Next Article in Journal
Study on the Ecotoxic Effects of Uranium and Heavy Metal Elements in Soils of a Uranium Mining Area in Northern Guangdong
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Angrand et al. Inflammation and Autophagy: A Convergent Point between Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)-Related Genetic and Environmental Factors: Focus on Aluminum Adjuvants. Toxics 2022, 10, 518
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxics
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/toxics11020096
toxics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Metals in Diverse Biochar Products: Effect of Feedstock Type and Pyrolysis Temperature

by
Hattan A. Alharbi
1,
Khaled D. Alotaibi
2,*,
Mohamed H. EL-Saeid
2 and
John P. Giesy
3,4,5
1
Department of Plant Protection, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Soil Science, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
3
Toxicology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B3, Canada
4
Department of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
5
Department of Environmental Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2023, 11(2), 96; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11020096
Submission received: 1 January 2023 / Revised: 12 January 2023 / Accepted: 16 January 2023 / Published: 19 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Emerging Contaminants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Biochar’s agricultural and environmental benefits have been widely demonstrated; however, it may cause environmental contamination if it contains large amounts of pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heavy metals (HMs). Therefore, this study aimed to assess the contents of PAHs and HM in a range of biochars generated from different sources and pyrolysis temperatures. A range of feedstock was converted to biochar, including sewage sludge (SS), olive mill pomace (OP), feather meal (FM), soft offal meal (CSM), chicken manure (CM), and date palm residues (DPR). Each feedstock was then pyrolyzed at three temperatures of 300, 500, or 700 °C, thereby producing a total of 18 types of biochar. These biochar products were analyzed for 16 PAHs and eight metals (Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb). Benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, and benzo(a)pyrene were significantly greater in the biochar produced at 700 °C than in that produced at 300 °C, especially for CM. The concentrations of dibenz(a,h)anthracene were significantly lower at 700 °C but greater at 500 °C and 300 °C in DPR. Increasing the pyrolysis temperature from 300 to 700 °C significantly increased the concentrations of metals, including Cr in SS and OP; Mn in CM; and Fe, Ni, Cu, and Zn in SS. However, the concentration of Cd was significantly lower in the SS when biochar was produced at 700 °C than at 500 or 300 °C. The type of feedstock used and the pyrolysis temperature are key factors influencing the contents of PAHs and HMs in biochar, both of which need to be considered during the production and use of biochar. Further investigations are recommended to establish the relationships between pyrolysis temperature and types of feedstock and the formation of PAH or the concentrations of metals. Monitoring the concentrations of PAHs and HMs before applying biochar to soil is also recommended.

1. Introduction

Biochar is considered an effective soil amendment with the potential to improve many physical, chemical, and biological attributes of soils [1,2], which can increase the crop yields by providing better availability of nutrients and a greater potential for soils to retain water [3,4,5]. Biochar also plays a major role in mitigating abiotic stresses in plants, for example, the treatments of plants with biochar might increase plants resistant to heat-induced stress [6]. It may therefore be used as a tool in environmental management [7]. However, regardless of the potential benefits, biochar also contains variable concentrations of toxic elements, such as heavy metals (HM), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), in addition to dioxins [8]. The concentrations of these chemical components, however, largely vary, depending upon the feedstock type and pyrolysis conditions (such as residence time, temperature, and heating rate) [9,10]
The initial composition of the feedstock substantially influences the content of metals and other toxic components in the resulting biochar. For instance, sewage sludge has a relatively high concentration of metals [9,11,12], and during pyrolysis, metals can undergo volatilization, enrichment, and speciation in the residues [13]. These metals become a part of the soil solution and exchange sites when biochar is applied as an amendment to the soil [8]. According to the International Biochar Initiative (IBI), thresholds of metals in biochar include Pb (Min = 121; Max = 300), Cd (Min = 1.4; Max = 39), Cu (Min = 143; Max = 6000), Ni (Min = 47; Max = 420), Hg (Min = 416; Max = 7400), Cr (Min = 93; Max = 1200), Co (Min = 34; Max = 100), Mo (Min = 5; Max = 75), and Se (Min = 2; Max = 200) at mg/kg dry weight [14]. However, the ecological risk of metals in biochar could be decreased if feedstock such as sewage sludge is pyrolyzed at an appropriate temperature [15]. The ecotoxicity of metals largely depends on the leachability and mobility of metals from biochar [16,17]
The PAHs are persistent organic contaminants that have two or more aromatic rings, the exposure to which induces potential risks and hazards to the environment [18]. Furthermore, PAHs can also adversely affect animals and humans, considering they are mutagenic, carcinogenic, and teratogenic [19,20]. The application of biochar with large concentrations of PAHs to soil additionally increases the potential for releasing these organic contaminants into the environment, particularly resulting in soil and plant contamination, thereby increasing the risk to public health [21,22].
The production of PAHs is mostly associated with the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels [19]; however, the partial aerobic combustion of raw biomass for biochar production under high temperatures (pyrolysis) can also result in the production of PAHs [10]. It has been hypothesized that recondensation during pyrolysis produces several (semi-) volatile organic compounds [23,24,25]. In addition, fluctuations in temperature, the composition of raw feedstock, and other analytical conditions, such as pressure, determine the type and concentration of PAHs [26]. The concentrations of PAHs in biochar, which can be coproduced during pyrolysis, may pose a potential risk to the environment [27,28,29,30].
It has also been observed that higher temperatures (1000 °C) and anaerobic conditions produce a small amount of syngas (~20%) and a large quantity of bio-oil (~60% of mass) and PAHs [23,24]. However, under low-temperature pyrolysis, relatively greater amounts of biochar (ca. 35–50%) and fewer PAHs are produced [31]. It has been shown that the type and chemical composition of feedstock can affect the amounts and types of PAHs in the produced biochar [29,32,33]. The amounts of lignin, C, H, N, and O elemental contents and cellulose and hemicellulose determine the quality and quantity of PAHs [31,34]. Concentrations of PAHs in biochar range from as low as 100 µg kg–1 to 100 mg kg–1 and can be in the thousands of mg kg–1 for the sum (Σ) of the 16 US EPA PAHs [31,35].
Considering the increasing use of biochar in agricultural and environmental applications, it is important to evaluate the number of contaminants in biochar to ensure its quality and avoid negative effects on soils. Research on the quality of biochar is essential, especially when considering the wide range of organic materials (feedstock types) used for its production and the pyrolysis temperature, all of which are critical factors that influence the chemical composition of biochar. Further studies to investigate a wide range of biochars derived from various feedstocks at different temperatures for their content of contaminants are essential to determine the magnitude of variability among biochars according to their production-related factors. This study, therefore, aimed to assess the biochar content of PAHS and metals as a function of the feedstock type and pyrolysis temperature. It was hypothesized that the pyrolysis temperature and feedstock type would result in variations in the concentrations of PAHs and metals in biochar.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Feedstock Collection and Biochar Production

Six organic materials were used as feedstocks for the production of biochar. These include (1) sewage sludge (SS), (2) olive mill pomace (OP), (3) feather meal (FM), (4) soft offal meal (CSM), (5) chicken manure (CM), and (6) date palm residues (DR). These materials were selected based on their local abundance and chemical composition. All six organic materials were converted into biochar at three pyrolysis temperatures—300, 500, and 700 °C. A sample of each feedstock was first homogenized and then placed in a tightly sealed stainless chamber to ensure oxygen-limited conditions. The feedstock was pyrolyzed in a muffle furnace at the desired temperature with a retention time of 3 h. The biochar produced was allowed to cool to room temperature, thoroughly mixed, ground manually to pass through a 1.0 mm sieve, and stored in glass jars in the lab until analysis. A total of 18 biochar products were obtained and evaluated in this study.

2.2. Extraction and Quantification of PAHs

Concentrations of 16 PAHs were determined in biochar, including 2-ring [naphthalene-(Nap)], 3-ring [acenaphthene (Ace)], acenaphthylene (Acy), fluorene (Flu), phenanthrene (Phe), anthracene (Ant)], 4-ring [fluoranthene (Fla)], pyrene (Pyr), chrysene (Chr), benzo[a]anthracene (BaA), 5-ring [benzo[b]fluoranthene (BbF)], benzo[k]fluoranthene (BkF), benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DahA)], 6-ring [indeno-1,2,3-cd-pyrene (IcdP)], and benzo[ghi]perylene (BghiP)]. Extraction and quantification of PAHs were conducted following the procedure described by Hilber et al. 2012. Briefly, the PAHs were extracted using the Soxhlet extraction method with 100% toluene for 36 h [36]; after which, 1 g of dried and homogenized biochar was briefly added to the sleeves of the Soxhlet extractor for 36 h with toluene. After extraction, the volume of the solvent was reduced to 10 mL using a rotary vacuum evaporator and then to approximately 1 mL using nitrogen. The extract was then spiked with 15 μL of the recovery standard (250 ng acenaphthene-d10 in toluene) and concentrated to 1 mL using GC-MS. Targeted PAHs were identified and quantified using a Thermo Scientific™ TSQ 8000™ triple–quadrupole GC-MS/MS system, equipped with a Thermo Scientific™ TRACE™ 1310 GC with an SSL Instant Connect™ SSL module and Thermo Scientific™ TriPlus™ RSH autosampler. The injection mode was splitless, with a splitless injection volume of 1 μL and a time of 1.0 min. A DB-5MS GC column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) was used. The carrier gas used was 99.99% pure He at a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. The temperature program was set at 100 °C, 1 min; 10 °C/min to 160 °C, 4 min; and 10 °C/min to 250 °C, 2 min. The ionization mode used was EI with 70 eV, the ion source temperature was 250 °C, and single reaction monitoring was used with a transition setup automatically built up by Auto SRM software.

2.3. Quantification of Metals

The quantification of the total metal (HMs) content involved digesting 0.2 g of biochar with a mixture of HNO3, HCl, and H2O2 in a microwave digestion system (Jin et al. 2016 [9]; Udayanga et al. 2018 [13]). The digested samples were diluted with deionized water to 50 mL; after which, the concentrations of Cr, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb were determined using an ICP-MS instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific GmbH, Bremen, Germany). An analysis was conducted on three replicates of each biochar type.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Two-way ANOVA was used to examine the effects of feedstock type and pyrolysis temperature on the concentrations of PAHs and HMs, and the treatment means were compared using Fisher’s LSD. To understand the similarity and dissimilarity among PAH and HM concentrations along different feedstocks and pyrolysis temperatures, the datasets were statistically analyzed using a cluster analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) with SPSS (IBM-Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 22) software. The cluster analysis grouped the datasets into similar categories and demonstrated the homogeneity of the various PAHs and HMs among the different feedstocks.
Statistical significance was determined at a 95% confidence interval with a significance level of 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using Origin 2021 Pro OriginLab Corporation (Northampton, MA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Metals Concentrations

The effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature were significant for the concentrations of chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), and nickel (Ni) in biochar. At 300 °C and 500 °C, SS demonstrated significantly greater concentrations of Cr than OP, FM, CSM, CM, and DPR. Cr was also significantly greater in OP than in FM, CSM, CM, and DPR at 300 and 500 °C. At 700 °C, OP contained higher concentrations of Cr than SS, FM, CSM, CM, or DPR (Figure 1A). Compared to 300 and 500 °C, Cr was significantly greater at 700 °C in the SS (0.35 and 0.17-fold), OP (30.61 and 8.93-fold), FM (42.39 and 8.63-fold), CSM (90.89- and 34.25-fold), CM (2.74- and 0.90-fold), and DPR (6.49- and 1.49-fold). Concentrations of Mn were significantly greater in CM than in SS, OP, FM, CSM, and DPR at 300 °C, 500 °C, and 700 °C., and increasing the temperature from 300 °C to 700 °C resulted in higher concentrations of Mn in SS, OP, FM, CSM, and CM (Figure 1B). At 300 °C, 500 °C, and 700 °C, SS contained significantly higher concentrations of Fe than OP, FM, CSM, CM, or DPR. In OP and FM, the Fe concentration increased marginally at higher pyrolysis temperatures—that is, 300–500 and 700 °C; however, Fe was lower in CSM but greater in CM and DPR at 500 and 700 °C than at 300 °C (Figure 1C). The concentrations of Ni in SS and CM were significantly greater than those in OP, FM, CSM, and DPR at 300, 500, and 700 °C. A significant enhancement in Ni was also observed in OP, FM, CSM, and DPR when the pyrolysis temperature was increased from 300 to 500 and 700 °C (Figure 1D).
The concentrations of Cu were significantly greater at 500 °C and 700 °C in the SS than at 300 °C. In OP, FM, CSM, and CM, higher production temperatures (500 and 700 °C) significantly enhanced Cu content compared to that at 300 °C (Figure 2A). No significant change in Cu was observed in the DPR pyrolyzed at 300 or 500 °C; however, the concentration of Cu was significantly greater at 700 °C than at 300 and 500 °C in the DPR. On average, the greatest amount of Cu was observed in the SS, followed by the CM. In FM, CSM, and CM, Zn was significantly greater at 500 °C and 700 °C compared to 300 °C. In DPR, concentrations of Zn were significantly greater at 500 °C, followed by 700 °C compared at 300 °C. In SS, Zn did not differ significantly at 300 and 500 °C but remained significantly greater at 700 °C (Figure 2B). The concentrations of Cd remained significantly greater in SS at 300 and 500 °C than 700 °C. For FM and CSM, concentrations of Cd were significantly greater at 500 and 700 °C compared to 300 °C. However, the concentrations of Cd in CM were significantly less at 500 and 700 °C compared to 300 °C (Figure 2C). Significantly more Pb was observed in the SS at 500 °C than at 300 °C; however, in SS, the concentration of Pb was significantly greater at 500 °C than at 700 °C. In the CM, the concentration of Pb was significantly greater at 500 and 700 °C than at 300 °C. In DPR, no significant difference was observed between the concentrations of Pb at 300 and 500 °C, but a significant enhancement was observed at 700 °C (Figure 2D).

3.2. Concentrations of PAHs in Biochar

The concentrations of benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, and benzo(a)pyrene increased in SS, OP, FM, CSM, CM, and DPR at 500 and 700 °C than at 300 °C. Compared to SS, OP, FM, CSM, and DPR, benzo[b]fluoranthene (Figure 3A), benzo[k]fluoranthene (Figure 3B), and benzo(a)pyrene (Figure 3C) were significantly greater in CM. Significantly more dibenz(a,h)anthracene was observed at 500 °C than at 300 °C.; however, at a pyrolysis temperature of 700 °C there was significantly less dibenz(a,h)anthracene formed than at 300 °C (Figure 3D). On average, CM and DPR exhibited the highest concentrations of dibenz(a,h)anthracene at 300 °C. The highest concentration of dibenz(a,h)anthracene was observed for the DPR pyrolyzed at 500 °C.
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (Figure 4A) and benzo(g,h,i)perylene (Figure 4B) differed significantly at 500 °C compared to 300 °C. Significantly less indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene and benzo(g,h,i)perylene) were observed at 700 °C than at 300 °C. At 300 °C, significantly more indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene was observed in the OP, FM, and CSM than in SS. However, at 500 °C, significantly more indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene was formed from CPR and OP than from SS. At 700 °C, the amount of indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene was significantly greater in OP than in SS. Benzo(g,h,i)perylene was significantly greater in DPR than in SS, OP, FM, CSM, and CM at 300 °C, 500 °C, and 700 °C.
Concentrations of naphthalene (Figure 5A), acenaphthylene (Figure 5B), acenaphthene (Figure 5C), and fluorene (Figure 5D) were significantly greater at 500 and 700 °C than at 300 °C. The naphthalene concentration was greatest in the OP at 300 °C and FM at 500 °C. At 700 °C, the OP and FM contained similar concentrations of naphthalene, which were greater than those in SS, CSM, CM, and DPR. The concentrations of acenaphthylene, acenaphthene, and fluorene were higher in OP than in SS, FM CSM, CM, and DPR at 300, 500, or 700°.
The production of phenanthrene (Figure 6A), anthracene (Figure 6B), pyrene (Figure 6C), and fluoranthene (Figure 6D) was directly proportional to the pyrolysis temperature. The concentrations of phenanthrene were the highest in CM at 300 °C and 500 °C. At 700 °C, SS contained greater amounts of phenanthrene than did FM, CSM, CM, and DPR. The concentrations of anthracene were similar in the biochars prepared from SS and CM, with maximum production at 700 °C. At 500 °C, the anthracene concentrations in FM were greater than those in SS, CSM, CM, and DPR. However, the concentrations of anthracene were significantly greater in SS at 700 °C, while the concentrations of pyrene and fluoranthene were significantly greater in CM at 500 and 700 °C; however, at 700 °C, the concentrations of pyrene were similar in DPR and CM. Only CM demonstrated maximum concentrations of fluoranthene formed at 700 °C. At 500 and 700 °C, benzo[a]anthracene (Figure 7A) and chrysene (Figure 7B) were significantly greater than those produced at 300 °C. At 300, 500, and 700 °C, the concentrations of benzo[a]anthracene and chrysene were highest in CM compared to SS, CSM, CM, and DPR.
The analysis of Pearson’s correlation showed that feedstocks were significantly negatively correlated with the concentrations of Cr, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb, as indicated in Figure 8. However, a significant positive correlation was observed among the feedstocks for benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene, benzo(g,h,i)perylene, and pyrene. The concentrations of Cr, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, naphthalene, acenaphthylene, acenaphthene, fluorene, phenanthrene, anthracene, pyrene, and fluoranthene were significantly and positively correlated (Figure 8). Principal component analysis revealed that Cr, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb were associated with SS. However, the PAHs were not associated with the feedstocks (Figure 9).

4. Discussion

Variations were observed in the concentration of metals in the biochar depending on the feedstock type and pyrolysis temperature. These results indicated that metals might be present in the parent feedstock material from which biochar was produced, but it depends on feedstock type. The higher concentrations of heavy metals in biochar are due to the partial mineralization of organic substances during the pyrolysis process. For example, the concentration of heavy metals were higher than that in the feedstock sewage sludge [11]. The enrichment of heavy metals in biochar enhanced with the pyrolysis temperature, and the average metal concentration was found to be proportional to the pyrolysis temperature. Although the concentrations of heavy metals are higher in biochar than its feedstock, the toxicity and bioavailability of heavy metals associated with biochar is lower than its feedstock [11]. During pyrolysis, the disintegration of organic compounds in feedstock tends to increase the concentrations of metals that do not degrade [37,38] Furthermore, most feedstocks from which biochar is produced are enriched with hydroxides, oxides, and sulfides. The provision of thermal stability to hydroxides, oxides, sulfides, and their salts plays an important role in the significant increases in the concentrations of metals as a function of temperature during pyrolysis [13]. Higher temperatures during pyrolysis also enhanced the diffusion kinetics inside the ash and reactions with an ash matrix. Such diffusion-trapped metals with mineral ash enhance the retention of metals, thus increasing the content of metals in biochar [39,40,41]. Similar increases in the concentrations of metals were also observed in the current study when the pyrolysis temperature was increased from 300 to 700 °C.
The concentrations of PAHs were also directly proportional to the temperature during the pyrolysis of biochar produced from various feedstocks. Higher temperatures during pyrolysis resulted in a greater production of volatile gases. Greater re-condensation of volatile organic compounds on the surfaces of biochar results in greater concentrations of PAHs in biochar [25]. Based on this result, the most of biochar produced from different feedstock are not recommended to use as a soil amendment. The concentrations of high molecular weight PAHs are higher than the maximum permissible content of Σ16 PAHs (US EPA) in biochar which is in ranges from 6 to 300 mg/kg [14]. During pyrolysis, higher temperatures initiate carbonization and aromatization. Both processes facilitate PAH synthesis during biochar production [10,35]. However, it has been shown that lower concentrations of PAH are produced during slow pyrolysis rate than during fast pyrolysis [35]. Unimolecular cyclization, dealkylation, dehydrogenation, and aromatization of feedstock lignin and cellulose result in the emission of H2O, CO2, CH4, and H2S [42]. These native compounds leave behind aromatized structures, which become low-molecular-weight PAHs during pyrolysis [43] and are the key factors responsible for the synthesis of PAHs [10,32,33,44,45]. However, the relationship between PAH concentration and the conditions under which biochar is produced is not well understood [35]. A previous study demonstrated greater concentrations of PAHs when the pyrolysis temperature was increased from 300 to 600 °C [39]. PAHs with greater toxic potency, such as benzo[a]pyrene and benzo[a]anthracene, become enriched in biochar when the pyrolysis temperature is greater than 500 °C [28]. The results of the current study are also consistent with previous findings, where concentrations of benzo[a]pyrene were significantly greater when biochar was produced from various feedstocks at 500 or 700 °C than at 300 °C. Chemical feedstocks consist of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, all of which can produce PAHs in biochar. A feedstock rich in cellulose and pectin produces significantly more PAHs than lignin-enriched feedstock [10,46]. Finally, it has been suggested that biochar with high PAHs concentrations might not pose significant ecotoxicological effects on soil dwelling organisms when biochar mixed with soil but not when biochar directly evaluate its toxicity (i.e., without soil) [47].

5. Conclusions

Both the feedstock and pyrolysis temperature affected the concentrations of PAHs and HMs in the biochar. Biochar produced from SS, OP, and CM demonstrated higher concentrations of HM. Similarly, biochars of SS and CM have a greater potential to produce PAHs than other feedstocks. Low-temperature pyrolysis produces fewer PAHs and HMs in biochar. Further investigations are recommended to better establish relationships between temperature and feedstock and PAH formation and HM contents. Monitoring these contaminants after the application of biochar to soil is additionally necessary to ensure environmental safety.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.A.A. and K.D.A.; methodology, H.A.A., K.D.A. and M.H.E.-S.; formal analysis, H.A.A. and M.H.E.-S.; investigation, H.A.A. and K.D.A.; data curation, K.D.A. and M.H.E.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, H.A.A.; writing—review and editing, H.A.A., K.D.A. and J.P.G.; funding acquisition, K.D.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2023R633), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset generated in this study can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This research project was funded by Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2023R633), king Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Giesy was supported by the Canada Research Chair Program, a distinguished visiting professorship in the Department of Environmental Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lehmann, J.; Rillig, M.C.; Thies, J.; Masiello, C.A.; Hockaday, W.C.; Crowley, D. Biochar effects on soil biota—A review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 1812–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ali, S.; Rizwan, M.; Qayyum, M.F.; Ok, Y.S.; Ibrahim, M.; Riaz, M.; Arif, M.S.; Hafeez, F.; Al-Wabel, M.I.; Shahzad, A.N. Biochar soil amendment on alleviation of drought and salt stress in plants: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 12700–12712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hagemann, N.; Joseph, S.; Schmidt, H.-P.; Kammann, C.I.; Harter, J.; Borch, T.; Young, R.B.; Varga, K.; Taherymoosavi, S.; Elliott, K.W. Organic coating on biochar explains its nutrient retention and stimulation of soil fertility. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Hussain, R.; Ravi, K.; Garg, A. Influence of biochar on the soil water retention characteristics (SWRC): Potential application in geotechnical engineering structures. Soil Tillage Res. 2020, 204, 104713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sarfraz, R.; Hussain, A.; Sabir, A.; Ben Fekih, I.; Ditta, A.; Xing, S. Role of biochar and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to enhance soil carbon sequestration—A review. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2019, 191, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fahad, S.; Hussain, S.; Saud, S.; Tanveer, M.; Bajwa, A.A.; Hassan, S.; Shah, A.N.; Ullah, A.; Wu, C.; Khan, F.A. A biochar application protects rice pollen from high-temperature stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 96, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, C.; Zeng, G.; Huang, D.; Lai, C.; Chen, M.; Cheng, M.; Tang, W.; Tang, L.; Dong, H.; Huang, B. Biochar for environmental management: Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, contaminant treatment, and potential negative impacts. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 373, 902–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hilber, I.; Bastos, A.C.; Loureiro, S.; Soja, G.; Marsz, A.; Cornelissen, G.; Bucheli, T.D. The different faces of biochar: Contamination risk versus remediation tool. J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. Manag. 2017, 25, 86–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Jin, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wu, S.; Cao, Y.; Liang, P.; Zhang, J.; Wong, M.H.; Wang, M.; Shan, S. Influence of pyrolysis temperature on properties and environmental safety of heavy metals in biochars derived from municipal sewage sludge. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 320, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Weidemann, E.; Buss, W.; Edo, M.; Mašek, O.; Jansson, S. Influence of pyrolysis temperature and production unit on formation of selected PAHs, oxy-PAHs, N-PACs, PCDDs, and PCDFs in biochar—A screening study. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 3933–3940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lu, T.; Yuan, H.; Wang, Y.; Huang, H.; Chen, Y. Characteristic of heavy metals in biochar derived from sewage sludge. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2016, 18, 725–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yuan, H.; Lu, T.; Huang, H.; Zhao, D.; Kobayashi, N.; Chen, Y. Influence of pyrolysis temperature on physical and chemical properties of biochar made from sewage sludge. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2015, 112, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Udayanga, W.C.; Veksha, A.; Giannis, A.; Lisak, G.; Chang, V.W.-C.; Lim, T.-T. Fate and distribution of heavy metals during thermal processing of sewage sludge. Fuel 2018, 226, 721–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. IBI. Standardized Product Definition and Product Testing Guidelines for Biochar That Is Used in Soil; International Biochar Initiative: Canandaigua, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, B.; Ding, S.; Fan, H.; Ren, Y. Experimental investigation into the effect of pyrolysis on chemical forms of heavy metals in Sewage Sludge Biochar (SSB), with brief ecological risk assessment. Materials 2021, 14, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yachigo, M.; Sato, S. Leachability and vegetable absorption of heavy metals from sewage sludge biochar. In Soil Processes and Current Trends in Quality Assessment; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2013; pp. 399–416. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mierzwa-Hersztek, M.; Gondek, K.; Klimkowicz-Pawlas, A.; Baran, A.; Bajda, T. Sewage sludge biochars management—Ecotoxicity, mobility of heavy metals, and soil microbial biomass. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2018, 37, 1197–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gbeddy, G.; Egodawatta, P.; Akortia, E.; Goonetilleke, A. Inherent and external factors influencing the distribution of PAHs, hydroxy-PAHs, carbonyl-PAHs and nitro-PAHs in urban road dust. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 308, 119705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abdel-Shafy, H.I.; Mansour, M.S. A review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Source, environmental impact, effect on human health and remediation. Egypt. J. Pet. 2016, 25, 107–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gbeddy, G.; Egodawatta, P.; Goonetilleke, A.; Akortia, E.; Glover, E.T. Influence of photolysis on source characterization and health risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and carbonyl-, nitro-, hydroxy-PAHs in urban road dust. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 269, 116103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, J.; Xia, K.; Waigi, M.G.; Gao, Y.; Odinga, E.S.; Ling, W.; Liu, J. Application of biochar to soils may result in plant contamination and human cancer risk due to exposure of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ. Int. 2018, 121, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, K.-H.; Jahan, S.A.; Kabir, E.; Brown, R.J. A review of airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their human health effects. Environ. Int. 2013, 60, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Spokas, K.A.; Novak, J.M.; Stewart, C.E.; Cantrell, K.B.; Uchimiya, M.; DuSaire, M.G.; Ro, K.S. Qualitative analysis of volatile organic compounds on biochar. Chemosphere 2011, 85, 869–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hale, S.E.; Lehmann, J.; Rutherford, D.; Zimmerman, A.R.; Bachmann, R.T.; Shitumbanuma, V.; O’Toole, A.; Sundqvist, K.L.; Arp, H.P.H.; Cornelissen, G. Quantifying the total and bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dioxins in biochars. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 2830–2838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Buss, W.; Mašek, O.; Graham, M.; Wüst, D. Inherent organic compounds in biochar–their content, composition and potential toxic effects. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 156, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Greco, G.; Videgain, M.; Di Stasi, C.; Pires, E.; Manyà, J.J. Importance of pyrolysis temperature and pressure in the concentration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in wood waste-derived biochars. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2021, 159, 105337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Buss, W.; Mašek, O. Mobile organic compounds in biochar–a potential source of contamination–phytotoxic effects on cress seed (Lepidium sativum) germination. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 137, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Freddo, A.; Cai, C.; Reid, B.J. Environmental contextualisation of potential toxic elements and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biochar. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 171, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. José, M.; Sánchez-Martín, Á.M.; Campos, P.; Miller, A.Z. Effect of pyrolysis conditions on the total contents of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biochars produced from organic residues: Assessment of their hazard potential. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 667, 578–585. [Google Scholar]
  30. Xiang, L.; Liu, S.; Ye, S.; Yang, H.; Song, B.; Qin, F.; Shen, M.; Tan, C.; Zeng, G.; Tan, X. Potential hazards of biochar: The negative environmental impacts of biochar applications. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 420, 126611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Buss, W.; Graham, M.C.; MacKinnon, G.; Mašek, O. Strategies for producing biochars with minimum PAH contamination. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2016, 119, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Krzyszczak, A.; Dybowski, M.P.; Czech, B. Formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their derivatives in biochars: The effect of feedstock and pyrolysis conditions. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2021, 160, 105339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Keiluweit, M.; Kleber, M.; Sparrow, M.A.; Simoneit, B.R.; Prahl, F.G. Solvent-extractable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biochar: Influence of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 9333–9341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, H.; Voroney, R.; Price, G. Effects of temperature and processing conditions on biochar chemical properties and their influence on soil C and N transformations. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 83, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, C.; Wang, Y.; Herath, H. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in biochar—Their formation, occurrence and analysis: A review. Org. Geochem. 2017, 114, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hilber, I.; Blum, F.; Leifeld, J.; Schmidt, H.-P.; Bucheli, T.D. Quantitative determination of PAHs in biochar: A prerequisite to ensure its quality and safe application. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 3042–3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Martín-Lara, M.; Pérez, A.; Vico-Pérez, M.; Calero, M.; Blázquez, G. The role of temperature on slow pyrolysis of olive cake for the production of solid fuels and adsorbents. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2019, 121, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Devi, P.; Saroha, A.K. Risk analysis of pyrolyzed biochar made from paper mill effluent treatment plant sludge for bioavailability and eco-toxicity of heavy metals. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 162, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xiao, Z.; Yuan, X.; Li, H.; Jiang, L.; Leng, L.; Chen, X.; Zeng, G.; Li, F.; Cao, L. Chemical speciation, mobility and phyto-accessibility of heavy metals in fly ash and slag from combustion of pelletized municipal sewage sludge. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 536, 774–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Toledo, J.M.; Corella, J.; Corella, L.M. The partitioning of heavy metals in incineration of sludges and waste in a bubbling fluidized bed: 2. Interpretation of results with a conceptual model. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, 126, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Corella, J.; Toledo, J.M. Incineration of doped sludges in fluidized bed. Fate and partitioning of six targeted heavy metals. I. Pilot plant used and results. J. Hazard. Mater. 2000, 80, 81–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhao, C.; Jiang, E.; Chen, A. Volatile production from pyrolysis of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. J. Energy Inst. 2017, 90, 902–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kuśmierz, M.; Oleszczuk, P. Biochar production increases the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon content in surrounding soils and potential cancer risk. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 3646–3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nakajima, D.; Nagame, S.; Kuramochi, H.; Sugita, K.; Kageyama, S.; Shiozaki, T.; Takemura, T.; Shiraishi, F.; Goto, S. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon generation behavior in the process of carbonization of wood. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2007, 79, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zielińska, A.; Oleszczuk, P. The conversion of sewage sludge into biochar reduces polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon content and ecotoxicity but increases trace metal content. Biomass Bioenergy 2015, 75, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Odinga, E.S.; Gudda, F.O.; Waigi, M.G.; Wang, J.; Gao, Y. Occurrence, formation and environmental fate of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biochars. Fundam. Res. 2021, 1, 296–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Godlewska, P.; Ok, Y.S.; Oleszczuk, P. The dark side of black gold: Ecotoxicological aspects of biochar and biochar-amended soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 403, 123833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Toxics 11 00096 g001a 550Toxics 11 00096 g001b 550
Figure 1. Effect of type of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature (300, 500, or 700 °C) on the concentrations of Cr (A), Mn (B), Fe (C), and Ni (D) in the biochars. Different color bars indicate the means of three replicates. Error bars represent ± standard error. Letters on bars represent a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. SS = sewage sludge; OP = olive mill pomace; FM = feather meal; CSM = soft offal Meal; CM = chicken manure; DPR = date palm residues.
Figure 1. Effect of type of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature (300, 500, or 700 °C) on the concentrations of Cr (A), Mn (B), Fe (C), and Ni (D) in the biochars. Different color bars indicate the means of three replicates. Error bars represent ± standard error. Letters on bars represent a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. SS = sewage sludge; OP = olive mill pomace; FM = feather meal; CSM = soft offal Meal; CM = chicken manure; DPR = date palm residues.
Toxics 11 00096 g001aToxics 11 00096 g001b
Toxics 11 00096 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature (300, 500, or 700 °C) on Cu (A), Zn (B), Cd (C), and Pb (D) in diverse biochars. Different bars indicate the means of three replicates. Error bars represent ± standard error. Letters on bars represent a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. SS = sewage sludge; OP = olive mill pomace; FM = feather meal; CSM = soft offal Meal; CM = chicken manure; DPR = date palm residues.
Figure 2. Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature (300, 500, or 700 °C) on Cu (A), Zn (B), Cd (C), and Pb (D) in diverse biochars. Different bars indicate the means of three replicates. Error bars represent ± standard error. Letters on bars represent a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. SS = sewage sludge; OP = olive mill pomace; FM = feather meal; CSM = soft offal Meal; CM = chicken manure; DPR = date palm residues.
Toxics 11 00096 g002
Toxics 11 00096 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature (300, 500 and 700 °C) on great molecular PAHs i.e., benzo[b]fluoranthene (A), benzo[k]fluoranthene (B), benzo(a)pyrene (C), and dibenz(a,h)anthracene (D) in the biochar samples. Different bars indicate the means of three replicates. Error bars represent ± SE. Letters on bars are representing a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. SS = sewage sludge; OP = olive mill pomace; FM = feather meal; CSM = soft offal Meal; CM = chicken manure; DPR = date palm residues.
Figure 3. Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature (300, 500 and 700 °C) on great molecular PAHs i.e., benzo[b]fluoranthene (A), benzo[k]fluoranthene (B), benzo(a)pyrene (C), and dibenz(a,h)anthracene (D) in the biochar samples. Different bars indicate the means of three replicates. Error bars represent ± SE. Letters on bars are representing a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. SS = sewage sludge; OP = olive mill pomace; FM = feather meal; CSM = soft offal Meal; CM = chicken manure; DPR = date palm residues.
Toxics 11 00096 g003
Toxics 11 00096 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature (300, 500 and 700 °C) on greater molecular mass PAHs i.e., indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (A) and benzo(g,h,i)perylene) (B) in the biochar samples. Different bars indicate the means of three replicates. Error bars represent ± SE. Letters on bars are representing a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. SS = sewage sludge; OP = olive mill pomace; FM = feather meal; CSM = soft offal Meal; CM = chicken manure; DPR = date palm residues.
Figure 4. Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature (300, 500 and 700 °C) on greater molecular mass PAHs i.e., indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (A) and benzo(g,h,i)perylene) (B) in the biochar samples. Different bars indicate the means of three replicates. Error bars represent ± SE. Letters on bars are representing a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. SS = sewage sludge; OP = olive mill pomace; FM = feather meal; CSM = soft offal Meal; CM = chicken manure; DPR = date palm residues.
Toxics 11 00096 g004
Toxics 11 00096 g005a 550Toxics 11 00096 g005b 550
Figure 5. Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature (300, 500, and 700 °C) on low molecular PAHs, i.e., naphthalene (A), acenaphthylene (B), acenaphthene (C), and fluorene (D) in the biochar samples. Different bars indicate the mean of three replicates. Error bars represent ± standard error. Letters on bars represent a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. SS = sewage sludge; OP = olive mill pomace; FM = feather meal; CSM = soft offal Meal; CM = chicken manure; DPR = date palm residues.
Figure 5. Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature (300, 500, and 700 °C) on low molecular PAHs, i.e., naphthalene (A), acenaphthylene (B), acenaphthene (C), and fluorene (D) in the biochar samples. Different bars indicate the mean of three replicates. Error bars represent ± standard error. Letters on bars represent a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. SS = sewage sludge; OP = olive mill pomace; FM = feather meal; CSM = soft offal Meal; CM = chicken manure; DPR = date palm residues.
Toxics 11 00096 g005aToxics 11 00096 g005b
Toxics 11 00096 g006a 550Toxics 11 00096 g006b 550
Figure 6. Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature (300, 500, and 700 °C) on low molecular PAHs, i.e., phenanthrene (A), anthracene (B), pyrene (C), and fluoranthene (D) in the biochar samples. The different bars indicate the means of three replicates. Error bars represent ± standard error. Letters on bars represent a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. SS = sewage sludge; OP = olive mill pomace; FM = feather meal; CSM = soft offal Meal; CM = chicken manure; DPR = date palm residues.
Figure 6. Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature (300, 500, and 700 °C) on low molecular PAHs, i.e., phenanthrene (A), anthracene (B), pyrene (C), and fluoranthene (D) in the biochar samples. The different bars indicate the means of three replicates. Error bars represent ± standard error. Letters on bars represent a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. SS = sewage sludge; OP = olive mill pomace; FM = feather meal; CSM = soft offal Meal; CM = chicken manure; DPR = date palm residues.
Toxics 11 00096 g006aToxics 11 00096 g006b
Toxics 11 00096 g007 550
Figure 7. Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature (300, 500, and 700 °C) on low molecular PAHs, i.e., benzo[a]anthrcene (A) and chrysene (B) in the biochar samples. The different bars indicate the means of three replicates. Error bars represent ± standard error. Letters on bars represent a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. SS = sewage sludge; OP = olive mill pomace; FM = feather meal; CSM = soft offal Meal; CM = chicken manure; DPR = date palm residues.
Figure 7. Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature (300, 500, and 700 °C) on low molecular PAHs, i.e., benzo[a]anthrcene (A) and chrysene (B) in the biochar samples. The different bars indicate the means of three replicates. Error bars represent ± standard error. Letters on bars represent a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. SS = sewage sludge; OP = olive mill pomace; FM = feather meal; CSM = soft offal Meal; CM = chicken manure; DPR = date palm residues.
Toxics 11 00096 g007
Toxics 11 00096 g008 550
Figure 8. Pearson’s correlation for biochar feedstock, pyrolysis temperature, metals, and PAHs. Red represents positive correlations while blue represents negative correlations. The intensity of color demonstrates the significance of correlation.
Figure 8. Pearson’s correlation for biochar feedstock, pyrolysis temperature, metals, and PAHs. Red represents positive correlations while blue represents negative correlations. The intensity of color demonstrates the significance of correlation.
Toxics 11 00096 g008
Toxics 11 00096 g009 550
Figure 9. Principal component analysis of metals and PAHs using pyrolysis temperature as observation and feedstock as a group.
Figure 9. Principal component analysis of metals and PAHs using pyrolysis temperature as observation and feedstock as a group.
Toxics 11 00096 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alharbi, H.A.; Alotaibi, K.D.; EL-Saeid, M.H.; Giesy, J.P. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Metals in Diverse Biochar Products: Effect of Feedstock Type and Pyrolysis Temperature. Toxics 2023, 11, 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11020096

AMA Style

Alharbi HA, Alotaibi KD, EL-Saeid MH, Giesy JP. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Metals in Diverse Biochar Products: Effect of Feedstock Type and Pyrolysis Temperature. Toxics. 2023; 11(2):96. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11020096

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alharbi, Hattan A., Khaled D. Alotaibi, Mohamed H. EL-Saeid, and John P. Giesy. 2023. "Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Metals in Diverse Biochar Products: Effect of Feedstock Type and Pyrolysis Temperature" Toxics 11, no. 2: 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11020096

APA Style

Alharbi, H. A., Alotaibi, K. D., EL-Saeid, M. H., & Giesy, J. P. (2023). Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Metals in Diverse Biochar Products: Effect of Feedstock Type and Pyrolysis Temperature. Toxics, 11(2), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11020096

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop