Next Article in Journal
Behavioral, Psychiatric, and Cognitive Adverse Events in Older Persons Treated with Glucocorticoids
Next Article in Special Issue
Protein Targets of Frankincense: A Reverse Docking Analysis of Terpenoids from Boswellia Oleo-Gum Resins
Previous Article in Journal
Takotsubo as Initial Manifestation of Non-Myopathic Cardiomyopathy Due to the Titin Variant c.1489G > T
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Current Status of the Pharmaceutical Potential of Juniperus L. Metabolites

by
Wilson R. Tavares
1 and
Ana M. L. Seca
2,3,*
1
Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Azores, 9501-801 Ponta Delgada, Portugal
2
Department of Chemistry & QOPNA-Organic Chemistry, Natural Products and Food Stuffs, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
3
cE3c—Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes/Azorean Biodiversity Group & Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Azores, Rua Mãe de Deus, 9501-321 Ponta Delgada, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicines 2018, 5(3), 81; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines5030081
Submission received: 4 July 2018 / Revised: 16 July 2018 / Accepted: 20 July 2018 / Published: 31 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological Potential and Medical Use of Secondary Metabolites)

Abstract

:
Background: Plants and their derived natural compounds possess various biological and therapeutic properties, which turns them into an increasing topic of interest and research. Juniperus genus is diverse in species, with several traditional medicines reported, and rich in natural compounds with potential for development of new drugs. Methods: The research for this review were based in the Scopus and Web of Science databases using terms combining Juniperus, secondary metabolites names, and biological activities. This is not an exhaustive review of Juniperus compounds with biological activities, but rather a critical selection taking into account the following criteria: (i) studies involving the most recent methodologies for quantitative evaluation of biological activities; and (ii) the compounds with the highest number of studies published in the last four years. Results: From Juniperus species, several diterpenes, flavonoids, and one lignan were emphasized taking into account their level of activity against several targets. Antitumor activity is by far the most studied, being followed by antibacterial and antiviral activities. Deoxypodophyllotoxin and one dehydroabietic acid derivative appears to be the most promising lead compounds. Conclusions: This review demonstrates the Juniperus species value as a source of secondary metabolites with relevant pharmaceutical potential.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Plants have been used by humans since the start of mankind thousands of years ago as construction material [1], clothing [2], and obviously, as food and drugs [3]. Although scientific knowledge has permitted the development of medicine to today’s standards based on herbal and traditional medicines, the oldest form of medicine known to man, they are still used around the world [4]. The use of plants themselves, their derived natural compounds and their biological and therapeutic properties have become a topic of increasing interest and investigation not only in modern medicine and pharmacology [5], but also in food and cosmetics industries [6].
Juniperus species are a good bet in the development of new drugs with natural compounds, since it is a diverse genus (75 species of Juniperus [7]) with several traditional medicinal applications reported. For example, Juniperus excelsa M.Bieb. is used to treat abdominal spasm, asthma, diarrhea, fever, gonorrhea, headache, and is also useful as antihypertensive, diuretic, carminative, appetizer, anticonvulsant, and flavoring agent [8]. In Turkey, powdered Juniperus oxycedrus subsp. oxycedrus L. berries are consumed to lower blood glucose levels [9], while in Mexico, Juniperus communis L. is used to treat respiratory problems, gastrointestinal infections, cardiovascular and/or blood disorders, and as astringent [10]. Use of J. communis also covers the treatment of urinary problems, migraines, diabetes, gonorrhea, and skin irritations [11].
The extracts and secondary metabolites from Juniperus species exhibit also interesting bioactivities [12,13], especially the Juniperus oxycedrus L. and J. communis, two of the most studied species in terms of their phytochemistry, pharmacological, and therapeutic effects [14,15]. It can be highlighted that extracts and compounds from both plants exhibit antimicrobial, antioxidant, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, anticonvulsant, analgesic, and cytotoxic activities [14,15], and additionally J. communis also possess antifertility, hepatoprotective, diuretic, neuroprotective, antiparasitic, and anti-ulcer properties [14].
Some of the most relevant studies published in recent years on the bioactivities of Juniperus extracts show clearly that Juniperus continues to be a hot spot in research on natural products as well as contribute to further highlight the pharmacological potential of this genus and of its chemical constituents. For example, Jung et al. [16] reports the butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) inhibitory activity of the compound valenc-1(10), 3(4), 11(12)-trien-2-one isolated from Juniperus chinensis L. with an IC50 value of 68.45 μM (IC50 = 18.75 μM for berberine). In Lee and colleagues work [17], Juniperus rigida Siebold & Zucc. fruit ethanol extract was showed to possess anti-atopic properties in in vivo oxazolone- and 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene(DNCB), and induced atopic dermatitis in mice models. It was suggested that the therapeutic effect verified by this extract occurs by decreasing the overproduction of interleukin 4 (IL-4) and immunoglobulin E (IgE) and accelerating skin barrier recovery function. Groshi et al. [18] assessed the cytotoxicity of the polar extract (methanol), and non-polar extracts (dichloromethane and n-hexane) of Juniperus phoenicea L. leaves against four human cancer cell lines concluding that the dichloromethane extract was the most cytotoxic extract against the lung carcinoma cell line A549 (IC50 = 13 μg/mL), while n-hexane extract exhibits the broadest spectrum of activity with IC50 values of 10, 14, 16, and 40 μg/mL against hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HepG2, human breast cancer cell line MCF-7, human lung carcinoma A549, and human bladder carcinoma cell line EJ138, respectively. On the other hand, imbricataloic acid isolated from Juniperus phoenicea var. turbinata (Guss.) Parl. (syn. Juniperus turbinata Guss.) ethanol extract showed the strongest cytotoxic activity (IC50 values of 0.06, 0.114, and 0.201 μM on human colon cancer HCT116, human malignant melanoma A375, and human breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-231 cell lines, respectively), being several times more potent than the reference compound cisplatin (IC50 values of 1.87 to 11.86 μM) [19] indicating that imbricataloic acid make a promising anticancer drug candidate.
The essential oil of Juniperus species are also a research target once they exhibit a great diversity of bioactivities. For example, the essential oil of J. phoenicea var. turbinata (syn. Juniperus turbinata Guss.) exhibits cytotoxic effects against HCT116, A375, and MDA-MB-231 human tumor cell lines, in a concentration-dependent inhibitory effect with IC50 values of 9.48–33.69 μg/mL [19]. Juniperus oxycedrus essential oil exhibited high antitrypanosomal activity (IC50 of 0.9 μg/mL) against Trypanosoma brucei brucei, with no cytotoxic effects on RAW 267.4 macrophage cell line showing the highest selectivity index (63.4) [20]. The authors of this study suggest that α-pinene would likely be the responsible for the J. oxycedrus essential oil antitrypanosomal properties. In another work using male mice [21], Juniperus virginiana L. essential oil at 400 and 800 mg/kg showed anxiolytic effect, although it failed to inhibit the anxiety-related behavior by light-dark box.
The interest of the Juniperus species is also at the nutritional/functional food level and some studies, including in vivo studies on this subject, have recently been published. Inci and colleagues [22] found that low supplementation levels of J. communis berry (0.5% and 1%) in Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica) diets have positive impacts on some body qualities, feed intake, and live weight. Juniperus species are also valuable in terms of their wood since it is a viable construction material classified as durable or even very durable, like J. communis case [23]. In this context, Ateş et al. [24] suggest that Juniperus foetidissima Willd. could be aimed for new natural wood preservatives development since its methanol extract reported antifungal activity against Pleurotus ostreatus with an IC50 value of 0.30 μg/μL.
Besides all the bioactive activities and other benefit effects of Juniperus species mentioned above, it should be noticed that toxicity side effects were found in Juniperus species such as the spoonful ingestion of J. oxycedrus extract of branches can cause poisoning, leading to fever, hepatotoxicity, renal failure, severe hypotension, and severe cutaneous burns on the face [25]. Adverse effects were also mentioned by Prinsloo and colleagues [3] to Juniperus sabina L. that contains thujone, a neurotoxic compound, and to Juniperus scopulorum Sarg., which contains safrole, a liver carcinogen substance [3].
Taking into account the abovementioned bioactivities of some Juniperus species, their importance as a source of novel natural compounds is well cleared. The increased interest and investigation of these species lead to new discoveries of interesting and promising metabolites. Juniperus L. metabolites pharmaceutical potential has been previously well reviewed in 2006 [12] and in 2015 [13], thus this work aims to update the information relative to the recently published studies involving Juniperus species secondary metabolites. It is important to highlight that this is not an exhaustive review of all the studies regarding compounds with biological activities form Juniperus species, but rather a selection taking into account the compounds whose biological activity and mechanism of action show that they are compounds with high pharmacological potential.

2. Bioactive Secondary Metabolites from Juniperus Species

2.1. Terpenoids

2.1.1. Dehydroabietic Acid

The dehydroabietic acid (1) (Figure 1) has a lipophilic abietan-8,11,13-trien structure with only one polar substituent, the equatorial carboxylic group at C-4. This acid is widely distributed in nature, being present in J. oxycedrus, J. phoenicea, and Juniperus brevifolia (Seub.) Antoine [12,13]. This compound has been considered as an interesting starting material for the synthesis of new compounds which means, an excellent leader compound, with important biological properties, having at least two hundred dehydroabietane derivatives described in literature [26]. Dehydroabietic acid (1) and its derivatives display not only antiviral [27] and antitumor [28,29] effects, but also gastroprotective [30], antimicrobial [31], and anti-inflammatory [32] properties.
More recently, new interesting dehydroabietic acid derivatives were studied. Hou and colleagues [33] accessed the in vitro antiproliferative activity of various dehydroabietic acid derivatives possessing a 1,2,3-triazole-tethered nucleus at C-14, against four different human cancer cell lines, showing that the majority of the newly synthesized derivatives displayed effective antiproliferative activities, being the presence of 1,2,3-triazole moiety substituted on C-4 crucial to the high cytotoxic activity. The dehydroabietic acid methyl ester derivative (1a) (Figure 1), with the substituent (2-(4-(3-(tert-butoxycarbonylamino)phenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)acetamido) at C-14, was the most potent derivative tested, exhibiting better IC50 values (i.e., 0.7 to 1.2 μM) against the tested cells lines (PC-3, SK-OV-3, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 human cell lines) than the clinical anticancer drug fluorouracil (5-Fu) (5.2 to 24.5 μM IC50 values). Moreover, it also demonstrated weak cytotoxicity against HL-7702 and HFF-1 normal cells. These results imply that, with proper structure modifications, these types of derivatives could be aimed for development into a new anticancer natural product-like.
In a very recent work [34], the antibacterial activity of various N-sulfonaminoethyloxime derivatives of dehydroabietic acid was assessed against Staphylococcus aureus Newman strain and multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains (NRS-1, NRS-70, NRS-100, NRS-108, and NRS-271). The results showed that these dehydroabietic acid derivatives showed great antibacterial effect with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values ranging from 0.78 to 1.56 μg/mL against the strains tested. With a MIC of 0.39 to 0.78 μg/mL (MIC = 0.63–1.2 μM) against Staphylococcus aureus Newman, the meta-CF3 phenyl derivative (1b) (Figure 1) showed the highest antibacterial activity, similar to the positive-control compound vancomycin, that had a MIC of 0.78 to 1.56 μg/mL (MIC = 0.54–1.1 μM) against the same bacteria strain.

2.1.2. Ferruginol

Ferruginol (2) (Figure 2) is, like dehydroabietic acid, a tricyclic diterpene with an aromatic ring but without the C-18 carboxylic acid and with a hydroxyl group at C-12. It is widely distributed in Juniperus genus [13,35], being particularly abundant in hexane extract of J. excelsa berries (32.9% of all the detected compounds) [36]. Several previous reports showed that this compound exhibits a great diversity of bioactivities such as anti-acaricide, antiplasmodial, nematicidal, antibacterial, antileishmanial, antiviral, antifungal, and antitumoral [26,36,37,38,39,40,41].
A recent study [42] showed that ferruginol (2) has antitumor activity, presenting inhibitory effects on HepG2 (IC50 = 11.4 ± 2.9 μg/mL, 39.8 μM) and Hep3B (IC50 = 19.4 ± 4.3 μg/mL, 67.7 μM) cell lines, without affecting the normal hepatocyte line L-02 viability (IC50 > 100 μg/mL, 349 μM). However, we would like to point out that the results previously mentioned have a standard deviation of around 20% of the value of the mean, which impairs the scientific impact of the results. Since ferruginol (2) exhibited the highest activity against Hep3B and HepG2 cell lines, the authors also assessed the mechanisms of apoptosis caused by compound (2). The results indicated that ferruginol (2) downregulated the expression levels of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 (related to mitochondrial apoptosis pathway) and upregulated pro-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2-associated X (Bax), caspase-3, and caspase-9 [42].
Increased production, accumulation, and aggregation of the neurotoxic peptide amyloid-β (Aβ) within the brain triggers severe molecular changes affecting many signaling pathways associated with neuronal metabolism, signaling, and neuronal communication, leading to spatial memory loss and learning impairment associated with Alzheimer’s disease [43]. Amyloid β oligomers induce an imbalance in the calcium signaling kinases (vital for maintaining the integrity and functionality of synapses), which leads to progressive impairment of the synaptic connections, altering the capacity for hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) resulting in neuronal apoptosis [44]. A recent study by Zolezzi and colleagues [45] found that ferruginol (2) might have a potential neuroprotective role in neurodegenerative alterations. Their study reports that 10 μM of ferruginol induce an increase in calcium intracellular levels in hippocampal neurons from mice and promote neuroprotection against apoptosis, synaptic protein loss, and LTP inhibition triggered by amyloid β oligomers. The capacity of ferruginol to induce an increase in calcium was correlated with an increase in Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) and in the active form of protein kinase C (PKC) in hippocampal slices, indicating that the changes in the LTP process and the calcium levels may be intermediated by the activation of calcium-dependent mechanisms involving PKC and CaMKII [46].
Furthermore, ferruginol (2) is the starting material for the synthesis of several compounds with high activity level and less secondary effects. In the work by Roa-Linares and colleagues [47], ferruginol and two analogues, showed relevant antiviral activity against Dengue Virus type 2, human Herpesvirus type 1, and human Herpesvirus type 2. The ferruginol derivative with a phthalimide moiety at C-18 (2a) (Figure 2), was ten times better (EC50 = 1.4 µM) than the reference ribavirin (EC50 = 13.5 µM) against Dengue Virus type 2 in a post-infection treatment and with a selectivity index value of 57.7, which indicates that this compound presents great potential as a therapeutic agent and should be aimed for further biopharmaceutical and pre-clinical studies [47].

2.1.3. Hinokiol

Hinokiol (3) (Figure 3) is a 3β,12-dihydroxy-abieta-8,11,13-trien present in Juniperus species, e.g., J. brevifolia, J. chinensis, J. excelsa, J. phoenicea, Juniperus procera Hochst. ex Endl. Juniperus przewalskii Kom. and Juniperus squamata Buch.-Ham. ex D.Don [12,13], with interest for the scientific community due to its pharmacological potential, since this compound has been reported to inhibit the generation of nitric oxide (NO) and TNF-α, as well as the production of pro-inflammatory enzymes from lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW macrophages [48,49]. Antioxidant [50] and hepatoprotective [51] effects have also been reported for hinokiol, as well as antitumor properties against human ovarian carcinoma (HO-8910) and cervical carcinoma (HeLa) cell lines [52].
In a more recent study, Wang and colleagues [53] reported the inhibition of voltage-gated Na+ channels (VGSCs) by hinokiol at 30 μM, in rat hippocampal CA1 neurons, differentiated NG108-15 cells and neuroblastoma N2A cells; VGSCs are crucial in the excitability of neurons since they permit the influx of Na+ during the upstroke phase of action potential, which ensures the quality of rapid signal transmission in the nervous system [53]. The VGSC inhibition by hinokiol presented in this work could be interpreted as an anti-anxiety, anaesthetic or anticonvulsant activity, but further research is necessary to clarify this topic and to hypothesize about future pharmacological applications.

2.1.4. Sugiol

Sugiol (4) (Figure 3), 12-hydroxy-abieta-8,11,13-triene-7-one is widely distributed in the Cupressaceae family, being found in J. brevifolia, J. chinensis, J. communis, Juniperus polycarpos K.Koch, J. procera, Juniperus rigida var. conferta (Parl.) Patschke (syn. J. conferta Parl.) and Juniperus formosana Hayata [12,13,16,54,55]. Sugiol presents hepatoprotective [51] and antioxidant properties [56].
Bajpai and Kang [57] evaluated sugiol for tyrosinase and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity in vitro, in terms of its antimelanogenesis and antidiabetic potential, respectively. The results showed that sugiol at the concentration range of 0.100 to 10 mg/mL presented efficacy on inhibiting α-glucosidase (12.34 to 63.47% of inhibition) similar to acarbose (19.2 to 65.5% of inhibition at same concentration range), while at concentration 0.020 to 0.50 mg/mL, sugiol inhibits 28.2 to 67.4% of tyrosinase activity, only a little less active than kojic acid used as reference (32.4 to 76.5% inhibition at the same concentration range).
The Bajpai research group [58] reports also the potential of sugiol as antiviral once it inhibits the growth of H1N1 influenza virus in a cytopathogenic reduction assay using Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell line. Severe cytopathic effect occurred in MDCK cells exposed to H1N1 influenza virus but in MDCK cells treated with sugiol (500 µg/mL) along with H1N1 influenza virus, cytopathic effect was absent. In fact, MDCK cells treated with sugiol showed similar morphology to control MDCK cells that were not exposed to H1N1 influenza virus.
Jung et al. [59] showed that sugiol may be useful against human solid tumors as an inhibitor of transketolase (TKT) and of the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3). In fact, the TKT reaction plays a crucial role in the pentose phosphate pathway, and its inhibition interrupts the production of FAD, NAD(P)+, CoA, and ATP, as well as the synthesis of DNA and RNA in cancer cells [60], while STAT3 inhibition plays an important role in the induction of cancer cells apoptosis [61]. In the work by Jung et al. [59], STAT3 activation was 40% inhibited by 20 μM of sugiol in DU145 prostate cancer cells, limiting their proliferation through cell cycle arrest at the G1/S checkpoint. The mechanism of inhibition proposed indicates that inhibition of TKT by sugiol imply ROS-mediated ERK activation and ERK activated phosphorylates STAT3 on Ser727 and recruits a protein tyrosine phosphatase MEG2, which dephosphorylates STAT3 on Tyr705 leading to the inhibition of STAT3 [59].
A very recent study [62] showed that sugiol reduced the cell viability of human pancreatic cancer cells (Mia-PaCa2) in a concentration-dependent manner being the IC50 value of 15 μM. The cytotoxic activity of sugiol was found to be caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated alterations in mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), in conjunction with an upregulation of Bax expression (an inducer of apoptosis) and a downregulation of Bcl-2 expression (an antiapoptotic protein). Additionally, the study indicates that sugiol also caused cell cycle arrest in G2/M phase of the cell cycle, ultimately leading to apoptosis. Furthermore, sugiol also inhibited the migratory capacity of Mia-PaCa2 cells at 15 μM concentration. This study suggests that sugiol is a very good candidate to in vivo evaluation against pancreatic cancer. Unfortunately, the authors of this study have not evaluated the compounds cytotoxicity towards a non-tumor cell line under the same conditions and did not use an approved clinical drug as positive control. If they had, they would have increased the impact of their work and its contribution to the field.

2.1.5. Totarol

The compound totarol (5) (Figure 3) is a tricyclic phenolic diterpene with a totarane skeleton. It is found in several Juniperus species such as J. brevifolia, J. chinensis, J. communis, J. conferta, J. excelsa, J. formosana, J. phoenicea, J. procera and Juniperus drupaceae Labill. [12,13]. It is the most abundant compound in the hexane extract of J. brevifolia bark (11 mg of compound by 100 mg of extract) [54], being also found in species from other genus [63]. This compound seems to be a good bet towards new interesting active drugs development since it displays a range of interesting bioactivities such as antibacterial [64,65,66], antimycobacterial [38], antileishmanial [36], antimalarial [67,68], antistaphylococcal activity caused by efflux inhibitory properties [69], as well as nematicidal activity and antifouling attributes [36]. Furthermore, totarol could also be used as activity enhancer of some conventional drugs [70].
A promising antimicrobial target is the bacterial cell division machinery and totarol (5), by perturbing the cell division, has the capacity to restrain bacterial growth [71]. A recent study [72] focused on the molecular targets and mechanism of action of totarol in Bacillus subtilis. Their quantitative proteome analysis showed that diterpene (5) induced changes in 139 proteins expression levels. The same study also reports that Bacillus subtilis major central metabolic dehydrogenases are repressed by totarol (5) at IC50 = 1.5 μM leading to metabolic shutdown in the bacteria.
Another study [73] reports that totarol (5) has vascular protective effects in vivo, by activating the protein kinase B/heme oxygenase-1 (PKB/HO-1) pathway, further increasing superoxide dismutase (SOD) and antioxidant glutathione (GSH) levels, which leads to ischemia-induced brain injury suppression. An in vitro assay showed totarol as no toxicity on cerebellar granule cells (CGC) at various concentrations (1 to 5 μM), which strengthens its protective properties. In order to simulate the situation of patients with acute stroke, a post-ischemia administration of totarol in rats (1 and 10 μg/kg) was used. The results showed considerable decreases in infarct volume compared with the untreated group. Moreover, totarol treatment (1 and 10 μg/kg) radically enhanced the ischemia-induced neurological deficit. The study also reported notably infarct volume reduction with 10 μg/kg of totarol administration.

2.2. Flavonoids

2.2.1. Amentoflavone

Amentoflavone (6) (Figure 4), is a flavonoid dimer composed by two apigenin units linked by a carbon-carbon bond between C-8 and C-3′, belonging to the biflavonoid family of compounds and is found in several Juniperus species, like: J. oxycedrus, J. phoenicea, J. rigida, J. virginiana, J. chinensis, J. communis, J. drupacea, J. foetidissima, Juniperus bermudiana L., Juniperus indica Bertol., Juniperus macrocarpa Sm., and Juniperus occidentalis Hook. [12,13,74].
Amentoflavone (6) possesses a wide variety of bioactivities, such as antiphotoaging [75], antifungal [76], antimicrobial [77], antioxidant [78], anti-inflammatory [79], antidiabetic [80], antipsoriasis [81], diuretic [82] and antitumor [83,84], as well as neuroprotective [85] and osteogenesis effects [86], and it confers cardiovascular injury protection [87]. Although all these bioactivities are well reviewed with great detail by Yu et al. [74] there are still some studies that are worth mentioning that were not included in the review.
Inhibition of prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) has been found as a pharmacological mechanism for the treatment of androgenic alopecia (i.e., pattern hair loss) [88]. A study [89] found that amentoflavone (6) might inhibit PGD2 synthesis and that it has acceptable skin permeability as well as not being irritating or corrosive to skin, suggesting that amentoflavone (6) can be used to develop safe and high-efficacy hair loss treatment.
Estrogens have a crucial role in the initiation and the progression of breast cancers. Aromatase catalyses the rate-limiting step in endogen/estrogen synthesis and its activity is stated to be higher in breast cancer [90]. Tascioglu et al. [91] showed that amentoflavone (6) could act as an aromatase inhibitor being determined the IC50 value as 93.6 μM in an in vitro assay.
In a very interesting study [92], the protective effect of amentoflavone (6) against Freund’s adjuvant induced arthritis in rats was evaluated. The findings show that treatment with 20 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg doses of amentoflavone (6) has suitable anti-arthritic properties since it demonstrates to positively control inflammation in the adjuvant induced arthritic rat model. Protective effects were also reported in another study [93], where it was demonstrated that amentoflavone (6) protected dopaminergic neurons against MPTP/MPP+-induced neurotoxicity. This neuroprotective activity may have its clinical application in the treatment of some central nervous system (CNS) diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease and ischemia.
Another study [94] examined the effects of amentoflavone in human ovarian cancer cell lines OVCAR-3 and SK-OV-3. The results showed that this biflavonoid (6) could considerably suppress cell propagation, block cell cycle progression at the G1/G0 phase and induce cell apoptosis. In both cell lines, amentoflavone (6) displayed dose- and time-dependent inhibition. In SK-OV-3 cells assay, after 48 h of treatment with compound (6) at 20 and 50 μM the cell viability decrease 15% and 20%, respectively, while with incubation time extended to 72 h, the decrease cell viability was 19% and 31% for the respective doses. In OVCAR-3 cells, the results were similar. Also, apoptotic cell population increased after 48 h and 72 h treatment at 20 μM and 50 μM. Furthermore, the results showed that amentoflavone (6) repressed the expression of S-phase kinase protein 2 (Skp2) through ROS/AMPK/mTOR signaling [94], which contributed to amentoflavone antitumor effect against ovarian cancer.
The amentoflavone (6) inhibitory activity on human aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B10 (AKR1B10), which is a detoxification enzyme involved in drug resistance, was studied [95]. The results showed that compound (6) decrease the growth of A549 human lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo by potently inhibition of human AKR1B10 activity (IC50 = 1.54 μM).
A key transcription factor that responds to oxidative stress is nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and its activation is related with prevention of aging, inflammation and cancer [96]. A recent study [97] found that amentoflavone (6) could trigger Nrf2 activation through ROS-mediated activation of the p38-AKT/PKB pathway in HaCaT keratinocytes.
A dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors increase the activation of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), leading to the inhibition of secretion of glucagon and enhancement of β-cells functionality [98]. Thus the control of DPP-IV activity is an essential factor in management of type 2 diabetes, and amentoflavone (6), with an IC50 value of 3.9 ± 0.5 μM, was recognized as a potential DPP-IV inhibitor [99].

2.2.2. Rutin

Rutin, 3,3′,4′,5,7-pentahydroxyflavone-3-rhamnoglucoside, and also known as quercetin 3-rutinoside (7) (Figure 4), is a flavonol found in many plants including Juniperus species like J. communis, J. excelsa, J. foetidissima, and J. oxycedrus [12,100].
Recently, two papers [101,102] have exhaustively reviewed the rutin (7) bioactivities and pharmacological potential. They showed that it possesses multiple pharmacological activities, including antioxidant, hepatoprotective, vasoprotective, anticarcinogenic, neuroprotective, cardioprotective and antidiabetic activities [101,102].
A recent work, not included in the mentioned reviews, reported that rutin can provide cardioprotective effect [103]. In this work, rutin at 50 μM was more effective than the cardioprotective agent dexrazoxane (DZR) at same concentration, in preventing pirarubicin-induced toxicity in rat cardiomyoblasts H9c2. The apoptosis rate of rutin (7) treatment after cells exposed to pirarubicin was nearly 20%, while DZR treatment reported an apoptosis rate of about 30% [103]. The authors propose that the protective effect of rutin (7) is related with its ability to scavenge intracellular ROS and inhibit cell apoptosis by modulating the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1-p38 MAPK signaling pathway.
An interesting work by Parashar et al. [104] found that rutin (7) (100 mg/kg) could alleviate chronic unpredictable stress (CUS) in mice, acting as an antidepressant. Since CUS impairs locomotors abilities of animals [105], the fact that rutin (7) treated animals were more balanced and active than the untreated ones, indicates a strong stimulatory effect on balancing activity, muscle coordination and locomotion. In addition, animals treated with rutin (7) had intact memory and were capable to identify a previously encountered object, thus spending more time discovering a novel object [104]. Stressed animals treated with rutin (7) presented an intact hippocampus with morphology and cell number similar to control animals that were not subjected to CUS [104].

2.3. Lignans

Deoxypodophyllotoxin

Deoxypodophyllotoxin (DPT) (8) (Figure 5) is an aryltetralin cyclolignan having been isolated from several Juniperus species like J. virginiana, J. rigida, J. sabina, J. squamata, J. procera, J. bermudiana, J. chinensis, J. communis, J. phoenicea, Juniperus procumbens (Siebold ex Endl.) Miq. Juniperus recurva Buch.-Ham. ex D.Don, Juniperus taxifolia Hook. & Arn. Juniperus thurifera L., and Juniperus x media V.D. Dmitriev [12,13,106,107].
The main characteristic of this compound is its great cytotoxic potential as reported in several studies [108,109,110,111,112]. Furthermore, DPT (8) also reported anti-inflammatory [113] and anti-angiogenic [109,111] properties.
A study [114] showed that deoxypodophyllotoxin (8) has a significant cytotoxic activity in vitro since it has inhibited the growth of numerous cancer cell lines (i.e., human glioblastoma-astrocytoma U-87 MG, human glioblastoma SF126, gastric carcinoma SGC-7901, gastric carcinoma BGC-823, ovarian carcinoma HO-8910, human ovarian carcinoma SK-0V-3, human colon carcinoma HT-29, breast carcinoma MDA-MB-231 and human choriocarcinoma JeG-3) with IC50 values varying from 13.95 to 26.72 nM, while the clinical anticancer drug etoposide was less efficient (IC50 ≥ 73.57 nM) [114]. Furthermore, the same study [114], also suggests that deoxypodophyllotoxin (8) treatment resulted in a dose- and time-dependent induction of apoptosis via caspase-dependent pathways by decreasing the expression of cyclin-dependent protein kinase 2 (Cdc2), cyclin B1, and cell division cycle 25C protein (Cdc25C), leading to cell cycle arrest in G2/M phase.
A recent study [115] also showed that DPT (8) at 5 nM induced G2/M cell cycle arrest in both human breast cancer cells MCF-7 (MCF-7/S) and their acquired resistant cells (MCF-7/A), while paclitaxel (10 nM) showed no effect on the cell cycle progression of the MCF-7/A cells. Besides that, DPT (8) exhibited antiproliferative activity against the MCF-7/S and MCF-7/A cell lines, with IC50 values of 10.61 ± 1.09 nM and 5.86 ± 0.30 nM respectively, with a resistance index (RI) [(IC50 of MCF-7/A cell line)/(IC50 of MCF-7/S cell line)] of 0.552 [115]. These values were better than the ones obtained by paclitaxel and etoposide [115]. Furthermore, DPT (8) at 12.5 mg/kg, suppressed in vivo the tumor growth in MCF-7/S and in MCF-7/A xenograft mice, exhibiting tumor volume growth inhibition of 49.62% in the MCF-7/S xenografts, approaching the tumor volume growth inhibition of paclitaxel (53.86% at 12.5 mg/kg). In addition, DPT (8) has potential to be a new microtubule inhibitor for breast cancer treatment since its antitubulin polymerization activity showed the absence of the polymerized tubulin, indicating that deoxypodophyllotoxin disrupted microtubule assembly in a different manner than paclitaxel [115]. The results presented by Zang et al. [115] also confirmed that deoxypodophyllotoxin (8) was not a substrate of the P-gp efflux pump and could overcome P-gp-mediated multi-drug resistance, unlike what happens with paclitaxel which is a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux pump substrate [116].
An in vivo study [117] showed the antitumor property of deoxypodophyllotoxin (8) on MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer xenografts in BALB/c nude mice in a concentration-dependent manner. Deoxypodophyllotoxin (8) was combined with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (DPT-HP-β-CD) in order to turn it more soluble and facilitate its intravenous administration. The results revealed that DPT (8) exhibited strong inhibitory effect and great antitumor activity, being the treatment with DPT-HP-β-CD (20 mg/kg) in MDA-MB-231 xenograft more efficient than the ones with etoposide (20 mg/kg) and docetaxel (20 mg/kg) [117], two anticancer drugs in clinical therapeutic [118,119]. The authors [117] also point out that, similar to other cancer chemotherapy drugs, DPT-HP-β-CD treatment caused gastrointestinal reactions after intravenous injection, consequential reducing food intake, which led to weight loss in the mice.
An in vitro study from Hu et al. [120] investigated the cytotoxic effect of DPT (8) on human prostate cancer DU-145 cells and its potential action mechanism. The results revealed that DPT (8) induced cell apoptosis and inhibited cell proliferation. Detection of high levels of the caspase-3 expression suggests that caspase-mediated pathways were involved in DPT-induced apoptosis. Moreover, the authors suggest that apoptosis was also induced through downregulation of the levels of phosphorylated Akt and activation of the p53/B-cell lymphoma 2 associated X protein/phosphatase and tensin homolog (i.e., Akt/p53/Bax/PTEN) signaling pathway [120]. Although this work must be emphasized because it exposes a new target involved in the DPT (8) mechanism of action, no control was used nor were IC50 values against DU-145 cells line presented, which is a misfortune since it decreases the scientific impact of the study.
Parthanatos is a unique cell-death pathway that is distinctive from necrosis, apoptosis or other recognized forms of cell death. It is a process dependent on the over activation of the nuclear enzyme poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1), causing it to synthesize a massive quantity of PAR polymer until reaching toxic levels, resulting in large-scale chromatin condensation and DNA fragmentation, leading to cell death [121]. A study [122] found that DPT (8) triggered parthanatos in rat C6, human SHG-44 and U87 glioma cell lines via induction of excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS). In addition, alterations of parthanatos-related proteins triggered by DPT (8) occurred in a dose and time dependent manner and involved the induced cytoplasmic accumulation of PAR polymer in SHG-44 and C6 glioma cells as well as the upregulation in the nuclear level of AIF and in the cytoplasmic and nuclear levels of PARP-1 [122].
ROS production plays a crucial role in apoptosis signaling, leading to cancer cell death [123], but it also can trigger autophagy [124]. Since autophagy is a degradation process in intracellular organelles that occurs when cells undergo nutrition deprivation and external stimulus, its activation is essential for preserving intracellular homeostasis and allowing the cell to survive [125]. An interesting study [126], demonstrated that deoxypodophyllotoxin (8) induces both autophagy and apoptosis in osteosarcoma U2OS cells, through modification of mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), which is related with generation of ROS. Furthermore, DPT (8) suppressed the PI3 K/AKT/mTOR signaling cascades, a pathway that leads the autophagy activation. Hence, these results indicate that deoxypodophyllotoxin (8) triggers simultaneously cytoprotective autophagy and cytotoxic apoptosis.
DPT (8) was used in a recent study [127], to establish a physiologically based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PBPK-PD) model that allowed to predict the tumor growth in human lung carcinoma NCI-H460 tumor-bearing mice during deoxypodophyllotoxin (8) multi-dose treatment, as well as in gastric cancer SGC-7901 tumor-bearing mice. Briefly, the PBPK-PD model uses in vitro/in vivo pharmacodynamic correlations and predicts antitumor effectiveness in tumor-bearing mice based on in vitro pharmacodynamics assays results. The authors defend that this PBPK-PD model could be use with other compounds besides DPT, permitting a faster dose regimen design and anticancer candidate screening in drug discovery processes.
Derivative compounds from deoxypodophyllotoxin (8) also present great potential as anticancer drugs, as it is shown in a study from Guan et al. [128]. In their study, cytotoxic activity of various deoxypodophyllotoxin–5-fluorouracil hybrid compounds were evaluated using four human cancer cell lines and the human lung fibroblast non-tumoral cell line WI-38. The majority of the hybrids were more potent in their cytotoxicity to the four tumor cell lines and presented reduced toxicity against the normal cell line than the reference compounds etoposide and 5-FU. The most promising compound was 4′-O-demethyl-4-deoxypodophyllotoxin-4′-yl 4-((6-(2-(5-fluorouracil-yl)acetamido) hexyl) amino)-4-oxobutanoate (8a) (Figure 5) that presented IC50 values of 0.27 to 4.03 μM against HeLa, A549, HCT-8 and HepG2 cells, being less toxic (IC50 = 113.8 μM) to WI-38 cells than 5-FU and etoposide (IC50 values of 78.52 μM and 35.8 μM respectively) [128]. Furthermore, this hybrid compound (8a) can inhibit A549 cell migration by up-regulation TIMP-1 and down-regulation matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9), as well as cause cell-cycle arrest in the G2/M phase by affecting levels of the cell-cycle regulators p-cdc2, cdc2 and cyclin B1 [128].
The same deoxypodophyllotoxin derivative (8a) (Figure 5), named C069 by Xiang et al. [129], could have antiproliferative effects in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC), in a dose- and time-dependent way. C069 (8a) at concentrations of 0.1 and 0.3 μM, showed better antiproliferative activity than etoposide at 1 μM, and low cytotoxicity against human normal lung cells WI-38 [129]. Since HUVEC represent a model cell line used to study angiogenesis processes, its non-proliferation is translated as an anti-angiogenesis property of C069 (8a).
Zhu et al. [130], showed that other DPT derivative (8b) (Figure 5), exhibits the IC50 values of 0.22 ± 0.02 μM against MGC-803 cells, being more active than the reference etoposide (IC50 values > 10 μM against the same cells line) and it can cause cell cycle arrest in G2/M phase through regulation of cell cycle check point proteins expression, such as p21, cdc25c, CDK1, cyclin A, and cyclin B. The same derivative (8b) at 4 mg/kg was also able to reduce in 45.56% the weights and volumes of HepG2 xenografts in mice in just 14 days [130].
Despise the impressive clinical efficacy of the deoxypodophyllotoxin (8) and its derivatives, their therapeutic use still needs to overcome some difficulties like its poor water solubility [131] and rapid elimination [132].

3. Conclusions

In conclusion, Juniperus genus is very rich in species and promising metabolites with pharmaceutical potential, being J. communis and J. oxycedrus the two most studied species in terms of their phytochemistry, pharmacological and therapeutic effects.
As a summary, the effects of Juniperus secondary metabolites and the level of activity/mechanism of action are shown in Table 1.
Regarding bioactivities, antitumor activity is by far the most studied, being followed by antiviral and antibacterial activities, with several works researching compounds found on Juniperus species mainly for these properties.
From the compounds mentioned in this review, deoxypodophyllotoxin (8) appears to be the most promising one in terms of development into a pharmaceutical natural drug, since it has reported antitumor effects against breast cancer acquired resistant cells (MCF-7/A), with IC50 = 5.86 nM, a very interesting value in the nanomolar level. However, their therapeutic use still needs to overcome obstacles like its poor water solubility. A deoxypodophyllotoxin derivative more soluble could do the trick. The dehydroabietic acid derivative 1a also appears to be a good bet for further studies and development since it has shown IC50 values between 0.7–1.2 μM against PC-3, SK-OV-3, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 tumor cell lines, an activity higher than the one exhibited by the anticancer agent 5-FU used clinically, and with significant selectivity once dehydroabietic acid derivative 1a displayed very weak cytotoxicity against normal cells.
The majority of the studies addressed in this review were made at the in vitro scale, with only a handful being done in in vivo. In fact, this is only the first step of a long, expensive, and very selective route until it can be declared as a compound with real potential to be a new drug, that is, with therapeutic application or as a new head of series. Thus, while this review work outlines the most promising compounds on which more studies are published in recent years, we are convinced that only the two compounds highlighted in the previous paragraph will be interesting enough to attract the attention of the pharmaceutical industry.
In light of this, the more active and promising compounds presented in Juniperus species should be taken to the next step, with future works aiming to in vivo testing assessment of them, particularly the ones with antitumor effects.
On the other hand, studies regarding any bioactivity assay of any compound should always present IC50 values of a reference compound in order to increases their scientific impact and facilitate results comparison.
This review hopes to demonstrate the Juniperus species value and their importance as a source of metabolites with relevant pharmaceutical potential.

Author Contributions

W.R.T. and A.M.L.S. conceived and wrote the paper.

Funding

This research was funded by Portuguese National Funds, through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, and as applicable co-financed by the FEDER within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement by funding the Organic Chemistry Research Unit (QOPNA) (UID/QUI/00062/2013) and the cE3c centre (UID/BIA/00329/2013).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank also to University of Azores, University of Aveiro by the Organic Chemistry, Natural Products and Food Stuffs (QOPNA) unit, and Azorean Biodiversity Group (GBA) for technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviation

5-FuFluorouracil
A375Human malignant melanoma
A549Human lung carcinoma
AIFApoptosis inducing factor
AKR1B10Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B10
AKT/PKBProtein kinase B
AMPKAdenosine monophosphate -activated protein kinase
ATPAdenosine triphosphate
Amyloid-β
BaxBcl-2-associated X
BChEButyrylcholinesterase
BGC-823Gastric carcinoma
C6Rat glial tumor
CaMKIICa2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II
Cdc2Cyclin-dependent protein kinase 2
Cdc25CCell division cycle 25C protein
CGCCerebellar granule cells
CNSCentral nervous system
CoACoenzyme A
CUSChronic unpredictable stress
DNADeoxyribonucleic acid
DNCB2,4-Dinitrochlorobenzene
DPP-IVDipeptidyl peptidase IV
DPTDeoxypodophyllotoxin
DPT-HP-β-CDMixture of deoxypodophyllotoxin with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin
DU145Human prostate cancer
DZRDexrazoxane
EC50Half maximal effective concentration
EJ138Human bladder carcinoma
ERKExtracellular signal-regulated kinase
FADFlavin adenine dinucleotide
GIPGlucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide
GLP-1Glucagon-like peptide 1
GSHGlutathione
H9c2Rat cardiomyoblasts
HaCaTNontumorigenic human epidermal cells
HCT-8Human colorectal adenocarcinoma
HCT116Human colon cancer
HeLaHuman cervical carcinoma
Hep3BHuman hepatoma
HepG2Human hepatocellular carcinoma
HFF-1Human normal fibroblast
HL-7702Human liver normal
HO-8910Human ovarian carcinoma
HT-29Human colon carcinoma
HUVECHuman umbilical vein endothelial cells
IC50Half maximal inhibitory concentration
IgEImmunoglobulin E
IL-4Interleukin 4
JeG-3Human choriocarcinoma
L-02Human fetal hepatocyte normal cell line
LTPLong-term potentiation
MCF-7/AAcquired resistant human breast cancer
MCF-7/SHuman breast cancer
MCF-7Human breast cancer
MDA-MB-231Human breast adenocarcinoma
MDCKMadin-Darby canine kidney cells
MGC-803Human gastric cancer
Mia-PaCa2Human pancreatic carcinoma
MICMinimum inhibitory concentration
MMPMitochondrial membrane potential
MMP-9Matrix metallopeptidase 9
MPP+1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium
MPTP1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine
mTORMammalian target of rapamycin
N2AMouse neuroblastoma
NAD(P)+Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
NCI-H460Human lung carcinoma
NONitric oxide
Nrf2Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2
OVCAR-3Human ovarian adenocarcinoma
PARPoly (ADP-ribose)
PARP-1Poly (ADP-ribose) synthetase 1
PBPK-PDPhysiologically based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic
PC-3Human prostate cancer
PGD2Prostaglandin D2
PKB/HO-1Protein kinase B/heme oxygenase-1
PKCProtein kinase C
PTENPhosphatase and tensin homolog
RAW 267.4Macrophage normal cell line
RNARibonucleic acid
ROSReactive oxygen species
SF126Human glioblastoma
SGC-7901Gastric carcinoma
SHG-44Human malignant glioma
SISelective index
SK-OV-3Ovarian cancer
Skp2S-phase kinase protein 2
SODSuperoxide dismutase
STAT3Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
TGFTransforming growth factor
TIMP-1TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1
TKTTransketolase
TNF-αTumor necrosis factor α
U-87 MGHuman glioblastoma-astrocytoma
VGSCVoltage-gated Na+ channels
WI-38Human lung fibroblast normal cells

References

  1. Youngs, R.L.; Hamza, M.F. Wood: History of use. In Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering, 1st ed.; Hashmi, S., Ed.; Elsevier Inc.: Oxford, UK, 2016; pp. 1–7. ISBN 978-0-12-803581-8. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lukešová, H.; Palau, A.S.; Holst, B. Identifying plant fibre textiles from Norwegian Merovingian period and Viking age graves: The late iron age collection of the University Museum of Bergen. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2017, 13, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Prinsloo, G.; Nogemane, N.; Street, R. The use of plants containing genotoxic carcinogens as foods and medicine. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 116, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Falzon, C.C.; Balabanova, A. Phytotherapy: An introduction to herbal medicine. Prim. Care Clin. Off. Pract. 2017, 44, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ghosh, N.; Ghosh, R.C.; Kundu, A.; Mandal, S.C. Herb and drug interaction. In Natural Products and Drug Discovery, 1st ed.; Mandal, S.C., Mandal, V., Konishi, T., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Oxford, UK, 2018; pp. 467–490. ISBN 978-0-08-102081-4. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rangel, M.L.; Guerrero-Analco, J.A.; Monribot-Villanueva, J.L.; Kiel-Martínez, A.L.; Avendaño-Reyes, S.; Abad, J.P.D.; Bonilla-Landa, I.; Dávalos-Sotelo, R.; Olivares-Romero, J.L.; Angeles, G. Anatomical and chemical characteristics of leaves and branches of Juniperus deppeana var. deppeana (Cupressaceae): A potential source of raw materials for the perfume and sweet candies industries. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 113, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. The Plant List. Available online: http://www.theplantlist.org/1.1/browse/G/Cupressaceae/Juniperus (accessed on 28 May 2018).
  8. Khan, M.; Khan, A.; Rehman, N.; Gilani, A.H. Pharmacological explanation for the medicinal use of Juniperus excelsa in hyperactive gastrointestinal and respiratory disorders. J. Nat. Med. 2012, 66, 292–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Orhan, N.; Aslan, M.; Pekcan, M.; Orhan, D.D.; Bedir, E.; Ergun, F. Identification of hypoglycaemic compounds from berries of Juniperus oxycedrus subsp. oxycedrus through bioactivity guided isolation technique. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 139, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sharma, A.; Flores-Vallejo, R.C.; Cardoso-Taketa, A.; Villarreal, M.L. Antibacterial activities of medicinal plants used in Mexican traditional medicine. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 208, 264–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bais, S.; Gill, N.S.; Rana, N.; Shandil, S. A Phytopharmacological review on a medicinal plant: Juniperus communis. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2014, 2014, 634723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Seca, A.M.L.; Silva, A.M.S. The chemical composition of the Juniperus genus (1970–2004). In Recent Progress in Medicinal Plants; Govil, J.N., Singh, V.K., Bhardwaj, R., Eds.; Studium Press LLC: Houston, TX, USA, 2006; Volume 16, pp. 401–522. ISBN 0-9761849–8–2. [Google Scholar]
  13. Seca, A.M.L.; Pinto, D.C.G.A.; Silva, A.M.S. The current status of bioactive metabolites from the genus Juniperus. In Bioactive Phytochemicals: Perspectives for Modern Medicine; Gupta, V.K., Ed.; M/S Daya Publishing House: New Delhi, India, 2015; Volume 3, pp. 365–407. ISBN 9789351246749. [Google Scholar]
  14. Al-Snafi, A.E. Medical importance of Juniperus communis—A review. Indo Am. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 5, 1779–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Al-Snafi, A.E. Pharmacological and therapeutic effects of Juniperus oxycedrus—A review. Indo Am. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 5, 2198–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jung, H.J.; Min, B.-S.; Jung, H.A.; Choi, J.S. Sesquiterpenoids from the heartwood of Juniperus chinensis. Nat. Prod. Sci. 2017, 23, 208–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, S.; Park, N.-J.; Bong, S.-K.; Jegal, J.; Park, S.-A.; Kim, S.-N.; Yang, M.H. Ameliorative effects of Juniperus rigida fruit on oxazolone- and 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene-induced atopic dermatitis in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 214, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Groshi, A.A.; Evans, A.R.; Ismail, F.M.D.; Nahar, L.; Sarker, S.D. Cytotoxicity of Libyan Juniperus phoenicea against human cancer cell lines A549, EJ138, HepG2 and MCF7. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 24, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Venditti, A.; Maggi, F.; Quassinti, L.; Bramucci, M.; Lupidi, G.; Ornano, L.; Ballero, M.; Sanna, C.; Bruno, M.; Rosselli, S.; et al. Bioactive constituents of Juniperus turbinata Gussone from La Maddalena Archipelago. Chem. Biodivers. 2018, e1800148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Costa, S.; Cavadas, C.; Cavaleiro, C.; Salgueiro, L.; do Céu Sousa, M. In vitro susceptibility of Trypanosoma brucei brucei to selected essential oils and their major components. Exp. Parasitol. 2018, 190, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhang, K.; Yao, L. The anxiolytic effect of Juniperus virginiana L. essential oil and determination of its active constituents. Physiol. Behav. 2018, 189, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Inci, H.; Ozdemir, G.; Sengul, A.Y.; Sogut, B.; Nursoy, H.; Sengul, T. Using juniper berry (Juniperus communis) as a supplement in Japanese quail diets. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2016, 45, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Brischke, C.; Hesse, C.; Meyer-Veltrup, L.; Humar, M. Studies on the material resistance and moisture dynamics of Common juniper, English yew, Black cherry, and Rowan. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 13, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ateş, S.; Gür, M.; Özkan, O.E.; Akça, M.; Olgun, Ç.; Güder, A. Chemical contents and antifungal activity of some durable wood extractives vs. Pleurotus ostreatus. Bioresources 2015, 10, 2433–2443. [Google Scholar]
  25. Koruk, S.T.; Ozyilkan, E.; Kava, P.; Colak, D.; Donderici, O.; Cesaretli, Y. Juniper tar poisoning. Clin. Toxicol. 2005, 43, 47–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. González, M.A. Aromatic abietane diterpenoids: Their biological activity and synthesis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015, 32, 684–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Agudelo-Gómez, L.S.; Betancur-Galvis, L.A.; González, M.A. Anti HHV-1 and HHV-2 activity in vitro of abietic and dehydroabietic acid derivatives. Pharmacologyonline 2012, 1, 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zaidi, S.F.H.; Awale, S.; Kalauni, S.K.; Tezuka, Y.; Esumi, H.; Kadota, S. Diterpenes from “Pini Resina” and their preferential cytotoxic activity under nutrient-deprived condition. Planta Med. 2006, 72, 1231–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Tanaka, R.; Tokuda, H.; Ezaki, Y. Cancer chemopreventive activity of “rosin” constituents of Pinus spez. and their derivatives in two-stage mouse skin carcinogenesis test. Phytomedicine 2008, 15, 985–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sepúlveda, B.; Astudillo, L.; Rodríguez, J.A.; Yáñez, T.; Theoduloz, C.; Schmeda-Hirschmann, G. Gastroprotective and cytotoxic effect of dehydroabietic acid derivatives. Pharmacol. Res. 2005, 52, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Fallarero, A.; Skogman, M.; Kujala, J.; Rajaratnam, M.; Moreira, V.M.; Yli-Kauhaluoma, J.; Vuorela, P. (+)-Dehydroabietic Acid, an Abietane-Type Diterpene, Inhibits Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms in vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 12054–12072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jang, H.J.; Yang, K.-S. Inhibition of nitric oxide production in RAW 264.7 macrophages by diterpenoids from Phellinus pini. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2011, 34, 913–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hou, W.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, G.; Cao, D.; Li, D.; Ruan, H.; Ruan, B.H.; Su, L.; Xu, H. Click chemistry-based synthesis and anticancer activity evaluation of novel C-14 1,2,3-triazole dehydroabietic acid hybrids. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 138, 1042–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, W.-M.; Yao, Y.; Yang, T.; Wang, X.-Y.; Zhu, Z.-Y.; Xu, W.-T.; Lin, H.-X.; Gao, Z.-B.; Zhou, H.; Yang, C.-G.; et al. The synthesis and antistaphylococcal activity of N-sulfonaminoethyloxime derivatives of dehydroabietic acid. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 1943–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Han, J.-W.; Shim, D.-W.; Shin, W.-Y.; Kim, M.-K.; Shim, E.-J.; Sun, X.; Koppula, S.; Kim, T.-J.; Kang, T.-B.; Lee, K.-H. Juniperus rigida Sieb. extract inhibits inflammatory responses via attenuation of TRIF-dependent signaling and inflammasome activation. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 190, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Samoylenko, V.; Dunbar, D.C.; Gafur, M.A.; Khan, S.I.; Ross, S.A.; Mossa, J.S.; El-Feraly, F.S.; Tekwani, B.L.; Bosselaers, J.; Muhammad, I. Antiparasitic, nematicidal and antifouling constituents from Juniperus berries. Phytother. Res. 2008, 22, 1570–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Becerra, J.; Flores, C.; Mena, J.; Aqueveque, P.; Alarcón, J.; Bittner, M.; Hernández, V.; Hoeneisen, M.; Ruiz, E.; Silva, M. Antifungal and antibacterial activity of diterpenes isolated from wood extractables of Chilean Podocarpaceae. Bol. Soc. Chil. Quim. 2002, 47, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mossa, J.S.; El-Feraly, F.S.; Muhammad, I. Antimycobacterial constituents from Juniperus procera, Ferula communis and Plumbago zeylanica and their in vitro synergistic activity with isonicotinic acid hydrazide. Phytother. Res. 2004, 18, 934–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Smith, E.C.J.; Williamson, E.M.; Wareham, N.; Kaatz, G.W.; Gibbons, S. Antibacterials and modulators of bacterial resistance from the immature cones of Chamaecyparis lawsoniana. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Smith, E.C.J.; Wareham, N.; Zloh, M.; Gibbons, S. 2b-Acetoxyferruginol—A new antibacterial abietane diterpene from the bark of Prumnopitys andina. Phytochem. Lett. 2008, 1, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ryu, Y.B.; Jeong, H.J.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, Y.M.; Park, J.-Y.; Kim, D.; Naguyen, T.T.H.; Park, S.-J.; Chang, J.S.; Park, K.H.; et al. Biflavonoids from Torreya nucifera displaying SARS-CoV 3CLpro inhibition. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 7940–7947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yang, J.; Xu, C.; Chen, H.; Huang, M.; Ma, X.; Deng, S.; Huang, Y.; Wen, Y.; Yang, X.; Song, P. In vitro and in vivo antitumor effects of the diterpene-enriched extract from Taxodium ascendens through the mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis pathway. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 96, 1199–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Shankar, G.M.; Li, S.; Mehta, T.H.; Garcia-Munoz, A.; Shepardson, N.E.; Smith, I.; Brett, F.M.; Farrell, M.A.; Rowan, M.J.; Lemere, C.A.; et al. Amyloid β-protein dimers isolated directly from Alzheimer brains impair synaptic plasticity and memory. Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 837–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kuchibhotla, K.V.; Goldman, S.T.; Lattarulo, C.R.; Wu, H.-Y.; Hyman, B.T.; Bacskai, B.J. Aβ plaques lead to aberrant regulation of calcium homeostasis in vivo resulting in structural and functional disruption of neuronal networks. Neuron 2008, 59, 214–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zolezzi, J.M.; Lindsay, C.B.; Serrano, F.G.; Ureta, R.C.; Theoduloz, C.; Schmeda-Hirschmann, G.; Inestrosa, N.C. Neuroprotective effects of ferruginol, jatrophone, and junicedric acid against amyloid-β injury in hippocampal neurons. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2018, 63, 705–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yang, H.-W.; Hu, X.-D.; Zhang, H.-M.; Xin, W.-J.; Li, M.-T.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, L.-J.; Liu, X.-G. Roles of CaMKII, PKA, and PKC in the induction and maintenance of LTP of C-fiber-evoked field potentials in rat spinal dorsal horn. J. Neurophysiol. 2004, 91, 1122–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Roa-Linares, V.C.; Brand, Y.M.; Agudelo-Gomez, L.S.; Tangarife-Castaño, V.; Betancur-Galvis, L.A.; Gallego-Gomez, J.C.; González, M.A. Anti-herpetic and anti-dengue activity of abietane ferruginol analogues synthesized from (+)-dehydroabietylamine. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 108, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Fan, S.-Y.; Zeng, H.-W.; Pei, Y.-H.; Li, L.; Ye, J.; Pan, Y.-X.; Zhang, J.-G.; Yuan, X.; Zhang, W.-D. The anti-inflammatory activities of an extract and compounds isolated from Platycladus orientalis (Linnaeus) Franco in vitro and ex vivo. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 141, 647–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chen, Y.-C.; Li, Y.-C.; You, B.-J.; Chang, W.-T.; Chao, L.K.; Lo, L.-C.; Wang, S.-Y.; Huang, G.-J.; Kuo, Y.-H. Diterpenoids with anti-inflammatory activity from the wood of Cunninghamia konishii. Molecules 2013, 18, 682–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Gaspar-Marques, C.; Simões, M.F.; Valdeira, M.L.; Rodríguez, B. Terpenoids and phenolics from Plectranthus strigosus. Nat. Prod. Res. 2008, 22, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Alqasoumi, S.I.; Abdel-Kader, M.S. Terpenoids from Juniperus procera with hepatoprotective activity. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 25, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Wang, W.-S.; Li, E.-W.; Jia, Z.-J. Terpenes from Juniperus przewalskii and their antitumor activities. Pharmazie 2002, 57, 343–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, Y.-W.; Yang, C.-T.; Gong, C.-L.; Chen, Y.-H.; Chen, Y.-W.; Wu, K.-C.; Cheng, T.-H.; Kuo, Y.-H.; Chen, Y.-F.; Leung, Y.-M. Inhibition of voltage-gated Na+ channels by hinokiol in neuronal cells. Pharmacol. Rep. 2015, 67, 1049–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Seca, A.M.L.; Silva, A.M.S. The chemical composition of hexane extract from bark of Juniperus brevifolia. Nat. Prod. Res. 2008, 22, 975–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Seca, A.M.L.; Silva, A.M.S.; Bazzocchi, I.L.; Jimenez, I.A. Diterpene constituents of leaves from Juniperus brevifolia. Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 498–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Bajpai, V.K.; Sharma, A.; Kang, S.C.; Baek, K.-H. Antioxidant, lipid peroxidation inhibition and free radical scavenging efficacy of a diterpenoid compound sugiol isolated from Metasequoia glyptostroboides. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2014, 7, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bajpai, V.K.; Kang, S.C. A diterpenoid sugiol from Metasequoia glyptostroboides with α-glucosidase and tyrosinase inhibitory potential. Bangladesh J. Pharmacol. 2014, 9, 312–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bajpai, V.K.; Kim, N.-H.; Kim, K.; Kang, S.C. Antiviral potential of a diterpenoid compound sugiol from Metasequoia glyptostroboides. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 29, 1077–1080. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  59. Jung, S.-N.; Shin, D.-S.; Kim, H.-N.; Jeon, Y.J.; Yun, J.; Lee, Y.-J.; Kang, J.S.; Han, D.C.; Kwon, B.-M. Sugiol inhibits STAT3 activity via regulation of transketolase and ROS-mediated ERK activation in DU145 prostate carcinoma cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2015, 97, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Wang, J.; Zhang, X.; Ma, D.; Lee, W.-N.; Xiao, J.; Zhao, Y.; Go, V.L.; Wang, Q.; Yen, Y.; Recker, R.; et al. Inhibition of transketolase by oxythiamine altered dynamics of protein signals in pancreatic cancer cells. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 2013, 2, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Aggarwal, B.B.; Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Harikumar, K.B.; Gupta, S.R.; Tharakan, S.T.; Koca, C.; Dey, S.; Sung, B. Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3, inflammation, and cancer: How intimate is the relationship? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1171, 59–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Hao, C.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Shang, H.; Bao, J.; Wang, H.; Li, Z. Sugiol (12-hydroxyabieta-8,11,13-trien-7-one) targets human pancreatic carcinoma cells (Mia-PaCa2) by inducing apoptosis, G2/M cell cycle arrest, ROS production and inhibition of cancer cell migration. J. BUON 2018, 23, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Cox, R.E.; Yamamoto, S.; Otto, A.; Simoneit, B.R.T. Oxygenated di- and tricyclic diterpenoids of southern hemisphere conifers. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2007, 35, 342–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jaiswal, R.; Beuria, T.K.; Mohan, R.; Mahajan, S.K.; Panda, D. Totarol inhibits bacterial cytokinesis by perturbing the assembly dynamics of FtsZ. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 4211–4220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kim, M.B.; O’Brien, T.E.; Moore, J.T.; Anderson, D.E.; Foss, M.H.; Weibel, D.B.; Ames, J.B.; Shaw, J.T. The synthesis and antimicrobial activity of heterocyclic derivatives of totarol. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 818–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Foss, M.H.; Eun, Y.-J.; Grove, C.I.; Pauw, D.A.; Sorto, N.A.; Rensvold, J.W.; Pagliarini, D.J.; Shaw, J.T.; Weibel, D.B. Inhibitors of bacterial tubulin target bacterial membranes in vivo. Med. Chem. Commun. 2013, 4, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Clarkson, C.; Musonda, C.C.; Chibale, K.; Campbell, W.E.; Smith, P. Synthesis of totarol amino alcohol derivatives and their antiplasmodial activity and cytotoxicity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003, 11, 4417–4422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tacon, C.; Guantai, E.M.; Smith, P.J.; Chibale, K. Synthesis, biological evaluation and mechanistic studies of totarol amino alcohol derivatives as potential antimalarial agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Smith, E.C.J.; Kaatz, G.W.; Seo, S.M.; Wareham, N.; Williamson, E.M.; Gibbons, S. The phenolic diterpene totarol inhibits multidrug efflux pump activity in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 4480–4483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Gordien, A.Y.; Gray, A.I.; Franzblau, S.G.; Seidel, V. Antimycobacterial terpenoids from Juniperus communis L. (Cuppressaceae). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 126, 500–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Evans, G.B.; Furneaux, R.H.; Gainsford, G.J.; Murphy, M.P. The synthesis and antibacterial activity of totarol derivatives. Part 3: Modification of ring-B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2000, 8, 1663–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Reddy, P.J.; Ray, S.; Sathe, G.J.; Gajbhiye, A.; Prasad, T.S.K.; Rapole, S.; Panda, D.; Srivastava, S. A comprehensive proteomic analysis of totarol induced alterations in Bacillus subtilis by multipronged quantitative proteomics. J. Proteom. 2015, 114, 247–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Gao, Y.; Xu, X.; Chang, S.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Ran, S.; Huang, Z.; Li, P.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; et al. Totarol prevents neuronal injury in vitro and ameliorates brain ischemic stroke: Potential roles of Akt activation and HO-1 induction. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2015, 289, 142–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Yu, S.; Yan, H.; Zhang, L.; Shan, M.; Chen, P.; Ding, A.; Li, S.F.Y. A review on the phytochemistry, pharmacology, and pharmacokinetics of amentoflavone, a naturally-occurring biflavonoid. Molecules 2017, 22, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Lee, C.-W.; Na, Y.; Park, N.-H.; Kim, H.-S.; Ahn, S.M.; Kim, J.W.; Kim, H.-K.; Jang, Y.P. Amentoflavone inhibits UVB-induced matrix metalloproteinase-1 expression through the modulation of AP-1 components in normal human fibroblasts. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 166, 1137–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Hwang, I.-S.; Lee, J.; Jin, H.-G.; Woo, E.-R.; Lee, D.G. Amentoflavone stimulates mitochondrial dysfunction and induces apoptotic cell death in Candida albicans. Mycopathologia 2012, 173, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Coulerie, P.; Nour, M.; Maciuk, A.; Eydoux, C.; Guillemot, J.-C.; Lebouvier, N.; Hnawia, E.; Leblanc, K.; Lewin, G.; Canard, B.; et al. Structure-activity relationship study of biflavonoids on the Dengue virus polymerase DENV-NS5 RdRp. Planta Med. 2013, 79, 1313–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Li, X.; Wang, L.; Han, W.; Mai, W.; Han, L.; Chen, D. Amentoflavone protects against hydroxyl radical-induced DNA damage via antioxidant mechanism. Turk. J. Biochem. 2014, 39, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Abdallah, H.M.; Almowallad, F.M.; Esmat, A.; Shehata, I.A.; Abdel-Sattar, E.A. Anti-inflammatory activity of flavonoids from Chrozophora tinctoria. Phytochem. Lett. 2015, 13, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Laishram, S.; Sheikh, Y.; Moirangthem, D.S.; Deb, L.; Pal, B.C.; Talukdar, N.C.; Borah, J.C. Anti-diabetic molecules from Cycas pectinata Griff. traditionally used by the Maiba-Maibi. Phytomedicine 2015, 22, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. An, J.; Li, Z.; Dong, Y.; Ren, J.; Huo, J. Amentoflavone protects against psoriasis-like skin lesion through suppression of NF-κB-mediated inflammation and keratinocyte proliferation. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2016, 413, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Aguilar, M.I.; Benítez, W.V.; Colín, A.; Bye, R.; Ríos-Gómez, R.; Calzada, F. Evaluation of the diuretic activity in two Mexican medicinal species: Selaginella nothohybrida and S. lepidophylla and its effects with ciclooxigenases inhibitors. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 163, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Chen, J.-H.; Chen, W.-L.; Liu, Y.-C. Amentoflavone induces anti-angiogenic and anti-metastatic effects through suppression of NF-κB activation in MCF-7 cells. Anticancer Res. 2015, 35, 6685–6694. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Ndongo, J.T.; Issa, M.E.; Messi, A.N.; Mbing, J.N.; Cuendet, M.; Pegnyemb, D.E.; Bochet, C.G. Cytotoxic flavonoids and other constituents from the stem bark of Ochna schweinfurthiana. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 1684–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Jeong, E.J.; Hwang, L.; Lee, M.; Lee, K.Y.; Ahn, M.-J.; Sung, S.H. Neuroprotective biflavonoids of Chamaecyparis obtusa leaves against glutamate-induced oxidative stress in HT22 hippocampal cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 64, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Zha, X.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Xu, L.; Huang, H.; Zhang, J.; Cui, L.; Zhou, C.; Xu, D. Amentoflavone enhances osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells through JNK and p38 MAPK pathways. J. Nat. Med. 2016, 70, 634–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Zheng, X.-K.; Liu, C.-X.; Zhai, Y.-Y.; Li, L.-L.; Wang, X.-L.; Feng, W.-S. Protection effect of amentoflavone in Selaginella tamariscina against TNF-α-induced vascular injure of endothelial cells. Acta Pharm. Sin. 2013, 48, 1503–1509. [Google Scholar]
  88. Garza, L.A.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Alagesan, B.; Lawson, J.A.; Norberg, S.M.; Loy, D.E.; Zhao, T.; Blatt, H.B.; Stanton, D.C.; et al. Prostaglandin D2 inhibits hair growth and is elevated in bald scalp of men with androgenetic alopecia. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 126ra34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Fong, P.; Tong, H.H.Y.; Ng, K.H.; Lao, C.K.; Chong, C.I.; Chao, C.M. In silico prediction of prostaglandin D2 synthase inhibitors from herbal constituents for the treatment of hair loss. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 175, 470–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Brodie, A.; Sabnis, G.; Jelovac, D. Aromatase and breast cancer. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2006, 102, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Tascioglu, A.; Ozcan, S.; Akdemir, A.; Orhan, H.G. In vitro and in silico evaluation of aromatase inhibitory activity of apigenin and amentoflavone; dual benefit of St. John’s Wort in postmenopausal women. Toxicol. Lett. 2016, 258, S125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bais, S.; Abrol, N.; Prashar, Y.; Kumari, R. Modulatory effect of standardised amentoflavone isolated from Juniperus communis L. against Freund’s adjuvant induced arthritis in rats (histopathological and X Ray analysis). Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 86, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Cao, Q.; Qin, L.; Huang, F.; Wang, X.; Yang, L.; Shi, H.; Wu, H.; Zhang, B.; Chen, Z.; Wu, X. Amentoflavone protects dopaminergic neurons in MPTP-induced Parkinson’s disease model mice through PI3K/Akt and ERK signaling pathways. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2017, 319, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Liu, H.; Yue, Q.; He, S. Amentoflavone suppresses tumor growth in ovarian cancer by modulating Skp2. Life Sci. 2017, 189, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Jung, Y.-J.; Lee, E.H.; Lee, C.G.; Rhee, K.-J.; Jung, W.-S.; Choi, Y.; Pan, C.-H.; Kang, K. AKR1B10-inhibitory Selaginella tamariscina extract and amentoflavone decrease the growth of A549 human lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 202, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Chun, K.-S.; Kundu, J.; Kundu, J.K.; Surh, Y.-J. Targeting Nrf2-Keap1 signaling for chemoprevention of skin carcinogenesis with bioactive phytochemicals. Toxicol. Lett. 2014, 229, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Wahyudi, L.D.; Jeong, J.; Yang, H.; Kim, J.-H. Amentoflavone-induced oxidative stress activates NF-E2-related factor 2 via the p38 MAP kinase-AKT pathway in human keratinocytes. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2018, 99, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Liao, W.-L.; Lee, W.-J.; Chen, C.-C.; Lu, C.H.; Chen, C.-H.; Chou, Y.-C.; Lee, I.-T.; Sheu, W.H.-H.; Wu, J.-Y.; Yang, C.-F.; et al. Pharmacogenetics of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors in a Taiwanese population with type 2 diabetes. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 18050–18058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Beidokhti, M.N.; Lobbens, E.S.; Rasoavaivo, P.; Staerk, D.; Jäger, A.K. Investigation of medicinal plants from Madagascar against DPP-IV linked to type 2 diabetes. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2018, 115, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yaglioglu, A.S.; Eser, F. Screening of some Juniperus extracts for the phenolic compounds and their antiproliferative activities. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 113, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ganeshpurkar, A.; Saluja, A.K. The pharmacological potential of rutin. Saudi Pharm. J. 2017, 25, 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Gullón, B.; Lú-Chau, T.A.; Moreira, M.T.; Lema, J.M.; Eibes, G. Rutin: A review on extraction, identification and purification methods, biological activities and approaches to enhance its bioavailability. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 67, 220–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, B.; Tong, Q.; Ren, L. Rutin protects against pirarubicin-induced cardiotoxicity through TGF-β1-p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 2017, 1759385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Parashar, A.; Mehta, V.; Udayabanu, M. Rutin alleviates chronic unpredictable stress-induced behavioral alterations and hippocampal damage in mice. Neurosci. Lett. 2017, 656, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Chakravarty, S.; Reddy, B.R.; Sudhakar, S.R.; Saxena, S.; Das, T.; Meghah, V.; Swamy, C.V.B.; Kumar, A.; Idris, M.M. Chronic unpredictable stress (CUS)-induced anxiety and related mood disorders in a zebrafish model: Altered brain proteome profile implicates mitochondrial dysfunction. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Renouard, S.; Lopez, T.; Hendrawati, O.; Dupre, P.; Doussot, J.; Falguieres, A.; Ferroud, C.; Hagege, D.; Lamblin, F.; Laine, E.; et al. Podophyllotoxin and deoxypodophyllotoxin in Juniperus bermudiana and 12 other Juniperus species: Optimization of extraction, method validation, and quantification. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 8101–8107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Zhao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Q.; Kasimu, R.; Aisa, H.A. Isolation of deoxypodophyllotoxin and podophyllotoxin from Juniperus sabina by high speed counter current chromatography. Afinidad 2016, 73, 236–239. [Google Scholar]
  108. Muto, N.; Tomokuni, T.; Haramoto, M.; Tatemoto, H.; Nakanishi, T.; Inatomi, Y.; Murata, H.; Inada, A. Isolation of apoptosis and differentiation inducing substances toward human promyelocytic leukemia HL-60 cells from leaves of Juniperus taxifolia. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2008, 72, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Jiang, Z.; Wu, M.; Miao, J.; Duan, H.; Zhang, S.; Chen, M.; Sun, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, X.; et al. Deoxypodophyllotoxin exerts both anti-angiogenic and vascular disrupting effects. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2013, 45, 1710–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Wu, M.; Jiang, Z.; Duan, H.; Sun, L.; Zhang, S.; Chen, M.; Wang, Y.; Gao, Q.; Song, Y.; Zhu, X.; et al. Deoxypodophyllotoxin triggers necroptosis in human non-small cell lung cancer NCI-H460 cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2013, 67, 701–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Wang, Y.-R.; Xu, Y.; Jiang, Z.-Z.; Guerram, M.; Wang, B.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, L.-Y. Deoxypodophyllotoxin induces G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in SGC-7901 cells and inhibits tumor growth in vivo. Molecules 2015, 20, 1661–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Wang, Y.; Wang, B.; Guerram, M.; Sun, L.; Shi, W.; Tian, C.; Zhu, X.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, L. Deoxypodophyllotoxin suppresses tumor vasculature in HUVECs by promoting cytoskeleton remodeling through LKB1-AMPK dependent Rho A activation. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 29497–29512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Jin, M.; Moon, T.C.; Quan, Z.; Lee, E.; Kim, Y.K.; Yang, J.H.; Suh, S.-J.; Jeong, T.C.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, C.-H.; et al. The naturally occurring flavolignan, deoxypodophyllotoxin, inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced iNOS expression through the NF-κB activation in RAW264.7 macrophage cells. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2008, 31, 1312–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Guerram, M.; Jiang, Z.-Z.; Sun, L.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, L.-Y. Antineoplastic effects of deoxypodophyllotoxin, a potent cytotoxic agent of plant origin, on glioblastoma U-87 MG and SF126 cells. Pharmacol. Rep. 2015, 67, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Zang, X.; Wang, G.; Cai, Q.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Q.; Wu, B.; Zhu, X.; Hao, H.; Zhou, F. A promising microtubule inhibitor deoxypodophyllotoxin exhibits better efficacy to multidrug-resistant breast cancer than paclitaxel via avoiding efflux transport. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2018, 46, 542–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Dumontet, C.; Jordan, M.A. Microtubule-binding agents: A dynamic field of cancer therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 790–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Khaled, M.; Belaaloui, G.; Jiang, Z.-Z.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, L.-Y. Antitumor effect of deoxypodophyllotoxin on human breast cancer xenograft transplanted in BALB/c nude mice model. J. Infect. Chemother. 2016, 22, 692–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Montecucco, A.; Zanetta, F.; Biamonti, G. Molecular mechanisms of etoposide. EXCLI J. 2015, 14, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Seca, A.M.L.; Pinto, D.C.G.A. Plant secondary metabolites as anticancer agents: Successes in clinical trials and therapeutic application. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Hu, S.; Zhou, Q.; Wu, W.-R.; Duan, Y.-X.; Gao, Z.-Y.; Li, Y.-W.; Lu, Q. Anticancer effect of deoxypodophyllotoxin induces apoptosis of human prostate cancer cells. Oncol. Lett. 2016, 12, 2918–2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. Fatokun, A.A.; Dawson, V.L.; Dawson, T.M. Parthanatos: Mitochondrial-linked mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171, 2000–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Ma, D.; Lu, B.; Feng, C.; Wang, C.; Wang, Y.; Luo, T.; Feng, J.; Jia, H.; Chi, G.; Luo, Y.; et al. Deoxypodophyllotoxin triggers parthanatos in glioma cells via induction of excessive ROS. Cancer Lett. 2016, 371, 194–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Ouyang, L.; Shi, Z.; Zhao, S.; Wang, F.-T.; Zhou, T.-T.; Liu, B.; Bao, J.-K. Programmed cell death pathways in cancer: A review of apoptosis, autophagy and programmed necrosis. Cell Prolif. 2012, 45, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Xu, J.; Wu, Y.; Lu, G.; Xie, S.; Ma, Z.; Chen, Z.; Shen, H.-M.; Xia, D. Importance of ROS-mediated autophagy in determining apoptotic cell death induced by physapubescin B. Redox Biol. 2017, 12, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Kenific, C.M.; Debnath, J. Cellular and metabolic functions for autophagy in cancer cells. Trends Cell Biol. 2015, 25, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Kim, S.-H.; Son, K.-M.; Kim, K.-Y.; Yu, S.-N.; Park, S.-G.; Kim, Y.-W.; Nam, H.-W.; Suh, J.-T.; Ji, J.-H.; Ahn, S.-C. Deoxypodophyllotoxin induces cytoprotective autophagy against apoptosis via inhibition of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in osteosarcoma U2OS cells. Pharmacol. Rep. 2017, 69, 878–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Chen, Y.; Zhao, K.; Liu, F.; Li, Y.; Zhong, Z.; Hong, S.; Liu, X.; Liu, L. Predicting antitumor effect of deoxypodophyllotoxin in NCI-H460 tumor-bearing mice on the basis of in vitro pharmacodynamics and a physiologically based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2018, 46, 897–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Guan, X.-W.; Xu, X.-H.; Feng, S.-L.; Tang, Z.-B.; Chen, S.-W.; Hui, L. Synthesis of hybrid 4-deoxypodophyllotoxin-5-fluorouracil compounds that inhibit cellular migration and induce cell cycle arrest. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 1561–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Xiang, R.; Guan, X.-W.; Hui, L.; Jin, Y.-X.; Chen, S.-W. Investigation of the anti-angiogenesis effects induced by deoxypodophyllotoxin-5-FU conjugate C069 against HUVE cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 27, 713–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Zhu, X.; Fu, J.; Tang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, S.; Guo, Q. Design and synthesis of novel 4’-demethyl-4-deoxypodophyllotoxin derivatives as potential anticancer agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 1360–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Khaled, M.; Jiang, Z.-Z.; Zhang, L.-Y. Deoxypodophyllotoxin: A promising therapeutic agent from herbal medicine. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 149, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Yang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhong, Z.-Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, F.; Jia, L.-L.; Liu, L.; Zhu, X.; Liu, X.-D. Validated LC–MS/MS assay for quantitative determination of deoxypodophyllotoxin in rat plasma and its application in pharmacokinetic study. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2014, 88, 410–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Dehydroabietic acid (1) identified in Juniperus species and its derivatives (1a and 1b) with significant cytotoxic and antibacterial activities.
Figure 1. Dehydroabietic acid (1) identified in Juniperus species and its derivatives (1a and 1b) with significant cytotoxic and antibacterial activities.
Medicines 05 00081 g001
Figure 2. Ferruginol (2) from Juniperus species and the most active antiviral derivative (2a).
Figure 2. Ferruginol (2) from Juniperus species and the most active antiviral derivative (2a).
Medicines 05 00081 g002
Figure 3. Diterpenes (3–5) from Juniperus species with significant pharmacological potential.
Figure 3. Diterpenes (3–5) from Juniperus species with significant pharmacological potential.
Medicines 05 00081 g003
Figure 4. The bioactive flavonoids amentoflavone (6) and rutin (7) from Juniperus species.
Figure 4. The bioactive flavonoids amentoflavone (6) and rutin (7) from Juniperus species.
Medicines 05 00081 g004
Figure 5. The bioactive lignan deoxypodophyllotoxin (8) identified in Juniperus species and its cytotoxic derivatives (8a) and (8b).
Figure 5. The bioactive lignan deoxypodophyllotoxin (8) identified in Juniperus species and its cytotoxic derivatives (8a) and (8b).
Medicines 05 00081 g005
Table 1. The key points of each secondary metabolite highlighted.
Table 1. The key points of each secondary metabolite highlighted.
CompoundBiological Activity (Tested Model)Level of Activity a (Control/Mechanism b)Ref.
1aAntitumor (PC-3, SK-OV-3, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cell lines)IC50 = 0.7–1.2 μM (IC50 = 5.2–24.5 μM to 5-FU)[33]
1bAntibacterial (Staphylococcus aureus Newman)MIC = 0.63–1.2 μM (MIC = 0.54–1.1 μM to vancomycin)[34]
2Antitumor (HepG2 cell line)IC50 = 39.8 μM (low cytotoxicity to L-02 cell line)[42]
Neuroprotective (hippocampal neurons from mice)At 10 μM cause ↑ calcium intracellular)[45]
2aAntiviral (Dengue Virus type 2)EC50 = 1.4 µM with SI = 57.7 (EC50 = 13.5 µM to ribavirin)[47]
3Neurons excitability (rat hippocampal CA1 neurons)At 30 µM cause inhibition of VGSC[53]
4Antidiabetic (α–glucosidase inhibition)At 33.2 mM cause more than 65% of inhibition (at 15.4 mM acarbose cause identical inhibition)[57]
Antimelanogenesis (tyrosinase inhibition)At 1.7 mM cause more than 65% of inhibition (at 3.5 mM kojic acid cause identical inhibition)[57]
Antiviral (MDCK cell line exposed to H1N1 virus)At 1.7 mM protect against severe cytopathic effect caused by H1N1 virus[58]
Antitumor (DU145 cell line)At 20 μM the STAT3 activation was 40% inhibited[59]
Antitumor (Mia-PaCa2 cell line)IC50 = 15 μM (↑ Bax expression, ↑ ROS–mediated alterations, ↓ Bcl–2 expression, ↓ migratory capacity[62]
5Antibacterial (Bacillus subtilis)At IC50 = 1.5 μM inhibition of metabolic dehydrogenases[72]
Vascular-protection (rats)At 1–10 μg/kg ↓ infarct volume, ↑ ischemia–induced neurological deficit by activation of PKB/HO–1, SOD and GSH[73]
6Antitumor (aromatase inhibition)IC50 = 93.6 μM[91]
Antitumor (OVCAR-3 and SK-OV-3)20–50 μM cause ↓ cell propagation, block cell cycle progression at the G1/G0 phase and induce cell apoptosis[94]
Antitumor (A549)IC50 = 1.54 μM (inhibition of human AKR1B10 activity)[95]
Anti-arthritis (adjuvant induced arthritic rats)At 20–40 mg/kg cause ↓ inflammation[92]
Antidiabetic (DPP-IV inhibition)IC50 = 3.9 μM[99]
7Cardioprotective (rat cardiomyoblasts H9c2)At 50 μM exhibits an apoptosis rate of 20% after pirarubicin–induced toxicity (30% to dexrazoxane)[103]
Antidepressant (in mice)At 100 mg/kg alleviate CUS[104]
8Antitumor (U-87 MG, SF126, SGC-7901, BGC-823, HO-8910, SK-0V-3, HT-29, MDA-MB-231, JeG-3)IC50 = 13.95–26.72 nM by ↓ Cdc2 expression, ↓ cyclin B1, ↓ Cdc25C (IC50 ≥ 73.57 nM to etoposide)[114]
Antitumor (MCF-7/S, MCF-7/A)IC50 = 5.86 nM, RI = 0.552 (paclitaxel and etoposide exhibit higher IC50 and RI)[115]
Antitumor (MCF-7/S and in MCF-7/A xenograft mice)At 12.5 mg/kg 49.2% of tumour volume growth inhibition (identical to paclitaxel)[115]
8aAntitumor (HeLa, A549, HCT-8 and HepG2 cell lines)IC50 = 0.27–4.03 μM, cell migration inhibition, ↑ TIMP-1 expression, ↓ MMP-9 expression, more selectivity than 5-Fu and etoposide[128]
Antitumor (HUVEC cell line)At 0.1–0.3 μM higher activity and selectivity index than etoposide at 1 μM[129]
8bAntitumor (MGC-803 cell line)IC50 = 0.22 μM (IC50 values > 10 μM to etoposide)[130]
Antitumor (HepG2 xenografts in mice)At 4 mg/kg ↓ in 45.56% the weights and volumes of tumor[130]
a The activity level presented as half maximal inhibitory concentration; b When available, data about activity level of the clinical drug used as positive control and/or action mechanism are given. ↑: increased level; ↓: decrease level.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tavares, W.R.; Seca, A.M.L. The Current Status of the Pharmaceutical Potential of Juniperus L. Metabolites. Medicines 2018, 5, 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines5030081

AMA Style

Tavares WR, Seca AML. The Current Status of the Pharmaceutical Potential of Juniperus L. Metabolites. Medicines. 2018; 5(3):81. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines5030081

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tavares, Wilson R., and Ana M. L. Seca. 2018. "The Current Status of the Pharmaceutical Potential of Juniperus L. Metabolites" Medicines 5, no. 3: 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines5030081

APA Style

Tavares, W. R., & Seca, A. M. L. (2018). The Current Status of the Pharmaceutical Potential of Juniperus L. Metabolites. Medicines, 5(3), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines5030081

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop