.
[137]
SiO2 NPs115 nm
  • Model: C57BL/6 mice
  • Dose: 8 mg/kg
  • Exposure time: 1 and 2 months
  • NPs deposition was mainly detected in the medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus
  • Neurodegeneration-like pathological changes, including reduced Nissl staining, increased tau phosphorylation, and neuroinflammation
[138]
Endocrine disturbance
and
reproductive toxicity
Polystyrene nanoplastics38.92 nm
  • Model: Wistar rats
  • Dose: 1, 3, 6 or 10 mg/kg/day
  • Exposure time: 5 weeks
  • Exposure to polystyrene nano plastics was negatively correlated with serum concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone.
  • DNA damage
  • Sperm morphology and motility were changed
[139]
Acute myeloid
leukemia (AML)
NENPsNot mentioned
  • Model: Population-based cohort study
  • Dose: Not mentioned
  • Exposure time: Not mentioned
  • NENPs were found to be linked and aggregated to blood components in AML patients, while almost absent in matched healthy controls.
[140]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yin, X.-H.; Xu, Y.-M.; Lau, A.T.Y. Nanoparticles: Excellent Materials Yet Dangerous When They Become Airborne. Toxics 2022, 10, 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10020050

AMA Style

Yin X-H, Xu Y-M, Lau ATY. Nanoparticles: Excellent Materials Yet Dangerous When They Become Airborne. Toxics. 2022; 10(2):50. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10020050

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yin, Xiao-Hui, Yan-Ming Xu, and Andy T. Y. Lau. 2022. "Nanoparticles: Excellent Materials Yet Dangerous When They Become Airborne" Toxics 10, no. 2: 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10020050

APA Style

Yin, X. -H., Xu, Y. -M., & Lau, A. T. Y. (2022). Nanoparticles: Excellent Materials Yet Dangerous When They Become Airborne. Toxics, 10(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10020050

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop