Next Article in Journal
Optimizing Bacterial Protectant Composition to Enhance Baijiu Yeast Survival and Productivity During Spray Drying
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Artemisia argyi Aqueous Extract on Rumen Fermentation Parameters and Microbiota in Lambs
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Grape Maceration on Quality and Biogenic Amine Formation in Slovak Tokaj Wines: Examination of Microbial, Chemical and Sensory Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Use of Mesquite Pods (Prosopis spp.) as an Alternative to Improve the Productive Performance and Methane Mitigation in Small Ruminants: A Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preliminary Study on the Impact of Ruminal Ciliate Inoculation in Fauna-Free Conditions on the Ruminal Fermentation and Ciliate–Prokaryote Association In Vitro

Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2025, 11(1), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11010028
Submission received: 12 December 2024 / Revised: 7 January 2025 / Accepted: 9 January 2025 / Published: 11 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ruminal Fermentation)

Abstract

:
Ruminants rely on the rumen for the anaerobic fermentation of fibrous plant materials, facilitated by a complex microbial community of bacteria, archaea, fungi, and ciliates. Among them, ruminal ciliates significantly influence ruminal fermentation, methane production, nitrogen utilization efficiency, and microbial interactions. This study examined the impact of ciliate inoculation on ruminal fermentation, microbial composition, and functional profiles in fauna-free conditions. Six treatments were tested: control (no ciliates), small entodinia, Epidinium spp., isotrichids, Ophryoscolex spp., and a mixed inoculum. Using QIIME2 to analyze 16S rRNA gene sequences, the study revealed group-specific effects on methane production, volatile fatty acids (VFAs), and microbial diversity. Small entodinia inoculation increased Streptococcus abundance, while isotrichids enriched Megasphaera, enhancing butyrate production. Alpha diversity indices indicated reduced richness in the ciliate-inoculated groups, reflecting predation on prokaryotes. Beta diversity showed distinct microbial and functional profiles among the treatments. Functional analysis highlighted elevated glycerolipid metabolism in isotrichid groups, associated with Bacteroides and Megasphaera, suggesting roles in lipid metabolism and oxidative stress resistance. Despite limited ciliate cell counts, the study emphasizes ciliate-specific interactions and the role of lactic acid-associated bacteria in shaping ruminal fermentation.

1. Introduction

Ruminants are distinguished from monogastric animals by their four-compartment stomachs: the rumen, reticulum, omasum, and abomasum [1]. Among them, the rumen serves as the primary site for the anaerobic fermentation of lignocellulose, which is fibrous plant materials and starches ingested through the diet, which the host animal cannot directly degrade [2,3]. The rumen is home to ruminal microorganisms that produce lignocellulolytic enzymes capable of breaking down plant lignocellulose [4]. These microorganisms include bacteria, ciliated protozoa (hereafter referred to as ciliates), archaea (including methanogens), and fungi. Together, they interact to perform essential functions in ruminal fermentation [5]. Among them, ruminal ciliates are particularly significant due to their biomass, which can account for up to 50% of the total microbial mass in the rumen [6]. Their presence has a substantial impact on ruminal fermentation and function.
To understand the roles and characteristics of ruminal ciliates, numerous in vitro and in vivo studies have utilized defaunated ruminants [7,8,9]. A meta-analysis conducted in 2015 synthesized these studies to explore how defaunation affects ruminal function, fermentation profiles, and interactions with other ruminal microorganisms, particularly cellulolytic bacteria [10]. The key findings from this meta-analysis include the following effects of defaunation:
(1)
A decrease in overall digestibility, including organic matter digestibility (OMD), neutral detergent fiber digestibility (NDFD), acid detergent fiber digestibility (ADFD), and volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations, particularly butyrate.
(2)
A reduction in methanogen abundance, methane emissions, and ammonia concentrations, alongside increases in duodenal nitrogen flow and microbial protein synthesis efficiency.
(3)
Significant decreases in the abundance of anaerobic fungi and cellulolytic bacteria such as Ruminococcus albus and Ruminococcus flavefaciens.
(4)
Reduced dry matter intake (DMI) by the host ruminant, while average daily gain (ADG) increased.
In summary, ruminal ciliates increase VFA concentrations, fiber digestibility, and methane production in the rumen, thereby enhancing host productivity but reducing nitrogen utilization efficiency.
Despite their significant roles and interactions with other microorganisms, the precise functions of ruminal ciliates remain poorly understood, largely due to limitations in cultivation techniques, including the inability to establish axenic cultures [11]. This challenge is further compounded by the limited research on ciliate-associated bacteria and methanogens, which are likely to cohabit with ciliates and significantly influence their functional roles. Addressing these gaps is essential for enhancing our understanding of ruminal ciliates.
Ruminal ciliates encompass various genera with distinct functions and characteristics. These include cellulolytic ciliates (e.g., Epidinium and Ophryoscolex), soluble sugar-lovers (e.g., isotrichids, such as Dasytricha and Isotricha), bacterivores (e.g., small entodinia, such as Entodinium and Diplodinium), and starch utilizers (e.g., Entodinium). Many studies using mono- or mero-faunated ruminants have investigated how these ciliates influence fermentation profiles and other microorganisms in the rumen [12,13,14,15]. Among them, three studies measured ruminal fermentation parameters but did not employ molecular-based methods [12,13,14]. Another study utilized real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (real-time qPCR), a molecular-based method, but its focus was limited to specific microbial species and a small number of fermentation parameters [15]. In summary, research on fauna inoculation that simultaneously explores ruminal fermentation profiles and ciliate–prokaryote associations remains scarce.
To overcome these limitations, this study aimed to investigate how the inoculation of various ruminal ciliate groups (i.e., small entodinia, isotrichids, Epidinium spp., Ophryoscolex spp.) into a fauna-free environment affects in vitro fermentation parameters and ruminal microbiota composition using a 16S rRNA gene-based approach. We hypothesize that certain ciliate–bacteria association patterns, specifically with inoculated ciliates, will be consistent or reconstructed after inoculation. Furthermore, we expect that each ruminal ciliate group will be able to impact in vitro fermentation parameters, including NDFD, ADFD, NH3-N, CH4, and VFAs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design

A completely randomized design was used for a 24 h in vitro fermentation experiment to evaluate the effects of ruminal ciliates. Each treatment was conducted in triplicate. The six treatment groups included CON (control, no ciliates inoculated), ENTO (small entodinia inoculated), EPI (Epidinium spp. inoculated), ISO (isotrichids inoculated), OPH (Ophryoscolex spp. inoculated), and MIX (all cultured ciliates inoculated). The experimental feeds included concentrate pellets (particle size between 0.425 mm and 1 mm) and oat hay, as detailed in Table S1.

2.2. Preparation of Inoculated In Vitro Cultures of Each Ruminal Microbe

The ruminal ciliate groups used in this study were selected based on their potential to influence fiber digestibility (NDFD and ADFD), ammoniagenesis, ruminal microbiome, and methane production. The cellulolytic ciliates (Epidinium and Ophryoscolex) were included for their effects on fiber digestibility, while bacterivory ciliates (small entodinia, including Entodinium and Diplodinium, and potentially Epidinium) were chosen for their effects on nitrogen utilization efficiency by their predatory behavior and impact on microbial interactions. Isotrichids (Isotricha and Dasytricha) were selected due to their potential impact on methane production.
The cultures of each ciliate group were established using two donor cows with distinct protozoal populations (types A and B; reference). Epidinium was isolated from a cannulated Holstein cow, while Ophryoscolex and small entodinia were isolated from a Hanwoo cow using stomach tubing. All entodiniomorphid ciliate cultures were maintained as mono- or meroxenic cultures for at least 3 months prior to inoculation. Small entodinia and Ophryoscolex were cultured in SP medium, while Epidinium was cultured in M medium, following the procedures outlined by Dehority [16]:
(1)
Rumen fluid used for isolation was filtered through two layers of cheesecloth, sedimented in a separatory funnel at 39 °C for 45 min, and the white pellet layer enriched with ciliate cells was collected.
(2)
The white pellet layer was further filtered through a 100 µm pluristrainer (J.One LifeScience, Seoul, Korea) to remove feed particles and large ciliates (>100 µm).
(3)
For the Epidinium and Ophryoscolex cultures, filtrates were resuspended in sterile M or SP medium after sequential filtration through a 70 µm pluristrainer. The single-cell isolation method was performed using microscopy to obtain meroxenic cultures [17].
(4)
For the small entodinia culture, the filtrate collected below a 30 µm pluristrainer was resuspended in a sterile SP medium to establish the culture.
The isotrichid culture was prepared in Dasytricha ruminantium medium (DRM) following these steps [18]:
(1)
Rumen fluid filtered through two layers of cheesecloth was passed through a 100 µm pluristrainer to remove impurities and ciliates larger than 100 µm.
(2)
The filtrate (300 mL) was transferred to a separatory funnel, supplemented with 1.5 g of glucose, and incubated at 39 °C for 30 min to sediment isotrichid cells into a white layer [19].
(3)
The collected white layer was sequentially filtered through 100, 85, 70, 50, and 40 µm pluristrainers, with microscopy used to identify fractions rich in Isotricha (50–70 µm) and Isotricha plus Dasytricha (40–50 µm). These fractions were cultured in DRM for seven days to remove the remaining entodiniomorphid ciliates.
(4)
After confirming the absence of entodiniomorphids under a microscope, viable isotrichid cells were used for inoculation in this experiment.
Before the in vitro experiment, all ciliate cultures were fasted for 24 h to remove residual feed from the medium. Ciliate cells were then prepared by filtering through pluristrainers of appropriate sizes and resuspending in fresh media (i.e., SP, M, or salt solution for DRM), ensuring all cultures had the same medium conditions.
A portion of the bacterial fraction was inoculated into rumen bacteria medium (330: rumen bacteria medium, DSMZ) and cultured to make feed for ruminal ciliates. Subsequently, 1 mL of the cultured bacterial fraction was inoculated into each bottle.

2.3. Preparation of In Vitro Ruminal Inoculums and Animal Donors

Rumen fluid for the in vitro fermentation experiment was collected via stomach tubing from three Hanwoo cows maintained at the Nonghyup Co., Ltd. research farm in Anseong, South Korea. The fluid was transferred to pre-warmed CO2-flushed thermos bottles and delivered to the laboratory within 30 min. Upon arrival, the rumen fluid was filtered through two layers of cheesecloth, and the bacterial fraction was isolated. To minimize ciliate contamination, low-speed centrifugation (500× g for 15 min) was performed, and the supernatant was collected. This supernatant was sequentially filtered through 30, 15, and 10 µm pluristrainers, and the filtrate was used as the final bacterial fraction for the experiment. The bacterial fraction was mixed with an in vitro buffer solution that had been flushed with 99.999% CO2 gas for 1 h. The mixture was further flushed with CO2 for an additional 20 min to maintain anaerobic conditions.

2.4. In Vitro Digestibility Experiment

After 20 min of CO2 flushing, 0.2 g of feed (0.1 g each of forage and concentrate) was preloaded into 60 mL serum bottles containing media (SP, M, or salt solution for DRM) and inoculum. Each treatment bottle was inoculated with the corresponding ciliate culture and ruminal bacteria, as detailed in Table 1.
The bottles were quickly sealed with blue butyl rubber stoppers and crimped with aluminum caps. The sealed bottles were incubated in a shaking incubator at 39 °C and 60 rpm for 24 h. After 24 h of incubation, each sample (1.6 mL) was transferred into a 2-mL Eppendorf tube and centrifuged at 17,278× g for 15 min at 4 °C. From the resulting supernatant, 1 mL was combined with 0.2 mL of 25% metaphosphoric acid and stored at −20 °C for subsequent volatile fatty acid (VFA) analysis using gas chromatography (7890B GC, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Additionally, 0.1 mL of the supernatant was mixed with 0.02 mL of 0.2 M H2SO4 and stored at 4 °C for ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) analysis. The remaining pellet was stored at −80 °C to be used for metagenomic DNA extraction. The gas pressure in the headspace of the fermentation bottles was measured using a pressure transducer (L20000DCV3, Laurel Electronics, Inc., Costa Mesa, CA, USA) attached to a rubber stopper via a 3-way cock and a 22-gauge needle. Gas production was recorded at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h during the incubation period, while maintaining headspace gas pressure at levels that would not interfere with microbial fermentation [20,21]. The collected gas was transferred into a gas bag using the 3-way cock [22]. To convert pressure values (mbar) into volume (mL), a standard curve was created by injecting a known volume of gas into a similarly sized serum bottle containing 20 mL of distilled water [22]. Methane (CH4) production, expressed as mL or mL per gram of degraded dry matter (methane yield), was determined via gas chromatography (YL6500, YOUNGIN Chromass, Anyang, Korea). Following subsampling, the remaining inoculum was transferred to a sterile 50 mL conical tube for pH measurement using a pH meter (MW150, Milwaukee Instruments, Inc., Rocky Mount, NC, USA). The remainder of the inoculum was then placed into pre-weighed nylon bags (pore size 50 μm, R510, Ankom Technology, Fairport, NY, USA) for dry matter digestibility (DMD) analysis. To ensure that no particles were left behind, the serum bottle was rinsed thoroughly with distilled water. Both pH measurements and the handling of dry matter (DM) samples were conducted on ice to minimize further microbial fermentation. The collected particles were squeezed 2–3 times to remove excess liquid and then dried completely in a 65 °C oven for 72 h. Once the DM content was measured, the samples were transferred to pre-weighed fiber bags (pore size 25 μm, F57, Ankom Technology, USA) for the determination of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents using an A220 fiber analyzer (Ankom Technology, USA) following the methodology outlined in a previous study [23].

2.5. Metagenomic DNA Extraction and Microbiome Analysis

Metagenomic DNA was extracted from the pellets of all samples using the RBB + C method described by Yu and Morrison [24]. The concentration and purity of the extracted DNA were assessed using a Nanodrop One Microvolume UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
Amplicons targeting the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene were amplified using the primer pair 341F (5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′)/805R (5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′) as reported by Herlemann et al. [25]. These amplicons were sequenced on the MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The initial microbiome analysis was conducted using Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology Version 2 (QIIME2) [26], which processed 16S rRNA sequences. Cutadapt [27] was employed to remove primer sequences, followed by quality control (Q ≥ 25), denoising, merging, and chimera removal using the DADA2 plugin [28]. Taxonomic classification of the resulting amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) was performed with the weighted Silva-138 99% classifier [29,30], which had been pre-trained using the Naïve Bayes algorithm [31]. Any ASVs that were unassigned or associated with mitochondria, chloroplasts, or archaea were excluded. The ASV table in BIOM format and the corresponding representative sequences were then utilized for subsequent analyses. In this study, only taxa present in all samples from at least one treatment group were included. Alpha diversity was evaluated using various metrics, including richness (e.g., observed ASVs and Chao1 estimates), evenness, Faith’s phylogenetic diversity (Faith’s PD), Shannon’s index, and Simpson’s index. These metrics were calculated using averaged rarefied ASV tables with 1000 iterations of random sampling, each at a depth of 31,119 sequences [32]. Microbial metabolic functions were inferred from the ASV sequences using PICRUSt2 [33]. The functional dissimilarity among the ciliate groups was evaluated using Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, with the KEGG ortholog profiles [34] serving as a representation of microbial functions. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) was conducted to visualize the difference of overall microbiota and its functional profile, and the NMDS plots were created using the ‘ggplot2’ R package [35].

2.6. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

The abundance of total bacteria, ciliate protozoa, and methanogenic archaea was determined by quantifying bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene copies and ciliate 18S rRNA gene copies, respectively, for each sample. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was conducted using universal primers specific to each microbial group: (1) 340F (5′-TCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAGT-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACCAGGGTATCTAATCCTGTT-3′) for bacteria [36], (2) uniMet1-F (5′-CCGGAGATGGAACCTGAGAC-3′) and uniMet1-R (5′-CGGTCTTGCCCAGCTCTTATTC-3′) for methanogens [37], and (3) 316F (5′-GCTTTCGWTGGTAGTGTATT-3′) and 539R (5′-CTTGCCCTCYAATC-GTWCT-3′) for ciliates [38]. The NanoDrop One Microvolume UV–Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, NC, USA) was used to measure the concentration of nucleic acids in the purified PCR products, allowing for the calculation of copy numbers per mL for standard curve generation. These prepared standards were stored at −20 °C for future use. Microbial quantification was performed using the QuantStudio 1 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, NC, USA). Each qPCR reaction included 1 μL of template DNA combined with 15 μL of a reaction mixture containing 0.075 μL of each primer (forward and reverse, each at 100 μM), 7.5 μL PowerUp SYBR Master Mix (2X), and 6.35 μL ultra-pure water. For total ciliate quantification, 2 μL of template DNA was added. The qPCR amplification followed protocols optimized for each primer set to ensure precise and reproducible results.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data on fermentation parameters and copy numbers of total bacteria, ciliates, and methanogens were analyzed using the PROC GLIMMIX procedure in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) to evaluate the effects of inoculated ciliates. Alpha-diversity indices and the number of microbial functional profiles (represented by KEGG orthologs and KEGG pathways) were also analyzed with inoculated ciliates treated as fixed effects using the same procedure. Differences between group means were identified using Duncan’s test. Statistical analysis of the relative abundance (RA) of bacterial taxa and functional profiles, considering the effects of inoculated ciliates, was conducted using the ‘MaAsLin2’ R package (v1.14.1) with a significance threshold of q ≤ 0.05 [39]. The RA of the bacterial taxa and KEGG pathways [40] was normalized using the centered log-ratio (CLR) transformation and analyzed without additional data transformations, as implemented in MaAsLin2. To evaluate differences in bacterial communities (represented by phyla and genera levels) and their functional profiles (represented by KEGG orthologs and KEGG pathways), permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was performed using the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity metric and the ‘vegan’ R package (Adonis function with 9999 random permutations). This analysis treated inoculated ciliates as fixed effects. Pairwise comparisons were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure to control for multiple testing. Spearman correlation coefficients between the RA of differentially abundant bacterial genera and in vitro rumen fermentation parameters were calculated using PROC CORR in SAS 9.4. Only correlations that were medium or strong (|r| ≥ 0.4) and statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) were visualized using the ‘ggplot2’ R package [35]. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Inoculated Ciliates on In Vitro Fermentation Parameters

Inoculation of different rumen ciliate groups had a significant effect only on the A:P ratio among in vitro fermentation parameters (Table 2). Dry matter digestibility (DMD) did not differ significantly among treatments (p = 0.791). Neutral detergent fiber digestibility (NDFD) and acid detergent fiber digestibility (ADFD) did not show significant differences among groups (NDFD, p = 0.808; ADFD, p = 0.526). The pH values across treatments remained stable, with no significant differences observed among the groups (p = 0.664). Similarly, ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) concentrations and total gas production showed no significant variation among treatments (NH3-N, p = 0.414; total gas production, p = 0.838). Methane production tended to be higher in the ISO, OPH, and MIX groups compared to the CON group. Methane yield [CH4 (mL/g of degraded dry matter)] followed a similar pattern, with the highest values observed in the MIX group, though the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.130). The total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations did not differ from any of the ciliate group inoculations (p = 0.496), but the acetate-to-propionate (A:P) ratio showed significant differences among treatments (p < 0.001). The MIX group exhibited the highest A:P ratio, which was significantly higher than that of all the other groups. Additionally, the ISO group had an intermediate level of A:P ratio, and it was significantly higher than that of the other remaining groups.
The addition of different ruminal ciliates significantly influenced each VFA concentration and profile after 24 h of incubation (Table 3). The molar proportion of acetate was higher in the MIX group than in all other groups (p = 0.001). The ENTO group exhibited the highest molar proportion of propionate, and it was significantly higher than the ISO, OPH, and MIX groups (p < 0.001). The molar proportion of butyrate exhibited the highest level in the ISO group, showing a significantly higher value than all other groups (p = 0.012). The ENTO, EPI, ISO, and OPH groups had significantly higher molar proportions of isovalerate compared to the CON and MIX groups (p = 0.005). The molar proportion of valerate was significantly higher in the ISO group compared to all other groups (p < 0.001). However, the molar proportions of isovalerate showed no significant differences among treatments (molar proportion of isovalerate, p = 0.111).

3.2. Impasct of Inoculated Ciliates on Alpha and Beta Diversity of Ruminal Microbiota

After processing the raw sequences, an average of 34,576 high-quality amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were obtained across 18 samples derived from in vitro batch cultures (Table S2). Alpha- and beta-diversity analyses were performed using a repeatedly rarefied BIOM table standardized to 31,199 ASVs per sample. Good’s coverage for all samples was calculated to be 99.97%.
Inoculated ciliates significantly altered the alpha-diversity metrics in the ruminal microbiota (Table 4). The observed ASVs were highest in the ENTO group and significantly decreased in the EPI, MIX, and OPH groups. Among them, the OPH group showed the lowest observed ASVs. The results for the Chao1 estimate were completely identical to the observed ASV, except for the figures for the ENTO group. The Shannon diversity and Simpson diversity indices were highest in the CON group and significantly reduced in groups inoculated with specific ciliates such as ENTO, EPI, and OPH groups, particularly in the OPH group. Faith’s phylogenetic diversity (PD) was significantly lower in the EPI, OPH, and MIX groups compared to the other treatments.
The evenness of microbial communities was highest in the CON and MIX groups, whereas it was significantly lower in the OPH group. In addition, the EPI and OPH groups showed lower evenness values than the other treatments. These results indicate that specific ciliate inoculation reduces microbial richness and diversity, with OPH having the most pronounced impact.

3.3. Predicted Microbial Functional Changes Induced by Inoculated Ciliates

Bacterial functional profiles were inferred from 16S rRNA gene sequencing data using the Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States 2 (PICRUSt2), aiming to detect changes in bacterial metabolic activities in response to the inoculation of ciliates. Predicted Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) orthologs were grouped into KEGG pathways. The inoculation of ciliates did not significantly affect the total number of KEGG orthologs or pathways (KEGG orthologs, p = 0.185; KEGG pathways, p = 0.713; Table S3). On the other hand, inoculated ciliates had a significant quantitative effect on the overall microbiota (Phyla, p = 0.018; Genera, p = 0.0155; Figure 1A,B), although pairwise comparisons among the six groups showed no statistically significant differences (Benjamini–Hochberg corrected p-value, Q > 0.05). Similarly, while inoculated ciliates significantly influenced the KEGG ortholog (p < 0.001, Figure 1D), there was no significant effect on the KEGG pathway (p = 0.7413; Figure 1D). Pairwise comparisons between the six groups also revealed no significant differences (q > 0.05).

3.4. Alterations in the Ruminal Microbial Composition by Inoculated Ciliates

The differential abundance test results, conducted using MaAsLin2, revealed distinct bacterial genera across the treatment groups (q < 0.05). Regarding the relative abundance of bacterial genera, Streptococcus was the most abundant in the MIX group and the second most abundant in the EPI group, while no significant differences were observed between the ENTO group and these two groups. In contrast, the CON and ISO groups showed significantly lower abundances compared to the EPI and MIX groups, but significantly higher abundances compared to the OPH group. Ruminococcaceae unclassified was significantly more abundant in the ENTO and EPI groups than in the other groups. Lachnoclostridium exhibited the highest abundance in the EPI group, while its abundance significantly decreased in the ENTO, OPH, and MIX groups. It was nearly absent in the ISO group and completely absent in the CON group. Basfia, Megasphaera, Parabacteroides, and Bacteroides were predominantly detected in the ISO group, followed consistently by the MIX group. Basfia and Megasphaera were significantly less abundant in the MIX group than in the ISO group, but significantly more abundant than in the other groups (Table 5). Fusobacterium was significantly more abundant in the ISO group compared to all the other groups, while the MIX group displayed intermediate levels. No significant differences were found between the MIX and ENTO groups, but the MIX group had significantly higher abundances than the remaining groups (Table 5).
In terms of metabolic pathways, the glycerolipid metabolism pathway (ko00561) was significantly enriched in the ISO and MIX groups, whereas it was not detected in other groups (Table 5).

3.5. Effect of Inoculated Ciliates on the Correlations Between In Vitro Fermentation Parameters and Microbial Composition

A total of 32 significant correlations (|r| ≥ 0.4, p ≤ 0.05) were identified between the RA of differentially abundant bacterial genera, total bacteria copy number, total methanogen copy number, total ciliate copy number, and in vitro ruminal fermentation parameters (Figure 2).
For RA of microbial genera, Bacteroides and Megasphaera, which were highly abundant in the ISO group, exhibited positive correlations with the CH4 production, A:P ratio, and molar proportions of valerate, whereas they exhibited negative correlations with NH3-N concentration and molar proportion of propionate. Similarly, Basfia, abundant in both ISO and MIX groups, had the same trend of correlation as Bacteroides and Megasphaera except for methane production. Fusobacterium showed positive correlations with methane production and the molar proportion of valerate, whereas it was negatively correlated with NH3-N concentration and the molar proportion of propionate. Parabacteroides, which was also associated with the ISO group, exhibited a significant positive correlation with CH4 production, A:P ratio, and molar proportion of valerate, while it exhibited a negative correlation with molar proportion of propionate. Additionally, Ruminococcaceae unclassified, which was highly abundant in the ENTO and EPI groups, was positively correlated with the molar proportion of propionate. The genus Streptococcus, highly abundant in the EPI and MIX groups, exhibited a positive correlation with NH3-N concentration and molar proportion of isovalerate, while it was negatively correlated with the A:P ratio and acetate molar proportion.
The copy number of total methanogen and bacteria was positively correlated with CH4 production but negatively correlated with the molar proportion of isobutyrate. Similarly, the total ciliate copy number exhibited negative correlations with isobutyrate molar proportion.

3.6. Quantitative Analysis of Ruminal Microbes Using Real-Time qPCR

Absolute quantification using qPCR revealed significant differences in microbial populations among treatments (Table 6). Total bacterial abundance was significantly higher in the OPH and MIX groups compared to the other groups (p = 0.006). Similarly, total ciliate abundance was highest in the MIX group, followed by the EPI group, while the ISO group exhibited the lowest values. In addition, the ENTO and OPH groups exhibited intermediate levels in total ciliate abundance (p < 0.001). Similarly, methanogen populations were significantly elevated in the OPH and MIX groups, with the significantly lower abundance observed in the CON, ENTO, and EPI groups (p < 0.001).

4. Discussion

This study aimed to investigate the effects of various ruminal ciliates on ruminal fermentation and microbiota, particularly focusing on prokaryotic microorganisms. To address the scarcity of studies on symbiotic or preferentially associated bacteria of ruminal ciliates, this research included microbiome analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene. This molecular approach strengthens the study compared to previous defaunation studies, which often lacked molecular insights. However, the limited biomass and cell counts of the inoculated ciliates in this study may pose a limitation in fully replicating the ciliate ecosystem within the rumen.

4.1. Impact of Inoculated Ciliates on Ruminal Fermentation and Total Copy Number

The trend of increased methane production in the OPH and MIX groups is associated with the total methanogen copy numbers in these groups. Considering the significant increase in total ciliate copy numbers in the EPI and MIX groups, as well as previous studies showing positive correlations between ruminal ciliates and methane production [10,41], significant methane production was expected in these groups. However, the total methanogen copy number did not increase in the EPI group, aligning with earlier findings that Epidinium has a relatively weak association with methanogens [42,43]. The RA of Streptococcus, a lactate-producing bacterium, increased in the EPI and OPH groups compared to the other groups, likely influencing the VFA profile. According to Hayirli et al. [44], lactic acid abundance reduces acetate while increasing propionate and butyrate. This explains the significantly higher acetate proportion and lower propionate proportion observed in the MIX group, where Streptococcus RA was the lowest. The significant increase in total methanogen copy numbers in the MIX group, combined with the use of acetate by methanogens [45], further supports the observed acetate proportion in this group. Additionally, Megasphaera, which was not detected in the other groups, was identified in the ISO and MIX groups. The numerically higher abundance of Streptococcus, a lactate-producing bacteria [46], in the ISO group, along with the significantly higher abundance of Megasphaera, a lactate-utilizing bacteria, in the same group, explains the significantly increased butyrate proportion observed in the ISO group [46]. This finding is consistent with previous research showing enhanced butyrate production following Megasphaera inoculation [47] and a study indicating that butyrate is efficiently converted by acid-utilizing bacteria like Megasphaera under lactic acid accumulation [48].

4.2. Implications of Inoculated Ciliates on Alpha and Beta Diversity of the Ruminal Microbiota

The alpha diversity indices, including richness (observed ASVs and Chao1 estimates), significantly decreased in the EPI, OPH, and MIX groups compared to the CON group. Additionally, Faith’s PD values significantly decreased in the OPH and MIX groups, correlating with the total ciliate copy numbers in these groups. The higher total ciliate copy numbers in these groups suggest the establishment of a ciliate consortium due to inoculation, potentially reducing prokaryotic diversity through predation. This is consistent with previous findings showing a 50–90% increase in bacterial populations in defaunated animals compared to faunated animals [6].
Beta diversity analysis based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity revealed significant differences at the phylum, genus, and KEGG ortholog levels among treatments. This indicates that the diversity and functional diversity of prokaryotes associated with different ciliates vary in fauna-free environments. However, the lack of significant differences in KEGG pathways aligns with previous findings, suggesting that microbial communities in the rumen maintain functional stability despite compositional changes [49].

4.3. Functional Predictions of Ruminal Microbiota in Response to Inoculated Ciliates

Significant differences in the predicted microbial functions due to inoculated ciliates were observed only in the ko00561 pathway (glycerolipid metabolism). This pathway significantly increased only in the ISO and MIX groups, where isotrichids were presumably inoculated, suggesting a potential association between isotrichids and this pathway. Additionally, the bacteria uniquely identified in these groups (Basfia, Megasphaera, Parabacteroides, and Bacteroides) may be linked to this pathway. In particular, Bacteroides, which is known to produce glycerolipids, such as plasmalogens, has been reported to exhibit species-specific lipid profiles [50]. Furthermore, Megasphaera elsdenii was found to produce plasmalogens via the plasmalogen synthase MeHAD [51]. The antioxidative properties of plasmalogens, which reduce oxidative stress, may be connected to the greater oxygen tolerance of isotrichids compared to entodinia [52,53].

4.4. Metabolic Relationship Between Ruminal Fermentation Parameters and Microbial Genera

Previous studies have highlighted the association between Entodinium caudatum and amylolytic bacteria [43], and its relationship with lactic acid [44,54]. The present study corroborates these findings, as all groups inoculated with entodinia showed a significantly higher RA of Streptococcus compared to the ISO and CON groups. This suggests that entodinia, beyond E. caudatum, may influence Streptococcus abundance and lactic acid levels.
Furthermore, Streptococcus lutetiensis was predominantly identified in this study, and its significantly higher abundance in cellulolytic ciliate-associated groups (EPI and OPH) compared to ENTO and MIX groups implies a potential antagonistic interaction with E. caudatum. The significantly higher A:P ratio in the MIX group is attributed to the significant increase in acetate and decrease in propionate, driven by the successfully established ciliate consortium in this group, consistent with one study [10].

5. Conclusions

This study investigated the impact of ruminal ciliate inoculation in a fauna-free environment on (1) in vitro fermentation parameters and (2) ruminal prokaryotic community composition and functional changes. While no significant changes were observed in fermentation parameters, such as NDFD, ADFD, and NH3-N, likely due to insufficient ciliate cell counts, the findings in this study underscore the critical role of ruminal ciliates in shaping microbial community dynamics and metabolic processes. Specifically, Streptococcus and Megasphaera were associated with fermentation byproducts such as lactic acid, while Bacteroides and Megasphaera were linked to broader metabolic pathways, including lipid metabolism and oxidative stress tolerance. These findings suggest that ruminal ciliates may adapt to the anaerobic environment of the rumen through interactions with associated prokaryotes and simultaneously influence metabolic processes within the rumen. Furthermore, these findings highlight the need for further research on the relationship between lactic acid-associated bacteria and ruminal ciliates, as well as the oxygen tolerance and plasmalogen metabolism of isotrichids. Future studies should aim to overcome the limitations of this study by inoculating ciliates with sufficient biomass to establish a robust ruminal consortium.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/fermentation11010028/s1: Table S1: Diet composition used in the in vitro digestibility experiment (% of dry matter, DM); Table S2: Sample information and sequencing statistics of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing variants; Table S3: Number of KEGG orthologs and pathways among each group after 24 h of incubation.

Author Contributions

T.P. and G.K. conceptualized and designed the study. G.K. and W.L. were responsible for collecting rumen fluid samples, developing experimental protocols, and carrying out the experiments. Microbiome data analysis was conducted by G.K. and T.P., while fermentation data analysis was handled by G.K. The initial draft of the manuscript was written by G.K., with T.P. providing additional contributions to the writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Korean government (RS-2023-00213604).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Chung-Ang University (protocol code 202401030032, approved on 1 April 2024). All animal-related procedures in this study were conducted in accordance with the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments) guidelines and relevant regulations.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets produced in this study are accessible through online repositories. The repository details and associated accession numbers are available in the NCBI database at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1196625 (accessed on 11 December 2024).

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Chung-Ang University Graduate Research Scholarship, 2023.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hungate, R. The Rumen and Its Microbes; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tharwat, M.; Al-Sobayil, F.; Ali, A.; Buczinski, S. Transabdominal ultrasonographic appearance of the gastrointestinal viscera of healthy camels (Camelus dromedaries). Res. Vet. Sci. 2012, 93, 1015–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Huws, S.A.; Creevey, C.J.; Oyama, L.B.; Mizrahi, I.; Denman, S.E.; Popova, M.; Munoz-Tamayo, R.; Forano, E.; Waters, S.M.; Hess, M.; et al. Addressing Global Ruminant Agricultural Challenges Through Understanding the Rumen Microbiome: Past, Present, and Future. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Puniya, A.K.; Singh, R.; Kamra, D.N. Rumen Microbiology: From Evolution to Revolution; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gruninger, R.J.; Ribeiro, G.O.; Cameron, A.; McAllister, T.A. Invited review: Application of meta-omics to understand the dynamic nature of the rumen microbiome and how it responds to diet in ruminants. Animal 2019, 13, 1843–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Williams, A.; Coleman, G. The rumen protozoa. In The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1997; pp. 73–139. [Google Scholar]
  7. Demeyer, D.; Van Nevel, C. Effect of defaunation on the metabolism of rumen micro-organisms. Br. J. Nutr. 1979, 42, 515–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ivan, M.; Veira, D. Duodenal flow and soluble proportions of zinc, manganese, copper and iron in the rumen fluid and duodenal digesta of faunated and defaunated sheep. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1982, 62, 979–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abel, H.; Schröder, B.; Lebzien, P.; Flachowsky, G. Effects of defaunation on fermentation characteristics and biotin balance in an artificial rumen-simulation system (RUSITEC) receiving diets with different amounts and types of cereal. Br. J. Nutr. 2006, 95, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Newbold, C.J.; de la Fuente, G.; Belanche, A.; Ramos-Morales, E.; McEwan, N.R. The role of ciliate protozoa in the rumen. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Park, T.; Meulia, T.; Firkins, J.L.; Yu, Z. Inhibition of the rumen ciliate Entodinium caudatum by antibiotics. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fonty, G.; Jouany, J.-P.; Thivend, P.; Gouet, P.; Senaud, J. A descriptive study of rumen digestion in meroxenic lambs according to the nature and complexity of the microflora. Reprod. Nutr. Développement 1983, 23, 857–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Koenig, K.M.; Ivan, M.; Teferedegne, B.; Morgavi, D.; Rode, L.; Ibrahim, I.; Newbold, C. Effect of dietary Enterolobium cyclocarpum on microbial protein flow and nutrient digestibility in sheep maintained fauna-free, with total mixed fauna or with Entodinium caudatum monofauna. Br. J. Nutr. 2007, 98, 504–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ivan, M. Comparison of duodenal flow and digestibility in fauna-free sheep inoculated with Holotrich protozoa, Entodinium monofauna or total mixed protozoa population. Br. J. Nutr. 2008, 101, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. de la Fuente Oliver, G.; Morgavi, D.P.; Belanche, A.; Fondevila, M. In vitro predation of pure bacterial species by rumen protozoa from monofaunated sheep, determined by qPCR. Options Méditerranéennes: Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens 2011, 99, 91–96. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dehority, B.A. Physiological characteristics of several rumen protozoa grown in vitro with observations on within and among species variation. Eur. J. Protistol. 2010, 46, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dehority, B.A. Generation times of Epidinium caudatum and Entodinium caudatum, determined in vitro by transferring at various time intervals. J. Anim. Sci. 1998, 76, 1189–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, Q.; He, J.; Wang, Y.; Xiong, J.; Qin, W.; Feng, J. Improved and easy method for long-term in vitro culture of rumen ciliates Dasytricha ruminantium. MethodsX 2024, 13, 102902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Heald, P.; Oxford, A.; Sugden, B. A convenient method for preparing massive suspensions of virtually bacteria-free ciliate protozoa of the genera Isotricha and Dasytricha for manometric studies. Nature 1952, 169, 1055–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hamid, M.M.A.; Moon, J.; Yoo, D.; Kim, H.; Lee, Y.K.; Song, J.; Seo, J. Rumen fermentation, methane production, and microbial composition following in vitro evaluation of red ginseng byproduct as a protein source. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2020, 62, 801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yáñez-Ruiz, D.R.; Bannink, A.; Dijkstra, J.; Kebreab, E.; Morgavi, D.P.; O’Kiely, P.; Reynolds, C.K.; Schwarm, A.; Shingfield, K.J.; Yu, Z. Design, implementation and interpretation of in vitro batch culture experiments to assess enteric methane mitigation in ruminants—A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2016, 216, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Theodorou, M.K.; Williams, B.A.; Dhanoa, M.S.; McAllan, A.B.; France, J. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1994, 48, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yu, Z.; Morrison, M. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. Biotechniques 2004, 36, 808–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Herlemann, D.P.; Labrenz, M.; Jürgens, K.; Bertilsson, S.; Waniek, J.J.; Andersson, A.F. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 2011, 5, 1571–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bolyen, E.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.R.; Bokulich, N.A.; Abnet, C.C.; Al-Ghalith, G.A.; Alexander, H.; Alm, E.J.; Arumugam, M.; Asnicar, F. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 2011, 17, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Callahan, B.J.; Wong, J.; Heiner, C.; Oh, S.; Theriot, C.M.; Gulati, A.S.; McGill, S.K.; Dougherty, M.K. High-throughput amplicon sequencing of the full-length 16S rRNA gene with single-nucleotide resolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, e103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Quast, C.; Pruesse, E.; Yilmaz, P.; Gerken, J.; Schweer, T.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Glockner, F.O. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D590–D596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kaehler, B.D.; Bokulich, N.A.; McDonald, D.; Knight, R.; Caporaso, J.G.; Huttley, G.A. Species abundance information improves sequence taxonomy classification accuracy. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bokulich, N.A.; Kaehler, B.D.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.; Bolyen, E.; Knight, R.; Huttley, G.A.; Gregory Caporaso, J. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 2018, 6, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xia, Y. q2-repeat-rarefy: QIIME2 plugin for generating the average rarefied table for library size normalization using repeated rarefaction. GitHub. 2021. Available online: https://github.com/xy-repo/q2-repeat-rarefy (accessed on 3 December 2024).
  33. Douglas, G.M.; Maffei, V.J.; Zaneveld, J.R.; Yurgel, S.N.; Brown, J.R.; Taylor, C.M.; Huttenhower, C.; Langille, M.G. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 685–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Villanueva, R.A.M.; Chen, Z.J. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Meas. Interdiscip. Res. Perspect. 2019, 17, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nadkarni, M.A.; Martin, F.E.; Jacques, N.A.; Hunter, N. Determination of bacterial load by real-time PCR using a broad-range (universal) probe and primers set. Microbiology 2002, 148, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhou, M.; Hernandez-Sanabria, E.; Guan, L.L. Assessment of the Microbial Ecology of Ruminal Methanogens in Cattle with Different Feed Efficiencies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 6524–6533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sylvester, J.T.; Karnati, S.K.R.; Yu, Z.; Morrison, M.; Firkins, J.L. Development of an assay to quantify rumen ciliate protozoal biomass in cows using real-time PCR. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 3378–3384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mallick, H.; Rahnavard, A.; McIver, L.J.; Ma, S.; Zhang, Y.; Nguyen, L.H.; Tickle, T.L.; Weingart, G.; Ren, B.; Schwager, E.H.; et al. Multivariable association discovery in population-scale meta-omics studies. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2021, 17, e1009442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kanehisa, M.; Furumichi, M.; Sato, Y.; Kawashima, M.; Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 51, D587–D592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guyader, J.; Eugène, M.; Nozière, P.; Morgavi, D.; Doreau, M.; Martin, C. Influence of rumen protozoa on methane emission in ruminants: A meta-analysis approach. Animal 2014, 8, 1816–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vogels, G.D.; Hoppe, W.F.; Stumm, C.K. Association of methanogenic bacteria with rumen ciliates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1980, 40, 608–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Takenaka, A.; Itabashi, H. Changes in the population of some functional groups of rumen bacteria including methanogenic bacteria by changing the rumen ciliates in calves. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 1995, 41, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hayirli, A.; Gulsen, N.; Umucalilar, H.D.; Alatas, M.S. Effect of lactic acid on Entodinium caudatum monoculture. Sci. Pap Ser. D Anim. Sci. 2014, 57, 98–100. [Google Scholar]
  45. Henderson, G.; Cox, F.; Ganesh, S.; Jonker, A.; Young, W.; Collaborators, G.R.C.; Janssen, P.H. Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wood, B.J.; Holzapfel, W. The Genera of Lactic Acid Bacteria; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1992; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  47. Cabral, L.d.S.; Weimer, P.J. Megasphaera elsdenii: Its role in ruminant nutrition and its potential industrial application for organic acid biosynthesis. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tsukahara, T.; Koyama, H.; Okada, M.; Ushida, K. Stimulation of butyrate production by gluconic acid in batch culture of pig cecal digesta and identification of butyrate-producing bacteria. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 2229–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Taxis, T.M.; Wolff, S.; Gregg, S.J.; Minton, N.O.; Zhang, C.; Dai, J.; Schnabel, R.D.; Taylor, J.F.; Kerley, M.S.; Pires, J.C. The players may change but the game remains: Network analyses of ruminal microbiomes suggest taxonomic differences mask functional similarity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 9600–9612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ryan, E.; Gonzalez Pastor, B.; Gethings, L.A.; Clarke, D.J.; Joyce, S.A. Lipidomic analysis reveals differences in Bacteroides species driven largely by plasmalogens, glycerophosphoinositols and certain sphingolipids. Metabolites 2023, 13, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, F.; Yang, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, B.; Xie, Z.; Yu, N.; Zhao, J.; Goldfine, H.; Dai, S.; Zhang, G.; et al. Characterization and heterologous expression of plasmalogen synthase MeHAD from Megasphaera elsdenii. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2023, 1868, 159358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yarlett, N.; Hann, A.C.; Lloyd, D.; Williams, A. Hydrogenosomes in the rumen protozoon Dasytricha ruminantium Schuberg. Biochem. J. 1981, 200, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yarlett, N.; Hann, A.C.; Lloyd, D.; Williams, A.G. Hydrogenosomes in a mixed isolate of Isotricha prostoma and Isotricha intestinalis from ovine rumen contents. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Comp. Biochem. 1983, 74, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Alatas, M.; Arık, H.; Gulsen, N.; Kahraman, O. Effects of Entodinium caudatum monocultures in an acidotic environment on in vitro rumen fermentation. J. Anim. Feed. Sci. 2022, 31, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. NMDS plots for overall microbiota at different taxonomic levels (phyla, (A); genera, (B), respectively), and prokaryotic functional profile (KEGG orthologs, (C); KEGG pathways, (D), respectively) based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. Red font indicates statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). CON, control group without ciliate added; ENTO, small entodinia inoculated; EPI, Epidinium spp. inoculated; ISO, isotrichids inoculated; OPH, Ophryoscolex spp. inoculated; MIX, mixed group with small entodinia, Epidinium spp., isotrichids, and Ophryoscolex spp. inoculated; NS, no significant difference between treatment groups.
Figure 1. NMDS plots for overall microbiota at different taxonomic levels (phyla, (A); genera, (B), respectively), and prokaryotic functional profile (KEGG orthologs, (C); KEGG pathways, (D), respectively) based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. Red font indicates statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). CON, control group without ciliate added; ENTO, small entodinia inoculated; EPI, Epidinium spp. inoculated; ISO, isotrichids inoculated; OPH, Ophryoscolex spp. inoculated; MIX, mixed group with small entodinia, Epidinium spp., isotrichids, and Ophryoscolex spp. inoculated; NS, no significant difference between treatment groups.
Fermentation 11 00028 g001aFermentation 11 00028 g001b
Figure 2. Heatmap of Spearman’s correlation coefficients between the in vitro rumen fermentation parameters and relative abundance of differentially abundant bacterial genera, as well as log copy number total methanogen, total ciliates, and total bacteria after 24 h of incubation (|r| ≥ 0.4, *, p ≤ 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001). NH3-N, ammonia nitrogen; A:P ratio, acetate-to-propionate ratio.
Figure 2. Heatmap of Spearman’s correlation coefficients between the in vitro rumen fermentation parameters and relative abundance of differentially abundant bacterial genera, as well as log copy number total methanogen, total ciliates, and total bacteria after 24 h of incubation (|r| ≥ 0.4, *, p ≤ 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001). NH3-N, ammonia nitrogen; A:P ratio, acetate-to-propionate ratio.
Fermentation 11 00028 g002
Table 1. Experimental design and the composition of culture components.
Table 1. Experimental design and the composition of culture components.
SampleCONENTOEPIISOOPHMIX
Bacterial fraction (mL)151515151515
Ruminal bacteria for feed (mL)111111
Culture
medium
(mL)
SP *212211.5
M *110110.75
SP salt solution
of DRM *
111010.75
Ciliate
culture
(mL)
ENTO010000.25
EPI001000.25
ISO000100.25
OPH000010.25
* SP and M medium, and SP salt solution of DRM compositions were based on previously established protocols as detailed in [16,18]. Approximate counts of each inoculated ciliate culture are as follows: (1) 6225 cells/mL of small entodinia; (2) 1200 cells/mL of Epidinium spp.; (3) 900 cells/mL of isotirichids; (4) 210 cells/mL of Ophryoscolex spp. CON, control group without ciliate added; ENTO, small entodinia inoculated; EPI, Epidinium spp. inoculated; ISO, isotrichids inoculated; OPH, Ophryoscolex spp. inoculated; MIX, mixed group with small entodinia, Epidinium spp., isotrichids, and Ophryoscolex spp. inoculated; DRM, Dasytricha ruminantium medium.
Table 2. In vitro fermentation parameters after 24 h of incubation.
Table 2. In vitro fermentation parameters after 24 h of incubation.
ItemCONENTOEPIISOOPHMIXp-ValuePooled SEM
DMD (%)71.2670.5170.7872.0472.4072.670.7913.17
NDFD (%)51.6149.9550.1352.2452.8951.610.8084.72
ADFD (%)37.3336.2336.2340.1441.8837.330.5267.53
pH6.476.466.496.486.496.480.6640.03
NH3-N (mg/dL)4.494.734.744.424.784.440.4140.39
Total Gas (mL)39.0638.2838.5038.7338.7039.980.8382.31
CH4 (mL)0.98 b1.27 a1.15 ab1.33 a1.38 a1.39 a0.0960.25
CH4 (mL/g dDM)6.869.198.159.229.569.580.1301.78
Total VFA (mM)38.1634.2829.2233.3124.9541.130.49614.90
A:P ratio1.66 C1.63 C1.64 C1.72 B1.66 C1.78 A<0.0017.95
A–C, Means (n = 3) within a row followed by different superscripts indicate significant differences among treatments (p ≤ 0.05). a,b, Means (n = 3) within a row followed by different superscripts indicate tendency among treatments (0.05 < p ≤ 0.10). CON, control group without ciliate added; ENTO, small entodinia inoculated; EPI, Epidinium spp. inoculated; ISO, isotrichids inoculated; OPH, Ophryoscolex spp. inoculated; MIX, mixed group with small entodinia, Epidinium spp., isotrichids, and Ophryoscolex spp. inoculated; DMD, dry matter digestibility; NDFD, neutral detergent fiber digestibility; NH3-N, ammonia nitrogen; CH4 (mL/g dDM), mL of methane production per degraded gram of dry matter; total VFA (mM), total volatile fatty acid concentration; A:P ratio, acetate to propionate ratio; Pooled SEM, pooled standard error of the mean.
Table 3. Inoculated ciliates’ effects on volatile fatty acid (VFA) profiles after 24 h of incubation.
Table 3. Inoculated ciliates’ effects on volatile fatty acid (VFA) profiles after 24 h of incubation.
ItemCONENTOEPIISOOPHMIXp-ValuePooled SEM
Total VFA (mM)38.1634.2829.2233.3124.9541.130.49614.90
A:P ratio1.66 C1.63 C1.64 C1.72 B1.66 C1.78 A<0.0017.95
Acetate (%)53.27 B52.51 B52.52 B52.34 B52.72 B54.77 A0.0014.82
Propionate (%)32.03 AB32.28 A32.00 AB30.40 C31.79 B30.78 C<0.0010.03
Isobutyrate (%)0.690.620.580.680.570.520.1110.11
Butyrate (%)11.96 B12.38 B12.60 B13.56 A12.59 B11.75 B0.0121.75
Isovalerate (%)0.88 B1.06 A1.09 A1.06 A1.07 A0.91 B0.0050.15
Valerate (%)1.17 B1.16 B1.20 B1.96 A1.27 B1.28 B<0.0010.16
Total VFA (mM)38.1634.2829.2233.3124.9541.130.49614.90
A:P ratio1.66 C1.63 C1.64 C1.72 B1.66 C1.78 A<0.0017.95
A–C, Means (n = 3) within a row followed by different superscripts indicate significant differences among treatments (p ≤ 0.05). CON, control group without ciliate added; ENTO, small entodinia inoculated; EPI, Epidinium spp. inoculated; ISO, isotrichids inoculated; OPH, Ophryoscolex spp. inoculated; MIX, mixed group with small entodinia, Epidinium spp., isotrichids, and Ophryoscolex spp. inoculated; Pooled SEM, pooled standard error of the mean.
Table 4. Alpha-diversity measurements for inoculated ciliates effects.
Table 4. Alpha-diversity measurements for inoculated ciliates effects.
ItemCONENTOEPIISOOPHMIXp-ValuePooled SEM
Observed ASVs777 A783 A727 B744 AB674 C709 BC0.00338.160
Evenness0.816 A0.804 AB0.796 BC0.813 A0.789 C0.816 A0.0080.012
Faith’s PD57.209 AB59.345 A55.137 BC57.246 AB52.061 C52.671 C0.0333.696
Chao1777 A784 A727 B744 AB674 C709 BC0.00338.161
Shannon7.835 A7.733 A7.563 B7.756 A7.415 C7.721 A<0.0010.117
Simpson0.986 A0.983 B0.979 C0.985 AB0.978 C0.985 AB<0.0010.002
A–C, Means (n = 3) within a row followed by different superscripts indicate significant differences among treatments (p ≤ 0.05). CON, control group without ciliate added; ENTO, small entodinia inoculated; EPI, Epidinium spp. inoculated; ISO, isotrichids inoculated; OPH, Ophryoscolex spp. inoculated; MIX, mixed group with small entodinia, Epidinium spp., isotrichids, and Ophryoscolex spp. inoculated; Pooled SEM, pooled standard error of the mean.
Table 5. Differentially abundant bacterial genera and the KEGG pathway by inoculated ciliates analyzed using MaAsLin2 (q ≤ 0.05).
Table 5. Differentially abundant bacterial genera and the KEGG pathway by inoculated ciliates analyzed using MaAsLin2 (q ≤ 0.05).
Bacterial Genera
GenusCONENTOEPIISOOPHMIXPooled
SEM
Streptococcus5.047 BC7.846 AB9.477 A5.863 BC9.629 A4.500 C1.265
Ruminococcaceae
unclassified
0.068 B0.147 A0.134 A0.068 B0.076 B0.096 B0.029
Lachnoclostridium0 C0.127 B0.206 A0.004 C0.132 B0.109 B0.032
Basfia0.004 C0 C0 C0.196 A0 C0.065 B0.012
Megasphaera0 C0 C0 C0.410 A0 C0.205 B0.007
Parabacteroides0 B0 B0 B0.020 A0 B0.001 B0.003
Fusobacterium0.019 C0.054 BC0.023 C0.209 A0.013 C0.077 B0.024
Bacteroides0 C0 C0 C0.477 A0 C0.102 B0.019
KEGG pathways
PathwayCONENTOEPIISOOPHMIXPooled
SEM
ko00561
(Glycerolipid metabolism)
0 B0 B0 B0.497 A0 B0.491 A0.012
A–C: Means (n = 3) within a row followed by different superscripts indicate significant differences among treatments (q ≤ 0.05). CON, control group with ciliate added; ENTO, small entodinia added group; EPI, Epidinium spp. added group; ISO, isotrichids added group; OPH, Ophryoscolex spp. added group; MIX, mixed group with small entodinia, Epidinium spp., isotrichids, and Ophryoscolex spp. added; Pooled SEM, pooled standard error of the mean.
Table 6. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis for absolute quantification of ruminal bacteria, ciliates, and methanogen.
Table 6. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis for absolute quantification of ruminal bacteria, ciliates, and methanogen.
SampleCONENTOEPIISOOPHMIXp-ValuePooled SEM
Total bacteria10.00 B10.11 B10.01 B10.02 B10.74 A10.86 A0.0060.41
Total ciliates-6.14 C7.02 B5.76 D6.29 C7.45 A<0.0010.19
Total methanogens6.73 B6.73 B6.82 B6.92 B7.43 A7.39 A<0.0010.23
A–D, Means (n = 3) within a row followed by different superscripts indicate significant differences among treatments (p ≤ 0.05). -, Data were not measured. CON, control group without ciliate added; ENTO, small entodinia inoculated; EPI, Epidinium spp. inoculated; ISO, isotrichids inoculated; OPH, Ophryoscolex spp. inoculated; MIX, mixed group with small entodinia, Epidinium spp., isotrichids, and Ophryoscolex spp. inoculated; Pooled SEM, pooled standard error of the mean.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, G.; Lee, W.; Park, T. Preliminary Study on the Impact of Ruminal Ciliate Inoculation in Fauna-Free Conditions on the Ruminal Fermentation and Ciliate–Prokaryote Association In Vitro. Fermentation 2025, 11, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11010028

AMA Style

Kim G, Lee W, Park T. Preliminary Study on the Impact of Ruminal Ciliate Inoculation in Fauna-Free Conditions on the Ruminal Fermentation and Ciliate–Prokaryote Association In Vitro. Fermentation. 2025; 11(1):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11010028

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Geonwoo, Woohyung Lee, and Tansol Park. 2025. "Preliminary Study on the Impact of Ruminal Ciliate Inoculation in Fauna-Free Conditions on the Ruminal Fermentation and Ciliate–Prokaryote Association In Vitro" Fermentation 11, no. 1: 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11010028

APA Style

Kim, G., Lee, W., & Park, T. (2025). Preliminary Study on the Impact of Ruminal Ciliate Inoculation in Fauna-Free Conditions on the Ruminal Fermentation and Ciliate–Prokaryote Association In Vitro. Fermentation, 11(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11010028

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop