Next Article in Journal
Effects of One-Step Abrupt Temperature Change on Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Kitchen Waste with Dewatered Sludge
Next Article in Special Issue
Cloning Systems in Bacillus: Bioengineering of Metabolic Pathways for Valuable Recombinant Products
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Impact of Fermentation on Brown Rice: Health Benefits and Value-Added Foods—A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Screening Bacterial Strains Capable of Producing 2,3-Butanediol: Process Optimization and High Diol Production by Klebsiella oxytoca FMCC-197
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Physiogenomic Study of the Tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Isoamyl Alcohol

1
Key Laboratory of Shandong Microbial Engineering, School of Bioengineering, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250353, China
2
School of Life Sciences and Medicine, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2024, 10(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10010004
Submission received: 22 November 2023 / Revised: 16 December 2023 / Accepted: 18 December 2023 / Published: 20 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Research on Strains Improvement and Microbial Biosynthesis)

Abstract

:
Isoamyl alcohol is a clear, unpleasantly odorous, colorless liquid of higher alcohol that emits a fruity aroma when heavily diluted. It has received much attention in recent years as a new fuel with a high energy density. Isoamyl alcohol can be produced industrially by microbial fermentation. Still, its toxicity to host cells has limited its potential for industrial production, and the molecular mechanism of its toxic effects has not yet been elucidated. In this study, RNA-Seq technology was used to analyze the transcripts of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under normal conditions and in the presence of isoamyl alcohol (0.5 g/L and 2.5 g/L). The results showed that the expression of the cell wall (CCW12, BGL2, NCW2 and SUN4), cell membrane (ELO1, ERG2, FAA1, and OPI3), translation and other structural genes were significantly down-regulated. The expression of genes related to ATP biosynthesis, NADPH biosynthesis (ZWF1), and metal ion transport (PMC1) proteins were up-regulated. Strains with key genes knocked out were cultured without isoamyl alcohol. Combined results suggested that isoamyl alcohol may affect cell wall stability and cell membrane fluidity, and the expression of genes related to ion homeostasis and energy production may play a protective role against isoamyl alcohol stress. By maintaining cell wall stability/membrane fluidity under isoamyl alcohol pressure, improving certain ion homeostasis, and generating energy/NADPH, it is possible to overcome the toxicity of isoamyl alcohol in industrial fermentation processes to a certain extent.

1. Introduction

Isoamyl alcohol is a colorless liquid with an unpleasant odor, which produces a pleasant fruity aroma when highly diluted [1]. Isoamyl alcohol, as a new type of fuel, has higher energy density and lower moisture absorption ability compared with ethanol and other traditional fuels. Along with other higher alcohols, isoamyl alcohol has received a lot of attention [2]. Isoamyl alcohol as an alcohol fuel itself has the advantages of cleanliness, renewable, higher energy density with ethanol, lower water solubility, better mixing with traditional fuels, better adaptability with traditional engines and more convenient transportation and storage, all of which indicate that isoamyl alcohol as a new energy fuel has good potential, the development of isoamyl alcohol as a new fuel will help to achieve energy diversification [3]. The majority of studies on higher alcohol biosynthesis are carried out in prokaryotic hosts, such as Escherichia coli (E. coli) [4]. However, E. coli is not a microorganism that spontaneously produces higher alcohols, and it is also not tolerant to higher alcohols, causing growth retardation at concentrations as low as 1% v/v [5].
In recent years, there have been increasing strategies to improve isoamyl alcohol production using S. cerevisiae as host cells [6], because S. cerevisiae itself produces isoamyl alcohol through the leucine degradation pathway (Figure S1) [3]. S. cerevisiae is widely used in the biotechnology industry and is generally considered safe due to its fully sequenced genome and well-characterized metabolic pathway [7]. There are several ways to increase isoamyl alcohol production using S. cerevisiae as a host cell, the main approaches include using plasmid-based systems to overexpress pathway-specific genes [8], eliminating competing pathways and resolving cofactor imbalance [9]. An artificial protein scaffold was used to pull dihydroxy dehydrase and α -IPM synthetase to their closest proximity, and the results showed a more than 2-fold increase in isoamyl alcohol production, with the best producer yielding 522.76 ± 38.88 mg/L [10]. This yield was much higher than that of E. coli as host cells, but the final output is still far short of industrial production standards [4]. It is speculated that the reason for this result is the toxicity of isoamyl alcohol to S. cerevisiae.
Many previous studies have confirmed the inhibitory effect of alcohol on the growth and reproduction of S. cerevisiae. Among them, ethanol has been studied the most. Too high a concentration of ethanol will affect cell structure, mitochondrial enzyme activity, plasma membrane, and cell wall components, and eventually inhibit cell growth and even lead to cell death [11,12]. Similar results have been found for higher alcohols, toxicity being a key issue in the actual production of biobutanol [11]. Whether high concentration of isoamyl alcohol can have irreversible effects on the cell structure and physiological state of S. cerevisiae remains unclear, and no relevant literature has been published. Possibly because isoamyl alcohol was previously considered as a secondary metabolite of S. cerevisiae [10], its inhibitory effect on S. cerevisiae has not been studied. However, if S. cerevisiae is used to produce isoamyl alcohol, this problem cannot be circumvented.
In this study, S. cerevisiae was cultured under different concentrations of isoamyl alcohol stress to determine whether isoamyl alcohol has toxicity to S. cerevisiae and the magnitude of toxicit [13]. In addition, transcriptome analysis was used to determine the functional genes that play a key role under isoamyl alcohol pressure, and the knockout strains of related genes were further cultured and verified to prove whether these key genes play important roles under isoamyl alcohol stress.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Yeast Strains

The YKO library is also called “yeast knockout strains open biosystems”, which are S. cerevisiae BY4741 with a genotype of his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0. Each single deletion mutant also contains a unique tag, “barcodes”. For our screening experiment, we used the YKO MATa Strain Collection, which contains 5155 unique ORFs made in the BY4741 (his31 leu20 ura30 met150) background [14]. The knockout strains used in this experiment are shown in Table 1.

2.2. Media

YPD liquid and solid media: Bacto-yeast extract 1% (w/v), Bacto-peptone 2% (w/v), Glucose 2% (w/v), Geneticine (500 × G418, for knockout genes). Minimal synthetic media: Bacto-yeast nitrogen base w/o Amino acids, w/o Ammonium sulfate 0.17% (w/v), Ammonium sulphate 0.5% (w/v), Glucose 2% (w/v), and amino acid mixture.

2.3. Isoamyl Alcohol Tolerance Experiment

Preculture was obtained from a single colony that was inoculated into 20 mL YPD liquid medium and incubated overnight (16 h) at 30 °C, 200 rpm. After activation, the strains were cultured at 30 °C and 200 rpm in liquid YPD medium with different isoamyl alcohol concentrations of 0 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 1.5 g/L, 2.5 g/L, 3.5 g/L and 4.5 g/L. A spectrophotometer was used to monitor the growth at 600 nm every hour and calculate the specific growth rate. All experiments were set up in triplicate.

2.4. RNA-seq

Two different concentrations of isoamyl alcohol were used besides the control condition without isoamyl alcohol: (i) 0.5 g/L, assumed to be a ‘non-inhibitory concentration’ (ii) 2.5 g/L, assumed to be an ‘inhibitory concentration’. The expression level of the gene was calculated by RSEM (v1.2.12), and differential expression analysis was performed using the DESeq2 (v1.4.5).

2.5. Genetic Targets Verification

Petri dishes containing YPD agar medium with an isoamyl alcohol concentration of 0 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 1.5 g/L, 2.5 g/L, 3.5 g/L, and 4.5 g/L were inoculated at initial OD600 of 1 and several dilutions. Cultures were carried out at 30 °C and observed and photographed every 4 h.

2.6. GO

Gene Ontology (GO) is an internationally standardized gene functional classification system that provides a dynamically updated controlled vocabulary to comprehensively describe the attributes of genes and gene products in living organisms. GO has a total of three ontologies, which describe the molecular function of genes, cellular components, and biological processes involved. The basic unit of GO is the term, and each term corresponds to an attribute.
Based on the GO annotation results and official classification, differentially expressed genes are functionally classified, and enrichment analysis is performed using the phyper function in R software to calculate pvalue. PValue is then corrected for FDR and functions with Q value ≤ 0.05 are typically considered significantly enriched. Enriching up-regulated genes and down-regulated genes separately to obtain relevant GOterms, and analyzing the ones with a higher number of gene enrichment.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Tolerance Test

The hourly absorbance of S. cerevisiae BY4741 in YPD liquid medium with different concentrations of isoamyl alcohol is shown in Table S1. The growth curves of WT BY4741 under different concentrations of Isoamyl alcohol are shown in Figure S2. with the specific growth rate ( μ ) under different concentrations determined. The specific growth rate of S. cerevisiae under different isoamyl alcohol concentrations was plotted as Figure 1a. It can be seen that the growth of S. cerevisiae under the pressure of isoamyl alcohol was significantly inhibited. When the isoamyl alcohol concentration reached 0.5 g/L, the specific growth rate was 97% of that at 0 g/L; at an isoamyl alcohol concentration of 2.5 g/L, the specific growth rate was 74.8% of that at 0 g/L; when the isoamyl alcohol concentration was 4.5 g/L, the growth rate of S. cerevisiae was 50% lower.
By observing the growth state of BY4741 in the solid medium in Figure 1b, we found that the inhibition effect was more obvious at the concentration of 2.5 g/L and almost no colony growth at the concentration of 5 g/L. We considered that there was sufficient nutrition in a liquid medium, and the yeast did not show sensitivity to isoamyl alcohol in a short time, so in the follow-up experiment, we selected three isoamyl alcohol concentration gradients of 0 g/L, 0.5 g/L, and 2.5 g/L for transcriptome analysis.

3.2. Transcriptome Analysis

The repression of isoamyl alcohol on the growth and metabolism of S. cerevisiae is the bottleneck of industrial production of microbial fermentation. Functional enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes in S. cerevisiae under isoamyl alcohol stress was performed by RNA-Seq (Table S2), and the GO terms found, then GO enrichment analysis was analyzed (Figure 2). In light of these results, we have selected several terms that we believe to be important for the vital activity of S. cerevisiae, such as cell wall, cell membrane, metal ion transport, vesicles, and mitochondria, for a further in-depth discussion.

3.3. Cell Wall

The S. cerevisiae cell wall accounts for approximately 15–30% of the dry weight. The inner layer is mainly composed of β -1,3-glucan chain (80–90%), β -1,6-glucan chain (8–18%) and a small amount of chitin chain (1–2%) [15]. Due to the helical nature of the β -1,3-glucan chain, this layer is primarily responsible for the mechanical strength and elasticity of the cell wall [16]. As shown in Table 2, the genes with significant differences in mannose and glucan GO enrichment were down-regulated genes. Moreover, the down-regulated functional genes are mainly related to biosynthesis, such as BGL2, FKS1, EXG1, which are all β -1,3-glucan biosynthetase regulatory genes. However, the expression of some genes related to chitin is up-regulated, and the blocked expression of BGL2 gene also will lead to increased chitin content in the cell wall. Therefore, we speculated under isoamyl alcohol pressure in the cell wall that the amount of mannose and glucan decreased and the amount of chitin increased, leading to a weakening in the mechanical strength and protection of the cell wall.
As shown in Table 2, the genes involved in mannose-related structural components of the cell wall with high and significant differences in expression are CIS3, SRL1, TIP1, CCW12, and same as genes related to chitin (UTR2), glucan (EXG1, KNH1, SUN4, BGL2, SCW10), All of these genes were down-regulated under isoamyl alcohol stress, and it is assumed that cell wall-related genes were inhibited as sensitive genes under isoamyl alcohol stress, leading to chemical changes in the cell wall structure and impaired biogenesis and maintenance mechanisms, thus affecting the permeability of the cell wall and further affecting yeast cell growth and reproduction.
Among the glucan-related enriched genes, we found an interesting gene, NCW2. Previous studies have shown that NCW2, a functional gene involved in cell wall integrity (CWI) regulon [17] participate in cell wall repair, is usually up-regulated when the cell wall is stimulated [18]. In most cases, NCW2 is up-regulated when the cell wall is stimulated by external stimuli, such as when yeast cells are exposed to PHMB, the gene shows a 7-fold up-regulation growth; it also shows slight up-regulation under high concentration ethanol stress; osmotic stress, heat stress, and acid stress do not alter the expression of NCW2 gene, while gene expression is continuously down-regulated under isoamyl stress. However, under isoamyl alcohol stress, the expression of NCW2 was continuously down-regulated. The key functional genes in the CWI signaling pathway such as SLT2, RLM1, ROM2, RHO1, PKC1, BCK1, MKK1, and SLT2 were up-regulated under isoamyl alcohol stress [19]. We predicted that the signaling pathway of CWI was still activated under isoamyl alcohol stress, but the expression of NCW2 was specifically inhibited by isoamyl alcohol, failing to synthesize or assemble the substances that repair cell wall structure and endow cell rigidity.
Based on the above analysis, we selected four potential genes (CCW12, BGL2, SUN4, NCW2) that may be strongly affected by isoamyl alcohol, further study about strain ccw12Δ, bgl2Δ, sun4Δ, ncw2Δ under isoamyl alcohol stress was carried out.

3.4. Cell Membrane

Ethanol can disrupt proton homeostasis by increasing membrane fluidity, reducing membrane integrity, and increasing ion permeability. Similar to ethanol, 1-butanol affects membrane lipid composition and nutrient transport in addition to inhibiting the initiation of translation. By demonstrating that the addition of a certain amount of fatty acids, particularly unsaturated fatty acids, to the culture medium, which can be taken up by yeast cells and fused into the cell and mitochondrial membranes, it was found that these yeast cells showed a significant increase in ethanol tolerance during ethanol fermentation, confirming that fatty acids can counteract the fluidizing effect of ethanol on the cell membrane. As a model organism with high ethanol tolerance, S. cerevisiae cells themselves can synthesize more long-chain unsaturated fatty acids during growth compared to other microorganisms, resulting in increased cellular ethanol tolerance. However, in our experiment, genes related to fatty acid synthesis in cell membranes were generally down-regulated under isoamyl alcohol conditions, with more obvious differences in expression including OLE1, TSC13, ELO1, ELO2, and ELO3. Similarly, the addition of ergosterol to the medium not only promoted yeast growth and increased ethanol production but also increased ethanol tolerance when the cell membrane of S. cerevisiae was rich in ergosterol or soy sterols than when it was rich in rape sterols or cholesterol, and the higher the ergosterol content, the more ethanol tolerant the organism was. It is assumed that ergosterol also increases the toughness of cell membranes and reduces membrane fluidity [20,21]. In our experimental results, GO cluster analysis showed that the main genes, such as ERG2, ARE1, CYB5 related to ergosterol biosynthesis were down-regulated. Therefore according to transcriptome analysis in Table 3, due to the two components that can enhance cell membrane fluidity, fatty acids, and ergosterol, their biosynthesis-related genes are down-regulated under isoamyl alcohol pressure, which may lead to a further increase in membrane fluidity. Among them, ELO1 and ERG2 were the most down-regulated genes. Interestingly, one gene related to long chain fatty acyl-CoA synthetase, FAA1, was not affected, and its expression level was continuously up-regulated with the increase in isoamyl alcohol concentration [22]. We speculate that S. cerevisiae cells can also utilize exogenous fatty acids activated by Faa1p when the expression of fatty acid synthetase complex is down-regulated by isoamyl alcohol inhibitors.
Phospholipids constitute most of the lipids in bilayer membranes, and therefore, they play an important role in determining the physical and chemical properties of membranes [23]. As shown in Table 3, the number of significantly different genes related to phospholipids was higher, so these genes were classified in more detail. For the up-regulated differential genes, GO classification includes phosphatidylinositol binding, transport, and CVT pathways. In the down-regulated differential genes, the GO classification mainly includes integral to membrane, transferase activity, and phospholipid biosynthesis. Among them, due to speculation SLC1, SCS2, SCS3, OPI3, and PIS1 genes related to phospholipid biosynthesis to play an important role in the influence of cell membrane function, and OPI3 has the highest expression level.
Therefore, we selected four potential genes (ELO1, FAA1, ERG2, OPI3) that may be strongly affected by isoamyl alcohol, further study about strain opi3Δ, elo1Δ, erg2Δ, faa1Δ under isoamyl alcohol stress was carried out.

3.5. Metal Ion Transporter

Table 4 shows that, in the GO enrichment results, all the significantly differentially expressed genes of Calcium ion transport, except PMC1, were down-regulated. It can be seen that PMC1 plays a key role under isoamyl alcohol pressure. PMC1 is known to be located in the fungi-type tonoplast membrane and is involved in the regulation of calcium homeostasis through transmembrane transport [24,25]. We predict that the intracellular ion balance is disrupted under isoamyl alcohol stress and further study about strain pmc1Δ under isoamyl alcohol stress was carried out.

3.6. Mitochondrial Activity

Mitochondria are the main organelles in cells that produce energy. A large number of mitochondria-related differential genes were obtained through GO enrichment, and further, GO classification of these genes found that the function of both up-regulated and down-regulated genes was related to ATP. In the ATP biosynthetic process of mitochondria, ATP synthase and the electron transport chain play an important role [26,27,28,29], especially the genes associated with ATP synthase and the electron transport chain. The expression of most genes was up-regulated, which suggested that more ATP was needed to satisfy the life activities of yeast cells under isoamyl alcohol stress. However, only CYC1 was down-regulated with increasing isoamyl alcohol concentration.
CYC1 is known to encode the electron carrier protein cytochrome c. Cytochrome c facilitates the transfer of electrons from respiratory complex III to respiratory complex IV via its covalently linked hemoglobin moiety [30]. In S. cerevisiae cells, which account for 95% of total cytochrome c, down-regulation ofCYC1 expression is likely to result in inhibition of S. cerevisiae growth [31]. Previous studies have shown that CYC1 expression is usually induced or repressed directly at the promoter transcription rather than at the translational stage and that the CYC1 activation sequence UAS2 represses CYC1 transcription by binding to Mig1p and ccaat binding activation complex subunits Hap2p and Hap3p. The expression levels of MIG1, HAP2, and HAP3 were all up-regulated, and it was hypothesized that isoamyl alcohol inhibited the expression of CYC1 by stimulating the expression of MIG1.

3.7. Pentose Phosphate Pathway

The pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) is also known as hexose monophosphate shunt. Large amounts of NADPH are produced by reducing the coenzyme NADP+ [32]. NADPH provides reducing agents for a variety of synthetic reactions within cells and is involved in several anabolic reactions, such as the synthesis of lipids, fatty acids, and nucleotides. This pathway also provides reducing energy for various enzymes involved in stress response [33]. Although no PPP and NADPH-related terms were found in GO enrichment analysis, this may be due to the limited number of enzyme regulatory genes that catalyze this process. ZWF1, SOL3/SOL4 and GND1/GND2 are the enzymes encoding the reactions that catalyze NADPH production and constitute the first [34], second and third steps of PPP, respectively. Based on differential gene analysis, these genes showed up-regulation. This may suggest that yeast cells require more NADPH to provide reducing energy for the enzymes required for various stress responses. To verify the importance of NADPH for resistance to isoamyl alcohol, Strain zwf1Δ under isoamyl alcohol stress was further analyzed.

3.8. Further Study on Potential Functional Genes

Based on the above analysis, we screened out several potential genes that may play an important role in yeast cell growth under isoamyl alcohol stress. These include NCW2, FAA1, PMC1, ZWF1, which may play a special molecular mechanism under isoamyl alcohol stress. It also includes genes that are highly expressed and representative in each functional classification, such as CCW12, BGL2 and SUN4 in the cell wall and OPI3, ELO1 and ERG2 in the cell membrane. All of the above potential functional genes were further analyzed.
According to the Figure 3, the growth state of ncw2Δ, ccw12Δ, bgl2Δ, elo1Δ, erg2Δ, faa1Δ, zwf1Δ strains were significantly slower than that of wild type BY4741. The growth of ncw2Δ, ccw12Δ and bgl2Δ strains were severely inhibited under the condition of 0 g/L isoamyl alcohol. It is speculated that CCW12 and BGL2, as regulatory genes of mannoglycoprotein on the cell wall, play an important role in the maintenance of new synthetic regions in the cell wall. Similarly, NCW2, as a gene involved in cell wall repair, determines whether the cell wall can continue to function despite damage. These results show that NCW2, CCW12, and BGL2 play important roles in the maintenance of life activities of S. cerevisiae under normal conditions. Under isoamyl alcohol, the downregulation of CCW12, BGL2 further impaired the life activities of S. cerevisiae.
The erg2Δ, faa1Δ and zwf1Δ strains can still grow normally at 0 g/L, but with the increase in isoamyl alcohol concentration, they show more sensitivity to isoamyl alcohol than WT. It can be seen from Figure 4a that with the increase in isoamyl alcohol concentration, the specific growth rate of elo1Δ is the same as that of WT BY4741, while erg2Δ shows a higher sensitivity when the isoamyl alcohol concentration reaches above 0.5 g/L, and completely stops growth at 4.5 g/L isoamyl alcohol concentration. The results showed that ELO1 deletion did not make the strain more sensitive to isoamyl alcohol. As an isomerase regulatory gene, ERG2 is mainly used to promote the biosynthesis of ergosterol, and its gene deletion strains show high sensitivity to isoamyl alcohol. This proves that ergosterol plays an important role under isoamyl alcohol pressure. The gene expressions of FAA1, PMC1, and ZWF1 were up-regulated in transcriptome analysis. Combined with Figure 3 and Figure 4b, we found that faa1Δ, pmc1Δ and zwf1Δ strains grew well in normal YPD medium but exhibited much higher sensitivity than WT BY4741 in the presence of isoamyl alcohols, which proved that the functional expression of genes FAA1, PMC1, and ZWF1 played a role in resistance to isoamyl alcohol. Earlier in this paper, we described the functions of genes FAA1, PMC1, and ZWF1 and speculated the molecular mechanism of resistance to isoamyl alcohol stress after the expression of these two genes. The culture results of the gene deletion strain are consistent with our hypothesis.
The growth state of sun4Δ and opi3Δ strains in 0 g/L isoamyl alcohol was also decreased compared with that of wild type BY4741. However as the concentration of isoamyl alcohol increased, the strains did not show much sensitivity. sun4Δ showed no obvious growth inhibition before isoamyl alcohol concentration of 3.5 g/L. It is known that sun4Δ can cause low efficiency of mother-daughter cell separation, so it is speculated that S. cerevisiae may be more resistant to isoamyl alcohol in the pseudomycelium state. Gene OPI3 controls the biosynthesis of phosphatidylcholine, which is an important component of biofilm, and its deletion affects the life activities of yeast. Combined with the growth status analysis of opi3Δ on solid medium, it was found that the deletion of phosphatidylcholine seemed to enhance the resistance of S. cerevisiae to isoamyl alcohol stress. This may be related to the ratio of phosphatidylcholine (PC) to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), with the decrease in PC content and the increase in PE content in order to reduce the fluidity of the membrane and enhance the stability of the membrane.

4. Conclusions and Perspectives

To improve the production of isoamyl alcohol from S. cerevisiae, it is important to study the toxic effect of isoamyl alcohol on host cells. By exploring the molecular mechanism, a feasible modification method was proposed to improve the tolerance of S. cerevisiae to isoamyl alcohol.
This study first verified the inhibitory effect of isoamyl alcohol on S. cerevisiae and transcriptome analysis of S. cerevisiae under isoamyl alcohol stress was performed using an RNA-Seq approach. To the authors’ knowledge in the field, this study is the first systematic study of the molecular mechanisms underlying the changes in gene expression that occur in S. cerevisiae under isoamyl alcohol stress. Through GO enrichment tests, we have selected terms important for cellular life and analyzed their expression in detail to identify potential genes that may play important functions under isoamyl alcohol stress.
Under isoamyl alcohol pressure, the proportion of other substances, except chitin, in the cell wall decreased. These phenomena demonstrate that the cell wall does undergo deformation under isoamyl alcohol conditions, which may be related to stimulated by isoamyl alcohol the production of pseudo mycelium in S. cerevisiae. Upon stimulation with isoamyl alcohol, membrane stability is reduced and fluidity is increased, leading to an imbalance in intracellular ion homeostasis. Ion transport proteins in the vesicles play a role in stabilizing ion homeostasis, and we have observed that a large proportion of the ion transport process is mediated by metal ion transport proteins. The overall up-regulation of key gene expression related to ATP release in mitochondria. The expression of most genes related to ATP synthesis is up-regulated, and the regulatory genes required for the composition of ATP synthase components are overall up-regulated. The expression of enzymes related to NADPH synthesis steps in the PPP pathway is also up-regulated. Therefore, it is speculated that it may require more ATP and NADPH to maintain life activities under isopentyl stress. The key gene FAA1, which acts on the synthesis of fatty acids in the cell membrane, is up-regulated under the stimulation of isoamyl alcohol; therefore, it is speculated that it may be an important potential gene for resisting the inhibition of isoamyl alcohol. The ion transport proteins in vacuoles play an important role in stabilizing ion homeostasis. The absence of gene PMC1 under conditions without isoamyl alcohol stimulation will not have a significant impact on the life activities of brewing yeast. However, under isoamyl alcohol stress, PMC1 up-regulation expression can activate the activity of p-type calcium transporters, regulate more ion transporters to play a role, and thus maintain intracellular ion balance.
Until now, the lack of understanding of the mechanisms of inhibition of isoamyl alcohol in S. cerevisiae has kept the production of isoamyl alcohol through the biological fermentation route at a theoretical stage. In this experiment, some of the key genes like NCW2, FAA1, SUN4, ERG2, PMC1, ZWF1 and the molecular mechanisms regulated by these genes were identified. This provides an essential theoretical basis for the study of the toxicity of isoamyl alcohol on S. cerevisiae and enriches the research system of the microbial cellular stress response. It provides new ideas for the development of highly tolerant strains and a modern theoretical basis for the biosynthetic pathway of S. cerevisiae as a host to enhance isoamyl alcohol production.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fermentation10010004/s1, Table S1: OD value of WT By4741 under different concentrations of isoamyl alcohol; Table S2: RNA-seq analysis of wild-type BY4741 strains grown with or without isoamyl alcohol; Figure S1: Saccharomyces cerevisiae produces isoamyl alcohol through the leucine degradation pathway; Figure S2: Growth curve of WT By4741 under different concentrations of isoamyl alcohol.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.S. and H.X.; methodology, C.N.; validation, Y.W. and J.L.; formal analysis, J.W. and H.Z.; investigation, J.S. and Y.W.; data curation, C.N.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S. and H.X.; writing—review and editing, Y.W., J.L. and J.W.; supervision, C.N. and H.Z.; project administration, C.N. and H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (2019GSF107044), the Foundation (No. ZZ20190310) of State Key Laboratory of Biobased Material and Green Papermaking, Qilu University of Technology, and Shandong Academy of Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. McGinty, D.; Lapczynski, A.; Scognamiglio, J.; Letizia, C.S.; Api, A.M. Fragrance materials review on isoamyl alcohol. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48 (Suppl. S4), S102–S109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yuan, J.; Chen, X.; Mishra, P.; Ching, C.B. Metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae for enhanced isoamyl alcohol production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 465–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hazelwood, L.A.; Daran, J.M.; Maris, A.; Pronk, J.T.; Dickinson, J.R. The Ehrlich Pathway for Fusel Alcohol Production: A Century of Research on Saccharomyces cerevisiae Metabolism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 2259–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Atsumi, S.; Hanai, T.; Liao, J.C. Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels. Nature 2008, 451, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dunlop, M.J. Engineering microbes for tolerance to next-generation biofuels. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2011, 4, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Peralta-Yahya, P.P.; Keasling, J.D. Advanced biofuel production in microbes. Biotechnol. J. 2010, 5, 147–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kim, J.; Baidoo, E.E.K.; Amer, B.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Adams, P.D.; Simmons, B.A.; Lee, T.S. Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae for isoprenol production. Metab. Eng. 2021, 64, 154–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, X.; Nielsen, K.F.; Borodina, I.; Kielland-Brandt, M.C.; Karhumaa, K. Increased isobutanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by overexpression of genes in valine metabolism. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2011, 4, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Matsuda, F.; Ishii, J.; Kondo, T.; Ida, K.; Tezuka, H.; Kondo, A. Increased isobutanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by eliminating competing pathways and resolving cofactor imbalance. Microb. Cell Factories 2013, 12, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yuan, J.; Mishra, P.; Ching, C.B. Engineering the leucine biosynthetic pathway for isoamyl alcohol overproduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 44, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kuroda, K.; Hammer, S.K.; Watanabe, Y.; Montaño López, J.; Fink, G.R.; Stephanopoulos, G.; Ueda, M.; Avalos, J.L. Critical Roles of the Pentose Phosphate Pathway and GLN3 in Isobutanol-Specific Tolerance in Yeast. Cell Syst. 2019, 9, 534–547.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yoshida, M.; Kato, S.; Fukuda, S.; Izawa, S. Acquired Resistance to Severe Ethanol Stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Protein Quality Control. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e02353-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jin, D.; Gu, B.; Xiong, D.; Huang, G.; Huang, X.; Liu, L.; Xiao, J. A Transcriptomic Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under the Stress of 2-Phenylethanol. Curr. Microbiol. 2018, 75, 1068–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gordon, M.R.; Zhu, J.; Qu, V.; Li, R. A case of convergent-gene interference in the budding yeast knockout library causing chromosome instability. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2021, 11, jkab084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. de Oliveira, H.C.; Rossi, S.A.; García-Barbazán, I.; Zaragoza, Ó.; Trevijano-Contador, N. Cell wall integrity pathway involved in morphogenesis, virulence and antifungal susceptibility in cryptococcus neoformans. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Taylor, E.J.; Campbell, S.G.; Griffiths, C.D.; Reid, P.J.; Slaven, J.W.; Harrison, R.J.; Sims, P.F.G.; Pavitt, G.D.; Delneri, D.; Ashe, M.P. Fusel alcohols regulate translation initiation by inhibiting eIF2B to reduce ternary complex in a mechanism that may involve altering the integrity and dynamics of the eIF2B body. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21, 2202–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Orlean, P. Architecture and biosynthesis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall. Genetics 2012, 192, 775–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Elsztein, C.; de Lima, R.d.C.P.; de Barros Pita, W.; de Morais, M.A. NCW2, a Gene Involved in the Tolerance to Polyhexamethylene Biguanide (PHMB), May Help in the Organisation of β-1,3-Glucan Structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cell Wall. Curr. Microbiol. 2016, 73, 341–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Elsztein, C.; de Menezes, J.A.S.; de Morais, M.A. Polyhexamethyl biguanide can eliminate contaminant yeasts from fuel-ethanol fermentation process. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 35, 967–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qi, Y.; Xu, N.; Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Meng, X.; Gao, C.; Chen, J.; Chen, W.; Chen, X.; Liu, L. Mediator Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Improve Multidimensional Stress Tolerance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 88, e01627-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, X.H.; Peng, Y.J.; Ding, J.L.; Feng, M.G.; Ying, S.H. A homologue of yeast acyl-coa synthetase faa1 contributes to cytomembrane functionality involved in development and virulence in the insect pathogenic fungus beauveria bassiana. Microb. Pathog. 2022, 164, 105419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ishmayana, S.; Kennedy, U.J.; Learmonth, R.P. Further investigation of relationships between membrane fluidity and ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 33, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kwiatek, J.M.; Carman, G.M. Yeast phosphatidic acid phosphatase Pah1 hops and scoots along the membrane phospholipid bilayer. J. Lipid Res. 2020, 61, 1232–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ozturk, M.; Metin, M.; Altay, V.; de Filippis, L.; Ünal, B.T.; Khursheed, A.; Gul, A.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Kawano, T.; et al. Molecular Biology of Cadmium Toxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 4832–4846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xu, H.; Fang, T.; Yan, H.; Jiang, L. The protein kinase Cmk2 negatively regulates the calcium/calcineurin signalling pathway and expression of calcium pump genes PMR1 and PMC1 in budding yeast. Cell Commun. Signal. 2019, 17, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Capps, D.; Hunter, A.; Chiang, M.; Pracheil, T.; Liu, Z. Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes Ubc1 and Ubc4 Mediate the Turnover of Hap4, a Master Regulator of Mitochondrial Biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Carrillo-Garmendia, A.; Martinez-Ortiz, C.; Canizal-Garcia, M.; González-Hernández, J.C.; Arvizu-Medrano, S.M.; Gracida, J.; Madrigal-Perez, L.A.; Regalado-Gonzalez, C. Cytotoxicity of quercetin is related to mitochondrial respiration impairment in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2022, 39, 617–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Matsumoto, T.; Osawa, T.; Taniguchi, H.; Saito, A.; Yamada, R.; Ogino, H. Mitochondrial expression of metabolic enzymes for improving carotenoid production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. Eng. J. 2022, 189, 108720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pandey, A.K.; Pain J, J.B.; Dancis, A.; Pain, D. Essential mitochondrial role in iron-sulfur cluster assembly of the cytoplasmic isopropylmalate isomerase Leu1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mitochondrion 2023, 69, 104–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gaignard, P.; Menezes, M.; Schiff, M.; Bayot, A.; Rak, M.; Ogier De Baulny, H.; Su, C.H.; Gilleron, M.; Lombes, A.; Abida, H.; et al. Mutations in CYC1, Encoding Cytochrome c1 Subunit of Respiratory Chain Complex III, Cause Insulin-Responsive Hyperglycemia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2013, 93, 384–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lin, Y.-Y.; Kee, P.E.; Ng, H.-S.; Lan, J.C.-W. Recovery efficiency of a hydrophilic ionic-liquid aqueous biphasic system for the primary purification of cytochrome c from simulated Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation broth. Process Biochem. 2020, 94, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Partow, S.; Hyl, P.B.; Mahadevan, R. Synthetic rescue couples NADPH generation to metabolite overproduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 2017, 43, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cadière, A.; Ortiz-Julien, A.; Camarasa, C.; Dequin, S. Evolutionary engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains with increased in vivo flux through the pentose phosphate pathway. Metab. Eng. 2011, 13, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gorsich, S.W.; Dien, B.S.; Nichols, N.N.; Slininger, P.J.; Liu, Z.L.; Skory, C.D. Tolerance to furfural-induced stress is associated with pentose phosphate pathway genes ZWF1, GND1, RPE1, and TKL1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 71, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) The growth rate ( μ ) of S. cerevisiae BY4741 under 0 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 1.5 g/L, 2.5 g/L, 3.5 g/L, 4.5 g/L of isoamyl alcohol. (b) Growth status of BY4741 on solid medium containing different concentrations of isoamyl alcohol at 36 h.
Figure 1. (a) The growth rate ( μ ) of S. cerevisiae BY4741 under 0 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 1.5 g/L, 2.5 g/L, 3.5 g/L, 4.5 g/L of isoamyl alcohol. (b) Growth status of BY4741 on solid medium containing different concentrations of isoamyl alcohol at 36 h.
Fermentation 10 00004 g001
Figure 2. Figure of GO enrichment analysis. (a) GO enrichment analysis of BY4741 up-regulated differential gene at 0 g/L and 0.5 g/L isoamyl alcohol concentrations. (b) enrichment analysis of BY4741 up-regulated differential gene at 0 g/L and 2.5 g/L isoamyl alcohol concentration. (c) enrichment analysis of BY4741 down-regulated differential gene at 0 g/L and 0.5 g/L isoamyl alcohol concentrations. (d) GO enrichment analysis of BY4741 down-regulated differential gene at 0 g/L and 2.5 g/L isoamyl alcohol concentrations.
Figure 2. Figure of GO enrichment analysis. (a) GO enrichment analysis of BY4741 up-regulated differential gene at 0 g/L and 0.5 g/L isoamyl alcohol concentrations. (b) enrichment analysis of BY4741 up-regulated differential gene at 0 g/L and 2.5 g/L isoamyl alcohol concentration. (c) enrichment analysis of BY4741 down-regulated differential gene at 0 g/L and 0.5 g/L isoamyl alcohol concentrations. (d) GO enrichment analysis of BY4741 down-regulated differential gene at 0 g/L and 2.5 g/L isoamyl alcohol concentrations.
Fermentation 10 00004 g002aFermentation 10 00004 g002b
Figure 3. Growth state of WT BY4741 and gene deletion yeast in solid medium with different concentrations of isoamyl alcohol at 36 h.
Figure 3. Growth state of WT BY4741 and gene deletion yeast in solid medium with different concentrations of isoamyl alcohol at 36 h.
Fermentation 10 00004 g003
Figure 4. Specific growth rate of cell (a) erg2Δ, elo1Δ, (b) pmc1Δ in liquid medium under isoamyl alcohol conditions of 0 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 2.5 g/L, 4.5 g/L ( μ L).
Figure 4. Specific growth rate of cell (a) erg2Δ, elo1Δ, (b) pmc1Δ in liquid medium under isoamyl alcohol conditions of 0 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 2.5 g/L, 4.5 g/L ( μ L).
Fermentation 10 00004 g004
Table 1. List of S. cerevisiae strains used in this study and their genotypes.
Table 1. List of S. cerevisiae strains used in this study and their genotypes.
YKO LibStrainsBackground
BY4741BY4741, ccw12Δ, bgl2Δ, sun4Δ, elo1Δ, erg2Δ, opi3Δ, ncw2Δ, faa1Δ, ftr1Δ, fet3Δ, pmc1Δ, zwf1Δ, ino1Δ, lys12Δ, ade4Δ, ald6Δ, trm2Δ, fcy2Δ, eft1Δ, sul2Δ, izh2Δ, izh1Δ, btn2Δ, grx8Δ, pdc1Δ, met5Δ, pdc6Δ, gas1Δ, mae1Δ, jlp1Δ, bna2Δ, hmt1Δ, rps12Δ, spi1Δ, hsp150Δ, hsp26Δ, leu4Δ, leu9Δ, oac1Δ, zps1Δ, zno1Δ, utr2Δ, exg1Δ, scs7Δ, lac1Δ, zrt1Δ, are1Δ, vcx1Δ, ctr2Δ, nhx1Δ, mrs2Δ, gdt1Δ, tat1Δ, atx2Δ, hxt1Δ, gsf2Δ, tdh1Δ, alg8Δ, lpd1Δ, sdh1Δ, atg8Δ, mdh1Δ, sol3Δ, gnd1Δ. BY family
Table 2. Differential expression of cell wall related genes in transcriptome analysis.
Table 2. Differential expression of cell wall related genes in transcriptome analysis.
Go-TermsDifference Multiple Value RangeIn Range from Cluster *
Mannose log 2 0.5   g / L 0   g / L < 1 CCW12, SRL1, TIP1, MNN2, PMT1, MNN11, PMT4, KTR1
log 2 2.5   g / L 0   g / L < 1 CCW12, SRL1, TIP1, CIS3, MNN2, MNN11, PMT4, KTR1
log 2 2.5   g / L 0.5   g / L < 1 CCW12, SRL1, KTR1
Chitin log 2 0.5   g / L 0   g / L < 1 UTR2, BGL2, CHS3, PCM1
log 2 2.5   g / L 0   g / L < 1 UTR2, BGL2
log 2 2.5   g / L 0   g / L > 1 CRZ1, CHS1
Glucan log 2 0.5   g / L 0   g / L < 1 BGL2, SUN4, KNH1, EXG1, FKS1, SCW10, NCW2
log 2 2.5   g / L 0   g / L < 1 BGL2, SUN4, KNH1, EXG1, FKS1, SCW10
* The following bold genes show the same trend of change under different concentrations of comparison.
Table 3. Differential expression of membrane related genes in transcriptome analysis.
Table 3. Differential expression of membrane related genes in transcriptome analysis.
Go-TermsDifference Multiple Value RangeIn Range from Cluster *
Fatty acid log 2 0.5   g / L 0   g / L < 1 ELO1, YAT1, ELO2, TSC13, ACP1, ELO3, IZH2, ERG10, AIM45, OLE1, FAT1, OAR1, FAA4, SCS7
log 2 0.5   g / L 0   g / L > 1 RTG1,FAA1, IDP3
log 2 2.5   g / L 0   g / L < 1 YAT1, ELO2, TSC13, OLE1, ELO1, ACP1, ELO3, IZH2, ERG10, AIM45
log 2 2.5   g / L 0   g / L > 1 RTG1, FAA1
Ergosterol log 2 0.5   g / L 0   g / L < 1 ERG4, ERG25, NCP1, ERG3, HMG1, ERG13, ERG2, ERG10, CYB5, ARE1, ERG11
log 2 0.5   g / L 0   g / L > 1 GRE2, ARE2
log 2 2.5   g / L 0   g / L < 1 ERG4, ERG25, NCP1, ERG3, HMG1, ERG13, ERG2, ERG10, CYB5
log 2 2.5   g / L 0   g / L > 1 GRE2
Phospholipid log 2 0.5   g / L 0   g / L < 1 ALG7, PER1, SLC1, GPI11, SPF1, SCS2, SCS3, GPI10, EGD2, OPI3, AUR1, ARV1, GAB1, HMG1, ERG13, PLB2, ANY1, CDC33, ARF3, PIS1, IPT1, AGE1, ATG27, SEC59, SCS7, OPT2
log 2 0.5   g / L 0   g / L > 1 SWH1, ATG8, ATG20, IVY1, VAM7, BBC1, PDR16, MET22, VPS30, INO1
log 2 2.5   g / L 0   g / L < 1 ALG7, PER1, SLC1, GPI11, SPF1, SCS2, SCS3, GPI10, EGD2, OPI3, AUR1, ARV1, GAB1, HMG1, ERG13, PLB2, ANY1, CDC33, ARF3, PIS1
log 2 2.5   g / L 0   g / L > 1 SWH1, ATG8, ATG20, IVY1, VAM7, BBC1, PDR16, MET22, VPS30
* The following bold genes show the same trend of change under different concentrations of comparison.
Table 4. Differential expression of metal ion and vacuolar related genes in transcriptome analysis.
Table 4. Differential expression of metal ion and vacuolar related genes in transcriptome analysis.
Go-TermsDifference Multiple Value RangeIn Range from Cluster *
Calcium ion transport log 2 0.5   g / L 0   g / L < 1 FTR1, FET3, SIT1, FLC2
log 2 0.5   g / L 0   g / L > 1 PMC1
log 2 2.5   g / L 0   g / L < 1 FLC2, GDT1, VCX1, SPF1
log 2 2.5   g / L 0   g / L > 1 PMC1
Vacuolar homeostasis log 2 0.5   g / L 0   g / L < 1 GDT1, PER1, VCX1, SIT1, VMA16, ZRT3, EMP70, PFK2, ZRC1, CTR2, TMN2, NHX1, VMA3, TMN3, FET5, SMF2, YHC3, VNX1, ENB1
log 2 0.5   g / L 0   g / L > 1 PMC1, VPS52, VMA22, GEX1, VPS3
log 2 2.5   g / L 0   g / L < 1 GDT1, PER1, VCX1, SIT1, VMA16, CTR2, ZRT3, EMP70, PFK2, ZRC1
log 2 2.5   g / L 0   g / L > 1 PMC1, VPS52, VMA22, GEX1, MNR2
* The following bold genes show the same trend of change under different concentrations of comparison.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Song, J.; Wang, Y.; Xu, H.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; Nie, C. A Physiogenomic Study of the Tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Isoamyl Alcohol. Fermentation 2024, 10, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10010004

AMA Style

Song J, Wang Y, Xu H, Liu J, Wang J, Zhang H, Nie C. A Physiogenomic Study of the Tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Isoamyl Alcohol. Fermentation. 2024; 10(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10010004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Song, Jialin, Yu Wang, Hengyuan Xu, Jinshang Liu, Jianping Wang, Haojun Zhang, and Cong Nie. 2024. "A Physiogenomic Study of the Tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Isoamyl Alcohol" Fermentation 10, no. 1: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10010004

APA Style

Song, J., Wang, Y., Xu, H., Liu, J., Wang, J., Zhang, H., & Nie, C. (2024). A Physiogenomic Study of the Tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Isoamyl Alcohol. Fermentation, 10(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10010004

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop