Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
A Novel Strategy for Further Enhancing Superior Properties of Thermophilic Endoglucanase from Acidomyces richmondensis
Previous Article in Journal
Denitrification Capacity of Volatile Fatty Acids from Sludge Fermentation: Lab-Scale Testing and Full-Scale Assessment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improved Cellulase Production of Trichoderma reesei by Regulating Mycelium Morphology

1
College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, No. 9, 13 Street, Tianjin Economic and Technological Development Zone, Tianjin 300457, China
2
Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Technology Innovation Center of Synthetic Biology, No. 32, Xiqi Road, Tianjin Airport Economic Park, Tianjin 300308, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Fermentation 2024, 10(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10010026
Submission received: 28 November 2023 / Revised: 22 December 2023 / Accepted: 26 December 2023 / Published: 28 December 2023

Abstract

:
The small GTPases of the Rho family are known to regulate various biological processes in filamentous fungi. In this study, we investigated the impact of deleting Rho proteins on the growth and cellulase production of Trichoderma reesei. Our findings revealed that deletion of cdc42 led to the most severe growth defect and impaired cellulase production. Conversely, overexpression of cdc42 resulted in a hyperbranched phenotype, significantly enhancing cellulase production. Furthermore, the cdc42-overexpressing (OCdc42) strain showed an increased expression of multiple cellulase genes and Rho GTPase genes. Analysis of the secretome in the OCdc42 strain unveiled an increased abundance and diversity of extracellular proteins compared to the parent strain. These discoveries provide valuable insights into the functionality of Rho GTPases in T. reesei and offer potential targets for engineering fungi to improve plant biomass deconstruction in biorefineries.

1. Introduction

Filamentous fungi are highly efficient microorganisms for industrial protein production due to their remarkable ability to express and secrete large amounts of protein [1]. They are widely utilized in the production of enzyme products, which play a crucial role in the food processing and bioenergy industries. Among these fungi, Trichoderma reesei stands out as a leading producer of cellulase. Protein secretion in filamentous fungi is closely linked to hyphal tip growth [2]. The rapid growth of mycelium requires constant synthesis of cell walls and the transport of cell membrane components, organelles, and vesicles. Establishing and maintaining cellular polar growth is crucial to facilitate the apical secretion of extracellular protein [3]. Extensive research has demonstrated that hyperbranching is associated with an enhanced capacity for protein secretion by increasing the number of tips [4,5]. Additionally, the hyperbranched phenotype leads to lower viscosity during liquid/solid fermentation, thereby improving the availability of dissolved oxygen and subsequently increasing protein yield [6,7].
The Ras homologue (Rho) proteins, which belong to the Ras GTPase superfamily, play crucial roles in various biological processes, including metabolism, morphogenesis, cell polarity, cytoskeletal organization, and gene expression. Rho GTPases are highly conserved in all eukaryotes, with a total of 20 members identified [8]. Among these members, RhoA, RhoB, RhoC, RhoD, RacA, and Cdc42 are typically the most dominant in filamentous fungi [9]. RhoA has been extensively studied as a key regulator of polarity establishment and cell viability [9,10,11,12,13,14]. RhoB is involved in various processes in different fungal species. RhoB is implicated in sporulation and cell wall integrity in Aspergillus niger [9]. In Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, RhoB is involved in conidial germination, septum formation, cell wall integrity, and chitin distribution [15]. In Ashbya gossypii, RhoB is associated with tip-branching [16]. In Magnaporthe oryzae, RhoB is involved in the morphological development of appressoria and virulence [17]. RhoB also contributes to cell wall integrity in Neurospora crassa, Arthrobotrys oligospora, and Fusarium graminearum [13,14,18]. While RhoC had no obvious function in A. niger [9], its homolog is involved in growth, conidiation, and virulence in Botrytis cinerea [19], secretion process in T. reesei [20], appressorium formation and polar growth in M. oryzae [21], and vegetative growth and conidiation in F. graminearum [14], as well as cell polarity and hyphal morphogenesis in A. gossypii [10]. RhoD is required for sporulation, septum formation, and cell wall integrity in A. niger and A. nidulans [9,22], hyphal growth, conidiation, and septum formation in F. graminearum [14], septum formation, hyphal tip growth, and possibly cell wall integrity in N. crassa [23,24], and cell wall integrity and virulence in Colletotrichum graminicola [25].
RacA and Cdc42 collectively maintain cell polarity, as simultaneous deletion of RacA and Cdc42 is lethal in A. niger, Ustilago maydis, and N. crassa [9,26,27]. RacA and Cdc42 display both overlapping and independent functions. Deletion of racA in A. niger, Colletotrichum scovillei, Claviceps purpurea, Aspergillus fumigatus, Nomuraea rileyi, Magnaporthe grisea, F. graminearum, A. oligospora, Epichloë festucae, N. crassa, Aspergillus flavus, and T. reesei results in increased hyphal branching, growth defect, and/or loss of cell polarity [9,18,26,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. However, the loss of Cdc42 does not significantly affect hyphal morphogenesis in A. niger [9]. In contrast, Cdc42 plays a major role in hyphal morphogenesis and establishment of hyphal polarity, while Rac1 is largely dispensable in A. nidulans [39,40]. Cdc42 is involved in diverse biological processes in filamentous fungi, such as polarity establishment in Penicillium marneffei [41], A. gossypii [10], Schizophyllum commune [42], and N. crassa [26], and growth or morphological development in U. maydis [27], Colletotrichum trifolii [43], C. purpurea [44], C. gloeosporioides [45], E. festucae [36], N. crassa [46], A. oligospora [18], F. graminearum [14], and B. cinerea [47], as well as cytokinesis [27], virulence [31,34,43,44,47], conidiation [14,34], germination [43,47], reactive oxygen species (ROS) production [18,31,32,34,43,45], and pyruvate metabolism [48]. However, the specific effects of Cdc42 on morphology and protein production in T. reesei have not been investigated.
In this study, the function of Cdc42 and other small GTPase members was investigated in T. reesei. In particular, the effect of cdc42 overexpression on fungal growth, hyphal branching, cellulase gene expression, and protein production was investigated. Our findings provide new insights into the function of Ras GTPase in cellulolytic filamentous fungi and provide potential targets for optimizing fungal strains for more efficient and cost-effective biomass conversion in biorefineries.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Strains, Media, and Cultivation Conditions

Trichoderma reesei strain A2H, which exhibits a high cellulase production phenotype, was obtained by ARTP (atmospheric and room temperature plasma) mutagenesis in our laboratory [49]. This strain was preserved at the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC 21470) and was used as a parent strain in this study. T. reesei strains were cultured at 30 °C for 7 days to obtain conidia. The growth medium consisted of 2% glucose, 1.5% KH2PO4, 0.5% (NH4)2SO4, 0.06% CaCl2, and 0.06% MgSO4. For the inoculum medium, 2% Avicel, 0.2% glucose, and 1.7% corn steep liquor were used. Medium pH was adjusted to 4.5 with 2 M KOH. For fermentation, the conidia of T. reesei were inoculated into 100 mL of medium consisting of 3.3% Avicel, 1.7% corn steep liquor, 0.6% KH2PO4, 0.5% (NH4)2SO4, 0.1% MgSO4, 0.25% glycerol, 0.25% CaCO3, and 0.1% Tween-80 (pH 5.0, adjusted with 2 M KOH) in a 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask. Selection medium (30 g/L malt extract, 182 g/L sorbitol, 20 g/L agarose) was used for screening transformants after protoplast transformation.

2.2. Plasmid Construction

The primers used in this study are listed in Table S1. For gene deletion, the 1-kb regions upstream of the start codon of cdc42 (TRIREDRAFT_50335), cla4 (TRIREDRAFT_71315), ras1 (TRIREDRAFT_120150), ras2 (TRIREDRAFT_110960), spa2 (TRIREDRAFT_108829), rho1 (TRIREDRAFT_119871), and rac1 (TRIREDRAFT_47055) were amplified from the genome of T. reesei using primers cdc42-up-F/R, cla4-up-F/R, ras1-up-F/R, ras2-up-F/R, spa2-up-F/R, rho1-up-F/R, and rac1-up-F/R, respectively. And the 1-kb regions downstream of the corresponding genes were amplified using primers cdc42-down-F/R, cla4-down-F/R, ras1-down-F/R, ras2-down-F/R, spa2-down-F/R, rho1-down-F/R, and rac1-down-F/R, respectively. The hygromycin B-resistance gene (hph) was amplified from plasmid pCamhybgfp1 (GenBank accession no. KX223837) using primers hph-F/R. The upstream (5’) and downstream (3’) region of each gene and hph fragment were assembled into the pEASY-Blunt Simple cloning vector (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) using the ClonExpress Ultra One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China). The 5’-hph-3’ cassette was amplified using primers M13F/M13R and used for protoplast transformation of the A2H strain.
For overexpression of cdc42, the promoter region of tef1a (TRIREDRAFT_46958) (Ptef1) and the terminator region of egl1 (cel7b, TRIREDRAFT_122081) (Tegl1) were amplified from T. reesei genomic DNA with the primers Ptef-F/Ptef-R and Tegl1-F/R, respectively. The open reading frame (ORF) of cdc42 was amplified from T. reesei cDNA using primers cdc42-F/cdc42-R. The 2A peptide-coding sequence and the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) gene were amplified from the plasmid Ptef1-MhGlaA-9 × His-2A-GFP-TtrpC [50] using primers 2A-F/eGFP-R. These fragments were then assembled into the pEASY-Blunt Simple cloning vector. The Ptef1-cdc42-2A-eGFP-Tegl1 cassette was amplified with primers Ptef-F/Tegl1-R and used for protoplast transformation of the A2H strain.

2.3. PEG-Mediated Transformation of T. reesei

Conidia of T. reesei were harvested and inoculated into 100 mL of growth medium. After incubation at 28 °C with shaking (180 rpm) for 18 h, mycelia were harvested and used for preparing the protoplasts. Protoplasts of T. reesei were prepared as previously described [51]. The transformed protoplasts were either grown for 3–4 days on selection medium at 28 °C, with selection for hph resistance using hygromycin B (50 µg/mL), or they were screened by flow cytometry analysis.

2.4. Screening of Transformants by Flow Cytometry Analysis

The transformed protoplasts were grown overnight in 20 mL liquid growth medium supplemented with 1 M sorbitol. The freshly regenerated hyphae were harvested, rinsed, and suspended in 3 mL of 0.05% (w/v) Tween 80. After filtration through a 70 μm Cell Strainer (Wuxi NEST Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China), hyphae were sorted using a MoFlo™ XDP cell sorter (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA). Fluorescence-based screening was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Single hyphae with the brightest GFP signal were sorted into individual wells (each well contained 150 μL of growth medium) of 96-deep-well plates and incubated at 28 °C with shaking (130 rpm) for 48 h. The transformants were then reexamined to pick up those with the brightest GFP signal.

2.5. Growth Test

Approximate 1 × 106 spores of strains were inoculated on PDA and minimal medium supplemented with soluble starch, sucrose, glucose, and Avicel. Photos were taken after culture at 30 °C for 5 days.

2.6. Protein and Enzyme Assays

Extracellular proteins were determined by SDS-PAGE analysis. Protein concentrations were estimated using a Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). FPase activity was measured as previously described [52]. The β-glucanase activity of the culture supernatants was detected as previously described [53] using 1.0% carboxymethylcellulose sodium (CMC-Na) as the substrate. One unit (U) of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that released 1 μmol of glucose per minute.

2.7. RNA Isolation and Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Fungal mycelia were harvested, washed, and frozen. They were then ground under liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was isolated using an RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (TIANGEN Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The removal of genomic DNA was confirmed by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). cDNA synthesis was performed using a TransScript® Uni All-in-One First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix for qPCR (TransGen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assays were performed as previously described [54]. Primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Table S1. Samples were analyzed in three independent experiments. The relative expression levels of the target genes were standardized against the levels of β-actin gene using the 2−ΔΔCT method [55].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Deletion of cdc42 Leads to Growth Defect and Impaired Cellulase Production

Ras homology (RHO) GTPases are signaling proteins that play a critical role in various biological functions, such as cell polar growth and cell morphogenesis. In filamentous fungi, the activity of these enzymes is particularly important in controlling hyphal morphogenesis, a crucial aspect of fungal development. The hyperproducing cellulase mutant T. reesei A2H was obtained from the parent strain RUT C30 using diethyl sulfite (DES) mutagenesis in our laboratory [49]. The expression of seven genes that have previously been reported to be involved in the branching process (cla4, rho1, spa2, rac1, ras1, ras2, and cdc42) was analyzed. Previous work suggested that the downregulation of these genes may contribute to the highly branched hyphae in the DES-15 strain [54].
The expression levels of cla4, ras1, ras2, spa2, rho1, cdc42, and rac1 were significantly decreased in the A2H strain compared to the parental RUT C30 strain. To investigate the role of these genes in mycelial growth, each of these genes was deleted in the T. reesei A2H strain. Compared to the parental A2H strain, all deletion strains exhibited smaller colony sizes on the PDA plate (Figure 1A). These findings provide additional support for the essential role of these genes in hyphal growth in ascomycetous fungi. Interestingly, the Δcdc42 mutant exhibited a significant reduction in elongation rate and formed smaller but thicker colonies compared to the other mutants (Figure 1A). In addition, the Δcdc42 mutant showed the most significant decrease in cellulase activity (Figure 1B). This suggests that Cdc42 may be involved not only in the regulation of mycelial morphology but also in cellulase production. Cdc42 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is essential for regulating and organizing the actin cytoskeleton, which is required for directed plasma membrane and maintenance of cell polarity [56]. Cdc42 in filamentous fungi played a similar function during isotropic spreading and was restricted to the bud during the polar extension. However, mutations in genes that maintain polarity often lead to a split mycelial tip in filamentous fungi, a phenotype that has no analog in yeast. Among them, cdc42 is a key gene involved in the establishment and maintenance of cell polarity. In this study, the knockout of cdc42 resulted in a significant reduction in hyphal elongation, smaller colony size, and slower hyphal growth. The delay and variation in spore polarization could be attributed to the crucial role of cdc42 in establishing polarity, while other genes such as cla4, ras2, ras1, spa2, rho1, and rac1 are involved in maintaining polarity.

3.2. Cdc42 Function in Polarized Apical Growth and Branching

The hyphae of the Δcdc42 mutant also appeared to be more linear and less branched than those of the parent strain (Figure 1A). To further investigate the role of Cdc42, we constructed a cdc42 overexpression cassette and introduced it into the T. reesei A2H strain. To conveniently screen out the positive transformants, we designed a co-expression system of Cdc42 and eGFP using the 2A peptide [57]. The 2A peptide is a self-cleaving peptide that enables the simultaneous production of eGFP and Cdc42. The transformed protoplasts with the highest GFP fluorescence were selected using a flow cytometer (Figure S1). One of the transformants with the highest GFP signal after re-assessment was selected as a cdc42-overexpressing strain (OCdc42). The OCdc42 strain grew better than the A2H strain on PDA medium and on Avicel (Figure 2A). After 72 h of cultivation in a glucose-containing medium, the hyphal branching of the parent strain and the OCdc42 strain were recorded. The results showed that the OCdc42 strain exhibited a higher frequency of hyphal branching (23–56 µm/tips) compared to the parent strain (73–114 µm/tips) (Figure 2B,C), leading to an increased number of mycelial tips which may in turn promote enzyme production.

3.3. Enhanced Protein Secretion and Cellulase Genes Expression in OCdc42 Strain

Cellulase production is one of the most important cellular processes for T. reesei, as this fungus is widely known for its exceptional capacity to produce significant amounts of cellulases [58]. In this regard, the OCdc42 strain shows a significant increase in the secretion of extracellular proteins by 50.2% (13.7 ± 0.4 g/L vs. 9.1 ± 0.7 g/L, p < 0.001) (Figure 3A,B), along with a 20.9% increase in FPAase activity (5.2 ± 0.3 U/mL vs. 4.3 ± 0.1 U/mL, p < 0.01) (Figure 3C), and a 39.1% increase in endoglucanase activity (46.1 ± 2.0 U/mL vs. 33.1± 1.7 U/mL, p < 0.001) (Figure 3D), compared to the control. These observations strongly suggest that Cdc42 plays an important role in the production of cellulase.
Multiple transcription factors are responsible for the regulation of cellulase and xylanase genes [58]. In cellulase-hyperproducing strains of T. reesei, the expression of transcription factors and genes involved in cellulase production is usually upregulated, resulting in high cellulase production [59]. For example, the transcript abundance of xyr1 and cbh1 was significantly higher in the industrial cellulase-hyperproducing strain T. reesei CL847 than in its parent strain RUT C30 [60]. Consistent with the elevated cellulase production (Figure 3), the expression levels of multiple cellulase genes, including cel7b (TRIREDRAFT_122081), cel3a (TRIREDRAFT_76672), cel3d (TRIREDRAFT_46816), cel3c (TRIREDRAFT_82227), cel1a (TRIREDRAFT_120749), cel45a (TRIREDRAFT_49976), cel12a (TRIREDRAFT_123232), cel61a (TRIREDRAFT_73643), gh31-1 (TRIREDRAFT_82235), and bxl1 (TRIREDRAFT_121127) in the OCdc42 strain, are significantly higher than that in the A2H strain (Figure 4).
Meanwhile, the proliferation of hyphal branches stimulates the synthesis of secreted proteins. Consequently, a notable increase in extracellular protein levels was observed in the cdc42-overexpressing strain (OCdc42). Notably, the OCdc42 strain exhibited a faster growth rate than its parent strain. Furthermore, the OCdc42 strain generated larger and more transparent circles on cellulose medium, indicating a notable advantage in enzyme production. In addition, the major cellulase genes were significantly upregulated in the OCdc42 strain, indicating its involvement in the regulation of cellulase gene expression. The identification of the downstream components of the Cdc42 pathway in cellulase gene expression will be a critical step in understanding the regulatory mechanisms involved in cellulase production.

3.4. Exoproteome Analysis of Secreted Proteins

SDS-PAGE analysis revealed a significant retention of certain bands in the OCdc42 strain compared to the A2H strain (Figure 3A). To investigate the differences in the secretomes of the OCdc42 and A2H strains, we further delineated the proteome by identification of extracellular proteins in the supernatants of 3-day Avicel cultures through LC-MS/MS analysis. A total of 54 proteins were detected in the OCdc42 strain, whereas only 30 proteins were identified in the A2H strain (Table S2). In the secretome analyses, 29 proteins were common to both strains (Figure 5A), of which 24 proteins showed increased abundance in the OCdc42 strain (Figure 5B, Table S2). Notably, 25 proteins were exclusively secreted by the OCdc42 strain, including 1 cell wall protein, 23 CAZymes, and 1 superoxide dismutase. The OCdc42 strain exhibits enhanced protein secretion, which aligns with its superior growth on Avicel medium (Figure 2A) and increased enzymatic activity (Figure 3).
These observed changes are likely to play a significant role in enhancing the protein secretion capacity of the OCdc42 strain during submerged cultivation. It is widely accepted that protein secretion by filamentous fungi occurs primarily at the young hyphal tips [61]. This result was consistent with previous studies showing that the process of branching results in the emergence of more growing tips which are crucial for protein secretion [62].

3.5. Mechanism of Regulation of Morphogenesis of T. reesei via Rho GTPases

In addition, the expression levels of cla4, ras2, ras1, spa2, rho1, and rac1 are also upregulated in the OCdc42 strain (Figure 6), indicating that Cdc42 is involved in multiple cellular processes. This result was consistent with a previous study suggesting that in T. reesei, Ras1 or Ras2 may interact with Cdc42 to regulate the process of filamentous growth [63]. Ras2 signals via the Cdc42 cascade to regulate cell elongation and cell adhesion, ultimately controlling the filamentous growth in S. cerevisiae [64]. By regulating the transcription level of cdc42, it can influence the transcription level of other Rho GTPases such as Cla4, Ras2, Ras1, Spa2, Rho1, and Rac1. The interaction between Cdc42 and other Rho GTPases in T. reesei may be a mutual cross-linking relationship rather than a hierarchical upstream-downstream response relationship.
Rho GTPases are crucial binary switches in signaling pathways that transmit signals from the external environment to the nucleus, regulating cell proliferation, growth, and differentiation in various eukaryotes, from humans to yeast [65]. The regulation of morphogenesis through signaling pathways, such as cAMP signaling or MAP kinase signaling, is of great interest. In the mutant with a deletion for TrRas2, it was observed that there was no change in cAMP levels on cellulose or glucose, indicating that the effect of TrRas2 on cellulase gene transcription was not dependent on the cAMP signaling pathway [63].
By studying S. cerevisiae as an analog, we identified homologs of the MAP kinase signaling components involved in filamentous growth in the T. reesei genome, including TrSte20 (TRIREDRAFT_104364), TrSte11 (TRIREDRAFT_4945), TrSte7 (TRIREDRAFT_75872), and TrSte12 (TRIREDRAFT_36543). Interestingly, we observed a 3.6, 2.9, 5.3, and 4.8-fold transcriptional upregulation of TrSte20, TrSte11, TrSte7, and TrSte12, respectively, in the OCdc42 strain compared to the parent strain A2H.
This suggests that the MAP kinase signaling pathway, rather than the cAMP signaling pathway, mediated by Cdc42 and other Rho GTPases in T. reesei, plays a role in the modulation of cellulase gene expression by regulating the transcription of transcription regulators for cellulase gene expression. As a molecular switch, Cdc42 responds to extracellular stimuli by transitioning from an inactive state (GDP-bound) to an active state (GTP-bound). This activation, in turn, regulates the polar growth of cells. Furthermore, Cdc42 positively regulates the MAPK pathway through positive feedback, thereby promoting hyphal formation [66].

4. Conclusions

Cellulase expression in filamentous fungi is a complex process in response to different environmental signals, with still unknown transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. Identification of novel factors affecting cellulase production is essential for improving the efficiency and yield of cellulase enzymes in T. reesei. Our study demonstrates that modulation of the Rho GTPase Cdc42 in T. reesei has a significant impact on both mycelial morphology and cellulase production. Deletion of cdc42 resulted in impaired growth and reduced cellulase production, while overexpression of cdc42 led to hyperbranched mycelium and enhanced cellulase production. This improvement in cellulase production was accompanied by the upregulation of cellulase genes and Rho GTPase genes. Additionally, secretome analysis reveals an increased abundance and diversity of extracellular proteins in the cdc42-overexpressing strain. These findings provide valuable insights into the functional role of Rho GTPases in T. reesei and present potential targets for engineering fungi to enhance the conversion of plant biomass in biorefineries. While this study has demonstrated the effect of cdc42 overexpression on fungal characteristics, it is important to note that the underlying molecular processes and mechanisms have not been extensively explored. Future research should aim to delve deeper into elucidating the precise molecular mechanisms by which downstream factors of Cdc42 regulate fungal growth, hyphal branching, cellulase gene expression, and protein production in T. reesei.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fermentation10010026/s1, Figure S1: GFP fluorescence-based sorting of cdc42-overexpressing protoplasts by flow cytometry; Table S1: Primers used in this study; Table S2: Proteome dataset of A2H and OCdc42 strains.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.J. and L.G.; methodology, F.J., J.T. and Q.C.; software, F.J.; validation, S.W., T.B. and L.M.; formal analysis, F.J., J.T. and J.L.; investigation, J.Y., Q.C., L.M. and L.G.; resources, L.M. and L.G.; data curation, J.Y. and L.M.; writing—original draft preparation, F.J. and J.T.; writing—review and editing, J.L., L.M. and L.G.; visualization, L.M.; supervision, L.M. and L.G.; project administration, L.M. and L.G.; funding acquisition, L.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDC0110304); Jilin Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences Science and Technology Cooperation High-tech Industrialization Fund Project (2022SYHZ0015, 2022SYHZ0019).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Peterson, R.; Nevalainen, H. Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30—Thirty years of strain improvement. Microbiology 2012, 158, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Higuchi, Y. Membrane traffic in Aspergillus oryzae and related filamentous fungi. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Takeshita, N. Coordinated process of polarized growth in filamentous fungi. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2016, 80, 1693–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fiedler, M.R.M.; Barthel, L.; Kubisch, C.; Nai, C.; Meyer, V. Construction of an improved Aspergillus niger platform for enhanced glucoamylase secretion. Microb. Cell Factories 2018, 17, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. te Biesebeke, R.; Record, E.; van Biezen, N.; Heerikhuisen, M.; Franken, A.; Punt, P.J.; van den Hondel, C.A.M.J.J. Branching mutants of Aspergillus oryzae with improved amylase and protease production on solid substrates. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 69, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lin, L.; Sun, Z.; Li, J.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Q.; Sun, W.; Tian, C. Disruption of gul-1 decreased the culture viscosity and improved protein secretion in the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Microb. Cell Factories 2018, 17, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bocking, S.P.; Wiebe, M.G.; Robson, G.D.; Hansen, K.; Christiansen, L.H.; Trinci, A.P. Effect of branch frequency in Aspergillus oryzae on protein secretion and culture viscosity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1999, 65, 638–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Murali, A.; Rajalingam, K. Small Rho GTPases in the control of cell shape and mobility. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71, 1703–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kwon, M.J.; Arentshorst, M.; Roos, E.D.; van den Hondel, C.A.; Meyer, V.; Ram, A.F. Functional characterization of Rho GTPases in Aspergillus niger uncovers conserved and diverged roles of Rho proteins within filamentous fungi. Mol. Microbiol. 2011, 79, 1151–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wendland, J.; Philippsen, P. Cell polarity and hyphal morphogenesis are controlled by multiple Rho-protein modules in the filamentous ascomycete Ashbya gossypii. Genetics 2001, 157, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guest, G.M.; Lin, X.; Momany, M. Aspergillus nidulans RhoA is involved in polar growth, branching, and cell wall synthesis. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2004, 41, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pham, C.D.; Yu, Z.; Sandrock, B.; Bölker, M.; Gold, S.E.; Perlin, M.H. Ustilago maydis Rho1 and 14-3-3 homologues participate in pathways controlling cell separation and cell polarity. Eukaryot. Cells 2009, 8, 977–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Richthammer, C.; Enseleit, M.; Sanchez-Leon, E.; März, S.; Heilig, Y.; Riquelme, M.; Seiler, S. RHO1 and RHO2 share partially overlapping functions in the regulation of cell wall integrity and hyphal polarity in Neurospora crassa. Mol. Microbiol. 2012, 85, 716–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, C.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhai, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, W.; Zheng, W.; Yu, W.; Zhou, J.; Lu, G.; et al. Functional characterization of Rho family small GTPases in Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2013, 61, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Xu, X.; Wang, Y.; Tian, C.; Liang, Y. The Colletotrichum gloeosporioides RhoB regulates cAMP and stress response pathways and is required for pathogenesis. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2016, 96, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nordmann, D.; Lickfeld, M.; Warnsmann, V.; Wiechert, J.; Jendretzki, A.; Schmitz, H.P. The small GTP-binding proteins AgRho2 and AgRho5 regulate tip-branching, maintenance of the growth axis and actin-ring-integrity in the filamentous fungus Ashbya gossypii. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e106236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fu, T.; Kim, J.O.; Han, J.H.; Gumilang, A.; Lee, Y.H.; Kim, K.S. A small GTPase RHO2 plays an important role in pre-infection development in the rice blast pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant Pathol. J. 2018, 34, 470–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, L.; Li, X.; Bai, N.; Yang, X.; Zhang, K.Q.; Yang, J. Transcriptomic analysis reveals that Rho GTPases regulate trap development and lifestyle transition of the nematode-trapping fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0175921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. An, B.; Li, B.; Qin, G.; Tian, S. Function of small GTPase Rho3 in regulating growth, conidiation and virulence of Botrytis cinerea. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2015, 75, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vasara, T.; Salusjärvi, L.; Raudaskoski, M.; Keränen, S.; Penttilä, M.; Saloheimo, M. Interactions of the Trichoderma reesei rho3 with the secretory pathway in yeast and, T. reesei. Mol. Microbiol. 2001, 42, 1349–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Q.; Chen, X.; Lin, L.; Zhang, L.; Wang, L.; Bao, J.; Zhang, D. Transcriptomic dynamics of active and inactive states of Rho GTPase MoRho3 in Magnaporthe oryzae. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Si, H.; Justa-Schuch, D.; Seiler, S.; Harris, S.D. Regulation of septum formation by the Bud3-Rho4 GTPase module in Aspergillus nidulans. Genetics 2010, 185, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rasmussen, C.G.; Glass, N.L. A Rho-type GTPase, rho-4, is required for septation in Neurospora crassa. Eukaryot. Cells 2005, 4, 1913–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rasmussen, C.G.; Morgenstein, R.M.; Peck, S.; Glass, N.L. Lack of the GTPase RHO-4 in Neurospora crassa causes a reduction in numbers and aberrant stabilization of microtubules at hyphal tips. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2008, 45, 1027–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Oliveira-Garcia, E.; Aliyeva-Schnorr, L.; De Oliveira Silva, A.; El Din Ghanem, S.; Thor, K.; Peiter, E.; Deising, H.B. The small Ras superfamily GTPase Rho4 of the maize anthracnose fungus Colletotrichum graminicola is required for β-1,3-glucan synthesis, cell wall integrity, and full virulence. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Araujo-Palomares, C.L.; Richthammer, C.; Seiler, S.; Castro-Longoria, E. Functional characterization and cellular dynamics of the CDC-42-RAC-CDC-24 module in Neurospora crassa. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e27148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mahlert, M.; Leveleki, L.; Hlubek, A.; Sandrock, B.; Bölker, M. Rac1 and Cdc42 regulate hyphal growth and cytokinesis in the dimorphic fungus Ustilago maydis. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 59, 567–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rolke, Y.; Tudzynski, P. The small GTPase Rac and the p21-activated kinase Cla4 in Claviceps purpurea: Interaction and impact on polarity, development and pathogenicity. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 68, 405–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fitz, E.; Gamauf, C.; Seiboth, B.; Wanka, F. Deletion of the small GTPase rac1 in Trichoderma reesei provokes hyperbranching and impacts growth and cellulase production. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2019, 6, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, N.H.; Fu, T.; Shin, J.H.; Song, Y.W.; Jang, D.C.; Kim, K.S. The small GTPase CsRAC1 is important for fungal development and pepper anthracnose in Colletotrichum scovillei. Plant Pathol. J. 2021, 37, 607–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, H.; Barker, B.M.; Grahl, N.; Puttikamonkul, S.; Bell, J.D.; Craven, K.D.; Cramer, R.A. The small GTPase RacA mediates intracellular reactive oxygen species production, polarized growth, and virulence in the human fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryot. Cells 2011, 10, 174–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chi, M.H.; Craven, K.D. RacA-mediated ROS signaling is required for polarized cell differentiation in conidiogenesis of Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, J.; Zheng, W.; Zheng, S.; Zhang, D.; Sang, W.; Chen, X.; Li, G.; Lu, G.; Wang, Z. Rac1 is required for pathogenicity and Chm1-dependent conidiogenesis in rice fungal pathogen Magnaporthe grisea. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jiang, S.S.; Yin, Y.P.; Song, Z.Y.; Zhou, G.L.; Wang, Z.K. RacA and Cdc42 regulate polarized growth and microsclerotium formation in the dimorphic fungus Nomuraea rileyi. Res. Microbiol. 2014, 165, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tanaka, A.; Takemoto, D.; Hyon, G.S.; Park, P.; Scott, B. NoxA activation by the small GTPase RacA is required to maintain a mutualistic symbiotic association between Epichloë festucae and perennial ryegrass. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 68, 1165–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kayano, Y.; Tanaka, A.; Takemoto, D. Two closely related Rho GTPases, Cdc42 and RacA, of the en-dophytic fungus Epichloë festucae have contrasting roles for ROS production and symbiotic infection synchronized with the host plant. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1006840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kwon, M.J.; Nitsche, B.M.; Arentshorst, M.; Jørgensen, T.R.; Ram, A.F.; Meyer, V. The transcriptomic signature of RacA activation and inactivation provides new insights into the morphogenetic network of Aspergillus niger. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Qin, L.; Yang, L.; Zhao, J.; Zeng, W.; Su, M.; Wang, S.; Yuan, J. GTPase Rac regulates conidiation, AFB1 production and stress response in pathogenic fungus Aspergillus flavus. Toxins 2022, 14, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Virag, A.; Lee, M.P.; Si, H.; Harris, S.D. Regulation of hyphal morphogenesis by cdc42 and rac1 homologues in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 66, 1579–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Si, H.; Rittenour, W.R.; Harris, S.D. Roles of Aspergillus nidulans Cdc42/Rho GTPase regulators in hyphal morphogenesis and development. Mycologia 2016, 108, 543–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Boyce, K.J.; Hynes, M.J.; Andrianopoulos, A. The CDC42 homolog of the dimorphic fungus Penicillium marneffei is required for correct cell polarization during growth but not development. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 3447–3457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Weber, M.; Salo, V.; Uuskallio, M.; Raudaskoski, M. Ectopic expression of a constitutively active Cdc42 small GTPase alters the morphology of haploid and dikaryotic hyphae in the filamentous homobasidiomycete Schizophyllum commune. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2005, 42, 624–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chen, C.; Ha, Y.S.; Min, J.Y.; Memmott, S.D.; Dickman, M.B. Cdc42 is required for proper growth and development in the fungal pathogen Colletotrichum trifolii. Eukaryot. Cells 2006, 5, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Scheffer, J.; Chen, C.; Heidrich, P.; Dickman, M.B.; Tudzynski, P. A CDC42 homologue in Claviceps purpurea is involved in vegetative differentiation and is essential for pathogenicity. Eukaryot. Cells 2005, 4, 1228–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, X.; Xu, X.; Liang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Tian, C. A Cdc42 homolog in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides regulates morphological development and is required for ROS-mediated plant infection. Curr. Genet. 2018, 64, 1153–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lichius, A.; Goryachev, A.B.; Fricker, M.D.; Obara, B.; Castro-Longoria, E.; Read, N.D. CDC-42 and RAC-1 regulate opposite chemotropisms in Neurospora crassa. J. Cell. Sci. 2014, 127, 1953–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kokkelink, L.; Minz, A.; Al-Masri, M.; Giesbert, S.; Barakat, R.; Sharon, A.; Tudzynski, P. The small GTPase BcCdc42 affects nuclear division, germination and virulence of the gray mold fungus Botrytis cinerea. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2011, 48, 1012–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Guan, Y.; Wang, D.; Lin, X.; Li, X.; Lv, C.; Wang, D.; Zhang, L. Unveiling a novel role of Cdc42 in pyruvate metabolism pathway to mediate insecticidal activity of Beauveria bassiana. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. He, R.; Ding, R.; Heyman, J.A.; Zhang, D.; Tu, R. Ultra-high-throughput picoliter-droplet microfluidics screening of the industrial cellulase-producing filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 46, 1603–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, F.; Liu, Q.; Li, X.; Zhang, C.; Li, J.; Sun, W.; Liu, D.; Xiao, D.; Tian, C. Construction of a new thermophilic fungus Myceliophthora thermophila platform for enzyme production using a versatile 2A peptide strategy combined with efficient CRISPR-Cas9 system. Biotechnol. Lett. 2020, 42, 1181–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, J.; Wang, X.; Zou, J.; Yang, K.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Huang, H.; Su, X.; Yao, B.; et al. Identification and characterization of the determinants of copper resistance in the acidophilic fungus Acidomyces richmondensis MEY-1 using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2023, 89, e0210722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Xu, X.; Li, J.; Shi, P.; Ji, W.; Liu, B.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, B.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, W. The use of T-DNA insertional mutagenesis to improve cellulase production by the thermophilic fungus Humicola insolens Y1. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Li, J.; Xu, X.; Shi, P.; Liu, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, W. Overexpression and characterization of a novel endo-β-1,3(4)-glucanase from thermophilic fungus Humicola insolens Y1. Protein Expr. Purif. 2017, 138, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. He, R.; Li, C.; Ma, L.; Zhang, D.; Chen, S. Effect of highly branched hyphal morphology on the enhanced production of cellulase in Trichoderma reesei DES-15. 3 Biotech 2016, 6, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Momany, M. Polarity in filamentous fungi: Establishment, maintenance and new axes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2002, 5, 580–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Subramanian, V.; Schuster, L.A.; Moore, K.T.; Taylor, L.E.; Baker, J.O.; Vander Wall, T.A.; Linger, J.G.; Himmel, M.E.; Decker, S.R. A versatile 2A peptide-based bicistronic protein expressing platform for the industrial cellulase producing fungus, Trichoderma reesei. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2017, 10, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bischof, R.H.; Ramoni, J.; Seiboth, B. Cellulases and beyond: The first 70 years of the enzyme producer Trichoderma reesei. Microb. Cell Factories 2016, 15, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sun, X.; Liang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, T.; Yao, B.; Luo, H.; Huang, H.; Su, X. Simultaneous manipulation of multiple genes within a same regulatory stage for iterative evolution of Trichoderma reesei. Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod. 2022, 15, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Portnoy, T.; Margeot, A.; Seidl-Seiboth, V.; Le Crom, S.; Ben Chaabane, F.; Linke, R.; Seiboth, B.; Kubicek, C.P. Differential regulation of the cellulase transcription factors XYR1, ACE2, and ACE1 in Trichoderma reesei strains producing high and low levels of cellulase. Eukaryot. Cells 2011, 10, 262–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gordon, C.L.; Archer, D.B.; Jeenes, D.J.; Doonan, J.H.; Wells, B.; Trinci, A.P.; Robson, G.D. A glucoamylase::GFP gene fusion to study protein secretion by individual hyphae of Aspergillus niger. J. Microbiol. Methods 2000, 42, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Peberdy, J.F. Protein secretion in filamentous fungi-trying to understand a highly productive black box. Trends Biotechnol. 1994, 12, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Qu, Y.; Wang, T. Ras GTPases modulate morphogenesis, sporulation and cellulase gene expression in the cellulolytic fungus Trichoderma reesei. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Mösch, H.U.; Kübler, E.; Krappmann, S.; Fink, G.R.; Braus, G.H. Crosstalk between the Ras2p-controlled mitogen-activated protein kinase and cAMP pathways during invasive growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1999, 10, 1325–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lowy, D.R.; Willumsen, B.M. Function and regulation of ras. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1993, 62, 851–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pérez, P.; Soto, T.; Gómez-Gil, E.; Cansado, J. Functional interaction between Cdc42 and the stress MAPK signaling pathway during the regulation of fission yeast polarized growth. Int. Microbiol. 2020, 23, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Characterization of gene deletion mutants for cla4, ras2, ras1, spa2, rho1, cdc42, and rac1. (A) Growth of the parent strain A2H and gene deletion mutants on PDA medium for 5 days at 30 °C. (B) Filter paper activity of the parent strain A2H and gene deletion mutants.
Figure 1. Characterization of gene deletion mutants for cla4, ras2, ras1, spa2, rho1, cdc42, and rac1. (A) Growth of the parent strain A2H and gene deletion mutants on PDA medium for 5 days at 30 °C. (B) Filter paper activity of the parent strain A2H and gene deletion mutants.
Fermentation 10 00026 g001
Figure 2. Overexpression of cdc42 results in hyper branching. (A) Growth of A2H strain and OCdc42 strain on different medium. (B) Mycelial branching of A2H strain and OCdc42 strain. (C) The hyphal growth unit (Lhgu, the ratio of total mycelial length to total number of hyphal tips) of the A2H strain (blue) and OCdc42 strain (red). *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Overexpression of cdc42 results in hyper branching. (A) Growth of A2H strain and OCdc42 strain on different medium. (B) Mycelial branching of A2H strain and OCdc42 strain. (C) The hyphal growth unit (Lhgu, the ratio of total mycelial length to total number of hyphal tips) of the A2H strain (blue) and OCdc42 strain (red). *** p < 0.001.
Fermentation 10 00026 g002
Figure 3. Overexpression of cdc42 results in elevated protein secretion. (A) SDS-PAGE of proteins secreted by the A2H strain and OCdc42 strain. (B) Extracellular protein concentration in culture supernatants of A2H and OCdc42 strains after 4 days of growth in 2% (w/v) Avicel medium. (C) Filter paper activity (FPA) in culture supernatants of A2H and OCdc42 strains. (D) Endoglucanase activity in culture supernatants of A2H and OCdc42 strains. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3. Overexpression of cdc42 results in elevated protein secretion. (A) SDS-PAGE of proteins secreted by the A2H strain and OCdc42 strain. (B) Extracellular protein concentration in culture supernatants of A2H and OCdc42 strains after 4 days of growth in 2% (w/v) Avicel medium. (C) Filter paper activity (FPA) in culture supernatants of A2H and OCdc42 strains. (D) Endoglucanase activity in culture supernatants of A2H and OCdc42 strains. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Fermentation 10 00026 g003
Figure 4. Expression levels of various cellulase genes in A2H and OCdc42 strains.
Figure 4. Expression levels of various cellulase genes in A2H and OCdc42 strains.
Fermentation 10 00026 g004
Figure 5. Comparative proteomic analyses between A2H and OCdc42 strains. (A) Comparison of secretomes from culture supernatants of A2H (lime) and OCdc42 strains (red). (B) Relative abundance of secreted proteins in the supernatants of cultures of A2H and OCdc42 strains. Detailed information about the abundance is shown in Table S2 in the Supplemental Material.
Figure 5. Comparative proteomic analyses between A2H and OCdc42 strains. (A) Comparison of secretomes from culture supernatants of A2H (lime) and OCdc42 strains (red). (B) Relative abundance of secreted proteins in the supernatants of cultures of A2H and OCdc42 strains. Detailed information about the abundance is shown in Table S2 in the Supplemental Material.
Fermentation 10 00026 g005
Figure 6. Expression levels of various branching-related genes in A2H and OCdc42 strains.
Figure 6. Expression levels of various branching-related genes in A2H and OCdc42 strains.
Fermentation 10 00026 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, F.; Tian, J.; Yuan, J.; Wang, S.; Bao, T.; Chen, Q.; Gao, L.; Li, J.; Ma, L. Improved Cellulase Production of Trichoderma reesei by Regulating Mycelium Morphology. Fermentation 2024, 10, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10010026

AMA Style

Jiang F, Tian J, Yuan J, Wang S, Bao T, Chen Q, Gao L, Li J, Ma L. Improved Cellulase Production of Trichoderma reesei by Regulating Mycelium Morphology. Fermentation. 2024; 10(1):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10010026

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Fangting, Jiudong Tian, Jie Yuan, Shengjie Wang, Tongtong Bao, Qiuhui Chen, Le Gao, Jinyang Li, and Lijuan Ma. 2024. "Improved Cellulase Production of Trichoderma reesei by Regulating Mycelium Morphology" Fermentation 10, no. 1: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10010026

APA Style

Jiang, F., Tian, J., Yuan, J., Wang, S., Bao, T., Chen, Q., Gao, L., Li, J., & Ma, L. (2024). Improved Cellulase Production of Trichoderma reesei by Regulating Mycelium Morphology. Fermentation, 10(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10010026

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop