Next Article in Journal
Safety Evaluation of Curcumol by a Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Exposure Toxicity Study in Rats
Next Article in Special Issue
Association of 3-Phenoxybenzoic Acid Exposure during Pregnancy with Maternal Outcomes and Newborn Anthropometric Measures: Results from the IoMum Cohort Study
Previous Article in Journal
Global Research Activities on Micro(nano)plastic Toxicity to Earthworms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exposure to Volatile Organic Compounds in Paint Production Plants: Levels and Potential Human Health Risks
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxics
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/toxics11020113
toxics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Health Economic Loss Due to Particulate Matter Pollution in the Seoul Subway, South Korea

by
Prakash Thangavel
1,
Kyoung Youb Kim
2,
Duckshin Park
3,* and
Young-Chul Lee
1,*
1
Department of BioNano Technology, Gachon University, 1342 Seongnam-daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si 13120, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Mobile IoT, Osan University, 45 Cheonghak-ro, Osan-si 18119, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
3
Korea Railroad Research Institute (KRRI), 176 Cheoldobakmulkwan-ro, Uiwang-si 16105, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2023, 11(2), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11020113
Submission received: 19 December 2022 / Revised: 20 January 2023 / Accepted: 21 January 2023 / Published: 24 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Exposure to Toxic Chemicals and Human Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Evaluating an illness’s economic impact is critical for developing and executing appropriate policies. South Korea has mandatory national health insurance in the form of NHIS that provides propitious conditions for assessing the national financial burden of illnesses. The purpose of our study is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the economic impact of PM2.5 exposure in the subway and a comparative analysis of cause-specific mortality outcomes based on the prevalent health-risk assessment of the health effect endpoints (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, and ischemic heart disease (IHD)). We used the National Health Insurance database to calculate the healthcare services provided to health-effect endpoints, with at least one primary diagnosis in 2019. Direct costs associated with health aid or medicine, treatment, and indirect costs (calculated based on the productivity loss in health effect endpoint patients, transportation, and caregivers, including morbidity and mortality costs) were both considered. The total cost for the exposed population for these endpoints was estimated to be USD 437 million per year. Medical costs were the largest component (22.08%), followed by loss of productivity and premature death (15.93%) and other costs such as transport and caregiver costs (11.46%). The total incurred costs (per 1000 persons) were accounted to be USD 0.1771 million, USD 0.42 million, and USD 0.8678 million for COPD, Asthma, and IHD, respectively. Given that the economic burden will rise as the prevalence of these diseases rises, it is vital to adopt effective preventative and management methods strategies aimed at the appropriate population.

1. Introduction

Exposure to pollution has short- and long-term effects on humans and poses a greater risk to public health than other forms of pollution, such as groundwater contamination or sludge contamination, because it affects more people. Particulate matter (PM) is a complex aerosolized substance produced primarily by vehicle exhausts and road dust. As a result, PM can have a wide range of particle sizes (2.5–10 µM), elemental compositions, and surface areas, producing a variety of health effects on humans [1].
With over eight million daily passengers utilizing the Seoul Metropolitan Subway, subway rail commuting is a major means of transportation in South Korea. However, subway commuters are frequently exposed to indoor PM2.5 pollution which is generated inside the subway stations and accumulates in subway platforms, waiting rooms, and train cabins [2]. Elevated PM2.5 concentration levels have been reported in subway platforms around the world, including in Los Angeles [3], London [4], Stockholm [5], Budapest [6], and South Korea [1]. PM2.5 is a major air pollutant in Seoul’s subway system and has been directly linked to several comorbidities in human health [7,8]. Furthermore, PM2.5-bound metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) have been related to major health effects such as lung cancer and reduced immunological function [9]. Furthermore, because of their high teratogenicity (pre- and early-pregnancy PM2.5 exposure has been linked to a higher occurrence of congenital anomalies, exposure to air pollution during pregnancy has, in particular, been linked to the development of congenital abnormalities, low birth weight, stillbirth, and newborn respiratory illnesses) and carcinogenicity [10,11]. Many countries, including the United States, China, the European Union, and India, have included benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) and metals in their air quality monitoring standards [12,13]. Because of the subway’s intrinsic characteristics, such as its compact size, airtight atmosphere, and higher passenger density per unit area, great attention has been paid to the interior air quality in subways or subterranean metro stations. Although passengers only spend a brief time in subway stations, repeated exposure to everyday commuters, as well as short-term exposure to excessive levels of air pollutants, can result in severe or acute health impacts. Furthermore, personnel working in subterranean metro stations are exposed to high levels of air pollution for extended periods of time, which might have long-term health repercussions. Although subterranean metro stations have greatly reduced ambient air pollution, internal air quality concerns may be more serious than outside air quality concerns [14,15,16].
South Korean legislation requires the surveillance of varied types of air pollutants, including PM with diameters of 10 µm or less (PM10) and 2.5 µm or less (PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and ozone [17]. Particle exposure has been linked to a variety of health issues, including premature death in people with respiratory disease, fatal and non-fatal heart attacks, heart palpitations, asthma, decreased lung function, and increased respiratory symptoms like airway irritation, shortness of breath, or breathing difficulties. In addition to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, recent large-population epidemiological studies have found that PM2.5 exposure can contribute to the initiation and progression of diabetes mellitus (DM) as well as adverse birth outcomes [18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Air pollution causes alteration of the airway epithelial barrier and signal transduction pathways, parenchymal damage, oxidative stress, phagocytosis impairment, inflammatory cell infiltration, dysregulated cell immunity, epigenetic changes, and autophagy [25]. Asthma prevalence, onset, symptoms, and treatment response can all be influenced by air pollution [26]. Air quality is important in the early development of asthma and as a cause of later-life asthma exacerbations. NO2 exposure throughout childhood increases the risk of getting asthma. Exposure to traffic-related air pollution during infancy has been linked to reduced lung function and long-term respiratory consequences in susceptible newborns [27]. PM exposure may produce physiologic changes in the respiratory system. PM suspensions increased cholinergic hyperresponsiveness while decreasing host defense in mice, resulting in neutrophil influx, bronchoalveolar lavage protein, and cytokine release in lung tissues. Ambient air particles may produce reactive oxygen species and inflammatory factors in alveolar macrophages and polymorphonuclear granulocytes [20], and bronchial epithelial cells. Reactive oxygen species, inflammatory factor production, and respiratory inflammation all played important roles in lung tissue destruction and the increased risk of COPD [28,29,30]. The amount of research addressing the processes behind the influence of air pollution on CVD has expanded dramatically over the last decade. The three most common starting mechanisms are (1) oxidative stress and inflammation, (2) autonomic nerve imbalance, and (3) direct particle translocation. These pathways may activate secondary pathways such as endothelial dysfunction, thrombotic pathways, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) activation, and epigenomic changes. The pathways are distinct and occur at different times and locations throughout the body, but they are highly interconnected, with effects that may converge at some point to increase the risk of CVD outcomes [31,32,33]. In 2010, PM2.5 was responsible for approximately 7.1% of global mortality. Ambient air pollution is widely established to have a variety of acute and long-term consequences on human health. Several epidemiological studies have found that the amount of particulate matter (PM2.5) or NO2 in the air is linked to daily mortality, primarily from cardiovascular and respiratory disorders [34,35,36,37]. An epidemiological study by Kim et al. 2017, found considerable deleterious consequences of pollution that endure over the long term. The study discovered that men and the elderly are the most affected, whereas children appear to recover entirely from the early shocks [38]. Kim et al. 2020 and Kim et al. 2022, in a study on the Indonesian population, present evidence of large and long-term harmful consequences of air pollution on mental health. Using a natural experiment in Indonesia, the study discovered that exposure to severe air pollution considerably increases the prevalence of depressive symptoms in both men and women, as well as the incidence of clinical depression in women, even 10 years later. The study also discovered robust substantial effects of pollution on the intensity of moderate symptoms of depression that persist over time in both sexes [39,40]. A study by Jayachandran 2009 on air pollution due to wildfire in Indonesia in late 1997 found that the air pollution led to over 15,500 child, infant, and fetal deaths. The study presented evidence of the most detrimental timing of exposure to pollution in utero that has the greatest influence on survival. Particulate matter has a significant influence on early-life mortality at levels that are common both indoors and outdoors in many poor nations [41].
In 2016, PM2.5 was responsible for 4.09 million premature deaths, with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), lower respiratory infections, lung cancer, and ischemic heart disease (IHD) accounting for 19.23, 15.97, 6.83, and 38.51% of fatalities, respectively. The health repercussions of PM2.5 have a direct influence on economic activity as measured by national accounts and GDP (GDP). Researchers have calculated the economic cost of extra illness and death caused by PM10 and 2.5 [42,43,44,45,46]. Kim et al. (2017) evaluated the impact of air pollution on labor supply in the short and long run. Using the 1997 Indonesian forest fires as a natural experiment, the researchers concluded that pollution had long-term detrimental effects on hours worked. Based on their estimates, average pollution levels in 1997, labor force participation rates, and Indonesian minimum wages, a conservative value of roughly USD 10 billion was lost as a result of this pollution incident in the year 2000 alone [47]. The quantification of the impacts of air pollution is becoming an important component in policy formulation. The effects of health on the economy can be seen from the perspectives of the people and the country [48]. As a result, there are two techniques to assess the health costs associated with air pollution: the economic burden of illness assessment and the macroeconomic approach. The former is further subdivided into the human capital approach and the willingness-to-pay technique, whilst the latter is further subdivided into the macro-econometric approach and the general equilibrium approach [49,50]. Several studies link PM exposures to exacerbated chronic illnesses such as COPD and asthma and ischemic heart disease. In this study, we specifically focus on PM2.5-associated long-term illnesses, such as ischemic heart disease, and respiratory disorders, such as asthma and COPD [33]. One of the primary goals of this research is to give a complete assessment of the economic impact of PM2.5 exposure in the subway, as well as a comparative analysis of cause-specific death outcomes based on the widespread health-risk assessment of the health effect endpoint. The study is based on newly accessible subway PM2.5 concentration data as well as an economic assessment of individual health-related expenditures.

2. Data and Methodology

2.1. Overview

As a prevalence-based technique that calculates the economic cost of all cases in a particular time, we computed the yearly costs related to the health impact endpoints of COPD, asthma, and IHD. The major source for cost estimates was the NHIS claims database, which contained virtually all of Korea’s claim records [51,52]. A person was considered a patient if they had at least one inpatient or outpatient claim that included a diagnosis. We evaluated both direct and indirect expenses in our analyses. Direct costs were those related to diagnosis and medication, whereas indirect costs were those associated with patient and caregiver productivity loss associated with inpatient and outpatient treatment methods. All costs are approximated in USD. The entire population exposed to PM2.5 from subway pollution was evaluated to determine the theoretical number of fatalities in the human risk assessment.

2.2. Study Area

The Beomgye subway station in Seoul, South Korea, was chosen for the study and was analyzed to determine the PM concentration and human economic loss due to PM2.5-induced health damage. The PM levels of Beomgye subway station were obtained from the Korean Railway Research Institute (KRRI).

2.3. Data Sources

PM10&2.5 levels of Beomgye station for the period January to March 2019 were obtained from the KRRI. The average or mean concentration of PM10, PM2.5, and the average number of passengers have been obtained from the KRRI. The 2019 GDP per capita data and total GDP and mortality due to respiratory and circulatory system data were obtained from the Korean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS) [53,54].
Daily PM levels of the platform, waiting room, and train cabin, and the number of passengers boarding and getting off the train at Beomgye station, Seoul, South Korea were obtained from the KRRI from January to March 2019 (Table 1). The 24 h data were averaged for all values. The variations in PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations on the platform and the waiting room are shown in Figure 1.

2.4. Exposed Population

Given that air quality is highly connected to the degree of modernization of the transportation system, everyday commuters who utilize the subway are the most likely population exposed to air pollution. As a result, conventional epidemiology considers commuters to be the primary population susceptible to PM2.5.
The cabin data of passengers boarding and getting off trains and the data on the total number of people and morbidity and mortality costs (sourced from NHIS) [54,55,56] of each health effect endpoint passengers developing or at risk of PM2.5-associated health risks reveal that an average of 30% of passengers will develop PM2.5-associated health problems (Table 2). We further normalized to 30% (1000 commuters, 166.6 commuters in a cabin) based on the obtained values of PM2.5 concentration and inhaled dose in a cabin linked with PM2.5-associated comorbidities, assuming that this 30% of commuters are at risk of developing PM-associated comorbidities.
The GDP per capita, average per capita disposable income, and mortality due to respiratory and circulatory system diseases in Korea in 2019 were sourced from KOSIS and NHIS and were found to be USD 31,846.2, USD 21,882, 36,655, and 60,252, respectively. Moreover, the highest concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 were much more than the minimum exposure concentration. The concentrations of PM observed in the subway platforms exceeded the WHO-defined daily values of 50 and 35 μg/m3 for PM10 and PM2.5 [55,56] (Figure 2).

2.5. Exposure Route

The human body can be exposed to PM2.5 in two ways: through inhalation and eating. PM2.5 can directly harm human health by allowing fine particles from the atmosphere to enter the human body through the respiratory tract and travel through the bronchi, disrupting gas exchange in the lungs. Fine dust in the environment can also fall into or settle on food or drink, affecting human health when consumed. To estimate the inhalational or ingested dose of PM2.5, we adopted an equation from a study by Manojkumar et al., 2021 [55].
ID = C × MV × T
where ID is the Inhaled dose per trip (μg), C is the exposure concentration (μg/m3), MV is minute ventilation (m3 min−1), and T is the trip duration (min).
The equation has been widely adopted in previous studies [56,57,58]. In this study, the per-minute ventilation rates recommended by the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Exposure Factors Handbook, EPA 2011 [59,60] were used and the per-minute ventilation rate for active commuters was set as 0.015 m3 min−1. Earlier studies adopted similar values for estimating inhaled doses [61,62]. The data are provided in Table 3.

2.6. Health-Effect Endpoint

It has been proven that PM2.5 can cause severe health risks such as damage to the lungs, respiratory system, and cardiovascular system, increased rates of premature death, and increased risks of cancers, chronic bronchitis, emphysema, and asthma. Based on this causation, we evaluated the economic loss due to PM2.5 on the following health effect endpoints:
  • COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease).
  • Asthma.
  • Cardiovascular diseases.

3. Health Economic Accounting

3.1. Poisson Regression Model

The likelihood of any endpoint for health effects in the context of the overall population is low, making them low-likelihood events. The actual distribution of endpoints is consistent with the Poisson distribution statistics as a time-series model. The relative risk model of Poisson regression is currently used in health-risk assessments of PM2.5 pollution. This works by quantifying the health effect caused by increases in PM2.5 concentration by calculating the corresponding health loss. We employed the Poisson regression model since it has been widely adopted by other studies [57].
The formula is as follows:
E = exp[β(C − C0)] E0
ΔE = E − E0
where E is the population health effect under the actual concentration of PM2.5, E0 is the population health effect under the PM2.5 threshold concentration, β is the exposure-response relationship coefficient of a health-effect endpoint, C is the mean PM2.5 concentration (Mean concentration of platform and waiting room 48.5 μg/m3), and C0 is the threshold concentration of PM2.5 (35 μg/m3) [53,63]. ΔE is the excess health effect—that is, the difference in health effects between the mean concentration and the threshold concentration.

3.2. Measurement of Direct and Indirect Cost

3.2.1. Direct Cost

The formal expenses for the diagnosis and treatment of asthma in the official health system were described as direct medical costs and included the costs for inpatient and outpatient care, as well as the costs for any prescription. The care costs assumed by the insurance company were calculated based on the NHIS claims records and KOSIS statistics [63,64,65,66].

3.2.2. Indirect Cost

In general, indirect costs are described as “loss of productivity owing to discontinuation or reduction in productivity due to sickness or death” [59]. In this study, indirect costs were assessed using the human capital method, which assesses human output in terms of market gains and includes sickness costs, death costs, and caregiver time costs (average daily caregiver cost). In the case of patients with severe asthma, the indirect cost was computed by multiplying the number of visits by age and gender, particular average daily income, and employment rates for the age group 20 to 69 years. However, Loss of productivity at work was not considered since the human capital approach is used. Instead, we calculated the total loss of productivity based on (mortality and morbidity) in terms of market gains (GDP). Mortality costs, defined as the loss of potential future income up to the age of 69 due to early death, were calculated by multiplying the amount of associated health effect endpoint by the amount of related health effect endpoint. Deaths in 2019 with gender- and age-specific average yearly earnings and employment rates for each death were used to calculate the present value of future admissions using a 3% discount rate. The expenses of caregiving time were calculated using literature studies and NHIS claims. In Korea, a family member, generally a middle-aged woman, provides practically all care for each health effect endpoint. To measure both direct and indirect costs, we employed the scheme of Lee et al., 2011 [63].
The scheme for estimating indirect costs was as follows:
  • Morbidity costs
  • Mortality costs
  • Caregivers’ time costs
  • Methods used to determine the health care costs are given in Table 4

Morbidity Costs

= ∑ j { ( I i j + 1 / 3 O i j ) } D i j E i j
where I is the age, j is the gender, I is the total number of inpatient days, O is the number of outpatient visits, D is the average daily earnings, and E is the employment rate.

Mortality Costs

= ∑ i ∑ j ∑ t [ F i j r j j t + k E i j ( 1 + r ) k ]
where I is the age, j is the gender, t is the age of death, F is the number of deaths, γ is the average yearly productivity at t k (The exponent “t + k denotes the adjusted years of productivity loss due to premature death before the age of 70), E is the employment rate, k is the number of years after death until the age of 70 (average years of life lost before the age of 70), and r is the discount rate. For each health effect endpoint, the number of years of life lost correlates with productivity loss.

Caregivers’ Time Costs

∑ i ∑ j ( N i j × I C ) E j ∑ i ≥ 10 ( 0 i j × I C ) 1 / 3
where I is the age, j is the gender, Nij is the number of days spent in the hospital, Oij is the number of outpatient visits, and IC is the average daily informal care expenditures. The caregiving expenses were determined by dividing the average daily caregiving cost by the total days of hospital admissions obtained from the NHIS [42].

4. Results and Discussion

The changes in PM concentrations are characterized by the tallest column in Figure 1. The highest concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 on the platform and in the waiting room were 150.38 and 43.24 μg/m3, and 177.27 and 53.24 μg/m3, respectively, and the lowest were 20.34 and 4.32 μg/m3, and 5.55 and 0.34 μg/m3, respectively (Figure 1A,B). The concentrations also peaked from midday to midnight, indicating that temperature, ventilation, and seasonal variation might play a major role in PM concentrations inside the subway. As shown in Table 3, the inhaled doses estimated using the above formula were 7.2, 14.5, and 21.8 µg for PM2.5 for 30, 60, and 90 min trips, respectively. Total costs were calculated according to each component of direct and indirect costs. We applied the Poisson regression model to estimate the risk of each health effect endpoint. To calculate a per capita cost, the anticipated total expenditures were divided by the number of commuters at risk of acquiring PM2.5 comorbidities for each health consequence endpoint. The data collected were then statistically analyzed. The economic cost of each health effect endpoint was measured using Equations (1)–(6). Using mortality and morbidity estimations and the economic costs for each health effect endpoint, we calculated the total economic loss for the exposed population developing PM2.5-related health effects (Table 5).
In this study, we analyzed the PM2.5 levels over a period of 3 months (January-March) in Beomgye station, Seoul, Korea. The PM2.5 levels found in the subway, on the platform, and in the waiting room exceed the defined values set by WHO, which in turn poses a great risk to the commuters and the operators. People with chronic disease of the lung, COPD, and asthma, and the aged are at higher risk of developing further complications. On our comprehensive health risk assessment of each health effect endpoint, we estimated that 373 (COPD), 44 (Asthma), and 19 (IHD) commuters (per trip in a train) were at risk of developing PM2.5-mediated comorbidities for each health effect endpoint. The total cost incurred by these comorbidities was estimated to be USD 437 million annually (Table 5). Medical costs were the largest component (22.08%), followed by lost productivity and premature deaths (15.93%) and nonmedical costs such as transportation and caregiver costs (11.46%) (Table 6). The total costs incurred by health effect endpoints (per 1000 persons) were estimated to be USD 0.1771 million (COPD; Table 6), USD 0.42 million (Asthma; Table 6), and USD 0.8678 million (IHD; Table 6). The finding that medical charges (direct costs) accounted for the majority of the overall cost suggests that PM2.5-induced health consequences are burdensome chronic conditions that need extensive outpatient monitoring. This pattern, which has been observed in other developed nations, might be considered an indirect indicator of a health consequence endpoint being adequately managed at the outpatient level and not progressing to the emergency or hospitalization level [67]. The lost productivity, premature deaths, and transportation and caregiver cost ranked second due to subjective assumptions, such as children needing medical attention for PM2.5-induced health effects, as other studies have established [68,69]. The heaviest economic burden is for commuters aged above 60 because of their high mortality and morbidity and this burden is mainly driven by the high proportion of hospitalization and inpatient treatment. Nonetheless, to evaluate the true indirect costs, productivity loss in any form must be considered [70,71,72,73]. As a result, the true socioeconomic burden in South Korea, including the low productivity due to health effect endpoints, will be much higher than our estimates. In addition, a previous study determined that workplace inactivity accounted for 50% of total productivity losses; as this factor was considered based on the KOSIS statistics, we have not considered actual productivity loss at the workplace in our study, and the real socioeconomic costs of each health endpoint may be more substantial than those reported in this study. Our findings indicated that the health burden and economic losses associated with short-term air pollution exposure are significant [74]. To date, only a few studies on the health burden caused by short-term exposure to air pollutants have been conducted in China, Korea, and other countries. The exposure-response coefficients of short-term exposure to air pollutants are likely to be much lower than those of long-term exposure [4,75,76].
In recent years, PM2.5 has been widely regarded as the primary air pollutant with the greatest health impact. Several studies have reported that the concentrations of PM2.5 inside trains are generally lower than in subway stations, which suggests that time spent on the platform and in the waiting room can be a better predictor of personal exposure [76,77]. However, commuters who travel every day are repeatedly exposed, which can lead to chronic health effects. Nonetheless, even short periods spent in underground environments can exacerbate health risks for vulnerable groups such as children, the elderly, and individuals with pre-existing health conditions. Train operators and other employees who spend many hours in the subway each day are more likely to be exposed to PM2.5 levels than the public and are thus at a potentially greater health risk.
A number of studies have revealed that high traffic counts are connected with an increased incidence of respiratory disease [78]. One large British assessment on traffic-related pollution discovered a risk gradient that rose significantly with day-to-day exposure [79]. A large study in southern California found an increased incidence of asthma and wheezing among children who commute on a daily basis [80]. Another study, conducted by Jerrett et al. using data from the same southern California cohort, found a connection between the incidence of asthma and other illnesses and exposure to traffic-related pollution [81]. Much remains unknown about which contaminants cause the majority of respiratory impacts and which signaling pathways are important for exacerbating chronic respiratory disorders. The processes underlying the induction of respiratory aggravation and ischemic heart disease by subway particles require further exploration, as do the interactions of coarse subway particles with major pollutants in provoking oncogenesis.

5. Limitations and Conclusions

The limitation of our approach to study was that work engagement was not taken into account when evaluating indirect costs, and because we utilized GDP per capita, the loss of work engagement cannot be depended upon. Cost-of-illness studies, including this one, fail to account for job involvement because existing report sets do not gather this information on a regular basis; instead, such information is often collected through self-reporting [82]. Implied speculations regarding lost production, productive time, and caretaker qualities may compromise the accuracy of projected indirect costs. The methodology for evaluating indirect costs in cost-of-illness research studies is organically based on various assumptions about human and productivity values; it is crucial to compare research with similar assumptions and methodologies [83]. The findings of this study come from a relatively small proportion of the population (1000); this may have led to an underestimation of outcomes. Another limitation of this study is that there is disagreement over the validity of NHIS claims data in terms of diagnostic accuracy. According to one research, only 70% of discharged diagnoses in NHIS claims data were concordant with medical records [84,85]. By using the direct costs of inpatient and outpatient care and indirect costs composed of morbidity and mortality costs based on NHIS claims and KOSIS, the outcomes may vary from those of other similar studies [86,87].
Furthermore, the results provided here are based on PM2.5, but no correlation is made between more toxic particles, such as those with high levels of sorbed toxic components. The study ignores the effects of exposure to ultrafine particles, which are implicated in numerous diseases, but for which measurements are lacking.
Altogether, the study found that the economic burden of COPD, Asthma, and IHD caused by commuter subway exposure to PM2.5 is large, with significant shares of overall expenditures ascribed to direct and indirect expenses. Given that the burden would increase in tandem with increases in these illnesses, effective preventive and management measures targeting the right population are necessary.

Author Contributions

All authors made significant contributions to the study’s conception and design. P.T. and Y.-C.L.; prepared the materials, collected the data, and analyzed it. P.T. and Y.-C.L.; did formal and statistical analyses. P.T., Y.-C.L. and K.Y.K.; wrote the original draft of the manuscript. Y.-C.L. and D.P.; thoroughly reviewed the book for essential intellectual substance. The manuscript version for publication has been approved by all authors. The final manuscript was reviewed and approved by all writers. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant from the Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport of the Republic of Korea (21QPPW-B152306-03) and the Basic Science Research Capacity Enhancement Project through a Korea Basic Science Institute (National Research Facilities and Equipment Center) grant funded by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea (2019R1A6C1010016).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors state that they have no financial or non-financial conflict of interest to report.

References

  1. Lee, Y.; Yang, J.; Lim, Y.; Kim, C. Economic damage cost of premature death due to fine particulate matter in Seoul, Korea. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 51702–51713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kwon, S.B.; Jeong, W.; Park, D.; Kim, K.T.; Cho, K.H. A multivariate study for characterizing particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5, and PM1) in Seoul metropolitan subway stations, Korea. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 297, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Kam, W.; Cheung, K.; Daher, N.; Sioutas, C. Particulate matter (PM) concentrations in underground and ground-level rail systems of the Los Angeles Metro. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45, 1506–1516. [Google Scholar]
  4. Seaton, A.; Cherrie, J.; Dennekamp, M.; Donaldson, K.; Hurley, J.F.; Tran, C.L. The London Underground: Dust and hazards to health. Occup. Environ. Med. 2005, 62, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Johansson, C.; Johansson, P.Å. Particulate matter in the underground of Stockholm. Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  6. Salma, I.; Pósfai, M.; Kovács, K.; Kuzmann, E.; Homonnay, Z.; Posta, J. Properties and sources of individual particles and some chemical species in the aerosol of a metropolitan underground railway station. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43, 3460–3466. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chuang, K.J.; Yan, Y.H.; Chiu, S.Y.; Cheng, T.J. Long-term air pollution exposure and risk factors for cardiovascular diseases among the elderly in Taiwan. Occup. Environ. Med. 2011, 68, 64–68. [Google Scholar]
  8. Shah, A.S.; Langrish, J.P.; Nair, H.; McAllister, D.A.; Hunter, A.L.; Donaldson, K.; Newby, D.E.; Mills, N.L. Global association of air pollution and heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2013, 382, 1039–1048. [Google Scholar]
  9. Behera, D.; Balamugesh, T. Lung cancer in India. Indian J. Chest Dis. Allied Sci. 2004, 46, 269–281. [Google Scholar]
  10. Koo, E.J.; Bae, J.G.; Kim, E.J.; Cho, Y.H. Correlation between Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) during Pregnancy and Congenital Anomalies: Its Surgical Perspectives. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2021, 36, e236. [Google Scholar]
  11. Seeni, I.; Ha, S.; Nobles, C.; Liu, D.; Sherman, S.; Mendola, P. Air pollution exposure during pregnancy: Maternal asthma and neonatal respiratory outcomes. Ann. Epidemiol. 2018, 28, 612–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ravindra, K.; Sokhi, R.; Van Grieken, R. Atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Source attribution, emission factors and regulation. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 2895–2921. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sin, D.W.; Wong, Y.C.; Choi, Y.Y.; Lam, C.H.; Louie, P.K. Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the atmosphere of Hong Kong. J. Environ. Monit. 2003, 5, 989–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Passi, A.; Nagendra, S.S.; Maiya, M.P. Characteristics of indoor air quality in underground metro stations: A critical review. Build. Environ. 2021, 198, 107907. [Google Scholar]
  15. Carrer, P.; Wolkoff, P. Assessment of indoor air quality problems in office-like environments: Role of occupational health services. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 741. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Bernstein, J.A.; Alexis, N.; Bacchus, H.; Bernstein, I.L.; Fritz, P.; Horner, E.; Li, N.; Mason, S.; Nel, A.; Oullette, J.; et al. The health effects of non-industrial indoor air pollution. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008, 121, 585–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Park, W.M.; Park, D.U.; Hwang, S.H. Factors affecting ambient endotoxin and particulate matter concentrations around air vents of subway sta-tions in South Korea. Chemosphere 2018, 205, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Atkinson, R.W.; Fuller, G.W.; Anderson, H.R.; Harrison, R.M.; Armstrong, B. Urban ambient particle metrics and health: A time-series analysis. Epidemiology 2010, 21, 501–511. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cadelis, G.; Tourres, R.; Molinie, J. Short-term effects of the particulate pollutants contained in Saharan dust on the visits of children to the emergency department due to asthmatic conditions in Guadeloupe (French Archipelago of the Caribbean). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Correia, A.W.; Pope, C.A., III; Dockery, D.W.; Wang, Y.; Ezzati, M.; Dominici, F. The effect of air pollution control on life expectancy in the United States: An analysis of 545 US counties for the period 2000 to 2007. Epidemiology 2013, 24, 23. [Google Scholar]
  21. Fang, Y.; Naik, V.; Horowitz, L.W.; Mauzerall, D.L. Air pollution and associated human mortality: The role of air pollutant emissions, climate change and methane concentration increases from the preindustrial period to present. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 1377–1394. [Google Scholar]
  22. Meister, K.; Johansson, C.; Forsberg, B. Estimated short-term effects of coarse particles on daily mortality in Stockholm, Sweden. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Ting, G.; Guoxing, L.; Meimei, X.; Xuying, W.; Fengchao, L.; Qiang, Z.; Xiaochuan, P. Evaluation of atmospheric PM2.5 health economic loss based on willingness to pay. J. Environ. Health 2015, 32, 697–700. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhao, X.; Yu, X.; Wang, Y.; Fan, C. Economic evaluation of health losses from air pollution in Beijing, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 11716–11728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jiang, X.Q.; Mei, X.D.; Feng, D. Air pollution and chronic airway diseases: What should people know and do? J. Thorac. Dis. 2016, 8, E31. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zheng, T.; Niu, S.; Lu, B.; Fan, X.E.; Sun, F.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Owens, P.; Hao, L.; et al. Childhood asthma in Beijing, China: A population-based case-control study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2002, 156, 977–983. [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu, F.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.Q.; Liu, Y.; Sun, J.; Huang, M.M.; Liu, Y.; Dong, G.H. Asthma and asthma related symptoms in 23,326 Chinese children in relation to indoor and outdoor environmental factors: The Seven Northeastern Cities (SNEC) Study. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 497, 10–17. [Google Scholar]
  28. Song, Q.; Christiani, D.C.; Wang, X.; Ren, J. The global contribution of outdoor air pollution to the incidence, prevalence, mortality and hospital admission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 11822–11832. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhou, Y.; Zou, Y.; Li, X.; Chen, S.; Zhao, Z.; He, F.; Zou, W.; Luo, Q.; Li, W.; Pan, Y.; et al. Lung function and incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease after improved cooking fuels and kitchen ventilation: A 9-year prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2014, 11, e1001621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hwang, Y.I. Reducing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease mortality in Korea: Early diagnosis matters. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2019, 34, 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Hamanaka, R.B.; Mutlu, G.M. Particulate matter air pollution: Effects on the cardiovascular system. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Wold, L.E.; Ying, Z.; Hutchinson, K.R.; Velten, M.; Gorr, M.W.; Velten, C.; Youtz, D.J.; Wang, A.; Lucchesi, P.A.; Sun, Q.; et al. Cardiovascular remodeling in response to long-term exposure to fine particulate matter air pollution. Circ. Heart Fail. 2012, 5, 452–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Thangavel, P.; Park, D.; Lee, Y.C. Recent insights into particulate matter (PM2.5)-mediated toxicity in humans: An overview. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7511. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Alexeeff, S.E.; Liao, N.S.; Liu, X.; Van Den Eeden, S.K.; Sidney, S. Long-term PM2.5 exposure and risks of ischemic heart disease and stroke events: Review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e016890. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kyung, S.Y.; Jeong, S.H. Particulate-matter related respiratory diseases. Tuberc. Respir. Dis. 2020, 83, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Liu, C.; Chen, R.; Sera, F.; Vicedo-Cabrera, A.M.; Guo, Y.; Tong, S.; Coelho, M.S.; Saldiva, P.H.; Lavigne, E.; Matus, P.; et al. Ambient particulate air pollution and daily mortality in 652 cities. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 705–715. [Google Scholar]
  37. Schikowski, T.; Mills, I.C.; Anderson, H.R.; Cohen, A.; Hansell, A.; Kauffmann, F.; Krämer, U.; Marcon, A.; Perez, L.; Sunyer, J.; et al. Ambient air pollution: A cause of COPD? Eur. Respir. J. 2014, 43, 250–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kim, Y.; Manley, J.; Radoias, V. Air pollution and long term mental health. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, Y.; Radoias, V. Severe Air Pollution Exposure and Long-Term Health Outcomes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14019. [Google Scholar]
  40. Jayachandran, S. Air quality and early-life mortality evidence from Indonesia’s wildfires. J. Hum. Resour. 2009, 44, 916–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Takizawa, H. Impacts of particulate air pollution on asthma: Current understanding and future perspectives. Recent Pat. Inflamm. Allergy Drug Discov. 2015, 9, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hanna, R.; Oliva, P. The effect of pollution on labor supply: Evidence from a natural experiment in Mexico City. J. Public Econ. 2015, 122, 68–79. [Google Scholar]
  43. Lanzi, E.; Dellink, R.; Chateau, J. The sectoral and regional economic consequences of outdoor air pollution to 2060. Energy Econ. 2018, 71, 89–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, L.; Lei, Y.; Pan, D.; Yu, C.; Si, C. Economic evaluation of the air pollution effect on public health in China’s 74 cities. SpringerPlus 2016, 5, 402. [Google Scholar]
  45. Li, S.; Williams, G.; Guo, Y. Health benefits from improved outdoor air quality and intervention in China. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 214, 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kim, Y.; Manley, J.; Radoias, V. Medium-and long-term consequences of pollution on labor supply: Evidence from Indonesia. IZA J. Labor Econ. 2017, 6, 5. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wan, Y.; Yang, H.W.; Masui, T. Considerations in applying the general equilibrium approach to environmental health assessment. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2005, 18, 356. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wong, C.M.; Lai, H.K.; Tsang, H.; Thach, T.Q.; Thomas, G.N.; Lam, K.B.; Chan, K.P.; Yang, L.; Lau, A.K.; Ayres, J.G.; et al. Satellite-based estimates of long-term exposure to fine particles and association with mortality in elderly Hong Kong residents. Environ. Health Perspect. 2015, 123, 1167–1172. [Google Scholar]
  49. Wan, Y.U.; Yang, H.O.; Masui, T. Air pollution-induced health impacts on the national economy of China: Demonstration of a computable general equilibrium approach. Rev. Environ. Health 2005, 20, 119–140. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kang, H.Y.; Yang, K.H.; Kim, Y.N.; Moon, S.H.; Choi, W.J.; Kang, D.R.; Park, S.E. Incidence and mortality of hip fracture among the elderly population in South Korea: A population-based study using the national health insurance claims data. BMC Public Health 2010, 10, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Choi, S.; Park, J.H.; Bae, S.Y.; Kim, S.Y.; Byun, H.; Kwak, H.; Hwang, S.; Park, J.; Park, H.; Lee, K.H.; et al. Characteristics of PM10 levels monitored for more than a decade in subway stations in South Korea. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2019, 19, 2746–2756. [Google Scholar]
  52. Korea Ministry of Environment (KMOE). 2018 White Paper of Environment; Publication No. 11-1480000-000586-10; Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea: Sejong, Republic of Korea, 2018.
  53. Korean Statistical Information Service. Available online: http://www.me.go.kr/ (accessed on 16 November 2021).
