Next Article in Journal
Efficiency of Osmotic Dehydration of Pomegranate Seeds in Polyols Solutions Using Response Surface Methodology
Next Article in Special Issue
‘Garnem’ and Myrobalan ‘P.2175’: Two Different Drought Responses and Their Implications in Drought Tolerance
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Phosphite Supply in the MS Medium on Root Morphological Characteristics, Fresh Biomass and Enzymatic Behavior in Five Genotypes of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phenotyping Almond Orchards for Architectural Traits Influenced by Rootstock Choice
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Advances in Hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) Rootstocks Worldwide

Horticulturae 2021, 7(9), 267; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7090267
by Mercè Rovira
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Horticulturae 2021, 7(9), 267; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7090267
Submission received: 14 June 2021 / Revised: 12 August 2021 / Accepted: 20 August 2021 / Published: 26 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rootstock Genetics and Improvement in Breeding)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This work is interesting, especially for practitioners. It is not remarkably scientifically written and summarizes very little knowledge. Nevertheless, the simple goal set by the author was achieved. Paper is well prepared. I have marked a few minor comments for improvement in the PDF.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Attahed you will finf the new version  of my manuscript, following your comments.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The ms 'Advances in hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) rootstocks world-2 wide' is an exhaustive revision about not suckering rootstocks for hazelnuts.

The ms is well organized and well written with minors spelling mistakes. 

Nonetheless it could be interesting to include a section related to compatibility/incompatibility of C. colurna L. with C. avellana

 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for your revision. You sugested me to include a section related to compatibility/incompatibility of C. colurna with C. avellana. This topic is develelopped already in the manuscript, but not in a special section. As you are the only reviewer (from 3 reviewers) who has proposed this new section, I consider that it is not necessary to include it.

 

Reviewer 3 Report

Interesting rewiew

Author Response

Thank you for revising my document

Back to TopTop