Next Article in Journal
Diversity and Distribution of Calonectria Species in Soils from Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis, Pinus massoniana, and Cunninghamia lanceolata Plantations in Four Provinces in Southern China
Next Article in Special Issue
Benzimidazole Derivatives Suppress Fusarium Wilt Disease via Interaction with ERG6 of Fusarium equiseti and Activation of the Antioxidant Defense System of Pepper Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Díaz-García et al. Candida Genotyping of Blood Culture Isolates from Patients Admitted to 16 Hospitals in Madrid: Genotype Spreading during the COVID-19 Pandemic Driven by Fluconazole-Resistant C. parapsilosis. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1228
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fungal Pathogens Associated with Crown and Root Rot in Wheat-Growing Areas of Northern Kyrgyzstan
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 9
Issue 2
10.3390/jof9020197
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A New Species of Neoscytalidium hylocereum sp. nov. Causing Canker on Red-Fleshed Dragon Fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) in Southern Thailand

by
Prisana Wonglom
1,
Chaninun Pornsuriya
2 and
Anurag Sunpapao
2,*
1
Faculty of Technology and Community Development, Phatthalung Campus, Thaksin University, Phatthalung 93210, Thailand
2
Agricultural Innovation and Management Division (Pest Management), Faculty of Natural Resources, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai District, Songkhla 90110, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(2), 197; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020197
Submission received: 23 December 2022 / Revised: 12 January 2023 / Accepted: 31 January 2023 / Published: 3 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis of Plant Pathogenic Fungi and Oomycetes and Plant Breeding for Disease Resistance 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
During 2020–2021, cultivated red-fleshed dragon fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) in Phatthalung province, southern Thailand, was infected with canker disease in all stages of growth. Small, circular, sunken, orange cankers first developed on the cladodes of H. polyrhizus and later expanded and became gray scabs with masses of pycnidia. The fungi were isolated using the tissue transplanting method and identified based on the growth of the fungal colony, and the dimensions of the conidia were measured. Their species level was confirmed with the molecular study of multiple DNA sequences, and their pathogenicity was tested using the agar plug method. Morphological characterization and molecular identification of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), translation elongation factor 1-α (tef1-α) and β-tubulin (tub) sequences revealed the fungal pathogen to be a new species. It was named Neoscytalidium hylocereum sp. nov. The biota of the new species, N. hylocereum, was deposited in Mycobank, and the species was assigned accession number 838004. The pathogenicity test was performed to fulfil Koch’s postulates. N. hylocereum showed sunken orange cankers with a mass of conidia similar to those observed in the field. To our knowledge, this is the first report of H. polyrhizus as a host of the new species N. hylocereum causing stem cankers in Thailand.

1. Introduction

Dragon fruit, also known as pitaya, is the fruit of several different cactus species belonging to the family of Cactaceae. The stems of dragon fruit are scandent, sprawling or clambering, and they branch profusely, whereas the fruit is oblong to oval and contains white or red pulp as well as edible black seeds. Dragon fruit is well known for its composition rich in nutrients, fiber, vitamins and minerals [1] and corresponding high medicinal value, with the potential to lower blood cholesterol concentration [2]. Due to its beneficial nutritive properties, this plant is now spreading worldwide for its fruit, especially in Asian countries such as Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam [3,4]. Three varieties are commonly cultivated, including the red-skinned fruit with white flesh (Hylocereus undatus), red-skinned fruit with red flesh (H. polyrhizus) and yellow-skinned fruit with white flesh (H. megalanthus) [5]. Although the cultivation of dragon fruit is historically common in all parts of Thailand, its cultivation has helped to provide additional income to farmers (Department of Agriculture Extension).
Similar to most other crops, the cultivation of dragon fruit faces problems caused by several fungal pathogens that have been scientifically documented, such as Bipolaris cactivora, Botryosphaeria dothidea, Colletotrichum capsici, C. gloeosporioides, C. truncatum, Curvularia lunata, Fusarium semitectum, Gilbertella persicaria, Neoscytalidium dimidiatum and Monilinia fructicola [4,6,7,8,9,10]. In Thailand, dragon fruit is cultivated in all regions—especially the southern region, in which the weather is suitable for plantations. The weather in tropical and subtropical zones is also favorable for pathogen germination and spread [11,12]. According to the pest list database, the identification of diseases in dragon fruit is rarely reported. Recently, flower rot of red-fleshed dragon fruit was reported to be caused by the fungus Gilbertella persicaria in southern Thailand [13]. Dy et al. [14] also demonstrated that the fungus N. dimidiatum acted as a pathogen, causing stem canker in H. polyrhizus in southern Thailand.
However, there are dragon fruit diseases in Thailand that are unsubstantiated and have not been correctly identified and scientifically confirmed. The lack of information on dragon fruit diseases in Thailand may contribute to a reduction in marketable yield. Knowledge of the precise diagnosis of disease and disease etiology is an essential step in appropriate disease management. During our investigation in 2020–2021, stem canker in red-fleshed dragon fruits was also observed in a cultivation farm in Phatthalung province, southern Thailand, where approximately 35% of plants were infected in the observed fields. There are some morphological variations and molecular properties indicating that this pathogen is a new species of Neoscytalidium. Therefore, this study aimed to isolate the pathogen causing stem canker in dragon fruit, to identify it based on morphological and molecular techniques and to assess the pathogenicity in H. polyrhizus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Fungal Isolation

Circular to irregularly shaped sunken orange cankers with a mass of pycnidia were observed in approximately 35% of dragon fruit plants cultivated in the observation area. Fruit and stem cankers were collected from a cultivation field in Phatthalung province, southern Thailand (7°45′24.2″ N 99°58′47.2″ E). A total of ten symptomatic samples were collected. The causal fungus was isolated using the tissue transplanting method [15,16]. The infected tissue samples were cut into small pieces (0.3 × 0.3 cm), and their surfaces were disinfected with 70% ethanol followed by 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Excess NaOCl was removed using sterile distilled water (DW), which was repeated 3 times, and samples were dried on sterile Whatman© paper. The tissue samples were then placed on water agar (WA). The plates were then incubated at ambient temperature (28 ± 2 °C) for 3 days. Hyphal tips were cut and transferred to Petri dishes containing potato dextrose agar (PDA) to obtain the pure fungal strain. The fungal isolate was cultured on a PDA slant for further study.

2.2. Pathogenicity Test

To determine which fungi isolated from the infected samples caused stem canker in H. polyrhizus, the candidate fungal pathogens were cultured on PDA for 5 days, and the agar plug method was conducted [17,18,19]. The stems of H. polyrhizus were wounded using sterile fine needles, and agar plugs (0.5 cm) cut from 5-day-old PDA culture plates of each fungal isolate were placed directly onto the wounded stems. Agar plugs of PDA alone were used as the negative control. There were 3 replicates per treatment, and the inoculation was repeated three times. The inoculated plants were incubated in a moist box to maintain humidity at ambient temperature (28 ± 2 °C). The development of canker was observed for 7 days.

2.3. Morphological Observation

The growth rate of fungal mycelia was measured on PDA. The macroscopic characteristics of pycnidia formation were observed [20] with a Leica S8AP0 stereomicroscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), whereas the microscopic characteristics of the conidia were examined with a Leica DM750 light microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The dimensions of the conidia were measured. The fungal cultures were then deposited in a culture collection, and the accession number was assigned.

2.4. Molecular Identification

The PCR amplification of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), translation elongation factor 1-α (tef1-α) and β-tubulin (tub) gene regions was conducted using the primer pair ITS1/ITS4 [21] for ITS, EF1-728F [22]/EF2 [23] for the tef1-α gene and T1/Bt2b [24,25] for the tub gene. For DNA extraction, fungal isolates were cultured on PDA for 2 days and subjected to DNA extraction using the mini-preparation method according to the method of Saitoh et al. [26]. The PCR reaction mixtures contained a DNA template, 10 pmol of each primer, 2× Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States) and distilled water (DW) in a 50 μL tube. PCR was performed with BIO-RAD T100TM Thermal Cycler (Hercules, CA, USA), and the PCR conditions were 3 min at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min and the final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were visualized with agarose gel electrophoresis.
The PCR products were then sequenced by the Ward Medic Ltd. sequencing service (Bangkok, Thailand) using the same primers that were used in the PCR reaction. The phylogenetic trees were constructed with related species acquired from GenBank (Table 1) with 1000 bootstrap replications. Sequences were aligned with Bioedit ver. 7.2 [27] using the ClustalW algorithm and ClustalX ver. 1.83 [28] and were manually adjusted as necessary. Phylogenetic tree estimation for each alignment was performed using maximum parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI). MP trees were obtained using the heuristic search option with 1000 random additions of sequences and tree bisection and reconnection (TBR) as the branch-swapping algorithm of MEGA X [29]. ML trees were constructed using MEGA X based on the nearest neighbor interchange (NNI) as the heuristic method for tree inference, and 1000 bootstrap replicates were performed. Bayesian trees were generated using MrBayes ver. 3.2.7a [30]. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) runs were performed for 1,000,000 generations and sampled every 100th generation. The initial 25% of generations were discarded as burn-in, and the remaining trees were used to calculate the Bayesian inference posterior probability (BIPP) values. Phylogenetic trees were visualized using FigTree ver. 1.4.4.

3. Results

3.1. Disease Observation and Symptom Recognition

During sampling in 2020–2021, canker disease was detected in approximately 35% of H. polyrhizus in Phatthalung province. Visible external signs were small, circular, sunken, orange cankers on the stems and fruits of H. polyrhizus (Figure 1). The pycnidia formed on the canker surface contained black masses of pycnidial conidia (Figure 1C), and the cladodes subsequently rotted (Figure 1E,F). Three isolates of a Scytalidium-like fungus and five Fusarium isolates were consistently isolated from stem canker symptoms using the tissue transplanting method.

3.2. Pathogenicity Test

A total of eight isolates including three Scytalidium-like fungus and five Fusarium isolates were inoculated in cladodes of H. polyrhizus. The results showed that three isolates of Scytalidium-like fungus caused stem canker on H. polyrhizus cladodes similar to that observed in the field (Figure 2), whereas five isolates of Fusarium did not cause symptoms. The symptoms included orange flecks, the raising up of the infected site, and scab and pycnidia formation on the surface of dragon fruit cladodes (Figure 2). The fungi were re-isolated, and their morphology was matched with the original culture of the Scytalidium-like fungus.

3.3. Morphological Study

A total of three isolates of Scytalidium-like fungus that caused stem canker in H. polyrhizus were subjected to macroscopic and microscopic observations. From the macroscopic perspective, three isolates produced woolly colonies and olive green to grayish colonies on PDA (Figure 3). All three strains examined rapidly produced colonies, with an average growth rate of 3 cm/day, and they colonized the plate within 3 days. Mycelia were branched, septate, hyaline to brown and disarticulated into 0- to 2-septate arthroconidia singly or in arthric chains (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5). Arthroconidia varied in size in different isolates (n = 20) and were ellipsoid to ovoid, globose, oblong or cylindrical, singly or in arthric chains, 3.70–9.65 (6.24 ± 1.77) × 2.46–6.15 (3.73 ± 1.04) μm, with a length/width ratio of 1.67, as shown in Table 2.
Pycnidia formed after incubation on PDA for 4 weeks, showing a black, irregularly shaped morphology, occurring singly or in aggregates (Figure 3). Pycnidial conidia were hyaline, ellipsoid, oblong or cylindrical and varied in size (n = 20) as 9.81–13.52 (11.48 ± 0.93) × 3.73–5.04 (4.27 ± 0.36) μm, with a length/width ratio of 2.68 (Figure 3 and Table 2). Based on the morphology observed in this study and the descriptions by Crous et al. [31], the fungus was identified as Neoscytalidium sp. The fungal isolates were then deposited in the culture collection of Pest Management Department, Faculty of Natural Resources, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand, with accession numbers PSU-HP01, TSU-HP01 and TSU-HP02 (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5).
Table
Table 2. Morphology comparison of Neoscytalidium spp. and related species.
Table 2. Morphology comparison of Neoscytalidium spp. and related species.
SpeciesColonyArthroconidiaPycnidiaPycnidial ConidiaReference
Neoscytalidium dimidiatumWhite or hyaline colony, turned dark gray to black after 12 days on PDACylindrical to round, hyaline to brown, singly or in arthric chains, 9.4 ± 1.2 × 5.1 ± 0.8 μm (length/width ratio = 1.85)Produced after 3–4 weeks, black, irregularly shaped to ovoid, singly or in aggregatesHyaline, ellipsoidal to ovoid, 11.1 ± 0.7 × 5.5 ± 0.5 μm (length/width ratio = 2.03)[32]
N. novaehollandiae–Cylindrical, oblong to obtuse to doliiform, 0- to 1-septate, thick-walled, 5.2–11.2 × 2.9–4.9 μm, in arthric chains Pycnidia (produced on pine needles on 1.5% water agar) semi-immersed or superficial with a mean diameter of 310 μmHyaline, ellipsoidal, becoming sepia, 0- to 1-septate, 3.1–4.1 × 12.2–13.8 μm[33]
N. hyalinumWhite with dense and hairy aerial mycelium and gradually turned gray to olive greenTruncated-cylindrical, oblong–obtuse to doliiform, hyaline to dark brown, 0- to 2-septate, in arthric chains, 4.57–9.85 × 3.125–27 μm––[34]
N. orchidacearumCream or white from above and reverse, with filamentous form or margin, flat–Stromatic, immersed, eventually erumpent, unilocular to multilocular (2~4-loculate), glabrous, brown to black, globose to subglobose, papillate, 200~500 μm diameterEllipsoidal to ovoid, hyaline, smooth, guttulate, aseptate becoming 2~3-septate, (10~) 12~13 (~15) × 3~5 (~6) μm (n = 50)[31]
TSU-HP01White, moderate growth of 3 cm/day, olive green to gray color and turned dark gray to black after 12 daysEllipsoid to ovoid, globose, oblong–cylindrical, singly or in arthric chains, 0- to 2-septate, 3.70–9.65 (6.24 ± 1.77) × 2.46–6.15 (3.73 ± 1.04) μm, length/width ratio = 1.67Rarely produced on PDA after 4 weeks of incubation, brown to dark brown, singly or in aggregatesEllipsoid, oblong or cylindrical, 9.81–13.52 (11.48 ± 0.93) × 3.73–5.04 (4.27 ± 0.36) μm, length/width ratio = 2.68This study

3.4. Phylogenetic Tree Analysis

The PCR products were approximately 510, 223 and 381 bp for the ITS, tef1-α and tub regions, respectively. A BLAST search in GenBank (The National Center of Biological Information; NCBI) showed that the sequences of the ITS, tef1-α and tub gene regions were more than 99% identical to Neoscytalidium dimidiatum for all isolates examined in this study. For the phylogenetic tree analysis, the dataset comprised 28 taxa, including Guignardia bidwellii, G. citricarpa and G. philoprina as the outgroup. The phylogenetic tree generated from the dataset consisted of 1114 characters, including the gap (ITS, 510; tub, 381; tef1-α, 223). The ML tree generated from the combined DNA sequences of ITS, tub and tef1-α of Botryosphaeria, Cophinforma, Neofusicoccum and Neoscytalidium is shown in Figure 6. Three isolates, PSU-HP01, TSU-HP01 and TSU-HP02, formed an independent clade with MP (77%) supports and were close to N. dimidiatum.