  54. Manojkumar, N.; Monishraj, M.; Srimuruganandam, B. Commuter exposure concentrations and inhalation doses in traffic and residential routes of Vellore city, India. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2021, 12, 219–230. [Google Scholar]
  55. Betancourt, R.M.; Galvis, B.; Balachandran, S.; Ramos-Bonilla, J.P.; Sarmiento, O.L.; Gallo-Murcia, S.M.; Contreras, Y. Exposure to fine particulate, black carbon, and particle number concentration in transportation microenvironments. Atmos. Environ. 2017, 157, 135–145. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ham, W.; Vijayan, A.; Schulte, N.; Herner, J.D. Commuter exposure to PM2.5, BC, and UFP in six common transport microenvironments in Sacramento, California. Atmos. Environ. 2017, 167, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ramos, C.A.; Silva, J.R.; Faria, T.; Wolterbeek, T.H.; Almeida, S.M. Exposure assessment of a cyclist to particles and chemical elements. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 11879–11889. [Google Scholar]
  58. Shang, Y.; Sun, Z.; Cao, J.; Wang, X.; Zhong, L.; Bi, X.; Li, H.; Liu, W.; Zhu, T.; Huang, W. Systematic review of Chinese studies of short-term expo-sure to air pollution and daily mortality. Environ. Int. 2013, 54, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. US Environmental Protection Agency. Exposure Factors Handbook 2011 Edition (Final); US EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
  60. Toelle, B.G.; Ng, K.K.; Crisafulli, D.; Belousova, E.G.; Almqvist, C.; Webb, K.; Tovey, E.R.; Kemp, A.S.; Mellis, C.M.; Leeder, S.R.; et al. Eight-year outcomes of the childhood asthma prevention study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 126, 388–389. [Google Scholar]
  61. Sullivan, P.W.; Ghushchyan, V.H.; Slejko, J.F.; Belozeroff, V.; Globe, D.R.; Lin, S.L. The burden of adult asthma in the United States: Evidence from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 127, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lee, Y.H.; Yoon, S.J.; Kim, E.J.; Kim, Y.A.; Seo, H.Y.; Oh, I.H. Economic burden of asthma in Korea. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2011, 32, 35. [Google Scholar]
  63. National Health Insurance Service. Available online: https://www.nhis.or.kr/ (accessed on 16 November 2021).
  64. Available online: http://kosis.kr/eng/ (accessed on 12 December 2021).
  65. Available online: https://kosis.kr/statHtml/ (accessed on 10 August 2021).
  66. Yu, G.; Wang, F.; Hu, J.; Liao, Y.; Liu, X. Value assessment of health losses caused by PM2.5 in Changsha City, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2063. [Google Scholar]
  67. Arshad, S.H. Environmental control for secondary prevention of asthma. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2010, 40, 2–4. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Rachelefsky, G.S. From the page to the clinic: Implementing new National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines. Clin. Cornerstone 2009, 9, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  69. Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Huang, J.J.; Zhang, L.W.; Song, F.J.; Mao, H.J.; Chen, K.X.; Chen, J.; Liu, Y.M.; Jiang, G.H.; et al. Nonmalignant respiratory mortality and long-term exposure to PM10 and SO2: A 12-year cohort study in northern China. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 231, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Chillrud, S.N.; Epstein, D.; Ross, J.M.; Sax, S.N.; Pederson, D.; Spengler, J.D.; Kinney, P.L. Elevated airborne exposures of teenagers to manganese, chromium, and iron from steel dust and New York City’s subway system. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 732–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Goel, R.; Gani, S.; Guttikunda, S.K.; Wilson, D.; Tiwari, G. On-road PM2.5 pollution exposure in multiple transport microenvironments in Delhi. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 123, 129–138. [Google Scholar]
  72. Qiu, H.; Yu, H.; Wang, L.; Zhu, X.; Chen, M.; Zhou, L.; Deng, R.; Zhang, Y.; Pu, X.; Pan, J. The burden of overall and cause-specific respiratory mor-bidity due to ambient air pollution in Sichuan Basin, China: A multi-city time-series analysis. Environ. Res. 2018, 167, 428–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Aarnio, P.; Yli-Tuomi, T.; Kousa, A.; Mäkelä, T.; Hirsikko, A.; Hämeri, K.; Räisänen, M.; Hillamo, R.; Koskentalo, T.; Jantunen, M. The concentrations and composition of and exposure to fine particles (PM2.5) in the Helsinki subway system. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 5059–5066. [Google Scholar]
  74. Martins, V.; Moreno, T.; Minguillón, M.C.; Amato, F.; de Miguel, E.; Capdevila, M.; Querol, X. Exposure to airborne particulate matter in the sub-way system. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 511, 711–722. [Google Scholar]
  75. Salma, I.; Weidinger, T.; Maenhaut, W. Time-resolved mass concentration, composition and sources of aerosol particles in a metropolitan under-ground railway station. Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41, 8391–8405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Minguillón, M.C.; Schembari, A.; Triguero-Mas, M.; de Nazelle, A.; Dadvand, P.; Figueras, F.; Salvado, J.A.; Grimalt, J.O.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.; Querol, X. Source apportionment of indoor, outdoor and personal PM2.5 exposure of pregnant women in Barcelona, Spain. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 59, 426–436. [Google Scholar]
  77. Morris, S.E.; Sale, R.C.; Wakefield, J.C.; Falconer, S.; Elliott, P.; Boucher, B.J. Hospital admissions for asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease in east London hospitals and proximity of residence to main roads. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2000, 54, 75–76. [Google Scholar]
  78. Venn, A.J.; Lewis, S.A.; Cooper, M.; Hubbard, R.; Britton, J. Living near a main road and the risk of wheezing illness in children. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001, 164, 2177–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. McConnell, R.; Berhane, K.; Yao, L.; Jerrett, M.; Lurmann, F.; Gilliland, F.; Künzli, N.; Gauderman, J.; Avol, E.D.; Thomas, D.; et al. Traffic, susceptibility, and childhood asthma. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 766–772. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Jerrett, M.; Shankardass, K.; Berhane, K.; Gauderman, W.J.; Künzli, N.; Avol, E.; Gilliland, F.; Lurmann, F.; Molitor, J.N.; Molitor, J.T.; et al. Traffic-related air pollution and asthma onset in children: A prospective cohort study with individual exposure measurement. Environ. Health Perspect. 2008, 116, 1433–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Gergen, P.J. Understanding the economic burden of asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2001, 107, S445–S448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Thanh, N.X.; Ohinmaa, A.; Yan, C. Asthma-related productivity losses in Alberta, Canada. J. Asthma Allergy 2009, 2, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Lamb, C.E.; Ratner, P.H.; Johnson, C.E.; Ambegaonkar, A.J.; Joshi, A.V.; Day, D.; Sampson, N.; Eng, B. Economic impact of workplace productivity losses due to allergic rhinitis compared with select medical conditions in the United States from an employer perspective. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2006, 22, 1203–1210. [Google Scholar]
  84. Rice, D.P. Cost of illness studies: What is good about them? Inj. Prev. 2000, 6, 177–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Shin, H.S.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, J.S.; Han, K.H. Socioeconomic costs of food-borne disease using the cost-of-illness model: Applying the QALY method. J. Prev. Med. Public Health 2010, 43, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pak, H.Y.; Pak, Y.S. The effects of PM10 on the hospital admission of patients with respiratory disease in Seoul, Korea. J. Converg. Inf. Technol. 2019, 9, 194–201. [Google Scholar]
  87. Ban, J.; Wang, Q.; Ma, R.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, W.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, C.; Sun, Q.; Wang, Y.; Guo, X.; et al. Associations between short-term exposure to PM2.5 and stroke incidence and mortality in China: A case-crossover study and estimation of the burden. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 268, 115743. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Toxics 11 00113 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations on the platform, (B) PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in the waiting room.
Figure 1. (A) PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations on the platform, (B) PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in the waiting room.
Toxics 11 00113 g001
Toxics 11 00113 g002 550
Figure 2. Average concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 on the platform and in the waiting room (the two bars on the left represent the values observed in the subway PM and the two bars on the right represent the value defined by WHO.
Figure 2. Average concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 on the platform and in the waiting room (the two bars on the left represent the values observed in the subway PM and the two bars on the right represent the value defined by WHO.
Toxics 11 00113 g002
Table
Table 1. Average concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 and average number of patients traveled.
Table 1. Average concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 and average number of patients traveled.
Platform μg/m3Waiting Room μg/m3Cabin
μg/m3		Avg. No. of People Travelling per Day
PM10PM2.5PM10PM2.5PM10PM2.5BoardingAlighting
42.1821.008.745.0120.6913.1354785364
83.9023.7256.1418.1732.6424.408331.68388
92.0422.4672.8421.1749.8241.057306.27089
72.7022.3849.914.2334.38326.197038.66947
Table
Table 2. Burden of PM2.5 per 1000 persons for each health effect endpoint.
Table 2. Burden of PM2.5 per 1000 persons for each health effect endpoint.
DiseaseRisk/Prevalence/Development of a Disease per 1000 Patients (Morbidity)Mortality-Associated Costs (Million USD) per 1000 PersonsAverage Median PM2.5 Exposure Concentration (μg)
COPD3739.31.05
Asthma441.11.03
IHD190.41.07
Table
Table 3. Average dose inhaled per trip at different time intervals.
Table 3. Average dose inhaled per trip at different time intervals.
Average Time Spent by a Commuter in the Subway (min)306090
Average exposure concentration PM2.5 (µg/m3)16.2216.2216.22
Average minute ventilation rate by commuter (m3 min−1)0.0150.0150.015
Inhaled dose per trip (μg) PM2.57.29914.59821.895
Table
Table 4. Methods used to determine health care costs.
Table 4. Methods used to determine health care costs.
Health Care CostsOutpatientInpatientFormula
Direct medical costs✓✓
  • The NHIS database was used to get hospital expenses covered by co-payment plans in Korea for inpatients and outpatient visits, including Emergency Department visits.
Nonmedical costs✓✓
  • Total transportation expenses were determined by multiplying transportation costs by the number of outpatient visits and hospitalizations based on NHIS claims for each kind of hospital treatment.
  • The overall caregiving expenses were estimated by dividing the average daily caregiving cost by the total days of hospital admissions obtained from the NHIS.
  • Using the human capital method, productivity costs for patients under 70 and over 60 years old were assessed.
Transportation
Caregiving ✓
Indirect costs✓✓
Table
Table 5. Direct and indirect costs of each disease.
Table 5. Direct and indirect costs of each disease.
DiseaseDirect Cost (Million USD; per 1000 Persons)Indirect Cost (Million USD; per 1000 Persons)Total Cost (Million USD; per 1000 Persons)
COPD0.105910.07180.17771
ASTHMA0.550.070.42
IHD0.574780.2940.86878
Table
Table 6. Economic loss due to COPD, asthma, and IHD.
Table 6. Economic loss due to COPD, asthma, and IHD.
CategoryCosts (Million USD; per 1000 Persons)
COPDContribution (%)AsthmaContribution (%)IHDContribution (%)
Direct
Medical
Formal (Treatment)0.02916.60.254.80.30234.76
Informal (Medical Equipment)0.006313.50.027.40.1618.41
Non-Medical
Transportation0.00060.30.082.40.078.066
Nursing0.070390.0514.10.042784.92
Indirect 3.33
Loss of Work0.058832.70.0412.40.02930.5
Premature deaths0.0137.70.0390.265100
Total0.177711000.421000.86878
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Thangavel, P.; Kim, K.Y.; Park, D.; Lee, Y.-C. Evaluation of Health Economic Loss Due to Particulate Matter Pollution in the Seoul Subway, South Korea. Toxics 2023, 11, 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11020113

AMA Style

Thangavel P, Kim KY, Park D, Lee Y-C. Evaluation of Health Economic Loss Due to Particulate Matter Pollution in the Seoul Subway, South Korea. Toxics. 2023; 11(2):113. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11020113

Chicago/Turabian Style

Thangavel, Prakash, Kyoung Youb Kim, Duckshin Park, and Young-Chul Lee. 2023. "Evaluation of Health Economic Loss Due to Particulate Matter Pollution in the Seoul Subway, South Korea" Toxics 11, no. 2: 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11020113

APA Style

Thangavel, P., Kim, K. Y., Park, D., & Lee, Y. -C. (2023). Evaluation of Health Economic Loss Due to Particulate Matter Pollution in the Seoul Subway, South Korea. Toxics, 11(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11020113

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop