Next Article in Journal
Metabolomics Analysis and Antioxidant Potential of Endophytic Diaporthe fraxini ED2 Grown in Different Culture Media
Previous Article in Journal
Surface Area of Wood Influences the Effects of Fungal Interspecific Interaction on Wood Decomposition—A Case Study Based on Pinus densiflora and Selected White Rot Fungi
Previous Article in Special Issue
Differential Physiological Prerequisites and Gene Expression Profiles of Conidial Anastomosis Tube and Germ Tube Formation in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 8
Issue 5
10.3390/jof8050518
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Stemphylium lycopersici Nep1-like Protein (NLP) Is a Key Virulence Factor in Tomato Gray Leaf Spot Disease

by
Jiajie Lian
1,
Hongyu Han
1,
Xizhan Chen
1,
Qian Chen
1,
Jiuhai Zhao
2,3,* and
Chuanyou Li
3,4,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agriculture, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
2
Key Laboratory of Soybean Molecular Design Breeding, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China
3
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100864, China
4
State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, National Centre for Plant Gene Research (Beijing), Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(5), 518; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050518
Submission received: 30 March 2022 / Revised: 14 May 2022 / Accepted: 15 May 2022 / Published: 18 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emergent Fungal Models for Genetics and Cell Biology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The fungus Stemphylium lycopersici (S. lycopersici) is an economically important plant pathogen that causes grey leaf spot disease in tomato. However, functional genomic studies in S. lycopersici are lacking, and the factors influencing its pathogenicity remain largely unknown. Here, we present the first example of genetic transformation and targeted gene replacement in S. lycopersici. We functionally analyzed the NLP gene, which encodes a necrosis- and ethylene-inducing peptide 1 (Nep1)-like protein (NLP). We found that targeted disruption of the NLP gene in S. lycopersici significantly compromised its virulence on tomato. Moreover, our data suggest that NLP affects S. lycopersici conidiospore production and weakly affects its adaptation to osmotic and oxidative stress. Interestingly, we found that NLP suppressed the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in tomato leaves during S. lycopersici infection. Further, expressing the fungal NLP in tomato resulted in constitutive transcription of immune-responsive genes and inhibited plant growth. Through gene manipulation, we demonstrated the function of NLP in S. lycopersici virulence and development. Our work provides a paradigm for functional genomics studies in a non-model fungal pathogen system.

1. Introduction

The fungal genus Stemphylium includes many plant pathogens that infect economically important crops worldwide [1,2,3,4,5]. Four Stemphylium species, S. lycopersici, Stemphylium solani, Stemphylium vesicarium, and Stemphylium botryosum f. sp. lycopersici, are necrotrophic fungi that cause tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) gray leaf spot disease (GLS) [6]. GLS mainly attacks the foliage of tomato and forms gray lesions. Severe damage can lead to complete defoliation, making GLS one of the most damaging diseases of tomato [6,7]. However, the mechanism underlying the interaction between the plants and Stemphylium spp. is still largely unknown.
Plant-phytopathogen coevolution has driven the development of complicated mechanisms underlying plant-pathogen interaction. Plants recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs)/microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) on the cell surface through pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs), which initiate PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) [8]. To suppress host PTI and promote invasion, many pathogens secrete host-specific effectors [8,9]. In turn, plants become disease resistant by expressing resistance (R) proteins that perceive pathogen effectors and initiate effector-triggered immunity (ETI) [9]. Phytopathogens employ various approaches to facilitate successful infection, such as the secretion of cell wall degrading enzymes [10], toxins [11], and small RNAs [12].
Necrosis- and ethylene-inducing peptide 1 (Nep1)-like proteins (NLPs) comprise a large family of microbial secreted proteins with a broad taxonomic distribution that includes fungi, bacteria, and oomycetes [13,14,15]. NLPs are classed into three types based on protein alignment and phylogeny, among which type I is the most abundant and is present in fungi, bacteria, and oomycetes [15]. Type II NLPs have been identified only in fungi and bacteria and type III NLPs only in ascomycete fungi [15]. Toxic NLPs induce cell necrosis and trigger immune responses in dicotyledonous plants [9,16], whereas nontoxic NLPs do not induce cell necrosis but trigger immune responses [9,13,16].The central region of NLPs is conserved, containing a 20-amino-acid pattern (nlp20) or a 24-amino-acid pattern (nlp24) [17,18]. Studies in Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis) show that the toxic nlp20 triggers necrosis and immune responses resembling PTI [9], while the nontoxic nlp24 triggers PTI but not necrosis [13]. A leucine-rich repeat receptor protein, RECEPTOR LIKE PROTEIN 23 (RLP23), has been identified as the receptor for nlp20 in Arabidopsis [19].
Currently, GLS is commonly controlled by breeding resistant cultivars. In tomato, resistance to pathogenic Stemphylium spp. is controlled by the resistance gene Sm, which was introduced into cultivated tomato from its wild progenitor Solanum pimpinellifolium [6,20]. Sm encodes a nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) resistance protein [21]. Since the virulence factor(s) in Stemphylium spp. are unknown, the tomato-Stemphylium interaction mechanism is also unclear. Necrotrophic phytopathogens use toxins and phytotoxic proteins as a central virulence strategy [22]. Metabolite profiling of S. lycopersici showed that the pathogen produces various phytotoxins, including the known compounds stemphylin and macrosporin [23,24], but no other virulence factors from Stemphylium spp. have been characterized. The S. lycopersici draft genome has been released and has provided the genetic information necessary for functional studies [25]. However, functional genomics studies in Stemphylium spp. have been lacking.
In this study, we identified and characterized the NLP gene from the S. lycopersici genome. To characterize its function, we carried out gene transformation and targeted gene replacement and generated NLP gene replacement mutants and overexpression strains. We demonstrated that NLP is a key virulence factor of S. lycopersici and triggers immune response in tomato. We also analyzed the role of NLP in fungal growth, conidiophore production, and stress adaption. Thus, we provide the first example of functional genomics in the non-model fungal pathogen S. lycopersici.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cv. M82 was used as the wild type (WT) in this study. Following incubation in a 50 °C water bath for 30 min, seeds were sterilized by soaking in 2.7% sodium hypochlorite for 30 min. The sterilized seeds were rinsed three times with sterile water to remove excess sodium hypochlorite, evenly distributed on moist filter paper to stimulate germination, and left to germinate for 2–3 days. The plants were then transferred to compost soil mix (grass charcoal:vermiculite, 1:1) in a growth chamber at 24–26 °C and a relative humidity of 60%, with a white light intensity of 200 μmol photons m−2 s−1, and grown under a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod. For in vitro or in vivo infection experiments, 4-week-old plants were used [26].

2.2. Fungal Strain Isolation and Growth Conditions

The WT S. lycopersici strain was isolated from a tomato field in Beijing. Single spores were purified, and the progeny were stored. The WT strain was identified using the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences ITS 1/4 [27], gpd and EF1α gene (Table S1). To further confirm the WT strain is a S. lycopersici strain, we sequenced the strain and made a draft genome assembly based on second generation sequencing on Illumina platform (unpublished). The whole-genome Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) was computed using FastANI (https://github.com/ParBLiSS/FastANI, accessed on 15 March 2022). The results showed that the ANI between the WT strain of Stemphylium lycopersici used and the released genome of strain CIDEFI 216 [25] was 99.3%, while the ANI between the WT strain and Stemphylium vesicarium (genome assembly GCA_008271585.1) was 89.8%, which suggests that the strain used in this study is a S. lycopersici strain.
The WT S. lycopersici strains were maintained at 25 °C in the dark on potato dextrose agar (PDA; Difco) and transferred weekly to fresh medium less than 3 generations. The frozen stocks of all strains were inoculated to reproduce conidia and the conidia suspension were used for experiment if needed. To test the effect of NLP on S. lycopersici adaption to ionic stress, conidia of the WT as well as ∆nlp-1, ∆nlp-2, pACTIN:NLP-1, and pACTIN:NLP-2 strains (see below) were inoculated on (complete medium) CM medium (dextrose 10 g, tryptone 2 g, yeast extract 1 g, casein acids hydrolysate 1 g, NaNO3 6 g, KCl 0.5 g, MgSO4·7H2O 1.0 g, KH2PO4 1.5 g, agar 9 g, H2O to 1 L, pH 6.5) containing NaCl (1 M) or KCl (1 M) and incubated at 25 °C. After 8 days incubation the medium plates were measured for the area of the mycelium. CM medium without NaCl or KCl was used as the negative control. To test the effect of NLP on the adaption of S. lycopersici to oxidative stress, fungal cakes (5 mm in diameter) of WT, ∆nlp-1, ∆nlp-2, pACTIN:NLP-1, and pACTIN:NLP-2 strains were inoculated on CM plates containing H2O2 (20 mM) [28] and incubated at 25 °C for 8 days. CM medium without H2O2 was used as the negative control.

2.3. Gene Knockout and Overexpression in S. lycopersici

∆nlp-1 and ∆nlp-2 strains were generated using a gene knockout method modified from split-marker and CRISPR strategies [29]. Primer information and vectors used for NLP knockout and overexpression experiments are shown in Table S1. The targeted gene replacement vector harbors a hygromycin B resistance marker gene (hph). The PYF11-mCherry overexpression vector was constructed by replacing the green fluorescent protein (GFP) sequence in the PYF11 backbone with an mCherry sequence. pACTIN:NLP-1, and pACTIN:NLP-2 strains were created in this vector using the NLP gene under the regulation of the 3-kb S. lycopersici ACTIN promoter, along with the first intron of the ACTIN gene [30].

2.4. Genetic Transformation of S. lycopersici

S. lycopersici genetic transformation was performed based on the method established by Connolly et al., with appropriate adjustments [31]. Spores were suspended in liquid medium and vortexed on ice. The concentration was adjusted to 1 × 105 spores/mL, and 5 mL of the spore suspension was added to CM liquid medium and incubated for 12 h at 25 °C and 200 rpm. The mycelium (1 g wet weight) was digested by adding 20 mL of 0.7 M KCl buffer with 500 mg driselase (Sigma, St. Luis, Mo, USA, D8037), 100 mg lysing enzyme (Sigma, St. Luis, Mo, USA, L1412), 225 mg Cellulase R10 (Yakult, Tokyo, Japan, MX7352), and 45 mg Macerozyme (Yakult, Tokyo, Japan, MX7351) and incubated at 28 °C and 90 rpm. After digestion and filtering, protoplasts were harvested for transformation. The protoplast concentration was adjusted to 1 × 106 protoplasts/mL. After washing twice with STC buffer (Sucrose 200 g, 0.5 M TRIS-HCl, 100 mL, CaCl2·2H2O 7.351 g, H2O to 1 L), 2–10 μg DNA fragments or plasmids to be transformed was added and mixed well, then 0.75 mL of PTC buffer (STC buffer containing 40% of PEG8000) was added. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Then regeneration medium (yeast extract 3 g, casein acids hydrolysate 3 g, sucrose 200 g, H2O to 1 L) was added and incubated at 28 °C and 200 rpm for 12 h. Targeted gene replacement or overexpression plasmids were introduced into protoplasts. Transformed protoplasts were then transferred to regeneration medium and cultured in screening medium with antibiotics. The knockout transformants were screened on regeneration medium containing 200 μg/mL hygromycin B. The putative transformants were first tested for deletion by NLP-TG-check primers (Table S1) and further confirmed by the full-length of the target gene sequencing. The overexpression transformants were screened on regeneration medium containing 100 μg/mL G418. Putative transformants were first assessed for mCherry fluorescence and further confirmed by RT-qPCR. The fluorescence observation of mycelium was performed with a ZEISS® LSM880 confocal microscope equipped with a 40× oil-immersion objective, and a 587 nm laser for mCherry fluorescence, controlled by ZEN Black software.

2.5. Bioinformatics Analysis and Phylogenetic Assay

The Alternaria alternata NLP (XP_018379771.1), Botrytis cinerea NLP1 (QIH49261.1) and NLP2 (XP_001551049.1) were selected as typical type I NLP. The Pectobacterium parmentieri NLP (WP_033071099.1) and P. atrosepticum (WP_011094611.1) NLP were selected as typical type II NLP. The Aspergillus turcosus (RHZ70022.1) NLP and A. novofumigatus NLP (XP_024685090.1) were selected as typical type III NLP. The sequences of S. lycopersici NLP and the typical type I, type II, and type III NLP proteins were analyzed by protein sequence alignment. NLP DNA and protein sequence data were obtained from NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on 15 March 2022). A protein BLAST comparison was performed using fungal NLP protein sequences reported in previous studies [32]. Prediction of conserved domains was performed by blastp in the NCBI blast website. Sequence alignments and phylogenetic trees were generated using MEGA 11 software [33].

2.6. Tomato Disease Assay

Spores produced on sporulation medium were collected in a 50-mL centrifuge tube and vortexed with liquid CM medium for 1 min, and the suspension was filtered through Miracloth (Millipore, Cat: 475855, Burlington, MA, USA). The spores were collected by centrifugation at 4000 rpm and transferred into a new 50-mL centrifuge tube. Spores were washed and diluted to 1 × 105 spores/mL with CM liquid medium. The disease assay was then performed based on a published method [26] with modifications. Two S. lycopersici spore suspensions (1 × 105 spores/mL) were placed on each detached tomato leave, which was then placed on water agar medium (agar 9 g, H2O to 1 L). The Petri dishes were then sealed with permeable tape (3M, Cat: T8030C-0, St. Paul, MN, USA), and incubated for 5 days in a growth chamber under a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod. Disease symptoms were photographed, and lesion size was measured using ImageJ software [34].

2.7. DNA Constructs and Plant Transformation

DNA constructs for plant transformation were generated following standard molecular biology protocols and using Gateway (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) technology. The full-length NLP gene coding sequence was amplified by PCR from genomic DNA and cloned into the pK7FWG2 vector to generate p35S:NLP. The primers used to generate these DNA constructs are listed in Table S2. The above constructs were introduced into tomato cv. M82 by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation [26]. Transformants were selected based on their resistance to kanamycin. Homozygous T2 or T3 transgenic plants were used for phenotypic and molecular characterization.

2.8. ROS Staining

Detection and quantification of ROS production during infection were performed as previously described [35,36]. Detached leaves from 4-week-old tomato plants were placed in Petri dishes containing 0.8% agar medium (agar dissolved in sterile water), with the petiole embedded in the medium. Tomato leaves infected with a 5-μL droplet of S. lycopersici spore suspension at a concentration of 105 spores/mL were collected 18 h after inoculation.
The infected leaves were stained with DAB (3,3′-diaminobenzidine, CAT: A03D10L104932) solution for H2O2 detection or with NBT (nitroblue tetrazolium chloride, CAT: A100329-0001) for O2− detection. Detached leaves were submerged in DAB solution (1 mg/mL in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 3.8) or NBT solution (0.5 mg/mL NBT in 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.8). Vacuum infiltration was performed for 30 min, and leaves were stained for 4 h at 25 °C in the dark. The staining solution was then replaced with decolorization solution (acetic acid:glycerol:ethanol, 1:1:1, v/v/v) and the mixture boiled for 15 min. The decolored leaves were then scanned by scanner (EPSON perfection V330 Photo) and the scanned pictures were subjected to ImageJ for staining density quantification. The RGB values of scanned images were converted into a 16-bit grayscale, which were then quantified using the grayscale statistics method.

2.9. RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR

For gene expression quantification, samples were subjected to reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Leaves of 2-week-old tomato plants were infected with a single 5-μL droplet of S. lycopersici spore suspension (1 × 105 spores/mL). The plants were then incubated in a growth chamber with high humidity. A droplet of CM liquid medium was used as the negative control. Infected leaves were harvested at different time points for RT-qPCR experiments.
For mycelium biomass quantification, detached leaves from 4-week-old tomato plants were placed in Petri dishes containing 0.8% agar medium, with the petiole embedded in the medium. Tomato leaves were infected with a 5-μL droplet of S. lycopersici spore suspension at a concentration of 105 spores/mL. A droplet of CM liquid medium was used as the negative control. Infected leaves were harvested at 5 dpi for RT-qPCR experiments. Relative fungal growth was measured by RNA-based RT-qPCR using the threshold cycle value (CT) of S. lycopersici ACTIN against the CT of tomato ACTIN2.
Tomato seedlings were homogenized in liquid nitrogen and RNA was isolated using the total RNA kit (Cwbio, Cat: CW0559). First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 2-μg total RNA using the All-in-One First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Supermix for qPCR (One-Step gDNA Removal) kit (with DNase) (EasyScript, Cat: AE341-02) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. TransStart® Green qPCR SuperMix was used for RT-qPCR reactions in the CFX Connect Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The RT-qPCR was performed by CFX96 Touch™ (Bio-Rad). Each reaction was performed in three biological replicates, with three technical replicates per biological replicate. Relative expression levels were calculated by the comparative 2−ΔΔCt method [37]. Transcript abundance was based on the abundance of tomato Actin2. The primer sequences used in these experiments are described in detail in Table S3. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM) from three biological replicates.

2.10. Quantification and Statistical Analysis

All experiments were repeated independently three times. At least four plants were included in each treatment in an independent experiment. Lesion area, fresh weight, spore concentration, plant height, and colony area data for quantification analyses are presented as average ± standard error (SE). RT-qPCR data for quantification analyses are presented as average ± standard error of mean (SEM). Statistical analyses were performed using routines implemented in DPS software. Comparisons among multiple groups were made by Duncan’s new multiple range test. Comparisons between two groups were made using Student’s t test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01) with Microsoft Excel software.

3. Results

3.1. A Stemphylium lycopersici Type I Nep1-like Protein (NLP) Is Induced during Infection of Tomato

We subjected NLP protein sequences from Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium graminearum, and Fusarium oxysporum to a BLASTP search in the NCBI database. This identified only one copy of an NLP protein (GenBank accession: KNG44024.1) in the S. lycopersici genome [25]. This NLP protein sequence was predicted to have secretory signal peptides and an NPP1 (Necrosis-Inducing Phytophthora Protein 1) domain (Figure 1A). Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the NLP of S. lycopersici is a type I NLP protein (Figure 1B). Accordingly, multiple protein sequence alignment using all three NLP types from various species showed that the S. lycopersici NLP contains type I conserved sequences (Figure S1). Next, to assess NLP expression during host infection, we quantified the NLP gene transcription by Reverse Transcription-Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Fungal conidia were inoculated on artificial medium as a negative control. RT-qPCR data showed that the NLP gene transcript abundance did not change on the control medium, but became significantly elevated in infected tomato leaves from 12 to 48 h post-inoculation (hpi; Figure 1C). These data suggest that the NLP gene expression is induced during S. lycopersici infection of tomato.

3.2. NLP Affects Conidiospore Production but Not Vegetative Growth in S. lycopersici

To study the molecular function of NLP in S. lycopersici, we first established a gene transformation method. Knockout of the NLP gene was conducted by targeted gene replacement through a CRISPR/Cas9 enhancement approach [29], in which Cas9 cut DNA and facilitated the targeted gene replacement. Using this method, we generated NLP gene knockout mutants (∆nlp) (Figure 2A). NLP gene deletion in screened transformants was confirmed by PCR (Figure S2A,B), RT-qPCR (Figure S2C), and gene sequencing (Figure S3). In addition, we constructed mCherry-tagged NLP protein under the regulation of the ACTIN promoter and first intron (pACTIN:NLP) (Figure 2B). RT-qPCR results showed high NLP gene expression levels in pACTIN:NLP strains (Figure S2C). The pACTIN:NLP strains were subjected to microscopy and mCherry fluorescence was detected (Figure S2D).
To investigate the role of NLP in fungal asexual reproduction, we quantified the conidia production of WT, ∆nlp, and pACTIN:NLP strains on sporulation medium. The results showed that NLP gene deletion reduced the ability of the ∆nlp mutant to produce conidia (Figure 2C). To test whether NLP regulates fungal development, we measured conidia germination and mycelial growth by inoculating WT, ∆nlp, and pACTIN:NLP strains in liquid complete medium (CM) and quantifying their germination after 6 h. The results showed no significant differences in spore germination rates between the tested strains (Figure S4A, p value > 0.05). To compare mycelial growth in the different strains, we incubated conidia on CM medium and measured mycelium growth area after 8 days, finding that mycelial growth did not differ significantly among the tested strains (Figure 2D–G). We also measured the area of mycelium on CM medium at 2, 4, and 6 days after incubation to quantify the mycelium growth rate, and again found no statistically significant differences in rates between strains (Figure S4B). These results indicate that S. lycopersici NLP does not influence either fungal conidia germination or vegetative growth. The results suggest that NLP affects conidia production but not the mycelium growth in S. lycopersici.

3.3. NLP Weakly Affects Osmotic and Oxidative Stress Adaptation in S. lycopersici

Infection-related stresses such as osmotic stress, oxidative stress, and cell wall integrity stress could be indictive of pathogen virulence [38]. To test whether NLP affects S. lycopersici adaptation to infection-related stresses [39], we compared the radial growth rates of WT, ∆nlp, and pACTIN:NLP strains on CM medium supplemented with osmotic stress agents. During incubation on CM medium with the osmotic stress agents NaCl (1 M) or KCl (1 M) for 8 days, osmotic stress significantly inhibited mycelium growth of the WT and both mutant strains, but whereas pACTIN:NLP showed a similar response to WT, the ∆nlp mutants showed a weakly yet significantly stronger growth inhibition (Figure 2D,E). To test whether NLP affects fungal adaptation to oxidative stress [28], we incubated the different strains on CM medium containing H2O2 (20 mM). Measurement of mycelium growth 8 days after inoculation again showed that the ∆nlp mutants exhibited weakly yet significantly stronger growth inhibition, while the pACTIN:NLP strains showed similar responses to the WT (Figure 2F,G). Next, to test whether NLP affects S. lycopersici adaptation to cell wall stability-disrupting agents, we inoculated conidia of different strains on CM medium containing sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, 0.005%) and Congo red (CR, 300 μg/mL). After 8 days, we detected no significant differences in the mycelial growth of all tested strains (Figure 2E). Taken together, these data suggest that NLP might play a role in S. lycopersici adaptation to osmotic and oxidative stresses, but not for maintenance of cell wall integrity.

3.4. NLP Is Required for Full Virulence of S. lycopersici in Tomato

To test the role of NLP in the virulence of S. lycopersici on tomato, we infected tomato leaves with the WT, ∆nlp, and pACTIN:NLP strains by placing droplets of conidial suspension (5 µL, 1 × 105 conidia/mL) on the surfaces of the leaves. When we measured the resulting diseased areas at 5 days post inoculation (dpi), we found that, compared to those on the WT leaves, the disease lesions on the ∆nlp mutant leaves were significantly smaller, while those on pACTIN:NLP strains were significantly larger (Figure 3A,B and Figure S5). In addition, we quantified the mycelium biomass of the different strains at the infection sites and found that the mycelia of the ∆nlp mutant at the diseased sites were lower than those of the WT at 5 dpi (Figure 3C). The results suggested that the NLP gene deletion reduced S. lycopersici virulence. Overall, these data indicate that NLP is an important virulence factor in tomato grey leaf spot disease.

3.5. NLP Suppresses S. lycopersici Infection-Induced ROS Production in Tomato Leaves

It has been proposed that NLP acts as a PAMP that could trigger PTI-like responses including ROS production in the host [40,41]. To test whether S. lycopersici NLP could affect host ROS production, we assayed the transcription of the tomato ROS synthesis genes RESPIRATORY BURST OXIDASE HOMOLOG A (RbohA) and RbohB in infected tomato plants by RT-qPCR [42]. Tomato leaves were infected by the WT, ∆nlp, and pACTIN:NLP strains, and expression levels of RbohA and RbohB were quantified as 12 hpi and 24 hpi. The results showed that the WT strain induced the transcription of RbohA and RbohB in tomato leaves. Compared to the WT strain, the ∆nlp strain triggered significantly higher expression of RbohA and RbohB, while the pACTIN:NLP strain caused lower expression of both genes (Figure 4A,B). To further confirm that host ROS production is affected by S. lycopersici NLP, we detected H2O2 and O2− production in infected tomato leaves at 18 hpi by DAB and NBT staining. Our results showed that the ∆nlp mutant strain caused more H2O2 (Figure 4C,D) and O2− (Figure 4E,F) accumulation than the WT. Accordingly, lower ROS levels were detected in leaves infected with the pACTIN:NLP strain vs. WT (Figure 4C–F). Overall, these results suggest that S. lycopersici NLP suppresses the transcription of host ROS synthesis genes and inhibits infection-induced ROS production in the host.

3.6. Expression of S. lycopersici NLP in Tomato Leads to Constitutive Plant Immune Responses and Reduced Growth

To test whether the S. lycopersici NLP protein could trigger immune responses in tomato, the NLP gene sequence was fused with GFP and driven by the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter (p35S:NLP). The p35S:NLP construct was introduced into tomato by Agrobacterium-mediated gene transformation. Expression of the NLP gene in p35S:NLP transgenic tomato was quantified by RT-qPCR. Our results showed that transgenic p35S:NLP tomato plants highly expressed the fungal NLP gene (Figure 5A). To determine the effect of p35S:NLP on tomato immune responses, we incubated p35S:NLP and WT tomato seedlings on half-strength Murashige and Skoog (1/2 MS) medium in sterile conditions and assessed their immune responses after 2 weeks. RT-qPCR data showed that the p35S:NLP transgenic plants constitutively expressed both PR-STH2 and ERF.C3 (Figure 5B,C), two immune-responsive genes that play an important role in tomato resistance to B. cinerea [26]. Interestingly, overexpressing S. lycopersici NLP gene in tomato resulted in a phenotype of reduced growth: the fresh weight of 1-week-old p35S:NLP transgenic plants was significantly lower than that of WT plants (Figure 5D). In addition, the primary roots of p35S:NLP tomato lines were significantly shorter than the WT (Figure 5E). Similarly, when grown in the greenhouse, the p35S:NLP lines showed lower growth, as well as significantly shorter height and lower fresh weight, compared to the WT (Figure 5F–H). These data suggest that S. lycopersici NLP triggers host immunity and inhibits plant growth.

4. Discussion

Stemphylium spp. fungal pathogens are economically important. Many are necrotrophic pathogens that infect a wide spectrum of crops worldwide, including tomato [6], pepper [43], eggplant [44], onion [45], parsley [3], garlic [4], lettuce [5], and cotton [46]. However, their pathogenicity is poorly understood due to a lack of functional genomic studies. Reliable genetic transformation methods are a prerequisite to studying the molecular functions of genes. It has been reported that targeted gene replacement could be enhanced by CRISPR/Cas-derived RNA-guided nucleases (RGNs) in the rice blast fungus Pyricularia oryzae [37]. In this study, we employed targeted gene replacement enhanced by RGN and established a gene transformation method by which we generated S. lycopersici NLP knockout mutants and overexpression strains. Using these genetically modified strains, we showed that NLP is a key virulence factor in tomato gray leaf spot disease caused by S. lycopersici.
Nep1 (necrosis- and ethylene-inducing peptide 1) was first identified as a 24-kDa elicitor protein from the fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. erythroxyli that induces necrosis and ethylene production in the leaves of Erythroxylum coca and other dicots [47]. The Nep1 gene from F. oxysporum was cloned, after which Nep1-like proteins (NLPs) were identified in other plant pathogens [48]. NLPs are taxonomically widespread in fungi, oomycetes, and bacteria [49,50]. The NLP family exhibits functional diversity, as demonstrated by the genetic manipulation of NLPs in many microorganisms including F. oxysporum [15], B. cinerea [17], Magnaporthe oryzae [51], B. elliptica [52], and Diplodia seriata [53].
Previous studies have suggested that NLPs can be either toxic or non-toxic to host plants [54]. For instance, Nep1 from F. oxysporum shows herbicidal potential against many dicot weed species [55]. The tomato-pathogenic Verticillium dahliae strain contains seven NLPs, of which only NLP1 and NLP2 induce plant cell death [56]. NLP1 also affects V. dahliae vegetative growth and conidiospore production [50,56]. It has been shown that toxic NLPs act as both phytotoxins and PAMPs. The toxic NLPs could induce necrosis, ROS and ethylene production, transcription of genes encoding pathogenesis-related proteins (PRs), and callose deposition [18,57]. In contrast, the non-toxic NLPs do not induce necrosis but are recognized by the host immune system and induce immune responses [58]. Thus, NLPs can be recognized by host receptors and trigger a PTI response.
We identified a single copy of NLP in S. lycopersici based on the drafted genome. As S. lycopersici infected tomato plants, NLP expression was upregulated. Targeted gene disruption of the NLP gene significantly inhibited S. lycopersici virulence and conidiophore formation. We found that in S. lycopersici, NLP also plays positive roles in osmotic and oxidative stress adaptation. It is still unclear how NLPs regulate fungal development and stress adaptation. Large scale functional genomics studies in S. lycopersici are needed to further understand how virulence factors affect fungal development. Based on the disease assays we conducted in tomato, S. lycopersici NLP promotes necrotic lesion formation and immune-responsive gene expression in infected plants, and is thus toxic to the plant host. Interestingly, our results showed that S. lycopersici NLP suppresses host ROS production (Figure 4). The effect of NLP on ROS production in the host could inhibit plant immunity and facilitate S. lycopersici virulence. However, no receptors of any pathogen NLPs have so far been reported in tomato. It remains unclear how NLP could suppress ROS production and trigger immune responses in tomato.
It is commonly accepted that plant defense responses are energetically costly and typically lead to plant growth inhibition [59]. A previous study has shown that expressing a non-cytotoxic NLP from the biotrophic downy mildew pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis, HaNLP3, in Arabidopsis triggered resistance to H. arabidopsidis and inhibited plant growth [60]. Similarly, in this study, we found that overexpression of the S. lycopersici NLP gene in tomato resulted in upregulation of immune-responsive genes and reduced plant growth (Figure 5). Because plants balance defense and growth, it has been a great challenge to improve both crop defense and yield. The tomato transgenic lines showed strong growth and defense phenotype, which makes this a powerful genetic tool to further study the mechanism of how plants balance defense and growth.
In conclusion, our work represents the first comprehensive functional genomic study in the non-model plant pathogen S. lycopersici. Using gene manipulation methods, we generated targeted gene disruption mutants and ectopic overexpression lines of NLP in S. lycopersici, which allowed us to investigate its role in pathogen virulence and development. Our data suggest that NLP might contribute to the virulence of S. lycopersici by suppressing ROS-mediated immunity in tomato. Large-scale functional genomic studies are required to further dissect the pathogenicity of Stemphylium spp.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof8050518/s1, Figure S1: Alignment of NLP proteins shows that S. lycopersici NLP is a type I NLP protein; Figure S2: Confirmation of NLP gene knockout and overexpression S. lycopersici strains; Figure S3: Confirmation of NLP gene knockout strains by sequence alignment; Figure S4: NLP does not affect spore germination and colony growth; Figure S5: NLP is required for full virulence of S. lycopersici on other tomato cultivars. Table S1: Primers for fungi NLP identification and gene manipulation; Table S2: Primers for NLP gene overexpression in tomato; Table S3: Primers Used for RT-qPCR.

Author Contributions

J.Z. and C.L. designed the experiment; J.L., H.H. and X.C. performed the experiments; J.L. analyzed the data; J.L., J.Z., Q.C. and C.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 31970285) and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China, grant number ZR2020JQ12.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Wenxing Liang (Qingdao Agricultural University) for providing the PYF11 vector.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Nasehi, A.; Kadir, J.-B.; Nasr-Esfahani, M.; Abed-Ashtiani, F.; Wong, M.-Y.; Rambe, S.-K.; Golkhandan, E. Analysis of genetic and virulence variability of Stemphylium lycopersici associated with leaf spot of vegetable crops. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2014, 140, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Franco, M.E.E.; Troncozo, M.I.; López, S.M.Y.; Lucentini, G.; Medina, R.; Saparrat, M.C.N.; Ronco, L.B.; Balatti, P.A. A survey on tomato leaf grey spot in the two main production areas of Argentina led to the isolation of Stemphylium lycopersici representatives which were genetically diverse and differed in their virulence. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2017, 149, 983–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Koike, S.T.; O’Neill, N.; Wolf, J.; Van Berkum, P.; Daugovish, O. Stemphylium Leaf Spot of Parsley in California Caused by Stemphylium vesicarium. Plant Dis. 2013, 97, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Galvez, L.; Gil-Serna, J.; Garcia, M.; Iglesias, C.; Palmero, D. Stemphylium leaf blight of garlic (Allium sativum) in Spain: Taxonomy and in vitro fungicide response. Plant Pathol. J. 2016, 32, 388–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, H.; Wang, H.; Zhong, J.; Lu, X.; Pan, X.T.; Zhu, H.J.; Zhou, Q. First report of Stemphylium lycopersici and Stemphylium vesicarium causing leaf spot on lettuce (Lactuca sativa) in China. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 2598–2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Behare, J.; Laterrot, H.; Sarfatti, M.; Zamir, D. Restriction fragment length polymorphism mapping of the Stemphylium resistance gene in tomato. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 1991, 4, 489–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Blancard, D. Tomato Diseases, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yuan, M.; Ngou, B.P.M.; Ding, P.; Xin, X.-F. PTI-ETI crosstalk: An integrative view of plant immunity. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2021, 62, 102030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qutob, D.; Kemmerling, B.; Brunner, F.; Küfner, I.; Engelhardt, S.; Gust, A.A.; Luberacki, B.; Seitz, H.U.; Stahl, D.; Rauhut, T. Phytotoxicity and innate immune responses induced by Nep1-like proteins. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 3721–3744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zeng, R.; Gao, S.; Xu, L.; Liu, X.; Dai, F. Prediction of pathogenesis-related secreted proteins from Stemphylium lycopersici. BMC Microbiol. 2018, 18, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Trigos, A.; Mendoza, G.; Espinoza, C.; Salinas, A.; Fernandez, J.J.; Norte, M. The role of macrosporin in necrotic spots. Phytochem. Lett. 2011, 4, 122–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Weiberg, A.; Wang, M.; Lin, F.-M.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, Z.; Kaloshian, I.; Huang, H.-D.; Jin, H. Fungal Small RNAs Suppress Plant Immunity by Hijacking Host RNA Interference Pathways. Science 2013, 342, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Oome, S.; Raaymakers, T.M.; Cabral, A.; Samwel, S.; Böhm, H.; Albert, I.; Nürnberger, T.; Van Den Ackerveken, G. Nep1-like proteins from three kingdoms of life act as a microbe-associated molecular pattern in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 16955–16960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Yang, K.; Dong, X.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Zhai, Y.; Li, X.; Wei, L.; Jing, M.; Dou, D. Type 2 Nep1-like proteins from the biocontrol oomycete Pythium oligandrum suppress Phytophthora capsici infection in solanaceous plants. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Seidl, M.F.; Van Den Ackerveken, G. Activity and phylogenetics of the broadly occurring family of microbial Nep1-like proteins. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2019, 57, 367–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ottmann, C.; Luberacki, B.; Küfner, I.; Koch, W.; Brunner, F.; Weyand, M.; Mattinen, L.; Pirhonen, M.; Anderluh, G.; Seitz, H.U.; et al. A common toxin fold mediates microbial attack and plant defense. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 10359–10364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Ono, E.; Mise, K.; Takano, Y. RLP23 is required for Arabidopsis immunity against the grey mould pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Böhm, H.; Albert, I.; Oome, S.; Raaymakers, T.M.; Van Den Ackerveken, G.; Nürnberger, T. A conserved peptide pattern from a widespread microbial virulence factor triggers pattern-induced immunity in Arabidopsis. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Albert, I.; Böhm, H.; Albert, M.; Feiler, C.E.; Imkampe, J.; Wallmeroth, N.; Brancato, C.; Raaymakers, T.M.; Oome, S.; Zhang, H.; et al. An RLP23–SOBIR1–BAK1 complex mediates NLP-triggered immunity. Nat. Plants 2015, 1, 15140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, H.; Zhao, T.; Jiang, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, A.; Li, J.; Xu, X. Mapping and screening of the tomato Stemphylium lycopersici resistance gene, Sm, based on bulked segregant analysis in combination with genome resequencing. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Yang, H.; Wang, H.; Jiang, J.; Liu, M.; Liu, Z.; Tan, Y.; Zhao, T.; Zhang, H.; Chen, X.; Li, J.; et al. The Sm gene conferring resistance to gray leaf spot disease encodes an NBS-LRR (nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat) plant resistance protein in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Laluk, K.; Mengiste, T. Necrotroph attacks on plants: Wanton destruction or covert extortion? Arab. Book 2010, 8, e0136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Medina, R.; Franco, M.E.E.; da Cruz Cabral, L.; Bahima, J.V.; Patriarca, A.; Balatti, P.A.; Saparrat, M.C.N. The secondary metabolites profile of Stemphylium lycopersici, the causal agent of tomato grey leaf spot, is complex and includes host and non-host specific toxins. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2020, 50, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Barash, I.; Karr, A.L.; Strobel, G.A. Isolation and characterization of Stemphylin, a chromone glucoside from Stemphylium botryosum. Plant Physiol. 1975, 55, 646–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Franco, M.E.; López, S.; Medina, R.; Saparrat, M.C.; Balatti, P. Draft Genome Sequence and Gene Annotation of Stemphylium lycopersici Strain CIDEFI-216. Genome Announc. 2015, 3, e01069-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Du, M.; Zhao, J.; Tzeng, D.T.W.; Liu, Y.; Deng, L.; Yang, T.; Zhai, Q.; Wu, F.; Huang, Z.; Zhou, M.; et al. MYC2 orchestrates a hierarchical transcriptional cascade that regulates jasmonate-mediated plant immunity in tomato. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 1883–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Korabečná, M.; Liška, V.; Fajfrlík, K. PrimersITS1, ITS2 andITS4 detect the intraspecies variability in the internal transcribed spacers and 5.8S rRNA gene region in clinical isolates of fungi. Folia Microbiol. 2003, 48, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jiang, C.; Cao, S.; Wang, Z.; Xu, H.; Liang, J.; Liu, H.; Wang, G.; Ding, M.; Wang, Q.; Gong, C.; et al. An expanded subfamily of G-protein-coupled receptor genes in Fusarium graminearum required for wheat infection. Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 1582–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Arazoe, T.; Miyoshi, K.; Yamato, T.; Ogawa, T.; Ohsato, S.; Arie, T.; Kuwata, S. Tailor-made CRISPR/Cas system for highly efficient targeted gene replacement in the rice blast fungus. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2015, 112, 2543–2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ford, K.L.; Baumgartner, K.; Henricot, B.; Bailey, A.M.; Foster, G.D. A native promoter and inclusion of an intron is necessary for efficient expression of GFP or mRFP in Armillaria mellea. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Connolly, L.R.; Smith, K.M.; Freitag, M. The Fusarium graminearum histone H3 K27 methyltransferase KMT6 regulates development and expression of secondary metabolite gene clusters. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Lenarcic, T.; Pirc, K.; Hodnik, V.; Albert, I.; Borisek, J.; Magistrato, A.; Nurnberger, T.; Podobnik, M.; Anderluh, G. Molecular basis for functional diversity among microbial Nep1-like proteins. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1007951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lian, J.; Han, H.; Zhao, J.; Li, C. In-vitro and in-planta Botrytis cinerea inoculation assays for tomato. Bio-Protocol 2018, 8, e2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Ngou, B.P.M.; Ahn, H.-K.; Ding, P.; Jones, J.D.G. Mutual potentiation of plant immunity by cell-surface and intracellular receptors. Nature 2021, 592, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Rahnama, M.; Fleetwood, D.J.; Johnson, R.D. Histological methods to detect early-stage plant defense responses during artificial inoculation of lolium perenne with Epichloë festucae. Bio-Protocol 2021, 11, e4013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Schmittgen, T.D.; Livak, K.J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cao, S.-N.; Yuan, Y.; Qin, Y.; Zhang, M.-Z.; de Figueiredo, P.; Li, G.-H.; Qin, Q.M. The pre-rRNA processing factor Nop53 regulates fungal development and pathogenesis via mediating production of reactive oxygen species. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 20, 1531–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, Y.; Liu, J.K.; Li, G.H.; Zhang, M.Z.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.Y.; Hou, J.; Yang, S.; Sun, J.; Qin, Q.M. A novel Botrytis cinerea-specific gene BcHBF1 enhances virulence of the grey mould fungus via promoting host penetration and invasive hyphal development. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2019, 20, 731–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kimura, S.; Waszczak, C.; Hunter, K.; Wrzaczek, M. Bound by Fate: The Role of reactive oxygen species in receptor-like kinase signaling. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 638–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Adachi, H.; Nakano, T.; Miyagawa, N.; Ishihama, N.; Yoshioka, M.; Katou, Y.; Yaeno, T.; Shirasu, K.; Yoshioka, H. WRKY Transcription factors phosphorylated by MAPK regulate a plant immune NADPH oxidase in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 2645–2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Sagi, M.; Fluhr, R. Production of reactive oxygen species by plant NADPH oxidases. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Xie, X.W.; Wu, J.; Cheng, Y.C.; Shi, J.J.; Zhang, X.J.; Shi, Y.X.; Chai, A.; Li, B.J. First report of Stemphylium lycopersici causing leaf spot on hot pepper in China. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 41, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yang, H.H.; Xu, X.Y.; Zhao, T.T.; Jiang, J.B.; Liu, G.; Li, J.F. First report of Stemphylium lycopersici causing gray leaf spot on eggplant in China. Plant Dis. 2017, 101, 834–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kurose, D.; Misawa, T.; Suzui, T.; Ichikawa, K.; Kisaki, G.; Hoang, L.H.; Furuya, N.; Tsuchiya, K.; Tsushima, S.; Sato, T. Taxonomic re-examination of several Japanese Stemphylium strains based on morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2015, 81, 358–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mehta, A.; Mehta, Y.R.; Rosato, Y.B. ERIC- and REP-PCR amplify non-repetitive fragments from the genome of Drechslera avenae and Stemphylium solani. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2002, 211, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Bailey, B.A. Purification of a protein from culture filtrates of Fusarium oxysporum that induces ethylene and necrosis in leaves of Erythroxylum coca. Phytopathology 1995, 85, 1250–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nelson, A.J. Sequence announcements. Plant Mol. Biol. 1998, 38, 911–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Feng, B.Z.; Li, P.Q. Molecular characterization and functional analysis of the Nep1-like protein-encoding gene from Phytophthora capsici. Genet. Mol. Res. 2013, 12, 1468–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Oome, S.; Van Den Ackerveken, G. Comparative and functional analysis of the widely occurring family of Nep1-like proteins. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2014, 27, 1081–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Chen, J.B.; Bao, S.W.; Fang, Y.L.; Wei, L.Y.; Zhu, W.S.; Peng, Y.L.; Fan, J. An LRR-only protein promotes NLP-triggered cell death and disease susceptibility by facilitating oligomerization of NLP in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2021, 232, 1808–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Staats, M.; VAN Baarlen, P.; Schouten, A.; VAN Kan, J.A.L. Functional analysis of NLP genes from botrytis elliptica. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2007, 8, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Cobos, R.; Calvo-Peña, C.; Álvarez-Pérez, J.M.; Ibáñez, A.; Diez-Galán, A.; González-García, S.; García-Angulo, P.; Acebes, J.L.; Coque, J.J.R. Necrotic and cytolytic activity on grapevine leaves produced by Nep1-Like Proteins of Diplodia seriata. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Schumacher, S.; Grosser, K.; Voegele, R.T.; Kassemeyer, H.-H.; Fuchs, R. Identification and characterization of Nep1-Like proteins from the grapevine downy mildew pathogen Plasmopara viticola. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jennings, J.C.; Apel-Birkhold, P.C.; Bailey, B.A.; Anderson, J.D. Induction of ethylene biosynthesis and necrosis in weed leaves by a Fusarium oxysporum protein. Weed Sci. 2000, 48, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Santhanam, P.; van Esse, P.; Albert, I.; Faino, L.; Nürnberger, T.; Thomma, B.P.H.J. Evidence for Functional Diversification Within a Fungal NEP1-Like Protein Family. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2013, 26, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Lenarčič, T.; Albert, I.; Böhm, H.; Hodnik, V.; Pirc, K.; Zavec, A.B.; Podobnik, M.; Pahovnik, D.; Žagar, E.; Pruitt, R. Eudicot plant-specific sphingolipids determine host selectivity of microbial NLP cytolysins. Science 2017, 358, 1431–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. da Silva, L.F.; Dias, C.V.; Cidade, L.C.; Mendes, J.S.; Pirovani, C.P.; Alvim, F.C.; Pereira, G.A.G.; Aragão, F.J.L.; Cascardo, J.C.M.; Costa, M.G.C. Expression of an oxalate decarboxylase impairs the necrotic effect induced by Nep1-like Protein (NLP) of Moniliophthora perniciosa in transgenic tobacco. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2011, 24, 839–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Bolton, M.D. Primary Metabolism and Plant Defense—Fuel for the Fire. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2009, 22, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Cabral, A.; Oome, S.; Sander, N.; Küfner, I.; Nürnberger, T.; Van Den Ackerveken, G. Nontoxic Nep1-like proteins of the downy mildew pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis: Repression of necrosis-inducing activity by a surface-exposed region. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2012, 25, 697–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Jof 08 00518 g001 550
Figure 1. Characterization of a type I Nep1-like protein (NLP) from S. lycopersici. (A) Schematic diagram of the NLP protein of gray leaf spot. The full sequence of the NLP protein of gray leaf spot was used to predict and analyze the conserved structural domains. SP denotes signal peptide. NPP1 denotes Necrosis-Inducing Phytophthora Protein 1 characteristic domain. nlp20 represents the conserved pattern of 20 amino acids. (B) Phylogenetic tree built using three types of NLP proteins with maximum likelihood method. Red, black, and blue represent the type I, type II, and type III NLPs, respectively. The black box highlights the NLP of S. lycopersici. (C) Expression of the NLP gene during pathogen infection. The expression of the NLP gene was measured at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h post-inoculation (hpi) on tomato leaves and in CM liquid medium (negative control). The S. lycopersici ACTIN gene was used as an internal reference.
Figure 1. Characterization of a type I Nep1-like protein (NLP) from S. lycopersici. (A) Schematic diagram of the NLP protein of gray leaf spot. The full sequence of the NLP protein of gray leaf spot was used to predict and analyze the conserved structural domains. SP denotes signal peptide. NPP1 denotes Necrosis-Inducing Phytophthora Protein 1 characteristic domain. nlp20 represents the conserved pattern of 20 amino acids. (B) Phylogenetic tree built using three types of NLP proteins with maximum likelihood method. Red, black, and blue represent the type I, type II, and type III NLPs, respectively. The black box highlights the NLP of S. lycopersici. (C) Expression of the NLP gene during pathogen infection. The expression of the NLP gene was measured at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h post-inoculation (hpi) on tomato leaves and in CM liquid medium (negative control). The S. lycopersici ACTIN gene was used as an internal reference.
Jof 08 00518 g001
Jof 08 00518 g002 550
Figure 2. NLP affects the adaptation of S. lycopersici to ionic and oxidative stress as well as its asexual reproduction. (A) Schematic diagram showing targeted replacement of NLP enhanced by CRISPR/Cas9. (B) Schematic diagram showing the S. lycopersici NLP gene overexpression construct. The mCherry-tagged NLP gene was driven by the promoter and first intron of ACTIN. (C) Effect of NLP on conidia production. Strains were inoculated on sporulation medium. All spores were collected and suspended in liquid medium. The conidia production was assessed by measuring spore concentration. Lowercase of a and b denotes significant difference among multiple groups (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s new multiple range test. (D) Effect of NLP on the adaption of S. lycopersici to ionic stress and the cell wall disturbing agents sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, 0.005%) and Congo Red (CR, 300 μg/mL). Conidia of the wild-type (WT), ∆nlp-1, ∆nlp-2, pACTIN:NLP-1, and pACTIN:NLP-2 strains were inoculated on CM medium containing NaCl (1 M) or KCl (1 M) and incubated at 25 °C for 8 days. CM medium without stress agents was used as the negative control. (E) Mycelial growth quantification of strains under ionic stress. (F) Effect of NLP on the adaption of S. lycopersici to oxidative stress. Fungal cakes (5 mm in diameter) of WT, ∆nlp-1, ∆nlp-2, pACTIN:NLP-1, and pACTIN:NLP-2 strains were inoculated on CM plates containing H2O2 (20 mM) and incubated at 25 °C for 8 days. CM medium without H2O2 was used as the negative control. (G) Mycelial growth quantification of strains growing under oxidative stress. ** denotes very significant difference (p < 0.01, Student’s t test); 8 denotes significant difference (p < 0.05); ns denotes no significant differences.
Figure 2. NLP affects the adaptation of S. lycopersici to ionic and oxidative stress as well as its asexual reproduction. (A) Schematic diagram showing targeted replacement of NLP enhanced by CRISPR/Cas9. (B) Schematic diagram showing the S. lycopersici NLP gene overexpression construct. The mCherry-tagged NLP gene was driven by the promoter and first intron of ACTIN. (C) Effect of NLP on conidia production. Strains were inoculated on sporulation medium. All spores were collected and suspended in liquid medium. The conidia production was assessed by measuring spore concentration. Lowercase of a and b denotes significant difference among multiple groups (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s new multiple range test. (D) Effect of NLP on the adaption of S. lycopersici to ionic stress and the cell wall disturbing agents sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, 0.005%) and Congo Red (CR, 300 μg/mL). Conidia of the wild-type (WT), ∆nlp-1, ∆nlp-2, pACTIN:NLP-1, and pACTIN:NLP-2 strains were inoculated on CM medium containing NaCl (1 M) or KCl (1 M) and incubated at 25 °C for 8 days. CM medium without stress agents was used as the negative control. (E) Mycelial growth quantification of strains under ionic stress. (F) Effect of NLP on the adaption of S. lycopersici to oxidative stress. Fungal cakes (5 mm in diameter) of WT, ∆nlp-1, ∆nlp-2, pACTIN:NLP-1, and pACTIN:NLP-2 strains were inoculated on CM plates containing H2O2 (20 mM) and incubated at 25 °C for 8 days. CM medium without H2O2 was used as the negative control. (G) Mycelial growth quantification of strains growing under oxidative stress. ** denotes very significant difference (p < 0.01, Student’s t test); 8 denotes significant difference (p < 0.05); ns denotes no significant differences.
Jof 08 00518 g002
Jof 08 00518 g003 550
Figure 3. NLP is a key virulence factor of S. lycopersici during infection on tomato leaves. (A) Infected tomato leaves of the WT, ∆nlp, and overexpression strains at 5 days post inoculation (dpi). (B) Lesion area of leaves of tomato cultivar M82 resulting from infection by WT, ∆nlp, and overexpression strains. (C) Fungal biomass of WT, ∆nlp, and overexpression strains on infected tomato leaves. The relative fungal growth was measured by RNA-based RT-qPCR using the threshold cycle value (CT) of S. lycopersici ACTIN gene (locus_tag:TW65_02246) against the CT of tomato ACTIN2 gene (Solyc11g005330). Conidia of different strains were inoculated on the surface of tomato leaves, and mycelium biomass was measured at 5 days post inoculation (dpi). The assay was performed on intact plants, of which the infected leaves were detached for imaging. Lowercase of a, b, and c denotes significant difference among multiple groups (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s new multiple range test.
Figure 3. NLP is a key virulence factor of S. lycopersici during infection on tomato leaves. (A) Infected tomato leaves of the WT, ∆nlp, and overexpression strains at 5 days post inoculation (dpi). (B) Lesion area of leaves of tomato cultivar M82 resulting from infection by WT, ∆nlp, and overexpression strains. (C) Fungal biomass of WT, ∆nlp, and overexpression strains on infected tomato leaves. The relative fungal growth was measured by RNA-based RT-qPCR using the threshold cycle value (CT) of S. lycopersici ACTIN gene (locus_tag:TW65_02246) against the CT of tomato ACTIN2 gene (Solyc11g005330). Conidia of different strains were inoculated on the surface of tomato leaves, and mycelium biomass was measured at 5 days post inoculation (dpi). The assay was performed on intact plants, of which the infected leaves were detached for imaging. Lowercase of a, b, and c denotes significant difference among multiple groups (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s new multiple range test.
Jof 08 00518 g003
Jof 08 00518 g004 550
Figure 4. NLP inhibits ROS production in tomato induced by S. lycopersici infection. (A,B) Relative expression levels of tomato RbohA (A) and RbohB (B) gene after infection by the WT, ∆nlp, and overexpression S. lycopersici strains. (C) DAB staining of tomato leaves showing H2O2 production induced by the WT, ∆nlp, and overexpression S. lycopersici strains. (D) Quantification of DAB staining. (E) NBT staining of tomato leaves showing O2− production induced by the WT, ∆nlp, and overexpression strains. (F) Quantification of NBT staining. The RGB values of images were converted into 16-bit grayscale, which were quantified by ImageJ with the grayscale statistics method. a, b, c, and d designate statistically significant differences determined using the DPS software. Lowercase of a, b, and c denotes significant difference among multiple groups (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s new multiple range test. ns denotes no significant differences.
Figure 4. NLP inhibits ROS production in tomato induced by S. lycopersici infection. (A,B) Relative expression levels of tomato RbohA (A) and RbohB (B) gene after infection by the WT, ∆nlp, and overexpression S. lycopersici strains. (C) DAB staining of tomato leaves showing H2O2 production induced by the WT, ∆nlp, and overexpression S. lycopersici strains. (D) Quantification of DAB staining. (E) NBT staining of tomato leaves showing O2− production induced by the WT, ∆nlp, and overexpression strains. (F) Quantification of NBT staining. The RGB values of images were converted into 16-bit grayscale, which were quantified by ImageJ with the grayscale statistics method. a, b, c, and d designate statistically significant differences determined using the DPS software. Lowercase of a, b, and c denotes significant difference among multiple groups (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s new multiple range test. ns denotes no significant differences.
Jof 08 00518 g004
Jof 08 00518 g005 550
Figure 5. Expression of S. lycopersici NLP gene in tomato leads to constitutive expression of immunity genes and plant growth reduction. (A) RT-qPCR results showing the NLP gene expression in the leaves of NLP-overexpressing transgenic tomato lines. GFP-tagged NLP was driven by the 35S promoter (p35S:NLP). (B,C) Expression of the immune-responsive genes PR-STH2 (B) and ERF.C3 (C) in the p35S:NLP tomato lines. Tomato plants were incubated under sterile conditions for 2 weeks prior to RNA extraction and RT-qPCR analysis. (D,E) Fresh weight (D) and root length (E) of p35S:NLP tomato plants. Two-week-old tomato plants grown in growth container under sterile conditions were weighed (g per plant) and their root lengths were measured. (F–H) Growth phenotype (F), height (G), and fresh weight (H) of p35S:NLP tomato plants. Plants were grown in the greenhouse for 5 weeks. The scale bar indicates 10 cm. Lowercase of a and b denotes significant difference among multiple groups (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s new multiple range test.
Figure 5. Expression of S. lycopersici NLP gene in tomato leads to constitutive expression of immunity genes and plant growth reduction. (A) RT-qPCR results showing the NLP gene expression in the leaves of NLP-overexpressing transgenic tomato lines. GFP-tagged NLP was driven by the 35S promoter (p35S:NLP). (B,C) Expression of the immune-responsive genes PR-STH2 (B) and ERF.C3 (C) in the p35S:NLP tomato lines. Tomato plants were incubated under sterile conditions for 2 weeks prior to RNA extraction and RT-qPCR analysis. (D,E) Fresh weight (D) and root length (E) of p35S:NLP tomato plants. Two-week-old tomato plants grown in growth container under sterile conditions were weighed (g per plant) and their root lengths were measured. (F–H) Growth phenotype (F), height (G), and fresh weight (H) of p35S:NLP tomato plants. Plants were grown in the greenhouse for 5 weeks. The scale bar indicates 10 cm. Lowercase of a and b denotes significant difference among multiple groups (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s new multiple range test.
Jof 08 00518 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lian, J.; Han, H.; Chen, X.; Chen, Q.; Zhao, J.; Li, C. Stemphylium lycopersici Nep1-like Protein (NLP) Is a Key Virulence Factor in Tomato Gray Leaf Spot Disease. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050518

AMA Style

Lian J, Han H, Chen X, Chen Q, Zhao J, Li C. Stemphylium lycopersici Nep1-like Protein (NLP) Is a Key Virulence Factor in Tomato Gray Leaf Spot Disease. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(5):518. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050518

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lian, Jiajie, Hongyu Han, Xizhan Chen, Qian Chen, Jiuhai Zhao, and Chuanyou Li. 2022. "Stemphylium lycopersici Nep1-like Protein (NLP) Is a Key Virulence Factor in Tomato Gray Leaf Spot Disease" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 5: 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050518

APA Style

Lian, J., Han, H., Chen, X., Chen, Q., Zhao, J., & Li, C. (2022). Stemphylium lycopersici Nep1-like Protein (NLP) Is a Key Virulence Factor in Tomato Gray Leaf Spot Disease. Journal of Fungi, 8(5), 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8050518

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop