Next Article in Journal
Strawberry Production with Different Mulches and Wetted Areas
Next Article in Special Issue
Morphological and Physiological Responses of In Vitro-Grown Cucurbita sp. Landraces Seedlings under Osmotic Stress by Mannitol and PEG
Previous Article in Journal
Climate Variables of the Sites of Origin and Genotype Influence on Phenolic Compounds Accumulation in Cultivars of Myrtus communis L.
Previous Article in Special Issue
Encapsulation in Calcium Alginate of Nodes from Stolons of Mentha spicata L.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Eradication of PPV and PNRSV Viruses from Three Peach Cultivars Using Thermotherapy In Vitro, Including Optimization of Microshoots’ Multiplication and Rooting Medium

1
Department of Plant Physiology and Plant Ecology, Institute of Agronomy, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Ménesi Str. 44, H-1118 Budapest, Hungary
2
Department of Agronomy, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 1477893855, Iran
3
Department of Tissue and Cell Culture, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Agricultural Research, Education & Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj 3135933151, Iran
4
Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Sistan and Baluchestan, Zabol 98615538, Iran
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2022, 8(10), 929; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8100929
Submission received: 6 September 2022 / Revised: 4 October 2022 / Accepted: 7 October 2022 / Published: 10 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Application of Tissue Culture to Horticulture)

Abstract

:
Peach cultivars (’Elberta’, ‘Red Top’, and ’Dixie Red’) were studied for their in vitro adoptability and performance in producing virus-free plantlets. The thermotherapy method with increasing temperatures (25 °C to 37 °C) was applied for the elimination of famous peach infecting plum pox viruses (PPVs) and prunus necrotic ringspot virus (PNRSV), and the DS-ELISA test and RT-PCR technique were performed to confirm the production of virus-free microshoots. The application of 30 mg L−1 of Fe-EDDHA treatment resulted in the best performance for culture establishment of all cultivars, where the best subsequent morphological performance in terms of branch and leaf numbers was recorded for the ’Dixie Red’ cultivar in MS medium, supplemented with 0.5 mgL−1 of gibberellic acid (GA3) and 0.5 mg L−1 of 6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP). At the regeneration stage, the highest (26.96 mm) and lowest (18.43 mm) shoot lengths were obtained from the ’Dixie Red’ cultivar treated with GA3 (2 mg L−1) + thidiazuron (TDZ) (2.5 mg L−1) and the ’Red Top’ cultivar treated with GA3 (1 mg L−1) + TDZ (1 mg L−1), respectively. The leaf numbers were affected by the application of growth regulators, where the ’Elberta’ cultivar under GA3 (2 mg L−1) + TDZ (2.5 mg L−1) treatment showed the highest numbers and the ’Red Top’ cultivar under GA3 (1 mg L−1) + TDZ (1 mg L−1) showed the lowest mean values. The thermotherapy treatment and micropropagation of shoot tips resulted in 100% virus-free plantlets, as confirmed by both applied diagnostic methods. The result of the application of the rooting stage with growth regulators on ’Elberta’ plantlets showed the best performance (90%) in ½ MS medium supplemented with 0.5–1 mg L−1 of IBA, which was significantly higher than the same treatment in MS medium. The obtained results should constitute the basis for further optimization of the multiplication and rooting of virus-free peach plantlets to be served for nurseries and planation orchards.

1. Introduction

Prunus necrotic ringspot virus—a member of the genus Ilarvirus of the family Bromoviridae—and plum pox virus—a member of the genus Potyvirus of the family Potyviridae (ICTV taxonomy available at https://ictv.global/taxonomy, accessed on 3 October 2022)—commonly infect important stone fruit trees such as peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) and nectarine (P. persica var. nucipersica), causing severe loss of productivity due to the consequent poor fruit quality and shortened tree life [1,2,3]. The severity of the host reaction and the consequent extent of interaction depend on the virus types and strains (persistent, semi-persistent, and persistent), which may range from largely latent (with no visible symptoms) to substantial damages with enormous economic impacts [1].
The presence of virus-infected fruit trees is remarkably high in orchards worldwide, as confirmed in an Australian study, with more that 70% of the investigated stone fruit trees being positive for one or more types of viruses [4]. The same virus infection incidence rate was found in a Czech Republic germplasm collection orchard in 2020 [5]. In another recent study in Bosnia and Herzegovina, more that 50% of the studied plum trees were positive for PPV [6]. So far, no natural form of PPV resistance has been reported or confidently identified for peach trees [7]. Therefore, the production and cultivation of virus-free plants is indispensable and the most realistic approach to establish sustainable orchards with optimized yield, to import/export novel cultivars from/to other countries, to safely exchange breeding materials between countries or regions, and to preserve plant germplasm [8].
The application of healthy, free-from pathogens, and uniform plants is the core requisite of a productive horticultural system. Among the approaches in plant virus eradication, in vitro techniques proved to be relevant and a successful strategy [8]. The historic development of in vitro plant cell and tissue culture has undoubtedly been a major factor in the advancement of our knowledge in cell biology and physiology. Micropropagation and plant tissue culture techniques are widely used for virus-free germplasm production from several vegetatively propagated plant species.
Thermotherapy is the term used to refer to the application of a high temperature that generates unfavorable conditions for virus multiplication in the cells and effectively decreases the virus load in the shoot tips [9,10,11,12]. Among the established thermotherapy-based methods typically used for virus elimination, combined in vitro thermotherapy with shoot tip culture, micrografting, electrotherapy, chemotherapy (especially using ribavirin), and shoot tip cryotherapy has been reported to be efficient for the eradication of different viruses from plants [8,13,14,15,16]. The efficiency of thermotherapy-mediated elimination of viruses from plant materials is very diverse and ranges from 20 to 100% [11,15,17,18,19,20].
In the current research, we investigated the effect of thermotherapy and optimized the in vitro conditions for the eradication of PPV and PNRSV from in vitro cultured shoots of three important peach cultivars of Iranian orchards. We believe that the presented methodology can be adopted and utilized in plant research institutes and laboratories to obtain and deliver pathogen-free plant materials for distribution in nurseries.

2. Materials and Methods

The study was performed on peach cultivars infected with an important peach virus (PPV and PNRSV) in a factorial experiment with a completely randomized design. Three peach cultivars (’Elberta’ (known as ‘Alberta’ in Iran), Red Tob, and ’Dixie Red’) were selected to obtain virus-free plantlets.

2.1. In Vitro Culture Establishment and Thermotherapy

The spring shoot tips (1.5 cm) of infected plants with both PPV and PNRSV were used for in vitro culture initiation after their infection status was confirmed by double antibody sandwich-ELISA kit (Bioreba, Basel, Switzerland) and RT-PCR methods. The plant materials were placed in vitro on autoclaved MS medium supplemented with GA3 (0.5 mg L−1) and BAP (0.5 mg L−1) for culture establishment. According to the fact that the peach plants are highly sensitive to iron content and iron type deficiency, treatments included the supplementation of different concentrations of ethylenediamine di-2-hydroxyphenyl acetate ferric (Fe-EDDHA) at three levels (0, 15, and 30 mg L−1) for the three cultivars.
After one week of in vitro culture initiation, the non-contaminated cultures were subjected to thermotherapy, where the light room temperature was gradually raised from 25 °C to 37 °Cover one week (2 °C/day) and then kept at 37 °C for 4 weeks until newly grown in vitro shoots were distinguishable.

2.2. Establishment of Regeneration Culture

At the end of the thermotherapy period, the explants (microshoots of 2.5–3 cm) were excised and collected from tolerant (to high temperature) branches. At this stage, MS medium (with 30 g L−1 sucrose and 7 g L−1 agar) was used with different concentrations of growth regulators’ supplementation for micropropagation.
In two different setups, a two-factorial experiment was designed for the determination of the best plant growth regulators’ application.
MS medium was supplemented with the following:
Exp 1: GA3 (1 mg L−1) + BAP (1.5 mg L−1) or GA3 (2 mg L−1) + BAP (2 mg L−1)
Exp 2: GA3 (1 mg L−1) + TDZ (1 mg L−1), or GA3 (1 mg L−1) + TDZ (1.5 mg L−1), or GA3 (2 mg L−1) + TDZ (1 mg L−1), or GA3 (2 mg L−1) + TDZ (2.5 mg L−1).
The cultures were transferred to growth chamber at 22 ± 2 °C under a 16 h photoperiod with a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 60 µmol m−2 s−1 at culture level, provided by cool-white-fluorescent lamps. At this period, subcultures were conducted in 4-week intervals in the same culture medium.

2.3. Selection of Virus-Free In Vitro Shoots

Leaf samples from microshoots were collected for virus detection by the ELISA and RT-PCR test after 4 weeks of thermotherapy. The sanitary status of in vivo collected samples regenerated from therapies and controls was determined using DAS-ELISA, as described by Manganaris et al. [17]. Plant extracts were prepared by homogenizing the leaf tissues in phosphate buffered saline–Tween (1:20 w/v) containing 2% polyvinylpyrrolidone-40 (PVP-40) and 0.2% egg albumin. The enzyme conjugated-IgG concentration was 1 mg mL−1 and the coating immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration for PNRSV and PPV was 0.5 and 1.0 mg mL−1, respectively. Five individual samples from each treatment were tested for maximum absorbance at 405 nm with a plate reader (Sunrise Model, TECAN, Austria) after 2 h of incubation.
RT-PCRs were performed on cDNA samples from total RNAs isolated [21] from the leaf tissues (200 mg) of infected mother plants with both viruses, leaves from in vitro cultured plants before the thermotherapy application, the microshoots obtained after the in vitro propagation, and the young peach rooted plantlets of ‘Elberta’ (five months old). The cDNAs were synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, K1622) according to the manufacturer’s description. The oligonucleotide sequences of applied primers are listed in Table 1. The PCR amplifications were carried out in a Veriti 96-well thermal cycler (Applied Biosystem, Waltham, MA, USA) and the presence or absence of products was visualized by ethidium bromide staining on 1.5% agarose gel in TAE buffer.

2.4. Establishment of Rooting Culture

The virus-free plantlets were subjected to the optimization of the rooting condition. Only the ’Elberta’ cultures under GA3 (2 mg L−1) + TDZ (2.5 mg L−1) were considered for this stage because of their best and significantly better performance in the case of the studied morphological traits. Three different conditions were set up (Table 2), including an intermediate sub-culturing for 6 days (in MS medium supplemented or not with IBA (4 mg L−1) at dark) followed by transferring the microshoots to the rooting media for 6 weeks. Finally, microshoots were transferred to hardening containers after adequate amounts of root growth and kept in a greenhouse for 6 months for the final examination of their sanitary status.

2.5. Statistics

Data obtained from measurements were statistically analyzed with the software IBM SPSS (v25) (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). The results are shown as mean values with standard deviations. The normal distribution of residuals was proved by Shapiro–Wilk’s test (p > 0.05) and the homogeneity of variances was checked by Levene’s test (p > α) (α = 0.05). The differences among the mean values were evaluated by one-way ANOVA and considered significant at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. In Vitro Culture Establishment

According to analysis of variances, the Fe-EDDHA treatment had significant effects (p < 0.01) on plant length, branch number, and leaf number (Table S1). An Fe-EDDHA -concentration-dependent and significant improvement was observed for all studied parameters in this stage. The results showed the highest mean of height (34 ± 2.1 mm) for ’Dixie Red’ in response to 30 mg L−1 Fe-EDDHA treatment, whereas the lowest mean with 15.97 ± 2.3 mm for ’Elberta’ without Fe-EDDHA supplementation (Table 3). The Fe-EDDHA treatment led to an increase in branch and leaf numbers among all cultivars, but ’Dixie Red’ showed the highest response to Fe-EDDHA application, where the highest mean of branch numbers (3.66) and leaf numbers (24.5) was obtained after 30 mg L−1 Fe-EDDHA application (Table 4).
The observed improvement in growth performance of the in vitro cultured plants could potentially contribute to the high temperature tolerance level during the thermotherapy. Therefore, only the cultures supplemented with the 30 mg L−1 Fe-EDDHA were subjected for thermotherapy treatment and further sub culturing.

3.2. Optimization of Shoot Multiplication

After the thermotherapy, the microshoots of tolerant and healthy plantlets (from the cultures supplemented with the 30 mg L−1 Fe-EDDHA) were placed in MS medium supplemented with two different concentrations of GA3 + BAP or with four different concentrations of GA3 and TDZ for in vitro growth. Growth regulators’ treatments, cultivars, and their interaction had significant effects (p < 0.01) on shoot length, branch number, and leaf number in both growth regulator combination experimental setups (Tables S2 and S3).
The 2 mg L−1 GA3 + BAP supplementation significantly increased the shoot length of ’Elberta’ plants only (from 23.17 ± 3.9 mm to 29.53 ± 4.1 mm) in comparison with 1 mg L−1 of the same growth regulator treatment (Table 4). The shoot lengths of ’Dixie Red’ and ’Red Top’ were not significantly altered under GA3 (2 mg L−1) + BAP (2 mg L−1) treatment when compared with lower concentrations of GA3 (1 mg L−1) + BAP (1.5 mg L−1). The branch numbers of ’Elberta’ and ’Red Top’ cultivars were significantly enhanced (p < 0.05) when increasing the concentration of GA3 and BAP. The 2 mg L−1 of GA3 and BAP supplementation had a significant and negative impact on the branch number of ’Dixie Red’ plants (Table 4).
Consequently, the number of leaves also followed the same trend as the branch number. The ’Red Top’ microshoots showed a significantly higher number of leaves at higher concentrations of GA3 and BAP (2 mg L−1) than the treatment with lower concentrations.
The GA3 and TDZ supplementation had also significant effects on shoot length, branch number, and leaf number of studied cultivars. Considering the effect of treatments on cultivars, the highest (26.96 ± 1.9 mm) and lowest (18.43 ± 1.3 mm) shoot length means were obtained among the ’Dixie Red’ cultivar under GA3 (2 mg L−1) + TDZ (2.5 mg L−1) treatment and ’Red Top’ cultivar under GA3 (1 mg L−1) + TDZ (1 mg L−1) treatment, respectively (Table 5). Among the treatments, the highest branch number (2.00 ± 0.1) belonged to the ’Elberta’ cultivar under GA3 (2 mg L−1) + TDZ (2.5 mg L−1). The highest number of leaves (15. 33 ± 2.8) was recorded among the ’Elberta’ plants treated with GA3 (2 mg L−1) + TDZ (2.5 mg L−1) and the lowest values (5.66 ± 0.65) were counted for ’Red Top’ plants under GA3 (1 mg L−1) + TDZ (1 mg L−1).

3.3. Selection of Virus-Free Plantlets

Samples of leaf tissues were subjected to the DAS-ELISA test and RT-PCR analysis prior to root induction culture. All plantlets of the three cultivars were 100% negative for PPV and PNRSV. A representative result of ELISA test (absorbance at 405 nm) is presented in Table 6. The same negative results of in vitro grown plantlets were confirmed by PCR where no amplification and PCR products of PPV and PNRSV were observed after agarose gel electrophoresis.

3.4. Effects of Different Growth Regulators on Rooting

The ’Elberta’ plants grown under GA3 (2 mg L−1) + TDZ (2.5 mg L−1) were tested for their rooting performance. According to the results presented in Table 7 and Table 8, the 6-day dark incubation condition remarkably influenced the rooting performance of the plantlets in rooting medium. The dark incubation in 4 mg L−1 IBA resulted in a longer root length (2.5 ± 0.6 cm) when compared with the incubation in MS medium only (1 ± 0.4 cm). It was evident that the lowest concentration of IBA resulted in better rooting performance (40%) and even better (70%) when the dark incubation of the plantlets took place in MS medium without any growth regulator (Table 7). The half concentration of MS medium in general was more suitable for the root induction (Table 9). The highest rooting induction rate (90%) was obtained in ½ MS medium supplemented with 0.5 mg L−1 of IBA and 0.5 mg L−1 of IBA + 0.25 mg L−1 NAA (Table 9).

4. Discussion

The elimination of viruses from plants is the most relevant priority to obtain healthy propagating materials for the establishment of pathogen-free orchards and to ensure the conservation of important germplasms [24]. Thermotherapy-based virus eradication has been successfully applied for almost all of the economically important fruit trees that are vegetatively propagated [8]. Several factors including temperature, duration of thermotherapy regime, and size of explants may affect the efficiency of virus eradication [14]. Although the rate of virus elimination from plant tissues was considerably high and reliable with this method, the upstream in vitro and in vivo processes to establish the rooted and stable plantlets were challenging and variable [16,25]. Even though we could obtain 100% virus-free microshoots after the applied thermotherapy methods, a variety of different responses to the same in vitro condition were observed among the selected cultivars of peach plants, which may be the indirect consequence of prolonged exposure to elevated temperature (thermotherapy) or the genetic makeups of the selected breeding lines. The numbers of leaves in response to the same growth regulator treatments were different between cultivars, for example, leaf numbers of ’Dixie Red’ cultivar reduced with the increase in GA3 and BAP dosage, but the leaf numbers of ’Red Top’ cultivar increased at higher concentrations of the same growth regulators. A similar cultivar-specific response has been also reported by Gentile et al. [26] for in vitro shoot induction from P. persica leaves, where their best results were obtained from leaf tissues when BAP was used as cytokinin in the medium. Furthermore, Zong et al. [27], in their optimized in vitro peach leaf regeneration protocol for the “Hansen 536” cultivar, found the maximum shoot regeneration rate for explants cultured on WPM medium supplemented with BAP in IBA. The comparison of the applied growth regulators (concentration and composition) in peach in vitro organogenesis and regeneration points to the cultivar-specific nature of morphological development [28,29]. The application of TDZ increased the organogenesis and was found to be more effective in micropropagation, multiple shoot induction, somatic embryogenesis, callus induction, and shoot organogenesis as compared with other cytokinins [30]. In some systems, the synergistic effect of TDZ with other cytokinin/auxin was found to be more effective than using it alone. The optimum concentration of TDZ and other plant growth regulators varies based on the plant species, explants, and duration of exposure [30,31]. The obtained result of the current study also indicates the importance of the inclusion of a wide range of plant growth regulators and their concentrations to optimize the in vitro culture of every single cultivar of interest. In the in vitro process to produce the healthy plantlets, the rooting of microshoots is usually one of the major obstacles for successful micropropagation [32]. In our trials, the sensitivity of ’Elberta’ microshoots to IBA and NAA was evident. Only 0.5 mg L−1 IBA in MS medium resulted in root formation. It was also evident that a decrease in MS salt concentration to ½ was a key factor in rooting of ‘Elberta’ microshoots. A survey of the literature related to stone fruits micropropagation reveals the fact that almost every plant species and cultivar respond differently to treatment with growth regulators for organogenesis. This indeed justifies the need for more studies and experimental trials.

5. Conclusions

Trials were undertaken in order to develop a method to obtain peach plants free from PPV and PNRSV viruses using in vitro shoot cultures. The applied method of thermotherapy was effective for the elimination of both viruses from three cultivars. Experiments on finding the optimal medium for the propagation and rooting of microshoots have shown a large difference in the reaction of cultivars to the type and concentration of growth regulators. For all cultivars, the addition of 30 mg L−1 Fe-EDDHA increased the efficiency of shoot regeneration. Thermotherapy at 25–37 °C resulted in 100% PPV- and PNRSV-free microshoots of three selected peach cultivars. The in vitro application of plant growth regulators revealed the variability in cultivars’ response to any of the applied growth regulators. The best overall morphological performance was recorded for the ’Dixie Red’ cultivar in MS medium supplemented with 0.5 mg L−1 of GA3 and 0.5 mg L−1 BAP, and for the ’Elberta’ cultivar under GA3 (2 mg L−1) + TDZ (2.5 mg L−1) treatment. The optimal rooting medium was tested for the ‘Elberta’ cultivar with the best performance (90%) in ½ MS medium supplemented with 0.5–1 mg L−1 of IBA. Here, we presented an experimental in vitro protocol to establish virus-free peach plantlets that can be the foundation of further optimizations and adaptations for practical use in developing virus-free nurseries.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/horticulturae8100929/s1, Table S1: Mean of square for morphological traits in response to Fe and cultivars interaction; Table S2: Mean of square for traits in response to GA3 + BAP, and cultivars interaction; Table S3: Mean of square for traits in response to GA3 + TDZ, and cultivars interaction.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.Z. and B.F.; methodology, R.Z. and A.H.M.; validation, R.Z., I.M., and I.P.; formal analysis, N.H.; investigation, N.H.; resources, R.Z.; data curation, E.K.-B.; writing—original draft preparation, N.H. and I.M.; writing—review and editing, I.P., A.S., and I.M.; visualization, N.H. and I.M.; supervision, R.Z., B.F., and A.H.M.; funding acquisition, A.H.M., I.P., and I.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC was funded by the Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE).

Acknowledgments

Neda Hesari considers it necessary to thank the Doctoral School of Biological Sciences of the Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Barba, M.; Ilardi, V.; Pasquini, G. Control of pome and stone fruit virus diseases. In Advances In Virus Research; Elsevier BV: London, UK, 2015; Volume 91, pp. 47–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Umer, M.; Liu, J.; You, H.; Xu, C.; Dong, K.; Luo, N.; Kong, L.; Li, X.; Hong, N.; Wang, G.; et al. Genomic, morphological and biological traits of the viruses infecting major fruit trees. Viruses 2019, 11, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Vargas-Hernandez, M.; Macias-Bobadilla, I.; Guevara-Gonzalez, R.G.; Rico-Garcia, E.; Ocampo-Velazquez, R.V.; Avila-Juarez, L.; Torres-Pacheco, I. Nanoparticles as potential antivirals in agriculture. Agriculture 2020, 10, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kinoti, W.M.; Nancarrow, N.; Dann, A.; Rodoni, B.C.; Constable, F.E. Updating the quarantine status of prunus infecting viruses in Australia. Viruses 2020, 12, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Přibylová, J.; Lenz, O.; Fránová, J.; Koloniuk, I.; Špak, J. Comparison of the incidence of viruses within germplasm, orchards and wild cherry trees in the Czech Republic. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2020, 176, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Okić, A.; Wetzel, T.; Zarghani, S.N.; Massart, S.; Grahić, J.; Gaši, F.; Konjić, A.; Vončina, D. Occurrence and distribution patterns of plum tree viruses and genetic diversity of sharka isolates in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dehkordi, A.N.; Rubio, M.; Babaeian, N.; Albacete, A.; Martínez-Gómez, P. Phytohormone Signaling of the resistance to plum pox virus (PPV, Sharka disease) induced by almond (Prunus dulcis (Miller) Webb) grafting to peach (P. persica L. Batsch). Viruses 2018, 10, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wang, M.-R.; Cui, Z.-H.; Li, J.-W.; Hao, X.-Y.; Zhao, L.; Wang, Q.-C. In vitro thermotherapy-based methods for plant virus eradication. Plant Methods 2018, 14, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Panattoni, A.; D’Anna, F.; Cristani, C.; Triolo, E. Grapevine vitivirus A eradication in Vitis vinifera explants by antiviral drugs and thermotherapy. J. Virol. Methods 2008, 146, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, F.; Hong, N.; Wang, G.; Wang, A.; Wang, L. Identification and characterization of microRNAs from in vitro-grown pear shoots infected with Apple stem grooving virus in response to high temperature using small RNA sequencing. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Koubouris, G.C.; Maliogka, V.I.; Efthimiou, K.; Katis, N.I.; Vasilakakis, M.D. Elimination of Plum pox virus through in vitro thermotherapy and shoot tip culture compared to conventional heat treatment in apricot cultivar Bebecou. J Gen Plant Pathol. 2007, 73, 370–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ebrahimi, M.; Habashi, A.A.; Emadpour, M.; Kazemi, N. Recovery of virus-free Almond (Prunus dulcis) cultivars by somatic embryogenesis from meristem undergone thermotherapy. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 14948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hu, G.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Fan, X.; Ren, F.; Zhou, J. Virus elimination from in vitro apple by thermotherapy combined with chemotherapy. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2015, 121, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Karimpour, S.; Davarynejad, G.; Zakiaghl, M.; Safarnejad, M.R. In vitro thermotherapy and thermo-chemotherapy approaches to eliminate some viruses in Pyrus communis L. cv.‘Natanz’. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2020, 22, 1645–1653. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bettoni, J.C.; Mathew, L.; Pathirana, R.; Wiedow, C.; Hunter, D.A.; McLachlan, A.; Khan, S.; Tang, J.; Nadarajan, J. Eradication of potato virus S, potato virus A, and potato virus M from infected in vitro-grown potato shoots using in vitro therapies. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Farhadi-Tooli, S.; Ghanbari, A.; Kermani, M.J.; Zeinalabedini, M.; Bettoni, J.C.; Naji, A.M.; Kazemi, N. Droplet-vitrification cryotherapy and thermotherapy as efficient tools for the eradication of apple chlorotic leaf spot virus and apple stem grooving virus from virus-infected quince in vitro cultures. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2021, 162, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Manganaris, G.A.; Economou, A.S.; Boubourakas, I.N.; Katis, N.I. Elimination of PPV and PNRSV through thermotherapy and meristem-tip culture in nectarine. Plant Cell Rep. 2003, 22, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kazemi, N.; Habashi, A.A.; Asadi, W. Evaluation of combined treatments of thermotherapy and apical meristem culture efficiency on virus elimination from in vitro shootlets of red flesh apple (Malus pumila Mill.). J. Hortic. Sci. 2019, 33, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kazemi, N.; Nahandi, F.Z.; Habash, A.A.; Asadi, W. Molecular assessment of chemotherapy and meristem culture efficiency for production of seven cultivars of virus-free pear (Pyrus communis L.). J. Crop. Improve. 2019, 21, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bettoni, J.C.; Fazio, G.; Carvalho Costa, L.; Hurtado-Gonzales, O.P.; Rwahnih, M.A.; Nedrow, A.; Volk, G.M. Thermotherapy followed by shoot tip cryotherapy eradicates latent viruses and apple hammerhead viroid from in vitro apple rootstocks. Plants 2022, 11, 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jaakola, L.; Pirttilä, A.M.; Halonen, M.; Hohtola, A. Isolation of high quality RNA from bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) fruit. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.-Part B Mol. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 201–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Naderpour, M.; Shahbazi, R. Investigation on Viral Diseases of Pome Fruit Orchards in Western Azarbaijan and Khorasan Razavi Provinces to Introduce Healthier Orchards for Stone Fruit Propagation Industry; Final Report; Center for Agriculture Information and Scientific Documentation, Areo, Ministry of Agriculture: Tehran, Iran, 2014; p. 69. [Google Scholar]
  23. Varga, A.; James, D. Detection and differentiation of plum pox virus using real-time multiplex pcr with sybr green and melting curve analysis: A rapid method for strain typing. J. Virol. Methods 2005, 123, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bettoni, J.C.; Marković, Z.; Bi, W.; Volk, G.M.; Matsumoto, T.; Wang, Q.-C. Grapevine shoot tip cryopreservation and cryotherapy: Secure storage of disease-dree llants. Plants 2021, 10, 2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Magyar-Tábori, K.; Mendler-Drienyovszki, N.; Hanász, A.; Zsombik, L.; Dobránszki, J. Phytotoxicity and Other Adverse Effects on the In Vitro Shoot Cultures Caused by Virus Elimination Treatments: Reasons and Solutions. Plants 2021, 10, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gentile, A.; Monticelli, S.; Damiano, C. Adventitious shoot regeneration in peach (Prunus persica L., Batsch). Plant Cell Rep. 2002, 20, 1011–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zong, X.; Denler, B.J.; Danial, G.H.; Chang, Y.; Song, G. Adventitious Shoot Regeneration and Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated Transient Transformation of Almond × Peach Hybrid Rootstock ‘Hansen 536’. Hortscience 2019, 54, 936–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. San, B.; Li, Z.; Hu, Q.; Reighard, G.L.; Luo, H. Adventitious shoot regeneration from in vitro cultured leaf explants of peach rootstock Guardian® is significantly enhanced by silver thiosulfate. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015, 120, 757–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ricci, A.; Sabbadini, S.; Prieto, H.; Padilla, I.M.; Dardick, C.; Li, Z.; Scorza, R.; Limera, C.; Mezzetti, B.; Perez-Jimenez, M.; et al. Genetic Transformation in Peach (Prunus persica L.): Challenges and Ways Forward. Plants 2020, 9, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guo, B.; Stiles, A.R.; Liu, C.Z. Thidiazuron enhances shoot organogenesis from leaf explants of Saussurea involucrata Kar. et Kir. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2012, 48, 609–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Deepa, A.V.; Anju, M.; Dennis Thomas, T. The Applications of TDZ in Medicinal Plant Tissue Culture. In Thidiazuron: From Urea Derivative to Plant Growth Regulator; Ahmad, N., Faisal, M., Eds.; Springer Nature, Singapore Pte Ltd.: Singapore, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abdalla, N.; El-Ramady, H.; Seliem, M.K.; El-Mahrouk, M.E.; Taha, N.; Bayoumi, Y.; Shalaby, T.A.; Dobránszki, J. An Academic and Technical Overview on Plant Micropropagation Challenges. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Primers used for partial amplification of viruses’ cDNA for RT-PCR.
Table 1. Primers used for partial amplification of viruses’ cDNA for RT-PCR.
Primer NameSequence (5’→3’)Amplicon Size (bp)Reference
PNRSV-F3GCCGAATTTGCAATCATACCC599Naderpour and Shahbazi [22]
PNRSV-R3ACTTCGGTCTTGAATTCGAT
PPV-RRCTCTTCTTGTGTTCCGACGTTTC345Varga and James [23]
PPV-F3GGAATGTGGGTGATGATGG
Table 2. Growth regulators’ composition of the rooting culture applied for ’Elberta’ peach cultivar.
Table 2. Growth regulators’ composition of the rooting culture applied for ’Elberta’ peach cultivar.
TreatmentRooting Condition (a) *Rooting Condition (b) **Rooting Condition (c) ***
1MS + IBA (0.5 mg L−1)MS + IBA (0.5 mg L−1)½MS + IBA (0.5 mg/l)
2MS + IBA (1 mg L−1)MS + IBA (1 mg L−1)½MS+ IBA (1 mg L−1)
3MS + IBA (2 mg L−1)MS + IBA (2 mg L−1)½MS + IBA (0.5 mg L−1) + NAA (0.25 mg L−1)
4MS + IBA (0.5 mg L−1) + NAA (0.5 mg L−1)IBA (0.5 mg L−1) + NAA (0.5 mg L−1)½MS + IBA (1 mg L−1) + NAA (0.5 mg L−1)
5MS + IBA (0.5 mg L−1)+ NAA (0.25 mg L−1)IBA (0.5 mg L−1) + NAA (0.25 mg L−1)-
*: transferred to 1–5, after 1 week in MS medium; **: transferred to 1–5, after 1 week in MS medium containing IBA (4 mg L−1); ***: transferred to 1–4, after 1 week in MS medium.
Table 3. Effect of MS medium supplementation with Fe-EDDHA on shoot multiplication of different peach cultivars.
Table 3. Effect of MS medium supplementation with Fe-EDDHA on shoot multiplication of different peach cultivars.
CultivarsFe * Treatments mg L1Shoot Length (mm)Branch NumberLeaf Number
’Elberta’015.97 ± 2.3 f1.00 ± 0.02 d1.33 ± 0.05 h
1521.42 ± 3.1 d1.16 ± 0.03 d9.50 ± 0.26 e
3024.00 ± 2.4 c2.33 ± 0.01 bc20.67 ± 0.37 b
’Dixie Red’018.97 ± 1.9 e1.00 ± 0.01 d2.04 ± 0.03 h
1526.87 ± 1.9 b3.21 ± 0.02 ab17.33 ± 0.9 c
3034.00 ± 2.1 a3.66 ± 0.02 a24.5 ± 1.2 a
’Red Top’018.97 ± 1.3 e1.16 ± 0.03 d2.04 ± 0.04 h
1521.68 ± 1.5 d1.70 ± 0.014 cd11.49 ± 2.3 d
3022.32 ± 1.9 cd1.44 ± 0.012 cd12.44 ± 2.5 d
*: ethylenediamine di-2-hydroxyphenyl acetate ferric (Fe-EDDHA). Values in columns with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05; n = 30).
Table 4. Effect of GA3 and BAP in MS medium on shoot multiplication of different peach cultivars.
Table 4. Effect of GA3 and BAP in MS medium on shoot multiplication of different peach cultivars.
CultivarGrowth RegulatorShoot Length (mm)Branch NumberLeaf Number
’Elberta’GA3 (1 mg L−1) + BAP (1.5 mg L−1)23.17 ± 3.9 e1.33 ± 0.04 b12.33 ± 1.8 bc
GA3 (2 mg L−1) + BAP (2 mg L−1)29.53 ± 4.1 a2.66 ± 0.4 a13.67 ± 2.05 b
’Dixie Red’GA3 (1 mg L−1) + BAP (1.5 mg L−1)28.89 ± 3.0 bc2.59 ± 0.8 a13.89 ± 3.0 b
GA3 (2 mg L−1) + BAP (2 mg L−1)28.37 ± 2.8 c1.733 ± 0.1 b9.36 ± 1.15 c
’Red Top’GA3 (1 mg L−1) + BAP (1.5 mg L−1)26.55 ± 1.95 d1.66 ± 0.2 b15.67 ± 2.75 b
GA3 (2 mg L−1) + BAP (2 mg L−1)27.11 ± 2.3 d3.00 ± 0.6 a38.33 ± 5.4 a
Values in columns with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05; n = 30).
Table 5. Effect of GA3 and TDZ in MS medium on shoot multiplication of different peach cultivars.
Table 5. Effect of GA3 and TDZ in MS medium on shoot multiplication of different peach cultivars.
CultivarGrowth RegulatorShoot Length (mm)Branch NumberLeaf Number
’Elberta’GA3 (1 mg L−1) + TDZ (1 mg L−1)22.79 ± 2.8 c1.55 ± 0.15 ab11.58 ± 2.3 b
GA3 (1 mg L−1) + TDZ (1.5 mg L−1)23.70 ± 3.1 bc1.90 ± 0.23 a11.63 ± 1.5 b
GA3 (2 mg L−1) + TDZ (1 mg L−1)19.08 ± 2.3 d1.51 ± 0.25 ab9.00 ± 1.25 d
GA3 (2 mg L−1) + TDZ (2.5 mg L−1)26.55 ± 3.1 a2.00 ± 0.1 a15.33 ± 2.8 a
’Dixie Red’GA3 (1 mg L−1) + TDZ (1 mg L−1)22.53 ± 1.1 c1.41 ± 0.2 ab7.26 ± 1.07 e
GA3 (1 mg L−1) + TDZ (1.5 mg L−1)20.00 ± 1.8 d1.00 ± 0.1 b6.00 ± 1.04 f
GA3 (2 mg L−1) + TDZ (1 mg L−1)23.52 ± 2.2 bc1.80 ± 0.15 ab10.76 ± 1.9 c
GA3 (2 mg L−1) + TDZ (2.5 mg L−1)26.96 ± 1.9 a1.74 ± 0.2 ab10.78 ± 2.1 c
’Red Top’GA3 (1 mg L−1) + TDZ (1 mg L−1)18.43 ± 1.3 d1.00 ± 0.3 b5.66 ± 0.65 f
GA3 (1 mg L−1) + TDZ (1.5 mg L−1)18.87 ± 2.1 e1.33 ± 0.4 ab8.66 ± 1.32 d
GA3 (2 mg L−1) + TDZ (1 mg L−1)24.67 ± 2.2 b1.00 ± 0.06 b8.66 ± 1.37 d
GA3 (2 mg L−1) + TDZ (2.5 mg L−1)18.44 ± 2.3 d1.66 ± 0.15 ab6.133 ± 1.41 f
Values in columns with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05; n = 30).
Table 6. Result of thermotherapy analysis in the DAS-ELISA test.
Table 6. Result of thermotherapy analysis in the DAS-ELISA test.
ELISA’Elberta’’Dixie Red’’Red Top’
PPV0.134 ± 0.0430.139 ± 0.0100.143 ± 0.025
PPV Positive control *3.849 ± 0.0463.849 ± 0.0463.849 ± 0.046
PNRSV 0.182 ± 0.0920.174 ± 0.0390.112 ± 0.084
PNRSV Positive control *3.809 ± 0.0423.809 ± 0.0423.809 ± 0.042
Negative Control **0.150 ± 0.0440.150 ± 0.0440.150 ± 0.044
ResultsNegativeNegativeNegative
*: Samples from infected mother trees. **: Samples from virus-free certified plant extract. n = 30 (in vitro samples) and n = 6 (controls).
Table 7. Effect of IBA and NAA in MS medium on rooting of ‘Elberta’ microshoots that were incubated for 6 days on medium free of growth regulators.
Table 7. Effect of IBA and NAA in MS medium on rooting of ‘Elberta’ microshoots that were incubated for 6 days on medium free of growth regulators.
Rooting MediumNo. of
Samples
No. of Rooted
Microshoots
Root Length
cm
Rooting
%
MS + IBA (0.5 mg L−1)30211 ± 0.470
MS + IBA (1 mg L−1)30000
MS + IBA (2 mg L−1)30000
MS + IBA (0.5 mg L−1) + NAA (0.5 mg L−1)30000
MS + IBA (0.5 mg L−1) + NAA (0.25 mg L−1)30000
Table 8. Effect of IBA and NAA in MS medium on rooting of ‘Elberta’ microshoots that were incubated for 6 days on medium containing 4 mg L−1 IBA.
Table 8. Effect of IBA and NAA in MS medium on rooting of ‘Elberta’ microshoots that were incubated for 6 days on medium containing 4 mg L−1 IBA.
Rooting MediumNo. of
Samples
No. of Rooted
Microshoots
Root Length
cm
Rooting
%
MS + IBA (0.5 mg L−1)30122.5 ± 0.640
MS + IBA (1 mg L−1)30000
MS + IBA (2 mg L−1)30000
IBA (0.5 mg L−1) + NAA (0.5 mg L−1)30000
IBA (0.5 mg L−1) + NAA (0.25 mg L−1)30000
Table 9. Effect of IBA and NAA in ½ MS medium on rooting of ‘Elberta’ microshoots that were incubated for 6 days on MS medium free from growth regulators.
Table 9. Effect of IBA and NAA in ½ MS medium on rooting of ‘Elberta’ microshoots that were incubated for 6 days on MS medium free from growth regulators.
Rooting MediumNo. of
Samples
No. of Rooted
Microshoots
Root Length
cm
Rooting
%
½MS + IBA (0.5 mg L−1)30272 ± 0.490
½MS + IBA (1 mg L−1)30251.5 ± 0.483
½MS + IBA (0.5 mg L−1) + NAA (0.25 mg L−1)30272 ± 0.590
½MS + IBA (1 mg L−1) + NAA (0.5 mg L−1)30221 ± 0.373
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hesari, N.; Haji Mohammadi, A.; Zarghami, R.; Fakheri, B.; Kiss-Bába, E.; Szegő, A.; Papp, I.; Mirmazloum, I. Eradication of PPV and PNRSV Viruses from Three Peach Cultivars Using Thermotherapy In Vitro, Including Optimization of Microshoots’ Multiplication and Rooting Medium. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 929. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8100929

AMA Style

Hesari N, Haji Mohammadi A, Zarghami R, Fakheri B, Kiss-Bába E, Szegő A, Papp I, Mirmazloum I. Eradication of PPV and PNRSV Viruses from Three Peach Cultivars Using Thermotherapy In Vitro, Including Optimization of Microshoots’ Multiplication and Rooting Medium. Horticulturae. 2022; 8(10):929. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8100929

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hesari, Neda, Ali Haji Mohammadi, Reza Zarghami, Bratali Fakheri, Erzsébet Kiss-Bába, Anita Szegő, István Papp, and Iman Mirmazloum. 2022. "Eradication of PPV and PNRSV Viruses from Three Peach Cultivars Using Thermotherapy In Vitro, Including Optimization of Microshoots’ Multiplication and Rooting Medium" Horticulturae 8, no. 10: 929. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8100929

APA Style

Hesari, N., Haji Mohammadi, A., Zarghami, R., Fakheri, B., Kiss-Bába, E., Szegő, A., Papp, I., & Mirmazloum, I. (2022). Eradication of PPV and PNRSV Viruses from Three Peach Cultivars Using Thermotherapy In Vitro, Including Optimization of Microshoots’ Multiplication and Rooting Medium. Horticulturae, 8(10), 929. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8100929

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop