Next Article in Journal
Compositing Fullerene-Derived Porous Carbon Fibers with Reduced Graphene Oxide for Enhanced ORR Catalytic Performance
Next Article in Special Issue
Structural and Electrochemical Characteristics of Platinum Nanoparticles Supported on Various Carbon Carriers
Previous Article in Journal
Acknowledgment to Reviewers of C in 2021
Previous Article in Special Issue
The X-ray, Raman and TEM Signatures of Cellulose-Derived Carbons Explained
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Reduced Graphene Oxide—Polycarbonate Electrodes on Different Supports for Symmetric Supercapacitors

1
TEMA—Centre for Mechanical Technology and Automation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
2
CICECO—Aveiro Institute of Materials, Department of Materials and Ceramic Engineering, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
3
V. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics at NAS of Ukraine, 03028 Kyiv, Ukraine
4
Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, FI-33101 Tampere, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 13 December 2021 / Revised: 24 January 2022 / Accepted: 31 January 2022 / Published: 2 February 2022

Abstract

:
Electrode materials for electrochemical capacitors or supercapacitors (SCs) are widely studied, as they are needed for the development of energy storage devices in electrical vehicles and flexible electronics. In the current work, a self-supported paper of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) with polycarbonate (PC) (as rGO-PC composite) was prepared by simple vacuum filtration and low-temperature annealing. rGO-PC as a freestanding single electrode was studied in a three-electrode system and presented a capacitive energy storage mechanism. To fabricate SCs based on rGO-PC, flexible polyethylene terephthalate (PET) with layers of both Cu tape (Cu tape) and carbon tape (C tape) (PET/Cu/C), as well as PET covered by graphene ink (PET/GrI), were used as supports. Fabricated flexible symmetric SCs have shown similar behavior with a higher areal capacitance value than that on PET/Cu/C substrate.

1. Introduction

Graphitic carbon monolayers were observed and studied more than several decades ago. At the beginning, in 1859, Sir Benjamin Collins Brodie described the highly lamellar structure of thermally reduced graphite oxide [1]. In 1918, the powder diffraction technique was used to study the structure of graphite, and graphite oxide “paper” was described by Kohlschütter and Haenni [2]. Later, the theory of graphene was prepared and published by Wallace in 1947 [3]. In the following year, Ruess and Vogt first showed just arrived electron microscopy images of few-layer graphite, accompanied by further observation of single graphene layers [4]. In 1986, Boehm et al. referred to a single layer of graphite or a thin layer of sp2 hybridized carbon atoms arranged in a honeycomb lattice as graphene [5]. However, it was only in 2004 that isolated graphene was reported to be obtained using the simple scotch tape method [6]. The subsequent discoveries of its unusual properties have led to an extraordinary interest amongst researchers across almost all scientific disciplines [7,8]. For instance, graphene has a high mechanical strength and a large specific surface area (2630 m2/g [9]), which makes it an ideal electrode material for energy storage devices.
Graphene oxide (GO) is a graphene-derived material that includes oxygen functional groups and, thus, has properties rather different from those of graphene. By reduction, these functional groups are removed resulting in reduced graphene oxide (rGO), which is a graphene-related material [10] that can be obtained in a much larger amount by easier ways than a monolayer of graphene. GO can be reduced by various techniques, including chemical and thermal treatments, although the former method typically requires the use of hazardous chemicals. Thus, the thermal reduction technique is the most preferred, being often used to significantly increase the electrical conductivity of rGO material [11]. Moreover, the specific surface area also increases with the reduction temperature but only up to 350 °C [12]. At the same time, the removal of functional groups at a high temperature creates defects in the carbon lattice plane, and the final properties of rGO can significantly depend on the annealing temperature [13]. The lowering of the defect concentration, as well as a significant (~two times) decrease in the lattice d-spacing, was reported to start at about 200 °C for freestanding GO papers prepared by vacuum filtration [14]. Moreover, freestanding rGO paper heat treated at 200 °C can also show a higher gravimetric or areal capacitance than rGO obtained at much higher temperatures [15].
Although rGO cannot show the same ideal structure as graphene, it can present a low enough sheet resistance from ~1000 Ω/▯ to <200 Ω/▯ [16] and chemical and thermal stability while not being as expensive as graphene. Thus, rGO is a highly acceptable material to be used in a large amount of sensors, environmental or catalytic applications as well as biological and optoelectronic devices [17]. rGO is especially intensively studied for application in energy storage devices, particularly in supercapacitors (SCs) due to its high enough specific capacitance of ~250 F/g [18] and high specific surface area (SSA) of ~1520 m2/g [19,20,21,22], although a high SSA does not guarantee the rising specific capacitance [23,24,25,26]. At the same time, the applications of rGO on flexible substrates are particularly promising [27].
Different methods have been employed for the preparation of rGO electrodes, including suspension-based vacuum filtration; electrophoretic deposition as well as that at microwaves; fiber injection; transferring; and powder-/aerogel-/hydrogel-based deposition by screen printing, gluing, dropping, covering, etc. [28,29]. For example, layer-by-layer (LBL) deposition and solution casting methods present advantages when preparing ultrathin hybrid films with a controllable thickness. However, the LBL technique lacks practical significance for the preparation of thick papers because of the complicated, time-consuming assembly process. Solution casting is another simple and easy method to assemble thin films because it only needs the evaporation of moisture from the cast dispersion on a substrate. The vacuum filtration method involves simple filtration of graphene oxide or hybrid dispersions through a microporous filter membrane with the aid of vacuum pumping, allowing the deposition of highly aligned graphene sheets [30]. Thus, vacuum filtration is also one of the easiest ways to prepare electrodes [31], although the following electrochemical analysis of these materials in supercapacitors can be difficult without additional support.
Polycarbonate (PC) is a thermoplastic polymer with enhanced thermal stability [32,33] and mechanical stiffness [34], and it is used in a wide range of applications [35], such as photonics [36], automotive and aeronautic industries [33,37]. At the same time, the composites of PC with graphene have also been widely studied as promising materials for 3D printing [38], photoactuators [39] and energy storage applications [40]. In addition, based on the studied electrochemical properties of PC [41], it can be used as a supercapacitor membrane [42,43] or as a polymer electrolyte [44,45]. It was also reported to be used after chemical recycling as activated carbon in supercapacitor electrodes [46].
However, to date, no direct use of PC alone or in a composite with rGO as an SC electrode material has been reported to the best of our knowledge. Therefore, freestanding rGO-polycarbonate paper discs were prepared by vacuum filtration and investigated here as freestanding electrodes. In addition, they were assembled onto two different substrates and encapsulated in supercapacitors for electrochemical test analysis and comparison. For that, two substrates were fast and simply prepared in the laboratory from such available and inexpensive materials as flexible polyethylene terephthalate (PET), Cu tape (Cu), carbon tape (C) and graphene ink (GrI).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Graphene Oxide Solution

A light brown graphene oxide (GO) solution (2 g per 1 L) was prepared based on the Hummer method. Commercially available natural flake graphite, sulfuric acid (99.99%), potassium permanganate (99%), hydrogen peroxide (30 wt% in H2O) and hydrochloric acid (37%) were used as received from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Taufkirchen, Germany. All aqueous solutions were prepared with deionized distilled water. GO was synthesized using the following process: 50 mL of 98% sulfuric acid was placed in a 250 mL chemical glass flask provided with a magnetic stirrer and fixed in a water bath with a small amount of added ice. Then, 2 g of graphite powder was added to the acid. After stirring for a few minutes, 6 g of dry potassium permanganate was added to the reactant mixture. Later, the mixture was heated to 35 °C and diluted with 100 mL of water for 20 min. The diluted mixture was held for 30 min at a temperature of 70 °C, followed by addition of 100 mL of water and 10 mL of 3% hydrogen peroxide. Immediately thereafter, the mixture was passed through a paper filter under evacuation. The filtered-out material was mixed with 500 mL of distilled water using a magnetic stirrer for 10 min. The GO fraction was separated from the reaction products using a centrifuge. The final product was a light brown GO solution, which did not reveal any signs of settling under further centrifuging for a prolonged time.

2.2. Preparation of rGO-PC Freestanding Electrode

The freestanding rGO-PC paper was obtained by a process similar to that described in our previous work [47] with addition of polycarbonate (PC, C15H16O2) (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Taufkirchen, Germany). Briefly, 0.5 g of PC was dissolved with 30 mL of dichloromethane (CH2Cl2, Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Taufkirchen, Germany) and mixed with GO solution at a weight ratio of 1:2 (PC:GO). Homogeneous solution was poured into a glass funnel (see Figure 1a) and filtered by laboratory vacuum pump with Millipore membrane filters (pore size = 0.45 μm, Merck Milipore, Darmstadt, Germany). Obtained wet samples (see Figure 1b) were dried at room temperature for 1 day, removed from the membrane as freestanding papers and thermally treated at 180 °C in vacuum oven (Vacutherm, Thermo Fischer Scientific GmbH, Dreieich, Germany) for 1 h, resulting in samples with areal loading of about 0.7 mg/cm2, referred to here as rGO-PC. Based on the geometrical and theoretical density values, and due to the fact that papers are freestanding, their porosity was assessed as 91%. We assessed the porosity value based on the assumption of the presence of the nominal polymer concentration in the analyzed electrode materials.

2.3. Preparation of rGO-PC-Based Supercapacitors

Two supercapacitors were prepared by laminating two electrodes together with an electrolyte and separator in between according to the scheme shown in Figure 2a. For one of them, PET (Melinex ST506 from Dupont Teijin Films, Dumfries, UK) only covered by adhesive Cu tape (Cu) (Mouser Electronics, Barcelona, Spain) and conductive carbon double-sided tape (C) (Nissin EM Co Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) using a layer-by-layer simple method resulted in PET/Cu/C substrate. rGO-PC freestanding disks were attached to the top C tape (see Figure 2a, right). Two equal PET/Cu/C/rGO-PC electrodes were used to prepare symmetric SC with a TF4050 paper separator (Nippon Kodoshi Corporation, Kochi, Japan) and 1M NaCl aqueous electrolyte. The high electrolyte concentration was selected to ensure an excess of ions such that the risk of electrolyte starvation and additional internal resistance was removed [48]. The electrodes and separator were sandwiched together with the electrolyte and sealed with an adhesive film (UPM Raflatac, Tampere, Finland). The assembly was carried out with the electrodes at 90° angle with respect to each other, forming a square-shaped supercapacitor at the electrode overlap area as shown in Figure 2b. For the electrodes of the second SC, the conductive graphite ink (GrI) (Electrodag PC407C, Acheson Industries Ltd., Cattedown, UK) was blade coated on top of the PET substrate using the mask for patterning and was subsequently cured at 120 °C for 5 min, which resulted in PET/GrI substrate. rGO-PC disk paper was placed onto Gr-ink. Two PET/GrI/rGO-PC electrodes were assembled in full device (see Figure 2c) by the method described above and checked for flexibility (see Figure 2d).

2.4. Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) profiles of the studied samples were collected at room temperature in a continuous scanning mode (step 0.02° and time 10 s) using a diffractometer (SmartLab, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) in the 2θ range from 5° to 50°. Morphology of the studied samples was analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM, SU70, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) under 15 kV acceleration voltage. Current–voltage (I–V) characteristics were measured by the four-point method in a van der Pauw configuration using a home-made cell. The single-electrode tests were performed with an AUTOLAB PGSTAT 302N potentiostat (Metrohm AG, Herisau, Switzerland) in a home-made electrochemical cell with the materials to be tested as a working electrode, a platinum wire as a counter electrode and a silver|silver sulphate (K2SO4) electrode as a reference (EAg|Ag2SO4|K2SO4 sat = 0.444 V vs. saturated calomel electrode (SCE) and 0.70 V vs. normal hydrogen electrode (NHE) at 22 °C). For the electrochemical characterization of the single electrode, a piece of the freestanding rGO-PC paper was directly connected to electrical cable as shown in Figure 1c and immersed in electrolyte in the home-made three-electrode cell presented in Figure 1d.
The supercapacitor properties were measured using a Zennium Electrochemical Workstation (Zahner Elektrik GmbH, Kronach, Germany) in a two-electrode configuration. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) from 0 to 0.9 V was used to obtain a qualitative measure of the supercapacitors. The voltage sweep rate was 100 mV/s. For the testing of supercapacitors, 1 M NaCl electrolyte was used. Galvanostatic charging/discharging (GCD) measurements were performed according to international standard IEC 62391-1:2006, Class 3 [49]. The supercapacitors were charged to 0.9 V in 1 min and held at this potential for 5 min.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Characterization of Freestanding rGO-PC Paper

The XRD profile of the vacuum-filtrated rGO-PC freestanding paper is presented in Figure 3, together with the data for the GO, bare rGO paper prepared by the same process and bare polycarbonate film obtained from the corresponding solution on glass substrate for comparison. The strong peak at ~10.4°, which is characteristic for GO, is shown in Figure 3a,b to disappear after vacuum annealing at 180 °C, while a broad rGO peak at ~24° appeared. The final composite XRD pattern includes both weak rGO response of rGO shown in Figure 3b and dominant response of PC shown in Figure 3c without any extra reflections as seen in Figure 3d. The morphology of the rGO-PC film in the plane-view SEM image is presented in Figure 3e, revealing that the components are mixed. According to the cross-section SEM micrograph shown in Figure 3f, the thickness of the composite paper is 7 ± 1 μm.

3.2. Electrochemical Characterization of Single Electrode

Before the electrochemical characterization, the I–V test was carried out on the paper as shown in Figure 4. Semimetal electrical behavior can be seen there. A difference of several orders of magnitude (from μA to A) can be found between the current values for GO (see inset of Figure 4) and rGO-PC (see Figure 4). In addition, 33 ± 3 Ω resistance was obtained with a digital multimeter when two probes were spaced at a 1 cm distance, which is low enough for electrical contact during the proposed measurements without additional support.
For the electrochemical characterization of the single electrode, rGO-PC freestanding paper was prepared as described in the Materials and Methods Section and shown in Figure 1. The self-supported rGO-PC electrode was electrochemically studied at different scan rates from 5 to 100 mV/s. Figure 5a shows the CV curves of the not ideal but quasi-rectangular shape without distinct peaks even at the highest scan rate of 100 mV/s, suggesting the absence of obvious pseudo-capacitive contribution due to oxidation and reduction but a strong capacitive energy storage mechanism typical for an electric double-layer capacitor (EDLC). The current change with the scan rate in the CV curve follows the power law shown in Equation (1) [50]:
I = a × v b
Here, i is the response current at 0.1 V, v is the scan rate, and a and b are the variable parameters. The capacitive origin of the energy storage is attributed to the parameter b value deduced from the log(i) vs. log(v) plot close to 1, while battery-type behavior is associated with its value close to 0.5. In this way, parameter b was calculated from CV in Figure 5a (as log(i) vs. log(v) plot) and found to be higher than 0.8, which supported an EDLC type of storage in the freestanding rGO-PC electrode [51,52].
The areal capacitance of the single rGO-PC electrode Ca can be calculated from CV by Equation (2):
C a = 1 A × v ×   V 2 V 1 V 1 V 2 I V d V ,
where A is the area of the electrode material; v is the potential scan rate; V2V1 is the potential window; and I(V) is the response current at voltage V under CV operation. As can be seen from Figure 1c, the studied material is slightly brittle, and some difficulties appeared during the connection of the material as the working electrode. The area of the electrode was also not easy to determine; however, it was calculated according to the graph paper (also shown in photo of Figure 1c). According to Equation (2), the areal capacitance from CV for the rGO-PC electrode was calculated as ~7.5, 3.4 and 3.1 mF/cm2 at 5, 50 and 100 mV/s, respectively (see inset of Figure 5a).
In addition, the freestanding rGO-PC was studied by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and the obtained results are presented in Figure 5b as Nyquist plots. The Nyquist plot basically contains two major impedance components: Z′ exhibits the resistive and Z″ shows the capacitive and/or inductive behavior of the electrode. The slope of the obtained results is almost but not perfectly vertical, which also supports the capacitive energy storage in the studied material [50]. The absence of a perfect vertical impedance line for the electrode could be because of some technical reason, such as penetration of the electrical signal and diffusion of ions in the deep inner parts of the rGO-PC electrodes. A slight and slow response to the electrical signal is also due to the oxygen functionalities, which, on the one hand, increase the resistivity of the electrode but, on the other hand, promote a faster diffusion of ions. The phase angle of the rGO-PC electrode is seen from the Bode plot, shown in the inset of Figure 5b to be close to −80°, which can indicate non-ideal capacitor behavior [53,54]. The characteristic frequency f0 for a phase angle of −45° is 193 Hz. This frequency marks the point at which the resistive and capacitive impedances are equal. The corresponding time constant t0 = 1/f0 equals 0.005 s, meaning that the studied material has a low frequency response (slow ion transport rate and high enough electrical resistance).

3.3. Electrochemical Characterization of Symmetric SC on Substrates

Furthermore, the prepared rGO-PC papers were assembled onto two PET-based supports to fabricate flexible SCs, and full-cell devices were electrochemically characterized. Two rGO-PC-based supercapacitors on the PET/Cu/C and PET/GrI substrates were prepared by laminating two electrodes together with an electrolyte and separator in between according to the scheme shown in the Materials and Methods Section. The supercapacitors were characterized by CV and GCD in an operating voltage window from 0 to +0.9 V in a two-electrode cell configuration to demonstrate the applicability of the facile preparation method for composite devices on flexible supports. Although the freestanding rGO-PC electrode was characterized with CV in a three-electrode cell to obtain a qualitative view of the device properties, the use of a two-electrode cell configuration should lead to more realistic results, predicting the performance of the materials in an actual application.
The CV curves for rGO-PC on PET/Cu/C and on PET/GrI are shown in Figure 6a. The CV curves for both SCs are not ideally rectangular, indicating also that the material charges and discharges quickly and efficiently. The CV of the SC made on PET/GrI is more rectangular, but its area, as well as corresponding capacitance, is smaller than that of the SC using PET/Cu/C as a support for rGO-PC. The specific capacitance of the full SC was calculated from CV using Equation (3):
C a   t o t a l = 1 2 × A × v ×   V 2 V 1 V 1 V 2 I V d V ,
where A is the work area of the electrodes (1 cm2), v is the scan rate, ∫I(V)dt is the integral area of the positive and negative sweeps of the CV curve, and V1 and V2 represent the voltage window of the charge (from 0 to +0.9 V).
Moreover, the more precise areal capacitance of the full SC was calculated from the GCD curves (Figure 6b–e) using Equation (4):
C a   t o t a l = 2 · I 2 × A · ( Δ V ) 2 t   V m a x t   V m i n V t d t ,
where ∫V(t)dt is the integral area; t(Vmax) is the initial time, at which the voltage has its maximal value and the discharge starts; and t(Vmin) is the final time, at which the discharge finishes (i.e., V = 0). Furthermore, for the symmetric SC, the capacitance of a single electrode according to the literature [55] is
C e l e c t r o d e = 4 × C   t o t a l
Based on the equations above, the areal capacitances deduced from CV for the single PET/Cu/C/rGO-PC and PET/GrI/ rGO-PC electrodes were found to be ~0.58 and 0.19 mF/cm2 at 100 mV/s, respectively. The corresponding gravimetric capacitance is 0.83 F/g and 0.27 F/g, respectively. At the same time, the areal capacitances deduced from GCD are 0.93 and 0.25 mF/cm2 at 10 μA/cm2, respectively.
Table 1 summarizes the results of this work in comparison with the literature reports on similar rGO-based systems [56,57,58,59,60]. Romero et al. reported that the areal capacitance of 0.23 mF/cm2 at 10 mV/s for infrared CO2 laser-induced graphene materials from Kapton® HN polyimide films was higher than that of 0.16 mF/cm2 for rGO obtained on PET by UV laser [56]. The rGO layers obtained through thermal treatment at 850 °C demonstrated an areal capacitance of ~2.2 mF/cm2 at 25 mV/s as can be seen in the work by Ghasemi et al. [57]. The areal capacitance of 3.51 mF/cm2 was reported by Chen et al. for an electrode fabricated by immersion of the carbon cloth into GO solution with further heat treatment [58]. Beidaghi et al. calculated ~3 mF/cm2 capacitance for rGO interdigital electrodes prepared by electrostatic spray deposition and photolithography lift-off methods [59]. Vacuum-filtrated rGO freestanding films that were chemically reduced by hydrazine hydrate were prepared by Xu et al., and an areal capacitance of ~100 mF/cm2 was reported at 0.2 mA/cm2, although it rapidly decreased with the current density increasing to ~10 mF/cm2 at 10 mA/cm2 [60]. Moreover, such a decrease, as well as the poor electrical conductivity of the pure rGO film electrode, was ascribed to its compact lamellar structure in the process of vacuum extraction, which could prevent the transmission of electrolyte ions to some extent [60]. As can be seen from Table 1, the obtained values of the areal capacitance for both SCs in the current work are slightly lower than the reported ones for graphene and rGO without PC, thus indicating that the addition of PC does not enhance electrode performance, although the rGO-PC electrodes are applicable to a flexible SC. However, the areal capacitance of rGO papers prepared by vacuum filtration was reported by Zhu et al. to strongly increase with the thickness [61] that can be used for the further study of the current materials.

4. Conclusions

In the current work, self-supported rGO paper with polycarbonate was prepared by simple vacuum filtration and low-temperature annealing. rGO-PC as a freestanding single electrode was studied in a three-electrode system and represented a capacitive energy storage mechanism. To fabricate flexible supercapacitors, inexpensive PET/Cu/C and PET/GrI were prepared by the facile method and used as flexible supports for the rGO-PC electrode active material. Fabricated flexible symmetric supercapacitors based on rGO-PC have shown similar behavior with a higher areal capacitance value than that on PET/Cu/C substrate. Improved electrochemical results are expected in further work by modifying the thickness and surface of the active material and by using an electrolyte with a wider potential window.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, data curation and writing—original draft preparation, O.O.; methodology, O.O., A.C.B. and S.T.; validation, O.O., A.C.B. and S.T.; formal analysis, A.T., A.C.B., S.T. and K.A.; resources, O.O., A.C.B. and S.T.; writing—review and editing, A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This article is funded by national funds, through FCT—Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, in the scope of the framework contract foreseen in numbers 4, 5 and 6 of article 23 of the Decree Law 57/2016, of 29 August and UIDB/00481/2020 and UIDP/00481/2020, and CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-022083—Centro Portugal Regional Operational Programme (Centro2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund. Olena Okhay acknowledges the European Consortium of Innovative Universities (ECIU) for its support with a research mobility grant to the University of Tampere. Alexander Tkach acknowledges the project CICECO Aveiro Institute of Materials (UIDB/50011/2020 and UIDP/50011/2020), financed by national funds through the FCT/MCTES and, when appropriate, co-financed by FEDER under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Jari Keskinen from Tampere University for his valuable contribution to the electrochemical measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brodie, B.C. On the Atomic Weight of Graphite. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1859, 149, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Kohlschütter, V.; Haenni, P. Zur Kenntnis des Graphitischen Kohlenstoffs und der Graphitsäure. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1918, 105, 121–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Wallace, P.R. The band theory of graphite. Phys. Rev. 1947, 71, 622–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ruess, G.; Vogt, F. Höchstlamellarer Kohlenstoff aus Graphitoxyhydroxyd. Monatsh. Chem. 1948, 78, 222–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Boehm, H.P.; Setton, R.; Stumpp, E. Nomenclature and terminology of graphite intercalation compounds. Carbon 1986, 24, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Katsnelson, M.I.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Dubonos, S.V.; Firsov, A.A. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 2005, 438, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, Y.B.; Tan, Y.W.; Stormer, H.L.; Kim, P. Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene. Nature 2005, 438, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Züttel, A.; Sudan, P.; Mauron, P.; Wenger, P. Model for the hydrogen adsorption on carbon nanostructures. Appl. Phys. A 2004, 78, 941–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sundaram, R.S. Chemically derived graphene. In Graphene: Properties, Preparation, Characterisation and Devices; Skakalova, V., Kaiser, A.B., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2014; pp. 50–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Okhay, O.; Tkach, A.; Hortiguela Gallo, M.J.; Otero-Irurueta, G.; Mikhalev, S.; Staitic, P.; Lufrano, F. Energy storage of supercapacitor electrodes on carbon cloth enhanced by graphene oxide aerogel reducing conditions. J. Energy Storage 2020, 32, 101839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sengupta, I.; Chakraborty, S.; Talukdar, M.; Pal, S.K.; Chakraborty, S. Thermal reduction of graphene oxide: How temperature influences purity. J. Mater. Res. 2018, 33, 4113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ganguly, A.; Sharma, S.; Papakonstantinou, P.; Hamilton, J. Probing the Thermal Deoxygenation of Graphene Oxide Using High-Resolution In situ X-ray-Based Spectroscopies. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 17009–17019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Ramamoorthy, H.; Buapan, K.; Chiawchan, T.; Thamkrongart, K.; Somphonsane, R. Exploration of the temperature-dependent correlations present in the structural, morphological and electrical properties of thermally reduced free-standing graphene oxide papers. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 15134–15150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tamboli, S.H.; Seok Kim, B.; Choi, G.; Lee, H.; Lee, D.; Patil, U.M.; Lim, J.; Kulkarni, S.B.; Chan Jun, S.; Hee Cho, H. Post-heating effects on the physical and electrochemical capacitive properties of reduced graphene oxide paper. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 5077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Karthick, R.; Brindha, M.; Selvaraj, M.; Ramu, S. Stable colloidal dispersion of functionalized reduced graphene oxide in aqueous medium for transparent conductive film. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 406, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tarcan, R.; Todor-Boer, O.; Petrovai, I.; Leordean, C.; Astilean, S.; Botiz, I. Reduced graphene oxide today. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 1198–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, C.; Yu, Z.; Neff, D.; Zhamu, A.; Jang, B.Z. Graphene-based supercapacitor with an ultrahigh energy density. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 4863–4868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. El-Kady, M.F.; Strong, V.; Dubin, S.; Kaner, R.B. Laser scribing of high-performance and flexible graphene-based electrochemical capacitors. Science 2012, 335, 1326–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. El-Kady, M.; Shao, Y.; Kaner, R. Graphene for batteries, supercapacitors and beyond. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ke, Q.; Wang, J. Graphene-based materials for supercapacitor electrodes—A review. J. Mater. 2016, 2, 37–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Lemine, A.S.; Zagho, M.M.; Altahtamouni, T.M.; Bensalah, N. Graphene a promising electrode material for supercapacitors—A review. Int. J. Energy Res. 2018, 42, 4284–4300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zuliani, J.E.; Tong, S.; Jia, C.Q.; Kirk, D.W. Contribution of surface oxygen groups to the measured capacitance of porous carbon supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2018, 395, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, J.; Tang, J.; Yuan, J.; Zhang, K.; Yu, X.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, H.; Qin, L.-C. Porous carbon nanotube/graphene composites for high-performance supercapacitors. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2018, 693, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, Z.-D.; Zhang, B.; Liang, R.; Zheng, Q.-B.; Oh, S.W.; Lin, X.Y.; Yousefi, N.; Kim, J.K. Effects of reduction process and carbon nanotube content on the supercapacitive performance of flexible graphene oxide papers. Carbon 2012, 50, 4239–4251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alazmi, A.; El Tall, O.; Rasul, S.; Hedhili, M.N.; Patole, S.P.; Costa, P.M.F.J. A process to enhance the specific surface area and capacitance of hydrothermally reduced graphene oxide. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 17782–17787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dubal, D.P.; Kim, J.G.; Kim, Y.; Holze, R.; Lokhande, C.D.; Kim, W.B. Supercapacitors based on flexible substrates: An overview. Energy Technol. 2014, 2, 325–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Faruque, M.A.A.; Syduzzaman, M.; Sarkar, J.; Bilisik, K.; Naebe, M. A review on the production methods and applications of graphene materials. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, L.; Zhang, D.; Deng, J.; Fang, J.; Gou, Y. Review—Preparation and application of graphene-based hybrid materials through electrochemical exfoliation. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 086511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, S.; Hu, K.; Cerruti, M.; Barthelat, F. Ultra-stiff graphene oxide paper prepared by directed-flow vacuum filtration. Carbon 2020, 158, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, S.; Li, M.; Wu, X.; Yu, S.H.; Zhang, W.; Luo, J.; Wang, J.; Geng, Y.; Gou, Q.; Sun, K. Graphene-based free-standing bendable films: Designs, fabrications, and applications. Mater. Today Adv. 2020, 6, 100060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, Z.; Chen, X.; Zhang, C.; Baer, E.; Langhe, D.; Ponting, M.; Zhu, L. High dielectric constant polycarbonate/nylon multilayer films capacitors with self-healing capability. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2019, 1, 867–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Legrand, G.D.; Bendler, G.T. Handbook of Polycarbonate Science and Technology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  34. Singh, J.; Bansal, S.A.; Singh, A.P. Mechanical Characterization of Polycarbonate-Graphene Oxide (PCG) Nanocomposite. In Advances in Production and Industrial Engineering; Pandey, M., Ed.; Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.: Singapore, 2021; pp. 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yoon, S.-H.; Jung, H.-T. Grafting polycarbonate onto graphene nanosheets: Synthesis and characterization of high performance polycarbonate–graphene nanocomposites for ESD/EMI applications. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 45902–45910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Li, D.; Del Rio Castillo, A.E.; Jussila, H.; Ye, G.; Ren, Z.; Bai, J.; Chen, X.; Lipsanen, H.; Sun, Z.; Bonaccorso, F. Black phosphorus polycarbonate polymer composite for pulsed fibre lasers. Appl. Mater. Today 2016, 4, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Sasaki, H.; Hamanaka, I.; Takahashi, Y.; Kawaguchi, T. Effect of reinforcement on the flexural properties of injection-molded thermoplastic denture base resins. J. Prosthodont. 2015, 26, 302–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lago, E.; Toth, P.S.; Pugliese, G.; Pellegrini, V.; Bonaccorso, F. Solution blending preparation of polycarbonate/graphene composite: Boosting the mechanical and electrical properties. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 97931–97940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Leeladhar, P.; Raturi, J.P. Singh. Sunlight-driven eco-friendly smart curtain based on infrared responsive graphene oxide-polymer photoactuators. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Yadav, A.; Kumar Yadav, D.; Kumar Mishra, J.; Sahu, R.; Jain, S.K.; Dixit, S.; Agarwal, G.; Jakhar, N.; Tripath, B. Effect of BaTiO3 Nanofillers on the Energy Storage Performance of Polymer Nanocomposites. Macromol. Symp. 2021, 399, 2100024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rogal’skii, S.P.; Pud, A.A.; Shapoval, G.S.; Mel’nik, A.F.; Bryk, M.T. Nature of Initiators for Indirect Electrochemical Reductive Degradation of Polycarbonates in Dimethylformamide. Theor. Exp. Chem. 2004, 40, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhu, D.; Hou, J.; Zhang, L.; Gao, Y.; Dai, B.; Lian, Y.; Yan, H.; Zhang, H. Microbial Porous Carbon by Low-Alkali Activation for Flexible Supercapacitors. J. Electron. Mater. 2021, 50, 6733–6740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wu, Y.; Yan, M.; Sun, L.; Shi, W. Flexible yolk-shelled NiCo2S4 hollow spheres/RGO film electrodes for efficient supercapacitive energy storage. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 16174–16182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Saito, K.; Jehanno, C.; Meabe, L.; Olmedo-Martínez, J.L.; Mecerreyes, D.; Fukushima, K.; Sardon, H. From plastic waste to polymer electrolytes for batteries through chemical upcycling of polycarbonate. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 13921–13926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Matsumoto, M.; Uno, T.; Kubo, M.; Itoh, T. Polymer electrolytes based on polycarbonates and their electrochemical and thermal properties. Ionics 2013, 19, 615–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Farzana, R.; Rajarao, R.; Bhat, B.R.; Sahajwalla, V. Performance of an activated carbon supercapacitor electrode synthesised from waste Compact Discs (CDs). J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2018, 65, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Okhay, O.; Gonçalves, G.; Dias, C.; Ventura, J.; Vieira, E.M.F.; Gonçalves, L.M.V.; Tkach, A. Tuning electrical and thermoelectric properties of freestanding graphene oxide papers by carbon nanotubes and heat treatment. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 781, 196–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pell, W.; Conway, B.; Marincic, N. Analysis of non-uniform charge/discharge and rate effects in porous carbon capacitors containing sub-optimal electrolyte concentrations. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2000, 491, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. IEC-62391-2. Fixed Electric Double Layer Capacitors for Use in Electronic Equipment—Part 2: Sectional Specification—Electric Double Layer Capacitors Fpr Power Application, 1st ed. International Standard, International Electrochemical Commission, ICS Codes 31.060.10. Available online: https://webstore.iec.ch/preview/info_iec62391-1%7Bed1.0%7Den.pdf (accessed on 10 April 2006).
  50. Mathis, T.S.; Kurra, N.; Wang, X.; Pinto, D.; Simon, P.; Gogotsi, Y. Energy storage data reporting in perspective-guidelines for interpreting the performance of electrochemical energy storage systems. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1902007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gogotsi, Y.; Penner, R.M. Energy storage in nanomaterials-capacitive, pseudocapacitive, or battery-like? ACS Nano 2018, 12, 2081–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Okhay, O.; Tkach, A. Graphene/reduced graphene oxide-carbon nanotubes composite electrodes: From capacitive to battery-type behaviour. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Paleo, A.J.; Staiti, P.; Rocha, A.M.; Squadrito, G.; Lufrano, F. Lifetime assessment of solid-state hybrid supercapacitors based on cotton fabric electrodes. J. Power Sources 2019, 434, 226735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Park, H.; Ambade, R.B.; Noh, S.H.; Eom, W.; Koh, K.H.; Ambade, S.B.; Lee, W.J.; Kim, S.H.; Han, T.H. Porous graphene-carbon nanotube scaffolds for fiber supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 9011–9022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tuukkanen, S.; Krebs, M. Printable power storage: Batteries and supercapacitors. In Organic and Printed Electronics, 1st ed.; Nisato, G., Lupo, D., Ganz, S., Eds.; Jenny Stanford Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 265–291. [Google Scholar]
  56. Romero, F.J.; Gerardo, D.; Romero, R.; Ortiz-Gomez, I.; Salinas-Castillo, A.; Moraila-Martinez, C.L.; Rodriguez, N.; Morales, D.P. Comparison of laser-synthetized nanographene-based electrodes for flexible supercapacitors. Micromachines 2020, 11, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ghasemi, F.; Jalali, M.; Abdollahi, A.; Mohammadi, S.; Sanaee, Z.; Mohajerzadeh, S. A high performance supercapacitor based on decoration of MoS2/reduced graphene oxide with NiO nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 52772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Chen, Y.; Bai, J.; Yang, D.; Sun, P.; Li, X. Excellent performance of flexible supercapacitor based on the ternary composites of reduced graphene oxide/molybdenum disulfide/poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). Electrochim. Acta 2020, 330, 135205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Beidaghi, M.; Wang, C. Micro-supercapacitors based on interdigital electrodes of reduced graphene oxide and carbon nanotube composites with ultrahigh power handling performance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 4501–4510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Xu, L.; Li, Y.; Jia, M.; Zhao, Q.; Jin, X.; Yao, C. Synthesis and characterization of free-standing activated carbon/reduced graphene oxide film electrodes for flexible supercapacitors. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 45066–45074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Zhu, J.; Zu, J.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Pei, M.; Xu, Y. Self-assembled reduced graphene oxide films with different thicknesses as high performance supercapacitor electrodes. J. Energy Storage 2020, 32, 101795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Digital photographs of glass funnel for vacuum filtration (a), vet sample after vacuum filtration of solution through PVDF membrane (b), rGO-PC paper connected to electrode (c) and home-made electrochemical cell used for the measurements of the single electrode in electrolyte (d).
Figure 1. Digital photographs of glass funnel for vacuum filtration (a), vet sample after vacuum filtration of solution through PVDF membrane (b), rGO-PC paper connected to electrode (c) and home-made electrochemical cell used for the measurements of the single electrode in electrolyte (d).
Carbon 08 00012 g001
Figure 2. The structure of the assembled supercapacitor (a) and digital photographs of SCs on PET with Cu and C tapes (b) and PET with graphite ink (c). Image of the fabricated SC presenting its flexibility (d).
Figure 2. The structure of the assembled supercapacitor (a) and digital photographs of SCs on PET with Cu and C tapes (b) and PET with graphite ink (c). Image of the fabricated SC presenting its flexibility (d).
Carbon 08 00012 g002
Figure 3. XRD profiles of GO (a), rGO after heat treatment at 180 °C (b), PC film on glass substrate (c) and rGO-PC freestanding paper prepared by vacuum filtration (d). SEM images of plan view (e) and cross-section (f) of rGO-PC paper.
Figure 3. XRD profiles of GO (a), rGO after heat treatment at 180 °C (b), PC film on glass substrate (c) and rGO-PC freestanding paper prepared by vacuum filtration (d). SEM images of plan view (e) and cross-section (f) of rGO-PC paper.
Carbon 08 00012 g003
Figure 4. I–V plot of rGO-PC freestanding paper at 5 cycling measurements. Inset shows I–V of GO paper.
Figure 4. I–V plot of rGO-PC freestanding paper at 5 cycling measurements. Inset shows I–V of GO paper.
Carbon 08 00012 g004
Figure 5. CV of single rGO-PC electrode measured at different scan rates (a) and calculated areal capacitances (inset). Nyquist plot of single rGO-PC electrode (b) and corresponding Bode plot (inset).
Figure 5. CV of single rGO-PC electrode measured at different scan rates (a) and calculated areal capacitances (inset). Nyquist plot of single rGO-PC electrode (b) and corresponding Bode plot (inset).
Carbon 08 00012 g005
Figure 6. CV measured at 100 mV/s on symmetric supercapacitors made of rGO-PC active material assembled on PET with Cu and C tapes (open symbols) and PET with graphite ink (solid symbols) (a). GCD measured at 10 μA/cm2 on SC made of rGO-PC active material assembled on PET with Cu and C tapes (b) and PET with graphite ink (c). Comparative figure of single GCD curves at 10 μA/cm2 for both SCs (d,e).
Figure 6. CV measured at 100 mV/s on symmetric supercapacitors made of rGO-PC active material assembled on PET with Cu and C tapes (open symbols) and PET with graphite ink (solid symbols) (a). GCD measured at 10 μA/cm2 on SC made of rGO-PC active material assembled on PET with Cu and C tapes (b) and PET with graphite ink (c). Comparative figure of single GCD curves at 10 μA/cm2 for both SCs (d,e).
Carbon 08 00012 g006
Table 1. The literature data for areal capacitance of rGO-based SC electrodes for comparison with the results of this work.
Table 1. The literature data for areal capacitance of rGO-based SC electrodes for comparison with the results of this work.
ElectrodeElectrolyteArea CapacitanceReference
rGO-PC, vacuum filtration,
placed on PET/Cu/C
NaCl0.93 mF/cm2 at 10 μA/cm2This work
rGO-PC, vacuum filtration,
placed on PET/GrI
NaCl0.25 mF/cm2 at 10 μA/cm2This work
Graphene, laser synthetized on KaptonH3PO4-PVA0.23 mF/cm2 at 10 mV/s[56]
rGO, placed on Si substrateKCl~2.2 mF/cm2 at 25 mV/s[57]
rGO, covered on carbon clothH2SO43.5 mF/cm2 at 0.5 mA/cm2[58]
rGO, interdigital microelectrode arraysKCl3 mF/cm2[59]
rGO, vacuum filtrationH2SO4-PVA~10 mF/cm2 at 10 mA/cm2[60]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Okhay, O.; Bastos, A.C.; Andreeva, K.; Tuukkanen, S.; Tkach, A. Reduced Graphene Oxide—Polycarbonate Electrodes on Different Supports for Symmetric Supercapacitors. C 2022, 8, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/c8010012

AMA Style

Okhay O, Bastos AC, Andreeva K, Tuukkanen S, Tkach A. Reduced Graphene Oxide—Polycarbonate Electrodes on Different Supports for Symmetric Supercapacitors. C. 2022; 8(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/c8010012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Okhay, Olena, Alexandre Cunha Bastos, Kateryna Andreeva, Sampo Tuukkanen, and Alexander Tkach. 2022. "Reduced Graphene Oxide—Polycarbonate Electrodes on Different Supports for Symmetric Supercapacitors" C 8, no. 1: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/c8010012

APA Style

Okhay, O., Bastos, A. C., Andreeva, K., Tuukkanen, S., & Tkach, A. (2022). Reduced Graphene Oxide—Polycarbonate Electrodes on Different Supports for Symmetric Supercapacitors. C, 8(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/c8010012

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop