Next Article in Journal
T2DB: A Web Database for Long Non-Coding RNA Genes in Type II Diabetes
Next Article in Special Issue
Small Nucleolar (Sno)RNA: Therapy Lays in Translation
Previous Article in Journal
The Non-Coding RNA Journal Club: Highlights on Recent Papers—12
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
ncRNA
Volume 9
Issue 2
10.3390/ncrna9020029
ncrna-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

The Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Gene (CFTR) Is under Post-Transcriptional Control of microRNAs: Analysis of the Effects of agomiRNAs Mimicking miR-145-5p, miR-101-3p, and miR-335-5p

by
Chiara Papi
1,
Jessica Gasparello
1,
Matteo Zurlo
1,
Lucia Carmela Cosenza
1,
Roberto Gambari
1,2,* and
Alessia Finotti
1,2,*
1
Department of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Section of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
2
Research Center on Innovative Therapies for Cystic Fibrosis, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Non-Coding RNA 2023, 9(2), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/ncrna9020029
Submission received: 6 March 2023 / Revised: 8 April 2023 / Accepted: 13 April 2023 / Published: 18 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Chemical Biology to Study and Target ncRNAs)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
(1) Background: MicroRNAs are involved in the expression of the gene encoding the chloride channel CFTR (Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator); the objective of this short report is to study the effects of the treatment of bronchial epithelial Calu-3 cells with molecules mimicking the activity of pre-miR-145-5p, pre-miR-335-5p, and pre-miR-101-3p, and to discuss possible translational applications of these molecules in pre-clinical studies focusing on the development of protocols of possible interest in therapy; (2) Methods: CFTR mRNA was quantified by Reverse Transcription quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR). The production of the CFTR protein was assessed by Western blotting; (3) Results: The treatment of Calu-3 cells with agomiR-145-5p caused the highest inhibition of CFTR mRNA accumulation and CFTR production; (4) Conclusions: The treatment of target cells with the agomiR pre-miR-145-5p should be considered when CFTR gene expression should be inhibited in pathological conditions, such as polycystic kidney disease (PKD), some types of cancer, cholera, and SARS-CoV-2 infection.

1. Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of short (less than 30 nucleotides in length) non-coding RNAs with a very important role in the regulation of gene expression at the post-transcriptional level [1,2,3] through sequence-specific interactions with the 3′UTR of target mRNAs. This causes translational repression or mRNA degradation [2]. Several miRNA/mRNA networks are responsible for the control of important biological functions, such as cell growth, apoptosis, and differentiation [3], and their alterations are associated with the onset and/or progression of several human pathologies [4,5,6]. In agreement, the alteration of miRNA biological functions (either by miRNA inhibition or miRNA mimicking) is considered an interesting and innovative strategy with potential therapeutic implications [7,8,9,10]. This is not merely a theoretical possibility since efforts aimed at translating laboratory investigations to clinical practice are in progress, as demonstrated by the several ongoing clinical trials such as NCT01646489, NCT01200420, NCT02826525, and NCT02580552, and by the increasing number of reports and reviews related to this issue [11,12,13].
Several studies have been reported demonstrating that microRNAs are involved in the expression of the gene encoding the chloride channel CFTR (Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator) [14,15,16,17,18,19].
Our group has reported that miR-145-5p [20,21,22], miR-101-3p [23], and miR-335-5p [24] play an important role in regulating the expression of the CFTR gene. In particular, miR-145-5p has been demonstrated to regulate CFTR by several research groups as well, as demonstrated by Oglesby et al. [19], Lutful Kabir et al. [25], and Dutta et al. [26]. A possible therapeutic application of these studies is that targeting these miRNAs (in our case miR-145-5p, miR-101-3p, and miR-335-5p) with antagomiRNAs could be considered an experimental strategy to upregulate CFTR expression. Interestingly, the activity of different miRNAs on post-transcriptional CFTR regulation might be synergistic, as found by Megiorni et al. [15] for miR-101 and miR-494 and by Papi et al. [27] for miR-145-5p and miR-101-3p. All these studies were in strong agreement in proposing anti-miRNA molecules targeting CFTR regulatory miRNAs as molecular agents that are able to upregulate CFTR. This was further confirmed using molecular blockers masking the miRNA-binding sites present in the CFTR 3′UTR [28,29]. A list of the most relevant regulatory miRNAs interacting with the CFTR 3′UTR and a scheme outlining the antisense and miRNA mimicking approach to control CFTR gene expression are presented in Figure 1.
AgomiR molecules mimicking the activity of the CFTR regulatory miRNAs are, on the contrary, expected to downregulate CFTR [9,19].
The objective of this short report is to comparatively characterize the possible effects of treatment of bronchial epithelial Calu-3 cells [20,27] and intestinal Caco-2 cells [30] with agomiRNA molecules mimicking pre-miR-145-5p, pre-miR-335-5p, and pre-miR-101-3p, and to discuss possible translational applications of these molecules in pre-clinical studies focusing on the development of protocols of possible interest in therapy.

2. Results

2.1. Effects of Treatment of Calu-3 Cells with Pre-miRNAs Regulating CFTR Expression

The results shown in Figure 2 demonstrate that CFTR is heavily modulated (downregulated) by some pre-miRNAs mimicking the bioactivity of miRNAs targeting the 3′UTR of the CFTR mRNA. The activity of three pre-miRNAs was compared, i.e., pre-miRNA-145-5p, pre-miRNA-101-3p, and pre-miRNA-335-5p. The treatment with high pre-miR concentrations was performed in order to compare the activities of miRNA-145-5p, pre-miRNA-101-3p, and pre-miRNA-335-5p, used at the same concentration, and considering that preliminary results indicated very low activity of pre-miR-101-3p; therefore, it required comparison at a high concentration (i.e., 300 nM). After 72 h of treatment of Calu-3 cells with 100 and 300 nM pre-miRNAs, the cells were harvested and the produced proteins were analyzed by Western blotting using the CFTR antibody against the NBD2 domain of CFTR, clone 596 (University of North Caroline, Cystic Fibrosis Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA). The antibody specific for the housekeeping of Na+/K+-ATPase (SC-514614, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) was employed for normalization. The obtained results show that the treatment with pre-miR-101-3p was ineffective, while the treatment with pre-miR-145-5p and pre-miR-335-5p strongly reduced CFTR production (see the quantitative analyses shown in Figure 2B).
The treatment of Calu-3 cells with miR-145-5p was more effective in inhibiting CFTR production than the treatment with pre-miR-335-5p. Accordingly, we focused our experiments on the use of pre-miR-145-5p. The effects of pre-miR-145-5p were detectable even when the agomiR was used at a concentration of 25 nM (Figure 3).

2.2. The Effects of Treatment of Calu-3 Cells with Pre-miR-145-5p Do Not Require Multiple Additions of the agomiR

We have compared two protocols. In the first protocol (protocol #1, Figure 4A–C), Calu-3 cells were treated with 300 nM pre-miR-145-5p (final concentration), and administered at the time of seeding (time 0, see Figure 4A). Further aliquots of pre-miR-145-5p were not added. In the second protocol (protocol #2, Figure 4D–F), three aliquots of pre-miR-145-5p (100 nM final concentrations) were added at the 0 time point and after 24 and 48 h (see Figure 4D). The two protocols were considered taking into account the possibility that the pre-miRNA molecules were unstable, or prone to intracellular compartmentalization associated with loss of bioactivity. In addition, long-lasting activity is required for possible therapeutic applications of biomolecules.
In both protocols, after 72 h of cell culturing, Calu-3 cells were isolated, RNA and proteins were purified, and RT-qPCR and Western blotting analyses were performed for the quantification of CFTR mRNA (Figure 4B,E) and CFTR protein (Figure 4C,F).
The obtained results demonstrate that the addition of pre-miR-145-5p at the beginning of Calu-3 cell culture (time 0) is sufficient to obtain the maximum level of inhibition of CFTR expression, analyzed by RT-qPCR (Figure 4B,E) and Western blotting (Figure 4C,F). These results strongly suggest that the agomiR is stable under these experimental conditions.

2.3. Pre-miR-145-5p Inhibits CFTR Expression in the Intestinal Cell Line Caco-2

The CFTR function is important not only in the lungs, but also in other tissues, such as the intestine, pancreas, and kidney. In this respect, potential therapeutic strategies to combat defective CFTR function in these organs are being considered [31]. In addition, CFTR should be downregulated in case its overexpression is associated with pathological conditions [32]. For this reason, we have extended the study on the effects of pre-miR-145-5p on the intestinal Caco-2, that are an important cellular system for the screening and validation of CFTR inhibitors [30,33].
The data are shown in Figure 5, which fully support the conclusions presented using the bronchial Calu-3 cells, i.e., that pre-miR-154-5p is a potent (and flexible) inhibitor of the expression of CFTR.

3. Discussion

Non-viral microRNA gene therapy is a molecular intervention based on the treatment of target cells (a) with antagomiRNA molecules able to interfere with the biological activity of microRNAs or (b) with agomiRNA molecules able to mimic the miRNA-associated effects. In the case of treatment with antagomiRNAs, the expected effect is an upregulation of those mRNAs whose expression is controlled by the target miRNAs. Conversely, the use of agomiRNA molecules is expected to cause the downregulation of target mRNAs (see Figure 1B).
There is a general agreement that the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Regulator (CFTR) Gene is under the control of microRNAs [14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. In this context, the major focus of previously published studies [20,21,22,23,24,27] was on hyper-expressing CFTR with the use of antagomiRNA molecules targeting miRNAs downregulating CFTR (for instance, miR-145-5p). This might be of interest for the therapy of Cystic Fibrosis. In those reports, the issue and the translational potential of inhibiting CFTR were not considered. On the contrary, one of the main results of this short report is that pre-miR-145-5p is effective in inhibiting CFTR expression with an efficiency higher than pre-miR-335-5p and pre-miR-101-3p (Figure 2). The addition of pre-miR-145-5p at the beginning of the cell culture period is sufficient to obtain the expected biological effect (i.e., CFTR inhibition) (Figure 3). These results allow proposing the employment of pre-miR-145-5p in pre-clinical studies focusing on pathologies in which CFTR inhibition should be considered a clinically relevant target.
The major limitation of our study is that only one delivery system was employed. Therefore, our studies need to be extended to other delivery systems, as those recently reported are considered very useful for biomedical applications [34]. Moreover, a second limit is that co-treatment using co-administration of different pre-miRNAs has not been considered. Hence, this study should be considered as a proof on concept suggesting that future studies are needed to determine whether co-treatment might lead to improving the inhibitory effects on CFTR.
We suggest that the translational applications of our results to “miRNA therapeutics” should be considered a strength of our study; in this context, the use of pre-miR-145-5p deserves further pre-clinical studies that will be performed using appropriate pathological model systems.
The first consideration is that CFTR inhibition might be a useful approach for human pathologies, such as polycystic kidney disease (PKD) [35]. The involvement of CFTR in PKD has been described in several studies [35,36,37,38]. For instance, Davidow et al. found that CFTR mediates transepithelial fluid secretion by human autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease epithelium in vitro [36]. In agreement, small-molecule CFTR inhibitors slow cyst growth in polycystic kidney disease, as reported by Yang et al. [33]. Examples of CFTR inhibitors that are potentially useful to treat PKD are pinostrobin [38], chalone derivatives [39], and steviol [40].
Even though CFTR has been proposed as a tumor suppressor gene [41,42], its upregulation has been described in some types of cancers [43,44,45]. For instance, Liu et al. found that high CFTR expression occurs in childhood B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and is a potential therapeutic target [43]. Zhao et al. described that CFTR promotes malignant glioma development via upregulation of the Akt/Bcl2-mediated anti-apoptosis pathway [44]. Finally, Xu et al. [45] reported that high expression of CFTR is associated with tumor aggressiveness of ovarian cancer. Accordingly, knockdown and/or inhibition of CFTR suppresses the proliferation of tumor cells in vitro and in vivo [45]. Interestingly, the CFTR inhibitor miR-145-5p is a recognized tumor suppressor miRNA [46,47,48]. These published studies, together with our results, should stimulate research efforts aimed to verify, in CFTR-overexpressing tumor cell lines, the interplay between pre-miR-145-5p treatment, CFTR downregulation, and effects on in vitro tumor phenotype.
A final application of miRNA-mediated downregulation of CFTR is in the field of infectious diseases. The first example is related to the role of CFTR functions in exacerbating secretory diarrhea, which remains an important global health problem and is strictly associated with the activity of the main virulence factor produced by Vibrio cholerae, the cholera toxin (CT) [49]. It is accepted that overstimulation of CFTR-mediated Cl- secretion plays an important role in the pathogenesis of secretory diarrheas [32,33,50]. Therefore, biomolecules acting as CFTR inhibitors can be proposed as a potential antisecretory therapy for diarrheas caused by CT [32,33,51,52]. The usefulness and antidiarrheal efficacy of CFTR inhibitors have been validated on human intestinal epithelial cells and in mouse models of cholera [49]. Interestingly, pre-miR-145-5p is a potent inhibitor of CFTR using the Caco-2 intestinal cell line (Figure 5); a model system to validate CFTR inhibitors for possible treatment of secretory diarrhea associated with cholera [33,39].
The second example of possible applications of CFTR downregulation in infectious diseases is related to the role of CFTR in the life cycle of SARS-CoV-2, responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic [53]. A possible relationship between CFTR and COVID-19 has been suggested by the surprising observation that CF patients (who produce low or altered levels of functionally deficient CFTR) are significantly protected against infection by SARS-CoV-2 [54], supporting the hypothesis of a possible role of CFTR inhibitors (such as pre-miR-145-5p) on the spread of COVID-19. Accordingly, Lotti et al. [55] provided evidence that CFTR expression/function was involved in the regulation of SARS-CoV-2 replication. Moreover, Bezzerri et al. were able to demonstrate that ACE2 expression and localization are regulated by CFTR, supporting the concept that molecules mimicking the biological activity of miRNA downregulating CFTR (such as miR-145-5p) should be considered as potential anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents [56]. This was formally demonstrated in SARS-CoV-2 infected Calu-3 cells [56], confirming that miR-145-5p-mediated downregulation of CFTR might be associated with inhibition of the SARS-CoV-2 life cycle. Interestingly, using differential expression analysis of microarray data, hsa-miR-145-5p was identified among the top differentially expressed transcripts in severe versus asymptomatic/mild cases [57]. The microarray data confirmed the miR-145-5p downregulation in severe cases of COVID-19, while miR-145-5p was found upregulated in the mild cases.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Lines and Culture Conditions

The human bronchial epithelial Calu-3 cell line was obtained from Prof. Anna Ta-manini (Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy) [24,27,58]; the intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cells were obtained from Prof. Giuseppe Valacchi (Department of Environmental Sciences and Prevention, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy) [30,59]. Calu-3 and Caco-2 cells were cultured in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2/air in DMEM/F12 and in a DMEM medium, respectively (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Biowest, Nauillè, France), 100 units/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Lonza Bioscience, Verviers, Belgium), and 1% NEEA (100X) (non-essential amino acids solution; Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.2. Cell Treatments with agomiRNAs

Calu-3 and Caco-2 cell lines were seeded in a 12-well plate with a concentration of 250,000 cells/mL and 50,000 cells/mL, respectively. The cells were treated with pre-miRTM miRNA precursor (Ambion, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), indicated in Table 1, using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX transfectant reagent (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. We have performed two different transfection procedures using the Calu-3 cell line.
For protocol #1 cells were treated with pre-miR-145 with a final concentration of 300 nM, whereas in protocol #2, Calu-3 cells were transfected with pre-miR-145 molecules with a concentration of 100 nM at the time of seeding, and this transfection procedure was repeated after 24 and 48 h. In all treatments, after 72 h, the cells were collected, washed with sterile PBS, and the total cell extracts and RNA were prepared for further analysis.

4.3. RNA Extraction

Cultured cells were trypsinized and collected by centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, washed with PBS, and lysed with Tri-Reagent (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The isolated RNA was washed once with cold 75% ethanol, dried, and dissolved in nuclease-free pure water before use [20,23,24].

4.4. Analysis of CFTR Expression: RT-qPCR

The gene expression analysis was performed by RT-qPCR using 500 ng of total RNA, extracted and reverse transcribed using the Taq-Man Reverse Transcription PCR Kit, and random hexamers (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) as RT reaction primers. Quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assays were carried out using gene-specific double fluorescently labeled probes. The primers and probes used to assay CFTR (Assay ID: Hs00357011_m1) gene expression were purchased from Applied Biosystems. The relative expression was calculated using the comparative cycle threshold method and, as reference genes, the human RPL13A (Assay ID: Hs03043885_g1).

4.5. Analysis of CFTR Expression: Western Blotting

The CFTR expression was measured using Western blotting analyses. Cell pellets were lysed in RIPA buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and sonicated for 30 sec three times on ice at 50% amplitude using the Vibra-Cell VC130 Ultrasonic Processor (Sonics, Newtown, CT, USA). The lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 14,000× g for 30 min at 4 °C. The protein concentration was determined using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For the CFTR analysis, 40 μg of total protein extracts were heated in Blue Loading Buffer by adding 50 nM dithiothreitol (DTT) (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) at 37 °C for 10 min and loaded onto a 7% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The gel proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) by using Trans-Blot Turbo (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and processed for Western blotting by using a mouse monoclonal antibody, clone 596, against the NBD2 domain of CFTR (University of North Carolina, Cystic Fibrosis Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA) at a dilution of 1:2500 by overnight incubation at 4 °C. After the washes, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-coupled anti-mouse immunoglobulin (R&D System, Minneapolis, MN, USA) at room temperature for 1 h, and after washes, the signal was developed by enhanced chemiluminescence (LumiGlo Reagent and Peroxide, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA). After membrane stripping, a Na+/K+-ATPase monoclonal antibody (sc-514614, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) or vinculin monoclonal antibody (sc-73614, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) was used to investigate the equal loading of samples [27].

4.6. Statistical Analysis

The results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Comparisons between groups were made by using one-way ANOVA (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ncrna9020029/s1. The uncut version of the Western blotting gels reported in Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 5 are included in Supplementary Figures S1–S3, respectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.G. and A.F.; methodology, C.P., J.G., M.Z. and L.C.C.; software, C.P.; validation, C.P., R.G. and A.F.; formal analysis, C.P., R.G. and A.F.; investigation, C.P. and A.F.; resources, R.G. and A.F.; data curation, R.G. and A.F.; writing—original draft preparation, C.P., R.G. and A.F.; writing—review and editing, C.P., J.G., M.Z., L.C.C., R.G. and A.F.; supervision, A.F.; funding acquisition, R.G. and A.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Fondazione Fibrosi Cistica (FFC), project “Revealing the microRNAs-transcription factors network in cystic fibrosis: from microRNA therapeutics to precision medicine (CF-miRNA-THER)”, Project no. FFC#7/2018. AF and RG are funded by MUR-FISR COVID-miRNAPNA (Project no. FISR2020IP_04128) and by the Interuniversity Consortium for Biotechnology (CIB) (Project no. CIB-Unife-2020). AF was funded by the University Fund for Scientific Research FAR, (Projects no. FAR-AF-Unife-2018, FAR-AF-Unife-2019, and FAR-AF-Unife-2020).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Most of the data obtained are included in the manuscript and supplementary materials. Further information and data will be made freely available by the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The association “Tutti per Chiara ONLUS” is acknowledged for supporting C.P. and M.Z. with a research fellowship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. He, L.; Hannon, G.J. MicroRNAs: Small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5, 522–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sontheimer, E.J.; Carthew, R.W. Silence from within: Endogenous siRNAs and miRNAs. Cell 2005, 122, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alvarez-Garcia, I.; Miska, E.A. MicroRNA functions in animal development and human disease. Development 2005, 132, 4653–4662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, Y.; Kowdley, K.V. MicroRNAs in common human diseases. Genomic. Proteom. Bioinform. 2012, 10, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lu, M.; Zhang, Q.; Deng, M.; Miao, J.; Guo, Y.; Gao, W.; Cui, Q. An analysis of human microRNA and disease associations. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Das, J.; Podder, S.; Ghosh, T.C. Insights into the miRNA regulations in human disease genes. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rupaimoole, R.; Slack, F.J. MicroRNA therapeutics: Towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nat. Rev. Dru. Discov. 2017, 16, 203–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hanna, J.; Hossain, G.S.; Kocerha, J. The Potential for microRNA Therapeutics and Clinical Research. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Christopher, A.F.; Kaur, R.P.; Kaur, G.; Kaur, A.; Gupta, V.; Bansal, P. MicroRNA therapeutics: Discovering novel targets and developing specific therapy. Perspect. Clin Res. 2016, 7, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chakraborty, C.; Sharma, A.R.; Sharma, G.; Lee, S.S. Therapeutic advances of miRNAs: A preclinical and clinical update. J. Adv. Res. 2020, 28, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. van der Ree, M.H.; de Vree, J.M.; Stelma, F.; Willemse, S.; van der Valk, M.; Rietdijk, S.; Molenkamp, R.; Schinkel, J.; vanNuenen, A.C.; Beuers, U.; et al. Safety, tolerability, and antiviral effect of RG-101 in patients with chronic hepatitis C: A phase 1B, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017, 389, 709–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ottosen, S.; Parsley, T.B.; Yang, L.; Zeh, K.; van Doorn, L.J.; van der Veer, E.; Raney, A.K.; Hodges, M.R.; Patick, A.M. In vitro antiviral activity and preclinical and clinical resistance profile of miravirsen, a novel anti-hepatitis C virus therapeutic targeting the human factor miR-122. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kohnken, R.; Mishra, A. MicroRNAs in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: The Future of Therapy. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2019, 139, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gillen, A.E.; Gosalia, N.; Leir, S.H.; Harris, A. MicroRNA regulation of expression of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene. Biochem. J. 2011, 438, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Megiorni, F.; Cialfi, S.; Dominici, C.; Quattrucci, S.; Pizzuti, A. Synergistic post-transcriptional regulation of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane conductance Regulator (CFTR) by miR-101 and miR-494 specific binding. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hassan, F.; Nuovo, G.J.; Crawford, M.; Boyaka, P.N.; Kirkby, S.; Nana-Sinkam, S.P.; Cormet-Boyaka, E. MiR-101 and miR-144 regulate the expression of the CFTR chloride channel in the lung. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ramachandran, S.; Karp, P.H.; Jiang, P.; Ostedgaard, L.S.; Walz, A.E.; Fisher, J.T.; Keshavjee, S.; Lennox, K.A.; Jacobi, A.M.; Rose, S.D.; et al. A microRNA network regulates expression and biosynthesis of wild-type and DeltaF508 mutant cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 13362–13367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ramachandran, S.; Karp, P.H.; Osterhaus, S.R.; Jiang, P.; Wohlford-Lenane, C.; Lennox, K.A.; Jacobi, A.M.; Praekh, K.; Rose, S.D.; Behlke, M.A.; et al. Post-transcriptional regulation of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator expression and function by microRNAs. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2013, 49, 544–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Oglesby, I.K.; Chotirmall, S.H.; McElvaney, N.G.; Greene, C.M. Regulation of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator by microRNA-145, -223, and -494 is altered in ΔF508 cystic fibrosis airway epithelium. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 3354–3362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fabbri, E.; Tamanini, A.; Jakova, T.; Gasparello, J.; Manicardi, A.; Corradini, R.; Sabbioni, G.; Finotti, A.; Borgatti, M.; Lampronti, I.; et al. A Peptide Nucleic Acid against MicroRNA miR-145-5p Enhances the Expression of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) in Calu-3 Cells. Molecules 2017, 23, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gasparello, J.; Fabbri, E.; Gambari, R.; Finotti, A. Differential effects on the miRNome of the treatment of human airway epithelial Calu-3 cells with peptide-nucleic acids (PNAs) targeting microRNAs miR-101-3p and miR-145-5p: Next generation sequencing datasets. Data Brief. 2021, 35, 106718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Finotti, A.; Gasparello, J.; Fabbri, E.; Tamanini, A.; Corradini, R.; Dechecchi, M.C.; Cabrini, G.; Gambari, R. Enhancing the Expression of CFTR Using Antisense Molecules against MicroRNA miR-145-5p. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 199, 1443–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fabbri, E.; Tamanini, A.; Jankova, T.; Gasparello, J.; Manicardi, A.; Corradini, R.; Finotti, A.; Borgatti, M.; Lampronti, I.; Munari, S.; et al. Treatment of human airway epithelial Calu-3 cells with a Peptide-Nucleic Acid (PNA) targeting the microRNA miR-101-3p is associated with increased expression of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) gene. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 209, 112876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tamanini, A.; Fabbri, E.; Jakova, T.; Gasparello, J.; Manicardi, A.; Corradini, R.; Finotti, A.; Borgatti, M.; Lampronti, I.; Munari, S.; et al. A Peptide-Nucleic Acid Targeting miR-335-5p Enhances Expression of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Gene with the Possible Involvement of the CFTR Scaffolding Protein NHERF1. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lutful Kabir, F.; Ambalavanan, N.; Liu, G.; Li, P.; Solomon, G.M.; Lal, C.V.; Mazur, M.; Halloran, B.; Szul, T.; Gerthoffer, W.T.; et al. MicroRNA-145 Antagonism Reverses TGF-beta Inhibition of F508del CFTR Correction in Airway Epithelia. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 197, 632–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dutta, R.K.; Chinnapaiyan, S.; Rasmussen, L.; Raju, S.V.; Unwalla, H.J. A Neutralizing Aptamer to TGFBR2 and miR-145 Antagonism Rescue Cigarette Smoke- and TGF-beta-Mediated CFTR Expression. Mol. Ther. 2019, 27, 442–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Papi, C.; Gasparello, J.; Zurlo, M.; Manicardi, A.; Corradini, R.; Cabrini, G.; Gambari, R.; Finotti, A. Combined Treatment of Bronchial Epithelial Calu-3 Cells with Peptide Nucleic Acids Targeting miR-145-5p and miR-101-3p: Synergistic Enhancement of the Expression of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Gene. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sultan, S.; Rozzi, A.; Gasparello, J.; Manicardi, A.; Corradini, R.; Papi, C.; Finotti, J.; Lampronti, I.; Reali, E.; Cabrini, G.; et al. A Peptide Nucleic Acid (PNA) Masking the miR-145-5p Binding Site of the 3’UTR of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) mRNA Enhances CFTR Expression in Calu-3 Cells. Molecules 2020, 25, 1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. De Santi, C.; Fernández Fernández, E.; Gaul, R.; Vencken, S.; Glasgow, A.; Oglesby, I.K.; Hurley, K.; Hawkins, F.; Mitash, N.; Mu, F.; et al. Precise Targeting of miRNA Sites Restores CFTR Activity in CF Bronchial Epithelial Cells. Mol. Ther. 2020, 28, 1190–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rodrat, M.; Wongdee, K.; Teerapornpuntakit, J.; Thongbunchoo, J.; Tanramluk, D.; Aeimlapa, R.; Thammayon, N.; Thonapan, N.; Wattano, P.; Charoenphandhu, N. Vasoactive intestinal peptide and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator contribute to the transepithelial calcium transport across intestinal epithelium-like Caco-2 monolayer. PLoS ONE. 2022, 17, e0277096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hegyi, P.; Seidler, U.; Kunzelmann, K. CFTR-beyond the airways: Recent findings on the role of the CFTR channel in the pancreas, the intestine and the kidneys. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2023, 22, S17–S22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. de Jonge, H.R.; Ardelean, M.C.; Bijvelds, M.J.C.; Vergani, P. Strategies for cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator inhibition: From molecular mechanisms to treatment for secretory diarrhoeas. FEBS Lett. 2020, 594, 4085–4108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Singh, V.; Yang, J.; Yin, J.; Cole, R.; Tse, M.; Berman, D.E.; Small, S.A.; Petsko, G.; Donowitz, M. Cholera toxin inhibits SNX27-retromer-mediated delivery of cargo proteins to the plasma membrane. J. Cell. Sci. 2018, 131, jcs218610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gasparello, J.; Lomazzi, M.; Papi, C.; D’Aversa, E.; Sansone, F.; Casnati, A.; Gaetano, D.; Gambari, R.; Finotti, A. Efficient Delivery of MicroRNA and AntimiRNA Molecules Using an Argininocalix[4]arene Macrocycle. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2019, 18, 748–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Colbert, G.B.; Elrggal, M.E.; Gaur, L.; Lerma, E.V. Update and review of adult polycystic kidney disease. Dis. Mon. 2020, 66, 100887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Davidow, C.J.; Maser, R.L.; Rome, L.A.; Calvet, J.P.; Grantham, J.J. The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator mediates transepithelial fluid secretion by human autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease epithelium in vitro. Kidney Int. 1996, 50, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, B.; Sonawane, N.D.; Zhao, D.; Somlo, S.; Verkman, A.S. Small-molecule CFTR inhibitors slow cyst growth in polycystic kidney disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008, 19, 1300–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tonum, K.; Chabang, N.; Fongsupa, S.; Chantawarin, S.; Jiarpinitnun, C.; Tuchinda, P.; Soodvilai, S. Pinostrobin inhibits renal CFTR-mediated Cl- secretion and retards cyst growth in cell-derived cyst and polycystic kidney disease rats. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2022, 148, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Veeraphan, P.; Chavasiri, W.; Muanprasat, C.; Chatsudthipong, V.; Yuajit, C. A chalcone derivative retards renal cyst enlargement by inhibiting fluid secretion and cell proliferation in an in vitro model of polycystic kidney disease. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2021, 25, 944–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yuajit, C.; Muanprasat, C.; Homvisasevongsa, S.; Chatsudthipong, V. Steviol stabilizes polycystin 1 expression and promotes lysosomal degradation of CFTR and β-catenin proteins in renal epithelial cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 94, 820–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, C.; Song, C.; Li, J.; Sun, Q. CFTR Functions as a Tumor Suppressor and Is Regulated by DNA Methylation in Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020, 12, 4261–4270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Than, B.L.; Linnekamp, J.F.; Starr, T.K.; Largaespada, D.A.; Rod, A.; Zhang, Y.; Bruner, V.; Abrahante, J.; Schumann, A.; Luczak, T.; et al. CFTR is a tumor suppressor gene in murine and human intestinal cancer. Oncogene 2016, 35, 4179–4187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liu, M.; Lin, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, M.; Tsang, K.S.; Liao, H.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; et al. High cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator expression in childhood B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia acts as a potential therapeutic target. Transl. Cancer Res. 2022, 11, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhao, M.; Zhang, J.; Huang, W.; Dong, J.; Guo, J.; U, K.P.; Weng, Z.; Liu, S.; Chan, H.C.; Feng, H.; et al. CFTR promotes malignant glioma development via up-regulation of Akt/Bcl2-mediated anti-apoptosis pathway. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2020, 24, 7301–7312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Xu, J.; Yong, M.; Li, J.; Dong, X.; Yu, T.; Fu, X.; Hu, L. High level of CFTR expression is associated with tumor aggression and knockdown of CFTR suppresses proliferation of ovarian cancer in vitro and in vivo. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 33, 2227–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cheng, X.; Shen, T.; Liu, P.; Fang, S.; Yang, Z.; Li, Y.; Dong, J. mir-145-5p is a suppressor of colorectal cancer at early stage, while promotes colorectal cancer metastasis at late stage through regulating AKT signaling evoked EMT-mediated anoikis. BMC Cancer 2022, 22, 1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. He, S.; Yu, G.; Peng, K.; Liu, S. MicroRNA-145-5p suppresses fascin to inhibit the invasion and migration of cervical carcinoma cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020, 22, 5282–5292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, Q.; Zhou, L.; Ye, X.; Tao, M.; Wu, J. miR-145-5p suppresses proliferation, metastasis and EMT of colorectal cancer by targeting CDCA3. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2020, 216, 152872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Satitsri, S.; Pongkorpsakol, P.; Srimanote, P.; Chatsudthipong, V.; Muanprasat, C. Pathophysiological mechanisms of diarrhea caused by the Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor variant: An in vivo study in mice. Virulence 2016, 7, 789–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Muangnil, P.; Satitsri, S.; Tadpetch, K.; Saparpakorn, P.; Chatsudthipong, V.; Hannongbua, S.; Rukachaisirikul, V.; Muanprasat, C. A fungal metabolite zearalenone as a CFTR inhibitor and potential therapy of secretory diarrheas. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2018, 150, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rivera-Chávez, F.; Meader, B.T.; Akosman, S.; Koprivica, V.; Mekalanos, J.J. A Potent Inhibitor of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Blocks Disease and Morbidity Due to Toxigenic Vibrio cholerae. Toxins 2022, 14, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Patanayindee, J.; Muanprasat, C.; Soodvilai, S.; Chatsudthipong, V. Antidiarrheal efficacy of a quinazolin CFTR inhibitor on human intestinal epithelial cell and in mouse model of cholera. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2012, 44, 619–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Al-Awwal, N.; Dweik, F.; Mahdi, S.; El-Dweik, M.; Anderson, S.H. A Review of SARS-CoV-2 Disease (COVID-19): Pandemic in Our Time. Pathogens 2022, 11, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bezzerri, V.; Lucca, F.; Volpi, S.; Cipolli, M. Does cystic fibrosis constitute an advantage in COVID-19 infection? Ital. J. Pediatr. 2020, 46, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lotti, V.; Merigo, F.; Lagni, A.; Di Clemente, A.; Ligozzi, M.; Bernardi, P.; Rossini, G.; Concia, E.; Plebani, R.; Romano, M.; et al. CFTR Modulation Reduces SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells. Cells 2022, 11, 1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bezzerri, V.; Gentili, V.; Api, M.; Finotti, A.; Papi, C.; Tamanini, A.; Boni, C.; Baldisseri, E.; Olioso, D.; Duca, M.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 viral entry and replication is impaired in Cystic Fibrosis airways due to ACE2 downregulation. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Parray, A.; Mir, F.A.; Doudin, A.; Iskandarani, A.; Danjuma, M.M.; Kuni, R.A.T.; Abdelmajid, A.; Abdelhafez, I.; Arif, R.; Mulhim, M.; et al. SnoRNAs and miRNAs Networks Underlying COVID-19 Disease Severity. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhu, Y.; Chidekel, A.; Shaffer, T.H. Cultured Human Airway Epithelial Cells (Calu-3): A Model of Human Respiratory Function, Structure, and Inflammatory Responses. Crit. Care Res. Pract. 2010, 2010, 394578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Woodby, B.; Schiavone, M.L.; Pambianchi, E.; Mastaloudis, A.; Hester, S.N.; Wood, S.M.; Pecorelli, A.; Valacchi, G. Particulate Matter Decreases Intestinal Barrier-Associated Proteins Levels in 3D Human Intestinal Model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ncrna 09 00029 g001 550
Figure 1. (A). Location of miRNA binding sites within the 3′UTR of the CFTR mRNA. (B). Scheme depicting the miRNA replacement approach using transfected agomiRNAs (see panel A) to downregulate CFTR gene expression. Adapted with permission from Papi et al. [27]; (copyright can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/16/9348 (2022, by Papi et al.) [27].
Figure 1. (A). Location of miRNA binding sites within the 3′UTR of the CFTR mRNA. (B). Scheme depicting the miRNA replacement approach using transfected agomiRNAs (see panel A) to downregulate CFTR gene expression. Adapted with permission from Papi et al. [27]; (copyright can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/16/9348 (2022, by Papi et al.) [27].
Ncrna 09 00029 g001
Ncrna 09 00029 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of treatment of Calu-3 cells with pre-miR-145-5p, miR-101-3p, and miR-335-5p. Treatment was 72 h. (A). Representative Western blotting gel images. (B). Relative values of CFTR content with respect to Na+/K+-ATPase. The uncut version of the gel is shown in Supplementary Figure S1. (-) = untreated cells. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 2. Effects of treatment of Calu-3 cells with pre-miR-145-5p, miR-101-3p, and miR-335-5p. Treatment was 72 h. (A). Representative Western blotting gel images. (B). Relative values of CFTR content with respect to Na+/K+-ATPase. The uncut version of the gel is shown in Supplementary Figure S1. (-) = untreated cells. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001.
Ncrna 09 00029 g002
Ncrna 09 00029 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of treatment of Calu-3 cells with increasing concentrations of pre-miR-145-5p. The length of treatment was 72 h. (A): RT-qPCR analysis; (B): representative Western blotting. (C): relative values of CFTR content with respect to Na+/K+-ATPase. The uncut version of the gel is shown in Supplementary Figure S2. (-) = untreated cells. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3. Effects of treatment of Calu-3 cells with increasing concentrations of pre-miR-145-5p. The length of treatment was 72 h. (A): RT-qPCR analysis; (B): representative Western blotting. (C): relative values of CFTR content with respect to Na+/K+-ATPase. The uncut version of the gel is shown in Supplementary Figure S2. (-) = untreated cells. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Ncrna 09 00029 g003
Ncrna 09 00029 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of treatment of Calu-3 cells with pre-miR-145-5p, following protocol #1 (A–C) and protocol #2 (D–F). (A). Scheme of protocol #1. (B). Relative amounts of CFTR mRNA (RT-qPCR) in treated Calu-3 cells. (C). Relative content of the CFTR protein in treated Calu-3 cells. Treatment was 72 h (see panel A). (D). Scheme of protocol #2. (E). Relative amounts of CFTR mRNA (RT-qPCR) in treated Calu-3 cells. (F). Relative content of the CFTR protein in treated Calu-3 cells. Treatment was 72 h (see panel D). (-) = untreated cells. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4. Effects of treatment of Calu-3 cells with pre-miR-145-5p, following protocol #1 (A–C) and protocol #2 (D–F). (A). Scheme of protocol #1. (B). Relative amounts of CFTR mRNA (RT-qPCR) in treated Calu-3 cells. (C). Relative content of the CFTR protein in treated Calu-3 cells. Treatment was 72 h (see panel A). (D). Scheme of protocol #2. (E). Relative amounts of CFTR mRNA (RT-qPCR) in treated Calu-3 cells. (F). Relative content of the CFTR protein in treated Calu-3 cells. Treatment was 72 h (see panel D). (-) = untreated cells. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Ncrna 09 00029 g004
Ncrna 09 00029 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of treatment of human intestinal Caco-2 cells with pre-miR-145-5p following protocol #1. (A). Relative amounts of CFTR mRNA (RT-qPCR) in pre-miR-145-5p treated Caco-2 cells. Treatment was 72 h. (B). Representative Western blotting. (C). Relative content of the CFTR protein. The uncut version of the gel is shown in Supplementary Figure S3. (-) = untreated cells. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 5. Effects of treatment of human intestinal Caco-2 cells with pre-miR-145-5p following protocol #1. (A). Relative amounts of CFTR mRNA (RT-qPCR) in pre-miR-145-5p treated Caco-2 cells. Treatment was 72 h. (B). Representative Western blotting. (C). Relative content of the CFTR protein. The uncut version of the gel is shown in Supplementary Figure S3. (-) = untreated cells. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Ncrna 09 00029 g005
Table
Table 1. The pre-miR miRNAs precursors list employed in Calu-3 and Caco-2 cell treatments.
Table 1. The pre-miR miRNAs precursors list employed in Calu-3 and Caco-2 cell treatments.
Pre-miRTM miRNA
Precursor		ID
has-pre-miR-145-5pPM11480
has-pre-miR-101-3pPM11414
has-pre-miR-335-5pPM10063
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Papi, C.; Gasparello, J.; Zurlo, M.; Cosenza, L.C.; Gambari, R.; Finotti, A. The Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Gene (CFTR) Is under Post-Transcriptional Control of microRNAs: Analysis of the Effects of agomiRNAs Mimicking miR-145-5p, miR-101-3p, and miR-335-5p. Non-Coding RNA 2023, 9, 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ncrna9020029

AMA Style

Papi C, Gasparello J, Zurlo M, Cosenza LC, Gambari R, Finotti A. The Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Gene (CFTR) Is under Post-Transcriptional Control of microRNAs: Analysis of the Effects of agomiRNAs Mimicking miR-145-5p, miR-101-3p, and miR-335-5p. Non-Coding RNA. 2023; 9(2):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ncrna9020029

Chicago/Turabian Style

Papi, Chiara, Jessica Gasparello, Matteo Zurlo, Lucia Carmela Cosenza, Roberto Gambari, and Alessia Finotti. 2023. "The Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Gene (CFTR) Is under Post-Transcriptional Control of microRNAs: Analysis of the Effects of agomiRNAs Mimicking miR-145-5p, miR-101-3p, and miR-335-5p" Non-Coding RNA 9, no. 2: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ncrna9020029

APA Style

Papi, C., Gasparello, J., Zurlo, M., Cosenza, L. C., Gambari, R., & Finotti, A. (2023). The Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Gene (CFTR) Is under Post-Transcriptional Control of microRNAs: Analysis of the Effects of agomiRNAs Mimicking miR-145-5p, miR-101-3p, and miR-335-5p. Non-Coding RNA, 9(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ncrna9020029

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop