Next Article in Journal
Inborn Errors of Immunity Causing Pediatric Susceptibility to Fungal Diseases
Next Article in Special Issue
Four New Species of Torula (Torulaceae, Pleosporales) from Sichuan, China
Previous Article in Journal
Complementation of an Eisosomal Yeast pil1 Mutant and Characteristics of Eisosomal Distribution in Hyphae of Neurospora crassa Germinating from Two Different Spore Types
Previous Article in Special Issue
Taxonomy and Multigene Phylogeny of Diaporthales in Guizhou Province, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Additions to Rhytidhysteron (Hysteriales, Dothideomycetes) in China

1
Center for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization, College of Biological Resource and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, Qujing 655011, China
2
Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand
3
School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand
4
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
5
Research Center of Microbial Diversity and Sustainable Utilization, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
6
Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
7
Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(2), 148; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020148
Submission received: 21 December 2022 / Revised: 14 January 2023 / Accepted: 18 January 2023 / Published: 22 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polyphasic Identification of Fungi 2.0)

Abstract

:
In this study, twelve terrestrial hysteriaceous saprobic fungi growing on different pieces of dead wood were collected from Yunnan Province, China. All hysteriaceous strains isolated in this study tallied with the general characteristics associated with Rhytidhysteron. Detailed morphological characteristics and combined multigene phylogeny of LSU, ITS, SSU, and TEF showed that the twelve hysteriaceous fungi strains represent four distinct new species, and seven new host or geographical records of Rhytidhysteron. Based on morphological and phylogenetic evidence, the four new species (Rhytidhysteron bannaense sp. nov., R. coffeae sp. nov., R. mengziense sp. nov., and R. yunnanense sp. nov.) expand the number of species of Rhytidhysteron from thirty-three to thirty-seven, while seven new geographical records expand the records of Rhytidhysteron in China from six to thirteen. In addition, 10 new Rhytidhysteron host records are reported for the first time, thus expanding the known hosts for Rhytidhysteron from 52 to 62. Full descriptions, images of the morphology, and phylogenetic analyses to show the position of the Rhytidhysteron taxa are provided. In addition, the present study summarizes the main morphological characteristics, host associations, and locations of this genus.

1. Introduction

The Dothideomycetes O.E. Erikss. & Winka is the largest class in the Ascomycota Caval.-Sm [1,2,3]. Currently, it is made up of the Dothideomycetidae P.M. Kirk, P.F. Cannon, J.C. David & Stalpers (three orders with 25 families), and Pleosporomycetidae C.L. Schoch, Spatafora, Crous & Shoemaker (four orders with 94 families) [2,4,5]. This highly diverse class is mainly characterized by bitunicate asci (asci with two-wall layers), and often with fissitunicate dehiscence [2,6].
The Hysteriales Lindau belong to the subclass Pleosporomycetidae [4,5]. This monotypic order is characterized by its thick-walled, navicular ascomata which dehisce by an invaginated slit or sulcus [4,7].
The Hysteriaceae Chevall., the only family in Hysteriales, has been classified under the Pseudosphaeriales E. Müll. & Arx, Dothiorales Luttrell, Dothideales Lindau, and the Pleosporales Luttr. ex M.E. Barr, previously [4,8,9,10,11,12]. The Hysteriaceae include the hysteriaceous fungi, which currently contain 13 genera [5]. Hysteriaceous fungi are characterized by hysterithecioid or apothecioid ascomata, semi-immersed to superficial, carbonaceous, thick-walled, and distinctly navicular with a pronounced, longitudinal slit, ascospores that are hyaline to pigmented, muriform, and one to multi-septate in bitunicate asci [2,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]
The genus Rhytidhysteron Speg. was introduced by Spegazzini [19] to accommodate two species (R. brasiliense Speg. and R. viride Speg.), but no type species was designated. Subsequently, Clements and Shear [20] designated R. brasiliense as the type species [12,16,21,22]. The genus was transferred by Boehm et al. [13] from the Patellariaceae Corda to Hysteriaceae, based on molecular data. Currently, 33 records of Rhytidhysteron are listed in the Index Fungorum [23]. The sexual morph is described as having large ascomata, conspicuous, navicular, usually with a perpendicular striae margin, and pigmented, septate and muriform to sub-muriform ascospores [16,18]. Currently, only four species (R. hysterinum [Dufour] Samuels & E. Müll., R. rufulum [Spreng] Speg., R. thailandicum Thambug. & K.D. Hyde, and R. xiaokongense G.C. Ren & K.D. Hyde) have been described with an asexual morph, and conidia are classified into two types—“Aposphaeria-like” and “Diplodia-like” [16,18,21]. The main characteristics used to distinguish some species in this genus are the shape and border of the hysterothecium, the type of the exciple, the color and reaction of the epithecium, and the size of the ascospores [24]. Species of Rhytidhysteron are widely distributed in 33 countries and on 52 hosts [6,18,25,26]. Members of Rhytidhysteron play an indispensable role as saprobes, endophytes, and weak pathogens on woody plants in both terrestrial and marine habitats, and some are rarely found as human pathogens [6,16,18,25,27].
In this study, we collected 12 strains of hysteriaceous fungi from Yunnan Province, China, and based on molecular phylogenetic analyses (LSU, ITS, SSU, and TEF) and morphological characteristic comparisons, they were identified as four distinct new species (Rhytidhysteron bannaense sp. nov., R. coffeae sp. nov., R. mengziense sp. nov., and R. yunnanense sp. nov.) and seven new host records (R. bruguierae Dayar., R. camporesii Ekanayaka & K.D. Hyde, R. hongheense Wanas., R. magnoliae N.I. de Silva & K.D. Hyde, R. neorufulum Thambug. & K.D. Hyde, R. tectonae Doilom & K.D. Hyde, and R. thailandicum).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection, Morphological Identification, and Single Spore Isolation

Dead plant specimens with fungal fruiting bodies were collected from Yunnan Province, China, between 2020 and 2021. Specimens were placed in plastic bags, important information such as collection date, location, and host name was recorded, and then the specimens were brought them back to the lab for isolation and morphological observation.
Senanayake et al. [28] was followed for the morphological study and single spore isolation. Morphological structures were examined under an OPTEC SZ650 dissecting stereomicroscope. An OLYMPUS optical microscope (Tokyo, Japan) was used to observe microscopic fungal structures and an OLYMPUS DP74 (Tokyo, Japan) digital camera fitted to the microscope was used to take photographs. All micro-morphological structures were measured with the Tarosoft ® Image Framework program and photo plates were made using Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended version 10.0 software (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA).
Single spore isolation was carried out for all the specimens and the pure cultures were grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA). Germinated spores were transferred to new PDA plates under sterile conditions and incubated at 28 °C. Culture characteristics (mycelia color, shape, and edge feature) were observed after one week.
The specimens were deposited in the Kunming Institute of Botany, Academia Sinica (HKAS), Kunming, China. Living cultures were deposited in the Kunming Institute of Botany Culture Collection (KUMCC), China. Facesoffungi (FoF) numbers were registered as described in Jayasiri et al. [29], and MycoBank number (MB) was registered as outlined in MycoBank (http://www.MycoBank.org, accessed on 24 October 2022).

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing

Dissanayake et al. [30] was followed for molecular studies. Fresh mycelia which grew on PDA plates for two weeks were scraped off the plates, and then DNA was extracted using DNA Extraction Kit-BSC14S1 (BioFlux, Hangzhou, P.R. China), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify four gene regions and the primers and protocols were used for the amplification following Wanasinghe et al. [25]. The LSU gene was amplified by using the primers LR0R and LR5 [31], the ITS gene was amplified by using the primers ITS5 and ITS4 [32], the SSU gene was amplified using the primers NS1 and NS4 [32], and the TEF gene was amplified using the primers EF1-983F and EF1-2218R [33]. The total volume of the PCR mixture for amplifications was 25 μL, which consisted of 12.5 μL 2xMaster Mix (mixture of Easy Taq TM DNA Polymerase, dNTPs, and optimized buffer (Beijing Trans Gen Biotech Co., Chaoyang District, Beijing, China)), 8.5 μL ddH2O, 2 μL of DNA template, and 1 μL of each forward and reverse primer (10 pM) [34]. Purification and sequencing of PCR products were carried out by Qinke Biotech Co., Kunming, China.

2.3. Phylogenetic Analyses

The sequences of all strains obtained in this study were checked in BioEdit v.7.2.6.1 [35] for quality. Geneious 9.1.8 was used to splice forward and reverse sequences. The combined sequences were searched for similar taxa via Blast in NCBI (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 10 November 2022)), and the most closely related taxa were put together for the phylogenetic analyses. Phylogenetic analyses were carried out with 65 sequences (Table 1) and two outgroup taxa—Gloniopsis calami S. Konta & K.D. Hyde (MFLUCC 15-0739) and G. praelonga (Schwein.) Underw. & Earle (CBS 112415). All four gene sequences were downloaded from NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 10 November 2022)) and aligned by MAFFT v.7 (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/ (accessed on 10 November 2022)) [36]. TrimAl.v1.2rev59 was used to optimize the alignment of sequences [37], sequences were combined in BioEdit v.7.2.6.1. FASTA alignment formats were converted to PHYLIP and NEXUS formats in ALTER (http://www.sing-group.org/ALTER/ (accessed on 10 November 2022)) [38].
In phylogenetic analyses, Randomized Accelerated Maximum Likelihood (RAxML) and Bayesian inference analyses (BI) were carried out in the CIPRES Science Gateway (https://www.phylo.org/portal2/login!input.action (accessed on 10 November 2022)) [39]. The RAxML trees are performed using RAxML-HPC2 on XSEDE (8.2.12) [40,41] with the GTR + I + G model of evolution. Additionally, Bayesian analyses were conducted using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method in MrBayes on XSEDE (3.2.7a) [42] to evaluate posterior probabilities [43,44]: the best model of LSU and ITS is GTR + I+G, the best model of SSU is HKY + I, and the best model of TEF is GTR + G. Six simultaneous Markov chains were run for 1,000,000 generations, and trees were sampled at every 100th generation. Max-trees was set to 5000 and clade robustness was assessed using a bootstrap (BT) analysis of 1000 replicates. Phylogenetic trees were visualized with FigTree v.1.4.2 [45], bootstrap values showing at the nodes, and edited by Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2010. The newly obtained alignments and phylogenetic trees were deposited in TreeBASE, submission ID: 30049 (https://treebase.org/treebase-web/user/submissionList.html, accessed on 28 November 2022).

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Analyses

The phylogenetic trees obtained from RAxML and BI analyses provided essentially similar topologies. The RAxML analyses of the combined dataset yielded the best scoring tree (Figure 1), with a final ML optimization likelihood value of −12081.382479. The matrix had 761 distinct alignment patterns, with 23.87% being undetermined characters or gaps. Parameters for the GTR + I + G model of the combined LSU, ITS, SSU, and TEF were as follows: estimated base frequencies A = 0.239683, C = 0.247793, G = 0.276186, T = 0.236338; substitution rates AC = 1.225201, AG = 2.493063, AT = 1.186723, CG = 0.732384, CT = 4.977839, GT = 1.0; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.675821; and gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.554013. The final RAxML tree is shown in Figure 1.
The final RAxML tree was divided into two clades of Rhytidhysteron and the results are similar to those reported by Wanasinghe et al. [25]. In this study, two new species R. mengziense (KUMCC 21-0490, KUMCC 21-0491) and R. yunnanense (KUMCC 21-0485, KUMCC 21-0486), and five new records for R. camporesii (KUMCC 21-0488), R. hongheense (KUMCC 21-0487), R. magnoliae (KUMCC 21-0478), R. neorufulum (KUMCC 21-0480), and R. tectonae (KUMCC 21-0479) were clustered within clade A. Two new species R. bannaense (KUMCC 21-0482, KUMCC 21-0483) and R. coffeae (KUMCC 21-0489, KUMCC 21-0492), along with two new records, R. bruguierae (KUMCC 21-0484) and R. thailandicum (KUMCC 21-0493), were included in clade B.
The four new species formed separate branches in the phylogenetic tree. Rhytidhysteron bannaense was well separated from R. thailandicum in an independent lineage with relatively good statistical support (100% ML/1.00 PP). Rhytidhysteron coffeae was separated from R. mangrovei Vinit & K.D. Hyde with good statistical support (99% ML/1.00 PP). Rhytidhysteron mengziense was well separated from R. camporesii with low statistical support. Rhytidhysteron yunnanense was separated from R. mesophilum Cobos-Villagrán, R. Valenz, Hern.-Rodr., Calvillo-Medina & Raymundo, with good statistical support (90% ML/0.92 PP).
The seven newly recorded strains and the known species in Rhytidhysteron clustered together in the phylogenetic tree with significant statistical support. Rhytidhysteron bruguierae (KUMCC 21-0484) grouped within five strains of R. bruguierae, with moderate statistical support (65% ML). Rhytidhysteron camporesii (KUMCC 21-0488) grouped with R. camporesii (KUN-HKAS 104277) with good statistical support (100% ML/1.00 PP). Rhytidhysteron hongheense (KUMCC 21-0487) grouped with R. hongheense (KUMCC 20-0222, H KAS112348, HKAS112349) with moderate statistical support (79% ML). Rhytidhysteron magnoliae (KUMCC 21-0478) grouped with R. magnoliae (MFLUCC 18-0719) with good statistical support (100% ML/1.00 PP). Rhytidhysteron neorufulum (KUMCC 21-0480) grouped with ten strains of R. neorufulum with low statistical support. Rhytidhysteron tectonae (KUMCC 21-0479) grouped with R. tectonae (MFLUCC 13-0710, MFLUCC 21-0037, MFLUCC 21-0034) with good statistical support (89% ML/0.98 PP). Rhytidhysteron thailandicum (KUMCC 21-0493) grouped within four strains of R. thailandicum with moderate statistical support (72% ML).

3.2. Taxonomy

Rhytidhysteron bannaense T.Y. Du and Tibpromma sp. nov. (Figure 2)
MycoBank number: MB 845999. Facesoffungi number: FoF 12957
Etymology: Named after the region Xishuangbanna where the type specimen of the new species was collected.
Holotype: HKAS 122695
Saprobic on decaying wood of Buddleja officinalis (Loganiaceae). Sexual morph: Ascomata. 1000–1500 μm long × 550–1100 μm wide × 350–850 μm high (x = 1350 × 750 × 670 μm, n = 5), hysterothecial, solitary to aggregated, semi-immersed to superficial, black, apothecioid, navicular, rough, perpendicular striae, elongate and depressed, compressed at apex, opening through a longitudinal slit, green at the center. Exciple: 40–150 μm wide, composed of dark brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis, outer layer brown to dark brown, inner layer pale brown to hyaline. Hamathecium: 1–2 μm wide, dense, hyaline, septate, branched, cellular pseudoparaphyses, forming an orange epithecium above asci when mounted in water, becoming a purple epithecium above the asci when mounted in 10% KOH and turns hyaline after 5 s. Asci: 140–189(–199) × 12–15(–16) μm (x = 166 × 14 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, bitunicate, cylindrical, with short pedicel, rounded at the apex, with an ocular chamber, J- apical ring. Ascospores: 22–27 × 10–12.8 μm (x = 25 × 11.5 μm, n = 30), uni-seriate, slightly overlapping, hyaline, 1-septate when immature, becoming brown to dark brown, 3-septate when mature, ellipsoidal, rounded to slightly pointed at both ends, smooth-walled, without guttules or mucilaginous sheath. Asexual morph: Undetermined.
Culture characteristics: Ascospores germinated on PDA within 24 h and germ tubes produced from one or both ends. Colonies on PDA reached a 6 cm diameter after two weeks at 28 °C. The colony is soft, circular, irregularly raised, with an undulated edge, white to gray on the forward, and grayish yellow in reverse.
Material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna Prefecture, Jinghong City, Manlie Village, 101°0′1″ E, 21°55′15″ N, on a decaying wood piece of Buddleja officinalis Maxim. (Loganiaceae), 12 September 2021, T.Y. Du, BND72 (holotype, HKAS 122695, ex-type living culture, KUMCC 21-0482 = KUMCC 21-0483).
Notes: In phylogenetic analyses, Rhytidhysteron bannaense was well separated from R. thailandicum with relatively good statistical support (100% ML/1.00 PP). In morphology, R. bannaense is distinct from R. thailandicum, having 8-spored asci, and ascospores 3-septate when mature, without guttules, while R. thailandicum has (3–)6–8-spored asci, (1–)3-septate ascospores, and guttulate [6,16,54]. In addition, the asci and ascospore size in R. bannaense are larger than those in R. thailandicum (asci: 166 × 14 μm vs. 145 × 12.8 μm; ascospores: 25 × 11.5 μm vs. 24.5 × 9.5 µm) [16]. Moreover, according to the comparison results of different gene fragments (Table 2), R. bannaense is different from R. thailandicum in ITS and TEF genes (≥1.5%, without gaps). Therefore, in this study, R. bannaense is introduced as a new species.
Rhytidhysteron bruguierae Dayarathne, Mycosphere 11(1): 20 (2020) (Figure S1)
MycoBank number: MB 556574. Facesoffungi number: FoF 06154
Description: See Dayarathne et al. [47], Supplementary Notes 1
Distribution: China (this study), Thailand [47,48].
Host: Alnus nepalensis (this study), Bruguiera sp. [47], Chromolaena odorata [48].
Material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna Prefecture, Jinghong City, Manlie Village, 101°1′1″ E, 21°54′0″ N, on decaying wood of Alnus nepalensis D. Don (Betulaceae), 12 September 2021, T.Y. Du, BND77 (HKAS 122690, living culture, KUMCC 21-0484).
Notes: Rhytidhysteron bruguierae was introduced by Dayarathne et al. (2020) based on both morphology and phylogenetic analyses. According to phylogenetic analyses based on combined multi-gene (LSU, ITS, SSU, and TEF), our collection grouped together with R. bruguierae (MFLUCC 18-0398, MFLUCC 17-1515, MFLUCC 17 1511, MFLUCC 17-1502, MFLUCC 17-1509). The morphological characteristics of our collection resemble R. bruguierae in having superficial, perpendicular striae, orange at the center hysterothecia, hamathecium comprising septate, branched pseudoparaphyses, forming a red epithecium above the asci, cylindrical, short pedicellate asci, and ellipsoidal to fusiform, brown ascospores [47,48]. Our collection and R. bruguierae are extremely similar in molecular data analyses and morphological characteristics. Previously, this species was only recorded in Thailand from Bruguiera sp. and Chromolaena odorata [47,48]. Therefore, our collection was introduced as a new geographical and host record of R. bruguierae from the decaying wood of Alnus nepalensis (Betulaceae) in the Yunnan Province of China. This is the first record of R. bruguierae on Alnus nepalensis.
Rhytidhysteron camporesii Ekanayaka & K.D. Hyde, Fungal Diversity 100: 5–277 (2020) (Figure S2)
MycoBank number: MB 556783. Facesoffungi number: FoF 06459
Description: See Hyde et al. [49], Supplementary Notes 2
Distribution: China [49] (this study).
Host: Cotoneaster franchetii (this study), unidentified wood [49].
Material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Kunming City, Panlong District, Changchong Mountain, on decaying wood of Cotoneaster franchetii Bois (Rosaceae), 5 September 2021, T.Y. Du, KMD93 (HKAS 122698, living culture, KUMCC 21-0488).
Notes: Rhytidhysteron camporesii was introduced by Hyde et al. [49] based on both morphology and phylogenetic analyses. According to phylogenetic analyses based on combined multi-gene (LSU, ITS, SSU, and TEF), our collection grouped together with R. camporesii (KUN-HKAS 104277). In addition, our collection shows similar morphological characteristics with R. camporesii, having black, striated hysterothecia, branched pseudoparaphyses, 8-spored, cylindrical, short pedicellate asci, and 3-septate, uni-seriate, ellipsoidal to fusiform, brown ascospores [49]. Therefore, we report our collection as a new host record of R. camporesii from decaying wood of Cotoneaster franchetii (Rosaceae) in the Yunnan Province of China. This is the first record of R. camporesii on Cotoneaster franchetii.
Rhytidhysteron coffeae T.Y. Du and Tibpromma sp. nov. (Figure 3)
MycoBank number: MB 846000. Facesoffungi number: FoF 12958
Etymology: Named after the host name, Coffea sp.
Holotype: HKAS 122700
Saprobic on decaying wood of Coffea sp. (Rubiaceae). Sexual morph: Ascomata 1000–1700 μm long × 1000–1200 μm wide × 300–600 μm high (x = 1520 × 1120 × 450 μm, n = 5), hysterothecial, solitary to aggregated, mostly solitary, superficial, base is embedded in the plant tissue, navicular, black, apothecioid, rough, perpendicular striae, elongate and depressed, compressed at apex, and opening through a nearly circular longitudinal slit, reddish brown at the center. Exciple: 70–160 μm wide (x = 95 μm, n = 10), composed of dark brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis, outer layer brown to dark brown, inner layer pale brown to hyaline. Hamathecium: 2–3 μm wide, dense, hyaline, septate, branched, cellular pseudoparaphyses, forming a red to purple epithecium above asci when mounted in water, becoming dark purple epithecium above the asci when mounted in 10% KOH, and turns hyaline after 5 s. Asci: (162–)170–197 μm × (9–)10–14(–16) μm (x = 179.5 × 13 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, bitunicate, cylindrical, with short pedicel, rounded at the apex, with an ocular chamber, and J- apical ring. Ascospores: 23–28.5 μm × 8.5–11.5 μm (x = 26 × 10 μm, n = 30), uni-seriate, slightly overlapping, hyaline, 1-septate when immature, becoming reddish brown to brown, 3-septate when mature, ellipsoidal to fusoid, straight or curved, rounded to slightly pointed at both ends, guttulate, smooth-walled, without a mucilaginous sheath. Asexual morph: Undetermined.
Culture characteristics: Ascospores germinated on PDA within 24 h and germ tubes produced from one or both ends. Colonies on PDA reached a 6 cm diameter after two weeks at 28 °C. The colony is flossy, velvety, circular, slightly raised, with an entire edge, reddish brown on the forward and in reverse, with a green circle in the middle.
Material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Pu’er City, Mojiang County, Jinggong coffee plantation, 101°44′20″ E, 23°15′15″ N, decaying wood of Coffea sp. L. (Rubiaceae), 23 December 2020, L. Lu, MJC2 (holotype, HKAS 122700, ex-type living culture, KUMCC 21-0489); Yunnan Province, Pu’er City, Qixiang coffee plantation, 101°20′47″ E, 22°42′15″ N, on decaying wood of Coffea sp. (Rubiaceae), 25 December 2020, L. Lu, QXC8 (HKAS 122701 paratype, ex-paratype culture, KUMCC 21-0492).
Notes: In the phylogenetic analyses, Rhytidhysteron coffeae clearly separated from R. mangrovei with good statistical support (99% ML/1.00 PP). With respect to morphology, R. coffeae is distinct from R. mangrovei in having branched pseudoparaphyses, 8-spored asci, and 3-septate ascospores when mature, while R. mangrovei has unbranched pseudoparaphyses, (2–6–)8-spored asci, and (1–)3-septate ascospores [12]. In addition, the ascomata, asci, and ascospore size of R. coffeae are larger than those of R. mangrovei (ascomata:1520 × 1120 × 450 μm vs. 940 × 800 × 500 μm, asci: 179.5 × 13 μm vs. 146 × 9.5 μm, ascospores: 26 × 10 μm vs. 23 × 8.3 μm) [12]. Moreover, according to the comparison results of different gene fragments, R. coffeae is different from R. mangrovei in ITS (77/651 bp, 11.83%, without gaps) and TEF (21/960 bp, 2.19%, without gaps) genes (≥1.5%). Therefore, in this study, R. coffeae is introduced as a new species.
Rhytidhysteron hongheense Wanas. J. Fungi 7, 180 (2021) (Figure S3)
MycoBank number: MB 837992
Description: See Wanasinghe et al. [25], Supplementary Notes 3
Distribution: China [25] (this study).
Host: Dodonaea sp. [25], Phyllanthus emblica (this study).
Material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Kunming City, Panlong District, Kunming Institute of Botany, 102°45′5″ E, 25°8′30″ N, on decaying wood of Phyllanthus emblica (Euphorbiaceae), 1 February 2021, T.Y. Du, KMD24 (HKAS 122697, living culture, KUMCC 21-0487).
Notes: Rhytidhysteron hongheense was introduced by Wanasinghe et al. [25] based on both morphology and phylogenetic analyses. According to phylogenetic analyses based on combined multi-gene (LSU, ITS, SSU, and TEF), our collection grouped together with R. hongheense (KUMCC 20-0222, HKAS112348, and HKAS112349). In addition, our collection shows similar morphological characteristics with R. hongheense in having solitary to aggregated, slightly striated hysterothecia, branched pseudoparaphyses forming a red epithecium above asci, 8-spored, cylindrical, short pedicellate asci, and uni-seriate ascospores, brown when mature [25]. Therefore, we report our collection as a new host record of R. hongheense from decaying wood of Phyllanthus emblica (Euphorbiaceae) in the Yunnan Province of China. This is the first record of R. hongheense on Phyllanthus emblica.
Rhytidhysteron magnoliae N.I. de Silva, Lumyong S & K.D. Hyde, Asian Journal of Mycology 3(1): 295–306 (2019) (Figure S4)
MycoBank number: MB 557220. Facesoffungi number: FoF 07369
Description: See de Silva et al. [6], Supplementary Notes 4
Distribution: China [6] (this study).
Host: Hevea brasiliensis (this study), Magnolia grandiflora [6].
Material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna Prefecture, Mengla County, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, 101°15′40″ E, 21°55′57″ N, on decaying wood of Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex A. Juss.) Muell. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae), 24 November 2020, T.Y. Du, BND10 (HKAS 122693, living culture, KUMCC 21-0478).
Notes: Rhytidhysteron magnoliae was introduced by de Silva et al. [6] based on both morphology and phylogenetic analyses. According to phylogenetic analyses based on combined multi-gene (LSU, ITS, SSU, and TEF), our collection grouped together with R. magnoliae (MFLUCC 18-0719). In addition, our collection shows similar morphological characteristics to R. magnoliae in having solitary to aggregated, semi-immersed to superficial, coriaceous, striated hysterothecia, septate pseudoparaphyses slightly swollen at the apex and enclosed in a gelatinous matrix, 8-spored, cylindrical, short pedicellate asci, and ellipsoidal to fusoid, 1–3-septate, guttulate, brown to dark brown ascospores [6]. There is a small difference between our collection and R. magnoliae in that the perpendicular striae of ascomata in our collection is not as obvious as that in R. magnoliae. However, in the phylogenetic tree, our collection (KUMCC 21-0478) grouped with R. magnoliae (MFLUCC 18-0719) (100% ML/1.00 PP). Therefore, we report our collection as a new host record of R. magnoliae from decaying wood of Hevea brasiliensis (Euphorbiaceae) in the Yunnan Province of China. This is the first record of R. magnoliae on Hevea brasiliensis.
Rhytidhysteron mengziense T.Y. Du and Tibpromma sp. nov. (Figure 4)
MycoBank number: MB 846001. Facesoffungi number: FoF 12959
Etymology: Named after the region Mengzi where the type specimen was collected.
Holotype: HKAS 122699
Saprobic on decaying twigs of Crataegus scabrifolia (Rosaceae). Sexual morph: Ascomata: 1000–1600 μm long × 800–1000 μm wide × 400–700 μm high (x = 1400 × 910 × 640 μm, n = 5), hysterothecial, solitary to aggregated, mostly solitary, semi-immersed to superficial, navicular, black, apothecioid, smooth, perpendicular striae, elongate and depressed, compressed at apex, opening through a longitudinal slit, reddish brown at the center. Exciple: 60–135 μm wide, composed of outer layer brown to black, thick-walled cells of textura angularis, and inner layer light brown, thin-walled cells of textura prismatica. Hamathecium: 1–2.5 μm wide, dense, hyaline, septate, branched, cellular pseudoparaphyses, forming a reddish brown to brown epithecium above asci when mounted in water, becoming purple epithecium above the asci when mounted in 10% KOH, and turns hyaline after 30 s, while appendages turn dark brown. Asci: 150–176(–182) μm × 10–14(–16.3) μm (x = 164.5 × 13 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, bitunicate, cylindrical, with short pedicel, rounded at the apex, with an ocular chamber, J- apical ring, always fused with hamathecium. Ascospores: (22.5–)24.5–27.5(–29) μm × 10.5–12.5 μm (x = 27 × 12 μm, n = 30), slightly overlapping, uni-seriate, slightly overlapping, hyaline, 1-septate when immature, becoming reddish brown to brown, (1–)3-septate when mature, ellipsoidal to fusoid, straight or curved, rounded to slightly pointed at both ends, guttulate, rough-walled, without the mucilaginous sheath. Asexual morph: Undetermined.
Culture characteristics: Ascospores germinated on PDA within 24 h and germ tubes produced from one or both ends. Colonies on PDA reached a 6 cm diameter after one week at 28 °C. The colony is flossy, velvety, circular, slightly raised, with an undulated edge, white aerial hyphae on the forward and cream white in reverse.
Material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Honghe Prefecture, Mengzi City, on a decaying piece of wood of Crataegus scabrifolia (Rosaceae), 21 May 2020, S. Tibpromma, MZD5 (holotype, HKAS 122699, ex-type living culture, KUMCC 21-0490 = KUMCC 21-0491).
Notes: In phylogenetic analyses, Rhytidhysteron mengziense was well separated from R. camporesii with low statistical support. However, R. mengziense is distinct from R. camporesii in having exciple cells of textura angularis to prismatica, and rough-walled ascospores, while R. camporesii has exciple cells of textura globulosa to angularis, and smooth-walled of ascospores [49]. In addition, the ascomata and ascospore size of R. mengziense are larger than those of R. camporesii (ascomata: 1400 × 640 μm vs. 1002.4 × 570.1 µm, ascospores: 27 × 12 μm vs. 26.1 × 10.4 µm) [49]. Moreover, according to the comparison results of different gene fragments, R. mengziense is different from R. camporesii in ITS gene (10/651 bp, 1.54%, without gaps). Therefore, in this study, R. mengziense is introduced as a new species.
Rhytidhysteron neorufulum Thambug. & K.D. Hyde, Cryptog. Mycol. 37(1): 110 (2016) (Figure S5)
MycoBank number: MB 551865. Facesoffungi number: FoF 01840
Description: See Thambugala et al. [16], Supplementary Notes 5
Distribution: China (this study), Mexico [55], Thailand [16,18].
Host: Bursera sp. [55], Elaeagnus sarmentosa (this study), Hevea brasiliensis [16], Tectona grandis [18].
Material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna Prefecture, Mengla County, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, 101°15′45″ E, 21°55′50″ N, on decaying wood of Elaeagnus sarmentosa Rehd. (Elaeagnaceae), 24 November 2020, T.Y. Du, BND49 (HKAS 122691, living culture, KUMCC 21-0480).
Notes: Rhytidhysteron neorufulum was introduced by Thambugala et al. [16] based on both morphology and phylogenetic analyses. According to phylogenetic analyses based on combined multi-gene (LSU, ITS, SSU, and TEF), our collection grouped together with R. neorufulum (MFLUCC 13-0216, GKM 361A, HUEFS 192194, MFLUCC 12-0528, CBS 306.38, MFLUCC 12-0011, MFLUCC 12-0567, MFLUCC 12-0569, EB 0381, MFLUCC 21-0035). In addition, our collection shows similar morphological characteristics to R. neorufulum, having solitary to aggregated, superficial, non-striated hysterothecia, septate pseudoparaphyses, 8-spored, cylindrical, short pedicellate asci, and uni-seriate, ellipsoidal to fusiform, ascospores, brown when mature [16,18]. This species was previously only recorded in Thailand and Mexico. Therefore, we report our collection as new geographical and host record of R. neorufulum from the decaying wood of Elaeagnus sarmentosa (Elaeagnaceae) in the Yunnan Province of China. This is the first record of R. neorufulum on Elaeagnus sarmentosa.
Rhytidhysteron tectonae Doilom & K.D. Hyde, Fungal Diversity. 82: 107–182 (2017) (Figure S6)
MycoBank number: MB 551964. Facesoffungi number: FoF 01849
Description: See Doilom et al. [53], Supplementary Notes 6
Distribution: China (this study), Thailand [18,53].
Host: Betula sp., an unidentified member of the Fabaceae [18], Magnolia delavayi (this study), and Tectona grandis [53].
Material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna Prefecture, Mengla County, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, 101°15′25″ E, 21°55′37″ N, on decaying wood of Magnolia delavayi Franch. (Magnoliaceae), 24 November 2020, T.Y. Du, BND33 (HKAS 122692, living culture, KUMCC 21-0479).
Notes: Rhytidhysteron tectonae was introduced by Doilom et al. [53] based on both morphology and phylogenetic analyses. According to phylogenetic analyses based on combined multi-gene (LSU, ITS, SSU, and TEF), our collection grouped together with R. tectonae (MFLUCC 13-0710, MFLUCC 21-0034, and MFLUCC 21-0037). In addition, our collection shows similar morphological characteristics to R. tectonae, having solitary to aggregated, semi-immersed to superficial, non-striated, yellow at the center hysterothecia, septate, branched pseudoparaphyses, 8-spored, cylindrical, short pedicellate asci, and uni-seriate, slightly overlapping, 1–3-septate ascospores, dark brown when mature [18,53]. This species was previously only recorded in Thailand. Therefore, we report our collection as a new geographical and host record of R. tectonae from decaying wood of Magnolia delavayi (Magnoliaceae) in the Yunnan Province of China. This is the first record of R. tectonae on Magnolia delavayi.
Rhytidhysteron thailandicum Thambug. & K.D. Hyde, Cryptog. Mycol. 37(1): 110 (2016) (Figure S7)
MycoBank number: MB 551866. Facesoffungi number: FoF 01841
Description: See Thambugala et al. [16], Supplementary Notes 7
Distribution: China [6] (this study), Mexico [55], Thailand [16,54].
Host: Acacia sp. [55], Afzelia xylocarpa [54], Aquilaria sinensis (this study), Morus australis [6], and unidentified wood [16].
Material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna Prefecture, Menghai County, agarwood plantation, on decaying wood of Aquilaria sinensis (Lour.) Spreng. (Thymelaeaceae), 15 September 2021, T.Y. Du, YNA62 (HKAS 122689, living culture, KUMCC 21-0493).
Notes: Rhytidhysteron thailandicum was introduced by Thambugala et al. [16] based on both morphology and phylogenetic analyses. According to phylogenetic analyses based on combined multi-gene (LSU, ITS, SSU, and TEF), our collection grouped together with R. thailandicum (MFLUCC 14-0503, MFLUCC 12-0530, MFLU17-0788, and MFLUCC 13-0051). In addition, our collection shows similar morphological characteristics to R. thailandicum, having solitary to aggregated, globose to subglobose, striated hysterothecia, exciple cells of textura angularis, septate, branched pseudoparaphyses, cylindrical, short pedicellate asci, and uni-seriate, brown ascospores [6,16,54]. There is a small difference between our collection and R. thailandicum in that the surface of the ascomata of our collection is covered with green. However, in the phylogenetic tree, our collection (KUMCC 21-0493) grouped with the four strains of R. thailandicum. Therefore, we report our collection as a new host record of R. thailandicum from decaying wood of Aquilaria sinensis (Thymelaeaceae) in the Yunnan Province of China. This is the first record of R. thailandicum on Aquilaria sinensis.
Rhytidhysteron yunnanense T.Y. Du and Tibpromma, sp. nov. (Figure 5)
MycoBank number: MB 846002. Facesoffungi number: FoF 12960
Etymology: Named after the region Yunnan where the type specimen was collected.
Holotype: HKAS 122696
Saprobic on decaying wood of Rhus chinensis (Anacardiaceae). Sexual morph: Ascomata: 1900–3000 μm long × 400–800 μm wide × 300–600 μm high (x = 2510 × 625 × 455 μm, n = 5), hysterothecial, solitary to aggregated, mostly aggregated, semi-immersed, navicular to irregular, black, apothecioid, rough, each hysterothecia has two parallel striae parallel to the longitudinal slit, and slight perpendicular striae, elongate and depressed, compressed at apex, longitudinal slit, no opening. Exciple: 60–180 μm wide, composed of dark brown, thick-walled cells of textura globulosa, outer layer brown to dark brown, inner layer pale brown to hyaline. Hamathecium: 1–2.5 μm wide, dense, hyaline, septate, branched, cellular pseudoparaphyses, forming a yellow epithecium above asci when mounted in water, and becoming hyaline epithecium above the asci when mounted in 10% KOH, while appendages turn dark. Asci: (205–)215–250(–265) μm × 12–16(–17) μm (x = 230 × 14 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, bitunicate, cylindrical, short with club-like perdicel, rounded at the apex, with an ocular chamber, J- apical ring. Ascospores: 28.5–36 μm × 11–14.5 μm (x = 32.5 × 13 μm, n = 30), uni-seriate when mature, hyaline, 1-septate when immature, becoming reddish brown to brown, 3-septate when mature, ellipsoidal to fusoid, straight or curved, rounded to slightly pointed at both ends, guttulate, without the mucilaginous sheath. Asexual morph: Undetermined.
Culture characteristics: Ascospores germinated on PDA within 24 h and germ tubes produced from one or both ends. Colonies on PDA reached a 6 cm diameter after two weeks at 28 °C. The colony is velvety, circular, slightly raised, with a filiform edge, white on the forward and white in reverse.
Material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Honghe Prefecture, Honghe County, 102°14′24″ E, 23°25′30″ N, on a decaying wood piece of Rhus chinensis Mill. (Anacardiaceae), 8 December 2020, T.Y. Du, HHD5 (holotype, HKAS 122696, ex-type living culture, KUMCC 21-048 = KUMCC 21-0486).
Notes: In phylogenetic analyses, Rhytidhysteron yunnanense was well separated from R. mesophilum with good statistical support (90% ML/0.92 PP). In morphology, R. yunnanense is distinct from R. mesophilum, having navicular to irregular ascomata, each hysterothecia has two parallel striae parallel to the longitudinal slit, and slight perpendicular striae, and a longitudinal slit with no opening, while R. mesophilum has boat-shaped ascomata, with perpendicular striae with a perpendicular to longitudinal slit, and a longitudinal slit opening [24]. In addition, the asci and ascospore size of R. yunnanense are smaller than those of R. mesophilum (asci: 230 × 14 μm vs. 267–282 × 15.5–16 µm, ascospores: 32.5 × 13 μm vs. 44.2 × 13.6 μm) [24]. Moreover, according to the comparison results of different gene fragments, R. yunnanense is different from R. mesophilum in the ITS (28/651 bp, 4.30%, without gaps) gene. Therefore, in this study, R. yunnanense is introduced as a new species.
Moreover, in the previous study of the genus Rhytidhysteron, ascomata have a transverse-striae, perpendicular to the longitudinal slit, and this study is the first to find parallel striae that are parallel to the longitudinal slit.

4. Discussion

Based on the morphological study and phylogenetic analyses, four new species and seven new records of Rhytidhysteron are introduced in this paper. Rhytidhysteron bannaense sp. nov., R. coffeae sp. nov., R. mengziense sp. nov., and R. yunnanense sp. nov. are proposed as new to science based on their unique morphological characteristics and moderate to good statistical support. Seven collections of R. bruguierae, R. camporesii, R. hongheense, R. magnoliae, R. neorufulum, R. tectonae, and R. thailandicum are identified as new records because of their identical morphological characteristics with the type species of the same species and high statistical support.
In this study, we found that the pseudoparaphyses of all 11 species are branched and septate. Interestingly, the epithecia of ten species all turn purple in 10% KOH, but the purple color of the epithecium fades and becomes hyaline in a short period of time (5–30 s). On the contrary, the epithecium of R. yunnanense sp. nov. (HKAS 122696) turns hyaline in 10% KOH, and the appendages become dark. In addition, R. yunnanense is unique in Rhytidhysteron because it has both parallel and perpendicular striae, relative to the longitudinal slit. This is also the first discovery of parallel striae in this genus, while other species of Rhytidhysteron have perpendicular striae or are non-striated (Table 3). The presence or absence of striae on the margin of ascomata is one of the important characteristics of this genus and is used to identify different species [16].
The results of the phylogenetic tree generated in this study are consistent with those reported by Ren et al. [18], and R. erioi Ekanayaka & K.D. Hyde is grouped as a sister to R. bruguierae. Therefore, to find out the correct taxonomic placement of R. erioi, it is necessary to recollect more samples and confirm their placement. Boehm et al. [13] suggested that R. opuntiae (J.G. Br.) M.E. Barr should be removed from Rhytidhysteron based on morphological and molecular data. Subsequently, Almeida et al. [15] suggested that R. opuntiae should be accommodated by a new genus in future studies. The main reason is that R. opuntiae grouped with Hysterodifractum partisporum D.A.C. Almeida, Gusmão & A.N. Mill. [15,56], but morpho-molecular differences exist between Hysterodifractum D.A.C. Almeida, Gusmão & A.N. Mill. and R. opuntiae [12]. This study agrees with Boehm et al. [13] and Almeida et al. [15] in that R. opuntiae should be included in a new genus, due to the fact that morpho-molecular data of R. opuntiae are different from those of Rhytidhysteron and Hysterodifractum. Therefore, more studies on R. opuntiae are needed.
Rhytidhysteron neorufulum and R. rufulum are the most common and most reported species in this genus [51]. Rhytidhysteron rufulum is considered a complex species based on studies on molecular and chemical data [16,22,27,51,57]. Thambugala et al. [16] indicated that some fungal specimens were incorrectly classified as R. rufulum, which needs to be reviewed exhaustively, as they might represent new species [51]. This action is meaningful, and can clarify the taxonomic placement of unclear species and enrich the diversity of Rhytidhysteron. Unfortunately, in this study, no strains with very similar morpho-molecular data to R. rufulum were found.
In previous studies, six species were reported in China. These are R. camporesii [49], R. hongheense [25], R. magnoliae [6], R. rufulum [15], R. thailandicum [6], and R. xiaokongense [18]. This study provides seven additional species from China—R. bannaense sp. nov., R. bruguierae, R. coffeae sp. nov., R. mengziense sp. nov., R. neorufulum, R. tectonae, and R. yunnanense sp. nov. With these additions, the number of species of Rhytidhysteron in China increases from six to thirteen. At the same time, the four new species added in this study expand the species of Rhytidhysteron from thirty-three to thirty-seven, and the known hosts for Rhytidhysteron expand from 52 to 62 records. However, only 22 species of Rhytidhysteron have sequence data (including this study), so more research needs to be carried out, and more samples need to be collected, isolated, and sequenced. This study also summarizes the morphological characteristics, hosts, and countries of the species of this genus for the first time (Table 3), which provides references for future research on Rhytidhysteron.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof9020148/s1, Supplementary Notes S1–S7: Description of seven new records; Supplementary Figures S1–S7: Photo plates of seven new records.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.C.K. and S.T.; Data curation, T.-Y.D. and L.L.; Formal analysis, T.-Y.D.; Funding acquisition, S.C.K., D.-Q.D., N.S., A.M.E., S.A.-R. and S.T.; Methodology, T.-Y.D. and L.L.; Software, T.-Y.D.; Supervision, S.C.K. and S.T.; Writing—original draft, T.-Y.D.; Writing—review & editing, S.C.K., D.-Q.D., A.M., L.L., N.S., S.L.S., A.M.E., S.A.-R. and S.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number NSFC 31760013, 31950410558, 32260004, High-Level Talent Recruitment Plan of Yunnan Provinces (“Young Talents” Program), and the Researchers Supporting Project, number (RSP2023R120), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The authors extend their appreciation to Chiang Mai University for financial support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Gui-Qing Zhang for her help. Tian-Ye Du thanks Mae Fah Luang University for the award of fee-less scholarship. Nakarin Suwannarach thanks Chiang Mai University, Thailand for financial support. Shaun Pennycook is thanked for his assistance in selecting a species epithet for the new species.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schoch, C.L.; Crous, P.W.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Boehm, E.W.A.; Burgess, T.I.; de Gruyter, J.; de Hoog, G.S.; Dixon, L.J.; Grube, M.; Gueidan, C.; et al. A class-wide phylogenetic assessment of Dothideomycetes. Stud. Mycol. 2009, 64, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hyde, K.D.; Jones, E.B.G.; Liu, J.K.; Ariyawansa, H.; Boehm, E.; Boonmee, S.; Braun, U.; Chomnunti, P.; Crous, P.W.; Dai, D.Q.; et al. Families of Dothideomycetes. Fungal Divers. 2013, 63, 1–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chethana, K.W.; Manawasinghe, I.S.; Hurdeal, V.G.; Bhunjun, C.S.; Appadoo, M.A.; Gentekaki, E.; Raspé, O.; Promputtha, I.; Hyde, K.D. What are fungal species and how to delineate them? Fungal Divers. 2021, 109, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hongsanan, S.; Hyde, K.D.; Phookamsak, R.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Sarma, V.V.; Boonmee, S.; Lücking, R.; Pem, D.; Bhat, J.D.; et al. Refined families of Dothideomycetes: Dothideomycetidae and Pleosporomycetidae. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 1553–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wijayawardene, N.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Dai, D.Q.; Sánchez-García, M.; Goto, B.T.; Saxena, R.K.; Erdoğdu, M.; Selçuk, F.; Rajeshkumar, K.C.; Aptroot, A.; et al. Outline of fungi and fungus-like taxa—2021. Mycosphere 2022, 13, 53–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. De Silva, N.I.; Tennakoon, D.S.; Thambugala, K.M.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Lumyong, S.; Hyde, K.D. Morphology and multigene phylogeny reveal a new species and a new record of Rhytidhysteron (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) from China. Asian J. Mycol. 2020, 3, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zogg, H. Die Hysteriaceae s. str. und Lophiaceae, unter besonderer berücksichtigung der mitteleuropäischen formen. Ber. Zur Kryptogamenflora Der Schweiz. 1962, 11, 1–190. [Google Scholar]
  8. Müller, E.; von Arx, J.A. Einige aspekte zur systematik pseudopharilaler ascomyceten. Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges. 1950, 60, 329–397. [Google Scholar]
  9. Luttrell, E.S. The ascostromatic Ascomycetes. Mycologia 1955, 47, 511–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kirk, P.M.; Cannon, P.F.; David, J.C.; Stalpers, J.A. Ainsworth & Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi, 9th ed.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kirk, P.; Cannon, P.; Minter, D.; Stalpers, J.A. Dictionary of the fungi, 10th edn. CAB International, Wallingford fermentations. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 39, 36–41. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kumar, V.; Cheewangkoon, R.; Thambugala, K.M.; Jones, G.E.; Brahmanage, R.S.; Doilom, M.; Jeewon, R.; Hyde, K.D. Rhytidhysteron mangrovei (Hysteriaceae), a new species from mangroves in Phetchaburi Province, Thailand. Phytotaxa 2019, 401, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Boehm, E.W.; Schoch, C.L.; Spatafora, J.W. On the evolution of the Hysteriaceae and Mytilinidiaceae (Pleosporomycetidae, Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) using four nuclear genes. Mycol. Res. 2009, 113, 461–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Boehm, E.W.A.; Mugambi, G.; Miller, A.N.; Huhndorf, S.; Marincowitz, S.; Schoch, C.L.; Spatafora, J.W. A molecular phylogenetic reappraisal of the Hysteriaceae, Mytilinidiaceae and Gloniaceae (Pleosporomycetidae, Dothideomycetes) with keys to world species. Stud. Mycol. 2009, 64, 49–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Almeida, D.A.C. A new genus and three new species of hysteriaceous Ascomycetes from the semiarid region of Brazil. Phytotaxa 2014, 176, 298–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Thambugala, K.M.; Hyde, K.D.; Eungwanichayapant, P.D.; Romero, A.I.; Liu, Z.Y. Additions to the genus Rhytidhysteron in Hysteriaceae. Cryptogam. Mycol. 2016, 37, 99–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tibpromma, S.; Hyde, K.D.; Jeewon, R.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Liu, J.K.; Bhat, D.J.; Jones, E.B.G.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Camporesi, E.; Bulgakov, T.S.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 491–602: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2017, 83, 1–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ren, G.C.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Jeewon, R.; Monkai, J.; Mortimer, P.E.; Hyde, K.D.; Xu, J.C.; Gui, H. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the novel Rhytidhysteron-like collections in the Greater Mekong Subregion. MycoKeys 2022, 86, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Spegazzini, C. Fungi argentini additis nonnullis brasiliensibus montevideensibusque. Pugillus quartus (Continuacion). An. Soc. Cient. Argent. 1881, 12, 174–189. [Google Scholar]
  20. Clements, F.E.; Shear, C.L. The Genera of Fungi; Hafner Publishing Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1931; p. 632. [Google Scholar]
  21. Samuels, G.J.; Müller, E. Life-history studies of Brazilian Ascomycetes. 7. Rhytidhysteron rufulum and the genus Eutryblidiella. Sydowia 1979, 32, 277–292. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yacharoen, S.; Tian, Q.; Chomnunti, P.; Boonmee, S.; Chukeatirote, E.; Bhat, J.D.; Hyde, K.D. Patellariaceae revisited. Mycosphere 2015, 6, 290–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Index Fungorum. 2022. Available online: http://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp (accessed on 7 October 2022).
  24. Cobos-Villagrán, A.; Valenzuela, R.; Hernández-Rodríguez, C.; Calvillo-Medina, R.P.; Villa-Tanaca, L.; Mateo-Cid, L.E.; Pérez-Valdespino, A.; Martínez-González, C.R.; Raymundo, T. Three new species of Rhytidhysteron (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) from Mexico. MycoKeys 2021, 83, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wanasinghe, D.N.; Mortimer, P.E.; Xu, J. Insight into the systematics of microfungi colonizing dead woody twigs of Dodonaea viscosa in Honghe (China). J. Fungi 2021, 7, e180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Farr, D.F.; Rossman, A.Y. Fungal Databases, U.S. National Fungus Collections, ARS, USDA. 2022. Available online: https://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/ (accessed on 12 November 2022).
  27. Soto-Medina, E.; Lücking, R. A new species of Rhytidhysteron (Ascomycota: Patellariaceae) from Colombia, with a provisional working key to known species in the world Artículo original. Rev. De La Acad. Colomb. De Cienc. Exactas Físicas Y Nat. 2017, 41, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Senanayake, I.C.; Rathnayaka, A.R.; Marasinghe, D.S.; Calabon, M.S.; Gentekaki, E.; Lee, H.B.; Hurdeal, V.G.; Pem, D.; Dissanayake, L.S.; Wijesinghe, S.N.; et al. Morphological approaches in studying fungi, collection examination isolation sporulation and preservation. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 2678–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jayasiri, S.C.; Hyde, K.D.; Ariyawansa, H.A.; Bhat, J.; Buyck, B.; Cai, L.; Dai, Y.C.; Abd-Elsalam, K.A.; Ertz, D.; Hidayat, I.; et al. The Faces of fungi database: Fungal names linked with morphology, phylogeny and human impacts. Fungal Divers. 2015, 74, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dissanayake, A.J.; Bhunjun, C.S.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Liu, J.K. Applied aspects of methods to infer phylogenetic relationships amongst fungi. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 2652–2676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4238–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.J.W.T.; Taylor, J.L. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols, a Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; Volume 18, pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rehner, S. Primers for Elongation Factor 1-Alpha (EF1-Alpha); Insect Biocontrol Laboratory, USDA, ARS, PSI: Beltsville, MD, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  34. Du, T.Y.; Hyde, K.D.; Mapook, A.; Mortimer, P.E.; Xu, J.C.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Tibpromma, S. Morphology and phylogenetic analyses reveal Montagnula puerensis sp. nov. (Didymosphaeriaceae, Pleosporales) from southwest China. Phytotaxa 2021, 514, 001–025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hall, T.A. BioEdit, a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Katoh, K.; Rozewicki, J.; Yamada, K.D. MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform. 2019, 20, 1160–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Capella-Gutiérrez, S.; Silla-Martínez, J.M.; Gabaldón, T. TrimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1972–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Glez-Peña, D.; Gómez-Blanco, D.; Reboiro-Jato, M.; Fdez-Riverola, F.; Posada, D. ALTER, program-oriented conversion of DNA and protein alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Miller, M.A.; Pfeiffer, W.; Schwartz, T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE); IEEE Computer Society: New Orleans, LA, USA, 2010; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8, a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Stamatakis, A.; Hoover, P.; Rougemont, J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57, 758–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; Van Der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Rannala, B.; Yang, Z. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: A new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 1996, 43, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhaxybayeva, O.; Gogarten, J.P. Bootstrap, Bayesian probability and maximum likelihood mapping: Exploring new tools for comparative genome analyses. BMC Genom. 2002, 3, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Rambaut, A. 2012—FigTree version 1. 4. University of Edinburgh: Edinburgh, Scotland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  46. Hyde, K.D.; Hongsanan, S.; Jeewon, R.; Bhat, D.J.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Jones, E.B.G.; Phookamsak, R.; Ariyawansa, H.A.; Boonmee, S.; Zhao, Q.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 367–490: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2016, 80, 1–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dayarathne, M.C.; Jones, E.B.G.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Devadatha, B.; Sarma, V.V.; Khongphinitbunjong, K.; Chomnunti, P.; Hyde, K.D. Morpho-molecular characterization of microfungi associated with marine based habitats. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 1–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mapook, A.; Hyde, K.D.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Jones, E.B.G.; Bhat, D.J.; Jeewon, R.; Stadler, M.; Samarakoon, M.C.; Malaithong, M.; Tanunchai, B.; et al. Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungi associated with the invasive weed Chromolaena odorata (Siam weed). Fungal Divers. 2020, 101, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hyde, K.D.; Dong, Y.; Phookamsak, R.; Jeewon, R.; Bhat, D.J.; Jones, E.B.G.; Liu, N.G.; Abeywickrama, P.D.; Mapook, A.; Wei, D.P.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 1151–1276: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2020, 100, 5–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Vu, D.; Groenewald, M.; De Vries, M.; Gehrmann, T.; Stielow, B.; Eberhardt, U.; Al-Hatmi, A.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Cardinali, G.; Houbraken, J.; et al. Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdom fungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation. Stud. Mycol. 2018, 91, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cobos-Villagrán, A.; Raymundo, T.; Calvillo-Medina, R.P.; Valenzuela, R. Rhytidhysteron mexicanum sp. nov. (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) from the Sierra of Guadalupe, Trans Mexican Volcanic Belt. Phytotaxa 2021, 479, 275–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mugambi, G.K.; Huhndorf, S.M. Parallel evolution of hysterothecial ascomata in ascolocularous fungi (Ascomycota, Fungi). Syst. Biodivers. 2009, 7, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Doilom, M.; Dissanayake, A.J.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Boonmee, S.; Liu, J.K.; Bhat, D.J.; Taylor, J.E.; Bahkali, A.H.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Hyde, K.D. Microfungi on Tectona grandis (teak) in northern Thailand. Fungal Divers. 2016, 82, 107–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hyde, K.D.; de Silva, N.I.; Jeewon, R.; Bhat, D.J.; Phookamsak, R.; Doilom, M.; Boonmee, S.; Jayawardena, R.S.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Senanayake, I.C.; et al. AJOM new records and collections of fungi: 1–100. Asian J. Mycol. 2020, 3, 22–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cobos-Villagrán, A.; Hernández-Rodríguez, C.; Valenzuela, R.; Villa-Tanaca, L.; Calvillo-Medina, R.P.; Mateo-Cid, L.E.; Martínez-Pineda, M.; Raymundo, T. El género Rhytidhysteron (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) en México. Acta Bot. Mex. 2020, 127, e1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jayasiri, S.C.; Hyde, K.D.; Jones, E.B.G.; Perŝoh, D.D.; Camporesi, E.; Kang, J.C. Taxonomic novelties of hysteriform Dothideomycetes. Mycosphere 2018, 9, 803–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Murillo, C.; Federico, J.A.; Julieta, C.; Thorsten, L.; Giselle, T. Molecular data indicate that Rhytidhysteron rufulum (Ascomycetes, Patellariales) in Costa Rica consists of four distinct lineages corroborated by morphological and chemical characters. Mycol. Res. 2009, 113, 405–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Petrak, F. Ein beitrag zur pilzflora Floridas. Sydowia 1953, 7, 103–116. [Google Scholar]
  59. Sarbhoy, A.K.; Lal, G.; Varshney, J.L. Fungi of India (1967–71); Navyug Traders: New Delhi, India, 1971; p. 148. [Google Scholar]
  60. Dingley, J.M.; Fullerton, R.A.; McKenzie, E.H.C. Survey of agricultural pests and diseases. Records of fungi, bacteria, algae, and angiosperms pathogenic on plants in Cook Islands, Fiji, Kiribati, Niue, Tonga, Tuvalu, and Western Samoa. Tech. Rep. 1981, 2, 485. [Google Scholar]
  61. Yuan, Z.Q. Fungi and associated tree diseases in Melville Island, Northern Territory, Australia. Austral. Syst. Bot. 1996, 9, 337–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pande, A.; Rao, V.G. A Compendium of Fungi on Legumes from India; Scientific Publishers: Rajasthan, India, 1998; p. 188. [Google Scholar]
  63. McKenzie, E.H.C.; Buchanan, P.K.; Johnston, P.R. Checklist of fungi on Nothofagus species in New Zealand. N. Z. J. Bot. 2000, 38, 635–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Minter, D.W.; Rodriguez Hernandez, M.; Mena Portales, J. Fungi of the Caribbean: An Annotated Checklist; PDMS Publishing: Surrey, UK, 2001; p. 946. [Google Scholar]
  65. Urtiaga, R. Host index of plant diseases and disorders from Venezuela—addendum. Unknown journal or publisher. 2004; 268. [Google Scholar]
  66. Urtiaga, R. Indice de enfermedades en plantas de Venezuela y Cuba, second edition. Unknown journal or publisher. 2004; 301. [Google Scholar]
  67. Sierra-López, D. Contribución al estudio de los ascomicetes bitunicados de Cataluña. Acta Bot. Barcinon. 2006, 50, 5–434. [Google Scholar]
  68. Pande, A. Ascomycetes of Peninsular India; Scientific Publishers: Rajasthan, India, 2008; p. 584. [Google Scholar]
  69. Niranjan, M.; Tiwari, S.; Baghela, A.; Sarma, V.V. New records of ascomycetous fungi from Andaman Islands, India and their molecular sequence data. Curr. Res. Environ. Appl. Mycol. 2018, 8, 331–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Camino-Vilaro, M.; Castro-Hernandez, L.; Abreu-Herrera, Y.; Mena-Portales, J.; Cantillo-Perez, T. Fungi associated with invasive plant species in Cuba. Phytotaxa 2019, 419, 239–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Reale Accademia delle scienze fisiche e matematiche di NapoliSocietà reale di Napoli. Atti della Reale accademia delle scienze fisiche e matematiche; Tip. della R. Accademia delle scienze fisiche et matematiche Napoli 1863–1935; 1879; Volume 8. [Google Scholar]
  72. Sociedad Científica Argentina and Congreso Científico Latino Americano and Congreso Científico Internacional Americano. Anales de la Sociedad Científica Argentina; Buenos Aires, [Sociedad Científica Argentina]: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1879; t.8-9.
  73. Sociedad Científica Argentina and Congreso Científico Latino Americano and Congreso Científico Internacional Americano. Anales de la Sociedad Científica Argentina; Buenos Aires, [Sociedad Científica Argentina]: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1888; Volume 25.
  74. Anahosur, K.H. Ascomycetes of Coorg (India) II. M. A. C. S. Research Institute, Poona-4 (India). Sydowia 1970, 24, 177–182. [Google Scholar]
  75. New York State Museum and University of the State of New York. Annual Report of the Regents; University of the State of New York: Albany, NY, USA, 1893. [Google Scholar]
  76. Desai, B.G.; Pathak, V.N. A new Tryblidiella from India. Sydowia 1970, 24, 198–200. [Google Scholar]
  77. Sociedad Científica Argentina and Congreso Científico Latino Americano and Congreso Científico Internacional Americano. Anales de la Sociedad Científica Argentina; Buenos Aires, [Sociedad Científica Argentina]: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1881; t.12.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree generated from RAxML analyses based on combined LSU, ITS, SSU, and TEF sequence data for Rhytidhysteron. The tree was rooted with Gloniopsis calami (MFLUCC 15-0739) and G. praelonga (CBS 112415). Bootstrap support values equal to or higher than 60% ML and posterior probability values equal to or higher than 0.90 Bayesian PP are indicated on the nodes. New species are in red, new records are in blue, and ex-type strains are in bold.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree generated from RAxML analyses based on combined LSU, ITS, SSU, and TEF sequence data for Rhytidhysteron. The tree was rooted with Gloniopsis calami (MFLUCC 15-0739) and G. praelonga (CBS 112415). Bootstrap support values equal to or higher than 60% ML and posterior probability values equal to or higher than 0.90 Bayesian PP are indicated on the nodes. New species are in red, new records are in blue, and ex-type strains are in bold.
Jof 09 00148 g001
Figure 2. Rhytidhysteron bannaense (HKAS 122695, holotype). (a,b) Appearance of hysterothecia on the host; (c,d) Vertical section through hysterothecium; (eh) Asci; (i) Epithecium mounted in water; (j) Pseudoparaphyses; (k) Exciple; (lo) Ascospores; (p) A germinating ascospore; (q,r) Colony on PDA medium (after four weeks). Scale bars: (c,d) = 500 μm; (eh) = 100 μm; (i,j,lp) = 20 μm; (k) = 50 μm.
Figure 2. Rhytidhysteron bannaense (HKAS 122695, holotype). (a,b) Appearance of hysterothecia on the host; (c,d) Vertical section through hysterothecium; (eh) Asci; (i) Epithecium mounted in water; (j) Pseudoparaphyses; (k) Exciple; (lo) Ascospores; (p) A germinating ascospore; (q,r) Colony on PDA medium (after four weeks). Scale bars: (c,d) = 500 μm; (eh) = 100 μm; (i,j,lp) = 20 μm; (k) = 50 μm.
Jof 09 00148 g002
Figure 3. Rhytidhysteron coffeae (HKAS 122701, holotype). (a,b) Appearance of hysterothecia on the host; (c,d) Vertical section through hysterothecium; (eg) Asci; (h) Epithecium mounted in water; (i,j) Pseudoparaphyses; (k) Pedicel of asci; (l) Exciple; (mr) Ascospores; (s) A germinating ascospore; (t) Colony on PDA medium (after four weeks). Scale bars: (c,d) = 500 μm; (eg) = 100 μm; (h,l) = 50 μm; (ik,ms) = 20 μm.
Figure 3. Rhytidhysteron coffeae (HKAS 122701, holotype). (a,b) Appearance of hysterothecia on the host; (c,d) Vertical section through hysterothecium; (eg) Asci; (h) Epithecium mounted in water; (i,j) Pseudoparaphyses; (k) Pedicel of asci; (l) Exciple; (mr) Ascospores; (s) A germinating ascospore; (t) Colony on PDA medium (after four weeks). Scale bars: (c,d) = 500 μm; (eg) = 100 μm; (h,l) = 50 μm; (ik,ms) = 20 μm.
Jof 09 00148 g003
Figure 4. Rhytidhysteron mengziense(HKAS 122699, holotype). (a,b) Appearance of hysterothecia on the host; (c,d) Vertical section through hysterothecium; (e) Epithecium mounted in water; (fh) Asci; (i) Exciple; (j) Pseudoparaphyses; (km) Ascospores; (n) A germinating ascospore; (o,p) Colony on PDA medium (after one week). Scale bars: (c,d) = 500 μm; (e,kn) = 20 μm; (fi) = 100 μm; (j) = 50 μm.
Figure 4. Rhytidhysteron mengziense(HKAS 122699, holotype). (a,b) Appearance of hysterothecia on the host; (c,d) Vertical section through hysterothecium; (e) Epithecium mounted in water; (fh) Asci; (i) Exciple; (j) Pseudoparaphyses; (km) Ascospores; (n) A germinating ascospore; (o,p) Colony on PDA medium (after one week). Scale bars: (c,d) = 500 μm; (e,kn) = 20 μm; (fi) = 100 μm; (j) = 50 μm.
Jof 09 00148 g004
Figure 5. Rhytidhysteron yunnanense (HKAS 122696, holotype). (ac) Appearance of hysterothecia on the host; (d,e) Vertical section through hysterothecium; (fj) Asci; (k) Epithecium mounted in water; (l) Pseudoparaphyses; (m) Exciple; (nq) Ascospores; (r) A germinating ascospore; (s,t) Colony on PDA medium (after one week); Scale bars: (d,e) = 500 μm; (fj) = 100 μm; (k,l,nr) = 20 μm; (m) = 50 μm.
Figure 5. Rhytidhysteron yunnanense (HKAS 122696, holotype). (ac) Appearance of hysterothecia on the host; (d,e) Vertical section through hysterothecium; (fj) Asci; (k) Epithecium mounted in water; (l) Pseudoparaphyses; (m) Exciple; (nq) Ascospores; (r) A germinating ascospore; (s,t) Colony on PDA medium (after one week); Scale bars: (d,e) = 500 μm; (fj) = 100 μm; (k,l,nr) = 20 μm; (m) = 50 μm.
Jof 09 00148 g005
Table 1. Taxa name, strain numbers, and GenBank accession numbers included in the phylogenetic analyses carried out in the present study.
Table 1. Taxa name, strain numbers, and GenBank accession numbers included in the phylogenetic analyses carried out in the present study.
Taxa NameStrain NumberGenBank Accession NumbersReferences
LSUITSSSUTEF
Gloniopsis calamiMFLUCC 15-0739NG059715KX669036KX669034KX671965[46]
G. praelongaCBS 112415FJ161173FJ161134FJ161090[13]
Rhytidhysteron bannaenseKUMCC 21-0482 TOP526408OP526398OP526395OP572199This study
R. bannaenseKUMCC 21-0483OP526409OP526399OP526396OP572200This study
R. bruguieraeKUMCC 21-0484OP442285OP494090OP482277OP572207This study
R. bruguieraeMFLU 18-0571 TMN017833MN017901MN077056[47]
R. bruguieraeMFLUCC 17-1515MN632452MN632457MN632463MN635661[48]
R. bruguieraeMFLUCC 17-1511MN632454MN632459MN632465[48]
R. bruguieraeMFLUCC 17-1502MN632453MN632458MN632464MN635662[48]
R. bruguieraeMFLUCC 17-1509MN632455MN632460MN632466[48]
R. camporesiiKUMCC 21-0488OP482286OP494091OP482278OP572208This study
R. camporesiiKUN-HKAS 104277 TMN429072MN429069MN442087[49]
R. chromolaenaeMFLUCC 17-1516 TMN632456MN632461MN632467MN635663[48]
R. coffeaeKUMCC 21-0489 TOP526406OP605963OP526412OP572201This study
R. coffeaeKUMCC 21-0492OP526407OP605964OP526413OP572202This study
R. cozumelenseA. Cobos-Villagrán 951MW939459MZ056797MZ457338[24]
R. cozumelenseT. Raymundo 7321MW939460MZ056798MZ457339[24]
R. erioiMFLU 16-0584 TMN429071MN429068MN442086[49]
R. esperanzaeT. Raymundo 6579MZ477203MZ056795MZ457336[24]
R. esperanzaeR. Valenzuela 17206MZ477204MZ056796MZ457337[24]
R. hongheenseKUMCC 21-0487OP482287OP494092OP482279OP572209This study
R. hongheenseKUMCC 20-0222MW264193MW264214MW264223MW256815[25]
R. hongheenseHKAS112348MW541820MW541824MW541831MW556132[25]
R. hongheenseHKAS112349MW541821MW541825MW541832MW556133[25]
R. hysterinumEB 0351GU397350GU397340[13]
R. hysterinumCBS 316.71MH871912MH860141[50]
R. magnoliaeKUMCC 21-0478OP482288OP494093OP482280OP572210This study
R. magnoliaeMFLUCC 18-0719 TMN989384MN989383MN989382MN997309[6]
R. mangroveiMFLU 18-1894 TMK357777MK425188MK450030[12]
R. mengzienseKUMCC 21-0490 TOP526396OP526402OP526414OP572203This study
R. mengzienseKUMCC 21-0491OP526397OP526403OP526415OP572204This study
R. mesophilumA. Trejo 74MW939461MZ056799MZ457340[24]
R. mesophilumA. Cobos-Villagrán 1800MW939462MZ056800MZ457341[24]
R. mexicanumRV17107.1 TMT626028MT626026[51]
R. mexicanumRV17107.2MT626029MT626027[51]
R. neorufulumKUMCC 21-0480OP482290OP494095OP482282OP572212This study
R. neorufulumMFLUCC 21-0035MZ346015MZ346020MZ346025MZ356249[18]
R. neorufulumMFLUCC 13-0216 TKU377566KU377561KU377571KU510400[16]
R. neorufulumGKM 361AGQ221893GU296192[13]
R. neorufulumHUEFS 192194KF914915[15]
R. neorufulumMFLUCC 12-0528KJ418117KJ418118KJ418119[16]
R. neorufulumCBS 306.38FJ469672GU296191GU349031[15]
R. neorufulumMFLUCC 12-0011KJ418109KJ206287KJ418110[16]
R. neorufulumMFLUCC 12-0567KJ526126KJ546124KJ546129[16]
R. neorufulumMFLUCC 12-0569KJ526128KJ546126KJ546131[16]
R. neorufulumEB 0381GU397351GU397366[13]
R. opuntiaeGKM 1190GQ221892GU397341[52]
R. rufulumMFLUCC 14-0577 TKU377565KU377560KU377570KU510399[16]
R. rufulumEB 0384GU397354GU397368[13]
R. rufulumEB 0382GU397352[13]
R. rufulumEB 0383GU397353GU397367[13]
R. rufulumMFLUCC 12-0013KJ418111KJ418112KJ418113[6]
R. tectonaeKUMCC 21-0479OP482291OP494096OP482283OP572213This study
R. tectonaeMFLUCC 21-0037MZ346013MZ346018MZ346023MZ356247[18]
R. tectonaeMFLUCC 21-0034MZ346014MZ346019MZ346024MZ356248[18]
R. tectonaeMFLUCC 13-0710 TKU764698KU144936KU712457KU872760[53]
R. thailandicumKUMCC 21-0493OP482292OP494097OP482284OP572214This study
R. thailandicumMFLUCC 14-0503 TKU377564KU377559KU377569KU497490[16]
R. thailandicumMFLUCC 12-0530KJ526125KJ546123KJ546128[16]
R. thailandicumMFLU17-0788MT093472MT093733MT093495[6]
R. thailandicumMFLUCC 13-0051MN509434MN509433MN509435[54]
R. xiaokongenseKUMCC 20-0158MZ346011MZ346016MZ346021MZ356245[18]
R. xiaokongenseKUMCC 20-0160 TMZ346012MZ346017MZ346022MZ356246[18]
R. yunnanenseKUMCC 21-0485 TOP526404OP526410OP526400OP572205This study
R. yunnanenseKUMCC 21-0486OP526405OP526411OP526401OP572206This study
Remarks: The newly generated sequences are indicated in bold, the superscript T indicates ex-type, and “—” indicates information unavailable.
Table 2. Comparison of LSU, ITS, LSU, and TEF gene fragments of R. bannaense and four strains of R. thailandicum (without gaps).
Table 2. Comparison of LSU, ITS, LSU, and TEF gene fragments of R. bannaense and four strains of R. thailandicum (without gaps).
Closest Known SpeciesStrain NumberLSU GeneITS GeneSSU GeneTEF GeneReferences
R. thailandicumMFLUCC 14-0503 T0.00%1.79%
(9/503 bp)
0.00%2.26%
(21/929 bp)
[16]
MFLUCC 12-05300.00%1.89%
(10/527 bp)
0.00%[16]
MFLU 17-07880.00%1.42%
(7/494 bp)
0.00%[6]
MFLUCC 13-00510.00%1.81%
(9/496 bp)
2.28%
(21/923 bp)
[54]
Remarks: The “—” represents unavailable data for this gene, superscript T indicates the ex-type.
Table 3. Morphological characteristics, hosts, and location information of species of Rhytidhysterons. Host and location information of taxa are from the following references and Farr and Rossman [26].
Table 3. Morphological characteristics, hosts, and location information of species of Rhytidhysterons. Host and location information of taxa are from the following references and Farr and Rossman [26].
SpeciesAscomata/
Conidiomata
Exciples/Conidiomata WallHamathecium/
Paraphysoids
Asci/
Conidiogenous Cells
Ascospores/
Conidia
SequencesHostsCountriesReferences
Holomorph
R. hysterinumSexual: ascomata 1000–3000 µm long × 500 µm wide × 500–1000 µm high, smooth-striated, erumpent, solitary or aggregated, sessile, deep longitudinal slit extending the entire length of the ascoma and with irregularly spaced, pseudoepithecium, orange or black when fresh and when dryExciples tightly compact, hyaline to light brown, becoming red in Melzer’s reagent, cells toward the interior less heavily pigmentedParaphyses exceeding the ascus by ca. 25 µm, branching dichotomously just below the tip, tip cells globose to clavate, disintegrating and embedded in an amorphous substance to form the pseudoepithecium, becoming blue-green in Melzer’s reagentAsci 185–220 µm × 15–17 µm, 4–8-spored, cylindrical, pedicellateAscospores 21–32 µm × 8–12 µm, 1-septate, septum median, fusiform with rounded to acute ends, slightly constricted at the septum, brown and translucent to nearly black, and opaque with septum obscuredITS, LSU, TEFBuxus spp., Diospyros sp., Ilex sp., Prosopis sp.Australia, France, India, USA[13,21]
Asexual (Aposphaeria-like): pycnidia produced abundantly in the aerialmycelium and on the surface of the agar on both MEA and PDA, non-stromatic, globose with a short papilla, 250–330 µm high × 220–250 µm wide, blackPhialides forming in a single layer over the entire inner surface of the pycnidial wall, hyaline, ampulliform to cylindrical, 7–8 µm long, × 2 µm wide basally, and 1.5 µm wide at the openingConidia globose, 2–3.5 µm diam., smooth, held in hyaline slime at the pycnidial opening
Asexual (Diplodia-like): pycnidia form on MEA within one month, immersed, non-stromatic, subglobose, 350 µm high × 400 µm wide, non-papillate, black, smoothPycnidial wall 25–35 µm wide, consisting of pseudoparenchymatous cells, 5–7 µm × 3–4 µm, thin-walled, brownParaphyses arisingfrom among conidiogenous cells, up to 50 µm long × 3 µm wide, septate, unbranched, with rounded ends, hyalineConidiogenous cells forming in a single layer over the entire inner surface of the pycnidial wall, barely distinguishable from cells of the wall; consisting of a basal cell 6–7 µm across, and a 5–10 µm long elongationConidia arising holoblastically from the tip of the conidiogenous cell; at first hyaline and unicellular, becoming dark brown, opaque, minutely punctate, and 1-septate with a pore in the middle of the septum, oblong, with a truncate, non-cicatrized base, 22–26 µm × 9–11 µm
R. rufulumSexual: ascomata 900–2350 µm long × 1134–1450 µm wide × 461–820 µm high, superficial, rough-striated, black or red at the centerExciples 75–228 µm wide, two layers. Outer layer dark brown to black, cells of textura angularis or textura globosa. Inner layer hyaline cells of textura angularis to textura prismaticaSeptate, branched pseudoparaphysesAsci 150–250 µm × 11–16 µm, 8-sporedAscospores 28–36 µm × 9–13 µm, 1–3-septate, reddish brown to brown when matureITS, LSU, SSU, TEFAbrus precatorius, Abrus pulchellus,
Acacia auriculiformis,
Acacia cochliacantha,
Acacia farnesiana,
Acacia macracantha,
Acacia spp.,
Adhatoda vasica,
Albizia lebbeck,
Albizia odoratissima,
Alphitonia excelsa,
Annona muricata,
Bignonia unguis,
Bougainvillea glabra,
Capparis sepiaria,
Casuarina sp.,
Celtis pallida,
Citrus aurantifolia,
Citrus aurantium,
Codiaeum variegatum,
Euterpe oleracea,
Grevillea robusta,
Guaiacum officinale,
Helietta parvifolia,
Juniperus lucayana,
Nothofagus sp.,
Pisonia aculeata,
Pithecellobium dulce,
Prosopis juliflora,
Torresia cearensis
Argentina,
Australia,
Brazil,
China,
Cook Islands,
Costa Rica,
Cuba,
Dominica,
France,
Ghana,
India,
Jamaica,
Japan,
Kenya,
Malaysia,
Mexico,
Micronesia,
New Guinea,
New Zealand,
Philippine,
Puerto, Rico,
Spain,
Tanzania,
Thailand,
Tonga,
United States,
Venezuela,
West Indies
[15,16,21,55,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70]
Asexual (Aposphaeria-like): pycnidia form abundantly in aerial mycelium, often associated with small tufts of red-brown hyphae, non-stromatic, globose to oblong, 100–150 µm high × 70–150 µm wide, non-papillate, black Phialides forming in a single layer over the entire inner surface of the pycnidial wall, hyaline, ampulliform to cylindrical, 4.5–9.0 µm long × 1.5–3.0 µm diam. basally, and 1.5 µm wide at the openingConidia globose to elliptic, 2–3 µm diam. or 3.0 µm × 2.5 µm, smooth, held in a drop of hyaline slime at the pycnidial opening
Asexual (Diplodia-like): pycnidia abundant to rare, immersed, non-stromatic, subglobose, 460 µm high × 400 µm wide, papillate or non-papillate, or seated on the surface of the agar, pyriform, 270 µm high × 130–180 µm wide and with a papilla 130–180 µm long × 70 µm wide, black, smoothPycnidial wall 45 µm wide, consisting of pseudoparenchymatous cells 8–20 µm × 8–10 µm, thin-walled, brownParaphyses arising from among conidiogenous cells, up to 50 µm long × 3 µm wide, septate, unbranched, with rounded ends, hyalineConidiogenous cells forming in a single layer over the entire inner surface of the pycnidial wall, consisting of a hyaline, globose cell 4–5 µm in diam. basally, and with a 5 µm long elongationConidia arising holoblastically from the tip of the elongation of the conidiogenous cell, at first hyaline and unicellular, becoming dark brown to opaque and 1-septate with a pore in the middle of the septum following discharge, oblong with a truncate, non-cicatrized base, 19.5–23.5 (–29.5) µm × (6.5–) 8–10 (–12) µm, smooth
R. thailandicumSexual: ascomata 700–1200 µm long× 530–750 µm wide × 360–640 µm high, semi-immersed to superficial, rough without striationsExciples 72–130 μm wide, brown to dark brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis, becoming hyaline towards the inner layers and baseSeptate, branched pseudoparaphyses, forming a yellow epithecium above asci when mounted in waterAsci 135–160 µm × 10.5–15 µm, (3–)6–8-sporedAscospores 20–31 µm × 7.5–12 µm, (1–)3-septate, yellowish to brown when matureITS, LSU, SSU, TEFAcacia sp., Aquilaria sinensis, Morus australisChina, Mexico, Thailand[6,16,55], this study
Asexual (Aposphaeria-like): conidiomata 70–108 µm long × 63–110 µm wide, superficial on PDA, globose, black, appearing in a mycelium massConidiomata wall thin, arranged in textura angularisConidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 5.9 µm × 3 µm, cylindrical to subcylindrical, truncate apex, short, smooth, hyalineConidia 2.9 µm × 2.2 µm, globose to subglobose, hyaline, smooth
Asexual morph
R. xiaokongenseAsexual (Diplodia-like): conidiomata 448–464 µm long × 324–422 µm wide, solitary, scattered, semi-immersed in the host, black, unilocular, subglobose to ampulliform. Ostioles 178–227 µm long × 166–234 µm wide, central, short papillateConidiomata wall 30–40 µm thick, 4–6 layers, reddish brown to dark
brown cells of textura angularis
Conidiogenous cells 5–8 µm × 3–6 µm, subglobose or ellipsoidal, hyaline, smooth, discrete, producing a single conidium at the apexConidia 20–25 µm × 8–10 µm, 1-septate and brown to dark brown at maturity, oblong to ellipsoidal, straight to slightly curved, with granular appearanceITS, LSU, SSU, TEFPrunus sp.China[18]
Sexual morph
R. bannaense1350 µm long × 750 µm wide × 670 µm high, rough, solitary to aggregated, semi-immersed to superficial, perpendicular striae, green at the center40–150 µm wide, composed of dark brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis, outer layer brown to dark brown, inner layer pale brown to hyalineSeptate, branched, cellular pseudoparaphyses, forming an orange epithecium above asci when mounted in water166 µm × 14 µm, 8-spored, J- apical ring25 µm × 11.5 µm, 3-septate, brown to dark brown when matureITS, LSU, SSU, TEFBuddleja officinalisChinaThis study
R. beccarianum1000 µm long, erumpent, solitary, dark brown60 µm × 6 µm, 8-spored12–15 µm × 5–6 µm, 3-septate, constriction at the septaSri Lanka[71]
R. brasilienseErumpent to nearly superficialSeptate, branched pseudoparaphyses230–250 µm × 20–30 µm, 8-spored40–45 µm × 15–20 µm, 3-septateOn rotten branchesBrazil, Thailand[16,19]
R. bruguierae400–950 µm long × 548–570 µm wide × 410–520 µm high, superficial, striated148–162 µm wide, dark brown to black, thick-walled cells of textura angularisSeptate, branched pseudoparaphyses, forming a red epithecium above asci when mounted in water128–148 µm × 10–14 µm, 6–8-spored, J- apical ring14–26 µm × 6.2–9 µm, 1–3-septate, yellowish-brown to reddish brown when matureITS, LSU, SSU, TEFAlnus nepalensis, Bruguiera sp., Chromolaena odorataChina, Thailand[47,48], this study
R. camporesii800–1100 µm long × 500–650 µm high, erumpent, slightly dentateEctal excipulum 65–95 µm wide, blackish cells of textura globulosa to angularis. Medullary excipulum 19–22 µm wide, thin-walled, hyaline to brown cells of textura porrectaParaphyses septate,
branched at the base, forming an orange-red epithecium above asci when mounted in water
165–175 µm × 13–15 µm, 8-spored, J- apical ring25–28 µm × 9–11 µm, 3-septate, dark brown when matureITS, LSU, SSU, TEFCotoneaster franchetiiChina[49], this study
R. chromolaenae500–1000 µm long × 250–500 µm high, superficial, not perpendicular striae, scattered, dark brown to black with dark orange at the center45–60(–110) µm wide, hyaline or pale brown to brown cells arranged in textura globulosa to textura angularisSeptate, branched pseudoparaphyses120–140 µm × 10–15 µm, 8-spored18–22 µm × 7–9 µm, 3-septate, pale brown to brown when matureITS, LSU, SSU, TEFChromolaena odorataThailand[48]
R. coffeae1520 µm long × 1120 µm wide × 450 µm high, rough, solitary to aggregated, mostly solitary, superficial, perpendicular striae, reddish brown at the center70–160 µm wide, composed of dark brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis, outer layer brown to dark brown, inner layer pale brown to hyalineSeptate, branched, cellular pseudoparaphyses, forming a red to purple epithecium above asci when mounted in water179.5 µm × 13 µm, 8-spored, J- apical ring26 µm × 10 µm, 3-septate, reddish brown to brown when matureITS, LSU, SSU, TEFCoffea sp.ChinaThis study
R. columbiense1500–3000 µm long × 1200–1800 µm wide × 600–700 µm high, superficial, striated, yellowish green on the margins60–90 µm wide, dark brown to black, thick-walled cells of textura angularisSeptate, branched pseudoparaphyses175–190 µm × 14–18 µm, 6–8-spored38–52 µm × 13–18 µm, (1–)3-septate, reddish brown when matureUnidentified woodyColombia[27]
R. cozumelense2500–3500 µm long × 1100–1500 µm wide × 800–1900 µm high, erumpent, solitary, smooth to slightly striated, dark at the centerTwo layers, the first carbonaceous, 45–100 µm wide thick cells of textura prismatica. The second cells hyaline, thin-walledSeptate pseudoparaphyses182–191 µm × 12–13 µm, 8-spored26–29 µm × 9–11 µm, 3-septate, dark brown when matureITS, LSU, TEFTabebuia roseaMexico[24]
R. discolor1000–2000 µm long, cracking after maturityCarbonaceousParaphyses filiform180–220 µm × 12–15 µm, 8-spored28–30 µm × 10–12 µm, 3-septate, elongated ellipse, guttulesCeltis talaArgentina[72]
R. erioi600–1200 µm long × 270–360 µm high, superficial or slightly erumpent, dentateEctal excipulum 55–75 µm wide, thin-walled, dark brown cells of textura angularis to textura globulosa. Medullary excipulum 14–20 µm wide, hyaline cells of textura porrectaParaphyses septate,
slightly branched at the base
140–200 µm × 9–16 µm, 8-spored, J- apical ring22–28 µm × 9–11 µm, 3-septate, dark brown when matureITS, LSU, TEFUnidentified woodThailand[49]
R. esperanzae2000–4500 µm long × 1200–3000 µm wide × 1000–2400 µm high, superficial, solitary, rarely gregarious, margin greyish green, striated, dark green to black at the centerExciple in two layers, the first carbonaceous, 60–220 µm wide cells of textura globulosa-angularis. The second slightly pigmented to hyaline, thin-walledSeptate pseudoparaphyses265–270 µm × 19–20 µm, 8-spored45–47 µm × 17–19 µm, 3-septate, reddish brown
to brown when mature
ITS, LSU, TEFOreomunnea mexicanaMexico[24]
R. guaraniticum1000–4000 µm long × 700–100 µm wide, superficial200 µm × 12–14 µm30–31 µm × 10–12 µm, 3-septateOn bark, rotten branchesJawa, Paraguay[73]
R. hongheense1200–2000 µm long × 600–1000 µm wide × 350–500 µm high, slightly erumpent, slightly dentateEctal excipulum 70–100 µm wide, thick-walled, with black cells of textura globulosa to textura angularis. Medullary excipulum is composed of narrow, long, thin-walled, hyaline to brown cells of textura
angularis
Septate, branched pseudoparaphyses, forming a red epithecium above asci when mounted in water140–180 µm × 12–16 µm, 8-spored20–33 µm × 9–13 µm, 3-septate, dark brown when mature, rarely muriform, with one longitudinal septumITS, LSU, SSU, TEF, RPB2Dodonaea sp., Phyllanthus emblicaChina[25], this study
R. indicum1800–3000 µm long, black, carbonaceous, scattered, erumpent, uniloculate, discoid to elongatedParaphyses filiform, septate, clavate expansion200–220 µm × 18–20 µm, 8-spored30–32 µm × 12–14 µm, dark brown, 3-septate, end cells slightly tapering, constricted at septa, uniseriateScutia indicaIndia[74]
R. magnoliae1200–2300 µm long × 540–600 µm wide × 430–550 µm high µm semi-immersed to superficial, striated, dark brown at the center80–100 µm wide, two layers. Outer layer black to dark brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis. Inner layer hyaline, thin-walled cells of textura angularis to textura prismaticaSeptate, branched pseudoparaphyses, forming an orange epithecium above asci when mounted in water160–200 µm × 14 µm, 8-spored25–32 µm × 8–12 µm, 1–3-septate, pale brown to dark brown when matureITS, LSU, SSU, TEFHevea brasiliensis,Magnolia grandifloraChina[6], this study
R. mangrovei930–1980 µm long × 780–910 µm wide × 500–520 µm high, crowded to aggregate,
semi-immersed to superficial, rough-striated
65–90 µm wide, dark brown to black, thin-walled cells of textura angularisSeptate, unbranched pseudoparaphyses110–150 µm × 9.4–10 µm, (2–6–) 8-spored21–28 µm × 7.5–8.5 µm, 1–3-septate, reddish brown when matureITS, LSU, TEFMangrove sp.Thailand[12]
R. mengziense1400 µm long × 910 µm wide × 640 µm high, smooth, solitary to aggregated, mostly solitary, semi-immersed to superficial, perpendicular striae, reddish brown at the center60–135 µm wide, composed of outer layer brown to black, thick-walled cells of textura angularis and inner layer light brown, thin-walled cells of textura prismaticaSeptate, branched, cellular pseudoparaphyses, forming a reddish brown to brown epithecium above asci when mounted in water164.5 µm × 13 µm, 8-spored, J- apical ring27 µm × 12 µm, 3-septate, reddish brown to brown when matureITS, LSU, SSU, TEFCrataegus scabrifoliaChinaThis study
R. mesophilum2500–4000 µm long × 1000–1500 µm wide × 1400–1700 µm high, superficial or erumpent, gregarious, rarely
solitary, margin yellowish green, striated, orange at the center
Two layers, the first carbonaceous, 62.5–75 µm wide, green yellowish cells of textura prismatica. The second hyaline, thin-walledAseptate, branched pseudoparaphyses267–282 µm × 15.5–16 µm, 8-spored40–44 µm × 12–14 µm, 3-septate, light brown when matureITS, LSU, TEFOn decayed woodMexico[24]
R. mexicanum2000–4000 µm long × 1500–2500 µm wide × 1500 µm high, superficial or erumpent, gregarious, rarely solitary, striatedTwo layers, the first carbonaceous, 104.5–114 µm wide in the medium cells of textura globulosa to textura angularis, thick-walled. The second composed of cells of textura
prismatica, hyaline, thin-walled
Aseptate, bifurcated to branched pseudoparaphyses285–297 µm × 16–17 µm, 8-spored34–40 µm × 10–12 µm, 3-septate, reddish brown when matureITS, LSUMexico[51]
R. neohysterinum1500–2500 µm long × 700–2200 µm wide × 700–1100 µm high, superficial, solitary, rarely gregarious, striated, orange at the center52–68 µm wide, dark brown to black, thick-walled cells of textura prismaticaSeptate pseudoparaphyses160–185 µm × 12–13 µm, 8-spored24.8–29 µm × 8.8–10 µm, 1-septate, brown when matureAcacia sp.Mexico[55]
R. neorufulum835–2100 µm long × 350–1320 µm wide × 430–1000 µm high, superficial, elliptic or irregular, without striations, black or yellow at the center64–160 µm wide, dark brown to black, thick-walled cells of textura angularisSeptate, branched pseudoparaphyses, forming a yellow epithecium above asci when mounted in water185–260 µm × 9.5–18 µm, 8-spored27–44 µm × 6.5–17 µm, 1–3-septate, reddish brown to brown when matureITS, LSU, SSU, TEFBursera sp., Elaeagnus sarmentosa, Hevea brasiliensis, Tectona grandisChina, Mexico, Thailand[16,18,55], this study
R. opuntiae640–1700 µm long85–160 µm × 12.5–16 µm, 3–8-spored17–33 µm × 13 µm, 3–5-septateLSU, TEFOpuntia fulgidaUSA[52]
R. prosopidisSuperficial, very hard when dry, elliptical or triangular, black, with very obtuse, thick, yellowish green disc3-septate, unineriate, oblong, sometimes slightly curvedProsopis julifloraUSA[75]
R. quercinum1000–3000 µm in diam., leathery apothecia, scattered, superficial, erumpent, pedicellate (short pedicel)Excipulum black with low seated, reddishAsci cylindrical, slender, stalked hyaline with inconspicuous wall19.0–24.7 µm × 7.6–11.4 µm, 1–3-septate more commonly 3Quercus sp.India[76]
R. tectonae550–3365 µm long × 325–728 µm wide × 370−835 µm high, semi-immersed to superficial, smooth without striation, yellow at the center80–135 µm wide, two layers. Outer layer black to dark reddish, thick-walled cells of textura angularis. Inner layer hyaline, thin-walled cells of textura angularisSeptate, branched pseudoparaphyses, forming an orange epithecium above asci when mounted in water150–200 µm × 10–15 µm, 8-spored19–31 µm × 8–13 µm, 1–3-septate, pale brown to dark brown when matureITS, LSU, SSU, TEFBetula sp., Fabaceae sp., Magnolia delavayi, Tectona grandisChina, Thailand[18,53], this study
R. viride1000–1500 µm long × 500–600 µm wide, erumpentFiliform, hyaline200–250 µm × 10–12 µm20–30 µm × 7–9 µm, 3-septateOn bark, associated with lichensBrazil[77]
R. yunnanense2510 µm × 625 µm × 455 µm, solitary to aggregated, mostly aggregated, semi-immersed, each hysterothecia has two parallel striae parallel to the longitudinal slit and slight perpendicular striae, longitudinal slit, no opening60–180 µm wide, composed of dark brown, thick-walled cells of textura globulosa, outer layer brown to dark brown, inner layer pale brown to hyalineSeptate, branched, cellular pseudoparaphyses, forming a yellow epithecium above asci when mounted in water230 µm × 14 µm, 8-spored, J- apical ring32.5 µm × 13 µm, 3-septate, reddish brown to brown when matureITS, LSU, SSU, TEFRhus chinensisChinaThis study
Remarks: the symbol “—” denotes no information available.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Du, T.-Y.; Dai, D.-Q.; Mapook, A.; Lu, L.; Stephenson, S.L.; Suwannarach, N.; Elgorban, A.M.; Al-Rejaie, S.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Tibpromma, S. Additions to Rhytidhysteron (Hysteriales, Dothideomycetes) in China. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020148

AMA Style

Du T-Y, Dai D-Q, Mapook A, Lu L, Stephenson SL, Suwannarach N, Elgorban AM, Al-Rejaie S, Karunarathna SC, Tibpromma S. Additions to Rhytidhysteron (Hysteriales, Dothideomycetes) in China. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(2):148. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020148

Chicago/Turabian Style

Du, Tian-Ye, Dong-Qin Dai, Ausana Mapook, Li Lu, Steven L. Stephenson, Nakarin Suwannarach, Abdallah M. Elgorban, Salim Al-Rejaie, Samantha C. Karunarathna, and Saowaluck Tibpromma. 2023. "Additions to Rhytidhysteron (Hysteriales, Dothideomycetes) in China" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 2: 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020148

APA Style

Du, T. -Y., Dai, D. -Q., Mapook, A., Lu, L., Stephenson, S. L., Suwannarach, N., Elgorban, A. M., Al-Rejaie, S., Karunarathna, S. C., & Tibpromma, S. (2023). Additions to Rhytidhysteron (Hysteriales, Dothideomycetes) in China. Journal of Fungi, 9(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020148

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop