Next Article in Journal
Bio-Catalysis and Biomedical Perspectives of Magnetic Nanoparticles as Versatile Carriers
Previous Article in Journal
Magnetostructural Studies on Zigzag One-Dimensional Coordination Polymers Formed by Tetraamidatodiruthenium(II,III) Paddlewheel Units Bridged by SCN Ligands
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structure, DFT Calculations, and Magnetic Characterization of Coordination Polymers of Bridged Dicyanamido-Metal(II) Complexes

1
Institut für Physikalische and Theoretische Chemie, Technische Universität Graz, A-8010 Graz, Austria
2
Institut für Anorganische Chemie, Technische Universität Graz, Stremayrgasse 9/V, A-8010 Graz, Austria
3
Departament de Quimica Inorganica I Organica, Universitat de Barcelona, Marti I Franques 1-11, E-31321 Barcelona, Spain
4
Department of Chemistry, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, P.O. Box 43700, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Magnetochemistry 2019, 5(3), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry5030041
Submission received: 23 April 2019 / Revised: 8 June 2019 / Accepted: 21 June 2019 / Published: 2 July 2019

Abstract

:
Three coordination polymers of metal(II)-dicyanamido (dca) complexes with 4-methoxypyridine-N-oxide (4-MOP-NO); namely, catena-[Co(µ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP-NO)2] (1), catena-[Mn(µ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP-NO)2] (2), catena-[Cd(µ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP-NO)2] (3), and the mononuclear [Cu(κ1dca)2(4-MOP-NO)2] (4), were synthesized in this research. The complexes were analyzed by single crystal X-ray diffraction as well as spectroscopic methods (UV/vis, IR). The polymeric 1-D chains in complexes 13 were achieved by the doubly µ1,5-bridging dca ligands and the O-donor atoms of two axial 4-MOP-NO molecules in trans configuration around the distorted M(II) octahedral. On the other hand, the two “trans-axial” pyridine-N-oxide molecules in complexes 2 and 3 display opposite orientation (s-trans). The DFT (density functional theory) computational studies on the complexes 13 were consistent with the experimentally observed crystal structures. Compounds 1 and 2 display weak antiferromagnetic coupling between metal ions (J = −10.8 for 1 and −0.35 for 2).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Small pseudohalide ions such as N3, NCS, NCSe, and NCO, as well as the longer dicyanamide ion N(CN)2, are known to bind divalent 3d and 4d metal ions in a variety of ways, and thus have been extensively used as linkers between metal ions and the construction of coordination polymers (CPs) with different nuclearities, frameworks, and topologies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. This class of materials has some interesting applications in crystal engineering as they can be used to utilize molecular sensors [27], microporous materials for gas adsorption and storage [28,29,30], electrical conductivity [30], non-linear optical activity (NLO) [31,32], and catalytic reactions [33], as well as some polymeric chains, which have been constructed with Zn2+ and Cd2+ complexes, exhibit some potential applications as MOFs (metal-organic frameworks) [34,35]. The interaction of Zn(II) and Cd(II) with nitrogen heterocyclic coligands may lead to enhancement or quenching the fluorescence emission of the organic ligand [9,10,36]. In addition, CPs containing paramagnetic metal ions can serve as molecule-based magnets [37,38,39,40]. The bridged pseudohalide complexes have the capability to transmit the magnetic interaction between the paramagnetic metal centers across the bridged pseudohalides [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,11,12,13,14,18,19,20,21,22,23,24].
The dicyanamido complexes display a wide range of coordination modes with divalent metal ions ranging from simple coordination mode to the terminal or central amide group (μ1 or μ3) [13,14,20,41] to complex modes including both of them. These modes, which are illustrated in Scheme 1 and have been previously summarized [10,14], include μ2 bonding: μ1,5 (end-to-end), μ1,1 (end-on), and μ1,3 [9,10,11,12,13,14,17,18,19,20,21,23,41]; μ3 bonding: μ1,1,5 and μ1,1,3 [14,18,19,20,24,25,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]; μ4 bonding: μ1,1,5,5 and μ1,1,3,5; and μ5 bonding: μ1,1,3,5,5 [14,18,24,25,45,46,47,48,49]. The majority of bridged-dicyanamido–metal(II) complexes exhibit weak antiferromagnetic coupling [10,11,12,13,14,30,50,51]; however, in some cases, strong antiferromagnetic [21,52] or weak ferromagnetic interactions have also been reported [43,53].
In continuation of our effort to explore the coordination geometry and magnetic properties of pseudohalide metal(II) complexes containing pyridine and pyridine-N-oxide derivatives as coligands, the following study was undertaken. With pyridine-N-oxide compounds, only two bonding modes (mono-dentate and bridging μ-O,O-NPR) [7,8,10,54,55,56,57,58,59] were found (Scheme 2). In the present study, the preparation and structural characterization of the 1D chain coordination polymers of 4-methoxypyridine-N-oxide (4-MOP-NO) with dicyanamide, catena-[M(μ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP-NO)2] (M(II) = Mn (1), Co (2), Cd (3)) and the monomeric [Cu(dca)2(4-MOP-NO)2] (4), are reported. Furthermore, compounds 1 and 2 were magnetically characterized and the results are compared to those derived from dicynamido-metal(II) compounds containing pyridyls.

2. Discussion of the Results

2.1. Preparation and Spectroscopy (IR, UV/Vis) of Complexes

The reaction of aqueous solutions of metal(II) nitrates with Nadca and 4-methoxypyridine-N-oxide in 1:2:2 molar ratio resulted in the formation of the polymeric chains catena-[M(µ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP-NO)2] {M = Co (1), Mn (2), Cd (3)} and the mononuclear complex [Cu(dca)2(4-MOP-NO)2] (4), whereas in the analogous reaction of Zn(II) nitrate, catena-[Zn(µ1,5-dca)2] was separated, where the ZnN4 tetrahedra are linked via four single µ1,5-dca to neighboring metal centers to result in a square grid 2D layer system [60].
The dicyanamide anion shows characteristic IR absorption bands at 2286 cm−1 for νs + νas(N-C), 2232 cm−1 for νas(N≡C), and 2179 cm−1 for νs(N≡C), respectively [61]. These vibrations were observed at 2290, 2232, and 2172 cm−1, respectively, for complex 1; at 2290, 2232, and 2172 cm−1, respectively, for 2; at 2287, 2225, and 2170 cm−1, respectively, for 3; and at 2292, 2241, and 2166 cm−1, respectively, for 4. The absorption bands of the dca anion at 1344 cm−1 for νas(N-C), 930 cm−1 for νs(N-C), 664 cm−1 for δ(CNC), 543 cm−1 for δ(NCN), and 529 cm−1 for δ(NCN) are covered by pyridine derivative ligand vibrations (Figures S1–S4 of Supplementary Material).
The UV/vis spectrum of the solid Co(II) compound 1 exhibits three absorption bands at 1550, 780, and 420 nm (Figure S5). For Co(II) in an octahedral environment, these bands refer to the electronic transitions 4T2g(F) ← 4T2g(F), 4T2g(P) ← 4T1g(F), and 4A2g4T1g(F), respectively. The corresponding spectrum of the Cu(II) complex 4 (diluted with BaSO4) shows a broad band centered around 1100 nm and two more bands at 588 and 266 nm. The latter band is most likely results from the electronic transition of the coordinated ligand, whereas the two intense bands centered located at 588 and 1100 nm may be attributed to the electronic transitions 2B1g2B2g and 2B1g2Eg, respectively, for Cu(II) in a square planar arrangement [62]. On the other hand, the electronic spectrum of catena-[Mn(µ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP-NO)2] (2) revealed the presence of a band at 378 nm, due to L → M CT, and un-resolvable broad bands over the visible region between 500 and 800 nm, with a shoulder around 460 nm. These bands are very common in Mn(II)-d5 octahedral configuration as a result of spin forbidden transitions. The solid spectra of the three complexes are shown in Figures S5–S7.

2.2. Crystal Structures

Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 represent plots of the polymeric chains and packing views for 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In these complexes, the metal(II) centers are coordinated by four N atoms of dicyanamide anions, which act in the bis-μ(1,5)-bridging mode, and O atoms of two terminal 4-methoxypyridine-N-oxide molecules in trans configuration. The MN4O2 chromophores form distorted octahedra, with M–O/N bond lengths in the 2.0571(9) to 2.1320(11) Å range for 1, in the 2.1639(14) to 2.2402(19) Å range for 2, and in the 2.2713(10) to 2.3303(12) Å range for 3. The bis-μ(1,5)-bridging dicyanamides form polymeric chains of polyhedra.
The structures of complexes 2 and 3 are orthorhombic with space groups P21212 (no. 18) and Pccn (no. 56), respectively, and their metal(II) centers have site symmetry 2, as the two “trans-axial” pyridine-N-oxide molecules are not ligated vertical to the “equatorial” MN4(dca) plane. In the Co(II) complex, the pyridine-N-oxide molecules show the opposite orientation when viewed along the chain direction (s-trans, N1-O···O1′-N1′ torsion angle is −180°). In complexes 2 and 3, the pyridine-N-oxide molecules have the same orientation when viewed along the chain direction (s-cis, N-O···O′-N′ torsion angle is +131.6 and −123.2°, respectively). Furthermore, in 3, an alternative CdN4O2 octahedron in the polymeric chain is inclined with an N1-O1···O1″-N1″ torsion angle of –119.5° (Figure 3).
The M···M intra-chain separations are 7.3603(6), 7.5065(6), and 7.6311(6) Å, whereas the shortest metal···metal inter-chain distances are 6.6096(5), 6.6283(3), and 6.6699(3) Å, for 13, respectively. The M–O–N bond angles of the 4-MOP–NO ligand molecules are in the range from 123.39(8) to 127.65(18)°. Their methoxy groups form synperiplanar C–O–C–C torsion angles in the range from 3.2 to 5.8°.
It is interesting to mention that the 1D polymeric complexes under investigation; regardless, they have the same MN4O2 with distorted octahedra, they are not isostructural with those reported for the analogous 1D systems of catena-[M(µ1,5-dca)2(L)2] (L = 4-hydroxymethylpyridine or 3-aminopyridine [10,63]). The 1D polymeric complexes with these two coligands crystallize in the monoclinic system (P21/c, space group no. 14), and their metal centers sit on the centers of inversion, which is also the case for the current Co(II) complex 1. In contrast to the N-coordinated 4-hydroxymethylpyridine and 3-aminopyridine ligands, the complexes 2 and 3 adopt different structural orientations. However, they are similar to the analogous 1D systems of catena-[M(µ1,5-dca)2(L)2] (L = 4-hydroxymethylpyridine or 3-aminopyridine) [10,63], where the pyridine rings of adjacent 4-methoxypyridine-N-oxide molecules in 13 form non-covalent π–π ring–ring interactions along the chain direction, as summarized in Table 1.
The copper(II) center of the mononuclear [Cu(κ1dca)2(4-MOP–NO)2] (4) (Figure 4) sits on the center of inversion and is ligated by N atoms of the two terminal dicyanamide anions and O atoms of two 4-methoxypyridine-N-oxide molecules. Its CuN2O2 chromophore has a trans-square planar geometry, with Cu–O/N bond lengths within the 1.924(13) to 1.9578(9) Å range. N(3) atoms of adjacent polyhedra are separated by 2.959(7) Å (Figure 4). The dicyanamide anions are disordered (0.57(2)/0.43(2) two-fold split occupancies). The N(1)–O(1)–Cu(1) bond angle is 118.39(6)°. The 4-methoxy-goup of the 4-MOP–NO molecule deviates by 3.2° from its pyridine ring plane. The 4-MOP–NO molecule forms a C(6)–O(2)–C(3)–C(4) torsion angle of 3.2°. The N(1)–O(1)–Cu(1) bond angle is 118.39(6)°.

2.3. Magnetic Data

The magnetic susceptibility for catena-[Co(μ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP-NO)2] (1) was measured in the temperature range of 2–299 K, in a 5000 Oe dc field. The χMT versus T plot for 1 is shown in Figure 5. The room temperature χMT value of 2.9 cm3mol−1K is much greater than the expected spin only value of 1.87 cm3mol−1K for S = 3/2, which results from the orbital contribution in Co(II) with g values strongly deviating for 2.00. The χMT values decrease with decreasing the temperature and reaching a value of 1.11 cm3mol−1K at 2 K. The decrease in the χMT values when the temperature decreases is partially attributed to antiferromagnetic intra-chain interactions, but this can be assumed to display minor exchange interactions, which are mediated by the μ1,5-bridging dicyanamido bridges. This result is in agreement with previously published experimental data and MO calculations [63,64,65,66,67,68]. Therefore, in order to obtain an approximate estimate for the coupling constant, J, the magnetic behavior of the Co(II)-ion in axially distorted octahedral coordination may be well described with the effective spin S = 1/2 and strongly anisotropic g factor. The Hamiltonian for the Ising chain of Co(II) ions in 1 is given by Equation (1):
H ^ = J i , j s i , z s j , z + μ B k H · g ^ · s K .
The solution of this Hamiltonian for the parallel and perpendicular susceptibility in a magnetic field close to zero was derived by Fisher [69]:
χ | | = N A μ B 2 g | | 2 4 k T e x p ( J / 2 k T )
χ = N A μ B 2 g 2 2 J { tanh ( J / 4 k T ) + J / [ 4 k T cosh 2 ( J / 4 k T ) ] }
For powder samples, the average susceptibility χ = (χ + 2χ)/3 is measured. The experimental χT versus T data in the dc field of 5000 Oe were fitted with the Ising model over the temperature range of 10–300 K (Figure 5). The best fit parameters are as follows: J = −10.8 ± 0.4 cm−1, g = 9.5 ± 0.1, and g ≈ 0.
The χM−1 versus T values for 1 are plotted in Figure 6. The behavior of this compound is fully described by the Curie–Weiss law χM = C/(T−θ) over the temperature range of 50–300 K, as indicated by the linear χM−1 versus T plot. The best fit of the magnetic susceptibility data with the Curie–Weiss law yielded C = 2.99 cm3Kmol−1 and θ = −13.8 K values.
The magnetic susceptibility of the compound catena-[Mn(μ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP-NO)2] (2) was measured over the 2–300 K temperature range in a dc field of 3000 Oe. The plot of χMT versus T for 2 is illustrated in Figure 7. When the sample is cooled, the χMT values decrease slowly from 4.4 cm3K mol−1 at 300 K, followed by a more rapid decrease below 50 K, and tends to zero at a low temperature. The χM values increase continuously throughout cooling. The overall magnetic behavior of 2 is consistent with a weak antiferromagnetically coupled system. The data were analyzed by the analytical expression of Equation (4) for an infinite chain of classical spins [70]:
χ = [Ng2β2S(S + 1)/3kT][(1 + u)/(1 − u)]
with u = coth[JS(S + 1)/kT] − kT/JS(S + 1).
The best-fit parameters produced J = −0.35(1) cm−1 and g = 2.002(1). The weak antiferromagnetic interaction was revealed through the magnetization measurements at 2 K up to an external field of 5 T. At high fields, the magnetization in M/Nβ units indicates a quasi-saturated S = 5/2 system (Figure 8). The comparison of the overall shape of the plots with the Brillouin plot for a fully isolated S = 5/2 system, g = 2.00, shows that observed slower magnetization is consistent with a weak AF (antiferromagnetic) interaction. The resulting low J value for 2 is fully in agreement with the determined weak antiferromagnetic coupling found in 1D bridged-dca-Mn(II) compounds [14,64,65,71].

3. DFT Calculations

Figure 9 shows the minimum energy geometry of the catena-[M(µ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP–NO)2] complexes, where M = Co, Mn, or Cd complexes. The figure shows the Co(II) and Mn(II) complexes maintain the cis orientation of the 4-methoxypyridine-N-oxide ligands (located at two adjacent metal ions), which is in line with the experimentally observed crystal structure. In contrast, the corresponding Cd(II) complex shows a trans orientation for the 4-methoxypyridine-N-oxide ligands, which again is consistent with the experimentally observed crystal structure.
In order to quantify these observations, potential energy (PE) profiles were computed along the oxygen–metal–metal–oxygen dihedral (see molecular inset for highlighted dihedral angle); these are given in Figure 10. The PE profiles show very distinct profiles, in which the Co(II) and Mn(II) complexes reveal minima at ϕ~0°, wherein the 4-methoxypyridine-N-oxide ligands maintain a cis conformation. In the Cd(II) complex, a global minimum is observed at ϕ~50°, which constitutes a trans conformation of the 4-methoxypyridine-N-oxide ligands.
The aforementioned theoretical results can be understood by considering the relative strength associated with the bridging dca when bound to Co, Mn, or Cd. In the case of Co and Mn, the strong d-orbital overlap of the metal center and the dca ligand maintains a rigid bonding arrangement about the bridging ligand. In contrast, the somewhat longer Cd–dca bond leads to a reduction in the d-orbital overlap, thus weakening the rigidity about the Cd–dca moiety. This weakening in the d-electron overlap inevitably leads to high amplitude motion around the bridging ligand. In fact, this result is in complete agreement with the observed M–ON bond distances, M(1)–O(1′): 2.0571, 2.1639, and 2.2713 Å for M = Co, Mn, and Cd, respectively.
Further, in order to assess the short-range antiferromagnetic coupling of 1 and 2, two additional computations were performed. Although the returned calculations explore the short-range magnetic effect, the results are strikingly consistent with the experimental results. These are comprised of computing the ground state minimum energy of both species in their high-spin configurations, in which each Co(II) or Mn(II) center of 1 and 2, respectively, contained a quartet and sextet spin-symmetry, respectively. This high-spin symmetry configuration was then compared to the minimum energy geometry of the low-spin singlet spin-symmetry analogues.
In complexes 1 and 2, the localized quartet or sextet spin-symmetry on both Co(II) or Mn(II) centers, one with α spins and the other with β spins (doublet symmetry in both cases), returns a lower energy than that of the low-spin, single-spin configuration (see Table S1 in Supplementary Materials section for the results of these calculations). This indicates that the alignment of the electrons in an anti-ferromagnetic arrangement with anti-parallel spins on the distinct Co(II) or Mn(II) centers is energetically favorable over the corresponding low-spin alignment of electrons. This agrees well with the experimental observations, which shows anti-ferromagnetic coupling for both 1 and 2.

4. Conclusions

To conclude, two categories of coordination polymers, doubly bridged by the terminal nitriles of dicyanamide (dca), of the structural formula catena-[M(µ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP–NO)2] (M = Co, 1; Mn, 2; Cd, 3) and a mononuclear [Cu(dca)2(4-MOP–NO)2] were synthesized and structurally characterized based on 4-methoxypyridine-N-oxide (4-MOP–NO). In the CP complexes, the polymeric 1D chains were achieved by the doubly µ1,5-bridging dca ligands and the O-donor atoms of the two axial 4-MOP–NO molecules are in trans configuration around the distorted M(II) octahedral. The trans-orientation adapted in title complexes, 13 are very similar to those observed in the corresponding CPs, catena-[M(µ1,5-dca)2(L)2], where L = 4-hydroxymethylpyridine or 3-aminopyridine and M = Co, Mn, Cu, Zn, or Cd [10,63]. As in these structures, the adjacent pyridine rings of 13 also constitute extra stability through the non-covalent π–π ring–ring interactions along the chain direction. The adaption of these configurations seem to be more common and unified in this class of compounds [15,62,63,65,72,73]. As a consequence of the long intramolecular distances between paramagnetic metal ions linked by µ1,5-dca coordination modes, the complexes 1 and 2 display weak antiferromagnetic coupling (small |J| values) [63,65,72,73,74,75,76].

5. Experimental

5.1. Materials and Physical Measurements

All materials used for the preparation of the compounds were of reagent grade quality. A Bruker Alpha P with a platinum-ATR-cap was used for the measurement of the IR spectra of the solid complexes. UV/vis–NIR spectra of the cobalt(II) and copper(II) complexes were recorded with an LS950 Lambda-spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Elemental microanalyses (CHN) were measured with an Elementar Vario EN3 analyzer. X-ray powder patterns of the bulk material were recorded with a D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker-AXS, Billerica, MA, USA) (Figures S8–S11). Magnetic data of polycrystalline solid samples of 1 and 2 were recorded with a MPMS-XL SQUID magnetometer (Quantum Design, San Diego, CA, USA) at the Magnetic Measurements Unit of the Universität de Barcelona. Pascal’s constants were applied for diamagnetic corrections.

5.2. Preparation of the Compounds

5.2.1. Preparation of Catena-[M(μ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP–NO)2] (13)

A similar procedure was used to prepare the complexes catena-[M(μ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP–NO)2] (13) (M = Co, 1; M = Mn, 2; M = Cd, 3). A mixture of metal(II) nitrate hexahydrate, M(NO3)2.6H2O (1 mmol), NaN(CN)2 (0.18 g, 2 mmol), and 4-methoxypyridine-N-oxide (0.19 g, 2 mmol) was dissolved in H2O (50 mL). The resulting solution, which was heated up to 70 °C and stirred for 30 min, was then filtered and the clear solution was slowly concentrated in an open glass beaker to crystallize at approximately 300 K (room temperature). After approximately two days, the well-shaped resulting needles were filtered off and dried in air.
Catena-[Co(μ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP-NO)2] (1): pink needles were obtained (yield: 0.26 g, 59%). Characterization: Anal. calcd for C16H16CoN8O4 (441.28 g/mol): C, 43.6; H, 3.2; N, 25.4% Found: C, 43.7; H, 3.1; N, 25.3%. IR (ATR, cm−1): 3118 (w), 3085 (w), 3043 (w), 2287 (m), 2238 (m), 2175 (s), 1624 (m), 1566 (w), 1494 (s), 1441 (m), 1337 (m), 1287 (m), 1242 (w), 1209 (s), 1182 (m), 1114 (w), 1036 (w), 1009 (m), 935 (w), 856 (m), 756(s), 662 (m), 527 (m), 502 (m), 421 (w).
Catena-[Mn(μ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP-NO)2] (2): tint yellow needles (yield: 0.29 g, 66%). Characterization: Anal. calcd for C16H14MnN8O4 (437.29 g/mol): C, 43.9; H, 3.2; N, 25.6%. Found: C, 43.7; H, 3.1; N, 25.8%. 3115 (w), 3041 (w), 2290 (m), 2232 (m), 2172 (s), 1624 (m), 1564 (w), 1495 (s), 1440 (m), 1342 (m), 1288 (m), 1214 (s), 1209 (s), 1112 (w), 1034 (w), 1010 (m), 934 (w), 853 (m), 759(s), 660 (w), 522 (m), 489 (m), 412 (w).
Catena-[Cd(μ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP-NO)2] (3): colorless needle (yield: 0.31 g, 63%). Characterization: Anal. calcd for C16H14CdN8O4 (494.76 g/mol): C, 38.8; H, 2.9; N, 22.6%. Found: C, 38.6; H, 2.8; N, 22.8%. 3115 (w), 3051 (w), 2292 (m), 2241 (m), 2166 (s), 1624 (m), 1569 (w), 1499 (s), 1460 (w), 1439 (m), 1355 (m), 1300 (s), 1257 (m), 1198 (s), 1118 (w), 1015 (s), 924 (w), 855 (s), 756(s), 661 (w), 546 (w), 509 (m), 461 (m), 411 (w).

5.2.2. Synthesis of [Cu(dca)2(4-MOP-NO)2] (4)

A procedure similar to that described above was used with Cu(NO3)2.3H2O, where green needle shaped crystals of 4 were obtained (yield: 0.26 g, 58%). Characterization: Anal. calcd for C16H14CuN8O4 (445.90 g/mol): C, 43.1; H, 3.2; N, 25.1. Found: C, 43.0; H, 3.2; N, 25.0%. IR (ATR, cm−1): 3115 (w), 3051 (w), 2292 (m), 2241 (m), 2166 (s), 1624 (m), 1569 (w), 1499 (s), 1460 (w), 1439 (m), 1355 (m), 1300 (s), 1257 (m), 1198 (s), 1118 (w), 1015 (s), 924 (w), 855 (s), 756(s), 661 (w), 546 (w), 509 (m), 461 (m), 411 (w).

5.3. X-Ray Single Crystal Measurements of 14

Single-crystal data of 14 were measured on an APEX II CCD diffractometer (Bruker-AXS). Table 2 summarizes crystallographic data, intensity data collection, and structure refinement specifications. Data collections were performed at 100(2) K with Mo–Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å); computer programs APEX and SADABS [77,78] were used for data reduction, LP, and absorption corrections. The program library SHELX [79,80] was used for solution (direct methods) and refinement (full-matrix least-squares methods on F2). Anisotropic displacement parameters were applied to all non-hydrogen atoms. H atoms (Uiso) were obtained from difference Fourier maps. HFIX geometrical constraints were applied only for C–H bonds. Additional software: Mercury [81]; PLATON [82]. CCDC deposition numbers: CCDC 1905722 for 1, CCDC 1905723 for 2, CCDC 1905724 for 3, and CCDC 1905725 for 4.

5.4. The Computational Methodology

Using Gaussview 6.0 [83], three model metal (II) dicyanamido (dca) complexes, as depicted in Figure 9, were constructed in order to describe the oligomeric bonding via the bridging ligand. The three structures are distinguishable by the metal(II) centers (Co, Mn, or Cd) and are consistent with those studied herein. As our interest is in the inherent connectivity of the dca unit, each of the three structures was terminated by an inert and benign carbonyl moiety, as shown in Figure 9. Using Gaussian 16 [83], the ground state minimum energy geometry of each of the three complexes was optimized using density functional theory (DFT), with the Becke–3rd Parameter–Lee–Yang–Parr (B3LYP) functional [84], coupled to the LANL2DZ [85] basis set. Potential energy (PE) profiles were computed along the oxygen–metal–metal–oxygen dihedral (see molecular inset in Figure 10; henceforth ϕ) in order to reveal the optimal orientation of the ligands with respect to the dca-bridge. The same level of theory as shown above was used for the PE profiles.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2312-7481/5/3/41/s1, Figure S1–S4: IR spectra of 1–4 compounds, respectively, Figure S5–S7. UV-VIS-NIR spectra of 1, 2 and 4 compounds, respectively, Figure S8–S11. Observed and simulated X-ray powder pattern of 1–4, Table S1: The groud state minimum energy of Co(II) or Mn(II) centers of 1 and 2, respectively in their high-spin and low-spin configurations.

Author Contributions

F.A.M., R.C.F. and A.T. performed the X-ray structural analysis. F.A.M. and P.J. contributed to the synthesis and spectral characterization of the compounds. R.V. was in charge of the magnetic study and T.N.V.K. performed the computational study. F.A.M., R.V. and S.S.M. contributed in analyzing the data and writing the manuscript.

Funding

Financial aid come from DGICT Project CTQ2015-63614-P and the department of chemistry at UL Lafayette by S.S.M.

Acknowledgments

F.A.M. is thankful for K. Gatterer. Financial aid from DGICT Project CTQ2015-63614-P is acknowledged by R.V.; and from the department of chemistry at UL Lafayette by S.S.M.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, S.-H.; Liu, L.-J.; Ju, H.-Y.; Liu, X.-Y.; Li, Y.-G.; Yan, S.-P. Dicyanamide bridged Cu(II)-metallacrown-6 complex with 1,4,7-triisopropyl-1,4,7-triaza-cyclononane and binding properties with DNA. Molecules 2018, 23, 1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mautner, F.A.; Traber, M.; Jantscher, P.; Fischer, R.C.; Reichmann, K.; Vicente, R.; Arafat, N.; Massoud, S.S. Thiocyanato-metal(II) and azido-cobalt(III) complexes with hydroxymethylpyridines. Polyhedron 2019, 161, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mautner, F.A.; Fischer, R.C.; Torvisco, A.; Henary, M.M.; Milner, A.; DeVillier, H.; Karsili, T.N.V.; Louka, F.R.; Massoud, S.S. Steric effects of alkyl substituents at N-donor bidentate amines direct the nuclearity, bonding and bridging modes in isothiocyanato-copper(II) coordination compounds. Crystals 2019, 9, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mautner, F.A.; Traber, M.; Fischer, R.C.; Torvisco, A.; Reichmann, K.; Speed, S.; Vicente, R.; Massoud, S.S. Synthesis and structural characterization of thiocyanato-4-methoxypyridine-cobalt(II) complexes with diverse geometries and a bridged 1D coordination polymer showing metamagnetic transition. Polyhedron 2018, 154, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Massoud, S.S.; Henary, M.M.; Maxwell, L.; Martín, A.; Ruiz, E.; Vicente, R.; Fischer, R.C.; Mautner, F.A. Structure, magnetic properties and DFT calculations of azido-copper(II) complexes with different azido-bonding, nuclearity and dimensionality. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 2627–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wöhlert, S.; Ruschewitz, U.; Näther, C. Metamagnetism and slow relaxation of the magnetization in the 2D coordination polymer: [Co(NCSe)2(1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethylene)]n. Cryst. Growth Des. 2018, 12, 2715–2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mautner, F.A.; Berger, C.; Fischer, R.C.; Massoud, S.S.; Vicente, R. Synthesis, structural characterization and magnetic properties of polymeric azido Mn(II) complexes based on methylpyridine-N-oxide co-ligands. Polyhedron 2017, 134, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Escuer, A.; Esteban, J.; Perlepes, S.P.; Stamatatos, T.C. The bridging azido ligand as a central “player” in high-nuclearity 3d-metal cluster chemistry. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2014, 275, 87–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mautner, F.A.; Fischer, R.C.; Reichmann, K.; Gullett, E.; Ashkar, K.; Massoud, S.S. Synthesis and characterization of 1D and 2D cadmium(II)-2,2’-bipyridine-N,N’-dioxide coordination polymers bridged by pseudohalides. J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1175, 797–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mautner, F.A.; Traber, M.; Fischer, R.C.; Massoud, S.S.; Vicente, R. Synthesis, crystal structures, spectral and magnetic properties of 1-D polymeric dicyanamido metal(II) complexes. Polyhedron 2017, 138, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Massoud, S.S.; Lemieux, M.C.; Le Quan, L.L.; Vicente, R.; Albering, J.H.; Mautner, F.A. Dicyanamido-metal(II) complexes. Part 6: 1-D polymeric copper(II) complexes bridging by dicyanamide. Effect of copper(II) salt on the nature of the polymeric product. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2012, 388, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mautner, F.A.; Albering, J.H.; Mikuriya, M.; Massoud, S.S. Dicyanamido-metal(II) complexes. Part 5: First example for a unit cell containing dinuclear and 1-D polymeric Cu(II) complexes bridging by dicyanamide. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2010, 13, 796–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mautner, F.A.; Mikuriya, M.; Ishida, H.; Louka, F.R.; Humphrey, J.W.; Massoud, S.S. Dicyanamido-metal(II) complexes. Part 4. Synthesis, structure and magnetic characterization of polynuclear Cu(II) and Ni(II) complexes bridged by μ-1,5-dicyanamide. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2009, 362, 4073–4080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Batten, R.S.; Murray, K.S. Structure and magnetism of coordination polymers containing dicyanamide and tricyanomethanide. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 246, 103–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chakraborty, P.; Mondal, S.; Das, S.; Jana, A.D.; Das, D. Dicyanamide mediated construction of 1D polymeric networks of quinoxaline with d10 metal ions: Synthesis, thermogravimetric analysis, photoluminescence and a theoretical investigation on the π-π interactions. Polyhedron 2014, 70, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Banerjee, S.; Halder, S.; Brandao, P.; Gomez Garcia, C.J.; Benmansour, S.; Saha, A. Synthesis and characterization of a novel dicyanamide-bridged Co(II) 1-D coordination polymer with a N4-donor Schiff base ligand. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2017, 464, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zheng, L.L.; Zhou, C.X.; Hu, S.; Zhou, A.J. Structural diversification of coordination assemblies of MII-dca–hydroxylpyridine (dca = dicyanamide). Polyhedron 2016, 104, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jensen, P.; Batten, S.R.; Moubaraki, B.; Murray, K.S. Infinite molecular tubes: Structure and magnetism of M(dca)2(apym) [M = Co, Ni, apym = 2-aminopyrimidine, dca = dicyanamide, N(CN)2]. Chem. Commun. 2000, 9, 793–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jensen, P.; Price, D.J.; Batten, S.R.; Moubaraki, B.; Murray, K.S. Self-penetration—A structural compromise between single Networks and interpenetration: Magnetic properties and crystal structures of [Mn(dca)2(H2O)] and [M(dca)(tcm)], M=Co, Ni, Cu, dc a= Dicyanamide, N(CN)2, tcm = tricyanomethanide, C(CN)3. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 3186–3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zheng, L.-L.; Leng, J.-D.; Liu, W.-T.; Zhang, W.-X.; Lu, J.-X.; Tong, M.-L. Cu2+-Mediated nucleophilic addition of different nucleophiles to dicyanamide—Synthesis, structures, and magnetic properties of a family of mononuclear, trinuclear, hexanuclear, and polymeric copper(II) complexes. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 2008, 4616–4624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vangdal, B.; Carranza, C.; Lloret, F.; Julve, M.; Sletten, J.J. Syntheses, crystal structures and magnetic properties of copper(II) dicyanamide complexes; dinuclear, chain and ladder compounds. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2002, 4, 566–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Genre, C.; Jeanneau, E.; Bousseksou, A.; Luneau, D.; Borshch, S.A.; Galina, S.; Matouzenko, G.S. First dicyanamide-bridged spin-crossover coordination polymer: Synthesis, structural, magnetic, and spectroscopic studies. Chem. A Eur. J. 2008, 40, 697–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Carranza, J.C.; Brennan, C.; Sletten, J.; Lloret, F.; Julve, M.J. Three one-dimensional systems with end-to-end dicyanamide bridges between copper(II) centres: Structural and magnetic properties. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2002, 16, 3164–3170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Armentano, D.; De Munno, G.; Guerra, F.; Julve, M.; Lloret, F. Ligand effects on the structures of extended networks of dicyanamide-containing transition-metal ions. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 4626–4636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Van Albada, G.A.; van der Horst, M.G.; Teat, S.J.; Gamez, P.; Roubeau, O.; Mutikainen, I.; Turpeinen, U.; Reedijk, J. Polynuclear Cu(II), Ni(II) and Cd(II) coordination compounds with bis(pyrimidin-2-yl)amine and dicyanamide. Polyhedron 2009, 28, 1541–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ghosh, T.; Chattopadhyay, T.; Das, S.; Mondal, S.; Suresh, E.; Zangrando, E.; Das, D. Thiocyanate and dicyanamide anion controlled nuclearity in Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn metal complexes with hemilabile ligand 2-benzoylpyridine. Cryst. Growth Des. 2011, 11, 3198–3205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Halder, G.J.; Kepert, C.J.; Moubaraki, B.; Murray, K.S.; Cashion, J.D. Guest-dependent spin crossover in a nanoporous molecular framework material. Science 2002, 298, 1762–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Gong, Y.N.; Huang, Y.L.; Jiang, L.; Lu, T.-B. A luminescent microporous metal–organic framework with highly selective CO2 adsorption and sensing of nitro explosives. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 9457–9459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Getman, R.B.; Bae, Y.-S.; Wilmer, C.E.; Snurr, R.Q. Review and analysis of molecular simulations of methane, hydrogen, and acetylene storage in metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 703–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rao, C.N.R.; Ranganathan, A.; Pedireddi, V.R.; Raju, A.R. A novel hybrid layer compound containing silver sheets and an organic spacer. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1, 39–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ruben, M.; Lehn, J.-M.; Vaughan, G. Synthesis of ionisable [2 × 2] grid-type metallo-arrays and reversible protonic modulation of the optical properties of the [CoII4L4]8+ species. Chem. Commun. 2003, 12, 1338–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ivanova, B.; Spiteller, M. AgI and ZnII complexes with possible application as NLO materials—Crystal structures and properties. Polyhedron 2011, 30, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ma, L.-F.; Wang, L.-Y.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Batten, S.R.; Wang, J.-G. Self-assembly of a series of cobalt(II) coordination polymers constructed from H2tbip and dipyridyl-based ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 915–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lv, R.; Li, H.; Su, J.; Fu, X.; Yang, B.; Gu, W.; Liu, X. Zinc metal–organic framework for selective detection and differentiation of Fe(III) and Cr(VI) ions in aqueous solution. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 12348–12356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mal, D.; Sen, R.; Brandao, P.; Lin, Z. Crystallization of five new supramolecular networks with both bipyridyl and dicyanamide ligands. Polyhedron 2013, 53, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mautner, F.A.; Berger, C.; Fischer, R.C.; Massoud, S.S. Synthesis, characterization and luminescence properties of zinc(II) and cadmium(II) pseudohalide complexes derived from quinoline-N-oxide. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2016, 439, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Evans, O.R.; Lin, W. Crystal engineering of NLO materials based on metal−organic coordination networks. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 511–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kahn, O. Chemistry and physics of supramolecular magnetic materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 647–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, G.-S.; Liu, C.B.; Liu, H.; Robbins, J.; Zhang, Z.J.; Yin, H.S.; Wen, H.-L.; Wang, Y.-H. Rational assembly of Pb(II)/Cd(II)/Mn(II) coordination polymers based on flexible V-shaped dicarboxylate ligand: Syntheses, helical structures and properties. J. Solid State Chem. 2015, 225, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Qiao, J.-Z.; Zhan, M.-S.; Hu, T.-P. Syntheses, crystal structures, photoluminescent/magnetic properties of four new coordination polymers based on 2,3′,4,5′-biphenyltetracarboxylic acid. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 62285–62294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mautner, F.A.; Soileau, J.B.; Bankole, P.K.; Gallo, A.; Massoud, S.S. Synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of dicyanamido-Cu(II) complexes. Part 2. Crystal structure of the complexes of tris[2-(2-pyridylethyl)]amine, tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine and 1,4-bis[2-(2-pyridylethyl)]-piperazine. J. Mol. Struct. 2008, 889, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sun, H.-L.; Gao, S.; Ma, B.-Q.; Su, G. Long-range ferromagnetic ordering in two-dimensional coordination polymers Co[N(CN)2]2(L) [L = pyrazine dioxide (pzdo) and 2-methyl pyrazine dioxide (mpdo)] with dual μ- and μ3-[N(CN)2] bridges. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 5399–5404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Costes, J.-P.; Novitchi, G.; Shova, S.; Dahan, F.; Donnadieu, B.; Tuchagues, J.-P. Synthesis, structure, and magnetic properties of heterometallic dicyanamide-bridged Cu−Na and Cu−Gd one-dimensional polymers. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 7792–7799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yang, E.-C.; Liu, Z.-Y.; Chen, S.-H.; Su, Y.-H.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; Zhao, X.-J. Four linear CuII3 subunit-based coordination polymers with various inter-subunit connections, spin ground-states and intra-/inter-subunit magnetic couplings. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 3190–3199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. El Fallah, M.S.; Badyine, F.; Vicente, R.; Escuer, A.; Solans, X.; Font-Bardia, M. Complementarity and countercomplementarity in polynuclear copper(II) complexes with R2NCH2CH(OH)CH2NR2 (R = H, CH3): Crystal structures and magnetic study. Dalton Trans. 2002, 2934–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Batten, S.R.; Jensen, P.; Moubaraki, B.; Murray, K.S. Anionic metal dicyanamide networks with paramagnetic counter-cations. Chem. Commun. 2000, 23, 2331–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Miller, J.S.; Manson, J. Designer magnets containing cyanides and nitriles. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Manson, J.L.; Huang, Q.-Z.; Lynn, J.W.; Koo, H.-J.; Whangbo, M.H.; Bateman, R.; Otsuka, T.; Wada, N.; Argyriou, D.N.; Miller, J.S. Long-range magnetic order in Mn [N(CN)2]2(pyz) {pyz = pyrazine}. Susceptibility, magnetization, specific heat, and neutron diffraction measurements and electronic structure calculations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 162–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Schlueter, J.A.; Manson, J.L.; Geiser, U. Structural and magnetic diversity in tetraalkylammonium salts of anionic M[N(CN)2]3 (M = Mn and Ni). Three-dimensional coordination polymers. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 3194–3202. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kutasi, A.M.; Batten, S.R.; Moubaraki, B.; Murray, K.S. New 2D coordination polymers containing both bi- and tri-dentate dicyanamide bridges and intercalated phenazine. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2002, 6, 819–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Manson, J.L.; Gu, J.; Wang, H.-H.; Schlueter, J.A. Structures and magnetic behavior of 1-, 2-, and 3D coordination polymers in the Cu(II)−dicyanamide−pyrimidine family. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 3950–3955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Talukder, P.; Shit, S.; Sasmal, A.; Batten, S.R.; Moubaraki, B.; Murray, K.S.; Mitra, S. An antiferromagnetically coupled hexanuclear copper(II) Schiff base complex containing phenoxo and dicyanamido bridges: Structural aspects and magnetic properties. Polyhedron 2011, 30, 1767–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sen, R.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Gutlich, P.; Miyashita, Y.; Okamoto, K.-I.; Koner, S. Structural and magnetic diversity in metal-dicyanamido polymer moieties: Paramagnetic and antiferromagnetic 1D chain compound and weakly ferromagnetic 2D motif. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2009, 362, 4663–4670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mautner, F.A.; Berger, C.; Fischer, R.C.; Massoud, S.S.; Vicente, R. Synthesis, structural characterization and magnetic properties of Mn(II) isothiocyanate complexes based on pyridine-N-oxide derivative co-ligands. Polyhedron 2018, 141, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Luo, Y.-H.; Ma, Y.-T.; Bao, Q.-Q.; Sun, B.-W. Syntheses, crystal structure and properties of two 1-D coordination polymers bridged by dicyanamides. J. Chem. Crystallogr. 2012, 42, 628–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sun, B.-W.; Gao, S.; Ma, B.-Q.; Niu, D.-Z.; Wang, Z.-M. Syntheses, structures and magnetic properties of three-dimensional co-ordination polymers constructed by dimer subunits. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2000, 22, 4187–4191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ghoshal, D.; Mostafa, G.; Maji, T.K.; Zangrando, E.; Lu, T.-H.; Ribas, J.; Chaudhuri, N.R. Synthesis, crystal structure and magnetic behavior of three polynuclear complexes: [Co(pyo)2(dca)2]n, [Co3(ac)4(bpe)3(dca)2]n and [{Co(male)(H2O)2}(H2O)]n [pyo, pyridine-N-oxide; dca, dicyanamide; ac, acetate; bpe, 1,2-bis-(4-pyridyl)ethane and male, maleate]. New J. Chem. 2004, 28, 1204–1213. [Google Scholar]
  58. Van Albada, G.A.; Mutikainen, I.; Turpeinen, U.; Reedijk, J. A rare 2D structure of a novel Cu(II) dinuclear-based compound with dicyanamide and 4-nitropyridine-N-oxide as ligands. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2006, 9, 441–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hnatejko, Z.; Kwiatek, D.; Durkiewicz, G.; Kubicki, M.; Jastrazab, R.; Lis, S. Pyridine N-oxide complexes of Cu(II) ions with pseudohalides: Synthesis, structural and spectroscopic characterization. Polyhedron 2014, 81, 728–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Manson, J.L.; Lee, D.W.; Rheingold, A.L.; Miller, J.S. Buckled-layered Structure of Zinc Dicyanamid, ZnII[N(CN)2]2. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 5966–5967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Köhler, H.; Kolbe, A.; Lux, G.Z. Metal-pseudohalogenide 27. Zur struktur der dicyanamide zweiwertiger 3d-metalle M(N(CN)2)2. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1977, 428, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hathaway, B.J. Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry; Wilkinson, G., Gillard, R.D., McCleverty, J.A., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1987; Volume 5, p. 533. [Google Scholar]
  63. Mautner, F.A.; Jantscher, P.; Fischer, R.C.; Torvisco, A.; Vicente, R.; Karsili, T.N.V.; Massoud, S.S. Synthesis and characterization of 1D coordination polymers of metal(II)-dicyanamido complexes. Polyhedron 2019, 166, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Claramunt, A.; Escuer, A.; Mautner, F.A.; Sanz, N.; Vicente, R.J. Two new one-dimensional systems with end-to-end single dicyanamide bridges between manganese(II) centres: Structural and magnetic properties. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2000, 15, 2627–2630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Manson, J.L.; Schlueter, J.A.; Nygren, C.L. Mn(dca)2(pym)2 and Mn(dca)2(pym)(H2O) {dca = dicyanamide; pym = pyrimidine}: New coordination polymers exhibiting 1- and 2-D topologies. Dalton Trans. 2007, 646–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wriedt, M.; Näther, C. Directed synthesis of μ-1,3,5 bridged dicyanamides by thermal decomposition of μ-1,5 bridged precursor compounds. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 886–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. De la Pinta, N.; Martín, S.; Urtiaga, M.K.; Barandika, M.G.; Arriortua, M.I.; Lezama, I.; Madariaga, G.; Cortés, R. Structural analysis, spectroscopic, and magnetic properties of the 1D triple-bridged compounds [M(dca)2(bpa)] (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Zn; dca = dicyanamide; bpa = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane) and the 3D [Ni(dca)(bpa)2]dca·6H2O. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 10445–10454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Das, A.; Marschner, C.; Cano, J.; Baumgartner, J.; Ribas, J.; El Fallah, M.S.; Mitra, S. Synthesis, crystal structures and magnetic behaviors of two dicyanamide bridged di- and polynuclear complexes of cobalt(II) derived from 2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)1,3,5-triazine and imidazole. Polyhedron 2009, 28, 2436–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fisher, M.E. Perpendicular susceptibility of the Ising model. J. Math. Phys. 1963, 4, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fisher, M.E. Magnetism in one-dimensional systems-the Heisenberg model for infinite spin. Am. J. Phys. 1964, 32, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Escuer, A.; Mautner, F.A.; Sanz, N.; Vicente, R. Syntheses, structures and magnetic properties of the dicyanamide (dca) polynuclear compounds [Mn(ac)(terpy)(μ1,5-dca)]n, [Mn(pdz)21,5-dca)2]n and [{Mn(dca)(terpy)-(MeOH)}2(μ-terephthalate)]. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2002, 340, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Biswas, M.; Rosair, G.M.; Pilet, G.M.; Mitra, S. Syntheses, structures and magnetic properties of [MII(dca)2(CH3OH)2]n, where M = Co or Cu and dca = dicyanamide, N(CN)2. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2007, 360, 695–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Van Albada, G.A.; Quiroz-Castro, M.E.; Mutikainen, I.; Turpeinen, U.; Reedijk, J. The first structural evidence of a polymeric Cu(II) compound with a bridging dicyanamide anion: X-ray structure, spectroscopy and magnetism of catena-[polybis(2-aminopyrimidine)copper(II)bis(μ-dicyanamido)]. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000, 298, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, X.; Li, B.; Zhang, J. An efficient strategy for self-assembly of DNA-mimic homochiral 1D helical Cu(II) chain from achiral flexible ligand by spontaneous resolution. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 3378–3383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Shi, W.B.; Cui, A.L.; Kou, H.Z. Assembly of dinuclear copper(II) secondary building units into polymeric complexes: Crystal structures and magnetic properties. CrystEngComm 2014, 16, 8027–8034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Escuer, A.; Mautner, F.A.; Sanz, N.; Vicente, R. Two new one-dimensional compounds with end-to-end dicyanamide as a bridging ligand:  syntheses and structural characterization of trans-[Mn(4-bzpy)2(N(CN)2)2]n and cis-[Mn(Bpy)(N(CN)2)2]n, (4-bzpy = 4-benzoylpyridine; bpy = 2,2‘-bipyridyl). Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 1668–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Bruker APEX, SAINT v. 8.37A; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2015.
  78. Sheldrick, G.M. SADABS v. 2; University of Goettingen: Goettingen, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  79. Sheldrick, G.M. A Short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. A 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. C Struct. Chem. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Macrae, C.F.; Edington, P.R.; McCabe, P.; Pidcock, E.; Shields, G.P.; Taylor, R.; Towler, T.; van de Streek, J.J. Mercury: Visualization and analysis of crystal structures. Appl. Cryst. 2006, 39, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Spek, A.L. PLATON, a Multipurpose Crystallographic Tool; Utrecht University: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  83. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 16, Revision B.01; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  84. Becke, A.D. Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098–3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hay, P.J.; Wadt, W.R. Ab initio effective core potentials for molecular calculations. Potentials for the transition metal atoms Sc to Hg. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 270–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Bonding modes of dicyanamide anion, N(CN)2 (dca), with metal ions.
Scheme 1. Bonding modes of dicyanamide anion, N(CN)2 (dca), with metal ions.
Magnetochemistry 05 00041 sch001
Scheme 2. Coordination bonding modes of pyridine-N-oxide derivatives (NOPR).
Scheme 2. Coordination bonding modes of pyridine-N-oxide derivatives (NOPR).
Magnetochemistry 05 00041 sch002
Figure 1. (top) One dimensional (1D) chain system of 1. Symmetry operations: (’) 1-x,2-y,1-z; (”) 2-x,2-y,1-z; (*)-1+x,y,z; (a) 1+x,y,z; (bottom) packing plot of 1.
Figure 1. (top) One dimensional (1D) chain system of 1. Symmetry operations: (’) 1-x,2-y,1-z; (”) 2-x,2-y,1-z; (*)-1+x,y,z; (a) 1+x,y,z; (bottom) packing plot of 1.
Magnetochemistry 05 00041 g001
Figure 2. (top) One dimensional (1D) chain system of 2. Symmetry operations: (’) 1-x,1-y,-z; (”) 1-x,1-y,1-z; (*) x,y,-1+z; (bottom) packing plot of 2.
Figure 2. (top) One dimensional (1D) chain system of 2. Symmetry operations: (’) 1-x,1-y,-z; (”) 1-x,1-y,1-z; (*) x,y,-1+z; (bottom) packing plot of 2.
Magnetochemistry 05 00041 g002aMagnetochemistry 05 00041 g002b
Figure 3. (top) One dimensional (1D) chain system of 3. Symmetry operations: (’) 3/2-x,3/2-y,z; (”) x,3/2-y,1/2-z; (*) 3/2-x,y,3/2+z, (a) x,3/2-y,-1/2-z; (bottom) packing plot of 3.
Figure 3. (top) One dimensional (1D) chain system of 3. Symmetry operations: (’) 3/2-x,3/2-y,z; (”) x,3/2-y,1/2-z; (*) 3/2-x,y,3/2+z, (a) x,3/2-y,-1/2-z; (bottom) packing plot of 3.
Magnetochemistry 05 00041 g003aMagnetochemistry 05 00041 g003b
Figure 4. (top) Molecular plot of 4. Symmetry operations: (’) 1-x,1-y,1-z; (bottom) packing plot of 4.
Figure 4. (top) Molecular plot of 4. Symmetry operations: (’) 1-x,1-y,1-z; (bottom) packing plot of 4.
Magnetochemistry 05 00041 g004
Figure 5. χMT vs. T Plot for catena-[Co(μ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP–NO)2] (1). The solid line shows the best fit obtained (see text).
Figure 5. χMT vs. T Plot for catena-[Co(μ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP–NO)2] (1). The solid line shows the best fit obtained (see text).
Magnetochemistry 05 00041 g005
Figure 6. χM−1 vs. T Plot for catena-[Co(μ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP–NO)2] (1). The Curie–Weiss law; the best fit is given as a solid line.
Figure 6. χM−1 vs. T Plot for catena-[Co(μ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP–NO)2] (1). The Curie–Weiss law; the best fit is given as a solid line.
Magnetochemistry 05 00041 g006
Figure 7. χMT vs. T Plot for catena-[Mn(μ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP–NO)2] (2). The solid line represents the best fit (see text).
Figure 7. χMT vs. T Plot for catena-[Mn(μ1,5-dca)2(4-MOP–NO)2] (2). The solid line represents the best fit (see text).
Magnetochemistry 05 00041 g007
Figure 8. Plot of the magnetization in 2S units measured at 2 K for compound 2. Solid line corresponds to the Brillouin function for fully isolated S = 5/2 system, g = 2.00.
Figure 8. Plot of the magnetization in 2S units measured at 2 K for compound 2. Solid line corresponds to the Brillouin function for fully isolated S = 5/2 system, g = 2.00.
Magnetochemistry 05 00041 g008
Figure 9. The global minimum energy geometries associated with the 1, 2, and 3 structures.
Figure 9. The global minimum energy geometries associated with the 1, 2, and 3 structures.
Magnetochemistry 05 00041 g009
Figure 10. Potential energy profiles along the ϕ dihedral angle, which is defined at the top of the structure of (a) Mn(II), (b) Co(II), and (c) Cd(II) complexes of 2, 1, and 3, respectively.
Figure 10. Potential energy profiles along the ϕ dihedral angle, which is defined at the top of the structure of (a) Mn(II), (b) Co(II), and (c) Cd(II) complexes of 2, 1, and 3, respectively.
Magnetochemistry 05 00041 g010
Table 1. Non-covalent π–π ring–ring interactions in 13.
Table 1. Non-covalent π–π ring–ring interactions in 13.
Comp.Ring(I)…Ring(J)Symmetry of JCg…Cg (Å)Alpha (°)Cg(I)_perp (Å)
1Cg(py)...Cg(py)[1-x,-1/2+y,1/2-z]4.7136(8)1.85(6)3.2119(5)
Cg(py)...Cg(py)[1-x,1/2+y,1/2-z]4.7135(8)1.85(6)3.2118(5)
2Cg(py)...Cg(py)[3/2-x,-1/2+y,2-z]4.7115(12)2.57(10)3.3814(9)
Cg(py)...Cg(py)[3/2-x,1/2+y,2-z]4.7114(12)2.57(10)3.2329(9)
3Cg(py)...Cg(py)[1-x,-1/2+y,3/2-z]4.6548(8)0.61(6)3.2300(5)
Cg(py)...Cg(py)[1-x,1/2+y,3/2-z]4.6548(8)0.61(6)3.2652(5)
Cg(py) = centroid of pyridine ring (N1,C1–C5); Cg…Cg = distance between ring centroids (<5 Å); Alpha = dihedral angle between plane I and J; Cg(I)_perp = perpendicular distance of Cg(I) on ring J.
Table 2. Crystallographic data and processing parameters.
Table 2. Crystallographic data and processing parameters.
Compound 1234
Empirical formulaC16H14CoN8O4C16H14MnN8O4C16H14CdN8O4C16H14CuN8O4
Formula mass441.28437.29494.76445.90
SystemMonoclinicOrthorhombicOrthorhombicMonoclinic
Space groupP21/cP21212PccnP21/c
a (Å)7.3603(4)18.2240(7)17.7537(7)11.0685(5)
b (Å)6.6096(5)6.6283(3)6.6690(3)6.0407(2)
c (Å)18.4806(13)7.5065(3)15.2622(6)13.4842(5)
β (°)101.257(4)90 90 91.770(2)
V (Å3)881.76(10)906.74(6) 1807.04(13) 901.14(6)
Z 2242
T (K)100(2)100(2)100(2)100(2)
μ (mm−1)1.0180.7721.2531.256
Dcalc (Mg/m3)1.6621.6021.8191.643
θ max (°)30.59830.09229.99830.148
Data collected38338292577022148444
Unique refl.2707266226482643
Rint0.05470.05220.03780.0306
Parameters134134133171
GooF on F21.0581.1341.1051.092
R1 (I > 2(σI))0.02820.02760.01890.0219
wR2 (all data)0.06990.06530.04310.0619
Residual extrema (e/Å3)0.43/−0.420.45/−0.400.41/−0.680.44/−0.37

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mautner, F.A.; Jantscher, P.; Fischer, R.C.; Torvisco, A.; Vicente, R.; Karsili, T.N.V.; Massoud, S.S. Structure, DFT Calculations, and Magnetic Characterization of Coordination Polymers of Bridged Dicyanamido-Metal(II) Complexes. Magnetochemistry 2019, 5, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry5030041

AMA Style

Mautner FA, Jantscher P, Fischer RC, Torvisco A, Vicente R, Karsili TNV, Massoud SS. Structure, DFT Calculations, and Magnetic Characterization of Coordination Polymers of Bridged Dicyanamido-Metal(II) Complexes. Magnetochemistry. 2019; 5(3):41. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry5030041

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mautner, Franz A., Patricia Jantscher, Roland C. Fischer, Ana Torvisco, Ramon Vicente, Tolga N. V. Karsili, and Salah S. Massoud. 2019. "Structure, DFT Calculations, and Magnetic Characterization of Coordination Polymers of Bridged Dicyanamido-Metal(II) Complexes" Magnetochemistry 5, no. 3: 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry5030041

APA Style

Mautner, F. A., Jantscher, P., Fischer, R. C., Torvisco, A., Vicente, R., Karsili, T. N. V., & Massoud, S. S. (2019). Structure, DFT Calculations, and Magnetic Characterization of Coordination Polymers of Bridged Dicyanamido-Metal(II) Complexes. Magnetochemistry, 5(3), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry5030041

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop