A Novel Yeast Genus and Two Novel Species Isolated from Pineapple Leaves in Thailand: Savitreella phatthalungensis gen. nov., sp. nov. and Goffeauzyma siamensis sp. nov.
1
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Thaksin University, Pa Phayom, Phatthalung 93210, Thailand
2
Microbial Technology for Agriculture, Food and Environment Research Center, Faculty of Science, Thaksin University, Pa Phayom, Phatthalung 93210, Thailand
3
Program of Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University, Nakhon Pathom 73000, Thailand
4
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
5
Biodiversity Center, Kasetsart University (BDCKU), Bangkok 10900, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(2), 118; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8020118
Submission received: 28 December 2021
/
Revised: 21 January 2022
/
Accepted: 23 January 2022
/
Published: 26 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polyphasic Identification of Fungi)
Abstract
:Four yeast strains, representing one genus and two novel anamorphic yeast species, were isolated from pineapple leaves collected in Thailand. Analysis of the sequences of the D1/D2 domains of the large subunit (LSU) rRNA gene and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions showed the two strains (DMKU-PAL186 and DMKU-PAL178) were closely related to the type strains of the Protomyces and Taphrina species, but with high nucleotide divergence. Two strains (DMKU-PAL39 and DMKU-PAL18) were found to be closely related to the type strains of Goffeauzyma iberica, but with eight nucleotide substitutions in the D1/D2 domains and 26 nucleotide substitutions in the ITS regions. In phylogenetic analyses, the strains DMKU-PAL186 and DMKU-PAL178 formed a well-separated lineage from Protomyces and Taphrina genera, confirming that they represented a distinct genus, while the strains DMKU-PAL39 and DMKU-PAL18 represented a species in the genus Goffeauzyma, which was phylogenetically distinct from other recognized species of the genus. Based on molecular analyses and phenotypic characteristics, the names Savitreella gen. nov. (Taphrinomycetes, Ascomycota) and Savitreella phatthalungensis sp. nov. are proposed to accommodate the strains DMKU-PAL186 and DMKU-PAL178, and the name Goffeauzyma siamensis sp. nov. (Tremellomycetes, Basidiomycota) is proposed to accommodate the strains DMKU-PAL39 and DMKU-PAL18.
1. Introduction
Pineapple (Ananas comosus), belonging to the family Bromeliaceae, is a well-known and readily available tropical fruit. The global production of pineapple is projected to grow at 1.9 percent annually, to reach 31 million tonnes in 2028 [1]. In Thailand, the pineapple is one of the most important plants to be grown commercially. Pineapple is a source of functional ingredients (fiber) [2], anti-inflammatory agents (bromelain) [3], antioxidants (flavonoids and phenolic acids), and vitamins (vitamin C) [4]. It has a high sugar content (sucrose, glucose, and fructose) [5] and is consequently the habitat of several microorganisms, including lactic acid bacteria (i.e., Lactobacillus plantarum and L. rossiae) and yeasts (i.e., Meyerozyma caribbica and Pichia guilliermondii) [6,7]. However, there are only a few reports of yeast being associated with the pineapple phyllosphere. Pineapple leaves exhibit an extreme environment involving such factors as high temperature, variable relative humidity, radiation, and acidic conditions [8]. Therefore, microorganisms that can grow on pineapple leaves need to be adapted to survive under variable and severe conditions.
Genera Taphrina and Protomyces are classified in the families Taphrinaceae and Protomycetaceae, respectively, which in turn are members of the order Taphrinales (subphylum Taphrinomycotina, phylum Ascomycota). Members of these two genera display varying color colonies with a reddish, salmon-like color, lighter shades of red, lavender, or yellow, that arise from the presence of carotenoids [9]. The genus Protomyces was first established, as an anamorphic genus, by Unger in 1833, and P. macrosporus was assigned as a type species of the genus. This has been strictly defined, based morphologically on cell sizes and their host range (Compositae and Umbelliferae) [9,10]. Later, Wang et al. [11] detected Protomyces species from a plant outside of its host families (Compositae and Umbelliferae), indicating the genus Protomyces may not be strictly associated with only the Compositae or Umbelliferae family host plants. Recently, an additional member of Protomyces, namely, P. arabidopsidicola, was found from the phylloplane of Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) [12].
The genus Taphrina was created by Fries in 1832 [13] to accommodate the teleomorphic yeast state in which T. populina was assigned as a type species of the genus. This genus has a dimorphic lifestyle, where the teleomorph is the parasitic counterpart on plants and the anamorphic yeast state represents the saprotrophic state, which is classified in the genus Lalaria. The genus Taphrina has been defined as being based on the host range, geographical distribution, morphological features (i.e., the size and shape of asci and ascospores), the type and site of infection, and their ability to cause specific infections on host plants [14]. However, the validity of species separation on related hosts has been debated by several authors [15]. In 2003, Rodrigues and Fonseca [16] studied the Taphrina species based on the sequence analysis of the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene and ITS regions and confirmed that the genus Taphrina was distinct from its closely related genus Protomyces. Later, Selbmann et al. [17] identified yeasts isolated from sandstone and granite and proposed as a new member of the genus Taphrina, namely, Taphrina antarctica, based on analysis of the ITS regions and the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene. In addition, the reclassification of four Lalaria species (La. arrabidae, La. inositophila, La. kurtzmanii, and La. veronaerambellii) is also proposed as novel combinations of the genus Taphrina, according to the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Melbourne Code, 2012). This report suggested that the genus Taphrina may not be strictly associated only with host plants, and the use of molecular tools for species identification in fungi allows for an easy connection between teleomorphic and anamorphic states, even when the morphology of the two forms differs considerably [17].
The genus Goffeauzyma was first proposed in 2015 by Liu et al. [18], based on the phylogenetic analysis of a seven-gene dataset consisting of the small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene, the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of the rRNA gene, the D1/D2 domains of the large subunit (LSU) rRNA gene, the two subunits of RNA polymerase II (RPB1 and RPB2), the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1) and cytochrome b (CYTB). In the seven-gene dataset and the rDNA phylogeny, this genus represented a well-supported clade containing six Cryptococcus species, which was formerly recognized as the gastricus clade [19], namely, C. aciditolerans, C. ibericus, C. metallitolerans, C. agrionensis, C. gastricus, and C. gilvescens [20,21,22]. The gastricus clade was located in the family Filobasidiaceae (subphylum Agaricomycotina and phylum Basidiomycota) but was phylogenetically-distinguished from the recognized species in the genera Filobasidium, Naganishia, and Heterocephalacria [18]. According to the Melbourne Code [23], which specifies that related anamorphic and teleomorphic species can be assigned to the same genus, numerous anamorphic species were consequently reassigned to the teleomorphic genera, based on their phylogenetic relationship, and many novel anamorphic genera were proposed. In view of the above, the genus Goffeauzyma was also established to accommodate the six Cryptococcus species of the gastricus clade, which were then renamed as G. aciditolerans, G. agrionensis, G. gastricus, and G. gilvescens, G. ibericus, and G. metallitolerans, respectively. Of these, G. gastricus was designated as the type species of the genus [18].
In the present study, four strains (DMKU-PAL186, DMKU-PAL178, DMKU-PAL39, and DMKU-PAL18) representing a novel genus and two species, namely, Savitreella phatthalungensis gen., sp. nov. (DMKU-PAL186 and DMKU-PAL178) and Goffeauzyma siamensis sp. nov. (DMKU-PAL39 and DMKU-PAL18) were proposed based on a polyphasic taxonomy.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection and Yeast Isolation
Green and healthy leaves of pineapple (Ananas comosus) were randomly collected from cultivated fields in Chon Buri province (21 samples), eastern region of Thailand, on December 26, 2020, and Phatthalung province (10 samples) southern region of Thailand, on January 13, 2021. Leaf samples (five leaves per sample) were put in plastic bags, sealed, and kept in icebox for 6–12 h during transfer to the laboratory. The samples were stored at 8 °C until subjected to yeast isolation, which was no longer than 48 h.
The yeasts were isolated by a dilution plate technique from the healthy pineapple leaves. The leaves (5 g) were suspended in 50 mL of 0.85% saline solution in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask and shaken on a rotary shaker at 150 rpm, 25 °C for 60 min to detach yeast cells from the surface. The suspension was serially diluted tenfold (1:10 to 1:103) by sterile 0.85% (w/v) saline solution; then, 100 µL of each dilution was spread onto yeast extract-malt extract (YM) agar (0.3% (w/v) yeast extract, 0.3% (w/v) malt extract, 0.5% (w/v) peptone, 1% (w/v) glucose, and 2% (w/v) agar) supplemented with 0.02% (w/v) chloramphenicol and incubated at 25 °C for seven days. The different yeast morphotypes were picked and purified by streaking on YM agar. All purified yeast strains were suspended in YM broth supplemented with 10% (v/v) glycerol and stored at −80 °C.
2.2. Yeast Identification
2.2.1. Morphological Study
The morphological characteristics of yeast strains were determined according to established methods by Kurtzman et al. [24]. Colony characters were observed on YM agar after two days of incubation in darkness at 25 °C. Mycelium formation was investigated by cultivation on potato dextrose agar (PDA; 20% (w/v) potato infusion, 2% (w/v) glucose, and 1.5% (w/v) agar) in slide culture at 25 °C for four weeks. Sexual processes of all strains were investigated for individual strain and strain pairs on PDA, corn meal agar (2% (w/v) cornmeal infusion and 2% (w/v) agar), 5% malt extract agar (5% (w/v) malt extract and 1.5% (w/v) agar), Fowell’s acetate agar (0.5% (w/v) sodium acetate and 2% (w/v) agar), Gorodkowa agar (0.1% (w/v) glucose, 0.5% (w/v) sodium chloride, 1% (w/v) peptone and 2% (w/v) agar), and V8 agar (10% (v/v) V8 juice and 2% (w/v) agar) at 15 °C and 25 °C for two months.
2.2.2. Biochemical and Physiological Studies
Four strains (DMKU-PAL186, DMKU-PAL178, DMKU-PAL39, and DMKU-PAL18) were characterized biochemically and physiologically, according to the standard methods described by Kurtzman et al. [24]. Fermentation of carbohydrates was carried out in a liquid medium using Durham fermentation tubes. Carbon source and nitrogen source assimilation tests were conducted in liquid medium and starved inocula were used in nitrogen assimilation tests [24]. Cycloheximide resistance was also performed in a liquid medium, while urea hydrolysis was conducted on agar slants. Acid production and the diazonium blue B (DBB) reaction were investigated on a solid medium in Petri dishes. Growth at various temperatures (15, 30, 35, 37, and 40 °C) was determined by cultivation on YM agar.
2.2.3. Molecular Study
Each yeast strain was grown on YM agar for two days. The target gene sequences were determined from polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products amplified from genomic DNA extracted from yeast cells. The methods used for DNA extraction and amplification were as described by Limtong et al. [25]. The D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene, ITS regions, SSU rRNA gene, TEF1, and RPB2 genes were amplified with the primer pairs NL1 and NL4 (for D1/D2 domains) [26], ITS1 and ITS4 (for ITS regions) [27], SSU1f and SSU4r, SSU3f and SSU2r (for SSU) [28], EF1-983f and EF1-2218r (for TEF1) [29], and RBP2-5f and RPB2-7r (for RPB2) [30]. The PCR products were checked by agarose gel electrophoresis and purified using the TIANgel Midi Purification kit (TIANGEN Biotech), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The purified PCR product was sequenced with the same primers used in PCR amplification at the First BASE Laboratories Sdn Bhd, Malaysia. The newly generated sequences were submitted to GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank, accessed on 30 November 2021) and the GenBank accession number of the sequences used in this study are shown in Table 1 and Table 2.
Sequences generated from the forward and reverse primers were aligned and assembled with MEGA software, version 11 (MEGA11) [31], to get full length of the gene sequence. Then, the assembled sequences were compared with the GenBank database using the BLASTn search tool [32]. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using the MUSCLE algorithm. Phylogenetic analyses, based on the concatenated sequences of the ITS regions and the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene and the multilocus datasets, using the neighbor-joining (NJ) and the maximum likelihood (ML) methods were performed with MEGA11 software. The Kimura-2 parameter distance correction and the general time reversible (GTR) models were respectively used for the NJ and ML analyses. Confidence levels of the clades were estimated from bootstrap analysis (1000 replicates) [33].
3. Results
3.1. Yeast Isolation
Strains DMKU-PAL186 and DMKU-PAL178 were respectively isolated from two pineapple leaf samples, one leaf sample collected at sampling site No. 7 (7°14′5″ N/100°10′54″ E) and another leaf sample at sampling site No. 9, (7°15′56″ N/100°10′23″ E), and both located in Phatthalung province, while strains DMKU-PAL39 and DMKU-PAL18 were isolated from the healthy pineapple leaf samples collected from two different cultivated fields (13°06′35.6″ N/101°06′16.9″ E, for DMKU-PAL39 and 13°11′48.9″ N/100°59′37.6″ E, for DMKU-PAL18) located in Chon Buri province.
During the investigation of yeasts associated with pineapple leaves collected from cultivated fields in Thailand, two yeast strains (DMKU-PAL186 and DMKU-PAL178) representing a novel yeast taxon of the Taphrinomycetes, Ascomycota were discovered. These two strains were found to be closely related to the type strains of the Protomyces and Taphrina species. In addition, another two strains (DMKU-PAL39 and DMKU-PAL18) representing a novel species of the genus Goffeauzyma (Tremellomycetes, Basidiomycota) were also obtained.
3.2. Molecular Analyses and Phenotypic Characterization
3.2.1. Strain DMKU-PAL186 and DMKU-PAL178
Analysis of the sequences of the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene and ITS regions demonstrated that the strains DMKU-PAL186 and DMKU-PAL178 were identical. BLASTn searches of the GenBank database revealed that the D1/D2 sequence of the two strains DMKU-PAL186T and DMKU-PAL178 are closely related to the type strains of Protomyces, whereas the ITS sequences of these two strains are closely related to the type strains of the Taphrina species, followed by the Protomyces species. Consequently, all Protomyces species (P. inouyei, P. pachydermus, P. lactucaedebilis, P. macrosporus, P. gravidus, P. inundatus, and P. arabidopsidicola) and six of the Taphrina species (T. virginica, T. wiesneri, T. letifera, T. communis, T. deformans, and T. carnea) showing a high degree of similarity in the BLAST searches were selected to compare genetic divergences. In terms of pairwise sequence similarities, the two strains (DMKU-PAL186 and DMKU-PAL178) differed from the type strains of the Protomyces species by 52–66 nucleotide (nt) substitutions in the D1/D2 domains and differed from a group of the related Taphrina species, by 63–65 nt substitutions in the D1/D2 domains (Table 3). In addition, the ITS sequences of the two strains differed from the Protomyces species and the Taphrina species by 57–106 and 89–114 nt substitutions, respectively (Table 3).
In phylogenetic analysis based on the concatenated sequences of the ITS and the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene, the trees derived from neighbor-joining (NJ) and maximum likelihood (ML) analysis were found to be similar and showed that the two strains formed a monophyletic clade closely related to Protomyces and Taphrina species, with strong statistical support (Figure 1). To clarify the placement of the two strains, the phylogenetic analysis of a multilocus dataset (SSU, ITS, LSU, TEF1, ACT1, and RPB2) needs to be conducted. However, the sequence data of the other marker genes (e.g., RPB2, TEF1, and ACT1) of several Protomyces and Taphrina species are not available in the public online databases. Consequently, the phylogenetic analysis based on the combined sequences of the SSU, ITS, and the D1/D2 domains of the two strains, and the type strains of representative species in the Taphrinomycotina with available SSU rRNA data, were performed in this study. From these analyses, the NJ and ML trees made it clear that the two strains formed a well-separated lineage from the neighboring genera, Protomyces and Taphrina (Figure 2), and confirmed the presence of the monophyletic clade that was phylogenetically distinct from any recognized families with yeast state in the Taphrinomycotina (Protomycetaceae, Schizosaccharomycetaceae, and Taphrinaceae) as well as two recognized genera in the Taphrinomycotina incertae sedis (Saitoella and Novakomyces), providing deeper level support (100% bootstrap support) for considering them as a distinct species and genus (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Since the family assignment of the Taphrinomycotina is still unclear, we chose not to assign the family of the new genus and have left open the family assignment until the existing family structure within the Taphrinomycotina is better clarified, based on eventual phylogenomic data.
In the comparison between morphological and phenotypic characteristics of the proposed novel species and type strains of the related species in genera Protomyces and Taphrina, we found the colonies of the strain DMKU-PAL186T on YM agar are cream to light pinkish–red, convex and with entire margins (Figure 3B), which is consistent with the colony color of Protomyces species reported by Kurtzman [9] and Wang et al. [12]. However, these two strains can be distinguished from their phylogenetically closest recognized neighbors by some phenotypic characteristics, as shown in Table 4. The proposed novel species assimilates D-gluconate, while the related Protomyces and Taphrina species do not. Several Protomyces and Taphrina species assimilate D-arabinose, L-arabinose, and potassium nitrate, but the proposed novel species does not. Starch formation is negative for the proposed novel species but is positive for the Protomyces (weak positive) and Taphrina species. Growth at 30 °C is present for the proposed novel species but is absent for the related Protomyces and Taphrina species. Based on polyphasic analyses (genetic divergent, phylogenetic, and phenotypic characteristics), we concluded that these two strains, DMKU-PAL186 and DMKU-PAL178, represent a novel genus and species of the subphylum Taphrinomycotina. The name Savitreella phatthalungensis gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed to accommodate these yeast strains.
3.2.2. DMKU-PAL39 and DMKU-PAL18
The sequence analyses of the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene and ITS regions revealed that the two strains (DMKU-PAL39 and DMKU-PAL18) had identical sequences, indicating that the two strains represented a single species. Pairwise sequence comparison of the D1/D2 domains and ITS regions of strain DMKU-PAL39 with respect to its related species showed that these strains were distinct from their closest species, Goffeauzyma iberica CBS 10871T, which differed by 8 nt substitutions (1.4%) of 570 nt in the D1/D2 domains and 26 nt substitutions of 454 nt (6.2%) in the ITS regions.
A phylogenetic analysis based on the combined sequences of the ITS regions and the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene demonstrated that the strains DMKU-PAL39 and DMKU-PAL18 placed in the Goffeauzyma species, but in a distinct position from the other Goffeauzyma species in the clade, with relatively high bootstrap support (Figure 4). To confirm the placement of these two strains, phylogenetic analyses of the combined sequences of the SSU rRNA, ITS regions, D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA, RPB2 and TEF genes of these two strains and the type strains of the Goffeauzyma species were performed by using the NJ and ML methods. From these analyses, the NJ and ML trees were found to be similar, making it clear that the two strains were placed in the Goffeauzyma clade and formed a well-separated lineage closely related to Goffeauzyma iberica (Figure 4).
In practice, Goffeauzyma siamensis nov. is not only distinguishable on the basis of molecular analyses but also by some phenotypic characteristics and growth abilities (Table 5). G. siamensis sp. nov. assimilates glycerol, ribitol, D-gluconate and DL-lactate, whereas G. iberica does not. Growth on medium containing 0.01% cycloheximide is absent for G. siamensis but is present for G. iberica. Based on this evidence, we therefore concluded that the strains DMKU-PAL39 and DMKU-PAL18 represent a single novel species of the genus Goffeauzyma. The name Goffeauzyma siamensis sp. nov. is proposed to accommodate these yeast strains.
3.3. Taxonomic Description of Genus and New Species
3.3.1. Savitreella P. Nutaratat, W. Boontham & P. Khunnamwong, gen. nov.
MycoBank: MB 840873.
Type species: Savitreella phatthalungensis
Etymology: Savitreella (Sa.vi.tre.el.la. N.L. fem. n. Savitreella, a yeast genus named in honor of Professor Savitree Limtong for her outstanding studies of yeast systematics and yeast technology in Thailand).
Description: The genus can be separated from the neighboring genera, Protomyces and Taphrina, by phylogenetic analyses (Figure 1 and Figure 2) and phenotypic characteristics (Table 4). Yeast cells divide by multilateral budding. Pseudohyphae are not produced. Ascospores have not been observed in individual or in mixed cultures. Glucose is not fermented. Diazonium blue B reaction, urease activity and acid production are negative. The genus is phylogenetically related to Protomyces and Taphrina.
Classification: Taphrinales, Taphrinomycetes, Taphrinomycotina, Ascomycota.
3.3.2. Savitreella phatthalungensis P. Nutaratat, W. Boontham & P. Khunnamwong, sp. nov.
MycoBank: MB 840874.
Etymology: Savitreella phatthalungensis (phat.tha.lung. en’sis. N.L. fem. adj. phatthalungensis) refers to Phatthalung province, Thailand, where the type strain was isolated.
Holotype: DMKU-PAL186 T is the holotype of Savitreella phatthalungensis. It was isolated from a pineapple leaf collected from pineapple cultivated field, Phatthalung province, Thailand. It has been preserved as a metabolically inactive state in the culture collection of the Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand (DMKU). The culture ex-type has been deposited in a metabolically inactivate state in the Thailand Bioresource Research Center (TBRC), National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Thailand as TBRC 15109 and the Portuguese Yeast Culture Collection (PYCC), Portugal as PYCC 9005.
Description: After 3 days at 25 °C on YM agar, cells are globose (2.8 − 4.9 × 3.1 − 5.8 µm) and occur singly or in pairs (Figure 3A). Budding is predominately polar. Colonies are cream to light pinkish–red, convex, and have an entire margin (Figure 3B). Pseudohyphae or true hyphae are not formed in slide culture on PDA and corn meal agar within 4 weeks at 25 °C. Ascospores formation is not observed in any of the strains or when strains are paired on PDA, corn meal agar, 5% malt extract agar, YPD agar, YCBY agar, YM agar, and water agar at 15 and 25 °C for one month. Fermentation is absent. Glucose, xylose (or slow), sucrose, maltose, trehalose (or weak), cellobiose (slow), salicin (weak), melezitose, glycerol, D-mannitol (or weak), D-glucono-1,5-lactone, gluconate, DL-lactate (or slow), succinate, and xylitol are assimilated, but galactose, L-sorbose, N-acetyl glucosamine, D-ribose, L-arabinose, D-arabinose, rhamnose, methyl α-D-glucoside, melibiose, lactose, raffinose, erythritol, arabitol, D-glucitol, myo-inositol, glucuronate, galacturonic acid, and citrate are not assimilated. Ammonium sulfate is assimilated, but nitrate, nitrite, ethylamine hydrochloride, L-lysine, and cadaverine are not assimilated. No growth occurs on media containing 10% (w/v) NaCl/5% (w/v) glucose, 16% (w/v) NaCl/5% (w/v) glucose, 50% (w/v) glucose, 60% (w/v) glucose, and in vitamin-free medium, 0.01% cycloheximide and 0.1% cycloheximide. Growth occurs at 15–35 °C, but not at 37 °C. Starch-like compounds are not produced. Diazomium blue B color and urease reaction are negative.
GenBank accession numbers: holotype DMKU-PAL186 (SSU: LC647808, ITS: MW876306, D1/D2: MW879743); additional strain DMKU-PAL178 (SSU: LC647809, ITS: MW876305, D1/D2: MW879742).
3.3.3. Goffeauzyma siamensis P. Nutaratat, W. Boontham & P. Khunnamwong, sp. nov.
MycoBank: MB 840692.
Etymology: The species epithet si.am.en′sis. N.L. fem. adj. siamensis, referring to Siam, the old name of Thailand, where the type strain was isolated.
Holotype: DMKU-PAL39T is the holotype of G. siamensis. It was isolated from a pineapple leaf collected from pineapple cultivated field, Si Racha district, Chon Buri province, Thailand. It has been preserved as a metabolically inactive state in the culture collection of the Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand (DMKU). The culture ex-type has been deposited in a metabolically inactivate state in the Thailand Bioresource Research Center (TBRC), National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Thailand as TBRC 14871 and in the Portuguese Yeast Culture Collection (PYCC), Portugal as PYCC 8910.
Description: After 3 days at 25 °C on YM agar, cells are subglobose to ovoid (2.8 − 4.9 × 3.1 − 5.8 µm) and occur singly or in pairs (Figure 3C). Colonies are very mucoid bright cream to light brown, convex and have an entire margin (Figure 3D). Budding is polar. Pseudohyphae or true hyphae are not formed. Ballistoconidia are not produced on PDA or corn meal agar. Sexual reproduction is not observed in any of the strains or when strains are paired on PDA, corn meal agar, 5% malt extract agar, YCBY agar, V8 and YM agar at 15 and 25 °C for 2 months. Fermentation of glucose is absent. Glucose, galactose, sorbose (variable), N-acetyl glucosamine (variable), D-ribose (variable), D-xylose, L-arabinose, D-arabinose (variable), L-rhamnose, sucrose, maltose, trehalose, methyl α-D-glucoside, cellobiose, salicin, melibiose, lactose, raffinose, melizitose, glycerol, erythritol, ribitol, D-glucitol, D-mannitol, galactitol (week), myo-inositol, D-glucono-1,5-lactone, D-gluconate (slow), D-glucuronate, D-galacturonic acid, DL-lactate, succinate and xylitol are assimilated as sole carbon source, but inulin, soluble starch, 2-ketogluconic acid, 5-ketogluconic acid, citrate, methanol, and ethanol are not assimilated. Ammonium sulfate and L-lysine are assimilated as sole nitrogen source, but nitrate, nitrite, cadaverine, and creatine are not assimilated. Growth in vitamin-free medium is negative. Growth is observed at 15–37 °C but not at 40 °C. Growth in the presence of 0.01 or 0.1% of cycloheximide is negative. Growth on media containing 50% (w/v) glucose and 10% (w/v) sodium chloride plus 5% (w/v) glucose are positive, but on media, a containing 60% (w/v) glucose is weak. No growth occurred in media containing 16% (w/v) sodium chloride plus 5% (w/v) glucose. Acid production is negative. Hydrolysis of urea and DBB reaction are positive. Starch-like compounds are not produced.
GenBank accession numbers: holotype DMKU-PAL39 (SSU: OK576181, ITS: MW669577, D1/D2: LC604627 RPB2: LC656481, TEF1: LC656484); additional strain DMKU-PAL18 (SSU: OK576179, ITS: MZ621116, D1/D2: MZ621115, RPB2: LC656482, TEF1: LC656483).
4. Discussion
In accordance with the guidelines for ascomycetous yeast identification based on nucleotide sequence divergences, the two compared strains with 0–3 nucleotide differences in the D1/D2 domains are designated to be the same species, whereas the strains that differed by greater than 6 nucleotides (1%) are recognized as different species [26]. For basidiomycetous yeasts, the strains that differed by two or more nucleotides in the D1/D2 regions represent different taxa [34]. Later, Vu et al. [35] proposed the threshold to consider a strain to belong to a different species from its close relatives is of less than 98.31% similarity (Ascomycota) or 98.61% similarity (Basidiomycota) in terms of ITS region and less than 99.41% similarity (Ascomycota) or 99.51% similarity (Basidiomycota) when considering the D1/D2 domains. In the present study, the sequences of the D1/D2 of the LSU rRNA gene and ITS regions of the four strains were compared with their closely related species. Two strains (DMKU-PAL186 and DMKU-PAL178) were identical in the D1/D2 and ITS regions but differed from the type strains of the closely related species by 52–66 nucleotide substitutions in the D1/D2, and by 57–114 nucleotide substitutions in the ITS regions, while two strains (DMKU-PAL39 and DMKU-PAL18) were identical in both rRNA regions but differed from the type strains of the closely related species by eight nucleotide substitutions in the D1/D2, and by 10 nucleotide substitutions in the ITS regions. According to the criteria mentioned above, these strains are sufficiently separated from known species. Consequently, we were justified in assigning the two strains (DMKU-PAL186 and DMKU-PAL178) as a novel genus and species (namely, Savitreella phatthalungensis gen., sp. nov.) of the Taphrinomycetes (phylum Ascomycota), and two strains (DMKU-PAL39 and DMKU-PAL18) as a novel species (namely, Goffeauzyma siamensis sp. nov.) of the Tremellomycetes (phylum Basidiomycota). In practice, the two novel species can be distinguished from their closest related species not only by the analysis of nucleotide sequence divergence but also by phylogenetic analyses and phenotypic characteristics.
The members of Protomyces and Taphrina have been isolated from various plants, such as giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida), hawk’s-beard (Crepis japonica), wild celery (Apium nodiflorum), the leaf gall of hedge parsley (Torilis japonica), Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) [9,11], grey alder (Alnus incana), pear (Pyrus communis), damson plums (Prunus insititia), and white or silver-leaved poplars (Populus alba) [13]. Based on the evidence provided above, it has been suggested that the Protomyces and Taphrina species are plant-associated genera. However, there is a member of the Protomyces species (P. inouyei) that has not only been obtained from a plant but also isolated from ice in a glacier cave [36]. In addition, the members of both Protomyces and Taphrina are generally recognized as phytopathogens. Most Protomyces species are plant parasites causing gall symptoms in the flowers, stems, leaves, and fruits of Compositiae and Umbelliferae [9,11,37]. A large number of Taphrina species cause symptoms similar to those seen as a result of Protomyces infections, such as galls on stems, leaf curls, and witches’ brooms of various plants, especially economically important fruit trees, viz., peach, plum and cherry [17]. In the present study, the two strains (DMKU-PAL186T and DMKU-PAL178) were isolated from healthy cultivated pineapple leaves. The pathogenicity of the strains DMKU-PAL186T and DMKU-PAL178 were evaluated on pineapple leaves in a greenhouse for three weeks and the results revealed no damage or disease symptoms on the tested leaves. Thus, it could be hypothesized that these two strains might be a saprobic stage, which allows them to survive outside the host plant, or that the pineapples are non-host plants for this species. The distribution of this species may be due to human or insect transmission. In this respect, these strains (DMKU-PAL186T and DMKU-PAL178) differ from the genus Protomyces and Taphrina.
The members of genus Goffeauzyma have been isolated from a wide range of habitats associated with acidic conditions, such as the acidic water of a volcanic environment in Argentina (G. agrionensis) [21], acid rock drainage in Iberian pyrite belt ecosystems in Portugal (G. aciditolerans, G. iberica and G. metallitolerans) [20], stomach lavage of a tuberculosis patient in Norway (G. gastrica) [22], soil and litter of an acidophilous beech forest in Austria (G. gastrica), and in soil from a tundra wetland at Cape Barrow in Alaska (G. gilvescens) [22]. In this study, the strains DMKU-PAL39 and DMKU-PAL18 were isolated from pineapple leaves, which were considered to be an acidic environment (pH 3–4), in Thailand. Thus, the species in genus Goffeauzyma appeared to occur commonly in diverse acidic environments and different geographical locations. In the samples from which the strains of the novel species were obtained, other yeast species were also isolated, namely, Hannaella pagnoccae, Papiliotrema sp., Rhodotorula toruloides, Rhodosporidiobolus ruineniae, Symmetrospora suhii, Saitozyma sp., and Tremella sp. This likely means that these yeast species are adapted to survive under acidic conditions. In order to evaluate differences in their genome that justify their adaptation to these environments, the genome of these new isolates should be sequenced.
5. Conclusions
A novel yeast genus and two novel species were described and illustrated. Based on the molecular analyses and phenotypic characteristics, the name Savitreella phatthalungensis gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed in the phylum Ascomycota, and the name Goffeauzyma siamensis sp. nov. is proposed in the phylum Basidiomycota. In the case of Savitreella phatthalungensis, the pathogenicity of this species on pineapple leaves was examined, and no damage or disease symptoms were observed on the tested leaves.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, P.N., W.B. and P.K.; methodology, W.B. and P.K.; validation, P.N., W.B. and P.K.; formal analysis, P.N., W.B. and P.K.; investigation, P.N., W.B. and P.K.; data curation, P.N., W.B. and P.K.; writing—original draft preparation, P.N.; writing—review and editing, P.N., W.B. and P.K.; supervision, P.K.; project administration, P.K.; funding acquisition, P.N., W.B. and P.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI) grant no. FF(KU)18.64.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
All sequence data are available in NCBI GenBank following the accession numbers in the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- FAO. Medium-Term Outlook: Prospects for Global Production and Trade in Bananas and Tropical Fruits 2019 to 2028; Rome, Italy; Available online: https://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/CA7568EN/ (accessed on 1 December 2021).
- Prakongpan, T.; Nitithamyong, A.; Luangpituaksa, P. Extraction and application of dietary fiber and cellulose from pineapple cores. J. Food Sci. 2006, 67, 1308–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onken, J.E.; Greer, P.K.; Calingaert, B.; Hale, L.P. Bromelain treatmentdecreases secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines by colonbiopsies in vitro. Clin. Immunol. 2008, 126, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mohsin, A.; Jabeen, A.; Majid, D.; Allai, F.M.; Dar, A.H.; Gulzar, B.; Makroo, H.A. Pineapple. In Antioxidants in Fruits: Properties and Health Benefits; Nayik, G.A., Gull, A., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 379–396. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, C.C.; Paull, R.E. Sugar metabolism and pineapple fruit translucency. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2000, 125, 558–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Di Cagno, R.; Cardinali, G.; Minervini, G.; Antonielli, L.; Rizzello, C.G.; Ricciuti, P.; Gobbetti, M. Taxonomic structure of the yeasts and lactic acid bacteria microbiota of pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr.) and use of autochthonous starters for minimally processing. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amorim, J.C.; Piccoli, R.H.; Duarte, W.F. Probiotic potential of yeasts isolated from pineapple and their use in the elaboration of potentially functional fermented beverages. Food Res. Int. 2018, 107, 518–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Escriba, R.C.R.; Rodriguez, R.; López, D.; Lorente, G.Y.; Pino, Y.; Aragón, C.E.; Garza, Y.; Podestá, F.E.; González, G.Y.L. High light intensity increases the CAM expression in “MD-2” micro-propagated pineapple plants at the end of the acclimatization stage. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 3109–3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kurtzman, C.P. Protomyces Unger (1833). In The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study, 5th ed.; Kurtzman, C.P., Fell, J.W., Boekhout, T., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 725–731. [Google Scholar]
- Reddy, M.S.; Kramer, C. A taxonomic revision of the Protomycetales. Mycotaxon 1975, 3, 1–50. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, K.; Sipilä, T.P.; Overmyer, K. The isolation and characterization of resident yeasts from the phylloplane of Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Sipilä, T.; Overmyer, K. A novel Arabidopsis phyllosphere resident Protomyces species and a re-examination of genus Protomyces based on genome sequence data. IMA Fungus 2021, 12, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fonseca, Á.; Rodrigues, M.G. Taphrina Fries (1832). In The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study, 5th ed.; Kurtzman, C.P., Fell, J.W., Boekhout, T., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 823–858. [Google Scholar]
- Mix, A.J. A monograph of the genus Taphrina. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 1949, 33, 3–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gjaerum, H.B. The genus Taphrina Fr. in Norway. Nytt Mag. Bot. 1964, 11, 5–26. [Google Scholar]
- Rodrigues, M.G.; Fonseca, A. Molecular systematics of the dimorphic ascomycete genus Taphrina. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2003, 53, 607–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selbmann, L.; Turchetti, B.; Andrey, Y.; Cecchini, C.; Zucconi, L.; Isola, D.; Buzzini, P.; Onofri, S. Description of Taphrina antarctica f.a. sp. nov., a new anamorphic ascomycetous yeast species associated with antarctic endolithic microbial communities and transfer of four Lalaria species in the genus Taphrina. Extremophiles 2014, 18, 707–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.-Z.; Wang, Q.-M.; Theelen, B.; Groenewald, M.; Bai, F.-Y.; Boekhout, T. Phylogeny of tremellomycetous yeasts and related dimorphic and filamentous basidiomycetes reconstructed from multiple gene sequence analyses. Stud. Mycol. 2015, 81, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, X.Z.; Wang, G.M.; Göker, M.; Groenewald, M.; Kachalkin, A.V.; Lumbsch, H.T.; Millanes, A.M.; Wedin, M.; Yurkov, A.M.; Bai, F.Y.; et al. Towards an integrated phylogenetic classification of the Tremellomycetes. Stud. Mycol. 2015, 81, 85–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gadanho, M.; Sampaio, J.P. Cryptococcus ibericus sp. nov., Cryptococcus aciditolerans sp. nov. and Cryptococcus metallitolerans sp. nov., a new ecoclade of anamorphic basidiomycetous yeast species from an extreme environment associated with acid rock drainage in São Domingos pyrite mine, Portugal. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 2375–2379. [Google Scholar]
- Russo, G.; Libkind, D.; Ulloa, R.J.; de García, V.; Sampaio, J.P.; van Broock, M.R. Cryptococcus agrionensis sp. nov., a basidiomycetous yeast of the acidic rock drainage ecoclade, isolated from an acidic aquatic environment of volcanic origin. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 996–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Fonseca, Á.; Boekhout, T.; Fell, J.W. Cryptococcus Vuillemin (1901). In The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study, 5th ed.; Kurtzman, C.P., Fell, J.W., Boekhout, T., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 1161–1737. [Google Scholar]
- McNeill, J.; Barrie, F.; Buck, W.; Demoulin, V.; Greuter, W.; Al, E. International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Melbourne Code); Regnum Vegetabile 154; A.R.G. Gantner Verlag KG: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2012; ISBN 978-3-87429-425-6. [Google Scholar]
- Kurtzman, C.P.; Fell, J.W.; Boekhout, T.; Robert, V. Methods for isolation, phenotypic characterization and maintenance of yeasts. In The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study, 5th ed.; Kurtzman, C.P., Fell, J.W., Boekhout, T., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 87–110. [Google Scholar]
- Limtong, S.; Yongmanitchai, W.; Tun, M.M.; Kawasaki, H.; Seki, T. Kazachstania siamensis sp. nov., an ascomycetous yeast species from forest soil in Thailand. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 419–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kurtzman, C.P.; Robnett, C.J. Identification and phylogeny of ascomycetous yeasts from analysis of nuclear large subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA partial sequences. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 1998, 73, 331–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
- Rosa, C.A.; Lachance, M.A.; Teixeira, L.C.; Pimenta, R.S.; Morais, P.B. Metschnikowia cerradonensis sp. nov., a yeast species isolated from ephemeral flowers and their nitidulid beetles in Brazil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kurtzman, C.P.; Robnett, C.J. Relationships among genera of the Saccharomycotina (Ascomycota) from multigene phylogenetic analysis of type species. FEMS Yeast Res. 2013, 13, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Diezmann, S.; Cox, C.J.; SchÖnian, G.; Vilgalys, R.J.; Mitchell, T.G. Phylogeny and evolution of medical species of Candida and related taxa: A multigenic analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 5624–5635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schäffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Felsenstein, J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fell, J.W.; Boekhout, T.; Fonseca, A.; Scorzetti, G.; StatzellTallman, A. Biodiversity and systematics of basidiomycetous yeasts as determined by large-subunit rDNA D1/D2 domain sequence analysis. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2000, 50, 1351–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vu, D.; Groenewald, M.; Szöke, S.; Cardinali, G.; Eberhardt, U.; Stielow, B.; De Vries, M.; Verkleij, G.J.M.; Crous, P.W.; Robert, V.; et al. DNA barcoding analysis of more than 9000 yeast isolates contributes to quantitative thresholds for yeast species and genera delimitation. Stud. Mycol. 2016, 85, 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butinar, L.; Strmole, T.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Relative incidence of ascomycetous yeasts in arctic coastal environments. Microb. Ecol. 2011, 61, 832–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valverde, R.A.; Templeton, G.E. Leaf gall of Torilis japonica caused by Protomyces macrosporus in Arkansas. Plant Dis. 1984, 68, 716–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Phylogenetic tree based on the combined sequences of the ITS regions and the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene, showing positions of Savitreella phatthalungensis sp. nov. with respect to closely related species. The tree backbone was constructed with the neighbor-joining method by MEGA software. Numbers at the node indicate percentages of bootstrap sampling (BP) of neighbor-joining (NJ) and maximum likelihood (ML) analyses, derived from 1000 samples. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated, resulting in a total of 731 positions in the final dataset. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 1171T was used as outgroup in these analyses. Bar, patristic distance of 0.05.
Figure 1.
Phylogenetic tree based on the combined sequences of the ITS regions and the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene, showing positions of Savitreella phatthalungensis sp. nov. with respect to closely related species. The tree backbone was constructed with the neighbor-joining method by MEGA software. Numbers at the node indicate percentages of bootstrap sampling (BP) of neighbor-joining (NJ) and maximum likelihood (ML) analyses, derived from 1000 samples. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated, resulting in a total of 731 positions in the final dataset. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 1171T was used as outgroup in these analyses. Bar, patristic distance of 0.05.
Figure 2.
Phylogenetic tree based on the combined sequences of the SSU rRNA gene, ITS regions and the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene, showing positions of Savitreella phatthalungensis sp. nov. with respect to closely related species. The tree backbone was constructed with the neighbor-joining method by MEGA software. Numbers at the node indicate percentages of bootstrap sampling (BP) of the NJ and ML analyses, derived from 1000 samples. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated, resulting in a total of 4392 positions in the final dataset. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 1171T was used as outgroup in these analyses. Bar, patristic distance of 0.05.
Figure 2.
Phylogenetic tree based on the combined sequences of the SSU rRNA gene, ITS regions and the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene, showing positions of Savitreella phatthalungensis sp. nov. with respect to closely related species. The tree backbone was constructed with the neighbor-joining method by MEGA software. Numbers at the node indicate percentages of bootstrap sampling (BP) of the NJ and ML analyses, derived from 1000 samples. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated, resulting in a total of 4392 positions in the final dataset. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 1171T was used as outgroup in these analyses. Bar, patristic distance of 0.05.
Figure 3.
Budding cells and colony morphology on YM agar after 3 days at 25 °C. (A,B) Savitreella phatthalungensis (holotype DMKU-PAL186); (C,D) Goffeauzyma siamensis (holotype DMKU-PAL39). Scale bars: (A,C) = 10 µm; (B,D) = 100 µm.
Figure 3.
Budding cells and colony morphology on YM agar after 3 days at 25 °C. (A,B) Savitreella phatthalungensis (holotype DMKU-PAL186); (C,D) Goffeauzyma siamensis (holotype DMKU-PAL39). Scale bars: (A,C) = 10 µm; (B,D) = 100 µm.
Figure 4.
Phylogenetic tree of Goffeauzyma siamensis sp. nov. based on the concatenated sequences of the SSU rRNA, ITS regions, D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA, RPB2 and TEF1 genes showing positions of the three strains of a novel species with respect to closely related species. The tree backbone was constructed with the neighbor-joining method by MEGA software. Numbers at the node indicate percentages of bootstrap sampling (BP) of the NJ and ML analyses, derived from 1000 samples. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated, resulting in a total of 2123 positions in the final dataset. Piskurozyma capsuligena CBS 1906T was used as outgroup in these analyses. Bar, patristic distance of 0.01.
Figure 4.
Phylogenetic tree of Goffeauzyma siamensis sp. nov. based on the concatenated sequences of the SSU rRNA, ITS regions, D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA, RPB2 and TEF1 genes showing positions of the three strains of a novel species with respect to closely related species. The tree backbone was constructed with the neighbor-joining method by MEGA software. Numbers at the node indicate percentages of bootstrap sampling (BP) of the NJ and ML analyses, derived from 1000 samples. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated, resulting in a total of 2123 positions in the final dataset. Piskurozyma capsuligena CBS 1906T was used as outgroup in these analyses. Bar, patristic distance of 0.01.
Table 1.
Sequences of the representative species in the Taphrinomycotina (Ascomycota) used in the phylogenetic analyses.
Table 1.
Sequences of the representative species in the Taphrinomycotina (Ascomycota) used in the phylogenetic analyses.
| Species | Strain | GenBank Accession Number * | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSU | ITS | D1/D2 | ||
| Novakomyces olei | NCAIM Y.02187T | - | MW023954 | MG250349 |
| Protomyces arabidopsidicola | C29T | - | LT602858 | MK934482 |
| Protomyces inouyei | NRRL YB-4354T | AY548295 | MK937056 | NG_042406 |
| Protomyces inundatus | NRRL Y-6349T | - | MK937057 | U76528 |
| Protomyces gravidus | NRRL Y-17093T | - | MK937055 | U84342 |
| Protomyces lactucaedebilis | NRRL YB-4353T | - | MK937058 | U84343 |
| Protomyces macrosporus | NRRL Y-12879T | D85143 | MK937059 | U94939 |
| Protomyces pachydermus | NRRL YB-4355T | D85142 | MK937060 | NG_064602 |
| Saccharomyces cerevisiae | CBS 1171T | NG_063315 | AB018043 | JQ689017 |
| Savitreella phatthalungensis | DMKU-PAL186T | LC647808 | MW876306 | MW879743 |
| Savitreella phatthalungensis | DMKU-PAL178 | LC647809 | MW876305 | MW879742 |
| Saitoella complicata | NRRL Y-17804T | NG_013154 | JN161162 | JN161156 |
| Saitoella coloradoensis | CBS 12360T | - | KY105294 | KY109521 |
| Schizosaccharomyces cryophilus | CBS 11777T | - | NR_121468 | GU470882 |
| Schizosaccharomyces osmophilus | CBS 15793T | - | MK589403 | MK253005 |
| Schizosaccharomyces japonicus | CBS 354T | - | NR_121199 | U94943 |
| Schizosaccharomyces pombe | CBS 356T | - | MK749863 | U40085 |
| Taphrina alni | CBS 683.93T | - | AF492077 | AF492024 |
| Taphrina antarctica | CCFEE 5198 | - | NR_132870 | NG_059477 |
| Taphrina americana | CBS 331.55 | - | NR_155874 | AF492025 |
| Taphrina deformans | CBS 356.35T | - | MH855698 | MH867217 |
| Taphrina dearnessii | CBS 334.55T | - | MH857499 | AF492037 |
| Taphrina betulina | CBS 119536T | - | AF492080 | AF492027 |
| Taphrina bullata | TB004 | - | KC491200 | JN997390 |
| Taphrina carnea | CBS 332.55T | - | MH857498 | MH869038 |
| Taphrina carpini | PYCC 5558T | - | NR_119488 | NG_042399 |
| Taphrina caerulescens | CBS 351.35T | - | NR_155875 | NG_057691 |
| Taphrina confusa | CBS 375.39T | - | NR_155876 | NG_067349 |
| Taphrina communis | CBS 352.35T | NG_065466 | NR_160070 | MH867214 |
| Taphrina epiphylla | CBS 111109T | - | AF492096 | AF492039 |
| Taphrina flavorubra | CBS 377.39T | NG_062593 | MH856045 | MH867541 |
| Taphrina insititiae | CBS 12782T | - | KC491202 | JN997391 |
| Taphrina letifera | CBS 335.55T | NG_062594 | NR_155877 | MH869040 |
| Taphrina mirabilis | CBS 357.35T | NG_062595 | NR_155878 | MH867218 |
| Taphrina nana | CBS 336.55T | - | MH857501 | MH869041 |
| Taphrina padi | CBS 693.93T | - | NR_155879 | AF492048 |
| Taphrina populina | CBS 337.55T | NG_062683 | MH857502 | NG_057694 |
| Taphrina populi-salicis | CBS 419.54T | - | NR_155881 | NG_057695 |
| Taphrina polystichi | CBS 379.39T | - | AF492105 | AF492049 |
| Taphrina pruni-subcordatae | CBS 381.39T | NG_062596 | MH856046 | MH867542 |
| Taphrina pruni | CBS 119537T | - | AF492111 | MH867219 |
| Taphrina robinsoniana | CBS 382.39T | NG_062597 | NR_172369 | AF492059 |
| Taphrina sadebeckii | CBS 102170T | - | NR_155882 | NG_057697 |
| Taphrina sacchari | CBS 119738T | - | AF492117 | AF492061 |
| Taphrina tormentillae | CBS 339.55T | - | NR_155883 | NG_057698 |
| Taphrina tosquinetii | CBS 276.28T | - | NR_155884 | NG_057699 |
| Taphrina ulmi | CBS 420.54T | NG_062598 | NR_155885 | NG_057700 |
| Taphrina vestergrenii | CBS 679.93T | AJ496253 | NR_155886 | NG_057701 |
| Taphrina virginica | CBS 340.55T | NG_062599 | AF492125 | MH869044 |
| Taphrina veronaerambellii | PYCC 5734T | - | NR_111148 | NG_059911 |
| Taphrina wiesneri | CBS 275.28T | - | NR_160065 | MH866479 |
* Gene sequences: SSU, nuclear small subunit rRNA gene; ITS, internal transcribed spacer regions; LSU, D1/D2 domains of the nuclear large subunit rRNA gene. The newly generated sequences are in boldface. Type strains indicated by “T”.
Table 2.
Sequences of the representative species in the Filobasidiaceae (Basidiomycota) used in the phylogenetic analyses.
Table 2.
Sequences of the representative species in the Filobasidiaceae (Basidiomycota) used in the phylogenetic analyses.
| Species | Strain | GenBank Accession Number * | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSU | ITS | D1/D2 | RPB2 | TEF1 | ||
| Goffeauzyma aciditolerans | CBS 10872T | KF036609 | NR_137808 | KY107763 | KF036746 | KF037017 |
| Goffeauzyma agrionensis | CBS 10799T | KF036611 | NR_137809 | EU627786 | KF036749 | KF037020 |
| Goffeauzyma gastrica | CBS 2288T | AB032633 | NR_111048 | KY107764 | KF036785 | KF037057 |
| Goffeauzyma gilvescens | CBS 7525T | AB032634 | NR_073228 | NG_058297 | KF036786 | KF037058 |
| Goffeauzyma iberica | CBS 10871T | KF036636 | NR_137812 | NG_058298 | KF036791 | KF037063 |
| Goffeauzyma metallitolerans | CBS 10873T | KF036639 | NR_137813 | KY107771 | KF036798 | KF037070 |
| Goffeauzyma siamensis | DMKU-PAL39T | OK576181 | MW669577 | LC604627 | LC656481 | LC656484 |
| Goffeauzyma siamensis | DMKU-PAL18 | OK576179 | MZ621116 | MZ621115 | LC656482 | LC656483 |
| Filobasidium globisporum | CBS 7642T | AB075546 | KY103422 | KY107713 | KF036890 | KF037153 |
| Filobasidium oeirense | CBS 868T | KF036644 | KF036644 | KY103438 | KY107723 | KF037076 |
| Filobasidium uniguttulatum | CBS 1730T | AB032664 | AF444302 | AF075468 | KF036891 | KF037154 |
| Naganishia albidosimilis | CBS 7711T | KF036612 | AF145325 | AF137601 | KF036750 | KF037021 |
| Naganishia liquefaciens | CBS 968T | KF036638 | AF444345 | NG_057655 | KF036794 | KF037066 |
| Naganishia globosa | CBS 1975T | KF036651 | AF444372 | AF181540 | KF036814 | KF037085 |
| Piskurozyma capsuligena | CBS 1906T | AB075544 | AF444381 | AF363642 | KF036887 | KF037152 |
* Gene sequences: SSU, nuclear small subunit rRNA gene; ITS, internal transcribed spacer regions; LSU, D1/D2 domains of the nuclear large subunit rRNA gene; RPB2, RNA polymerase II; TEF1, translation elongation factor 1-alpha. The newly generated sequences are in boldface. Type strains indicated by “T”.
Table 3.
Number of nucleotide divergent and percent of nucleotide similarity in the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene and the ITS regions between the Savitreella phatthalungensis sp. nov. and its closely related species.
Table 3.
Number of nucleotide divergent and percent of nucleotide similarity in the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene and the ITS regions between the Savitreella phatthalungensis sp. nov. and its closely related species.
| Gene/ Species | Number of Nucleotide Substitution/Nucleotide Similarity (%) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. inouyei NRRL YB-4354T | P. pachydermus NRRL YB-4355T | P. lactucaedebilis NRRL YB-4353T | P. macrosporus NRRL Y-12879T | P. gravidus NRRL Y-17093T | P. inundatus NRRL Y-6349T | P. arabidopsidicola C29T | T. virginica CBS 340.55T | T. wiesneri CBS 275.28T | T. letifera CBS 335.55T | T. communis CBS 352.35T | T. deformans CBS 356.35T | T. carnea CBS 332.55T | |
| D1/D2 | 56/90.49 | 54/90.50 | 55/90.33 | 53/90.63 | 66/88.88 | 52/90.81 | 55/90.33 | 65/88.98 | 65/88.98 | 63/89.26 | 64/89.13 | 66/88.42 | 65/88.98 |
| ITS | 91/80.51 | 57/87.01 | 97/79.27 | 92/80.04 | 106/77.82 | 87/80.87 | 92/79.60 | 110/77.55 | 105/78.61 | 108/78.18 | 114/77.24 | 105/78.70 | 89/81.45 |
Table 4.
Phenotypic characteristics that differentiate Savitreella phatthalungensis gen., sp. nov. from its closest species in the genera Protomyces and Taphrina.
Table 4.
Phenotypic characteristics that differentiate Savitreella phatthalungensis gen., sp. nov. from its closest species in the genera Protomyces and Taphrina.
| Characteristics | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assimilation of carbon compound | |||||||||||||||
| D-Galactose | - | - | v | - | + | - | - | - | w | w | - | w | - | - | - |
| L-Sorbose | - | - | - | - | s | - | v | - | - | - | v | - | v | v | - |
| N-Acetyl glucosamine | - | - | - | - | s | - | - | - | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| D-Ribose | - | - | - | - | s | - | - | - | - | + | - | - | v | - | v |
| L-Arabinose | - | - | s | - | s | - | - | w | - | + | - | + | - | - | + |
| D-Arabinose | - | s | s | s | s | - | v | w | - | + | - | - | v | - | v |
| Cellobiose | s | + | s | - | s | + | v | + | + | + | + | + | v | + | + |
| Salicin | w | + | w | - | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | + | v | + | + |
| D-Gluconate | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | v | - | - | - | w |
| Assimilation of nitrogen compound | |||||||||||||||
| Potassium nitrate | - | s | v | + | s | + | v | ND | w/s | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Other characteristic | |||||||||||||||
| Growth 25 °C | + | + | ND | - | + | ND | - | + | - | + | + | - | + | + | v |
| Growth 30 °C | + | ND | ND | - | ND | ND | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Starch formation | - | w | w | w/- | w/- | w | + | ND | + | + | + | + | + | v | + |
Legend of the sign: + positive; s slow positive; w weakly positive; v variable; - negative; ND not determined. Species: 1 S. phatthalungensis.; 2 P. gravidus; 3 P. inouyei; 4 P. inundates; 5 P. lactucaedebilis; 6 P. macrosporus; 7 P. pachydermus; 8 P. arabidopsidicola; 9 T. vestergrenii; 10 T. virginica; 11 T. wiesneri; 12 T. letifera; 13 T. communis; 14 T. deformans; 15 T. carnea.
Table 5.
Phenotypic characteristics that differentiate Goffeauzyma siamensis sp. nov. from its closest species, G. iberica.
Table 5.
Phenotypic characteristics that differentiate Goffeauzyma siamensis sp. nov. from its closest species, G. iberica.
| Characteristics | G. siamensis | G. iberica |
|---|---|---|
| Assimilation of carbon compound | ||
| Glycerol | + | - |
| Ribitol | + | - |
| Galactitol | w | - |
| D-Gluconate | s | - |
| DL-Lactate | + | - |
| Citrate | - | + |
| Other characteristics | ||
| 0.01% Cycloheximide | - | + |
Legend of the sign: + positive; s slow positive; w weakly positive; - negative.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Nutaratat, P.; Boontham, W.; Khunnamwong, P. A Novel Yeast Genus and Two Novel Species Isolated from Pineapple Leaves in Thailand: Savitreella phatthalungensis gen. nov., sp. nov. and Goffeauzyma siamensis sp. nov. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8020118
AMA Style
Nutaratat P, Boontham W, Khunnamwong P. A Novel Yeast Genus and Two Novel Species Isolated from Pineapple Leaves in Thailand: Savitreella phatthalungensis gen. nov., sp. nov. and Goffeauzyma siamensis sp. nov. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(2):118. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8020118
Chicago/Turabian StyleNutaratat, Pumin, Wanatchaporn Boontham, and Pannida Khunnamwong. 2022. "A Novel Yeast Genus and Two Novel Species Isolated from Pineapple Leaves in Thailand: Savitreella phatthalungensis gen. nov., sp. nov. and Goffeauzyma siamensis sp. nov." Journal of Fungi 8, no. 2: 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8020118
APA StyleNutaratat, P., Boontham, W., & Khunnamwong, P. (2022). A Novel Yeast Genus and Two Novel Species Isolated from Pineapple Leaves in Thailand: Savitreella phatthalungensis gen. nov., sp. nov. and Goffeauzyma siamensis sp. nov. Journal of Fungi, 8(2), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8020118
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
