FD-2, an Anticervical Stenosis Device for Patients Undergoing Radical Trachelectomy or Cervical Conization
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. FD-2, a New Anticervical Stenosis Device
2.2. Tensile Properties
2.3. Extractables and Leachables Testing
2.4. Patients
2.5. Definition of Cervical Stenosis
3. Results
3.1. Manufacturing FD-2
3.2. Bench Testing
3.3. Case Series
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
6. Patents
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Li, X.; Li, J.; Ju, X.; Chen, X.; Wu, X. Abdominal scar characteristics as a predictor of cervical stenosis after abdominal radical trachelectomy. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 37755–37761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, X.; Li, J.; Wu, X. Incidence, risk factors and treatment of cervical stenosis after radical trachelectomy: A systematic review. Eur. J. Cancer. 2015, 51, 1751–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nishio, H.; Fujii, T.; Kameyama, K.; Susumu, N.; Nakamura, M.; Iwata, T.; Aoki, D. Abdominal radical trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing procedure in women with early-stage cervical cancer in a series of 61 women. Gynecol. Oncol. 2009, 115, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanaka, Y.; Ueda, Y.; Kakuda, M.; Kubota, S.; Matsuzaki, S.; Iwamiya, T.; Okazawa, A.; Matsuzaki, S.; Hashimoto, K.; Kobayashi, E.; et al. Predictors for recurrent/persistent high-grade intraepithelial lesions and cervical stenosis after therapeutic conization: A retrospective analysis of 522 cases. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 22, 921–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vieira, M.A.; de Araújo, R.L.C.; da Cunha Andrade, C.E.M.; Schmidt, R.; Filho, A.; Reis, R.D. A randomized clinical trial of a new anti-cervical stenosis device after conization by loop electrosurgical excision. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0242067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tan, Y.; Bennett, M.J. Urinary catheter stent placement for treatment of cervical stenosis. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2007, 47, 406–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Motegi, E.; Hasegawa, K.; Kawai, S.; Kiuchi, K.; Kosaka, N.; Mochizuki, Y.; Fukasawa, I. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system placement for severe uterine cervical stenosis after conization: Two case reports. J. Med. Case Rep. 2016, 10, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luesley, D.M.; Williams, D.R.; Gee, H.; Chan, K.K.; Jordan, J.A. Management of postconization cervical stenosis by laser vaporization. Obstet. Gynecol. 1986, 67, 126–128. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Nasu, K.; Narahara, H. Management of severe cervical stenosis after conization by detention of nylon threads tied up to intrauterine contraceptive device. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2010, 281, 887–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grund, D.; Köhler, C.; Krauel, H.; Schneider, A. A new approach to preserve fertility by using a coated nitinol stent in a patient with recurrent cervical stenosis. Fertil. Steril. 2007, 87, 1212.e13–1212.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brown, A.J.; Shah, J.S.; Fleming, N.D.; Nick, A.M.; Soliman, P.T.; Chisholm, G.B.; Schmeler, K.M.; Ramirez, P.T.; Frumovitz, M. Role of cervical cytology in surveillance after radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2016, 142, 283–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Musella, A.; Santangelo, G.; Vertechy, L.; Di Pinto, A.; Sassu, C.M.; Fischetti, M.; Di Donato, V.; Perniola, G.; Palaia, I.; Benedetti Panici, P. Post-conization cervical stenosis treated with silicone catheter in microinvasive cervical cancer patient: A case report. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2020, 67, 95–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wagatsuma, T.; Sakamoto, S.; Matsuyama, E.; Amenomori, Y.; Kobayashi, T.; Takada, M.; Matsuda, S.; Fujimoto, S.; Shimizu, T.; Suzuki, M.; et al. A study on the contraceptive effectiveness of a newly designed IUD “FD-1” in Japan. Contraception 1978, 17, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shastri, P.V. Toxicology of polymers for implant contraceptives for women. Contraception 2002, 65, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sopracordevole, F.; Clemente, N.; Papiccio, M.; Del Fabro, A.; Serri, M.; Fichera, M.; Buttignol, M.; Giorda, G.; Delli Carpini, G.; Ciavattini, A. Histopathological findings in hysterectomy for cervical stenosis in postmenopausal women: A retrospective case series. Medicine 2022, 101, e29586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shimura, K.; Mabuchi, S. Extraperitoneal radical trachelectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2019, 29, 842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mabuchi, S.; Kimura, T. Extraperitoneal Radical Trachelectomy With Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Novel Fertility-Preserving Option for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Patients. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2017, 27, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Querleu, D.; Cibula, D.; Abu-Rustum, N.R. 2017 Update on the Querleu-Morrow Classification of Radical Hysterectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017, 24, 3406–3412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Penna, C.; Fambrini, M.; Fallani, M.G.; Pieralli, A.; Scarselli, G.; Marchionni, M. Laser CO2 conization in postmenopausal age: Risk of cervical stenosis and unsatisfactory follow-up. Gynecol. Oncol. 2005, 96, 771–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, N.S. More on how to remove a Chinese IUD. J. Fam. Plann Reprod. Health Care. 2003, 29, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Reference Score | Test Value | |
---|---|---|
Transparency test | Transparent | Transparent |
pH * | ≤1.50 | 0.7 |
Foaming test | ≤2 min ** | 30 s |
Heavy metals * | ≤1.0 ppm | ≤1.0 ppm |
Potassium permanganate-reducing substances * | ≤1.0 mL | 0.2 mL |
Reside on evaporation * | ≤1.0 mg | 0.0 mg |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mabuchi, S.; Kamiura, S.; Saito, T.; Furukawa, H.; Abe, A.; Sasagawa, T. FD-2, an Anticervical Stenosis Device for Patients Undergoing Radical Trachelectomy or Cervical Conization. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 1032. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10091032
Mabuchi S, Kamiura S, Saito T, Furukawa H, Abe A, Sasagawa T. FD-2, an Anticervical Stenosis Device for Patients Undergoing Radical Trachelectomy or Cervical Conization. Bioengineering. 2023; 10(9):1032. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10091032
Chicago/Turabian StyleMabuchi, Seiji, Shoji Kamiura, Takuya Saito, Hayato Furukawa, Azusa Abe, and Takashi Sasagawa. 2023. "FD-2, an Anticervical Stenosis Device for Patients Undergoing Radical Trachelectomy or Cervical Conization" Bioengineering 10, no. 9: 1032. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10091032
APA StyleMabuchi, S., Kamiura, S., Saito, T., Furukawa, H., Abe, A., & Sasagawa, T. (2023). FD-2, an Anticervical Stenosis Device for Patients Undergoing Radical Trachelectomy or Cervical Conization. Bioengineering, 10(9), 1032. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10091032