3.5. Taxonomy of a New Species

A total of three isolates representing most of the morphological variation presently recognized as Neoscytalidium [31] were subjected to DNA sequence analysis. Based on the morphological characteristics and DNA sequences of the ITS, tef1-α and tub regions, Neoscytalidium sp. isolates PSU-HP01, TSU-HP01 and TSU-HP02 were considered to be a new species (sp. nov.)
Neoscytalidium hylocereum S. Kheawleng, S. Intaraa-nun and M. Rodkaew, sp. nov., MycoBank 838004 (Figure 3).
Etymology: The name hylocereum refers to the host genus (Hylocereus).
Holotype: TSU-HP01.
Pathogen causing stem and fruit canker in H. polyrhizus. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous asexual morph not seen. Coelomycetous asexual morph: mycelium disarticulated into 0- to 2-septate, ellipsoid to ovoid, globose, oblong-cylindrical, singly or in arthric chains, 3.70–9.65 (6.24 ± 1.77) × 2.46–6.15 (3.73 ± 1.04) μm, length/width ratio = 1.67. Pycnidia rarely produced on PDA after 4 weeks of incubation, brown to dark brown, singly or in aggregates. Pycnidial conidia hyaline, ellipsoid, oblong or cylindrical and varied in size (n = 20) 9.81–13.52 (11.48 ± 0.93) × 3.73–5.04 (4.27 ± 0.36) μm, length/width ratio = 2.68.
Culture characteristics: Powdery white, fast-growing (3 cm/day), olive green to gray color and turned dark gray to black after 12 days.
Material examined: Thailand, Phatthalung province; on stem and fruit of dragon fruit (H. polyrhizus); August 3, 2020; S. Kheawleng, S. Intaraa-nun and M. Rodkaew (TSU-HP01 holotype).
Notes: Neoscytalidium hylocereum PSU-HP01, TSU-HP01 and TSU-HP02 with the same DNA sequences were related to N. dimidiatum with 77% MP support, although without enough ML and PP support. Within the comparison of the tree regions of DNA sequences, there were two character differences in the ITS and tef1-α regions and four in the tub region. Therefore, Neoscytalidium hylocereum (TSU-HP01) is introduced as a new species.

4. Discussion

In this study, we identified the cause of canker in H. polyrhizus based on symptom recognition (Figure 1), pathogenicity testing (Figure 2), morphology (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5) and molecular analysis (Figure 6). For the pathogenicity test, the wounding method was successful in inoculating the fungal pathogen into the stem of H. polyrhizus (Figure 2). This result is in agreement with previous studies [35,36], where infection by a fungal pathogen was facilitated by wounding. The stem canker from the pathogenicity test appeared similar to that observed in the natural infection. However, the symptom found in the natural infection seemed more severe than that in the laboratory test, and this may have been due to the environmental conditions in the field favoring fungal germination and host infection.
Stem canker in dragon fruit has been recognized to be caused by the fungus N. dimidiatum throughout Asian countries [10,14]; however, very few reports exist regarding the life cycle in dragon fruit. Infected dragon fruit shows three stages of symptoms, including sunken yellow to orange flecks, the raising up of the infected site due to tissue proliferation beneath the infected area and pycnidia forming on the surface of dragon fruit cladodes, which was observed in a new species, N. hylocereum, in this study. The fungus produced two types of conidia: arthroconidia, which were formed by the breaking up of individual cells and clusters of cells of mature hyphae, and pycnidial conidia, which formed in pycnidia embedded in the surface of the host [32]. Our result is in agreement with a previous report indicating that N. hylocereum produced two types of conidia on host surfaces.
The identification of the Botryosphaeriaceae species is commonly based on the morphology of the anamorph [37]. The most abundant characteristic of fungi in the genus Neoscytalidium is that the hyphae are branched, septate, brown and disarticulated into 0- to 1-septate arthrospores [31]. In this study, three isolates of Neoscytalidium spp. displayed these morphological characteristics (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5). The morphology of three isolates (PSU-HP01, TSU-HP01 and TSU-HP02) was closely related to N. dimidiatum (Table 2), but there were some distinct morphological characteristics, and DNA sequence analysis supported the classification of the three isolates found in this study as a new species. For instance, the average size of N. dimidiatum arthroconidia was 9.4 × 5.1 μm with a length/width ratio of 1.85 [32]; however, the arthroconidia of TSU-HP01 were smaller than those of N. dimidiatum, at 4.82 × 2.74 μm (ratio = 1.75) and 6.24 × 3.73 μm (length/width ratio = 1.67), respectively, as described in Table 2. The pycnidia of N. dimidiatum were black, irregularly shaped to ovoid, singly or in aggregates and were produced after 3–4 weeks [32], whereas the pycnidia of TSU-HP01 were rarely produced on PDA (Table 2). Furthermore, the pycnidial conidia of N. dimidiatum were hyaline, ellipsoidal to ovoid, with an average size of 11.1 × 5.5 μm, and a length/width ratio of 2.3 [32], whereas the pycnidial conidia of TSU-HP01 were ellipsoid, oblong or cylindrical, with an average size of 11.48 × 4.27 μm and a length/width ratio of 2.68 (Table 2).
Based on our results, ML trees indicated that the isolates of Neoscytalidium in this study were morphologically and genetically distinct from other isolates (Figure 6 and Table 2). Although the DNA sequences of Neoscytalidium sp. isolates PSU-HP01, TSU-HP01 and TSU-HP02 showed sequence similarity to N. dimidiatum of more than 99% according to BLAST search analysis (NCBI), the phylogenetic tree of combined DNA sequences revealed a new clade of Neoscytalidium spp. found in this study (Figure 6). The combined DNA sequences of the ITS, tef1-α and tub gene regions placed these three isolates in a different clade with respect to N. dimidiatum (Figure 6), with 77% MP support. Based on the morphological characteristics and DNA sequences, the three isolates of Neoscytalidium spp. found in this study were considered a new species (sp. nov.). The biota of the new species was deposited in Mycobank with accession number 838004 for N. hylocereum.
Fungi of the genus Neoscytalidium have been found to cause disease in several plant species, with worldwide distribution. For instance, N. dimidiatum has been documented to cause wood canker in grapevines in California, USA [38]; dieback in Ficus benjamina L. in Mexico [39]; canker, shoot blight and fruit rot in almond trees in California, USA [32]; dieback, shoot blight and branch canker in willow trees in Turkey [40]; and shoot blight, dieback and canker in apricot trees in Turkey [41]. This fungal species has been reported to cause stem canker in pitaya (H. undatus and H. polyrhizus) in Taiwan [42], stem and fruit canker in H. undatus in Florida [43] as well as canker disease in pitaya in Hainan, China [44].
Currently, only four species of the genus Neoscytalidium have been confirmed to cause disease in several plants worldwide. In southeastern Malaysia, stem canker in red-fleshed dragon fruit (H. polyrhizus) was reported to be caused by N. dimidiatum [10]. However, the results of the present study reveal that the causal agent of canker in red-fleshed dragon fruit (H. polyrhizus) in Thailand seems to be a new species, namely, N. hylocereum. Therefore, to our knowledge, this is the first report of the new species, N. hylocereum, causing canker in H. polyrhizus in Thailand and elsewhere.

5. Conclusions

The majority of the species of Neoscytalidium have been reported worldwide, and only four species have been found to cause disease in several plant species. In this study, we introduced a new species derived from H. polyrhizus in southern Thailand, by means of geographical records, pathogenicity testing, and morphological and phylogenetic evidence. Until now, only two species of Neoscytalidium (N. dimidiatum and N. orchidacearum) have been reported in Thailand [13,31]. Over the years, there has been a lack of research on Neoscytalidium fungi in Thailand. Therefore, the introduction of N. hylocereum sp. nov. enriches the literature regarding the diversity study of Neoscytalidium fungi in Thailand. Knowledge of the precise diagnosis of plant diseases is an essential step in disease management, and further study and verification regarding disease control is required in the near future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.W. and A.S.; methodology, P.W.; software, C.P.; validation, C.P. and A.S.; formal analysis, P.W.; investigation, A.S.; resources, A.S.; data curation, C.P.; writing—original draft preparation, P.W.; writing—review and editing, A.S.; visualization, A.S.; supervision, A.S.; project administration, A.S.; funding acquisition, P.W. and A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by National Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF); Prince of Songkla University (grant Nos. NAT6505003M, NAT6505003b, NAT6601012M and NAT6601012b); and Center of Excellence in Agricultural and Natural Resources Biotechnology (CoE-ANRB) phase 3; further, it was partially supported by Thaksin University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank S. Kheawleng, S. Intaraa-nun and M. Rodkaew for sample collection. This study was partially supported by Thaksin University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jaafar, R.A.; Abdul Rahman, A.R.B.; Mahnood, N.Z.C.; Vasudevan, R. Proximate analysis of dragon fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus). Am. J. Applied Sci. 2009, 6, 1341–1346. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sonawane, M.S. Nutritive and medicinal value of dragon fruit. Asian J. Hort. 2017, 12, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mizrahi, Y.; Nerd, A.; Nobel, P.S. Cacti as crops. Hort. Rev. 1997, 18, 291–320. [Google Scholar]
  4. Masyahit, M.; Sijam, K.; Awang, Y.; Satar, M.G.M. The first report of the occurrence of anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum gloeospo rioides (Penz.) Penz. & Sacc. on dragon fruit (Hylocereus spp.) in Peninsular Malaysia. Am. J. Applied Sci. 2009, 6, 902–912. [Google Scholar]
  5. Barbeau, G.C. La pitahaya rouge, un nouveau fruit exotique (The red pitahaya, a new exotic fruit). Fruits 1990, 45, 141–147. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hawa, M.M.; Salleh, B.; Latiffah, Z. Characterization and intraspecific variation of Fusarium semitectum (Berkeley and Ravenel) associated with red-fleshed dragon fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus [Weber] Britton and Rose) in Malaysia. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 273–284. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ghani, M.A.A.; Awang, Y.; Sijam, K. Disease occurrence and fruit quality of pre-harvest calcium treated red flesh dragon fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 10, 1550–1558. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hawa, M.M.; Salleh, B.; Latiffah, Z. Characterization and pathogenicity of Fusarium proliferatum causing stem rot of Hylocereus polyrhizus in Malaysia. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2013, 163, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Guo, L.W.; Wu, Y.X.; Ho, H.H.; Su, Y.Y.; Mao, Z.C.; He, P.F.; He, Y.Q. First report of dragon fruit (Hylocereus undatus) anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum truncatum in China. J. Phytopath. 2014, 162, 272–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mohd, M.H.; Salleh, B.; Zakaria, L. Identification and molecular characterizations of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum causing stem canker of red-fleshed dragon fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) in Malaysia. J. Phytopath. 2013, 161, 841–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wonglom, P.; Thithuan, N.; Bunjongsiri, P.; Sunpapao, A. Plant-Parasitic algae (Cephaleuros spp.) in Thailand, including four new records. Pacific Sci. 2018, 72, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Thithuan, N.; Bunjonsiri, P.; Sunpapao, A. Morphology and behavior of gametes and zoospores from the plant-parasitic green algae, Cephaleuros (Chlorophyta, Ulvophyceae). Pac. Sci. 2019, 73, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ruangwong, O.-U.; Kunasakdakul, K.; Wonglom, P.; Dy, K.S.; Sunpapao, A. Morphological and molecular studies of a rare mucoralean species causing flower rot in Hylocereus polyrhizus . J. Phytopathol. 2022, 170, 217–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dy, K.S.; Wonglom, P.; Pornsuriya, C.; Sunpapao, A. Morphological, molecular identification and pathogenicity of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum causing stem canker of Hylocereus polyrhizus in southern Thailand. Plants 2022, 11, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Daengsuwan, W.; Wonglom, P.; Arikit, S.; Sunpapao, A. Morphological and molecular identification of Neopestalotiopsis clavispora causing flower blight on Anthurium andraeanum in Thailand. Hort. Plant J. 2021, 7, 573–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sunpapao, A.; Suwannarach, N.; Kumla, J.; Dumhai, R.; Riangwong, K.; Sanguansub, S.; Wanchana, S.; Arikit, S. Morphological and molecular identification of plant pathogenic fungi associated with dirty panicle disease in coconuts (Cocos nucifera) in Thailand. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Thaochan, N.; Pornsuriya, C.; Chairin, T.; Chomnunti, P.; Sunpapao, A. Morphological and molecular characterization of Calonectria foliicola associated with leaf blight on rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) in Thailand. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pornsuriya, C.; Chairin, T.; Thaochan, N.; Sunpapao, A. Identification and characterization of Neopestalotiopsis fungi associated with a novel leaf fall disease of rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) in Thailand. J. Phytopathol. 2020, 168, 416–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Saqib, S.; Zaman, W.; Ayaz, A.; Habib, S.; Bahadur, S.; Hussain, S.; Muhammad, S.; Ullah, F. Postharvest disease inhibition in fruit by synthesis and characterization of chitosan iron oxide nanoparticles. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 28, 101729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Saqib, S.; Zaman, W.; Ullah, F.; Majeed, I.; Ayaz, A.; Munis, M.F.H. Organometallic assembling of chitosan-Iron oxide nanoparticles with their antifungal evaluation against Rhizopus oryzae . Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 33, e5190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetic. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  22. Carbone, I.; Kohn, L.M. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 1999, 91, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. O’Donnell, K.; Kistler, H.C.; Cigelnik, E.; Ploetz, R.C. Multiple evolutionary origins of the fungus causing Panama disease of banana: Concordant evidence from nuclear and mitochondrial gene genealogies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 2044–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Glass, N.L.; Donaldson, G.C. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 1323–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. O’Donnell, K.; Cigelnik, E. Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1997, 7, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Saitoh, K.; Togashi, K.; Arie, T.; Teraoka, T. A simple method for a mini-preparation of fungal DNA. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2006, 72, 348–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids. Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  28. Thompson, J.D.; Gibson, T.J.; Plewniak, F.; Jeanmougin, F.; Higgins, D.G. The Clustal_X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nuclic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 4876–4882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamaru, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; van der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MRBAYES 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model selection across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Crous, P.W.; Slippers, B.; Wingfield, M.J.; Rheeder, J.; Marasas, W.F.O.; Philips, A.J.L.; Alves, A.; Burgess, T.; Barber, P.; Groenewald, J.Z. Phylogenetic lineages in the Botryosphaeriaceae. Stud. Mycol. 2006, 55, 235–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nouri, M.T.; Lawrence, D.P.; Yaghmour, M.A.; Michailides, T.J.; Trouillas, F.P. Neoscytalidium dimidiatum causing canker, shoot blight and fruit rot of almond in California. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 1638–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Derviş, S.; Özer, G.; Türkölmez, S. First report of Neoscytalidium novaehollandiae causing stem blight on tomato in Turkey. J. Plant Pathol. 2020, 102, 1339–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mirtalebi, M.; Sabahi, F.; Banihashemi, Z. Fruit rot caused by Neoscytalidium hyalinum on melon in Iran. Australasian Plant Dis. Notes 2019, 14, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wonglom, P.; Sunpapao, A. Fusarium incarnatum is associated with postharvest fruit rot of muskmelon (Cucumis melo). J. Phytopathol. 2020, 168, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Daengsuwan, W.; Wonglom, P.; Sunpapao, A. First report of Lasiodiplodia theobromae causing spadix rot in Anthurium andraeanum . J. Phytopathol. 2020, 168, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Slippers, B.; Crous, P.W.; Denman, S.; Coutinho, T.A.; Wingfield, B.D.; Wingfield, M.J. Combined multiple gene genealogies and phenotypic characters differentiate several species previously identified as Botryosphaeria dothidea . Mycologia 2004, 96, 83–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rolshausen, P.E.; Akgül, D.S.; Perez, R.; Eskalen, A.; Gispert, C. First report of wood canker caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum on grapevine in California. Plant Dis. 2013, 97, 1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fernández-Herrera, E.; Moreno-Salazar, S.F.; Rentería-Martínez, M.E.; Arratia-Castro, A.A.; Villar-Luna, E. Neoscytalidium dimidiatum: Causal agent of dieback in Ficus benjamina L. in Mexico. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Horticu. 2017, 23, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Türkölmez, S.; Derviş, S.; Çiftçi, O.; Serçe, C.U.; Türkölmez, C.G.; Dikilitas, M. First report of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum causing dieback, shoot blight, and branch canker of willow trees in Turkey. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Oksal, E.; Yiğit, T.; Özer, G. First report of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum causing shoot blight, dieback and canker of apricot in Turkey. J. Plant Pathol. 2020, 102, 579–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chuang, M.F.; Ni, H.F.; Yang, H.R.; Shu, S.L.; Lai, S.Y.; Jiang, Y.L. First report of stem canker disease of pitaya (Hylocereus undatus and H. polyrhizus) caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum in Taiwan. Plant Dis. 2012, 96, 906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sanahuja, G.; Lopez, P.; Palmateer, A.J. First report of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum causing stem and fruit canker of Hylocereus undatus in Florida. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xu, M.; Peng, Y.; Qi, Z.; Yan, Z.; Yang, L.; He, M.-D.; Li, Q.-X.; Liu, C.-L.; Ruan, Y.-Z.; Wei, S.-S.; et al. Identification of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum causing canker disease of pitaya in Hainan, China. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2018, 47, 547–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jof 09 00197 g001 550
Figure 1. Canker of Hylocereus polyrhizus observed in the field: circular sunken orange cankers on cladode (A) and fruit (B); black pycnidia formed on the surface of cankers on cladodes (C) and fruit (D); and infected tissues that became rotted (E,F).
Figure 1. Canker of Hylocereus polyrhizus observed in the field: circular sunken orange cankers on cladode (A) and fruit (B); black pycnidia formed on the surface of cankers on cladodes (C) and fruit (D); and infected tissues that became rotted (E,F).
Jof 09 00197 g001
Jof 09 00197 g002 550
Figure 2. Pathogenicity test of three Neoscytalidium sp. isolates by means of agar plug method on wounded H. polyrhizus cladodes: control (A), PSU-HP01 (B), TSU-HP01 (C) and TSU-HP02 (D).
Figure 2. Pathogenicity test of three Neoscytalidium sp. isolates by means of agar plug method on wounded H. polyrhizus cladodes: control (A), PSU-HP01 (B), TSU-HP01 (C) and TSU-HP02 (D).
Jof 09 00197 g002
Jof 09 00197 g003 550
Figure 3. Morphological characteristics of Neoscytalidium sp. (TSU-HP01): three-day-old colony on PDA—top (A) and bottom views (B); one-week-old colony on PDA (C); arthroconidia ((D,E); ×400); black pycnidia ((F); ×100); pycnidia and conidiogenous cells ((G); ×100); pycnidial conidia ((H); ×400).
Figure 3. Morphological characteristics of Neoscytalidium sp. (TSU-HP01): three-day-old colony on PDA—top (A) and bottom views (B); one-week-old colony on PDA (C); arthroconidia ((D,E); ×400); black pycnidia ((F); ×100); pycnidia and conidiogenous cells ((G); ×100); pycnidial conidia ((H); ×400).
Jof 09 00197 g003
Jof 09 00197 g004 550
Figure 4. Morphological characteristics of Neoscytalidium sp. (PSU-HP01): three-day-old colony on PDA—top (A) and bottom views (B); one-week-old colony on PDA (C); arthroconidia ((D,E); ×400); black pycnidia (F); pycnidial conidia ((G); ×400).
Figure 4. Morphological characteristics of Neoscytalidium sp. (PSU-HP01): three-day-old colony on PDA—top (A) and bottom views (B); one-week-old colony on PDA (C); arthroconidia ((D,E); ×400); black pycnidia (F); pycnidial conidia ((G); ×400).
Jof 09 00197 g004
Jof 09 00197 g005 550
Figure 5. Morphological characteristics of Neoscytalidium sp. (TSU-HP02): three-day-old colony on PDA—top (A) and bottom views (B); one-week-old colony on PDA (C); arthroconidia ((D,E); ×400); black pycnidia (F); and pycnidial conidia ((G); ×400).
Figure 5. Morphological characteristics of Neoscytalidium sp. (TSU-HP02): three-day-old colony on PDA—top (A) and bottom views (B); one-week-old colony on PDA (C); arthroconidia ((D,E); ×400); black pycnidia (F); and pycnidial conidia ((G); ×400).
Jof 09 00197 g005
Jof 09 00197 g006 550
Figure 6. Phylogenetic tree of combined DNA sequences of ITS, tef1-α and tub of Neoscytalidium sp. and related species; PSU-HP01, TSU-HP01 and TSU-HP02 were samples from this study. Bootstrap support values for MP and ML equal to or greater than 70% and Bayesian inference (BI) equal to or greater than 0.90 were defined as MP/BI/ML above or below the nodes. Guignardia bidwellii, G. citricarpa and G. philoprina were used as the outgroup.
Figure 6. Phylogenetic tree of combined DNA sequences of ITS, tef1-α and tub of Neoscytalidium sp. and related species; PSU-HP01, TSU-HP01 and TSU-HP02 were samples from this study. Bootstrap support values for MP and ML equal to or greater than 70% and Bayesian inference (BI) equal to or greater than 0.90 were defined as MP/BI/ML above or below the nodes. Guignardia bidwellii, G. citricarpa and G. philoprina were used as the outgroup.
Jof 09 00197 g006
Table
Table 1. Collection details and GenBank accession numbers of isolates included in this study.
Table 1. Collection details and GenBank accession numbers of isolates included in this study.
SpeciesVoucher/CultureLocationHostGenBank Accession Number
ITStef1-αtub
Botryosphaeria agavesMFLUCC 11-0125 TThailandAgaves sp.JX646791JX646856JX646841
B. fusisporaMFLUCC 10-0098 TThailandCaryota sp.JX646789JX646854JX646839
B. dothideaCMW8000SwitzerlandPrunus sp.AY236949AY236898AY236927
Cophinforma eucalyptiMFLUCC 11-0425ThailandEucalyptus sp.JX646800JX646865JX646848
C. mamaneCBS 117444VenezuelaEucalyptus sp.KF531822KF531801KF531802
Guignardia bidwelliiCBS 111645USA: MissouriParthenocissus quinquefoliaFJ824766FJ824772FJ824777
G. citricarpaCBS 102374 TBrazilCitrus aurantiumFJ824767FJ538371FJ824778
G. philoprinaCBS 447.68USATaxus baccataFJ824768FJ824773FJ824779
Neofusicoccum mangiferaeCBS 118532AustraliaM. indicaAY615186DQ093220AY615173
N. mediterraneumCBS 121718 T GreeceEucalyptus sp.GU251176GU251308GU251836
N. parvumCBS 110301PortugalVitis viniferaAY259098AY573221EU673095
Neoscytalidium dimidiatum10-B05USA: KernP. dulcisMG021589MG021541MG021486
KARE1790USA: MaderaP. dulcisMG021578MG021567MF991145
KARE1791USA: MaderaP. dulcisMG021579MG021531MG021476
KARE1792USA: MaderaP. dulcisMG021580MG021532MG021477
KARE1794USA: MaderaP. dulcisMG021582MG021534MG021479
2-D53USA: MaderaFicus caricaMG021568MG021521MG021511
2-D56USA: FresnoF. caricaMG021570MG021523MG021513
CBS 145.78 I,*United KingdomHomo sapiensKF531816KF531795KF531796
CBS 499.66 *MaliMangifera indicaKF531820KF531798KF531800
CBS 251.49 *USAJuglans regiaKF531819KF531797KF531799
N. novaehollandiaeCBS122071 TAustraliaCrotalaria medcagineaEF585540EF585580MT592760
CBS122070AustraliaGrevillea agrifoliaEF585539EF585579MT592759
CBS122072AustraliaAdansonia gibbosaEF585535EF585581MT592761
N. orchidacearumCMU287 TThailandCattleya sp.KY933091N/AN/A
Neoscytalidium sp.PSU-HP01ThailandHylocereus polyrhizusLC590859LC590862LC647832
Neoscytalidium sp.TSU-HP01ThailandH. polyrhizusLC590860LC590863LC647833
Neoscytalidium sp.TSU-HP02ThailandH. polyrhizusLC590861LC590864LC647834
T = ex-type strain; I = ex-isotype strain; N/A = not available. * Name changed from Neoscytalidium hyalinum; isolates from this study are indicated in bold.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wonglom, P.; Pornsuriya, C.; Sunpapao, A. A New Species of Neoscytalidium hylocereum sp. nov. Causing Canker on Red-Fleshed Dragon Fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) in Southern Thailand. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020197

AMA Style

Wonglom P, Pornsuriya C, Sunpapao A. A New Species of Neoscytalidium hylocereum sp. nov. Causing Canker on Red-Fleshed Dragon Fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) in Southern Thailand. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(2):197. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020197

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wonglom, Prisana, Chaninun Pornsuriya, and Anurag Sunpapao. 2023. "A New Species of Neoscytalidium hylocereum sp. nov. Causing Canker on Red-Fleshed Dragon Fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) in Southern Thailand" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 2: 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020197

APA Style

Wonglom, P., Pornsuriya, C., & Sunpapao, A. (2023). A New Species of Neoscytalidium hylocereum sp. nov. Causing Canker on Red-Fleshed Dragon Fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) in Southern Thailand. Journal of Fungi, 9(2), 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9020197

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop